View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

A meeting of the Federal Reserve Board was held in the office of
the Federal Reserve Board on Saturday, April 16, 1932, at 11:40 a. rt.
PRESMIT:

Governor Leyer
Mr. Hamlin
Mr. Miller
Mr. Magee
Mr. Pole
Korrill, Secretary
Er. licClelland, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Harrison, Assistant to the Governor.

The Board considered and acted upon the following matters:
Letter dated April 14, 1932, from the Secretary of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and telegram dated April 14, 1932, from the Chairman
Of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, both advising that at meetings of
the Boards of Directors on the date

stated no changes were made in the

banks' existing schedules of rates of discount and purchase.
dithout objection, noted with approval.
I:emorandum dated April 13, 1932, from Assistant Secretary McClelland
recomhiending that iJr. Erastus R. Massey be appointed as a stenographer on
the Board's staff, with salary at the rate of 4,800 per annum, effective
APril 16, 1932, and that he be assigned to the Division of Examinations.
Recommendation approved.
Report of the Committee on Salaries and Expenditures on a letter
dated April 9, 1932, from Deputy Governor Helm of the Federal Reserve Bank
Of

Kansas City, requesting approval of a change in the personnel classifi-

cation plan of the bank to provide for the creation of the new position of
"Special Agent" in the Failed Banks-Rediscounts Department; the Board's
Committee recommending approval.




Approved.

4/16/62
Reply, approved by five members of the Board on April 14, to a
letter dated April 9, 1932, from the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank
Of Richmond, advising of an arrangement which was made, effective February
7, 1932, for the division between the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and
the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond of the salary of l'r. R. H. Broaddils,
Deputy Governor of the bank, during the period of his service as Eanager of
the Richmond Agency of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, under which
the Corporation would compensate Eli!. Broaddus at the rate of8,000 Per annum
and the Federal reserve bank at the rate of ,6,000 Per annum; the reply
stating that the Board approves the payment to lir. Broaddus by the Federal
Reserve Bank of Richmond of the salary stated during the period of the
arrangement with the Corporation.
Reply approved.
Reply, approved by five members of the Board on April 14, to a
letter dated April 6, 1932, from the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis requesting approval by the Board of an amendment to Section 1 of
Article IV of the by-laws of the Louisville branch, under which the closing
hour of the branch on 3aturdays will be 1:00 p. m. instead of 2:00 p.
the hour of closing on other business days; the reply stating that the
Board approves the amendment referred to.
Reply approved.
Telegraphic reply, approved by five members of the Board on April
13, to a telegram dated 4.pril 13, 1932, from Deputy Governor Day of the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco recommending approval by the Board of
an application filed by the Old I:ational Bank and Union Trust Com)any,
Spokane, ',[ashington, for an advance, under the provisions of Section 10(b)




•;.1

4/16/32
Of

0.10

the Federal Reserve Act, in the amount of .2,500,000, for a period of

three months, at a rate of 5 1/2

per annum, on the security of $3,395,000

face amount of school district warrants, real estate loans, loans secured by
stock and bonds, automobile contract loans and unsecured loans; the bank
desiring the advance in order to net demands caused by a threatening
emergency facing a competing bank in Spokane.

The reply stated that the

Board authorizes the advance by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Under the terms and conditions recommended.
Unanimously approved.
Telegraphic reply, approved by five members of the Board on April 15,
to a letter dated April 14, 1932, from Deputy Governor Rounds of the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York transmitting an application

by the Lincoln Eational

Bank of Newark, ilew Jersey, for an advance of 175,000, under the provisions
Of Section 10(b) of the federal Reserve Act, and recuesting anproval of the
advance for a period of ninety days, at a rate of 5 1/2,, per annum, on the
security of $225,000 face amount of customers' paper of building and loan
associations, motor finance companies, etc.; the reason given for the
application being that the bank has borrowed to the extent of its eligible
Paper with the Federal Reserve bank and is borrowing practically to the
limit of its bond account with its correspondent, and that the bank's reserves
have shown an average deficiency of •;07,000 during the past fifteen days and are
now deficient in the amount of -190,000.

Cl

The reply stated that the Board

apProves the advance under the terms and conditions recommended.
Unanimously approved.
Telegram to Deputy Governor Day of the Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco replying to his telegram of April 15, 1932, reconnending approval




315
4/16/32
r '1
c)

-4-

Of an application made by the Anglo California Trust Company, San Francisco,
under the provisions of Section 10(b) of the Federal Reserve Act, for an advance of

5,000,000, for a period of four months, at a rate of 5 1/2% per

.7,500,000 face amount of bonds, real estate
annum, on the security of :
Mortgages, and notes secured by stocks and bonds; the reason given for the
aPplication being that the advance is desired to meet demands arising out of
a situation confronting a closely associated bank which has nineteen
affiliated banking institutions.

The reply stated that the Board approves

the advance under the terms and conditions stated.
Assistant Secretary NeClellsnd reported that Er. Tames, before
leaving Washington yesterday evening, had approved the application and
initialed the telegram to Deputy Governor Day.

Er. Miller stated that he

was reluctant to vote for the proposed advance because he felt that the circumstances were such that it would be preferable if it were obtained from
the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.

Governor Meyer stated that Governor

Calkins of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, while in Washington
earlier in the week, had discussed the matter with him, and he understood
also with other members of the Board, and had expressed the opinion that if
the application were submitted to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation the
fact that such an application had been made would become known with very
4nfortunate results, especially in view of the tense state of mind of the
People in California with respect to banking conditions.

Therefore, Governor

Calkins felt that the matter should be handled by the Federal reserve bank
rather than the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.

Governor reyer added

that no application had been received by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and consequently that the Corporation could take no action at this time




4/16/32

-5-

with respect to it.
Upon further discussion the application
was approved unanimously.
Telec;raphic reply, approved by five members of the Board on April 15,
to a telegram dated April 14, 1932, from Governor Harrison of the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York stating that the Bank for International Settlements
had advised that all of the other participants in the credit to the Austrian
National Bank and all but one small participant in the credits to the
Hungarian National Bank had agreed to renew their participations in the
credits for three months on the same conditions as applied to the previous
renewals, except that they had agreed to the waiver of the engagement commission of 1/4;7) on the credits and to a reduction to 90,000,000 schillings
in the amount of unencumbered gold to be held by the Austrian National Bank
against its credit which previously had been reduced to the equivalent of
90,000,000 schillings.

The reply stated that the Board interposes no

Objection to the modifications in the terms and conditions of the credits
to the Austrian National Bank and the Hungarian National Bank, in
connection with the renewals of the New York bank's participation in the
credits for periods of three months from April 16 and April 18, 1932,
respectively, it being understood that the possible withdrawal of one
participant in the Hungarian credits will not involve any increase in the
New York bankts participation in the credits.
Reply approved.
Telegram dated April 15, 1932, from Deputy Governor Crane of the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York advising that the credits to the Austrian
Nationn1 Bank and the Hungarian National Bank have been renewed by all
Participants for periods of three months from April 16 and April 18, 1932,



R17
4/16/32

-6-

respectively, with the modifications referred to above.
Noted.
Letter to The First National Bank of Fort Worth, Texas, approved by
five members of the Board on April 11, 1932, advising that, in addition to
the authority previously granted to the bank to act, when not in contravention
Of State or local law, as trustee, executor and registrar of stocks and bonds,
the Federal Reserve Board has approved the application filed by the bank for
Permission to act as administrator, guardian of estates, assignee, receiver,
committee of estates of lunatics, or in any other fiduciary capacity in
Which State banks, trust

Companies

or other corporations which come into

competition with national banks are permitted to act under the laws of the
State of Texas, the exercise of such rights to be subject to the provisions
Of the Federal Reserve Act and the Regulations of the Federal Reserve Board.
Application ana letter approved.
Reply to a letter dated March 31, 1932, from the Federal Reserve
Agent at Dallas, reporting that the First National Bank of Rock Springs, Texas,
Was continuously deficient in its reserves during the six months period
ending March 15, 1932; the reply stating that, in accordance with the Agent's
recommendation and in view of the fact, communicated in his letter of April
4, 1932, that the bank has now restored its reserves to the required amount,

the Board will take no action in the matter, other than to forward a copy of
the Agent's letter to the Comptroller of the Currency for the information of
his office.
Reply approved.
Letter to the Federal Reserve Agent at San Francisco, approved by
five members of the Board on April 15, referring to his letter of February




-7-

4/16/32

29, 1932, transmitting information with regard to the transaction by which
the Coffman Dobson. Bank and Trust Company, Chehalis, Washington, a member,
acquired certain of the assets and assured the liabilities, other than to
stockholders, of the First National Bank of Chehalis, effective as of
February 23, 1932; the reply stating that in accordance with its usual
Policy, the Board will defer action on the question whether the transaction
has resulted in a change in the chakacter of the assets of the member bank
or broadening in the functions exercised by it within the meaning of the
general condition of membership, until it is in possession of complete information with reference to the matter, which, in this case, can best be obtained
through an examination of the merged institution.

The letter also requested

the Agent to instruct his examiners to secure at the time of the next examination of the member bank, or through an independent credit investigation,

a classification of the criticised assets taken over from the national bank.
Letter approved.
Letter to the Federal Reserve Agent at Chicago, approved by five
raerbers of the Board on April 11, referring to Assistant Federal Reserve
Agent young's letter of April 5, 1932, with which he submitted, in accordance
With the request contained in the Board's letter of March 30, 1932, additional
information in connection with the transaction by which the Monticello State
Bank of Monticello, Iowa, on December 30, 1931, purchased the assets and
assumed the deposit liabilities of the Lovell State Bank of Monticello; the
Board's letter stating that it does not appear from the information submitted
that the transaction has resulted in a change in the general character of the
assets of the Monticello State Bank or broadening in the functions exercised




9
-8--

4/16/'32

by it within the meaning of the general condition under which the bank was
admitted to membership in the Federal Reserve System, and that the Federal
Reserve Board will, therefore, interpose no objection to the transaction.
Letter approved.
Reply, approved by five members of the Board on April 14, to a
letter dated Earch 9, 1932, from the Deputy Superintendent of Banks of the
State of New York advising that the Genesee River rational Bank of it. Fbrris,
New York, has forwarded to the State Banking Department the certificate issued
by the Board on February 27, 1932, that the bank is no longer authorized to
exercise fiduciary Powers, and requesting that the Board advise the Denartnent that the national bank has not at Present any fiduciary business; the
Board's reply stating that before issuing to the national bank the certificate above referred to, the Board requested the Comptroller of the Currency
to make an examination to determine whether any trusts which the bank might
have accepted had been properly disposed of, and that the Colaotroller had
advised the Board that an examination made of the bank on February 3, 1932,
disclosed that the bank had never exercised any of the fiduciary powers
granted to it by the Board.

The reply also called attention to the fact

that the Board is required by the provisions of Section 11(k) of the Federal
Reserve Act to satisfy itself that a national bank has been relieved of all
Of its duties as fiduciary before it issues to such bank a certificate that
the bank is no longer authorized to exercise trust powers, and that a
is entitled,
national hank to which the Board has issued such a certificate
Under the provisions of the Act, to have returned to it any securities which
it may have deposited with State aathorities for the Protection of private




-9-

4/16/32
or court trusts.

Reply approved.
Reply, approved by five members of the Board on April 15, to a
letter dated March 12, 1932, from Deputy Governor Zurlinden of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Cleveland, enclosing copies of correspondence with the Union
Storage Company of Erie, Pennsylvania, in which the question is raised as to
Whether notes of farmers given to finance the storage of cherries grown by
them and cold packed at their expense are to be regarded as agricultural

Paper and therefore eligible for rediscount with maturities up to nine months;
the reply stating that the Board has heretofore taken the position that the
storage of crops pending their orderly marketing is one of the steps in the
marketing of such crops and that the paper of a grower the proceeds of which

have been used to enable him to store his crops pending an orderly marketing
is agricultural paper; that if the processing or cold packing of the cherries
th the present case is incidental to the agricultural operations of the grower
and necessary to the successful consummation thereof, his notes given for the
Purpose of financing the storage of the cherries as one of the steps in their
orderly marketing, would appear to be eligible as agricultural paper; but

that before taking a definite position on this question, the Board would be
glad to have a more complete statement of the reasons for the view expressed

by Deputy Governor Zurlinden that the grower in packing and storing the
cherries is engaged in connerctal rather than agricultural operations.
Reply approved.
Letter to the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis,
referring to his reply of April 6, to the Board's letter of March 16, 1932,
relative to the report of examination of the Federal Reserve Bank of




(11

4/16/32

-10-

St. Louis and its branches as of January 23, 1932.

The proposed letter

stated that the various corn-lents contained in the Chairnan's reply have been
carefully noted, Particularly those relatinc., to the recommendations of the
Board's examiner that the bank and its branches retain in their files the
original or certified copies of financial statements of borrowers in lieu
Of the present practice of naintaininr, card analyses of credit information,
and that the financial statements of farmer borrowers to be retained at the
Ilbnphis branch be enlarged so as to include additional and more detailed
information as to certain items; and that, while the Board is in full
sympathy with these recommendations, in view of the attitude of the
directors of the reserve bank and the unsettled conditions which exist, the
Board will not object to the bank continuing its present practice for the
tille being, although it is requested that at a later date, when circumstances
Warrant, consideration be given to making the changes effective.
Letter approved.
The Governor stated that mr. Goldenweiser, Director of the Board's
Division of Research and Statistics, has received a request from the ActinE.
Chairman of the Ways and reans ComLiittee of the Rouse of Representatives to
appear before the Comitittee early next week in connection with hearings
being conducted by the Committee on bills Providing for immediate payment of

the Soldiers' Adjusted Comnensation certificates, and the Governor inquired
Whether there would be any Objection on the part of the members present to
17.r.

Goldenweiserts complying with the request.




After a brief discussion, the Secretary was
requested to advise Lir. Goldenweiser that the Board
has no objection to his appearing before the Committee
in his personal capacity and in no way as a representative of the Federal Reserve Board.

322
4/16/32

-11The Governor then presented a draft of a reply, prepared by him in

accordance with the action taken at the neeting of the Board on April 13,
1932, to the letter received under date of April 12, 1932, from 1.r. X. B.
LIcDougal, as Acting Chairman of the Open Llarket Policy Conference.
The reply, reading as follows, was apProved:
"I have brought to the attention of the Board your letter of
April 12, 1932, in which you stated that 'the Governors of the Federal Reserve Banks, sitting today as an Open Market Committee, have
necessarily given consideration to Senate Bill No. 4115, and to the
suggestions in reference thereto BA:Flitted by the Federal Reserve
Board', and requested that I communicate the conclusion reached to
the Banking and currency Committee of the Senate.
The meeting of the Open i:arket Committee, as you know, was
called by the Federal Reserve Board not for the purpose of considering Senate Bill Ho. 4115 or the comments and recomnendations which
the Board submitted to the Senate Committee on. Banking and Currency,
but for the purpose of considering the open market policy of the
system. It seems to the Board that the question whether any Federal reserve bank should submit its views regarding S. 4115 to the
Senate Committee on Banking and Currency is one for determination
by its board of directors. In the circumstances, the Board does
not feel that it should comply with the request contained in your
letter."
Drafts of a telegram and letter to the Federal Reserve Agent at
Chicago, replying to his letter of I:arch 5, 1932, and telegram of April 15,
1932, outlining the considerations which make it desirable to have a representative of the Federal Reserve Agent stationed at the Detroit branch, and
lsequesting aueroval by the Board of the appointment as Assistant Federal
aeserve Agent at the branch of Mr. W. C. Recklingel who has been employed at
the branch since 1920; the Board's telegram and letter advising of approval

or

the designation with the understanding that r. Recknagel will be carried

on the payroll of the Federal Reserve Agent and will be responsible solely
to him for the proper performance of his duties.

The telegram and letter

]-so stated that before the designation becores effective I*1". Recknagel




323
4/16/32

-12-

Should execute the usual form of oath of office and a surety bond for )50,000
in the form enclosed in the letter, which should be submitted to the Board
for approval.
Letter and telegram approved.
Reply to a letter dated March 29, 1932, from the Federal Reserve
Agent at Chicago stating that under a recent change in procedure bankers'
acceptances pledged with the Agent at the ahicago office have been transferred to the investment department, thereby making a representative of
the Agent necessary in that department, and that he has appointed Yr. Frank
R. Hoffman as such representative with George L. Moore as alternate.

The

Federal Reserve Agent also stated that for several years the Federal Reserve
AGent has had representatives in the discount department of the Chicago bank
• and the Detroit branch and that in order to bring the record up to date he
haS reappointed Mr. Caleb Henningson as his representative at the Chicago
office with

Mr.

George L. Moore as alternate, and Er. T. F. Billig as his

representative at the Detroit branch with Er. Edmund T. Quandt as alternate.
The Board's reply noted the appointments and stated that the Board feels that
•

40 formal action on its part is required, it being understood that the
aPPointment of these representatives does not in any way relieve the Agent
Of his personal responsibility as the official custodian of the collateral
Pledged with him as security far Federal reserve notes.
Reply approved.
Reports of Standing Committee dated -April 15, 1932, recommending
approval of the following changes in stock at Federal reserve banks:
Aalication for ORIGINAL Stock:
1C114rict No. 8.
Mercer County National Bank, Harrodsburg, Ky.




Shares
72

72

R24
4/16/32

-13-

APT.1111tLons for SURRENDER of Stock:
RIAtrict No. 2.
National Bank of Whitehall, N. Y. (Insolvent)

Shares

District No. 5.
First National Bank in Florence, S. C. (Insolvent)
Schmalz National Bank, Newport News, Va. (V.L.Abs.
by First National Bank of Newport News)

90
360

450

18

18

54
Total

54
612

Xstrict NO. 8.
Producers State Bank, Siloam Springs, Ark.
(Insolvent)
District No. 11.
First National Bank, Rockdale, Texas. (V.L.Abs.
by Rockdale State Bank of Rockdale)

90

90

Approved.
Reports of Standing Committee dated April 13, 1932, recommending
aPproval of the following Clayton Act applications:
raf. Lindley C. Morton for permission to serve at the sane
tine as director of the First National Bank of Birmingham,
Alabama, and as director of the Manufacturers Trust Company of
New York, N. Y.
Mr. Henry B. Kennedy for permission to serve at the sane
tine as director of the Fulton National Bank of Atlanta, Georgia,
and as director and officer of the Empire Trust Company of
Atlanta, Georgia.

ra.. 0. G. Thomas for permission to serve at the sane time
as director of the First National Bank of Arcadia, Louisiana,
and as director of the City Savings Bank and Trust Company of
Shreveport, Louisiana.
Mr. X. W. Royall for permission to serve at the same time
as officer of the Republic National Bank and Trust Company of
Dallas, Texas, and as director of the First National Bank in
Honey Grove, Texas.
Mr. X. N. Hadra for permission to serve at the same time
as officer of the Republic National Bank and Trust Company of
Dallas, Texas, and as director of the First National Bank in
Honey Grove, Texas.




325
4/16/32

-14-

Mr. X. A. Colenan for permission to serve at the same tine
as director of the First National Bank of Monroe, Washington,
and as director of the First National Bank of Everett, Washington.
Mr. L. S. Omohundro for pernission to serve at the sane
time as director of the Whitesboro National Bank of Whitesboro,
Texas, and as officer of the Merchants & Planters National Bank
of Sherman, Texas.
Approved.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

61

APProved: