View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

t2>r
4
H.ll

. BQAED-OFGOVERNORS-- OF--THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
DEPARTMENT STORE SALES ' IN:.SEI£CTED CITIES AND AREAS
•
• ~ .
.. .'.(Based on Dollar Amounts)

Federal Reserve D i s t r i c t , Area, and City.
United' States

'

Boston D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Area
Lowell-Lawrence
Cities
Downtown Boston
Springfield
Providence
New York D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Buffalo
2oChester "
• Syracuse ' "
Cities
New York
Newark

Chicago D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Chicago
Indianapolis
Detroit
Milwaukee




+ 6

+ 1

-11

tik

.

12

+JL

ri?

-_6

Mass.

+ 8

-12

+16

• +10

- 2

'

Mass*
ii
R. I . ,

+ 1
-22
+ 2 •
Q
0
-28

- 9

i+ 7
-3
. +10

:

+ 7

+iU
+30
+17

N. t., ;
n
'
It : "
N. Y. '
N. J...

;

-

•

^

.

+

^

+ _1

ril

-12

r+11

+ L
+ 6
+ 7

+10
-13

-10
+15
-17 .

r+18
+16
r+3U

'- 2
+ 5

-21
-2U

-k.

"

-ih

'

- 9

-

tl

;
0
+ .2
+• 9

,

r+ 7 - , + L
' v+12

tl

-11

-22

r+18.

t_i

+ 2

-lU

-25.

r+21

.-0

r+15

-"-y+l

+_£

iX-

zl

Ohio: ' \ "
It ' ' :
n
'
it:
Pa...

+
+
+
+
+

3
7
7
5
7

+ 6r.
+ 'U
+10

-19
- 6
+ h

-3

- 9 .; • t .8

0

Ohio
Pa.

+ 3
+ 3

- 3+10

-.7
-13

+11+
+12

0
- 1

+ 1

=_7

Richmond D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Washington
D.C.
Downtown Washington
1
Baltimore
.Md.
Richmond
Va.
Atlanta D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Birmingham
Jacksonville
Miami
Atlanta
.•
Augusta
New Orleans
Nashville

Percentage change from corresponding
yci xuu d
agv
Week ending .
August Sept. 5*1Sept.12*|Sept. 19|Sept. 26
n

Philadelphia D i s t r i c t ' City
Philadelphia
Cleveland D i s t r i c t "
Metropolitan Areas-. ; •
Akron
"
Cincinnati
" - Columbus."
>}:.Toledo .
, Erie
Cities
, Cleveland
Pittsburgh

October 2, 1953

Ala.
Fla.
Ga.
La •
Tenn.

-

=13

+ 9

- 1

- 6
-13
-23
-11

+ 9
+ 9
+12
+ 6

0
- 1
0
- 2

±J±

-11

r+ 1

±1

3
2
7
2.

-,6 -11
. +.3
-19
+25 ... -20
..+ 3
- 1
6
•
-11 .
r31
+ 6 ! +16
-14
+ 6
- 2
-13

+ _6
111.
Ind.
Mich.
Wis.

+13 •
; + 5
+ 9- v.: + ?
+ 6
+19 ..

- 8
- 2
- 5
0 • -10
+ 1 .> 3

+
+
+

:

+ 1
+ 6
+10
+ 2

- 2
-

6
ii
2
6

-6

.

- 2
- 7
+ 7
r+ 6
r-16
+ 7
r- 5
+ 6

±_3
;

.

- k
-10
+ 1
+12
•JHr
0
- 3
+ 5

•

- 6
- U
-13
0

+ 5 + 8
+ 8
+12

,+ 3
> 5
+ 6
+10

,

S3?
H.ll

DEPARTMENT STORE SALES IN SELECTED CITIES AND AREAS (Continued)
(Eased on Dollar Amounts)

Federal Reserve D i s t r i c t , Area, and. City-

S t . Louis D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
L i t t l e Rock
Louisville
S t . Louis
Memphis
Minneapolis D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Minneapolis-St. Paul
Minneapolis City
S t . Paul City
Cities
Duluth-Superior
Kansas City D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Denver
Topeka
Mchita
S t . Joseph
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
City
Kansas City
Dallas D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Dallas
El Paso
Fort Worth
Houston
San Antonio
San Francisco D i s t r i c t
Metropolitan Areas
Los Angeles
Downtown Los Angeles
VJestside Los Angeles
San Diego
San Francis co-Oakland
San Francisco City
Oakland City
Portland
Salt Lake City
Seattle
Spokane
Tacoma

Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago
Jan.l e e k endingAugust Sept 5* I Sept* 12* | Sept. 191 Sept 25"

+b

Minn.
"

»

Minn

Colo.
Kans.
Mo.
Okla.
ii
Mo.

Tex,

Calif.
»
"

»

Ore.
Utah
TJash.

-11

+ 1

+ 2

3
2
3
8

- 3
-12
- 9
-27

-28
0
+ b
+ 6

+11
0
+ 3
- 7

0

±_i

- 2

+10

+ 2
+ 1
+ 2

+ 2

- 3

. +1U

+ 7
-x-x~

1
+ 2 | +18

- 3

r+ 5

+ 6

+ 1 | ' +_9

- 9

zl

_r_5

0
+ 3
+ 5
+ 3

Ark.
Ky.
Mo.
Tenn.

is.

/

Page ' 0

+
+

!

0 !
+ bj
+ 3
0
0 ;
+ u

**

**

+15
+ U
+iu
*+ 5
+ 1
+ 1

-11
- 3
-11
- 3
• -19
- 7

+ 2

+ 7

t_b
+
+
+
-

**

-

8
8
2
1
7
5

- b

- 8

- 3

- 1

+10

-13

- 3

5 • - 1
5
+31
2 • +11
7
+12
+19
1

-10
-10
-25
-15
-18

0
-27
- 8
+ 3
- 2

- b
- u
-111
--5
- 2

- 7
- 9
+ 3
-13

'^5

+_3

+22

-18

r- U

0

+ b
0

+32
+ 8
+62
+28
+12
+14
+ 7
+23
+ 8
+21
+10

-17
- 1
-28
-25
-15
-Hi
-15

- 3
- 2

+ 2
+ 5
+ 5
-13
- l
0

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

5
u
3
2
2
3
3
3
5
3

-2b

-23
-22
-26
- 8

+b
- b

+ 5
+11
- 8
- 9
-23
- 1
- 3
- 1

- b
- b

0
- 2
+ 1
- 8

r—Revised.
-x-x—Data not a v a i l a b l e .
—Labor day in 1952 f e l l in the week ending Sept. 6, whereas t h i s year i t f e l l one
week l a t e r . Therefore, the week ending Sept. 5, 1953 had one more trading day than
the corresponding week l a s t year, while the week ending September 12, 1953 had one
l e s s trading day than the week ending September 13 l a s t y e a r .