View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for

To:

August 7, 1957

Members of the Board

From: Office of the Secretary
Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard
to the minutes, it will be appreciated if you vill
advise the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, if you
vere present at the meeting, please initial in column A, below to indicate that you approve the minutes.
If you were not present, please initial in column B
below to indicate that you have seen the minutes.

Chm. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
Gov. Vardaman
Gov, Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston

Gov. Shepardson




Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Wednesday, August 7, 1957. The Board met
in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Vardaman
Mills
Shepardson
Carpenter, Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Leonard, Director, Division of
Bank Operations
Mr. Masters, Director, Division of
Examinations
Mr. Solomon, Assistant General Counsel
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Discount rates. Governor Vardaman stated that he had requested
Mr. Thomas, Economic Adviser to the Board, to prepare as a matter of
information such views as he might have regarding differential discount
rates applicable to continuous or repetitive borrowing by member banks,
including the reasons for the philosophy underlying the establishment of
such rates, the effects of the practice, and the things to which the
dif
ferential rates might be related.
In brief discussion of the matter, Governor Mills cited reasons
against the establishment of differential rates and suggested that
Prcbleme of continuous borrowing should preferably be dealt with through

the administration of the discount window, as provided under the Board's
Regulation
A.
Governor Vardaman indicated that he had no fixed views on the
Inatter at the present time and that he had requested Mr. Thomas to prePare the material only to permit study of the subject.




91

8/7/57

-2Le•al

roceedin

a•ainst Nu ent R. Oberwortmann and others

Item

1-124_11.! In a letter to Chairman Martin dated July 23, 1957, Mr. Meyer
Field of Chicago, Illinois, referred further to a legal proceeding which
he had instituted against Mr. Nugent R. Oberwortmann and others for the
Principal purpose of setting aside the sale to the defendants of certain
shares of the capital stock of the North Shore National Bank of Chicago.
In his complaint, Mr. Field had charged that the sale of the stock should
be set aside because it resulted from unlawful pressure exerted by the
defendants against the plaintiff and because of the violation of
fiduciary relationships on the part of the defendants. It appeared from
14r. Field's letter and enclosures that the Illinois Appellate Court had
Aow ruled that the lower court should not have granted a motion to dismiss the complaint, and that the plaintiff should be allowed to attempt
to Prove the facts alleged in the complaint. It was also indicated that
Mr. Field had written to members of the House Banking and Currency
Committee, had referred to the fact that Mr. Oberwortmann was a director
°f the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, and had stated that some aspects
of the matter were directly within the purview of the Federal Reserve
Board.

However, the latest correspondence from Mr. Field did not add

4r0'' new facts to those which he had previously alleged.
In a memorandum dated July 25, 1957, which had been circulated
to the members of the Board, Mr. Solomon reviewed the nature of the
Complaint filed by Mr. Field, discussed the most recent correspondence




2
21,3

8/7/57
front Mr. Field, and suggested that it would seem appropriate merely
to acknowledge receipt of the letter and send a copy of the reply to
the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. With the memorandum, Mr. Solomon submitted a draft of a proposed letter of acknowledgment.
Chairman Martin asked Mr. Solomon whether the Legal Division
had looked into the matter carefully. He said that it had been
mentioned to him by two members of the Congress recently and that he had
told them the matter was under study.
Mr. Solomon assured the Chairman that the matter had been given
careful attention, both upon receipt of the recent letter from Mr. Field
and following receipt of previous correspondence from Mr. Field some two
Years ago. After reviewing the nature of Mr. Field's allegations, which
he said were lengthy and involved, Mr. Solomon brought out that up to
thi3

point no proof seemed to have been adduced. In the circumstances,

he felt that it would be in order for the Board merely to note receipt
of the correspondence, as it had done in the case of the earlier
correspondence.
There being agreement with Mr. Solomon's point of view, unanimous

40:Jzzal

was given to the suggested letter of acknowledgment to Mr.

a copy of which is attached hereto as Item No. 1.
At this point Messrs. Thomas, Economic Adviser to the Board,
44d Koch, Assistant Director, Division of Research and Statistics,
entered the room.




ft

8/7/57

-4Testimony before the Senate Finance Committee. There had

been sent to the members of the Board under date of August 5, 1957, a
revised draft of statement which might be presented by Chairman Martin
in testifying before the Senate Finance Committee in connection with
that Committee's current hearings concerning Governmental financial and
monetary policies.
Chairman Martin reported having received advice from the
Committee Chairman, Senator Byrd, that the Committee's current schedule
called for him to begin his testimony on Tuesday, August 13, at 10:00 a.m.,
and that two days would be held aside for whatever presentation Chairman
Martin desired to make before the questioning by members of the Committee

began on August 15. The Senator indicated, he said, that the Committee
would like as much information about the Federal Reserve System as
P°ssible and referred to the possibility of having Mr. Wayne, First Vice
President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, give the Reserve Bank's
fla nnelboard presentation.

Chairman Martin said that in all the circum-

stances, and particularly in the light of the suggestions made by Senator
4Yrd, he had in mind beginning the testimony with a few general remarks,
f°110wing which he would present Mr. Wayne. Thereafter, he felt that
ad vantage should be taken of the opportunity to put into the record for

the benefit of the Committee the best possible formal statement on the
structure and background of the Federal Reserve System and the present
general thinking of the System. The formal statement, he felt, should
le - •
au in the direction of being extensive and should not be curtailed




1

2215
-5-

8/7/57
simply for the sake of brevity.

He also mentioned having said to

Senator Byrd that the Committee might want to call other members of
the Board and that, if so, such a procedure would of course be perfectly
agreeable to him.
The discussion then turned to the revised draft of statement
and the first comments were made by Governor Mills, who said that,
aPProaching the document from the standpoint of a layman rather than
from an academic point of view, he was rather apprehensive concerning
the possible reaction. It was important, he thought, to bear in mind
the reaction of the lay community to a statement discussing a very
sensitive area which came from an informed source.

His principal question

was whether the tone of the statement, as drafted, might provoke concern
and unnecessary worry about the problem of inflation and where continuing
inflation might lead the country, particularly because certain portions
of the statement, taken out of context, might leave a false impression
concerning the position of the System. To help avoid that possibility,
he suggested that the warning about inflation contained in the opening
Paragraph of the draft be followed immediately by material such as that
contained in the concluding part of the paper which would clearly in
that it was within the power of the Government and the people
to Prevent the type of inflationary developments that would have longlasting consequences.

He also felt that some of the intermediate

dis cussion of the inflationary process might be too extensive and that
it wa$ couched in stronger language than necessary for the purpose.




-6-

8/7/57

The resulting general tone of the statement, he suggested, might
easily lead to the belief that the System had adopted a defeatist
Point of view and that continuing erosion of the value of the dollar
might be expected.

He noted the absence of reference in the draft to

the business cycle and the possibility that changes in the cycle might
Provide some automatic correction of the problems that otherwise might
get out of hand. In further comments Governor Mills stressed the
importance of maintaining public confidence in the value of the dollar
84d said that a statement which explored the problem of inflation but
expressed hope and determination to pursue the means of achieving
economic stability would serve a valuable purpose.
Chairman Martin, after expressing the view that the points
raised

by Governor Mills should be borne in mind in further redrafting

of the statement, proceeded to discuss informally some of the more
imPortant questions relating to the Federal Reserve System which were
raised by members of the House Banking and Currency Committee during his
l'eoant testimony in regard to the Financial Institutions Act and
suggested the possibility of recognizing certain of these issues in the
Proposed statement.
Governor Vardaman, who originally had opposed the presentation
Of

anY formal statement in testimony before the Senate Finance Committee,

then stated that in view of developments, including the current
atmosphere of the hearings and the appearance that they might be laying




221,7
8/7/57

-7-

a foundation for efforts to pass legislation vital to the Federal
Reserve System, he now agreed that some formal statement must be made.
After commenting that he considered the current draft much preferable
to those which had preceded it, he went on to say that he concurred
in the views expressed by Governor Mills but would go even further, since
uPon reading the draft he was left with the feeling that inflation was
considered inevitable. To what extent it would be possible to change

the tone of the document he did not know. He also felt that the statement did not go far enough in explaining the limitations of System
monetary and credit policy as an instrument to combat inflationary
tendencies.
Further comments by members of the Board suggested the possibility
Or

amPlifYing the statement to include material on the historical back-

ground of the System and perhaps on the changes effected by the banking
le
gislation of the 1930s.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Mr. Thurston was requested
t° draft a further revision of the statement in the light of the views
exPressed at
this meeting.
Aram9ments for audit services (Items 2 and 3). Governor
ShaPardson called attention to a draft of letter to Price Waterhouse tic Co.,
114tch had been circulated to the members of the Board, requesting that
the firm (1) undertake as promptly as convenient after January 1, 1958,
ari
audit of the Board's books and accounts for the year 1957, and (2)
4/ialt during the examination of a Federal Reserve Bank in 1958 the




22

_8_

8/7/57

procedures followed by the Board's field examining staff.

Along with

the proposed letter there had been circulated a draft of letter to
Arthur Andersen ge Co. stating that the Board would appreciate it if the
firm would afford Price Waterhouse & Co. an opportunity for consultation
O1 certain matters.
Governor Shepardson stated that inasmuch as Price Waterhouse &
C°• was anxious to contact Arthur Andersen & Co. and also to start certain
Preliminary studies pertinent to the assignment, he would recommend that
the letters be approved and sent.
Pursuant to this recommendation, the letters, of which copies
are attached hereto as Items 2 and 3, were approved unanimously.
Removal of tennis court. Governor Shepardson referred to
Prellous informal discussion by the Board concerning the possibility of
rem"ing the east tennis court on the lot across "C" Street owned by the
Board in order to provide badly needed additional parking spaces for
members of the Board's staff.
to him under date of August

He then presented a memorandum addressed

5, 1957, by

Mr. Bethea, Director of the

Dilision of Administrative Services, which stated that several bids had
been obtained for removal of the tennis court, surfacing of the area, and
PelIormance of other required services, and that the low bid, submitted by
Corson and Gruman Co., Inc., was in the amount of $2,460.
Governor Shepardson stated that although this expenditure had
11°t been provided for in the Board's

1957

budget, there would appear to

be "me advantage in having the work performed this month when the use




8/7/57
Of the parking lot was not as heavy as usual due to vacations. For
this reason, and in the interest of employee relations, it was his
commendation that the low bid be accepted and the work undertaken.

re

Pursuant to this recommendation, it was voted unanimously to
accept the low bid and Governor Shepardson was authorized to take the
necessary steps to have the work performed as soon as possible.
The meeting then adjourned.




710

4f_4—do
cretary

aid

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 1

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

8/7/57

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

August 7, 1957

Mr. Meyer Field,
188 West Randolph Street,
Chicago, Illinois.
Dear Mr. Field:
This will acknowledge receipt of your letter and
at
tachments of July 23, 1957, addressed to Chairman Martin
On the subject of the legal proceeding you have instituted
against Nugent R. Oberwortmann and others. It is noted from
aur letter and attachments that the Illinois Appellate Court
s rendered an opinion with respect to the motion to strike
l'°11.r amended complaint, and that you have communicated with
alembers of the Committee on Banking and Currency of the House
c)r Representatives regarding the matter.

r




Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

2221
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 2
8/7/57

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

August 7, 1957

Price Waterhouse & Co.,
1000 Vermont Avenue, N. L I
Washington 5, D. C.
Gentlemen:
This letter is in response to yours of July 31 with
respect to the audit of the Board's books and accounts and a
review during the examination of a Federal Reserve Bank of the
examination procedures used by the Board's examiners.
It is requested that your firm undertake, as promptly
after January 1, 1958, as is convenient, an audit of the books
and accounts of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System for the year 1957.
As was explained to you by Governor Shepardson, no
restrictions have or will be placed by the Board upon your firm
as to the scope of the audit or the manner in which it is to be
conducted, and you will make the audit as extensive and in such
manner as appears to you to be desirable in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards. Compensation will be on
the basis outlined in the last paragraph of your letter.
You can be assured that the Board and its staff will
stand ready to consult with you whenever, as indicated in your
letter, that may be desirable. A copy of a self-explanatory
1?tter which is being addressed today to Arthur Andersen & Co.
lath respect to your consultation with them is attached.
Arrangements for the review of the examining procedures
Used by the Board's examiners in the examination of a Federal
Reserve Bank will be made with you by Mr. Robert C. Masters,
1°1-rector of the Division of Examinations, and it will be appreciated if you will advise with whom in your firm he should comXunicate in that connection.
Sincerely yours,
(Signed) Wm. McC. Martin, Jr.
Wk. McC. Martin, Jr.
Enclosure



/00y1r
'
,

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No.
817/57

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON

--

11A.V41.0.
,

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

August 7, 1957

Arthur Andersen & Co.
777 - 14th Street, N. W.,
*Washington
5, D. C.
Gentlemen:
In a letter of November 7$ 1956, requesting that
Yoll audit the Board's accounts for the year 1956, it was
indicated that, for the reason stated, another firm would
be selected to make the audit for 1957.
The firm of Price Waterhouse & Co. has been
V,Iosen to make the 1957 audit, and they have indicated that
would be helpful if they could confer with you before the
twa
, scope of their work had been planned. The Board of
novernors would appreciate
it very much if you would afford
wiem that opportunity.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this
occa..4
0-Lon to express our appreciation for the excellent manner
"Ignich the audits conducted by your firm were carried out.




Sincerely yours,

Wm M C. Martin, Jr.