View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for

To:

Members of the Board

From:

Office of the Secretary

February 201 1962

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date. 1/
It is not proposed to include a statement
With respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard to
the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will advise
the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, please initial
below. If you were present at the meeting, your
initials will indicate approval of the minutes. If
You were not present, your initials will indicate
only that you have seen the minutes.

Chm. Martin
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson

Gov. Shepardson
Gov. King
Gov. Mitchell

Meeting with the Federal Advisory Council.

A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
SYstem with the Federal Advisory Council was held in the offices of
th

Board of Governors in Washington on Tuesday, February 20, 1962, at

10:30 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Mills
Robertson
Shepardson
King
Mitchell
Mr. Sherman, Secretary
Mr. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary

Messrs. Enders, Murphy, Petersen, Hays, Hobbs, McRae,
Zwiener, Maestre, Moorhead, Breidenthal, Betts,
and McAllister, Members of the Federal Advisory
Council from the First, Second, Third, Fourth,
Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth,
Eleventh, and Twelfth Federal Reserve Districts,
respectively
Mr. Prochnow, Secretary of the Federal Advisory
Council
Mr. Korsvik, Assistant Secretary of the Federal
Advisory Council
The results of the election of officers of the Federal Advisory
a°11/1cil for the current year had been as follows:
President
Vice President
Executive Committee

Secretary
Assistant Secretary

George A. Murphy
Reuben B. Hays
George A. Murphy, ex officio
Reuben B. Hays, ex officio
Ostrom Enders
Robert B. Hobbs
Kenneth V. Zwiener
Herbert V. Prochnow
William J. Korsvik

The following newly appointed members were attending their first
nieeting of the Federal Advisory Council:

651
2/20/62

-2J. Finley McRae, President, Merchants National Bank,
Mobile, Alabama;
Kenneth V. Zwiener, President, Harris Trust and Savings
Bank, Chicago, Illinois;
Sidney Maestre, Chairman of the Executive Committee,
Mercentile Trust Company, St. Louis, Missouri;
John A. Moorhead, President, Northwestern National
Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota;
M. L. Breidenthal, Chairman of the Board, Security
National Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, Kansas; and
Elliott McAllister, Chairman of the Board, The Bank of
California National Association, San Francisco,
California.
Before this meeting the Federal Advisory Council had submitted

t° the Board a memorandum setting forth its views on the subjects to be
cliscussed.

The topics, the Council's views, and the discussion at this

t`leeting were as follows:
1.

What are the observations of the Council regarding
the current business situation, the prevailing sentiment of the business community, and the general
outlook for the next six months? What indications
does the Council have on current trends in consumer
credit, residential mortgage credit, and business
loans? Are there indications of stockpiling of
steel and steel products as protection against a
strike or price increases?

The members of the Council report that the current business
situation is generally good. The sentiment of the business community
is one of cautious optimism. Businessmen anticipate a moderate rise
In the over all level of economic activity in the next six months,
but they are not certain that the expansion in sales will be
accompanied by a corresponding improvement in profits.
• The Council has observed few indications of any significant
Change in the current trends in consumer, residential mortgage, and
business loans. However, the anticipated increase in automobile
sales should result in some expansion in consumer credit. Furthermore, the flow of savings funds into the commercial banks in recent
Weeks is causing them aggressively to seek additional consumer loans

W)2
2/20/62

-3-

and residential mortgages. The present cost of savings funds is
an important factor contributing to these developments. The
Council has found comparatively little evidence of the stockpiling of steel and steel products as a hedge against a strike
or price increases. As the contract expiration date, June 300
draws nearer, and assuming no accord has been reached, inventory
accumulation is likely to accelerate.
In discussion, Mr. Petersen said there was a general sentiment within
the Council that there would be no steel strike.

The Council's concern,

therefore, related more to whether or not the settlement would be
Illaationary.

It appeared from the observations of the members that there

11°41d be no significant accumulation of inventories, in the thought that
the settlement was not likely to be inflationary.
Mr. Betts reported some inquiries from potential borrowers to take
e of stockpiling if it should develop that such stockpiling was thought
'
c4l
to be necessary.
President Murphy said that in the Second District there had been
little evidence of stockpiling.

Further, there was no evidence that such

et°ekPiling as was taking place resulted from concern about price increases;
to the extent that stockpiling was occurring, it reflected apprehension
4holzt the possibility of a strike.

A lot of the stockpiling in 1959 was

as a hedge against possible price increases, and the current situation
'
flied to
be a healthy turnaround.
Mr. Hobbs reported that at the Bethlehem plant in the Baltimore area
°1'ciel'e were very brisk.

There was little actual inventory accumulation, but

wanted to be sure they could get steel when they wanted it.
the,,

were putting in orders ahead of time.

Therefore,

2/20/62

-4Mr. Hays noted an observation by the head of a steel company

in

the Fourth District that he would regard a noninflationary settle-

Ment as far more important than an early settlement.
Inquiry was made as to what significance the Council placed on
recent indications of a moderate slackening in business activity, as suggested by the January decline in the Board's index of industrial production,
the decline in housing starts, and certain other indexes.

It was asked

Whether those evidences of hesitation might at some point tend to color
the thinking of businessmen.
President Murphy commented that the Council, in reviewing the
1°all figures, was rather surprised that they had not moved up more rapidly.
The Council members had noted the evidences of hesitation in economic
activity and had discussed the matter to some extent yesterday, but they
found it difficult to pinpoint the reasons.
Mr. Petersen noted that demand factors seemed less robust than
had been generally anticipated.

At its previous meeting the Council had

said. that it saw little real buoyancy in the recovery movement, and he
did not think the Council's view had changed.

Recovery had been taking

Mace, but with no signs of great strength.
The comment was made that there seemed to be some evidence that
retained earnings had lessened the requirements of many companies for
borrowed funds; at least at this stage.
President Murphy respcnded that there was evidence of a high
degree of liquidity on all sides.

He then turned to Mr. Zwiener, who

2/20/62

-5-

summarized a personal survey of several companies in different lines
Of business, which survey showed that each company was spending more
money in 1962 than in 1961, but that all of the companies except one
were providing the funds entirely out of cash and liquid assets.
Mr. Hobbs reported that his bank had experienced a gradual
change in the composition of its loan portfolio.

There had been a

falling off in the volume of loans accounted for by "normal lines of
borrowing", while construction, consumer, and mortgage lending had
increased.

He thought that this had been a rather general experience.

Question was raised whether there was evidence of any substantial borrowing in anticipation of going into the capital markets
later this year, and President Murphy indicated that this would apply
to the utilities.

He noted an observation made at the Council meeting

Yesterday that the old seasonal pattern of borrowing seemed to have
changed in many instances.
cleals".

Today there were more so-called "special

There was still much seasonal borrowing, but it was not as

easy to predict as in the past.
Mr. McAllister reported that West Coast banks had been
disappointed in the extent of loan demand during

1961. Budgets and

e timateshadanticipatPd a higher volume of loans than actually
clteveloped.

There had been no great pick-up as yet) but the banks

were looking forward to the fall hopefully.

the thinking was one of cautious optimism.

The general tenor of

2/20/62
President Murphy commented that bankers appeared to be relating
the situation to their ability to lend.

With new time money, banks

were quite liquid; even though loans were higher today than a year
ago, the ability of banks to lend was greater.

In short, the sentiment

waS not as optimistic as the loan figures per se would indicate.
Further observations by members of the Council concerning the
Picture in their respective Districts tended to support these comments.
Loans were higher than a year ago, but deposits were up and banks were
ia a more comfortable position.

Thus, there was some disappointment

that the demand for loans was not greater.
Question then was raised regarding the sufficiency of motivations
for capital investments.
President Murphy commented to the effect that the cost of
csPital was a principal topic of conversation and study among corporate financial officers as they tried to determine how best to meet

the anticipated needs of the future. No outstanding pattern was seen,
except that in most instances companies apparently were trying to
Provide the required funds out of earnings.

Some reluctance to

issue stock was seen, because it was held that this was the most
expensive method of financing.

It was thought better to issue bonds,

slid better still to save the funds out of earnings.
Mr. Zwiener observed that the problem appeared to be tied
closely to the prospect of profits.

The greatest profit from capital

expenditures appeared to result from installation of the cost-cutting

2/20/62
type of equipment.

As he saw it, the profits squeeze was the most

important deterrent to capital investment at the present time.
President Murphy commented on the considerable amount of
obsolete and inefficient equipment in use today.

Such equipment

tended to be used more as production rose closer to capacity) with
a resulting squeeze on profits.

This made it all the more necessary

for management to raise funds fpr rehabilitating machinery and equipment.

In order to remain competitive in world markets, American

industry must find ways of becoming more efficient, and this required
the availability of capital.
Mr. Zwiener said that he saw more "trouble" types of loans
in the banking system than possibly ever before.

Most of these related

in some way to the fact that the companies were behind the parade in
their capital expenditures programs.
Comments followed on the part played by the tax laws in
determining business decisions, after which Governor Mills inquired
whether it was correct to conclude from the Council's comments that
capital expenditures at the present time were aimed more at reducing
costs than expanding output and endeavoring ts reach new markets.
President Murphy replied that he thought this was probably
a fair conclusion.

Mr. Hobbs referred to existing over-capacity

In almost every segment of industry, and President Murphy observed

that this was true when the old was added to the new. Mr. Maestre
commented that it seemed to be thought by corporations that interest

2/20/62
rates were not going to be any lower and that this was a good time to
fund.
Reference was made to the apparent adequacy of plant capacity,
the high level of personal incomes, and the increase in savings.

In

these circumstancesp question was raised as to what it was going to
take to stimulate the demand that would utilize existing capacity more
Dully and create a need for additional capacity.
President Murphy said that the answer seemed to lie basically
ill Profits.

This tied in with the tax laws. The nation still had

its share of entrepreneurs who were willing to take a risk, but time
after time it was heard that people had decided to defer taking the
risk.
There was an inquiry about the strength of demand for available
goods at present price levels, to which President Murphy replied that
the customer appeared to be more discriminating than in the past.
The company that made a quality product and gave the customer his
t011eyts worth could still produce and sell.
With reference to the Council's comment about the greater
clemand by banks for mortgages, question was raised regarding the
14fluence on mortgage rates.
President Murphy said the Council felt that the immediate
effect was going to be a lowering of rates. In his personal opinion,
however, that would be only temporary.

2/2o/62
Mr. McAllister reported a conversation that had raised the
question of a possible broadening of the definition of paper eligible
for discount at the Federal Reserve Banks in order to give member
banks additional flexibility for mortgage lending in areas where the
demand for such credit was great.
2.

What evidences are seen of current or prospective
improvement in the unemployment situation?

There has been moderate improvement in the unemployment
situation, and the Council believes this improvement will
continue. The lengthening of the workweek in manufacturing
in the past year suggests that the expected expansion in
economic activity should be accompanied by further additions
to employment. Although unemployment is at present less severe,
a persistent problem of structural unemployment remains.
President Murphy commented on the difficulty in obtaining
unemployment figures that were fully meaningful.
that the trend was in the right direction.

He felt, however,

There were still well-

distress areasarnund the country, and they required special
a
ttention.

On the other hand, the areas that had become distress areas

chle to the recession seemed to be coming along quite well.
Question was raised regarding retraining programs, and the
comments of several Council members indicated a lack of knowledge of
sticb programs in their respective areas.

Mr. Hobbs commented that

14 the Baltimore area employers of labor were constantly complaining
4bout the lack of interest on the part of a certain segment of employees
14 bettering themselves.

He understood that many jobs in the area were

Unfilled because of that lack of interest.

Mr. Moorhead reported some

659
2/20/62

-10-

evidence of retraining efforts in the iron range area.

However, there

vas nothing to train people for in that area, and most individuals did

not seem to want to move. This included even the younger population.
Chairman Martin suggested that one of the shadows on the
unemployment picture was the balance of payments problem.

not generally recognized, he thought.

This was

However, it appeared to be

getting more difficult to induce foreigners to invest in this country,
for they did not see the opportunities for profit.

This was one of

the basic problems with which this country must deal.
Mr. Petersen commented that the prospect of a good return on
capital was so much greater in the European Common Market area than

in this country that it was causing a return flow of capital. President Murphy commented that the Common Market offered safety through
diversification.

Firms could now go into any member country with the

whole Common Market at their doorstep.

Entrance by American companies

Into the Common Market area might be good from the standpoint of the
Profits of the company concerned, but it increased employment abroad
rather than in this country.

3.

What are the prospects for demand at banks during
the next six months for commercial and industrial
loans?

The anticipated expansion in business activity in the
next six months suggests a moderate rise in the demand for
commercial and industrial loans. This demand is likely to
strengthen further if inventory accumulation accelerates.
President Murphy said he found it rather difficult to make
LIP his mind as to the possibility of substantial inventory accumulation.

2/2o/62

-11-

A new pattern of inventory controls seemed to be developing.

He was

not sure that businesses were going to accumulate inventories in the
future to the same extent as in the past, for reasons discussed several
times at recent meetings of the Board and the Council.
Reference was made to substantial loans by United States banks
to foreigners in the fourth quarter of 1961, and question was raised
as to whether this type of lending was likely to accelerate.
President Murphy replied that the demand was accelerating but
the availability of money was not.

There were not too many areas of

the world where American banks were willing to invest their funds at

the moment, and it seemed doubtful to him whether the over-all volume
of overseas lending would increase a great deal.

Most banks had a

limited proportion of funds that they were willing to expose abroad,
'with rather nebulous quotas for particular countries.

4. What has been the reaction of banks to the recent
increase in the maximum permissible rates of
interest on time and savings deposits? What
structure of rates on different types of time and
savings accounts, including certificates of deposit,
is developing in various areas of the country?
What is the Council's impression as to the origin
of the funds being added to savings accounts and
time accounts, including certificates of deposit?
How will the higher rates of interest paid by banks
affect their lending and investment policies?
A substantial proportion of the nation's banks have
raised rates on time and savings deposits, with many banks
having increased their rates to the maximum permissible.
Many banks raised rates reluctantly and under competitive
Pressures. Savings rates in a number of areas were immediately increased to the maximum. This has created problems
in making the required adjustments in bank earning assets.

2/20/62

-12-

There is little uniformity across the country in the
structure of rates on different types of time and savings
accounts. The rates on negotiable certificates of deposit
are running somewhat higher than on Treasury bills but tend
to be lower than the 3-1/2 and 4 per cent maximums permitted
on savings deposits.
Several members reported on surveys that various
institutions have made in an effort to determine the origin
of the funds flowing to their savings accounts. The results
have suggested that no one source seems dominant. Some of the
funds are undoubtedly coming from demand accounts. However,
the members of the Council believe that a considerable portion
of the new savings and time deposits represent funds that heretofore had flowed to competitive institutions other than banks.
While banks will aggressively seek to augment their
earnings in an effort to offset the increase in their interest
costs, the members of the Council believe it is premature to
generalize about possible significant changes in bank lending
and investment policies. Some institutions have indicated that
they will seek to expand their residential mortgage activities,
and to increase their consumer credit loans. The recent
strengthening of the price of municipals is likewise attributed
to an increased demand by commercial banks. The need to increase
income will probably result in the lengthening of maturities in
mortgage and municipal portfolios.
President Murphy reported that the Council had spent a great deal
Ottime discussing this subject and that a variety of opinions had been
expressed.

The banks were going through a reaction period after the change

in the maximum permissible rates of interest. It was a period of adjustIllent, and personally he thought the adjustment was a healthy one.
°Pinion, commercial banking would emerge as a stronger industry.

In his
Banks

/4°Uld be forced to exercise ingenuity in cutting costs; they would have to
be run more efficiently.

Thus, the banks were on their mettle.

a challenge, and he welcomed it.

There was

In the past, bankers had been prone to

2/20/62

-13-

lean on the fact that they were not permitted to pay a higher rate of
interest, and as a result they may have gotten a little soft.

At

Present the New York State Bankers Association was working diligently

on a method of analyzing costs. Questionnaires were being sent to the
banks asking them to tabulate and code expenses; and the State Banking
Department was going to analyze this information so that the banks could

have a standard for different types of costs. This was a healthy sign.
There was hardly a bank that could not do a better job on cost control.
President Murphy went on to say that the scramble for higher
rates was bound to cause some difficulty.

In the process, however, he

felt that banks were going to become stronger institutions.
vere entitled to the market price for their money.

Customers

If the banks did

11°t Pay the market price, people would be justified in taking their
Money some place else.
Mr. McRae commented that in the Sixth District some banks had
said at first that they were not going to raise their interest rates.
14 most case, however, that situation did not last very long.

He was

14clined to think that increases had usually been made because some bank
started the move and others followed for competitive reasons.
b44k5 had probably now gone to the ceiling.

Thus, most

As to his bank's experience,

savings deposits increased about 10 per cent in 1961.
the year through mid-February) they rose about

From the end of

3 per cent further, with

shout half of the money coming out of checking accounts and a small

O

2/20/62

-14-

amount from savings and loan associations.

The associations promptly

increased their rates by 1/2 per cent.
Mr. McRae expressed concern about the ultimate effect on bank
liquidity.

He felt that banks were going to reach for more income.

Those having the major part of the assets of the banking system were
not going to lower the standards of quality for loans and investments
O1 stretch maturities too far.

However; he had reservations about the

aPplicability of this statement to the many thousands of smaller banks.
Mr. Hobbs said his bank had experienced quite an increase in
savings deposits in January, continuing the trend that began in 1961
at midyear.

An analysis of deposits of $5,000 or more from the first

°f January through the first of February showed that
cleposits came from checking accounts.

4o per cent of the

Other money came from savings

banks and from savings and loan associations.

There had been a large

increase in the number of new savings accounts, indicating that the
3-1/2 per cent rate was attracting customers.
Was

Whether this situation

typical throughout the country, he did not know, but he thought it

Was fairly typical in Baltimore.
President Murphy commented that today's depositor was very rate
conscious.

Some years ago it had been felt that location might be more

In1Portant than the rate of interest, within certain limitations, but

that was not true today. The scramble for funds had started with the
84\rings banks and the savings and loan associations.

If the banks were

1.1°t Mae to meet that competition, they would have to sit back and watch

2/20/62

-15-

a further attrition in a very important area.
banks could compete in this field.

In his opinion, the

They would not have to pay exactly

as much as savings and loan association -: and savings banks; they could
compete with some differential.

As of today the competitive factor was

running in the favor of the commercial banks, whereas they had previously
been on the defensive since World War II.

He had a great deal of respect

for the ability of the commercial banker to do a job, and he felt that
the commerr'ial banker would do a job in this area.

The banker would buy

Mortgages to the extent that they were offset by savings deposits

he

would buy some municipals, and there would be some lengthening of
Maturities.

To President Murphy's way of thinking, however, these

things would not be harmful as long as they were done with a high degree
°f good judgment.

If the banks had not been given their present oppor-

ttlnitY, he would have been worried.
Mr. McRae said he hoped that mortgages would not be made eligible
for discounting at Reserve Banks because their ineligibility would
serve
as

a brake against loading up too much with such loans.

He felt, however,

that in the course of time the Federal Reserve was going to have to do
8°Mething with respect to mortgages because the liquidity of many banks
would be weakened.

He hoped, of course, that his fears were unfounded.

Mr. Betts agreed with President Murphy that the commercial banks
114a not been getting their share of the savings dollar, that they should

be Ole to compete, and that they were now on their mettle.

Nevertheless,

2/20/62

-16-

the amendment of Regulation Q had created problems in the Eleventh
District, where about 70 per cent of the banks had gone to the ceiling.
The split rate on savings accounts was in his opinion a mistake.

The

theory apparently had been to give a little elbow room, but in the
minds of the public 4 per cent became the rate that commercial banks
should and would pay.

The majority of banks had gone to that rate

because their competitors were doing it.

Rural banks in the area were

nOW faced with a real operating problem.

All of the benkers were talking

about what they could do and were trying to increase their earnings in
waYs that had been mentioned previously, along with higher service
Charges.

In his opinion, the banks would have to streamline their

operations and become more efficient.

Be that as it may, however, the

banks were greatly disturbed, and in his opinion the repurcussions were
g°ing to be rather widespread.

For example, there might be a substantial

move out of U. S. Savings Bonds.

In summary; the banks were going to have

to do the things that would offset the increased cost of doing business.
They would probably reach for mortgages and long-term municipal bonds.
Liquidity would be affected, and in some instances, he thought, the
Taality of assets.
Mr. Hays agreed with President Murphy that the banks should be
14 a position to compete.

He was not concerned about the large banks,

/4401 had management with broad perspective; but about the thousands of
little banks.

In the Fourth District he hnA found 104 out of about 900

000

2/20/62

-17-

banks that had increased their rates.
those 104 banks, and

He had sent a questionnaire to

86 had replied. Most of the banks that replied

expressed displeasure about the change in Regulation Q, but most of
them had gone to the maximum rate.

The majority expected checking

accounts to be the principal source of new savings deposits.

Many

Planned to raise the rates charged on loans and to increase their
mortgage and consumer loans and their holdings of municipals.

A sub-

stantial number planned to lengthen the maturities of their investment
Portfolios.

The banks generally objected to the split rate on savings

accounts, feeling that it would be difficult to explain the matter
satisfactorily to customers and that there would be difficulties of
rate computation.

1/

Mr. Moorhead said he would be more impressed by the arguments
against the change in maximum rates if he had not heard them given before
when the maximum rate was increased to
1957.

3 per cent at the beginning of

He was inclined toward. President Murphy's view.

Bankers, he felt,

were really worried about profits rather than liquidity.

It would be a

sad commentary if banks were to pay interest rates that they could not
afford to pay, but competition was a strong factor.
'
Ilelcomed the opportunity to meet competition.

Personally, he

There would be a burden,

admittedly, on small banks; they would have to adjust by improving their
earnings or else not pay high interest rates.

1/ Copies of Mt. Hays' summary of the replies to his questionnaire were
distributed to the members of the Board following the meeting.

2/20/62

-18Mr. Zwiener commented that the change in Regulation Q probably

'would have the effect of slowing down applications for new bank charters
in Illinois, because earnings prospects would not be as favorable.
Mr. Petersen said that the change in Regulation Q was not a
Popular move in the Third District.
had changed their rates.

Only about 20 per cent of the banks

In Pennsylvania the State authorities had ruled

that banks could not pay a rate higher than 3-1/2 per cent without a
commitment that the money would be in the bank for 12 months.
Mr. Breidenthal commented that in its statement the Council had
been attempting to do an effective reporting job on the sentiment in the
respective Districts.

The statement might not reflect in all cases the

I'MY the members felt themselves.

In the Tenth District the first reaction

l'as one of resentment, but he thought that was beginning to die down a
little.

Many country banks had stayed at

and had gone to

4

3

per cent on savings accounts

per cent on time certificates, and in January they

l'ePorted a large amount of transfers from checking accounts to certificates
of deposit.

They immediately assumed that they were now paying

011 funds that were formerly interest-free.

4

per cent

Every January, however, there

been funds transferred from checking accounts to other financial
institutions.

Therefore, the funds left the communities, and in his

°Pinion those communities had use for the funds.

He could not help but

feel that this was another change in the constantly changing image of
Qopamercial banking.

in

The banks must be competitive if they wanted to stay

the savings business.

Further, the maximum rates did not reflect a

2/20/62

-19-

hard-and-fast rule.

If at some time in the future interest rates should

go down, the banks were probably going to adjust their rates downward on
savings and time deposits.

To him it was a management proposition, and

the commercial banks were capable of doing the job.
Mr. Breidenthal said he thought the most unsatisfactory aspect
Of the problem was the matter of split rates, for this was going to
Present difficulties from the public relations standpoint.

Interest

should be figured the same way in all banks, and he did not know how the
banks were going to make a satisfactory explanation to their customers
When they came in to have interest entered in their pass books.

In a

concluding comment, Mr. Breidenthal said that he thought practically all
banks during the past several years had told their savings and time
depositors that they would like to pay more interest but were limited,
aria that if the time came when banks could be more competitive they would
be more competitive.

Therefore, he was not going to worry.

The banks

*would do the job.

5. Does the Council detect any change in public
concern about the persisting deficit in the
United States balance of payments?
The members of the Council believe there is an
increasing concern by the informed public about the persisting deficit in the United States balance of payments.
A still greater public awareness is necessary if we are to
have the policy changes required to eliminate the deficit.
Such changes would include sound fiscal policies, a critical
reappraisal of our military and aid expenditures overseas,
and a level of costs which would make American products and
services competitive in world markets.
Mr. Petersen commented that the concern of the general public tends
t0 increase when there are gold losses.

The Council had phrased its

2/20/62

-20-

statement in terms of the reaction of the informed public.

Personally,

he was greatly concerned about the balance of payments problem, which
he thought would be a persistent one.

The fact that 1961 was a

relatively better year than 1960 was a welcome development but did
not solve the problem, and he did not see any solution right around the
corner.

In his opinion, the current tariff debate would serve as an

educational medium, probably causing the balance of payments problem to
be presented to the public on a much broader basis than heretofore.
'would be all to the good.

This

Also, he felt that banks had an obligation to

have their officers well informed in this area in order to be of some
assistance to the general public, particularly the business community.
BY and large, he would guess that this was being done in the larger banks.
President Murphy said he felt that the average businessman was
better informed than in the past.

He also noted that gold movements

could arouse public feelings quickly, to which he added that foreign
bankers without exception were looking at developments closely.

He had

detected an undertone of encouragement because foreign bankers seemed to
feel that the United States had recognized the problem, and when a problem
is recognized a solution is more likely to be in prospect.

With the problem

'
leeeiving so much attention, he felt that the authorities were in a better
Position to obtain cooperation from the business community in doing what
/4as necessary.

In his opinion, the balance of payments was perhaps the

11/ J°r problem of the country at the present time, and he felt that a lot
°r things were being done to solve it.

2/20/62

-21Question was raised with regard to the role of monetary policy

in relation to the balance of payments problem, and the views expressed
by members of the Council were to the effect that the maintenance of
a sound monetary policy was one of the aspects of an over-all discipline

that would be necessary in working toward a solution of the problem.
This was not to imply, however, a criticism of current monetary policy.
Further, it was not felt that monetary policy could correct deficiencies

in other areas, such as inadequate fiscal policies.

The Council felt

that sound policies to control expenditures at home and abroad were
necessary, along with a balanced budget.
Mr. Hays reported that discussions with businessmen in his
al'ea revealed some difficulty in connecting the balance of payments
Problem with their own businesses.

There was a gap, he thought, that

Igas not bridged in the minds of most people.

However, there was

considerable concern about tariff policies, and a strong sentiment
that the budget should be balanced by whatever means were necessary.
In reply to a question concerning the outlook for agricultural
eXPorts to the countries comprising the European Common Market, Mr.
Petersen reviewed various aspects of the situation; including the
difficulties involved in conducting negotiations in view, particularly,
°f the heavy agricultural trade balance running in favor of the United
States.

While there were some factors that seemed heartening, in

general he was not inclined to be too optimistic.

2/20/62

Mr.

Petersen withdrew from the meeting at this point in order

to keep another engagement.

6. What are the views of the Council regarding the
impact of current monetary and credit policy?
The members of the Council believe that current monetary
and credit policy has been appropriate and is having a desirable
impact on business activity.
Chairman Martin inquired whether there were any members of the
Council who felt that monetary policy had been too easy, having in mind
Particularly the relationship to the balance of payments problem.
Mr. Hobbs noted that at the time of its meeting in November
1961 the Council had been rather evenly divided, with some members
inclined to feel that a slight tightening of policy might be in order
if there was continued improvement in the domestic business situation.
There was still some feeling within the Council, he thought, that
Perhaps a little tightening of policy would be in order before the
time of the next meeting of the Council.

The situation might be

getting closer and closer to that point.

Perhaps, however, this

reflected no more than his personal opinion.
President Murphy said the Council had noted some of the little
dtPs in economic activity that had occurred recently.

He was not so

c°11vinced of future trends as to feel that much if any tightening
/las needed at the present time.

In his opinion, an ample availability

or funds was quite important at this stage.
Chairman Martin then inquired whether it was the judgment of

the Council that the level of short-term rates was having an effect
ill relation to the balance of payments problem.

2/20/62

-23President Murphy replied that in his opinion the level of

short-term interest rates had had a considerable effect.

He added

that American banks were finding today, with the rates they were able
to pay, that they could attract money in international markets.

They

Were getting a healthy volume of dollars at current rates, and if
necessary they could step up the rates in order to protect their
balances.
Chairman Martin inquired how the American public might be
expected to react to any further substantial losses of gold, and President Murphy commented that much would depend, in his opinion, on how
the matter was reported in the press.

The average reader tended to

look at the headlines and not go into the fine print.

People could

get excited again, as they did with respect to the Multer bill to
remove the gold cover.

He thought there was a somewhat better unaer-

standing of the balance of payments situation than in the past, but

a few articles of a certain type in the press could get people stirred
11p.
Chairman Martin asked about the thinking of the Council
c°110erning removal of the gold cover, and several members indicated

that they thought such a move would be ill advised. The factor of
13111311c misunderstanding of such a proposal was mentioned.
President Murphy said that he would personally favor removing

the gold cover. However, he gathered there was a lot of opinion against
It
' Within the Council it was apparent that he was in the minority.

2/20/62
This concluded the discussion of the questions that had been
included on the agenda for this meeting.
System foreign currency operations.

Chairman Martin commented

that the Federal Open Market Committee had recently authorized a
Program of System operations in foreign currencies.

The Treasury,

through its Stabilization Fund, had already done some pioneering work

in this area, and the Open Market Committee felt that the System should
also work in this field and see whether there was a role for it to
Play.

In his view, Chairman Martin said, operations in foreign exchange

Probably could serve a useful purpose.

No one in the System would want

to take a strong position at this time, but it seemed desirable for the
System to obtain some experience.

The System would have to move forward

gl'adually, much in the same way as when open market operations in the
Government securities market were first undertaken many years ago,
with a minimum objective of dealing with temporary disequalibria in
the exchange markets and with the idea of working cooperatively with
Other central banks to determine what might be done in the exchange
field without changing basic flows.

Therefore, the Open Market

CoMmittee had authorized the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to
°Perate on behalf of all of the Reserve Banks in conducting operations
for the system open Market Account.

Before the next meeting of the

C°1ancil there might be some transactions, but it should be emphasized

that the program was very much on an experimental basis.

2/20/62

-25In this connection, Chairman Martin noted that President Hayes

Of the New York Reserve Bank had made a speech on this general subject
on January 22, and that he (Chairman Martin) had discussed the subject
in his testimony on January 30 before the Joint Economic Committee in
connection with hearings on the President's Economic Report.

He noted

that there had been relatively little comment to date.
President Murphy commented that this seemed to be a realistic
Inove in the light of world developments.

It was essential for the

aations of the free world to work closely together, and he assumed
that in conducting foreign exchange operations there would be close
relations between the Federal Reserve and foreign central banks.
In reply to a question as to why the Federal Reserve had not
conducted such operations previously, Chairman Martin said the basic
reason was an absence of pressure.

At the present time, however,

the United States was an international borrower instead of the
Vorld's chief lender.

He added that the principal danger in these

oPtrations was quite clear.

It might be thought that things could

be accomplished through them that were not possible.

There might

be an inclination to temporize with essential disciplines.
The Chairman also said that the Open Market Committee and the
130ard of Governors had looked at the matter carefully in terms of the
SYstem's legal authority.

An opinion had been obtained from the

Gtneral Counsel of the Committee that authority existed to conduct
f°reign currency operations) and the General Counsel of the Treasury

2/20/62
had. concurred, along with the Attorney General.

However, there was

no authority, for example, to buy foreign bills.

This might be wanted

at some point, and the System might decide to seek additional legislation.

On the other hand, it seemed doubtful to most of the members

Of the Federal Open Market Committee that it would be advisable to
request additional legislation at this time.

Without any experience

14 actual operations, the System was hardly in a position to know
exactly what kind of legislation might be needed.
In a further comment) Chairman Martin noted that there might
be some question regarding the possible magnitude of the operations.
Rowever, this was a rather pointless question.

The System was not

g°ing to risk its resources unduly, but the operations would have to
be sufficient to deal effectively with speculative disturbances. For
this reason the establishment of any specified maximum limits would be
14sPpropriate.

Further, if the System were successful in its operations,

it might be that the Stabilization Fund would want to cease its operations
14 this area, but Obviously that would be some time ahead.
President Murphy stated that an international monetary conference
14 Rome was scheduled at the time that the next meeting of the Federal
'
Advisory council ordinarily would have been held.

The Council therefore

14°41d. like to suggest that, if agreeable to the Board, the next meeting
be held April 30-May 10 1962.
There being no Objection, it was understood that the next meeting
°t the Council would be held on those dates.

-27The meeting then adjourned.