View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Release Date:

HOLDOVER
NUV

BOSTON
LEWISTON
WINDSOR LOCKS
N E W YORK
BUFFALO
JERICHO
CRANFORD
UTICA
PHILADELPHIA
CLEVELAND
CINCINNATI
PITTSBURGH
COLUMBUS
RICHMOND
bALT1MURE
CHARLuTTE
COLUMBIA
CHAkLE STON
ATLANTA
BIRMINGHAM
JACKSONVILLE
NASHVILLE
NEW ORLEANS
MIAMI
CHICAGO
DETROIT
DES MOINES
INDIANAPOLIS
MILWAUKEE
ST. LOUIS
LITTLE RCCK
LOUISVILLE
MEMPHIS
MINNEAPOLIS
HELENA
KANSAS CITY
OtNVER
OKLAHOMA CITY
OMAHA
DALLAS
EL P A S O
HOUSTON
SAN A N T U N I O
SAN FRANCISCO
LOS ANGELES
PORTLAND
SALT LAKE CITY
SEATTLE
OVERALL

1977
RANK
ELI
42
0.91
0.87
43
0.0*
48
39
1.05
30.88
1
2 .29
18
1.91
*1
0.96
40
24
1.70
38
1 .06
1.66
Z5
41
0.92
32
1.27
20
2.12
31
1 .35
46
0.59
22
1.62
45
0.7b
3.72
11
1 .64
26
16
3.13
1 .09
36
5.40
5
4.83
7
13
3.3b
4
5.77
23
1 .7b
1.64
c6
15.74
2
28
1.63
Z.34
17
14
3.24
4.43
6
19
2.1b
12.54
3
30
1.37
3.40
12
1.44
29
35
1.17
15
3.15
47
0.15
6
5.36
10
4.04
37
1-07
9
4.24
44
0.81
33
1.25
34
1.22

ti

3.13

SYSTEM


I
;


1977
RANK
ELI
0 .66
38
0.10
46
4o
0.33
37
1 .07
26 . 7 6
1
5.12
I .63
28
0.64
41
3.01
16
O.bo
3b
3.4U
13
I .04
25
35
1.J4
15
3.14
3.36
14
<•2
0.77
0.65
45
o .bo
38
12.76
2
1 .ti5
26
I .65
21
2.36
22
5.59
7
2 .15
23
3.97
11
f.43
5
30
1 .57
1.57
30
10.32
3
1.54
32
43
0.75
3.96
12
C.75
19
36
i . lb
6.96
6
23
2.15
c.bZ
18
2 .99
17
1 . bb
27
4.00
10
47
0.15
9.10
1 .61
29
33
1.52
5.47
44
0.71
34
1.46
2.70
20

-

T

:

;

F L U AT
1978

AS

PERCENT
JAN

&AW&
ELI
0.86
40
0.10
45
O.Ob
47
1.56
27
17.76
1
4.05
7
1.61
26
0.95
39
1.43
29
0.59
43
2.43
17
O.Ob
47
1.73
20
1.6^
24
1.47
2b
44
0.47
4.22
5
2.6j
15
6
3.62
1.73
20
5.36
1.66
22
1.64
23
9
3.55
2.95
13
6.59
3
30
1.35
1.9b
Id
10.4u
34
1.25
0.62
42
1.34
31
3.06
12
1.06
37
4.06
38
1.02
1.2b
33
24
1.62
1.29
32
14
2.91
0.06
46
3.37
10
3.23
11
1.13
36
1.9b
16
0.85
41
2.67
16
35
1.19

:

—

2.55

-

-

-

UP

12-JAN

ELI
0.62
0.24
0.12
0.90
25.06
10.15
3.17
0.65
1.54
0.76
2.09
0.07
1.56
1.70
1.27
0.32
0.90
1.17
1.96
1.22
3.61
2.71
1.19
3.50
5.28
7.67
1.69
1.61
6 .6
1.25
0.95
3.68
6.16
l.lo
2.35
1.29
0.60
3.12
1.06
3.17
0 . 13
5.76
3.01
1.13
3.43
0.51
3.41
1.45

2.31

2.74

:

JAN

DOLLAR
18

R A M
42
45
47
37
1
I
13
39
25
41
19
46
24
21
2b
44
37
33
ZO
30
9
17
31
10
7
3
22
23
4
29
36
6
5
32
16
27
40
15
35
13
46
6
16
34
11
43
12
26

AMOUNT

RECEIVED

JAN 19—JAN 25—3AN~2T<FFEB
1
RANK
RANK
ELI
ELI
3
0
0.78
1.16
21
46
0.03
0.01
46
47
0.01
0.04
45
28
0.85
0.89
32
1
7.49
9.73
2
12
2.01
2.30
12
16
1.22
1.16
2 1
dZ
i.03
0.72
37
27
0.67
1.39
16
43
0.40
0.60
40
3
5.62
1.99
14
44
0.08
45
0.04
46
0.00
1.03
24
17
1.26
1.19
20
1.40
15
2.Z0
13
42
0.43
44
0.28
34
0.74
17.53
1
1.04
21
1.23
19
2.03
11
Z . 33
11
13
1.49
3.17
6.51
2
1.00
25
0.6b
37
2.70
7
20
1.09
23
1.12
9
3.51
5
2.17
16
1.32
1.75
15
3
2.41
7
7.65
0.95
24
0.72
37
19
3
3
1
.
1
8
0.88
5.60
4
4.13
29
0.92
0.63
31
3
5
0.71
0.b8
39
3b
0.70
0.b3
36
1.47
14
0.55
42
30
0.7b
0.9b
27
0.44
41
43
0.51
30
0.78
0.86
35
10
2.06
0.66
33
0.46
40
1.28
18
23
0.97
0.94
30
b
3.06
2.46
9
45
0.06
0.04
45
6
2.34
2.36
10
5
4.51
0.95
29
0.96
25
28
0.92
39
0.51
1.29
17
38
0.60
0.58
40
33
0.76
6
2.50
25
0.92
1.00
25
1.77

1.41

" ^ i g ^ r r

ebruary 28, 1978

,CVE
FEB
2-1
RANK
ELI
0.61
35
0.08
42
0.01
44
999.99
1
2.07
17
3.67
9
3.63
10
0.77
32
2.62
15
0.00
45
0.00
45
0.00
45
0.00
45
1.24
5.07
0.30
41
1.28
21
0.94
26
9.37
3
1.90
18
6.40
5
0.65
34
10.55
2
4.16
b
2.67
14
3.43
11
1 .60
19
0.76
31
6 . 46
4
c4
1.05
0.54
37
1.05
24
0.91
29
0.91
29
0.46
39
0.67
33
2.56
16
3.31
12
26
1.02
3.15
13
0.06
43
20
1.33
4.99
7
0.97
27
0.49
38
0.34
40
0.59
36
1.14
23
2.56

PfcB
9 - PfcB 15
RANK
ELL
0.00
42
0.04
41
6
7.41
2.53
18
10.9a
3
4.76
12
3.85
15
0.91
27
1.43
23
0.00
42
0.00
42
0.00
42
0.00
42
1.29
25
1.41
24
0.54
37
0.82
30
0.67
28
2.41
19
1 . 46
22
5.56
9
0.59
36
6.39
6
3.35
16
4.36
14
15.23
1
13.3b
0.77
31
4.90
11
0.00
4<d
0.69
34
5.25
10
29
0.64
26
1.06
c.29
20
10.49
4
2.09
21
0.62
35
0.00
42
5
10.23
0.20
40
4.64
13
6.69
7
0.76
32
38
0.4-4
38
0.44
0.74
33
2.58
17
3.92

•!«**>•• p ~

CHECKS
DFCC

ELI

BOSTON
LEWLSTON
WINDSOR LOCKS
NEW

YORK.

BUFFALO
JERICHO
CRANFOKO

I .03
0 .07
.58
6 .26
56 .97
4 .35

1

I .74

1. 7 9

UT1CA
PHILADELPHIA

BALTIMORE
CHARLOTTE

NEW ORLEANS
MIAMI
CHICAGO
DETROIT
DES MOINES
INDIANAPOLIS
MILWAUKEE
ST. LOUIS

41 .17
1 .63
.6*

1
31

8 2 .. 6 1
2. 74

16
30
36

2. 53
99

.01
3 .69

42
17

0 .97
2 .39

39
21

5 .42
.67

10
43

2 .62
0 .73

19
43

2. 94
67

12

45
35
3

ANGELES

PORTLAND
SALT LAKE

CITY

SEATTLE
OVERALL

SYSTEM




rr

6

5 .12
.69
.36

26
34

22
28
36

1
1

4

1

6

45

2 • 64
0 .65

18
37

17 .28
2 .22
.43

2
14

35

0 .39
.56

39
25

1 .C8
1 .OO

31

18

2 .39
0 .93

20
35

11
7
6

0 .43
.50

1
1. 7 4

44
29

1

9
40

2,. 1 1
4.24

27
14

5.50

6 .87

6

.88
2,. 0 5
2 .32

41
26

0

4.11

22

1

2 .99

43
9

7 .07
.01

1

2
36

23
10
7

2 .07
5 .55
.78

16
6
20

6 .71
5 .14

7
12

16 .16

3

15
5

4 .63

2

2 .04
3 .20
2 .12
5 .70

17
6

3

.64
4 .42
6 .47
14 . 0 6

6
4
8
23

.57

1

25
29

2 .42
1 .74

17
24

0 .72
.59

1

36
23

1 .35
.36

1

C8
27

1. 3 7
1. 5 5

13
6
27
24

20 .34
1 .58

2
25

2
34

12 . 7 5
.26

36

7
48
23

1.4 4
0.5 4

33
43

3. 20
97

13
39

6.7 5

0

5
34

7

0 .40
3 .42

4.25
00

1.5 8

7 .24
.94

1

4 .27

10
26

31

0.

22
3

9 .01
.96

31
14

24

1.

3.42

16

0. 7 9
1. 6 7

22

26
18

6 .21
.07

37
23

1.86

32
11

2. 31

1

0. 9 2
1. 5 7

20

1 .41
4 .29
.46

15

3 .37

2 .06
. 66

24

19
40

44
45

41
33

0 .00
1 .12

4
40

LO
35

0.63
0.50

0. 0 0
0. 0 0

44
30

2. 61
87

27
44

44
44

1. 0 7

5
32

2 .11
0 .51

0 .00
0 .00

7 .93
0 .57

21

0.

3
44

23
22

0 .CO

1.

13
46

1 .66
1 .65
0 . 00

11
41

2. 55

4 .02
0 .00
3 .33

0 .31

41
41
41

15
44

47
30

2. 9C
35

16
48
5

43

1

6
27

3 .96

23

0 .00
.30

14. 4 4
37

0. 0 0
6.92

11

1 .65
2 .72
0 .00

16
29

2 .71
0 .62

12
7

2. 01
2. 65
64

10
45

24
19

4
7
16
14

B
42

2
29

14
20

1 .77
2 .01
1 .34
0 .37
6 .95

13 .92
9 .91
3 .96
5 .41

33
30

4 .07
6 .62
5 .50
1
7 .78
.60

35

1

.27
0 .29

1

17
22
31
44

1
20
14

41
40
6

4 .10
0 .49

16 .72
.74

1

1

.27
2 .12
1 .67

17 .47
1 .79
3 .08
5 .16

0 .05
9 .98

16
42

2
33

3 .95
2 .56
.37

4

RANK

0 .00

37
19

2 6.32
.76

29

6 .87
5 .49
.50

1
31

V

0 .03

ELI

. 64
0 .50

1.

1. 6 2

5

0. 0 6

37

1.07

2 .12
64

0.

45
46

RANK

0 .66

1. 9 8

16
33

1

0 .05
0 .02

ELI

15
42

2 .91
.56

.96

47
46

1

37
30

21
47

20
39

1.
1.2 6

38

0. 2 1
1. 2 3
1. 2 9

1

3 .46
I .41

1

0 .02
0 .05
7 .59
9 5 .44

JAN 2 6 - •FEB
RANK
ELI
0 .75

0 .75

0 .20

20
5
9

1

19- JAN 25
RANK
36

ELI

0 .37
.96

2. 60
5. 01
4. 23
1 3 . 6TI

10
9

2. 01

RECEIVED

JAN

14

44

11
3

1

2 «2 5
4. 09

TOTAL

45

4 .71
4 .63
4 .60
1 2 .1 J

11
25
19
16

FRANCISCO

17

19 . 2 6
6 .90

1

15
4

1

LOS

4.4 3

46
41

4

0 .23
0 .54
7 .47

7
26

2 .47
6 .55
2 .21
4 .16
14 . 7 9

5 .29
2 .31
3 .52
3 .57

SAN

3. 93
4 U2 5

17

39

24
37

HELENA
KANSAS CITY

ANTONIO

23
34

0 .72

26

36
8

SAN

0.

ELI

1. 6 3

23
37

DALLAS
EL P A S O
HOUSTON

3 . 15

OF

1 2 -- J A N 1 8
RANK

2 .26
.20

I .47
.47

CITY

1

25

PERt.hhT
JAN

30
24

2 .76
.56

DENVER
OKLAHOMA

2 .30
.52
2 .84

46
42

AS

32

1. 7 7
1.61

MEMPHIS
MINNEAPOLIS

OMAHA

1.
1.3 4
0.3 3
0.2 3
1.3 2
1.6 1

1

LITTLE ROCK
LOUISVILLE

1. 7 2
1. 2 5

0 .33
2 .23
0 .84

1

JACKSONVILLE
NASHVILLE

10.66

1
13
34

21

0 .37
.59
14 .92

BIRMINGHAM

36
6

0

1978

ELI R A M
0.> O 3 4 1
0.. 1 3 4 7
0., 1 6 4 6

36
40
47
4

0 .31

0

COLUMBIA
CHARLESTON
ATLANTA

RANK

1 .01
.96
0 .05
9 .19

4 .75
3 .11

1

COLUMBUS
RICHMOND

ELI

HELOOVER

JAN

31
22
46

3 .04

CLEVELAND
CINCINNATI
PITTSBURGH

RANK
41
47

1977

1*

32

1. 4 4
1

1

26

1

7 .16

.18
.55
.73

24

13
15
9

3
36

6 .52
0 .95

4
35

6 .04
1 .04

1
35

11 . 7 0
0 .99

2
32

7 .18
0 .00

11
41

32
5

1 .15
1 .51

34
24

33
31

0 .95
1 .06

33
31

1 .07
9 .13

34
8

20
35

19
26

12
34

2 .22
.17

17
29

2 .15
0 .94

18
36

.81
1 .40
2 .19
0 .67

1 .98

1 .31

1 .16
1 .26
2 .69
1 .16

15
39

2 .62
0 .67

13
40

0 .62

19
39

29
24

2 .79
.40

9

2 .72
6 .51

15
8

1
1. 4 1
7 .its
1. 9 7

1

4 .24

0. 0 0

30
12
48
15

2 .77
1 .67
0.49

28
43

4.69

9

0,. 5 7

3.72
1.69
3,. 4 9

40
13

26

1

1. 3 6
1. 5 1
1. 4 1

2 . 14
0 .00
3 .05

0.74
0.52
2,. 2 5
0 .66
3,. 3 1

1. 7 0

16 . 1 4

1
1. 8 3

1. 4 7

21
2D

2 .79
11 . 8 6
1 .19
1 .48

32
27

17
5

1
1. 6 2

21

1. 4 6

26

0 .00

41

12

5 .24
.00
2 .30

7
47
14

5 .76
0 .00
0 .76

10
44
36

14 .43
0 .00
7 .36

3
41
10

37
41

2 .78
0 .55

10

6 .21
0 .53

9

42

6 .78
0 .47

27
16
48

13
40
11
21

0

1. 6 2

0 .68
.24

1

1.46
2..44

™ 1 W : :

26

21
39
32
25

1. 5 3
0. 6 5
1. 2 3
1,.76
3.. 6 1

41
25
38
28

1. 4 3
0. 8 2
1. 4 2

21

2.58

6,. 2 5

mzFT'

12
38
29
36
30

19

DATA
DATA

NOTE:

1

FUR

THE

OFFICES
THE

A CHECK HAS BEEN MADE
SHOWN. FLOAT ANALYSTS




LISTED UN THIS
STATISTICS AND

PAGE FOR
RANKINGS

ERRUR

EXCEPT ION

REPORT

THE S T A T E M E N T W E E K B E G I N N I N G 7 6 / 0 2 / 0 9 ARE E I T H E R M I S S I N G
ON THE ACCOMPANYING REPORTS ARE AFFECTED ACCORDINGLY.

010

BOSTON

040

CLEVELAND

041

CINCINNATI

04Z

PITTSBURGH

043

COLUMBUS

OTIO

ST.

103

OMAHA

O N L Y ON K E Y DATA F I E L D S W H I C H W O U L D
S H O U L D R E V I E W P R E V I O U S E D I T RFCPORTS

OR

INCORRECT.

LOUIS

A F F E C T THE A C C O M P A N Y I N G R A N K I N G S FOR
FOR W A R N I N G MESSAGES AND A C C U R A C Y OF

"

R

^

F

M

R

' i W x V r

THE LATEST REPORTED
REPORTED FIGURES.

WEEK