View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

January 2002
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS HOUSTON BRANCH

Houston Business
A Perspective on the Houston Economy

Slow Job Growth
in Houston in 2002

L

Just as Houston was
among the last to feel
the effects of this
recession, it may be
among the last to pick
back up. Strong U.S.
growth will be the first
and most important
step in getting
Houston growing.

ast year was a bad one for the U.S. and
global economies. After a decade-long run, the
United States ended the longest continuous
expansion in its history and, in March, fell into
recession. Manufacturing led the U.S. downturn
early in 2001, and GDP growth turned negative in
the second half. As the U.S. economy sputtered
and Japan and Europe failed to replace the United
States as the main engine for global expansion,
worldwide growth slowed to less than half the
pace of the year before.
If it was a bad year for the world economy, it
was an even worse year for economic forecasters.
Occasionally, forecasters find themselves scrambling to keep up with current events, and last year
was such a time. Table 1 shows a series of forecasts the International Monetary Fund (IMF) made
between October 2000 and December 2001, predicting annual growth rates for the United States,
the world’s advanced economies and the world
economy. The forecasts are representative of most
made in the last 18 months. They show a continuous downward revision of growth prospects as it
became apparent the United States would not
achieve a soft landing, that it would fall into recession and that the recession would be extended by
the events of Sept. 11.
Based on the forecast the IMF made in October 2000, the year 2001 should have been a good
one for Houston. After U.S. GDP growth exceeded
4 percent annually from 1997 to 2000, the IMF
thought growth would slow to 3.2 percent in 2001. The
world economy, which is important to Houston’s
chemical and machinery exports, port activity and
international business community in general, was
expected to grow at 4.2 percent, down only slightly
from 4.7 percent in 2000. And a full-scale drilling

months leading up to November, Houston’s job
growth was 1.6 percent, compared with a
national loss of 0.7 percent.

Table 1
2001 a Bad Year for Economic Forecasters
(IMF Forecasts of Annual Percent Growth Compared for Various Regions)

Forecast and
date made

U.S.

Advanced
economies

World

Forecasts for 2001:
October 2000
May 2001
October 2001
December 2001

3.2
1.5
1.3
0.7

3.2
1.9
1.3
1.1

4.2
3.2
2.6
2.4

Forecasts for 2002:
May 2001
October 2001
December 2001

2.5
2.2
1.0

2.7
2.1
0.8

3.9
3.5
2.4

SOURCE: World Economic Outlook, various issues.

boom was under way, with domestic drilling
activity rising sharply. Such conditions have
historically resulted in strong local job growth:
3.3 percent in 1994, 4.9 percent in 1997 and 4.5
percent in 1998. Another year of 4 percent job
growth seemed achievable in 2001.
HOUSTON RUNS OUT OF GAS
As the economic outlook was revised
downward, Houston continued to see positive
job growth through the first half of the year
because of its strong drilling activity. The half
of Houston’s economy that is dependent on
national and global economic conditions
slowed down; layoffs at Continental Airlines
and the proposed Compaq Computer Corp.
merger with Hewlett-Packard mirrored broad
negative trends in travel and technology being
felt elsewhere in the nation. But the energydependent half of Houston’s economy continued to expand.
In the first half of 2001, drilling activity
reached its highest level since 1986. But the oil
field boom ended abruptly during the summer
(Figure 1). After reaching nearly 1,300 working
rigs in July, the rig count plummeted to 887 by
year-end. The barrier that had kept Houston
from recession gave way, and job growth
slowed sharply.
Houston’s job growth, which was running
at a 2.8 percent annual rate in the second quarter, slipped to 1.6 percent in the third quarter
and was slightly negative in October and
November. The private sector drove Houston’s
employment growth in the first half of 2001 but
became a drag on growth in the second half. If
there is a silver lining, it is that Houston outperformed the United States in 2001. In the 12

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE DRILLING BOOM?
Natural gas drives the U.S. rig count. In
recent years, 80 percent or more of the rigs
searching for hydrocarbons in the United States
have been looking for gas, not oil. The end of
the U.S. drilling boom resulted from a rapidly
rising inventory of natural gas. Natural gas is
typically moved by pipeline to the consuming
region during the off-season and stored in
nearby caverns, depleted gas fields or salt
domes for use during the winter heating season. In 2001, storage grew 60 percent faster
than in recent years. At the end of November,
3.1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas was in storage—the highest level since data have been
kept. Even if a very cold winter materializes
through the rest of the heating season, it seems
likely that substantial amounts of gas will be
left in storage when spring arrives. Large and
growing inventories have exerted downward
pressure on natural gas prices throughout
2001, and it seems likely they will continue to
do so for much of 2002.
Where did all this gas come from? Some
came from new production, a result of new
supplies found by heightened exploration in
2001. And some was attributable to the slow
economy. Production of fewer goods means
less natural gas burned under boilers or used
in industrial processes, and manufacturing has
been the hardest hit part of the U.S. economy

Figure 1
Baker Hughes Rig Count
(Working Rigs, 1989 to Present)
Count
1,400
Working rigs
Seasonally adjusted
1,200

1,000

800

600

400
’89 ’90

’91 ’92

SOURCE: Baker Hughes Inc.

’93 ’94

’95 ’96

’97

’98 ’99 ’00

’01

throughout this recession. Unused gas is diverted into storage. While we don’t have the
data to divide the increase in storage between
new supplies and a slow economy, the consensus places most of the blame on the latter.
Gas producers expected a price close to $4
per thousand cubic feet in 2001. Instead, the
price bounced between $2 and $2.50 for most
of the second half. Producer cash flows were
lower than expected, and cuts in drilling activity ensued. Without a brutally cold winter or a
quick revival in U.S. industrial production, a
collapse in gas prices remains a real threat.
Conditions in the oil fields may not be as
bad as the decline in the domestic rig count
would indicate, however. Independent producers led the U.S. rig count to the high levels of
2001, and their cuts have been responsible for
the recent decline in activity. However, the
major and supermajor companies now seem to
be spending money after digesting a series of
mergers during 2000 and much of 2001. Very
large and risky projects —projects that only the
majors can undertake—continue to move forward overseas and in the deep waters of the
Gulf of Mexico, which saw record activity last
year. The international rig count remains
strong in areas important for oil service revenues, such as the North Sea, Brazil and west
Africa. Day rates for offshore rigs, for example,
have collapsed in the shallow regions of the
Gulf of Mexico, but they remain at last summer’s high levels in the North Sea, Africa,
Brazil and the deep Gulf of Mexico. Most estimates of capital spending for oil and gas
exploration in 2002 are down only about 20
percent from 2001, less than one might expect
from the recent decline in domestic activity.
OUTLOOK FOR 2002
Just as the Houston economy was among
the last to feel the effects of this recession, it
may be among the last to pick back up. Strong
U.S. growth will be the first and most important step in getting Houston growing. Strong
U.S. growth would ignite world growth, which
would lift global energy markets. This may be
a lengthy process, and it may be 2003 before
we see all the energy and nonenergy components of Houston’s economy working together
and driving strong job growth.
Even an optimistic outlook for 2002 does
not bring much local job growth. Figure 2
shows overall growth in Houston of only about

Figure 2
2002 Houston Job Growth Slow Even with Quick Turnaround
Total

10

–3.4

Mining

–6.1

Durable manufacturing
0.4

Nondurable manufacturing
–1.7

Construction

–1.1

Transportation and utilities

Finance and services

9.4

Retail

6.3
Wholesale

–2.8
Government
–10

–5

9
0

5

10

15

Thousands of jobs
SOURCE: Author’s calculations.

10,000 jobs, or 0.5 percent, this year. This scenario makes some fairly optimistic assumptions: a first-quarter turnaround in the U.S.
economy and improved job markets by the
second quarter; a pickup in worldwide growth
by midyear; and stabilization of the domestic
rig count at 850–900 working rigs before picking up late in the year. Even these optimistic
assumptions make it difficult to overcome the
negative momentum of the second half of
2001. Mining, durable manufacturing, construction, transportation and utilities, and wholesale
trade drive job losses. The bulk of the gains
come from finance and services, retail and government.
What if these assumptions are too optimistic? What if the U.S. recovery is delayed or
more sluggish than expected? Or what if
domestic natural gas prices or world oil markets collapse? Clearly, such economic conditions would continue to dampen the Houston
economy. But it is important to know that
Houston has seen these circumstances before.
In 1991–92, a national recession and sluggish
recovery, combined with a warm winter, briefly
pushed natural gas prices below $1 per thousand cubic feet. The rig count collapsed in
1992 as a result, but the Houston economy did
not. Total job growth was near zero for nearly
18 months, waiting for the economy and the
rig count to recover, but there was no significant overall local job loss. Strong growth was a
hallmark of Houston’s economy through the
rest of the decade.

JANUARY 2002

HOUSTON BEIGE BOOK

B

eige Book respondents reported that
weak conditions persist in oil and gas exploration, as well as in petrochemicals and refining. Good news was confined to strong auto
and home sales. Job growth has weakened
steadily all year, and Houston enters 2002
with virtually no forward momentum in the
local economy.
RETAIL AND AUTO SALES
Houston retailers reported mixed results
over Christmas. Only furniture and food stores
hit the level of sales achieved last year, while
sporting goods were among the worst performers. Department stores did better than
anticipated, but only with the help of expensive promotions that hurt margins.
Auto sales in November were 14 percent
above sales last November, thanks largely to
manufacturers’ incentives. Year-to-date auto
sales are running 1 percent ahead of last
year’s record. Dealers reported that sales
remained solid in December.
CRUDE AND OIL PRODUCT MARKETS
The price of crude oil remained in a range
of $18–$21 in recent weeks, with the bottom
of the range marking a 29-month low. The
dominant factor moving oil prices was OPEC’s
efforts to gain crude production cuts from
non-OPEC producers such as Mexico, Norway
and Russia. Non-OPEC producers finally
agreed to cut half a million barrels of production on January 1, and OPEC joined in
with another 1.5 million barrels. In response,
the price of crude moved back to the top of
its recent range. Cuts were driven by weak
global oil demand, warm weather in the
United States and rising crude inventories.
The second warmest November of the
last 100 years pushed heating oil prices
down sharply, and weaker than expected
gasoline demand over the Thanksgiving holiday hurt gasoline prices. Refiners saw profit
margins fall throughout recent weeks, particularly for Gulf Coast and East Coast refineries.
Heating oil prices bounced back up at year-

end, as very cold weather returned to the
United States.
PETROCHEMICALS
Petrochemical markets remained very
weak, suffering from a combination of a lack
of demand and overcapacity in the industry.
Producers of plastics such as polystyrene,
polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride have all
reported price declines in recent weeks, citing weak demand as the primary reason.
Profit margins remain very low.
NATURAL GAS
Natural gas inventories built to a record
3.1 trillion cubic feet in November, thanks to
warm weather. With 40 percent of the heating season behind us, it is highly likely that
spring will find substantial amounts of gas still
in storage. The price briefly slipped under $2
per thousand cubic feet in December, but with
cold weather in January, it rallied back to $2.50.
DRILLING AND OIL SERVICES
Warm weather, the buildup in natural
gas and heating oil inventories, and OPEC’s
loosening grip on world oil prices have put
downward pressure on drilling activity. The
decline in the domestic rig count accelerated
over the past eight weeks, falling from more
than 1,000 to 887 at year-end. Key international markets and deep-water drilling in
the Gulf remain strong, offsetting some weakness at home. Forecasters point to a rig count
in the 750 – 900 range for 2002, with a 20 percent cut in industry capital spending from
2001 levels.
HOME SALES
Lower interest rates, rising apartment
rents and the remaining momentum from
solid job growth earlier in the year offset other
gloomy economic news, and new home sales
in Houston set a record for November, 3 percent above November 2000. Existing home
sales did even better, up 25 percent from
November 2000.

For more information, contact Bill Gilmer at (713) 652-1546 or bill.gilmer@dal.frb.org.
For a copy of this publication, write to Bill Gilmer, Houston Branch,
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, P.O. Box 2578, Houston, TX 77252.
This publication is available on the Internet at www.dallasfed.org.
The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions
of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System.