View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

k 609

Minutes for

To:

Members of the Board

From:

Office of the Secretary

August 12, 1966

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard to
the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will advise
the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, please initial
below. If you were present at the meeting, your
initials will indicate approval of the minutes. If
you were not present, your initials will indicate
only that you have seen the minutes.

Chm. Martin
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. Mitchell
Gov. Deane
Gov. Maisel
Gov. Brimmer

2960
Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System on Friday, August 12, 1966.

The Board met in the Board Room

at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Robertson, Vice Chairman
Shepardson
Mitchell
Daane
Brimmer
Mr. Sherman, Secretary
Mr. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Young, Senior Adviser to the Board and
Director, Division of International Finance
Adviser to the Board
Holland,
Mr.
to the Board
Assistant
Mr. Molony,
to the Board
Assistant
Mr. Fauver,
Division of Examinations
Director,
Mr. Solomon,
Division of
Director,
Assistant
Mr. Leavitt,
Examinations
Mr. Furth, Consultant
Mr. Morgan, Staff Assistant, Board Members'
Offices
Messrs. Brill, Partee, Bernard, Ettin, Fry, and
Kelty, and Mrs. Peskin and Miss Stockwell of
the Division of Research and Statistics
Messrs. Sammons, Katz, Reynolds, Baker, and
Gemmill of the Division of International
Finance

Money market review.

Mrs. Peskin reviewed developments in the

Governme nt securities market, Mr. Fry commented on the projections cont ined in a distributed table affording perspective on bank reserve
Utilization, and Mr. Gemmill discussed sterling developments, other
foreign exchange market developments, and the London gold market.

Copies

°f the several tables and charts distributed in connection with today's
review have been placed in the Board's files.

2%1
8/12/66

-2After discussion based on the foregoing presentations, with

Particular reference to the results of recent System open market operations, all members of the research staff who had been present except
Mr. Sammons withdrew from the room, as did Messrs. Holland, Furth, and
Morgan, and the following entered:
Mr. Hackley, General Counsel
Mr. O'Connell, Assistant General Counsel
Miss Hart, Senior Attorney, Legal Division
Mr. Forrestal, Senior Attorney, Legal Division
Mr. Robinson, Attorney, Legal Division
Messrs. Egertson and Maguire, Supervisory Review
Examiners, Division of Examinations
Discount rates.

The establishment without change by the Federal

Reserve Banks of Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis,
Minneapolis

Kansas City, and Dallas on August 11, 1966, of the rates

on discounts and advances in their existing schedules was approved unanimously, with the understanding that appropriate advice would be sent to
those

Banks.
Approved items.

After discussion of relevant information that

had been made available to the Board, unanimous approval was given to
the following letters, copies of which are attached to these minutes
"der the respective numbers indicated:
Item No.
!.4.etter to Depositors Trust Company, Augusta,
1;13.alne , approving the establishment of an in-town
ranch and commenting on the bank's capital position.

1

2962
-3-

8/12/66

Item No.
Letter to Washington Trust Bank, Spokane,
Washington, approving an investment in bank
Premises.

2

Letter to the Bureau of the Budget regarding
a Proposed Executive Order entitled "Amending
Executive Order No. 11175 Relating to the
Exclusion for Original or New Canadian Issues
Where Required for International Monetary
St
ability."

3

Letter to the Bureau of the Budget regarding
a draft bill "To amend the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes

4

The Executive Order referred to in Item No. 3 would limit the
e xclusion from the interest equalization tax now applicable to acquisitions by U.S. persons of new Canadian stock or debt issues.

The Treasury

rePorted that some of the new Canadian issues had been purchased by U.S.
Persons for the purpose of making indirect acquisitions of other Canadian
4nd foreign securities free of the interest equalization tax.

The pro-

Posed Order would deny the exclusion for new Canadian issues to U.S.
Persons who, in acquiring such issues, also acquired indirectly an interest in other foreign stock or debt obligations that, if acquired directly,
Would be subject to the tax.
The proposed Executive Order would also permit U.S. conmiercial
banks to acquire new issues of Canadian stock or debt obligations without
Payment of the interest equalization tax.

The existing exclusion did not

extend to commercial banks because at the time the original Executive
°rder was issued bank loans were not subject to the tax.

The proposal

2
8/12/66

-4-

would equalize the treatment of all U.S. persons in acquiring such new
Canadian issues.
Section 8 of Clayton Act.

In April 1965 the Board asked the

Federal Reserve Banks for information on instances where nominal stock
O wnership in a bank had been used for the purpose of avoiding the provisions of section 8 of the Clayton Act that forbid persons from serving
two or more banks as directors, officers, or employees.

Five Reserve

Banks subsequently reported a total of 10 such cases.
In a distributed memorandum of August 10, 1966, the Legal Divisi°fl noted that at present the loophole contained in paragraph (4) of
section 8 apparently was not being used to any significant extent to
°old the prohibition of the statute.
thus

The Division also reported that

far it had not been able to develop any satisfactory proposal to

el°se the loophole within the scope of the Board's authority.

It pointed

Gut that the House Judiciary Committee had under consideration a bill
(R.R. 11572) that among other things would eliminate the loophole, and
that the Board had included comments on this aspect of the matter in a
letter to Committee Chairman Celler dated June 9, 1966.

The Division

recommended that a letter be sent to the Reserve Banks asking that the
B°ard be kept informed of any further instances that came to their attention where nominal stock ownership was being used to justify interlocking
telationships otherwise prohibited by section 8.
Discussion developed a view on the part of the Board that it
q(3111d be desirable to recommend to the Congress an amendment to section 8

2M
8/12/66

-5-

of the Clayton Act to close the loophole, and the preparation of a letter
s

ubmitting such a recommendation was requested.

It was understood that

a letter also would be sent to the Federal Reserve Banks advising that
such a recommendation had been made and requesting them to keep the Board
informed of further cases that might come to their attention.
Chain banking.

Question was raised whether the Board did not

regard itself as having a responsibility for bringing to the attention
°f the Congress the degree of concentration of banking resources that
was occurring through the use of devices (such as one recently reported

in the press in the State of Michigan) that served to bring banks under
the effective control of common interests, but in ways that did not fall
Within the purview of the Bank Holding Company Act.

Members expressed

the view that the Board did have such a responsibility.
Governor Brimmer referred to the discussion at the meeting on
julY 29, 1966, regarding the case in which Texas-based interests owning
Shares of certain Florida banks were attempting to achieve effective
control of a relatively small New York City nonmember insured bank, but
through corporate purchase of something less than 25 per cent of the
bank's stock.

He stated that, pursuant to conversation with the Vice

Chairman following the July 29 meeting, he was working with the staff
tc) bring together information for the Board's consideration not only

With

respect to this particular case, and the possible applicability of

the Bank Holding Company Act thereto, but also other cases involving
se`mewhat similar circumstances.

8/12/66

-6It was agreed that consideration of a possible report to the

Congress would await the results of the study referred to by Governor
Brimmer.
Direct verification.

Reference was made to a distributed memo-

randum from the Division of Examinations dated August 8, 1966, proposing
that the Federal Reserve Banks be asked to inform State member banks
with less than about $50 million of deposits that the Federal Reserve
would, during each examination and at the System's expense, verify
directly a percentage of the bank's assets and liabilities, if the bank
was agreeable.
The memorandum referred to the experience of the Dallas Reserve
Bank in offering this service on a voluntary basis.

It also noted the

recent instruction of the Comptroller of the Currency to national bank
examiners that in those cases where a national bank's internal audit
sYstem was considered inadequate, certain audit procedures, including
direct verification, were to be performed by the examiners.
Discussion of the matter by the Board developed a view that the
dire _.
ct verification procedure should be mandatory in cases where a State
Member bank's internal controls and/or audit program were of questionable adequacy.

The staff was requested to prepare for the Board's

"nsideration a revised draft of letter to the Federal Reserve Banks
Stating

the matter in such terms.

In recognition of certain bank and

Public relations problems that might be involved, it was suggested that

29f*
8/1 2/66

-7-

such letter as might be approved by the Board be sent to the Reserve
Banks in draft form, with a request for discussion with the Board at
the time of the next meeting of the Presidents' Conference.

In view

of the problem of relationships with State banking departments, it was
also understood that a letter would be sent to the National Association
of Supervisors of State Banks citing the contemplated examining procedureand inviting the views of the State bank supervisors.

Finally, the

Board expressed the view that the Reserve Banks should be informed that
the practice of sight posting incoming items from cash letters and local
clearings should be made a routine part of each bank examination unless
the internal controls and audit program of the bank were such as to make

this procedure unnecessary.
All members of the staff except Messrs. Sherman, Kenyon, and
Young then withdrew.
Visit of CEMLA group.

In connection with arrangements being

made for the visit of trainees from the Center for Latin American MonetarY Studies during the week of September 6, 1966, question had been
raised at staff level whether the Board would be prepared to defray the
cost of an evening function for the trainees either at the home of a
Board staff member, if such arrangement could be made, or elsewhere.
After discussion of the values involved in such a function as
Part of the over-all program being arranged for the group, it was underthat the Board would be willing to defray the reasonable cost of

2967
8/12/66

-8-

such an affair if arrangements could be worked out to hold it at the
residence of some person associated with the Board.
Fund-Bank meetings.

Reference was made to the decision at the

meeting on August 3, 1966, that a reception would be held at the Federal
Reserve Building on the afternoon of Monday, September 26, for central
bankers, and possibly others, attending the annual meetings of the
International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction
and Development.

It was now stated that it appeared, in the light of

further information concerning the program for the meetings, that
Wednesday, September 28, would be a more convenient date.

It was also

stated that staff calculations suggested the desirability of restricting the list of invitees to central bankers.
In discussion, some reservations were expressed by Governors
Nene and Brimmer as to whether a reception of the kind being planned
would prove entirely satisfactory.

It was understood, however, that

Plans would proceed on this basis, for the afternoon of September 28,
with invitations limited to central bankers and their wives.
The meeting then adjourned.
Secretary's Notes: Governor Shepardson
today approved on behalf of the Board
memoranda recommending the following
actions relating to the Board's staff:
1-\P-RSILEILI12111L
Christine Klaput as Clerk-Typist, Division of Research and Statiswith basic annual salary at the rate of $4,269, effective the date
'
1 entrance upon duty.
t.

8/12/66

-

increases

-91ary

Lynda Fein, Clerk-Typist, Division of Research and Statistics,
from $4,413 to $4,776 per annum, with a change in title to Administrative Clerk, effective August 14, 1966.
.
Watkins Leigh Ribble, Economist, Division of Research and Statistics, from $9,851 to $10,927 per annum, effective August 14, 1966.

ASS..tio tance

of resi:nation

Patricia Ann Cuneo, Statistical Clerk, Division of Research and
S tatistics, effective the close of business August 12, 1966.
Governor Shepardson also approved today
on behalf of the Board a request from
Frederic Solomon, Director, Division of
Examinations, for permission to deliver
a lecture on bank capital at the Graduate
School of Banking, University of Wisconsin,
Madison, Wisconsin, in August 1966 while on
annual leave.

Secretar0

'411)
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 1
8/12/66

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

August 12, 1966

Board of Directors,
Depositors Trust Company,
Augusta, Maine.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System approves the establishment by Depositors Trust
Company, Augusta, Maine, of a branch in the Maine Shopping Center, Outer Western Avenue, Augusta, Maine,
provided the branch is established within six months
from the date of this letter.
It is the Board's understanding that careful
consideration is being given to means to strengthen your
bank's capital position which is presently regarded as
less than satisfactory.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke

Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.

(The letter to the Reserve Bank stated that the
Board also had approved a six-month extension
of the period allowed to establish the branch;
and that if an extension should be requested,
the procedure prescribed in the Board's letter
of November 9, 1962 (S-1846), should be followed.)

2970
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 2
8/12/66

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFIcIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

August 12, 1966

Board of Directors,
Wa
shington Trust Bank,
Spokane, Washington.
Ge

ntlemen:

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 24A of the Federal
serve Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
an investment in bank premises of not to exceed $200,000
by
'Y
Washington Trust Bank, Spokane, Washington, for purchase of
Property in Opportunity, Washington, and construction of quarters
for a
proposed branch.
Re

The Board's approval of this proposed investment in no
"lay
a
indicates its approval of an application by your bank for
abranch in Opportunity, Washington, now pending before the State
uthorities and the Board. In the event the proposed branch should
be
t denied by the State or the Board, it is presumed the property
be purchased in Opportunity would be disposed of promptly.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Karl E. Bakke
Karl E. Bakke,
Assistant Secretary.

A...
tottiltt r,

e

BOAR() OF GOVERNORS

Item No. 3
8/12/66

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINOTON

Orrice

OF THE VICE CHAIRMAN

August 12, 1966.

The Honorable Charles L. Schultze,
Director,
Bureau of the Budget,
Washington, D. C. 20503
Dear Mr. Schultze;
This is in reply to the Budget Bureau's letter
of July 7, 1966, regarding a proposed Executive Order
entitled "Amending Executive Order No. 11175 Relating to
the Exclusion for Original or New Canadian Issues Where
Required for International Monetary Stability."
The Board is in sympathy with the objectives
to be achieved by the proposed amendment and recommends
that it be approved.
Sincerely,
(Signed)

L. Robertson

J. L, Robertson.

29'2
Item No. 4
8/12/66

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
• iDOFG0C,•

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
•
•.•

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20551
ADDRESS OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE

•

TO THE BOARD

RESO-••
•••••••

August 12, 1966.

Mr. Wilfred H. Rommel,
Assistant Director for Legislative Reference,
Bureau of the Budget,
20503
Washington, D. C.
Dear Mr, Rommel:
This is in response to the Bureau's Legislative Referral
Memorandum of August 5, 1966, received by the Board on August 8,
reque sting the Board's views on a draft bill "To amend the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes." We note
that bills, identical in language, were introduced, respectively,
in the Senate on August 8 (S. 3695) and in the House of Representatives on August 9 (H. R. 16934), and that, with minor exceptions,
eaCh is identical with the draft bill to which this response is
d irected.
The Board favors what it perceives to be the purpose of
the draft bill, that is, to strengthen the regulatory and supervisory powers of the Small Business Administration with regard to
its administration of the Small Business Investment Company program.
While the Board has not undertaken a detailed analysis of the effect
of the draft bill on all phases of the Small Business Administration's
tegulation of the Small Business Investment Company program, as
viewed in its broad aspects, the draft bill would appear to broaden
sufficiently the Administration's supervisory and related enforcement authority as to enable it to deal more effectively with any
serious problems relating to the operations of small business
investment companies. This strengthened supervisory position will
serve the best interests of the regulated companies and the small
pusiness concerns which they serve, and equally important, the
Public interest.
The Board has no objection to the draft bill to amend
the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.