View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

295
A meeting of the Federal Reserve Board was held in the office of the
Federal Reserve Board on Monday, April 11, 1932, at 12:10 p. m.
PRESENT:

Governor Meyer
Mr. Hamlin
Mr. Miller
Mr. Tames
Mr. Pole
Mr. McClelland, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Harrison, Assistant to the Governor.

The following matters of business were considered and acted upon by
the Board:
Telegrams dated April 8, 1932, from the Secretaries of the Federal
Reserve Banks of Cleveland and Atlanta, advising that their Boards of
Directors, at meetings on that date, made no changes in the banks' existing
schedules of rates of discount and purchase.
Without Objection, noted with approval.
Letter dated April 9, 1932, from the Chairman of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Atlanta, referring to his letter of March 12, 1932, presented at the
Meeting of the Board on March 15, which advised that the Board of Directors of
the bank had fixed a rate of 1% above the discount rate of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Atlanta for advances made under Sections 10(a) and 10(b) of the Federal Reserve Act, and stating that at the meeting of the Board of Directors
Of the bank on April 8, 1932, further consideration was given to the matter
and it was voted, subject to the approval of the Federal Reserve Board, to fix

aa interest or discount rate of 5 1/2% for advances under Sections 10(a) and
10(b) of the Federal Reserve Act.
Inasmuch as under the procedure outlined in the
Board's letter of March 10, 1932, applications for
loans under Sections 10(a) and 10(b) of the Federal
Reserve Act, including the rate of interest or discount
to be charged, will be approved by the Board in each
case, the action of the Board of Directors of the Atlanta




4/11/32

-2bank was noted, and the Secretary was directed to
advise the Chairran of the Atlanta bank accordingly.
Telegram dated April 11, 1932, from the Chairman of the federal Re-

serve Bank of Kansas City stating that at the neetinR of his 7oard of
Directors on April 7, 1932, it was voted to rescind the action taken at
their meetin7 on March 17, 1932, and reported in his telegram to the Board
Of that date, in establishing a rate of 5-; for loans made by the bank under
Sections 10(a) and 10(b) of the federal Reserve Act; the Chairnan advising
that the Prior action was rescinded in view of the lack of applications for
such loans and the belief that conditions existing when applications are
received should be considered in setting the rate of discount.
Noted.
Memorandum dated April 9, 1932, from Er. Drinnen, federal Reserve
Examiner, recomending the appointment of Mr. W. T. Mann as an Assistant
Federal Reserve Examiner, with salary at the rate of :2,000 per annum,
effective I:ay 3, 1932.
Upon notion, it was voted to appoint Er.
Mann an examiner for all purposes of the Federal Reserve Act as amended and of all other
Acts of Congress pertaining to examinations
made by, for, or under the direction of the
Federal Reserve Board; to designate him as an
Assistant Federal Reserve Examiner, and to fix
his salary at the rate of :2,000 per annum, all
effective May 3, 1932.
Telegraphic reply, approved by five nerrbers of the Board on April
9, to a telegram dated April B, 1932, from Deputy Governor Rounds of the federal Reserve Bank of New York requesting authority to purchase from the first
National Bank and Trust Company, ramaroneck, New York, ;200,000 of tax
antici-Pation notes of the Village of lAmaroneck; the reply statinr, that the
Board authorizes the Purchase with the understandin7, that the notes meet all




297
4/11/32

-3-

requirements of Regulation E except that the amount offered, in addition
to warrants of the municipality already held by the New York bank, exceeds
25;1 of the total warrants of the municipality outstanding.
Reply approved.
Telegraphic reply, approved by five members of the Board on April
9, 1932, to a telegram dated April 8, 1932, from the Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco stating that the cormercial department
Of a California departmental bank having a capital under

5,000,000 has no

further eligible or acceptable assets available for adequate credit
accommodations through rediscounting at the Federal reserve bank or by any
Other method provided by the Federal Reserve Act other than that provided

by Section 10(a), that the savings department of such bank has eligible
and acceptable assets but the commercial department is not in a position to
obtain transfer thereof, that exceptional and exigent circumstances exist,
and inquiring whether under these conditions the bank is eligible as a
borrower under Section 10(b) of the Federal Reserve Act; the reply stating
that, assuming that the aggregate capital of all departments of the bnnk
does not exceed .,)5,000,000 and that the commercial department does not have
an adequate amount of assets eligible far investment by the savings department to enable it to acquire from the savings department eligible and acceptable assets on which to obtain adequate credit accommodations under other
provisions of the Federal Reserve Act, except Section 10(a), the Federal
reserve bank, under the circumstances outlined, may grant the application,
subject to the approval of the Federal Reserve Board, as provided in Section
10(b).




Reply approved.

298
4/11/32
Letter to the Federal Reserve Agent at Philadelphia referring to his
letter of April 1, 1932, with which he submitted a certified copy of a
resolution of the Board of Directors of the Sixth National Bank of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, signifying its desire to surrender its right to exercise trust
Powers; the Board's letter stating that, in accordance with the procedure
prescribed in Regulation F, the Comptroller of the Currency is being requested
to have one of his examiners make a special investigation of the trust departMont of the Sixth National Bank upon the occasion of the next regular
examination of that bank, and to furnish a report upon the basis of which the
Board may determine whether it may properly issue a certificate to the effect
that the national bank is no longer authorized to exercise trust powers.
Letter approved, as was a letter to the
Comptroller of the Currency in accordance
therewith.
Letter to the Assistant Cashier of the Capital National Bank of
Lensing, Michigan, formerly Cashier

of the City Natiopal Bank of Lansing,

stating that, in accordance with the advice contained in his reply of April
2, to the Board's letter of March 26, 1032, the Federal Reserve Board is
requesting the Comptroller of the Currency to have one of his examiners make
a special investigation of the trust department records of the City National
Bank upon the occasion of the next regular examination of the Capital National
Bank of Lansing, and to furnish a report upon the basis of which the Board may
determine whether it may issue a certificate terminating the right of the City
National Bank to exercise trust powers.




Letter approved, as was a letter to the
Comptroller of the Currency in accordance therewith.

299
4/11r02
1

•

-5Letter to the Federal Reserve Agent at Dallas referring to his

letters of Larch 9 and 16, 1932, regarding the action taken by the Board of
Directors of the bank in recomending that the Federal Reserve 'Board institute
Proceedings, under the provisions of Section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act, to
terminate the membership of the First State Bank of Roby, Texas,' the Board's
letter stating that, in view of the information submitted and inasluch as it
appears that the first State Bank has violated the provisions of Section 9 of
the Federal Reserve Act and the Regulations of the Federal Reserve Board made
Pursuant thereto, in that it has failed to maintain the reserve required by
law, and has failed to exercise its Powers with due regard to the safety of
its customers, the Federal Reserve Board has decidea to institute proceedings
looking toward the forfeiture of the membership of that bank.

The letter

also outlined the procedure to be followed by the Federal Reserve Agent in
this matter and enclosed a letter to the member bank to be forwarded by the
Federal Reserve Agent, notifying the member bank that the Federal Reserve
Board will afford it an opportunity for a hearing in the Board's offices in
Washington, D. C., at 11 o'clock on the morning of May 16, 1932, at which
time the bank's representatives may appear to show cause why the First State
Bank shoulu not be required to surrender its stock in the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas and to forfeit all rights and privileges of membership in the
Federal Reserve System.

The letter to the member bank stated further that

in the event the bank desires to waive its right to appear before the Feueral
Reserve Board, and provided it gives reasonable notice in advance both to
the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Agent of its intention to
appear before the Federal Reserve Agent, it may, through its duly appointed
representatives appear before the Federal Reserve Agent at Dallas on a date




1/11/32

-6-

to be fixed by the latter, to Present such evidence as the bank may care
to have transmitted to the Federal Reserve -Ioard for its consideration in
determining whether or not the bank should be required to surrender its stock
in the Federal Reserve Bank of lianas and to forfeit all rights and privileges
Of membership in the Federal Reserve System.
Letters approved.
Letter to the Federal Reserve .Agent at Dallas referring to his
letters of :larch 9 and 16, 1932, regarding the action taken by the Board of
Directors of the bank in recomending that the Federal Reserve Board
Institute proceedings, under the Provisions of Section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act, to terminate the membership in the Federal Reserve System of the
Junction State Bank, Junction, Texas; the Board's letter statinre, that, in
view of the information submitted and inasmuch as it appears that the
Junction State Bank has violated the provisions of Section 9 of the Federal
Reserve Act in that it has failed to maintain the reserve ret- uired by law,
the Federal Reserve Board has decided to institute proceedings looking toward
the forfeiture of the membership of that bank.

The letter also outlined the

Procedure to be followed by the Federal Reserve Agent in this natter and
enclosed a letter to the member bank to be forwarded by the Federal Reserve
Agent notifying the member bank that the Federal Reserve Board will afford
it an opportunity for a hearing in the Board's of ices in Washington, D. C.,
at 11 o'clock on the morning of Lay 17, 1932, at which time the bank's
representatives may appear to Show cause why the bank should not be required
to surrender its stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and to forfeit
all rights and privileges of membership in the Federal Reserve System.

The

letter to the member bank stated further that in the event the bank desires




301
4/11/32

-7-

to waive its right to appear before the Federal Reserve Board, and provided
it gives reasonable notice in advance both to the Federal Reserve Board and to
the Federal Reserve Agent at Dallas of its intention to appear before the
Federal Reserve Agent, it may, through its representatives, appear before
the Federal Reserve Agent at Dallas on a date to be fixed by the latter, to
Present such evidence as the bank may care to have transmitted to the Federal
Reserve Board for its consideration in determining whether or not the bank
Should be required to surrender its stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas and to forfeit all rights and privileges of menbership in the Federal
Reserve System.
Letters approved.
Letter to the Federal Reserve Agent at New York referring to his
letter of February 29, 1932, and to Assistant Federal Reserve Agent
Dillistin's letter of March 24, 1932, with regard to the merger, as of
December 26, 1931, of the Mountain Trust Company, a nonmember, with the
Montclair Trust Company, a member institution, both of Montclair, New Jersey;
the Board's letter stating that it appears from the information submitted
that the merger has not resulted in any material change in the general
character of the assets of the Montclair Trust Company or in the scope of
the functions exercised by it within the meaning of the general condition
under which it was admitted to menberahip in the Federal Reserve System, and
that the Federal Reserve Board will, therefore, interpose no objection to
the transaction.
Letter approved.
Letter to the Federal Reserve Agent at Cleveland referring to
Assistant Federal Reserve Agent Fletcher's letters of March 17 and April 1,




tio2
-81932, with regard to the action of the Guardian Trust Company, Cleveland,
Ohio, a member, on February 29, 1932, in acrluiring for liquidation the assets
Of the Ohio State Bank, a nonmember, and assuming certain of its liabilities;
the Board's letter stating that the inforriation submitted has been reviewed,
but that in the absence of detailed information regarding, the classification
Of the assets of the Ohio State Bank which are to be liquidated by the
Guardian Trust CamJany, the Board will defer final consideration of the
question whether the transaction will result in any material change in the
general character of the assets of the Guardian Trust Company or in the sccrie
of the functions exercised by it within the meaning of the so-called general
condition under which it was admitted to membership in the Federal Reserve
SYstem.

The letter also requested that following the connletion of the

examination of the Guardian Trust Company which is now being made, the Agent
submit a further report to the Board, including therein a detailed statement
Of the assets and liabilities involved in the transaction and a classification
Of such assets as are subject to criticism, for the use of the Board in
connection with its further consideration of the matter above referred to.
Letter approved.
Reply to a letter dated Liarch 15, 1932, from Assistant Federal Reserve Agent Losher of the Federal Reserve Bank of Hinneanolis, enclosing a
cony of the by-laws of the bank, as revised by the Board of Directors on
March 14, 1932; the reply noting the changes which have been made therein.
The reply called attention to the fact that Section 2 of Article III of the
by-laws provides that the Federal Reserve Agent, as chairman of the Board,
shall preside at meetings thereof, and Section 3 of the same Article provides




4/11/32

-9-

that in the absence or disability of the Federal Reserve Agent his powers
shall be exercised and his duties performed by an Assistant Federal Reserve
Agent; that it is assumed that Section 3 is intended to refer to the powers
and duties of the Chairman of the Board in his capacity as such and not in his
capacity as Federal Reserve Agent; and that, inasmuch as Section 4 of the
Federal Reserve Act provides that one of the Class C directors shall be
appointed as Deputy Chairman to exercise the powers of the Chairman of the
Board when necessary, it would seem that Section 3 of Article III of the
by-laws should by its terms be made applicable to the Deputy Chairman rather
than to an Assistant Federal Reserve Agent, and that it also seems desirable
to refer to the Federal Reserve Agent as Chairman of the Board in Sections
2 and 3 of Article III rather than as Federal Reserve Agent.

The reply also

noted that the amendment to Article III of the by-laws of the bank with
regard to the election of officers at the first meeting of the Board of
Directors after January 1 of each year, which was adopted pursuant to the
suggestion contained in the Board's letter of August 16, 1927, has been
omitted from the latest revision of the by-laws, and requested that the
Board be advised as to the considerations which led to the omission of this
Provision.

The reply further requested that there be forwarded to the

Board a copy of the revised by-laws of the Helena Branch which were referred
to but not enclosed in the Assistant Federal Reserve Agent's letter.
Reply approved.
Reports of Standing Committee dated April 81 1932, reconnending
approval of the following changes in stock at Federal reserve banks:
Aaications for SURRENDER of Stock:
District No. 2.
National Bank of Rensselaer, Y. Y. (Insolvent)




Shares
75

75

304
-10-

4/11/32

I
I

m7DER of Stock: (Contfd)
Ipp1ications for S .District No. 3.
Farmers &Mechanics-National Bank of Phoenixville,
Phoenixville, Pa. (Cons. National Bank of
Phoenixville with the above bank)
District No. 7.
Joliet National Bank, Toilet, Ill. (Insolvent)
Pistrict No. 8.
Second National Bank, New Albany, Ind.
(Decrease in surplus)
Farmers National Bank, Princeton, Ind.
(Decrease in surplus)
First National Bank in St. Louis, YD.
(Decrease in capital)
District No. 12.
Xackson County Bank, Medford, Oregon.
(V.L.Abs. by First National Bank)
First National Bank, Woodburn, Oregon.
(V.L.Abs. by Bank of Woodburn)

Shares

222

222

660

660

30
15
105

60

72
18
Total

90
1,152

Approved.
Reports of Standing Committee dated April 8 and 11, 1932, recommending
approval of the following Clayton Act applications:

Mr. IT. J. Alexander for permission to serve at the same time
as director and officer of the American National Bank of Nashville,
Tennessee, and as director of the First National Bank of McMinnville,
Tennessee.
Mr. Clifford B. Fergus for permission to serve at the same time
as officer of the Mellon National Bank of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
and as director of the Logan National Bank and Trust Company of
New Kensington, Pennsylvania.
Approved.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Assistant Secretary.
Approved: