View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1,1....yr1
4,‘ 1.1

A meeting of the Federal Reserve Board was held in Washington on
Tesday, August 29, 1933, at 11:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Black, Governor
Hamlin
Junes
Thomas
Szymczak
O'Connor

Mr. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Martin, Assistant to the Governor
Er. Paulger, Chief of the Division of
Examinations
Mr. Wyatt, General Counsel
Er. Boatwright, Assistant Counsel.
The Board considered and acted upon the following matters:
Letter dated August 24, 1933, from Mr. Roelse, Assistant Secretary
or the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, and telegrams dated August 23,
1933, from Mr. Curtiss, ahairmnn of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston,
44gust 24, 1933, from Mr. McClure, Chairman of the Federal
Reserve Bank of
ICEuasas City, August 25, 1933, from Mr. Stevens,
Chairman of the Federal Re"I
‘ve Bank of Chicago, and August 28, 1935, from Mr. Mosher, Secretary of
tile Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, all advising
that at meetings of
the h
14°Etrds of directors on the dates stated no changes were made in the

betlake
existing schedules of rates of discount and purchase.
Without objection, noted with approval.
Laimorandum dated August 21, 1933, from Mr. Paulger, Chief of the
8"n of Examinations, recomnending the appointment of Mr. Earl D. Buck
44a
8

6't thA
-

tloti

designation as an Assistant Federal Reserve Examiner, with salary

rate of .:;4,200 per annum, effective August 28, 1933; the recommenda-

44ving been approved by four members of the Board on August 23, 1933.




8/29/33

-2-

nr. Buck Was appointed an examiner for all purposes of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, and of
all other acts of Congress pertaining to examinations
made by, for, or under the direction of the Federal
Reserve Board, and was designated an Assistant Federal
Reserve Examiner, with salary at the rate of .4,200
per annum, all effective as of August 28, 1933.
Memorandum dated August 23, 1933, from Mr. Paulger, Chief of the
Division of Examinations, recommending the appointment of Mr. R. Wilson
Oster and his designation as an Assistant Federal Reserve Examiner, with
66/15-17 at the rate of $'2 600 per annum.
Mr. Oster was appointed an examiner for all purposes of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, and of
all other acts of Congress pertaining to examinations
made by, for, or under the direction of the Federal
Reserve Board; and was designated an Assistant Federal
Reserve Examiner, with salary at the rate of .2,600
per annum, all effective as of the date upon which he
enters upon the performance of his duties.
Memorandum dated August 24, 1933, from NI% Paulger, Chief of the
-031on of Examinations, recomnending the appointment of Mr. Charles T.
11410
Ile and his designation as an Assistant Federal Reserve Examiner, with
41414rY at the rate of .1,200 per annum; the recommendation having been
oved by five members of the Board on August 26, 1933.
Mr. Malone was appointed an examiner for all purposes of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, and of all
other acts of Congress pertaining to examinations made
by, for, or under the direction of the Federal Reserve
Board; and was designated an Assistant Federal Reserve
Examiner, with salary at the rate of '14,200 per annum,
all effective as of the date upon which he enters upon
the performance of his duties.
Memorandum dated August 23, 1933, from lir. Paulger, Chief of the
1)141.
aion of Examinations, recommending the appointment of Benjamin D.
14111t3r,

as

a messenger to be assigned to the Division of Examinations, with




t`372
8/29/33

-3-

4alary at the rate of 0.400 per annum, effective as of the date upon which
he enters upon the performance of his duties; the recommendation having
been approved by four members of the Board on August 25, 1933.
Approved.
Memorandum dated August 25, 1933, from Mr. Smead, Chief of the
i.lrision of Bsnk Operations, recommending the appointment of I:iss Evelyn
as a comptometer operator in the division, with salary at the rate
°t 1,440 per annum, effective September 1, 1933; the recommendation
114Virig been approved by six members of the Board on August 28, 1933.
Approved.
Letter dated August 15, 1933, from Governor Harrison of the Federal
4eserve Bank of New York, stating that the Board's letter of August 1
4641ressed to Mr. Young, Deputy Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Mew
1.(14c) in reply to the letters which he and Governor Harrison wrote to
Q'°.7"rlor Black on Tuly 14, 1933, regarding proposed changes in official
Ilk411-es at the bank, was considered by the board of directors of the bank
ttt Ite meeting on August 3, and that it was voted to take no action at that
1445 on the two special cases referred to in the Board's letter of August 1,
433) the directors believing that they also should be left for consideration
114til the end of the year as long as the Board indicated in its letter that

it w
°lad not be prepared to take up the other recommendations of the
(lite
et°re until then. Governor Harrison's letter also called attention to

the

-Lact that the action of the directors with reference to the whole

kikla
question followed the receipt of the Board's letter of July 11, 193'6,

the directors carefully to review the salaries of all the senior




tt-,? Oif7

8/29/33
Officers of the bank in the light of their varying responsibilities and
stating that when this was done the Board would be glad to receive and consider a schedule setting forth the adjustments which would be appropriate
Sid reasonable in the judgment of the directors, and that, inasmuch as the
Board has now apparently decided to postpone this consideration until the
Slid of the year, the directors of the bank were of the opinion that it
voUld be preferable to consider all adjustments at that time rather than
to take up now only the two special cases referred to.
Noted.
Telegraphic reply on August 21, 1933, approved by three members of
the Board, to a letter dated August 18 from Mr. Hoxton, Federal Reserve
4gent at Richmond, requesting approval by the Board of the appointment of
*. Edward A. Leake as an examiner in the Federal reserve agent's departOf the bank, with salary at the rate of

3,100 per annum.

The reply

stated that the Board approves the appointment referred to with salary at
the rate stated.
Approved.
Telegraphic reply on August 23, 1933, approved by four members of
the

Board, to a letter dated August 22 from Mr. Hoxton, Federal Reserve

/
1
4
'
13/at at Richmond, requesting approval by the Board of the appointment of

14'1

C. T. Allen as an examiner in the Federal reserve agent's department

"the bank, with salary at the rate of $3,600 per annum.

The reply stated

th
"the Board approves the appointment referred to with salary at the
l'4te stated.




8/29/33
Approved.
Letter dated August 22, 1933, from Mr. Peyton, Federal Reserve
Agent at Minneapolis, referring further to the proposed termination of the
services of La.
. Curtis L. Mosher as Assistant Federal Reserve Agent at the
Pederal Reserve Bark of Minneapolis and recommending that, in view of his
1°11g service, he be granted leave of absence with full pay from September
1 to December 31, 1933, inclusive.
The Secretary was requested to advise Mr.
Peyton that the Board will interpose no objection
to granting Mr. Mosher leave of absence as recommended, with the understanding that his services
will terminate effective as of the close of business on December 31, 1933.
Letter dated August 24, 1933, to Mr. McClure, Federal Reserve Agent
4t1%nses City, approved by five members of the Board, stating that,
42e°rding to the records of the Board, Ex. N. R. Oberwortmann, one of the
e PloYees of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, is acting in the dual
ee'Pacity of examiner and assistant cashier, the division of duties being
bl'011ght about originally because neither the operating department nor the
elelltie office required Mr. Oberwortmann's full time on work which might
be"
signed to him; that the Board feels that consideration should be given
the
termination of this arrangement and Ex. Oberwortmann assigned ex"IllsivslY to duties under and responsibility wholly to the Federal reserve
O' exclusively

to the operating department; and that the Board will
ea.
e.c1 to be advised as to the action taken upon this matter.
Approved.

or the

Telegraphic reply on August 25, 1933, approved by three members

Board, to a telegram of that date from Mr. Newton, Federal Reserve




S/29/33
Agent at San Francisco, requesting approval by the Board of a request of
the Reconstruction Finance Corporation that the Federal Reserve Bank of
844 Francisco lend to the Corporation Mr. E. F. Sims, a temporary exRminer
ill the agent's department, for the purpose of assisting in examinations
or the First National Bank and the Farmers and Merchants Savings Bank, both

°r

Santa Ana, California.

The reply stated that the Board interposes no

Objection to lending Mr. Sims to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation
rer the purpose referred to, and that it is assumed that Mr. Sims' salary
the examinations will be paid by the Corporation or that the bank
iii be reimbursed therefor.
Approved.
Reply on August 22, 1933, approved by four members of the Board,
t° letters dated August 9 from la'. Curtiss, Federal Reserve Agent at Boston,
Ilith regard to indebtedness and outside business connections of officers
eloPloyees of the bank.

The reply noted that the agent had included in

418 report of indebtedness of members of his staff information as to the
-edness of the officers and employees of the auditing department, and
tilted that, inasmch as this department reports to the chairman of the
boor,
'
4 of directors rather than to the Federal reserve agent, it is
411,.

t5.gested that this information be presented to the directors for their
The reply also noted that Jr. John T. Fogg, Assistant
kait

r
(11 -,

4

.
‘s associated with the Boston Student's Union and the Frances E.

Settlement, and stated that it will be appreciated if the agent
8alaae the Board as to the purpose for which these activities were
zed, and the nature of Mr. Fogg's official or other ccnnection with




S/29/33
them.

The reply noted further that Lir. I.:arcus L. Ramsdell, Assistant

Audit Clerk, has a minor business connection with a member of the
fiesachusetts Judiciary in some real estate operations in Nantucket, that
One or two clerks are selling insurance after office hours in their native

t°wns, one is working in a restaurant, and one receives a small annual
°QmPensation for auditing two charities, and stated that it is assumed
that the agent has satisfied himself that these affiliations do not interin any way with the employees' service to the Federal reserve bank

44a

that the activities do not involve any financial or other relations

that might be embarrassing to the bank, but that it will be appreciated

ir

he will confirm this assumption.
Approved.
Letter dated August 21, 1933, to Ur,. Case, Federal Reserve Agent

at

Nevi York, approved by five members of the Board, replying to Assistant

l'etleral Reserve Agent Williams' letter of August 3 transmitting reports as
°t 3.1.111r 1, 1933, of indebtedness of officers and employees in the Federal
486I've agent's department of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
stated that it appears that

/a..

The

Williams also forwarded reports sub-

trtitted by members of the auditing department, and that, Inasmuch as this
l't/Pextment reports to the chairman of the board of directors rather than
to
the Federal reserve agent, it is suggested that the information contEtit
ed in the reports be brought to the attention of the directors of the
-44
" The reply noted that requests for reports were not made of certain
f/tij?l
oYees in the agent's department receiving a salary of less than C3,000

14.r

and stated that the Board's letter of April 29, 1933, contain-




;.77
-8-

8/29/33

Plated the submission of reports of indebtedness by all members of the Fed"al reserve agent's staff, and that in order that the Board's records
raaY be complete with regard to the New York bank it will be appreciated
if the agent will obtain and forward to the Board reports as of Tuly 1,
1933, covering indebtedness of employees in the agent's department from
whom such reports have not been requested.

The reply also noted that the

z'aPort submitted by Mr. Dillistin, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent, states
that the proceeds of two personal loans were used by him for the purpose
°r Purchasing securities, and stated that it is assumed that there were not
14clUded in
the purchases any obligations of banking institutions, their
flib eidiaries or affiliates, but that it will be appreciated if the agent
Will advise the Board whether its assumption is correct.

The reply also

4t4ted that lar, R. LI.Cheseldine reports that he is co-maker on a note of
e.

Xierid in favor of the NationAl City Bank; that the Board feels that the

184-ple objections which may be made to an employee of a Federal reserve bank
b01.,
'w1n3 for his own account from a member bank, apply in the case of an
1111)1°Yes acting as co-maker or endorser on a note representing a loan by
4111eQber bank to another person; that the report submitted by T:r.
°n states that he is liable as endorser on his wife's note in the
441°43at

Of

v250.00; and that, inasmuch as the payee or holder of the note

1417i
"named, it is assumed the 4older is not a member bank.

The reply

te,
ted.

further that it is also noted that the reports of certain employees

4re i'°01mplete in some minor details and that this additional information
be
1:4Etkez

forwarded to the Board when available; that 1::r. Williams' letter

13.0 reference to the steps taken by the agent to comply with the




78
8/29/33

-9-

request contained in the Board's letter of April 29, 1933, that there be
autmitted to it information with regard to any outside business connections
Of officers and employees of the bank occupying responsible positions; and

that it will be appreciated if the agent will advise when this information
Will be sent to the Board.
Approved.
Reply on August 23, 1933, approved by four members of the Board, to
4 letter dated August 12 from Er. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent at ahicago,

With further reference to indebtedness of members of the Federal reserve
Etgent's department of the bank.

The reply noted that in Mr. Patterson's

nleutorandum of August 3, 1933, inclosed with the agent's letter, he states
tItat his indebtedness to the Union and Peoples Company of Jackson, Michigan,
°°48iats of two notes aggregating ,)26,106.98, whereas the report of his
44ebtedness as of July 1, 1933, which was inclosed with the agent's letter
°Z juslY 11, shows indebtedness in the amount of a3,052.58, and stated
1114t, inasmuch as Mr. Patterson's memorandum states that the sale of the
01-latera1

will reduce the debt to $14,700.00, it is assumed that the

4111Q1Int shown on the report is in error, and that $26,106.98 is the correct
al40141t.
The reply also noted that further information with regard to the
144ttedne33 of Fs. Pitman will be forwarded to the Board as soon as an
(14ortunity is presented for the agent to discuss the matter with him; and
at4ted that the Board is pleased to note that the employees of the bank are
4% encouraged to consult with the officers before seeking loans from

Dez.a,
xal loan conpanies in the future, with the thought that funds may be

kesie

4vailable from the employees' loan fund.




1

8/29/33

-10Approved.
Reply on August 25, 1933, approved by five members of the Board, to

4

letter dated July 26 from Mr. Walsh, Federal Reserve Agent at Dallas, with

rtirther regard to indebtedness of officers and employees in the Federal
reserve agent's department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

The

IlePlY stated that it is noted that the members of the agent's staff who
'
41's indebted to member banks will take steps to liquidate such indebtedness

4114 that the agent will keep the Board informed of the progress made in
this connection; that it is also noted that Fr. Hall, Assistant Federal Reeerve Agent, will arrange to dispose of his holdings of the stock of the
Ic1415e1 National Bank within a reasonable time; and that it will be appreciated if the agent will advise the Board of the action taken by Mr. Hall in
the Matter.
letter

The reply also referred to a statement contained in the agent's

with regard to the loan policy of the Federal Reserve Employees'

4/111ags and Investment Association, which shows that loans are made by the
eseo
ciation to employees of the Federal reserve bank and others on the
4"`Irity of automobiles as collateral, and stated that the Board feels
ilttollelY that any association of officers and employees of a Federal reserve
bsult,
Ior the purpose of establishing a savings fund or loan fund should
015111,,,
.'411e its loan activities strictly to members of the bank's staff, that

tuacier
rio circumstances should advances be made to persons not employed by
tj
ederal reserve bank, and that any loan to an officer and employee of
the 1,
"41kk should be limited to amounts within the capacity of such officer
'lb11)1°Yee to repay; and that it is requested, therefore, that the agent
41/e'es

t- to the
Federal Reserve Employees.' Savings and Investment Association




8/29/33

-11-

that it discontinue the practice of making loans to persons not in the
°ZIA-0y of the Federal reserve bank, and that he advise the Board of the consideration given by the association to the suggestion.

The reply stated

tIrths3r that the Board understands that Mr. R. B. Coleman, Deputy Governor,
414 14r. Fred Harris, Cashier, are trustees of a fund created by the bank
traz receipts of notaries fees, and that advances are made from this fund
to employees only in the case of necessitous circumstances.
Approved.
Reply on August 21, 1933, approved by five members of the Board, to
4 letter dated August 12 from Mr. Newton, Federal Reserve Agent at Atlanta,

Witla further reference to the attendance at directors' meetings of Messrs.

a. Saunders

and E. H. Allison, directors respectively of the New

141'ft/1a and Birmingham branches of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
e reply noted the agent's statement that, if they can arrange to attend
te
etinge regularly, he would like to have the directors continue to serve
tile respective branches, as their counsel and advice are always valuable,
44a that he feels
that if an opportunity is afforded to talk with them, he
vtai
be able to persuade them to attend directors' meetings and other
illeetillgs of the branches regularly, and stated that the Board is in agreetellt with the agent's statement that if Messrs. Saunders and Allison are
41)18 to be present at directors' meetings only infrequently they should
l'ettr
es

110sza

but that, in view of the agent's comments referred to above, the

"4-11 take no action in the matter until he has an opportunity to

1188 the situation with them personally and advise the Board the
l'eallits of the discussions.




6/29/33

-12Approved.
Reply on August 21, 1933, approved by five members of the Board, to

4 telegram dated August 14 from Governor Calkins, Chairman of the
Governors' Conference, stating that, feeling that it was important that the
W°Iic of the pension committee be carried forward without interruption, he
he
'
d appointed, with the unqualified approval of the governors of all the
Pederal reserve banks, and received the acceptance of, lIr. L. R. Rounds,
bePUty
Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, as chairman of the
Dellaion committee of the Governors' Conference to succeed Er. E. R. Eenzel,
eceased.

The reply stated that the Board is not advised whether Er.

4elaza1 prior to his death had instituted the necessary steps to obtain
11 °Posals from insurance companies in accordance with the plan which he
ellVraitted to the Board, and that the Board will be glad to be advised as
to the present status of the matter.

The reply also stated that, as it is

"84med that Governor Calkins, if he has not already done so, will request
n

ziounds to make a report to the governors of the Federal reserve banks.
411c/wing the present situation with respect to negotiations with the insurance
°(1Pan1es, it will be appreciated if Governor Calkins will transmit to the
1/0A

copy of such report.
Approved.
Letter dated August 28, 1933, to the beard of directors of The
Pie-8

Savings Bank, Van Wert, Ohio, approved by four members of the

QA

statinc that, subject to the conditions prescribed in the letter,
the
--NA approves the bank's application for membership in the Federal Rea

erve

k"Yatem and for the number of shares of stock of the Federal Reserve




8/29/33

-13-

of Cleveland to which the bank will be entitled upon the basis of
its capital and surplus as of the date upon which its membership becomes
e
ffective.
Approved.
Letter dated August 28, 1933, to the board of directors of the
€1111P1eton Savings Bank, Templeton, Iowa, approved by six members of the
Board, stating that, subject to the conditions prescribed in the letter,
the Board approves the bank's application for membership in the Federal Re41 e System and for the number of shares of stock of the Federal Reserve
1144k Of Chicago to which the bank will be entitled upon the basis of its
41Pital and surplus as of the date upon which its membership becomes effective.
Approved.
Letter dated August 28, 1933, to

ra..

Newton, Federal Reserve Agent

lanta, approved by six members of the Board, referring to the applicati(Y.4 of the Florida Bank at Orlando, Florida, for membership in the Federal
lleael've System, and stating that it has been noted that a majority of the
131148 of the capital stock of the bank is owned by Florida National Group,
Itle
't and Almours Securities, Inc.; that it is also noted that the Florida
Ntim
-11al Group, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary of Almours Securities,
6; that if the bank is admitted to membership in the Federal Reserve
k'ste- .qLt

will be necessary for Almours Securities, Inc., and Florida

Nti
-4e3. Group, Inc., to agree to accept the same conditions and limitations
°
(41 ex
a applicable under section 5142 of the Revised Statutes of the United
as amended, in the case of holding company affiliates of national




8/29/33

-14-

banks, and to obtain from the Board voting permits as required by the proof sections 9 of the Federal Reserve Act and 51/14 of the Revised
Statutes, as amended by the Banking Act of 1933; and that in acting upon
ePPlications for such voting permits, the Board is required under the law
to consider the financial condition of the applicant holding company
eaTiliates, the general character of their management and the probable
erfect of the granting of such permits upon the affairs of the member bsnk.
letter also stated that the Board does not, at this time, have sufficient
illrormation with regard to Almours Securities, Inc., and Florida National
Ql*QuP, Inc., to determine whether or not they should be granted voting
Permits; that it does not feel that it should act upon the application for
if z

Inbership of the Florida Bank at Orlando until it is also in a position

tO determine whether it can properly grant voting permits to the holding
ec44.13ellY affiliates of the bank; that the agent is requested to advise the
1/41* that the Board will defer action upon its application for membership
'44C1 that copies of the regulations and forms relative to voting permits of
11(44111g company affiliates will be furnished to the bank as soon as
13ecticable, in order that Almours Securities, Inc., and Florida National
11$34P, Inc., may take appropriate action preparatory to their applications
for
voting permits; that the Board will, therefore, consider the applica'1111 for membership when applications for voting permits have been received
e441 the/ Board has given favorable consideration to such applications; and
th4t it is essential that the voting permits be applied for as soon as
Desa4,,
4'u-Le after receipt of the Board's regulations in order to obviate the
"eesity of any further examination of the bank applying for membership,




8/29/33

-15-

8ince it is important that the information regarding the condition of the
bank be current.

The letter suggested that when Almours Securities, Inc.,

alld the Florida National Group, Inc., apply for voting permits in connection with the Florida Bank at Orlando, they should also include in their
EIPPlications a request for a voting permit covering any other member banks
Of which they are holding company affiliates within the meaning of section
2(c) of the Banking Act of 1933 and the Board's Regulation P, and stated

that if the Florida National Associates, Inc., or any other corporation,
blIsiness trust, association, or other similar organization is a holding
e°1qanY affiliate of any such member bank, such organization should file,
"the same time, an application for a permit to vote the stock of any
84e4 member bank; and that, in advising the applicant bank of the Board's
Dc'sition in the matter of its application, it is suggested that the agent
1°I.10.t out to the institution its nnaercapitalization and suggest that in
-- interim an effort be made to increase the capital to a more satisfact°rY ratio to deposits.
Approved.
Letter dated August 23, 1933, to Er. Williams, Federal Reserve
4eent at Cleveland, approved by four members of the Board, replying to
4413i5t5nt Federal Reserve Agent Fletcher's letter of August 19 recommend11/ aPProval of the request of the Dormont Savings Ze, Trust Company, Dormont,
l'eillisIrlvania, for an extension for thirty days of the time within which to
"eg°111P11sh its admission to membership in the Federal Reserve System under
'Oa°
eonditions contained in the Board's letter of Tuly 31, 1933. The reply
t4tEtcl that the Board grants the extension requested.




Approved.

8/29/33
IT

-16Letter dated August 28, 1933, to Mr. McClure, Federal Reserve Agent

at Kansas City, approved by five members of the Board, stating that the
Board has received a request from The Commercial Bank, Grand Island,
Nebraska, for an extension until November 1, 1933, of the tine within which
to accomplish its admission to membership in the Federal Reserve System
114der the conditions contained in the Board's letter to the bank of August
Is 1933, and has also received the agent's letter of August 18 recommending
that the request be granted.
ie

The letter also stated that, while the Board

not disposed to grant an extension of time until November 1, 1933, it

le willing to extend until October 1, 1933, the time within which the bank
144Y comply with the conditions and accomplish its admission to membership,
. 11c1 that it will be appreciated if the agent will so advise the bank.
Approved.
Reply on August 21, 1933, approved by five members of the Board,
to

a letter dated August 8 from Mr. Young, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent

"Chicago, advising that the Merchants & Farmers Bank, Grays Lake,

Illinois, whose application for membership in the Federal Reserve System
17444 aPproved by the Board on June 30, 1933, subject to certain conditions,
/148 requested that it be permitted to withdraw its application, stating
48 it8 chief objection to membership at this time that the bank desires to
114Y tiwe certificates before their due date.

The reply stated that, in

"c°rciance with the request of the bank, its application will be considered
having been withdrawn.




Approved.

366
8/29/33

-17Letter dated August 22, 1933, to Mr. Stevens, Federal Reserve agent

at Chicago, approved by four members of the Board, replying to Assistant
'eclaral Reserve Agent Prugh's letter of August 16 advising that the
Citizens Banking Company of Anderson, Indiana, whose application for membership in the Federal Reserve System was approved by the Board on Yune 3,
1933, subject to certain conditions, has requested that the application for
membership be withdrawn.

The reply stated that, in accordance with the

request of the bank, its application will be

considered as having been

withdrawn.
Approved.
Letter dated August 22, 1933, to Mr. Eoxton, Federal Reserve Agent
4/ Richmond, approved by four members of the Board, replying to Assistant
40eral Reserve Agent Fry's letter of August 7 inclosing a letter dated
411gAlst 4 from the Bank Commissioner of Maryland with regard to proposed
Of reorganization of banks whereby depositors waive part of their deposits,
rec

ing therefor certificates of beneficial interest which are preferred

to all
claims of the stockholders and are payable from the recovery in
48eets written off and from such part of the earnings of the bank as the
board
Mite.

of directors, with the approval of the Bank Commissioner, may deterThe reply stated that it appears from the information submitted that

it som
e cases these certificates are direct liabilities of the bank, but
4re carried on the books in the nominal alrount of one dollar; that the

130firA

has taken the position that a bank's books and published statements
d. reflect
all liabilities; are. that, in this connection, the agent's

IltIelition is called to the Board's letter of Tune 20, 1933 (X.-7455), in



8/29/33

-18-

Which circumstances comparable to those here involved were discussed in
connection with the reduction of capital of national banks.

The reply

quoted extracts from a letter to the Federal reserve agent of another
district stating that the Board would not be justified in approving a membership application of a bank reorganized on a plan similar to the plans
l'arerred to in Mr. Fry's letter, and stated that it appears from the plan
Or reorganization inclosed in Mr. Fry's letter that there also may be other
4.atters involved therein which the Board could not approve in connection
With an application for admission to membership, but that, in the absence

or

detailed information with regard to these points and particularly in the

absence of copies of all agreements usually executed in carrying out such
4 Plan of reorganization and advice as to whether the plan is binding only
04 depositors who voluntarily execute agreements contemplated by the plan
O

la binding upon all depositors in the event a prescribed part of the

dePcaitors agree, the Board cannot undertake to determine these questions
cleeinitely at this time.

The reply also stated that if the Bank

C°Innilssioner of the State of Maryland so desires, the Board will be glad
to ,
''clasider all features of the plan of reorganization upon receipt of
detailed information with regard to all of its features and copies of all
e'*eelnents usually involved, and that any additional information which is
1\11114ahed the Board in this natter should be accompanied by the agent's
l'eQ°111111endation and any comments of counsel for the Federal reserve bank
-1‘.tex' careful consideration of all aspects of the proposed plan of reorganilation.




Approved.

h

-19-

8/29/33

Reply on August 21, 1933, approved by five members of the Board,
to letters dated July 13 and 31 from NI'. Stevens, Federal Reserve Agent
at Chicago, the reply reading as follows:

"The Board has received your letters of July 13 and
July 31, 1933, with regard to the policy which should be
followed in the consideration of applications for membership
received from State banks which have been reorganized, with
the approval of the State banking department, on the basis
Of plans involving a partial waiver of deposits, such plans
of reorganization giving evidence that the shareholders have
forced the depositors to bear the burden of the reorganizations
and themselves have not made proper contributions toward rehabilitating the banks. The Board notes that such banks,
after reorganization, may be in a position technically to
qualify for membership but that you have grave doubts of the
continuing confidence of the community in barks which have
forced their depositors into reorganizations of this kind and
Of the future success of such banks, particularly where the
management remains unchanged, and that such procedure is at
variance with the reorganization policy of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Chicago which requires the shareholders first to bear
the burden of correction. It is also noted that your general
experience over the past ten years with many such banks is
that they have been unable to survive, and you inquire
Whether the general policy which you are following of asking
such banks to defer their applications until such time as
the possibility of their successful operation can be determined to your satisfaction is in conflict with the rights of
the banks asking for membership.
"Under the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act, as you
know, the Federal Reserve Board is specifically required to
consider the financial condition and the character of the
zaaagement of each bank applying for membership in the Federal
Reserve System. Accordingly, in each such case, the Board
gives careful consideration to all factors which may affect
the financial condition of the applying bank. As it is
apparent that the manner in which an existing bank is reorgaaized may have a decided bearing on the condition of the
institution which should be taken into account in connection
With an application by such bank for membership, full information should be obtained with regard to the manner in which
ellch reorganization was effected, and careful consideration
given to its possible effect on the condition of the bank and
the institution's ability to maintain a sound financial condition in the future.
"The Board feels that when, after a careful consideration
Of all the facts involved, the Federal reserve agent is of the




8/29/33

-20-

"opinion in any case that there is grave doubt as to the
ability of the applying bank to maintain a sound condition
on account of inequities in the plan of its reorganization,
or for any other reason, he is fully justified in suggesting
that the application for membership be deferred until it can
be determined more definitely whether the bank will be able
to maintain a sound condition or until appropriate action
has been taken to correct the inequities. Of course, if in
any such case the applicant bank requests that its application be submitted to the Federal Reserve Board, the Board
will be glad to consider the application upon receipt of full
information as to all the facts in the case and the recommendation of the Federal reserve agent, together with that of the
Committee of his bank, as to the action which should be taken.
"In all of these cases, whether submitted to the Board
or not, careful inquiry should be made into the plan of reorganization for the purpose of determining whether, under such
plan, the shareholders have been or will be released from any
obligation to correct the condition of the bank, the reasons
for any such release, whether the management has made full
effort to conserve the interests of the depositors, the
attitude of the community toward the reorganized institution,
the character of the institution's management and whether
any changes should have been made therein, the need for the
institution in the community and whether the possibilities
for its future growth and ability to survive are favorable.
In this connection, in any case where the reorganization has
not resulted in a change in the msnagement, careful consideration should be given to the responsibility of the management
for the condition of the bank which required its reorganization, and a statement which establishes a clear justification
for the continuance of such management from the standpoint
Of the welfare of the institution must be furnished.
"There may be some instances where the depositors will
benefit through a reorganization of the type mentioned where
the shareholders' liability is uncollectible and the liquidation of the institution through receivership proceedings
would entail a greater loss than through a waiver of deposits.
However, the Board feels that, in the absence of special
circumstances, it would not be justified in admitting a bank
to membership on the basis of a reorganization plan under
Which the shareholders evidently have not assumed a reasonable
share of the burden of correcting the bank's unsatisfactory
condition and particularly where the management responsible
for the bank's unsatisfactory condition remains unchanged,
Until the bank has demonstrated that it is in sound condition
and that it has the confidence of the community."




Approved.

1

8/29/33

-21Reply on August 28, 1933, approved by six members of the Board,

to letters dated July 19 and August 21 from Er. Stevens, Federal Reserve
Agent at Chicago, inquiring whether the Board would object to the issuance
of stock not subject to assessment in reorganizations of State member
beaks, and inclosing a copy of a letter received from the Commissioner of
Banking of the State of idichigan, in which he called attention to the fact
that under the provisions of section 22 of the Banking Act of 1933 the
additional liability imposed upon shareholders in nationnl banking
associations by the provisions of section 5151 of the Revised Statutes, as
ended, will not apply with respect to shares in a national bank issued
4tter the date of the enactment of the Banking Act of 1933.

The reply

atated that the Board does not require that the capital stock of State
beat
cs admitted to membership in the Federal Reserve System shall be subject
to assessment where under the laws of the State under which the bank is
°Isganized non-assessable stock may lawfully be issued; that in a number
°t instances it has admitted banks to membership having capital stock not
1-111 ject to assessment; and that, in the circumstances, the Board would not
Object to the issuance of stock not subject to assessment in the reorgan14ation of a State member bank where the issuance of such stock is authorized Under the laws under which the bank is organized.
Approved.
Letter dated August 25, 1933, to the Reconstruction Finance
e°11°°ration, Washington, D. C., approved by five members of the Board,
4P1Ying to a letter dated August 5 from Er. Tames B. Alley, Counsel for
the
Corporation; the reply reading as follows:




8/29/33

-22-

"Reference is made to the letter addressed by your Counsel,
Lir. Tames B. Alley to the Federal Reserve Board on August 5,
1933, requesting advice as to whether debentures issued by a
bank under the provisions of the laws of the State of New York
may be considered capital by the Federal Reserve Board in determining whether or not such bank has a capital sufficient to
make it eligible for membership in the Federal Reserve System.
"It appears that the laws of the State of New York authorize a State banking institution 'to issue by its board of
directors capital notes or debentures when so specifically
authorized by the superintendent of banks'. The New York laws
apparently do not in terms prescribe any of the qualities or
rights and liabilities of such debentures or of the holders
thereof. However, it is understood that under the provisions
of the Constitution of the State of New York any stock issued by
banks located in that State, including preferred stock, is subject to double liability and that the amendment to the laws of
the State of New York authorizing banks to issue debentures
was enacted in order to enable banks in that State to obtain
funds for the protection of depositors without the holders of
such debentures being subject to double liability as in the
case of holders of capital stock of banks in that State.
"It has also been noted that under the provisions of
Section 304 of the Act of March 9, 1935, as amended, the
Reconstruction Finance Corporation is not authorized to purchase preferred stock in a State banking institution if under
the laws of the State in which such institution is located the
holders of preferred stock are not exempt from double liability.
However, in any State where a State banking institution is not
Permitted to issue preferred stock exempt from double liability
the Reconstruction Finance Corporation is authorized to purchase legally issued capital notes or debentures of State
banking institutions located in such State. It has also been
noted that under the provisions of R. F. C. Form P. S. 2, Form
or Bank Debentures, debentures which will be purchased by the
Reconstruction Finance Corporation represent promises to pay
on a specified date the amount of money paid in on such
debentures and to pay the holders of the debentures a prescribed
rate of interest semi-annually, and that so long as any of the
debentures are outstanding the bank may not, except under
certain circunntances, issue additional debentures or incur
any 'other indebtedness' except for certain specified purposes.
84ch Form further provides that except under certain circumstances no debentures shall be called for redemption unless the
Unimpaired capital, surplus and undivided profits of the bank
Is in excess of a prescribed amount. Under the provisions of
the laws of New York and the form of debenture prescribed by
the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, the holders of such
debentures apparently are not entitled to voting rights in the




8/29/33

-23-

"management of the corporation.
"In the circumstances described above, it seems clear that
the New York law and the form of debenture prescribed by the
Reconstruction Finance Corporation contemplate that such
debentures shall represent borrowed money of the issuing bank
and are not intended to represent a proprietary interest in
the bank as is usually represented by capital stock of a bank
or other corporation.
"'Under the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act, banks
become members of the Federal Reserve System through subscriptions for stock in a Federal reserve bank and, except in
the case of mutual savings banks or similar institutions which
are not here involved, the Federal Reserve Act requires that
the subscription for Federal reserve bank stock shall be made
on the basis of the 'paid-up capital stock and surplus' of the
subscribing bank. The Federal Reserve Act also provides that
a State bank shall not be admitted to membership unless it
Possesses ta_paid-up unimpaired capital sufficient to entitle
it to become a national banking association in the place where
it is situated', except that banks located in a place having
a population of not exceeding three thousand inhabitants may
be admitted under certain circumstances with a capital of not
less than ,25,000. In this connection, attention is called to
the fact that, under the Provisions of Section 303 of the Act
of Larch 9, 1933, the term 'capital', as used in provisions
Of law relating to the capital of national banking associations
'shall mean the amount of unimpaired common stock plus the
amount of preferred stock outstanding and unimpaired.' The
term 'capital', as used in connection with the capital requiraments of national banks, therefore, includes only common
and preferred stock, and, in view of the facts described above,
this definition of 'capital', applicable to national banks, is
also applicable to capital requirements for admission of State
institutions to membership in the Federal Reserve System.
"In view of the above circumstances and the provisions of
law referred to, it seems clear that, under the provisions of
the Federal Reserve Act, the eligibility of a State bank for
membership in the Federal Reserve System depends upon the
aMount of its capital stock and cannot be determined upon the
basis of its capital stock plus borrowed money obtained through
the issuance of debentures or other methods. In this connection, it may be noted that, under the law and the consistent
Position of the Board, the surplus of a bank is not included
in determining whether the bank has sufficient capital to make
it eligible for admission to membership.
"'You are accordingly advised that, in the opinion of the
Federal Reserve Board, debentures issued under the provisions
of the laws of the State of New York, as described above, may
aot be included in determining whether a State bank has a
capital sufficient to make it eligible for membership in the
Federal Reserve System."




39:3
8/29/33

-24Approved.
Telegram dated August 25, 1933, to Ur. Stevens, Federal Reserve

Agent at Chicago, approved by five members of the Board, referring to the
aPPlication of the First State Bank, Holland, Michigan, for Permission to
Withdraw immediately from membership in the Federal Reserve System, and
stating that the Board waives the usual requirement of six months notice
°I' intention to withdraw and that, accordingly, upon surrender of the
Federal reserve bank stock issued to the First State Bank, the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago is authorized to cancel such stock and make a
Zerund thereon.
Approved.
Telegram dated August 25, 1933, to Mr. Wood, Federal Reserve
Aant at St. Louis, approved by five members of the Board, referring to
the ePplication of the Twin City Bank of North Little Rock, Arkansas, for
13ernodssion to withdraw immediately from membership in the Federal Reserve
SYstem, and stating that the Board waives the usual requirement of six
111011th8 notice of intention to withdraw and that, accordingly, upon
841Tender of the Federal reserve bank stock issued to the Twin City Bank
°t liorth Little Rock, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis is authorized
to cancel such stock and make a refund thereon.
Approved.
Letter dated August 22, 1933, to L'ir. Williams, Federal Reserve
It eilt at Cleveland, approved by five members of the Board, replying to
411813tant Federal Reserve Agent Fletcher's letter of July 31 advising of
the receipt from the Toledo Trust Company, Toledo, Ohio, a member, of a




8/29/33

-25-

formal request for permission from the Board to purchase the business and
assets, and assume the liabilities of the West Toledo National Bank,
Toledo, Ohio, which request was recommended by the agent for the favorable
consideration of the Board.

The reply stated that, from the information

sUbmitted, it would appear that the proposed transaction would not result
111 anY change in the character of the assets of the Toledo Trust Company
°r in the scope of the functions exercised by it within the meaning of the
general condition under which the trust company was admitted to the Federal Reserve System, and that, in accordance with the agent's recommendation, the Board will interpose no objection to the transaction, provided
that counsel for the Federal reserve bank is satisfied with the legal
aspects of the agreement of purchase and that the transaction will not
teault in any change in the corporate existence of the trust company which
Alight affect its membership in the Federal Reserve System.

The reply also

etated that, in view of the fact that the Toledo Trust Company has not
been examined since Tune 50, 1932

the Board feels that an examination

411041d be made at an early date either by the State banking authorities or
15Y the agent's department.
Approved.
Reply on August 21, 1933, approved by five members of the Board,
to

a letter dated August 8 from la*. Newton, Federal Reserve Agent at

ktlanta, transmitting the request of the Bank of Monroe, Georgia, for an
etteneion of the time within which it is required by law to dispose of
the remaining 51 Shares of its own stock which were acquired on February
e, 1„
-°33, to prevent a loss on a debt previously contracted in good faith,




8/29/33

-26-

and recanmending that the Board grant an extension of such time to January
1) 1934.

The reply stated that the Board is not authorized to grant the

bank permission to hold this stock longer than the period of six months
from the date of acquisition thereof allowed under the provisions of
section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act; and requested that the agent call
the provisions of the law to the attention of the Bank of Monroe and advise it that the Board must insist that such stock be disposed of at the
first practicable opportunity, and that the agent keep the Board advised
of the action taken by the bank to dispose of the stock.
Approved.
Reply on August 26, 1933, approved by five members of the Board,
to a letter dated August 8 from Mr. Newton, Federal Reserve Agent at
4tlanta, inclosing a copy of a letter dated August 5 from the Bank of
'4"oxl,Georgia, advising that the appraisal of the bank's other real
estate as required under condition number 20 for admission to the Federal
1168erve System had been completed.

The reply stated that one of the

131
'
°v1sions of condition number 20 was that the bank "shall charge off
111)111ed1ately the amount of any loss shown by such appraisal', the intent

being that each piece of property in the other real estate account should
be treated as a separate unit and that no individual property should be
e4liried at more than its appraised value; that the appraisal shows that
"114in properties of the bank are being carried at amounts in excess of
their aPpraised values; and that it is requested that the agent advise

the Board whether the Bank of Tifton has fully complied with the condition
by e
he-rging off the excess of book over appraised values on these




96
8/29/33

-27-

Properties, and that the bank secure an independent appraisal of its two
vacant lots in Baltimore carried at 01,750 and of its interest in the
Phoenix Planing Uill Company of Atlanta carried at $2,400 and, on the
basis of such appraisals, charge off any excess amount of book over
aPPraised values, advising the Board in detail when this has been
accomplished.

The reply also stated that it appears that several proper-

ties carried in the bank's other real estate account have been held for
Periods considerably in excess of five years, including the two vacant
lots in Baltimore which have been held since 1919, and that the Board
reels that assets of this type are extremely undesirable for retention by
a commercial banking institution over such an extended period of tine and
140uld like to be advised regarding the steps being taken by the bank for
the elimination thereof.
Approved.
Reply on August 26, 1933, approved by five members of the Board,
to letters dated Tune 16 and July 10 from Ur. Walsh, Federal Reserve Agent
at Dallas, with regard to the proceedings which were instituted by the

8clard to determine whether the membership in the Federal Reserve System
°r the Forney State Bank, Eorney, Texas, should be terminated.

The reply

atated that the Board has approved the recommendation of the board of
directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas that no further steps be

telzQ,

to terminate the membership of the State bank and that the proceedWhich have been instituted in this connection have been brought to

a. Close
Approved, together with a letter dated
August 26, 1933, to the Forney State BRnk, also
approved by five members of the Board, advising



?„97
6/29/33
of the Board's action as referred to above.
Letter dated August 25, 1933, to the First National Bank of Athol,
Massachusetts, approved by five members of the Board, stating that the
Board approves the application filed in the bank's behalf for permission
to act, when not in contravention of State or local law, as trustee,
executor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of
estates, assignee, receiver, committee of estates of lunatics, or in any
Other fiduciary capacity in which State banks, trust companies, or other
c°rPorations which come into competition with national banks are pertaitted to act under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the
e4ercise of all such rights being subject to the provisions of the Fedel'al Reserve Act and the regulations of the Federal Reserve Board.
Approved.
Letter dated August 23, 1933, to the Baltimore NationAl Bank,
Ba
ltimore, Maryland, approved by three members of the Board, stating that
the Board approves the application filed in the bank's behalf for per1413810n to act, when not in contravention of State or local law, as
ttlIstee, executor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian
°I
'estates, assignee, receiver, committee of estates of lunatics, or in
44Y other fiduciary capacity in which State banks, trust companies or
°thel* corporations which cone into competition with national banks are
1)elltitted to act under the laws of the State of Maryland, the exercise
O1' all such rights being subject to the provisions of the Federal Reserve
Aet
alqd the regulations of the Federal Reserve Board. The letter also
4t"ea that the Board feels that the bank should not take over any trusts




8/29/33

-29-

from the Baltimore Trust Company the execution of which might react unfavorably upon the bank, and further feels that, if the bank is tendered
anY of the trusts now held by the Baltimore Trust Company, it should carefully scrutinize the condition of these trusts, which, through their
assumption, may be detrimental to the interests of the institution, and
Particularly that the bank should not accept the trusteeship for issues

Of

the First Natioral Company which is commented upon by the examiner in

his report of examination of the trust department of the Baltimore Trust
Cornpany as of April 18, 1933.
Approved.
Letter dated August 26, 1933, to the Hamilton National Bank,
Washington, D. C., approved by four members of the Board, stating that,
effective if and when the Comptroller of the Currency authorizes the bank
to commence business with a capital of at least :4;1,000 000 and surplus of
l 250 000, the Board approves the application filed in the bank's behalf
for permission to act, when not in contravention of local law, as trustee,
eXecutor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of
estates, assignee, receiver and committee of estates of lunatics, the
exercise of all such rights being subject to the provisions of the Federal
aeserve Act and the regulations of the Federal Reserve Board.
Approved.
Letter dated August 28, 1933, to Mr. Curtiss, Federal Reserve
4€ett at Boston, approved by five members of the Board, replying t
4e8istant Federal Reserve Agent Gettemy's letter of August 8 inclosing
the application of the Norway National Bank, Norway, Maine, filed in ad-




8/29/33

-30-

v3nce of the granting of its charter, for permission to act in all fiduciarY capacities authorized under section 11(k) of the Federal Reserve Act.
The reply observed that the laws of the State of Maine provide that a
bank exercising fiduciary powers must have a paid-in capital of at least
'C'50,000, and stated that information obtained from the office of the
CoMptroller of the Currency discloses that the applicant bank was
Chartered and authorized to commence business with only 433,643.46 of its
050,000 capital paid in, and that, therefore, the institution could not
exercise fiduciary powers, if granted conditionally, until the capital
required by the laws of the State of Maine for a bank exercising powers had
been fully paid in.

The reply also stated that, in these circumstances,

the Board is unwilling to act upon the application made on behalf of the
114tional bank prior to the date it was authorized to commence business,
4ad suggested that, when the bank's capital has been fully paid in, it
tile an application for trust powers in its own behalf.
Approved.
Letter dated August 23, 1933, to Mr. O'Connor, Comptroller of the
CilrrencY, approved by three members of the Board, replying to his memol'andum of July 18 recommending approval of a reduction in capital of the
Lliddletown National Bank, Liddletown, Connecticut, from 469 300 to
96,96o and the immediate increase of such capital to ,350 000, by the
"le at par of 3,826 shares of new stock of par value of c;,40 per share;
the released capital in the amount of 4172,340 to be used to eliminate
eetimated losses in loans and discounts and depreciation on stocks,
4rEttl1ted bonds and investment securities as shown in the report of exam144tion of the bank as of February 16, 1933.




The reply stated that the

Li 00
6/29/33

-31-

approves the proposed reduction under the plan submitted, subject
to the conditions set forth in the reply.

The reply also observed that

on the basis of the last report of examination as of February 16, 1933,
the corrections to be made under the proposed plan of reduction in capital
Will not be sufficient to eliminate all estimated losses and depreciation
on securities, and stated that it is understood, however, that the bank
448 indicated its willingness to raise additional capital funds if given
4 little more time, and that it is assumed that the Comptroller's office
Will require further corrections to be made as soon as possible.
Approved.
Letter dated August 23, 1933, to La... O'Connor, Comptroller of the
ClIrrency, approved by three members of the Board, replying to his memoof July 28 recommending approval of a reduction in the capital stock

Of

The Liatteawan National Bank, Beacon, New York, from .200,000 to

9-4u0,000 in accordance with a plan which provides for a reduction in the
1/ar value of the shares from 400 to ;50. and the sale of 400,000 new
Iltock at par; the released capital in the amount of 400,000 to be used
to eliminate securities depreciation and criticized assets as determined
1) the Chief National Bank Examiner.

The reply stated that the Board

%roves the proposed reduction under the plan submitted, subject to the
Q°11aitions set forth in the reply.

The reply also stated that, in connec-

ti°4 with condition numbered one, the Board notes the suggestion of the
°Ibrioe of the Federal Reserve Agent at New York that one-half of the
stock account and one-half into
:100)000 of new money be paid into capital
fund; that this procedure would provide a capital structure
"
'equate for the present volume of deposits and permit of the elimination




401
-32-

8/29/33

o1' •fli50,000

more of criticized assets than would be the case if the entire

sMount of new funds is used for new capital; and that it is assumed that
this suggestion has received consideration by the Comptroller's office.
Approved.
Letter dated August 23, 1933, tonr. O'Connor, Comptroller of the
Ottrrency, approved by three members of the Board, replying to his memorELndum of July 25 recommending approval of a reduction in the capital
stock of the first National Bank, lleeker, Colorado, from :,40,000 to
A,
i?G5,000, in accordance with a plan of reorganization which provides for

e' 100% voluntary assessment by the shareholders and the sale of $25,000
Preferred stock to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation; the released
caPital in the amount of

15,000, together with the shareholders' con-

tribution of :)40,000 and funds in the amount of approximately c;3,268
Etvailable in the surplus and undivided profits of the bank, to be used to
elixainate unacceptable assets in the amount of approximately $58,268.

The

rePlY stated that the Board approves the reduction under the plan submitted,
allbject to the conditions set forth in the reply.
tiukt

The reply also stated

it appears that, in the event of retirement of the preferred stock,

the common capital of the bank probably would be inadequate to support its
(18Po8it liability, besides being below the statutory minimum, and that it
le assumed that the Comptroller's office will require that adequate pro1181011 be made for the issuance of additional common stock, if and when
Preferred stock is retired, so that the statutory minimum of capital
ellci a satisfactory ratio of capital to deposits will be maintained at all
ttmes.




-33-

8/29/33

Approved.
Reply on August 28, 1933, approved by six members of the Board, to
a letter dated Tune 12 from Mr. Peyton, Chairman of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Minneapolis, in response to the Board's letter of Tune 6, 1935, with
regard to the examination of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis made
by the Board's examiners as of ljarch 22, 1933.

The reply contained further

comments with regard to various matters mentioned in the chairman's letter,
and requested that the chairman furnish the Board with additional informtion in connection with certain of the matters.
Approved.
Letter dated August 21, 1933, to the Secretary of the Treasury,
Proved by five members of the Board, referring to the request of the then
2ecretary of the Treasury under date of February 24, 1933, that a special
illcitary be instituted by the examiners of the Board with the view to deterraining whether the proper procedure is followed at each of the Federal re"I've banks and their branches in connection with the issue, exchange and
l'edemption of Government securities, and transmitting a copy of a special
report by Federal Reserve Exsminer Cagle, as of

May

27, 1933, covering the

tieeal agency department of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Approved.
Letter dated August 25

1933, to

Mr.

Case, Federal Reserve Agent

"New York, approved by five members of the Board, inclosing a copy of a
lePort of the special study as of May 27, 1933, of the fiscal agency
'
°13erations of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and stating that the
8°erd desires that the detailed information contained in the report be




403
8/29/33

-34-

broutpilt to the attention of the board of directors of the bank, and that the
Board be advised of any action which may be taken in connection therewith.
The letter also stated that the Board will appreciate advice as to whether
the recommendations of the examiner in regard to auditing functions, with a
view to maintaining a more complete control over the assets, accounts and
tunctions of the fiscal agency department, have been adopted.
Approved.
Letter dated August 23, 1933, to the Secretary of the Treasury,
ePProved by three members of the Board, referring to the request of the then
Secretary of the Treasury under date of February 24, 1933, that a special
itlquiry be instituted by the examiners of the Board with the view to determining whether the proper procedure is followed at each of the Federal
I'eserve banks and their branches in connection with the issue, exchange
814 redemption of Government securities, and transmitting a copy of a
sPecial report by Federal Reserve Examiner Cagle, as of July 29, 1933,
e0vering the fiscal agency department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Rich-

Approved.
Letter dated August 21, 1933, to Mr. McClure, Federal Reserve Agent
t ICansas City, approved by five members of the Board, inclosing a copy of
lePOrt of a special study of the fiscal agency operations of the Federal
4'
11"erve Bank of Kansas City, and stating that particular attention is
(ill'ected to the examiner's comments concerning the transactions involved
ill the special subscriptions made by the reserve bank to various issues
°I' Government securities, and the distributions made of the allotments




404
8/29/33

-35-

received on such subscriptions, and that the Board questions the need or
desirability of the reserve bank entering subscriptions the allotments
on which are to be used for the purpose of adjusting errors arising on

the part of either the reserve bank or a subscribing bank, or to provide
for subscriptions received from banks or individuals too late to handle

in the usual manner, and regards the practice of assigning any portion
of the allotments received on such special subscriptions to officers or
employees of the reserve bank, or to banks in which a director of the
reserve bank is interested, as especially undesirable.

The letter also

stated that the Board feels very strongly, as stated in its circular
letter X-7407, dated April 12, 1933, that subscriptions for Government
eeourities, filed with a reserve bank by its directors, officers and
eMPloyees, should be handled in strict accordance with Treasury instructions and in no respect receive more favorable treatment than would be
accorded other subscriptions of the same class; and that the Board
desires, therefore, that the detailed information contained in the report
be brought to the special attention of the board of directors of the
bellk and that the Board be advised of the action taken in this connecti°11. The reply stated further that the Board will appreciate advice as to
Whether the various suggestions made by Kr. Cagle in regard to changes in

the forms used by, and the clerical routine of, the fiscal agency departend his recoramendations in regard to auditing functions with a
l'1617 to maintaining a more complete control over the assets, accounts and
rIlletions of the fiscal agency department, have been adopted.




Approved.

405
8/29/33

-36Reply on August 21, 1933, approved by five members of the Board,

to a letter dated July 19 from Mr. Wood, Federal Reserve Agent at St.
LOUIS, referring to the petition of certain banks in Benton County,
Arkansas, to be transferred from the Eighth to the Tenth Federal Reserve
District, and stating that of the ten banks in the county four did not
Sign the petition; that only three of the ten banks are members, one of
Which did not sign the petition; that one of the two signing member banks
had indicated indifference to the proposed change; that of the seven
lionmember bwriks one remits in St. Louis exchange, one effects collection
°f items through the national bank of the same town which remits in St.
Lois exchange, and the other five are not on the par list; and that,
While the agent does not object to the proposed change, he feels it is
44necessary and recommends against it.

The reply stated that L:r. McClure,

''ederal Reserve Agent at Kansas City, in a letter addressed by him under
(14te of ally 25, 1933, to the Bank Commissioner of Arkansas, a copy of
Which was sent to Lr. Wood, stated that it was felt that, while the change
ilight be of some benefit to a few banks, the benefits would be more than
"feet by the inconvenience and confusion which would result from the
to
e4nge in Federal reserve district lines; that in a letter addressed
the Board by Ex. Wasson, Bank Commissioner of Arkansas, under date of
he stated
3\11Y 10, 1933, in response to the Board's letter of July 6,
banks' reth4t he had no interest in the matter except to approve the
for the transfer; and that, in view of these circumstances, the
8°4rd will take no action with regard to the requested change at this
tble) but that should the banks in Benton County, in accordance with the




8/29/33

-37-

last paragraph of Mr. McClure's letter of July 25 to the Bank Commissioner
Of Arkansas, submit additional information in support of their request of
4 character which would result in a change in the agent's recommendation,
the Board will be glad to give further consideration to the matter.
Approved.
Reply on August 22, 1933, approved by four members of the Board,
to a letter dated August 14 from Mr. Walter Lichtenstein, Secretary of
the Federal Advisory Council, Chicago, Illinois, referring to the recommendation adopted at the meeting of the Federal Advisory Council on
Rovember 19, 1929, with respect to a study of branch, group and chain
bankin .

The reply stuted that

la..

Lichtenstein is correct in his under-

standing that a Federal Reserve System committee was appointed to make a
st4dY along the general lines mentioned in the recommendation of the Fed"al Advisory Council; that the committee formulated a report which is
qtlite voluminous, being embraced in about eleven volumes of typewritten
4144u8cript; and that, after considering the matter of printing or publishing the report, the Board concluded not to take such action, and
°°4sequently copies are not available for distribution, although each
'4deral reserve bank has a set of copies.

The reply also stated that

Whelp, the Council meets in September, if it is the desire of the members
t° examine the report, a set will be made available by Mr. Goldenweiser
'their inspection.
1'131
Approved.
Letter dated August 23, 1933, to Mr. Williams, Chairman of the
Pedsral Reserve Bank of Cleveland, approved by five members of the Board,




3

8/29/33

-38-

tr8nsm1tt1ng, for his information and consideration, a copy of a memorandum addressed to Mr. Morrill by Lir. Smead, Chief of the Division of
Bank Operations, and

La..

Paulger, Chief of the Division of Examinations,

containing recommendations with regard to the audits of the accounts of
the 2isca1 Agent of the Federal Reserve Board.

The letter stated that it

18 understood from a telephone talk with Mr. Williams that it will be
entirely satisfactory to him to permit the auditor of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Cleveland to audit the Fiscal Agent's accounts for the period
beginning July 1, 1955, and ending July 1, 1935, and to have the first
aUdit made as of the close of business August 15, 1933, subsequent audits
to be made as of dates to be selected by the auditor; that, while the
Procedure outlined in the memorandum has been considered carefully, it
will, nevertheless, be appreciated if Yr. Williams will feel free to make
eJV suggestions regarding it that seem. to him and the auditor of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland to be desirable; and that a similar
l GqUeSt is being made of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
'

The

letter also stated that it is contemplated that the Federal Reserve Bank
°r Cleveland should be reimbursed for the compensation and expenses of
its auditor and any necessary assistance in the same manner as reimburse18 now made for the temporary assistance of employees of the Federal
Re
serve Bank of Cleveland who are assigned to aid from time to time in

the examinations by the Board's Division of Examinations of other Fedreserve banks under established procedure; that it is believed that
the actual time which will be required for the audits will aggregate only
4 tew days for each audit; and that it will be appreciated if Er. Williams




8/29/33

-39-

Will advise at his earliest convenience as to any suggestions he may have
regarding the plan for auditing the Fiscal Agent's accounts so that final
action may be taken upon it by the Board at an early date.
Approved, together with a letter dated August
23, 1933, to Er. Hoxton, Chairman of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Richmond, also approved by five
members of the Board, inclosing a copy of the
letter to Mr. Williams, together with a copy of the
memorandum referred to therein, and stating that it
will be appreciated if L:r. Hoxton will let the Board
have the benefit of any suggestions that either he
or Er. Walden, Controller, may feel will be helpful.
Letter dated August 26, 1933, to L:r. O'Connor, Comptroller of the
Currency, approved by five members of the Board, stating that under the
Provisions of section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended by the
4Aking Act of 1933, a State member bank may establish and operate a
bl'anch outside of the city, town or village in which it is situated "on
tIls same terms and conditions and subject to the same limitations and
restrictions as are applicable to the establishment of branches by
Aational banks"; that a national bank is required, among other things,
to obtain the approval of the Comptroller of the Currency in order to
establish a branch beyond the limits of the city, town or village in which
it is situated; that the question has arisen whether, in these circumetUtoes, it is necessary that a State member bank obtain the consent of
the

Comptroller of the Currency in order to establish and operate an outbranch; and that the Board's counsel has given careful considera-

ti°A to this question and has reached the conclusion that it must be
Utswered in the affirmative.
O

The letter inclosed, for the information

t18 Comptroller, a copy of the opinion on this question, prepared in




6/29/33

-40-

the office of the Board's counsel, and stated that, in view of the fact
that, with respect to other matters, supervisory powers and authority
over State member banks are vested in the Federal Reserve Board, it has
occurred to the Board that, as a practical matter, it may be desirable,
both from the standpoint of the Controller of the Currency and of the
Board, that applications or requests of State member banks for the
aPproval of the establishment and operation of out-of-town branches be
handled in substantially the following manner:

Such a request or

application may be submitted by a State member bank to the Federal relieve agent of the district in which the bank is located and transmitted
bY him with his recommendation and comments to the Federal Reserve Board.
The Board will then consider such request on the basis of the facts and
lecommendation submitted and of the information which it has in its
'
records with respect to the member bank in question.

The Board will then

Present the request of the State member bank to the Comptroller of the
Currency for his consideration, advising him of the recommendation of the
?eciaral reserve agent and also of its awn views on the question, with the
laggest that the Comptroller inform the Board as to his conclusion in the
'
Inattere

The letter stated further that it will be appreciated if the

Caralotroller will advise the Board whether, as a practical matter, the

4.4 ,

dllne of requests or applications for the establishment of out-of-town

111'411ches of State member banks, in accordance with the procedure suggested
411°0, will be agreeable to him.
Approved, together with a letter to the
chairmen of all Federal reserve banks, also
approved by five members of the Board,for dispatch if and when the procedure as referred to




t

8/29/33

-41above is approved by the Comptroller, stating that
the procedure as set forth in the letter to the
Comptroller of the Currency has been agreed upon,
and requesting that applications of State member
banks which may desire to establish out-of-town
branches be handled in accordance with the procedure.
Telegraphic reply on August 28, 1933, approved by five members of

the Board, to a telegram dated August 26 from Deputy Governor Attebery
Of

the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, stating that the idemphis Branch

OA August 25 made a loan to a nonmember bank secured by direct obligations of the United States, under section 403 of the Act of Larch 9, 1933,
knd inquiring as to whether the provisions of section 404 of the Act of
Ilarch 9, 1933, as amended by the Act of March 24, 1933, apply to such
1°ans, particularly with respect to examination of the bank, and the reqUirement as to maintaining a reserve balance.

The reply stated that the

l'equirements with respect to loans made under section 404 of the Act of
14exch 9, 1933, as amended by the Act of March 24, 1933, are not applicable
la the case of a loan made under authority of the last paragraph of
Election 13 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended by section 403 of the
Act of March 9, 1933.
Approved.
Letter dated August 22, 1933, to the Under Secretary of the
Tl'easury, approved by five members of the Board, stating that the Board
la informed that the Attorney General rendered an opinion under date of
44gUst 18, 1933, at the request of the Secretary of the Treasury, with
l'ege,rd to the interpretation of the term "executive officer" as used in
aeetion 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended by the Banking Act
°r 1933; that the Board desires to publish the text of this opinion in




-42-

8/29/33

the Federal Reserve Bulletin and to furnish copies of the opinion to the Federal reserve banks, if this is agreeable to the Attorney General; and that
it will be appreciated, therefore, if the Under Secretary will inquire of
the Attorney General whether he has any objection to this being done.
Approved.
Reply on August 22, 1933, approved by five members of the Board, to
a letter addressed under date of August 5 by Mr. Louis D. CArroll of
Baltimore, Maryland, to Senator Peter Norbeck, and by him referred to the
Board for reply, in regard to a loan which it appears was made by the
Maryland Trust Company of Baltimore in November, 1929.

The reply stated

that, while the Federal Reserve Board has certain general supervisory
P0Wers with respect to member banks of the Federal Reserve System, it is
llot within its authority to interfere with the taking of such steps to
collect any indebtedness duo to such bank as the officers and directors
Or

the bank may deem proper and justifiable within legal limitations; that,

therefore, the Board could not undertake to request the Maryland Trust
ConVany to withhold action on the indebtedness to which Er. Carroll refers;
alad that, consequently, the proper course of procedure would be for Er.
C4rroll to take the matter up directly with the officers of the bank and
eadeavor to work out a satisfactory arrangement with respect to the
illdebtedness.
Approved.
Reply on August 25, 1933, approved by five members of the Board,
to letters dated July 26 and August 11 from Er. Logan, Counsel of the
l'e"ral Reserve Bank of New York, inclosing copies of opinions of the




8/29/33

-43-

attorneys for the First Citizens Bank & Trust Company of Utica, New York,
With regard to the question whether payment of interest is required by the
law of the State of New York upon deposits of public funds of the State or
Of counties or municipalities thereof, and stating that, in the light of
these opinions, Mr. Logan has answered SOEB inquiries on this subject by
atatinc that, while he has formed no final opinion in the matter, the information he has at the present time indicates that the New York State law
does not require the payment of interest on demand deposits of such public
funds; that if the Board so desires he will reply in this manner to the
inquiry contained in the letter of the Manufacturers Trust Company, dated
19, 1933, and inclosed with Mr. Logan's letter of July 26; and that
it is expected that the New York State Legislature will enact a bill at an
early date which will clearly require the payment of interest on deposits
or public funds of the State and of counties and municipalities thereof.
The reply stated that, in the circumstances, the Board will be glad to
have Mr. Logan reply to the letter from the Manufacturers Trust Company
14 the manner which he has suggested, but that this is not to be underas a final expression of opinion by the Board on the question whether
13aMent of interest is required by the law of the State of New York on
dePoeits of public funds, and that, in this connection, attention is
ilptvited to the Board's letter of August 22, 1933 (X-7558).

The reply

6k180 stated that the Board agrees with the view expressed by 1141". Logan
that deposits of court or trust funds in the names of New York counties,
e048i8ting of unclaimed moneys paid into court and moneys held in court
the benefit of minors and incompetents, are not deposits of "public




-44-

8/29/33

ritnds" within the meaning of section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act, as
amended by the Banking Act of 1933, unless the beneficial ownership of the
funds is in the State or some subdivision thereof, and such deposits do
not fall within any of the other exceptions to the prohibition of the
statute; and requested that Mr. Logan include advice as to the views of the
Board with reference to this question in his letter to the Manufacturers
Trust Company.
Approved.
Reply on August 21, 1933, approved by five members of the Board,
to a letter dated July 12 from Mr. Peyton, Federal Reserve Agent at
Minneapolis, inclosing copies of opinions of the Attorney General of the
State of South Dakota and of counsel for the Federal reserve bank with
respect to the question whether a member bank may lawfully pay interest
011 deposits of public funds of the State of South Dakota which are payable
04 demand.
Of

The reply stated that one of the exceptions to the prohibition

section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended by the Banking Act

°r 1933,

upon the payment by a member bank of interest on any deposit

Pa'able on demand is "any deposit of public funds made by or on behalf of
eILY State, county, school district, or other subdivision or municipality,
With respect to which payment of interest is required under State law";
E'lla that the question presented is whether the law of the State of South
of public funds made
Ilta requires the payment of interest on deposits
"
1)41
other subdivisions
bY 01 on behalf of the State, of counties thereof, or of
1114n1cipa1ities thereof.

The reply also stated that the opinions in-

counsel,
closed with the agent's letter have been considered by the Board's
ho advises that, upon the basis of the information submitted and the




8/29/33

-45-

statutes referred to in the opinions, he finds no reason to express an
Opinion differing from the conclusion of counsel for the Federal reserve
bank on the question; and that, in the circumstances, it is suggested that
the agent reply to the inquiry which he has received on this subject in
accordance with the views expressed by counsel for the Federal reserve bank.
Approved.
Letter dated August 22, 1933, to the chairmen of all Federal reserve banks, approved by four members of the Board, stating that the provision of section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended by the Banking
Act of 1933, which forbids a member bank to pay interest on any deposit
PaYable on demand excepts "any deposit of public funds made by or on
behalf of any State, county, school district, or other subdivision or
roUnicipality, with respect to which payment of interest is required under
State law"; that the Board has been requested to rule upon questions as to
Whether the payment of interest is required on such public funds under the
lpr°visions of particular State statutes; and that, in view of the numerous
414 varying provisions of the laws of the States on this subject, the
8(1/ard feels that, when a question as to whether a particular State law rethe Payment of interest on public funds is presented to a Federal
reserve bank, it is advisable that it be considered by counsel for the Fedreserve bank and his opinion should be followed in the matter, unless
there

appears to be doubt as to the proper interpretation to be placed

/1P(3tx the law and it is considered advisable to present the matter to the
cl'
13°41

The letter also stated that in any case in which a question of this

'is submitted to the Board, it is requested that there be furnished to
kill(




ail 5
-46-

8/29/33

the Board copies of all pertinent provisions of the State law, a copy of
an opinion of counsel for the Federal reserve bank discussing all aspects
Of the question fully and in detail, and a copy of an opinion on the
question rendered by the State Attorney General or other State official
having similar authority, together with any other information which may be
relevant.

The letter stated further that it will be appreciated if the

Chairmen will furnish the Board, merely for its information, with a copy
Of any opinion which may be rendered by counsel for the Federal reserve
bank on a question of this kind, even though it is not considered necessary
to present the matter to the Board for a ruling.
Approved.
Reply on August 21, 1933, approved by five members of the Board, to
ti letter dated June 28 from 1,1r. Logan, Deputy Governor of the Federal Reeerve Bank of New York; the reply reading as follows:
"Reference is made to your letter of June 28, 1933, with
inclosure, in which the question is raised whether, under the
provisions of Section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended
by the Banking Act of 1933, a trust company organized under
the laws of the State of New York, and a member of the Federal
Reserve System, may pay interest on deposits of funds belonging
to an estate or trust of which it is acting as executor or
l
trustee and deposited by the trust department in the commercia
withdepartment of the trust company, subject to immediate
of the
drawal. In this connection, you refer to a provision
company to pay
Banking Law of New 'fork which requires a trust
but
interest on funds received by it in a fiduciary capacity;
funds
such
the law does not appear to require that deposits of
in another department of the trust company shall necessarily be
made payable on demand.
Reserve Act, as
"As you know, Section 19 of the Federal
1933, forbids a
emended by Section 11(b) of the Banking Act of
on any
interest
pay
to
y,
indirectl
or
member bank, directly
e with
accordanc
in
except
demand,
on
payable
deposit which is
1933,
16,
a contract entered into in good faith prior to Tune
to
and in force on that date; and a member bank is required




41_6
6/29/33

-47-

"eliminate from any such contract any provision for the payment
of interest on deposits payable on demand as soon as possible
consistently with its contractual obligations. Deposits of
certain kinds are excepted from the provision of law in question;
but deposits of the kind which are the subject of your inquiry
would not appear to COMB within any of the exceptions mentioned
in the statute (unless payable only at an office of a member
bank located in a foreign country); and the Federal Reserve
Board has no authority to make any additional exceptions to the
prohibition of the law against the payment of interest on
deposits payable on demand. It is the opinion of the Board,
thorefore, after a consideration of the question which you raise,
that a member bank is forbidden by law to pay interest on
deposits of funds payable on demand which belong to an estate
or trust in which it is acting as executor or trustee and which
are deposited by the trust department in the commercial department of the bank, except in accordance with a contract entered
into in good faith before Tune 16, 1933, and existing on that
date, and such a contract must be modified by the bank as soon
as possible to eliminate any provision for the payment of interest on deposits payable on demand."
Approved.
There was then presented for the record the following report of a
eqmmittee of the Agents' Conference, which was submitted to the Conference
approved at its meeting on August 16, 1933:
"Your members who have been assigned to consider Topic
IV - 'Regulations and Interpretations of the New Act' - offer
the following observations thereon:a.

"The Federal Reserve Board has addressed to all Federal
Reserve Agents a tentative form of Regulation on 'Savings
and Time Deposits and Interest Rates'. This tentative
draft has had the careful study of the office groups in
the several Federal reserve banks, and the Board now has
the comments and suggestions from the Federal reserve
bmiks. We are advised that the Federal Reserve Board
will shortly promulgate its regulation in final form.
The members of the Conference have a deep conviction that
there should be more explicit control of the maximum
amount of any savings deposit upon which interest may be
paid. No doubt exists as to the promise of encouragement
by certain banks to a policy of transfer of demand
deposits in part to a savings deposit basis in order to
circumvent the prohibition of interest payment upon
demand deposits. Since Counsel for the Board is convinced that the Banking Act of 1933 gives no lawful basis
for a classification of savings deposits as to a maximum




8/29/33

-48"amount acceptable at interest in any one account the Conference expresses the hope that the Federal Reserve Board
may find this matter of sufficient importance to consider
a request to the Congress at its next session to enact
legislation to give the Board an authority to define a
maximum amount permitted as to any single savings bank
deposit.

b.

"The Federal Reserve Board has issued Regulation P, Series
of 1933 - 'Holding Company Affiliates - Voting Permits'.
It has also issued X-7543 (Interpretation of Banking Act
of 1933) applying to a particular case of affiliate examination.
"It is believed that the great variety and intricacy of
affiliate relationships brings to the fore another sound
reason for the numerical and quality enlargement of the
examination staffs in the Federal Reserve Agents departments. Furthermore, the statement in letter advices to
the Board of particular affiliate relationships if made
presently by the Federal Reserve Agents may contribute
helpfully to the solution of this group of problems as
the Board devises its final regulations thereon.

C.

"While it is understood that the Federal Reserve Board
has an interim opinion of its Counsel as to the effect
of Section 8A of the Clayton Antitrust Act as amended by
section 33 of the Banking Act of 1933 and is prepared to
deal with strictly emergency applications for permits to
serve as director in more than one institution, the Board
has requested the deferring of such applications in
general pending the issuance of regulations and the preparation of forms to be used in that connection.
"In general your committee believes that there is great
helpfulness to the Federal Reserve Agents in the particular letters of interpretation that are being received.
The Secretary of the Board advises us that we are
receiving these important contributions in every case
where specific problems are presented to the Board.
Although we are mindful of the added burden laid upon
the Board and its officers by suggesting an increase of
such Letters of Interpretation, it is suggested that by
presenting to the Board for advice thereon all such
problems as they arise in the several Federal reserve
banks each Federal Reserve Agent is materially aiding
his colleagues in preparation for their new and heavier
responsibilities.




L. B. Williams
W. W. Hoxton
M. L. McClure
Committee"

8/29/33

-49Reference was then made to the expiration on Tune 30, 1933, of

the period covered by the Board's approval of the payment to the Comptroller
Of the Currency by Federal reserve banks of a fee of 40.00 for each report
Of examination of national banks, and to the action taken at the meeting
of the Federal Reserve Agents' Conference on August 16, 1933, in voting,
subject to the approval of the Federal Reserve Board, to acquiesce in a
request of the Comptroller of the Currency that the fee of
tinued for one year from July 1, 1933.

10.00 be con-

It was pointed out that the 40.00

fee was approved by the Board in November, 1932, for the purpose of assistLag the office of the Comptroller of the Currency to make up a deficiency
1Z the revenues of his office for the fiscal year 1933 pending a determination by the Comptroller upon some other method of meeting the situation;
that conferences between Er. Paulger, Chief of the Board's Division of
.4kbilinations, and the Chief National Bank Examiner of the Comptroller's
"rice have established the fact that a fee of 1;1-5.00 is amply sufficient
to cover the cost of the reports furnished the Federal reserve banks; but
that the Comptroller of the Currency has not been able to determine upon a
Inethod of making up the deficiency in his funds and that the continuation
°r the :,)10.00 fee for reports furnished the Federal reserve banks is again
'
lequested by him temporarily to meet the situation.
L's. James stated that he felt that if the Comptroller of the CurWill agree to set up a procedure under which adequate examinations
4c)1' '4e trust departments of national banks will be made and assure the
-k-cl that satisfactory examinations will be made in the future, he would
he willing to approve the payment for a temporary period of an additional




-50-

8/29/33

amount for the reports furnished to the Federal reserve banks, but that he
feels there should be a distinct understanding that the examinations of
national banks are to be satisfactory to the Federal Reserve Board, particUlarly with regard to the examination of the trust departments.
Mr. O'Connor stated that he was fully aware of the necessity for the
establishment of an adequate force of examiners and satisfactory supervision of the examination of trust departments of national banks, but that

his office has been so occupied with the problems of opening closed national
beaks that he had had no opportunity to work out a procedure for the examination of trust departments or a satisfactory basis for assessment for such
ezaminations under the Act of Tuly 2, 1933, which authorizes the Comptroller
°I" the Currency to assess against a national bank the cost of examining the

trust department.

He stated, however, that he would give attention to this

raatter as soon as possible.
At the conclusion of a discussion, the action
of the Federal Reserve Agents' Conference was
approved with the understanding that the payment
of a fee of 0.0.00 for each report of examination
of a national bank furnished by the Comptroller of
the Currency during the year ending Tune 30, 1934,
will enable him to meet the present deficiency in
the revenues of his office and that as soon as
possible during the year there will be set up by
the Comptroller an organization to examine trust
departments of national banks for which an adequate
charge will be made.
In connection with the above matter, reference was made to the
"of a comnittee of the Federal Reserve Agents' Conference with regard
rePt3
to

e
a responsibility of the Federal reserve agents under the Banking Act

or 19331 in which it was stated that the Federal reserve agent at each
?ederal reserve bank should have a thoroughly trained man on his force to




-51-

8/29/33

exam1ne the trust departments of State member banks and that the services
Of such a man should be available for the examination of trust departments
Of national banks.
The Secretary was requested to send a letter
to all Federal reserve agents stating that the
Board approves the recommendation of the conference and requests each agent to take steps immediately to arrange for the employment of a man who
is well qualified as a trust examiner, and, when
found, to make a specific recommendation to the
Federal Reserve Board with regard to his appointment and salary.
Mr. Morrill then stated that as a result of negotiations authorized by the Board at the meeting on July 28, 1933, an agreement has been
reached with the Shoreham Investment Company, Incorporated, owners of the
Shoreham Building, and a lease has been prepared providing for 856 square
feet of additional space on the third floor of the Shoreham Building for
the Division of Bank Operations at a rate of 4.50 per square foot or a
total rental of ::,;107 per month, the lease to expire on June 30, 1937, subject to the right of the Board to terminate the lease on or after the first
claY of July, 193b, upon sixty days' written notice, which conforms to the

I/I'°visions of the existing lease covering the space now occupied by the
4visions of Bank Operations and Research and Statistics in the Shoreham
811ilding; that two leases have been prepared providing for space on the
si th floor of the Shoreham Building, to be occupied by the Division of
' :6•Ininations, one lease covering 4342.9 square feet to be occupied
)
'
beCinting September 1, 1933, at a rental of tfi633.34 per month, and the
tiler lease providing for (a) 1007 square feet to be occupied as soon as
l'e4cIY for occupancy during the first week of September, at a rental of




41

-52-

8/29/33

a46.90 per month, and (b) 453 square feet to be occupied beginning
October 1, 1933, or as soon as ready for occupancy, at a rental of $66.06
Per month.

In both of these leases covering space on the sixth floor, the

i 1.75 per square foot per year and the terms of
rental is at the rate of cei

the leases expire on February 28, 1934, with an option on the part of the
Board to renew for the period ending June 30, 1937, suhject to the right
Of the Board to terminAte the renewed leases at any time upon 90 days
totice in writing.

Li.. Morrill also stated that, in view of the option

of the Board to terminate the leases covering the space to be occupied by
the Division of Examinations, it is provided that if the lease covering

the 4342.9 square feet of space is terminated within one year, the Board
ia to pay the Shoreham Investment Company ,1,500, representing the cost
Of

replacement of partitions which are being removed in that space pur-

eklant to the agreement with the Company.
The Governor was authorized to execute the
three leases above referred to on behalf of the
Federal Reserve Board following their execution
by a duly authorized officer of the Shoreham Investment Company, Incorporated.
Memorandum dated August 11, 1933, from Mr. Wyatt, General Counsel,
l'ecammending that the Board authorize the expenditure of a sum not exceedfor the purpose of erecting and painting temporary partitions
ellb dividing rooms 204 and 208 into two rooms each, and a partition cutting
l(30m off the end of room 357 which will be occupied by Counsel's office
'
e'.*8 80011 as the Division of Examinations is moved to the Shoreham Building.




Approved.

8/29/33

-53There was then presented a memorandum dated August 11, 1933, from

Mr. Goldenweiser, Director of the Division of Research and Statistics,
recommending the temporary appointment of Mr. Woodlief Thomas as a member
Of the staff of that division, with salary at the rate of :666.67 per
Month, with the understanding that the appointment and compensation are
to be reviewed at the end of six months; Mr. Thomas to take the place of
M. Winfield Riefler, who has been loaned temporarily to the President's
xecutive Council.
Of

la*. florrill stated that Mr. Thomas is now in the employ

the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and that Mr. Case, Chairman of the

Xew York bank, had advised that the board of directors of the bank had
granted Lai. Thomas a leave of absence with pay during the period of his
service to the Board, one of the reasons for the directors' action being
the desire to preserve Hr. Thomas' status under the bank's group insurance
policy.
After discussion, during which it was agreed
that the Board should pay the salary of Mr. Thomas
during the period of his service, and, in order
that there may be no question as to the continuance
of his status under the bank's group insurance
policy, the Secretary was requested to advise the
chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
that the Board will reimburse the Federal reserve
bank for Mr. Thomas' salary at the present rate of
0,500 per annum during the period of his service
to the Federal Reserve Board, together with an
additional amount at the rate of 0500 per annum to
cover the expense to which he will be put in coming
to Washington.
There was then presented a revised draft of the regulation,
telitatively approved at the meeting on August 4, 1933, with regard to the
1:3SYMent by member banks of interest on deposits, and Yr. Morrill stated

"careful consideration had been given to the suggestions made by the
th




8/29/33

-54-

various Federal reserve banks with regard to the regulation, a number of
Which had been incorporated in the draft now under consideration.
After discussion, the regulation was approved
in the following form, and the Secretary was requested to send copies to all Federal reserve agents
with the advice that it has been adopted by the Board
and is to be published in the next issue of the Federal Reserve Bulletin and also printed in pamphlet
form, and with the request that, in order that member
banks may be advised as soon as possible of the provisions of the regulation, each Federal reserve bank
issue to each member bank in its district as soon as
possible a special circular containing the complete
text of the regulation:
REGULATION Q, SERIES OF 1933
PA I

OF INTEREST ON DEPOSITS.

101

SCOPE OF REGULATION
"This regulation relates to the payment of deposits and
interest thereon by member banks of the Federal Reserve System
and not to the computation and maintenance of the reserves
Which member banks are required to maintain against deposits.
The rules concerning reserves of member banks are contained in
the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation D.
SECTION I.

STATUTORY PROVISIONS.

"Section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended by the
Banking Act of 1933, provides in part as follows:
'Sec. 19. Demand deposits within the meaning of
this Act shall comprise all deposits payable within
thirty days, and time deposits shall comprise all deposits payable after thirty days, all savings accounts
and certificates of deposit which are subject to not
less than thirty days' notice before payment, and all
postal savings deposits.
* * *

* * ** *

* * *

'No member bank shall, directly or indirectly by
any device whatsoever, pay any interest on any deposit
Which is payable on demand: Provided, That nothing
herein contained shall be construed as prohibiting the
payment of interest in accordance with the terms of any




8/29/33

-55"'certificate of deposit or other contract heretofore entered into in good faith which is in force on
the date of the enactment of this paragraph; but no
such certificate of deposit or other contract shall
be renewed or extended unless it shall be modified to
conform to this paragraph, and every member bank shall
take such action as may be necessary to conform to
this paragraph as soon as possible consistently with
Its contractual obligations: Provided, however, That
this paragraph shall not apply to any deposit of such
bank which is payable only at an office thereof
located in a foreign country, and shall not apply to
any deposit made by a mutual savings bank, nor to any
deposit of public funds made by or on behalf of any
State, county, school district, or other subdivision
or municipality, with respect to which payment of
interest is required under State law.
'The Federal Reserve Board shall from time to
time limit by regulation the rate of interest which
may be paid by member banks on time deposits, and may
prescribe different rates for such payment on time and
savings deposits having different maturities or subject to different conditions respecting withdrawal or
repayment or subject to different conditions by reason
of different locations. No member bank shall pay any
time deposit before its maturity, or waive any requirement of notice before payment of any savings deposit
except as to all savings deposits having the same requirement.'

"Section 24 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended by the Act
Of February 25, 1927, provides in part as follows:
'Such banks may continue hereafter as heretofore
to receive time and savings deposits and to pay
interest on the same, but the rate of interest which
such banks may pay upon such time deposits or upon
savings or other deposits shall not exceed the maximum
rate authorized by law to be paid upon such deposits
by State banks or trust companies organized under the
laws of the State wherein such national banking association is located.'

SECTION II.

DEPOSITS PAYABLE ON DILAND.

"(a) Interest prohibited. - Except as hereinafter stated, no
Member bank of the Federal Reserve System shall, directly or indirectly, by any device whatsoever, pay any interest on any deposit




425
8/29/33

-56-

"which is payable on demand.
"(b) Exceptions. - This prohibition does not apply to
1. Any deposit which is payable only at an office of
such bank which is located in a foreign country.(1)
2. Any deposit made by a mutual savings bank.
3. Any deposit of public funds(2) made by or on behalf of any State, county, school district, or other subdivision or municipality, with respect to which payment of
interest is required under State law.
4. Payment of interest in accordance with the terms
of any certificate of deposit or other contract thich was
lawfully entered into in good faith before June 16, 1933,
and in force on that date and which may not be terminated
or modified by such bank at its option or without liability;
but no such certificate of deposit or other contract may be
renewed or extended unless it be modified to eliminate any
provision for the payment of interest on deposits payable
on demand; and every 'norther bank shall take such action as
may be necessary, as soon as possible consistently with its
contractual obligations, to eliminate from any such certificate of deposit or other contract any provision for the
payment of interest on deposits payable on demand.
SECTION III.

INTEREST ON TIME DEPOSITS.

"(a) Time deposits. - The term 'time deposits', for the purposes of this section, includes 'time certificates of deposit',
'time deposits, open accounts', and 'postal savings deposits', as
defined below:(3)

"Footnote
(1) The Philippine Islands, Puerto Rico, Canal Zone,
Hawaii and other territories, dependencies or
insular possessions of the United States are not
foreign countries, within the meaning of the
above provision.
(2) Deposits of moneys raid into State courts by private parties pending the outcome of litigation
are not deposits of 'public funds' made by or on
behalf of any State, county, school district, or othc7
subdivision or municipality, within the meaning of
(3)

the above provision.
Under the provisions of Section 19 of the Yederal
serve Act, time deposits include savings deposits; but,
for convenience, savings deposits are dealt with separately in this regulation.




426
8/29/33

-57"1. Time certificates of deposit. - The term 'time
certificate of deposit' means an instrument evidencing the
deposit with a bank of a certain sum specified on the face
of the instrument payable to bearer or to any specified
person or to his order (i) On a certain date, specified in the instrument,
not less than thirty days after the date of the
deposit, or
(ii) At the expiration of a certain specified time
subsequent to the date of the instru:Tlent, in no case
less than thirty days, or
(iii) Upon notice in writing which is actually reauired(4) to be given a certain specified number of
days, not less than thirty days, before the date of
repayment, and
(iv) In all cases only =on presentation and surrender of the instrument.
"2. Time deposits, open accounts. - The term 'time
deposits, open accounts' means deposits, other than 'time
certificates of deposit', 'postal savings deposits', and
'savings deposits', in respect to which a written contract
has been entered into with the depositor at the time the
deposit is made that neither the whole nor any part of
such deposit may be withdrawn, by check or otherwise,
prior to the date of maturity, which shall be not less
than thirty days after the date of the deposit, or on
written notice which must be given by the depositor a
certain specified number of days in advance, in no case

"Footnote
(4) Under the provisions of Regulation D, a certificate
of deposit with respect to which the bank merely reserves the right to require written notice of not less
than thirty days may be classified as a time deposit
for the purpose of computinc, reserves; but interest
- aid on such a certificate of deposit, bemay not be )
cause it is in fact payable on demand unless prior to
such payment the notice of not less than thirty days
is actually required, and because the prohibition in
the law upon the pay-ent by a member bank of any time
deposit before its maturity clearly contemplates that
time deposits (other than savings deposits), upon which
interest is payable, must have a definite maturity for
at least thirty days prior to payment.




427
8/29/33

-58"less than thirty days.(°)
"3. Postal savings deposits. - The term 'postal savings deposits' means deposits in banks which consist of postal
savings funds deposited under the terms of the Postal Savings
Act, approved June 25, 1910, as amended by the Banking Act of
1933, and which comply with the requirements of paragraph 1 or
2 of this subsection.

"(b) Payment of interest. - Except in accordance with the provisions of this section, no member bank shall pay interest on any
time deposit in any manner, directly or indirectly, or by any method,
practice or device whatsoever.
"(c) Maximum rate of interest. "1. No member bank shall Pay interest, accruing after
October 31, 1933, on any time deposit or any part thereof at
a rate in eccess of three per cent per annum, compounded semiregardless of the basis upon which such interest
annually,(
may be computed, except as provided in paragraph 2 hereof.
"2. A member bank may pay interest on time deposits in
accordance with the terms of any certificate of deposit or
other contract which was lawfully entered into in Good faith
prior to June 16, 1933 and in force on that date and which
may not legally be terminated or modified by such bank at
its option or without liability; but no such certificate of
deposit or other contract shall be renewed or extended unless it be modified to conform to the provisions of this
regulation, and every member bank shall take such action as
may be necessary, as soon as possible consistently with its
contractual obligations, to bring all such certificates of
deposit or other contracts into conformity with the provisions of this regulation.
"3. The rate of interest paid by a member bank upon a
time deposit shall not in any case exceed (i) the maximum
rate prescribed in paragraph 1 of this subsection, or (ii)
the maximum rate authorized by law to be paid upon such deposits by State banks or trust companies organized under the
"Footnote
(5)

deposit, with respect to which the bank merely reserves the right to require notice of not less than
thirty days before any withdrawal is made is not a
'tine deposit, open account', within the meaning of
the above definition.
This limitation is not to be interpreted as preventing the compoundin,, of interest at other than semiannual intervals provided that the aggregate amount
of such interest so compounded does not exceed the
aggregate amount of interest at a rate of three per
cent per annum when compounded semi-annually.




428
8/29/33

-59-

"laws of the State in which such member bank is located,
whichever may be less.
"(d) Deposits payable within thirty days. - Interest at a
rate not exceeding that prescribed in subsection (c) of this
section may be paid until maturity upon deposits which were bona
fide time deposits at the time of deposit, although they have
since become payable within thirty days. On time deposits with
respect to which notice of withdrawal shall have been given to
the bank interest may be paid until the expiration of the period
of such notice at a rate not exceeding that prescribed in subsection (c) of this section. No interest shall be paid by a
member bank on any amount which, by the terms of any certificate
or other contract or agreement or otherwise, the bank may be
required to pay within thirty days from the date on which such
amount is deposited in such bank.
"(e) No interest after maturity or expiration of notice. After the date of maturity of any time deposit, such deposit
is a deposit payable on demand, and no interest may be paid on
such deposit for any period subsequent to such date. After the
expiration of the period of notice given with respect to the
repayment of any time deposit, such deposit is a deposit payable
on demand and no interest may be paid on such deposit for any
period subsequent to the expiration of such notice.
SECTION IV.

PAYMENT OF TIME DEPOSITS BEFORE flATURITY.

"(a) No member bank shall pay any time deposit except in
accordance with the provisions of this section, even though no
interest is paid on such deposit.()
"(b) No member bank shall pay any time deposit, which is
Payable on a specified date, before such specified date.
"(c) No member bank shall Pay any time deposit, which is
Payable at the expiration of a certain specified period, before
such specified period has expired.
"Footnote
(7) The making of a loan to the owner of a time deposit
in a member bank by such bank, or by any other bank,
person, partnership or corporation in accordance with
any agreement, arrangement or understanding with such
bank, for the purpose of evading, any prohibition of
section IV above, will, to the extent of such loan,
be deemed to be a payment of such deposit in violation
of such prohibition, and, in any case in which a loan
is made Lo the owner of a time deposit in a member
bank by such bank or in accordance with any agreement,
arrangement or understand ins; with such bank, the member bank must be prepared to show clearly that it was
made in good faith and not for the purpose of evading
any such prohibition.




429
8/29/33

-60-

"(d) No member barilc shall Pay any time deposit, with respect to which notice is required to be (iven a certain specified Period before any withdrawal is made, until such required
notice has been given and the specified period thereafter has
expired.
SECTION V.

INTEREST ON SAVINGS DEPOSITS.

"(a) Definition. - The term 'savings deposit' means a deposit
which consists of funds accumulated for bona fide thrift purposes(8)
and in respect to which "1. The pass book or other form of receipt, evidencing
such deposit, must be presented to the bank whenever a
withdrawal is made.
"2. The depositor is required, or may at any time be
required, by the bank to give notice in writing of an intended withdrawal not less than thirty days before a withdrawal is made, and
"3. The above requirements are included in the bank's
printed regulations accepted by the depositor or in some
other written contract with the depositor.
"(b) Payment of interest. - Except in accordance with the
Provisions of this section, no member bank shall pay interest
on any savins deposit in any manner, directly or indirectly, or
by any method, Practice or device whatsoever.
"(c) Laximum rate of interest. "1. No member bank shall pay interest, accruing after
October 31, 1933, on any savings deposit or any part thereof
at a rate in excess of three per cent per annum, compounded
sami-annually,(9) regardless of the basis upon which such
interest may be computed, except as provided in paragraph 2
hereof.
"2. _L member bank may pay interest on savings deposits
in accordance with the terms of any contract, which was law"Footnote
(8) If by reason of the amount of the deposit, the business
of the depositor or otherwise, a question arises whether
a deposit is properly classified by a bank as a savings
deposit, the bank must be prepared to show clearly that
it is a deposit consisting of funds accumulated for bona
fide thrift purposes and that it otherwise complies with
the above definition.
(9) This limitation is not to be interpreted as preventing
the compounding of interest at other than semi-annual
intervals provided that the aggregate amount of such
interest so compounded does not exceed the aggregate
amount of interest at a rate of three per cent per
annum when compounded semi-annually.



8/29/33

-61"fully entered into in good faith prior to June 16, 1933, and
in force on that date and which may not legally be terminated
or modified by such bank at its option or without liability;
but no such contract shall be renewed or extended unless it
be modified to conform to the provisions of this regulation,
and every member bank shall take such action as shall be
necessary, as soon as possible consistently with its contractual obligations, to bring all such contracts into conformity with the provisions of this regulation.
"3. The rate of interest paid by a member bank upon
a savings deposit shall not in any case exceed (i) the
maximum rate prescribed in paragraph 1 of this subsection,
or (ii) the maximum rate authorized by law to be paid upon
such deposits by State banks or trust companies organized
under the laws of the State in which such member bank is
located, whichever may be less.

"(d) Deposits upon which notice of withdrawal is not given.Interest at a rate not exceedilw that prescribed in subsection
(c) of this section may be paid upon savings deposits as defined
above with respect to which notice of intended withdrawal has
not actually been required or given.
•
"(e) Deposits upon which notice of withdrawal has been
- Interest at a rate not exceeding that prescribed in subsection (c) of this section may be paid upon savings deposits,
with respect to which notice of intended withdrawal may have
been given to the bank, until the expiration of the period of
such notice.
"(f) No interest after expiration of period of notice. liter the expiration of the period of notice given with respect
to the intended withdrawal of any savings deposit, such deposit is
a deposit payable on demand and no interest may be paid on such
deposit for any period subsequent to the expiration of such notice,
unless the owner of such deposit advise the bank in writing that
the deposit will not be withdrawn pursuant to such notice or that
the deposit will thereafter again be subject to the requirements
aPPlicable to savings deposits, in which event the deposit again
constitutes a savings deposit after the date upon which such advice is received by the bank.
SECTION VI.

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF SAVINGS DEPOSITS.

"(a) A member bank must observe the requirements set forth
below in requiring notice of intended withdrawal of any savings
deposit, or in waiving such notice, or in repaying any savings
deposit, or part thereof, without requiring such notice, whether
such notice of intended withdrawal is required to be given in
each case by the terms of the bank's contract with the depositor




8/29/33

-62-

"or may, under such contract, be required by the bank at any time
at its option.
"1. If a member bank waive such notice of intended
withdrawal as to any portion or percentage of the savings
deposits of any depositor, it shall waive such notice as
to the same portion or percentage of the savings deposits
of every other depositor which are subject to the same
reauirement.
"2. If a member bank pay any portion or percentage
of the savings deposits of any depositor, without requiring such notice, it shall, upon request and without
requirin: such notice, pay the same portion or percentage
of the savings deposits of every other depositor which
are subject to the same requirement.
"3. If a member bank require such notice before the
payment of any portion or percentage of the savings
deposits of any depositor, it shall require such notice
before the payment of the same portion or percentage of
the savings deposits of any other depositor which are
subject to the same requirement.
"(b) No member bank shall change its practice with respect
to the requiring or waiving of notice of intended withdrawal of
savings deposits except after duly recorded action of its board
Of directors or of its executive comittee properly authorized,
and no practice in this respect shall be adopted which does not
conform to the requirements of paragraph 1, 2, or 3 of subsection
(a) of this section.
"(c) No change in the practice of a member bank with respect
to the requiring or waiving of notice of intended withdrawal of
savings deposits subject to the same requirement shall be made
until a reasonable time following the last preceding change in the
practice with respect to savings deposits subject to the same
requirement shall have elapsed.
"(d) A member bank must observe the requirements of this
section with respect to savings deposits even though no interest
be paid on such deposits.(10)

"Footnote
(10)




The makinc: of a loan to the owner of a savings deposit
in a member bank by such bank, or by any other bank,
person, partnership or corporation in accordance with
any agreement, arrangement or understanding with such
bank, for the purpose of evading any requirement of

8/29/33

-63-

"Footnote (continued)
(10) this section, will, to the extent of such loan, be
deemed to be a payment of such deposit or waiver
of notice with respect thereto in violation of
such requirement, and, in any case in which a loan
Is made to the owner of a savings deposit in a
member bank by such bank or in accordance with any
agreement, arrangement or understanding with such
bank, the member bank must be prepared to show
clearly that it was made in good faith and not for
the purpose of evading any requirement of this
section."
Governor Black then stated that he had just talked to mr. Stevens,
airman of the Federal Reserve Bark of Chicago, over the telephone, who
had advised that the board of directors of the bank, at its meeting on
44gu5t 25, had decided to defer the selection of a governor of the bank
until the meeting of the directors in January of next year, that during
the interim Deputy Governor Preston had been designated as Acting Governor,
and that, subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Board, his salary had
been fixed at the rate of ::34,000 per annum for the balance of the current
Irear.

Governor Black also stated that Lir. Stevens had advised that the

board of directors was in session and would like to be advised as to whether
the Board would approve the salary fixed for La... Preston.
During the ensuing discussion, Governor Black called Er. Stevens
On the telephone and stated that the Board did not understand why the board
°I' directors should not take definite action with regard to the appointment
°r a governor of the bank, or why Deputy Governor :McKay should not be
e°11tinued as acting Governor, as the Board understood he had been acting
14 that capacity.

Lir. Stevens replied, Governor Black stated, that a

decision has not been reached by the directors as to the action to be taken
Etrtez the first of the year with regard to the appointment of a governor




8/29/33

-64-

of the bank as it is possible that Governor EcDougal may return, and that
Deputy Governor McKay had never been designated as acting governor of the
bank, although he had been selected as the bank's representative on the
Federal Open Market Committee.
Ex. Szymczak stated that he had understood from Mr. Stevens that
tothing would be done with regard to the appointment of a governor of the
bank until some time during the first two weeks in September, after the
return of Ex. Simpson, Deputy Chairman of the board of directors, to
Chicago, and of Ex. Miller, Chairman of the Board's Committee on District
No, 7, to Washington, and that it was his understanding that Er. Simpson
Wa8

not at the directors meeting on August 25.
At the conclusion of the discussion, it was
.
.
understood that Governor Black would request ra
Stevens to advise the Board fully in a letter as
to the action taken by the Board of Directors of
the bank. It was also decided that upon receipt
of such letter it should be referred to the
Chicago Committee consisting of Messrs. Szymczak
and Miller for consideration.
Upon inquiry by Ex. Hamlin as to the status of the proposed letter

to the Attorney General transmitting the report made by the Board's
Division of Examinations with regard to irregularities in the fiscal
"5451loY department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago,

la..

Morrill stated

t4t as a result of a discussion at a meeting of the Board on April 17,
3433

St which the Chairman of the Board was in attendance, the letter was

l'eterred to him for consideration and had not been returned.

Er. Morrill

:41180 stated that he understood that Under Secretary Ballantine had been
°Dposed to sending the letter and that the matter had been laid aside, and,




t

-65-

8/29/33

because of the illness of the Secretary of the Treasury, nothing was done
regarding the letter until recently when Under Secretary Acheson took the
tatter up and asked Lir. Harlan, Financial Legal Assistant to the Secretary,
to review the matter, which he is now doing.
Reports of Standing Committee dated August 21, 22, 23, 25, 26
and 28, 1933, requesting approval of the following changes in stock at
Federal reserve banks:
A2211a.ations for ORIGINAL Stock:
District No. 1.
First National Bank of Pittsfield, Maine.
Pirst Natiorml Bank of Waterville, Maine.
Farmington National Bank, Farmington, N. II.

Shares
72
216
33

321

District No. 3.
Pulton County Bank, McConnellsburg, Pa.

90

90

District No. 6.
First National Bank in Tarpon Springs, Florida.

33

33

66
Total
Tot

66
510

strict No. 12.
Medford National flank, Medford, Oregon.

Akklications for
..19.1Ptrict No. 4.
ational Bank of
(Increase in
decrease in

ADDITIONAL Stock:
London, London, Kentucky.
capital, partly offset by
surplus)

,
1)18trict No. 6.
-Liberty National Bank and Trust Company,
Savannah, Ga. (Increase in surplus)
l'irst National Bank, Lie Comb City, Miss.
(Increase in surplus)
District No.
9.
li-rat National Bank, Carlton, Minnesota.
(Increase in capital, preferred)




8

8

1
15

16

18
Total

18
42

8/29/33

-66Shares

Applications for SURRENDER of Stock:
District No. 3.
Millersville National Bank, Eillersville, Pa.
(Insolvent)

36

District No. 4.
First National Bank, Ansonia, Ohio. (Insolvent)
First National Bank of Latrobe, Pa. (V.L.Suc. by
2irst National Bank in Latrobe)
District No. G.
Chattanooga National Bank, Chattanooga, Tenn.
(Being liquidated through conservator)

36

20
240

260

1,500

1,500

District No. 7.
Citizens National Bank, Liaberry, Ind. (Insolvent)
Farmers National Bank, Taylorville, Illinois.
(Insolvent)

42
92

134

1.10.••••••

APt No."
First National Bank of Marissa, Illinois. (V.L.Suc.
by The First National Bank, Larissa, Ill.)

39

39

District No. 9.
First National Bank, Le Sueur, Liinn. (Insolvent)

18

18

District No. 12.
First National Bank, Rialto, California. (Insolvent)

Approved.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

%roved:




48
Total

48
2,035