View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

833
A meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserv
e System
1448

held in Washington on Tuesday, April 21, 1936,
at 10:30 a. m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Eccles, Chairman
Szymczak
McKee
Ransom

Mr. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Bethea, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Clayton, Assistant to the Chairman
Mr. Thurston, Special Assistant to the
Chairman
Mr. Wyatt, General Counsel
Mr. Parry, Chief of the Division of
Security Loans
Mr. McKee referred to a letter received from
the Federal Reserve
Agent at the
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis under date of April 10,
1936 1
transmi
tting the request of Mr. A. WagenfUehr, Vice President of
The Boatmen's Nation
al Bank of St. Louis, for an expression from the
Board
as to whether units of trust shares representing listed stocks
are
to
be c
onstrued as registered equity shares for the purposes of Regula—
tjon
u", Loans by Banks for the Purpose
of Purchasing or Carrying Stocks

Re

gistered on a Nation
al Securities Exchange.

A draft of reply had been

Pl'ePal'ed in which it
was stated that certificates or other evidences of
beneficial interest in shares of stock registered on
a national securities
e oh ge
and held in a fiduciary capacity are not stocks
registered on a
tiet1°4111 securities exchan
ge within the meaning of Regulation "U" if the
e"tificates or
other evidences of interest are themselves not registered
on a
national securities exchange.
Both Mr. McKee and Mr. Ransom had ex—
Pr'eseed the opinio
n that, while the proposed reply appeared to be a correct
teelulical interpretati
on of the lar, such a ruling might permit evasion




834
4/21/36
-2-"he regulation and that the matter should be given careful consideration.
At the conclusion of a discussion of the
matter, during which it was pointed out that it
did not appear from the Federal reserve agent's
letter that the inquiry was based on anything
more than a hypothetical case, it was agreed
that the Federal reserve agent should be requested to obtain additional information concerning the facts surrounding the inquiry and
that the matter should be reconsidered by Mr.
Parry and Counsel's office on the basis of the
additional information thus obtained.
At this point Mr. Parry left the meeting.
There was then presented a letter dated April 16, 1936, signed
by

""e directors
of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, requesting
reco .
„"Blderation of the action taken by the Board on April 3, 1036, in
ning to approve salaries at the rates of e50,000 and el5,000 per
for Mr.
Tilliam A. Day as President and Mr. T. M. Hale as Vice
Pl'eBident,
t23,000
q

those

respectively, and in approving for them salaries at the rates
and e14,000 per annum, if fixed by the directors of the bank

rates.
After a discussion of the considerations
Upon which the Board's action was based, the
Secretary was requested to prepare for the consideration of the Board a draft of reply stating
briefly the Board's reasons for not approving
the salaries fixed by the directors for Messrs.
Day and Hale.

Reference was made to the excess reserves of member banks and
there

f°11owed a discussion of various aspects of the situation which
84ge8ted the desirability of the Board reaching a conclusion on the
cIlleqi°n whether
action should be taken by it in the near future to in-




835
k

4/21/36
crease reserve requirements. It was stated
that certain members of the
Board had planned to
be absent from Washington later in the week and during
the following reek and that, therefore, it would be
advisable to consider

the

matter as promptly as possible.
Accordingly, it was agreed unanimously
that a meeting of the Board should be held tomorrow afternoon at 2:30 p.m. for the purpose
of considering the problem of excess reserves.
It was also agreed unanimously that the Chairman should invite Mr. Landis, Chairman of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, to be
present at the meeting to present any views
that he might have with regard to the subject
of excess reserves and that Mr. Harrison,
President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, and Messrs. Burgess and Williams, Vice
Presidents of the bank, should also be invited
to be present.
In connection with the above action, it
was understood that arrangements would be made
for the members of the subcommittee of the
special committee of the American Bankers
Association appointed to confer with the Board
on Regulation rU" to meet with the Board at
10:00 a. in. tomorrow morning, instead of at
2:30 p. in. as was agreed upon at the meeting on
April 17.
In connection with this matter, Chairman Eccles referred to
the

fact that
at the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on March 19,
1936
s it had
been agreed that there should be another meeting of the
-fluttee on April
30 with the understanding that this would not prevent
the e
ailing of
an earlier meeting, and stated that he had discussed the
ter
Yesterday with President Harrison, Vice Chairman of the Committee,

Who 1,
"4C1
r()1.

concurred in Chairman Eccles' opinion that there was no necessity

4 meeting

on that date.

Mr. Morrill stated that President Fleming

c)f the
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, a member of the Federal Open
M kt

Committee, had talked with him on the telephone and had said that




836

11

4/21/36

-4-

it would meet with his approval if the meeting were deferred.
Chairman Eccles suggested that in these circumstances he be
authorized
to address a letter to the four Federal reserve bank members
Of

the Federal Open Market Committee which would state that the members
the Board were in agreement that it was not necessary to hold a meeting

of the
Committee on April 30, and that, in the absence of objection on the
Part of the Federal reserve bank members of the Committee, the meeting
Will be
postponed with the understanding that it will be called by the
Chairman for some date during the month of May.
Chairman Eccles' suggestion was approved
unanimously.
%
Mr. Morrill stated that Mr. Goldenreiser, Director of the
bivi
64.0n of Research and Statistics, had suggested that, in order that
•

the latest information with regard to the possible effects of e change in
l'eeerve requirements of member banks might be available to the Board, a
telegram be sent to the Federal reserve banks requesting them to send to
the
t5oard immediately information regarding average reserve balances of
tetuber banks with the Federal reserve banks and average balances with
thel
'banks for the period from March 1 to March 15, inclusive.
The Secretary was authorized to send a
telegram to the Federal reserve banks in
accordance with Mr. Goldenweiserts suggestion.
The minutes of the meetings of the Board of Governors of the Fedel'el Reserve System held on April 15 and 16, 1936, were approved unanimously
.4114 the actions recorded therein were ratified unanimously.




837

II 4/21/36

-„At this point Messrs. Thurston and Wyatt left the meeting.
There was then presented a draft of letter to Mr. O'Connor,

N
Ttroller of the Currency, reading as follows:
"This refers to Deputy Comptroller Gough's letter of
March 9, 1936, requesting advice as to whether a loan made
to an executive officer of a member bank prior to June 16,
19Z:3, which has been extended by resolution of the board of
directors of such bank even though secured by marketable
collateral sufficient to liquidate the loan, can be considered to have been properly extended in view of the requirement of section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act that
the board of directors must be satisfied that the officer
has 'made reasonable effort to reduce his obligation'.
Advice is also requested on the same question, with the
additional facts included that a part of the loan has been
charged off and the marketable collateral to the loan is
81.1fficient to liquidate the remainder. The applicable provisions of section 22(g) are as follows:
'Provided, That loans wade to any such officer
prior to June 16, 1933, may be renewed or extended for periods expiring not more than five
years from such date where the board of directors of the member bank shell have satiefied
themselves that such extension or renewal is
in the beet interest of the bank and that the
Officer indebted has made reasonable effort to
reduce his obliption, these findings to be
evidenced by resolution of the board of directors spread upon the minute book of the bank:
* * *r.
"'LOU will observe that the law requires that the board of
'irectors of the member bank shall be satisfied as to the
TE'tters prescribed by the law before extending or renewing a
t°an of the kind under discussion, and that, in addition to
Ltetcrmin
ing Ilether the officer 'has made reasonable effort to
reduce his obligation', the board
of directors must also be
i ll isfied that the extension or renewal 'is in the best
uerest of the bank'. It seems clear, therefore, that the
Primary responsibility for the extension or renewal of
lo
such a
an is placed by law upon the board of directors of the
member bank involved and that it is contemplated that in
retching a
determination in the matter the board of directors
111 consider all of the facts and circumstances in the
'
articular case. It is the view of the Board, therefore,




838
4/21/36

-6-

"that the fact that a loan of the kind under discussion Is
Secured by marketable collateral in an amount sufficient to
liquidate the loan would not of itself show that an extension
Of the loan was not in conformity with the requirements of
section 22(g) but that all of the facts in the particular
case would have, to be given consideration in determining this
question. The fact that a part of the loan had been charged
off and the marketable collateral would liquidate the remainder would not change such conclusion. Of course, in any
case rhere it appears that a loan. may have been extended
Tlthout a proper regard for the provision of law quoted
above, it rould be desirable for the bank examiner, in
connection with his examination of the bank, to give
particular consideration to all the facts involved in the
case in order to determine whether or not the directors
have acted arbitrarily in extending the loan."




Approved unt.nimously.

Thereupon the meeting edjourned.

Chairman.