View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

i58

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Fed—
eral Reserve System on Friday, February 4, 1955.

The Board met in the

Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Szymczak
Vardaman
Robertson
Balderston
Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Thomas, Economic Adviser to the Board
Vest, General Counsel
Young, Director, Division of Research
and Statistics
Mr. Sloan, Director, Division of Examinations
Mr. Hackley, Assistant General Counsel
Mr. Thompson, Federal Reserve Examiner,
Division of Examinations

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

The following matters, which had been circulated among the mom—
of the Board, were presented for consideration and the action taken

in each instance was as indicated:
3 .
Letter to the Honorable Philip Young, Chairman, United States Civil
"vice Commission, Washington, D. Cop reading as follows:
In accordance with the regulations established by the
Civil Service Commission in connection with the administra—
tion of the Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Act of
1954, Mr. H. Franklin Sprecher, Jr., Assistant Director of
the Division of Personnel Administration, has been desig—
nated as the Insurance Officer for the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Willis, Secretary, Federal Reserve Bank of New York,

readingn as follows:

Reference is made to your letter of January 25, 1955,
advising that, in response to a request received from Mr.




c
tr•

—2—
R. E. Peterson, Director of Office of Personnel, Foreign
Operations Administration, Washington, D. C., the services
of Mr. Frank W. Schiff, Economist in the Domestic Research
Division, and Mr. Alan R. Holmes, Economist in the Foreign
Research Division, Research Department, are being made
available to enable them to act as consultants to the Foreign
Operations Administration mission to Indochina.
It is noted that Messrs. Schiff and Holmes have been
granted leaves of absence without pay for a period of approx—
imately six months, plus travel time, commencing with and
contingent upon the securing of necessary clearance pertaining
to their employment with the Foreign Operations Administration.
It is noted further that Mr. Holmes will, in effect, assist
Mr. Schiff in carrying forward the work performed by Mr. Bloom—
field, who is now returning from Indochina.
The Peard of Governors will interpose no objection to
the arrangements made with respect to Messrs. Schiff and
Holmes as described in your letter.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Board of Directors, Bank of Commerce, Lexington,
Kentucky, reading as follows:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Cleveland, the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System approves the establishment of a
branch at 1974 Harrodsburg Road, Fayette County, Kentucky,
by Bank of Commerce, Lexington, Kentucky, provided the branch
is established within six months of the date of this letter.
Approved unanimously, for
transmittal through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
There were presented telegrams to the Federal Reserve Banks of
Boston, New York, Philadelphia, St. Louis, and San Francisco approving
the establishment without change by the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston
and St. Louis on January 31, by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
°11 February 21 and by the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and Philadelphia
°n February

3, 1955,

of the rates of discount and purchase in their existing

sc
hedules.




Approved unanimously.

160

At its meeting on November

h, 1951, the Board adopted a general

Policy of making favorable determinations under section 301 of the Bank—
ing Act of 1935 as a normal matter in all so—called "one—bank" cases,
with the understanding that such a determination might be declined in any
extraordinary case in which such action seemed necessary.

In connection

with the adoption of this policy, the Board requested that a review be made
of 22 cases in which favorable determinations had been made and were out—
standing, but which appeared to present some questionable aspects.

At its

meeting on December 2, 1954, the Board also requested that a review be made
of four one—bank cases in which section 301 determinations were declined
during

1954. Accordingly, the following memoranda had been prepared and

circulated to the members of the Board prior to this meeting:
1.

Memorandum dated December 17, 1954, from the
Division of Examinations reviewing the 22 out—
standing cases that had been referred to as
questionable. The memorandum recommended that
no action be taken to rescind any of the deter—
minations.

2.

Memorandum from the Division of Examinations
dated December 200 1954, reviewing the four ap—
plications for section 301 determinations which
were denied in 1954. In two of these cases, it
was found that the holding company affiliate
relationship no longer existed. In the other
two cases (Main Line, Inc., of Wilmington, Dela—
ware, and Friendly Finance Company, of St. Louis,
Missouri), it was recommended, from a supervisory
and practical viewpoint, that the decisions of
the Board in declining favorable determinations
be continued.

3. Memorandum from Mr. Hackley dated January 13,
1955, discussing the reviews made by the Division
of Examinations and concurring in the recommenda—
tions of that Division.




••

2/4/55

'

-4At the request of the Board, Mr. Hackley commented on the reviews

Which had been made and summarized the reasons,
for the recommendations contained therein.

as

stated in the memoranda,

Messrs. Vest, Sloan, and

Thompson indicated that they concurred in the views expressed by Mr. Haekley.
During a discussion of the matter, question was raised as to what
information was available to the Division of Examinations in reviewing cases
involving favorable section 301 determinations to determine whether there
had been any material change in the factual situation which would appear to
warrant rescission of such determinations.

Following a statement by Mr.

Thompson regarding the data obtainable from reports of examination, Governor
Robertson reiterated the view (Which he expressed at the meeting on January
19) 1955, in connection with a discussion of certain material regarding
holding companies owning only one member bank that had been requested by
Congressman Spence, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee)
that steps should be taken through the Federal Reserve Banks to make sure
that the Board had in its possession adequate current information regarding
such holding companies for the purpose of reviewing each situation.

He also

suggested that a review of all outstanding cases should be made by the Board
°nee each year.

The other members of the Board expressed general agreement

with Governor Robertson's position, and the discussion which followed con—
cerned the extent to which the accumulation of such information would be
feasible and the methods by which this might be accomplished.

Following

a statement by Chairman Martin that this was not an occasion which appeared
to call for a letter from the Board requesting information regarding the




2/4/55
holding companies, it was suggested that the Division of Examinations be
asked to contact the bank examination departments of the Federal Reserve
Banks by letter or otherwise on the basis that the Division had reviewed
outstanding section 301 determinations at the request of the Board and
that the Division would like to have, in addition to such information as
Was already available to it, information from the Federal Reserve Banks
as to whether there had been any substantial change in the factual situ—
ation in any outstanding case that might call for reconsideration of the
holding company affiliate status.

Under the procedure suggested, it would

be left to the judgment of the Federal Reserve Banks as to how any informa—
tion deemed necessary in a given case should be obtained.
At the conclusion of the dis—
cussion, the matter was referred to
the Division of Examinations with the
request that additional information
relative to the outstanding determina—
tions be obtained in the manner sug—
gested.
Messrs. Sloan, Hackley„ and Thompson then withdrew from the meeting.
In accordance with the understanding at the meeting yesterday, there
were distributed for the further consideration of the Board three alterna—
tive drafts covering the statement in the policy record section for the
Board's 1954 Annual Report of the votes on the amendments to Regulations J,
Check Clearing and Collection, and G, Collection of Noncash Items, approved
on July 2, 1954.

Following a discussion of the alternative drafts, agree—

was reached on an entry suggested by Governor Robertson, as follows:




)

k.)0

2/4/55

-6-

Votes for this action: Messrs. Mills and Robertson.
Messrs. Martin, Szymczak„ and Vardaman who were absent had
previously indicated their approval. Votes against this
action: None. This action was taken on this date because
in the circumstances it was desirable to have the new pro—
cedures become effective as soon as possible with reason—
able notice thereof. The action was ratified by unanimous
vote at the next meeting on July 7, 1954, at which Messrs.
Martin, Vardaman, Mills, and Robertson were present, and be—
came effective on July 15, 1954.
Reference also was made to the entry for February 4, 1954, re—
lating to approval of a reduction in the rates on discounts for and ad—
vances to member banks by Federal Reserve Banks, and it was suggested by
Governor Robertson that the draft of entry be modified by inserting a para—
graph as follows:
In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Re—
serve Act, the Federal Reserve Banks establish, subject to
review and determination of the Board of Governors, rates
on discounts and advances to member banks at least every 14
days and submit such rates to the Board for consideration.
No changes involving new policy had been made in these rates
since those referred to on pages 82 and 85 of the Board's
Annual Report for 1953.
There being agreement with
this suggestion, unanimous ap—
proval was given to the record of
Board policy actions for inclusion
in the appendix to the 1954 Annual
Report, with the understanding that
the draft originally submitted to
the Board would be changed to in—
corporate the changes agreed upon
at this meeting.
On January 21,

1955, Mr. Riefler, as

Secretary of the Federal Open

Market Committee, sent to the members of the Committee and to the Federal
Reserve Bank Presidents not now serving on the Committee copies of a




A

2/4/55

_7

draft of record of policy actions of the Committee during the year 1954.
Prior to this meeting, he had sent to the members of the Board copies of
a memorandum dated February 3, 1955, discussing the comments and suggestions
received from the Federal Reserve Bank Presidents, showing haw the draft
of policy record would appear if certain of these suggestions were accepted,
and raising questions with respect to the incorporation of other suggestions.
Following a discussion, during
which agreement was expressed with
several suggested changes, unanimous
approval was given to the record of
policy actions for inclusion in the
appendix to the Boardts Annual Report
for 1954, with the understanding that
copies of the policy record, as revised
to take into account the changes agreed
upon at this meeting would be resubmit—
ted to the Federal Reserve Bank Presi—
dents and that, if any further requests
for changes were received, the matter
would be considered by the Board again.
Governor Balderston suggested the desirability of including in the
Boardts Annual Report for 1954 as a matter of current interest, a reference
tO the action on December 27, 1954, approving an investment by The Chase
Bank, New York, New York, in the stock of a Canadian investment corporation.
Chairman Martin suggested that the Report likewise make reference to the
study by the Special Committee on Foreign Operations of American Banks (the
Neal Committee).
It was agreed that references to
these matters should be included in
the text of the Annual Report.
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal