View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

895

Ameeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
SYstem was held in Washington on Wednesday, August 31, 1938, at 10:30
a. m.

PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Ransom, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
McKee
Davis
Draper

Mr. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Thurston, Special Assistant to the
Chairman
Mr. Goldenweiser, Director of the Division
of Research and Statistics
Mr. Paulger, Chief of the Division of
Examinations
Mr. Cagle, Assistant Chief of the Division
of Examinations
Mr. Gardner, Senior Economist of the
Division of Research and Statistics
Mr. Piser, Senior Economist of the
Division of Research and Statistics
Preliminary to the conference of the members of the executive
coMMittee of the Federal Open Market Committee with the Secretary of
the Treasury on September 1, 1938, there was a discussion of factors
Which might be taken into consideration by the Treasury in determining
the extent of the September 15 Treasury financing and the securities
that might be offered at that time.

After the discussion, Messrs.

Goldenweiser, Gardner and Piser left the meeting.
Reference was made to a memorandum submitted by Mr. Vest,
48eistant General Counsel, under date of August 17, 1938, pursuant
to the request made at the meeting of the Board on August 12, 1938,

that there be prepared drafts of amendments to Regulation 0, Loans to




896
8/31/38
Executive Officers of Member Banks, which would exempt from the regu14tion inactive or honorary bank officers.

The memorandum had been

circulated among the members of the Board for consideration prior to
Meeting.

After a discussion of the four
alternative drafts of amendments suggested in the memorandum, Messrs. Morrill
and Dreibelbis were requested to prepare,
for the consideration of the Board, a
draft of a letter to the Federal reserve
banks requesting an expression of their
views with respect to certain of the proposed amendments and any suggestions
that they might have to make in the light
of conditions existing in their respective
districts.
Mr. Ransom stated that he felt that the proposed amendment
W" contrary to the purposes for which Section 22(g) of the Federal

Reserve Act was enacted, that it was his opinion that the amendment
84°41d not be made, and that should the matter come up for a vote
ir

his absence he wished to be recorded as opposed to any modification

cr the present provision.
Consideration was given to a memorandum dated August 19, 1938,
*°''m the Division of Examinations which swnmarized the replies received by the Board to its letter of December 6, 1937, requesting the
views as to the desirability of amending Section 3(a) of ReguL, Interlocking Bank Directorates Under the Clayton Act, to
discontinue the permission granted by that section to a Private banker
or Et

Qireetor, officer or employee of a member bank to serve one Morris




897
-3-

8/31/38
Plan Bank.
baric

The memorandum stated that six of the Federal reserve

(Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, St. Louis and Min-

lleaPoli ei favored discontinuance of the permission, that Kansas City
Made no recommendation but apparently favored discontinuance of the
Pernission, that Atlanta suggested that the permission be limited so
as to apply only to institutions which did not receive demand deposits,
and that the four remaining banks (Richmond, Chicago, Dallas and San
PlaeLacisco) recommended that the Regulation be not amended.

The memo-

flduiii also stated that the question involved was one of policy for
determination by the Board and submitted a draft of an amendment for
consideration in the event the Board should decide to amend the regulati°n.

The memorandum stated further that the replies received from

the Federal reserve banks indicate that conditions with respect to
Pclasible competition between member banks and Morris Plan banks vary
ecn aiderably in the different Federal reserve districts, that it was
"ident, however, that the changes referred to in the Board's letter
Of

December 6

1937, had taken place to a considerable extent and ap-

Parently were continuing progressively, but that the number of existing
l'elationships that would have to be terminated if the permission
gl'anted in Section 3(a) were revoked would be relatively small.

The

eMbers of the Board present agreed that, while the number of interIcIcking directorates which would be affected by the amendment was not
large at the present time, the increasingly competitive situation




898
8/31/33
between

-4member banks and Morris Plan banks made undesirable the creation

of additional interlocking directorates of this type or the continuation of those now in existence.
Thereupon, Mr. McKee moved the adoption
of the following resolution:
RESOLVED, That effective February 1,
1939, Section 3(a) of Regulation L be amended
to read as follows:
"(a) Any private banker or any director,
officer, or employee of a member bank of the
Federal Reserve System may be at the same
time a director, officer, or employee of not
more than one cooperative bank, credit union
or other similar institution;"
Carried unanimously, with the understanding that a letter to the Federal
reserve banks advising them of the Board's
action would be sent immediately.
Mr. Cagle withdrew from the meeting at this point and Messrs.
alleed, Chief of the Division of Bank Operations, and Leonard, Assistant
Chief of the Division of Examinations, entered the room.
There was presented a telegram dated August 29, 1938, from
?re

aident McKinney of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, stating that

the bank has been called upon for the first time to state the conditi°ns under which it would accept deposits of securities referred to
in chaPter 7 of the amended Bankruptcy Act approved Tune 22, 1938;
tblit it was not unlikely that the bank would be called upon to handle
4 lellge volume of this business; that it was felt that, in view of the




899
8/31/38

-5-

7°Iwne and expensive character of the business the bank should establish reasonable charges therefor, and that advice was requested whether
the Board would have any objection to the bank establishing a reasonable
schedule of rates.
The matter was referred to Mr.
Szymczak for recommendation to the
Board as to the action to be taken.
The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Governors of the
Psderai

Reserve System held on August 30, 1938, were approved unani-

Moilay.




Thereupon the meeting adjourned.