View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes for

To:

Members of the Board

From:

Office of the Secretary

April 3, 1957

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on
the above date.
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard
to the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will
advise the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, if you
were present at the meeting, please initial in column A below to indicate that you approve the minutes.
If you were not present, please initial in column B
below to indicate that you have seen the minutes.
A
Chin. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
1/Gov. Vardaman
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
1/ In accordance with Governor Shepardsonts
memorandum of March 8, 1957, these minutes are not being
sent to Governor Vardaman for initial.




Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on Wednesday, April

3, 1957. The Board met in the

Board Room at 10:00 a.m. in executive session.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
Mills
Robertson
Shepardson

At the conclusion of the executive session, the following
members of the staff were called into the meeting:
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Carpenter, Secretary
Sherman, Assistant Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
Thomas, Economic Adviser to the
Board
Young, Director, Division of Research
and Statistics
Sloan, Director, Division of Examinations
Hackley, General Counsel
Noyes, Adviser, Division of Research and
Statistics
Masters, Associate Director, Division of
Examinations
Hexter, Assistant General Counsel

Items which had been circulated to the Board.

The following

items, which had been circulated to the members of the Board and copies
Of which are attached to these minutes under the respective item numbers
Indicated, were approved unanimously:
Item No.
Letter to The First Pennsylvania Banking and
Trust Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
approving the establishment of a branch at
City Line Avenue and Presidential Boulevard.
(For transmittal through the Federal Reserve
Bank of Philadelphia.)




1

4/3/57

-2Item No.

Letter to American Trust Company, Charlotte, North
Carolina, approving the establishment of a branch
at Douglas Municipal Airport. (For transmittal
through the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.)

2

Letter to First National Bank of Myrtle Beach,
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, approving its
application for permission to exercise fiduciary
Powers. (For transmittal through the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.)

3

Letter to Security Bank, Lincoln Park, Michigan,
approving the relocation of a branch from one site
to another in Southgate, Ecorse Township, Wayne
County, Michigan. (For transmittal through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.)

14.

Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
waiving the assessment of certain penalties for
deficient reserves incurred by Occidental Savings
and Commercial Bank, Los Angeles (North Hollywood),
California.

5

Letter to Bank of Belmont Shore, Long Beach, California, approving the establishment of a branch in Seal
Beach, California. (For transmittal through the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.)

6

Letter to the Comptroller of the Currency recommending
approval of an application to organize a national bank
at Princeton, West Virginia, provided arrangements are
made for a capital structure satisfactory to the Comptroller. (With a copy to the Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond.)

7

Letter to the Comptroller of the Currency recommending
disapproval of an application to organize a national
bank at Treasure Island, Florida.(With a copy to the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.) 1

8

1/ This matter was discussed by the Board at its meeting on March 18,
1957, following which the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta reviewed
the application at the Board's request and reaffirmed its unfavorable recommendation.




-3-

4/3/57

Item No.
Letter to the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice transmitting a copy of the report
on the study of banking conditions in the State
of Arizona conducted by the Federal Reserve Bank
Of San Francisco.
Letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
concerning the transmittal of the abovementioned
report to the Department of Justice.

9

10

Applicability of the proposed Financial Institutions Act (S. 1451)
to a Federal Reserve Bank director whose second consecutive term expires
this year.

(Item No. 11) In a letter dated March 11,

1957, President

Bryan of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta inquired on behalf of Mr.
Sherman Drawdy, President of the Georgia Railroad Bank and Trust Company,
Atlanta, Georgia, concerning the applicability of section 17(a) of
Title II of the proposed Financial Institutions Act to the service of
a Reserve Bank director whose second consecutive term expires this year.
Section 17(a) provides, among other things, that no director of a Federal
Reserve Bank (except a director designated as chairman of the board of
directors) who has served two full consecutive terms of three years
each shall be eligible to serve again as a director pursuant to a new
election or new appointment until after an intervening period of not
less than three years.

It appeared that both Mr. Drawdy and the present

election
incumbent, now completing two terms of service, had announced for
to the Group I, Class A directorship of the Atlanta Reserve Bank in the
election to be held this fall.
A draft of reply to Mr. Bryan had been prepared which would
Point out that the Act was still in the legislative stage and that the




828
4/3/57
final context of any given section therefore could not be determined
at this time.

The letter would go on to mention that the application

of the pertinent section would depend on the facts obtaining at the
time of enactment, and would state that the Board therefore would
prefer not to express any opinion at this time as to the applicability
of section 17(a) of Title II.
In view of questions raised by Governor Balderston when the
file was in circulation concerning the adequacy of the proposed reply,
an alternative draft of letter was prepared and circulated which would
attempt some interpretation of the applicability of section 17(a) under
various circumstances, depending on the time when S. 1451 might be
enacted into law.
Governor Robertson indicated that he would not be inclined to
attempt any interpretation at this time, on the basis that the Act was
Still in the legislative stag, its provisions might be changed, the
time of enactment could not be predicted, and the full legislative
history should be available in order to make any interpretation of
the bill if it became law.

He also

referred to the circumstances

in which the question had been raised in the Atlanta District and
expressed apprehension that any interpretative statement by the Board
might be used out of context in a way which would be detrimental to
one or the other of the candidates for the directorship.
Governors Balderston and Mills were inclined to feel that the
explanation given in the alternative draft of letter was appropriate.




4/3/57

-5-

They pointed out that the pertinent section of the Act had been recommended by the Board, and this suggested to them that some clarifying
statement might reasonably be expected.

However, following a reading

of the two drafts and further discussion concerning the contest in
the Atlanta District, they indicated that they would go along with a
reply limited to the statement that at the present time the final
context of any given section of the Act could not be determined.
Accordingly, unanimous approval was given to a letter to
President Bryan in the form attached to these minutes as Item No. 11.
Proposed consolidation of certain banks in Flint, Michigan.
There had been circulated to the members of the Board a memorandum
from the Division of Examinations dated March 12, 1957, recommending
that the Board give its consent, under the provisions of section 18(c)
Of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, to the consolidation of the
Genesee County Savings Bank and the Merchants and Mechanics Bank, both
of Flint, Michigan, and approve the establishment of six branches by
the consolidated bank.

This recommendation was in accord with the

recommendation of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
Attached to the memorandum from the Division of Examinations
was a memorandum from the Legal Division dated March 26, 1957, raising
certain questions from the standpoint of the competitive situation involved in the proposed transaction.

The desirability was suggested of

requesting the Federal Reserve Bank to develop this phase of the matter
more fully.




830
-6-

4/3/57

Messrs. Hackley and Hexter stated that the Legal Division's
memorandum was not intended to suggest that the Board should disapprove
the proposed transaction.

However, it had been noted that the material

furnished by the Federal Reserve Bank contained little or no information
regarding the competitive aspects of this case, and the Board had indicated to the Congress on various occasions that in all such cases
consideration was given to the competitive situation.

Therefore, no

matter what the final decision might be, it would seem advisable to
develop information along lines suggested in the memorandum from the
Legal Division.
Mr. Sloan said that it would be helpful to the Division of
Examinations if the Legal Division would indicate more specifically
the nature and extent of the information considered necessary in cases
of this kind, and Chairman Martin suggested that the two Divisions
collaborate on the preparation of a letter to the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago requesting the development of information regarding the
competitive aspects of the proposed transaction in Flint, Michigan.
This suggestion was approved unanimously, with the understanding
that the letter would be sent in a form satisfactory to Messrs. Sloan
and Hackley.
Arizona banking study.

During the discussion of the above matter,

unanimous agreement was expressed with a suggestion by Chairman Martin
that copies of the report by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
concerning its study of the banking situation in Arizona be made available to all of the Federal Reserve Banks for their confidential information.



-7-

4/3/57

Application of Citizens Commercial & Savings Bank, Flint,
to establish a branch. (Item No. 12) Along with the file

Michigan

on the proposed consolidation of two banks in Flint, Michigan, there
had been circulated to the members of the Board a file relating to
the application of Citizens Commercial & Savings Bank to establish
a branch at the intersection of Richfield and Center Roads in Flint.
This application raised no question from the standpoint of competitive
aspects and the recommendations of the staff and the Federal Reserve
Bank of Chicago were favorable.
Accordingly, unanimous approval was given to a letter to the
applicant bank approving the establishment of the branch, for transmittal through the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

A copy of the

letter is attached to these minutes as Item No. 12.
Report on S. 1711.

(Item No. 13)

Under date of March 27,

1957, the Chairman of the Senate Banking and Currency Committee requested
the Board's comments on the subject bill, which would provide for the
establishment of a Commission on National Housing Policy.

Since the

Proposed bill was substantially the same as S. 3186, introduced in the
84th Congress, on which the Board expressed its views in a letter to
the Banking and Currency Committee dated March 16, 1956, there had been
distributed to the members of the Board a draft of letter which would
note the similarity between the two bills, state that the Board reaffirmed
the views expressed previously, and transmit copies of the 1956 letter.
Following a brief discussion, unanimous approval was given to
the proposed letter to the Chairman of the Banking and Currency Committee.
A copy is attached to these minutes as Item No. 13.



4/3/57

-8Report on H. R. 4602. (Item No. 14) There had been distributed

to the members of the Board copies of a memorandum from Mr. Noyes dated
April 2, 1957, submitting a draft of letter to the Chairman of the
Senate Banking and Currency Committee in response to a request for the
Board's comments on the subject bill, which would provide additional
authority for direct loans by the Veterans Administration to veterans
in rural areas and small cities, increase the maximum amount of such
loans from $10,000 to 413,500, and permit advance commitments.
Following a discussion, during which an editorial change in
the proposed reply was suggested by Governor Balderston, unanimous
aPProval was given to a letter in the form attached to these minutes
as Item No. 14.
Proposal to exempt certain loans from section 24 of the Federal
Reserve Act. (Item No. 15) There had been sent to the members of the
Board copies of a memorandum from Mr. Hexter dated April 2, 1957, relating to a request from the Bureau of the Budget for the Board's
views on a legislative proposal by the Small Business Administration
that disaster loans covered by deferred participations of the Administration be exempted from the requirements and limitations of section 24
which pertain to real estate loans by national banks.

It was understood

that the Comptroller of the Currency would not object to the proposed
amendment.

Submitted with Mr. Hexter's memorandum was a draft of pro-

posed reply to the Budget Bureau.




4/3/57

-9Following explanatory comments by Mr. Hexter based on the

material contained in his memorandum, unanimous approval was given
to the proposed letter to the Bureau of the Budget.

A copy of the

letter is attached to these minutes as Item No. 15.
Mr. Hexter then withdrew from the meeting and Messrs. Leonard,
Director, Division of Bank Operations, Solomon, Assistant General
Counsel, and Sammons, Chief, Latin American Section, Division of
International Finance, entered the room.
Proposed mission to Puerto Rico.

On Thursday, March 28,

Governor Balderston, members of the Board's staff, and Assistant
Vice President Crosse of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York met
With Dr. Rafael Pico, Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico, to
discuss a request by the Governor of Puerto Rico that a survey group
from the Federal Reserve System visit the island to study certain
questions pertaining to the Puerto Rican banking system and the economy
as a whole, including the possible establishment of a Federal Reserve
Bank agency.

The request for such a survey, which would bring up to

date and supplement the study conducted by Federal Reserve System
representatives in 1951, had been a matter of discussion at the staff
level at the Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
At Governor Balderston's request, Mr. Sammons had prepared a
memorandum on the conference with Dr. Pico and copies thereof had been
sent to the members of the Board along with a lettk!r from President
Hayes of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York providing certain background data and views with respect to the request from the Governor of




834
-10-

4/3/57
Puerto Rico.

The memorandum discussed the composition of such a

mission, the scope of the investigation, procedural questions in
connection with the study, and a possible time schedule.

Assuming

that the mission was approved by the Board, the memorandum suggested
the possibility that the study group could go to Puerto Rico for a
visit near the end of April or in the early part of May.

At that

time a program of research to be conducted in Puerto Rico would be
mapped out, and the Federal Reserve group then would return at a
later date to analyze the information collected, discuss it with
interested parties, and prepare a final report.
In commenting on the matter, Governor Balderston read a copy
of a memorandum on the subject which Mr. Crosse had prepared for the
files of the New York Bank.

This memorandum verified the principal

Points covered in the memorandum prepared by Mr. Sammons and expressed
concurrence in the view that the proposed study mission would be desirable.
In response to a question by the Chairman, Governor Szymczak
said that it had always been contemplated that the 1951 survey would

be supplemented by another study and that he favored the proposal for
another mission at this time.
While there was no dissenting opinion on the part of the other
members of the Board regarding the mission as such, question was raised
by Governor Robertson regarding the composition of the Federal Reserve




35
-U-

4/3/57

study group, which it had been suggested would include representatives
of the Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Without having

gone into the matter in detail, it appeared to Governor Robertson that
if a Federal Reserve agency were established in Puerto Rico, it perhaps
should be an agency of the Federal Reserve Bank located closest to the
island.

With that in mind, he inquired whether it would be desirable

to expand the study group to include a representative of the Atlanta
Reserve Bank.
In response to the question raised by Governor Robertson,
comments were made on the reasons which would favor a Federal Reserve
Office in Puerto Rico being an agency of the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, including the current lines of communication and business
relationships.

For these reasons, as well as the fact that to date

the study of the Puerto Rican situation had been carried on by the
Board and the New York Reserve Bank, the thought was expressed that
the inclusion in the study group of a person representing another
Federal Reserve Bank might be inadvisable.

With regard to the com-

Position of foreign missions in general, there was unanimity of opinion regarding the desirability of utilizing personnel from all of the
Federal Reserve Banks to the extent possible, if for no other reason
than the educational value of such projects to the participants, but
in this instance it was suggested that to go beyond the Board and the
New York Reserve Bank could create problems. The point was made that,




836
4/3/57

-12-

if further study of the Puerto Rican situation indicated the feasibility
of establishing a Federal Reserve agency in Puerto Rico, consideration
could then be given to the question of the Reserve Bank with which the
agency should properly be affiliated.
At the conclusion of the discussion, there was unanimous agreethat the proposed study mission should be undertaken on the general
basis discussed in the memorandum of the meeting with Dr. Pico.

As to

the composition of the mission and similar questions, there was agreewith a suggestion by Chairman Martin that such aspects of the
matter be referred to Governors Balderston and Szymczak with power to
act.
Proposed changes in the Retirement System of the Federal Reserve
Banks.

With reference to the discussion at the meeting of the Board

Yesterday, the Chairman reported that President Johns of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis would be available to meet with the Board at
10:00 a.m. next Monday, April

8, for further consideration of the pro-

posals of the Special Joint Committee for changes in the Bank Plan of
the Retirement System.
Possible designation of Miami, Florida, as a reserve city.

With

reference to the understanding at the meeting of the Board yesterday
that repremAatives of the member banks in Miami would be invited to
meet with the Board to present their views on the possible designation
of Miami as a reserve city, the Secretary stated that the Miami bankers
would be available for such a meeting on Wednesday, April 17.




He also

-13-

4/3/57

said that President Bryan, who would be in Washington on April 16
for a meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee, could remain
for the meeting with the Miami bankers.

Accordingly, it was agreed

unanimously that the meeting would be held on the date suggested.
Salary structure for official positions at the Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas. (Item No. 16) Reference was made to a
memorandum from the Division of Personnel Administration dated
March 29, 1957, which had now completed circulation to the members
of the Board, discussing a proposed revision in the salary structure
for official positions at the Federal Reserve Bonk of Dallas which
the Bank would like to make effective April 1, 1957.

The memorandum

recommended that the revision be approved by the Board.
Pursuant to this recommendation, unanimous approval was given
to the letter to the Dallas Bank of which a copy is attached to these
minutes as Item No. 16.

The meeting then adjourned.




Secretary's Note: Governor Balderston,
acting as alternate to Governor Shepardson, today approved on behalf of the
Board a telegram to the Federal Reserve
Bank of Boston approving the designation
of Joseph Samuel Winning as a special
assistant examiner. A copy of the telegram is attached to these minutes as Item
No. 17.
Pursuant to recommendations contained in
memoranda from appropriate individnAls concerned, Governor Balderston, acting as

S3S
4/3/57

_l11_
alternate to Governor Shepardson, also
approved on behalf of the Board today
the following actions with respect to
members of the Board's staff:

Extension of term of service as Special Assistant Federal Reserve Examiner
Extension of the term of service of Winifred J. Black as Special
Assistant Federal Reserve Examiner in the Division of Examinations until
May 31, 1957: effective April 8, 1957.
Transfer and appointment as Special Assistant Federal Reserve Examiner
Transfer of Ann C. Tompros, Secretary in the Division of International Finance, to the Division of Examinations for a period of approximately one year, with appointment as a Special Assistant Federal Reserve
Examiner and an increase in her basic anniml salary from *3,670 to $3,805,
effective the date she assumes her new duties, and with the understanding
that at the termination of her assignment with the field examining staff,
Miss Tompros would return to the position of Secretary, either in the
Division of International Finance or in some other Division of the Board.




Item No. 1
4/3/57

April

3, 1957

Board of Directors,
The First Pennsylvania Banking and Trust Company,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, the Board of Governors
Of the Federal Reserve System approves the establishment
Of a branch in the Madison House, Presidential Apartments,
at the southeast corner of City Line Avenue and Presidential
Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, by the First Pennsylvania
Banking and Trust Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, provided
the branch is established within six months from the date of this
letter, and the approval of the State authorities is in effect
as of the date of the establishment of the branch.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

841)

Item No. 2
4/3/57

April 3, 1957

Board of Directors,
American Trust Company,
Charlotte, North Carolina.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System approves the establishment
Of,a branch at Douglas Municipal Airport which is located
about two and three-fourths miles west of the city limits
Of Charlotte, North Carolina, by American Trust Company,
Charlotte, North Carolina, provided the branch is established within six months from the date of this letter and
the approval of the State authorities is in effect as of
the date of the establishment of the branch.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

Item No.
4/3/57

April

3, 1957

Board of Directors,
First National Bank of Myrtle Beach,
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
Gentlemen:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
has given consideration to your application for fiduciary
powers and grants you authority to act, when not in contravention of State or local law, as trustee, executor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of estates,
assignee, receiver, committee of estates of lunatics, or in
anY other fiduciary capacity in which State banks, trust
companies or other corporations which come into competition
with national banks are permitted to act under the laws of the
State of South Carolina, the exercise of all such rights to be
subject to the provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and the
regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
SystPm.
A formal certificate indicating the fiduciary powers
which the First National Bank of Myrtle Beach is now authorized
to exercise will be forwarded to you in due course.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

842

Item No. 4

4/3/57

April 3, 1957

Board of Directors,
Security Bank,
Lincoln Park, Michigan.
Gentlemen:

Pursuant to your request submitted through the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Board of Governors approves the
relocation of the branch operated by the Security Bank at 13161
Dix-Toledo Road, to the intersection of Dix-Toledo Road and
Eureka Road, both sites in Southgate, Ecorse Township, Wayne
County, Michigan, provided the branch is established at the new
location within one year from the date of this letter, and the
aPProval of the State Banking Department is in effect as of the
date the change of location is effected.




Very truly yours,
(Signed)

Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

•

Item No. 5

4/3/57
April 3, 1957

Mr. H. N. Mangels, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,
San Francisco 20, California.
Dear Mr. Mangels:
This refers to your letter of March 20, regarding
Penalties totaling 3837.40 incurred by the Occidental Savings
and Commercial Bank, Los Angeles (North Hollywood), California,
as a result of deficiencies in reserves in the six semimonthly
Periods in December 1956 and in January and February 1957.
It is noted that the deficiencies resulted from the
bank's considering drafts drawn on its Los Angeles correspondent
and sent to tha Los Angeles Branch in payment of its daily cash
letters as "Cash items in process of collection" for one day
against a deferred charge to the account of its correspondent
bank, which in effect resulted in a double deduction on the reserve reports; this procedure was the result of a misunderstanding
Of a conversation with the Los Angeles Branch; the bank has reverted to the correct reporting procedure; and since opening for
business in January 1954, the bank had only three minor deficiencies, which were waived under the provisions of Paragraph A of
the rules.
In the circumstances, and in view of your recommendation, the Board authorizes your Bank to waive the assessment of
these penalties.




Very truly yours,
(Signed)

Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

844
Item No. 6

4/3/57

April 3, 1957

Board of Directors,
Bank of Belmont Shore,
Long Beach, California.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request submitted through
the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, the Board of
Governors approves the establishment of a branch in the
vicinity of the intersection of Main Street and Pacific
Coast Highway, Seal Beach, California, by Bank of
Belmont Shore, Long Beach, California, provided the branch
is established within six months from the date of this
letter and that formal approval of the Superintendent of
Banks of the State of California is effective at the time
the branch is established.
It is understood that capital funds will be increased
by not less than 5200,000 through sale of additional common
stock.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

845
Item No.

7

4/3/57
April

3, 1957

Comptroller of the Currency,
Treasury Department,
Washington 25, D. C.
Attention:

Mr. W. M. Taylor,
Deputy Comptroller of the Currency.

Dear Mr. Comptroller:
Reference is made to a letter from your office dated February
organize a
11, 1957, enclosing photostatic copies of an application to
recommendation
a
requesting
and
Virginia,
national bank at Princeton, West
approved.
be
should
n
as to whether or not the applicatio
A report of investigation of the application made by an examiner
for the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond indicates that the proposed capital
structure of the bank would be adequate for the volume of business anticipated by the proponents but that more capital should be provided if the
institution is to function soundly in a community of this size and in
competition with the existing bank. The prospects for profitable operaof the bank are fair, and it appears that the proposed directorate
and management could operate the bank capably. While it is indicated
that the banking needs of the community are being met fairly satisfactorily
tY the existing institution, it would seem that another bank could be supPorted, and, in view of the desirability of providing banking competition
111 the community, it is believed that favorable consideration may be given
the proposal. Accordingly, the Board of Governors recommends approval of
the aPPlication provided arrangements are made for a capital structure
satisfactory to your office.
The Board's Division of Examinations will be glad to discuss
any aspects of this case with representatives of your office if you so
desire.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Merritt Sherman
Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

Item No. 8

4/3/57
April 3, 1957

Comptroller of the Currency,
Treasury Department,
Washington 25, D. C.
Attention: Mr. W. M. Taylor,
Deputy Comptroller of the Currency.
Dear Mr. Comptroller:
Reference is made to a letter from your office dated
July 31, 1956, enclosing photostatic copies of an application
signed by Emerson L. Parker and associates to organize a national
bank at Treasure Island, Florida, and requesting a recommendation
as to whether or not the application should be approved.
A report of investigation of the application made
by an examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta indicates that the proposed capital structure of the bank would be
ade quate provided the investment in fixed assets is held to
a reasonable amount. However, the prospects for profitable
Operations are not favorable, and there does not appear to be
sUfficient need for the bank in the area at this time. No
managing officers have been selected, and the majority of the
directors as proposed appear to be engaged in real estate depment and promotion. In view of these unfavorable factors,
the Board of Governors does not feel justified in recommending
approval of the application.

n

The Board's Division of Examinations will be glad to
discuss any aspects of this case with representatives of your
c)ffice if you so desire.




Very truly yours,
(Signed)

Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

S7
Item No.

9

4/3/57
April

3, 1957

Honorable Victor R. Hansen,
Assistant Attorney General,
Antitrust Division,
Department of Justice,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Mr. Hansen:
At the request of the Board of Governors, in 1956 the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco conducted a study of banking
conditions in the State of Arizona, with particular reference to
certain corporate acquisitions of bank stocks within recent years
and the possible application thereto of section 7 of the Clayton
Act. The results of that study were embodied in a two-volume
report entitled "Investigation of Banking in Arizona", dated
November 23, 1956.
The banking situation in Arizona, as reflected in the
above-mentioned report and other data, is currently receiving consideration from the point of view of the Board's responsibilities
under section 11 of the Clayton Act with respect to enforcement of
section 7 thereof. In view of the jurisdiction of the Department
°f Justice in the enforcement of the antitrust laws, the Board is
transmitting to you herewith a copy of the report for your information and use. Needless to say, transmittal of this study does not
indicate that the Board of Governors has reached a conclusion as to
whether there has been any violation of either the Sherman Act or
the Clayton Act.
The Board's staff is available at all times for discussion
Of this subject, and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and
tne Board will be glad to make available such information as they
can. In that connection it is mentioned that The American Banker of
March 14, 1957, stated that The Bank of Douglas plans to absorb the
Farmers and Stockmens Bank of Phoenix "early in the summer".
Sincerely yours,
(Signed)

Enclosur




S. R. Carpenter

S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

Item No. 10

4/3/57

April

3, 1957

Mr. H. N. Mangels, P-esident,
Federal Reserv,:. Bank of San Francisco,
San Francisco 20, California.
Dear Mr. Mangels:
Enclosed are copies of (1) a letter sent today to the
Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice transmitting for
Its use a copy of the report entitled "Investigation of Banking
in Arizona", which was prepared by yOur Bank, and (2) a memoto the Board of Governors dated March 18, 1957, with
respect to "Sending to Department of Justice a copy of the Arizona
banking study".
It would be appreciated if your Bank would make available
to the Department of Justice, upon its request, such information
as YOU properly can on the subject of the banking situation in
Arizona,
Sincerely yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.
Enclosures.




849
Item No. 11
4/3/57

April 3, 1957

Mr. Malcolm Bryan, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta,
Atlanta 3, Georgia.
Dear Mr. Bryan:
This refers to your letter of March 11, 1957,
With enclosures, regarding the question whether section
17(a) of Title II of the proposed Financial Institutions
Act of 1957 (S. 1451) would be applicable to a Federal Reserve Bank director whose second consecutive term is expiring this year.
The Financial Institutions Act of 1957 is, as you
knw, still in the legislative stage and thus the final
context of any given section of the Act cannot be determined
at this time.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

850
Item No. 12
4/3/57

April

3, 1957

Board of Directors,
Citizens Commercial & Savings Bank,
Flint, Michigan.
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to your request submitted through the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System approves the establishment
of a branch by Citizens Commercial & Savings Bank in the
vicinity of the intersection of Richfield and Center Roads
in Flint, Michigan, provided the branch is established
vlthin six months from the date of this letter, and that
approval of State authorities is effective as of the date
the branch is established.




Very truly yours,
(Signed)

Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Assistant Secretary.

85-1_

Item No. 13
4/3/57

April 3, 1957

The Honorable J. W. FUlbright, Chairman,
Committee on Banking and Currency,
United States Senate,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Senator FUlbright:
This is in reply to your letter of March 27, 1957,
requesting a report on 8.17111 a bill to provide for the
establishment of a Commission on National Housing Policy. The
proposed bill is substantially identical to S.31861 which was
introduced during the second session of the 84th Congress and
Which was referred to the Board for a report by your letter of
February 16, 1956.
The Board has reviewed the comments contained in its
Previous letter and reaffirms them. For your convenience I am
attaching five copies of that letter.
Sincerely yours,
(Signed) Wm. McC. Martin, Jr.
WM. Mee. Martin, Jr.

Enclosures 5




852
Item No. 14
4/3/57

April 3, 1957

The Honorable J. W. Fulbright, Chairman,
Senate Committee on Banking and Currency,
United States Senate,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Senator Fulbright:
This is in response to your request of March 27 for the
Board's views on the bill H.R.4602 now before your Committee on
Banking and Currency. This bill would expand the authority of the
Administrator of Veterans Affairs to make direct loans to veterans,
and would empower the Administrator to make loan commitments to
builders in "housing credit shortage areas" for a fee of not more
than 2 per cent of the amount of loans committed for. The interest
rate on these
loans would be the maximum rate permitted on guaranteed
loans.
The Board is aware of the fact that mortgage credit is
usually available to borrowers in large eastern metropolitan districts on terms more favorable than those obtainable by borrowers
ta less thickly populated regions. In the latter sections, the
making and servicing of loans is more expensive for the lender, and
the cost of borrowing in such areas has historically been higher
than in metropolitan areas. The most effective way of assuring
that the cost of borrowing is kept as low as possible is to have as
ManY lenders as possible freely competing for loans, and the Board
believes that public policy may properly be directed to encouraging
more lenders to invest funds in such areas. The Voluntary Home
m?rtgage Credit Program has made a very useful contribution in this
direction.
A strong deterrent to the entrance of many lenders into
small or remote areas has been the maximum interest rate on
fede rally-underwritten loans, which would otherwise be the best
vehicle for large investors to use in competing for loans in such
areas. The program embodied in H.R.4602 may be expected to make
iovernment funds available in small and remote areas, but it is
-Likely, by creating Government competition on terms that private
investors cannot meet, to increase rather than reduce this deterrent
to the entrance of lenders into such markets.




853

The Honorable J. W. Fulbright

-2-

For this reason, as well as because of the drain the
Program would make on the Federal Treasury, the Board believes
that greater flexibility with respect to the maximum rate of
interest on VA loans would be a preferable approach to the
Problem.




Sincerely yours,
(Signed) Wm. McC. Martin, Jr.
Wm. McC. Martin, Jr.

854
Item No. 15
4/3/57

April 3, 1957

Mr. Roger W. Jones,
Assistant Director for
Legislative Reference,
Bureau of the Budget,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Mr. Jones:
This is in response to your Legislative Referral Memorandum
of March 19, 1957, requesting the Board's views with respect to a
proposal submitted by the Small Business Administration to amend section 24 of the Federal Reserve Act, which prescribes limitations and
re quirements with respect to loans by national banks on real estate
security.
The proposal is that "disaster loans" covered by SBA
deferred participation agreement "shall not be subject to the restrictions or limitations of this section 5.e., section 247imposed upon
1°ans secured by real estate." It ii—understood that SBA considers
that such an amendment is needed in order to enable national banks to
make residential disaster loans more freely than is possible under
existing
law.
Section 24 establishes minimum standards for real estate
1°5ns by national banks and limits the aggregate amount of such loans.
These provisions are designed to safeguard solvency and liquidity.
Under the instant proposal, a national bank would be subject to no
aggregate limit on the amount of "disaster loans" secured by real
estate that it could have outstanding; and such loans could be made
(1) on the security of second or third mortgages, (2) without any provisions with respect to amortization, and (3) in amounts that might
equal or exceed the value of the real estate security.
When a bank makes disaster loans in compliance with the
De Tlirements of its Disaster Participation Agreement with SBA, the
ank is protected against loss on such loans by a commitment on the
Part of SBA to take over upon demand whatever percentage has been
designated by the bank. That percentage can not exceed 90 per cent of
1°ans of less than $20,000 or 75 per cent of loans in excess of

c




855

Mr. Roger W. Jones

-2-

$20,000, and it may be a smaller percentage if the bank so elects.
However, the Board has been informed that in most cases SBA's deferred
Participation in residential disaster loans is 90 per cent.
When occasion for making disaster loans arises, the demand
for such loans in a particular community or area may be very substantial,
and a national bank might be under considerable pressure to make such
loans with less than the usual attention to safeguards of the kinds
prescribed by section 24. If such a bank elected to have only a
relatively small percentage of such loans covered by SBA deferred participation, the risk exposure might be sufficient to endanger the bank's
capital structure or liquidity. However, if most loans affected by the
proposed amendment would be protected to the extent of 90 per cent by
SBA deferred participations, the aggregate risk may not be excessive as
a practical matter. The Comptroller of the Currency, who is the primary
supervisor of the national banking system, has detailed information
regarding its condition and operations, and accordingly the views of
the Treasury Department presumably would be accorded particular weight
in passing on the advisability of the proposal.
In the interest of clarity and uniformity, it is suggested
(1) that any provision on this subject should be inserted at the end
Of the fourth paragraph of section 24 rather than in the first paragraph, and (2) that the provision should begin "Loans made to borrowers
•
• -" rather than "All loans, referred to in this section, made to
borrowers . . .".
Attention is called to the fact that the March 13, 1957 letter
•Irom SBA to your Bureau is not complete and accurate in all respects
ln describing the present provisions of section 24 with respect to such
matters as the permissible percentage relationship of real estate loans
tO the value of the security, amortization requirements, aggregate
limitations, and existing exemptions. It is also mentioned that the
next-to-last paragraph of that letter should refer to national bank
e xaminers rather than Federal Reserve Bank examiners.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary.

85

Item No. 16
4/3/57

April 3, 1957

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
Mr. Robert J. Smith, Chairman,
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas,
Dallas 13, Texas.
Dear Mr. Smith:
The Board of Governors has approved, effective April 1, 1957, the adjustments proposed in
Mr. Irons' letter of March 14, 1957, in the minimums
mad maximums of the salary structure of the Officers'
Salary Administration Plan of the Federal Reserve Bank
Of Dallas, as follows:
Group
A




Minimum

Maximum

$ 8,000
9,800
12,100
15,000

$12,000
14,700
18,200
22,500
Very truly yours,
(Signed) S. R. Carpenter
S. R. Carpenter,
Secretary

857
Item No. 17
4/3/57
TELEGRAM
April 3, 1957

LATHAM - BOSTON

Reurtel April 21 1957.

Board approves designation of

Joseph Samuel Winning as a special assistant examiner
for the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.




(Signed) Merritt Sherman
SHERMAN