View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

5u

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
August 4, 1950
DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES
(Based on Dollar Amounts)
Federal Reserve district
and city
UNITED STATES

- 2

Boston District
New Haven
Boston
Springfield
Providence

Conn.
Mass•
"
R.I.

Nov vork District
iK/ark
Buffalo
New York
Rochester
Syracuse

N.J.
N.Y,
"
"
"

Philadelphia District
Philadelphia
Pa.
Cleveland District
Ohio
Akron
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Toledo
Pa.
Erie
Pittsburgh
"
Richmond District
D.C.
Washington
Baltimore
Md.
Atlanta District
Birmingham
Miami
1
Atlanta
New Orleans
Nashville
Chicago District
Chicago
Indianapolis
Detroit
Milwaukee

Jan*'
May

^2
- 7
- 2

- 5
- 4
zJt

- 3
- 6

- 5
- 2
- 2

+ 4
0
- 2
+ 2
- 3

fi

+
+

1
l
2
7

- 5
0
- 3
- 6
- 6
- 5
- 4

+ 6
+ 4
+ 1
+ 4
+ 1
+ 4
+14
+ 7

- 2

ft

- 5

111.

- 2

- 3
- 4
- 1

L

*l J u l y 8 *

+10

+8

+25

+46

+42

=11
- 4
-17
-12
+ 3

+12

+ii
+ 7
+ 1

+13
+20
+14

+32
+39
+36
+36

+36
+48
+30
+38
+67

r +32
r+42
+39
r +28
+42
+52

+48
+30
+38
+48
+42

°J^e°

0

±_2
- 3
+ 4
+ 5
- 1
+ 3




M

+ 6
+ 3

Ala,
Fla.
Ga.
La#
Tenn.

Ind.
Mich.
Wis .

Percentage change from corresponding
period a year ago

+ 3

feo
+12
+ 4
- 1
+ 8
+_6
- 1
+ 4
+10
+ 6

n
%1
— 2
+ 6
+ 3

+11

-_7
- 7
+ 6
-10
+ 3
-14

1

n

+ 6

+12
+ 1
+ 7
+12
+14

n
n

+11
+ 9
+ 8
+ 3
+26
+11

Jul

y 15 M y

n
+22
+14

+16
+25

n

#

r+35
+31

+14
+16
+13
+22
+23
+24

+32
+54
+22
+39
+30
+41
+46
+33

+69
+51
+37
+47.
+38
+46

+ 7

+27
+25
+36

+20
+ 5
+40

-0
- 2

22jJuly 2^

0

+ 2

+19
+ 6
+15
+18

+12
- 1
+21
+24
-11
+ 5

+35
+20
+35
+23

r+60
+68
+46
+52
r+51 .
. r+52

+11
+ 8
+10
+17
+ 8

+11
+ 3
+10
+20
+ 6

+27
+31
+23

+59
+35

I

+55
+52
+33
+29

+39
+50
+45

H.ll

Page 2
DEPARTMENT STORE SALES, BY CITIES (Continued)

Percentage change from corresponding
Federal Reserve district
period' a year ago
and city
I Jan.- M
July 1
°Jund
l
* | J u l y 8 * J u l y 15 July 22 Jjuly 29
May .
St. sLouis District
Little Rock
Louisville
St. Louis
Memphis

Ark.
Ky.
Mo.
Tenn.

rf

0
- 3
» 1

+12

+ 1
+7
+11

+2

- 3
+ 2

+1

m

H

0

Minneapolis District
Minneapolis
+ 2
Minn .
St. Paul
"
- 1
Duluth-Superior
"&Wis. - 5

+ 7
+ 6
+ 4

Kansas City District
Denver
Colo.
Wichita
Kans •
Kansas City
Mo.
St. Joseph
Oklahoma City
Okla.
11
Tulsa

+
+
+
+

Dallas District
^-Dallas
Fort Worth
Houston
San Antonio

Tex.
"

San Francisco District
Los Angeles Area Calif.
Oakland
"
11
San Francisco
Portland
Ore•
Salt Lake City
Utah
Seattle -Wash.

rJL
- 2
- 5
- 2
- 5
+ 5
- 1
+_6
+ 5
+ 9
- 2
+11
=-2
- 3
- 2

+ 1
-3
- 2
+ 1

.

+2 '
2
5
2
5
8

± 2

+13
- 3
+ 4
+13
±2
0
+ 1
0
- 1
+ 9
+ 5

.

+n
+19
- 3
+ 8
+ 6
+19
+ 6

-2

+10
+19
+12
+15

+2

+23
+12
±10

+ 9

+ 6
+ 6
+ 3
+15
+12

ft

+15
' + 5
+14

+27

+18

+33
+25
+18

+47
+42
+64

+50
+37
+41

m

+22
+24
•+23

±41
+43
+38
+35

±62

+ 5
+17
+17
- 5
" + 8
+24

±25
+29
.+44
+40
+ 5
+37
+46

r+60
+59
+54
+71
+35
+51
+70

±42
+42
+58
+42
+13
+38
+58

+21
+14
+19
+25
+11

±29
+33
+35
+41
+48

+71
+75
r+62
+56
+82

+49
+45
+44
+46
+55

+20
+19
+20
+12
+22
+ 9
+15

±22
+34
+37
+30
^"44
+24
+29

r+62
+65
+62
+54
+56
+51
+60

• ±ir:
• +22
• +11
+10

+12

+U2
+hh

+32

38"
+47
+29
£
+42

In using year ago comparisons for these weeks, allowance should be made for
differences in the number of trading days. For stores in some cities the week
ending July 1 contained one more trading day than in the corresponding week
last year and conversely the week ending July 8 contained one less trading day.