Full text of K.11 Holdover Float as Per Cent of Dollar Amounts Received : June 19, 1979

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Release date: June 19, 1979
K.11

BOSTON
LEWISTON
WINDSOR LOCKS
NEW YORK
BUFFALO
^MERICHO
•TRANFORD
^UTICA
PHILADELPHIA
CLEVELAND
CINCINNATI
PITTSBURGH
COLUMBUS
RICHMOND
BALTIMORE
CHARLOTTE
COLUMBIA .
CHARLESTON
ATLANTA
BIRMINGHAM
JACKSONVILLE
NASHVILLE
NEW ORLEANS
MIAMI
CHICAGO
DETROIT
DES MOINES
INDIANAPOLIS
•RTLWAUKEE
ST. LOUIS
LITTLE ROCK
LOUISVILLE
MEMPHIS
MINNEAPOLIS
HELENA
KANSAS CITY
DENVER
OKLAHOMA CITY
OMAHA
DALLAS
EL PASO
HOUSTON
SAN ANTONIO
SAN FRANCISCO
LOS ANGELES
PORTLAND
SALT LAKE CITY
SEATTLE
OVERALL SYSTEM

HOLDDVEP FLOAT AS PERCENT Qf QQklAE,ASQli^L.E£C£I^£D
1979
ELI BJW
1•01 40
0• 05 48
2 •68 18
4 .15
8
1.29 37
2 .75 17
0 .31 47
1.23 38
5 .65
4
0 .93 43
3 .55 11
0 .75 45
2.30 20
1.47 30
2.90 15
1.30 36
1.86 27
0 .88 44
4 .60
5
3.13 13
8 .94
3
3 .38 12
16 .72
1
2 .89 16
2 .17 23
2 .99 14
1.63 29
1 .45 31
1.96 26
4 •59
6
1.43 32
I.03 39
7
4 .17
2 .15 24
9
4 .07
0 .57 46
2 .05 25
1 .43 32
2 .28 21
2 .49 19
1.01 40
2.23 22
11 .44
2
3 .57 10
1• 34 35
0 •96 42
1 .85 28
1.41 34
3.12




-APR 1979
££T BANK
I.70 31
0 .08 47
1.06 40
2 • 63 21
1.42 36
3.66 12
3.27 14
1.09 3O
8
5 .34
0 .00 48
6 .OR
6
7•22
5
1.90 30
1.49 34
3.78 10
1.49 34
1.39 37
0 .85 42
7.46
4
2 .61 22
1.69 32
3
8 .93
3 .78 10
.61
2
12
2 .40 23
2 .33 24
9
4 .43
I.50 33
2.16 28
3 .39 13
2 .20 27
1.10 38
2 .72 20
2 .31 26
14 .06
1
1 .05 41
2 .01 29
0 .42 46
2 .32 25
2 .75 17
2 .73 18
2 .94 16
7
5 .44
2 .73 18
0 •52 45
0 .75 43
0 •57 44
3 .13 15
3.10

MAY 1979
2L1 R A M
1.22 39
0. 10 48
0.78 45
3.28 18
2.36 25
3.61 14
3.33 17
I.29 36
19.97
2
0.80 44
5.73
4
1.06 42
3.03 20
1.77 31
4.61 10
1.24 38
1.86 29
0.90 43
2.84 21
1.44 35
1.27 37
1.75 32
2.74 23
3.55 15
2.79 22
4.56 11
0.48 47
1.21 40
4.92
8
2.25 26
2.49 24
6
5.39
4.91
9
6.49
3
22.73
1
1.50 34
I.70 33
2. 14 27
I.99 28
3.27 19
0.73 46
3.36 16
3.75 13
5.06
7
1. 14 41
5.43
5
I.82 30
4.00 12
3.37

3-1
SAM
ECI
37
1.19
45
0.09
42
0.79
19
2.85
3.72
15
6
5.32
3. 11
17
47
0.00
15.97
1
0.00
47
4
9.04
22
2. 14
18
3.05
20
2.64
10.93
2
0.91
41
31
I.78
40
0.88
4.31
11
34
1.52
38
I.09
35
1.44
0.01
46
3.75
14
31
1.78
4.57
9
26
1.96
39
1.03
27
1.83
56
33
1.
43
0.72
30
I.79
13
4.00
21
2.50
28
1.82
16
3.33
29
1.81
5
5.93
24
1.98
4.69
8
36
1.20
12
4.09
7
4.85
4.53
10
44
0.50
3
TO.00
25
1.97
23
2.05
3.58

££L
1.09
0 .08
1.23
5.10
0 .68
2 .92
7 .97
1.06
.21.78
0 .88
4 .62
0.85
3 .16
2 .24
2 .70
1.45
5.03
0 .99
2 .78
1.46
0 .90
1 .04
4.79
2 .26
5 .25
5 .01
0 .37
1.31
15 .48
1.44
5.30
7 .17
11 .39
2 .24
3 .28
1 .80
1.23
0 .47
2.13
2 .36
0 .32
5 .06
5 .68
5 .86
0 .77
7 .09
3 .99
3 .92
3.07

RAM
36
48
34
11
44
21
4
37
1
41
16
42
20
26
23
31
13
39
22
30
40
38
15
25
10
14
46
33
2
32
9
5
3
26
19
29
34
45
28
24
47
12
8
7
43
6
17
18

17-1
££I
1.45
0.07
0.50
2.69
5.20
3.24
2.70
1.01
12.65
0.93
4.22
0. 28
2.87
1.35
1.81
0.74
0.47
0..92
1.73
1.20
1.57
0.92
2.09
2.64
2.25
3.60
1.88
1.25
2. 14
5.22
2.20
6.71
5.25
0.00
1.17
0. 51
2.67
2.61
2.07
1.44
0.33
0.71
1.85
4.69
2. 84
3.46
0.96
7.04
2. 75

29
47
43
15
6
11
14
35
1
37
8
46
12
31
26
40
44
38
27
33
28
38
22
17
19
9
24
32
21
5
20
3
4
48
34
42
16
18
23
30
45
41
25
7
13
10
36
2

MAY ,. 24-MAY 30
RANK
££X
31
1.23
47
0 .12
38
0 .78
21
2 .01
43
0 .49
9
3 .20
0 .51
42
.00
2
22
3
7 .82
1.03
34
6
5 .35
0 .00
48
3 .00
11
35
0 .97
17
2 .21
2 .70
14
46
0 .17
0.86
37
16
2 .47
1.44
28
1.86
23
33
1.07
1.77
24
13
2 .81
19
2 .17
6 .36
4
30
1 .38
32
1 .22
27
1 .55
36
0 .92
2 .91
12
4 .46
7
2 .18
18
9 .00
2
74 .93
1
0 .65
40
1 .58
26
0 .58
41
15
2 .51
3 .04
10
44
0 .48
0 .21
45
2.05
20
6 .28
5
0 .72
39
.42
29
1
25
1 .66
8
3 .34
3 .04

31-J
0.00
0.07
2.66
4.26
3.39
6. 85
4.16
1.41
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.09
3. PO
6.06
0.69
4.76
1.12
1.74
2.73
1. 16
1.17
4.42
3. 70
3.55
4.35
2.02
1.46
2. 25
2.20
0.80
4.92
6.63
12.78
13.47
0.65
4.22
6.07
2.23
6.67
9.38
3*63
4.
6*55
0.
1.SO
3I43
1.73
3.96

4%,
46\%
2?;%
19
36;
12
45 .
45
45
8
20
10
41
13%:
39
32
26
38
37
14
21
23
15
31
35
28
30 ,
40
11 .
6
2 -V
1 X
42
18 ;
9
29
5
3$
22
16 *
7 \
43 ;
34 !
24
33

CHECKS HEIPOVEP AS PF*CFNT OF TOTAL RECEIVED
BOSTON
LEWISTON
WINDSOR LOCKS
NEW YORK
BUFFALO
JERICHO
CRANF0R9
U V ICA
JMLADELPHI A
•tvELANO
CINCINNATI
PITTSBURGH
COLUMBUS
RICHMOND
BALTIMORE
CHARLOTTE
COLUMBIA
CHARLESTON
ATLANTA
BIRMINGHAM
JACKSONVILLE
NASHVILLE
NEW ORLEANS
MIAMI
CHICAGO
OFTPOIT
OE5, MOINES
INDIANAPOLIS
MILWAUKEE
ST. LOUIS
j^.ITTtf %nc«
^mnUISVILLE
S
MIMNfAPOlIS
HFLFN*
KANSAS CITY
DENVER
n
KLAH n M\ CITY
0"!AHA
"'ALIAS
EL PA$N
HOUSTON
S&N ANTON 10
SA** FO&'CISC"
I S A:;GEI.fS
N R T L %% :'
SALT LAFF tlTV
SEATTLE
OVCfALL SYSTEM

MAR 1979
££I SAME
0.98 43
3.93 48
4.11 15
16. 87
I
1. 24 39
2. 65 23
0. 80 44
1. 17 43
«i.88
6
0. 35 46
4. 51 12
1. 38 37
2. 21 26
2. 58 24
4# 76 10
2. 70 21
1. 17 40
1.4ft 36
5.61
8
2. 16 27
4
6.68
3.25 18
16. 52
2
1.52 33
2.92 20
7
5. 83
4. 54 11
1.71 31
5. IS
9
4. 48 13
1.94 28
1.49 34
4. 12 14
1.77 30
6. 06
5
0. 56 45
?.68 22
1.49 3*
1.36 38
42 17
0. 27 47
1. 11 42
3
12.12
1.85 29
3. 15 19
1 .5? 32
2. sp 24
46 16
4. 18




APR :1979
££I RANK
1.75 29
0 .06 48
2 .60 21
11 .83
1
1 .14 42
4 .06 16
3 .83 17
1 .09 44
3 .00 20
0 .32 46
7 .51
5
4 .30 14
1.58 33
3 .57 18
4 .53 13
2 .26 23
1 .24 40
1 .38 37
? .22
6
1.64 30
I.46 35
9 .61
4
2 .24 24
11 .3Q
2
4 .12 15
4 .60 11
6 .90
8
1.61 31
7 .16
7
3 .17 19
2.42 22
1.60 32
1.77 28
1• 86 27
10 .79
3
I • 14 42
2 .22 25
1 .32 38
1 .46 35
4 .58 12
0 .16 47
1 .94 26
6..41
1.16 41
1 .51 34
1.30 39
0..91 45
6,.OC* 10
3,,8e

MAY 1979

£01 B A M

1.,10
0.• 08
2,,67
12. 64
2.11
4.79
3.89
1.58
4. 10
0. 28
7. 80
I.94
3. 24
3.95
4.97
1.29
2.03
1.43
3. 79
1.61
1.32
1.95
3. 01
3. 22
5.42
8.89
10. 18
1.50
10. 19
2. 54
3. 58
8. 74
6.66
4.39
16.69
I.87
2.09
2. 55
1.25
4.64
0.07
2.77
3. 84
2.28
3.08
7.93
1.74
8. 17
4.30

45
47
27
2
31
13
18
39
16
46
9
35
22
17
12
43
33
41
20
38
42
34
25
23
11
5
4
40
3
29
21
6
10
15
1
36
32
28
44
14
48
26
19
30
24
8
37
7

MAY 3-HAY 9
££I
RAM
1.,01
42
0.,06
45
3,,06
24
3
11,.62
3.34
22
6. 16
10
3. 58
21
46
0. 00
3. 89
20
0. 00
46
11. 92
2
23
3. 13
3. 02
25
5.04
14
9.61
4
44
0. 62
27
2.61
39
1.30
6
7. 26
36
1.71
43
1.00
33
1.76
4.93
16
17
4. 91
37
1.63
9. 22
5
5. 74
11
38
1.34
6.64
8
30
2.09
I.25
41
28
2. 26
13
5. 11
34
1.72
2. 77
26
4.42
18
1.88
32
6. 38
9
1.26
40
7. 01
7
0.00
46
4.96
15
5. 18
12
2. 14
29
1.95
31
13. 17
1
1.72
34
4. 40
19
4. 36

MAY ID-MAY 16
RANK
££I
1,,06
42
0,,06
48
23
2. 97
18.,73
3
0.94
43
3.94
17
9
8.,75
40
1.27
3.13
20
0.,27
47
6. 13
12
29
2. 13
28
2. 16
4. 98
14
2.75
24
45
0. 76
4.91
15
34
1.62
3.60
19
33
1.66
1. 08
41
38
1.34
3.74
18
37
1. 44
4
14.43
9. 17
8
68
20.
1
30
1.84
19. 56
2
1.68
32
7. 04
11
12. 75
6
13. 79
5
2.33
27
2. 75
24
31
1.79
1.50
36
0. 93
44
39
1.28
3.06
21
0. 29
46
3.04
22
5.59
13
35
I.58
4.38
16
9.69
7
2.48
26
7.35
10
5. 52

MAY 31—J
££I
1.,28
0.,07
2.03
10.89
3.08
4. 39
3. 66
1. 24
6. 75
0.,28
5. 88
0. 50
5. 10
3. 43
2. 25
0.60
0. 67
1.48
1.58
1. 34
2.00
1.36
1.48
1. 74
2.72
7.97
7.02
1. 50
8.44
5. 53
4. 01
11. 23
7. 06
0.00
2. 53
0. 64
3. 59
2. 12
1.34
0. 98
0. 00
1.00
1.64
2.01
4. 75
6. 18
1.94
17. 11
3. 77

BAM
37
46
24
3
19
14
16
38
8
45
10
44
12
18
22
43
41
32
30
35
26
34
32
28
20
5
7
31
4
11
15
2
6
47
21
42
17
23
35
40
47
39
29
25
13
9
27
V

££L
1 .17
0 .12
2 .80
9 .39
0 .69
4 .98
0 .57
2 .67
1 .49
0 .29
7 .48
0 .00
2 .43
2 .58
4 .74
4 .76
0 .17
1 .34
2 .50
1 .49
1 .60
1 .48
1 .92
1 .98
2 .83
9 .52
6 .35
1 .29
5 .51
0 .99
3 .44
4 .57
2 .49
4 .56
65 .24
0 .71
1 .70
0 .95
1 .60
5 .00
0 .00
0 .70
2 .07
4 .50
1.75
2 .84
1 .45
4 .89
3 .39

RANK
37
46
18
3
42
8
43
19
31
44
4
47
23
20
11
10
45
35
21
31
29
33
26
25
17
2
5
36
6
38
15
12
22
13
1
40
28
39
29
7
47
41
24
14
27
16
34
9

RQ1

0.00
0.09
5.07
16::
16. 23
1
3. 12 , 23
6.90
10
6. 35
13
36
1.41
1. 11
38
0. 00 . 45
0.00
45
0.00
45 :
4.08
19 /
7.65
8 .
5. 81
0.88
4p i
4.39
1.63
30
U 50
5. 58
0. 84
1.55
34
3. 84
20
1.63
30
8. 06
6
8. 47
8. 16
5 :
1.57
33
6.68
ii
1.98
28
39
1.09
7.90
7
6. 51
12
8.30
4
13.37
0.61
42
4.31
18
3.68
zi:
1.29
7.26
0. 19
3. 15
2.94
2.61
1.63
2.03
2.33
1.80

:

5. 19

DATA FOR THE OFFICES LISTED ON THIS PAGE FOR THE STATEMENT WEEK BEGINNING 79/05/31 ARE EITHER MISSING OR INCORREI
THE STATISTICS AND RANKINGS ON THE ACCOMPANYING REPORTS ARE AFFECTED ACCORDINGLY.

010

BOSTON

040

CLEVELAND

041

CINCINNATI

042

PITTSBURGH

062

JACKSONVILLE

NOTE: A CHECK HAS BEEN HADE ONLY ON KEY DATA FIELDS WHICH WOULD AFFECT THE ACCOMPANYING RANKINGS FOR THE LATEST REPORTED WEEK
SHOWN. FLOAT ANALYSTS SHOULD REVIEW PREVIOUS EDIT REPORTS FOR WARNING MESSAGES AND ACCURACY OF REPORTED FIGURES.




#

4