View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1337
A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
6̀Ystem

waS held in Washington on Saturday, August 18, 1945, at 10:30

PRESENT:

Mr. Ransom, Vice Chairman
Mr. Szymczak
Mr. Draper
Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Connell, General Assistant,
Office of the Secretary
Mr. Morrill, Special Adviser
Mr. Thurston, Assistant to the Chairman

The
action stated with respect to each of the matters hereinOtte
,
referred to was taken by the Board:
reatiin

Telegram to the Presidents of all the Federal Reserve Banks

g as
follows:
cei,:
Following memorandum dated August 17, 1945, re'
e from Navy Department signed by Comdr. Donald P.
tolles, Chief of Finance Division, on procedure to be
ter ?wed in connection with guaranteed loan program afGe1.4ugust 14, 1945. Similar memorandum, signed by Maj.
?tarter, received from War Department.
pl1A 9RANDUM TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDRESERVE SYSTEM
.ubject: Guaranteed Loan Program after August

-1-4, 1945

1. The announcement of the Japanese agreement '
to surrender makes it appropriate for the
`a7r1,1ces to modify the guaranteed loan program,
4na accordingly the following instructions are
'8811
"by the War Department, the Navy Department
a nd the
i
Maritime Commission in connection with
pll,t?ure administration of guaranteed loans by the
e'eral Reserve Banks.
'V AND VT LOANS
'2. Outstanding V and VT Loans. The rights
:
4c1 obligations of
the guarantor (including the FedZ,
1 Reserve Bank as its agent), the financing inand the borrower under existing loans and
guarantees as
defined in the documents relating




1338
8/18/45

-2-

"thereto, will not be affected by the surrender
of Japan. In cases where outstanding loans require
the consent of the Reserve Bank or the guarantor
for the financing of production under additional
war contracts, such consent should not be given
Without submission of the matter to Washington.
'3. Outstanding Authorizations. V-loan
a
uthorizations which were outstanding on August
14) 1945 may be executed in accordance with their
terms, but the authority previously given to the
Reserve Banks to extend such outstanding authorizations for a period of thirty days is hereby revoked. Requests for the extension of such authorizations should be referred to the guarantor, and
its decision will be made in the light of the circumstances involved in each case.
Pending Applications. Applications for
-loans which have been filed with the Reserve
Banks and which were pending with the Reserve
Banks or the Services on August 14, 1945 will,
1,1nless withdrawn by the financing institution,
°e processed in the usual my. In such cases,
'
lphe guarantee will be confined to a loan with a
actTcia:lrily formula limited to items under termincontracts, and borrowings under unterminated contracts will be permitted only if the
circumstances stipulated in paragraph (7) below
eXist.
/34mi, '5.
Extensions of Maturity. The Reserve
are authorized to consent to requests for
'he extension of maturity of any V or VT loans
under the 1942
or 1943 form of guarantee agreement maturing hereafter (whether it be an origial maturity or a maturity resulting from an ex4!nsion hitherto granted) when in the opinion of
.Te Reserve Bank (concurred in by the Liaison Ofleer in the
case of War Department guarantees)
tlIch extension is necessary for orderly liquidaof the loan, subject to the following condi01 (3n8: (a) no such extension may exceed sixty
(b) the borrower shall relinquish its rights
'uder Section 6, except as to contracts terminated
ror to the beginning of the period of the exinstitution shall
rni°n; and (c) the financing
in
--4-inquish its rights under Section 5, except as

Z
I




8/18/45
-3"to contracts terminated prior to the beginning
of the period of the extension. Pursuant to such
relinquishment, contracts terminated during any
such period of extension should be excluded from
(a) or (x), as the case may be, and included in
(b) or (y), as the case may be. Loans under the
1944 V-loan guarantee agreement may be extended
by the
financing institution under the terms of
section 7 thereof. Additional extensions or an
extension exceeding sixty days may be given only
with the consent of the guarantor after submission
t° Washington. Previous instructions which are
i
nconsistent with the instructions set forth in
tills paragraph are hereby revoked.
'6. Authority_ for new V-loans. The surrender of Japan has not resulted in termination
of the war within the meaning of the First War
Powers Act, 1941, under which Executive Order 9112
was issued. Accordingly, the War and Navy Departments and the Maritime Commission are still empowered
to enter
into contracts with financing institutions
Fuaranteeing them against loss of principal or interest on loans, discounts or advances, or on camTitments in connection therewith, which may be made
lor the
Purpose of financing any contractor, subcontractor or
others engaged in any business or
?Peration which is deemed by the War Department,
the Navy
Department or the Maritime Commission to
e necessary, appropriate
or convenient for the
Prosecution of the war.
„ '7. Policy as to new V-Loans. However, it
wi-LI be the policy of the Services to enter into
:uarantees or new V loans (as distinguished from
inendin
g guarantees of outstanding loans or issulrlig guarantees of refinancing arrangements made
„ Order to bring about orderly liquidation of outStanding guaranteed loans)
only in exceptional cases
*c"nd where there is a clear necessity for the promurement of supplies or services by the War DepartNavy Department or Maritime Commission from
trt,
he
particular borrower, and where no other means
adequate financing is available to that borrower.
4 such cases the financing institution will be
e:)cPeoted to take an exposure clearly commensurate

i




1340
8/18/45

-4-"'With the risk involved, and the maturity will
be limited strictly in accordance with the requirements of the particular contracts to be financed.
Appropriate provision for borrowing against terminated contracts may be included in such loans.
'T-LOANS
'8. There will be no present change in the
Operation of the T-loan program. However, the special provision with respect to receivables on unterminated subcontracts under terminated prime contracts, which was authorized by the Navy Department
memorandum of April 24, 1945 attached to Board letdated April 27, 1945 to be inserted in
zxhibit D of the termination loan agreement, may
not be inserted
in T-loan agreements executed hereafter, unless the prospective borrower still holds
1:;rar contracts which have not been fully terminated.
lf any- case arises where the omission of this spe2ial provision will, in the opinion of the Reserve
J?azik, work an undue hardship upon the borrower, it
13 requested that such case be referred to the guarantor for its consideration.
'9. I am authorized to state that the War Department and the Maritime Commission concur in the
above.
'10. It is requested that copies of the above

instructions be transmitted to all Federal Reserve
Banks and to Army Liaison Officers."
Approved unanimously.

Telegram to the Presidents of all the Federal Reserve Banks
fig as
follows:

"Neither military nor civilian jeeps a;TT, classified
automobiles
for purposes of Regulation Vv.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Day, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of
ancisco,
reading as follows:
copy "There is enclosed herewith for your information a
'
u a letter addressed to Chairman Eccles by Charles




"
/45

—5—

it 13
.

a. Henderson, Chairman of the Board, Reconstruction
Finance Corporation. The letter is self-explanatory."
Approved unanimously. The letter
referred to above read as follows:
"With the thought that this may be a matter of con2e to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
stem, we are
advising you that recently this Corpora2.0n cancelled its Blanket Participation Agreements with
the First
Richmond, Richmond, California,
and with National Bank in
the Escalon State Bank, Escalon, California,
11.id Agreements being dated April 24, 1945 and June 7,
t'945, respectively. This Corporation also denied liabilUnder said Agreements with respect to the loans made
'
17 said
banks to Renco, Ltd.
the same reason, we are also calling to your
't,tention the following facts:
"According to our information, Renco, Ltd. is the
'estamed business name of Mrs. Jeannette R. Partridge, a
certificate
to that effect having been filed in Martinez
k,ontra Costa County, California, approximately three
ths ago. Her
husband owns the controlling interest
!!ree banks: the First National Bank in Richmond,
ce
ndy California, the Escalon State Bank, Escalon,
He V-°rnia, and the Bank of Hughson, Hughson, California.
moll s also president of the First National Bank of Richarid director of the Escalon State Bank. The loan
.a.de
V the Escalon Bank to Renco is secured by 1191
Shares
;
/11
of the stock of the First National Bank of Richcotlu (the Richmond Bank has outstanding 3000 shares of
m4mon and 1000 shares of preferred stock) and the loan
to Renco by the Richmond Bank is secured by 151
shares
1/11
of stock of the Bank of Hughson, California (the
Bank has outstanding 3000 shares of common stock).
arid ,'In connection with the criss-crossing of the banks
tent
collateral securing the loans to Renco, Ltd., at1°11
is
8
,ection 3, particularly invited to 12 U.S.C. 83 and to
44 of Act 652 (the Bank Act), Deering's California
kxe
nsral Laws
(Vol. 1, page 241 )."
Tel
-egram reading as follows to Mr. Leedy, President of the
Peder.Reserve Bank of Kansas City, in reply to his telegram of Autklet
17
'1945, outlining the procedure which the Federal Reserve Bank

j

Tr




1342
8/18/45

—6—

"ansas City proposed to follow in the handling of checks drawn
04
Nebraska banks, a few of which have notified the Reserve Bank that
th
e'Y did not
intend to comply with the recent State law which requires
the
Par clearance
of checks:
„ "Re your wire August 17, we have considered language
advices
respect to which you propose to give your endorsers with
the return of checks not paid at par and also
reti°n taken with respect to bank which made deduction in
onl-tting for items forwarded to it. Procedure which you
"
-Line seems satisfactory and we have no suggestions to
°ffer.0




Approved unanimously

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Vice Chairman.