View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL

RESERVE

statistical
f*AL

release

**

FOR

IMMEDIATE
MARCH 2 4 ,

BANK
(DOLLAR

DEBITS,
AMOUNTS

DEBITS

1969

1970

FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY

TOTAL
233
CENTERS
8,833.1
8,723.7
8,883.8
9 , 1 4 7 . 6
9,385.2
9,242.8
9,430.1
9 , 7 3 7 . 3
9,527.0
9,484.5
9,560.4
9,547.5
9 , 7 5 2 . 0

FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY

TOTAL
233
CENTERS
131.5
133.0
133.6
134.5
138.7
134.7
134.4
134.9
134.2
134.9
140.8
134.4
136.1

FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY

TOTAL
233
CENTERS
67.2
66. 0
66.6
68.2
68.7
67.6
70.1
72.3
70.8
70.5
69.4
69.4
72.1

D E P O S I T S , AND D E P O S I T T U R N O V E R
I N B I L L I O N S , SEASONALLY A D J U S T E D )

TO

DEMAND

1970

1970

NOTE:

1.




6

1

OTHERS

2,047.2
1,974.3
2,028.9
2,083.2
2,164.4
2,244.4
2,242.8
2,249.6
2,254.7
2,224.8
2,212.9
2,277.4
2,283.4

OF MONTH)
LEADINf CENTERS
NY
26.8
27.6
27.8
27.8
29.3
28.2
28.5
27.7
27.8
27.7
29.9
28.1
28.8

OF

ACCOUNTS

CENTERS

NY
3,929.8
3,882.8
3,902.0
4,097.6
4 , 1 5 5 . 7
3,908.6
4 , 1 4 8 . 4
4,311.5
4 , 1 2 7 . 6
4 , 2 0 7 . 5
4,198.2
4 , 0 5 4 . 0
4,232.1

TURNOVER

1969

DEPOSIT

LEADING

(END

1969

RELEASE

1970

6

1
OTHERS
30.6
30.6
30.6
31.5
31.6
30.8
30.7
30.9
31.0
31.1
32.5
31.1
31.0

TOTAL 2 3 2
CENTERS
( E X C L U D E S NY)

4,463.2

4,840.9
4,981.8
5,050.0
5,229.6
5,334.2
5,281.7
5,425.8
5,399.3
5,277.0
5,362.2
5,493.5
5,519.9

TOTAL 2 3 2
CENTERS
(EXCLUDES NY)
104.6
105.4
105.8
106.6
109.4
106.5
106.0
107.2
106.4
107.2
110.9
106.4
107.2

226
OTHER
CENTERS
2,856.1
2,866.6
2,952.9
2,966.8
3,065.2
3,089.8
3,038.9
3 , 1 7 6 . 3
3,144.7
3 , 0 5 2 . 2
3,149.3
3,216.1
3,236.5

226
OTHER
CENTERS
74.0
74.8
75.2
75.2
77.8
75.7
75.2
7 6 . 3
75.4
76. 1
78.4
75.2
76.2

DEMAND D E P O S I T S
LEADINf
NY
146.4
142.6
140.9
147.3
145.5
136.1
146.5
153.5
148.8
151.6
145.7
139.9
148.8

•—HfSrf 1 J f
CENTERS
6

1
OTHERS
66.9
64.5
66.3
67.1
68.6
71.8
72.9
73.0
72.9
71.7
69.6
71.6
73.5

TOTAL 2 3 2
CENTERS
(EXCLUDES NY)
46.9
46.1
47.2
47.5
48.4
49.4
49.7
50.9
50.6
49.4
49.2
50.6
51.7

OTHER
CENTERS
38.6
38.5
39.4
39.5
40.1
40.3
40.3
41.9
41.5
4 0 . 3
40. 8
41.9
42.7

DEMAND D E P O S I T A C C O U N T S ARE T H O S E O F I N D I V D U A L S , P A R T N E R S H I P S AND
C O R P O R A T I O N S AND O F S T A T E S AND P O L I T I C A L S U B D I V I S I O N S .
U . S . G O V E R N M E N T AND I N T E R B A N K A C C O U N T S A R E NOT I N C L U D E D .
B O S T O N , P H I L A D E L P H I A , C H I C A G O , D E T R O I T , SAN FRANC I S C O - O A K L A N D ,
AND L O S A N G E L E S - L O N G B E A C H S T A N D A R D M E T R O P O L I T A N S T A T I S T I C A L A R E A S .

BANK

DEBITS,

ENO-OF-MONTH

DEPOSITS,

D E B I T S T O DEMAN D D E P O S I T S
PERCENT CHANGE
FEBRUARY
1970
FROM
( M I L L I O N S OF
YEAR
MONTH
DOLLARS)
AGO
AGO
DISTRICT

NO.

1 -

WATERBURY
MAINE:
BANGOR*
LEWISTON-AUBURN
PORTLAND
MASSACHUSETTS:
BOSTON
BROCKTON
FALL RIVER
LAWRENCE- HAVERHILL
LOWELL
NEW B E D F O R D
PITTSFIELD
SPRINGFIELD-CHICOPEE-HOLYOKF
WORCESTER
HAMPSHIRE:
CONCORD*
MANCHESTER

RHODE I S L A N D :
PROVIDENCE-PAWTUCKET-WARWICK
VERMONT:
BURLINGTON*
DISTRICT
DISTRICT

NO.

NO.

2

-

I

TOTALS

NEW

NEW

JERSEY:
JERSEY CITY
NEWARK
PATERSON-CLIFT3N-P ASSAIC
YORK:
BINGHAMTON
BUFFALO
NEW YORK
ROCHESTER
SYRACUSE
UTICA-ROME
DISTRICT

DISTRICT

NO.

3

NO.
-

2

TOTALS

JERSEY:
ATLANTIC
TRENTON

CITY

P E N N S Y L V AN I A:
ALLENTOWN-EASTON-BETHLEHEM
ALTOONA
HAPRISBURG
JOHNSTOWN
LANCASTER
L FBANON*
PHIL ADELPHIA
READING
SCRANTON
WILKES-BARRE-HAZELTON
W I L L I AM S P O R T *
YORK
DISTRICT

TURNOVER
DE P O S I T S

aiNNUAL R A T E
TURNOVER

4ANGG

[F

FROM
MONTH
AGO

YEAR
AGO

45,802.1
8 ,366 . 2
2,009.4
5,389.1

-12.7
-9. 7
-13.0
—2 6 . 9

+8.2
- 8 . 5
+. 1
+26.0

7 40,229
250,970
81,773
168,042

- 7 . 8
—6 . 7
+.1
+5 . 2

- 5 . 7
- 7 . 6
- 1 . 8
+ 14.4

59.4
32.2
24.6
32.o

1,313.1
1,075.3
5,005.7

-14.9
-9.9
-14.2

+ 35.3
+5.7
+ 12.8

46,796
30,589
129,986

- 4 . 0
-2.7
- 6 . 7

+20.2
- 19.6
- 2 . 1

27.5
34.7
37.2

211,908.9
1,793.0
1.484.3
2,77 1.0
2,204.2
1,697.9
1,576.5
10,334.5
7.414.4

- 1 0 .8
-19.5
-15.5
- 1 4 . 9
- 7 .7
-11.2
-12.0
-12.8
-13.3

+.0
+5.0
+5.3
+ 3. 2
+ 23. 2
-1.0
—6 . 1
+1.6
+4.0

3,268,800
61,179
55,576
116 ,768
72,800
6 5 , 3 94
57,376
2^6,5%4
223,447

-1.0
- 4 . 2
+4. 8
- . 7
- 5 . 3
-1.8
- . 9
+ .0
-1.2

- 10.9
- 4 . 2
+6 . 9
+ 8. 1
- 2 . 2
- . 4
- 5 . 7
+2. 0
- 5 . 1

64.5
28.7
27.3
23 .6
29.4
25.7
27.3
34.8
33. 0

930.5
2,212.2

- 1 8 .3
-15.8

- 1 . 7
+3.7

40,809
56,4&6

+3 . 4
-1.5

+7 . 3
- 3 . 0

23.2
38.9

22,921.0

- 9 .6

S44,999

- 4 . 5

- 3 . 9

41.1

1 ,985.6

-16.2

70,983

+ .2

+1.7

28.0

- 2 . 3

—6. 8

52 .0

+ 10. 8

+6.1

- 1 1 . 7

+2.4

6,379,546

9,433.9
6 , 0 0 7 .2

+.0
- 8 . 8

+6 . 7
+ 10.3

295,061
248,937

-3. 7
+ .0

- . 9
+3.5

31.4
24.1

17,801.7
73,168.0
34,119.3

-10.3
+2.0
+6 . 3

+2.2
+6.1

+9.5
-1.5
+1 .4

-7.2
+1 . 1
+2.8

38.6
39.9

+ 13.2

482,564
1,818,669
I,066,807

4,570.0
40 ,4 1 6 . 1
4,232,147.4
25,474.0
16,984.0
5 ,774.4

—3 . 6
- 2 . 4
+4 . 3
-10.6
+.9
+2.0

+6.4
+7. 1
+7. 6
+9.7
+ 19. 3
+ 17.7

16 1 , 8 6 7
846,126
28,839,402
618,872
4 19, 540
169 ,582

+4. 1
+2.7
+2 . 7
- 4 . 0
+1.5
- . 8

+3 . 0
-1. 9
+ 7. 4
- 2 . 0
+6 . 9
+ .1

28.8
48 .4
148. 8
40.3
40.8
33

4,465,996.2

+4 . 3

+7. 7

34,967,427

+2 . 3

+6. 1

129.0

69,041.2

+11.7

+9. 1

485,695

- 2 . 5

- 1 3 . 6

140.3

3,037.9
2 1 ,904.6

-4.0
+20.9

+9.5
+20.6

143,688
406,927

+ .2
- 10.5

- 1 . 4
+4.6

21.2
50.8

- 3 . 1
7
+ 32.9
- 2 . 4
+7.5
+6. 8
+. 6
+ 5. 3
- . 9
+2.2
+6 . 6
+ 15. 5

26.2
21 .6
2 C. 9
21 . 7
24.3
2 1 .0
56. 9
26.2
25.8
23 .6
24.6
24.4

338,194.7

32.2

PHILADELPHIA

DELAWARE :
WILMINGTON
NEW

DEMAND
EBRUARY
1970
(THOUSANDS OF
DOLLARS)

YORK

CONNECTICUT:
BRIDGEPORT
S T AM F O R D
NEW

DEPOSIT

BOSTON

CONNECTICUT:
HARTFORD
NEW H A V E N
NEW L O N D O N - G R O T O N - N O R W I C H

NEW

AND

NO.

3

TOTALS

7.491.0
1 ,558.4
8,281.0
1,847.4
5,980.3
785 .9
256,546.1
7,596.9
3,909.7
4.840.1
1,376.3
6.865.2
401,062.0

295,043
73,255
403,379
86,464
245,033
39,210
4,540,324
296,639
152,577
208 ,67°

- 3 . 2
+2.1

-1 .4
+5 . 2
+ 14. 0
+7 . 2
+ 14.9
+9.1
+ 12. 4
+6.0
+2.0
+9. 8
+ 5. 6
+ 11. 1

56,643
295,277

+ 6. 5
+2.7
+3 . 8
+3 . 5
- . 8
+9. 5
+1 .4
+4.3
+1.1
+3.6
+2.4
+10.0

+2 . 4

+ 11.6

7,728, 833

+1.2

-

8 . 0
2.4
2 . 2
6.1
1.9
+. 1
+.1
-7.3
-1.7
+1.9

* C I T Y O N L Y ( O R ) N O T AN SMSA R U T R E P O R T E D ON A C O U N T Y B A S I S .
D E B I T S - S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T * 1 ) ANNUAL R A T C .
0 EM AND D E P O S I T S - E N D OF MONTH S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D F I G U R E S .
TURNOVER S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D A N N U A L RATE O F D E B I T S D I V I D E D BY
P R E C E D I N G M O N T H S S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D DEMAND D E P O S I T S




AVERAGE
FIGURE.

OF

CURRENT

+1.8

52.0

BANK

DEBITS,

END-OF-MONTH

DEPOSITS,

D E B I T S TO DEMAND D E P O S I T S
FEBRUARY
1970
P E R C E N T CHANGE
( M I L L I O N S OF
FROM
DOLLARS)
MONTH
YEAR
AGO
AGO
DISTRICT

NO.

4

-

DEPOSIT

DEMAND
FEBRUARY
1970
( T H O U S A N D S OF
DOLLARS)

TURNOVER
DEPOSITS
P E R C E N T CHANGE
FROM
MONTH
YEAR
AGO

ANNUAL RATE
O F TURNOVER

CLEVELAND

KENTUCKY:
LEXINGTON

+.4

4,022.2

OHIO:
AKRON
CANTON
CINCINNATI
C L E V EL AND
COLUMBUS
DAYTON
HAMI L T O N - M I D D L E T O WN
LIMA
LORAIN-ELYRIA
MANSFIELD
SPRINGFIELD
STEUBENVILLE-WEIRTON,
TOLEDO
YOUNGSTOWN-WARREN

W.

VA.

PENNSYLVANIA:
ERIE
PITTSBURGH
WEST

AND

VIRGINIA:
WHEELING

+3.1

165,045

+2.4

+3.3

24.7

+ .1
+1.5
+3 . 5
+1 . 2
+ 1.4
+ 3.9

+. 0
+3. 8

—6 . 2
+3 . 4
+3.5

48.3
35.5
56. 8
53.9
72.3
36.2
34.7
26.4
26.7
28.8
31.5
24.5
40.5
3 0.4

20,323.6
7.580.6
48,890.6
113,600.6
58,504.3
19,241.3
3.959.7
2,730.0
2,612.4
2.395.2
2.357.8
2,001.6
18,038.0
8.682.3

+ 11.8
- 2 . 1
+16 . 3
- 1 . 9
- 7 . 6
- 1 0 . 8
- 1 . 1
+3.1
-1.3
— 1.9

-12.2R
+5 . 0

421,508
215,398
875,495
2,121,412
814,863
542,352
113,234
106,711
99,80 3
83,563
77,436
79,112
453,387
290,799

5,494.8
158,711.5

+ 11.8
+8.2

+ 23.7
+ 17.0

186,151
2,653,936

+. 9
+ 8.1

124,508

+4 . 5

—. 9
+ 1.1
- 5 . 1
+.7

+ 29.8
+ 28.6
+4.1
+1 2 . 7
+35.1
+ 23.1
+2 7 . 3
+9.1R
+8.0
+ 23.5
- . 1
+7.2

- 1 . 6
+6.6
+3 . 8
+ .9
+7.1

— 11.6
- 2 . 6
+6 . 0
+2 . 6
- 5 . 3
+4.2R
+3 . 0
- 5 . 4
+4.6
+.8
+5.9R
- 3 . 8

+4.1
+10.9

29.7
62.2

2,961.7

- 9 . 7

+6.6

- 1 . 4

24.3

482 ,108 .0

+3.4

+ 15.3R

9 , 4 2 4 , 7 1 3

+3.7

+ 1.9R

52.0

D I S T R I C T OF COLUMBIA:
WASHINGTON

88,921,6

-2.1

+5.8

2,474,400

+2 . 7

+4.5

36.4

MARYL A N D :
BALTIMORE

61,292.0

- 8 .8

+5 . 7

1,423,152

+ 11.1

+3 . 9

45.3

NORTH C A R O L I N A :
ASHEVILLE
CHARLOTTE
DU RHAM
FAYETTEVILLE
GREENSBORO-HIGH
RALEIGH
WILMINGTON
WINSTON-SALEM

2,959.4
21,307.9
3,909.9
2,144.9
10,586.3
15,281.8
1,641.1
14,734.5

+ 1.3
- 1 . 6
+15 . 4
- 1 . 8
- 1 . 2
+5.5

83,418
420,381
91,132
56,159
215,160
247,810
50,577
192,869

+ .9
- 1 . 1
- 8 . 4
- 2 . 0
- 4 . 2
+3.3
+.4
+7.2

+4.0
+. 5

-2.0
+21.1

+8.2
+4.5
+ 16.2
+20.6
+ • OR
+ 27.2
+2.9
+36.0

- 6 . 9
+ 1.6
+3.6R
+ 14.2
+ 1.8
+4.5

35.6
50.4
41. 0
37.8
48.1
62.7
32.5
79.1

SOUTH C A R O L I N A :
CHARLESTON
COLUMBIA
GREENVILLE

4,073.3
11,652.6
7,069.1

+3.5
+12.4
+1.7

+9. 2
+20.0
+2.6

162,895
225,751
204,731

+ 2.1
+3.9
+1.9

+2. 5
+8.9
+5 . 0

25.3
52.6
34.9

VIRGIN IA:
LYNCHBURG
NEWPORT N E W S - H A M P T O N
NORFOLK-PORTSMOUTH
RICHMOND
ROANOKE

2,700.6
3,518.6
11,281.1
29,349.2
6,332.8

+4. 3
—6.1
—.6
-16.2
- 2 . 1

+ 34.0
+8.9
+ 12.3
+ 16.6
+ 14.4

83,104
115,132
378,661
621,737
151,359

+5.6
- 1 . 3
+1.2
+9.1
+4.4

+3.1
+ 1.0
+3.4
+ 9.2
+ 8.3

33.4
30.4
30.0
49.3
42.8

216,352
164,138

—1 . 6
+3 . 1

+7.0
-2. 9

33.5
23.9

+3.9

+4 . 5 R

41. 0

2
3
2
3
6
3

- 1 . 3
- 2 . 2
- . 9
+5.2
- 1 . 1
+7.4

39.1
21.0
28.7
32.7
2 8.1
24.3

-8 .6
- 1 0 . 3
- . 3
+.1
+ 12.2
- 2 . 7
+. 7

+ 13.4
+ 1.7
+20.2
+ 16.4
+ 5.1
- 2 . 0
+11.5
+ 28. 7

19.9
45.0
23.4
25 .8
27.8
32.2
31.6
15.9

DISTRICT
DISTRICT

WEST

NO.

NO.

5

-

4

TOTALS

RICHMOND

POINT

VIRGINIA:
CHARLESTON
HUNTINGTON-ASHLAND,
DISTRICT

DISTRICT

NO.

6

NO.
-

5

KY.

7,316.7
3,867.7

+8.5
+. 6

+6.8
+5.9

TOTALS

309,941.2

—2 .6

+9.9R

23,873.2
869.7
2,877.4
7 ,595.8
4,489.7
1,529.3

+6 . 9
+7 . 9
+3 . 3
+5. 8
- 6 . 4
+5.5

12,563.1
25,530.1
39,729.4
8,918.3
2,929.2
2,484.6
25,779.6
7,568.6

- . 3
+ 16.5
-10.3
- 3 . 3
+.5
+7.9

7,578,918

ATLANTA

ALABAMA:
BIRMINGHAM
GADSDEN
HUNTSVILLE
MOBILE
MONTGOMERY
TUSCALOOSA

+9. 8
+ 14.2
+27.7
+6. 2
—6. 9
+2.8

600,643
39,816
100,255
242,980
158,700
64,566

- 3 .
- 7 .
+.
+9.
- 1 .
+5 .

FLORIDA:
F T . LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD
JACKSONVILLE
MIAMI
ORLANDO
PENSACOLA
TALLAHASSEE
TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG
W E S T PALM B E A C H
R - PREVIOUS PERIOD R E V I S E D .
DEBITS S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D ANNUAL R A T E .
DEMAND D E P O S I T S - END OF MONTH S E A S O N A L L Y
TURNOVER

-

ADJUSTED

- 2 . 1
- 7 . 9

603,252
536,299
1,695,925
346,284
111,594
76,035
818,002
458,782

FIGURES.

S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D A N N U A L R A T E OF D E B I T S D I V I D E D BY
P R E C E D I N G MONTHS S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D DEMAND D E P O S I T S




+3 . 1
+ 21.6
+6.6
+ 11.6
+7.6
+12.0
+ 20.5
+11.7

AVERAGE
FIGURE,

OF

CURRENT

AND

- 6 . 4

BANK

DEBITS,

END-OF-MONTH

DEPOSITS,

D O m
T O DEMARD D E P O S I T S
K=WWUAWY
1970
CHANGE
—PERCENl
FROM
(MILLIONS OF
YEAR
-MONTH
DOLLARS)
AGO
AGO
DISTRICT

NO.

6

-

AND

DEPOSIT

OEM AND
FEBRUARY
1970
(THOUSANDS OF
DOLLARS)

1,363.6
99,266.9
3,819.0
3,258.8
3,699.5
3 ,668.9

-3.5
- 9 . 9

+6 . 5
+24.7
+8.1
—3.6
-3.5
-7.3

L O U S I AN A :
BATON ROUGE
LAFAYETTE
LAKE CHARLES
NEW O R L E A N S

10,027.3
2,002.3
2,063.5
33,446.4

+1 . 7
+8.5
+3 . 3
—2 . 6

+ 17.8
+9.7
+3. 0
+5.9

28
8
10
97

132
432
215
290

MISSISSIPPI:
J ACK SON

11,454.8

+14.4

+ 25.9

TENNESSEE:
CHATTANOOGA
KNOXVILLE
NASHVILLE

10,213.5
6 ,751.3
22,664.5

+ 12.8
—1 . 6
-3.0

380,438.4

3,110.3
2,703.4
787,158.9
8,256.8
3,021.9
8,281.2
5,560.9
4,181.1

DISTRICT

NO.

7

NO.
-

6

TOTALS

ANNUAL R A T E
OF T U R N O V E R

+2 6 . 4
+13.9
- 6 . 9
- 4 . 1
+.0
+6.2

26.6
59.2
31.5
29.2
28.7
30.7

- 2 . 0
+.8

+2 . 9
+3 . 9

- 1 . 7
+2 . 3

-1. 5
+.0

34.6
22.5
19.3
34.8

368,871

- 1 . 5

+ 11.5

3 0. 8

+ 14.9
+1 . 5
- 2 5 . 7

246,849
2 35,466
509,476

- 1 . 8
+2 . 9
+5.5

+•6
- . 5
- 5 . 4

41.0
29.1
45.7

+2 .0

+ 10.4

11,019,450

+1.6

+8 . 4

34. 0

-3.5R
+6.3
+1.6
+3.3
+3.3
+13.7
+6 . 5
+10.6

+9.5
+ 15.8
+ 15.3
+8.4
+ 15.3
+ 14.3
+3.5
+ 10. 3

103,171
125,998
9 , 0 1 1 , 2 7 3
262,345
104,432
249,237
203,979
170,294

+1.9R
+2.0
- 2 . 4
+ 1.1
+2 . 6
+1 . 7
+.0
- . 5

+7 . 6
+3. 3
+4 . 7
- I . 8
+4.4
+4.9
—. 4
+ 8.1

3 0.4
21.7
86.3
31.6
29.3
33.5
27.3
24.5

- 2 . 0
- 9 . 9
- 5 . 9
- 1 . 2
+6.7
- 8 . 6
+1 2 . 6
- 4 . 9

+ 12.4
+9.2
+ 22. 1
+8.0
+ 16.4
+ 12.4
+ 11.2
+2.5

244,850
332,157
1,065,678
90,902
77,453
204,688
121,161
130,224

+.1
+4 . 7
+ 3.9
+5.2
- . 2
+ 3. 6
+ 1.9
- 2 . 4

38.2
28.2
37. 0
29. 0
32.9
28.7
23.3
30.4

- . 5
+ 1.4
-2.4R
+.2R

66.3
28.3
35.5
32.6

26.8
30.5
77.5
31.4
43.9
30.1
34. 8
33.0
33.6
39.8

- 3 . 5
+7.9
+. 3
+ .9

54,781
1,807,552
123,193
114,590
128,320
122,150

7
9
6
2

,
,
,
,

+ 14.7
+ 17.0
+3.0
+5 . 4
- . 7
+4.2

CHICAGO

ILLINOIS:
BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL
CHAMPAIGN-URBANA
CHICAGO
D A V E N P O R T - R O C K I S L A N D - M O L I NE
DECATUR
PEORIA
ROCKFORD
SPRINGFIELD
INDIANA:
F O R T WAYNE
GARY-HAMMOND-EAST CHICAGO
INDIANAPOLIS
LAFAYETTE-WEST LAFAYETTE
MUNCIE
SOUTH BEND
T E R R E HAUTE
CEDAR R A P I D S

9 , 4 0 7 . 0
9,626.4
43,010.5
2,638.3
2,591.9
6 ,174.8
2,824.4
3,954.3

IOWA:
DES MOINES
DUBUQUE
SIOUX CITY
WATERLOO

22
1
3
2

MICHIGAN:
ANN A R B O R
BAY C I T Y
DETROIT
FLINT
GRAND R A P I D S
JACKSON
KALAMAZOO
LANSING
MUSKEGON-MUSKEGON
SAGINAW

HEIGHTS

WISCONSIN:
G R E E N BAY
KENOSHA
MADISON
MILWAUKEE
RACINE
DISTRICT

[)EPO S I T S
P E R C E N T CHANGE
FROM
YEAR
MONTH
AGO
AGO

CONTINUED

G E O R G I A:
ALBANY
ATLANTA
AUGUSTA
COLUMBUS
MACON
SAVANNAH

DISTRICT

TURNOVER

NO.

7

TOTALS

+6.5
+3.4
+ 3.8
+8 . 1

+ 19.6
+ 10.4
+3.9R
+10.5R

343,907
65,967
103,991
78,032

4,144.5
1,727.2
261,532.5
6,607.6
15,923.0
2 ,712.6
4,660.8
6,670.5
2,274.9
4,694.7

+4.9
+10.1
+3 . 0
+3.7
+2 . 3
+.6
+3.2
+9.6
- . 7R
+5 . 2

+ 13.6
+ 16.9
+6. 8
- . 3
+ 15.7
+. 6
+9.6R
+8.6
+5.1
+9.7

153,077
57,313
3,288,987
213,991
363,907
89,753
133,237
200,302
66,284
118,905

- 1 . 8
+2 . 7
- 4 . 9
+3.3
+.5
- 1 . 0
- 1 . 2
- 1 . 9
-4.3R
+1.4

+7.3
+8. 8
+. 0
+4.9
+3.6
- 4 . 3
- 1 . 4
+2 . 9
- 4 . 7
+ 6.0

3,368.4
1,504.1
7,552.9
68,228.5
3,039.4

+6.8
+6 . 7
+9.2
-4.2R
—6.8R

+11.7
+5.3
+ 21.5
+ 14.5
+6.3

92,235
46,901
223,692
1,193,977
97,955

+.0
+3.8
+5 . 6
+2.5R
- . 2

+2.0
+7. 1
+7 . 5
+5.7
+.7

36.5
32.7
34.7
57.9
31.0

1.328.264.3

+1.5R

+13.2R

19.430.255

-7.9R

+3-3R

67 -0

,929.
,887.
,722.
,581.

1
5
2
6

R - PREVIOUS PERIOD R E V I S E D .
D E B I T S - S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D ANNUAL R A T E .
DEMAND D E P O S I T S - END OF MONTH S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D F I G U R E S .
T U R N O V E R - S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D A N N U A L R A T E O F D E B I T S D I V I D E D BY
P R E C E D I N G M O N T H S S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D DEMAND D E P O S I T S




- 1 . 2
- 5 . 4
- 15 . 5
- . 3
- 3 . 3
- 9 . 2
+.0
+.4

AVERAGE
FIGURE.

OF

CURRENT

AND

-

1
1
1
2

.
.
.
.

1
8
5
6

BANK

DEBITS,

END-OF-MONTH

DEPOSITS,

D E B I T S T O DEMAND D E P O S I T S "
FEBRUARY
1970
PERCENT CHANGE
( M I L L I O N S OF
_FROJj_
DOLLARS)
YEAR
MONTH
AGO
AGO
DISTRICT

NO.

8

-

ST.

AND

DEPOSIT

FEBRUARY
1970
(THOUSANDS OF
DOLLARS)

- 3 . 3
+ 3.4
- 7 . 3
+3.0
+5.3
+9.6

+13.3
+27.9
- 2 0 . 9
+ 15.0
+ 16.7

ILLINOIS:
QUINCY*

1,271.3

+1.7

+ 11.4

53, 224

INDIANA:
EVAN S V I L L E

5,414.5

+ 2.2

+ 11.1

205,918

KENTUCKY:
LOUISVILLE
OWENSBORO*
PADUCAH*

27,548.8
1,421.2
992. 9

+5.7
+ 12.9

687,652
51,657
42,099

LITTLE

MISSISSIPPI:
GREENVILLE*

630.7
258.0
140,765.9
658.0
3,832.2

TENNESSEE:
JACK SON*
MEMPHIS

DISTRICT

93 0 . 3
28,507.7

NO.

9

-

TOTALS

MONTANA:
BILLINGS
GREAT F A L L S
NORTH DAKOTA:
FARGO-MOORHEAD,

MINN.

SOUTH DAKOTA:
SIOUX FALLS
DISTRICT
NO.

COLORADO:
COLORADO
DENVER
PUEBLO

NO.

10

-

9

TOTALS

KANSAS

SPRINGS

MISSOURI:
KANSAS C I T Y ,
S T . JOSEPH

KANSAS

MEXICO:
ALBUQUERQUE

CITY

DISTRICT

-4.2
+ 19.2

+6 .0

—6. 2

—6. 1

+ 1.7
+ .0
+5.4
+7.6

- 5 . 0

-.1

+4. 1
+5 . 7

— 6. 6

-1.2

- 3 . 5

—3.6

+ 1.6

+9.5

+2.8
- 4 . 8
+2 . 5

+ 1.8
-11. 8
- 4 . 4

36,065

+.7
- 1 . 3
+3.6

+ 18.0

+ 11.1

27,518
16,063

-4. 0
+ 34.9
+ 28.9

2,162,226

+3 . 5
+.5
+ .0
+9.4
+ .0

+5 . 7

-.2
-2. I

- . 7

+ 12.0

29,486
118,732

- 3 . 2
+ .0

+2. 5
+9.2

42,416
577,386

- 1 . 4
+.9

- 2 . 5

+ 15.8

+ 2.6
11.2

228,857.7

+ 2.0

+ 23.5

4,607,451

+ 1.1

- . 5

4,433.9
149,062.2

+ 1.9
—. 9

—5 . 6
+ 17.6

157,011
1,700,886

-3. 6
- 1 . 4

- 4 . 7
+4 . 9

2,067.3
2 ,383.5

—4. 8

-2.1

+ 28.2

+9.2

77,198
65,829

+1.9
+5.0

- 4 . 0

2,753.5

- . 3

+ 1.1

101,303

+2 . 9

+4.2

3,082.5

+ 18 . 7

+ 15.4

89,527

+5.9

+ 5. 1

+ 16.5

2,191,754

-.8

+3 . 6

+9.4
+ 15.9
+3.3

141,104
1,015,854
57,733

+2.0

+6.1

-2.2

—5.6
+6.9

161,822

-5. 1

352,299

NO.

10

163,782.8

3,809.0
52,417.0
1,542.0

NEBRASKA:
LINCOLN
O M A H A , IOWA

OKLAHOMA:
LAWTON
OKLAHOMA
TULSA

YEAR
AGO

— .6

TOTALS

+4.2
+2.7

+ 2.1

7,675.0
11 , 5 1 9 . 0

+6.9

70,055.0
2 ,587.0

+3 . 0

-2.0

+ 21.3
+6.9

1,356,851

5,699.0
21 ,575.0

+7 . 4
-9. 3

+ 14.7
+2.5

+ 1.6

+2 . 9

- . 6
- 3 . 4

+ 1.1

+ 1.6

+2 . 5

- . 5
- . 9

-1.9

152,823
524,478

+ .6
-1.1

+ 11. 1

224,334

+ 7. 8

8 0 , 120

-.2

+2 . 5

10,648.0

+2 9 . 9

-10.9

1,024.0
23,468.0
23,233.0

+7.5
—6 . 3
+ 14.5

+ 14.9
+2.4

45,266
615,850
522,253

- 3 . 1
- 4 .4
+4.1

-1.6

235,251.0

+2.7

+ 11.3

5,250,787

- . 5

+ 1.3

* C I T Y O N L Y ( O R ) N O T AN SMSA B U T R E P O R T E D ON A C O U N T Y B A S I S .
D E B I T S - S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D ANNUAL R A T E .
DEMAND D E P O S I T S - E N D OF MONTH S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D F I G U R E S .
T U R N O V E R - S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D ANNUAL R A T E O F D E B I T S D I V I D E D BY
P R E C E D I N G M O N T H S S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D DEMAND D E P O S I T S




-.1

CITY

KANSAS:
TOPEKA
WICHITA

NEW

CHANGE

MINNEAPOLIS

MINNESOTA:
DULUTH-SUPERIOR, WISC.
M I N N E A P O L I S - S T . PAUL

DISTRICT

ROCK

38,481
105,159
12,561
278,126
54,723
67,959

852.9

MISSOURI:
CAPE GIRARDEAU*
HANNIBAL*
ST. LOUIS
S E D A L I A*
SPRINGFIELD

8

MONTH
a m

918.1
2 ,739.2
279.0
8,773.5
1.581.7
1.481.8

NO.

DEPOSITS
PERCENT

LOUIS

ARKANSAS:
EL DORADO*
FORT SMITH
HELENA*
L I T T L E ROCK-NORTH
P I N E BLUFF
TEXARKANA, T E X .

DISTRICT

TURNOVER

+ 6. 2

AVERAGE
FIGURE.

OF

CURRENT

AND

+ 3.7

-.2

ANNUAL R A T E
OF T U R N O V E R

BANK

DEBITS,

ENO-OF-MONTH

DEPOSITS,

D E B I T S TO DEMAND D E P O S I T S
P E R C E N T CHANGE
FEBRUARY
197 0
( M I L L I O N S Of
FRI DM
DOLLARS)
MONTH
YEAR
AGO
AGO
DISTRICT

NO.

II

-

AND

DEPOSIT

DEMAND
FEBRUARY
1970
(THOUSANDS OF
DOLLARS)

TURNOVER
DEPOSITS
P E R C E N T C HA NGE
FROM
MONTH
YEAR
AGO
AGO

ANNUAL RATE
OF T U R N O V E R

DALLAS

ARIZONA:
TUCSON

5,850.8

- 1 . 5

+ 18.9

231,077

+2 . 9

+ 9. 4

25.7

LOUISIANA:
MONROE
SHREVEPORT

2,830.6
9,779.9

+9 . 5
-. 7

+ 16.8
+42.8

8 2 , 59 5
224,433

-5.1
- 3 . 5

- 1 . 5
-1. 5

33.4
42 .8

- 5 . 5

+ 16.4

35,341

- 1.8

+ 7. 7

25.2

- 1 . 6
+ 7. 1
+ 1.3
+2 . 6
+2 . 2
-. 7
- 2 . 8
+ 1.3
+6.2
+ 1.4
+4.2
— . 6
+2 . 3

21.5
35.6
29.1
26.2
25.4
24 .4
14.8
54.5
28.7
34.2
29.4
41.3
23.1
27.0
16. 6
15.6
22.0
18.9
28.7
24.0
27.3
19.6

NEW

MEXICO:
RO S W E L L *

899.8

TEXAS:
ABILENE
AMAR I L L O
AUSTIN
BEAUMONT-PORT ARTHUR-ORANGE
BROWNSVILLE-HARLINGEN-SAN BENITC
C O R P U S CHR 1 S T I
COR S I C A N A *
DALLAS
EL P A S O
F O R T WORTH
GALVESTON-TEXAS CITY
HOUSTON
LAREDO
LUBBOCK
MC A L L E N — P H A R R - E D I N B U R G
MIDLAND
ODESSA
SAN A N G E L O
SAN ANTONIO
TYLER
WACO
WICHITA FALLS
DISTRICT
DISTRICT

NO.

NO.

12

-

11
SAN

TOTALS

CALIFORNIA:
A N A H E I M - S A N T A A N A - G A R D E N GROVE
BAKERSFIELO
FRESNO
L O S A N G E L E S - L O N G BEACH
OXNARD-V ENTURA
SAN B E R N A R D I N O - R I V E R S I D E - O N T A R I C
SAN D I E G O
SAN F R A N C I S C O - O A K L A N D
SAN J O S E
SANTA BARBARA
STOCKTON

CITY

NEVADA:
L A S VEGAS
RENO
OREGON:
EUGENE
PORTLAND
UTAH:
OGDEN
SALT LAKE

CITY

WASHINGTON:
SEATTL E - E V E R ETT
SPOKANE
TACOMA
DISTRICT

NO.

12

+ 1
- 6 . 9
- 7 . 2
+2.7
+1 .3
-5. 8
+ 10 . 5
+1.5
—6.3
+3.5
+9 . 6
+6 . 9
+7 . 3
+14 .0
+ 1
+10.7
-1.1
+3.2
—•4
- 2 . 7
+5 . 5
- 1 . 4

+3.5
+9 . 2
-7. 8
+ 10.8
+ 17.9
+2.3
+ 17. 5
+ 17.4
+7.9
+ 12. 7
+ 26. 5
+2 0 . 2
+ 11.9
+9. 3
+6. 1
+8.5
+ 22.2
+ 15. 6
+ 16.2
+ 14.9
+ 17.3
+. 5

95,175
158,930
271,045
235,425
74,123
200,046
31,224
2,134,670
225,684
619,566
109,697
2,434,480
39,89 3
150,437
95, 866
136,658
78,909
66,66 8
598,340
90,695
111,798
115,823

- . 8
- . 1
+.1
- 1 . 6
+ 5.1
+ 1.8
+5 . 6
+1.3
- . 8
- I . 1
- 1 . 3
+.1
+5.3
+5.8
- 1 . 8
+3.9
+5.1
- .6
+1.1
+2 . 5
- 1 . 9
+.6

331,673.7

+2 .6

+ 16.6

8, 6 4 8 , 598

+.4

+.7

38.0

28,624.6

+7 . 6

+28.2

748,140

+2 . 4

+10.9

38.7

26,816.9
6,642.7
8,686.0
397,598.8
6,022.4
14,734.7
32,849.5
368,623.1
25,142.8
4,573.9
5,262.3

- 7 . 0
+ 13.0
+ 19.9
+• 6

796,182
182,139
232, 204
7,108,332
164,333
499,676
877,768
3,823,907
671,100
176,206
171,180

+11.0
+5 . 5
+2. 6
+2 . 5
+7 . 7
+4.8
+4 . 7
+2 . 6
+8.2
+2 . 7
-. 8

+ 11.6
+ 1.0
+4.8
+4. 0
+9. 5
+3 . 4
+2.3
+ 3. 1
+10.1
+3.0
+3 . 0

35.5
37.5
37.9
56.6
38.0
30.2
38.3
97 .7
39.0
26.3
30.6

.

TOTALS

- 1 9 . 1
+. 9
+ .8R
+2 . 2
- 2 .2
—6.2
-7.3

+7. 8
+27.5
+ 15.6
+6. 4
+ 46 . 6
+ 11.3
+27.1
+ 2 0 . 3R
+6. 3
+ 16.9
-9.9

5,325.2

+5. 3

+34.3

119,937

- 1 . 9

+20.6

44.0

6,479.8
3,482.1

+.2
- 4 . 2

+ 10.0
+9.8

201,900
135,279

+4 . 0
- 1 . 8

+ 1.9
+ 10.9

32.7
25.5

3,423.2
41,952.5

- 2 . 9
+

- 1 . 4
+ 16.9

106,406
822,888

- 3 . 1
+2.3

- 1 . 5
+3.4

31.7
51.6

2,499.2
18,801.7

+14.3
+9.9

+ 29.6
+5.1

62,082
382,686

+.1
+2 . 4

+2. 1
+.7

40.3
49.7

62,413.0
6,742.7
9,834.7

-2.8
- 9 . 1
+8.1

+ 10. 2
+8.0
+8.4

1, 1 5 2 , 4 5 9
163, 766
213,491

+7.2
- 2 . 7
- . 4

- . 5
- 4 . 4
- 2 . 1

56.1
36.2
46.0

+ l.OR

+13.IP

18,831,961

+3 . 3

+4.0

58.0

I ,086 ,531.8

.0

R - PREVIOUS PERIOD R E V I S E D .
* C I T Y O N L Y C O R ) N O T AN S M S A B U T R E P O R T E D ON A C O U N T Y B A S I S .
D E B I T S - S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D ANNUAL R A T E .
DEMAND D E P O S I T S - END O F MONTH S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D F I G U R E S .
T U R N O V E R - S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D ANNUAL R A T E O F D E B I T S D I V I D E D BY
P R E C E D I N G M O N T H S S E A S O N A L L Y A D J U S T E D DEMAND D E P O S I T S




—. ft

+6.8
+5 . 5
+2 . 7
+ 1.7
- 3 . 8
- 1 . 2
+2.8
- 3 . 1

FRANCISCO

ARIZONA:
PHOENIX

IDAHO:
BOISE

.

2,055.1
5 ,661.9
7,885.1
6,218. 5
1 ,835.0
4 , 8 2 7 .5
449.6
115,675.8
6 , 5 1 3 . 5
21,311.3
3,244.8
100,544.2
899.1
3,955.2
1,605.0
2,089.1
1,693.0
1,266.5
17,090.7
2,149.0
3,079.7
2,262.9

AVERAGE
FIGURE.

OF

CURRENT

AND