View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

1

t}4

H.ii

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
.
K n
September 25, 19-53
DEPARTMENT STORE SAISS IN SELECTED CITIES AND AREAS •
(Eased on Dollar Amounts)

Federal Reserve'District, Area, and City-

Percentage change from corresponding .
period a year ago
Week ending
Jan.July Aug e 29 |Sept. 5-x | Sept .12* | Sept .19
+ 1"

United States
Bos con D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Area
Lowell-Lawrence.
Cities
Downtown Boston
Springfield
Providence
New'York D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
• Buffalo
Rochester
Syracuse
"Cities
New York
Newark
Philadelphia D i s t r i c t
CityPhiladelphia
Cleveland D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
• Akron
Cincinnati
Columbus
Toledo
Erie
Cities
Cleveland
Pittsburgh

+ 2

Chicago D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Chicago
Indianapolis
Detroit
Milwaukee




- 6

• +lh

+16

'+10

Mass.

+10

- .8

-12

Mass.
ti
R. I .

+ 1
> 3
+ 1

-10
-10
-12

-22
- 9 • . + u ••
+ 9. * +30
o:
+17
-28 ... + 7

+ 1

-12

-17

: r-12

+10

rlU
-10
-13

+10 . r-10
+15
-13
- u . ' r-17

+17
+16
+33

N. Y.
"

•_

; •

+ 5
+ 7
+ 8

.

+ 6
+1U

N. Y.
N. J .

- 2
+ 2

-13
. -11

- -21
-2U

-1U:
- 9

±_k

' + U

-11

-22

+17

Pa.

+ 2

+ 5

-25

+20
+16

t i

t A

- 7
r-19
- 6
+ h

+13
+ 9
+19

3
7
8
U
6

- 9
-10
- 8

+ 6
+ k
+10

Pa.

+
+
+
+
+

+ 3

- 3

- 9

+ 8

Ohio
Pa.

+ 3
+ 3

-12
-3

- 3
+10

-7
: - "13

+1U
+12

+ 2 i

=17

zJL

r-13

+ 9

1 :
u
1
1

-18
-22
-23
- 9

- 8
-Ik
-10
- 3

- 6
-13
-23
-11

+ 9
+ 9
+12
+ 6

+_7

r-11

+ 2

- 6

-11
-19
-20
-1
-31
-1U
-13

Ohio

Richmond D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
D. C.
Washington
Downtown Washington
Md.
Baltimore
Va.
Richmond
Atlanta D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas .
Birmingham
Jacksonville
Miami
Atlanta
Augusta
New Orleans
Nashville

-11

+
+

.

t l
Ala.
Fla.

+ h
- l

Qa «
ii
La,
Tenn.

+
+
+

111.
Ind. .
Mich.
Wis.

3
b
6
7

t i
-16
t 7
+ 3
- 2
-20
- 3
- 9 .

.

+

2
+25
+ 3
-11
+1.6
- 2

- 2
- 7
+ 7.
+ 5.
-17
+ 7
, - 3-

,+_6

- 9

- ,2 : ' r - 6

•'•+. 6

+ 2
•+ 6
+11
+ 2

-13
- 6

-

- 6
- U
-13
0

+ 5
+ 8
+ 8
+12

-

-17

6
U
2
6

*3?
I
H,ll
DEPARTMENT S IRE SALES IN SELECTED CITIES AND AREAS (Continued)
(Based on Dollar Amounts).
Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago
lAeek ending
Aug 29 |Sept. ^ | S e p t . 12^[Sept.19

Federal Reserve D i s t r i c t . Area, and City
St. Louis D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
L i t t l e Rock
Louisville
St e Louis
Memphis
Minneapolis District-.
Metropolitan Areas
.Minneapolis-St. Paul
Minneapolis City
S t . Paul City
Cities '
. '
Dulutli-Superior :
Kansas City D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Denver
Topeka
TJichita
S t . Joseph
Oklahoma City '
. Tulsa
City
Kansas City
Dallas D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Dallas
El Paso
Fort worth
Houston
San Antonio

Jan.July

-11

+ 1

3
2
3
8

- 3
-12
•- 9
-27

-28
0
+ U
+ 6

-12

+ _5

- 2

+10

-12
-10
-15

+ 2

- 3

+1U

+18

- 3

+ k

±1

- 9

- I

Ark.
Ky.
Mo.
Term.

+
+
+
+

-Ik
- 9,
-10
- U

+
+

+ 1
Minn.

+ 2
+ 2
+ 3
+ 3

-19

"
"

Minn.&VJis .

1
3
5
3

J_£

-12

+ 9

r- 9

Colo.
Kans.

+ 2
+ h

Mo.
Okla.

+ l
0

-11
-16
- 9
-111
- 5
-11

+15
+ h
+lh
+ l
+ l

-11
- 3
-11
- 3
-19
, - 7

Mo.

+ 3

-13

+ 7

- 8

- 3

+ U

-_5

+10

-13

- 3

h
+ 6
- 2
+ 7 !
0 j

- 2
- h
- 9
- 3
-13

- 1
+31
+11
+12
+19

-10
-10
-25
-15
-18

0
-27
- 8
+ 3
- 2

+

5

+

Tex.

+

"
"
"

San Francisco D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas ~~
Los Angeles
Calif.
Dovmtown Los Angeles
"
Vv est side Los Angeles "
San Diego
"
San Franciscc-Oakland
"
San Francisco City
Oakland City
Portland
Ore.
Salt Lake City
Utah
Seattle
wash.
11
Spokane

5

+

5

%_5
-

8
8
2
1
7
5

+ h !

- 9

+22

-18

- 3

+

5 |
+ 1 i

- 6
- 7

+

-

+32
+ 8
+62
+ 28
+12
+14
+ 7
+23
+ 8
+ 21
+10

-17
- 1
-25
-25
-15
-lh
-15
-2h
-23
-22
-26

+
-

3
2
u
k

+

5

5

"3
k

i

+

1

+

+
+
^
+
+

3

3
5
?
h
6

|

:
;•
i
i
;

5

-12
-13
-13
-13
- 7
-llj.
-11
- 1

+11
- 8
- 9
-23
- 1
- 3

r—Revised.
—Data not a v a i l a b l e .
*—Labor day in 1952 f e l l in the week ending Sept. 6, whereas t h i s year i t f e l l one
we-=k l a o e r . Therefore, the week ending Sept. 5> 1953 -had one more trading day than
the corresponding week l a s t year, while the week ending September 12, 1953 had one
l e s s trading day than the v;eek ending September 13 l a s t year.-