View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDEML RESERVE SYSTEM

November 6, 1953

DEPARTMENT STORE SALES IN SELECTED CITIES AND AR^AS
(Based on Dollar Amounts)

Federal Reserve District, Area, and City

Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago
i/.eek ending
Sept,, Oct. 10 I Oct, 17 |Oct, i
Oct. 31

United States
Boston District
Metropolitan Area
Lowell-Lawrence •
Cities
Downtown Boston
Springfield
Providence

+ 3

+ 7

+ 2

+ 6

-13

/

Mass,

+ 1
+ 3
0

-2
•4 6
+ 1

- 1
+ 8
- 3

-10
- 7
- 7

' - 8
- • + h
-10

0

Z_9

R. I.

,

zJ.

+1

- 1

+

+ k
+ 7
6

+ 2
+ 1
- 1

- 2
- h+ 6

N. Y.
N". J.

- 2
+ 2

- 2
- 2

- 1
- 9
+ h ... -12

+_k |

%_5

+ 2

r- 7

Pa.

+' 1

- 5

~+ 1

r- 8

Pa.

:

Ga.

La,
Tenn.

,

- 6
:

+7
+2
- 1

,•

- 9
"

;

6

-11
-11

- 6

-11

0

+ 6

-9
- 6
-11
-7
-11
-12

- 7
+ 2
0
.+ 5
+ 1
+ 2

+ 2

- 8

-12

-18

+ 1

- 6

zl

- 2
- 5
- l
0

- b

- .6

3 1
6 i
2 |
7

ii
Ala.
Fla.

-12

- 2
- 3
- 1
- 2
-11
- 9.

+
+
+
+

»
tt
Pa.

|

r-11
r+ 1
-12

2_6

- h
+ 2
- h
- 2,
-15
- 2

±_5
Ohio

Richmond District
Metropolitan Areas
•..ashington.
..
D./.C.
Downtown v. ashing ton
Baltimore'
rid.
Richmond
Va.




0 ••
-•

Philadelphia District
City
Philadelphia

Chicago District
Metropolitan Areas
Chicago
Indianapolis
Detroit
Milwaukee

2

• . -

Mass.

N. Y.
11
ir

Atlanta District
Metropolitan Areas
Birmingham
Jacksonville
Hiami
Atlanta
Augusta
New Orleans
Nashville

c i

0

New York District
Metropolitan Areas
Buffalo
Rochester
Syracuse
Cities
New York
Newark

Cleveland District
Metropolitan Areas
Akron
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus •'
Toledo
Erie
• •
City
Pittsburgh

,

+ 2

+
+
'+
+
+

-9

- 6
• - 8.
- U

- 1
- 7

zJ_

—

2 • -15
- 8
3
6
•+ .2
2
- 5
8 ,
. • -21
5
-11
h
- 3

+ U

.

-

-10

-11
• -13
-15
- 9
- 7

•

- 6 -

-11 .
-13
-Hi.
- 3
0

r- 5

• • -11 " -13
+11 >
-21
'
r+10 '•
+ h
r- 6 '
- 5
= -3U
-13
+ 2 •
-10
- 8 \ . +10 •

- U "

- 6

- 8
- 1
- 1
"22
+16
*
+ 3

•

111.
Ind.
l.iich.
Wis.

+
+
+
+

l
6
9
2

- 8
+ 7
+ 1
-10

'

- 6
0
- 6
- 9

- 2
•, - 8
-11
- 8

"

- 2

+
+
+
+

5
l
1
3

H.ll

Page 2
DEPARTMENT STORE SALES IN SELECTED CITIES AND ARi%AS (Continued)
(Based on Dollar Amounts)

Percentage change
period
Federal Reserve District, Areaj and City Jan.liveek
Sept. Oct. 10 (Oct.
St. Louis District
metropolitan Areas
Little Rock .
Louisville
St. Louis
Memphis

Ark.
Ky.
Ho.
Term.

, Minneapolis District
metropolitan Areas
jvIinneapolis-St. Paul
hi inn.
Minneapolis City
"
St. Paul CityCities
Buluth-Superior
jginn.&L'is.
Kansas City District
metropolitan Areas
Denver
Tcpeka
v.ichita
St. Joseph
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
City
Kansas City
Dallas District
Metropolitan Areas
Dallas
El Paso
Fort v.orth
Houston
San Antonio

r- 8

r-12

1
1
U
2

- 8
-1U
- 6
- 9

-11
- 9
- u
- 7

- 7
-11
-11
• -13

0

i_k

-13

r- 6

+ 2

- 2

+ 1
0
3
2
0
2
3

Mo.

Tex.
«

"

Mo.
Okla.

"
"
"

"




- 8 -.

+
+
+

- 8

San Francisco District
Metropolitan Areas
Los Angeles
Calif.
Dov-ntovm Los .-ngeles
lu est side Los Angeles
San Diego
San Francisco-Oakland
"
San Francisco City
"
Oakland City
"
Portland
Ore.
Spit Lake City
Utah
Seattle
bash.
Spokane .
Tacoma
r—Revised.

+ 3

+ 2
+ 2
+ 2

Colo.
Kans.

from/corresponding
a year ago
ending
17 I Oct . 24 Oct.
31
|
+ 2
+
+
+

9
u
2
5

lA

-17

-/x~
- 6

+ 3

-10

0

+ 5

rJ±

-10

r- 6

0

- 3
0
- 7
. - i
0
- 5

- 1
- k
-19
-16
-20
- 9

+ u
- 5
-10
- 8
- 7
-11

- 6
+ 2
+ 3
- 3
+ k

+ 1

- 5

-lit

-10

+ 2

+ 2

+ 3

ll2

-13

+ 9

+
+
+
-

+ 9
+ 2
-1U
+15
-13

-11
- h
—16
-16
-3,0

-19
-11
- -15
-lU
+ 6

+13
+ 6
0
+ h
+16

+
+
+

3
U

h

5
l

-

+ 2

=11

- 7

r- 7

- 9

+ 3
0
+ 5
- h
+ 2
+ 1
+ 1
+ 2
+ 1
+ 2
+ u
+ 2

-15
-17
-16
-19
-13
-15
- 8
- 6
+ 3
+ 1
- 9
' - 3

-.9
-11
- 3
- h
- 6
- 7
- h
- 3
-11
- 1
+ 5
- 2

- 9
- 7
- 2'
- 6
- 9
-10
•- 6
- 3
- 2
- 4
+12
+ 2

- 7
- 6
- 2
-16
- 6
- 6
- 6
-11
-11
-11
-18
-20

—Data not available