View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS Ot THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
H.8b

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 20, 1956
WEEKLY DEPARTMENT STORE SALES - SELECTED CITIES AND AREAS

eral Reserve District, Area, and City

United States

Mass.
R. I.

New York District
Ke tropolitan Areas
Buffalo
New York-N.E.Mew Jersey
Newark
New York
Rochester
Syracuse

N. Y.
N.Y.-N.J.
IM.'J.
N.11Y.
it

Mass.
"

City

+10

+ U

+20

+ U

-19

- 8

+ 3
0

+21
+18
+28
+21
Vr*
+22
+19

0
e
- 5
+18
+ 9
+25

-22
-20
-26
-al
-m
-17
- k

-10
-11
- 8
+15
-15
-15
-1U

"

+26
0

-12

- h

+10
-10

+ 8

i
1
1
j
1
I

'

+ 5

"

"

+ 6
>10
+ h
+ ii

+.19

+11

-1U

+ 6

•. +12
+10
+ 6
+ 9
+12
+25

-15
-15
-ii
-17
r+ 1
r-11

-5
+ 8
+10
+ 5
+ h
+ b

+26

r+ 8

r-13

+ 3

+23
+10
+22
+29
| +26
1 +1U
| ,+16

+13
+ 5
+21
r+ r
+15
+ 5
+ 3

r- 1
-20
-10
r-lU
- 2
r-13
-11

+13
+39
+ 9
+ 1
0
- 2
0

+ 7

it
"
"

it
Vet.
V. ..V- .-Ohio

Digitized forPittsburgh
FRASER
Pa.


.

f + 23

+11

-11

+10

+ "2
+13
+. 7
+21
+ 6
+21
+ 7
+26
+ 8
+23
+12
+ 3
+ '9 . +18
- r
i •'13.
+ 7
! +18
1
+20
1 +30

r- 2
+ 6
r+ 9

-10
-11
- 5
-15
-It*
+ 2
-IS

- 8
+ 2
+ 9'
+ 7
+ 6
+ 2
+11
4-D.l

+11
Ky.
Ohio

a

-11

+20
+18
+15+18
+22.
+ 24

+ 2
^ + U
0 .
0
:+ 2
+ 5

+ 9
+ 9
+ 5
t 7
+10
+ 3
+10

-

+18
. +13

+ 3

Philadelphia District
Metropolitan Areas
Wilmington
Del.
N. J.
Trenton
Lancaster
Pa.
Philadelphia
Reading
ScranLon
Mikes-Barre—Hazleton .

Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Springfield
Toledo

+ 22

+ 7

Boston District
metropolitan Areas
Boston
Downtown boston
Suburban Boston
Cambridge
Lynn
Quincy
Lov/ell
Cities
Springfield
Providence

Cleveland District
Metropolitan.Areas
Lexington

Percentage change from, corresponding
period- a year ago (Eased on retail dollar amounts)
Jan.Week ending
Mcv.
Dec.2ii-"jDec. 311 Jan. 7 I Jan. m""

+ih

+19
r+10
r+l6
+

?

+ 6

-TV

- 6 "

+ 1

- 9

+19

WEEKLY r;E?AHTI.i£I'T STORE SALES - LRL-Ci'ED CITIES AND AKEAL (Continued)
Percentage cuange frca corresponding
period a year ago
(Based on retail dollar amounts)
Jan.- |
v.eek ending
Nov. | Dec. k?U-*|Dec. 311Jan. 7 j Jan. lq

/Federal Reserve District, Area, snd City

Richmond District
metropolitan Areas
V.asnington
Downtown Washington
Baltimore
Richmond
Atlanta District
Metropolitan Areas
. Birmingham. .
Jacksonville
.Atlanta
Augusta
" Hev< Orleans
Knoxville
Nashville
City ^

.
D. C.
"

Kd.
Va.

Ala.
Fla.
•Ga.
"

'

La.
T'enn.
"

Fla.

+ 9

+23

+ 7

r- 9

+
+
+
+

9

+27
+19
+ 21
+23

+13
+ 4
- 1
+ 3

• r- 8
r-19
r-10
r-12

0
- 8
- 3
+11

+10

+18

5'
h
h

+ 9
+ 6
+11
+ 2
+ 6
+12
+7

•ill.
Ind.
Mich.
V- is.

St. Louis District
Metropolitan Areas
Little Rock
Louisville
St. Louis
Memphis

Ark.
Ky.
Mo.
Term.

!

+ 3
+ 8

Chicago District
Metropolitan Areas
Chicago
Indianapolis
. Detroit
Milwaukee

r+16
+20
+21 .
+17
+20
| +19
+19
+ 9.

| + 25

+ 5
!
+ 7
j
+13 ' ,
+ 2
j

Minneapolis
• St. raul
Duluth-Superior




Minn.
Minn. ^ \,is. :

r- 5

.+ 8

- 9
- 9
r-10
-11
r+21
- 8

+ 10
+ 9
+ h
- 5
+ 8
0
+ 7

- 2

+ 1

+ k

+18

- 9

+ 3

+12
+21
+25
+22

-12
-11
- 7
- 8

0
+ 3

-2k

+

k

+ 6

t +29

+12

r- 9

+11

+ 1
+
6
+ 6
+ 5

i
,
j
i

+22
+19
+3M
+24

+ 8
+ 2U
r+10
r+ 9

-12
- 7
-10

+13
+1U
+11
+ 7

!

161

—

:

+ 9
+12
+18
+ 5
+ 6
+11
+16
+13

tM

Minneapolis District
Cities

+ 2a
+ 25
+25
+24

0

+

T

2

+ 2

j +16
! +17
1 +19

-

k

z £ - .

- 5

+10

— 6
- 3
+ 4

- 8
-10
+ 2

+12
+ 7
+12

H.Bb

Page 3
WEEKLY DEPARTi.'IENT STORE SAULS - SELECTED CITIES AND ARt,AS (Continued)

Federal Reserve District, Area> and City

Kansas City District
Metropolitan Areas
Denver
Topeka
michita
St. Joseph
Albuquerque
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
City
Kansas City
Dallas District
Metropolitan Areas
Dallas
El Paso
Fort Worth
Houston
San Antonio
San Francisco District
Metropolitan Areas
Los Angeles
Downtown Los Angeles
Vi est side Los Angeles
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco-Oakland
San Francisco City
Oakland City
San Jose
Portland
Salt Lake City
Seattle
Spokane
Taccma

Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago
(based on retail dollar amounts)
\iieek ending
Jan.Nov.
Dec.2U~" |Dec. 31 j Jan. 7 I Jan. 14 ~
+19

Colo.
Kans.
i "
Mo.
N. Mex.
Okla.
"

+15
+ 6
+13
+ 8
+12
' +12

+ 3

- . M

r+28
+ 5
+11
+ 3.

r+2U
+23.
+15
+1U .
+22
+19
+23

-

9

11

"
"

Calif.

+10
+ 9
+ 9
+ 7
+ 7

+ 6
0
+ 6
+ 5
+ 5
+ 8
+ 4
+ 2
+12

Ore.
Utah
i«ash.
"
"

+ 5
+12
+ 6
+ 7
+11

.+19
+21
+22

+19
+16

.

- 5
- 5
r- 5

+lii
+ 7
+ 3
+13

-18

-ll

+11

-21

+ 2

rlh

- 1

+11

-12

+ -9-

+ 7
+ 4
+18
r+11

-12

+ U
+ 3
+12
+1k
+12

+29
+ 9

+20 ,

Tex.
"

+

2

+15

Mo.

h

-10

+22

. +18

+ 9

- +17
+15
+18
+15
+20
+17
+15
+19
+15
+19
+18
+18
+17
+16

+ 4
r- 1
r+ k
+11;
r+23
r+lu
+16
r+13
r+11
+11
+ 3
+12
+ 3
+ h

-13
- 1
-11
-20

-16

-

-23
-17

- 4

-11

- 9
-17
-16
—18

- 5
-19
-14
-19
- 7
- 6

2

- 1
+ 1
0
+ k
+ 3
+ 7
- 1
+ 9
+ 9
+ 3
+14

+22

r—itevised.
->«-—Daua not available.
—The large increases shown for this week reflect in part the fact that this year
Christmas fell on Sunday and the week therefore included six days of heavy preChristmas shopping as compared with five days last year v/hen Christmas fell on
Saturday.