The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM DEPARTMENT STORE/SALES, BY CITIES > . • . . (Based on Dollar^Ampunts) . . ... 131950 .-SSCRVE BANK. ';iMONO . Percentage cahnge from-corresponding Federal Reserve district and city jy New York District Newark , Buffalo New York Rochester Syracuse Conn. Mass. N.J. N.Y. " + 2 - 5 0 ^_2 -•4. 0 - 4 -.5 + - =_4 ±_1 ±_1 - 2 -14- ,-13 + A , +. 2 J - - 1 -18 - 9 4 — 8 -11 - A =12 rl7 -11 -11 -17 +_7 •- 4 +10 + 2 + 9 -.A - 8 -8 - 5 -5 - 6- 6 . -3 =J> — 8 -. - 3 +1? - 1 - 6' - 6 + 4 - 3 + 7 • 1 =_6 . - 5 0 - 2 ±_2 + 9 +58 1/+82 =_2 - 7. - 7 - 7 - 5. . - 7" - 4 - 7 - 7 - 8 + 2 - 3 - 7 - 9. - 8 -11. - l" - 8 + 6 + 3 •+ 2 - 9 - 1 - 4 - 5 - 3 - 1 - A -11 - 2 + 2 - 7 - Philadelphia District Philadelphia Cleveland-District Akron Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Toledo' • Erie Pittsburgh - 4 - V.. UNITED STATES Boston District New Haven Boston , Springfield Providence .. . .. . . .. , • • i • Year (Month of Feb. 4 Feb.11j Feb.18 Feb.2 51Mar * 4 1969' 1 Jan. Ohio f 1 ' 6 26. 5 Richmond District Washington . Baltimore D »C • Md. + i - 6 Ala. Fla. Ga • La. Tenn. =_2 - 9 - 4- 5 + 2 - 7 =_l -13 0 + 5 - 2 - 5 =_7 - 5 - 4 - 7 - 7 =_5 - 4 — 8 — 8 — 8 Chicago District Chicago Indianapolis Detroit Milwaukee 111. Ind • Mich. Wis. 0 .zJt ±i + 1 =12 1- • r-15 r-22 4 -12 5 6 -11 6 -15 • " ±_2 +-47 + 3 - U - Tr . =12 -13 =4 - 6 =_i -11 . - 1 . - 8 - 4-15 - 7 - 3 =11 -10 -11 -13 -11. r-15 -17 — 8 - 7 - 3 - 5 - 9 -10 -12 - 4 - z_3 P . : ",+T - 5 - 4 - =_i - 2 — 5 Atlanta District . Birmingham Miami Atlanta New Orleans Nashville % \ _o + 7 — 8 r=_Z m - 7 -10 - 2 . - 1 - 1 + 6 0 +19 +14 + 8 ±_2 - 8 0 + 1 + 3. - 3 . +_9 0 + 3 +14+11 +12 - 3 + 5 -22 - 1 +10 -13 +20 + 5 +33 + 2 =_1 - 3 - 4 + 1 - 7 ±_1 0 0 + 2 - 4 - - -20 - 9 - 5 =_2 - 1 - 2 - 8 + 1 4. 5 9 5 5 H.ll Page 2 DEPARTMENT STORE SALES BY CITIES (Continued) Percentage change from corresponding 1 Year IMonth of Feb. 4jFeb.lljFeb.l8 jFeb .25 Mar. 4 j] Jan. 1 1969 ! . and city St. Louis District Little Rock Louisville St. Louis Memphis Minneapolis District , Minneapolis St. Paul Duluth-Superior Kansas City District Denver Wichita Kansas City St. Joseph Oklahoma City Tulsa Dplias District Dallas Fort Worth Houston San Antonio Ark. Ky. Mo. .Tenn. - 5 6 4 6 3 z_5 - 2 - 8 "&Wl-s. - 5 Minn. Colo. Kans . Mo. Okla. " .Tex. San Francisco District Los Angeles Area Calif. Oakland' San Francisco Portland Ore. Salt Lake City Utah Seattle Wash. + - 3 3 1 9 . . -10 -32 - 1 -11 - 2 z_2 - U — •8 - 4 0 - 4 - 6 0 11. - 6 - 2 + 2 + 2 — + 4 8 2 • 9 + 5 -11 - 9 + 3 +10 + 8 '+16 + 1 + 7 +11 + 3 - 3 r+31 +49 + 6 + 2 ±_3 + 8 - 6 - 3 • zJt Z_2 - 4 - 4 - 3 - 4 - 5 + 3 - 2 - 7 + 1 - 3 -13 + 7 -10 + 1 - 2 + 4 - 1 +14 r+ 8 + 1 r+ 8 + 6 +19 r+14 +21 r+14 + 4 +19 +10 +14 + 8 - 3 +19 ±_6 o + l +10 +18 +16 + 8 + 6 - 3 + 4 + 5 +17 + 8 +15 rj_2 - 1 + 6 + 3 + 3 + 6 0 ±_2 + 3 + 5 +10 - 4 + 2 - 4 zJ. -10 0 - 2 — - 6 6 2 8 6 6 8 ±_3 -.1 - 1 + 2 + 2 +16 o - 5 - 3 -14 - 3 -11 - 2 -12 - 5 6 2 8 4 ±_i + 6 +11 - 4 + 2 =_2 -12 - 9 + 9 +15 - 5 6 - 2 + 3 - 5 -1* -20 - 6 -11 - 2 +11 . 2 ' - 7 - 9 — 8 - 1 -15 Z_2 - 1 - 2 - 3 . -14 + 4 - 7 r—Revised. V The large increase shown for this week reflects in part the fact that sales in the corresponding week last year were reduced because of a curtailment in public transportation service in the City of Philadelphia.
@FedFRASER