View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for

To:

Members of the Board

From:

Office of the Secretary

February 10, 1965.

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard to
the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will advise
the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, please initial
below. If you were present at the meeting, your
initials will indicate approval of the minutes. If
you were not present, your initials will indicate
only that you have seen the minutes.

Chm. Martin
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Goy. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. Mitchell
Gov. Daane

461
Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System on Wednesday, February 10, 1965.

The Board met in the

Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Mills
Robertson
Shepardson
Mitchell
Daane
Mr. Sherman, Secretary
Mr. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Young, Adviser to the Board and Director,
Division of International Finance
Mr. Noyes, Adviser to the Board
Mr. Molony, Assistant to the Board
Mr. Fauver, Assistant to the Board
Mr. Hackley, General Counsel
Mr. Brill, Director, Division of Research
and Statistics
Mr. Solomon, Director, Division of Examinations
Mr. Johnson, Director, Division of Personnel
Administration
Mr. Shay, Assistant General Counsel
Mr. Reynolds, Associate Adviser, Division of
International Finance
Mr. Sprecher, Assistant Director, Division
of Personnel Administration
Messrs. Egertson and McClintock, Supervisory
Review Examiners, Division of Examinations
Mr. Furth, Consultant
Mr. Holmes, Vice President, Federal Reserve
Bank of New York

Investment in bank premises (Item No. 1).

Unanimous approval

/14s given to a letter to The Provident Bank, Cincinnati, Ohio, approvi4g an investment in bank premises.
as Item No. 1.

A copy of the letter is attached

2/10/65

-2Reports on competitive factors.

.Pa'
E1
.

After discussion, unanimous

_.1 was given to the transmittal to the Comptroller of the

Currency of a report on the competitive factors involved in the
Proposed merger of The Birmingham National Bank, Derby, Connecticut,
and The Home Trust Company, Derby, Connecticut, into The Second
National Bank of New Haven, New Haven, Connecticut.

The conclusion

read as follows:
The Birmingham National Bank, Derby, and The Home Trust
Company, Derby, have been affiliated for many years. The
proposed merger of these banks with The Second National Bank
of New Haven would eliminate a small amount of competition.
While consummation of this transaction would remove
the "home office protection" from the community of Derby,
thereby permitting the entry of offices of other banks, it
would further increase the concentration of banking resources
in the New Haven area.
Pursuant to the understanding at the meeting on February 8,
1965, there had been distributed a revised draft of report to the
Comptroller of the Currency on the competitive factors involved in
the proposed merger of The Peoples National Bank of Lexington,
Lexington, Virginia, into The First National Exchange Bank of Virginia,
Roanoke, Virginia.
The revised report was approved unanimously for transmittal
to the Comptroller.

The conclusion therein read as follows:

The proposed merger would eliminate little competition
existing between The First National Exchange Bank of Virginia,
Roanoke, and The Peoples National Bank of Lexington, and would

2/10/65

-3-

not significantly alter First National's competitive capacity
in the areas in which it currently operates nor alter its
position in relation to other large banks in the State. However, consummation of the transaction would expand First
National's geographic coverage into an additional county
and further concentrate banking resources into holding companies
and large banks in the southwestern section of Virginia. In
this respect, consummation of the merger would again alter the
banking structure in an area, which, since February 1963, has
witnessed the loss of three independent institutions--one through
merger and two through acquisition by a holding company. The
remaining area independent banks would be exposed to the competitive capabilities of another large institution.
Messrs. Egertson and McClintock then withdrew from the meeting.

Review of foreign currency operations.

There had been

distributed a memorandum from Mr. Molony dated February

8, 1965,

transmitting a draft review of open market operations in foreign
currencies prepared by the Special Manager of the System Open Market
Account and proposed for inclusion in the Board's Annual Report for
1964.
In a discussion of the draft several changes of an editorial
nature were suggested, and means whereby these suggestions might be
accommodated were agreed upon.
Governor Mitchell then suggested that the draft review tended
t° give an impression that the Federal Reserve System, in its foreign
currency operations, was undertaking to manage the currencies of other
countries rather than entering into such operations for the purpose
Of strengthening and protecting the U.S. dollar.

There was general

2/10/65

-4-

agreement that the necessary steps should be taken to avoid creating
such an impression, and Mr. Young expressed the view that this could
be accomplished by careful editing.

It was noted that Mr. Coombs

had undertaken to clear with the central banks concerned the portions
Of the draft review referring to the currencies of such countries.
However, it was understood that no commitments had been made up to
this point and that there was no substantial reason why such changes
as the Board desired could not be worked out.
Accordingly, agreement was expressed with a suggestion by
Chairman Martin that the Board's staff work with Mr. Coombs to effect
changes in the review for the purpose that had been indicated at this
meeting and that a revised draft then be submitted.
Philadelphia salary structure (Item No. 2).

As recommended

in a memorandum from the Division of Personnel Administration dated
aanuary 29, 1965, which had been circulated, unanimous approval was
given a letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia approving
revision of the Bank's salary structure applicable to employees.

A

e9PY of the letter is attached as Item No. 2.
Messrs. Johnson and Sprecher then withdrew from the meeting
and Messrs. Broida, Assistant Secretary, Cardon, Legislative Counsel,
and Koch, Associate Director, Division of Research and Statistics,
entered the room.

465
2/10/65

-5Foreign lending by U.S. financial institutions (Items

3

and 4). Chairman Martin noted that the President's balance of payments message to the Congress was to be delivered at noon today but
that the final draft of the message was not yet available.

The

message would of course have to be reviewed carefully, particularly
insofar as it dealt with the program for voluntary restraint on
foreign lending by U.S. banks and nonbank financial institutions.
The circular proposed to be sent by Federal Reserve Banks to
member and nonmember banks, as redrafted under date of February

9,

1965, would have to be checked to make sure that it was in conformity
'With the text of the President's message.

It seemed definite, haw-

ever, that bankers and industrialists representing organizations
engaged actively in foreign lending and investment would be invited
to meet with the President at the White House on Thursday, February 18.
As to the bankers, the Board would be asked by the Treasury to assist
in preparing a list of persons to whom White House invitations would
be sent.

Depending on the timing of the White House meeting, it was

Planned that the Board would invite the bankers, and perhaps representatives of nonbsrk financial institutions, to meet at the Federal
Reserve Building for further discussion of the voluntary effort to
r
estrain foreign lending.
Chairman Martin then suggested that Governor Robertson be
depti
,gnated as the member of the Board in whom responsibility would
-.

t

2/10/65

-6-

be centered for administration of the voluntary program as it affected
banks, and nonbank financial institutions if they fell within the
Board's purview for this purpose, and after discussion, Governor

Robertson was so designated.
Chairman Martin also stated that language reportedly would
be included in the President's message indicating that legislation
would be sought to provide antitrust immunity for certain agreements
and programs entered into in connection with the voluntary effort,
but that in the meantime the procedures followed should avoid conflict with the antitrust laws.
There ensued a general discussion regarding various aspects
of the voluntary program in the course of which Chairman Martin
commented in reply to a question that the circular to be sent by

the Reserve Banks should contain language indicating that there was
no commitment at this point to establish technical advisory committees.
The question could be resolved in the light of further developments
843

the program proceeded.
Chairman Martin noted that there would shortly be a telephone

conference with the Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks, the
Principal purpose of which would be to inform them concerning the
fact that the President's message would be delivered at noon today
and to receive any comments they might have concerning the proposed
Reserve Bank circular, a draft of which had been sent to them by
wire.

2/10/65

-7Mr. Young commented that the Presidents could be reminded

Of the fact that under the procedures called for by the circular
they were to write letters to those banks actively engaged in
foreign lending inviting them to the Reserve Banks for consultation
on an individual bank basis.

It might also be pointed out that

there would have to be a request to banks for permission to give
the Federal Reserve access on a voluntary basis to certain info
motion on foreign lending currently being reported to the Treasury,
and that a draft of letter to be sent by the Reserve Bank Presidents
to the commercial banks involved would be transmitted to the Presidents in due course.

He also noted that there was the question

Whether a press release should be issued by the Board today, and Mr.
Molony commented that the text of such a release could draw largely
Upon the circular that was to be sent by the Reserve Banks to member
and nonmember banks.

The issuance of such a release was authorized.

The telephone conference was held at this point.

All of

the Reserve Banks were represented by their Presidents except that
First Vice President Helmer represented the Federal Reserve Bank

of Chicago and First Vice President Strothman represented the Federal
Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
In preliminary comments Chairman Martin informed the Presidents
414)ng the lines that had been suggested earlier and told them that
coPies of the President's balance of payments message would be sent

2/10/65

-8-

to them as soon as available.

He invited suggestions on the draft

circular and noted that the draft would be reviewed in the light of
the President's message.

The final draft of the circular would then

be sent to the Reserve Banks by wire this afternoon.

Chairman

Martin also referred to the question of the antitrust laws and the
legislation that was to be sought.
The Chairman said that Governor Robertson had been designated
by the Board to have major responsibility at the Board level for
administration of the voluntary lending restraint effort.

He further

stated that the question of naming a technical advisory committee or
committees was under consideration and that no action to form such
committees should be taken for the time being.
President Ellis inquired as to when conferences with individual
banks should be scheduled by the Reserve Banks, and Chairman Martin
indicated that they should be scheduled as promptly as practicable
atter the White House meeting on February 18.

President Ellis said

that apparently five banks in the First District were active enough
111 foreign lending (outstanding credits of $5 million or more at
end of 1964) to be invited for such consultations and that there
14ight be a few others as full information became available.

He also

l'aised several procedural questions, to which Chairman Martin responded.
President Hayes expressed the view that it was important
or the circular to contain some indication of flexibility in applying

2/10/65

-9-

the standards of the voluntary program to credits to particular
foreign countries.

If there was no indication of administrative

flexibility, he saw danger of aggravating problems abroad, in which
connection he referred particularly to the British and Japanese
situations.

Chairman Martin said he understood that there might

be some reference of this nature in the President's message and
that the draft circular would be reviewed with Mr. Hayes' suggestion
in mind.

President Hayes then observed that the draft circular in

its present form did not contain guidance as to types of foreign
credits that would be considered undesirable when the voluntary
Program was in effect.
helpful to the banks.

He felt that some such guidance would be
President Hayes also noted that the circular

indicated the Federal Reserve System would do everything possible
to insure the success of the President's balance of payments program.
While he realized it probably would not be advisable to make any
lrerY specific reference to monetary policy, he wondered whether the
circular could not contain some reference to using the powers in
the hands of the System as necessary.
he

Chairman Martin replied that

understood there would be some reference to monetary policy in

the President's message.

After the text of the message was available,

the draft circular could be reviewed in light of it, but the matter
Vould have to be considered carefully.

President Hayes then made

certain suggestions for clarifying changes in the language of the

2/10/65

-10-

circular, following which he raised the point whether appropriate
advice concerning the President's message and the voluntary program
would be transmitted to foreign central banks, and Chairman Martin
replied that this would be taken care of by messages sent from the
Board.

In response to a question from Mr. Hayes, the Chairman said

that no Board press conference was contemplated but that a press
release would be issued.

In reply to a question by the Chairman,

President Hayes indicated that there were

40 to 50 banks in the

Second District that were engaged substantially in foreign lending.
Mr. Bopp said there were five or six banks in the Third
District that were doing a substantial amount of foreign lending.
He asked if the Federal Reserve would have responsibility for nonbank financial lenders, and it was indicated that this would probably
be the case, although the matter had not yet been finally resolved.
President Bopp also asked whether a Federal Reserve Bank meeting
with a group of banks engaged in foreign lending would involve any
antitrust problem, and Chairman Martin replied affirmatively.

He

reiterated that legislation was going to be sought by the Administration
to cover the antitrust problem.
President Hickman said there were six banks in the Fourth
District with outstanding foreign loans and investments in excess of
$5 million.

He then raised several questions about interpretation

Of the objective stated in the draft circular that foreign credits

r-7,1

2/10/65

-11-

extended during 1965 be held to an amount not more than 5 per cent
in excess of outstandings at the end of 1964.

After some discussion

Of these questions, President Hickman indicated that he felt a strict
interpretation of the

5

per cent limit would seriously limit export

financing by Fourth District banks, because he understood that most
Of their outstanding credits were for such purpose.

He believed

there should be some room for administrative flexibility.

In reply

to a question from Mr. Hickman regarding credits to underdeveloped
countries, Chairman Martin said he understood there would be some
reference to underdeveloped countries in the President's message;

however, this was a phase of the program that would have to be worked
out more definitely in the light of developments.
President Wayne said there were apparently only two banks
in the Fifth District with foreign credits outstanding at the end
Of 1964 in excess of $5 million.

In the case of the bank whose

credits were by far the largest, he understood that Canadian credits
vere involved for the most part.

President Wayne inquired about

aending the circular to nonbank financial institutions, and it was
Indicated that the Presidents should exercise their judgment, within
4

general framework of endeavoring to place the circular in the hands

°f financial institutions that seemed likely to be affected significantly
by the voluntary program.

As to savings and loan associations, it was

not believed, on the basis of available information, that many of them,

2/10/65

-12-

if any, had foreign credits on their books.

Types of institutions

that might come under the program included banks, investment companies,
insurance companies, finance companies, and pension funds.
President Bryan said he was not certain as to the number of
banks in the Sixth District that would be significantly affected,
but on the basis of current reports there might be no more than one
or two.

He asked about the application of the program in cases

Where banks held participations in credits originated by other banks,
and Chairman Martin indicated that presumably any bank would be asked
to share in the program to the extent of its participations.
A question was also raised about the activities of organizations such as the Inter-American Development Bank and the ExportImport Bank, and Chairman Martin said they would presumably be brought
Into the program in some way.

This would be worked out in Washington.

Another question raised at this point had to do with bank loans to
U.S. corporations to enable such corporations to finance activities
abroad, and it was suggested that this might call for some exploration
With the Department of Commerce, which had responsibility for the part
of the program relating to corporate investments.
First Vice President Helmer indicated that there were eight
banks in the Seventh District with foreign credits at the end of 1964
in excess of $5 million, and President Shuford said there apparently
Were only three or four such banks in the Eighth District.

In reply

•-')
'( ft

2/10/65

-13

to a question by Mr. Shuford, Chairman Martin reiterated that the
circular only referred to the possibility of establishing technical
advisory committees, to which he added that this would have to be
considered further as the program developed.

First Vice President

Strothman said there were no banks in the Ninth District with foreign
credits outstanding of as much as $5 million, and President Clay
noted that the situation was the same in the Tenth District.

This

meant that certain appropriate changes would be made by those Reserve Banks in pertinent parts of the circular.
President Irons said there appeared to be four banks in the
Eleventh District with foreign credits outstanding of more than
*5 million, with indication that the credits were principally to
Mexico and Japan.

He asked for further information as to when

conferences should be scheduled with the banks involved, and it
14as indicated that this should be done at the earliest convenient
time after the February 18 meeting at the White House.

Chairman

Martin repeated at this point that no technical advisory committees
should be appointed by the Reserve Banks at this time.
President Swan asked for and received information about
Matters such as the appropriate distribution of the circular.

He

180 inquired about certain aspects of the application of the prograin to foreign branches of U.S. banks.

On the last point, it was

2/10/65

-14-

indicated that there were a number of difficult problems involved
that would have to be worked on further.
In additional discussion further reference was made to the
application of the 5 per cent limit, with indication given that
according to present thinking banks would be expected to accommodate
export credits within the 5 per cent limit by cutting back on other
foreign credits.

Reference also was made to the Canadian situation

as it would be affected by extension of the interest equalization
tax through the Gore amendment.
Chairman Martin concluded the telephone conference with
comments in which he observed that inequities were bound to arise
under a program of this kind and that all reasonable efforts would
have to be made to minimize them.

He noted that the space problem

l'rould limit attendance at the White House meeting, that the timing
or the meeting at the Federal Reserve Building would depend someon how the White House arrangements were worked out, and that
the Board might want to have a meeting with the Reserve Bank Presidents on February 18 prior to the White House meeting.

He added

that the draft Reserve Bank circular would be reviewed and revised
14 the light of comments that had been received, including those
er the Presidents, and in light of the President's balance of payments

message when it became available, and that the final draft

Of the
circular would be sent by wire to the Reserve Banks this

, 00

2/10/65

-15-

afternoon so that it could be transmitted as promptly as possible
to member and nonmember banks along with such other financial institutions as the Reserve Banks might deem advisable.
The telephone conference concluded at this point.
There followed further discussion of the manner in which
the over-all objective of limiting foreign credits to not more than
4

5 per cent increase beyond the end of 1964 might best be expressed.

Certain suggestions were made, particularly with a view to indicating
that although export financing should be encouraged, the 5 per cent
limit would be expected to include such credits.

It was suggested

that the staff make further inquiry into credits by savings and
loan associations to determine whether there appeared to be reason
why the voluntary program should embrace such institutions.
Secretary's Note: Attached to these minutes
as Item No. 3 is a copy of the text of the
circular that was sent to the Federal Reserve
Banks later in the day, after review in the light
of comments made at this meeting and in the light
of the President's balance of payments message.
Attached as Item No. 4 is a copy of the press
release issued by the Board this afternoon.
Cables were sent to foreign central banks advising them of the principal features of the
President's balance of payments message and
particularly the voluntary lending restraint
effort, the text of the communication being
drawn substantially from the Reserve Bank circular.
The meeting then adjourned.

17 3
2/10/65

-16Secretary's Note: Governor Shepardson today
approved on behalf of the Board memoranda
recommending the following actions relating
to the Board's staff:

3
1 4p_ko
.ja r2ln.
James L. Pierce as Economist, Division of Research and Statistics,
with basic annual salary at the rate of $12,075, effective the date of
entrance upon duty. (The appointment was approved with the understanding
that the Board would pay the transportation of Professor Pierce, his
family, and household goods to and from Washington, D. C., with New
Haven, Connecticut, as the base.)
Ethel Adeline Bergstein as Statistical Clerk, Division of Data
Processing,
with basic annual salary at the rate of $4,930, effective

the date of entrance upon duty.
TEp_.nsfer
W. Lucius Thalley, from the position of Clerk in the Division of
lank Operations to the position of Library Assistant in the Division
c't Research and Statistics, with no change in basic annual salary at
the rate of $5,085, effective February 14, 1965.

Secretary

Item No. 1
2/10/65

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25, D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

February 10, 1965

Board of Directors,
The Provident Bank,
Cincinnati, Ohio.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System approves, under the provisions of
Section 24A of the Federal Reserve Act, an investment of not to exceed $600,000 in bank premises
by The Provident Bank, Cincinnati, Ohio, for the
construction of two branch office buildings, provided the remodeling program of the bank's main
office building involving an expenditure of
approximately $2,000,000 is abandoned.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Elizabeth L. Carmichael

Elizabeth L. Carmichael,
Assistant Secretary.

Item No. 2
2/10/65

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

.....
1,.00? Govi
'
4 •

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

,o

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADOW[921

orrociAL

CORPICIIIPONOICHOW

TO THC •OARO

February 10, 1965

CotipID

R

:
111% Robert N. Hilkert,
rirst Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,
l'hi
ladelphia, Pennsylvania 19101.
bear Mr.
Hilkert:
As requested in your letter of January 22, 1965, the Board of
Gov
ernors approves the following minimum and maximum salaries for the re?ective grades of the employees' salary structure at the Federal Reserve
44k of Philadelphia, effective April 1:
Grade
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Minimum Salary
$ 2,600
2,860
3,240
3,660
4,115
4,600
5,120
5,665
6,245
6,890
7,575
8,330
9,145
10,020
10,975

Maximum Salary
$ 3,360
3,845
4,375
4,945
5,560
6,210
6,910
7,650
8,435
9,300
10,230
11,245
12,345
13,530
14,820

The Board approves the payment of salaries to employees within the
8 specified for the grades in which their respective positions are classi'
ul. All employees whose salaries are below the minimums of their grades as a
rell
Itft lt of the structure increase should be brought within appropriate ranges not
er than three months after the effective date of the new structure.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 3

2/10/65
February 10, 1965.

To be mailed by Reserve Banks
to member and nonmember banks
to
The President of the United States has today sent
Congress a message setting forth his program to improve the U.S.
balance of payments.
ity
In addition to stressing the vital importance of stabil
°E domestic costs and prices, the President's program includes:
(1) Legislation to continue the Interest Equalization
Tax through December 31, 1967;
(2) Immediate action under the existing statute to
impose the Interest Equalization Tax on bank loans
with maturity of one year or more;
Tax,
(3) Legislation to apply the Interest Equalization
retroactive to February 10, 1965, to nonbank credits
to foreigners if such credits have a maturity of one
year or more;
(4) A call on the Federal Reserve System -- in cooperation
with the Treasury -- to work with all banks to limit
lending to foreigners;
laws
(5) Legislation to provide immunity from anti-trust
for specified voluntary programs, if needed, with
respect to foreign loans by banks.

-7-

180
(6) A call on the Department of Commerce to work with
corporations with business interests abroad to
effectuate a reduction of their capital outflows;
(7)

A more vigorous export promotion drive;

(8) Encouragement of foreign investment in the U.S.
through appropriate tax legislation;
(9) Legislation to reduce from $100 to $50 the duty-free
allowance of tourists returning from abroad, and a
"See the USA First" program designed to increase
tourism in the U.S.;
(10)

An intensified effort to reduce military expenditures
abroad;

(11)

Continued action to minimize adverse balance of payments effects of the foreign aid program.

The Federal Reserve System shares the President's concern
about the deterioration in our balance of payments nnd his determination to improve our payments position and to strengthen confidence
in the dollar.
have been

The System and the banking and financial community

assigned major rules in the President's program.
The central focus of the program is on measures that will

teduce the outflow of United States capital.

Such flows have been

heav- .
/ in recent years, and were particularly so in recent months.
In th e
fourth quarter of 1964, for example, bank credit to
f°teigners expanded by $1 billion.

1181
To assure the success of the program, the System i
requesting all banks to limit credits to foreigners that are not
clearly and directly for the purpose of financing exports of U.S.
8°()ds and services.

Over all, the objective is to hold outstanding

erect/ s (including export credits) to foreigners during 1965 to a
level not over five per cent above the December 31, 1964, outstandings.
11 est instances, this should be the mtnimum goal for individual
banks.

Within the over-all limit, certain countries may need to

be given preferential treatment. You will be advised later concerntills,
Outstanding credit to foreigners includes loans, acceptance
edits, deposits with foreign banks (including foreign branches and
subsidiaries of U.S. banks), and investments and acquisitions of
Assets abroad regardless of maturity, whether or not they are
sub.
Ject to the interest equalization tax.
The Federal Reserve program will be further explained under
the following procedures:
(1) The President is asking representatives of the
financial community to meet with him to discuss the
program set forth in his message to the Congress,
(2) The Chairman of the Board of Governors is asking
the bank rep

ent tives present at the President's

meeting to confer with him and the other members of
the Board of Governors, and presidents of the Reserve
Banks following that meeting-,

-4(3) Each bank that has foreign loans and investments
outstanding in excess of $5 million is being requested
to meet individually with representatives of the
Reserve Bank of their District for further discussion
of the program;
(4) Technical advisory committees may be invited to
meet with Federal Reserve officials concerning problems
that arise under the System's program.
Implementation of the program limiting lending to foreigners
Will result inevitably in some hardships for individual lenders and
borrowers.

This is unfortunate, but the overriding long-run inter-

national position of the dollar is dependent upon your wholehearted
t°0Peration.
prepared
I am confident that the financial community stands
to

effort
Jc)in with the Federal Reserve System in this urgent national

to restore balance of payments equilibrium and to maintain the dollar

48 good

as gold."

In good part, the success of the President's

Program depends on us.

President

Item No.

4

2/10/65
For immediate release.

February 10, 1965,

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System today
issued the following statement:
The Federal Reserve System shares the President's concern
about the deterioration in our balance of payments and his determination
to improve
our payments position and to strengthen confidence in the
dollar. The System and the banking and financial community have been
a ssigned major roles in the President's program.
The central focus of the program is on measures that will
"
duce the outflow of United States capital. Such flows have been heavy
ill recent years, and were particularly so in recent months. In the fourth
quarter of 1964, for example, bank credit to foreigners expanded by
$1 billion.
To assure the success of the program, the System is requestg all banks to limit credits to foreigners that are not clearly and
di_rn

Li),for the purpose of financing exports of U. S. goods and services.

°vex. all,

the objective is to hold outstanding credits (including export

its) to foreigners during 1965 to a level not over five per cent above
the n
....,ecernber 31, 1964, outstandings. In most instances, this should be
the
minimum goal for individual banks. Within the over-all limit, cer,
tairi
C ountries may need to be given preferential treatment.

-2-

Outstanding credit to foreigners includes loans, acceptance
credits, deposits with foreign banks (including foreign branches and subsidiaries of U. S. banks), and investments and acquisitions of assets
abroad regardless of maturity, whether or not they are subject to the
interest equalization tax.
The Federal Reserve program will be further explained under

the following procedures:
(1) The President is asking representatives of.
the financial community to meet with him soon to discuss the program set forth in his message to the
Congress;
(2) The Chairman of the Board of Governors is
asking the bank representatives present at the
President's meeting to confer with him and the other
members of the Board of Governors, and presidents
of the Reserve Banks following that meeting;
(3) Each bank that has foreign loans and investments outstanding in excess of $5 million is being
requested to meet individually with representatives
of the Reserve Bank of their District for further discussion of the program;

(4) Technical advisory committees may be
invited to meet with Federal Reserve officials concerning problems that arise under the System's
program.
foreigners
Implementation of the program limiting lending to
Will result inevitably in some hardships for individual lenders and borrowers,
the
T his is unfortunate, but the overriding long-run international position of
dollar is dependent upon the wholehearted cooperation of the nation's
financial institutions.
ial
The Federal Reserve .)ystem is confident that the financ
"rnrnunity stands prepared to join with it in this urgent national effort
to restore balance of payments equilibrium and to maintain the dollar
sta _
In good part, the success of the President's program
good as gold.
depend s on this effort.

-0-