View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for

To:

April 7/ 1961

Members of the Board

From: Office of the Secretary

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
With respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard to
the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will advise
the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, please initial below.
If you were present at the meeting, your initials will
indicate approval of the minutes. If you were not present,
Your initials will indicate only that you have seen the
minutes.




Chin. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. King

Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
on Friday, April 7, 1961.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mx.
Mr.
Mr.

The Board met in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.

Balderston, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
Robertson
Shepardson
King
Mr,
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Sherman, Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Thomas, Adviser to the Board
Young, Adviser to the Board and Director,
Division of International Finance
Fauver, Assistant to the Board
Noyes, Director, Division of
Research and Statistics
Koch, Adviser, Division of
Research and Statistics
Yager, Economist, Division of
Research and Statistics

Mr. Stone, Manager, Securities Department,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Money market review.

Mr. Yager reviewed developments in the

Government securities market, following which Mr. Thomas commented on
bank credit and related matters.
There ensued. a general discussion based on these reports, at
the conclusion of which Messrs. Thomas, Young, Koch, Yager, and. Stone
withdrew from the meeting and Messrs. Hackley, General Counsel, and.
8°1°mon, Director, Division of Examinations, entered the room.

Miss

liart, Assistant Counsel, also joined the meeting at this point.
Discount rates.

The establishment without change by the

Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond,
ICansas City, Dallas, and San Francisco on April 6, 1961, of the rates
on discounts and. advances in their existing schedules was approved




;.‘

."4„•(.1‘..)

4/7/61

-2-

unanimously, with the understanding that appropriate advice would be
sent to those Banks.
Report on S. 1127 and S. 1249 (Item No. 1).

Pursuant to the

Understanding at the meeting on April 40 1961, there had been distributed
to the Board copies of a revised draft of letter to Senator Robertson,
Chairman of the Senate Banking and Currency Committee, concerning
S. 1127 and S. 1249, bills relating to farm housing.
After discussion the letter, a copy of which is attached as
was approved unanimously.
Request of Otto Bremer Company (Item No. 2).

Otto Bremer

C°111PanY, St. Paul, Minnesota, had requested a determination, under
section 4(c)(6) of the Bank Holding Company Act, that the activities
of the following proposed subsidiaries would be of such nature as to
make it unnecessary for the prohibitions of section 4 of the Act, with
respect to shares in nonbanking corporations, to apply in order to
carry out the purposes of the Act:
Farmers State Agency, Inc., a North Dakota corporation;
Citizens Agency, Inc., a Minnesota corporation; and
Warren Agency, Inc., a Minnesota corporation.
In a memorandum dated April 6, 1961, which had been distributed
to the

Board, the Legal Division reported that arrangements had been

rflade for a hearing at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis on May 10,
1961. Under these arrangements Charles W. Schneider would serve as
Hearing Examiner, John P. Olin, Assistant Counsel of the Minneapolis




_
V7/61

-3-

Reserve Bank would serve as Board Counsel, and M. H. Strothman, Jr.,
Vice President and General Counsel of the Minneapolis Bank, would be
associated with Mr. Olin.

Submitted with the memorandum was a draft

of order for hearing which would be published in the Federal Register.
No objection to the arrangements for the hearing was indicated.
Accordingly, the designation of Mr. Schneider as Hearing Examiner was

ao2222.1t1 unanimously,

along with the issuance of the Order for Hearing.

ooPy of the Orj!er is attached as Item No. 2.
Miss Hart then withdrew from the meeting.
Request for access to examination reports

(Item No, 3).

The

Board previously had agreed., Governors Mills and. King dissenting, to
grant the request of the Department of Justice for access to reports
of examination oL State member banks in Lexington, Kentucky, for use
in connection with an antitrust procceding against a bank in that city
that resulted from a recent merger.

At yesterday's meeting it was

agreed to defer transmittal to the Justice Department of the letter
reflecting the postion of the majority of the Board because it hed
eon learned that Mr. Coburn, General Counsel of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, and. Mr. Englert, Chief Counsel, Ocfice of the
Comptroller of the Currency, were arranging an appointment at the
bePartment of Justice to present the point of view of those agencies
that the reports of examination of national and insured nonmember
bank,
Q in Lexington should not be used for the purpose indicated.




4/7/61

-4Mr. Hackley reported that Messrs. Coburn and Englert had a

meeting yesterday with a representative of the Justice Department,
as a result of which they gained, the impression that the Department
might not press its request for access to the examination reports of
the banks in Lexington, except possibly the reports of the banks
involved in the merger.

It was understood that the two bank

suPervisory agencies proposed. to take no action in the absence of a
further request from the Justice Department.
Mr. Hackley also said Mr. Coburn had in'icated that there was
Pending before the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation a proposed
merger on which the Justice Department had rendered an adverse report
On competitive aspects.

He understood. Mr. Coburn intended to recommend

to the
directors of the Corporation that if, upon further study, it
appeared that the Justice Department would be inclined to institute an
antitrust proceeding if the merger were approved, the Corporation inquire
of the banks concerned whether they would like to have action on the
merger application deferred, and that action be deferred on receipt of
such request f rom the banks.
The Question raised by the report of Mr. Hackley was whether

the Board wished, in the present circumstances, to transmit to the
riePartment of Justice the letter granting the Department's request for
access to the examination reports of the State member banks in Lexington.
An alternative might be to check with the Department for the purpose of
encleavoring to learn whether a decision had been made against seeking




r"
,

1.4.40

4/7/61
access to the examination reports

of the national and insured nonmember

banks and, if so, whether the Department had any further interest in
obtaining access to the reports of the State member banks.
Governor Robertson indicated that he would be inclined to send
to the Department of Justice
the letter reflecting the original decision
of the majority of the Board.

He commented that if the letter was sent

and the Department decided not to press its request for access to the
reports of examination of the national and insured nonmember banks, the
Department would hardly be interested in access to the reports of the
State member banks for they would not provide a complete picture.

If

the Board asked that the request of the Justice Department be withdrawn,
it would simply be linking itself with the other bank supervisory
agencies,

Board.
itself

whose views did not agree with those of the majority of the

Thus, depending on further developments, the Board might get
involved in a dispute for no purpose.
Governor Shepardson expressed the view that it would not be

()lit of order, in light of the developments reported by Mr. Hackley,
to

defer a decision on transmitting the letter long enough to ascertain

Whether

the Department of Justice had decided to withdraw its request

f°r access to the examination reports of the national and nonmember
insured banks in Lexington.

If the Department was not going to press

the other two bank supervisory agencies, it would hardly press the
Board.

Further, it seemed likely that the decision of the Department

14°111d be made quite promptly because of the early date set for the




4/7/61

-6-

trial of the suit brought by the Department in the Lexington case.
Accordingly, he would favor checking with the Department before the
letter was sent.
Governor King referred to his original position against acceding
to the request
of the Justice Department for access to the reports and
said that that would still be his position. In view of what had
transpired since the original decision of the Board was made, he felt
that it would be reasonable to give consideration to those developments.
Governor Szymczak supported the

position that the letter

r
eflecting the original decision of the Board be sent to the Justice
D
epartment.
In reply to a question by Governor Balderston, Mr. Hackley
said he believed it was his feeling that the cleanest approach would
be to
send the letter reflecting the Board's original decision to the
Justice Department.

The Board had on record the request of the

Department, the Board had considered that request, and it had decided
by majority vote to comply with the request. The principal argument
against sending the reply would appear to be that it might cause some
etrain in relations between the Board and the other bank supervisory
agencies, particularly if they felt that it might have been unnecessary,
in the light of developments, for the Board to send the letter.

In

allY event, as had been pointed out, the decision of the Justice
Department should be known shortly, in view of the date set for trial
°f the Lexington
case.




_7-

4/7/61

Governor Balderston then stated that he would be agreeable
to the transmittal of the letter to the Justice Department.
Accordingly, the views of Governors Shepardson and King having
been noted, it was agreed to send the letter. A copy of the letter,
as sent pursuant to this action, is attached as Item No. 3.
The meeting then adjourned.




„
Secreta

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON

Item No. 1
4/7/61
OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

April 71 1961
1/„Ile Ho norable
A.
hobertson,
'hairman, Committee on Banking
and
Currency,
United
. States
Senate,
14ashington 25,
D. C.
Dear Mr.
Chairman:
112, This is in response to your recent request for reports on
8'
biuct ' and S. 1249. This report deals with the two together since the
ap
to be identical except that the former would permit the
arY of Agriculture, under the proposed direct loan program, to
pas '
thatsuitability of single or multi-family construction, and to
occupants be given an opportunity to purchase the housing.
Beag not clear how this last provision is expected to operate. The
niade w°111d suggest that, if the provision is retained, the language be
111c)re explicit
to ext
Both bills would (1) authorize the Secretary of Agriculture ,
to d end financial assistance under Title V of the Housing Act of 1959w
saili4°.nIestic farm laborers "to enable them to provide decent, safe, and
caect'arY dwellings for themselves and their families"; (2) extend the
kent:
which loans and grants.may be made for repairs and improve,,
seerfk.o
farm buildings; (3) create a new program, administered by the
Purpo
.
- 'arY of Agriculture, of insurance of loans "to any person for the
labc e Of Providing housing and related facilities for domestic farm
Agric
,,
1113 to 05 million per fiscal year; (4) authorize the Secretary of
ror ;
c ure
1"
to make direct loans for provision of new housing suitable
4elling use by domestic farm labor or rehabilitation of housing
,, able P
il„ r use by migratory farm labor, and authorize appropriation of
the
to a revolving fund for this purpose; and (5) remove from
leati'sostri
ctions of Section 24 of the Federal heserve Act real estate
tInder 11.nder Title V of the Housing Act of 1949 (including those made
the FeLhe new programs proposed in these bills). Since Section 24 of
der l
Reserve Act applies to national banks, the Committee may
poiltsto,
hu-ve the views of the Comptroller of the Currency on this last

In paying obligations arising under the proposed insurance
the Secretary of Agriculture would utilize the insurance fund
Should
have read Housing Act of 1949.




‘30., r's-r!

The Honorable A. Willis Robertson

for the under Section 11 of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act. Funds
,
direct loan program would be appropriated funds and would be
.Lent at the
higher of 2-3/4 per cent per annum or one-fourth of 1 per
Cent
0,above
the averare annual interest rate on all interest bearing debt
t',. the United States at the end of the preceding fiscal year, adjusted
;!the nearest one-eighth of 1 per cent. The Board believes that a
Izula which
would more accurately reflect the current cost of borrow1.11ds for a term comparable to that for which loans are extended
”
11
'4-tu be preferable.

r




Sincerely yours,

(Signed) Wm. MCC. Martin,
V,11. licG. Martin, Jr.

_4 g
1.0.,4 Sc)

Item No.

4/7/61
BO/RD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 4(c)(6) OF
BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1956 AND
ORDER FOR HEARING THEREON

Notice is hereby given that request has been made to the
13°ard of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, pursuant to
secti°n 4(c)(6) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 [12 U.S.C.
18431 and section 5(b) of the Board's Regulation Y [12 CFR 222.5(b)]
Otto Bremer
Company, St. Paul, Minnesota, n bank holding company,
l'131* a determination by said Board that the activities of three pro13°8ed subsidiaries, Farmers State Agency, Inc., a North Dakota
c°rPoration; Citizens Pgency, Inc., a Minnesota corporation; and
Ilarr
en Agency, Inc., also a Minnesota corporation will be of the
kill(
'described in the aforementioned sections of the Act end the
"1-auion so as to make it unnecessary for the prohibitions of
sect
i(pn

tions

4 of the

Pct with respect to shares in nonbanking organiza-

to apply in order to carry out the purposes of the let.
Inasmuch

Act nf

as

section 4(c)(6) of the Bank Holding Company

-- 1956 requires that any determination pursuant thereto be made




e

,
2;-/,‘)
-2bp the
Board after due notice and hearing and on the basis of the
record made at such hearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED That pursuant to section 4(c)(6) of
the Bpnk Holding Company Act of 1956 and in accordance with
sections
5(b) and 7(a) of the Board's Regulation Y [12 CFR 222.5(0),
222.7t \-1
a

promulgated under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,

hearing with respect to this matter be held commencing on ilay 10,

19613 at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Tlinneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota, before a duly selected hearing
°fficer, such hearing to be conducted in accordance with the Rul-2s
Of

Practice for Formal Hearings of the Board of Governors of the

Federal Reserve System [12 CFR Part 263].

The right is reserved to

the Board or such hearing officer to designate any other date or
Place for such hearing or any part thereof which may be determined
to be necessary or appropriate for the convenience of the parties.
The Board's Rules of Practice for Formal Hearings provide, in part,
that "Ill
such hearings shall be private and shall be attended only
respondents and their representatives or counsel, representatives
f the Board, witnesses, and other persons having an official interest

in the proceedings; Provided, however, That on the written request
or more respondents or counsel for the Board, or on its own
11°ti°n, the Board, when not prohibited by law, may permit other
Perscns to attend or may order the hearing to be public."




1240

Any person desiring to give testimony in this proceeding
should file with the Secretary of the Board) directly or through

the Federal Reserve Bank of Ninnerpolis, on or before May 3) 1961,
written request containing a statement of the nature of the petitionerfs interest in the proceeding, and a summary of the matters
concerning which said petitioner wishes to give testimony.

Such

request will be presented to the designated herring officer for his
det
ermination.

Persons submitting timely requests will be notified

cf the hearing officerts decision.
Dated at Washington, D. C., this 7th day of April, 1961.

By order of the Board of Governors.




(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.

4.04 tJL

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No. 3

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

4/7/61

WAS

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

April 7, 1961

The Honorable
Lee Loevinger,
Assistant Attorney. General,
Antitrust Division,
Department of Justice,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Judge Loevinger:
relating to
U s V This is in reply to your letter of March 30,
. First Security National Bank and Trust Company of Lexington,
et al.,
currently pending in the United States District Court for
the Eastern
District of Kentucky. In connection with that litigation,
itpe Antitrust
Division wishes to inspect reports of examinations of
nj of
Commerce, Lexington, Kentucky, and Security Trust Company,
treington, Kentucky. The Division wishes only to study the facts set
rao, in
these reports and is not requesting that the reports be made
vailable for
use at the trial of the above-mentioned case.
The reports of examination to which your letter refers will
be
available for inspec4on in the Board's offices by representa:ves of the Antitrust Division. These reports are being made availto the Division for use in developing information and not for
l'sselosure in connection with the trial of the case or otherwise.
',!/-8 is in accordance with section 7(b) of the Rules of Organization
04 the Board of Governors (12 CFR 261.2(b)), which provides that

V

i

. "The Board...may make available to...agencies of the
United States
reports of examination and other information, for use where necessary in the performance of their
Official duties: Provided, That...under no circumstances
shall any person or authority to whom the information is
made available, nor any officer, director, or employee
thereof, disclose or otherwise make public any such information except in official publications of general statistical
reports which are not in such detail as to disclose the
affairs of any person."




Sincerely yours,
(Signed) Wm. McC. Martin, Jr.

Win. MeC. Martin, Jr.