View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Search

MACROBLOG

April 8, 2014

A Closer Look at Post-2007 Labor Force Participation Trends

Editor's note: Since this post was written, we have developed new tools for examining labor market trends. For a more detailed
examination of factors affecting labor force participation rates, please visit our Labor Force Participation Dynamics web page, where
you can create your own charts and download data.
Introduction
The rate of labor force participation (the share of the civilian noninstitutionalized population aged 16 and older in the labor force) has
declined significantly since 2007. To what extent were the Great Recession and tepid recovery responsible?
In this post and one that will follow, we offer a series of charts using data from the Current Population Survey to explore some of the
possible reasons behind the 2007–13 drop in participation. This first post describes the impact of the changing-age composition of
the population and changes in labor force participation within specific age cohorts—see Calculated Risk posts here and here for a
related treatment, and also this recent BLS study. The next post will look at the issue of potential cyclical impacts on participation by
examining the behavior of the prime-age population.
Putting the decline in context
After rising from the mid-1960s through 1990, the overall labor force participation rate was relatively stable between 1990 and 2007.
But participation has declined sharply since 2007. By 2013, participation was at the lowest level since 1978 (see chart 1).

For men, the longer-term declining trend of participation accelerated after 2007. For women, after having been relatively stable since
the late 1990s, participation began to decline after 2009. The decline for both males and females since 2009 was similar (see chart
2).

A

A

A

The impact of retirement
One of the most important features of labor force participation is that it varies considerably over the life cycle: the rate of participation
is low among young individuals, peaks during the prime-age years of 25 to 54, and then declines (see chart 3). So a change in the
age distribution of the population can result in a significant change in overall labor force participation.

The age distribution of the population has been shifting outward for some time. This is a result of the so-called baby boomer
generation—that is, people born between 1946 and 1964 (see chart 4). The oldest baby boomers turned 62 in 2008 and became
eligible for Social Security retirement benefits.

At the same time the age distribution of the population has shifted out, the rate of retirement of older Americans has been declining.
Retirement rates have generally been drifting down since the early 2000s (see chart 5). The decline in age-specific retirement rates
has resulted in rising age-specific labor force participation rates. For example, from 1999 to 2013, the share of 62-year-old retirees
declined from 38 percent to 28 percent. The BLS projects that this trend will continue at a similar pace in coming years (see table 3
of the BLS report).

Although the decline in the propensity to retire has put some upward pressure on overall labor force participation, that effect is
dominated by the sheer increase in the number of people reaching retirement age. The net result has been a steep rise in the share
of the population saying they are not in the labor force because they are retired (see chart 6).

Participation by age group
Individuals aged 16–24
The labor force participation rate for young individuals (between 16 and 24 years old) has been generally declining since the late
1990s. After slowing in the mid-2000s, the decline accelerated again during the Great Recession. However, participation has been
relatively stable since 2009 (see chart 7). Nonetheless, the BLS projects that the participation rate for 16- to 24-year-olds will decline
further, albeit at a slower pace than it declined between 2000 and 2009, and will fall a little below 50 percent by 2022.

The change in participation among young people can be attributed almost entirely to enrollment rates in education programs (see
here) and lower labor force participation among enrollees (see chart 8). The change in the share of 16- to 24-year-olds who say they
don't currently want a job because they are in school closely matches the change in labor force participation for the entire cohort.

Individuals aged 25–54 (prime age)
Generally, people aged 25 to 54 are the group most likely to be participating in the labor market (see chart 3). These so-called primeage individuals are less likely to be making retirement decisions than older individuals, and less likely to be enrolled in schooling or
training than younger individuals.
However, the prime-age labor force participation rate declined considerably between 2007 and 2013, and at a much faster pace than
had been seen in the years prior to the recession (see chart 9). Reflective of the overall gender-specific participation differences
seen in chart 2, the decline in prime-age female participation did not take hold until after 2009, and since 2009 the decline in both
prime-age male and female participation has been quite similar. Nevertheless, the BLS projects that prime-age participation will
stabilize in coming years and prime-age participation in 2022 will be close to its 2013 level.

Implications
The BLS projects that participation by age group will look like this in 2022 relative to 2013 (see chart 10).

Participation by youths is projected to continue to fall. The participation of older workers is projected to increase, but it will remain
significantly lower than that of the prime-age group. Combined with an age distribution that has also continued to shift outward (see

chart 11), the overall participation rate is expected to decline over the next several years from its 2013 level of around 63.3 percent.
From the BLS study:

A combination of demographic, structural, and cyclical factors has affected the overall labor force participation rate, as
well as the participation rates of specific groups, in the past. BLS projects that, as has been the case for the last 10 years
or so, these factors will exert downward pressure on the overall labor force participation rate over the 2012–2022 period
and the rate will gradually decline further, to 61.6 percent in 2022.

However, an important assumption in the BLS projection is that the post-2007 decline in prime-age participation will not persist.
Indeed, the data for the first quarter of 2014 does suggest that some stabilization has occurred.
But separating what is trend from what is cyclical is challenging. The rapid pace of the decline in participation among the prime-age
population between 2007 and 2013 is somewhat puzzling. Could this decline reflect a temporary cyclical effect or something more
permanent? A follow-up blog will explore this question in more detail using the micro data from the Current Population Survey.
Note: All data shown are 12-month moving averages to emphasize persistent shifts in trends.
Update: The authors acknowledge a debt to Tomaz Cajner and Bruce Fallick for their influence on some of this material. We regret
inadvertently omitting this acknowledgement in the original post.
By Melinda Pitts, director, Center for Human Capital Studies,

John Robertson, a vice president and senior economist in the Atlanta Fed's research department, and

Ellyn Terry, a senior economic analyst in the Atlanta Fed's research department
April 8, 2014 in Business Cycles, Employment, Unemployment | Permalink