The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM *11 • February 17, 1950 DEPARTMENT STORE SALES,' BY CITIES (Based .on .Dollar Amount.s) . Federal -Reserve district. and city Percentage change from'corresponding .. ; period a year ago Jan.- Month of Jan.li; Jan. 21 J an . 28Feb. h Feb, 11 Nov. Dec. UNITED STATES Boston District New Haven ... Boston Springfield • Providence New York District Newark Buffalo New York Rochester Syracuse - Conn. Mass. " R.I. N.J. N„Y. " " Philadelphia District Philadelphia Pa. Cleveland District Akron . Ohio " Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Toledo Erie Pa. Pittsburgh Richmond District Washington Baltimore D.C. Md. - 3' •- h — . + 6 - 2 + 8 . +.6 + 3 + + 9 - 1 +10 • + + 2" . * 5 1 2 h h 8 + 1 -iH * 2 - 9 - U 0 - 3 TE r-5 + 1 +13 - 2 r- 6 + U * 5 * 5 ";+7 - 6 0 • - 5 - 6 - 3 - 1 0 0 -15 -13 - 7 ^7 - 3 - 8 - 8 - 5 - 3 - 9 - • -12 - 9 - 7 - 8 0 S . - 3 . - 1 + 6 0 - 5 - 2 ; ^TJ . - 6 - 1 - k h - 3 - 2 - 8 • - 7 8 1 - 6 - 5 • — 7 •• - b • - 8 - 5 +~T - 7 Atlanta District Birmingham Miami Atlanta New Orleans Nashville Ala. Fla. Ga. La. Tenn, * - Chicago District Chicago Indianapolis Detroit Milwaukee 111. Ind. Mich. Wis. - 7 T-5 - li - 8 - 7 + 2 2 - 3 - 5 3 7 1 8 h h + 8 + 7 0 ' r- 1 + 1 + 6 +23 - 2 r+ 3 + 2 - 7 - 2 - 9 +10 - 1 - 6 - li - 5 - 7 + + + -6 -22 - 3 - 6 - 3 -.8 '"+ 2 - 3 + + 3 +10 - 6 +1 +12 + 6 + 2 - 5 ru - 2 - 5 -12 + 1 TT + 3 + 1 - 2 + 2 - 1 « 7 0 - li +1 - 7 li 5 3 2 - 3 - 3 - 2 - 5 -5 - 7 .-•1 u 1 7 2 1 r 0 r ~ .0 + 2 • - k - h 3 6 1 8 •' - 3 .- 5 . T-& + 8 - 7 + 1 - 1 * 1 - 8 - 7< , - 8 - 9 . ;r/3 - - 8 - 6 0 0 • - - 1 - h -11 - 2 + 2 - 7 + U — X - 3 +~B •; 0 — * h - 5 • - li + n >11 +T ' 0 +19 +1U + 8 u +_k 0 + 1 +10 - 3 + 1 0 0 + 2 r li Page1 * H. 11. DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Continued) Federal Reserve district and city St,. Louis District -•Little Rock " " ' Louisville St. Louis x Menphis •- 6 Ark. Ky. Ho. Tenn. . Minneapolis District Minneapolis Minn. St. 'Paul Duluth-Superior "ffiVis. Kansas City District Denver Wichita Kansas City St. Joseph Oklahoma City Tulsa Dallas District Dallas Fort Worth Houston San Antonio Percentage cuange from corresponding period a year ago Jan„- Month- of Jan. lb Jan„21 Jan.28 Feb. Dec, Nov. . Colo. Kans. Ho. ^ Okla. " ' TS " San Francisco District Los Angeles Area Calif. Oakland • San Francisco Portland Ore. Salt Lake City Utah Seattle . Wash. -• 1' ru 0 0 2 - 5 - 7 - 3 - 6 3 9 6 + 1 • - 3 + 1 - k - 5 - l -11 - 5 TU + 2 - 1 - 9: + 2 0 - 1 0 + 1 + 2 *.9 r+12 + 1 +12 +32 +1U +35 +12 - 6 + 2 + 7 - 7 - 7 - 2 ' -10. - 7 - 7 Tex. " . ' - 3 - 9 - 5 -7 -10 - 5 - 2 -10 - -5 - 2 -15 . -17 zJ - 2 - 7 - 9 - 8 - 1 -15 + Urr 0 +16 0 +18 + 3 +12 - 3 +11 + 5 - 1 +li9 +2U z_5 - 3 -lii - 3 -11 - 2 - -12 3 3 8 3 3 -lk 0 - 9 - 5' - h 0 1 1 6 2 -12 - 8 -16 -12 -23 - 6 + 1 -30 + 8 • + -10 • - 8 b 8 1 5 • +16 + 1 - 2 h +15 -a +-13 - U + L - 2 0 - U - 6 0 -15 -• Feb. 11 r^lO -32 - 1 -11 - 2 Z_Z -10 0 - 2 +11 + * + + + TH + k + + + • A . +19 +31 + 5 - 2 + 3 +28 +lli + 1 - 3 k r+18 TB r+38 - 1 +15 r- 2 r-12 r- 9 + 9 +15 0 + 3 - 2 + 3 -20 +11 - 2 +10 +~E r+ 1 + 2 - 1 +11* + 6 0 + 1 +10 +18 +16 . + 8 .