The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM February 26, 1949 H.ll '; • TDEmTIENT-Srp^E; -SALES-, • iBY • ClfflES •••Percentage change from corves}jonding' . ', period a year ago (value J a n . - •Month--ofDecember Jan.22 Jan.29 Feb: 5" Feb .12 Feb.19 Nov. Federal Reserve d l ' s t r i c S and c i t y : UNITED:STATES Boston-. D i s t r i c t New Haven Boston Springfield .. Providence : • New York D i s t r i c t Newark• -.Buffalo . *•'; • New York - Rochester • Syracuse Richmond D i s t r i c t Washington Baltimore '7 . Conn. ivla6s . + 2 ; ' * 2 + 3 . R.I, : * 2- . + s" , N.J • . ,N.Y. ti ' " « ii ' • J J 4" .. +M + 5 • Ohio • . » . ' " V/Pa. •- • D»C. M. ';... +?2 "~0 *,3. , +-3,+ 3 + 9 •- • +~7 + 7 . + 9 „ +12 +10 + 9' 1 1 + 6 + 1 + 2 + + 9 +12 + 8 +1'2 + 7 Chicago D i s t r i c t Chicago Indianapolis Detroit Milwaukee 111. Ind. • Mich. Wis. + 7 + 5 + 4 + 8 •KLO + 6 •0 + 2 3 Ala, • Fla. Ga. ,-La. ' Term. + 6 . * 1 •" - 7 . ".-J ' +11 + r - 3 - 3 - 8 -19" . .+ 1 : - 7 -10 — ' - 4 +16 - 2 - 2 +12/ -13 '^14 + .4 +•13 0 +21 . , - 1 5 • ..«14 . 9 - 7 *17' " v 1 ' * 2 0 + 6 .0 + 3 + 1 14 + 6 ' + 5 . + *10 + 7 Atlanta D i s t r i c t Birmingham ' Miami" Atlanta New Orleans ; Nashville f +X ' ; ' Philadelphia D i s t r i h Pa. Philadelphia Cleveland D i s t r i c t Akron Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus .Toledo Pittsburgh ; + : -10 + 3 ;1 7 r+ 2 r-10 +- 9 + 1 +•13 +- 4 +12 +• 7 .. - 1 +35 - 4 - 5 -11 +16 - 1 +18 - 5 0 - 8 + 9 -7 -12 - 7 ; >;9 -16 +TcT + 9 +::% +10 -• : 8 • •' • - - 4 -4 7 * - —•.trr5 - 8 r- 6 + 1 -'8. -15 ' r - 7 r+ 2 r+ 1 -L0 ; ; i + 6 0 TIF •TT - 7 -2 +14 -14 * 1. + 3 + 3 + 7 +17" + 1 +10 +24 + 7 - 7 -13" - 5 .. • 6 +10 — .8 +26 - 8 +12 -10 -10 -13 + 2 - 4 -10 + - + 1 0 + 4 + 3 + 6 - 1 +11 ! + 2 + 3 + 2 -46* - 1... K ^ 7 ::: + 2 +17 + 1 • + s - 6 . + 5- • +11 > 9 " + 3 . r 7 +12 - 3. " +g? .+ 4 -21 - 8 r r + 1 , + 4 + 5;:.. ' +13 -2 ' +17 - 7 rl3" . +.3" - 6 : - e 5 3 7 4 5 + 1 —0 +•• 3 + 8 - 6 r'6 -14 -10 - 3 - 4 - 4 -•5 ' - 4 — ' - 9 - 2 — T.1 -13 +28 -21 - 7 — 6 w3 - 6 • Page 2 H.ll . DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Continued) .Federal Reserve d i s t r i c t ... and c i t y . S t . Louis d i s t r i c t . L i t t l e Rock Louisville S t . Louis Memphis Minneapolis D i s t r i c t Minneapolis S t . Paul .Duluth-Superior Kansas City D i s t r i c t Denver Wichita Kansas City S t • Joseph Oklahoma City Tulsa Dallas D i s t r i c t Dallas Fort Worth . Houston . San Antonio San Francisco D i s t r i c t Los Angeles Area Oakland San Francisco Portland ' Salt Lake City Seattle Ark-. Ky.Tenn. Minn. "&Wis. Colo. Kans . Mo, Okla. Tex, Calif, Ore. Utah Wash. Percentage change from corresponding * - • -period-a year ago (value) ' J 6 n , - Month of Feb ,19 Feb.12 Feb. 5 Jan,29 Jan,22 Nov; " December + 6 0 • +T . + 6 +- 4 +10 +• 7 . - 4 . + 6 + 4 + 7 + 8 + 3 +11 +- 6 + . + + 2 1 4 4 - 7 + 4 + 4 -16 +35 + 7 +54 + 4+- 6 -112 + 3 -18 T~3 - 6 -15 -26 :36 -20 + 3 + 6 - 1 - 2 - 5 - 1 +18 -17 - 3 - 7 + 4 .+ 2 -14 - 9 -15 - 9 5 0 1 7 . + 3 4 + 6 8 0 2 + 2 3 + 4 - 7 - 1 0 -13 -14 -12 - 9 -14 + 1 + 3 - 7 -19 ' -10 -10 -10 -11 - 1 -1.6 -16 - 6 +10 + 4 + 7 +23 + 8 + 2 — +13 +14. + 1 +13 +22 - 8 + 2 - 2 . -10 - 7 (Not a v a i l a b l e f o r publication). - 7 +~3 + 2 -18 - 2 -20 +- 2 - 1 +10 +11 + 6 - 2 - 2 " - 6 + 7 0 +14 - 2 + + ' + + + + - 2 + 4 *• 7 . . — 6 • + 8 • — +21 + 4 - 1 +•11 +14 -10 + 9 ' — 8 —6 +15 +15 - 5 +17 + 6 - 4 -11 . -21 - 9 - 8. r+ 9 • - 8 +18 -10 +15 - 4 + 3 - 8 - 8 - 8 -11 -12 - 5 - 8 -11 -25 - 6 - 8 6 - 4 - 2 -17 -17 - 3 -Revised-. The large decrease shown f o r t h i s week r e f l e c t s i n p a r t the f a c t t h a t s a l e s were •- reduced because of a curtailment in public t r a n s p o r t a t i o n service i n the City of P h i l a d e l p h i a . ' . . . ** Data not a v a i l a b l e . * I
@FedFRASER