View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
*11

•

February 17, 1950
DEPARTMENT STORE SALES,' BY CITIES
(Based .on .Dollar Amount.s) .

Federal -Reserve district.
and city

Percentage change from'corresponding
.. ;
period a year ago
Jan.- Month of
Jan.li; Jan. 21 J an . 28Feb. h Feb, 11
Nov.
Dec.

UNITED STATES
Boston District
New Haven
... Boston
Springfield
• Providence
New York District
Newark
Buffalo
New York
Rochester
Syracuse

-

Conn.
Mass.
"

R.I.
N.J.
N„Y.
"
"

Philadelphia District
Philadelphia
Pa.
Cleveland District
Akron
. Ohio
"
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Toledo
Erie
Pa.
Pittsburgh
Richmond District
Washington
Baltimore

D.C.
Md.

- 3'

•- h

—

. + 6
- 2
+ 8
. +.6
+ 3

+
+ 9
- 1
+10 • +
+ 2" . * 5

1
2
h
h
8

+ 1
-iH
* 2
- 9
- U

0
- 3
TE
r-5
+ 1
+13
- 2 r- 6
+ U
* 5
* 5 ";+7

- 6

0
• - 5
- 6

- 3
- 1
0

0
-15
-13

- 7
^7
- 3
- 8
- 8
- 5

- 3

- 9

-

•

-12
- 9
- 7
- 8

0
S
. - 3
. - 1
+ 6
0

- 5

- 2 ;
^TJ .

- 6

- 1

- k
h
- 3
- 2

- 8
• - 7
8
1
- 6
- 5
• — 7 •• - b
• - 8
- 5
+~T
- 7

Atlanta District
Birmingham
Miami
Atlanta
New Orleans
Nashville

Ala.
Fla.
Ga.
La.
Tenn,

*
-

Chicago District
Chicago
Indianapolis
Detroit
Milwaukee

111.
Ind.
Mich.
Wis.

- 7
T-5
- li
- 8
- 7




+ 2

2

- 3

-

5
3
7
1
8
h
h

+ 8
+ 7

0 ' r- 1
+ 1
+ 6
+23
- 2
r+ 3
+ 2
- 7
- 2
- 9
+10
- 1
- 6
- li

- 5

- 7

+
+
+

-6
-22
- 3
- 6
- 3
-.8

'"+ 2
- 3
+
+ 3
+10
- 6

+1
+12
+ 6
+ 2

- 5
ru
- 2
- 5
-12

+ 1
TT
+ 3
+ 1
- 2

+ 2

- 1

« 7
0
- li

+1
- 7

li
5
3
2

- 3
- 3
- 2
- 5
-5

- 7

.-•1

u

1
7
2
1

r 0
r ~

.0
+ 2 •
- k

- h
3
6
1
8

•' - 3
.- 5
. T-&
+ 8
- 7
+ 1
- 1
* 1
- 8
- 7< ,
- 8
- 9 . ;r/3 - - 8
- 6

0
0

• -

- 1
- h
-11
- 2
+ 2
- 7

+ U
— X
- 3
+~B •;
0
—
* h
- 5 • - li
+

n

>11
+T
' 0
+19
+1U
+ 8

u

+_k
0
+ 1
+10
- 3
+ 1
0
0
+ 2
r li

Page1 *

H. 11.
DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Continued)
Federal Reserve district
and city

St,. Louis District
-•Little Rock " " '
Louisville
St. Louis
x
Menphis

•- 6
Ark.
Ky.
Ho.
Tenn. .

Minneapolis District
Minneapolis
Minn.
St. 'Paul
Duluth-Superior
"ffiVis.
Kansas City District
Denver
Wichita
Kansas City
St. Joseph
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
Dallas District
Dallas
Fort Worth
Houston
San Antonio

Percentage cuange from corresponding
period a year ago
Jan„- Month- of
Jan. lb Jan„21 Jan.28 Feb.
Dec,
Nov. .

Colo.
Kans.
Ho. ^
Okla.
"

'

TS

"

San Francisco District
Los Angeles Area
Calif.
Oakland
• San Francisco
Portland
Ore.
Salt Lake City
Utah
Seattle
. Wash.




-• 1'
ru
0
0
2

- 5
- 7
- 3
-

6
3
9
6

+ 1

• - 3
+ 1
- k
- 5
- l
-11
- 5

TU

+ 2
- 1

- 9:

+ 2
0
- 1
0
+ 1
+ 2

*.9

r+12
+ 1
+12
+32
+1U
+35
+12

- 6

+ 2

+ 7

- 7
- 7
- 2
' -10.
- 7
- 7

Tex.
"

.
'

- 3
- 9
- 5
-7
-10
- 5
- 2
-10
- -5
- 2

-15
. -17

zJ
- 2
- 7
- 9
- 8
- 1
-15

+ Urr
0
+16
0
+18
+ 3

+12
- 3
+11
+ 5
- 1
+li9
+2U

z_5
- 3
-lii
- 3
-11
- 2
- -12

3
3
8
3
3

-lk

0

- 9

- 5'

-

h

0
1
1
6
2

-12
- 8
-16
-12
-23

- 6
+ 1
-30
+ 8 • +
-10 • -

8
b
8
1
5

•

+16
+ 1

- 2

h

+15
-a
+-13

- U
+ L

- 2
0
- U
- 6
0

-15

-•

Feb. 11

r^lO
-32
- 1
-11
- 2
Z_Z
-10
0
- 2

+11

+
*
+
+
+

TH
+ k

+
+
+

• A . +19
+31
+ 5
- 2
+ 3
+28
+lli
+ 1
- 3

k

r+18
TB
r+38
- 1
+15

r- 2
r-12
r- 9
+ 9
+15
0
+ 3
- 2
+ 3
-20
+11
- 2

+10

+~E

r+ 1
+ 2
- 1
+11*
+ 6
0
+ 1
+10
+18
+16 .
+ 8

.