View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System on Monday, April 27, 1953. The Board met
in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr. Martin, Chairman
Mr. Szymczak
Mr. Evans
Mr. Vardaman
Mr. itElls
Mr. Robertson
Carpenter, Secretary
Kenyon, Assistant Secretary
Thurston, Assistant to the Board
Leonard, Director, Division of
Bank Operations
Mr. Vest, General Counsel
Mr. Cherry, Legislative Counsel

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Mr. Cherry presented a review of legislative developments
during which he said that the Clerk of the House Banking and Currency
Committee was to call him this morning and give the date on which a
hearing would be held on Bill H. R. 4605, introduced by Representative
Wolcott, of Michigan, to increase the authority for construction of
Federa] Reserve Bank branch buildings.

The Senate Banking and Currency

Committee, he said, was meeting in executive session today to consider
bills now before that Committee, and according to a member of the staff
of the Committee, it was likely that the comparable Senate bill, S. 1631,
would be reported out by the Committee without a hearing.
Mr. Cherry reported that the Senate Committee on Post Office and
Civil Service was to begin hearings today on Bill S. 573, introduced by




Nkic

-2-

4/27/53

Senator Bennett, of Utah, at the request of the American Bankers
Association, to discontinue the Postal Savings System, and that
a member of the staff of the House Committee on Education and Labor
had stated to him that during the recent hearings before the Committee on the Taft-Hartley Act amendments only one reference was
made to the existing exemption of the Federal Reserve Banks under
the Act.

The staff member doubted that there would be any move

to keep
within the Committee to repeal the exemption, but agreed
Mr. Cherry advised so that if the matter should come up the Board
would be given an opportunity to make any representations it wished
to the Chairman of the Committee.

Mr. Cherry added that he had not

and
been in touch with the staff of the Senate Committee on Labor
Public Welfare to discuss the hearings on the Taft-Hartley Act which
were held before that Committee.
Mr. Cherry added that the economic controls bill (S. 1081)
was still being held up because of the debate on the "tidelands oil"
bill.

He thought it likely that the amendment to the bill offered by

referred at the meeting
Senator Maybank, of South Carolina, to which he
on April 21, 1953, would be agreed to when the bill reached the floor
of the Senate.
Governor Vardaman said that it appeared that the Board would
be asked again in the near future to review the maximum permissible




-3-

L/27/S3

interest rate on V-loans, that he had discussed the matter with Mr.
Gunderson, of the Washington office of the American Bankers Association, and that he advised Mr. Gunderson to ascertain the views of the
guaranteeing agencies before submitting to the Board a request for an
increase in the rate. Governor Vardaman said he continued of the
opinion that there was no reason for the Board to increase the rate
until the guaranteeing agencies indicated that the V-loan program was
being hampered by the current rate. He expected that the matter gould
be pushed, however, and said that he might want to suggest at the meeting of the Board on Friday of this week that another meeting with the
guaranteeing agencies be called to review the situation.
The Secretary stated that Congressman Busbey, of Illinois, Chairman of a subcommittee of the House Committee on Appropriations, called
him on the telephone last Friday afternoon to request the services of
Rodney H. Van Devanter, Administrative Assistant in the Division of
Personnel Administration, for about a week for the purpose of checking
over certain classification or job description sheets in connection
With a matter pending before the subcommittee. Mr. Carpenter said he
explained that the Division of Personnel Administration was extremely
by with work on salary plans at the Federal Reserve Banks but that he
would look into the matter and inform the Congressman today whether it
would be possible to spare Mr. Van Devanter. He further stated that in




4/27/53
the meantime it had been ascertained that there were men in the Salary
and Wage Stabilization Board who were qualified for the type of work
in question and who could be made available for the purpose.
Following a discussion, it was
agreed that Mr. Cherry should call
on Congressman Busbey and suggest
the use of someone from the Salary
and Plage Stabilization Board, but
that if the Congressman indicated
a particular desire to have Mr. Van
Devanter do the work, the Board would
be agreeable to making his services
available for the purpose.
Secretary's Note: Mr. Cherry called
on Congressman Busbey later in the day
and for reasons stated in his file
memorandum dated April 27, 1953, indicated that the Board would make lar.
Van Devanter available.
Messrs. Thurston and Cherry then withdrew from the meeting.
Mr. Leonard reported that he had received a telephone call from
Mr. Earhart, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, who
stated that it had been planned to rent space in the Portland Branch
building to the local office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
that General Services Administration had located quarters for the Bureau
elsewhere, that the First National Bank of Portland wished to rent the
space in the branch building for its accounting department, and that
this arrangement had been approved by the directors of the branch.
However,

counsel for the




Reserve Bank had raised the

question

V27/53
whether the fact that the national bank was controlled by Transamerica
Corporation would have any bearing on the matter in view of the current
Clayton Act proceeding against the Corporation, and President Earhart
wished to have the views of the Board on that point although it was his
own feeling that no problem would be presented. President Earhart also
said that if any question should be raised at this time, it might be
embarrassing to disapprove the action of the directors of the Portland
Branch, and he wished to go ahead with the arrangement unless the Board
felt otherwise.
During a discussion of the matter it was agreed that the national
banks connection with Transamerica Corporation should not be a determining
factor.

However, a majority of the Board expressed themselves as feeling

that where space was available in a Reserve Bank or branch

building, it

would be preferable to lease it to a Government agency, or, as a second
choice, to a nonfinancial organization, and that space should be leased
to a financial institution only as a last resort because of the fact
that such institution might consciously or unconsciously make use of
the fact that it had quarters in the Reserve Bank building in such a
way as to cause some embarrassment.

It was suggested, however, that

if the arrangements for the proposed lease of space at the Portland Branch
had proceeded to the point where it would be difficult for the Reserve
Bank to withdraw, it would probably be better for the Board not to interpose any objection.




-6-

h/27/53

Mr. Vest stated that he knea of no legal objection to leasing
the space to the national bank but that in his opinion there was merit
to the view that such a practice should be avoided as a general policy.
Thereupon, it was agreed that
Mr. Leonard should ascertain from
President Earhart the status of the
negotiations, with the understanding
that if the negotiations had proceeded
to the point of a definite commitment
on the part of the Reserve Bank, the
Board would interpose no objection to
the signing of the lease. It was also
understood that Mr. Leonard would inquire of President Earhart as to the
circumstances which caused the Federal
Bureau of Investigation to decide upon
the use of other quarters.
Governor Vardaman suggested that a general letter might be sent
to the Chairmen and Presidents of all Federal Reserve Banks with respect
to the leasing of space in Reserve Bank buildings.
Messrs. Leonard and Vest then withdrew from the meeting.
There was presented a draft of letter to Mr. Prochnoa, Secretary
of the Federal Advisory Council, submitting topics to be discussed at
the next meeting of the Council and the Board on May 19, 1953.

The draft

suggested that instead of the Council preparing a formal statement, as
had been done in the past, the members of the Council be prepared at the
joint meeting to participate in a round table discussion of the topics
listed.




L/27/3

-7Following a discussion of the
existing procedures for the meetings
of the Board and the Council and the
circumstances under which these procedures were adopted, unanimous approval was given to a letter to Mr.
Prochnow in the following form, with
the understanding that Chairman Martin
would discuss the proposed change in
procedure with Mr. Brown, President of
the Council, and ascertain whether there
would be any objection to it:

"This letter is in reply to yours of April 17 with
respect to the meeting of the Federal Advisory Council on
May 17-19, 1953. The Board Room will be available on Monday afternoon, May 181 for the meeting of the Council, and
the usual arrangements have been made for luncheon for
fourteen in the Blue Room on May 19. The items referred
tc in the last two paragraphs of your letter will be sent
to you at the hotel on the preceding Friday.
"The Board will be glad if the following items can be
placed on the agenda for discussion with the Board at the
joint meeting on May 19:
1. What are the views of the Council with respect
to the prospective business situation during
the next six months and the probable changes
in the volume and purposes of bank loans in
that period including commercial, consumer, and
real estate loans'
2. What comments does the Council have to make
with respect to (a) the System's credit policies
in the months ahead, and (b) the steps that
might be taken in the field of credit policy in
the event of a change in the economic climate?
3. The proposal is being advanced in the Congress
that the Reconstruction Finance Corporation be
abolished and that some arrangement be made
through the Federal Reserve Banks or otherwise
for the extension of loans, particularly to
small business, which would not be available
through the regular banking channels. The
Board would like to have the views of the Council on this proposal and, if thought desirable,
the manner in which it might best be carried out."




-8-

L/27/53

Governor Mills stated that the Committee on Current Business
Developments .as meeting in ;lashington and that a dinner had been planned
for the group and about twenty members of the Board's staff at a local
hotel.

the
He raised the question whether it would be appropriate for

when the meetBoard to pay the cost of the dinner, having in mind that
Banks it
ings of the Committee were held at one of the Federal Reserve
was customary for the Bank to absorb the cost.

He pointed out that if

the Board did not pay for the dinner the representatives of the Reserve
Banks attending would include the cost on their expense accounts, but
the members of the Board's staff involved sould have to pay for the
dinner themselves.
The matter was discussed in the light of the policy regarding
with
payment by the Board of the cost of dinners held in connection
4, 1947, and
System conferences, as stated in actions taken on February
November 10, 1949. The latter action provided that the Board would pay
the cost of a dinner not more frequently than once each year for persons
attending the Auditors' Conference, Examiners' Conference, and the System
Research Advisory Committee meeting

in igashington, provided that the

cost of such dinners did not exceed

10 per person and the list of those

invited was submitted in advance for approval.




At the conclusion of the discussion, there was agreement with
the suggestion that it would not
be wise to expand the established
policy to include what in effect
were subcommittees of the groups
to which the present policy applies.

-9-

14/27/53

Chairman Martin referred to the decision reached at the meeting of the Board on April 21, 1953, that one member of the senior
staff should be selected to represent the staff at the ceremonies on
May 6 incident to the opening of the new building of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, and he stated that he had asked Mr. Carpenter to
go to Boston for that purpose.
The meeting then adjourned.

During the day the following ad-

ditional action was taken by the Board with all of the members present:
Minutes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on April 24, 1953, were approved unanimously.