The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM February. 29, H.ll 1952 DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Based on Dollar Amounts) Percentage change from corresponding period a year ago Month of Jan.26 Feb. 2 Feb. 9 Feb.l6 Feb.23 Dec. II Federal Reserve District and city' h - 8 - 6 -12 + 1 - 2 •• 0 -10 + 9 —toi - U +31 - 9 +11 + 8 -11 - h ThO - 6 - 9 + 3 -10 -13 -20 -15 -17 ' + 2 -li; -16 -20 -16 -17 -11 -13 - 7 + 6 + 9 -10 - il - 6 -12 -13 - 2 -111 - 9 + U - 7 -16 + 2 r- 7 - 7 -15 -10 -13 - 3 -10 -12 -17 -li; =15' i_5 + 6 - k - 7 - 5 r%3 -7 +15 +16 +28 +10 +65 + 6 +12 • + 6 - 6 - 8 + 2 -19 - 6 -15 -lh UNITED STATES + 5 - 1 Boston District lie./ Huven Boston Lowell-Lawrence Springfield Providence + 2 + 1 •ru .+ 2 + 2 + 1 - 2 -17 . -13 -18 -13 -13 -20 — 3 =-5 Conn. Masso " R.I. + 3 - 2 + 5 0 New York District Nev-ark Buffalo New York Rochester Syracuse N.J. N.Y. " " " + + + + + + Philadelphia District Philadelphia Pa. + h + 3 Cleveland District Akron Cincinnati Cleveland •Columbus Toledo Erie Pittsburgh Ohio " " " " Pa. " + 8 +10 + 1 + 8 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 7 Richmond District Washington Baltimore D.C. Md. + 6 + Ala. Fla. ." Ga. " • La. Tenn. + h + 2 + 9 + 7 + 1 + 21 + 1 + 2 + u i + 2 | + 7 ! + 2 I - 3 i +17 j + 7 ' j + 8 , Atlanta District Birmingham Jacksonville Miami Atlanta Augusta New Orleans Nashville Chicsgo D"strict Cnica£0 Indianapolis Detroit Milwaukee • 11 6 T 6 5 7 8 + 5 - 2 5 2 6 k 1 — -15 - 3 -lb - 3 -13 -2 -16 -10 +10 0 -15 -U • + 1 • j+ 2 + 7 j -21 > 1 | i k - 2 + 8 + 5 + h +2 + 111. Ind. Mich. Yv'is. + + 7 0 j -11 - 7 -15 - 8 -12 + 3 - 9 -12 +19 + 6 —18 -13 -11 -17 j -16 -11 ! + +19 +12 - 9 • -i: -17 u -13 — 5 -16 - 5 -16 -15 -15 -12 -10 - ? , - 7 -13 -22 + 3 r-11 + b2 + 2 -11 +11 +30 -11 -10 - 8 +16 +27 +218 - 3 - 8 + h +10 +3o - 7 - 1 r- 6 -11 -15 + 2U +15 +17 r- 7 -12 • -lit - 2 : - 7 -8. ' =T - Z± - k - ' - 5 -12 -lb -10 + 2 - 8 -10 - 6 -10 - 9 - 5 -20 + 4 -13 -19 -17 -19 -22 -21 e Page 2 H.ll DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Continued) percentage change frc3m corresponding period a yezir ago Jan.- Month of Jan.26 Feb. 2 Feb. 9 [Feb.16 Feb.23 Nov. Dec. Federal Reserve District^ and city St. Louis District Little Rock Louisville St. Louis Area . Memphis Minneapolis District ' Minneapolis St. Paul Duluth-Superior Kansas City District Denver Y.ichita •Kansas 'City St, Joseph Oklahoma City Tulsa Dallas District Dallas El Paso Fort Worth Houston San Antonio San Francisco District Los Angeles Area Dov.-ntov.Ti Los Angeles Y.-estside Los Angeles Oakland San Diego San Francisco Portland Salt -Lake City Seattle Spokane Ark.' Ky. Mo. Tenn. Minn. "aY.is. Colo. Kan s. Mo. Okla. " Tex. +k 0 0 - $ - 1 " I =TS - 2 0 -33 - 8 + 3 + 3 +15 + k * l - h + 2 + 5 + 1 + 2 + 2 +15 + 1 + Calif. Ore. Utah "i.asn. -Ik + 2 0 + 2 + 2 + 3 k — 0 - 1 +• 2 + 6 + 5 + 2 + 7 + 6 + 5 - 2 + 2 + 3 0 + + • + -17 -13 -15 -22 1 1 6 U +24 +36 +36 +18 +67 - 6 -13 + 9 - 7 - 8 r- 5 r-g -14 + i -ii -10 + 1 -17 -11 - 9 + 2 - 3 - 3 0 + 6 -12 - 6 r+ 2+10 -21 - 8 ~~0 + k + -12 -19 -15 - 8 - 2 + h + 5 + 2 + 6 + 2 +10 + 5 +29 - 7 +36 .-19 -10 - 3 +18 -12 + 8 - +53 +38 - 9 + + + + + - -13 -13 -16 - 9 -14 + 6 - 9 -16 -16 -12 -26 2 1 ' 1 9 2 5 8 ii + 1 + 1 - k ii +10 + 5 -15 -23 - 3 - 9 -23 -22 -12 -k - k k - k + + 5 +10 + 2 + 6 -12 -12 - 9 -14. -14 -16 -15 -11 - 1 + 3 r+ 4 - 7 - 1 +11 +12 +13 +27 -13 -19 - 2 -10 -21 -17 - 8 -12 - 9 - 8 - 2 r+13 +11 +11 +12 +11 + 6 - 9 -10 - 2 -11 -11 - 9 -11 . -10 -15 - 7 -15 -ii -15 -16 - 9 -11 -15 - 5 -10 - 7 - 6 -11 -14 - 8 - 8 - 9 z? -13 - 2 -13 - 3n -20i - .8 -12 -12 - 9 -Ik -19 -10 - 8 -16 - k - k - k r—Revised. Data not available. 1/ The decrease reflects in part the fact that sales this week were reduced because . of a curtailment in public transportation service in the City of San Francisco
@FedFRASER