View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for August 14, 1957

To:

Members of the Board

From: Office of the Secretary

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System on the above date.
It is proposed to place in the record of policy actions required to be kept under the provisions of Section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act an entry covering the item in this set of minutes cam414enoing on the page and dealing with the subject referred to below:
Page

7

Approval of a discount
rate of 3-1/2 per cent
for the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco.

Should you have any question with regard to the minutes, it
al be appreciated if you will advise the Secretary's Office. OtherIf you were present at the meeting, please initial in column A
uelow to indicate that you approve the minutes. If you were not
Present, please initial in column B belay to indicate that you have
seen the minutes.

Chm. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
Gov. Vardaman
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson




2275
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Wednesday, August 14, 1957. The Board
met in the Board Room at 2:30 p.m.
PRESENT: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Cbnirman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Vardaman
Mills
Shepardson
Mr. Carpenter, Secretary
Mr. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Riefler, Assistant to the
Chairman
Mr. Thomas, Economic Adviser to
the Board
Mr. Johnson, Controller, and
Director, Division of Personnel
Administration
Mr. Masters, Director, Division of
Examinations
Mr. Cherry, Legislative Counsel
Mr. Solomon, Assistant General
Counsel

Letters from Congressman Patman. Chairman Martin called
attention to three letters received late yesterday afternoon and
today from Congressman Patman of Texas, the first of which referred
to the reports of examination of the Federal Reserve Banks and the
l'eport of audit of the System Open Market Account which were sent
several days ago to the Chairman of the House Banking and Currency
C°MMittee at Mr. Patman's request.

In his letter of August 9, 1957,

trluasmitting the reports, Chairman Martin stated that they were being
it to the Committee with the understanding that they might be made
4vailable in confidence only to members of Congress, their staffs,
suaa the staff of the Committee, this being the same basis on which




8/14/57

-2-

similar reports were sent to the Committee in 1954.

Mr. Patman's

letter stated that it would be convenient to him and his staff if
the reports could be removed from the quarters of the Committee to
a room in another Government building across the street known as
George Washington Inn. The letter also stated that Mr. Patman would
Personally guarantee that no one would enter the room who was not
Working for him on his staff, that there would be no leaks of information, and that the reports would be kept in perfect condition
and returned in good order.
In a discussion of what response would be appropriate,
Governor
Vardaman suggested writing a letter to Committee Chairman
Spence in which, after reference to the receipt of Mr. Patman's
letter, a statement would be mAde along the lines that inasmuch as
the reports had been sent by the Board to the Committee upon request,
the matter of their physical location would appear to be within the
responsibility of the Committee and the Board would consider it
4PPropriate for the question to be governed by the Committee's
views as to the proper use of the documents.
Agreement having been expressed with the approach suggested
13Y Governor Vardaman, Mr. Solomon was requested to prepare a letter
t0 Mr- Spence for the Chairman's signature, with the understanding
th4t the letter would be sent in Chairman Martin's discretion after

he had talked with Mr. Spence.




227
8/14/57
The other two letters from Congressman Patman requested information in several different categories, including information on the
waiver of penalties against member banks for failure to maintain required reserves, the classification of member banks for reserve
Purposes, and the operation of the System Open Market Account.
Consideration of these letters led to a general discussion
concerning types of information which the Board should refrain from
divulging to outside parties in the public interest.

With specific

reference to the letters from Mr. Patman, it was noted that the answers
to the first could be compiled quite readily but that the reply to
the other letter would require the gathering of a considerable amount
°f data.

It was understood that the replies would be sent at the

earliest opportunity and that an interim acknowledgment would be made.
Mr. Cherry then withdrew from the meeting.
Request from the Civil Service Commission.

Governor Shepardson

referred to a request from the Civil Service Commission for a report
On Board employees by occupational series as established under the
Civil Service Classification Act.

By way of background, he said

that in 1951 somewhat similar information was requested by the Civil
Service Commission but not furnished.

However, in 1955 the Board,

ill a gesture of cooperation, supplied information of this kind to the
Civil Service Commission and the National Science Foundation in conwith a study of the availability of professional personnel.




227S
8/14/57

The current request, he said, was received several months ago and
had been a matter of negotiation by the Division of Personnel Administration, which was unsuccessful in obtaining withdrawal of the
A letter addressed to Chairman Martin had now been received

inquiry.

from Mr. John W. Macy, Jr., Executive Director of the Civil Service
Commission, quoting a regulation of the Commission with regard to
Such requests and stating that this regulation, promulgated under
authority of the President, had the effect of a legal requirement for
agencies within the Executive Branch of the Government.
Governor Shepardson went on to say that at one stage consideration vas given to the possibility that certain, basic information from
the Board's payroll records could be turned over to the Commission
for adaptation for the purpose of the survey, but that the Division
Of Personnel Administration doubted whether the Commission would be
able to refine this basic information successfully.

He said it had

been his feeling - a view which he had conveyed to the Personnel
D

sion - that the request probably need not be complied with, since

it appeared to be of the same general nature as various reports collected
tl'am time to time by the Commission from agencies that are under Civil
Service.

However, in view of the letter from Mr. Macy, he felt that

the matter should be brought to the Board's attention.
In an ensuing discussion, the thought was expressed that if
the data were to be furnished, the basis would have to be one of




8/14/57

_5_

cooperation rather than compliance under the terms of Mr. Macy's
letter, which inferred that the Board was bound by regulations
aPPlicable to agencies in the Executive Branch of the Government.
In the circumstances, Governor Shepardson was requested to get in
touch with Mr. Macy, advise him of the Board's desire to be as
cooperative as possible in matters of this kind, clarify why the
Board could not comply with the request on the basis indicated in
the letter, and suggest that if the material was desired on a
cooperative basis the Board would be glad to consider a letter
written to its Chairman by the Chairman of the Commission.
Messrs. Riefler

Thomas, and Johnson then withdrew from the

meeting.
Items distributed or circulated to the Board.

The following

)'ems, which had been distributed or circulated to the members of
the Board and copies of which are attached to these minutes under
the respective item numbers indicated, were approved unanimously:

Item No.
from Mr. Johnson recommending that
tleMorandum
Board
the Retirement

1

authorize payment to
!
stem of the Federal Reserve Banks of an amount
'
-tPresenting the Board's accrued liability for
:!PloYees under the Bank Plan by reason of the
'';11cling changes in retirement benefits.
Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
!PProving the appointment of William B. Morgan
c'*8 Alternate Assistant Federal Reserve Agent.




2

2280
8/14/57

-6Item No.

Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco approving the appointment of
Charles V. Hinman as Federal Reserve Agent's
Representative at the Portland Branch.

3

Letter to Bank of America, New York, New York,
approving a proposed increase in the Bank's
capital stock. (For transmittal through the
Pederal Reserve Bank of New York)

4

Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
relating to the request of Consolidated Naval
Stores Company for a tax certification under
the Bank Holding Company Act.

5

Proposed purchase by The Chase Manhattan Bank of certain
There had been circulated to the members of the
Board a file relative to the proposed investment of $25,000 by The
Chase Manhattan Bank, New York, New York, in the stock of Manch, Inc.,
a corPoration which would act as nominee to hold title to FHA and VA
mortgages held in certain labor union trusts for which the member
baak acts as custodian for a group of individual trustees. This
rile indicated that the bank had been advised by the Office of the
Crvh--wtroller of the Currency that in the case of a national bank the
°trice would not object to the stock acquisition, the view being that
the

expenditure was a necessary cost of doing business and must be

ellerged to expense. It also appeared that an officer of the Federal
serve Bank of New York had advised a representative of the member
baJak that in his opinion the Board would take the same view as the




,t,
;
.
)0(
4
41

8/14/57
Comptroller's Office.

Upon review, however, the Board's staff con-

cluded that the stock purchase was not permitted by any provision of
the law and that it would constitute a violation of section 5136,
Revised Statutes.

A suggested letter to the New York Reserve Bank

would take this position, ask that the member bank be notified of
the Board's opinion, and request that in any future case of this
kind the Reserve Bank take the matter up with the Board before
giving an opinion as to the legality or propriety of the proposed
action.
Following preliminary discussion of the matter which indicated

that the members of the Board were interested in developing fully the
legal and practical aspects of the situation, it was agreed, at the
suggestion of Chairman Martin, to hold the item over for further
consideration at another meeting of the Board.
The meeting then adjourned.




Secretary's Note: During the day advice
was received from the Federal Reserve Bank
of San Francisco that the directors of that
Bank had established, subject to review and
determination by the Board of Governors, a
rate of 3-1/2 per cent on discounts for and
advances to member banks under sections 13
and 13a of the Federal Reserve Act, along
with appropriate subsidiary rates of discount
and purchase. Pursuant to the authority
given at the meeting on August 12, 1957,
the Secretary sent to the Reserve Bank a
telegram in the form attached hereto as
Item No. 6.

2282
8/14/57




-8Secretary's Note: In order to enable them
to consider in the preparation of their
final report comments made by Governors
Balderston and Szymczak on a draft of the
report, Governor Shepardson today approved
on behalf of the Board extension of the
appointments of Messrs. Leslie R. Rounds,
Chester Morrill, and George B. Vest as
Consultants to the Board, on the same
contractual basis as originally approved
by the Board, for such additional days
after August 16, 1957, as might be necessary in the judgment of the Vice Chairman
for the completion of their assignment.
Secretary's Notes: Governor Shepardson
approved on behalf of the Board on August
13, 1957, a letter to the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York, of which a copy is
attached hereto as Item No. 7, approving
the appointment of Walter E Jones as
examiner.
Pursuant to the recommendation contained
in a memorandum dated August 9, 1957, from
Mr. Marget, Director, Division of International
Finance, Governor Shepardson also approved
on behalf of the Board on August 13, 1957,
acceptance of the resignation of Anna I.
Sansalone, Clerk in that Division, effective
August 9, 1957.
Governor Shepardson today approved on behalf
of the Board a letter to the Federal Reserve
Bank of Philadelphia, of which a copy is
attached hereto as Item No. 81 approving the
appointment of Wayne H. Hainley as assistant
examiner.

SOAR° OF: GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 1
8/1h/57

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

°ice Correspondence
of Governors
E. J. Johnson

Date
Subject:

228'1
i"

August 8, 1957

Payment of Accrued Liability
to Retirement System

Attached is a letter dated August 51 19571 from the Secretary
Of the Retirement System of the Federal Reserve Banks advising of
the accrued liability payment with respect to Board employees who are
under the Bank Plan. This results from the changes in the benefits
by reason of the amendments to the Rules and Regulations adopted by
the Trustees on July 291 1957.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Board authorize the payment to the
Retirement System of $81 281 (of the total amount of $81343,289 for the
Banks and the Board) representing its accrued liability.
Comments
Four employees were still under the Bnnk Plan at the time of
the preparation of the actuary's estimates of accrued liabilities.
Since that time one employee has changed to the Board Plan and the
three remaining employees have this under consideration with the decision required by September 1, 19571 as set by the Board. It is
Understood that any additional adjustment for accrued liability resulting from these employees changing to the Board Plan will be made
in the actuarial rate established at the time of the next valuation
on February 28, 1958.

(Signed) E. J. Johnson

Attachment




2284
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 2
8/1h/57

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

August lh, 1957
1:r, Walter Ivj. Mitchell,
Federal Reserve Agent,
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta,
Atlanta
3, Georgia.
bear Mr. Mitchell:
In accordance with the request contained in your letter of
Atoll
the Board of Governors approves the appointment of
Mr--su ), 1957,
William B. Morgan as Alternate Assistant Federal Reserve Agent at
the Federal
Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
This approval is given with the understanding that Mr. Morgan
be solely responsible to the Federal Reserve Agent aid the Board
Governors for the proper performance of his duties, except that,
llring the absence or disability of the Federal Reserve Agent or a
va
F,,,!alleY in that office, his responsibility will be to the Assistant
kleral Reserve Agent and the Board of Governors.
will

When not engaged in the performance of his duties as Alternate
istant Federal Reserve Agent he may, with the approval of the Federal
n erve Agent and the President, perform such work for the Bank as will
8,' be inconsistent with his duties as Alternate Assistant Federal Re—
I've Agent.

t

It will be appreciated if Mr. Morgan is fully informed of the
41Portance of his responsibilities as a member of the staff of the
Fed
dl Reserve Agent and the need for maintenance of independence from
the
e °Aerations of the Bank in the discharge of these responsibilities.
It will also be appreciated if Mr. Morgan's executed Oath of
with advice as to the effective date of his appointment, is
iwarded to the Board.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
01,11.41,1,
eAtIM;14!.

OF THE
14.

ftlt

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No.

3

8/14/57

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

vci

ADDRESS OrriCIAL CORRESPONDENCE

oro,.
N7.04.1t0

TO THE BOARD

.*‘.3
0
*004**4

August

14, 1957

AIR MAIL
Mr. A. H. Brawner, Federal Reserve Agent,
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,
San Francisco 20, California.
Dear Mr. Brawner:
In accordance with the request contained in your letter of
u1Y 31, 1957, the Board of Governors approves the appointment of
A(
• .1r.
Charles V. Hinman as a Federal Reserve Agent's Representative at
the Portland Branch to succeed Mr. Donald H. Goetz.
This approval is given with the understanding that Mr. Hinman
wiL1 be solely responsible to the Federal Reserve Agent and the Board
(Icif Governors for the proper performance of his duties, except that,
uring the absence or disability of the Federal Reserve Agent or a
yacancy in that office, his responsibility will be to the Assistant
Federal Reserve Agent and the Board of Governors.
When not engaged in the performance of his duties as Federal
!eserve Agent's Representative Mr. Hinman may, with the approval of the
ederal Reserve Agent and the Vice President in charge of the Portland
j'anch, perform such work for the Branch as will not be inconsistent
41th his duties as Federal Reserve Agent's Representative.

l

It will be appreciated if Mr. Hinman is fully informed of
the •
importance of his responsibilities as a member of the staff of the
F
've_deral Reserve Agent and the need for maintenance of independence from
ne operations of the Bank in the discharge of these responsibilities.
It is noted from your letter that Mr. Hinman will execute the
Oath of Office, which will be forwarded to the Board of Governors
with advice of the effective date of his appointment.
us




Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
4012**,1,4

OF THE

1400001,N
'

Item No. LI
8/11/57

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

Y•tt

August 14, 1957

Ili'. Russell G. Smith,
Executive Vice President,
Bank of America,
40 wail street,
New York, New York.
Dear Ni. Smith:
This refers to your letter of July 19, 1957, and enclosures,
l'equesting the Board's approval of a proposal to increase the capital
stock of Bank of America.
It is noted that the capital stock of Bank of America is to
be
ncreased from $13,000,000 consisting of 130,000 shares to
?e3,000,000 consisting of 230,000 shares, the additional shares to
°E) sold at $100 per share.
6_

The Board approves the proposed increase in the capital stock
°f Bank of America and the proposed amendment to the Articles of Asso?iation of Bank of America in this connection. The Board's approval
t8 given without regard to any additional capital that may be necessary
Jai the event that Bank of America, after obtaining the Board's further
!nd final approval, consummates the proposed purchase of the stock of
'oanca d'America e d'Italia.




Very truly yours,
(Signed)

S. R. Carpenter

S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

228
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No.

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

5

8/M/57

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE SWARD

August lb, 1957
J. E. Denmark, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta,
Atlanta 3, Georgia.
Dear Mr. Denmark:
This is with further reference to your letter of May 29, 1957,
en"1
,-,
osing a letter of May 24 from Mr. F. Elgin Bayless, President of
rnsolidated Naval Stores Company, with respect to tax certification
1-4 connection with Consolidated's proposed distribution of shares of
'he Barnett National Bank and Barnett National Securities Corporation
(4* Jacksonville. The Board has now received from the Internal Revenue
,e1"Tice a ruling on the question mentioned in the Board's letter of
°ale 26 to you; a copy of that ruling is enclosed for the consideration
°f Your Bank's counsel.
The last three paragraphs of Mr. Bayless' letter indicate a
Poseible
misunderstanding
of the tax provisions of the Bank Holding
Com,
Pany Act. As pointed out in previous correspondence, section 1103(b)
of the
Internal Revenue Code calls for certification by the Board that
the corporation concerned satisfies all requirements for "qualified
allk
the holding corporation" status. One of these requirements is that
corporation "is a bank holding company". Internal Revenue Code,
1---1-03(b)(1). A second requirement, as it appears to apply to this case,
-e1-8 that
the corporation either (a) "would have been a bank holding
b°1)4PanY on May 15, 1955, if the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 had
in effect on such date", or (b) "is a bank holding company detered solely by reference to ... property acquired by it on or before
15, 1955". Internal Revenue Code, §1103(b)(2)(A).

r

These statutory provisions are mandatory, arid the Board has no
discretion to waive them. Consequently, the Board cannot make the
I'oequested certification unless it is established that Consolidated not
(tDL}Y (1) is a bank holding company at the present time, but also
C
ol either was a bank holding company on May 15, 1955, or is a bank
(
,_ling company determined solely by reference to property acquired on
wa uefore May
15, 1955. In other words, with respect to "(1)", if the
stgricultural exemption" (§2(a)(E) of the Act) applies to Consolidated
tin!'lle Present time, the Board could not make the requisite certificatr
.
With respect to "(2)", under the enclosed interpretation of secpr°'n 1103(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code, section 2(a)(E) would not
event an affirmative finding by the Board if, upon evaluation of ell




2288

Mr, J. E.
Denmark

- 2

Property that is presently held by Consolidated but was acquired by it
On or before May 1
1953, it appeared that less than 80 per cent of
such property consisted of holdings
in the field of agriculture.
Since it is essential, in order to establish that the first
enumerated above is satisfied, to establish the value of all
of
Consolidated's present assets, it would seem advisable, when that
v aluation has been made, to ascertain whether the second requirement
is
satisfied (that is, that section 2(a)(E) is not applicable) with
respect
to
Consolidateds present assets that were acquired on or before May 15,
2)5. If section 1103(h)(2)(A) can be satisfied on that basis, it
would
obviate the need for any appraisal of the value of Consolidated's
assets
on May 15, 1955, which presumably would reduce substantially the
4LI:k and expense that will be involved in the making of appraisals in
case.
The legal questions dealt with in the preceding paragraphs are
:
1be
b111113uallY complex and technical, and the foregoing explanation may not
sufficient to
present the matter clearly. In that event, your General
p„,
ul1s°1 may consider it advisable to telephone the Board's staff for the
--Pose of discussing such questions in more detail.
Mr. Bayless also inquires regarding the appropriate procedure
for
riot appraisal of the assets of his company. The Board of Governors does
have any employees who would be available and qualified to appraise
Cons
a nsolidated's assets.
Vhile persons in your Bank would, no doubt, be in
i.,Position to appraise some of Consolidated's assets, it is felt that
orcTe the appraisal of a sizeable portion of the assets is not within
the
co,
lnarY functions of your Bank, all appraisals should be furnished by
s,solidated.
Therefore, Mr. Bayless should be told that it will be necesIZY for Consolidated to engage independe
nt appraisers, and that it would
peradvisable to make certain in advance that the Board mould regard
the
°/18 selected by Consolidated to be qualified for this purpose.
Mr. Bayless refers to the possibility of supplying "affidavits
°t
or -Putahle real estate, citrus men, or bankers". Suitable
affidavits

werccT Lificates from such persons probably would be acceptable if they
or ,
e qualified to make sound independent appraisals, and if the affidavit
al)1
;
ert,ificate was based on an adequate investigation of the properties
S c',,a1.8ed. It is doubtful whether an affidavit of Consolidated's
tacietarY as to the market value of its stocks would constitute a satisb4rd°rY "independent appraisal", and it might not prove excessively
s::
7nsome
1
to obtain an appraisal of such assets from one or more reputable
'Axities dealers or brokers.




22,99
1411* J. E. Denmark
Mr. Bayless also inquires whether certain enumerated assetn
would be included among Consolidated's "holdings in the field of agri—
claltlizeu
within the purview of section 2(a)(E) of the Act. These
_questions may be very complex, as a legal matter, and their answers
1
,essarily
will depend upon the circumstances in each case. Presumably
such assets will have to be appraised in any event, in order to
:scertain the value of Consolidated's "total assets". Accordingly, it
:lam advisable to the Board to postpone consideration of these questions
(17t1 the assets have been appraised, since it may be unnecessary to
4(2cide those questions, or some of them, depending upon the total and
vidual values established by the appraisal.
The Board will appreciate your transmitting to Consolidated the
1
,n5nce
of this letter. It is suggested that any data Consolidated
mi.nata be in duplicate, in order that one copy may be immediately trans—
;red to the Board and one copy retained by your Bank. After a review
such data, please give the Board the benefit of your comments.

4

Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.
°sUre




TELEGRAM

Item NO. 6

LEASED WIRE SERVICE

8/14/57

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON

August 14, 1957.

Millard - San Francisco

Reurtel today. Board approved, effective August 15,
for your Bank (a) rate of 3-1/2 per cent on discounts for and
advances to member banks under Sections 13 and 13a, and (b)
other rates as set forth in your telegram of today.

(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
Carpenter
The rates referred to in (b) above were as follows:
On advances to member banks under Section 10(b)

•••••■•

4.

per

cent;
On advances to individuals, partnerships, and corporations
Other than member banks under last paragraph of Section 13-4-1/2 per
cent;
On advances direct to industrial and commercial businesses
under Section 13b, including advances made in participation with
financing institutions--a range of 4 per cent to 6 per cent;
On commitments to make advances to financing institutions
(provided that no commitments shall be given on a loan on which the
borrower is charged more than 6 per cent per annum):
(1) On undisbursed portion of loan-1/4 per cent;
(2) On disbursed portion of loan--10 per cent to 25 per
cent of loan rate with a minimum of 1/2 per cent per annum.




BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 7

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

8/14/57

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.
,
4.

ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

August 13, 1957

Mr. John F. Pierce, Chief Examiner,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
New York 45, N.
Y.
Dear Mr. Pierce:
In accordance with the request contained in your
letter of August 7, 1957, the Board approves the appointment
of Walter E. Jones as an examiner for the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York. Please advise as to the date upon which
the appointment is made effective and as to the salary rate.
It is noted that Mr. Jones is indebted to The
Connecticut Bank and Trust Company, Hartford, Connecticut,
a State member bank located in the First Federal Reserve
District, in the amount of $4,174. Accordingly, the Board's
aPproval is given with the understanding that, should examiners
for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York be requested to participate in examinations of State member banks in the First
District, Mr. Jones will not participate in any examination
of The Connecticut Bank and Trust Company until his indebtedness
has been liquidated or otherwise eliminated.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

224

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Item No. 8
8/lit/57

WASHINGTON 25. O. C.
ADDRESS OFFICIAL. CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

August14 1957

Mr. Joseph R. Campbell,
Assistant Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,
Philadelphia 10 Pennsylvania.
Dear Mr. Campbell:
In accordance with the request contained in
your letter of August 9, 1957, the Board approves the
appointment of Wayne H. Hainley as an assistant examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Please advise us as to the date upon which his appointment is made effective.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.