View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FR 609
Rev. 10/59

Minutes for

To:

April 1, 1960.

Members of the Board

From: Office of the Secretary

Attached is a copy of the minutes of the
of the Federal Reserve System on
Governors
Board of
date.
the above
It is not proposed to include a statement
with respect to any of the entries in this set of
minutes in the record of policy actions required to
be maintained pursuant to section 10 of the Federal
Reserve Act.
Should you have any question with regard to
the minutes, it will be appreciated if you will advise
the Secretary's Office. Otherwise, please initial below.
If you were present at the meeting, your initials will
Indicate approval of the minutes. If you were not present,
your initials will indicate only that you have seen the
minutes.




Chm. Martin
Gov. Szymczak
Gov. Mills
Gov. Robertson
Gov. Balderston
Gov. Shepardson
Gov. King

,

Minutes of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
The Board met in the Board Room at 10:00 a.m.

on Friday, April 1, 1960.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Balderston, Vice Chairman
Szymczak
Robertson
Shepardson
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Discount rates.

Sherman, Secretary
Thomas, Adviser to the Board
Shay, Legislative Counsel
Farrell, Director, Division of Bank Operations
Solomon, Director, Division of Examinations
Hexter, Assistant General Counsel
O'Connell, Assistant General Counsel
Landry, Assistant to the Secretary

The establishment without change by the Federal

Reserve Banks of Chicago and San Francisco on March 31, 1960, of the
rates on discounts and advances in their existing schedules was approved
unanimously, with the understanding that appropriate advice would be
sent to those Banks.
Item circulated to the Board.

The following item, which had been

circulated to the members of the Board and a copy of which is attached
to these minutes as Item No. 1, was approved unanimously:
Letter to the Maplewood Bank and Trust Company,
Maplewood, Missouri, waiving the requirement of six
months' notice of withdrawal from membership in the
Federal Reserve System.
Order on request for hearing.

Before the meeting there had been

distributed a draft of order on request for hearing by BancOhio Corporation relative to its application for permission to acquire shares of
The Hilliard Bank, Hilliards, Ohio, prepared pursuant to the understanding




-2-

4/1/60

reached at the Board meeting on March 30, 1960.

The order provided for

a public hearing with reservation to the hearing officer of the right
to exclude persons other than parties to the proceeding, counsel to such
parties, or necessary witnesses.
Following brief discussion the order (attached Item No. 2) was
unanimously approved.
Letter to Congressman Multer

(Item No. 3).

There had been

March
distributed prior to the meeting a draft of reply to a letter dated
24, 1960, from Congressman Multer regarding the reserve requirement bill
enacted into law in July 1959.

A number of suggestions were made for

editorial changes in the wording of the proposed reply, following which
unanimous approval was given to a letter in the form of attached Item
No. 3.
Messrs. Molony, Assistant to the Board, and Noyes, Director, and
Koch, Adviser, Division of Research and Statistics, entered the room at
this point.
Letter to Senator Proxmire

(Item No. 4).

Chairman Martin

reported that he and Mr. Thomas had received similar letters from
Senator Proxmire of Wisconsin dated March 30, 1960, calling attention
to a talk by Mr. Thomas on January 20, 1960, in New York City, with
respect to interest rate trends and asking for comments on a speech that
the Senator had made in the Senate with reference to Mr. Thomas' talk.
The Chairman then read a proposed reply to Senator Proxmire that referred




4/1/6o

-3-

to the section in the Board's Annual Report for

1959 on pages 6 through

25 relating to "Interest Rates, Economic Activity, and Saving."

The

proposed reply also noted that there would be forthcoming soon the Board's
reply to a letter from a group of Senators dated March 12, 1960, making
certain suggestions regarding administration of credit policy.

Following

discussion it was decided to omit any reference to the forthcoming letter
to the 21 Senators; and the Chairman's reply to Senator Proxmire in the
form of attached Item No.

4 was unanimously approved.

Mr. Young, Adviser to the Board, entered the room at this point.
Procedure for handling provision of information to Justice
Department on bank holding company applications.

Mr. Sherman said that,

pursuant to the action of the Board on January 28, 1960, a letter had
been prepared informing the Department of Justice of the receipt of an
application from Bank Stock Corporation of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, under
section 3(a) of the Bank Holding Company Act of

1956, for approval of

the acquisition of bank shares or bank assets.

He noted that advice to

the Justice Department ordinarily would be sent at the same time that a
letter was sent to the State banking authority or the Comptroller of the
Currency transmitting a copy of the application and asking advice on
whether it should be approved, and he inquired whether the Board wished
to have such letters of notification to the Department of Justice submitted to the Board prior to their dispatch.

There was agreement with

a suggestion that in the future such letters need not be brought to the




-4-

4/1/60

Board's attention before being sent to the Justice Department, but it
was understood that a copy thereof would be circulated among the members
of the Board for their information.
New Treasury financing.

Following the close of the market last

evening the Treasury announced an offering to investors of a 25-year
4-1/2 per cent bond callable in 15 years for as much as $1-1/2 billion
as well as $2 billion of a two-year one-month 4 per cent note issue to
meet total borrowing requirements of between $2-1/2 and $3-1/2 billion.
In response to a request from the Chairman, Messrs. Thomas and Koch
commented on the offering.

In this connection, Mr. Koch referred to

steps that might be taken to prevent a recurrence of the speculation
that had occurred in the Government securities market in mid-1958, a
subject that had been discussed at the Board meetings on March 29 and 30,
1960.

He noted that a statement accompanied the Treasury's announcement

of the financing to the effect that (1) the value of "rights" might be
eliminated in future refundings; (2) the Treasury does not intend to ask
Congress for authority to impose margin requirements on loaas against
Governments; and (3) it might take administrative action to realize the
same effect as a margin requirement in this area.
Testimony on S. 2755 regarding disclosure of finance charges.
Mr. Noyes referred to the forthcoming appearance of Chairman Martin before
the Subcommittee on Production and Stabilization of the Senate Committee
on Banking and Currency relative to S. 2755, a bill introduced by




1.2
4/1/6o

-5-

Senator Douglas requiring disclosure of finance charges in connection
with extensions of credit.

The Board's letters dated January 28, 1960,

to Senator Robertson, Chairman of the Senate Banking and Currency
Committee, and to Chairman Spence of the House Banking and Currency
Committee had taken a position favoring the objective of the bill
requiring full disclosure of interest charges on loans, but expressing
bill
belief that the Board should not be the enforcing agency should the
become law.

Mr. Noyes said that a draft of statement that was being

prepared for the Chairman's use could be placed in the hands of the
Board members late this afternoon.
A discussion developed relating principally to whether the
be
Chairman should take the position in his testimony that it would
bill by
preferable to achieve the objectives sought in Senator Douglas'
means of a criminal statute rather than as currently specified in the
bill by regulation to be administered by the Federal Reserve.

During

this discussion, Governor Robertson stressed the importance of not
placing too much emphasis on the Board's avoiding an assignment as the
enforcing agency under the proposed legislation, and Governor Balderston
referred to the likelihood that other witnesses would emphasize the
difficulties of codifying such a law.

The discussion concluded with an

observation by the Chairman that the Board's answer to any request by
the Committee that the Board undertake to draw up a statute in this
regard should be that the Board is not qualified to do this.




I

"?

-6-

4/1/6o

All members of the staff then withdrew and the Board went into
executive session.
Executive development program.

Governor Shepardson later informed

the Secretary that during the executive session he brought to the Board's
attention (1) a letter dated February

5, 1960, from the White House to

the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies concerning the establishment of executive development programs in the respective departments and
agencies; (2) a memorandum of February 12, 1960, from Eugene J. Lyons,
Special Assistant to the President, to the Heads of Departments and
Agencies relating to the development program and enclosing a memorandum
on the subject from Mr. Lyons to the Civil Service Commission; and (3) a
memorandum from Mr. Johnson, Director, Division of Personnel Administration,
dated March 21, 1960, presenting certain information and recommendations
With regard to an executive development program within the Board's
organization.
Governor Shepardson stated that after consideration of the subject
the Board agreed that an executive development program should be instituted
as a part of the Board's Employee Training and Development Program, which
was approved on September 10, 1958.

The Board vested responsibility for

this additional program in Governor Shepardson, as the Board member in
charge of internal affairs of a managerial nature, with the understanding
that he would work through the Director of the Division of Personnel
Administration in the formulation and administration of the program.




4 os-ms
-4,,vocilt

4/1/6o

-7Presentation of computer developments.

Governor Shepardson

the
reported that arrangements were being made for a presentation to
t,
Board regarding the use of the computer by Mr. Schwartz, Chief Analys
Statistics, and
Statistical Operations Planning, Division of Research and
others at 10:00 a.m. on April 15, 1960.

The meeting then adjourned.




Secretary's Notes: Governor Shepardson today
approved on behalf of the Board a letter to The
Prudential Insurance Company of America transmitting an executed copy of a request for
amendment to Group Policy No. GZ-30051 providing
that dividends payable to the Board as a result
of favorable claims experience under the Board's
policy GZ-30051 would depend on the financial
experience of the combined Federal Reserve System
major medical plan and the Board's major medical
plan.
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in a
memorandum dated March 29, 1960, from Mr. Kelleher,
Director, Division of Administrative Services,
Governor Shepardson also approved today on behalf
of the Board an increase in the basic annual salary
of Helen M. Capozio from $5,390 to $5,580, with a
change in title from Printing Clerk to Publications
Assistant in that Division, effective April 3, 1960.

Secretary,

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
**4
,Aig ©Ore
r

Item No. 1
4/1/60

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

'

WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

0
tl
%A

AOOREEIB OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

frOt
4.0

April 1, 1960.

Board of Directors,
Maplewood Bank and Trust Company,
Maplewood, Missouri.
Gentlemen:
The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis has forwarded
to the Board of Governors your letters of February 10 and 15,
1960, signifying your intention to withdraw from membership in
the Federal Reserve System and requesting waiver of the six
months' notice of such withdrawal.
In accordance with your request, the Board of Governors
waives the requirement of six months' notice of withdrawal. Upon
surrender to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis of the Federal
Reserve Bank stock issued to your institution, such stock will be
canceled and appropriate refund will be made thereon. Under the
provisions of Section 10(c) of the Board's Regulation H, your
institution may accomplish termination of its membership at any
time within eight months from the date the notice of intention to
Withdraw fromnBmbership was given.
It is requested that the certificate of membership be
returned to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.




Very truly yours,
(Signed) Kenneth A. Kenyon
Kenneth A. Kenyon,
Assistant Secretary.

Item No. 2
4/1/60

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
NOTICE OF ORDER ON REQUEST FOR HEARING

On February 15, 1960, the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System issued a Notice of Tentative Decision on
the application of BancOhio Corporation, Columbus, Ohio, filed
pursuant to section 3(a) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,
for prior approval of the acquisition of a minimum of 80 per cent
of the 1,000 voting shares of The Hilliard Bank, Hilliards, Ohio.
Subsequent to the issuance of the Board's Notice of Tentative
Decision, Applicant filed a timely request for a hearing on this
matter.
It appearing to the Board of Governors that it is appropriate in the interest of the public, as well as the Applicant,
that the request for hearing be granted,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, That, pursuant to section 7(a)
of the Board's Regulation Y [12 CFR Part 222.7(a)], promulgated under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, a
public hearing with respect to this application be held
commencing May 31, 1960, at 10 a.m., at the offices of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland,

1455 East

Sixth Street,

Cleveland, Ohio, before a duly selected hearing officer,
such hearing to be conducted in accordance with the Rules
of Practice for Formal Hearings of the Board of Governors




of the Federal Reserve System [12 CFR Part 263].

The

right is reserved to the Board or such hearing officer
(a) to designate any other date or place for such hearing
or any part thereof if deemed necessary or appropriate,
and (3) to exclude from the hearing persons other than
parties to the proceeding, counsel to such parties, or
necessary witnesses, durin

such times as evidence is

being given that is held to involve information of such
a nature that disclosure thereof would not be in the
public interest.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That the following matters
will be the subject of consideration at said hearing, without prejudice to the designation by the hearing officer of
additional matters considered by him to be relevant.;
1.

The financial history and condition of

the company and the bank concerned;
2.

The prospects of said company and bank;

3. The character of their management;

4.

The convenience, needs, and welfare of

the communities and the area concerned;
5.

Whether the effect of such acquisition

would be to expand the size or extent of the bank holding
company system involved beyond limits consistent with
adequate and sound banking, the public interest and
the preservation of competition in the field of banking.




"ci
_3_
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That any person desiring to give
testimony or submit a statement in this proceeding should
file with the Secretary of the Board on or before May 2,
1960, a written request relative thereto, setting forth
the reasons for wishing to testify or submit a statement,
the nature of the petitioner's interest in the proceeding,
and a summary of the matters concerning which he wishes
to testify or submit a statement. Such requests will be
presented to the hearing officer for his determination,
and persons submitting them will be notified of his
decision.

(Signed)

Merritt Sherman

Merritt Sherman,
Secretary.
(SEAL)
Dated April 1, 1960




BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WAS HI N GTO N

Item No. 3

4/1/60
OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

April 1, 1960.

The Honorable Abraham J. Multer,
House of Representatives,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Mr. Multer:
This will acknowledge your letter of March 24, 1960, regarding the reserve requirement bill enacted last July.
As indicated in your letter, the law provided that the
changes could be made gradually. The Board, in supporting the
legislation, emphasized the necessity for a gradual process of
Putting the provision into effect, because it recognized that
changes such as those authorized would have important and perhaps
disturbing effects with respect to current monetary policies,
money market developments, and competitive relationships among
individual banks. For these reasons the Board believes that the
changes should be made by degrees over an extended period of time,
unless economic conditions should develop that would call for the
release of a large volume of reserves at once.
As you know, the Board acted last November to permit
member banks to count a portion of their vault cash toward meeting
reserve requirements. That action, which was taken at the
beginning of December when the Federal Reserve System customarily
needs to make additional reserves available to the banking system
in order to meet the seasonal needs of the economy, released something over $300 million of reserves for member banks as a group
and affected approximately half of the member banks of the System.
The Board has also acted to permit a considerable number
of individual banks in reserve cities to carry reduced reserves, as
authorized by one of the provisions of the law. These have been
relatively small banks that heretofore have not been eligible for
such permission because of location and that would clearly be granted
that permission under any standards that might be adopted as to
character of business. The determination of such standards for all
member banks requires a time consuming comparative analysis of the
activities of a large number of individual banks. This analysis is




The Honorable Abraham J. Multer

—2—

now in process. It is a complex problem that is basic to furthe
r
implementation of this legislation.
Termination of the central reserve city classification
will necessarily be effective not later than July 1962. Equaliza—
tion of reserve requirements for banks in reserve cities and
central reserve cities may be effected at an earlier date, if the
credit situation is such that this can be done without hampering
appropriate credit policy.




Sincerely yours,

Wm. McC. Martin, Jr.

.4 Ile,

)X

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

Item No.

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

4/1/60

WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

April 1, 1960.

The Honorable William Proxmire,
United States Senate,
Washington 25, D. C.
Dear Senator Proxmire:
Thank you for your letter of March 30, enclosing a
copy of your statement on the Senate floor on March 28,
concerning interest rates and referring to Mr. Thomas'
address on January 20, dealing with the same subject.
Your comments and criticisms were read with
interest. As I did so, however, it occurred to me that
you may not have had the time to examine the material
at page 6 - 25 of the Board's Annual Report for 1959
concerning "Interest Rates, Economic Activity, and
Saving." I feel that this material is very relevant to the
matters discussed in your statement. For your convenience, a copy of the Report is enclosed.
I understand that Mr. Thomas expects to reply in
a day or so to a similar letter of March 30 which you
wrote to him.
Sincerely yours,
(Signed) Wm. McC. Martin, Jr.
Wm, McC. Martin, Jr.
Enclosure




4