The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
rPA Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Feder '91. Reserve System on Thursday, February 28, 1952. The Board met exe . ciltive session in the Special Library at 10:00 a.m. PREsENT: Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Martin, Chairman Szymczak Evans Vardaman Powell Mills Robertson At the conclusion of the executive session the following, members Of the staf joined the meetinF: Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. 4arci Carpenter, recretary Sherman, _ssistant Secretary Kenyon, .soistant 'ecrctary Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman Thomas, Economic Adviser to the Board Leonard, Director, Division of Bank, Operations Vest, General Counsel Noyes, Director, Division or (- elective Credit Re,ful.ation Chase, Assistant Solicitor Garfield, /Aviser on Economic Research, Division of Research and Statistics Solomon, —ssistant General Counsel wan, ...cting Assistant Director, :vision of Selective Credit iegulation Cherry, Assistant Counsel Jones, Chief, Consumer Credit and Finances Section, Division of Research and Statistics 13efore this meeting there had been sent to each member of the c°127 of a memorandum dated February 26, 1952, from Mr. Evans, regarding ''4ner n-p -4- suggestions made in recent weeks for chances, pcenerally or a relaxi )flatIlre, in the terms of Regulation Consumer Credit. The 2/28/52 -2?leill°1'anclurri. stated that these representations had bean most persistent with l'esDect to furniture and floor coverings, where it was argued that the current rlarket was extremely soft, and with respect to residential repairs, altera- tiolis, and improvements, where it was argued that the present down payment l'eclUirements were unworkable and unfair to registrants attempting. to comPly °Illsions of the regulation. The memorandum also stated that It'''. Zva.eris c°11011rred in the recommendation of the starf that the Board authorize .°11eultat,.. 7:..nd desiral7ility -0112 with the trade to detr,rnine the necessity for , "solne c nec in the regulation of a relavinv nature, -oarticular17 whether the current down Payment requirement on residential repairs, alterations, irapr ovements should be eliminated and whether the provision exempting trerli the d.own payment and loan value requirements of the regulation listed `Intiel.es 1952) h a cash should be increased to a higher of less than price rn The memorandum wa- accompanied by a staff report dated February 21, reviewine the In ' etion on goods situation. consumer durable commenting upon his memorandum, Mr. Evans emphasized. that no the Part of the Board to change the terms of the regulation was hirig recommended at this time but that in accordance with the usual proc" 'llre he viehed to situation and obtain the Poard's advise the Beard of the 8.s to whether consultations should be held with the trade. At t he request of Mr. Evans, Mr. Noyes outlined the reasons why the tte had been brought up for discussion at this time, stating that, in 2/28/52 -38.dcliti°4 to those mentioned ih Mr. Evans' memorandum,there was continued Dl'eSSII from automobile dealers L,enerally for on eytension of the maximum lattlritY provision relatinL to automobiles, and also from dealers on the "ast who felt that a differential should be established for that al'e to allow for hiL;her freight legarding the automobile situation, Mr. laves said that in the Q13141°11 of the staff there was no economic justification for any relaxation tItthis time since prices 11(,re continuing upward, inventories were not ecessive 'and res'oonsible rcuresentatives of the trade indicated alnost 1.11:L11°1-It exce'otion that effective demand would exceed the number of cars could he Produced this Y`''" tfj As to home improvements, he said that slaff was in agreement with the industry that the present down paynent Isec'reraent8 of the QiPp. that it would in that field nresented great administrative preferable to eliminate them as a matter of ellit.6.131-0 tr eatment of registrants, and that such action would have a liee:lieible effect on the voume lfcredit. o He went on to sQl, however, t 'la the Pefaeral Housing Administration would prefer to retain the present tE*Iris theY helped reduce risk in the Insurance of home improvement : 1 11u °.11.(1 that ;n the circumstances any removal of the restrictions would t° 1°e di scussed with that a7ency. Mr. Noyes also said that the le(lera3 Reser-ve Banks:, with but one exc eDt' 1°4) we -re Generally opposed to delisting furniture or relaxing the 2/28/52 -on with respect to furniture or other speCfc items, and that the, felt that any increase in the present c.,:)0 exemption would be likely to st t 1111111ate requests for other forms of relaxation. The Board's staff, he ad-ded) felt that while economic conditions did not clearl call for 'ellarige in the regulation at -tIv7 s tine there would be some adv;:,ntace in relaXatiQn which would indicate that the Board was administerinc the re6111ation in a flexible manner according to changes in, prevailinc. eccn znaricet 414 the conditions For example, an increase in the exa-. ic tc the 10 per cent down payment on home iml)y - , removal - twise,he said, but would :drobaliy he 1-1' 11.1rerios'ubstantial effect cre0 I l'eceilled by 1°.rtable the rio dealers in furniture and such articles as vacuum cleaners, sewing machines, cedar chests, and to a, lesser extent radios. tated that in In response to 9. cruestion by Mr. _1- wins, Mr. Noyes • c°1-7-rse the 'Poard would offer the trade some time to study and th -e-tx reEional orflcco before consultations were held and that if 4k cop, '01-11tations were authorized it would probably be about the end of larch befo,• 1°4.11 a recommemktion : Concerning _resented to the Poard. an inquiry by iy]r. Vardaman, Mr. Noyes stated that smF.1.1- corapanies and consumer loanks had_ not pressed for a relaxation of the but had announced publicly that they intended to oppose r'' °11 th, toard, authority over consumer crelt 1- eyond the ore sent 4te, hrie 30, 1952. 2/28/52 -5At this point Messrs. art n, Riefler, and Thomas withdrew from the m There followed a further ceneral discussion of the effect of relaxations lfl such as those suggested by the staff during which it was stated, reSPOZ1Se to a question 'by Mr. Mills, that such callss some move probably would criticism, on the grounds of discrimination, from automobile cielers s4nce the regulation presently was more restrictive in that field tiAll in the ljnes that would be effected by an increase to 100 in the exeraption or the down payment requirement on home eliminatiorl of creaite. At the conclusion of the discussion it was tatter, -°,4-1-d. 1.)e considered further by the Board in eyecutive Mr* Ewan commented on the recent regional conferences e°11FAIMer Es4eral that the credit and real estate credit regulations, stating agreement that the four conferences were worth while. zost important topic concerned the proEram for obtain He sai(7 c., %qth aricl enforcement of the regulations and that the Board's letter to Reserve Bealks of January 18, 19')1, restating the objectives find prinJ the l'oEram, was well received, it having been the general feeling that .t11 letter would result in an improved program, with no disagreement on Principle s OT the minimul n-ocedi,res involved. He said the Reserve Eenerally fav ored the suggestion contd:ned in the letter for the ete'/311 braerit 01 a coma:It:tee of Reserve RasP personnel to consider matters 2/28/52 -6relating to Regulation L. rr. :wan also said that the noard'E re„)resent&tivs e "ad benefited by sugrestions advanced by the Reserve Ban;'s for technichanEes in the re_ -ulation. Mr. Noyes said that as the result of discussions at the conferences cc)ricerninE cu-toner cont_ctr; in cases of apparent violatjons of the recu ati°11) the l'ederal Reserve Dank of Philadelphia was elTerimenti_ng with an 8.1ternative procedure under which carefully worded letters were sent to etlst°111ers asking that they cs,11 at the Reserve Dank at their convenience to discla 138 their transactions with the registrant being investigated. He said tt vas 11°t Yet fully apparent how well this would work but that in one case c'2 letters were written, 21 persons had come to the Bank and 3 others ni c--leci the Dank on the telephone. DIIX'ing a discussion of this alternative procedure Mr. 'Vardaman eythe °Pinion that in some respects it would seem mare undesirable 4144 th -e Pr°cedure of contacting customers at their residences. Mr. Noyes reiteted that the alternative procedure v„:s exi_erjmcntal, adding that it /1Eci been sugrested by representatives of the Board, hut was an outgrowth 110t Of el:1 discussion at the regional conferences. At this point, all of the nembers of the staff withdrew and the again gent into executive session. Following the eyecutive session, Mr. Szymczak advised the Pecretary that a decision had been reached to postpone rzc, “ 212R/32 action on the recommendation contained in Mr. Evans' nemorandum Pending developments over the next two or three weeks. The action stated with respect to each of the matters hereinafter referred to was then taken by the Board: Minutes of actions taken Ty the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserv, E'Ystem on Fel,ruary 27, l92,uere approved unanimously. Me morandum dated Fe-hruary 1952, from Mr. Bethea, Director, Administrattve ,S,ervices, stating that Elizabeth M. Young, Nrlio raell in that Divisin, had applied for retirement in accordance 1?ith 1)1, ---°-visions of the Civil L,ervice rietireraent Eystem, effective as e --Lose of business Fe'bruary 2 1952. Noted. il1ians, Assistant Meill°randum Opted February 25, 1 952, from Nr 141, ector 'Division of Research and f-tatistics, recommending increases in theba sin - annual salaries of the following employees in that Division, effecti Ire Mr21 ' ch 2 1952: m Naze ,le'rrlard N. '',11-110r R. Freedman re.tricia Harris C Johnz°n tlezet rawley Lone Title Econom:'st (Editorial) Economist Economist recretary to Mr. Villiams Clerk Clerk Approved unanimously. Salary Increase From To $7,4.0 6P '2,560 7)105 2,5 (0 3,(6o 3,335 3,190 3,78) 2 J,413,270 2/2%2 -8Letter to Mr. Clarke, Secretary, federal Reserve Bank of New York, as follows: 19, "Reference is made to your letter of February 21, 2',a(lvisinc that at the meeting of the board of direc,'S -Reid on February 14, 19,2, the appointment of Mr. 1:1!rding Cowan as Acting -ssictc,nt Secretary-was terminated trfective March 1, 1952. In accordance with this action, the Board of Governors aDDroveg ealt the payment of salary to Mr. Harding Cowan as Assist19,e°11nsel for the period Yrirch 1, 1952, through March 31, $))-) at his present rate of :3 1.1 000 per annum." Approved umnimously. Letter to Mr. Clarke, First lice President, Federal Reserve Bank Of Atlante, reading as follows: "Reference is made to your letter of February 6, 1952 il penl./hich you advised the "Board of the reasons why the ex-. alle„e_s for certain items of expenditures at uour decA_ Office uFanches exceeded the 1951 budget estimates. Board's recor,z'ITPropriate notations are 'being made in the u'S concerning these overexpendAtures." Approved unanimously. Lett Letter + P1,4Lcisco Mr. Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of Can 'reading as follows: ,"This refers to your letter of January 3, and to sul:seq. skln.2ent correspondence and conversations, in which t was ' 366ested cert. that consideration be given to the acce.ctance rof_ beliklfied copies of the reports of cordition of ,YLate member N California as Published on the California ,-,tate ,'licL,tion of the reDort 41 lieu of requiring se! °11 the Board's form F. 10, with ,, If negotiations -s noted that, as a result '=.-tate'lle State Superintendent ( ' —ed revised whIch will f0rm has been submitte(' , 2/2882 -9- 1I 8401i (or the information will be readily obtainable therefrom) 8 11.1 t1 °f the items on the Beard's form except second preferred : :01.°1!W oNi i .t iiEstl notes and debentures, and the opcional item 33 reserves against loans and securities. However, is time, no State member bank in California has any sec"' Preferred stock or capital notes and debentures. is the Board's understanding that, at the top of the baNs,fsed form, space will be iirovided for use by State member ii7s in which may be stamped or overprinted the phrase, 'PubUI accordance with a call made by the -t.,,te bilking ,%Itigie and by the Federal Reserve Bank of this District'. t , l_ls, there would be no differences of any substance between "Q Et.tate form and the Beard's requirements. the t'In the circumstances, and in view or your recommendatn, will Interpose no objection to the acceptance, until flirt,-°ard calirr notice, of the publication of condition reports of := State member banks on the proposed California State antially the same as the one you submitted to the coard the B express to the California Superintendent of Banks arcP.s appreciation of his cooperation in this matter. ase Approved unanimously. Telegram to Mr. Barrett, Assistant Cashier, Federal Reserve Bank of eall ?ran cieco, reading as follows: to f "Reurtel February concerning Regulation T. You refer f.11.act that Fan Francisco rtock Exchange will conform to zeh-f1-111-business-day settlement rule adopted by New York , a g 4e, You ask whether amendment to section 3 of Resulatio CUI T t° Permit similar four-day period for settlement in "re i general accounts is under considerat'on. txch 'The move toward four-day settlement by New York Stock and it 11614e and other exchanges has been closely rollowed question ae some recognized that it might present to NeW.(1),. Possible amendment of rule in Regulation 'J. In fact, Howt::change has informally raised the question. when time 8 cis no necessary connection between ital .0.1iltY is delivered to broker and time when he must obtain is rIl• The significant date for purposes of Regulation ri 13.1st;Elte cal Which transaction is executed. No matter when 1" receives delivery of securities purchased, customer " 933 2128/52 -10- If sh°111c1 he advised ond margin oltair.ed, aJ soon as 1.?ossible :rte uould net be appropriate, howexecution of order. to carry this to the point of imposing an unreasonrThie _ccordingly, althoucji it has burden on brokers. -Lericalriot seemed advisable to amend, the rule in liegulation T at this t time, the situation is being closely watched to bet a clear „earer picture of how conditions will work cut in actual :ttilactice when exchanges have :put four-day rule into operaT ?n, If it appears that present provisions of Regulation dalITIP°se undue administrative burden on brokers after four.cj trule of exchange goes into (Deration, Board would appre —e 'being advised of any pertinent facts in that regard.' Approved unanimously. Letter to Mr. Debus, assistant Cashier, Federal Reserve Lank of sas CIt relative to the matter of Western Slci:e Sales, Rifle, Colorado, Cistrant unoter Regulation W, Consumer Credit, reading as follows: nR eference is made to your letter of 1,ebruary '), 19)2, Etild enclosures regarding the above matter. vi "It is noted that the investigation disclosed a few IZ'timns, which were app-,rent13, willful, but that the par ' : . t es chiefly responsible for the violations were a sale.ner Igho is now in the armed services and a 2orMer fur;traan, who is not longer endloyed by the firm. It i, noted that you plan to reinvestigate the regisEInt again in sixty days. ree, "In the circumstances, the Board concurs in your re,v7 Illeridation that disciclinvxy action against tivt " strant be withheld pending the reinvestigatien. Approved unanimously. Letter t, Fank of , ,'. Delus, Assistant Cashier, Federal Reerve 1sas City 4, relative to the matter of e°1111, estern Slope Sales and Lqui-2ment Rifle, Colorado, a registrant under Regulation W, Consumer Credit, l'ee41171€ as follows: 334. 2/28/52 -11"Reference is rx_icile tc your letter of FeIru_r; regp,A4 , the above mtter. It is ieted that a few ii*cl',A'cza, "ere discovered which were 2rcl' 1 1, unlful, but that the .P iaztner who was responsifie f'c- 1,12 ,6 in the armed servic. ilitthe circumstances, To,u, .' ,Jan a _',.'-vestigation in approx.:1rther disciplinary acdays and recnmmene. the t0, - Lde taken acan,--,t the re,;-'cLr1,, vendinc. such reinvestiCation Loard is in agreement with this recommendation. ipproved unanimously. L,,,oretary.