View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1152
A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
"Itelli was held in Washington on Tuesday, August 17, 1937, at 10:30
a. m.

PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Ransom, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
McKee
Davis

Mr. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Thurston, Special Assistant to the
Chairman
Mr. Wyatt, General Counsel
Mr. Paulger, Chief of the Division of
Examinations
Mr. Dreibelbis, Assistant General Counsel
Mr. Wingfield, Assistant General Counsel
Mr. Baumann, Assistant Counsel
Mr. Hostrup, Federal Reserve Examiner
There was presented the memorandum which was addressed to Mr.
14c4sebY Mr.
Paulger under date of April 17, 1937, and on which action
11413 deferred at the meeting of the Board on May 21, 1937, with respect
to th
e tr
eatment of securities depreciation in reports of examination.

After a discussion, consideration of
the memorandum was again deferred until
mich time as Mr. McKee might wish to bring
it up for further discussion by the Board.
At this point Mr. Bradley, Assistant Chief of the Division of
ty Loans,
joined the meeting.
Reference was made to informal discussions which had taken
"Lee wit
h respect to the installation of a news ticker service and
th
-goers
present expressed agreement that the service was desirable
141c1 that
'instead of being located in the Division of Security Loans,




1153
M/A7
-2it Eh
ould be installed in one of the rooms adjoining Mr. Thurston's
office.
Mr. Bradley withdrew from the meeting at this point.
Mr. Davis then submitted memoranda dated August 10 and 11,
147 ,
4
''rom the Personnel Committee recommending that the Chairman of
the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta be requested to indicate to each
ofthe f
ollowing persons that the Board is considering him for appointraerit 48 a director of a branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
48 ellc)/57.1 below, and to ascertain and advise the Board by wire whether
hs w°111d be willing
to accept the appointment if tendered:

Branch
W. E.
ClYde

For unexpired
portion of term
ending December 31:

MeEwen

Nashville

1939

Austin

Nashville

1938

Birmingham

1937, and at
the end of the
year, for the
succeeding
three year term.

Edward L.
Norton

Mrs Davis also submitted a memorandum dated August 17, 1937,
tret the
.v ersonnel Committee recommending
that the Chairman of the Fed-

04,e:serve

Bank of Kansas City be requested to indicate to Mr.

ee Roberts
that the Board is considering him for appointment as

&tree

4,14n Cr of the Oklahoma City branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of

be

itY for the unexpired portion of the term ending December 31,
and ,
to
ascertain and advise the Board by wire whether he would
g to accept the appointment if tendered.




1154
8/17/37
-3Mr. Davis moved that the recommendations of the Personnel Committee be approved.
Carried unanimously.
Attention was called to a letter received under date of July
6' 1937) from Vice President Sargent of the Federal Reserve Bank of
8111"11111ciaco inclosing a copy of a letter received under date of July
2) 1937, r_ora
r
Mr. John M. Grant, President of Transamerica Corporation,
Stin
Fran cisco,
California, and to a letter addressed to the Board by

Mr.

Grant under
date of July 23, 1937, with respect to the violation

c)tSecti°11 20 of the Banking Act of 1933 by member banks in the Transkaerice
group by reason of their affiliation with Bankamerica Company,
a
securiti
es Company.
At the conclusion of a discussion of
the matter, Mr. McKee moved that the Board
approve a letter to Mr. Sargent reading as
follows:
ti
"This refers to your letter of July 6, 1937, transmitbellg a copy of a letter of July 2, 1937, addressed to Mr.
tlY bY Mr. John M. Grant, president of Transamerica Corpora1a°!1) requesting that the Board review the circumstances reto the violation of section 20 of the Banking Act of
wit3 bY certain member banks by virtue of their affiliation
is h Bankamerica Company, a securities company. The Board
in receipt of a letter of July 23, 1937, from Mr.
ei'Llit relating to the same matter and a copy thereof is in(Is
for your information.
"In the letter addressed to Mr. Day, Mr. Grant sug6;e
itst” that, on the basis of the information contained thereth' It would be within the discretion of the Board to waive
r,
e Penalties provided by section 20 for at least one year
Ilam the date
when the affiliation of the member banks with
z;onnaerica Company became effective as a result of the disof Inter-America Corporation on June 28,, 1937, and
th
e
of its assets to Transamerica Corporation.




1155
8/17/37
"With respect to this question, it is the Board's view
that while it may exercise discretion with respect to the
assessment of penalties for violations of section 20, it has
no authority to exempt particular cases from the application
of that section or to authorize or consent to the continuance
Of r
elationships which are in violation of the law.
"In the letter addressed to the Board you will observe
that Mr. Grant's position is that where an affiliation rethrough common control by a holding company affiliate
sults
the
Provisions of section 5144 of the Revised Statutes of the
States, instead of those of section 20, apply and that
Ihe
the
affiliate relationship need not be terminated prior to
ifivel
Years from the date the holding company affiliate files
.
,
b 8 application for a voting permit. However, as you were
advised in the Board's telegram of July 1, 1937, the Board
lias already ruled with respect to that question and you are
.
1dvised that, after reconsidering the matter, it sees no
'eason to alter its views.
"Mr. Grant also stated that Bankamerica Company would
seam to
have been a securities company affiliate of the banks
question ever since the passage of the Banking Act of
and that in permitting such affiliate relationships to
rhtinue long after June 16, 1934, the Board had obviously
i°11°Ived the theory that the provisions of section 5144,
t1
):1:
1 !ead of those of section 20, control. He also suggested
aS a practical matter, the dissolution of Inter-America
Crporation and the transfer of its assets to Transamerica
'rPoration made no change in the relationships.
"In this connection, however, you will recall that in
a 1,104
involving loans by Bank of America National Trust
'
Savings Association to a corporation controlled by TransCorporation, the Board held that, since Transamerica
turporation only owned the stock of a corporation which in
nol
t*n owned stock of the bank, Transamerica Corporation was
2(bl a 'shareholder' of the bank within the meaning of section
co /(2) of the Banking Act of 1933, and hence the borrowing
ganc)ration was not an affiliate. By the same reasoning
of"raerica Company was not technically an affiliate of any
Ame b1,16 member banks in question. The dissolution of InterCorporation and the transfer of its assets to Transin rice Corporation, of course, changed this situation, mak11,11 the latter corporation a shareholder of each of the banks
poref ahY construction of the law. Thus, Transamerica Corte ;a'ion and its subsidiary banks lost the benefit of the
Clinical ruling which had protected them theretofore.
With respect to Bank of America National Trust and
'-us Association, Mr. Grant apparently recognized that,

1

Z




1156
8/17/37
-5Under the letter of the law, the distribution of a majority
of the shares of its stock to the shareholders of Transamerica
C3rPoration would not in itself, terminate the affiliate relEttionship between that bank and Bankamerica Company. However,
YOU Will observe his comment
to the effect that 'it seems
obvlous
tnat it was not the intent of the Banking Act to include within the term "affiliate" a relationship based upon
!
he ownership by large number of individuals of stocks of
uwo different institutions, where the disposition of either
i
c)r both of such
stocks by such individuals is not restricted
any Way.' However, the provisions of law defining the
sFm.'affiliate' make no such express exception and, in the
°P141on of the Board, afford no justification for so limiting
411e nleaning of the words by implication.
'In conclusion, you are advised that if, in the light of
the
nme views herein expressed, any member banks of the Transgroup are now violating section 20 as a result of afstion with Bankamerica Company, the Board will expect such
nv,lolations to
be terminated within a reasonable time and that
-usransamerica Corporation will take such action as may be fecesOn its part to bring about such temination. Meanwhile,
t, 61 the view of affording Transamerica Corporation an oppor7 111tY to comply with law, the Board, pending receipt of adWith respect to the steps which are being taken to comply
(; th the law, will defer any action concerning the assessment
_Penalties. Please advise Transamerica Corporation accordingly
T:( the Board
will appreciate your keeping it currently inrgled regarding the matter."
Carried unanimously.
At this
point Messrs. Wyatt, Paulo:.er, Dreibelbis, Wingfield,
141.11114n
4 and hostrup left the room.

t]

Mr. Davis presented a memorandum dated August 16, 1937, from

Personnel Committee regarding the selection of a Class C director
°I' the liederal Res
David
erve Bank of Philadelphia to succeed Mr.
telli) resigned.

The memorandum suggested for consideration in this

Ilecti°11 Mr. Thomas B. McCabe, President of the Scott Paper Company,
elleSter,
pennsylVania2

ek 8.̀ Company0




and Mr. Lessing Rosenwald, Chairman of Sears

1151
8/17/37
-6After a review of the consideration which
the Personnel Committee had given to the matter,
Mr. Davis moved that the Board indicate to Mr.
McCabe that it is considering him for appointment
as a Class C director of the Federal Reserve Bank
Of Philadelphia for the unexpired portion of the
term ending December 31, 1939, and ascertain
whether he would be willing to accept the appointment if tendered.
Carried unanimously, with the understanding
that Mr. Davis would take the necessary steps to
ascertain whether Mr. McCabe would be willing to
serve.
At this point
Mr. Thurston left the meeting and consideration
th
en given to each of the matters hereinafter referred to and the
Retiola
stated with respect thereto was taken by the Board:
The minutes of the meeting of the Board of Governors of the
Reserve System held on August 16, 1937, were approved unanitOusiy.

Teleo.rans to Messrs. Stewart and Sargent, Secretaries of the
''141

Reserve Banks of St. Louis and San Francisco, stating that the

IIPPr"es the establishment without chance by the respective banks
t(3cir °I' the
rates of discount and purchase in their existing schedules.
Approved unanimously.

clue,
'or
141,.

emerandum dated August 13, 1937, from Mr. Thanes, Assistant
the Division of Research and Statistics, recommending that

Ir. Drury, who has been working on a part-time temporary
'
,
In the storeroom of the Division since October 1, 1935, be
P4eed
e

to

n

full time temporary basis for the period from August 17
,
ePt%ebe,
- 00, 1937, both dates inclusive, and that his present




11158
-717, at
the rate of 000 per annum, be changed accordingly to the
rate or
k1,600 per annum.
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Leach, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of
reading as follows:
"Reference is made to the application of 'The Citizens
Bank in Gastonia', Gastonia, North Carolina, for
fiduciary powers, which was transmitted to the Board
h Mr. Fry's letter of July 21, 1937.
"The Board has given consideration to the application
ajgd to the information available in relation thereto. It
?Pears that the bank has immediately available one large
InntarY trust; that it has other trust business in pros'; and that the population and business activity of the
-„;!'
Z'Y of Gastonia and its trade territory are such as to war'
allt the belief that a corporate fiduciary in Gastonia would
entually
be able to develop a satisfactory volume of trust
cusineas, particularly as there is said to be at present no
°I*Porate fiduciary in Gastonia or the county of Gaston.
It appears further, however, that while the applicant
batk .
is in a generally satisfactory condition, Mr. Sims, the
?oPosed trust officer, has had but little practical experi,ce or training in fiduciary matters, and that his conduct
t_ the trust department of the predecessor bank was subject
critm by the national examiner, although it is recog114
:d that the business of that departme
nt was limited in
Ura and volume and the criticisms related mainly to insquate books and records.
tic, "It has been noted also, that
the report of investiga444 bY a national examiner, made in August, 1933, of the
the 4-eation to organize the applicant bank, reveals that
examiner regarded Mr. Sims as being overly optimistic,
N407?ulatively inclined and hopelessly involved financially.
rit
ormation is available here as to Mr. Sims' present
tioencial status, but the foregoing comments raise a cluesn Of doubt as to his qualifications and fitness to act
a trust
officer.
is t it is the view of the Board that, if a national bank
Where be authorized to exercise trust powers in Gastonia,
4s , the importance of the city and its trade territory
a g field for trust business warrant the assumption that
silbstantial amount of such business could eventually be
Nt

r

4




1159
8/17/37
-8"developed,
such bank should have available the services of
44 experienced and competent trust officer.
"The Board, therefore, has deferred action on the fiduei417 application of The Citizens National Bank in Gastonia
until such time as the bank can show that its proposed trust
otticer is qualified by training and experience to handle
Properly the
volume and types of fiduciary business which
44 would be likely to acquire."




Approved unanimously.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Chairman.