The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM H.ll October 5> 1951 DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Based on -Dollar Amounts) Federal Reserve D i s t r i c t and c i t y July UNITED STATES + 6 Boston D i s t r i c t .New Haven Boston Lowell-Lawr enc e Springfield Providence + 3 + b + 4 0 + o + k Conn. . Mass. R.I. Percentage change from coirresponding period a year a( Month oi Aug. ' Sept. 1 Sept. 8 S e p t . 15 Sept.22 Sept.: - 5 - 2 - b 2 - b — 6 +1 - 9 + 2 0 + 3 — - t i + 3 - 3 + b' + 1 + .6 •+ 5 + 2 0 -10 r -12 1 -10 -21 - 5 • -24 - 2 - 9 0 -15 -10 -10 -13 -10 -12' - 9 - 8 -10 - 6 - 9 . - 6 - 1.. - " + b +T - 5 -9 ' + 2 0 Cleveland D i s t r i c t Akron Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Toledo .. Erie Pittsburgh + 8 +10 + 3 +10 + 6 +10 +10 + 7 - 7 -12 - 5 - 6 - 2 + 4 -11 - 1 0 - 1 - 3 + 1 0 +12 - 4 - 2 + 1 - 8 0. - 2 + 3 + 5 - h - 7 -15 - 7 ' 0 +"~3 + 2 - 1 +3 - 2 - 9 -11 - 4 r+ 2 0 + 8 - 5 - 2 0 - 5 -14 +22 + l . - k -7 ZTF + U - 7 . -12 +13 -12 - 7 -14 -20. -24 -7 r-il + 9 -lU -13 r+13 +11 - 1 + 2 r+15 +21 +15 + 6 -3 - 2 - 3 - 3 -13 - 9 - 7 -10 - 8 -11 0 + 1 * S -7 + 2 Richmond D i s t r i c t Washington Baltimore Atlanta D i s t r i c t Birmingham Jacksonville Miami Atlanta Augusta New Orleans Nashville Chicago D i s t r i c t Chicago Indianapolis Detroit Milwaukee » Ohio Pa. " D.C. Md. ' - h —~F + 1 - 7 + 1 + 2 + b - 3 + b - 1 ; La. Tenn. + k + 3 + 7 +10 + 5 +19 - 2 0 - k =3 + 5 - 3 -15 - + 1 + 4 - 7 111. Ind. Mich. Ms. + 7 + b + 9 +10 + 7 ~ Ala. Fla. Ga, 5 b I b 6 + + + + lr 1 3 1 2 k + 1 0 0 + 2 + - U - 9 - 7 -10 0 - 7 - 5 •'+ + + + + - -_3 Philadelphia D i s t r i c t Philadelphia Pa. N.J. N.Y. + 2 0 +10 +11 + 9 +10 + 9 + 9 New York D i s t r i c t Newark Buffalo New York Rochester Syracuse + 1 - 2 - 3 + lh +13 +15 . + 1 - 1 .. +-2 + l -5 +, 4 + .3 - U - 3 + 8 + 2 + a +16 +12 + 7 0 - 7 -10 -10 -20 ' -11 - I 4 U 3 3 3 8 3 + 3 + b 0 + 2 - + .7 + 5 -17 +15 + 5 + 7 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 1 b & Page 2 H.ll DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, EL CITIES (Continued) Federal Reserve D i s t r i c t and c i t y S t . Louis D i s t r i c t L i t t l e Rock Louisville St.. Louis Area Memphis Minneapolis D i s t r i c t Minneapolis S t . Paul Buluth-Superior Kansas City D i s t r i c t Denver \iichita Kansas City S t . Josepn Oklahoma City Tulsa Dallas D i s t r i c t Dallas El Paso Fort Y.orth Houston San Antonio July + + + + 2 2 2 2 2 Perce ntage change from corresponding period a year ago Month cf Sept. l j Sept. i81 Sept. 15 J Sept. 22 Sept.29 Aug. r- 7 -17 - 8 - 9 -13 r-10 -12 - 4 -lk - 0 r+11 +14 +11 + 2 +17 - 3 ~0 - 9 + 4 -11 -17 - 9 -7 - 5 - 9 -10 + + + - 6 + 1 -10 + 4 + 5 -10 - d -18 -14 +10 + 9 + 5 -18 - 5 + 9 +10 —lo - 3 +23 + 9 + 7 - 4 +14 + 9 + 4 +23 + 20 - 1 0 - 7 -13 - 5 -10 + 3 - 4 - 4 =IF 0 - 5 + 5 0 -10 -17 - 9 -19 - 3 - 6 -.14 -13* -14 - 0 -12 -24 r+17 - + 8 + 3 + 7 +45 - 4 +10 + 2 -11 + 2 +32 +11 - 4 — o - 5 - 2 - 3 + 4 =T + i + 8 + 8 + 5 + 1 +17 +17 + 1 -12 -14 -13 -15 - 3 -17 -la - 7 — 4 r- 2 +11 - 1 +13 - 6 0 - 1 + o + + + + + + 5 9 6 0 r-.8 0 - 8 -10 - 3 + 3 + 3 -3 + 1 - 6 - 9 -17 - 7 -14 - b + 4 Colo. . + 4 +17 Kans. +3 '+ u Okla. - 3 + 1 - 7 - 7 + 5 - 5 - 6 -16 -10 + 4 o + 3 + 2 +15 0 Ark, Ky. Mo. Tenn. Minn. %is. Tex. " + 5 5an Francisco D i s t r i c t Los Angeles Area Calif. + T .+ u Oakland + 7 San Diego + 5 San Francisco + 5 Ore. Portland +10 'Utah S a l t Lake City\jash. ' +10 Seattle + 7 Spokane r—Revised. z - l - 4 0 + 5 -10 Data nov ' / ule. + + - 0 2 2 1 4 2 4 rl_3 +14 +11 - 2 +17 2 3 3 C 1 1 1 8 4 1 + 1 ; -; 1 H.ll Page 2 DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Continued) Federal Reserve D i s t r i c t and c i t y S t . Louis D i s t r i c t L i t t l e Rock Louisville S t . Louis Area Memphis Minneapolis D i s t r i c t Minneapolis S t . Paul Duluth-Superior Kansas City D i s t r i c t Denver Wichita Kansas City St „ Joseph Oklahana City Tulsa Dallas D i s t r i c t Dallas El Paso Fort v.orth Houston San Antonio July Ark. Ky. Mo. Tenn. Minn. " "ScV;is. Colo. Kans. Mo, " Okla, " Tex. " " San Francisco D i s t r i c t Los Angeles Area Calif. Oakland San Diego San Francisco Ore. Portland S a l t Lake City Utan v. a s h . Seattle Spokane " r—Revised. Percent age change from, corresponding period a year ago Month of Sept. 8 Sept. 15 Sept.22 Sept. 29 Oct. 6 Aug. . + + + t 2 2 2 2 2 + + + 3 3 3 1 + 3 +14 +11 - 2 ••"17 - 2 0 - 3 -5 - 2 -11 =T - 7 -17 - 9 - 9 -10 + + + 2 3 3 6 - 3 + 1 -13 - 6 + 9 - 2 +23 +20 - 4 - 1 0 +12 - 3 + 7 -11 + 3 +10 + 2 -11 + 2 +32 +11 r+ 3 -10 -12 - k -14 - b -17 - 7 - 3 0 - 9 + h + 1 -10 -13 + 9 -18 +10, + U - b +23 + 9 • + 7 - 4 +1U 5 5 9 b. 0 - 6 + h - 7 +17 + 3 + h - 3 + 1 + 5 +10 + 9 -5 - 8. . + 5 —lb • -18 -10 - 5 + 4 + 3 + 3 + 2 +15 0 - 7 -13 - 5 -10 + 3 - 4 " -4 + 1 -5 - 2 - 3 +11 - 1 +13 - U 0 + 5 0 + 1 ! + 6 + 5 + 3 + 4 + 7 + 5 + 5 +10 +10 + 7 +11 +14 +11 . + 2 +17 - 7 -17 - 8 - 9 -13 - * -10 -17 -9 -1* - 3 0 T -P-4 414 T b 12 -24 -12 -la -13 -15 -3 -17 -14 - 7 - 4 +17 r ? + 3 + 7 , +u5 V- - 4 - 2 + + - Data net a v a i l a b l e . 0 2 2 1 4 2 4 + + + + + + + 1 1 1 8 k 1 5 2 1 -14. 0 +10 +17 0 0 + 1 - 1 + 1 +10 - 2 - 2
@FedFRASER