View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

304

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Friday, February 18, 1949.

The Board

tat in
the Board Room at 10:40 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

McCabe, Chairman
Szymczak
Draper
Evans
Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Morrill, Special Adviser
Vest, General Counsel
Leonard, Director of the Division of
Bank Operations
Mr. Horbett, Assistant Director of the
Division of Bank Operations
Mr. Smith, Special Counsel
Mr. Hodge, Technical and Legal Adviser to
Mr. Evans

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Mr. Evans stated that the following demand for production
Or

int,

crmation was filed by attorneys for Transamerica Corporation
at the
close of the hearing in the proceeding against that Corpor
ation under
the Clayton Act on Tuesday, February 15, 1949:
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE TILE
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THR FtDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
,211
MATTER OF
QqaTSAMERICA
CORPORATION
1,SIR8: "DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF INFORMATION
dem "The respondent, Transamerica Corporation, hereby
allds that the following Exhibits, or at least the
:
4_13nblished
source material therefor, as may be reby respondent's counsel, be assembled and pre' by the staff of the Board of Governors of the
el'al Reserve System and be made available to




2/18/49

-2-

"Transamerica Corporation a reasonable time prior to the
reconvening of hearings in this proceeding in San Francisco, California:
"Exhibits comparable to Board's Exhibits 13, 14, 15,
16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 for each of the following banks
and their predecessors, for each location in which they
Operate, together with county and state totals:
"1. Security First National Bank of Los Angeles,
and its predecessors.
"2. American Trust Company of San Francisco, and
its predecessors.
"3. Anglo-California National Bank, San Francisco,
and its predecessors.
4. Citizens National Trust and Savings Bank of
Riverside, and its predecessors.
Valley National Bank of Arizona, and its predecesso"r5s:
"6. United States National Bank of Portland, and
its predecessors.
"7. National Bank of Commerce, Seattle, and its
Pr
edecessors.
"8. Seattle First National Bank, and its predecessors,
It
"The basis for this demand is the testimony of the
11°8It'8 witness, John E. Horbett, and Board's Exhibits
t°8* 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20. From said
)
,!!timony and Exhibits it appears that the Board has
Ported, to present county and state tabulations showhg 'the
the relative growth' of Bank of America and banks
81
!
1 'which Transamerica has an investment, but it has not
orra the growth of competitor banks to which the growth
the banks shown in the Board's Exhibits must be rem!)
,
:ted if
an honest, fair and accurate picture is to be
:lesented. While counsel for Transamerica Corporation
tijenuously objected and still objects to the publicade°4 of the facts and figures in question from confii tial sources, the hearing officer has allowed the
'
c"
0 roduction of these Exhibits into evidence, which
tilletitutes their publication. The comparable informatcompeting banks is not available to the reexcept to the extent that it may be made availfrom similar sources by the Board. It is respectY' submitted that if the information in the Board's
;:trItbits referred to is to be left in the record, cornable exhfbits as to the competitor banks must also




2/18/49

-3-

"be put there, unless the record is to be left in an inFomplete, inaccurate and misleading condition.
"Dated: February 15, 1949.
(silined1_21911(211. Stewart,
Samuel B. Stewart, Jr.

(signed) Hugo A. Steinmeyer
Hugo A. Steinmeyer
Attorneys for Respondent,
Transamerica Corporation.
THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM."
At Mr. Evans' request, Mr. Hodge discussed the demand, stat-

ing thni,
ta his opinion the preferable course would be to refuse
the

A

"emantl without prejudice to the right to renew it later.

ale°

Suggested

He

that, since the information would probably become

tlelquat later in the hearings, it would be desirable for the
lloardis
staff to start assembling it.
There followed a discussion of the demand during which

(114elati—
'As were raised as to whether the data requested were con4c1eaat al

whether they were relevant to the cross-examination of

erbett, whether they were likely to be introduced into the
(k.te
as

1949

evidence in the proceeding, and whether if made available

'Pori.se to the request the data could be prepared by March 28,

j when the hearings were scheduled to be resumed in San Fran-

Messrs. Vest and Smith expressed the view that the data




2/18/49

-4-

requested were relevant to the cross-examination of Mr. Horbett and
that the information should be prepared.
Following the discussion, by unanimous vote, the following statement and
order was approved:
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
HI
,
TIlE MATTER OF
'
14‘ANIERICA CORPORATION
"STATEMENT AND ORDER ON D DI 4 0
FOR PRODUCTION OF INFORMATION
"On February 15, 1949, respondent filed with the Board
'11 'Demand for Production of Information', in which it reqUested that the Board's staff assemble and prepare certe-tm information and data in exhibit form and make the
!Erie available to respondent 'a reasonable time prior to
;he reconvening of hearings in this proceeding in San
ncisco, California.' On the same date the Hearing
`Jlticer announced that he would refer respondent's DeOfto the Board, and, with the consent and agreement
.,, counsel, he recessed the hearing to reconvene in
°an Francisco, California, on March 28, 1949.
x
The information requested by respondent in its Deis extremely comprehensive. Counsel for respondent
te-e recognized on the record that it will require con,
1:dera:ble
time to prepare such information, and members
the Board's staff estimate that its preparation may
4:tnuire most of the time of three men for as much as
ee months. In the opinion of the Board, the Board
e;under no legal obligation to produce the information
.p_Ught be respondent, and it is impossible for such inrmation to be prepared and made available prior to
interest of affoXi 28, 1949. Nevertheless, in the
DA-c'-ing respondent every reasonable opportunity to pretc:talld Present its defense to the Board's complaint,
rol-„:?ard is granting respondent's request for the inprW4Uion desired. Such information will therefore be
6tred as expeditiously as circumstances permit and,
!
lille
PrePared, will be forwarded to counsel for resPoAdent
and the Solicitor for the Board.

W




308

2/18/49

_5-

"In granting respondent's request for the information referred to, the Board expresses no opinion upon
the relevance of such information) at whatever time it
IllaY be offered in evidence. Further, the Board notes
the statement of counsel for respondent at the hearing
held February 151 1949, that 'I have no desire to hold
uP these proceedingl to have these things/I.e. the information requested/ prepared.' The Board therefore
assumes that pending the preparation and production of
such information, the hearings will proceed In due course
ana as may be ordered from time to time by the Hearing
Officer.
ORDER
"It is hereby ordered that there be prepared and
served upon counsel for respondent and the Solicitor
for the Board as expeditiously as possible, the exbits requested by respondent in its 'Demand for Proauction of Information' dated and filed February 15,
1949.
"This 18th day of February, 1949.
"BY the Board
S. R. Carpenter
Secretary.
"Governors Eccles and Clayton took no part in the
CO
or decision of the Demand referred to
14 the foregoing Statement and Order."
(signed)

There were presented telegrams to the Federal Reserve Banks

()1r Re

Philadelphia) Atlanta) Chicago, St. Louis, Kansas City,
kNI s

1,1111,10

FranCiSCO

stating that the Board approves the establishment

ut change by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on FebriAltry
41)111 5/ by the Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta and St. Louis on
atY 16, and by the Federal Reserve Banks of New York)
la.-,'
Chicago, and Kansas City on February 171 1949, of Phithe
'Ettes
Of

discount and purchase in their existing schedules.




Approved unanimously.

2/18/49

-6Mr. Clayton and Mr. Townsend, Solicitor for the Board, en

tered the meeting at this time and Messrs. Horbett, Smith, and
Rodge

withdrew.
Mr. Evans referred to a letter received under date of Feb

Y 4/ 1949 from John Oden Bennett, Maxim Radio, Bartow, Florida,
to the Board's letter of February 21 1949, in which he
rerilsed to permit inspections of records of his business in contieti()u with the administration of Regulation W) Consumer Instal41en't Credit, as reported in a memorandum from Mr. Solomon, dated
41/1111Etr7 11,
1949.

The memorandum also stated that the matter

18.8 bei
-ug referred to Mr. Townsend for further consideration.
Mr. Evans stated that if it were decided to take the nec"'
'Y stePs to enforce compliance by the concern, consideration
14ight
be given to whether Mr. Cherry) attorney in the Legal DiVIS1
04

'might be spared for that assignment.
In response to a question from Chairman McCabe) Mr. Vest
St

at d

"flat/ while the handling of litigation was under Mr. Town-

444,8 su
pervision, he felt that if it were decided to go ahead at
t1118timeit

would be preferable, because of Mr. Cherry's other

114131euts, to handle the matter with the assistance of counsel
th
Pederal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, who would work under
ToloaRi4

At

s direction.

C hairman McCabe said the question for consideration was




310

-7-

21/18/49

vhether the Board should take action against the Maxim Radio at this
time.
Speaking to that point, Mr. Townsend expressed the view that
l esPect for Regulation W was to be maintained, the Board should
it '
be„
-Prepared to take vigorous steps when necessary to enforce it,
that,
he would prefer to take the first formal action against a
lellger concern so that there could be no charge of attacking small
111/814esses, but that the Board should handle the cases as they arise
elferi though the violator happens to be a small concern.

Another

'he said, is that any proceeding of this kind might raise the
1)(1114
elkstitUtionality of the statute on which Regulation W was based,
that
there had never been a test of that question, and that, while
e felt the Supreme Court would hold the law constitutional, it
var3 n
°t certain that it would do so. Mr. Townsend added that while
se_
the
before the Board probably would raise the constitutional
(14 ti
—1°4 it Was as good a case as could be found to test the Board's
MIthority.
During the discussion of the question, it was suggested
thavt,
Sinee

the administration of the regulation was decentralized

11112c41g th-e
Federal Reserve Banks and since Mr. Bennett was a registralat
11 the territory of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, it
Vottiti .1)
e desirable to discuss the case with Mr. McLarin, President
or that,
4 Ink, when he was in Washington next week.
"




It was also

2/18/49
134gested that, if necessary, Mr. Patterson, General Counsel of the
l'etleral Reserve B11,0 of Atlanta, be asked to come to Washington when
Maorin was here to participae in the discussion.
The foregoing suggestion was approved
unanimously with the understanding that,
following the discussion with Mr. McLarin,
the matter would be considered by the
Board again.
Chairman McCabe stated that Mr. Thorp, Assistant Secretary
Of S4.
4ate)

called him on the telephone yesterday to inquire about the

e.cti.011 of the Board with respect to the application of the Bank of
11.T. & S.A., for a branch in Bangkok, Siam, saying that, beCe.ti

se

of the pressure upon the State Department for having an Amer-

1c4libmik established in Siam, the delay was becoming somewhat emb
& Etse-t
iig to the Department.
Mr. Millard, Director of the Division of Examinations, en44
'
ed th
-e meeting at this time.

troll

Mr. Clayton stated that Mr. Szymczak and he met with CompOf

the Currency Delano on Tuesday, February 15, 1949,

00k, Director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
11°1' be present because of illness) at which meeting Messrs.
killara
and Townsend were also present. Be said that Mr. Delano
441e it very
clear that he would not deviate from his previously
te,41.
Position that he would interpose no objection to the Board's
4 Permission to the Bank of America for the establishment of




2/18/149

-9-

the foreign branches under consideration, and that he was not willto say that the capital position of the Bank of America or any
"her factor in the situation was such as to cause him to take the
1438itien that he would deny any application for a de novo domestic
brellch. Also, he would object to the Board stating to the applic4t that the Comptroller's office felt that the capital position
or the Bank of America was not satisfactory and that for that rea8°11 additional foreign branches should not be granted. The reason
to
l' the Comptroller's position, Mr. Clayton said, was that there
Other national bneks in substantially the same capital posias Bank of America and while he felt the office of the Comptroll
el' of the Currency should continue to press for additional

4°14

elqqtAl

he did not feel he should take the position that no fur-

t4ei,
bliallchss should be granted where the needs of the community

taaa r

°r

approval of a branch.

Mr. Clayton went on to say that he still believed that, in
he

11ght of
all the circumstances and for reasons substantially

th
the sae as those he advanced at the meeting on January 27, 1949,
4t Wlication
of Berk of America N.T. & S.A., for permission to
0i:411114h branches at Bremen, Frankfurt-am-Main, and Homburg,
'end at Bangkok, Siam, should be granted and that at the
t 1114111Y
e f
°- giving its approval, the Board should inform the Bank that
41t to
ekrcl ves disturbed by certain factors in the condition and




2/3-8/

-10-

oPerati
-ng policies of the Bank and felt they should be corrected,
that because of such factors very careful consideration would
IlEtve to be given to them before taking favorable action on any
tIrttlre applications that might be filed for foreign branches.

He

84cled that he
did not feel It was inconsistent for the Board to
Permission for the four branches requested and at the same
tulle ,
uo make clear that it felt there should be improvement in the
cellital position and certain operating practices before any addi-" applications would be considered favorably.
In response to a question from Mt. Clayton, Mt. Vest stated
his 0
Pinion that the Board had broad legal authority for denying to
Permission to establish foreign branches if it concluded such
~i vas desirable.
the

Mr. Szymczak stated there was a great deal to be said for

u P"ition Mr. Clayton presented, but that he was afraid that it
-0111,1
not be
effective in correcting the unsatisfactory capital
14)"'tl°11 and lending and dividend policies of the Bank of America
Et4lthat
he felt the best course would be to deny the pending ap13114:tit:nu.

If that were done and the reasons given, he said, the

414 tight come
in and want to know what it should do to correct
f4 situation.
He added that if the necessary corrections were

1*°11rsht about,

he would not now say the Bank should not be given

15trillE3 ion to
establish additional foreign branches.




:i4
2/18/49

-11There was a further discussion during which Chairman McCabe

Buggested that the applications for three branches in Germany be
dellied and the application for a branch in Siam be granted on the
t'(1144.8 that other American banking facilities were already availeble in Germany
and the Board should ascertain how they are workOut before
authorizing additional branches, whereas no American
betio
'ng facilities were available in Siam and the State Department
extremely
anxious that a branch of an American bank be estabin that country as soon as possible.
Mr. Szymczak felt that such a procedure would beg the questi()
;since it was not a matter of Siam or Germany, but rather how
thelinsatisfactory extended
position of the Bank of America could
be correcte.

He said the Board must take that position sooner or

let;er
because otherwise additional de novo domestic branches will
be €N1ted by
the Comptroller and applications for additional foreign
1)Itches will be submitted by the Bank of America to the Board.

He

Doirted out
that no bank supervisory authority is satisfied with the
bknit
-is Present
extended position and the Board has frequently stated
It 14)es not look
with approval on further expansion by the Bank of
Ake i
l'-ce in the domestic branch field -- and the Comptroller had
41e4 that the
Board's action in granting foreign branches to the
11A—
np .
-.4. America
is 86 expansionary, if not more so, as action in
(titing

domestic de novo branches.




Therefore, he said, the sooner

2/18/49
the

-12-

Board acts to correct that condition the better in the public

interest.
Mr. Clayton stated that his preference would be to grant
all the pending
applications and place the Bank on notice that the
lloard felt
the unsatisfactory conditions should be corrected, but
that as a compromise he would go along with the suggestion made by
Chttillnan McCabe. He made the additional statement that the deposits
to 13„,
held at the proposed foreign branches and the operating costs
"such branches would be negligible in relation to the Bank of
Alnerica as a whole, that the unsatisfactory conditions of the Bank
tealata
e- almost entirely from its domestic operations, and that in
hig
(11/141on Congress did not give the Board authority over foreign
bttize,.
"e8 with the intention that such authority should be used as a
to bring about corrections in the domestic condition of a Bank
vhich
"
14
primarily the responsibility of another supervisory au-

110am

Mr. Szymczak said the condition of the Bank is likewise a
resPonsibility.

th
thect

kr.

The meeting then recessed and reconvened at 2:45 p.m. with
"L4e attendance as at the close of the morning session, except
Mes
srs. Morrill and Leonard were not present.
Mr. Szymczak stated that in a telephone conversation with
cele„
on Wednesday morning he (Mr. Eccles) said that he did




31C
2/18/49

-13-

4°t favor approving the applications of Bank of America for branches
ill Germany and Siam, that he did not agree that the question involved
i4

the branches Was entirely separate from the question of monopoly,

814 that it did involve the establishment of a string of foreign
131'84°11as which indirectly added to the monopolistic position of the
beak

on the Pacific Coast in handling the business of its customers.
Mr. Carpenter stated that at Mr. Szymczak's request he talked
lth

Mr. Vardaman on February 16 who said that, while he was opposed
111111%4
"-knoiple to granting the branches, he felt that since the Board
iledgranted permission to establish branches in Manila, Shanghai,
4141thrae cities in Japan without raising the question of the bank's
Slid loan and dividend policy, the only thing the Board could
Qv"' to grant the pending applications and advise the bank that it
vould
"
4 approve any additional branches until the capital situation
bed, b
een remedied. He also felt, Mr. Carpenter said, that regardless

or
waether additional branch applications were filed, the Board should
N ist th.
--,t the bank correct the matters which were subject to crit-

After a further discussion, it was suggested that the matter
teate„
up for action at a meeting on Monday, February 21, 1949,
141b,,
.all
members of the Board would be present.
be

The foregoing suggestion was approved viumimously.




2/18/49

-14Reference was made to a letter from the Senate Banking and

IselleY Committee dated January 28, 1949, requesting a report on
elll
'
S
'js Res. 9 to provide for the establishment of a national monetary
c°34raissioll) which was referred to at the meeting on. February 4, 1949.
It was agreed unanimously that the
Legal Division should prepare a reply to
the request, stating that the Board would
prefer to defer comments on the proposal
until the Commission on Organization of
the Executive Branch of the Government had
submitted its recommendations with respect
to bank supervisory agencies and there had
been an opportunity to study it.
At this point Messrs. Vest, Townsend, and Millard withdrew
action stated with respect to each of the matters hereinferred to was taken by the Board:
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Beserve System on February 17, 1949, were approved unani-

Memorandum dated February 15, 1949, from Mr. Thomas, DiNtor
of the Division of Research and Statistics, recommending
ktilllel'ease in the basic salary of Miss Rita I. Ryhal, a clerk in
1)iv1si0n,
from $2,799.4 to $2,949.72 per annum, effective
brilal7 20, 1949,
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated February 15, 1949, from Mr. Thomas, DiOf the Division of Research and Statistics, recommending




iro4

2/18/49

-15-

Creases in the basic annual salaries of the following employees in
that

Division, effective February 20, 1949:

Name
Ilelen E.
Dyer
Caroline M. Burgess
II,erna L.
Hodge
'10sa Ernst
Gretchen Hill Fowler
,
148.17 G.
Offutt
41-orence R.
Cox

Title
Library Assistant
Library Assistant
Library Assistant
Research Assistant
Research Assistant
Clerk
Clerk-Stenographer

Salary Increase
From
To
$4.75-4.20 $4,479.6o
41228.80
4,103.40
3,024.96
3,225.60
4,354.20
4,479.60
3,100.20
2,949.72
2,874.48
2,799.24
3,100.20
3,024.96

Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated February 17, 1949, from Mr. Leonard, DiIleetar or the Division of Bank Operations, recommending an increase
th

basic annual salaries of the following employees in that Dieffective February 20, 1949:

m

Name
Kf.
--"Durkan
-kelMa C.
Millican

Title
Analyst
Clerk

Salary Increase
To
From
$3,727.20 $3,'552.60
3,601.80
3,476.40

Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated February 17, 1949, from Mr. Hammond, As-

t,„„t
Chter

Secretary, recommending that Frank M. Tamagna, Assistant

"the International Section in the Division of Research and
Ztfiti
"ice) undertake the six-week trip to Korea approved by the
ts%rti
Or
January 28, 1949, on the Board's orders and that he re- Per diem of
1,%111

$8

with the understanding that, should this

Prove inadequate, adjustment would be made.
stated that Mr. Tama




The memo-

's travel expenses would be reimbursed

2/18/49

-16-

tO the Board by the Economic Cooperation Administration.

The memo-

randum further recommended that the purchase of flight insurance be
aUthorized, which would amount to approximately $25.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated February 17, 1949, from Mr. Carpenter recclitilliencling increases in the basic annual salaries of the following
el41)10Yees in the Secretary's Office, effective February 20, 1949:
Name
'
aatrice E.
Hunter
Marion R.
Derr

Salary Increase
To
From
$379-7.00 $4,153.40

Title
Asst. Chief, Files
Section
File Clerk

2,724.00

2,799.24

Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated February 14, 1949, from Mr. Nelson, Directo, of,
'the Division of Personnel Administration, recommending, for
thereasons
stated in the memorandum, that Dwight L. Allen, Personnel
lesistant in that Division, be authorized to attend the Management
Co,ir
erellca on Job Evaluation to be held March 14 to 18, inclusive,
ell°111a A. and M. College, Stillwater, Oklahoma, and that the

to__
ttot,)

EtY the expenses, including

trosiend Per diem at the rate of
tl.
'Let

mrregulations.

$60

$8,

Conference fee, transporta-

in accordance with the Board's

The memorandum also stated that it was expected

. Allen would stop at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
the c_
urse of the trip for the purpose of making the annual reviev '

t4

"the operation of the job evaluation plan of that Bank.




Approved unanimously.

2/18/49

-17Memorandum dated February 17, 1949, from Mr. Nelson, Direc-

of the Division of Personnel Administration, recommending an
increase in the basic salary of Mrs. Ruth L. Jarvis, a maid in that
elon., from $2,350 to $2,423.04 per annum, effective February 20,
1949.
Approved unanimously.
Memorandum dated February 17, 1949, from Mr. Bethea, DirectC
"f the Division of Administrative Services, recommending an inere4186 in the basic salary of Thomas V. Kopfman, a clerk in that
from $2,284 to $2,498.28 per annum, effective February 20,
1949.

Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Leach, President of the Federal Reserve Bank
or

Th.,

'4440td, reading as follows:
194 "This will acknowledge your letter of January 13,
enclosing information regarding the personnel
i
vz the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, as requested
4 the Board's letter of November 9, 1948.
rol
An examination of Schedule A indicates that the
°Ifing employees are receiving basic salaries which
not within the ranges of their respective grades
11(
7 which have not been specifically approved by the
eltrl of Governors or on which the authorization has
Ilea. Accordingly, the Board approves the payment
Of'
&reBaleries to the following employees at rates which
41,e,below the minimum for a period of one year begin11U817 1, 1949:
Department
Title
Ali
B. Lamkin
Transit
Return Checks Clerk
g-Llie M.
Transit
Puller
Return Checks Clerk

Ilt11




2/18/49

-18-

"The Board also approves the payment of salaries to
the following employees at the rates indicated which are
above the m$)Timums for the grades in which their jobs
are classified:
Salary
Name
Title & Dept.
Mrs. Robert Burruss
$2,180*
Hostess
Cafeteria
Cafeteria
Estelle Cauthorne
2,130
Currency Counter C
Money
"The Board has heretofore approved the payment of
salaries to Joseph C. Knapp, Credit Analysis Clerk,
and John J. Beall, Old Records Clerk, Baltimore Branch,
at their present rates.
*When converted to a full-time basis."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Diercks, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
tam,
-*" of Chicago, reading as follows:
"In accordance with the request contained in your
letter of February 10, 1949, the Board approves the
!PPointment of Ray A. Barrett as an assistant examiner
ror the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
"Please advise us as to the salary rate and the
tiate Upon which the appointment becomes effective."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Woolley, Vice President of the Federal Reserve
41* Of lansas City, reading as follows:
"In accordance with the request contained in your
lette
desi -r of February 12, 1949, the Board approves the
gnation of the following as special assistant exlasrs for the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas city.
Charles Patterson
Dorothy Burns
R. L. Compton
Edna Polfer
Virgil curp
Lucile Porter
Alice Dulle
Ethel Savidge
Hazel F. Goebel
Robert M. Shanklin
Catherine Strada
Marjorie Hansen
Eunice Swinney
Barbara Jean Held
Aileen Johnson
Harry R. Trimble
Mary Lynn
Arthur Wangler"




Approved unanimously.

322
2/18/49

-19Letter to Mr. Gilbert, President of the Federal Reserve Bank

"'Dallas, reading as follows:
"The Board of Governors approves the reappointments of Messrs. Charles R. Moore, E. P. Simmons,
Lawrence S. Pollock, Ira T. Moore and Jake L. Hamon
as members of the Industrial Advisory Committee for
the Eleventh Federal Reserve District to serve for
terms of one year each, beginning
March 1, 1949, in
accordance with the action taken by the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, as rePorted in your letter of February 14, 1949."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Honorable Maple T. Earl, Chairman, Federal De1)(18it Insurance Corporation, reading as follows:
"In connection with the request contained in your
etter of February 9, 1949, the Board of Governors of
the
Federal Reserve System hereby grants written consent/ pursuant to the provisions of sub-section (k) (2)
(
;1* Section 12B of the Federal Reserve Act, for examiners
2
'
1 the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to make an
;
.Zamination of the Kansas State Bank, Kansas, Illinois,
i4 connection with its application for continuance of
!
e surance after withdrawal from membership in the Fed.Reserve System.
"There
Note been no corrective programs urged upon
tbs
bank or agreed to, which have not been fully conmated and in connection with which the Board would
Test incorporation of conditions for continuing its
status
as an insured bank."
Approved unanimously.

Ettleh

Telegram to Mr. Watkins, Assistant Manager, Los Angeles

%la

the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, reading as

ova.:




:323
2/18/49

-20-

"It is noted from your letter of February 14 that
Kelley Kar Company has stated that it will correct its
Practices with respect to so-called service contract.
Referring to your wire of February 17, when insurance
in connection with listed article is sold or financed
in connection with the listed article by person who
sells or finances the listed article, insurance cannot
be treated as separate exempted sale of unlisted article.
It must be included in 'time balance' as specified in
section 6(c), and must be repaid within applicable
a• .zimum maturity as specified in sections 3(a) and 3(b).
!ame treatment is required in case of instalment loans.
rlease advise Kelley accordingly."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Elmer B. Staats, Assistant Director, Legislativ
• Reference, Bureau of the Budget, reading as follows:
"This is in response to your letter of January 31,
49, requesting the Board's views with respect to
'
1-9
281/ a bill 'To insure the maintenance of full emv.LoYment in the United States.'
"Briefly, this bill would provide for the establishmetf
1,4 - of a Capital Development Fund of not to exceed $15
:'llion which would be administered by the Board of Di441ctors of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. For
mee Purpose of maintaining levels of production, employ„lit, and investment called for in the annual economic
17Pert of the President, the Corporation would be auized to use the Fund to make loans to new or existthe
co€ business enterprises, to State Governments for
the
to
and
,
Te4struction of needed industrial facilities
authorregional
11e88ee Valley Authority and similar
;
it1
An advisory board composed of twelve members
r;• 44 be created for the purpose of advising the di'
phn0r8 of the Corporation in the management of the
• ,', and certain other amendments would be made to the
Act•
ject:The Board is, of course, sympathetic with the ob''vels of maintaining maximum employment; and the EmloYme
reuw, nt Act of 1946, which provided for annual economic
Aci;Trts by the President and for the Council of Economic
-sers, declared the policy and responsibility of the




-47sr).4

2/18/49

1-

"Federal Government to use all practicable means in promoting maximum employment, production and purchasing
Power.
"The Board believes, however, that there is no evidence at this time of such a general lack of sources of
Private financing as to justify the establishment and
Use of the $15 billion fund which would be provided by
this bill, without a more specific indication of the
Purposes for which the fund is to be used and of the
time and circumstances which warrant such use. At the
Present time, provisions making such a large volume of
Government capital available without limitation would
have the effect either of displacing private capital
or of injecting a further inflationary factor in our
economy.
"In the Economic Report of the President transmitted to the Congress on January 7, 1949, the President recommended, as measures for restraining excessive
!redit
expansion, that Congress should promptly provide
che Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
ntIi continuing authority to require all insured banks
Lc) hold
supplemental reserves against their deposits
that the Board's present temporary authority for
e regulation of consumer instalment credit should be
intinued in order to exert a stabilizing influence on
tie e°°nomY. As you know, the Board hopes that legislath°n to effectuate these recommendations with respect to
b e regulation of bank reserves and consumer credit will
.
enacted at this session of Congress. However, active
8e of the fund which would be set up by the bill S. 281
0
;
ofilld, at the present time, tend to defeat the purposes
such legislation.
vitt, The Federal Reserve System is vested by Congress
is " important responsibilities in the credit field and
threuthorized by existing law to take certain steps
ms °Ilgh the conduct of open nArket operations and other
4s to increase or reduce the volume of credit. Present
:
us
re of the authority provided in the proposed bill would
Boilder more difficult the effective discharge of the
responsibilities in this field and would be inp48istent with the policies now being followed by the
i.8-1 Reserve System in the exercise of its credit
fIxtiell
Ions. If it should become necessary in a period
or
eflationary pressures to provide authority along
'
the
lines of the legislation here proposed, it is

!fa

r
j




325
2/18/49

-22-

"important that some provision should be made for the
coordination of such authority with the credit and
fiscal functions and policies of other agencies of
the Government.
"In the circumstances, it is the view of the
Board that legislation which would provide for the
exPenditure of such large amounts of funds, thus increasing the inflationary potential in the economy,
mould be undesirable at this time."
Approved unanimously.
Letter to the Presidents of all Federal Reserve Banks readas

follows:

"In view of inquiries received from some Reserve
Banks, it is felt that the attached excerpts from a
December 14, 1948 letter to a Vice President of one
or the Reserve Banks might be helpful in answering
!ertain queries from member banks concerning reserves
ror bad
debt losses on loans."
Approved unanimously.

ADDroveti:




Chairman.