The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
L.4.1 CONFIDENTIAL (FR) April 19, 1972 SURVEY OF MATURITY STRUCTURE OF OUTSTANDING LARGE DENOMINATION CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT AT LARGE WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS AS OF March 29, 1972 NOTE: Sales since the previous survey and comparisons with previous data reflect revisions in the February report whereby $4.6 million in outstanding negotiable CD's have been eliminated from the series. Banking Section Division of Research and Statistics Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System # TECHNICAL APPENDIX A DERIVATION OF GROSS SALES OF CERTIFICATES OF D E P O S I T Sales of CD's between survey dates are derived in the following manner: Outstanding CD's maturing in each month of the previous survey are subtracted from maturities in the same month of the current survey. Those CD's maturing in the remaining portion of the month in which the current survey is taken are ignored. Those CD's maturing after the last individual month shown in the current survey (i.e. CD's with the longest maturity) are added to those CD's maturing in the last individual month shown on that survey in order to derive an outstanding quantity for a time period com- parable1 to the longest maturity CD's shown on the previous survey. The procedure used produces gross sales of CD's between survey dates maturing in each of the eleven full months after the currect survey, and combines sales of CD's maturing in twelve or more months. are also lost by the method described above. Some sales Sales of CD's between the survey dates that mature in the remaining days of the calendar month of the current survey are ignored. However, since the minimum maturity for time deposits under current regulation's is 30 days, the time period between monthly survey dates (28 to 34 days) suggests that very few sales are lost from the series as derived in this manner. Total derived sales will differ from the change in total outstandings between survey dates by (1) the amount of CD's that have matured between surveys and (2) the amount, if any, of sales between survey dates that mature in the remaining days of the calendar month in which the current survey is taken. TECHNICAL NOTE B CALCULATION OF AVERAGE MATURITIES OF NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT OUTSTANDINGS Average maturities of outstanding negotiable time certificates of deposit are calculated on a weighted .average basis. All CD's are assumed to mature in the middle of the month and those CD's maturing in the survey month--after the survey date--are assumed to mature in the middle of the period between the .survey date and the end of the calendar month in which the survey is taken. The weights are the quantity of CD's maturing in each month or fraction thereof as a proportion of total CD's outstanding and the starting date for calculations is the survey date. A downward bias in the calculated average maturity develops from the fact that all CD's maturing in more than twelve months after the survey date are lumped together. All of these CD's are assumed to mature in the middle of the twelfth full month after the survey date, regardless of the actual, but unknown, maturity of the CD's maturing in more than twelve full months. SALES Average maturity of negotiable time certificates of deposit sold between survey dates are calculated in exactly the same way. That is, they are weighted averages calculated from the survey date with the assumption made that all CD's mature in the middle of the month. Any CD's sold between survey dates and maturing in the period between the current survey date and the end of the calendar month in which the current survey was taken (a maximum of 6 days) are ignored. Technical Note B (continued) This procedure assumes all CD's sold between survey dates were issued on the most recent survey date. While it appears more logical to assume that all CD's were sold at the mid-point between the two surveys, such an assumption would tend to reduce comparability between average maturities of outstandings and of sales as a result of using two different starting dates for the calculations. If the assumption is made that all CD's are sold at the mid-point between surveys, the average maturity of sales would be lengthened relative to the average maturity of outstandings, by, in effect, using an earlier starting date for sales than for outstandings. Sales of CD's maturing in a particular month are often a large and highly variable proportion of total sales while changes in outstandings due in any particular month are a small and rather stable proportion of the level of total outstandings. As a result, the average maturity of sales is much more sensitive to month-to-month variation in the maturity structure of sales than is the case with the outstandings series. Thus, large changes in the calculated average maturity of sales, or situations in which the average maturity of sales differ sharply from the average maturity of outstandings, should be interpreted with care and references should be made to actual dollar sales bv month. Formulas for calculation of average maturities are available on request from the Banking Section, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. e # e e # # TABLE e # # # 1 1/ MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES O c DEPOSIT AT WEFKLY REPORTING BANKS AS OF 29 MAR 1972 AMOUNT (MILLICNS OF DOLLARS) CD'S MATURING IN CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE SALES SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH 2 / (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) .0 1,8C4.1 5.4 5.4 APRIL 8,953.2 26.A 32.2 3,433.0 MAY 5,276.6 15.8 48.0 1,59".A JUNE 4.592.4 13.7 61.7 1,A07s6 JULY 2.619.1 7 .8 69.F 2 44.1 AUGUST 2.285.2 6.8 76. ? 498.3 SEPTEMBER 1.916.5 5.7 82.0 A 6 7 . OCTOBER 1,367.5 4.1 86 . 1 134.1 NOVEMBER 737.3 2.2 88.? QC.5 DECEMBER 994.9 3 .0 Ql . 3 127.6 1,032.5 3 .0 Q4. % 34. 3 FEBRUARY 468.6 1 .4 95.7 74. A MARCH 534. 1 1 .6 97.? OVER 12 MONTHS 9C4.2 2.7 lie.c 33,456.1 100.0 VYX 1972 MARCH 30 - 31 1973 JANUARY TOTAL (MEMORANDUM: JUNE 12 J UN F 15 APR ft. 17 1/ PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION INCLUDES ONLY CERTIFICATES 267.* 735 . 0 1, C 6 0 . 7 S4R.S i/ xyx -,3Q?.4 TAX AND HIVIDFND M A T'J P I "H F c> ) .R ? .2 3.2 1 N DENOMINATIONS C? * 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ?/ SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX A. http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank St. LouisOF CD'S MATURING AFTER 11 MONTHS. 3 / of SALES ? XV X XXX n^ . 1 X V V PR ISSUE n BY WFFKL.Y V E P r P T \ \ r y rjmi;. * TABLE 2A 1/ MATURITY D I S T R I B U T I O N OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT AT NEW YORK C I T Y , CHICAGO, AND ALL OTHER WEEKLY REPORTING RANKS AS OF 29 MAR 1972 (IN M I L L I O N S OF DOLLARS) NEW YORK C I T Y ALL OTHFO WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS CHICAGO CD'S MATURING IN AMOUNT 1972 PAR 3C - 970.4 .0 74.9 .0 858.8 .0 APRIL 2,823.6 1,100.7 607 . 7 231.1 5,521.9 2,101.? MAY 1,860.5 717.0 2 64.1 76.1 3,15?." 797.5 JUNF 1,537.9 734.6 344.9 99.6 ? ,700. A JULY 927.0 69.3 190.2 20.2 1.502.0 144.7 1 , 103.5 309.9 171 . 8 17.2 1,009.9 171.1 SEPTEMBER 681.8 314.5 176 .9 1Q.2 1,056.7 332 . 3 OCTOBER 480.6 25. 5 81 . 9 . 1 805 108.7 NOVEMBER 319.6 38.5 27.5 .7 390.2 50 DECEMBER 463.9 61.0 17.5 4.4 513.5 6? . 1 JANUARY 335.2 39.7 29.3 .1 638.1 45.2 FEBRUARY 69.7 l.c 18.7 5.4 390.3 6Q.6 MARCH 79.3 81.7 428.2 431.9 259.0 XXX 35.8 XXX 609.5 XXX 11 , 8 1 2 . 0 3,494.3 2,066.2 50 7 . 6 19,575.7 5,370.1 MAR 31 AUGUST 1973 OVER 12 MONTHS TOTAL * NUMBER OF REPORTING BANKS SALES SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH 2 / AMOUNT /3 12 (MEMORANDUM: JUNE 12 JUNE 15 APRIL 17 82.3 284.5 38 5 . 1 I/ INCLUDES CNLY CERTIFICATES 2/ SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX A . 33.7 /3 25.0 12 AMOUNT SALES SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH 2 / TAX AND DIVIDEND 18.3 78.1 84.0 107.8 1 ,r&3 ?3t MATURITIES) 167. ? 372.4 13.o 591.6 171.4 I N DENOMINATION OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED RY WEEKLY REPORTING RANKS. 3 / SALES CF C D ' S MATURING AFTER 11 MONTHS. http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ * 0 Reserve 1 T A L S Bank MAY ofNSt. C ^Louis ADD DUE TO ^ | U N D I N G . @ Federal # # SALES SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH 2 / # • E /3 # e # # # # TABLE MATURITY CHICAGO, AND ALL AS OF 20 MAR 1 9 7 2 # 2B D I S T R I B U T I O N OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIA8LF NEW YORK C I T Y , # 1/ T IMF C E R T I F I C A T E S O C DEPOSIT AT OTHER WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS AND 23 FFR 1972 (PERCENTAGE D I S T R I B U T I O N ) r n 1 C MATIID IMP IM 0 - 6 DAYS 2 / NEW YORK C I T Y CHICAGO ALL OTHFR 29 MAR 23 FEB 29 MAP 23 FEB 29 MAR 7.4 4.2 3.6 4.6 4.4 5.5 23 FES 01 MONTHS 3 / 23.9 30.3 29.4 2*.6 29.2 2°.3 02 MONTHS 15.8 15. 1 12.8 17.0 16.1 16.7 03 MONTHS 13.0 10.1 16.7 8.5 13.9 11.5 04 MONTHS 7.8 7.1 9.2 1 1 .0 7.7 9.0 05 MONTHS 9.3 7.5 8.3 7.7 5.2 6.6 06 MONTHS 5.8 7.0 9.6 7.0 5.4 4. 1 07 MONTHS 4.1 3.2 4.0 7.1 4. 1 ?.5 OR MONTHS 2.7 4.0 1.3 3.7 2.0 3.4 09 MONTHS 3.9 2.5 .8 1.2 2.6 1 .7 10 MONTHS 2.8 3.5 1.4 •6 3.3 2. ? .6 2.6 .9 1.3 1 .9 12 MONTHS .7 .6 1.2 .6 2.2 1 .5 2.2 2.3 1.7 1.2 3.1 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 inn.o OVER 12 MONTHS TOTAL * 100.0 C O O 11 MONTHS ?.° 1 1 1 1/ INCLUDES BANKS. ONLY C E R T I F I C A T E S IN DF NOMI NAT IONS HF 2/ NUMBER OF DAYS REMAINING I N SURVEY MONTH. T H I S FOLLOWING THE LAST WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH. 3/ NUMBER OF MONTHS FOLLOWING THF SURVEY MONTH. * TOTALS MAY NOT ADD DUE TO ROUNDING. *100,000 0^ MORF I SSTJFT) BY WFFKL V PERIOD V AR ! F S kTTH IMF MiJ MR FP or RFPOPTTNin PAYS TABLE PC 1/ MATURITY DISTRIBUTION QF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CFRTIFTCATFS OF DFPnSTT M NEW YORK C I T Y , CHICAGO, AND ALL OTHPR WFFKLY REPORTING RANKS AS OF 29 MAR 197? AND 23 FFR 1972 (CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION) rV n\Ji c M ATI ID IT Kd 1 T«NM 1 Ui> NEW YORK CITY 29 MAR 0-6 23 FEB ALL OTMC R CHICAGO 29 MAR 23 FEB 29 MAP ?3 FFR 5 7.4 4. ? 3.6 4.6 4.4 01 MONTHS 3 / 31.3 34. 5 33.0 33.2 32.6 36.3 02 MONTHS 47. 1 49.6 45.8 50.2 48. 7 51.S 03 MONTHS 60.1 59. 7 62.5 58.7 62.5 6"* . " 04 MONTHS 67.9 66.8 71.7 6C.7 70. ? 71 . 0 05 MONTHS 77.2 74.3 80.0 77.4 75.4 77.A 06 MONTHS 83.0 81.3 88.6. 84.4 80.8 81.7 07 MONTHS 87. 1 84.5 92.6 91.5 84.o 85.7 08 MONTHS 89.8 88.5 93.9 95.2 86.9 88.6 09 MONTHS 93.7 91.0 9 4.7 96.4 89.5 90.3 10 MONTHS 96.5 94.5 96.1 97.0 92.8 92.5 11 MONTHS 97.1 97. 1 97.0 98.3 04. 7 95.4 12 MONTHS 97.8 97.7 98.2 99 . Q 96.0 96.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 DAYS 2 / OVER 12 MONTHS 1/ INCLUDES ONLY CERTIFICATES BANKS. 2/ NUMBER OF DAYS REMAINING IN SURVEY MONTH. THIS FOLLOWING THE LAST WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH. 3/ NUMBER OF MONTHS FOLLOWING THE SURVEY MONTH. 100.0 IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING PERIOD VARIES WITH THE NUMB F R OF DAYS MATURITY TABLE 3A D I S T R I B U T I O N OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE T I M F C E R T I F I C A T F S AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY S I Z E OF BANKS 2 / AS OF 2 9 MAR 1 9 7 2 (AMOUNTS IN M I L L I O N S OF DOLLARS) OF DEPOSIT 1/ $1 B I L L I O N CD* S MATURING 1972 1973 IN TOTAL $200 MILLION AND UNDER $200 $500 MILLION TO MILLION MILLION TO $1 B I L L I O N AND HVFR PPIMF $500 3/ OUTS I D F NEW YORK CITY NON -PR IMF NFW YORK CITY TOTAL 1,804.0 118.8 216.1 252 . 7 1,216.4 815.9 234.5 166.0 APRIL 8,953.0 687.6 1,355.6 1,590.6 5,319.2 2,527.0 1,554.9 1,237.3 MAY 5,276.7 434.5 751.8 927.5 3,162.9 1,720.3 810.2 63?.4 JUNE 4,592.2 316.8 741.1 784.9 2,749.4 1,481.9 732.3 535.2 JULY 2,619.1 159.8 334.1 394.9 1,730.3 898 . S 57%.6 252.o AUGUST 2,285.1 106.5 227.4 230.5 1,720.7 9 9 N . F 4? 1 . 8 308.4 SEPTEMBER 1,916.4 136.6 219.3 238.1 1,322.4 622 . 6 429.4 270.4 OCTOBER 1,367.6 62.0 146.0 180.0 Q79.6 474. 7 31 1 . 9 19 3 . 0 MAR 30-31 Q NOVEMBER 737.1 41.7 75.6 118.5 501.3 317.5 DECEMBER 994.8 47.3 105.7 120.8 721.0 442.7 145.4 132.o 1,002.5 38.7 119.0 117.4 727.4 334.9 2^3.0 189.5 FEBRUARY 468.7 35.5 61.1 67.0 305. 1 69.4 124.7 111 . 0 MARCH 534.0 38.8 44.3 74.9 376.0 76.8 14Q.n 15^.2 APRIL OR LATER 904.2 64.9 83.3 192.1 563.9 236.6 256.5 70.8 33,455.4 2,289.5 4,480.4 5,289.9 21,39^.6 ll,0nq.6 6f04Q.7 4 ,334.1 JANUARY TOTAL * TAX Kin UnITv vL TU TNI NFUM nN MMATIIO ,A 'AINU U " L ' 78.3 12 267. 7 17.6 47.4 66.5 JUNE 15 734.9 29.7 79.6 117.8 5N 7 . P 267.P 1 , 0 6 0 . 6 45.0 132.3 152.2 7 31.1 3*7. 88 136.2 2 9 . 3 28.6 1 4 4 . -> OS.Q 1 1 11 7 . Q 7 1? MtlMRFD Rn AMKQ IN U 1" n n K (1C U i N 'X ^1 1 (MEMORANDUM: 255 86.3 L TR > F JUNE APRIL17 7 81 49 37 1 / INCLUDES C E R T I F I C A T E S I N DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 ? CR MQRF ISSIJFD BY WFFKLY REPORTING RANKS. 2T TOTAL DFPGSITS AS REPORTED I N THF CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON DFCFMRFR M , 1^65. Digitized FRASER M for DR IMF BANKS ARE THOSF WHOSE NEGOTIABLE C E R T I F I C A T E S OF DEPOSIT ARF REGARDED AS BEING (?I= THF H I G H E R REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE W I T H I N 1 OR 2 B A S I S POINTS OF EACH OTHFP W I T H I N THF SECONDARY MARKPT. http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ TOTALS Federal* Reserve Bank MAY of St. NOT Louis ADD CUF TO ROUNDING. OlJALITv AND W H T F. H ARE 1« TABLE 3R SALES / I / OF NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT SINCE PREVIOUS wmiTH 7 / AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY SIZE OF BANKS 3 / AS OF 29 MAR 197? (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) $1 BILL IOM AMD nvcp CD'S MATURING IN TOTAL $200 MILLION AND UNDER $200 MILLION TO $500 MILLION $500 MILLION TO $1 B I L L I O N pDfMC 4 / TOTAL 0V1TS I D E NFW VPR K CITY 1972 MAR APRIL 3,432.% 375.0 570.7 586.0 1 ,901.1 MAY I t 590.8 142.8 212.2 275.7 JUNE 1.897.5 147.5 346.7 JULY 234.3 30.3 AUGUST 498.3 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER o^O. 1 4A3 . 4 467.6 960. 1 645.Q 1 "*5.7 159. 5 343.9 1,039.4 711.5 144.9 1« 1 . 1 43.8 34.4 175.9 S7. P 15.0 50.3 39.7 393.3 2??.8 667.2 50.5 89.2 86.6 440.9 ?57.4 134.2 5.2 17.2 2 9.9 *1.9 75.5 NOVEMBER 89.4 6.4 2 1.5 54.6 38.= DECEMBER 127.6 1C.3 11.9 29.2 76.2 50.0 14.5 11.7 84.9 3.4 2.8 3.8 74. Q 39.7 9.6 25.6 76.9 9.2 13.0 12.0 42.7 1.Q 15. 0 25.0 548.7 48.3 41 .3 84. 1 375.0 7n . 4 16R . 6 136.0 9.382.6 843.9 1,406.0 FEBRUARY MARCH OR LATER TOTAL * 6.9 . (MEMORANDUM: 17 293.1 14.6 --- 255 1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ * CITY 30-31 1973 JANUARY APRIL NjPM-DO TMF NFW YORK 88 1,566.8 5,565.9 3,111.5 179.3 105.4 7. 1 10.° 57.4 117.9 C 171.4 77.1 79.^ 7. A 1 ,165.8 1 ,288.6 TAX AND DIVIDEND MATURITIES) 57.7 (MEMORANDUM: 41.5 25.6 NUMBER OF BANKS) 81 49 37 12 SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX A. INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS. TOTAL DEPOSITS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON DECEMBER 3 1 , 1 9 6 5 . PRIME BANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT ARE REGARDED AS BEING 0*= THE HIGHEST QUALITY AND WHICH ARE REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE WITHIN 1 OR 2 BASIS POINTS OF EACH OTHER WITHIN THE SECONDARY MARKET. TOTALS MAY NOT ADD DUE TO ROUNDING. 18 • TABLE 3C # # # • # E MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIMF CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY SIZE O p RANKS 2 / AS OF 29 MAR 1972 PERCENTAGE D I S T R I B U T I O N 1972 MAR 1973 30-31 TOTAL $200 MILLION AND UNDER $200 M I L L I O N TO $500 M I L L I O N $500 M I L L I O N TO $1 B I L L I O N AND OVER PRIME 3 / TOTAL NEW YORK OUTSIDE MFW YORK CITY CITV NON-PR IMF 5.4 5.2 4.8 4.8 5.7 7.4 3.9 3.R APRIL 26.8 30.C 30.3 30.1 24.9 23.0 25.7 29.5 MAY 15.8 19.0 16.8 1 7.5 14.8 1^.6 JUNE 13.7 13.8 16.5 14.8 12.9 13.5 12. 1 12.3 JULY 7.8 7.0 7.5 7.5 8.1 9.2 9.6 5.P AUGUST 6.8 4.7 5.1 4.4 8.0 9.0 ? 7. i SEPTEMBER 5.7 6.0 4.9 4.5 6.2 5.7 7.1 A.? OCTOBER 4.1 2.7 3.3 3.6 4.6 4.3 5.9 4.5 NOVEMBER 2.2 1.8 1.7 2.2 2.3 1.A ?.0 DECEMBER 3.0 2.1 2.4 2.3 3.4 4.0 2.4 3.1 JANUARY 3.0 1.7 2.7 2.2 3.4 3.0 ?.& 4.4 FEBRUARY 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.4 0.6 2.1 2.6 MARCH 1.6 1.7 1.0 1.4 1 .A 0.7 * ?.S APR I L CR LATER 2 .7 2.8 1.9 3.6 2. ^ 2.1 4. ? ] . <s 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1 on.o inn.r TOTAL * (MPMQPAMDUM: TAX AND DIVIOFND JUNF 12 0.8 0.A 1. 1 1 .3 JUNE 15 2.2 1.3 1.8 2.2 3.? 2.0 3.0 2.9 APR I I E 1/ $1 M I L L I O N C D ' S MATURING IN # 17 Tl R I T 13.4 14.6 i I F\ ) 0.6 3.4 0. 7 P. 7 ?.4 ? .4 7.7 3.3 4.1 7.7 1 / INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 CR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS. 2 / TOTAL DEPOSITS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON DECEMBER 3 1 , 1 9 6 5 . / PRIME Digitized3 for FRASERBANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT ARE REGARDED AS BEING OF THF HIGHEST QUALITY REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE WITHIN 1 OR 2 BASIS POINTS OF EACH OTHER WITHIN THE SECONDARY M&RKFT. http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ TOTALS MAY NOT ADD DUE TO ROUNDING. Federal ^Reserve Bank of St. Louis AND WHICH APC TABLE 3D MATURITY D I S T R I B U T I O N OF O U T S T A N D I N G N E G O T I A B L E T I M E C E R T I F I C A T E S AT WEEKLY R E P O R T I N G BANKS BY S I Z F OF BANKS ?Z AS OF 2 9 MAR 1 9 7 ? C U M U L A T I V E PERCENTAGE OF DEPOSIT $1 CD1S MATURING IN $200 MILLION AND UNDER TOTAL $200 $500 MILLION TO MILLION MILLION TO $1 B I L L I O N IZ R I L L ION AND I V F R PR T M F 3 / $500 —————————— TOTAL NEW YORK CITY 1972 1973 MAR 30-31 NON-DR TMF 5.4 5.2 4.8 4.8 5.7 7.4 3.9 3. 8 APRIL 32.2 35.2 35.1 34.9 30.6 30.4 29.4 32.3 MAY 48.0 54.2 51.9 52.4 45.4 64.0 4*. * 4A . O JUNE 61.7 68.0 68.4 67.2 58. 3 59.5 55. 1 59.2 JULY 69.5 75.0 75.9 74. 7 46.4 67.7 64.7 45.0 AUGUST 76.3 79.7 81.0 79.1 74.4 74.7 71.7 72.1 SEPTEMBER 82.0 85.7 85.9 •83.6 *0.6 92.4 78.8 78.3 OCTOBER 86.1 88.4 89.2 87.0 8 5.2 P6.7 06.0 89 . 9 NOVEMBER 88.3 90.2 90.9 89.2 87.5 89.4 85.6 84.8 DECEMBER 91.3 92.3 93.3 91.5 90.9 03.6 89.0 87.9 JANUARY 94.3 94.0 96.0 93.7 94.3 96.6 91.4 97.3 FEBRUARY 95.7 95.6 97.4 95.0 95.7 97.2 91.5 96. Q MARCH 97.3 97.3 98.4 96.4 97.5 97.9 96. n 98.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 APRIL CR LATER 1/ 2Z 3Z HUT ST OF NJFW YORK t v r T • I N C L U D E S C E R T I F I C A T E S I N D E N O M I N A T I O N S OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE I S S U E D BY WEEKLY R E P O R T I N G B A N K S . TOTAL D E P O S I T S AS REPORTED I N THE C A L L REPORT OF C O N D I T I O N ON DECEMBER 3 1 , 1 9 6 5 . PRIME BANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE N E G O T I A B L E C E R T I F I C A T E S OF D E P O S I T ARE REGARDED AS B E I N G OF TH C H I G H E S T REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE W I T H I N 1 OR 2 B A S I S P O I N T S OF EACH OTHER W I T H I N THE SECONDARY MARKET. QUALITY 100.0 AND WHICH 1 00 . 0 ARE TABLE 3E SALES / i / OF NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH 2 / AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY SIZE OF BANKS 3 / AS OF 29 MAR 1972 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION $1 P I L L I O N AND OVFR CD'S MATURING IN 1972 MAR TOTAL $200 MILLION AND UNDER $200 MILLION TO $500 MILLION $500 MILLION TO $1 B I L L I O N TOTAL NEW YORK CITY OUTSIDE NEW YORK CITY NON-PR IMF 30-31 APRIL 36.6 44.4 40.6 37.4 34.7 31.2 ^9.7 36.3 MAY 17.0 16.9 15.1 17.6 17.? 21.4 11.6 1?.3 JUNE 20.2 17.5 24.7 23.2 18.7 22.9 12.6 14.1 Q 4.Q O.R JULY 2.5 3.6 3.1 2.2 2.3 l. AUGUST 5.3 1.8 3.6 2.5 7.1 7.? 4•Q 8.8 SEPTEMBER 7.1 6.0 6.3 5.5 7.9 8.3 5.1 ^.4 OCTOBER 1.4 0.6 1.2 1.9 1.5 O.R ? • 1 .0 0.8 0. 5 1.4 1 .0 1 .2 ^• DECEMBER 1.4 1.2 0.8 l.o 1.4 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.2 1 .3 1. 3 FEBRUARY 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.8 MARCH OR LATER 5.8 5.7 2.9 5.4 100.0 100.0 10C.0 100.0 TOTAL * (MEMORANDUM: 17 3. 1 1.7 RR •3 ° •6 ^ •Q •q ?•° O.i 1.3 ?.n 6.7 2.1 14.5 1^.6 100.0 10P.? 1^.~ l°0.n TAX AND DIVIDEND MATIPTT 4. 1 2.6 (MEMORANDUM: 255 n 7 7 NOVEMBER 1973 JANUARY APRIL PRIMF 4 / 3.2 3.4 ?. n ^.1 NUMBER OF BANKS) 81 49 37 7 1 / S t t TECHNICAL APPENDIX A. 2 / INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 ^ 0 , ^ 1 " CR MHRF ISSUED RY WF^KLV PFPTRTTN^ RAMKS. 3/ TOTAL DEPOSITS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON DECEMBER 3 1 . 1 ° 6 ^ . 4 / PRIME BANKS ARF THOSE WHOSE NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES CF DEPOSIT ARE REGARDED AS R*=TNC ^ THE HTG^FST 01! A L T T v REPORTED RY DEALERS TO TRADE WITHIN 1 OR 2 BASIS POINTS OF EACH OTHER WITHIN THF qFCONDAOY m a p k f t . http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ * TOTALS MAY NOT ADD DUE TO POUNDING. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1 \-> AM~ ad r R TABLE 4A AVERAGE MATURITY OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE AT WEEKLY TIME OF DEPOSIT 1/ REPORTING BANKS AT VARIOUS (IN CERTIFICATES SURVEY DATES MONTHS) DATE OF SURVEY BANK C L A S S I F I C A T I O N 29 MAR 1972 23 (BY FEB 1°72 26 J A N 197? LOCATION) ALL R-EPORTING BANKS ISSUING CD'S 3.3 3.4 3.4 NEW YORK C I T Y 3.2 3.5 3.5 CHICAGO 3 .0 3.2 3.4 OTHER 3.4 3.4 3.4 CBY S I Z E UNDER $200 $200-$500 MILLION MILLION $ 5 0 0 - $ 11000 OVER MILLION $1 B I L L I O N PRIME IN NEW YORK C I T Y PRIME O U T S I D E 3/ NEW YORK C I T Y 3/ NON-PRIME 1/ INCLUDES C E R T I F I C A T E S 2/ TOTAL DEPOSITS I N DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 AS REPORTED I N THE C A L L OF BANK) 2/ 3 .0 3.0 3.2 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.4 3.2 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORT OF C O N D I T I O N ON DECEMBER 31, REPORTING BANKS. 1965. 3/ PRIME BANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE NEGOTIABLE C E R T I F I C A T E S OF DEPOSIT ARE REGARDED AS RFING OF THF HIGHEST Q U A L I T Y AND WHICH ARE REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE W I T H I N 1 OR 2 B A S I S POINTS OF EACH OTHFR W I T H I N THF SECONDARY MARKFT. http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal# Reserve Bank of St. # Louis # # # # # # # # # • • • e e e e # # TABLE 4B AVERAGE MATURITY OF NEGOTIABLE TIME C E R T I F I C A T E S OF DEPOSIT 1/ SOLD BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS DURING THE MONTH OF VARIOUS (IN SURVEYS MONTHS) DATE OF SURVEY —————————— — —— — ——— —————— ——— — 29 MAR 1 9 7 2 23 FEB 1 9 7 2 BANK C L A S S I F I C A T I O N (BY 26 ————————— JAN 1 9 7 2 —————— LOCATION) ALL REPORTING BANKS ISSUING CD'S 2.8 3.1 3.7 NEW YORK C I T Y 2.7 3.6 4.5 CHICAGO 2.5 2.7 3.4 OTHER 3.0 3.0 3.3 (BY UNDER $ 2 0 0 $200-$500 MILLION MILLION $ 5 0 0 - $ I « 000 MILLION OVER $ 1 B I L L I O N PRIME I N NEW YORK C I T Y 3/ PRIME OUTSIDE NEW YORK C I T Y 3/ NON-PRIME IN DFCNOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 SIZE OF RANK) 2/ 2.5 2.2 2.7 2.4 2.7 *.0 2.7 2.6 3.0 3.1 3.5 4.2 2.6 3.8 4.6 3.6 3.4 3 .6 3.6 T.2 3.Q 1/ INCLUDES C E R T I F I C A T E S 2/ TOTAL DEPOSITS 3/ PRIME BANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE NEGOTIABLE C E R T I F I C A T E S OF DEPOSIT ARE REGARDED AS BEING OF THE HIGHEST QUALITY AND WHICH ARE REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE W I T H I N I OR 2 B A S I S POINTS OF EACH OTHER W I T H I N THF SECONDARY MARKET. AS REPORTED I N THE CALL NOTE—SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX B . OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORT OF CONDITION ON DECEMBER 3 1 , REPORTING BANKS. 1965. e # TABLE 5 A RATIO OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES n F DEPOSIT 1/ TO TOTAL DEPOSITS AT VARIOUS SURVEY "DATES (PER CENT) DATE n c TOTAL DEPOSITS 2 / ( I N MILLIONS CF DOLLARS) 29 MAR 1972 SURVEY 23 FEB 1972 26 JAN 197? ALL BANKS ISSUING CD'S 12.6 12.9 12.A UNDER 200 10.5 10.4 9.9 200 - 500 11.6 12.1 12.? 500 - 1000 11.1 12.1 12.0 13.6 13.7 13.5 18.5 17.4 17.r 9.3 9.9 9.9 13.2 14.7 13.B OVER 1000 PRIME IN NEW YORK 3 / PRIME OUTSIDE NEW YORK 3 / NONPRI ME 1/ INCLUDES CERTIFICATES 2/ TOTAL DEPOSITS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON DECEMBER 3 1 , 3/ PRIME BANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT ARE REGARDED AS BEING OF THE HIGHEST QUALITY AND WHICH ARE REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE WITHIN 1 OR 2 BASIS POINTS OF EACH OTHER WITHIN THE SFC^NOA&Y MARKET . NOTE- IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS. DEPOSITS IN THE DENOMINATOR OF THE RATIO INTERBANK AND U . S . GOVERNMENT DEPOSITS. 1Q65. IN THIS TABLE ARE TOTAL DEMAND AMD TIME DEPOSITS, INCLUDING e e # # e e e e # # TABLE 5B RATIO OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIMF CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 1 / TO TOTAL DEPOSITS AS OF 29 MAR 1972 (NUMBER OF BANKS) TOTAL DEPOSITS 2 / ( I N MILLIONS CF DOLLARS) 5% OR LESS 5 TC 10% 10 TO 15* 15 TO 20% 20 TP 25% 2%% OR MORE AVERAGE CO TO DEPOSIT RATIO (PER CENT ) ALL BANKS ISSUING CD'S 51 67 70 33 20 14 12.6 UNDER 200 21 28 20 10 3 6 10.^ 2CC - 500 19 20 20 Q 7 6 11.6 500 - 1000 7 10 19 10 3 0 3 1.1 4 9 11 4 7 2 13.* PRIME IN NEW YORK 3 / 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 PRIME OUTSIDE NEW YORK 3/ 2 6 1 2 1 0 9. NONPRI WE 2 3 8 0 4 I 13.2 OVER 1000 Q . 5 1/ INCLUDES CERTIFICATES 2/ TOTAL DEPOSITS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON DECEMBER 3 1 , 3/ PRIME RANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE NEGOTI A PL E CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT ARE REGARDED AS BEING OF THE HIGHEST QIJAI TTY AND WHICH ARE REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE WITHIN 1 OR 2 BASIS POINTS OF FACH OTHER WITHIN T H F SEC °NHA PY MARKET. NOTE- IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS. DEPOSITS IN THE DENOMINATOR OF THE RATIA INTERBANK AND U . S . GOVERNMENT DEPOSITS. 19*5. IN THIS TABLE ARE TOTAL DEMAND AND TIME DEPOSITS, INCLUDING e TABLE 5C PFR CENT CHANGE IN OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE T IMF CERTIFICATE OF DFPOSIT / I 23 FEB 1972 TO 29 MAR 1972 (NUMBER OF RANKS) DECLINES 0(= TOTAL DEPOSITS 2 / REDUCED CD'S TO ZERO ( IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) ALL BANKS ISSUING CD'S 10% OR MORE 5 TO 10* INCREASES 0 5% OR LESS NO CHANGE 5% OR LESS ?9 56 35 53 13 5 TO 10% 1 no MOP F I NO ?A 4P I? 1Q UNDER 2 CO 0 20 7 17 6 2CC - 5CO 0 19 10 17 6 8 11 5CC - ICOO 0 8 8 13 1 R 4 0 9 10 6 0 3 A PRIME IN NEW YORK 3 / 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 PRIME OUTSIDE NEW YORK 3 / 0 2 6 3 0 1 NONPRI ME 0 7 3 2 0 ? OVER 1000 T S S ' J - n C D ' S RUT M A P N r - M F m.JT s T AM 0 ON RASE OATF 1/ INCLUDES CERTIFICATES 2/ TOTAL DEPOSITS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON DECEMBER 31, 3/ PRIME BANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT ARE REGARDED AS BEING OF TH«= HIGHEST QUALITY AND WHICH ARE REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE WITHIN 1 OR 2 BASIS POINTS HF FACH OTHER WITHIN THE SECONDARY MA»KFT. NOTE- IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WFFKLY REPORTING RANKS. 1965. THE NUMBER OF BANKS IN THIS TABLE DIFFERS FROM THOSE IN MOST OTHER TARLES TO THE EXTENT t h a t HAD OUTSTANDING CD'S ON THE LAST SURVEY REDUCED THEIR OUTSTANDINGS TO ?FRO ON THIS SIJRVFY. RANKS THAT TABLE 5 C PER CENT CHANGE IN OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TT*E CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT / I 29 CEC 1971 TO 29 MAR 1972 (NUMBER OF RANKS) TOTAL DEPOSITS / 2 C IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) REDUCED CD'S 25% TO OR ZERO MORE ALL BANKS ISSUING CD* S 0 UNDER 20 C 15 TO 20 TO 25% 5 TO 10% 10 TO 15* 20% ISSUFD CD 1 S RUT HAD INCREASE OF DECLINES OF 17 11 17 24 26 6 4 2 8 7 5% OR LESS NO CHANGE 2P 10 3 15 5% OR LESS 5 TO 10% 20 20 21 14 7 6 «=; 7 10 TO 15% TO ?o MHN|C 25* TO 25% OR MORF 11 = OUTSTANDING ON BASF 0A TF ** 7 20 1 9 0 2CO - 500 0 6 2 6 A 9 9 3 6 5 10 500 - 10C0 0 2 3 4 5 4 4 1 4 8 4 ? ? 1 0 3 2 5 3 6 5 0 3 1 2 ? 2 n 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 n n PR I ME OUTSIDE NEW YORK 3 / 0 1 0 2 1 4 1 1 0 0 1 n 1 0 NCNPRI ME 0 2 2 3 ? 1 3 n 0 2 n 1 9 n OVER 1000 PR IMF IN NEW YORK 3 / 1/ INCLUDES CERTIFICATES 2/ TOTAL DEPOSITS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL REPORT OF CONDITION ON DECEMBER 3 1 , 3/ PRIMF BANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT ARE REGARDED AS BEING HF THE HIGHEST QUALITY WHICH ARE REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE WITHIN 1 OR 2 BASIS POINTS OF EACH OTHER WITHIN THE SEC^\m/\PY M A R K F T NOTE- IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 r OR MOPE ISSUED BY WFFKLY OFPORTINK RANKS. 1965. THE NUMBER OF BANKS IN THIS TABLE DIFFERS FROM THOSE IN MOST OTHER TABLES TO THE EXTFNT THAT RANKS THAT HAD OUTSTANDING CD'S ON THE SURVEY THREE MONTHS PRIOR TO THE CURRENT SURVEY, REDUCED THEIR OUTSTANDINGS TC ZERO. ANn . TABLE CHANGE IN OUTSTANDING N E G O T I A B L E OVER THE MONTH AS AT FEB 1972 I IN ALL MILLIONS BANKS CD'S UNDER OF TOTAL CF THE DEPOSITS PERIOD OF BANKS I D E C L I N E S OF OF DOLLARS) 3% AND OVER 2 TO 3% 1/ TO 2 9 MAR 1 9 7 2 (NUMBER 2/ TIME C E R T I F I C A T E S OF DEPOSIT A PER CENT THE B E G I N N I N G 23 TOTAL D E P O S I T S 56 INCREASES NC 1 TO 2% IS AND LESS NO CHANGE 1% AND LFSS 1 TO 2% ? TN 3V AMI OVE.R ISSUING 2 CO 7 15 42 81 13 1 2 11 30 6 22 22 10 4 11 2 6 5 N 2CC - 5CO 3 8 10 25 6 17 7 A 50C - 1000 2 2 10 16 1 14 3 0 11 10 0 6 OVER 1000 PRIME 1 IN NEW YORK 3 / PRIME O U T S I D E NEW YORK 3 0 3 / NCNPRIME 0 0 I DENOMINATIONS 1 3 2 7 ? 1 0 2 1 7 0 1 0 0 N 3 1 1 1 2 0 1 2/ TOTAL D E P O S I T S 3/ PRIME BANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE N E G O T I A B L E C E R T I F I C A T E S OF DEPOSIT ARE REGARDED AS B E I N G OF THE H I G H F S T Q U A L I T Y AND WHICH ARE REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE W I T H I N 1 OR 2 B A S I S POINTS OF EACH OTHER W I T H I N THE SECONDARY MARKET. I N THE CALL BY WEEKLY REPORTING B A N K S . REPORT OF C O N D I T I O N ON DECEMBER D E P O S I T S I N THE DENOMINATOR OF THE R A T I O INTERBANK AND U . S . GOVERNMENT D E P O S I T S . OR MORE ISSUED 1 INCLUDES C E R T I F I C A T E S AS REPORTED OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ? 1/ NOTE- IN 1 2 IN THIS TABLE 31, 1965. ARE TOTAL DEMAND AND T I M E DEPOSITS, INCLUDING TABLE 5F CHANGE IN OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 1/ OVER THE LAST THREE MONTHS AS A PER CENT OF TOTAL DEPOSITS AT THE BEGINNING CF THE PERIOD 29 DEC 1971 TO 29 MAR 1972 (NUMBER OF BANKS) ( IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) INCREASES OF DECLINES OF TOTAL DEPOSITS 2 / 5% AND OVER 1 TO 2* 2 TO 3% 3 TO 4% 4 TO 5* IT AND LESS NO CHANGE ALL BANKS ISSUING CD' S 7 6 8 17 25 60 7 UNDER 200 I I 2 5 6 21 3 200 - 50C 3 2 2 4 8 21 500 - 1C00 1 2 3 4 4 2 1 1 4 C 0 C 0 OVER 1000 PRIME IN NEW YORK 3 / 1* AND UNDER 5T AND OVER 4 TO 5* 3 Tn 4T 2 TO 3% 1 TO 2* 8 24 14 15 19 5 7 9 n 5 3 15 11 3 4 3 ? 9 I 15 4 % 1 1 0 7 9 0 6 4 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 ? ? 1 n PRIME OUTSIDE NEW YORK 3/ I 0 0 2 2 4 0 3 0 0 n NONPRI ME 1 1 I 2 4 4 0 1 ? 0 i ° I 1/ INCLUDES CERTIFICATES IN DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE ISSUED BY WFFKLY REPORTING BANKS. 2/ TOTAL DEPOSITS AS REPORTED IN THE CALL RFPCRT OF CONDITION ON DFCFMBFR 3 1 , 3/ PRIME BANKS ARE THOSE WHOSE NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT ARE RFft &RDFO AS BEING HF THF HIOMFtv QIIZVLTTY AND WHICH ARE REPORTED BY DEALERS TO TRADE WITHIN 1 OR 2 BASIS POINTS H P EACH OTHER WITHIN T H F S F f . O N n H R v " A P K f T . 1965. NOTE- DEPOSITS IN THE DENOMINATOR OF THE RATIO IN THIS TABLE ARE TOTAL DEMAND AMD T [ M F D F O I S ! , INTERBANK AND U . S . GOVERNMENT DEPOSITS. TNfl.linTMG p TABLE 6A MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DFPOSIT AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT IZ AS OF 29 MAR 1972 ( AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS 0*= DOLLARS ) CD'S MATURING IN ALL DISTRICTS BOSTON 1804.1 45.5 APR 8953.0 MAY ST. LOUIS MINNCAPOL I S KANSAS r TTV HAL LA c SAN FP ANCISCO 131.4 18.ft 15.& 4? . 1 107.2 1 °6 . 7 341.3 1009.6 167.5 114.7 ??7.T 7^.3 140. 1 241 . o 573.9 80. 5 46.4 12?.% ?40. 5 7M .3 244.9 151.9 228.3 633.5 90.6 51 121.4 231.7 e;o7 . Q 45.4 226.1 61.7 82.7 311.1 39. A ?6.3 62.3 151. n 4S1.8 1202.8 74.1 86.4 51.7 59.2 246.4 35.9 7.1 44.7 106.4 319.? 53. 1 780.7 93.5 85.3 62.4 99.6 248. 1 19.1 17.6 44.6 1 ?4. ? ?ft 7 . 3 1367.6 104.4 538.7 92.7 91.0 37.1 22. 8 116.4 14. 2 ?1 .? 39.8 7 1.5 226.ft NOV 737.2 60.5 343.6 69.4 34.3 32. 1 18.2 53.6 6.2 3.6 35.6 5Q.I DEC 995.0 52.3 495.8 91.8 33.8 16.4 19.9 66.0 9.s 13.4 52.4 115.6 1973 JAN 1002.5 32. 3 349.2 65.9 35. 8 55.7 34.3 40.6 30.5 19.? 104. P ?05.3 FEB 46 8 . 6 10.2 81.5 65.9 21.3 11.7 15.9 30. 3 5.6 3.2 24.3 73. 5 123.2 MAR 532.6 38.8 94.7 96.0 34.7 7.6 19.4 45.9 12.6 2.0 Q.4 3 . 8 132.7 APR OR LATER 904.2 . 34.6 262.4 91.3 198.4 15.8 22.7 57.2 2 7.7 6.5 36.6 ?3. 1 129.Q 33453.7 1639.6 13767.8 1502.4 1949.ft 961.7 1258.7 3584.0 55«. ^ 167.6 82ft. 1 2141.3 4874.4 AVERAGE MATURITY IN MCNTHS 2 / 3.3 3.1 3.1 4.9 3.9 3.2 2.9 2. 9 3.4 3 .4 3. 2 3.5 NUMBER OF REPORTING BANKS 255 18 42 10 19 15 23 36 11 ?0 24 32 PHILADELPHIA CLEVELAND 1026.3 37.7 98.5 40.0 53.5 514. 7 3448.0 349.5 491 . 2 277 .% 5276.7 319.0 2240.6 150.6 268 . 1 JUN 4592.6 217.4 1846.2 178.6 JUL 2619.1 103.6 1057.3 AUG 2285. 1 53.2 SEP 1915.4 OCT 197? MAR 30-MAR 31 TOTAL * 1/ INCLUDES ONLY CERTIFICATES NEW YORK RICHMOND ATLANTA CHICAGO ISSUED I N DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 OR MORE BY WEEKLY REPORTING RANKS, 2 / SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX B. http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ * DETAILS Ij^Y NOT ADD T (^TOTALS DUE T ^ ROUNDING. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis % % % % * = 28.1 7 °. Q 13*8.6 TABLE 6B 1/ 2/ SALES OF NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT AS OF 29 MAR 1972 (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) CD'S 1972 1973 MATURING IN ALL DISTRICTS BOSTON NEW YORK APR 3433.1 202.2 MAY 1590.7 JUN PHILADELPHIA CLEVELAND RICHMOND ATLANTA CHICAGO 1345.6 104.P 126.2 123.0 166.7 52.3 828.4 34.7 56.2 39.0 1897.6 83.5 866.0 54.5 81.7 JUL 234.4 17.1 81.8 3.3 AUG 498.4 15.7 336.1 SEP 666.0 20.3 OCT 134. 1 NOV 89.6 TOTAL MINNEAPOLIS 381.9 S6.8 31.Q Al.n 8?.9 177. 1 24. 5 14.5 2Q.1 123.0 I 24.o 40.5 114.Q 238.0 4Q.6 1* .o 50.2 117.7 174.1 18.6 8.4 3.8 35.1 n. 1 3.2 11.4 7.2 11.1 0.8 8.3 35.8 9.3 1 .9 356.5 13.8 40. 8 30.6 22.9 47.7 13.7 4.7 19.2 51.6 1 .6 14.4 5.5 0.7 3.8 2.2 13.1 50.9 ; 1.3 "4.3, "2.0 7.3 47.2 17.3 30.6 6 7.1 0.6 1 .Q 13.7 18 . o 5.0 1 .7 0.1 2.^ 13. o &.2 2 .4 4. 1 1.0 69.5 3.0 6.9 0.1 JAN 94.9 0.2 47.0 0.7 1.5 1.4 0.2 2.0 2.4 O.T FFR 76.8 3. 7 2 3.1 5.4 3.2 3.3 *.6 2.8 0.* 547.3 28.5 90.3 99.6 41.8 6.8 I 7.6 9380.6 466. 3 4127.8 347.7 408. 9 26 1 . 3 4?8. 1 2.6 5.2 3.5 2.3 AVERAGE MATURITY IN MONTHS 3 / 2.8 1/ SEE TECHNICAL ?/ INCLUDES CNLY CERTIFICATES 2.8 2.2 I Q2 . 0 inon.Q ?.5 3.7 1 PO . U 2.3 APPENDIX A . ISSUED IN DE NOM I f< AT I CK S OF $ 1 0 0 , 300 OR MORc &Y WFFKLY DEPORTING RANKS. 3 / SEP TECHNICAL APPENDIX B. http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ * D F T A I L ^ M A Y NOT ADD TOTALS DtJF^TO R O U N D I N G . ^ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis # # . 7 1.2 10.5 * # 4? 1 . 4 1 7 ° .6 ?4.7 DALLAS 39.4 127.7 4. 1 KANSAS CITY 1 2. 2 DEC WAR OR LATER SAN FRANCISCO ST. LOUIS n 2.1 p. ? 14.? 14.0 1 10.4 6?.4 17 8 . 7 "T1.S 10=1.A 4 1 .3 TABLE 6C MATURITY D I S T R I B U T I O N OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE T IMF CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY FEDERAL RESERVE D I S T R I C T 1/ AS OF 29 MAR 1 9 7 2 (PERCENTAGE D I S T R I B U T I O N ! ST. LOUIS MINNEAPOLIS KANSAS CITY DALLAS SAN FR ANr.Tsro 3.7 3.4 4.2 5.2 5.0 3.9 27. 1 28.2 30.0 31 . 2 27.4 32.5 26.8 14. 6 19.2 16.0 14.4 18.1 14.9 1 5. A 15. 0 15.8 18. 1 17.7 16.2 1 3.9 ' 14.7 10. 7 ' V .3 . 6.4 6.6 8.7 7.1 7.2 7.5 7.0 9.3 4.4 5.4 4.7 6.° 6.4 1 .9 5.4 4.0 6.5 6.2 4.4 6.5 7.9 6.9 3.4 4.7 F.4 5. A 5.9 3.9 6.2 4.7 3.9 1.8 3.2 2.5 5.8 3.7 3.3 4.7 3.7 2.5 4.6 1.8 3.3 1.4 1.5 1.1 1 .0 2.7 I. * 1 .2 3.0 3.2 3.6 6.1 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.7 3.6 3.4 2.4 2.4 JAN 3.0 2.0 2.5 4.4 1.8 5.8 2.7 1.7 5.5 5.2 1.2 4.8 4.2 FEB 1.4 0.6 0.6 4.4 1. 1 1.2 1.3 0.8 1 .0 0.9 3.? 3.4 2.5 MAR 1.6 2.4 0.7 6.4 1.8 0.8 1.5 1.3 2.3 0.5 1 .1 1.8 2.7 APR OR LATER 2.7 2.1 1.9 6.1 10.2 1.6 1.8 1.6 5.0 1.8 4.2 I. 1 2.7 100.0 100.0 100.c 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 no.c 100.0 ALL DISTRICTS BOSTON 5.4 2.8 APR 26.8 MAY C D ' S MATURING IN PHILADELPHIA CLEVELAND RICHMOND ATLANTA 7.5 2.5 5.1 4.2 4.3 31.4 25.0 23.3 25.2 28.9 15.8 19.5 16.3 10.0 13. A JUN 13.7 13.3 13.4 11.9 12.6 JUL 7.8 6.3 7.7 3.0 11.6 AUG 6.8 3.2 8.7 4.9 SEP 5.7 3.2 5.7 OCT 4.1 6.4 NCV 2.2 DEC 1972 MAR 30-MAR 3 1 1973 TOTAL * 1/ INCLUDES ONLY CERTIFICATES NEW YORK ISSUED I N DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . CHICAGO OR MORE BY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS. 1*0.0 100.0 TABLF 6D MATURITY D I S T R I B U T I O N OF OUTSTANDING NEGOTIABLE T I ^ F CERTIFICATES OF DF P PS T T AT WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY FEDERAL RESERVE D I S T R I C T 1/ AS OF 29 MAR 197? (CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE) CD* S MATURING IN 1972 1973 ALL DISTRICTS BOSTON 5.4 2.0 APR 32.2 MAY PHILADELPHIA CLEVELAND 7.5 2.5 5.1 4.2 4. 3 RICHMOND ATLANTA 34.2 32.5 25.8 30.3 33.1 31.4 48.0 53. 7 48.8 35.A 44. 1 47.7 JUN 61.7 67.C 62.2 47.7 56.7 JUL 69.5 73. 3 69.9 50.7 AUG 76.3 76.5 78.6 SEP 82.0 79.7 OCT 86. 1 NOV CHICAGO 7 ST. LOUTS MINNEAPOLIS DALLAS SAN FRANCISCO KANSAS CITY 3.4 4.2 5. * 3.0 31.9 33.4 35.6 T7.5 3^.6 50. 6 47.Q 47.0 53.5 47.5 5 3. 3 45.4 63.5 68.7 6 5.6 64. * 67.4 62.2 64. r 57.g 68.3 69.9 75.3 74.3 71 . 1 74 .A 6Q . 7 71.0 67.2 55.6 72.7 75.3 80.0 81.2 77.5 76.5 75. 1 75.9 73.7 84.3 61.8 77. 1 81.8 87. 9 08. 1 00.O 01.2 00.5 01.6 79 86. 1 88.2 68.0 81.8 85.7 89. 7 91.3 83.4 07.0 84.2 04. Q 04.3 88.3 89.8 90.7 72.6 83.6 89.0 91.1 92.8 84.5 80 . 0 06 . 9 86.5 05.5 DEC 91.3 93.0 94.3 78.7 85.3 90.7 92.7 94.6 06.2 Q1.6 on.3 08.o 07 .Q JAN 94.3 95.0 96.8 83.1 87.1 96.5 95.4 96.3 Ql.7 96.8 Q1.5 93.7 92.1 FEB 95.7 95.6 97.4 87.5 88.2 97.7 96. 7 97. 1 92.7 97 . 7 94 .7 S7. 1 94.6 MAR 97.3 98.0 98. 1 93.9 90.0 90.5 q 90.4 95.0 90 .? Q5.0 .q 97.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1 0 100.0 lOrt . 0 n 10^.0 MAR BO- MAR 3 1 APR OR LATER 1/ NEW YORK INCLUDES ONLY C E R T I F I C A T E S ISSUED I N DENOMINATIONS OF $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 8. 2 n . n .7 100. OR MORF RY WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS. oq -no.* . 6 1*0.0 TABLE 6E 1/ 2/ SALES OF NEGOTIABLE TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT SINCE PREVIOUS MONTH WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT AS OF 29 MAP 1972 (PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION) ALL DISTRICTS BOSTON APR 36.6 43.4 MAY 17.0 J UN CD'S MATURING IN 1972 MIMNFA POL IS KANSAS CT TV DALLAS T8.2 7Q.6 39.7 %5.5 49. 8 40.1 20.5 17.7 12. « 1« . 0 12.4 15.7 11.o 15.5 26.8 23.8 ?5. « 73.c ?4.Q 15.1 16.6 4.5 3.2 0.9 1.5 0. 1 4.0 4.9 1.6 3.7 2.1 2.7 0.3 1.9 ?.6 4.8 2.4 3.3 7. 2 4.5 8.6 4.0 10.0 11 . 7 5.3 4.8 7. 1 5.8 -%4 3.Q 6 .4 4.1 1.3 0.5 3.5 2.1 0.2 0.4 1. 1 0.7 O.o 1. o 1 .» 1.0 2.8 1.2 0.4 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.9 0. 1 1 .o %7 0.2 1 .4 2.3 1.7 0.9 1.7 0.0 0. 1 1.4 2.2 3.0 1 .8 1.0 0.4 Q CLEVELAND 32.6 30. 2 30.9 47.1 38.9 11.2 20.1 10.0 13.7 14.9 20.2 17.9 21.0 15.7 20.0 JUL 2.5 3.7 2.0 0.9 AUG 5.3 3.4 8.1 SEP 7.1 4.4 OCT 1.4 NOV DEC CHICAGO 0.9 0.0 1.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.0 0. ? 1 . 3 0.4 0.4 1. FEB 0.8 0.8 0. 1 6.6 1.3 1 .2 o. q 0.9 1 .5 *.4 ?. 1 % 9 MAR CR LATER 5.8 6.1 2.2 28.6 10.2 2.6 4. 1 5.2 ! ?. Q 2.o 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1*0.0 100.0 1/ SEE TECHNICAL APPENDIX A . ?/ INCLUDES ONLY CERTIFICATES NOTE * RICHMOND A TLANTA 1973 JAN TOTAL * SALES IN THIS 100.0 100.0 l^O.O ISSUED IK OFNCMINAT I ONS OF SlOO,OOO OP MOR^ RY WFFKLY ' ^PHPTTMn ^ANKS. TABLE ARE NOT ADJUSTED FOR CD'S DETAILS MAY NOT ADD TC TOTALS DUE TO ROUNDING. SAN f- R A N — CISCO ST. LOUIS PHILADELPHIA NEW YORK THAT HAVF MATURED. c. 4 ITo.o 1 I 1?.? 10^.0
@FedFRASER