View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Federal Reserve

Bulletin
SEPTEM BER

1972

* * * * * * *

*f^AL

BOARD OF GOVERNORS ■ THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ■ WASHINGTON, D.C.




A copy of the Federal Reserve Bulletin is sent to each member bank without charge; member banks desiring
additional copies may secure them at a special $2.00 annual rate. The regular subscription price in the United
States and its possessions, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador,
Guatemala, Haiti, Republic of Honduras, M exico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, El Salvador, Uruguay,
and Venezuela is $6.00 per annum or 60 cents per copy; elsewhere, $7.00 per annum or 70 cents per copy.
Group subscriptions in the United States for 10 or more copies to one address, 50 cents per copy per month,
or $5.00 for 12 months. The Bulletin may be obtained from the Division of Administrative Services, Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D. C. 20551, and remittance should be made
payable to the order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in a form collectible at par
in U .S. currency. (Stamps and coupons not accepted)







FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN

CONTENTS
N U M B E R 9 □ V O L U M E 58 □ S E P T E M B E R 1972

747 T h e Lab or M arket in an E x p a n d in g E c o n o m y
757 T re asu ry and Federal R e se rv e Foreign E x c h a n g e O pe ratio n s
783 Y ie ld s on N ew ly Issu e d Corporate B o n d s
785 Statem en t to C o n g r e s s
790 R e cord of Policy A ctions of the Federal O p e n M arket Com m ittee
797 La w D epartm ent
851

A n n o u n c e m e n ts

852

National S u m m a ry of B u s in e s s C on d ition s
Financial and B u s in e s s Statistics

A
A

1
3

Contents
Guide to Tabular Presentation

A
A
A

3
4
74

Statistical Releases: Reference
U.S. Statistics
International Statistics

A

98

B o ard of G o v e rn o rs and Staff

A 100

O p e n M arket Com m ittee an d Staff; Federal A d v iso ry C ou ncil

A 101

Federal R e se rv e B a n k s and B ra n c h e s

A 102

Federal R e se rv e Bo ard Publications

A 106

Index to Statistical T a b le s
M a p of Federal R e se rv e S y ste m on Inside B a c k C o v e r

EDITORIAL COMMITTEE
J. C h a rle s Partee

Robert C. Holland

Robert S o lo m o n
R alp h C. Bryant

Kenneth B. W illiam s
Elizabeth B. Sette

The Federal Reserve BULLETIN is issued monthly under the direction of the staff ed i­
torial committee. This committee is responsible for opinions expressed except in official
statements and signed articles. Direction for the art work is provided by M ack R ow e.

The Labor Market
in an
Expanding Economy
EMPLOYMENT and production began to rise sharply about a year
ago in response to a significant upturn in demand. Unemployment
showed little improvement until the spring of 1972, however, as
gains in employment were about matched by increases in the labor
force. At the same time, a strong cyclical rebound of growth in
productivity, together with some dampening of wage increases,
has brought about a moderation of the rise of unit labor costs and
of upward pressure on prices.
Strengthening of labor demand began unusually late in the
recovery— more than half a year after the trough of late 1970.
Once the recovery got under way, the composition of employment
gains was similar to previous experience. The initial impetus to
employment occurred in the service-producing sectors, where hiring
j

A fte r s u m m e r o f 1 9 7 1 , INCREASED DEMANDS s tim u la te d g ro w th o f e m p lo y m e n t;
b u t w ith f a s t e r la b o r f o r c e g ro w th , th e d e c lin e in u n e m p lo y m e n t w a s sm all

♦A ffected by major strike.
Seasonally adjusted data. C hanges in G N P are at annual rates. Labor force, em ploym ent, and unem ploym ent rates are quarterly
averages except for 1972 Q3 w hich is a July—A ugust average.
Real G N P is in 1958 dollars.




748

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

accelerated after a recession lull. The subsequent recovery of
industrial production brought increases in both manufacturing em ­
ployment and working hours, but these came late and were mild
compared with those in other cyclical upturns. Moreover, between
May and August 1972, manufacturing employment was about
unchanged. Mainly as a result of sluggishness in manufacturing,
total nonfarm payroll employment has risen by only 3 per cent
since the cyclical peak in the fall of 1969.
From the cycle trough until m id-1972, growth of the labor force
about matched increases in employment. As a result, unemploy­
ment remained near 6 per cent until June 1972, when it dropped
to around 5 V2 per cent and held there through August. Labor force
growth was particularly rapid from m id-1971 until the spring of
1972 as the rate of labor force participation moved back toward
the level of early 1970. This cyclical increase in labor force
growth was augmented by the continuing flow of veterans into
the civilian labor market.
In contrast to most previous postwar cyclical experience, in­
creases in wages and prices had shown little tendency to slow during
the recession. Since the economic stabilization program was insti­
tuted in August 1971, however, increases in average hourly com ­
pensation have been reduced somewhat. In the private nonfarm
econom y, average hourly compensation rose 6.2 per cent over the
year ending in the second quarter of 1972— 1 percentage point less
than in the comparable 1970-71 period. In conjunction with the
strong cyclical recovery of growth in productivity, this improvement
contributed to a substantial slowing of the rise in unit labor costs.

LABOR DEMAND




Increased spending by consumers and businesses provided the basis
for sharp advances in production, employment, and productivity
after the summer of 1971. Real GNP increased by 6.2 per cent
over the year ending in the second quarter of 1972, while total
employment advanced by 2.4 million persons, or about 3 per cent.
Employment gains amounted to roughly 900,000 each for men
and women and about 600,000 for teenagers. Most of the increase
in total employment occurred among full-time workers— threefifths of the advance was among blue-collar workers, many of
whom had been laid off in 1969 and 1970. Reflecting this pattern
of recovery, the reduction of unemployment since the summer of
1971 has been most pronounced for blue-collar workers seeking
full-time jobs in the manufacturing industries. Most such workers
are heads of households and the jobless rate of this group declined
significantly over the past year to 3.3 per cent in August 1972.
Job gains in the services, trade, and State and local government
sectors totaled 1.8 million in the past year after having slowed

LABOR-MARKET DEVELOPMENTS

749

to an annual rate of about 1 million during and just after the
recession. Employment increases in these service-producing indus­
tries had averaged 1.6 million annually over the 2 years before
the recession. The average workweek in the service-oriented in­
dustries has continued its long-run downward trend during the
recovery. This secular decline is primarily a result of increases
in the number of part-time workers— a trend that may change or
at least moderate with slowly developing changes in the age
structure of the population.
2 I EMPLOYMENT GROWTH s t r e n g t h e n s in s e r v ic e - ty p e in d u s tr i e s

SERVICES

BLS payroll em ploym ent data, seasonally adjusted. 1972 Q3 is a July-A ugust average.

FA CTO RY W ORKW EEK

FR data on industrial production and
b l s data on em ploym ent and hours,




As usual, the average weekly hours of factory workers turned
up before manufacturing employment began to rise, showing about
a 6-month lead. By August 1972, factory hours reached 40.7 hours,
nearly an hour longer than a year earlier and close to the average
level in the 1967-69 period. Increased overtime hours accounted
for more than half the rise in working hours— a typical recovery
pattern.
Manufacturing employment was on a downward path from July
1969 until August 1971. Over that period, it registered a net decline
of 1.8 million jobs— with about one-fourth of this decline in de­
fense-oriented industries. With a net gain of only 540,000 factory
jobs since August 1971— the lowest point for factory em ploy­
ment— the greater part of the over-all drop has yet to be made
up; factory jobs remain 1.3 million below the level of m id-1969.
During the recent recession, employment cuts among nonpro­
duction workers in manufacturing were far larger than in the past.
During previous postwar recessions, employment of nonproduction
workers edged down only 1 or 2 per cent and then resumed growth
during the recovery phase. In this cycle, job losses by nonproduc­
tion workers were larger— about 6 per cent— and continued well
after the trough. Layoffs of engineers and other professionals at
defense firms accounted for most of the extra reduction at the early

750

PR O D U C TIO N W ORKERS

b l s data, seasonally adjusted.

LABOR SUPPLY




FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

stages. During the recovery of 1972, however, the number of
nonproduction jobs has remained about unchanged; apparently
employers in most firms have continued to curb cost increases by
limiting hiring and by promoting productivity growth in the office
as well as on the production line. Although total employment of
professional and technical workers rose in nonmanufacturing firms,
the growth was not rapid enough to absorb new entrants and those
losing defense-type jobs. As a result, unemployment among pro­
fessional and technical workers rose more sharply than usual in
this recession (from 1.0 per cent at its low to 3.3 per cent at its
high) and continues relatively high.
Declines in employment during the recession were unevenly
distributed across the Nation. The largest losses of jobs occurred
in States that have concentrations of durable goods manufacturing
industries— particularly defense products firms. States that showed
the largest relative declines included California, Washington,
Michigan, New York, and Illinois.
Employment continued to expand in the South during the reces­
sion— in part because durable goods manufacturing plays a less
important role in that region. And since m id-1971 employment in
the West and in industrial States in the North has recovered some
of the earlier losses. In several important industrial States, how­
ever, the current number of jobs remains below 1969 levels.

Growth in the supply of labor has about equaled changes in total
employment over most of the past 22 months. From November
1970— the trough of the cycle— to August 1972, the civilian labor
force increased by 3.7 per cent and total civilian employment rose
by 4 .0 per cent. Month-to-month movements over the period were
similar in size until June 1972 when employment growth moved
slightly ahead of the labor force and the unemployment rate moved
down to about 5 xh per cent, where it remained through August.
Cyclical responsiveness of the labor force to changes in labor
market conditions is reflected in participation rates (the percentage
of the population either working or seeking work). During the
recent recession the labor force participation rate dropped substan­
tially as persons unable to find work ceased looking and others
who might have come into the labor force were discouraged from
doing so. Among the major groups the decline in participation took
the form of faster and larger reductions in the participation rates
of men and a slowing of the increase in participation of women.
During the recovery, participation rate changes for most broad
groups appear to have resumed their longer-run trends. As a result,
the average participation rate has returned to about its pre-recession
level: hence, continued strong demands for labor are much more

LABOR-MARKET DEVELOPMENTS

751

likely to reduce the ranks of the unemployed than to stimulate
rapid growth of the labor force.
The cyclical rebound of labor force growth was largest for adult
women; their number in the civilian labor force has increased by
1.1 million since m id-1971. Adult women filled more than one
CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE: g ro w th in c r e a s e s s h a r p ly ;
g a in s e s p e c ia lly la r g e fo r w om en
CHANGE, MILLIONS OF PERSONS

WOMEN

MEN

TEENAGERS

AGED 2 0 AN D OVER

AGED 2 5 AN D OVER

MEN
AGED 2 0 TO 2 4

1.0

’70

'71

72

a
’69

’70

n

’71

12

’69

D

’70

r

’71

’72

a

’69

I 0
’70

’71

’72

BLS household survey data. C hanges from a year earlier are based on annual averages
for 1 9 6 9-71 and J uly-A ugust 1972.

M ALESU N E M P L O Y M E N T RATE

■■■■■■■■■■■■I
LABOR FORCE P A R T IC IP A T IO N RATE

BLS household survey data. Annual
averages except for 1972, w hich is
a seasonally
adjusted
half-year
average.

UNEMPLOYMENT




quarter of the additional professional and technical jobs, about
two-thirds of the added clerical jobs, and three-fourths of the service
jobs (excluding private household workers). About 500,000 teen­
agers were added to the labor force this past year; approximately
half of this rise was due to growth in their population and half
due to an advance in their participation rate.
The number of men aged 20 and over in the civilian labor force
increased by 1.0 million over the past year. About half the rise
occurred among 20- to 24-year olds in part because continuing
reductions in the Armed Forces increased the number of young
men seeking civilian jobs. About half a million men aged 25 years
and over were added to the civilian labor force, owing entirely to
an increase in their civilian population, and the labor force partici­
pation rate of this group continued its secular decline. The reduc­
tion in male participation has been particularly pronounced among
Negro men, whose rates of participation have declined for all age
groups. The reasons for these continuing declines are not entirely
clear, but in light of the particularly large drop in 1970 and 1971
discouragement with the job market must be counted as a major
factor.
Unemployment did not climb so high in this recession as in previous
post-World-War-II downturns, but it remained near its cyclical high
point for 19 months— an unusually long period. Not until June

752

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

1972 did the jobless rate go below the 5.8 to 6.1 per cent range
in which it had fluctuated since November 1970.
The unemployment rate had initially reached the 6 per cent range
in late 1970, primarily as a result of layoffs in durable goods
manufacturing where a weak demand situation was aggravated by
secondary effects of an auto strike. At that time, and throughout
1971, the number of persons among the unemployed who had been
laid off averaged about 2.3 million, about 1.3 million more than
in late 1969 when demand for labor was still strong. Most such
workers were eligible for unemployment insurance benefits, and
the number of workers drawing jobless benefits spurted from about
1.2 million late in 1969 to about 2.2 million late in 1970. Insured
unemployment continued high until late 1971, when the character
of unemployment began to change. Unemployment among adult
men, which had risen rapidly during 1970, began to move lower
as layoffs declined and factory hiring increased.
Rates of unemployment in August 1972 were lower than a year
earlier for most groups. The sharpest relative reduction occurred
among men aged 20 years and over where the unemployment rate
dropped from 4.5 per cent to 3.9 per cent; in the pre-recession
period the rate for this group had been fluctuating around 2 per
cent. The improvement in the rate for adult men was reflected
in declines in the unemployment rates of heads of households,
full-time workers, married men, blue-collar workers, and those in
the manufacturing sector. In contrast, the unemployment rate for
white-collar workers was unchanged from a year earlier and only
slightly lower than at its cyclical high. Employment of white-collar
UNEMPLOYMENT d e c lin e s s o m e w h a t in 1 9 7 2 , b u t JO B L E SS RATES c o n ti n u e re la tiv e ly h ig h
f o r m o s t g ro u p s
PER CENT

NEGRO AND OTHER

BLS household data, seasonally adjusted quarterly averages except for 1972 Q 3, w hich is a Ju ly-A u gu st average.




753

LABOR-MARKET DEVELOPMENTS

workers has continued to increase but demand has merely kept
pace with increases in the number of workers seeking such jobs.
Unemployment among white workers has moved down over the
past year but Negro joblessness has remained virtually unchanged
since the spring of 1971 at a rate near 10 per cent. In previous
recoveries, the rate for whites began to decline some months be­
fore the rate for Negroes.

LABOR COSTS
AND WAGES




Progress has been made in reducing upward cost and price pressures. The bulk of the improvement reflects accelerated productivity
growth, which— spurred by substantial gains in output— has shown
a strong, if belated, post-recession pattern of recovery. In the
private nonfarm sector, productivity advanced by 4.2 per cent from
the first half of 1971 to the first half of 1972 with faster growth
occurring in 1972. This advance compares with increases of less
than 1 per cent each in 1969 and in 1970 and a trend increase
of just over 2 xh per cent per year for the post-World-War-II period.
Growth of hourly compensation in the private nonfarm sector
from a year earlier slowed from 7.2 per cent for early 1971 to
I n c r e a s e s in UNIT LABOR COSTS slo w - m ain ly b e c a u s e o f
g r e a t e r g r o w th in p r o d u c tiv ity
PERCENTAGE CHANGE OVER THE YE/

8
HOURLY
COMPENSATION

4

0

PRODUCTIVITY
0
2
8
UNIT LABOR
COSTS

4

0
1969

1970

1971

BLS data. Changes from a year earlier based on half-year averages.




754

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

6.5 per cent for the first half of 1972. As with productivity,
improvement was most pronounced in the spring of 1972. The
acceleration of gains in productivity during the past year, in
combination with the moderation of increases in compensation,
resulted in a dramatic reduction in the rate of increase in unit labor
costs. For the first half of 1972 the increase in unit labor costs
from a year earlier averaged 2.2 per cent. These increases in unit
labor costs were less than one-third as large as those in 1969 and
1970. Maintenance of the improved performance of unit labor costs
will depend to a large extent on further slowing of increases in
average hourly compensation because cyclical increases in produc­
tivity as large as those in the past three quarters are not likely to
be sustained.
The growth of workers’ hourly compensation has moderated
somewhat since the economic stabilization program began in Au­
gust 1971. The pattern of changes in pay rates has been uneven,
however, reflecting changes in the nature and coverage of the wage
control aspect of the program. Growth of wage rates was virtually
halted during the freeze, but early in Phase II wage rates spurted
up sharply as pay increases scheduled for the freeze period were
allowed to be put into effect. In 1972, the trend of wage changes
began to reflect more clearly the restraining influence of the con­
trols.
The Pay Board, which is the administrative and policy arm of
the program to dampen wage growth, initially set a standard for
pay increases of 5 xh per cent annually. A number of exceptions
to the generally permissible increase allow larger wage adjustments
in particular circumstances. The Pay Board reviews all pay adjust­
ments for employee units of 1,000 or more workers and any other
proposed increases that are in excess of the generally permissible
standard. The average of pay adjustments approved by the Board
was in fact around 5 V2 per cent through August 1972.
The recent trend of hourly earnings of production workers in
private nonfarm industry suggests that progress has been made in
the effort to moderate the growth of wages generally. Hourly
earnings of production workers— adjusted for interindustry shifts—
have increased by 5.6 per cent in the year since August 1971,
compared with a 6.9 per cent increase in the preceding year. Since
December 1971 hourly earnings have risen at an annual rate of
just over 5 per cent.
The most dramatic reduction of wage rate inflation has occurred
in the construction industry. Throughout the late 1960’s, increases
in hourly earnings of construction workers grew progressively
larger, reaching a peak average increase of 9.6 per cent in 1970.
(In that year, first-year wage increases under construction industry
collective bargaining agreements averaged 17.6 per cent.) In order




755

LABOR-MARKET DEVELOPMENTS

6

[I n c re a s e s in HOURLY EARNINGS s m a lle r o v e r p a s t y e a r
PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM YEAR EARLIER

72

&

BLS data on production w orkers’ hourly earnings adjusted for interindustry shifts and
overtim e in manufacturing. C hanges based on averages for the m onths o f June, July, and
August.

to halt the wage spiral in construction, the Construction Industry
Stabilization Committee was established early in 1971. This com ­
mittee has the authority to review and approve or disapprove all
collective bargaining agreements in the construction industry. As
of August 1972 the year-to-year growth of average hourly earnings
in the industry had declined to 5.5 per cent. Collective bargaining
agreements negotiated since November 1971— when the committee
came under the jurisdiction of the Pay Board— and approved by
the committee provide average increases of only 5.7 per cent in
wages and fringe benefits. The reduced pace of earnings increases
in construction during recent months is attributable in part to the
activities of the committee, but other factors including high unem­
ployment among construction workers and slack nonresidential
building activity in some parts of the country also may have been
important factors.
Aside from construction, the slowing of wage increases has been
most pronounced in service, finance, and trade— industries that tend
to be less unionized and to be composed of smaller establishments.
In services, where increases in wages reached a peak annual rate
of more than 8 per cent in early 1971, average hourly earnings
were up by only 3.5 per cent over the year ending August 1972.
In trade and finance, the picture since m id-1971 has been similar,
although the slowing has been less dramatic. Employers in these
industries may be relying heavily on Pay Board regulations to help
hold down their wage costs. Also, because wage determination
in these industries tends to be more individualized, more flexible,
and less rigidly periodic, wages may respond more quickly to
changes in economic and institutional conditions.

756

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

In contrast, growth of wages in the highly unionized manufac­
turing sector has slowed less dramatically. In the transportation
and public utilities industry group, growth of wages has actually
increased. In both situations, the wage adjustments provided for
in contracts that were settled before the controls program was
inaugurated have tended to maintain the earlier rapid growth of
wages. The few new collective bargaining agreements that have
been negotiated in manufacturing in the past 6 months have pro­
vided smaller increases than those negotiated before the economic
stabilization program began, and increases in hourly earnings in
1972 have been down to the 5 lA per cent zone.

COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING




Major negotiations completed in the first half of 1972, which
affected only 870,000 workers, showed a significant slowdown in
wage rate adjustments for the first year of the contract: increases
averaged 7.5 per cent compared with 11.7 per cent in 1971. Smaller
first-year wage increases— a movement away from the practice of
front-end loading of contracts— probably resulted from Pay Board
regulations that emphasize consideration of adjustments at the time
of implementation. A consequence has been a pattern of more even
distribution of wage adjustments over the life of the contract.
Wage increases over the full term of new contracts, however,
slowed considerably less than first-year increases— from 8.1 per
cent annually in 1971 contracts to 7.1 per cent in contracts signed
in the first 6 months of 1972. Contracts signed in 1972 have also
been of somewhat shorter duration than earlier settlements. Both
reduced front-end loading and shorter contracts reflect the existence
of a controls program of uncertain duration, and these tendencies
are likely to continue during the stabilization period.
Bargaining activity will continue to be light for the remainder
of 1972; slightly more than 1 million workers are covered under
major contracts coming up for renewal. However, bargaining will
accelerate in 1973 as contracts expire in major industries such as
trucking, construction, electrical equipment, and autos. During
1973 new contracts affecting more than 4.1 million workers will
be negotiated; this is more than twice as many as in 1972. If price
increases continue to moderate, a less inflationary pattern of wage
increases may be established in these important industries.
□

Treasury and Federal Reserve
Foreign Exchange Operations
This 2 1 st jo in t interim rep o rt reflects the
T reasu ry-F ederal R e serve p o lic y o f m aking
a va ila b le a d d itio n a l inform ation on foreig n ex­
change o peration s from tim e to tim e. The F ed­
e r a l R e serve B an k o f N e w Y ork acts as a gen t
fo r both the T reasu ry an d the F ederal O pen
M a rk e t C om m ittee o f the F ederal R e serve S y s­
tem in the con du ct o f foreign exchange o p e r a ­
tions.

This rep o rt w as p r e p a r e d by C h a rles A .
C o o m b s, S en io r V ice P resid en t in ch arge o f the
Foreign D ep a rtm en t o f the F ederal R e serve
B ank o f N e w Y o rk , an d S p ecia l M a n a g e r,
System O pen M a rk e t A cco u n t. It co vers the
p e r io d M arch to S ep te m b er 1972. P reviou s
rep o rts have been p u b lish ed in the M a rch and
S ep tem b er B u l l e t i n s o f each y e a r beginning
with S ep tem b er 1962.

The Smithsonian Agreement of December 18,
1971, was greeted with satisfaction and relief
by the exchange markets. Rates for a number
of European currencies settled at or close to their
new floor levels, and sizable reflows of funds
to the United States developed through the
year-end. Following the turn of the year, how­
ever, market optimism shifted to an anxious and
even skeptical mood as traders began to ponder
the long negotiating path to a restructured in­
ternational financial system. Market concern fo­
cused particularly on the risk that certain foreign
central banks might suddenly withdraw from
their Smithsonian commitments to defend their
currencies at the new upper limits, and succes­
sive waves of speculation in January and Feb­
ruary drove the mark, the guilder, the Belgian
franc, and the yen close to or hard against their
official ceilings.
The central banks concerned intervened de­
cisively and without hesitation, however, and
this demonstration had a reassuring effect. In
early March, expeditious congressional action
on a “ clean” gold price bill removed another
source of uncertainty that had been breeding
unsettling market rumors. Simultaneously, the
German Government took action to discourage
borrowing abroad by German business firms,
which had been a major source of buying pres­
sure on the mark over the the previous 3 years,
while the Japanese Government reinstated con­
trols on speculative buying of the yen. Finally,

the interest rate gap between Europe and the
United States began to be squeezed out from
both sides. As recessionary tendencies contin­
ued in Europe, discount rate cuts were an­
nounced in Germany, Belgium, and the Nether­
lands, while the U.S. Treasury bill rate rose
significantly.
The dollar showed growing strength and re­
siliency throughout most of the spring months,
as a return flow of short-term funds largely
offset continuing deficits in other components
of the U.S. balance of payments. This encour­
aging trend was abruptly reversed midway in
June, however, as sterling was suddenly swept
off its Smithsonian parity by a speculative wave
that had been gathering force for many months
past. In allowing sterling to float on June 23,
the British authorities indicated that the defense
of sterling during the previous 6 days had cost
the equivalent of $2.6 billion.
Such official intervention to defend sterling
was almost entirely conducted in Common
Market currencies, in accordance with a British
undertaking on May 1 to join with its prospec­
tive Common Market partners in maintaining a
spread of no more than 2 lA per cent between
sterling and any other Common Market cur­
rency. This European Community (EC) agree­
ment had thus created a dual system of exchange
rate limits in which the 2 lA per cent Common
Market band became colloquially described as
the “ snake in the tunnel” represented by the




757

758

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

4 V2 per cent Smithsonian band. A critical feature
of the Common Market 2 lA per cent band was
that intervention in dollars was to be confined
to circumstances in which a weakening Com­
mon Market currency should decline the full
distance to its Smithsonian floor or a strong
currency should rise to its Smithsonian ceiling.
Otherwise, maintenance of the 2 lA per cent
Common Market band was to be carried out by
intervening in each other’s currencies.
As sterling came under selling pressure in
June, the bank of England accordingly was
called upon to offer marks and whatever other
Common Market currencies were being quoted
at rates 2 lA per cent above sterling, while its
European partners bought sterling with their
currencies. The general effect of such interven­
tion to maintain the 2 lA per cent Common
Market band was to brake the decline of sterling
toward its Smithsonian floor of $2.5471, while
simultaneously pulling down the stronger EC
currencies well below their Smithsonian ceil­
ings. In this strained pattern of rates, the mar­
kets may have sensed a two-way speculative
opportunity to go short of sterling and long of
continental currencies in the hope of profiting
on both. Most of the outflow from London
seems to have ended up in the Common Market.
On June 23 the British authorities announced

TABLE 1
FEDERAL RESERVE RECIPROCAL CURRENCY
ARRANGEMENTS
In m illions o f dollars
Institution

Amount o f facility
Sept. 8, 1972

Austrian National B a n k .................................
National Bank of B e lg iu m ............................
Bank o f C a n a d a ................................................
National Bank of E>enmark.........................

200
600
1,000
200

Bank of E n g la n d .............................................
Bank of France ................................................
German Federal Bank ...................................
Bank of I ta ly .....................................................
Bank of Japan....................................................
Bank of M e x ic o ................................................

2 ,0 0 0
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,000
130

Netherlands B a n k ...........................................
Bank of N o r w a y ...............................................
Bank of S w e d e n ...............................................
Sw iss National B a n k ......................................

300
200
250
1,000

Bank for International Settlem ents:
Sw iss francs/dollars...................................
Other authorized European currencies/
dollars .......................................................

1,000

T o t a l ...............................................................

11,730




600

their decision to float the pound, in effect tem­
porarily suspending their participation in the
Smithsonian and EC agreements. Following that
announcement, other European currencies imme­
diately rebounded to their Smithsonian ceilings,
reflecting market fears of a severe tightening of
capital import controls, a joint float of the
Common Market currencies, or some combina­
tion of both. The European currency markets
were then closed down, and an emergency
meeting of the Community finance ministers
was set for the following Monday in Luxem­
bourg. At that meeting Denmark formally with­
drew from the EC monetary agreement, while
Italy secured a temporary authorization to keep
the lira within the 2 lA per cent band by inter­
vening in dollars rather than in European cur­
rencies. The finance ministers then reaffirmed
their determination to defend both the Smith­
sonian parities and the Common Market band.
Despite this reaffirmation and subsequent
drastic controls imposed by Switzerland and
Germany to ward off unwanted capital inflows,
rumors of a European joint float continued to
incite heavy speculative selling of dollars
against the stronger European currencies and the
yen. By Friday, July 14, the sterling crisis had
generated not only the previously noted flight
of $2.6 billion of funds from sterling into other
Common Market currencies but also additional
flows totaling over $6 billion from dollars into
various European currencies and the yen.
Meanwhile, the U.S. authorities had been
considering the advisability of renewed opera­
tions in the exchange markets, involving, if
necessary, Federal Reserve swap drawings that
had been suspended on August 15, 1971. On
U.S. initiative and with the approval of the
German Federal Bank, the first of such exchange
operations was launched on July 19 in the form
of repeated offerings by the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York of sizable amounts of Ger­
man marks on the New York market. This
intervention, which was continued briefly on the
following day, was described by Chairman
Burns as a move by the U.S. authorities to play
their part to restore order in foreign exchange
markets and to do their part in upholding the
Smithsonian Agreement, just as other countries
were doing. The Chairman also indicated that

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

759

TABLE 2

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ACTIVITY UNDER ITS RECIPROCAL SWAP LINES
In millions of dollars equivalent

Transactions w ith—

System
swap
draw ings,
Jan. 1,
1972

D raw ings, or repayments ( —)
1972
I

July 1 Sept. 8

II

1 0 .2 1 >
-1 0 .2 ;
- 6 6 3 .0

^ -2 0 .0

Bank o f E n g la n d ................................

7 1 5 .0

-5 2 .0

German Federal B a n k ......................

5 0 .0

-5 0 .0

S w iss National B a n k .......................
Bank for International Settlem ents
(S w iss fr a n c s ).................................

1,000.0

\
/

4 3 5 .0

1

7 0 0 .0

6 0 0 .0

6 0 0 .0

3 5 .0

3 5 .0
- 3 7 2 .0

the operation would continue on whatever scale
and whenever transactions seemed advisable.
The U.S. Treasury also confirmed the interven­
tion, stating in part that: “ The action reflects
the willingness of the United States to intervene
in the exchange markets on occasion when it
feels it is desirable to help deal with speculative
forces. The action indicates absolutely no
change in our basic policy approach toward
monetary reform and the necessary efforts on
all fronts to achieve a sustainable equilibrium
in our balance of payments.”
On August 10, the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York intervened in a second European
currency, the Belgian franc, which had re­
mained pinned to its ceiling. In a series of daily
operations in some volume, the Belgian franc
rate was brought down appreciably below its
ceiling and, in the process, some unwinding of
speculation on the Belgian franc may have been
set in motion.
Since July 19, the New York Reserve Bank
has intervened in the market on nine occasions
and sold in the process $31.5 million of foreign
currencies; total offerings were, of course, much
larger. All market sales of foreign currencies,
either from balances or from small swap draw­
ings, were fully covered by market purchases
as the dollar strengthened on the exchanges.
As noted in the preceding report in this
series, Federal Reserve swap debt, which had
reached a peak of $3,045 million on August 13,




8

T o t a l ...................................................

0

4 5 5 .0

fO

N ational Bank o f B e lg iu m .............

Bank for International Settlem ents
(B elgian fr a n c s )............................

System
swap
draw ings,
Sept. 8,
1972

1

JK -2 1 I 1 ,7 7 0 .0

1971, had been reduced to $2,855 million by
the end of last year.1 Since then, further net
repayments of $1,085 million have brought
down the total outstanding debt to $1,770 mil­
lion (Table 2), a reduction of nearly 40 per cent
from the August 1971 peak. The bulk of such
debt repayments during the period under review
was accounted for by liquidation of the remain­
ing $715 million of an original $750 million
drawing on the Bank of England. The sterling
needed for such repayments was acquired in
regular purchases during June, July, and early
August, both through the market and in direct
transactions with the Bank of England, plus a
sizable direct purchase from the U.S. Treasury
of sterling previously acquired in a U.S. Gov­
ernment drawing on the International Monetary
Fund (IMF).
In June, $300 million of swap debt to the
Swiss National Bank was repaid through a direct
purchase of $250 million of Swiss francs from
the National Bank, supplemented by Federal
Reserve purchases of Swiss francs in the mar­
ket. In July, the remaining $50 million of swap
debt due to the German Federal Bank was
liquidated through a direct transaction with that
institution. In May, swap debt in Belgian francs
was reduced by a $20 million repayment to $470
million equivalent. Finally, in August, new
drawings of $10.2 million equivalent were made
^ e e B u l l e t i n , M arch 1 9 7 2 , pp. 2 2 8 - 5 6 .

760

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

discourage inflows of nonresident funds. Spot
sterling fell close to the new floor of $2.5471
in late December, as some speculative positions
began to be unwound and year-end adjustments
were made. Taking advantage of this develop­
ment, the Federal Reserve acquired sterling in
the New York market and repaid, just prior to
the year-end, $35 million of the $750 million
equivalent swap drawing on the Bank of
England that had been entered into in August
1971.
After the year-end adjustments were com­
pleted, however, the initial post-Smithsonian
euphoria in the markets faded. The outflow of
funds from the United Kingdom dried up rap­
idly, and spot sterling moved away from the
floor. Doubts about the durability of the new
exchange rates quickly surfaced, and by midJanuary most other major European currencies
were bid up toward, or even above, their central
rates. At the same time it became clear that the
EC countries were approaching agreement on
narrowing the margin of fluctation between their
currencies and that the United Kingdom proba­
bly would participate in the arrangements.
Consequently, sterling was bid up into line with
the continental currencies, rising by 4 cents to
more than $2.59 before leveling off. In early
February, following a further decline in Euro­
dollar rates relative to money market rates in
London, the pound advanced to its middle rate.
Over the course of that month, sterling weak­
ened from time to time, reflecting the market’s
pessimism over the long-term implications of
a protracted coal miners’ strike, but once the
strike was settled the continuing general ad­
vance of other major European currencies had
a buoyant effect on sterling.

on the Belgian swap line, but these were fully
liquidated by early September.
In March and July of this year, the U.S.
Treasury redeemed in two equal instalments a
$153 million equivalent German mark-de­
nominated note that had been issued to the
German Federal Bank under the 1967 military
offset agreement with Germany (Table 4). Other
foreign-currency-denominated securities were
renewed at maturity. As of September 8, out­
standing U.S. Treasury foreign-currency-denominated securities amounted to $2.0 billion
equivalent.

STERLING
In 1971 the United Kingdom had recorded a
large payments surplus, with a substantial gain
in official reserves. Meanwhile, however, the
British economy had become afflicted by a wage
and price spiral that threatened to weaken its
competitive position in world markets. More­
over, a significant proportion of the 1971 reserve
gain reflected hot money inflows that could be
reversed in short order. Consequently, at the
Smithsonian meeting the United Kingdom
maintained sterling’s gold parity, thereby lim­
iting the appreciation of sterling against the
dollar to the 8.57 per cent increase in the dollar
price for gold. A middle rate for the pound of
$2.60571— commensurate with the dollar’s
devaluation— was established, and the Bank of
England announced official buying and selling
rates in conformity with the Smithsonian
Agreement’s provision for a band of 4.5 per
cent around the new middle or central rates.
At the same time the British authorities re­
laxed the exchange control regulations they had
announced in late August and early October to
TABLE 3

DRAWINGS AND REPAYMENTS ON FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM BY ITS
SWAP PARTNERS
In m illions o f dollars

Banks drawing on System

Bank for International Settlem ents
(against German marks) ..................
T o ta l .......................................................




D raw ings, or repayments ( —)

Drawings
on
Sy stem ,
Jan. 1,
1972

1972
I

r

8.o

\

-8 .0

/
\

8 .0
-8 .0

II
6 .0
-6 .0
6 .0
- 6 .0

July 1 A ug. 31

D rawings
on
System ,
A ug. 31,
1972

1.0 \
- 1 .0 J
1.0 1L..................
- 1 . 0 Jr

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

On March 7, against a background of wide­
spread market uncertainty and growing specula­
tion about the readiness of individual central
banks to absorb sizable new inflows of dollars,
the EC countries announced agreement to nar­
row the margin of fluctuation between their own
currencies to 2 lA per cent by July 1. The market
saw this agreement as greatly increasing the
likelihood of a concerted European attempt to
stem further inflows of dollars— either through
new controls or a joint float against the dollar—
and there was a rush to stockpile currencies that
might become more expensive or even una­
vailable later on. Although the buying wave was
directed with particular force toward continental
currencies, demand for sterling was also strong,
and the spot rate shot up by almost 5 cents in
3 days to well over $2.65. The flurry soon
abated, however, as the U.S. Congress acted
on the gold bill, short-term interest rates in this
country began to firm, and, following the March
central bank meeting in Basle, it was made clear
that there was continuing firm support for the
Smithsonian Agreement.
Sterling, in particular, fell back sharply,
especially after the release of British trade fig­
ures showing a swing into deficit in February.
Thus, by the time the British budget was pre­
sented on March 21, sterling was down to the
$2.61 level once again. The budget, which was
expansionary, stressed the need for combating
the sluggish trend in the domestic economy and
the persistent high level of unemployment. In
addition, there was a modest relaxation of ex­
change controls, primarily for capital outflows
to the EC and candidate countries, and British
firms controlled by residents of those nations
were allowed to raise unlimited sterling finance
for their operations in the United Kingdom.
Following the budget announcement, forward
sterling softened somewhat but, reflecting the
general pressure against the dollar, spot sterling
rose close to $2.62 by the end of March.
In April the sterling market was reasonably
well balanced, with the spot rate fluctuating
around $2.61. On April 28 the United Kingdom
discharged the remainder of its debt to the IMF,
thereby reconstituting its full drawing rights
with the Fund for the first time since December
1964. The repayment required the cooperation



761

1A

CHANGES IN EXCHANGE RATES AND
OFFICIAL TRANSACTIONS

JULY
SEPT.
NOV.
JAN.
MAR.
MAY
JULY
SEPT.
___________ 1971_____________________________ 1972___________________

M ovem ents in exchange rates are measured as percentage d e­
viations o f w eek ly averages of N ew York noon offered rates
from the m iddle or central rates established under the Sm ith­
sonian Agreem ent. Changes in reserves are com puted from
the figures published in the International M onetary Fund’s
International F inancial S ta tistics and, as such, reflect for
D ecem ber 1971 not only actual m ovem ents in reserve assets
but also the revaluation, on the basis of the Sm ithsonian A gree­
m ent, o f assets other than dollars. Changes for January 1972
include this year’s allocations o f S D R ’s.
♦Upper and low er intervention lim its established in D ecem ­
ber 1971.

of a number of countries. Under the arrange­
ment that was worked out, the U.S. Treasury
drew SDR 200 million equivalent of sterling
from the IMF, thereby reducing the United
Kingdom’s repurchase obligation by a corre­
sponding amount to SDR 950 million. The
United Kingdom, in turn, discharged this resid­
ual commitment with SDR 500 million equiva­
lent of currencies acquired from third countries
against dollars, with SDR 50 million of gold
and SDR’s purchased from Canada, and with
SDR 400 million out of British reserves. Then,
on May 1, the United Kingdom formally began
its participation in the EC narrower band ar­

762

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

rangement that had been put into effect 1 week
earlier. There was little reaction in the market,
however, as sterling had been holding well
within the 2 % per cent band for some 2 months.
Spot sterling remained fairly steady through
most of May. Nevertheless, an increasingly
pessimistic atomosphere was developing in the
market, as price and wage inflation and the
continuing series of labor disputes threatened to
cut further into Britain’s competitiveness in
world markets. The trade deficits, which had
appeared in February and had continued in
March and April, were taken as a sign that the
huge current-account surplus of the past 3 years
was already being eroded and might soon be
erased. Market pessimism first showed through
in a widening of discounts on forward sterling
late in May, and in early June spot sterling
began to soften as well. The pound was still
trading above the middle rate for the dollar but
had fallen close to the bottom of the EC band.
On June 8, the release of first-quarter balance
of payments statistics for the United Kingdom,
showing a sharp drop in Britain’s current-ac­
count surplus, seemed to confirm market fears
about the pound’s prospects, and sterling came
on offer, with traders beginning to switch into
German marks, Swiss francs, and Dutch
guilders. Then, on June 15, out of a growing
morass of legal and jurisdictional controversies
on the labor front, a wildcat dock strike trig­
gered a new selling wave of both forward and
spot sterling. With spot sterling now at the
bottom of the EC band, the Bank of England
and several Common Market central banks were
obliged to intervene heavily in support of the
pound against EC currencies. As the pound
dipped to $2.58!/2 against the dollar on June 16,
it tended to pull the whole band down vis-a-vis
the dollar, thereby making the continental cur­
rencies appear relatively cheap.
Meanwhile, sterling’s prospects had become
a subject of general debate in the United King­
dom, especially against the background of
Chancellor of the Exchequer Barber’s statement
in the March budget address that “ the lesson
of the international balance of payments upsets
of the last few years is that it is neither necessary
nor desirable to distort domestic economies to
an unacceptable extent in order to maintain




unrealistic exchange rates, whether they are too
high or too low .” In parliamentary debate on
June 19, an opposition spokesman stated that
he did not see how a devaluation could be
delayed beyond July or August of this year.
Over the next 3 days, enoromous amounts
of sterling were dumped on the exchanges.
Forward sterling was driven to deep discounts
(as much as 15 per cent per annum on 1-month
deliveries), and spot sterling was pushed down
to as low as $2.5614 against the dollar, even
as EC central banks continued their massive
support effort to maintain the 2 lA per cent band
among their own currencies. In sum, over the
six trading days June 15 to 22, such support
amounted to $2.6 billion equivalent, financed
by exchange transactions with the Bank of
England that were to be liquidated by the end
of July.
Early on the morning of Friday, June 23, with
no end to the reserve losses in sight, the British
authorities announced:
H.M. Government has decided that, as a tempo­
rary measure, sterling will be allowed to float. This
means that for the time being the market rate for
sterling will not necessarily be confined within an­
nounced limits either in respect of the U .S. dollar
or in respect of EEC currencies.
It is the Government’s intention to return as soon
as conditions permit to the maintenance of normal
IMF margins round parity and participation in the
special EEC currency arrangements.

At the same time, the London market was closed
through the following Monday and most of the
exchange controls applying to nonsterling-area
countries were extended to the overseas-sterling-area countries other than the Republic of
Ireland.
The floating of the pound, and the subsequent
withdrawal on the same day of the continental
central banks from their respective markets,
gravely weakened confidence in the durability
of the Smithsonian Agreement and the EC in­
tervention arrangements. On Monday, June 26,
however, the EC finance ministers agreed in
Luxembourg to continue to defend the Smith­
sonian rates and to retain the narrower EC band
arrangements, while the pound continued to
float.
On June 27, when London was the only major
European foreign exchange market to resume

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

763

TABLE 4

U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES, FOREIGN CURRENCY SERIES
In m illions o f dollars equivalent
R edem ptions ( —)
Issued to—

Outstand­
ing,
Jan. 1,
1972

1972
I

II

July 1 Sept. 8

O utstand­
ing,
Sept. 8,
1972

German Federal B a n k ............................
German b a n k s ...........................................
S w iss National Bank
Bank for International Settlem en ts1...

6 1 2 .0
1 53.0
1 ,2 1 5 .4
164.8

-7 6 .5

- 7 6 .5

4 5 9 .0
153.0
1,21 8 .3
170.9

T o ta l .......................................................

2 ,1 4 5 .2

-7 6 .5

-7 6 .5

2 ,0 0 1 .2

d e n o m in a te d in Sw iss francs.
N o t e .— D iscrepancies in totals result from valuation adjustments and from rounding.

normal operations, the sterling rate dropped
almost to $2.47, but a sharp squeeze for bal­
ances developed later in the day as deliveries
on earlier sales contracts had to be met, and
the spot rate temporarily rebounded to $2.513A.
Once the squeeze for balances had passed, ster­
ling dropped off steadily, by a penny or two
a day over the course of the next week, to as
low as $2.41 lA on July 4 in London. At that
point, commercial demand reappeared and the
rate recovered to around $2.45.
The revival of commercial demand was un­
derscored by the release of trade figures for
June, which had swung back into surplus and
confirmed that in fact the United Kingdom was
still in current-account surplus. Moreover, the
continuing money market squeeze in London
tended to support sterling in the exchanges.
Even so, new troubles on the labor front, cul­
minating in a dock strike beginning on July 21,
had a disturbing influence on the sterling mar­
ket, occasionally pulling the rate down sharply.
Over the remainder of July, sterling traded in
the $2.44 to $2.45 range. On July 31, the United
Kingdom settled its debts in connection with the
defense of sterling in June, utilizing $1,150
million of funds previously swapped out under
special arrangements, $634 million equivalent
drawn under the U .K .’s IMF gold tranche posi­
tion, and $823 million from reserves that at the
end of July still amounted to $6,082 million
(inclusive of Britain’s remaining $126 million
IMF gold tranche position).
Meanwhile, as sterling began to decline
sharply against the dollar in mid-June, the New
York Federal Reserve Bank, acting in close
consultation with the Bank of England, began
to buy sterling in the New York market to repay




the Federal Reserve’s remaining swap commit­
ment. By the end of June the System had been
able to reduce its swap commitment by another
$52 million to $663 million equivalent. After
sterling was floated, the U.S. Treasury periodi­
cally bought sterling on days when the rate was
declining in New York and by mid-July had
purchased a total of $41.5 million equivalent.
At that point the Federal Reserve, in order
to repay the remainder of its swap commitment
in sterling, initiated a program of daily pur­
chases of sterling, mainly on a direct basis from
the Bank of England but also in the market.
These purchases, together with sterling acquired
from the U.S. Treasury, including the pounds
drawn by the Treasury at the time of the British
IMF repayment in April, enabled the System
to reduce its swap commitment by $405 million
equivalent to $258 million as of July 31. The
program of daily purchases continued through
early August, and by August 14 the Federal
Reserve had acquired sufficient sterling to liqui­
date the remainder of its original swap commit­
ment of $750 million.
Buoyed by a tight domestic money market
and continuing commercial demand, sterling
rose early in August to trade above $2.45.
Announcement of an end to the dock strike and
release of a second consecutive trade surplus
gave additional support to the spot rate toward
midmonth. Subsequently, the squeeze for bal­
ances eased, with British short-term interest
rates declining abruptly, and spot sterling edged
to below the $2.45 level in early September.

GERMAN MARK
Following the Smithsonian Agreement, the
German authorities established a new central

764

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

rate for the mark of $0.3103Vs, an effective
appreciation of 13.58 per cent against the dollar,
and set margins at $0.30347s and $0.3174% on
either side of the central rate. None of the
restraints against inflows of foreign funds intro­
duced earlier in 1971 were removed, but the
Government announced that it would not avail
itself for the time being of its new power to
impose deposit requirements of up to 50 per cent
against German firms’ borrowings abroad.
When exchange trading was resumed, the mark
settled well below its new central rate. Except
for some modest outflows toward the year-end,
there was no significant reversal of the huge
speculative positions in marks that had been
built up over the course of 1971.
Early in 1972 doubts began to spread in the
exchange markets that a durable settlement of
the international monetary crisis really had been
achieved. Moreover, many Europeans were ex­
pressing concern over the further decline taking
place in the U.S. interest rates. With the press
and the markets focusing more and more on
these issues, the atmosphere deteriorated pro­
gressively over the early weeks of the new year,
and almost any news item or rumor was seized
upon as a reason for additional selling of dollars.
Funds were shifted into Germany particularly,
and in heavy demand the spot mark rose through
the new central rate by mid-January. Further
waves of nervousness swept through the foreign
exchange markets in February. Each time the
mark rate was bid up sharply, and the pressures
eased only after forceful intervention by the
German Federal Bank.
Then, late in February, the German authori­
ties announced new measures designed to lessen
the inflow of funds and to defend the Washing­
ton agreement. These included cuts in the dis­
count and Lombard rates of the German Federal
Bank and a hike in the marginal reserve re­
quirement against nonresident liabilities. More
importantly, the Ministry of Economics and
Finance imposed a 40 per cent deposit require­
ment (B ardepot) on most foreign borrowings of
nonbanking enterprises, retroactive to January
1, moving for the first time to curb German
corporate borrowings abroad. Following the an­
nouncement of these measures, the spot rate
declined to almost 1Vi per cent below its upper




limit by late February. Over the month as a
whole, however, German official reserves had
increased by $744 million.
The demand for marks soon built up again
in early March, and the mark was driven up
almost to its Smithsonian ceiling in reaction to
the growing press discussion of a possible con­
certed European response to the continued in­
flux of dollars— through either the introduction
of controls or a joint float against the dollar.
Following encouraging reports of the Basle
meeting of central bankers on the weekend of
March 11-12 and indications that U.S. short­
term interest rates were beginning to firm, the
mark backed off somewhat and traded around
the $0.3150 level. The mark held at this level
well into April, with little reaction to the an­
nouncement early that month that on April 24
the EC would implement its narrower trading
band arrangement (the “ snake in the tunnel” ).
By that time, and indeed throughout the sec­
ond quarter, Germany’s international payments
position was undergoing a substantial read­
justment. The domestic economy had leveled
off, but wage and price pressures remained
strong in Germany and the rise of the mark rate
over the course of the previous year was begin­
ning to exert an influence on the German trade
balance. Thus the trade surplus, which had
swelled to substantial proportions toward the
end of 1971 and through the early months of
1972, showed a decline in March and subse­
quent months. Coupled with a further deterio­
ration in service items and transfer payments,
this moved the full current account from surplus
to rough balance.
The continuing strength of the mark during
the spring reflected, therefore, an increasingly
heavy influx of capital. These inflows were
mainly generated by the market’s ^expectation
that there might be a further rise in the value
of mark-denominated instruments. At the same
time, moreover, German corporations continued
to seek funds abroad through a variety of means.
To avoid the B ardepot, the corporations ran
down their foreign market borrowings by $1.3
billion in March and April but at the same time
were able to sell to foreigners a substantial
volume of mark-denominated bonds.
The exchange markets were in better balance

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

in May, but the general uneasiness over the
international monetary situation showed through
on a number of occasions. Such events as the
intensification of the Vietnam war early in the
month and Treasury Secretary Connally’s resig­
nation toward midmonth brought forth a spate
of market and press commentary on their ulti­
mate significance for the monetary system.
Comments to the press by officials from either
side of the Atlantic, or even rumors of what
they might have said, were closely scrutinized
for any hint of further moves to be made on
the international monetary front. Thus, several
times in May the German mark was bid up
sharply in the exchanges, pulling several other
European currencies along with it. These bursts
of demand were short lived, however, and each
time the spot rate quickly retreated.
The mark was trading quietly around $0.3150
in early June, when swiftly moving events in
the sterling market sent shock waves into other
markets as well. The rush out of sterling was
directed mainly toward the mark, which rose
sharply against the dollar. By June 16, sterling
had fallen to its intervention point against the
mark under the EC arrangements and both the
German Federal Bank and the Bank of England
had to intervene massively (selling marks
against sterling) to keep the spread between their
two currencies from widening beyond 2 3A per
cent. This heavy injection of marks into the
exchanges tended to pull the mark down against
the dollar, and the rate dropped to $0.3131 by
June 22.
When the British authorities announced the
floating of the pound on Friday, June 23,
thereby dropping out of the Smithsonian and EC
agreements, traders immediately began shifting
funds out of dollars and into other European
currencies as they feared a general abandonment
of the Smithsonian rates. As a result, the Ger­
man Federal Bank was flooded with nearly $900
million within the first hour of trading, after
which it suspended operations and closed the
exchange market. In trading later that day and
on Monday, June 26, in New York, the spot
mark jumped 15 points above its Smithsonian
ceiling. Following the EC finance ministers’
decision on June 26 to continue to defend the
Smithsonian limits and to maintain the EC band,




765

the German authorities announced they would
reopen their foreign exchange markets on
Wednesday, June 28.
When normal trading resumed that day, the
spot mark traded just below its ceiling, but
marks for future delivery were quoted at large
premiums. The next day the German Govern­
ment moved to back up the decision to support
the existing international exchange agreements
by announcing a series of measures to tighten
controls. The B ar depot requirement was raised
from 40 per cent to 50 per cent and was applied
to a wider range of borrowings. Sales of do­
mestic fixed-income securities to nonresidents
were made subject to the prior approval of the
authorities, to be administered restrictively. The
German Federal Bank again raised its reserve
requirements against the banks’ foreign liabili­
ties, so that in effect reserves totaling between
90 per cent and 100 per cent would be required
against any additional foreign liabilities of the
banks. Finally, domestic reserve requirements
were hiked to absorb the liquidity generated by
inflows of the nonbanking sector. This increase
in domestic liquidity reflected the fact that Ger­
many’s official reserves, which had risen by
$121 million in April and May, had been
swelled by a further $2,763 million in June,
largely as a result of the intervention to support
both sterling and the dollar.
The tightening of controls by the German
authorities did not immediately allay market
anxieties and, in the generalized pessimism over
the future of the Smithsonian Agreement,
traders hastened to shift even more funds into
Germany ahead of the possible imposition of
additional controls. Consequently, the mark was
in heavy demand early in July and the German
Federal Bank was obliged to absorb dollars on
a large scale. The buying of marks, and of most
major European currencies, continued until the
Swiss authorities relieved some of the uncer­
tainties by taking forceful defensive measures
of their own on July 4 and 5. The Federal Bank
then intensified its efforts to tighten up the
B ardepot and also asked banks to enter into a
gentlemen’s agreement neither to sell assets out
of their own portfolios to nonresidents nor to
arrange or guarantee any sizable foreign credits
to residents. In addition, the Federal Bank once

766

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

again boosted its minimum reserve requirements
against domestic liabilities to mop up the
liquidity flowing directly into German corpora­
tions.
These various measures helped settle the
markets briefly, but a new rush into marks and
other currencies soon developed in the week
prior to the scheduled July 17-18 London
meeting of EC finance ministers. With the at­
mosphere still tense following the floating of the
pound, there were reports in the European press
suggesting that the EC finance ministers would
plan a joint float of their currencies against the
dollar, rather than stick to their announced
agenda. The market seized upon these reports
to mount a new drive out of the dollar and into
the mark and other European currencies. With
the mark pushed once again to its upper limit,
the German Federal Bank had to absorb some
$1.1 billion over the 2 days of July 13-14. On
Monday, July 17, the EC ministers in London
made clear their determination to maintain the
Smithsonian exchange-rate
structure and
emerged with a general agreement on longerterm monetary questions, including the need for
par values. The reports out of London gave
pause to the markets, and the demand for marks
let up over the 2 days of the meeting. The huge
technical positions built up over previous days
and weeks, short of dollars and long of marks
and other currencies, nevertheless remained in­
tact.
By Wednesday, July 19, the mark had edged
slightly away from its ceiling and eased further
after the New York market opened that morn­
ing, to around $0.3160 by 11 o ’clock. Shortly
thereafter, on the basis of a U.S. Government
policy decision, the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York placed large offerings of marks in
the New York market. These offers were for
System account, with marks made available by
the U.S. Treasury on a swap basis. Such unex­
pected intervention generated an immediate
market reaction, and traders quickly moved their
mark quotations down. As the market backed
away, the Federal Reserve’s offering rate was
subsequently lowered several times. The opera­
tion generated considerable market comment
and, in response to press inquiries, Chairman
Burns confirmed the System’s intervention in




marks, adding that such intervention would
continue on whatever scale and whenever it was
deemed desirable. The following morning in
Germany, with the market fully alerted to the
news of the U.S. initiative, the spot mark fell
further, reaching $0.3152 (some 3A of 1 per cent
below the upper limit) by the time the New York
market opened. The Federal Reserve followed
up with a further offering of marks out of
previously accumulated System balances. Over
succeeding days, with additional favorable press
and market commentary on the Federal Reserve
initiative, the mark rate continued to decline.
This tendency persisted into early August, with
some unwinding of speculative positions, and
the rate settled temporarily around $0.3140.
By midmonth a more favorable atmosphere
developed for the dollar, following the release
of improved U.S. balance of payments figures
for the second quarter and indications of new
efforts by the United States to negotiate a set­
tlement of the Vietnam conflict. In addition, the
various measures taken by the German authori­
ties in July were beginning to bite. Conse­
quently, the mark rate dropped further, reaching
$0.3134 on August 16, and the Federal Reserve
again sold marks to consolidate the dollar’s
improvement. These sales brought to $21.4
million equivalent the total of marks sold in
market operations.
The shift in sentiment in favor of the dollar
continued, pushing the mark rate to $0.31261>4
on August 21. On the next day, however, Ger­
man commercial banks reportedly found them­
selves short of liquidity to meet their reserve
requirements through the end of August. A
squeeze developed in the Frankfurt money mar­
ket, and the banks scrambled to buy marks in
the exchanges, setting off a sharp rise in the
mark rate before the banks’ liquidity needs were
met. When the July trade figures for the United
States showing a narrowing of the trade deficit
were announced on August 24, however, the
mark eased once again.
In other operations during the period under
review, the U.S. authorities, under agreements
with the German Federal Bank, were able to
liquidate certain German mark obligations en­
tered into prior to the floating of the mark in
May 1971. In March and July the U.S. Treasury

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

purchased sufficient marks from the Federal
Bank to redeem in two payments a $153 million
mark-denominated note. Moreover, on July 24,
the Federal Reserve liquidated its remaining $50
million equivalent mark swap commitment, also
purchasing marks directly from the Federal
Bank. This repayment placed the $1 billion
swap arrangement with the German Federal
Bank on a fully standby basis and no new
drawings have been made.

SWISS FRANC
Under the Smithsonian Agreement the Swiss
authorities fixed a central rate for the franc of
$0.2604Vs— in effect, an increase of 6.36 per
cent against the dollar from the franc’s previous
parity and of 13.88 per cent from the parity in
force prior to Switzerland’s revaluation on May
10, 1971— and announced their new interven­
tion points, 2 Va per cent on either side of the
central rate. Actual trading conditions were little
changed, however, since the banks had been
allowed to deal throughout and because the
restrictions imposed the preceding August re­
mained in effect. Increases in the banks’ net
foreign liabilities over the July 31, 1971, levels
continued to be subject to a 100 per cent reserve
requirement, and interest payments on nonresi­
dents’ deposits made after July 31 were still
prohibited. In the wake of the Smithsonian
Agreement there were modest outflows from
Switzerland, and the franc gradually began to
ease toward the new floor of $0.2546%. There
was no substantial unwinding of speculative
positions, however, and the Swiss banks re­
mained highly liquid as the year-end ap­
proached.
Early in January, with the current account of
Switzerland’s balance of payments continuing
in small surplus and the markets hesitant in the
face of the many monetary issues still to be
resolved, the franc rate remained slightly above
the floor, even as domestic monetary conditions
eased further. By midmonth the market was
already beginning to question the durability of
the exchange rate realignment, and the spot
franc rose along with other European currencies.
Over succeeding weeks, as traders grew in­
creasingly jittery, several rounds of heavy buy­
ing pushed the franc up to as high as the central




767

rate. At that time, in view of the continuing
inflows from abroad, the Swiss National Bank
instituted a requirement that 25 per cent of the
proceeds of foreign bond issues in Switzerland
(which were running at more than twice their
volume of a year earlier) had to be converted
into dollars by the central bank at the franc’s
lower intervention limit. Another wave of de­
mand for francs developed in early March when,
in the general strengthening of European cur­
rencies, the Swiss franc was rapidly bid up to
some 1 per cent above the central rate. The
tensions in the foreign exchanges eased abruptly
at that point, however, and the franc rate fell
back sharply. Since domestic liquidity remained
extremely abundant in Switzerland, the decline
was steeper in the Swiss franc market than
elsewhere on the Continent, and after midMarch the spot rate was again below the central
rate.
On April 5 the Swiss National Bank and the
Swiss Bankers Association agreed on two
measures to mop up some of the excess domes­
tic liquidity. First, marginal reserve require­
ments ranging up to 20 per cent were introduced
against the growth in the banks’ domestic lia­
bilities since July 31, 1971. Second, the already
existing 100 per cent reserve requirement
against increases in the banks’ net foreign lia­
bilities was considerably tightened through a
more restrictive interpretation, even though the
required ratio was halved. At first, there was
little reaction to these measures in the Swiss
franc market and the spot rate held fairly steady.
But as the market came to appreciate the possi­
ble consequences of the restriction on the banks’
net foreign currency positions, the franc
weakened.
Late in April the Swiss banks began to
transfer funds to the National Bank under the
terms of the tightened reserve requirement
against increases in net liabilities to foreigners.
An alternative for the banks was to reduce their
net external liability positions by purchasing
dollars from the National Bank, and on May
2 the National Bank sold $150 million at the
rate of $0.2577^ (3.88 Swiss francs) for this
purpose. The following day the National Bank
announced that it would henceforth be prepared
to sell dollars at this higher rate, rather than

768

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

at the official lower intervention point of
$0.2546%, thereby reducing the effective range
of fluctuation of the Swiss franc. In a parallel
move, it lifted to the same level the exchange
rate for conversions of foreign bond proceeds
raised in Switzerland, while increasing to 40 per
cent from 25 per cent the share of such proceeds
that had to be converted at the central bank.
These measures had no direct impact on the
market but, over succeeding weeks, resulted in
a further decline in the National Bank’s dollar
holdings.
The nervousness that broke out in the ex­
changes at the beginning of the second week
of May pushed the franc somewhat higher, but
there was never any severe pressure and the spot
rate soon receded, declining until the middle of
that month. Trading in francs then turned quiet,
with the rate about 3A per cent under the central
rate and well below the EC currencies. Taking
advantage of the relatively weak exchange rate,
the Federal Reserve, with the agreement of the
Swiss National Bank, initiated a program of
moderate purchases of Swiss francs in the mar­
ket to make a start on covering the System’s
swap commitments in that currency— $1 billion
equivalent to the Swiss National Bank and $600
million to the BIS. By early June, such Federal
Reserve purchases were sufficient, together with
$250 million of francs bought directly from the
Swiss National Bank to replenish its dollar bal­
ances, to enable the Federal Reserve to make
swap repayments totaling $300 million equiva­
lent to that bank. The System’s Swiss franc
swap indebtedness to the National Bank was
thereby reduced to $700 million, while the
additional $600 million equivalent Swiss franc
drawing on the BIS remained outstanding.
Late in May the Swiss National Bank’s sus­
tained efforts to absorb domestic liquidity began
to take hold and the Swiss franc strengthened.
On May 30, an erroneous press report from
Switzerland to the effect that Under Secretary
Volcker had not absolutely ruled out the possi­
bility of another dollar devaluation set off a
particularly sharp reaction in the Swiss franc
market. In heavy trading, the rate surged by X
A
per cent within half an hour. Although the wire
service later admitted that it had transmitted its
own interpretation of Mr. Volcker’s response




CHANGES IN EXCHANGE RATES AND
OFFICIAL TRA N SACTION S
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

PER CENT

For notes see p. 761.

to questions and that the Under Secretary had
in fact strongly supported the Smithsonian
alignment, the market did not immediately re­
cover from the initial adverse reaction, and the
franc swung widely around the central rate over
the subsequent days.
This misunderstanding was the first of a series
of disquieting developments to hit the exchange
markets in rapid succession in the late spring,
and the Swiss franc became increasingly subject
to speculative pressures. Early in June freemarket gold prices— which had already ad­
vanced sharply the preceding month— surged in
a strong speculative outburst on rumors of an
increase in the official price of gold. In response,
the Swiss franc rose rapidly, moving through
its $0.2604Vs central rate.
Later in the month, the fever in the gold
markets abated and the Swiss banks’ concerns
over their midyear liquidity positions were eased
by the willingness of the National Bank to
extend assistance through short-term swaps. (In
fact, it granted a total of $923 million in swaps
over the midyear period.) Nevertheless, demand
for Swiss francs began to pick up, as funds were
switched out of sterling on a progressively

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

heavier scale. Since Switzerland is not a party
to the EC currency arrangements, the franc rate
was not pulled downward, as were many other
continental currencies, by the rapid drop of
sterling vis-a-vis the dollar. Instead, the spot
franc was propelled upward by speculative
positioning to $0.2653 by June 22.
Following the floating of the pound on June
23, the Swiss National Bank announced that it
would not intervene in the foreign exchange
market until further notice. The Swiss banks
were still free to trade, however, and the franc
immediately rose above its ceiling. On June 26
the Swiss authorities took new and more drastic
measures to limit the inflow of foreign capital,
this time banning the sale to foreign investors
of domestic securities, foreign securities de­
nominated in Swiss francs, and mortgages on
land and also prohibiting all sales of Swiss real
estate to nonresidents. Following these steps,
the franc rate moved back down toward its
official ceiling. When other continental central
banks reopened for business on June 28, how­
ever, the National Bank stayed out of the market
to assess the situation further, and the franc
continued to trade erratically above the upper
limit in a thin market through the month-end.
During this period, the Federal Reserve sold out
of balances small amounts of francs in the New
York market, with most of the proceeds used
to purchase German marks.
When the National Bank resumed operations
on Monday, July 3, it warned that a negative
interest rate penalty on increases in nonresident
deposits in Switzerland would be imposed if the
inflow of funds became too large. Nevertheless,
there was a heavy demand for francs, and the
bank was forced to intervene at the upper inter­
vention limit. The Swiss authorities moved
promptly, therefore, to impose a quarterly 2 per
cent tax on any portion of foreign deposits with
Swiss banks in excess of the balances held on
June 30, 1972. In addition, they extended the
prohibition of interest payments on nonresident
deposits made after July 31, 1971, to all banks
(this ban had previously applied only to deposits
with the larger banks), prohibited all banks from
having net foreign exchange liability positions
(including forward positions) at the close of
business on any day, subjected borrowings




769

abroad by Swiss citizens and corporations to the
prior approval of the Swiss National Bank, and
placed on a legal basis the previous gentlemen’s
agreement establishing the marginal reserve re­
quirements against banks’ net foreign liabilities.
This barrage of measures halted the inflows, and
the Swiss franc fell away from its upper limit,
reaching as low as $0.2647 on July 5.
As the July 17-18 meeting of the EC finance
ministers approached, the Swiss franc again
came into extremely heavy demand, and the
National Bank had to absorb just over $1 billion.
Once the meeting got under way, however, the
market concluded that the anticipated joint EC
float against the dollar probably would not ma­
terialize, and buying pressure on the franc
tapered off. When the meeting ended in a reaf­
firmation of official intent to defend the Smith­
sonian parities, some offerings of Swiss francs
against dollars developed and the franc rate fell
rapidly away from its $0.2664Vs ceiling. The
downward movement was accelerated by the
news of the U.S. authorities’ reentry into the
exchanges on July 19 and by the favorable
response that action received. The franc reached
as low as $0.2641 before leveling off. On July
21, in order to absorb part of the franc liquidity
resulting from the heavy mid-July inflows, the
National Bank raised its marginal reserve re­
quirements against increases in the banks’ do­
mestic and foreign liabilities.
The Swiss franc market, no longer fueled by
a rapid succession of speculative rumors, then
turned very quiet. In mid-August, when senti­
ment toward the dollar improved in response
to the Federal Reserve’s continuing market in­
tervention and release of improved secondquarter U.S. balance of payments figures, the
Swiss franc followed the German mark down­
ward. By early September, the spot rate was
fluctuating around the $0.2645 level.

BELGIAN FRANC
Following the Smithsonian meeting, the Belgian
authorities announced that the franc’s central
rate would be set at $0.022313, an effective
revaluation of 2.76 per cent against gold and
a total appreciation of 11.57 per cent against the
dollar. New intervention points were established
at 2 lA per cent above and below the central rate.

770

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

At the same time, Belgium and the Nether­
lands— which appreciated the guilder by the
same percentage against the dollar— decided to
maintain the close link between their currencies
by continuing to intervene when necessary to
keep the rate between the franc and the guilder
within a 1.5 per cent spread. Moreover, the
Belgian authorities maintained the two-tier
market structure, with only current transactions
going through the official market. When the
Brussels exchange market was reopened on De­
cember 21, the Belgian franc was quoted well
above the new floor and rose gradually thereaf­
ter. By the year-end, when Euro-dollar quota­
tions fell below comparable Belgian domestic
interest yields, the franc reached the new central
rate.
Early in 1972, the Belgian franc joined other
currencies in rising sharply against the dollar,
and by February the National Bank had begun
to take in dollars, both on a swap and an outright
basis. Moreover, in the separate market for
financial francs, quotations had risen to a sig­
nificant premium over the commercial rate. To
a large extent, the run-up of the franc reflected
relatively high interest rates in Belgium, as well
as market fears over the prospects for the
Smithsonian Agreement. For its part, the Na­
tional Bank cut its lending rates three times
between the first of the year and early March,
with the discount rate reduced from 5 V2 per cent
to 4 per cent in Vi per cent steps, but these
actions served merely to bring Belgian rates
down into line with comparable rates in other
centers. At the same time, economic activity
was only gradually recovering from a slowdown
and Belgium’s current-account surplus remained
large. Once the spot rate began to rise, fears
of a possible further advance led to a build-up
of leads and lags in trade payments, which in
turn generated additional demand in both spot
and forward markets for commercial francs.
Early in March, when there was widespread
discussion of a possible common EC response
to growing dollar inflows, either through a joint
float of their currencies or through administra­
tive controls to bar these inflows, there was a
jump in demand for several currencies, and the
National Bank of Belgium again had to take in
dollars at the Smithsonian ceiling. On March




9, in an effort to discourage short-term capital
inflows, the authorities instructed the banks to
avoid any further build-up in their spot liabilities
to foreigners without a corresponding increase
in their spot foreign assets. This tended to stem
the tide for the time being, and the franc rate
backed away.
With the Brussels money market now highly
liquid, and with incentives having opened up
in favor of moving into Euro-dollars, the Bel­
gian franc continued to decline through midApril. The generally improved exchange market
atmosphere also encouraged some unwinding of
the earlier leads and lags in favor of the franc.
Nevertheless, the Belgian current account was
still in surplus, and when the domestic money
market turned tighter once again late in April
while Euro-dollar rates declined, the Belgian
franc began to advance. This tendency contin­
ued through May, when renewed nervousness
in the exchanges led to a number of brief spurts
in the Belgian franc rate. Late in May, when
the Belgian Government needed dollars for cur­
rent payments, the Federal Reserve purchased
francs in a direct transaction with the National
Bank and, using these francs as well as some
balances on hand, repaid a total of $20 million
equivalent of its swap debt to the National Bank.
The System’s Belgian franc swap commitments
were thereby reduced to $470 million, including
$35 million equivalent owed to the BIS.
When sterling came under speculative attack
in mid-June, the Belgian franc was initially
pushed up to its upper limit against the dollar.
Sterling soon dropped to its middle rate, and
the spread within the EC band thus reached the
full 2 Va per cent. Consequently, as pounds con­
tinued to be dumped on the markets, the Na­
tional Bank of Belgium joined other EC central
banks in the support effort, buying sterling with
francs in the market and making francs available
to the Bank of England for corresponding inter­
vention in London. As the whole EC band was
pulled down against the dollar by the pressure
on sterling, the franc dropped to as low as
$0.022537 on June 22, or 1.3 per cent below
the ceiling.
The floating of the pound on June 23 released
the downward pressure on the EC band, and
the franc snapped back to its ceiling. After

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

absorbing some dollars, the National Bank of
Belgium quickly withdrew from the market
along with the other continental central banks
that had opened that morning. In the limited
trading that followed, the franc rate immediately
rose above its Smithsonian ceiling. After the EC
finance ministers met in Luxembourg on June
26 and made clear their intention of upholding
both the Smithsonian and EC currency arrange­
ments, the Belgian exchange market was
reopened on June 28. At first, the rate held just
below its upper limit and there was no need
for the Belgian authorities to intervene.
The grave uncertainties left in the wake of
the floating of the pound soon led to new de­
mands for continental currencies, however, and
along with other European central banks the
National Bank had to intervene heavily in early
July, particularly on July 13-14, just prior to
the EC finance ministers’ meeting in London.
Reports from that meeting tended to reassure
the markets and, as with other currencies, the
franc edged away from its upper limit. Never­
theless, although the German mark, the Dutch
guilder, and the Swiss franc all declined fairly
sharply over subsequent days, the Belgian franc
hovered close to its upper limit. By late July
it had moved back to its ceiling and held there
into early August, with the National Bank again
absorbing dollars almost every day.
In part, the relative strength of the Belgian
franc reflected the continuing current-account
surplus. In addition, the Belgian authorities had
worked out a gentlemen’s agreement with the
Belgian commercial banks to absorb some of
the domestic liquidity created by the earlier
official purchases of sterling and dollars, and
the banks made sizable deposits with the central
bank at the end of July and during most of
August. Finally, it was clear that the speculative
build-up of the previous month had not been
unwound, and the longer the rate held at the
ceiling the more entrenched became market ex­
pectations that the Belgian authorities might not
be able to resolve the situation within the con­
text of the Smithsonian Agreement.
In these circumstances, on August 10, fol­
lowing consultations with the National Bank of
Belgium, the Federal Reserve initiated a probing
action in the New York exchange market to see




771
whether some shift of expectations could be
generated that would pry the Belgian franc loose
from its ceiling. As in the case of the operation
in German marks in July, the Reserve Bank
placed a large offer of Belgian francs in the
market at the current rate. As the market backed
away, the offer was subsequently moved down
and a moderate amount of francs was sold over
the course of the day. On the following morning
in Europe there was not only some decline of
the franc rate but also some sympathetic easing
of other currency rates. To consolidate the gain,
the Federal Reserve followed up with further
offers on subsequent days, but, with the market
continuing to back away, only a small amount
of Belgian francs was sold. By August 14 the
Belgian franc was clearly following the general
downtrend of other European currencies, so that
no further offers were made. As had been agreed
at the inception of the operation, the Federal
Reserve covered its franc sales by drawing on
its swap line with the National Bank. These
drawings totaling $10.2 million equivalent were
repaid by early September, as improved condi­
tions permitted the Federal Reserve to acquire
the needed francs through market operations.
With the generally improved sentiment for the
dollar, the franc continued to decline on its own
through the end of August, reaching as low as
$0.022743 before steadying in early September.
As of September 8, the Federal Reserve swap
drawings in Belgian francs remained at $470
million equivalent.

DUTCH GUILDER
At the conclusion of the Smithsonian meeting,
the Dutch Government announced that the
guilder would be revalued by 2.76 per cent
against gold, thus producing an effective appre­
ciation of the guilder of 11.57 per cent relative
to the dollar. New intervention limits were set
at 2 lA per cent on either side of the new central
rate of $0.3082. There was little outflow of
funds from the Netherlands when the Amster­
dam market was reopened on December 21 and,
with the Dutch current account strengthening
against the background of sluggish domestic
economic activity, the guilder rate began to rise
during late December and early January.
With interest rates falling in foreign centers

772

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

early in January, the Netherlands Bank reduced
all its lending rates by % percentage point, the
discount rate being cut to Ax/i per cent. Domestic
money market rates declined in response, but
the exchange rate did not follow suit, as there
were sizable new direct investment inflows and
the underlying Dutch payments position re­
mained strong. Even more important, the de­
mand for guilders reflected the exchange mar­
ket’s growing concern over the viability of the
exchange rate realignment negotiated in Wash­
ington, and the rise of the guilder followed
closely the advance of other continental curren­
cies, particularly the German mark. Conse­
quently, the guilder rate was ratcheted upward
in several stages in January and early February,
reaching almost to the upper intervention level.
In February the Dutch authorities moved to
provide additional liquidity to the Amsterdam
money market, first by open market purchases
of Dutch Treasury bills and subsequently
through exchange market swaps, and these
operations relieved some of the upward pressure
on the spot rate. Nevertheless, just after mid­
month a new wave of exchange market uncer­
tainty briefly pushed the spot guilder to the
ceiling, and the Netherlands Bank had to absorb
a modest amount of dollars. The market turned
quieter through the end of February, and in view
of the further decline in interest rates abroad,
effective March 2, the Netherlands Bank cut its
discount rate by V2 percentage point to 4 per
cent.
By early March, however, the debate in
Europe over alternative means of dealing with
dollar inflows was in full swing, with a further
extension of capital controls appearing to be the
most likely route. Consequently, there was an
influx of funds into guilders by traders and
investors who feared that new controls could
render the guilder more expensive or even una­
vailable for certain kinds of transactions later
on. The heavy demand pushed up the guilder
rate, although the Netherlands Bank slowed the
advance by entering into new swaps with its
banks. Then, on March 7, the EC countries
reached the decision to narrow the band of
fluctuation between their currencies, and the
market took the view that the community would
now be in a better position to take common




action against dollar inflows—perhaps through
a joint float. The demand for guilders thus
swelled even further, pushing the spot rate to
its Smithsonian upper limit, and over the course
of 3 days the Netherlands Bank had to absorb
$417 million. On March 9 the Netherlands Bank
moved to curb inflows from abroad by prohibit­
ing nonresidents from making new guilder time
deposits or renewing such deposits when they
mature and by banning the payment of interest
on nonresidents’ demand deposits. At the same
time, the central bank restated its determination
to maintain its Smithsonian buying and selling
rates for dollars. Following these moves, the
market turned much quieter and, as new inflows
tapered off, the spot rate soon retreated from
the ceiling.
The Dutch money market was now extremely
liquid as a result of the earlier heavy influx of
funds, and the guilder tended to drift downward
through the second half of March and well into
April, steadying only after dropping below
$0.3100 in mid-April. Thereafter, the guilder
followed the gradual updrift of the German mark
and other continental currencies, and by early
June was trading quietly around $0.3125.
The guilder was then caught up in the rush
out of sterling. Although the guilder rate was
bid up at first, the operation of the EC currency
arrangements eventually resulted in a decline of
the whole EC band vis-a-vis the dollar. As
sterling weakened, it reached its support point
against successive community currencies. By
June 22, the guilder too was at the ceiling of
the community band— now well below the
Smithsonian upper limit against the dollar— and
the Netherlands Bank was obliged to buy ster­
ling with guilders. This additional supply of
guilders tended to push the guilder rate still
lower against the dollar, to 1.4 per cent below
the ceiling at one point.
On June 23, following announcement of the
floating of sterling, the Netherlands Bank along
with other European central banks withdrew
from the market. After the EC finance ministers’
meeting on June 26, the Dutch joined others
in reaffirming their commitment to the Smith­
sonian and EC arrangements. The Amsterdam
market was officially reopened on Wednesday,
June 28, with the guilder trading below its

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

1p
IU

773

CHANGES IN EXCHANGE RATES AND
OFFICIAL TRA N SACTION S

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

PER CENT

■ NETHERLANDS
RESERVES

1.00

FRANCE

K
■

RAL

rate

RESERVES
E X C H A N G E RATE

SEPT.

SEPT.

For notes see p. 761.

official ceiling. Over subsequent days, however,
the dollar came under pressure in other conti­
nental markets and, with exchange controls in
other countries deflecting funds away from those
currencies, the guilder came into strong de­
mand, obliging the Netherlands Bank to absorb
substantial amounts of dollars. By July 7, stiff
measures by the Swiss authorities had helped
calm the European exchanges and the guilder
edged away from its ceiling. The respite proved
only temporary, as the prospective EC finance
ministers’ meeting on July 17-18 in London
sparked new rumors of a possible joint float
against the dollar that led to massive shifting
out of dollars into most continental currencies.
Along with other central banks, the Netherlands
Bank had to absorb progressively larger
amounts of dollars. In sum, from the time of
the floating of sterling through July 17, the
Netherlands Bank took in $543 million at the
Smithsonian ceiling.
Demand pressures for continental currencies
abated considerably when, during the course of
the London meeting, the EC finance ministers
reaffirmed their determination to defend the
Smithsonian Agreement, while focusing their
discussion on longer-term issues of monetary



reform. Also, on July 17, the Netherlands Bank
announced additional measures to curtail capital
imports, through both leads and lags in pay­
ments for merchandise trade and through intra­
corporate transfers by multinational firms. These
steps helped calm the guilder market further,
and the rate began to ease away from the upper
limit. The Federal Reserve’s reentry into the
exchange market through offers of marks in
New York on July 19 brought about an easing
of the German mark against the dollar over the
next few days, and the guilder rate too began
to decline. Moreover, as the rate continued to
soften through the end of July and into August,
previous leads and lags on trade transactions
began to be unwound. As a result of this de­
cline, the spread between the guilder and the
Belgian franc reached 1Vi per cent. Under the
terms of the Benelux agreement the Netherlands
Bank was obliged to sell modest amounts of
Belgian francs against guilders in order to pre­
vent the spread from widening still further. By
early September the guilder was trading below
$0.3100 in a quiet market.

FRENCH FRANC
The French balance of payments had been in
substantial surplus in 1971, and the franc had
remained strong throughout the year. As part
of the Smithsonian Agreement, the French
Government agreed to keep the gold parity of
the franc unchanged, thereby permitting the
franc to appreciate relative to the dollar by 8.57
per cent. The new central rate for the franc was
set at $0.1954%, with intervention limits set at
2 lA per cent on either side. Although many
of the exchange controls imposed in the second
half of 1971 were eased or abolished following
the Smithsonian Agreement, the French au­
thorities maintained the basic structure of their
two-tier exchange market. Under this system,
which subsequently has been liberalized, the
Bank of France defends the franc at the pre­
scribed intervention points only in the official
market (through which trade and most service
transactions as well as governmental transac­
tions are effected), while all capital transactions
and some service transactions are strictly segre­
gated in a financial market where the franc rate
is allowed to find its own level.

774

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

Despite the strength of the franc during 1971,
most market participants had not expected so
large an appreciation of the franc against the
dollar, and profit-taking brought the rate under
heavy selling pressure as soon as the Paris
exchange market was reopened on December
21. With leads and lags beginning to be un­
wound, the French authorities sold a consid­
erable amount of dollars in the market as the
spot franc edged downward almost to its new
floor. Selling pressure on the franc let up in the
last days of December and, as doubts began to
develop in the markets over the durability of
the Smithsonian Agreement, the franc rate early
in 1972 started a long steady advance. The
financial franc, in the meanwhile, had fallen
below the official franc’s floor on December 21
as speculative positions were unwound, but it
subsequently converged with the official franc.
During the first quarter, the French currentaccount balance deteriorated. Furthermore, in
January the French authorities took a number
of steps to stimulate the domestic economy,
including reductions by the Bank of France in
its rates on discounts and secured advances of
V2 percentage point to 6 per cent and IVi per
cent, respectively. While the franc rate might
have been expected to soften in consequence,
there was simultaneously a general strengthen­
ing of European currencies against the dollar,
and the spot franc quickly rose to a level only
slightly below the central rate. In early Febru­
ary, an additional burst of demand, set off in
part by open debate over measures to control
short-term capital flows and rumors of growing
official support in Europe for a joint EC float,
lifted the franc somewhat above the central rate.
These speculative pressures continued through
much of the month and, with the Bank of France
on the sidelines, the rate rose steadily. At the
same time, the financial franc was pushed up
to a modest premium above the official rate.
The market atmosphere deteriorated further
when, on March 3, French Finance Minister
Giscard d’Estaing warned that the European
response to continuing dollar inflows would be
a further extension of exchange controls—
perhaps at first on a piecemeal basis but later
in concert. It was shortly thereafter that the EC
finance ministers announced they would soon




cut to 2 lA per cent the maximum permissible
spread among their currencies. In the general
rush into all European currencies that followed,
the commercial franc was pushed almost to its
ceiling by March 9, and the financial franc, bid
up not only by speculative pressures but also
by heavy foreign purchases of French securities,
surged almost 3 per cent above that level.
The flurry was short lived, however, and the
commercial franc quickly settled down to a rate
well below its ceiling. The financial franc, al­
though staying above the official ceiling, also
eased. At first, the softening reflected a normal
technical reaction to the preceding excessive
sales of dollars. In mid-March, however, there
was a perceptible improvement in market atmo­
sphere following the regular central bank meet­
ing in Basle, Switzerland, Secretary Connally’s
indication of willingness to discuss the forum
for negotiations on international monetary re­
form, and President Pompidou’s expression of
optimism about the international monetary situ­
ation. Moreover, the French authorities acted
at this time to ease domestic monetary condi­
tions, cutting requirements against the banks’
domestic demand and time deposits (the re­
quirements against liabilities to nonresidents
were, however, kept unchanged), reducing
those longer-term interest rates directly con­
trolled by the Ministry of Finance, and lowering
the Bank of France’s domestic money market
intervention rates.
Further relaxations of monetary policy re­
lieved buying pressure on the franc until late
April. Then, heavy month-end conversions of
export proceeds and, later, a temporary liquidity
squeeze during the tax-payment period exerted
upward pressure on the franc, and the spot rate
climbed close to its ceiling. Underlying liquidity
conditions continued to ease, however, and,
once month-end factors were out of the way,
the franc traded quietly just below the upper
intervention point until the end of May.
At that point the franc rose to its ceiling in
response to an erroneous news report of Trea­
sury Under Secretary Volcker’s press confer­
ence on May 30. The pressure was especially
heavy on June 2, when the Bank of France
moved to restrain the growth of the French
money supply by raising the reserve requirement

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

against increases in bank credit from 2 per cent
to 4 per cent. With interest rates in France
already higher than in other major European
countries, however, the authorities were con­
fronted with a dilemma since they did not wish
to draw in additional funds from abroad.
Consequently, the Bank of France reduced its
money market intervention rates on successive
days to keep domestic interest rates below
Euro-dollar yields. With each drop in the do­
mestic intervention rates, the pressure in the
exchange market subsided and the franc tempo­
rarily edged below its ceiling. Meanwhile, the
financial franc had advanced to a premium of
over 3 per cent above the commercial rate,
reflecting flows of funds into the French stock
market and some switching of funds out of
sterling.
The franc rate was again pushed hard against
its ceiling in mid-June, when speculation against
sterling began. As the flight from sterling gath­
ered momentum, large-scale official intervention
was required to keep sterling within 2 Va per cent
of the franc. Both the Bank of France and the
Bank of England had to intervene on a pro­
gressively heavier scale, supplying francs
against sterling to an often hectic market. In
the circumstances, the franc was pulled lower
and lower vis-a-vis the dollar until it reached
$0.1972V£ by the morning of June 22, some 1.4
per cent below the ceiling.
With the announcement of the floating of the
pound at the opening on June 23, the franc
immediately rebounded to the ceiling. After
absorbing a sizable amount of dollars, the Bank
of France, in a joint move with the other EC
central banks that were still dealing in the
foreign exchanges that morning, ceased inter­
vening and the Paris exchange market was
closed. When the Bank of France reopened the
exchange market on June 28, the franc hovered
close to the ceiling, but the market was rela­
tively quiet and there was little further official
intervention. As a result of the inflows during
June, French reserves rose by $921 million.
During the first half of July, strong specula­
tive pressure began to build up against the
dollar; with the franc rate hard against its upper
limit, the Bank of France had to intervene
almost every day, often in large amounts. The




775
outcome of the EC finance ministers’ meeting
in London on July 17-18 had a calming effect
on the market, however, and in line with the
general firming of the dollar in mid-July the
demand for francs eased to the point where
official support tapered off. Nevertheless, the
spot rate continued to bump up against the
ceiling until news of the Federal Reserve’s in­
tervention in defense of the dollar on July 19
helped reduce pressure on the franc. Even then
the franc continued firm by comparison with
other continental currencies, as the French
authorities maintained a relatively tight rein on
domestic liquidity by raising the banks’ mini­
mum reserve requirements against both resident
and nonresident liabilities by 2 percentage
points, effective July 21. The franc remained
close to the ceiling in early August, but a
somewhat softer tone developed toward mid­
month following market and press reports that
the Federal Reserve had been selling Belgian
francs. Moreover the dollar was helped by
subsequent news of improved second-quarter
U.S. balance of payments figures and reports
of further U.S. efforts to find a settlement of
the war in Vietnam. The financial franc had been
dropping more sharply, falling to a premium of
less than 2 xh per cent over the official franc’s
ceiling, as new issues of franc-dominated Euro­
bond issues slackened during the vacation
period and as conversions of franc bank notes
sold abroad by French tourists swelled. Later
in August, both the commercial and financial
franc rates firmed but trading remained orderly.

ITALIAN LIRA
Following the Smithsonian meeting, the Italian
authorities established a central rate of
$0.001719% for the lira, representing a 7.48
per cent appreciation against the dollar that was
slightly less than the dollar’s devaluation against
gold. At the same time, they revoked the ex­
change control regulations introduced as of De­
cember 6, whereby the Italian banks had been
instructed to refuse conversion of foreign cur­
rencies into lire unless the proceeds were re­
quired for normal trade or service transactions
or for nonspeculative capital transactions backed
by the appropriate documentation.
After the Italian exchange market was

776

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

reopened on December 21, the spot rate soon
settled near its new floor. A prolonged period
of political uncertainty and the resultant delay
in dealing with important social and economic
problems generated some capital outflows. At
the same time there were continuing prepay­
ments of foreign loans. Consequently, even
though the already large surplus in Italy’s bal­
ance of payments on current account was ex­
panding as the pace of domestic economic activ­
ity slowed, the spot rate held close to its lower
limit through the second week in January. Then,
with successive waves of speculation pushing
many of the other EC currencies to their ceilings,
the lira was pulled upward, eventually reaching
some 1 per cent below its central rate where it
traded through early March.
On March 7 the EC finance ministers an­
nounced their agreement in principle to narrow
the margin of fluctuation between the Common
Market countries’ currencies to 2 X
A per cent.
With other EC currencies at or close to their
ceilings, the market responded to this an­
nouncement by pushing the lira up into the
proposed band. For some days the spot rate was,
therefore, above the central rate. But the Euro­
pean markets soon turned quieter and, when the
other EC currencies edged away from their
upper limits, the lira— near the bottom of the
2 lA per cent band— dropped back to the central
rate or just below, where it held through the
end of the month.
A still softer tone developed in early April,
especially when the Bank of Italy acted to help
stimulate an upturn in economic activity by
relaxing domestic credit conditions. Taking ad­
vantage of the tendency toward lower interest
rates abroad, the bank cut its rates on discounts
and secured advances by Vi percentage point to
4 per cent and V/i per cent, respectively, effec­
tive April 10. (The additional IV2 percentage
point penalty for banks making excessive use
of central bank credit was, however, main­
tained.) Simultaneously, interest payments on
balances held by commercial banks with the
Bank of Italy were discontinued for deposits of
more than 8 days, and were reduced from IV2
per cent to 1 per cent per annum for deposits
of 8 days or less. The banks were thus induced
to place excess funds in the market rather than




with the central bank, and shortly thereafter they
cut both their lending and deposit rates.
The spot lira rate declined until just before
the EC currency arrangements limiting the
maximum permissible spread between any two
EC currencies were put into effect on April 24.
At that point the spot rate firmed somewhat,
fluctuating about 2 per cent below the strongest
EC currency through the month-end. In early
May, when the Belgian and French francs
moved smartly higher, the lira held at the lower
end of the band. But no official intervention was
required to keep the lira within the band, as
market arbitrage proved sufficient to do so in
the absence of strong pressures. As other EC
currencies rose during May, the lira rate was
pulled higher and it hovered around the central
rate until late May. Then, when formal con­
sultations to form a new government in Italy
were undertaken, the lira moved up to about
0.4 per cent above the central rate.
The accelerating attack on sterling that de­
veloped in mid-June brought with it heavy sell­
ing of lire and an abrupt shift in leads and lags
against Italy. By June 22 the spot rate had been
pushed to more than 1 per cent below the central
rate. When the Italian exchange market re­
mained closed on Friday, June 23, in the wake
of the floating of the pound, reports circulated
widely both in the market and in the Italian press
that the lira would be devalued or that the Italian
authorities were strongly considering withdraw­
ing from the EC arrangements. In this atmo­
sphere, the formation of a new Italian coalition
government failed to allay the market’s intense
nervousness.
On June 26 the EC finance ministers, meeting
in Luxembourg in the aftermath of sterling’s
float, confirmed their intention to maintain the
EC arrangements and, to facilitate Italy’s con­
tinued adherence to the scheme, permitted Italy
to intervene for a 3-month period in dollars
rather than in EC currencies to keep the lira
within the EC band. (The EC arrangements
normally permit intervention in dollars only
when a currency is at its Smithsonian limits.)
In addition, the Italian authorities took several
other measures in an attempt to tighten control
over foreign currency movements. They pro­
hibited the crediting of lira notes to foreign

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

111

CHANGES IN EXCHANGE RATES AND

ID OFFICIAL TRANSACTIONS

.4

.8
5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0
1.0
+
0
1.0
2.0

3.0

tion was required to bring the lira back into the
band at around its central rate. Despite this
support, pressure on the lira continued as leads
and lags remained adverse and Italian residents
continued to repay their foreign borrowings.
Consequently, the Italian authorities had to in­
tervene in support of the lira well into July. To
help offset the cost of official reserves of this
foreign exchange market intervention, the Ital­
ian Exchange Office required any bank that
developed a net foreign asset position to use
the surplus foreign exchange to repay out­
standing dollar swaps with it, while public en­
terprises were encouraged to tap the Euro-dollar
market for large amounts. By mid-July Italian
banks were repatriating funds on a large scale,
state-owned entities were converting consid­
erable amounts taken up in the international
market, and tourist receipts were starting to
build up. Consequently, pressure on the spot
rate subsided, and the lira held just around its
central rate through the rest of the month. Some
of the foreign exchange inflows were added to
official reserves, keeping the total reserve cost
of the Italian support operations in June and July
to around $100 million. This improved atmo­
sphere continued through August, although the
lira eased somewhat along with other European
currencies as the dollar strengthened.

1.2

JAPANESE YEN
.8
.4

+
0
JULY
SEPT.
_______________ 1971

NOV.

JULY

SEPT.

For n o tes s ee p. 7 6 1 .

accounts, thereby shutting down the export of
capital through bank note conversion. They au­
thorized the banks to assume net foreign liability
positions rather than, as before, requiring bal­
anced positions. And, finally, they reopened the
door to nonbank borrowings abroad.
Fortified with these measures, the Italian
authorities reopened the exchange market on
June 28. The lira opened the day well outside
the 2 lA per cent EC band, and sizable interven­



For several years prior to 1971, Japan had
recorded progressively larger balance of pay­
ments surpluses, marked both by a burgeoning
trade surplus and by increasingly heavy private
capital inflows. As foreign exchange reserves
mounted, the Government had moved to impede
or offset the inflows of funds by tightening
exchange controls, by promoting a shift in the
financing of Japanese imports from foreign to
domestic sources, by liberalizing some of the
controls on imports arid on capital outflows, and
by depositing some officially held dollars with
commercial banks.
While these measures had helped to relieve
some of the immediate pressure, the markets
became increasingly convinced that the yen was
seriously undervalued. Therefore, when the
U.S. Government suspended convertibility of
the dollar in August 1971, there was a massive

778

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

rush into yen that ultimately forced the Japanese
Government to float its currency later that
month. Over the following months, the yen rose
sharply in the exchange market. But the au­
thorities, concerned that a rapid run-up in the
yen rate might impede the hoped-for recovery
in the domestic economy, intervened heavily to
moderate the advance.
Under the terms of the Smithsonian Agree­
ment, the central rate for the yen was established
at $0.003246%, an effective appreciation of
16.88 per cent against the dollar. The Japanese
authorities, in line with actions taken by other
countries, immediately abolished some of the
severe measures imposed earlier to block the
inflow of funds. Then on January 5, with the
yen settling near its floor and some reflows
developing, the Japanese Government an­
nounced a further relaxation of exchange con­
trols, eliminating among other things the re­
quirement of prior official approval for any
prepayment of Japanese exports. Not all of the
control apparatus was dismantled, however, and
certain measures limiting the foreign positions
of Japanese banks were retained. Over the next
2 days a bunching-up of export prepayments
gave rise to a burst of demand for yen, and
the Bank of Japan absorbed a sizable amount
of dollars, but the market then turned quieter.
By late January the exchange markets had
become increasingly jittery. Most major foreign
currencies began to rise sharply against the
dollar, reflecting uncertainty over the viability
of the Smithsonian Agreement and concern over
declining interest rates in the United States. The
yen, in particular, was in strong demand as the
December 18 appreciation was seen by some
as insufficient, given the size of the adjustment
needed to bring the Japanese payments accounts
into balance. Even with the Bank of Japan
intervening to slow the advance, the yen almost
reached its upper limit by February 24.
In view of this renewed show of strength for
the yen, the authorities resumed their efforts to
encourage the financing of Japanese trade out
of Japanese reserves rather than with foreign
credits, and the yen eased. The Ministry of
Finance began to make deposits, totaling $200
million in February and $100 million in March,
with the Japanese exchange banks to induce




those banks to reduce their borrowings for U.S.
banks. Deposits with the banks to facilitate the
provision of export cover had been initiated in
June 1971, and these new deposits raised the
total amount transferred out of official reserves
to $1.5 billion.
Then late in March, the Bank of Japan an­
nounced that, as an additional step to curb
official reserve growth, it would increase its
share of the financing of the country’s imports
from 30 per cent to 50 per cent over the 4-month
period beginning in April; credits already ex­
tended by the central bank under this program
totaled some $1.3 billion at that time. Despite
these programs, however, Japan’s official re­
serves rose by $1.2 billion during the first
quarter, exclusive of the 1972 allocation of
SDR’s.
Early in April the authorities decided to stim­
ulate some demand for dollars by requiring
repayment at maturity of a series of special
dollar deposits made the previous fall in con­
nection with provision of forward cover for
small and medium-sized Japanese enterprises.
Since the banks did not have the dollars avail­
able, they were forced to come into the market
as buyers of dollars to repay the maturing de­
posits. Shortly thereafter, Japanese seamen
began a prolonged strike, and subsequent work
disruptions at the docks and in other industrial
sectors curtailed Japanese exports for some
time. As a consequence of these developments,
the yen declined over much of April and re­
mained easy in early May. By mid-May the yen
dropped to as low as $0.003282, and the Bank
of Japan sold dollars to steady the market.
On May 23 the Bank of Japan announced
that, as of June 1, the 1.5 per cent minimum
reserve requirement against the foreign ex­
change banks’ free-yen liabilities to foreigners
would be replaced by a 25 per cent marginal
requirement on increases in such liabilities. Also
that day, the Japanese cabinet gave approval to
a multifaceted plan to stimulate domestic busi­
ness activity and, at the same time, bring
Japan’s external accounts into better balance.
The exchange market did not believe these
measures would bring any early change in the
basic situation, however, and the spot rate held
steady through early June.

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

With the attack on sterling, the entire Smith­
sonian alignment appeared threatened and the
yen was bid sharply upward. Following the
floating of the pound, the Bank of Japan closed
its exchange market while also announcing a
reduction in its discount rate by Vi percentage
point, to 4 Va per cent. Then, in an attempt to
isolate the Tokyo market from a new round of
short-term inflows, the central bank doubled the
reserve requirement for free-yen accounts to 50
per cent and strengthened the regulations against
advance payments of Japanese exports. When
the Japanese market reopened on June 29, the
Bank of Japan had to absorb substantial amounts
of dollars through the end of June to hold the
spot rate at the ceiling.
These inflows and the continuing basic pay­
ments surplus were more than fully offset by
the various measures taken to push dollars out
of reserves. By the end of June the special
deposits with the banks, which had been in­
creased in several stages, amounted to $1.9
billion, and the Bank of Japan’s share in import
financing amounted to some $2.3 billion. Dur­
ing the entire second quarter the Japanese au­
thorities succeeded in pushing some $1.4 billion
out of reserves through special operations,
bringing about a reduction in reserves of $820
million for the quarter.
In early July the exchange markets remained
in the grip of uncertainties over the future of
the Smithsonian Agreement, and with the yen
at its ceiling, the Bank of Japan was obliged
to intervene heavily. Although most European
currencies eventually edged away from their
dollar ceilings, particularly after the July 17-18
London meeting of EC finance ministers and the
July 19 exchange market initiative by the Fed­
eral Reserve, the Japanese yen remained at its
upper limit in Tokyo. Demand remained heavy
as a result of the continuing large export surplus
and renewed inflows to the Japanese stock mar­
ket. The Bank of Japan, therefore, had to take
in dollars almost daily, and sometimes in fairly
substantial amounts, during July and August.

CANADIAN DOLLAR
As other major currencies rose strongly against
the U.S. dollar late last year, there was also
occasional upward pressure on the Canadian




779

dollar. Heavy buying of Canadian dollars did
not develop, however, until the conclusion in
early December of the Group of Ten meeting
in Rome. Thereafter, the Canadian dollar was
pushed as high as $1.00%, and it remained
strong until the Smithsonian meeting of the
Group of Ten on December 17-18.
The communique at the conclusion of the
Washington meeting noted that “ Canada in­
tends temporarily to maintain a floating ex­
change rate without intervention except as re­
quired to maintain orderly conditions.” The
Canadian dollar immediately rose to nearly
$1.00%, but expectations of a further appreci­
ation dissipated rapidly, and the spot rate
dropped back to below the $1.00 level in late
December. After easing further early in January,
the Canadian dollar settled at around $0.99%
by the middle of that month.
With the domestic economy expanding rap­
idly, the Canadian current account had slipped
into deficit in late 1971 and the deficit increased
in early 1972. Nevertheless, a step-up in loan
demand in Canada put pressure on bank liquid­
ity and in February interest rates began to rise,
attracting funds from abroad. This influx of
short-term capital, combined with continuing
longer-term Canadian borrowings tended to off­
set the current-account deficit, and the Canadian
dollar held relatively steady in the exchanges
through late February.
At that point, substantial new Canadian wheat
sales to the Soviet Union were announced,
leading to a bullish reaction in the market. The
spot rate for the Canadian dollar began to ad­
vance, and with rising interest rates in Canada
still drawing funds from abroad, the rate soon
rose above $1.00 once again. As it has done
throughout the period of the floating rate,
the Bank of Canada intervened intermittently
on both sides of the market to moderate fluctua­
tions in the rate, and with the Canadian dollar
rising on balance, official reserves rose by $189
million over the first 3 months of the year.
During the second quarter the Canadian dollar
came into strong, persistent demand. On occa­
sion, this demand reflected the general uncer­
tainties that were having such profound effect
on other currency markets. Nevertheless, the
growing strength of the Canadian dollar

780

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

throughout the spring was more clearly traceable
to developments in Canada’s own payments
position. Canada’s current account improved
sharply during the second quarter, with a swing
of some $400 million away from the exceptional
deficit of the first quarter. Moreover, the Cana­
dian provincial governments and public utilities
borrowed heavily abroad through bond issues,
particularly in May. In addition, domestic credit
conditions in Canada continued to tighten, and
the chartered banks moved aggressively to at­
tract funds. The consequent heavy demand for
Canadian dollars drove the spot rate up by more
than 2 cents from late April through early June,
to about $1.021A.
At that point, the squeeze for balances in
Canada became acute, and the chartered banks,
facing heavy loan demand but under pressure
not to raise their prime rates above 6 per cent,
had begun to offer certificates of deposit (CD’s)
at yields of as much as 6 V2 per cent. This
naturally drew in still more funds, pushing the
Canadian dollar to almost $1.02%. The Cana­
dian authorities then moved to forestall a further
rise in the exchange rate by prevailing upon the
chartered banks to cut back their rates on CD’s,
effective June 12. Subsequently, other Canadian
money market yields also dropped back, as loan
demand eased somewhat. The Canadian dollar
began to ease in the exchanges, reaching
$1.011/2 by the end of June. Over the second
quarter as a whole, official intervention in a
market that was rising on balance resulted in
a substantial net reserve gain of $328 million.
Trading turned much quieter in July, and the
Canadian dollar held fairly steady between
$1.01% and $1.01% throughout the month.
With the onset of seasonal strength, a somewhat
firmer tone emerged in August and the spot rate
edged slightly higher.

On the demand side the market has come
increasingly under the influence of a wide vari­
ety of administrative restraints imposed by Eu­
ropean governments and central banks over the
past year. In several countries, access by cor­
porations to the market has been severely cur­
tailed in order to restrain further accretions to
official dollar reserves. In Germany, in particu­
lar, corporate borrowings in the Euro-dollar
market were limited by fears of the impending
imposition of compulsory cash-deposit require­
ments for nonfinancial enterprises, even before
the actual implementation of the B ardepot on
March 1. In addition, in many countries various
barriers have been erected that prevent banks
from converting Euro-dollar borrowings into
local currencies, and these and other impedi­
ments to Euro-dollar borrowings were rein­
forced during periods of pressure on the dollar
early this year and again following the currency
crisis in June.
As a result of these constraints and of the
decline in interest rates in European domestic
loan markets, the demand for Euro-dollars in
major European countries tended to be weak
during most of the spring and summer. How­
ever, the contraction of demand from traditional
sources was largely offset by a sharp rise of
borrowings, mostly for distant maturities, by
YIELD COM PARISONS
3-M O N TH M A T U R IT IE S E X C E P T W HERE NO TED
CENT

10

EURO-DOLLAR
On the whole, Euro-dollar rates have been rela­
tively stable since early 1972, although for brief
periods speculative flurries and exchange market
uncertainties have exerted upward pressure on
the rate level. In contrast to the wide rate fluc­
tuations during the preceding year, the weekly
average of daily rates for the 3-month maturity
remained within a relatively narrow range.




0
JULY

SEPT.
1971

NOV.

JAN.

MAR.

MAY
1972

JULY

SEPT.

Euro-dollars are w eek ly averages of daily rates; C D ’s W ed ­
nesday data.

FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

public and semipublic institutions in developing
countries. Much of this expansion of loans to
non-European borrowers reflected the aggres­
sive efforts of major European banks that were
flush with funds to find new takers for Euro­
dollar loans. Eastern European countries also
took advantage of the ample supply of Euro­
dollar loans.
These various borrowings tended to cushion
rate pressures arising from the disappearance
from the market of some major Euro-dollar
borrowers. Nevertheless, for protracted periods,
notably during the April-June period, overnight
Euro-dollar rates remained substantially below
the Federal funds rate, providing some of the
New York agencies and branches of foreign
banks with opportunities for arbitraging between
the two markets. Some U.S. banks also took
advantage of the relatively attractive rates to
borrow overnight Euro-dollars.
On the supply side, both U.S. residents and
non-U.S. holders of dollars found the market
increasingly attractive during the early months
of the year, when short-term interest rates in
the United States dropped much more sharply
than 3-month Euro-dollar rates. Supplies from
European official sources were held back as a
result of the June 1971 agreement of the central
banks of the Group of Ten countries not to place
additional dollar balances in the market; how­
ever, supplies from non-European official
sources expanded further, as monetary reserves
of many countries continued to rise. The relative
attraction of the market to European commercial
banks also increased, as the relaxation of
monetary policy by several eastern European
countries during the January-April period rein­
forced a general trend toward lower interest
rates.
Against this background, Euro-dollar interest
rates tended to move downward in sympathy
with U.S. domestic interest rates early in the
year. Then, rates began to rise sharply in a
belated response to the turnaround in U.S. in­
terest rates in late February. This rise proved
short lived, however; when the usual quarterend pressures failed to materialize and domestic
European money market rates declined further,
rates on all Euro-dollar maturities began to drift
lower again.




781

YIELD COM PARISONS
3-M O N TH M A T U R IT IE S
PER CENT

10
U.K. LOCAL AUTHORITY

SEPT.

Weekly averages of daily rates.

In April, with U.S. interest rates moving up
and with Euro-dollar rates remaining under
pressure, the differential between the 3-month
Euro-dollar rate and that for U.S. CD’s nar­
rowed appreciably. The spread between the two
rates had been in excess of 2 per cent in the
middle of January; it fell to less than 1 per cent
in April. During the remainder of the spring,
conditions in the Euro-dollar market were gen­
erally more comfortable. Thus, by early June
the Euro-dollar/CD spread had narrowed further
to only 40 basis points.
The run on sterling, which had developed in
mid-June, at first had little direct impact on the
Euro-dollar market. As sterling weakened, the
central banks of the EC intervened in the market
by selling their own currencies. Several Euro­
pean currencies dropped to levels that the mar­
ket considered unsustainably low in dollar
terms. As a result, these currencies were bought
heavily with dollars. The financing of these
purchases brought about a new demand for
Euro-dollars that, coupled with some midyear
demand, pushed rates up once again.
On June 23, the day the British authorities
yielded to the intense market pressure and al­
lowed the pound to float, the 3-month rate rose
as high as 6 per cent and 7-day Euro-dollars
reached a peak of 7 per cent. Then, with the
passing of the immediate effects of the specula­

782

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

tive buying of continental European curriencies
and of the midyear pressures, the rates on most
Euro-dollar maturities eased somewhat. How­
ever, the Euro-dollar market remained suscepti­
ble to the anxieties of the foreign exchange
market, and during the period of heavy pressure
on the dollar in the exchanges in early July there
were periodic scrambles for funds to cover short
positions.
When the exchange markets turned calmer
after mid-July following the resumption of Fed­
eral Reserve operations in defense of the dollar,




Euro-dollar rates began to edge downward.
After a brief squeeze at the month-end, the
market stabilized in early August, with the 3month rate fluctuating narrowly around 5 Vi per
cent per annum. The tone of the market was
nevertheless fairly firm, as U.S. short-term rates
tended to rise and some new demands came into
the market. In particular, Italian public cor­
porations resumed their borrowings of Euro­
dollars in response to official encouragement,
and the squeeze for sterling balances in London
also tended to draw funds out of Euro-dollars.

Yields On Newly Issued Corporate Bonds
With this issue of the B u l l e t i n , the Board of
Governors is beginning to publish a series of
yields on new issues of corporate bonds.
Monthly and quarterly data for 1960 to 1972
and weekly data for 1972 are shown in Table
l . 1 Yields are based on prices asked by un­
derwriting syndicates and do not necessarily
coincide with market clearing prices. A com­
panion series for yields on recently offered cor­
porate bonds— which reflects free market
yields— is being prepared for publication later.
Yield series on seasoned corporate bonds
carry the undesirable feature of generally tend­
ing to understate both the level and the move­
ment of yields in thfe new-issue market. Several
factors account for this behavior. One, the lower
yields usually found on seasoned bonds may
stem from market imperfections that cause an
appreciable lag in yield adjustments between
newly issued and seasoned bonds. Two, bonds
in a seasoned bond series often carry noncurrent
coupons— this has been true especially for the
period since the mid-1960’s— that translate into
bond prices considerably above or below par.
When corporate bonds trade at such prices, pre­
vailing yield differentials may reflect the effect of
capital gains taxes, call-price restraints, or other
considerations, which are infrequently if ever
encountered in the new-issue market. And three,
both the reliability and the availability of bidand-asked quotes on seasoned bonds leave
something to be desired. For these reasons, the
new-issue yield series provides a more sensi­
tive measure of interest rates on corporate
bonds— one that should be useful in analyzing
current market developments and in conducting
certain longer-term research projects.

lrThis series was developed by James L. Kichline,
P. Michael Laub, and Guy V. G. Stevens.
W eekly data beginning Jan. 1, 1960, are available
upon request from Capital Markets Section, Division
of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, W ashington, D.C. 20551.




The nature of the public market for corporate
bonds presents several obstacles to the develop­
ment of a new-issue yield series. There are
relatively few new public offerings of bonds in
any given week. And on occasion there may
be none. More importantly, the relatively small
number of observations are for bonds with sub­
stantial heterogeneity. Newly issued bonds in
any week may come from one of a number of
industry groups, and they may have different
default risks, call options, call schedules, ma­
turities, and so on. The market valuation of some
of these characteristics varies over time, particu­
larly for the call option and for default risk.
In order to track accurately the level and the
changes in a “ pure” yield on a newly issued
corporate bond over time, it is necessary to
measure the yield on a bond with invariant
characteristics— in effect, a hypothetical new
bond. This standard bond is defined as a new
straight-debt, long-term (20 years or longer)
utility issue, rated Aaa by Moody’s Investors
Service, Inc., carrying 5-year call protection,
and underwritten by a process of competitive
bidding. Since the hypothetical bond is a new
issue, it is also assumed to carry a current
coupon. Although these characteristics were
chosen somewhat arbitrarily, they represent
features that have been common to a large
number of the bonds offered to investors in
recent years.
Since there are many weeks in which no
standard bond is offered, weekly yield informa­
tion on newly issued bonds is obtained from
bonds with characteristics other than those of
the standard bond. Using such information re­
quires a model that explains the market valua­
tion of heterogeneous bond characteristics. The
model employed relies upon existing theory
whenever possible; it is basically a nonlinear
regression model that can be used, when one
has good estimates of its parameters, to calcu­
late the values of the heterogeneous charac­
teristics on observed newly issued bonds and to
783

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

784

ible bonds, serial issues, offerings of natural gas
pipeline companies and foreign companies, and
bonds guaranteed by the U.S. Government.
Details of the model, the estimation procedures,
and a discussion of the results will be presented
in a forthcoming Federal Reserve Staff Eco­
nomic Study, which will be summarized in the

arrive ultimately at the estimated yield on the
standard bond.
The parameters of the model were estimated
with a sample of 1,422 new issues covering the
period January 1960 through February 1972. All
long-term, straight-debt issues rated Aaa, Aa,
or A by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., were
included in the sample. Excluded were convert­

B u lle tin .

□

TABLE I
NEW-ISSUE AAA UTILITY BONDS
In per cent
Period

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

M onthly and quarterly, 1 9 6 0 -7 2
Jan..............
F eb .............
Mar.
A pr.............
M ay ........
June ........
July
A u g ............
S ep t............
O ct.............
N ov.
D e c ............

4 .9 3
4 .8 6
4 .7 5
4 .7 4
4 .7 6
4 .6 2
4 .4 9
4 .1 9
4 .4 0
4 .5 4
4 .6 0
4 .7 0

4 .11
4 .0 5
4 .0 5
4 .3 6
4 .3 8
4 .6 2
4 .4 2
4 .5 4
4 .4 3
4 .3 0
4 .3 8
4.51

4 .3 6
4 .4 0
4 .2 8
4 .1 4
4 .1 2
4 .1 3
4 .2 8
4 .2 5
4 .0 6
4 .1 3
4 .0 4
4 .0 9

4 .0 8
4 .1 2
4 .1 2
4 .2 0
4 .2 0
4 .1 9
4 .2 3
4 .2 0
4 .2 5
4 .2 3
4 .2 9
4 .3 5

4 .3 3
4 .2 5
4 .3 6
C1)
4 .3 7
4 .3 9
4 .3 4
4.31
4 .3 2
4 .3 2
0)
4 .3 9

4 .3 0
4 .3 6
4 .3 8
4 .3 9
4 .4 2
4 .4 7
4 .4 9
4 .5 6
4 .5 8
4 .5 9
4 .6 7
4 .8 4

4 .7 8
5.01
5.21
5.0 7
5 .2 7
5 .3 7
5 .5 2
5.81
5.8 5
5.73
5.81
5 .73

5 .1 8
5.21
5 .3 6
5 .4 2
5 .7 0
5 .8 7
5 .8 7
5 .9 9
5 .9 6
6 .1 9
6 .4 7
6 .5 9

6 .2 9
6 .2 5
6 .5 0
6.51
6 .7 4
6 .6 9
6.4 8
6.1 8
6.25
6 .5 0
6 .6 6
6.9 3

6 .9 8
6 .9 8
7 .3 8
7 .1 8
7 .3 2
7 .6 9
7 .6 6
7 .7 2
8.1 5
8 .1 6
8 .4 8
8 .8 2

8 .5 9
8.53
8 .6 4
8 .6 9
9 .0 9
9 .2 5
8 .7 9
8 .7 2
8.6 3
8.81
8.51
7.9 3

7 .4 3
7 .3 3
7 .5 9
7 .4 8
8.01
7 .9 8
8 .0 4
7.71
7 .6 8
7 .5 0
7 .3 8
7 .2 8

7.21
7 .3 4
7 .2 4
7 .4 5
7 .3 8
7 .3 2
7 .3 8
7 .3 7

Q 1

4 .8 5
4 .7 2
4 .3 8
4 .6 2

4 .0 8
4 .5 4
4 .4 6
4 .3 9

4 .3 4
4 .1 3
4.21
4 .0 8

4.11
4 .2 0
4 .2 3
4 .2 9

4.31
4 .3 7
4 .3 2
4 .3 4

4 .3 5
4 .4 3
4 .5 5
4 .7 0

4 .9 9
5 .2 2
5 .7 4
5.7 5

5.2 5
5 .6 7
5.9 3
6 .3 7

6 .3 4
6 .6 4
6 .2 9
6 .6 6

7.11
7 .3 9
7.8 3
8 .4 4

8 .5 9
9.01
8 .7 2
8.51

7 .4 6
7.7 8
7 .8 3
7 .4 2

7 .2 6
7 .3 8

Q2
Q3
Q4

........
........
........
........

W eek ly, 1972
Jan.

7 ........
14
21
28

7 .1 8
7 .1 0
7 .1 8
7 .3 9

Feb.

4
11
18
25

7 .2 2
7 .4 4
7.31
7 .3 5

Mar.

3
10
17
24
31

7 .3 2
7 .0 8
7 .2 4
7 .3 2
7 .2 9

Apr.

7
14
21
28

7 .3 4
7 .4 6
7 .6 0
7.41

M ay

5 ........
12
19
26

7 .4 0
7 .4 0
7 .2 9
7 .4 9

July

7
14
21
28

June

2 ........
9
16
23
30

7 .2 2
7 .2 7
7 .3 5
7 .3 0
7 .4 2

A ug.

4
11
18
25

Sept.

1
8

1In these time periods, there were no new issues that met the criteria for inclusion in the series.
N o t e .— B oard o f G overnors of the Federal R eserve System .




7.3 5
7 .3 2
7 .3 7
7 .4 8
....

7 .4 0
7 .3 7
7 .3 2
....... 0 )
7.41
7 .3 8

Statement to Congress
Statem ent by A rthur F. Burns , Chairman ,
B oard of G overnors of the Federal Reserve
System , before the Subcommittee on Interna­
tional Exchange and Payments of the lo in t E co­
nomic Com m ittee , Septem ber 15, 1972.

Nine months have elapsed since last December
when the finance ministers and central bank
governors of the Group of Ten countries met
at the Smithsonian Institution and reached an
agreement on realigning the rates at which major
currencies are to ‘exchange for one another.
During this period, exchange markets have al­
ternated between calm and uneasiness.
The immediate reaction of the financial world
to the Smithsonian Agreement was one of over­
whelming approval. After the turn of the year,
however, the earlier enthusiasm gave way to
more cautious appraisal.
Many market participants expected a large
return flow of capital to the United States to
materialize right after the December meeting.
This did not happen. A decline of interest rates
in the United States relative to those abroad was
partly responsible for inhibiting the reflow of
funds. Another factor was the initial low level
of foreign exchange rates within the wider ex­
change margins agreed to at the Smithsonian
meeting. With the major European currencies
below their central values, temporary holders
of those currencies sensed a possibility of mak­
ing a larger profit by delaying a shift back into
dollars until the dollar prices of foreign curren­
cies approached closer to their upper limits. And
once major European currencies strengthened
within the margins, fears developed that some
governments would fail to defend the Smith­
sonian exchange rates.
But as successive speculative episodes oc­
curred in January, February, and early March,
the foreign central banks intervened decisively.
Their clear determination to uphold the new
system of exchange rates had a reassuring effect
on the market. Moreover, short-term market




interest rates began rising somewhat in the
United States while they declined abroad. This
convergence of international interest rates
helped to improve the atmosphere of foreign
exchange markets. So too did prompt passage
by the Congress of the Par Value Modification
Act, known popularly as the gold bill. Confi­
dence in the new system of exchange rates
therefore improved and markets became more
orderly.
Indeed, between mid-March and mid-June a
sizable reflow of capital to the United States
actually materialized. This reflow more than
offset our continuing deficit on current account.
Since the United States ran a surplus in its
official settlements balance during this period,
the dollar naturally strengthened in exchange
markets.
This encouraging developm ent ended
abruptly in June as sterling came under increas­
ing pressure. Today’s hearing is hardly the
occasion to discuss Great Britain’s problems,
except to note that sharp and persistent wage
and price advances weakened the market’s
confidence in the ability of Britain to continue
to defend its new exchange rate. On June 23,
after suffering a huge decline of monetary re­
serves, the British Government announced its
decision to float the pound.
In the weeks following the British decision,
exchange markets were again in turmoil and the
dollar again weakened. Most of the major Eu­
ropean currencies and the Japanese yen moved
to their Smithsonian ceilings as market partici­
pants sought protection against the possibility
of tighter foreign restrictions on capital imports,
a float of Common Market currencies, or some
combination of both. Speculative waves buf­
feted the markets daily, and several countries
responded by adopting new restrictive measures
on capital inflows. By Friday, July 14, the
sterling crisis, besides causing a shift of $2.6
billion from sterling into Common Market cur­
rencies, led to an additional flow of over $6
785

786

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

billion from dollars into European currencies and
the yen.
A period of relative calm was finally restored
after mid-July and has been maintained since
that time. On July 17-18, the Common Market
finance ministers and central bank governors
met in London and reaffirmed their determi­
nation to maintain the Smithsonian pattern of
exchange rates while discussions were proceed­
ing on longer-term reform of the international
monetary system. On July 19, the Federal Re­
serve System, acting in collaboration with the
Treasury, resumed operations in the foreign
exchange market. These two actions were en­
tirely independent. Both played a major role in
arresting disorderly speculation and renewing
market confidence.
Officials of the Federal Reserve and the Trea­
sury had been considering for some time the
advisability of renewed operations in the ex­
change markets that would involve— among
other things— a resumption of Federal Reserve
swap drawings that were suspended on August
15, 1971. Once a governmental decision to
reactivate the swap network was reached, the
Federal Reserve was ready to move. The first
of these exchange operations occurred on July
19 when the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
made repeated offerings of sizable amounts of
German marks on the New York market. I
explained at the time that this operation was
undertaken to help restore order in the foreign
exchange markets, that the United States was
simply doing its part in upholding the Smith­
sonian Agreement just as other countries were
doing, and that the operation would continue
on whatever scale and in whichever currencies
seemed advisable. As this Committee doubtless
knows, the American intervention in the ex­
change market was very favorably received by
financial observers and participants both in the
United States and abroad.
The New York Reserve Bank has recently
intervened in the market for Belgian francs as
well as for German marks. In all, the Bank has
intervened in the exchange markets on nine
occasions and in the process sold about $32
million of foreign currencies. This amount,
while relatively small, needs to be interpreted




in the light of two major facts: first, the amount
offered by the Bank for sale was much larger;
second, in view of the extensive swap facilities
outstanding, their reactivation meant that the
amount that could at any time be offered for
sale was vastly larger. The second of these facts
has been a matter of general knowledge, and
it was sufficient to make even reckless specula­
tors stop and think. As the dollar strengthened
on the exchanges, all sales of foreign currencies
by the Federal Reserve that have taken place
since July 19, whether from balances on hand
or from swap drawings, were later fully covered
by market purchases.
The Federal Reserve’s foreign exchange
operations started in 1962 and have been
reported semiannually since then. The latest
report, which describes operations through Sep­
tember 8, was released just a few days ago.
With your permission, I would like to submit
it for the record.
Let me call your attention now to a few salient
facts concerning the swap facility— that is, the
network of reciprocal currency arrangements
that the Federal Reserve maintains with foreign
central banks. This facility encompasses 14
central banks and also the Bank for International
Settlements. The total amount that the Federal
Reserve can draw on these institutions under
outstanding arrangements is $11,730 million.
By August 15, 1971, the amount actually
drawn— that is, the Federal Reserve’s debt to
foreign institutions— had reached a peak of $3,045 million. Since then, substantial repayments
have taken place, and the outstanding debt stood
at $1,770 million on September 8 of this year.
Although profit considerations have never
been the primary factor in the swap transactions,
the Federal Reserve may either earn a profit or
incur a loss in the course of using the swaps.
A swap drawing by the Federal Reserve entails
an obligation to deliver a specified amount of
foreign currency at a future date. If the Federal
Reserve acquires the currency needed for
repayment of the swap at a dollar price that is
lower than the price at which it was initially
sold, a profit is made on the two transactions
taken together. A loss results in the reverse case
when the foreign currency appreciates between

STATEMENT TO CO N G RESS

the time of the drawing and the time it is paid
off and the required amount of foreign currency
is therefore purchased at a higher price.
As already noted, the Federal Reserve’s out­
standing swap commitments on August 15,
1971, amounted to $3,045 million. Inasmuch
as the dollar prices of the affected currencies—
namely, Swiss francs, Belgian francs, pounds
sterling, and German marks— have risen since
then, the Federal Reserve has already incurred
or will probably need to incur losses in liqui­
dating these drawings. The total loss is presently
estimated at about $160 million.
Two related facts have a vital bearing on this
loss figure. First, from the inception of the swap
network in 1962 until August 15, 1971, the
Federal Reserve had a cumulative profit on its
foreign exchange transactions of $25.6 million.
The second and more basic fact is that the
expected Federal Reserve loss on foreign cur­
rency transactions undertaken prior to August
1971 is offset by the Treasury’s incremental
profit on gold account. Prior to the suspension
of convertibility on August 15, 1971, foreign
central banks taking in dollars could, under the
Bretton Woods Agreement, convert such dollars
into gold or other reserve assets. The swap
transactions that were carried out in 1971 and
earlier years served to defer or to reduce de­
clines in reserve assets that would otherwise
have occurred. Since gold was revalued in May
of this year, the Treasury has profited substan­
tially from the revaluation of the additional
amount of gold that it now holds precisely
because foreign central banks were willing to
accept Federal Reserve swap drawings instead
of demanding reserve assets from the Treasury.
All along, the primary purpose of the swap
facilities that I have been discussing has been
to serve as a first line of defense against disrup­
tive speculation in exchange markets. Future
foreign exchange operations by the Federal Re­
serve will continue to be guided by this objec­
tive. As in the past, operations in the currency
of a particular country will be conducted only
after full consultation with the central bank of
that country.
In the new phase of operations, however, we
shall not be confronted with the necessity of




787

drawing on swap lines as an alternative to con­
version by foreign central banks of dollars into
gold or other reserve assets. In the new opera­
tions, market intervention will be on the Federal
Reserve’s initiative. It will be undertaken only
to prevent or counteract disorderly market
conditions and will be in such amounts and at
such times as are judged likely to have a favor­
able market impact. Swap drawings will not be
made for the purpose of providing medium- or
longer-term financing of the U.S. payments
deficit. Nor will they be used as a substitute
for needed adjustments in basic economic poli­
cies.
Let me turn next to a brief discussion of
recent balance of payments developments. The
world payments situation continues to be
plagued by large imbalances, despite the fact
that the Smithsonian exchange rates are more
appropriate than those that prevailed before Au­
gust 1971. The U.S. deficit on current account
and long-term capital transactions— sometimes
called the “ basic” deficit— has continued to be
disconcertingly large, reaching an annual rate
of nearly $11 billion in the first half of this year.
Meanwhile, other countries have been ex­
periencing large payments surpluses— not only
Japan and some industrial countries in Europe,
but also many of the nonindustrial countries.
We knew, of course, at the time of the
Smithsonian Agreement that it would probably
take 2 or 3 years for exchange rate adjustments
to work out their full remedial effects. We also
knew that business recovery in Europe and
Japan was lagging behind the recovery in the
United States, and that this divergence of business-cycle phasing would of itself delay resto­
ration of equilibrium in our balance of pay­
ments. Under the circumstances, it would be
entirely premature to reach a pessimistic
conclusion about the longer-run outlook for our
international transactions. It should, however,
be noted that the needed adjustments of pay­
ments imbalances, particularly in our merchan­
dise trade, are taking place more slowly than
had been hoped or anticipated.
One need not be a great optimist to argue
that several forces are at last working in the
direction of bringing about significant improve­

788

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

ment in the over-all balance of our international
payments. These include, first and foremost, the
better performance of costs and prices in this
country during the past year than in other in­
dustrial countries; second, the impact of the
exchange rate changes of last December, which
in time should appreciably moderate the growth
of our imports while stimulating the expansion
of exports; third, the cyclical recovery now
under way in Japan and Europe, which should
increase the demand for our exports; and fourth,
the strong expansion of our domestic economy,
which should— besides helping to attract foreign
capital to this country— make American inves­
tors more willing to put their dollars to work
at home rather than abroad.
Still another encouraging fact is the growing
awareness— emphasized in the recent IMF
report on international monetary reform— that
the status of international payments imbalances
requires continuing review by both deficit and
surplus countries.
Finally, I want to comment briefly on the
prospects for international monetary reform.
The governments represented at the Smithsonian
conference recognized that the agreement they
had reached represented only the first step in
rebuilding monetary order. Although the
Smithsonian meeting— and conversations since
that time— have set the stage for realistic in­
ternational negotiations, they have done no
more than that. The uneasiness and turmoil that
have characterized exchange markets in recent
months, the violent movements of short-term
capital from one currency into another, the new
capital controls that various governments estab­
lished in reacting to these movements, the
floating of the British pound— all these indicate
the urgent need for early rebuilding of the in­
ternational monetary system.
Fortunately, it now appears that substantive
negotiations will get under way promptly. The
Committee of 20 in the International Monetary
Fund will begin to function at the Fund-Bank
meetings the week after next. The Deputies of
the Committee of 20 should be able to meet
frequently thereafter, canvass different ap­
proaches, and seek diligently to narrow the
differences of view that presently prevail among
national governments.




Many important issues will have to be re­
solved in the forthcoming negotiations. They
include questions about the future monetary role
of gold— a subject in which this subcommittee
has indicated a special interest and on which
Under Secretary Volcker testified earlier in the
week. In general, I agree with the views that
he has expressed. More specifically, I believe
that the monetary role of gold will continue to
diminish in the years ahead, while there will
be a continuing increase in the importance of
SDR’s.
In discussing international monetary reform,
we should guard against the tendency to be
preoccupied with gold. Other issues deserve the
greater part of our attention. Let me note some
of them.
Ways need to be found, first of all, to assure
a more prompt adjustment of payments imbal­
ances than characterized the practical workings
of the Bretton Woods system. Discussion of this
objective and the means to attain it will in turn
necessitate a thoroughgoing reexamination of
the provisions of the IMF Articles of Agreement
dealing with par values and exchange-rate flex­
ibility.
Under the monetary system that prevailed
before August 1971, there was a tendency to
equate deficits with sin and surpluses with vir­
tue. Moral as well as financial pressures were
certainly much greater on deficit countries to
reduce their deficits than on surplus countries
to reduce surpluses. In fact, however, respon­
sibility for payments imbalances can seldom be
assigned unambiguously to individual countries.
Moreover, the adjustment process is unlikely to
work efficiently if surplus countries fail to par­
ticipate actively in it. New means will therefore
need to be devised for achieving a better divi­
sion of responsibilities among surplus and defi­
cit countries for initiating the correction of pay­
ments imbalances.
A number of vital issues will arise in connec­
tion with the convertibility of the dollar and
future procedures for the settlement of payments
imbalances. Decisions will need to be reached
on the role of various reserve assets— not only
gold, but also SDR’s and reserve currencies.
Major changes may be called for in the proce­
dures governing the creation, allocation, and use

STATEMENT TO CO N G RESS

of SDR’s. Understandings will have to be
reached about the desirability and feasibility of
imposing limitations on the use of reserve cur­
rencies. Various proposals for the “ consoli­
dation” of reserve assets— among them, the
substitution of SDR’s for reserve currencies or
gold— may need to be examined.
Moreover, since restrictive trading practices
are a major factor influencing the balance of
payments position of individual countries, it
would be neither possible nor desirable to ex­
clude the subject of trading arrangements from
the forthcoming negotiations. As a specific ex­
ample, some consideration will have to be given
to ways of amending trade restrictions that im­
pede payments adjustment when exchange rates
are altered.
Still other issues will come up, particularly
those bearing on volatile capital movements, the
transition from our present interim arrangements
to the new reformed system, and the organi­
zational structure of the IMF.
There are bound to be significant differences
in national views on the issues I have men­




789

tioned, and practical difficulties will intrude as
efforts are made to resolve the differences.
Nevertheless, we can be moderately optimistic
about the outlook. All countries have a strong
interest in devising new rules to govern interna­
tional monetary arrangements. Disagreements
among nations exist, but they can be resolved
once their representatives get down to the
serious business of discussing them in a con­
structive and cooperative spirit.
The task confronting the conferees will be
rendered more manageable if the major indus­
trial countries, particularly the United States,
meanwhile practice strict financial discipline.
Indeed, I doubt if a viable international mone­
tary system can be rebuilt without better control
over inflation than we have as yet achieved.
Fortunately, this need is increasingly understood
in our country.
I look ahead to an extended period of chal­
lenging and rewarding negotiations on monetary
and related trade issues. At the end of this
process, we should have the foundations of a
new and stronger international economic order.

Record of Policy Actions
of the Federal Open Market Committee

Records of policy actions taken by the Federal Open Market Com­
mittee at each meeting, in the form in which they will appear in the
Board’s Annual Report, are released approximately 90 days
following the date of the meeting and are subsequently published
in the Federal Reserve B ull etin .
The record for each meeting includes the votes on the policy
decisions made at the meeting as well as a resume of the basis for
the decisions. The summary descriptions of economic and financial
conditions are based on the information that was available to the
Committee at the time of the meeting, rather than on data as they
may have been revised since then.
Policy directives of the Federal Open Market Committee are
issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York— the Bank
selected by the Committee to execute transactions for the System
Open Market Account.
Records of policy actions have been published regularly in the
B ulletin beginning with the July 1967 issue, and such records
have continued to be published in the Board’s Annual Reports.
The records for the meetings held in 1972 through May 23 were
published in the B ulletins for April, pages 390-97; May, pages
455-63; June, pages 562-70; July, pages 640-48; and August,
pages 707-12. The record for the meeting held on June 19-20,
1972, follows:

790




791

MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19-20, 19721
Current economic policy directive.
The information reviewed at this meeting suggested that real output
of goods and services was rising in the second quarter at a faster
pace than the 5.6 per cent annual rate recorded in the first quarter.
A moderately higher rate of growth appeared to be in prospect
for the rest of 1972.
In May retail sales increased sharply, according to the advance
report, and were well above the first-quarter average. Industrial
production continued to expand, with gains reported among con­
sumer goods, business equipment, and materials. Payroll em ploy­
ment rose substantially further in manufacturing and other nonfarm
establishments, but because of another large addition to the civilian
labor force, the unemployment rate remained at 5.9 per cent.
Wholesale prices of farm and food products rose considerably
in May, following little change in April, and prices of industrial
commodities continued upward at about the average rate of earlier
months this year. Average hourly earnings of production workers
on private nonfarm payrolls advanced at a slower pace than they
had in the preceding 3 months.
The latest staff projections of real GNP for the second half of
1972, which suggested some further increase in the over-all rate
of expansion, were similar to those of 4 weeks earlier. It was
anticipated that disposable income and consumption expenditures
would rise at a somewhat faster pace; that business capital outlays
would continue to expand, although not so rapidly as had been
suggested in the previous projections; and that inventory investment
would increase appreciably. It was expected that Federal purchases
of goods and services would expand moderately further and that
residential construction would level off.
In foreign exchange markets, speculation involving a number
of European currencies had developed since the last meeting of
the Committee. The exhange rate for sterling against the dollar
had declined significantly while rates for most continental currenlrThis meeting was held over a 2-day period beginning on the afternoon of
June 19, 1972, in order to provide more time for the staff presentation concerning
the economic situation and outlook and the Comm ittee’s discussion thereof.




792




FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

cies had risen; the spread between sterling and several other
currencies had widened to the maximum specified under the Euro­
pean Community monetary agreement. Through early June the U .S.
balance of payments was in surplus on both the official settlements
basis and the net liquidity basis, as recorded and unrecorded inflows
of short-term capital to the United States continued to exceed the
deficit on current and long-term capital account. The excess of
merchandise imports over exports in April, however, had been even
larger than in February and March.
Since the Committee’s meeting on May 23, market interest rates
on both short- and long-term securities had fluctuated in a narrow
range— declining somewhat early in the period and rising again
later. Rates had edged down in late May in part because of a
Treasury decision not to refund $1.2 billion of bonds maturing
on June 15 and expectations in the market that the Treasury would
not borrow new funds until late July. Moreover, the combined
volume of new publicly issued corporate and State and local
government bonds had declined somewhat further in May and
appeared likely to remain at a reduced level in June. Later in the
period rates moved up again, in part because of the effects on
investor expectations of reports that suggested further strengthening
in economic activity and indications of some firming in money
market conditions. Markets for Treasury notes and bonds also were
influenced by discussion of the possibility that the Treasury might
undertake an advance refunding. The market rate for 3-month
Treasury bills was 3.92 per cent on the day before this meeting
compared with 3.79 per cent 4 weeks earlier.
Contract interest rates on conventional new-home mortgages
were unchanged from April to May while yields in the secondary
market for Federally insured mortgages rose slightly. Inflows of
savings funds to nonbank thrift institutions continued to moderate.
At commercial banks, business loans outstanding expanded in
May at about the stepped-up rate of April, and real estate and
consumer loans continued to grow rapidly. Banks also added a
substantial amount to their holdings of securities, especially securi­
ties of State and local governments.
Growth in the narrowly defined money stock (private demand
deposits plus currency in circulation, or M x) slowed further in May.
However, inflows of savings funds to commercial banks increased,

RECORD OF POLICY ACTIONS OF FOMC

after having fallen off in the preceding 3 months, and growth
stepped up somewhat in the more broadly defined money stock
(M x plus commercial bank time and savings deposits other than
large-denomination C D ’s, or M2). Over the April-M ay period, M x
and M2 grew at annual rates of about 6 and 8 per cent, respectively,
compared with rates of about 9 and 13 per cent in the first quarter
of 1972.2 Expansion in the bank credit proxy— daily-average
member bank deposits, adjusted to include funds from nondeposit
sources— remained rapid as banks, especially those experiencing
strong demands for business loans, acted aggressively to increase
the volume of large-denomination C D ’s outstanding.
System open market operations since the May 23 meeting of
the Committee had been directed at fostering growth in reserves
available to support private nonbank deposits (RPD’s) at an annual
rate in the May-June period between 7.5 and 11.5 per cent and
growth in the monetary aggregates at rates somewhat slower than
those recorded earlier this year, while avoiding sharp day-to-day
fluctuations and large cumulative changes in money market condi­
tions. It appeared at present that RPD’s would grow over the
M ay-June period at a rate of about 7 per cent. The average Federal
funds rate had been slightly below AVi per cent since the beginning
of June, compared with about 4 xk per cent in May. In the 4 weeks
ending June 14 member bank borrowings had averaged about $115
million, approximately the same as in the preceding 5 weeks.
As at its May meeting, the Committee agreed that the economic
situation called for moderate growth in the monetary aggregates
over the months ahead. After taking account of recent changes
in deposits and the 2-week lag in reserve requirements, the Com­
mittee decided to seek growth in RPD’s at an annual rate in a
range of 4.5 to 8.5 per cent during the June-July period while
continuing to avoid sharp fluctuations and large cumulative changes
in money market conditions. As before, it was recognized that
pursuit of the objective for RPD’s might be associated with some
firming of money market conditions. The members also decided
that some allowance should be made in the conduct of operations
if growth in the monetary aggregates appeared to be deviating
2Based on the change in the daily-average levels from March to May and from
December to March.




793

794




FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

significantly from the rates expected, and that account should be
taken of capital market developments and possible Treasury fi­
nancing. As at other recent meetings, it was understood that the
Chairman might call upon the Committee to consider the need for
supplementary instructions before the next scheduled meeting if
it appeared that the Committee’s objectives and constraints were
not being met satisfactorily.
The following current economic policy directive was issued to
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York:
The information reviewed at this meeting, including recent data
for such measures of business activity as industrial production,
employment, and retail sales, suggests that real output of goods
and services is growing at a faster rate in the current quarter than
in the two preceding quarters, but the unemployment rate remains
high. In May wholesale prices of farm and food products advanced
appreciably—after having changed little in April—and the rise in
prices of industrial commodities remained substantial. The most
recent data suggest some moderation in the pace of advance in wage
rates. The U.S. balance of payments has been in surplus in recent
weeks on both the official settlements basis and the net liquidity
basis. In April, however, the excess of merchandise imports over
exports was even larger than in February and March. Some strains
have developed in international financial markets recently, involving
European currencies.
Growth in the narrowly defined money stock slowed further in
May, while growth in the broadly defined money stock stepped up
somewhat as inflows of consumer-type time and savings deposits
to banks expanded considerably; over the April-May period, growth
in both measures of the money stock was well below the high rates
in the first quarter of the year. The outstanding volume of large-denomination CD’s increased substantially further in May, and expan­
sion in the bank credit proxy remained rapid. In recent weeks,
market interest rates have continued to fluctuate in a narrow range.
In light of the foregoing developments, it is the policy of the
Federal Open Market Committee to foster financial conditions
conducive to sustainable real economic growth and increased em­
ployment, abatement of inflationary pressures, and attainment of
reasonable equilibrium in the country’s balance of payments.
To implement this policy, while taking account of possible
Treasury financing and developments in capital markets, the Com­
mittee seeks to achieve bank reserve and money market conditions

RECORD OF POLICY ACTIONS OF FOMC

that will support moderate growth in the monetary aggregates over
the months ahead.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Burns, Brimmer,
Bucher, Coldwell, Daane, Eastburn, MacLaury,
Mitchell, Robertson, Sheehan, Winn, and Treiber.
Votes against this action: None.
Absent and not voting: Mr. Hayes. (Mr. Treiber
voted as his alternate.)
Subsequent to this meeting, on July 6, 1972, Committee
members voted to amend this current economic policy directive
by adding a reference to international developments in the final
paragraph. As amended, that paragraph read as follows:
To implement this policy, while taking account of possible
Treasury financing, developments in capital markets, and interna­
tional developments, the Committee seeks to achieve bank reserve
and money market conditions that will support moderate growth
in monetary aggregates over the months ahead.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Brimmer, Bucher,
Coldwell, Daane, Eastburn, MacLaury, Robertson,
Sheehan, Winn, and Treiber. Votes against this
action: None.
Absent and not voting: Messrs. Burns, Hayes,
and Mitchell. (Mr. Treiber voted as Mr. Hayes’
alternate.)
In the 3 days preceding this action, foreign central banks had
acquired large amounts of dollars in the process of maintaining
exchange rates for their currencies within the internationally agreed
margins. The System Account Manager advised that, insofar as
the investment of these and any additional funds that might be
acquired by the foreign central banks took the form of purchases
of U .S. Treasury bills in the market, they would tend to exert
downward pressures on bill rates. In the interests of the U .S.
balance of payments and international confidence in the dollar, the
members decided that open market operations should be conducted
with a view to avoiding significant declines in bill rates, insofar




795

796




FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

as that was consistent with the objectives agreed upon by the
Committee on June 20, 1972. Specifically, it was decided that (1)
to the extent feasible, reserve additions required to meet the
Committee’s objectives should be made by means other than
purchases of Treasury bills, and (2) foreign official demands for
bills, if heavy, should be met to the extent feasible by sales of
bills from the System ’s portfolio, with any undesired reserve effects
offset by other means. The members agreed that the directive should
be amended to affirm the Committee’s intention to authorize such
operations.
In casting their affirmative votes, a number of members indicated
that while they believed the authorization desirable they thought
it should be used with restraint. Mr. Brimmer noted that he favored
the action not only on the international grounds cited but also
because he thought a significant decline in bill rates would have
adverse domestic implications.

Law Department
Statutes, regulations, interpretations, and decisions

SECURITIES CREDIT TRANSACTIONS

The Board of Governors, effective October 16,
1972, has amended Regulation T, “ Credit by
Brokers and Dealers,” and Regulation U, “ Credit
by Banks for the Purpose of Purchasing or Carry­
ing Margin Stocks,” to exempt from margin re­
quirements certain credit extended to so-called
“ block positioners” and “ third-market makers.”
Block positioners are securities firms that stand
ready to hold amounts of stock for their own
account sufficient to facilitate the sale or purchase
by their customers—primarily institutions—of
quantities too large to be absorbed by normal
exchange transactions. Third-market makers are
firms that make a market off the exchanges in
stocks that are listed for exchange trading.
The amendments, which also apply new report­
ing requirements to exchange specialists, have
been adopted simultaneously with registration and
reporting requirements imposed by the Securities
and Exchange Commission pertaining to the same
subject.
The text of the Board’s amendments reads as
follows:
AMENDMENT TO REGULATION T
Effective October 16, 1972, § 220.4(g) is
amended to read as follows:
SECTION 220.4—SPECIAL ACCOUNTS
*

*

*

*

(g) Specialist’s account. (1) In a special ac­
count designated as a specialist’s account, a credi­
tor may effect and finance, for any member of a
national securities exchange who is registered and
acts as a specialist in securities on the exchange,
such member’s transactions as a specialist in such
securities, or effect and finance, for any joint
venture in which the creditor participates, any
transactions in any securities of an issue with
respect to which all participants, or all participants
other than the creditor, are registered and act on
a national securities exchange as specialists.
(2) Such specialist’s account shall be subject to




the same conditions to which it would be subject
if it were a general account except that if the
specialist’s exchange is a national securities ex­
change which requires and submits to the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
reports suitable for supplying current information
regarding specialist’s use of credit pursuant to this
paragraph (g), the requirements of § 220.6(b)
regarding joint ventures shall not apply to such
accounts and the maximum loan value of a regis­
tered security in such account (except a security
that has been identified as a security held for
investment pursuant to a rule of the Commissioner
of Internal Revenue (Regs, section 1-1236-1(d)))
shall be as determined by the creditor in good
faith.
*
*
*
*
AMENDMENTS TO REGULATION U
Effective October 16, 1972, §§ 221.3(a), (o),
(w)(l), and (y) are amended and § 221.3(z) is
added as set forth below; and footnote 9 in § 221.4
(the Supplement to Regulation U) is redesignated
as footnote 12:
SECTION 221.3—MISCELLANEOUS
PROVISIONS
(a) Required statement as to stock-secured
credit. In connection with an extension of credit
secured directly or indirectly by any stock, the
bank shall obtain and retain in its records for at
least 3 years after such credit is extinguished a
statement in conformity with the requirements of
Federal Reserve Form U-l executed by the recipi­
ent of such extension of credit (sometimes referred
to as the “ customer” ) and executed and accepted
in good faith by a duly authorized officer of the
bank prior to such extension: Provided, That this
requirement shall not apply to any credit described
in paragraphs (o), (w), (x), (y), or (z) of this
section or § 221.2 of this part except for credit
described in paragraphs 221.2(f), (g), and (h)
extended to persons who are not brokers or dealers
subject to Part 220 of this Chapter (Regulation T).
797

798

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

In determining whether or not an extension of
credit is for the purpose specified in § 221.1 or
for any of the purposes specified in § 221.2 or
this section the bank may rely on the statement
executed by the customer if accepted in good faith.
To accept the customer’s statement in good faith,
the officer must (1) be alert to the circumstances
surrounding the credit and (2) if he has any in­
formation which would cause a prudent man not
to accept the statement without inquiry, have in­
vestigated and be satisfied that the customer’s
statement is truthful.
*

*

*

*

(o)
Specialist. In the case of credit extended
to a member of a national securities exchange who
is registered and acts as a specialist in securities
on the exchange for the purpose of financing such
member’s transactions as a specialist in such se­
curities, the maximum loan value of any stock
(except stock that has been identified as a security
held for investment pursuant to a rule of the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Regs, section
1-1236-1(d))) shall be as determined by the bank
in good faith: Provided , That the specialist’s ex­
change is a national securities exchange which
requires and submits to the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System reports suitable for
supplying current information regarding special­
ists’ use of credit pursuant to this section.
*

*

*

*

(w) OTC market maker exemption. (1) In the
case of credit extended to an OTC market maker,
as defined in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph
(w), for the purpose of purchasing or carrying an
OTC margin stock in order to conduct the marketmaking activity of such a market maker, the
maximum loan value of any OTC margin stock
(except stock that has been identified as a security
held for investment pursuant to a rule of the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Regs, section
1-1236-1(d))) shall be determined by the bank in
good faith: Provided , That in respect of each such
stock the OTC market maker shall have filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission a notice
of his intent to begin or continue such marketmaking activity (Securities and Exchange Com­
mission Form X-17A-12 (1)) and all other reports
required to be filed by market makers in OTC
margin stock pursuant to a rule of the Commission
(Rule 17a-12(17 CFR 240.17a-12)), shall not have
ceased to engage in such market-making activity,
and shall have a reasonable average rate of inven­
tory turnover in such stock: And provided further ,




That the bank shall obtain and retain in its records
for at least 3 years after such credit is extinguished
a statement in conformity with the requirements
of Federal Reserve Form U-2, executed by the
OTC market maker who is the recipient of such
credit and executed and accepted in good faith9
by a duly authorized officer of the bank prior to
such extension. In determining whether or not an
extension of credit is for the purpose of conducting
such market-making activity, a bank may rely on
such a statement if executed and accepted in ac­
cordance with the requirements of this paragraph
(w) and paragraph (a) of this section.
*

*

*

*

(y) Third-market maker exemption. (1) In the
case of credit extended to a third-market maker,
as defined in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph
(y), for the purpose of purchasing or carrying a
stock that is registered on a national securities
exchange (other than a convertible debt security
described in paragraph (t) (1) of this section) in
order to conduct the market-making activity of
such a market maker, the maximum loan value
of any stock (except (i) a convertible debt security
described in paragraph (t) (1) of this section, and
(ii) stock that has been identified as a security held
for investment pursuant to a rule of the Commis­
sioner of Internal Revenue (Regs, section 1-12361(d))) shall be determined by the bank in good
faith: Provided , That in respect of each such stock
he shall, at least five full business days prior to
such extension of credit, have filed with the Se­
curities and Exchange Commission a notice of his
intent to begin or continue such market-making
activity, and thereafter all other reports required
to be filed by third-market makers pursuant to a
rule of the Securities and Exchange Commission
and, except when such activity is unlawful, shall
not have ceased to engage in such market-making
activity: And provided further , That the bank shall
obtain and retain in its records for at least 3 years
after such credit is extinguished a statement in
conformity with the requirements of Federal Re­
serve Form U-3, executed by the third-market
maker who is the recipient of such credit and
executed and accepted in good faith10 by a duly
authorized officer of the bank prior to such exten­
sion. In determining whether or not an extension
of credit is for the purpose of conducting such
market-making activity, a bank may rely on such
a statement, if executed and accepted in accor9A s described in paragraph (a) of this section.
10A s described in paragraph (a) of this section.

LAW DEPARTMENT

dance with the requirements of this paragraph (y)
and paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) A third-market maker with respect to a stock
that is registered on a national securities exchange
is a dealer who has and maintains net capital, as
defined in a rule of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (Rule 15c3-l (17 CFR 240.15c3-l)),
or in the capital rules of an exchange of which
he is a member if the members thereof are exempt
therefrom by Rule 15c3-1(b)(2) of the Commission
(17 CFR 240.15c3-l(b)(2)), of $100,000 plus
$20,000 for each stock in excess of five in respect
of which he has filed and not withdrawn a notice
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (but
in no case does this subparagraph (2) require net
capital of more than $500,000) who is in compli­
ance with such rule of the Commission and who,
except when such activity is unlawful, meets all
the following conditions with respect to such
stock: (i) He furnishes bona fide, competitive bid
and offer quotations to other brokers and dealers,
in the stocks for which he makes a market, at all
times on request, (ii) he is ready, willing, and able
to effect transactions for his own account in reas­
onable amounts, and at his quoted prices, with
other brokers and dealers, and (iii) he has a reas­
onable average rate of inventory turnover in the
stock.
(3) If all or a portion of the credit extended
pursuant to this paragraph (y) ceases to be for the
purpose specified in subparagraph (1) of this para­
graph or the dealer to whom the credit is extended
ceases to be a third-market maker as defined in
subparagraph (2) of this paragraph, the credit or
such portion thereof shall thereupon be treated as
“ a credit subject to § 221.1.”
(z) Block positioner exemption. (1) In the case
of credit extended to a block positioner, as defined
in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph (z), for the
purpose of financing the activity of block posi­
tioning, the maximum loan value of any margin
stock obtained in the ordinary course of the activity
of block positioning as described in subparagraph
(2) of this paragraph (z) (except (i) a convertible
debt security described in paragraph (t) (1) of this
section and (ii) stock that has been identified as
a security held for investment pursuant to a rule
of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Regs,
section 1-1236-1 (d))) shall be determined by the
bank in good faith: Provided , That in respect of
such activity he shall have filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission a notice of undertaking
such activity as prescribed by the Commission,
and all reports required to be filed by block-posi-




799

tioners: And provided further , That the bank shall
obtain and retain in its records for at least 3 years
after such credit is extinguished a statement in
conformity with the requirements of Federal Re­
serve Form U-5 and paragraph (a) of this section,
executed by the block positioner who is the recip­
ient of such credit and executed and accepted in
good faith11 by a duly authorized officer of the
bank prior to such extension. In determining
whether or not an extension of credit is for the
purpose of conducting such block positioning ac­
tivity, a bank may rely on such a statement if
executed and accepted in accordance with the
requirements of this paragraph (z) and paragraph
(a) of this section. In determining whether or not
an extension of time has been granted pursuant
to subparagraph (4) of this paragraph (z) and
whether or not such extension of time is commen­
surate with the circumstances the bank may rely
on a statement executed by an officer of the ex­
change or association on behalf of the committee
in conformity with the requirements of Federal
Reserve Form U-6 and paragraph (a) of this sec­
tion.
(2)
A block positioner is a dealer who (i) is
registered with the Securities and Exchange Com­
mission under section 15 of the Securities Ex­
change Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o) and has a
minimum net capital, as defined in a rule of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (Rule 15c31 (17 CFR 240.15c3-l)) or in the capital rules
of an exchange of which he is a member if the
members thereof are exempt therefrom by Rule
15c3-l(b)(2) of the Commission (17 CFR
240.15c3- 1(b)(2)), of $1 million, (ii) engages in
the activity of purchasing long or selling short as
principal, from time to time, from or to a customer
(other than a partner or a joint venture or other
entity in which a partner of the dealer, or the dealer
itself, participates or a person “ associated with”
such dealer as defined in section 3(a)(18) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) a block of stock
(other than a convertible debt security as described
in paragraph (t)(l) of this section) with a current
market value of $200,000 or more in a single
transaction or in several transactions at approxi­
mately the same time from a single source to
facilitate a sale or purchase by such customer, (iii)
certifies to the lending bank that he has determined
in the exercise of reasonable diligence that the
block could not be sold to or purchased from others
on equivalent or better terms, and (iv) sells the
11A s described in paragraph (a) of this section.

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

800

shares comprising such block as rapidly as possible
commensurate with the circumstances. In the case
where a block positioner acquires a block from
a broker who acts as agent for several sellers, such
acquisition shall be deemed for purposes of this
section to be an acquisition from a single source.
(3) No credit shall be extended or maintained
pursuant to this paragraph (z) in respect of any
such block of stock or portion thereof which the
block positioner has held continuously for more
than 20 business days, and any credit extended
pursuant to this paragraph (z) shall be extinguished
or brought into conformity with the initial margin
requirements of §§ 221.1 and 221.4 before the
expiration of such 20-day period. For the purposes
of this subparagraph, a block or portion thereof
shall be treated as not having been held continu­
ously only to the extent that there has been a net
sale (or in the case of short positions, net purchase)
of such securities (whether or not represented by
the same certificate) during such 20-day period.
(4) In exceptional cases the 20-day period
specified in subparagraph (3) of this paragraph (z)
may on the application of the block positioner, be
extended for one or more periods limited to 5
business days each commensurate with the cir­
cumstances by any regularly constituted committee
of a national securities exchange having juris­
diction over the business conduct of its members,
of which the block positioner is a member or
through which his block transaction was effected,
or by a committee of a national securities associa­
tion, if effected in the over-the-counter market:
Provided, That such committee is satisfied that the
block positioner is acting in good faith in making
the application and that the circumstances in fact
warrant such treatment.
BANK HOLDING COMPANIES

INSURANCE AGENCY ACTIVITIES
Effective September 1, 1971, the Board of
Governors amended § 225.4(a) of Regulation Y
to add specified insurance agency activities to the
list of activities the Board has determined to be
so closely related to banking or managing or
controlling banks as to be a proper incident
thereto. In the course of administering this regula­
tion, a number of questions have arisen concerning
the scope and terms of the Board’s regulation. The
Board’s views on some of these questions are set
forth below.
§ 225.4(a)(9)(i): Insurance “for the holding




company and its subsidiaries The Board regards
the sale of group insurance for the protection of
employees of the holding company as insurance
for the holding company and its subsidiaries.
§ 2 2 5 .4(a)(9)(ii)(d): Insurance “directly re­
lated to an extension of credit by a bank or a
bank-related firm” . (1) This provision is designed
to permit the sale, by a bank holding company
system, of insurance that supports the lending
transactions of a bank or bank-related firm in the
holding company system. The Board regards the
sale of insurance as directly related to an extension
of credit by a bank or bank-related firm where (i)
the insurance assures repayment of an extension
of credit by the holding company system in the
event of death or disability of the borrower (for
example, credit life and credit accident and health
insurance); or (ii) the insurance protects collateral
in which the bank or bank-related firm has a
security interest as a result of its extension of
credit; or (iii) the insurance is other insurance
which is sold to individual borrowers in conjunc­
tion with or as part of an insurance package (as
a matter of general practice) with insurance pro­
tecting the collateral in which a bank or bankrelated firm has a security interest as a result of
its extension of credit. Examples that fall within
(iii) above are: (a) liability insurance sold in
conjunction with insurance relating to physical
damage of an automobile when the purchase of
such automobile is financed by a bank or bankrelated firm; and (b) a homeowner’s insurance
policy with respect to a residence mortgaged to
a bank or bank-related firm.
(2) Other types of insurance may be directly
related to an extension of credit. A bank holding
company applying to engage in the sale of such
other types should furnish information showing
that such insurance is so directly related.
(3) A renewal of insurance, after the credit
extension has been repaid, is regarded as closely
related to banking only to the extent that such
renewal is permissible under § 225.4(a)(9)(ii)(c)
of Regulation Y.
(4) The Board generally regards insurance pro­
tecting collateral where the security interest of a
bank or bank-related firm was obtained by pur­
chase rather than by a direct extension of credit
by the holding company system as not being
directly related to an extension of credit by a bank
or bank-related firm. However, if such security
interests are purchased on a continuing basis from
a firm or an individual and the interval between
the creation of the security interest and its subse­

LAW DEPARTMENT
quent purchase is minimal, the Board may regard
such purchase as an extension of credit. Full
details of the transactions should be provided to
support a holding company’s contention that such
insurance sales are directly related to an extension
of credit.
§ 225.4(a)(9)(ii)(b): Insurance “directly re­
lated to the provision of other financial services
by a bank or . . . bank-related firm ” . This provi­
sion is designed to permit the sale by a bank
holding company system of insurance in connec­
tion with bank-related services (rendered by a
member of the holding company system) other
than an extension of credit. Among the types of
insurance the Board regards as directly related to
such services are: (i) insurance against loss of
securities held for safekeeping; (ii) insurance for
valuables in a safe deposit box; (iii) life insurance
equal to the difference between the maturity value
of a deposit plan for periodic desposits over a
specified term and the balance in the account at
the time of the depositor’s death; (iv) in connection
with mortgage loan servicing that is provided by
a bank or bank-related firm, insurance on the
mortgaged property and/or insurance on the
mortgagor to the extent of the outstanding balance




801
of the credit extension, provided that the mortga­
gee is a beneficiary under such types of insurance
policies; and (v) insurance directly related to the
provision of trust services if the sale of such
insurance is permitted by the trust instruments and
under State law.
§ 225.4(a)(9)(ii)(c): Insurance that “ is other­
wise sold as a matter of convenience to the pur­
chaser, so long as the premium income from sales
within . . . subdivision (ii)(c) does not constitute a
significant portion of the aggregate insurance pre­
mium income of the holding company from insur­
ance sold pursuant to . . . subdivision (ii)” .
(1) This provision is designed to permit the sale
of insurance as a matter of convenience to the
purchaser. It is not designed to permit entry into
the general insurance agency business.
(2) The term “ premium income” means gross
commission income.
(3) The Board generally will regard premium
income attributable to “ convenience” sales as not
constituting a “ significant portion” if the income
attributable to “ convenience” sales is less than
5 per cent of the aggregate insurance premium
income of the holding company system from in­
surance sold pursuant to § 225.4(a)(9)(ii).

802

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

ORDERS UNDER SECTION 3(a) of
BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT

FIRST CITY BANCORPORATION
OF TEXAS, INC.,
HOUSTON, TEXAS
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k

First City Bancorporation of Texas, Inc., Hous­
ton, Texas, a bank holding company within the
meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act, has
applied for the Board’s approval under section
3(a)(3) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to ac­
quire an additional 29.7 per cent of the voting
shares of United Bank Shares, Inc., El Paso, Texas
(“ United” ), a holding company owning 100 per
cent (less directors’ qualifying shares) of the shares
of Southwest National Bank of El Paso, El Paso,
Texas (“ Bank” ). Applicant presently owns 24.5
per cent of United..
Notice of receipt of the application has been
given in accordance with section 3(b) of the Act.
Time for filing comments and views has expired.
The Board has considered the application and all
comments received in the light of the factors set
forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
Applicant, the third largest banking organization
in Texas, controls eight banks with aggregate
deposits of approximately $1.5 billion, represent­
ing about 4.9 per cent of deposits in commercial
banks in the State.1 Consummation of the proposal
would increase Applicant’s share of deposits by
only .2 percentage points and would not result in
a significant increase in the concentration of bank­
ing resources in Texas.
Bank (about $75 million in deposits) is the third
largest of 12 banking organizations in the El Paso
area and controls approximately 11 per cent of
deposits there. However, two larger organizations
dominate El Paso with each controlling about 36
per cent of deposits in the area. As the Board
recognized in its earlier Order approving Appli­
cant’s acquisition of 24.5 per cent of the voting
shares of United Bank (1972 Federal Reserve
B u lle tin
295), the acquisition of Bank by
Applicant eventually may lead to some decon­
centration in the El Paso area through the intro­
duction of a strong effective organization that
competes with the two dominant organizations.
*A11 b an k in g d ata are as o f D ecem b er 3 1 , 1971 and reflect
ban k h o ld in g c o m p an y fo rm atio n s and a cq u isitio n s a p proved
by the B oard th ro u g h Ju n e 3 0 , 1972.




Competitive considerations are consistent with ap­
proval of the application.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant and its subsidiary
banks are regarded as generally satisfactory.
Applicant proposes to provide additional capital
to Bank and to strengthen management. Banking
considerations lend weight for approval of the
application. Applicant proposes to enable Bank to
provide expertise in petroleum financing. Consid­
erations relating to the convenience and needs of
the community to be served are consistent with
approval. It is the Board’s judgment that the
proposed transaction is in the public interest and
that the application should be approved.
On the basis of the record the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas pursuant
to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
July 28, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Brimmer, and Sheehan. Absent and not
voting: Governors Daane and Bucher.

[s e a l]

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.
RIBSO, INC.,
ROCK ISLAND, ILLINOIS

O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k

Ribso, Inc., Rock Island, Illinois, a bank hold­
ing company within the meaning of the Bank
Holding Company Act, has applied for the Board’s
approval under § 3(a)(3) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(a)(3)) to retain ownership of 2.276 per cent
of the voting shares of Rock Island Bank and Trust
Company, Rock Island, Illinois (“ Bank” ) .1
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
*On June 22 , 1971, the B oard ordered that any com pany
w hich acquired an interest in a bank betw een D ecem b er 31,
1970, and June 22, 1971, w ith o u t first securing p rio r B oard
approval because of lack of kno w led g e of that re q u ire m e n t
m ight file fo r such a pproval by A u g u st 31, 1971, u nless such
tim e w as e x te n d ed for good c au se. T h e applicatio n h e re in w as
filed pu rsu an t to the B o a rd ’s Ju n e 22, 1971, O rder.

803

LAW DEPARTMENT

application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U .S.C .
1842(c)).
As a result of the enactment of the 1970
Amendments to the Bank Holding Company Act,
Applicant became a bank holding company by
operation of law on December 31, 1970, because
it then owned 23.1 per cent of the voting shares
of Bank and controlled the election of a majority
of Bank’s directors. Subsequently, during the first
six months of 1971, Applicant acquired an addi­
tional 2.276 per cent of the voting shares of Bank
without the prior approval of the Board as required
by § 3(a)(3) of the Act. The proposal herein is
for the Board’s approval to retain the shares so
acquired.
Applicant, organized in 1955, is principally
engaged in the ownership of shares of Bank and
Bank’s premises, and has no other banking subsi­
diaries. Bank ($59.1 million deposits) is the sec­
ond largest of three banks in Rock Island, a
community 160 miles west of Chicago. (Banking
data are as of December 31, 1971.) Approval of
Applicant’s proposal would not result in the elim­
ination of either existing or potential competition,
nor does it appear that there would be any adverse
effects on any bank in the area.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant and Bank are regarded
as satisfactory and consistent with approval of the
application. Approval of the proposal would have
no effect on convenience and needs of the com­
munity. It is the Board’s judgment that the ap­
plication should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 1, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Daane, Brimmer, and Sheehan. Absent
and not voting: Governor Bucher.

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.

[s e a l]

AMERICAN BANCORPORATION,
COLUMBUS, OHIO
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k

American Bancorporation, Columbus, Ohio, a
bank holding company within the meaning of the
Bank Holding Company Act, has applied for the
Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3) of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire 100 per cent of the
voting shares (less directors’ qualifying shares) of




The Farmers State Bank of McClure, Ohio, Mc­
Clure, Ohio (“ Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and none has been timely received.
The Board has considered the application in light
of the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1842(c)).
Applicant controls four banks with deposits of
$18.7 million, representing .08 per cent of aggre­
gate deposits of commercial banks in Ohio. (All
banking data are as of December 31, 1971, and
reflect holding company formations and acquisi­
tions approved through May 31, 1972.) The ac­
quisition of Bank with deposits of $6.3 million
would not appreciably increase the concentration
of banking resources in any relevant area, and
Applicant would retain its rank as the smallest
bank holding company in the State.
Bank serves Henry County in the northwestern
part of Ohio. There are six banks headquartered
in the county with deposits ranging from $4.5
million to $22.4 million. Bank controls 11.6 per
cent of county deposits and is the third largest of
these banks. Consummation of the proposal should
have no adverse effects on any of the competing
banks.
The closest offices of Applicant and Bank are
78 miles apart, and no significant present com­
petition exists between any of these offices. In
addition, there does not appear to be any potential
for the development of future competition between
the two institutions, due to the distances separating
their offices, the location of numerous intervening
banks, and the restrictions placed on branching by
State laws.
The financial and managerial resources of
Applicant, its subsidiary banks, and Bank are
considered to be generally satisfactory, and pros­
pects for the group appear favorable. Therefore,
considerations relating to the banking factors are
consistent with approval of the application. Appli­
cant proposes to expand and improve the present
services offered by Bank to include specialized
consumer and business loan programs. Although
the major banking needs of the area are being
served at the present time, Applicant’s assistance
to Bank in loan participation with other affiliates,
and in training and management planning would
better serve the convenience and needs of the
communities. Considerations under this factor are
consistent with approval of the application. It is

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

804

the Board’s judgment that consummation of the
proposed acquisition would be in the public inter­
est and that the application should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board,
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 3, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent and not
voting: Governors Mitchell and Daane.

[sea l]

(Signed) T ynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

has expired, and the Board has considered the
application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons set forth in the Board’s
Statement of this date. The transaction shall not
be consummated (a) before the thirtieth calendar
day following the effective date of this Order or
(b) later than three months after the effective date
of this Order, unless such period is extended for
good cause by the Board or by the Federal Reserve
Bank of Chicago pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 3, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Mitchell, Daane, and Sheehan. Voting against this action:
Governors Robertson and Brimmer. Absent and not voting:
Governor Bucher.

[seal]
MICHIGAN NATIONAL CORPORATION,
LANSING, MICHIGAN
O rder A pproving Formation of B ank
Holding Company
Michigan National Corporation, Lansing,
Michigan, has applied for the Board’s approval,
under § 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act
(12 U.S.C. 3(a )(l));, of formation of a bank hold­
ing company through the acquisition of 80 per cent
or more of the voting shares of each of the fol­
lowing five Michigan banks: Michigan National
Bank, Lansing; Michigan Bank, N .A ., Detroit;
Livonia National Bank, Livonia; Troy National
Bank, Troy; and Oakland National Bank, South­
field. As a result of its acquisition of Michigan
National Bank, Applicant would also acquire in­
direct control of less than 25 per cent but more
than 5 per cent of the outstanding voting shares
of each of seven Michigan banks as follows:
Central Bank, Grand Rapids (24.1 per cent); Val­
ley National Bank of Saginaw, Saginaw (24.9 per
cent); Security National Bank of Manistee, Man­
istee (23.4 per cent); First National Bank of East
Lansing, East Lansing (13.8 per cent); First Na­
tional Bank of Wyoming, Wyoming (23.3 per
cent); Central National Bank of Alma, Alma (18.8
per cent); and St. Clair Shores National Bank, St.
Clair Shores (10 per cent).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views




(Signed) Tynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.
S tatement

Michigan National Corporation, Lansing,
Michigan (“ Applicant” ), has filed with the Board,
pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956, an application for approval
of action to become a bank holding company
through the acquisition of 80 per cent or more of
the voting shares of each of the following five
Michigan banks: Michigan National Bank, Lans­
ing (“ Michigan National” ); Michigan Bank,
N .A ., Detroit (“ Michigan Bank” ); Livonia Na­
tional Bank, Livonia (“ Livonia Bank” ); Troy
National Bank, Troy (“ Troy Bank” ); and Oakland
National Bank, Southfield (“ Oakland Bank” ). By
virtue of acquisition of Michigan National, Appli­
cant would acquire also indirect control of voting
shares of each of seven other Michigan banks as
follows: 24.1 per cent of the shares of Central
Bank, Grand Rapids (“ Central Bank” ); 24.9 per
cent of the shares of Valley National Bank of
Saginaw, Saginaw (“ Valley National” ); 23.4 per
cent of the shares of Security National Bank of
Manistee, Manistee (“ Security Bank” ); 13.8 per
cent of the shares of First National Bank of East
Lansing, East Lansing (“ East Lansing Bank” );
23.3 per cent of the shares of First National Bank
of Wyoming, Wyoming (“ Wyoming Bank” );
18.8 per cent of the shares of Central National
Bank of Alma, Alma (“ Alma Bank” ); and 10 per
cent of the shares of St. Clair Shores National
Bank, St. Clair Shores (“ St. Clair Shores Bank” ).

LAW DEPARTMENT

The described shares of the latter seven banks are
held in trust by the Michigan National Bank Profit
Sharing Trust for the benefit of employees of
Michigan National and, pursuant to § 2(g)(2) of
the Act, Michigan National is deemed to control
such shares; by virtue of § 2(g)(1) of the Act,
Applicant will be deemed to control such shares
upon its acquisition of control of Michigan Na­
tional.
Statutory considerations. Applicant is a re­
cently-organized corportion formed for the pur­
pose of becoming a multi-bank holding company
through the direct acquisition of voting shares of
each of five banks. As an incident to the acquisi­
tion of one of those banks, control of less than
25 per cent but more than 5 per cent of the voting
shares of seven other Michigan banks would be
attributed to Applicant. The proposal is essentially
a corporate reorganization inasmuch as the
proposed five direct subsidiary banks are, and have
been, closely affiliated for several years through
common ownership by ten families and by profit
sharing trusts established at each of the five banks.
Each of the five banks has established a profit
sharing trust for the benefit of its employees,
which, in each case, has invested in the stock of
its own bank and the stock of certain of the other
proposed subsidiaries. The five banks have been
operated as a unified banking group for several
years with common directors and interchanging
management. Upon acquisition of the shares of
the five banks, Applicant would control approxi­
mately 9.3 per cent ($2.03 billion) of the total
deposits held by commercial banks in Michigan
and would become the second largest banking
organization and the largest bank holding company
in Michigan on the basis of deposits. (Unless
otherwise indicated, all banking data are as of June
30, 1971, adjusted to reflect holding company
formations and acquisitions approved by the Board
to date.) The largest banking organization in
Michigan would still be almost twice the size of
Applicant and there are two other banking organi­
zations comparable in size to Applicant.
Michigan National ($1.1 billion deposits),
which holds 5.1 per cent of the total commercial
bank deposits in the State, is located in Lansing
85 miles northwest of Detroit and is the fourth
largest bank in Michigan and the largest bank
outside of the Detroit area. Michigan National is
represented in six banking markets, and has a total
of twenty-five offices located throughout southern
Michigan. On the basis of deposits, Michigan
National’s ranking among the banks operating in




805
those six markets is as follows: first of the nine
banks in the Lansing market; third of the fifteen
banks in the Grand Rapids market; second of the
six banks in the Saginaw market; third of the seven
banks in the Flint market; first of the six banks
in the Port Huron market; and first of the seven
banks in the Battle Creek market. It appears that
consummation of the proposal would not eliminate
any significant existing competition between
Michigan National and any of the other four
proposed direct subsidiaries, all of which are lo­
cated in the Detroit metropolitan area. Further, on
the facts of record, particularly in view of the
intervening distances between Michigan National
and any of the other banks (the closest offices are
57 miles apart), the number of available banking
alternatives, the common ownership of the five
banks, the sizes of the banks involved, and the
restrictions of Michigan branching law, it appears
that no significant potential competition between
Michigan National and any of the other four
proposed direct subsidiaries would be precluded
by consummation of the proposal.
Michigan Bank ($730 million deposits), head­
quartered in downtown Detroit with an additional
twenty-six branches in the Detroit area, is the sixth
largest bank in the State and the fifth largest of
forty-nine banks located in the Detroit banking
market, approximated by the three county Detroit
SMSA, and holds 5.8 per cent of deposits in that
market. Livonia Bank ($70.7 million deposits),
located in a suburb two miles west of Detroit,
operates six branches in Livonia, and is the six­
teenth largest bank in the Detroit market with .6
per cent of deposits in the market. Troy Bank
($57.2 million deposits), located in a suburb six
miles north of Detroit, operates seven branches
in Troy, and is the nineteenth largest bank in the
Detroit market with .5 per cent of deposits in the
market. Oakland Bank ($56.3 million deposits),
located in a suburb just northwest of Detroit,
operates four branches in Southfield, and is the
twenty-first largest bank in the Detroit market with
approximately .5 per cent of deposits in the mar­
ket.
It appears that consummation of the proposal
would not have any significant adverse effects on
competition in the Detroit banking market. As
indicated above the four banks have been closely
affiliated and have been operated as part of the
Michigan National banking group for several
years. Individuals associated with Michigan Na­
tional purchased a substantial interest in Michigan
Bank in 1955. Subsequently, Troy Bank and Oak­

806

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

land Bank were organized de novo with the assis­
tance of Michigan National and Michigan Bank
in 1962 and 1965, respectively, and the common
ownership in Livonia Bank dates back to 1963
when the bank had only $12 million in deposits.
Since the inception of the ownership interest in
the three suburban banks, the management of all
three has been supplied by Michigan National and
Michigan Bank and all three have been operated
as part of the banking group. On the basis of the
facts herein, notably the origin and closeness of
the existing relationships and the unlikelihood that
the banks would become disaffiliated in the fore­
seeable future, the Board concludes that con­
summation of the proposal would not have any
significant adverse effects on existing or potential
competition among the four Detroit area banks.
Because of its acquisition of Michigan National,
Applicant will acquire also indirect control of
certain shares (in each instance, less than 25 per
cent) of each of seven other Michigan banks pres­
ently held by the Michigan National Profit Sharing
Trust (“ indirect banks” ). Neither Manistee Bank
nor Alma Bank nor St. Clair Shores Bank operates
in any meaningful way in a market served by
Michigan National or any of the other proposed
subsidiaries. Through its profit sharing trust,
Michigan National was instrumental in organizing
East Lansing Bank (1955), Valley National Bank
(1959), and Wyoming Bank (1960); and Michigan
National acquired its interest in Central Bank over
ten years ago. Notwithstanding the origin of the
interests of the profit sharing trust in the indirect
banks that are located in the areas of Grand
Rapids, Saginaw, and East Lansing, the relation­
ship of Michigan National to said indirect banks
is a matter of concern to the Board inasmuch as
offices of Michigan National serve these areas. The
Board notes that in each of the areas of Grand
Rapids and Saginaw a larger banking organization
holds more than twice the deposits held by Michi­
gan National and, in the Lansing market, East
Lansing Bank is one of the smallest banks and
holds less than 2 per cent of the deposits there.
It appears that there is no adverse competitive
consideration serious enough to warrant denial of
the application. Moreover, the order herein does
not constitute a determination that any of said
indirect banks is or may become a subsidiary of
Applicant;1 nor is the order herein any indication
xO f co u rse, the d ete rm in a tio n herein does not preclude the
B oard from d eterm in in g that the A p p lican t e x ercises a c o n tro l­
ling influence o v er the m a n a g em e n t or p o licies o f any of the
seven so-called in d irect b an k s w ith in the m ean in g of §
2(a)(2 )(C ) of the A ct.




that Applicant will be permitted to acquire direct
or indirect control of any additional shares of any
of said banks. Any proposal for the acquisition
of additional shares of any of said banks will be
judged on the basis of the competitive circum­
stances and all other relevant facts involved in the
particular proposal.
On the basis of the record before it, the Board
concludes that consummation of the proposal in­
volving the direct acquisition of the five banks and
the indirect acquisition of less than 25 per cent
of seven banks would not substantially lessen
competition in any relevant area nor have a signif­
icantly adverse effect on existing competition, nor
foreclose the development of significant potential
competition in any relevant area.
The managerial resources of Applicant and each
of its proposed subsidiaries are regarded as satis­
factory and consistent with approval of the ap­
plication. During consideration of the subject ap­
plication, Applicant was notified by the Board of
its serious concern over what it considered to be
the inadequate capital positions of the proposed
subsidiary banks, especially Michigan National
and Michigan Bank, and of the Board’s view that
the capital position of each of the banks should
be improved without delay.
In response to the Board’s concern in this area,
Applicant has proposed a capital improvement
program that would immediately increase the cap­
ital funds of the five subsidiary banks by $45.8
million and by December 31, 1973, would in­
crease the capital by over $80 million. The capital
improvement program includes the sale of $32
million in convertible debentures by Applicant
($30 million of which will be used to exercise
preemptive rights to purchase additional common
stock of the proposed subsidiaries), the sale of
$15.8 million in capital notes by Michigan Na­
tional and Michigan Bank, and a dividend reten­
tion program that will increase significantly the
capital position of each of the proposed subsi­
diaries. In addition, Applicant’s capital improve­
ment program includes the sale of $10 million of
equity securities by December 31, 1973.2 Execu­
tion of this capital improvement program would
strengthen the financial condition of Applicant and
its proposed subsidiaries and enhance the prospects
2T he B oard reco g n izes that the co n d itio n of the m arket for
equity securities m ay p re sen t a serious im p ed im en t to a
proposed sale of e quity secu rities and that a reaso n ab le delay
bey o n d the pro jected period m ay be w arran ted . H o w ev e r, such
delay w ill be w arranted only if the B oard is satisfied that a
substan tially significant d e te rio ra tio n below presen t m arket
levels has taken place in the m ark et for e q uity securities.

807

LAW DEPARTMENT
of the group substantially. The significant in­
creases that will be made in the capital account
of each of the subsidiary banks as a result of the
program to which Applicant is committed and the
fact that Applicant is likely to have better access
to capital markets than any of the individual banks
lend weight for approval of the application.
Consummation of the proposal would not have
any immediate effects on the convenience and
needs of the communities served by the proposed
subsidiaries. However, reorganization of the own­
ership of the banks into the corporate structure of
a holding company should provide the operational
flexibility that would enable the holding company
to assist the subsidiary banks in improving and
expanding their services. Considerations relating
to the convenience and needs of the communities
are consistent with approval of the application.
Summary and conclusion. On the basis of all
relevant facts contained in the record, and in light
of the factors set forth in section 3(c) of the Act,
it is the Board’s judgment that the proposed trans­
action would be in the public interest, and that
the application should be approved.
D is s e n t in g

Sta tem ent of G overnors

R obertso n

and

B r im m e r

We would approve the formation of a holding
company to control the five direct subsidiary
banks, now that steps have been taken or will be
taken to augment their capital structures. How­
ever, the proposal before the Board involves not
only the direct acquisition of five banks but also,
as a result of investments of the Michigan National
Bank’s profit sharing trust, the indirect acquisition
of interests in each of seven other Michigan banks.
With respect to four of the seven banks, namely,
First National Bank of East Lansing, Valley Na­
tional Bank, Central Bank, and First National
Bank of Wyoming, we consider the effects of this
acquisition on competition to be adverse.
The profit sharing trust just mentioned, a crea­
ture of Michigan National Bank established for the
benefit of its employees, purchased and holds stock
(ranging from 10 per cent to 24.9 per cent of the
voting shares) of seven banks other than the five
direct subsidiaries.1 While we doubt the appro­
1 A d d itio n al sh ares in som e o f the seven b an k s w ere acq u ired
by in d iv id u al m em b ers o f the ten fa m ilie s th at co n tro l the
M ich ig an N a tio n al B an k , thus stren g th en in g the co n tro l or
influence o v er su ch b an ks by the M ich ig an N atio n al B ank.
A s a m atter of fa c t, M ich ig an N atio n al B ank is rep resen ted
on the B o ard o f D irecto rs o f five of th o se sev en b an k s. A nd
to fill in p art of th e rest of the p ic tu re , each of the five d irect
su bsidiary ban k s has its o w n profit sh arin g tru st fo r the benefit
o f e m p lo y e es, each o f w h ich h o ld s stock o f som e or all of
those five ban k s.




priateness of such investments by such a trust, we
are adamantly opposed to sanctioning the employ­
ment of such a device to further the interests of
a parent bank (the creator of the trust), especially
when the result is both to enlarge that bank’s share
of the market and stifle competition.
The record shows beyond any doubt that there
is potential if not actual competition between each
of the four above-mentioned banks and Michigan
National Bank, the largest of Applicant’s proposed
subsidiaries. In the Lansing market, where Michi­
gan National Bank is by far the largest bank with
over 43 per cent of the deposits, First National
Bank of East Lansing ranks seventh and holds
about 2 per cent of the deposits. In the Saginaw
market, where Michigan National Bank is the
second largest bank with about 23 per cent of the
deposits, Valley National Bank ranks fourth and
holds about 7 per cent of the deposits. In the Grand
Rapids market, where Michigan National Bank is
the third largest bank with about 18 per cent of
the deposits, Central Bank and First National Bank
of Wyoming rank fourth and sixth, respectively,
and hold, in the aggregate, about 4 per cent of
the deposits. In each instance, the service area of
Michigan National Bank overlaps that of one of
the four banks. In our view, the evidence reflects
meaningful potential— if not actual— competition
which would be foreclosed to the detriment of the
public interest. Consummation of Applicant’s
proposal would tend to eliminate competition and
to preclude the development of potential competi­
tion by rendering less likely the prospect of disassociation of the four banks from the Michigan
National group.
In view of Michigan National Bank’s already
significant position in the Lansing, Saginaw, and
Grand Rapids markets, we consider that the public
interest will not be served by approving Appli­
cant’s indirect interest in four banks that are in
competition with Applicant’s principal subsidiary.
Instead, competition would be enhanced, and the
public interest served, by withholding approval of
the application until Applicant persuades the profit
sharing trust to divest itself of its interests in the
four banks. In the alternative, approval of the
application should be so conditioned as to give
Applicant a reasonable period of time after forma­
tion of the holding company within which to
accomplish the divestiture of the four banks.
While we realize that (as intimated in the ma­
jority’s opinion) divestiture of the stock of these
four banks (or possibly the stock of all seven of
the banks) held by the profit sharing trust could

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

808

be required as a condition to the approval of future
applications to expand, we believe that in fairness
to all parties and in the interests of sound bank
supervision the issue should be faced and settled
now, at the outset of the formation of the holding
company rather than at some uncertain date in the
future.
WORCESTER BANCORP, INC.,
WORCESTER, MASSACHUSETTS
Order A pproving A cquisition of B ank
Worcester Bancorp, Inc., Worcester, Mas­
sachusetts, a bank holding company within the
meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act, has
applied for the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3)
of the Act (12 U .S.C . 1842(a)(3)) to acquire all
of the voting shares of First National Bank of
Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts (“ Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
Applicant, the sixth largest banking organi­
zation in Massachusetts, controls one bank with
aggregate deposits of $336.3 million, representing
2.9 per cent of total deposits of commercial banks
in the State. (All banking data are as of December
31, 1971, and reflect bank holding company
formations and acquisitions approved through May
31, 1972.) Approval of this application would not
significantly increase Applicant’s share of State­
wide deposits and its present ranking would not
change.
Bank, with deposits of $25.2 million, is the
largest of six banks in its banking market, which
is approximated by central Hampshire County and
portions of Franklin County, and controls 32 per
cent of deposits in commercial banks in that mar­
ket.
Applicant’s acquisition of Bank would consti­
tute its initial entry into Bank’s market and
Hampshire County. Applicant’s closest existing
subsidiary banking office is located approximately
30 miles from Bank. No meaningful competition
exists between Bank and any of Applicant’s exist­
ing subsidiary banking offices, nor does it appear
likely that such competition would develop in the
future, in view of the distances separating Bank
from Applicant’s subsidiaries, the State’s restric­




tive branching laws and the relatively static eco­
nomic conditions in Bank’s market.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant, its subsidiaries and
Bank are generally satisfactory and consistent with
approval of the application. In addition, it is ex­
pected that Applicant’s acquisition of Bank will
add depth to the management of Bank. Although
there is no evidence that the banking needs of the
communities involved are not being adequately
met at present, Applicant expects to offer, through
Bank, a broader range of financial services to
Bank’s customers. Considerations relating to the
convenience and needs of the communities to be
served are, therefore, consistent with approval of
the application. It is the Board’s judgment that
consummation of the proposed acquisition would
be in the public interest, and that the application
should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
approval herein neither provides authority to
Applicant to continue in the nonbank activities nor
to retain nonbank shares nor requires the Applicant
to modify or terminate said activities or holdings.
However, consummation of the proposal herein is
subject to the continuing authority of the Board
to require modification or termination of such
activities or holdings (within a period no shorter
than 2 years), if the Board determines that the
continued combination of banking and nonbanking
interests is likely to have an adverse effect on the
public interest.1 The transaction shall not be con­
summated (a) before the thirtieth calendar day
following the effective date of this Order or (b)
later than three months after the effective date of
this Order, unless such period is extended for good
cause by the Board, or by the Federal Reserve
Bank of Boston pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 4, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Daane, Brimmer, and Sheehan. Absent
and not voting: Governor Bucher.

[seal]

(Signed) Tynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

xIn perm ittin g A p p lic a n t to retain its g ra n d fa th e re d land
d e v elo p m en t c o m p a n y , W o rn a t D e v elo p m en t C o rp o ra tio n , the
B oard has not altered its po sitio n that land d e v elo p m en t is
not a perm issib le a ctivity un d er § 4(c)(8 ) of the B ank H old in g
C o m p an y A ct. (A p p lic a tio n o f U B F inancial C o rp o ra tio n ,
P h o e n ix , A riz o n a , to retain H . S. P ickrell C o m p a n y , 1972
F .R . B u l l e t i n 4 2 8 .)

LAW DEPARTMENT

NEW JERSEY NATIONAL CORPORATION,
TRENTON, NEW JERSEY
Order A pproving A cquisition of B ank
New Jersey National Corporation, Trenton,
New Jersey, a bank holding company within the
meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act, has
applied for the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3)
of the Act (12 U .S.C . 1842(a)(3)) to acquire 100
per cent of the voting shares (less directors’ qual­
ifying shares) of New Jersey National Bank of
Princeton, Princeton Borough, New Jersey (“ New
Bank” ), a proposed new bank.
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and none has been timely received.
The Board has considered the application in the
light of the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act
(12 U.S.C . 1842(c)).
Applicant controls one bank, New Jersey Na­
tional Bank, Princeton (“ Bank” ), with deposits
of $578.7 million, representing 3.4 per cent of
the aggregate commercial bank deposits for the
State of New Jersey. (All banking data are as of
December 31, 1971, and reflect holding company
formations and acquisitions approved by the Board
through May 31, 1972.) Bank holds the largest
percentage of deposits in the Second New Jersey
Banking District and also in the Trenton Banking
Market, but is the second largest New Jersey
banking organization represented in this market
area. The acquisition by Applicant of the proposed
new bank would have no immediate impact on
the concentration of banking resources in any
areas.
The proposed location of New Bank would be
in Princeton Borough, a distance of 8.8 miles from
the nearest office of Bank. Bank is prohibited by
State law from branching into this area where
subsidiaries of two banking organizations, with
$1.1 billion and $447 million in deposits, respec­
tively, presently operate six offices. Branch offices
of three Trenton market banks are also located in
the outlying area. The establishment of New Bank
in Princeton Borough would not adversely affect
competition in any relevant areas, but, conversely,
would have a procompetitive effect by providing
another source of full banking services to the
Princeton Borough area. Competitive consid­
erations are consistent with approval of the ap­
plication.
The financial and managerial resources of




809

Applicant and Bank are considered to be generally
satisfactory and their prospects appear favorable.
New Bank would also appear to have favorable
prospects for future development and growth.
Banking factors are consistent with approval of
the application. Although the major banking needs
of the Trenton market are presently fulfilled by
its 25 banking organizations, New Bank would
provide alternative banking facilities to an area of
27,500 inhabitants which area appears to have
good potential for growth and economic expan­
sion. Considerations relating to the convenience
and needs of the communities to be served are
consistent with and lend some support toward
approval of the application. It is the Board’s judg­
ment that the proposed transaction would be in
the public interest and that the application should
be approved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after that date, and (c) New Jersey National Bank
of Princeton, Princeton Borough, New Jersey,
shall be opened for business not later than six
months after the effective date of this Order. Each
of the periods described in (b) and (c) may be
extended for good cause by the Board, or by the
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia pursuant to
delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 8, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent
and not voting: Governor Daane.

[seal]

(Signed) T ynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

NORTH SHORE CAPITAL CORPORATION,
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
Order D enying Formation of B ank Holding
C ompany
North Shore Capital Corporation, Chicago, Illi­
nois, has applied for the Board’s approval under
§ 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12
U.S.C. 1842(a)(1)) of formation of a bank holding
company through acquisition of 50.1 per cent or
more of the voting shares of The North Shore
National Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
(“ Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and

810

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
Applicant is a newly-formed organization and
has no operating history. Upon acquisition of Bank
($102.2 million of deposits), Applicant would
control 0.3 per cent of the ccommercial bank
deposits in Illinois. (All banking data are as of
June 30, 1971.) Bank is the fourth largest of 18
banks competing in its service area and holds
approximately 9 per cent of area deposits. The
Board notes that the principals of Applicant are
also principals of four other one-bank holding
companies in Illinois, which hold deposits of $51,
$38, $22, and $7 million, respectively. However,
consummation of the proposed transaction is not
likely to adversely affect existing competition in
that the service areas of the other banks controlled
by these principals do not appear to overlap with
that of Bank. The nearest of these, Citizen’s Na­
tional Bank of Chicago, is approximately 12 miles
distant from Bank.
Applicant will incur substantial debt in order
to acquire shares of Bank and has projected retire­
ment of this debt in 8 V2 years from dividends to
be declared by Bank. Although, on occasion, the
Board has approved acquisitions involving similar
or even greater relative amounts of debt, payable
over a lengthier period, those cases involved the
transfer of ownership of small rural banks gener­
ally through the formation of small one-bank
holding companies. In each such case, the adverse
effects deriving from leverage were outweighed by
public benefits deriving from the facilitation of the
otherwise-difficult task of transferring ownership
of those banks and the promotion of local owner­
ship and management. Those benefits are absent
where, as here, the bank, whose shares are sought
to be acquired, is a large bank located in an urban
center. The amount of debt Applicant will assume
and the length of time contemplated to retire that
debt are considered excessive for the financing of
a bank of this size.
Although Bank’s asset condition is satisfactory,
an infusion of capital is necessary to raise Bank’s
capital to what the Board deems to be an accept­
able level. The Board generally expects a bank
holding company to assist its subsidiary banks
especially where those banks are in need of in­
creased capitalization. However, Applicant, ap­
parently due to the debt-servicing obligations it




would incur upon consummation of the proposed
transaction, has been unreceptive to suggestions
that it increase Bank’s capital. The fact that Bank’s
earnings have been below the average earnings of
similarly-sized banks suggests that consummation
would foreclose capital improvement in Bank, and
that Applicant may even be unable to service its
debt without unduly straining Bank’s earnings,
retention of which are necessary to strengthen
Bank’s capital position.
Applicant’s projected income includes an annual
“ consulting” fee of $24,000 to be extracted from
Bank in order to enable Applicant to service its
acquisition debt. In return, directors and officers
of Applicant would, as directors and officers of
Bank, provide services to Bank normally provided
by such bank management; Applicant will not
have a servicing staff. This consulting fee therefore
appears to be unjustified and a means by which
a portion of Bank’s income would be distributed
to Applicant without a similar pro rata distribution
to Bank’s minority stockholders.
The instant proposal contemplates the use of
excessive leverage and, if consummated, could
impede Bank’s future capital growth and unduly
operate to the detriment of Bank’s minority share­
holders. These factors weigh heavily against ap­
proval of this application.
The convenience and needs of the communities
to be served are already adequately being served
and there is no evidence that consummation of the
proposed acquisition would give rise to any sig­
nificant public benefits, other than those derived
from the added flexibility inherent in a holding
company structure. Considerations relating to the
convenience and needs of the communities to be
served therefore lend slight weight for approval.
Under all the circumstances of this case, the
Board concludes that the leverage contemplated,
the potentially unfulfilled capital need of Bank and
unfair treatment of minority shareholders involved
in this proposal present adverse circumstances
bearing on the financial condition, managerial re­
sources, and future prospects of Applicant and
Bank. These circumstances are not outweighed by
any procompetitive factors or by considerations
relating to the convenience and needs of the com­
munities to be served. Accordingly, approval of
this application is not in the public interest and
it should be denied.
On the basis of the record, the application is
denied for the reasons summarized above.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 8, 1972.

811

LAW DEPARTMENT

Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent
and not voting: Governor Daane.

[sea l]

(Signed) T ynan Sm ith,
Secretary of the Board.

FIRST BANC GROUP OF OHIO, INC.,
COLUMBUS, OHIO
Order A pproving A cquisition of B ank
First Banc Group of Ohio, Inc., Columbus,
Ohio, a bank holding company within the meaning
of the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied
for the Board’s approval under section 3(a)(3) of
the Act (12 U .S.C . 1842(a)(3)) to acquire the
successor by merger to The Liberty National Bank,
Fremont, Fremont, Ohio (“ Bank” ). The bank into
which Bank is to be merged has no significance
except as a means to facilitate the acquisition of
voting shares of Bank. Accordingly, the proposed
acquisition is treated herein as a proposed acquisi­
tion of the shares of Bank.
Notice of the application affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views has been given in accordance with section
3(b) of the Act. The time for filing comments and
views has expired, and the Board has considered
the application and all comments received in light
of the factors set forth in section 3(c) of the Act
(12 U .S.C . 1842(c)).
Applicant, the seventh largest banking organi­
zation in Ohio, controls 11 banks with aggregate
deposits of approximately $823 billion, represent­
ing about 3.5 per cent of deposits of commercial
banks in the State.1 Consummation of the proposal
herein would increase Applicant’s share of depos­
its by only .1 percentage point and would not
change its Statewide ranking nor result in a signif­
icant increase in the concentration of banking
resources in Ohio.
Bank (about $24 million in deposits) is the third
largest of five banking organizations in the San­
dusky County area and controls approximately 19
per cent of area deposits. There is no significant
existing competition between Applicant and Bank
nor is there a reasonable probability of competition
developing in the future since the Sandusky
County area is not attractive for de novo entry with
a population per banking office somewhat lower
than the Statewide average. Additional reasons
that mitigate against the possibility of future com*A11 b an k in g d a ta are as o f D e ce m b e r 3 1, 1971, and reflect
bank h o ld in g co m p a n y fo rm atio n s and acq u isitio n s a p p ro v ed
by the B o ard th ro u g h Ju n e 3 0, 1972.




petition developing between Applicant and Bank
are the distance separating Applicant’s banking
subsidiaries and Bank, and Ohio law regarding
branching. The Board concludes that competitive
considerations are consistent with approval of the
application.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant, its subsidiary banks
and Bank are regarded as generally satisfactory.
Applicant proposes to provide additional manage­
ment depth to Bank so that banking considerations
lend weight for approval of the application.
Applicant also proposes to provide certain new
services such as a 24-hour automated teller and
educational loans, which Bank is not presently
providing. Consequently, considerations relating
to the convenience and needs of the community
lend weight for approval. It is the Board’s judg­
ment that the proposed transaction is in the public
interest and that the application should be ap­
proved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 8, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent
and not voting: Governor Daane.

[seal]

(Signed) Tynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

Order A pproving A cquisition of B ank
First Banc Group of Ohio, Inc., Columbus,
Ohio, a bank holding company within the meaning
of the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied
for the Board’s approval under section 3(a)(3) of
the Act (12 U .S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire the
successor by merger to The First National Bank
and Trust Company of Ravenna, Ravenna, Ohio
(“ Bank” ). The bank into which Bank is to be
merged has no significance except as a means to
facilitate the acquisition of voting shares of Bank.
Accordingly, the proposed acquisition is treated
herein as the proposed acquisition of the shares
of Bank.
Notice of the application, affording opportunity

812

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with section
3(b) of the Act. The time for filing comments and
views has expired and the Board has considered
the application, and all comments received in light
of the factors set forth in section 3(c) of the Act
(12 U .S.C. 1842(c)).
Applicant controls 12 banks with deposits of
about $847 million representing approximately 3.6
per cent of total deposits of commercial banks in
Ohio, and is the seventh largest banking organi­
zation in the State.1 Acquisition of Bank (deposits
of about $57 million) would increase Applicant’s
share of deposits in the State by only 0.2 percent­
age points and would not alter its State ranking
nor result in a significant increase in the con­
centration of banking resources in Ohio.
Bank is the seventh largest organization operat­
ing in the Akron banking market and has only 3.9
per cent of market deposits. There is no substantial
existing competition between Applicant and Bank,
and there is little probability of competition devel­
oping in the future because of the distances
separating Bank and Applicant’s banking sub­
sidiaries and Ohio branching laws. On the other
hand, the entry by Applicant into the Akron market
through a “ foothold” acquisition such as that of
Bank may enable Bank to provide increased com­
petition for the larger organizations in the market.
The Board concludes that competitive consid­
erations are consistent with approval of the ap­
plication.
Considerations relating to the financial condi­
tion, managerial resources and prospects of
Applicant, its subsidiary banks, and Bank are
generally satisfactory. Applicant proposes to pro­
vide Bank with additional management depth so
that banking considerations give weight for ap­
proval of the application. Considerations relating
to the convenience and needs of the community
to be served lend weight for approval of the
application since Applicant plans to provide edu­
cational loans and automatic 24 hour teller service
which Bank does not presently provide for its
customers. It is the Board’s judgment that con­
summation of the proposed acquisition would be
in the public interest and the application should
be approved.
On the basis of the record the application is

approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 8, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent
and not voting: Governor Daane.

[seal]

(Signed) T ynan Sm ith,
Secretary of the Board.
FIRST UNION, INCORPORATED,
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI

Order A pproving A cquisition of B anks
First Union, Incorporated, St. Louis, Missouri,
has applied for the Board’s approval under §
3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12
U.S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire 90 per cent or more
of the voting shares of The Peoples Bank and Trust
Company of Branson, Branson, Missouri ( “ Bran­
son Bank” ), and The Bank of Crane, Crane,
Missouri (“ Crane Bank” ).
Notice of the applications, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
applications and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
On the basis of the record, the applications are
approved for the reasons set forth in the Board’s
Statement of this date.1 The transactions shall not
be consummated (a) before the thirtieth calendar
day following the effective date of this Order or
(b) later than three months after the effective date
of this Order, unless such period is extended for
good cause by the Board, or by the Federal Re­
serve Bank of St. Louis pursuant to delegated
authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 8, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors

‘B anking d ata are as of D e ce m b e r 3 1, 1971, and reflect
h o ld in g c o m p an y fo rm atio n s an d a cq u isitio n s app ro v ed by the
B oard th ro u g h June 3 0 , 1972. D ata also reflect the B o a rd ’s
ap p ro v al o f this d ate o f A p p lic a n t’s a cq u isitio n o f T h e L iberty
N a tio n al B ank o f F ree m o n t, F ree m o n t, O hio.




‘T he S tatem ent also reflects B oard action of this date d e n ying
an a p p lication by F irst U n io n , In c o rp o rate d , to acquire 90 per
cent or m ore of the v oting shares of T he B ank of T aney C o u n ty ,
F o rsy th , M issouri.

LAW DEPARTMENT

813

Robertson, Daane, and Sheehan. Absent and not voting: Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Brimmer, and Bucher.

(Signed) T ynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

[seal]

Order D enying A cquisition of B ank
First Union, Incorporated, St. Louis, Missouri,
has applied for the Board’s approval under §
3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12
U.S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire 90 per cent or more
of the voting shares of The Bank of Taney County,
Forsyth, Missouri (“ Forsyth Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C .
1842(c)).
On the basis of the record, the application is
denied for the reasons set forth in the Board’s
Statement of this date.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 8, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Daane, and Sheehan. Absent and not voting: Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Brimmer, and Bucher.

(Signed) T ynan Sm ith,
Secretary of the Board.

[seal]

S tatement
Nature of transaction. First Union, Incorpo­
rated, St. Louis, Missouri, a registered bank hold­
ing company, has applied to the Board of Gover­
nors, pursuant to § 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(a)(3)), for prior
approval of the acquisition of 90 per cent or more
of the voting shares of The Peoples Bank and Trust
Company of Branson, Branson, Missouri ( “ Bran­
son Bank” ), The Bank of Crane, Crane, Missouri
(“ Crane Bank” ), and The Bank of Taney County,
Forsyth, Missouri (“ Forsyth Bank” ).
While each of the applications has been sepa­
rately considered and the proposed acquisition of
Forsyth Bank is subject to a separate Board Order,
because of certain common facts and circum­
stances this Statement contains the Board’s find­
ings and conclusions with respect to all of the
applications.
Statutory considerations. Applicant, the third
largest bank holding company and banking orga­
nization in Missouri, controls ten banks with




aggregate deposits of $1,048.7 million, represent­
ing approximately 8.3 per cent of the commercial
bank deposits in the State. (All banking data are
as of December 31, 1971, adjusted to reflect bank
holding company acquisitions and formations ap­
proved by the Board through June 30, 1972.) As
a result of consummation of the three proposed
acquisitions herein, Applicant’s share of Statewide
deposits would increase by 0.3 percentage points,
and its position in relation to the State’s other bank
holding companies and banking organizations
would remain unchanged.
Branson Bank ($16.5 million in deposits) and
Forsyth Bank ($8.9 million in deposits) are the
largest and third largest, respectively, of three
banks competing in the Taney County banking
market, and control a combined share of 62.7 per
cent of total deposits in that market. The present
degree of common ownership between the two
banks, while significant, is not as conclusive as
would be the case upon affiliation with Applicant.
The proposed affiliation would place the two banks
under common control, which would tend to have
a significant impact on concentration in Taney
County. Furthermore, acquisition of both Branson
Bank and Forsyth Bank would eliminate a banking
alternative since the banks in Branson are the
closest alternatives for residents of Forsyth. Ap­
proval would also foreclose potential competition
as the operations of Branson Bank and Forsyth
Bank are expected to be drawn much closer to­
gether by the planned establishment of remote
facilities for each Bank at Hollister and Rockaway
Beach, respectively. Completion of such facilities,
under Missouri’s new bank facility law, would
substantially increase the likelihood of meaningful
competition developing between them in the fu­
ture.
Crane Bank ($8.5 million in deposits) is the
largest of two banks in Stone County, the adjacent
county to Taney County. Acquisition of Crane
Bank and Branson Bank would have no anticom­
petitive consequences as the two banks are 35
miles apart, serve separate counties which consti­
tute separate banking markets, and have an inter­
vening bank between them. Potential competition
would not be adversely affected.
No existing competition with Applicant’s sub­
sidiary banks would be eliminated, as Applicant’s
closest subsidiary bank is located in Springfield,
Missouri, about 30 miles from Crane Bank and
40 miles from Branson Bank.
On the basis of the record before it, the Board
concludes that the competitive effects of the

814

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

proposed acquisitions, with the exception of For­
syth Bank, are consistent with approval of the
applications.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant, its subsidiary banks,
and Banks, are regarded as satisfactory, in view
of Applicant’s commitment to provide $350,000
in additional capital to Branson Bank and its
agreement to permit Branson Bank to retain all
earnings for a period of three years.
Affiliation with Applicant will permit higher
loan limits through loan participation arrange­
ments, and allow each of the communities in­
volved to be afforded trust and investment man­
agement services. Considerations relating to the
convenience and needs of the communities to be
served lend weight for approval. With the excep­
tion of the Forsyth Bank proposal, any anticom­
petitive consequences inherent in the proposed
acquisitions are clearly outweighed by the proba­
ble effect of the transactions in meeting the con­
venience and needs of the communities to be
served. The likely adverse competitive conse­
quences that would attend the Forsyth Bank ac­
quisition are not outweighed by benefits to the
community to be served.
Conclusion. On the basis of all relevant facts
before it, the Board concludes that the proposed
acquisitions of Branson Bank and Crane Bank
would be in the public interest and these applica­
tions should be approved. The proposed acquisi­
tion of Forsyth Bank would not be in the public
interest and that application should be denied.
THE CENTRAL BANCORPORATION, INC.,
CINCINNATI, OHIO
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k

The Central Bancorporation, Inc., Cincinnati,
Ohio, has applied for the Board’s approval under
§ 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12
U .S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire 100 per cent of the
voting shares (less directors’ qualifying shares) of
the successor by merger to First National Bank
of Canton, Canton, Ohio (“ Bank” ).
The bank into which Bank is to be merged has
no significance except as a means to facilitate the
acquisition of the voting shares of Bank. Accord­
ingly, the proposed acquisition of the successor
organization is treated herein as the proposed ac­
quisition of the shares of Bank.
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)




of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
Applicant, the tenth largest banking organi­
zation and sixth largest multi-bank holding com­
pany in Ohio, controls five banks with deposits
of $605.7 million. (All banking data are as of
December 31, 1971, and reflect holding company
formations and acquisitions approved through May
31, 1971.) The acquisition of Bank ($157 million
deposits) would increase Applicant’s share of total
State deposits by .67 percentage points, and al­
though it would become the ninth largest banking
organization, it would remain the sixth largest
multi-bank holding company in Ohio. Con­
summation of the acquisition would not result in
any undue concentration of banking resources
within the relevant areas of the State.
Bank is headquartered in Canton, and operates
ten offices in Stark County and one office in Carroll
County. Bank is the second largest of 15 banks
in the Canton banking market, and holds 21 per
cent of the total deposits for the market. Applicant
does not compete in the market at the present time,
and the closest banking offices of Bank and Appli­
cant are 80 miles apart. Applicant’s other affiliates
are located between 100 and 250 miles from Can­
ton and none of its subsidiaries obtains any sub­
stantial amount of banking business from the Can­
ton market. It appears that there is little likelihood
for the development of any substantial amount of
future competition between offices of Applicant
and Bank due to the distances separating the
banking offices and the cross-county branching
limitations imposed by State laws. Should Bank
become the nucleus for the formation of a small
bank holding company, Applicant and Bank might
compete in local markets in the future. This factor
could have a slightly adverse effect on possible
future competition. However, in considering the
future development of the overall banking struc­
ture in Ohio, there are a number of large banks
in the State that could develop into holding com­
panies over time. Thus, the loss of Bank as a
potential member of a holding company would not
have a serious anticompetitive effect.
The financial and managerial resources of
Applicant, its subsidiary banks and Bank are gen­
erally satisfactory, and prospects for each appear
favorable. Banking factors are consistent with ap­
proval of the application.
The major banking needs of the Canton area

815

LAW DEPARTMENT

are presently being served. However, the popula­
tion of Stark County, primarily centered in Can­
ton, is rapidly increasing along with its industrial
expansion. Credit is needed to finance the purchase
of homes and automobiles, as well as to support
the expansion in industrial activity. Bank has been
limited heretofore in its lending activities. Appli­
cant proposes to increase Bank’s lending capabil­
ities, expand its trust services and make interna­
tional services available at Bank. The expanded
and enlarged services Bank would be able to offer
its customers would serve the convenience and
needs of the communities. Therefore, consid­
erations under this factor are consistent with and
lend support to approval of this application. It is
the Board’s judgment that the convenience and
needs aspects of the instant proposal outweigh the
slightly adverse competitive consequences and that
consummation of the proposed acquisition would
be in the public interest, and that the application
should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order, or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board,
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 9, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Mitchell, Daane, and Sheehan. Voting against this action:
Governors Robertson and Brimmer. Absent and not voting:
Governor Bucher.

[seal]

(Signed) T ynan Sm ith,
Secretary of the Board.

D issenting S tatement of Governors
Robertson and B rimmer
We would deny this application because there
are no overriding public benefits which result from
the affiliation to outweigh the adverse effects on
competition or to bring the proposal within the
exception prescribed in the Bank Holding Com­
pany Act (12 U .S.C . 1842).
Bank is located in Canton, the county seat of
Stark County— approximately 57 miles from
Cleveland, 37 miles from Youngstown, and 23
miles from Akron. It serves the Canton Market,
a highly industrialized area with a population of
400,000. It holds deposits of $157.1 million
(representing 21.0 per cent of total deposits), and




it ranks as the second largest of 15 banks in the
market. Applicant, with deposits of $605.7 mil­
lion, centers its operations in Cincinnati where its
lead bank holds deposits of $519.5 million.
The acquisition of Bank would give Applicant
control of aggregate deposits of $762.7 million,
representing an immediate increase of 26 per cent.
The 15 Canton Market banks operate 52 offices
and control deposits ranging from $4 million to
$186 million. The three largest of these banks
(including Bank) control 64 per cent of total de­
posits. The acquisition by Applicant of the second
largest bank in the market would further strengthen
Bank’s position and would solidify the high degree
of concentration of banking resources already
present there. As a result of consummation of the
acquisition, the 12 smaller Canton Market banks,
with deposits ranging from $4 to $54 million,
would be placed in an even more difficult compet­
itive position.
Applicant is capable of entering the market de
novo or through acquisition of a smaller area bank.
Either of these alternatives could have procompetitive effects on area banking. We are also
mindful that this acquisition forecloses future
competition between Applicant’s subsidiaries and
Bank. That institution, the twenty-fourth largest
banking organization in Ohio— absent this pro­
posal— is a potential lead bank in a local or possi­
ble Statewide bank holding company formation.
Our review of the record indicates that conveni­
ent and full banking services are made available
to residents of the area by existing financial insti­
tutions and that no unserved public need or benefit
would be added by consummation of this proposal.
We have concluded, therefore, that banking com­
petition in Ohio on a local and Statewide basis
would best be served by a denial of this application
and by requiring Applicant to resort to less anti­
competitive means of entry.
THE CHASE MANHATTAN CORPORATION,
NEW YORK, NEW YORK
Order A pproving A cquisition of B ank
The Chase Manhattan Corporation, New York,
New York, a bank holding company within the
meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act, has
applied for the Board’s approval under section
3(a)(3) of the Act (12 U .S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to ac­
quire 100 per cent of the voting shares (less
directors’ qualifying shares) of Chase Manhattan
Bank of Central New York (National Association),
Syracuse, New York (“ Bank” ), a proposed new
bank.

816

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

Notice of receipt of the application has been
given in accordance with section 3(b) of the Act,
and the time for filing comments and views has
expired. The Board has considered the application
and all comments received in the light of the
factors set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1842(c)) and finds that:
Applicant, the second largest banking organi­
zation in New York in terms of domestic deposits,
controls two subsidiary banks with aggregate de­
posits of approximately $13.6 billion, representing
14.1 per cent of the total deposits in commercial
banks in the State. (Unless otherwise noted, de­
posit data are as of December 31, 1971, and
market data are as of June 30, 1970, adjusted to
reflect bank holding company formations and ac­
quisitions approved by the Board through June 16,
1972.) Since Bank is a proposed new bank, no
existing competition would be eliminated nor
would concentration be increased in any relevant
area.
Bank will be located in downtown Syracuse,
and will represent the initial entry by Applicant
into the upstate New York markets. Applicant’s
two existing subsidiaries are presently barred from
branching into the Syracuse market until Statewide
branching becomes effective on January 1, 1976.
Applicant’s closest banking office is located about
250 miles southeast of Bank. Applicant’s acquisi­
tion of Bank would have a procompetitive effect
by introducing a new competitor into the highly
concentrated Syracuse banking market, where four
of the 11 banks competing in that market control
over 90 per cent of total market deposits. Appli­
cant’s entry into this market should stimulate
competition without having adverse effects on any
competing bank.
The financial condition, management, and pros­
pects of Applicant and its subsidiary banks are
regarded as satisfactory. Since Bank will be able
to draw on Applicant’s financial and managerial
resources, its prospects are favorable and the
banking factors are consistent with approval.
Considerations relating to the convenience and
needs of the community to be served lend weight
toward approval as Bank will provide an additional
source of full banking services. It is the Board’s
judgment that consummation of the proposed ac­
quisition would be in the public interest and that
the application should be approved.
Applicant owns two nonbanking subsidiaries,
Berkeley Service Corporation, Boston, Massachu­
setts, and Dovenmuehle, Inc., Chicago, Illinois,
which were acquired on June 4, 1969, and on




December 19, 1969, respectively. Berkeley Ser­
vice Corporation is a service agency for the
Shapiro Factors Division of The Chase Manhattan
Bank, and Dovenmuehle, Inc., is a mortgage
servicing company. The approval herein neither
provides authority to Applicant to continue in the
nonbank activities nor to retain nonbank shares nor
requires the Applicant to modify or terminate said
activities or holdings. However, consummation of
the proposal herein is subject to the continuing
authority of the Board to require modification or
termination of such activities or holdings (within
a period no shorter than two years), if the Board
determines that the continued combination of
banking and nonbanking interests is likely to have
an adverse effect on the public interest.
The provision of any credit, property or services
by the holding company or any affiliate thereof
shall not be subject to any condition which, if
imposed by a bank, would constitute an unlawful
tie-in arrangement under § 106 of the Bank Hold­
ing Company Amendments of 1970. The non­
banking activities of Applicant shall not be altered
in any significant respect from those engaged in
at the time of the filing of the application herein
nor shall they be provided at any location other
than as described in said application, except upon
compliance with the procedures of § 225.4(b)(1)
of Regulation Y; and no merger, or consolidation,
or acquisition of assets other than in the regular
course of business, to which Applicant or any
affiliate thereof is a party, shall be consummated
without prior Board approval.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after that date, and (c) Chase Manhattan Bank of
Central New York (National Association), Syra­
cuse, New York, shall be opened for business not
later than six months after the effective date of
this Order. Each of the periods described in (b)
and (c) may be extended for good cause by the
Board, or by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 10, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent and
not voting: Chairman Burns and Governor Daane.

(Signed) T ynan Sm it h ,
[seal]

Secretary of the Board.

817

LAW DEPARTMENT

C o n c u r r in g

Statem en t of G overnor
B r im m e r

As I stated in my Dissenting Statement to the
Board’s approval of the application by First Na­
tional City Corporation to acquire the successor
by merger to The National Exchange Bank of
Castleton-on-Hudson (37 Federal Register 14259),
a review of the nonbanking activities of a one-bank
holding company which became regulated as a
result of the 1970 Amendments should precede
Board approval of an application by that company
to acquire an additional bank. However, I concur
in the Board’s approval of this application.
A preliminary investigation suggests that the
activities engaged in by Applicant’s two nonbank­
ing subsidiaries are permissible activities for a
bank holding company under current Board regu­
lations. The question of whether Applicant’s con­
tinued ownership of the indicated nonbanking ac­
tivities poses anticompetitive problems remains
open, but in passing it should be observed that
these activities are quite modest in both volume
and scope. A comprehensive review of Applicant’s
nonbanking activities will be undertaken shortly.
AMERICAN BANCSHARES,
INCORPORATED,
NORTH MIAMI, FLORIDA
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k s

American Bancshares, Incorporated, North
Miami, Florida, a bank holding company within
the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act,
has applied in separate applications for the Board’s
approval under § 3(a)(3) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(a)(3)) to acquire 80 per cent or more of the
voting shares of each of the following banks in
Florida: (1) Second National Bank of Clearwater,
Clearwater (“ Clearwater Bank” ); (2) Sterling
National Bank of Davie, Davie ( “ Davie Bank” );
and (3) First National Bank of the Upper Keys,
Tavernier (“ Keys Bank” ).
Notice of these applications, affording opportu­
nity for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and none has been timely received.
The Board has considered the applications in light
of the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12
U.S.C . 1842(c)).
Applicant, the second smallest among twentythree multi-bank holding companies in Florida,
controls three banks with aggregate deposits of
$78.1 million, representing approximately .5 per




cent of total deposits of commercial banks in the
State. (All banking data are as of December 31,
1971, and reflect bank holding company forma­
tions and acquisitions as of May 31, 1971.) Upon
consummation of the proposals herein, Applicant
would control .85 per cent of total deposits of
commercial banks in Florida and would rank 19th
among the bank holding companies in the State.
Consummation of Applicant’s proposals herein
would constitute its initial entry into the relevant
market of each bank proposed to be acquired.
Clearwater Bank ($19.5 million of deposits)
ranks eleventh among 18 banks operating in North
Pinellas County (which approximates its market)
and holds 3.7 per cent of total deposits of com­
mercial banks in that area. Applicant’s subsidiary
bank closest to Clearwater Bank is located in St.
Petersburg, Florida, 19 miles south of Clearwater
Bank’s only office, and is regarded as operating
in a separate banking market.
Davie Bank ($25.8 million of deposits) is the
eighth largest of 14 banks in the Hollywood
(Florida) area, which approximates its market and
holds approximately 6 per cent of total deposits
of commercial banks in that area. Applicant’s
subsidiary bank closest to Davie Bank is located
in North Miami, 14 miles southeast of Davie
Bank’s only banking office and operates in a sepa­
rate banking market.
Keys Bank ($17.2 million of deposits) operates
one banking office in the northern portion of the
Florida Keys in Monroe County, Florida, and is
the only bank located in its market. Applicant’s
subsidiary bank closest to Keys Bank is located
in North Miami, 82 miles north of Keys Bank.
It appears that no meaningful competition exists
between any of the banks Applicant proposes to
acquire, nor between any of Applicant’s present
subsidiary banks and any of Applicant’s proposed
subsidiary banks. In addition, the prospect of such
competition developing in the future between any
of these banks appears unlikely, particularly in
view of (1) the distances separating these banks,
(2) the number of banks in intervening areas, (3)
the inconvenience of travel between these banks,
and (4) the provisions of Florida banking law
which prohibit branch banking. On the record
before it, the Board concludes that consummation
of Applicant’s proposals would not have an ad­
verse effect on competition in any relevant area
and, in fact, may have a procompetitive effect in
the markets of Clearwater and Davie banks where
affiliation with Applicant will enable those banks
to compete more effectively with banks that are

818

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

now members of bank holding company organi­
zations larger than Applicant.
The financial condition and managerial re­
sources of Applicant and its subsidiary banks ap­
pear generally satisfactory. The future prospects
of Applicant and its present subsidiary banks ap­
pear favorable, particularly in light of Applicant’s
commitment to strengthen the capital position of
its subsidiary banks. The financial condition and
prospects of Clearwater, Davie, and Keys banks
appear generally satisfactory. Applicant’s stated
plans to strengthen the capital position of Davie
and Keys banks soon after acquisition of those
banks and to provide additional managerial re­
source strength to the proposed subsidiary banks
should increase their ability to provide expanded
and more efficient services to their respective
communities. Considerations relating to the bank­
ing factors are consistent with and lend some
weight toward approval of these applications. Al­
though the banking needs of the relevant commu­
nities generally appear adequately served by the
existin g banking organizations, Applicant
proposes to provide trust services to customers of
the subject banks through its lead bank and ability
to enable these banks to accommodate larger credit
requests through participations. These consid­
erations are consistent with approval. It is the
Board’s judgment that consummation of the
proposed transactions would be in the public in­
terest and that the applications should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the applications are
approved for the reasons summarized above. None
of the acquisitions shall be consummated (a) be­
fore the thirtieth calendar day following the effec­
tive date of this Order or (b) later than three
months after the effective date of this Order, unless
such period is extended for good cause by the
Board, or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 14, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent
and not voting: Governor Daane.
[s e a l]

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.

FIRST AT ORLANDO CORPORATION,
ORLANDO, FLORIDA
O r d e r D enying A cquisition of B a n k
First at Orlando Corporation, Orlando, Florida,
a bank holding company within the meaning of
the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied for




the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3) of the Act
(12 U .S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire at least 90 per
cent of the voting shares of The Seminole Bank
of Tampa, Tampa, Florida (“ Seminole Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired and the Board has considered the
application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U .S.C .
1842(c)).
Applicant controls 26 banks with aggregate de­
posits of $904.6 million, representing 5.57 per
cent of the deposits for commercial banks in
Florida, and is the fourth largest banking organi­
zation in the State. (All banking data are as of
December 31, 1971, and reflect holding company
formations and acquisitions approved through June
30, 1972.) The acquisition of Seminole Bank ($34
million in deposits) would increase Applicant’s
control of State deposits to 5.75 percentage points,
and Applicant’s rank among State banking organi­
zations would remain unchanged.
Applicant presently controls Tampa Bay Bank
(deposits of $24.1 million), the ninth largest bank
in the Tampa Market. Seminole Bank, which
Applicant seeks to acquire through this proposal,
is also in the Tampa Market. The two banks hold
2.2 and 3.1 per cent, respectively, of total market
deposits. If this application were approved,
Applicant would become the market’s fourth larg­
est banking organization and would control 5.3
per cent of total deposits. The two banks are 10.5
miles apart, their service areas overlap slightly,
and each bank obtains approximately 7 per cent
of its deposits and loans from the service area of
the other. Consummation of the proposal, there­
fore, would eliminate this existing competition.
Tampa, Florida’s fifth largest city, is located in
Hillsborough County, one of Florida’s most im­
portant agricultural areas; it is also an important
manufacturing center. The Tampa Harbor handles
the bulk of Florida’s shipping tonnage. In this
prosperous area, the Tampa Banking Market is
highly concentrated; 71 per cent of total deposits
are held by three banking organizations. Seminole
Bank is one of five remaining unaffiliated banks
located in close proximity to the downtown Tampa
area. It is especially attractive as a potential affili­
ate of a bank holding company making its initial
entry into the area.
The acquisition of Seminole Bank by a banking
organization not presently represented in the

819

LAW DEPARTMENT

Tampa Market would have a salutary effect on the
existing high degree of concentration present in
this area and could have a beneficial effect on
competition in the relevant areas. The Board con­
cludes, therefore, that the competitive factors re­
lating to this application are adverse; that con­
summation of the proposed transaction would (1)
eliminate some existing competition between
Applicant’s Tampa subsidiary and Seminole Bank;
(2) eliminate a banking alternative in this concen­
trated market; and, most importantly, (3) remove
Seminole Bank as a potential means of entry by
other organizations not presently represented in
this market. Accordingly, competitive consid­
erations require denial of this application unless
the anticompetitive effects of the proposal are
outweighed by benefits to the public in meeting
the convenience and needs of the communities to
be served.
The financial conditions of Applicant and its
subsidiaries are considered to be generally satis­
factory, and their managements are deemed capa­
ble. Prospects for the group appear favorable. The
financial condition and managerial resources of
Seminole Bank are considered to be generally
satisfactory, and prospects for its future growth
and development are also favorable; its deposits
increased 54 per cent from 1967 to 1971. Thus,
banking factors are consistent with approval but
provide no significant support for such action.
There are 19 banking organizations operating
in the Tampa Market. No prime banking needs
or conveniences are going unserved at this time.
Applicant’s proposed initiation of trust services
and the hiring of a business development officer
at Seminole Bank would not be important conse­
quences of the proposed affiliation. Accordingly,
considerations relating to the convenience and
needs of the communities to be served, while
consistent with approval of the application, do not
outweigh the adverse competitive effects of the
proposed acquisition. It is the Board’s judgment
that consummation of the proposed acquisition
would not be in the public interest and the ap­
plication should be denied.
On the basis of the record, the application is
denied for the reasons summarized above.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 17, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent and not
voting: Governors Mitchell and Daane.

(Signed)
[s e a l ]




T

ynan

Smith,

Secretary of the Board.

ALABAMA BANCORPORATION,
BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n s o f B a n k s

Alabama Bancorporation, Birmingham, Ala­
bama, a bank holding company within the meaning
of the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied
for the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3) of the
Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire the succes­
sors by merger to (1) The American National Bank
& Trust Co. of Mobile, Mobile, Alabama (“ Mo­
bile Bank” ), and (2) First National Bank of Deca­
tur, Decatur, Alabama (“ Decatur Bank” ). The
banks into which Mobile Bank and Decatur Bank
are to be merged have no significance except as
a means to facilitate the acquisitions of voting
shares of Mobile Bank and Decatur Bank. Ac­
cordingly, the proposed acquisitions are treated
herein as the proposed acquisitions of the shares
of Mobile Bank and Decatur Bank.
Notice of the applications, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
applications and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
Applicant controls one bank with deposits of
approximately $648 million, representing about
12.4 per cent of deposits of commercial banks in
Alabama.1 Consummation of the two proposals
would increase Applicant’s share by 1.8 per cent,
resulting in Applicant controlling approximately
14.2 per cent of deposits in commercial banks in
Alabama. However, this would not result in a
significant increase in the concentration of banking
resources in the State.
Mobile Bank (deposits of about $64 million) is
the third largest bank in the Mobile market with
approximately 11 per cent of market deposits,2
while Decatur Bank (deposits of about $35 mil­
lion) is the second largest in the Decatur market
with approximately 26 per cent of market depos­
its.3 Acquisition of Mobile Bank and Decatur Bank
would not have a substantial effect on existing
competition since Decatur Bank is over 70 miles
and Mobile Bank about 225 miles from Bir*A11 b a n king da ta are as of Ju n e 30, 1971, w ith the e x ce p tio n
o f d ata for the D e ca tu r m a rk e t w here the d a ta is as of June
30, 1970.
2T he M obile b a n k in g m a rk e t is a p p ro x im ated by B aldw in
and M obile C o u n ties.
3T he D ecatu r b an k in g m a rk e t is a p p ro x im ated by M o rg an
C ounty.

820

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

mingham, the headquarters of Applicant’s banking
subsidiary.
There is some existing competition between
Engel Mortgage Compay (“ Engel” ), a subsid­
iary of Applicant’s lead bank, and Mobile Bank
and Decatur Bank, since Engel participates to a
certain degree in the mortgage banking business
in both Decatur and Mobile. In 1971, Engel orig­
inated a total of $7.1 million in loans in the
Mobile area, most of which were FHA-VA loans
on 1-4 family homes. During the same period of
time, Mobile Bank originated approximately $1
million in conventional loans on 1-4 family homes.
The total mortgage originations on 1-4 family
residences in the Mobile area in 1971 was between
$70 to $87 million; thus, it appears that neither
Mobile Bank nor Engel has a major share of this
market. Therefore, consummation of the transac­
tion would have only a slightly adverse effect on
competition for mortgage originations on 1-4 fam­
ily residences in the Mobile area.
Also, in 1971 Engel had total mortgage origi­
nations of $1.5 million in the Decatur area. During
the same period, Decatur Bank originated a total
of $0.7 million in mortgage loans on 1-4 family
homes. Total mortgage originations in 1971 in the
Decatur area on 1-4 family homes was between
$22-$24 million. Thus, both Decatur Bank and
Engel accounted for only a modest proportion of
the loan origination business in the Decatur mar­
ket, so that, as in the Mobile market, the competi­
tive consequences are only slightly adverse.
The Department of Justice filed comments with
regard to both proposals. The Department con­
tended that approval of the applications would
have a significantly adverse effect on potential
competition between Applicant and Mobile Bank
and Decatur Bank. In the Department’s view,
Applicant, as the largest banking organization in
Alabama, is one of the most likely entrants into
markets throughout the State. The Department
stated that the Mobile market was a highly con­
centrated one in terms of banking resources, and
that Mobile Bank was the third largest bank in
the market. For these reasons, the Department
asserted that approval of the application would
have a substantially adverse effect on competition
in the Mobile market.
In addition, the Department contended that the
acquisition of Mobile Bank would have signifi­
cantly adverse effects on a Statewide level since
Mobile Bank was believed to be one of only a
small number of banks in Alabama which were
capable of becoming significant components of




new bank holding companies. The Department
stated that banks comparable in size to Mobile
Bank should be preserved in order to facilitate the
possibility of the formation of additional holding
companies in Alabama.
The Department considered the Decatur market,
in which Decatur Bank is the second largest bank,
to be highly concentrated. Since Applicant was
the largest of the three Statewide holding compa­
nies in Alabama that were not presently repre­
sented in Decatur, the Department viewed the
proposed acquisition of Decatur Bank as having
a significantly adverse effect on potential competi­
tion.
Applicant was given an opportunity to reply and
did so. In Applicant’s view, the Mobile market
is not conducive for de novo entry since both
population growth and rate of per capita income
growth in the Mobile market were below the State
averages between 1960 and 1970. In addition,
Applicant pointed out that the Mobile economy
had suffered a severe loss with the closing of a
nearby air force base. Since the two largest Mobile
banks control over 70 per cent of deposits in the
Mobile market, Applicant viewed its proposed
affiliation to be procompetitive, one likely to aid
in the eventual deconcentration of the market.
Applicant also viewed the Decatur market as
being unattractive for de novo entry by reason of
its low population per banking office. No other
bank in the Decatur area that would provide more
m eaningful com petition to the largest organi­
zation, which is already affiliated with a bank
holding company, was available. The other
independent bank headquartered in Decatur has an
existing business relationship with a bank holding
company, and the two banks located in Morgan
County are prevented by law from branching into
Decatur.
The record indicates that population growth in
the Mobile market between 1960 and 1970 was
3.7 per cent. However, the rate of growth between
1965 and 1970 was a negative 4.2 per cent. This
decline, plus the curtailment of military expendi­
tures in the area, make prospects for the area
unfavorable. The Board concludes that the Mobile
market is not attractive for de novo entry. More­
over, the proposed acquisition could assist in that
area’s economic expansion. Mobile Bank ranks a
distant third in the market; the two largest banks
are both over three times the size of Bank. Affil­
iation with Applicant could make Mobile Bank
a stronger competitor to these two large banking
organizations which now tend to dominate the

821

LAW DEPARTMENT
market. The resulting increase in competition
would, in the Board’s view, serve to stimulate
economic expansion in the Mobile area.
The Decatur market does not appear attractive
for de novo entry since the population per banking
office is considerably less than the Statewide
average. A4ditionally, there are no other suitable
banks that would be available to Applicant. The
largest banking organization in Decatur is already
associated with a bank holding company, and the
other bank located in Decatur has an existing
affiliation with another organization. The only two
remaining banks in the Decatur market are both
located in Hartselle, about 13 miles from Decatur.
Neither of these banks can branch into Decatur
under present law so that they are unsuitable for
entry by Applicant. Moreover, the proposed affil­
iation with Decatur Bank could be procompetitive
since the largest bank in the market is a subsidiary
of Central and State National Corporation of Ala­
bama and has deposits of $253 million. Moreover,
this bank is the third largest in Alabama and
operates under grandfather privileges in 12 coun­
ties. Affiliation with Applicant should enable
Decatur Bank to give stronger competition to this
large organization. The Board concludes that
competitive considerations of the proposed ac­
quisitions of both Mobile Bank and Decatur Bank
are consistent with approval.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant, its subsidiary banks,
and Mobile Bank and Decatur Bank are regarded
as generally satisfactory. Applicant does propose
to provide additional capital for Mobile Bank so
that banking considerations lend support for ap­
proval of the acquisition of Mobile Bank and are
consistent with approval of the acquisition of
Decatur Bank. Considerations relating to the con­
venience and needs of the communities to be
served are consistent with approval of the Decatur
application and lend some weight for support of
approval of the Mobile Bank acquisition since
Applicant will be able to make use of Mobile
Bank’s active International Department in the Bir­
mingham area which presently does not have a
bank with an international department. It is the
Board’s judgment that the proposed transactions
are in the public interest and that the applications
should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the applications are
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transactions shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months




after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta pursuant
to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 17, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Mitchell and Sheehan. Voting against this action: Governors
Robertson and Brimmer. Absent and not voting: Governors
Daane and Bucher.

[sea l]

(Signed) T ynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

D issenting Statement of Governors
R obertson and B rimmer
We would deny both these applications by Ala­
bama’s largest banking organization.
The majority does not deny that there is existing
competition between Applicant’s subsidiary,
Engel Mortgage Company, and each of the two
banks sought to be acquired. There has been no
showing that competition between Applicant and
the two banks in this market is insubstantial; in
fact, the indications are that it is probably sub­
stantial. The proposed acquisitions are, therefore,
likely to cause a substantial lessening of existing
competition in the market for mortgage origina­
tions in both the Mobile and Decatur areas.
As regards the application to acquire Mobile
Bank, the fact that the Mobile area has experienced
little growth in recent years does not, in and of
itself, signify that the market is unattractive for
de novo entry. The Mobile area is underbanked
as measured by population per banking office as
compared to the Statewide average. Even if popu­
lation remains static in the Mobile area, there
would be an incentive for Applicant to enter de
novo. However, the lack of growth and population
decline in Mobile can be traced to the closing of
a large military base in 1964. There is no indica­
tion that the Mobile area will not in the future
overcome this setback and expand, both in terms
of population growth and economic activity. In
our view, the long-term prospects for the Mobile
area are favorable and, with the passage of a few
years, likely to attract entry of other bank holding
companies.
The three largest banking organizations in the
Mobile market presently hold over 80 per cent of
market deposits. Entry by a likely potential com­
petitor through de novo means is particularly im­
portant in such a setting. With the financial re­
sources and strength of Applicant behind a de novo
bank, deconcentration of the market and better

822

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

economic performance could result. Additionally,
we see no benefits to the public to offset the
adverse competitive effects that are present in this
application. The majority noted that Applicant has
agreed to increase capital of Mobile Bank and also
that acquisition of Mobile Bank will enable
Applicant to provide international banking services
in the Birmingham area. The short answer to these
“ benefits” is that the Mobile Bank can surely
increase capital without being acquired by the
largest banking organization in Alabama, and the
latter organization can certainly provide interna­
tional services for Birmingham— given its size—
without having to resort to acquisition of a large
Mobile bank.
We cannot join the majority in approving the
acquisition of Decatur Bank. Decatur Bank is the
second largest bank in the Decatur market, with
over 26 per cent of market deposits. Moreover,
the two largest organizations within the Decatur
market have close to 75 per cent of area deposits.
Given this concentrated setting, and the fact that
Applicant as the largest banking organization in
Alabama is one of the most likely potential en­
trants into the Decatur area, we feel that the
competitive considerations alone prohibit con­
summation of the proposal.
We find no public benefits which might out­
weigh the adverse competitive effects inherent in
each application. We believe that Applicant’s ac­
quisition of each Bank will tend to solidify the
already high level of concentration present in both
markets. The absence of public benefits and the
presence of anticompetitive effects mandate denial
of both applications.
THE ALABAMA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.,
BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k s

The Alabama Financial Group, Inc., Bir­
mingham, Alabama, a bank holding company
within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company
Act, has applied for the Board’s approval under
§ 3(a)(3) of the Act (12 U.S.C . 1842(a)(3)) to
acquire the successors by merger to (1) The First
National Bank of Dothan, Dothan, Alabama
(“ Dothan Bank” ) and (2) Peoples National Bank
of Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama (“ Huntsville
Bank” ). The banks into which Dothan Bank and
Huntsville Bank are to be merged have no signifi­
cance except as a means to facilitate the acquisition
of voting shares of Dothan Bank and Huntsville
Bank. Accordingly, the proposed acquisitions are




treated herein as the proposed acquisitions of the
shares of Dothan Bank and Huntsville Bank.
Notice of the applications affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired and the Board has considered the
applications and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U .S.C .
1842(c)).
Applicant controls one bank with aggregate de­
posits of approximately $357 million, representing
about 6.8 per cent of deposits in commercial banks
in Alabama.1 Consummation of both proposals
would increase Applicant’s share of deposits by
1.5 per cent so that Applicant would control 8.3
per cent of deposits of commercial banks in the
State. Such an increase would not be significant
in terms of the concentration of banking resources
in Alabama.
Dothan Bank (deposits of about $55 million)
is the largest bank in the Dothan market, with
approximately 54 per cent of market deposits.2
Huntsville Bank (deposits of about $21 million)
is the fourth largest of six banks in the Huntsville
market, with about 9.3 per cent of market depos­
its.3 Due to Alabama’s branching laws and the
distances between Applicant’s Birmingham loca­
tion and Huntsville and Dothan, which are, re­
spectively, over 100 and about 200 miles distant,
there is no substantial existing competition be­
tween Applicant, Dothan Bank and Huntsville
Bank.
The Department of Justice filed comments with
regard to both proposals. In the Department’s
view, there are only a relatively few banking
organizations in Alabama, including this Appli­
cant, that are significant potential entrants into all
markets in the State. The Department found the
Dothan market to be highly concentrated and con­
sidered it important that Applicant enter the market
through some means other than by acquisition of
the “ dominant” bank. Affiliation of Dothan Bank,
the twelfth largest banking organization in Ala­
bama, with Applicant would also eliminate the
former as a member of another possible Statewide
or regional banking group. For these reasons, the
Department concluded that the acquisition of
*A11 b a n k in g da ta are as of June 30, 1971, w ith the e x ce p tio n
of da ta for the H u n tsv ille M ark et w here the da ta are as of
June 30, 1970.
2T h e D othan b a n k in g m a rk e t is ap p ro x im ated by the city
of D othan.
3T h e H u n tsv ille b an k in g m a rk e t is a p p ro x im a te d by M adison
C o u n ty .

823

LAW DEPARTMENT
Dothan Bank would have a substantially adverse
effect on competition.
The Department viewed Applicant as one of the
two most likely entrants into the Huntsville mar­
ket, where the three largest banks control approxi­
mately 79 per cent of total commercial deposits
and, two of the four largest holding companies
in Alabama are already present. The Department
concluded that Huntsville Bank’s affiliation with
Applicant would have an adverse effect on com­
petition.
Applicant replied to the Department’s comments
by stating that the Dothan market was not attrac­
tive for de novo entry. Applicant pointed to such
indicia as population and deposits per banking
office, per capita income, and the moderate popu­
lation growth in Dothan as reasons supporting this
view. Since each of the two other banks head­
quartered in Dothan had existing relationships with
other holding companies, there was no other
means available for Applicant to enter this market.
Moreover, Applicant asserted that Dothan Bank
was not capable of serving as a lead bank for a
new holding company due to its remoteness and
relatively small size.
Since Huntsville Bank ranks as the fourth largest
of six banks in the Huntsville market and must
compete with much larger organizations, Appli­
cant viewed the proposed acquisition of Huntsville
Bank as procompetitive in that more vigorous
competition would result.
The record indicates that the Dothan market is
not attractive for de novo entry. Population per
banking office is considerably under the compara­
ble State ratio, while deposits per banking office
are also less than the State average. Moreover,
the Dothan market had only moderate population
growth during the last decade. The Board, there­
fore, concludes that Applicant is not a likely de
novo entrant into this market. It further appears
that there is no likelihood that Applicant could
enter the City of Dothan other than through ac­
quisition of Dothan Bank. The two other banks
in Dothan have existing relationships with other
bank holding companies; a pending application
from a holding company seeks approval to acquire
one of these banks.
In the Huntsville market, deposits per banking
office are well below the State average. Although
the market’s population growth during the last
decade was high, this growth has leveled off
substantially from 1965 to 1970. Thus, the Board
views the Huntsville market as an unattractive
market for de novo entry at this time. Acquisition




of the Huntsville Bank, fourth largest of six banks
in the market, could strengthen Bank’s competitive
position. The three larger banks in the market are
substantially larger than Huntsville Bank and two
of them are already affiliated with the second and
third largest holding companies in Alabama. The
proposal offers Applicant the opportunity to in­
crease Huntsville Bank’s ability to compete with
these larger organizations and would, therefore,
be procompetitive. For these reasons, the Board
concludes that the acquisition of both Dothan Bank
and Huntsville Bank are consistent with competi­
tive considerations.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant, its subsidiary bank
and Huntsville Bank are regarded as generally
satisfactory, and these considerations are consis­
tent with approval of the application. On the other
hand, Applicant proposes to provide needed man­
agement depth for Dothan Bank so that banking
considerations as regards the acquisition of Dothan
Bank lend weight for approval of the application.
Considerations relating to the convenience and
needs of the communities of Dothan and Hunts­
ville are consistent with approval of the two ap­
plications. It is the Board’s judgment that the
proposed transactions are in the public interest and
that the applications should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the applications are
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transactions shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board,
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta pursuant
to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 17, 1972.
Approval of acquisition of First National Bank of Dothan.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors Mitchell
and Sheehan. Voting against this action: Governors Robertson
and Brimmer. Absent and not voting: Governors Daane and
Bucher.
Approval of acquisition of Peoples National Bank of Hunts­
ville. Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Brimmer, and Sheehan. Absent and not
voting: Governors Daane and Bucher.

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.

[s e a l]

D is s e n t in g S t a t e m e n t o f G o v e r n o r s
R o bertson

and

B r im m e r

We concur in the majority’s approval of the
acquisition by Applicant of Peoples National Bank

824

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

of Huntsville. However, we would not approve
the acquisition of The First National Bank of
Dothan (“ Dothan Bank” ).
At present, there are only four existing
Statewide bank holding companies in Alabama.
Applicant is one of them. As the Department of
Justice suggested, these holding companies must
be considered the most likely to enter the Dothan
market, both in light of objective circumstances
and by the expressed intent of the companies
themselves.
We are confronted here with a dominant bank
in a concentrated market being acquired by one
of a small number of potential entrants into that
market. The Courts have ruled in comparable cases
that such an acquisition violates Section 7 of the
Clayton Act. (F .T .C . v. Proctor & Gamble Co
et al., 386 U.S. 568 (1967), and General Foods
Corp. v. F .T .C ., 386 F. (2nd) 936 (3rd Cir. 1968),
cert, denied 391 U .S. 919 (1968)). The Board took
a similar position in First Financial Corporation,
1972 Federal Reserve B u l l e t i n 480. In our view,
the acquisition of Dothan Bank by Applicant falls
squarely within the framework of these previous
positions and should be denied.
Another factor in our consideration is the fact
that Dothan Bank will no longer be a likely
member of an additional Statewide holding com­
pany if this application is approved. There are
presently only four Statewide holding companies
in the entire State of Alabama. We need to keep
open avenues for the formation of additional bank
holding companies in order to provide the degree
of competition in the banking field that is compat­
ible with the public interest. Approval of the
acquisition of a bank the size of Dothan Bank— the
twelfth largest in the State— inhibits the formation
of alternative holding companies. Unless we are
content to let Alabama be divided among a handful
of organizations— perhaps no more than four—
which we think would not be consonant with the
responsibilities imposed on the Board by the Bank
Holding Company Act, we should be alert to deny
applications for the acquisition of banks of the size
and importance of Dothan Bank in the absence
of overriding benefits to the public that offset the
anticompetitive consequences arising from a pro­
posal. In this case, we think there must be much
more concrete evidence of public benefits flowing
from the proposed acquisition before the anticom­
petitive consequences arising from approval of this
acquisition could be considered to be outweighed.
Therefore, we would deny the application by
this Applicant to acquire Dothan Bank.




CENTRAL AND STATE NATIONAL
CORPORATION OF ALABAMA,
BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k

Central and State National Corporation of Ala­
bama, Birmingham, Alabama, a bank holding
company within the meaning of the Bank Holding
Company Act, has applied for the Board’s ap­
proval under section 3(a)(3) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(a)(3)) to acquire at least 80 per cent of the
voting shares of Peoples Bank and Trust Com­
pany, Montgomery, Alabama (“ Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with section
3(b) of the Act. The time for filing comments and
views has expired, and the Board has considered
the application and all comments received in light
of the factors set forth in section 3(c) of the Act
(12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
Applicant controls two banks with aggregate
deposits of approximately $388 million represent­
ing about 7.4 per cent of deposits in commercial
banks in Alabama.1 Consummation of the proposal
would increase Applicant’s share of deposits by
only .7 percentage points, and would not result
in a significant increase in the concentration of the
banking resources in Alabama.
There is no substantial existing competition be­
tween Applicant and Bank (about $36 million in
deposits). Moreover, approval of this application
may provide procompetitive effects for the
Montgomery area. Bank is the fourth largest of
five banks, with about 8.8 per cent of area depos­
its, while the two largest organizations in
Montgomery control over 75 per cent of area
deposits. The introduction of Applicant into the
area, through acquisition of Bank, should provide
a more vigorous competitor for these two large
organizations and aid in the eventual deconcentra­
tion of the Montgomery area. For these reasons
competitive considerations are consistent with the
approval of the application.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant, its subsidiary banks,
and Bank, are regarded as generally satisfactory,
particularly since Applicant has made a commit­
ment to provide additional capital to one of its
subsidiary banks and also to Bank. These consid­
erations lend weight for approval of the applica­
tion. Considerations relating to the convenience
‘All banking data are as of June 30, 1971.

LAW DEPARTMENT

825

and needs of the community also lend weight for
approval, since Applicant proposes to expand
Bank’s business development, data processing,
and correspondent banking services. It is the
Board’s judgment that the proposed transaction is
in the public interest and that the application
should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board,
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta pursuant
to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 17, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Bums and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Brimmer, and Sheehan. Absent and not
voting: Governors Daane and Bucher.

[s e a l]

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.

O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k

Central and State National Corporation of Ala­
bama, Birmingham, Alabama, a bank holding
company within the meaning of the Bank Holding
Company Act, has applied for the Board’s ap­
proval under § 3(a)(3) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(a)(3)) to acquire 80 per cent or more of the
voting shares of The Citizens’ Bank of Eufaula,
Eufaula, Alabama (“ Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
Applicant controls three banks1 with aggregate
deposits of approximately $478 million, repre­
senting about 8.1 per cent of deposits in commer­
cial banks in Alabama.2 Consummation of the
proposal would increase Applicant’s share of de­
posits by only .2 percentage points and would not
^ h i s in clu d es P eo p les B an k and T ru st C o m p a n y , M o n tg o ­
m e ry , A la b am a, w h o se acq u isitio n by A p p lic a n t w as ap p ro v ed
by the B oard on A u g u st 17, 1972.
2A11 b a n k in g d a ta are as o f D ecem b er 3 1 , 1971.




result in a significant increase in the concentration
of banking resources in Alabama.
Bank ($9 million in deposits) is the third largest
in Barbour County with about 17 per cent of the
market, but is the smallest bank located in the City
of Eufaula. Due to Alabama’s branching laws and
the fact that the closest banking subsidiary of
Applicant to Bank is some 80 miles away, there
is no significant existing competition between
Applicant, its subsidiary banks, and Bank. There
is little probability that Applicant would enter
Barbour County on a de novo basis because of
the small population growth and the low income
per capita figures of the area, and consummation
of the proposal would foreclose no substantial
potential competition. The Board concludes that
competitive considerations are consistent with ap­
proval of the application.
Considerations related to the financial and man­
agerial resources and future prospects of Appli­
cant, its subsidiary banks, and Bank are regarded
as generally satisfactory and consistent with ap­
proval, particularly since, as noted in the Order
approving the acquisition of Peoples Bank and
Trust Company by Applicant dated August 17,
1972, Applicant has made a commitment to pro­
vide additional capital for its subsidiary banks. The
banking considerations are consistent with ap­
proval of the application. Considerations relating
to the convenience and needs of the community
lend some weight for approval, since Applicant
proposes to provide trust services, data processing
and certain marketing functions which are not now
readily available in the area. It is the Board’s
judgment that the proposed transaction is in the
public interest and the application should be ap­
proved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board,
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta pursuant
to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 17, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent and not voting:
Chairman Burns and Governors Mitchell and Daane.

(Signed) T ynan Sm it h ,
[seal]

Secretary of the Board.

826

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

THE ALABAMA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.,
BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k

The Alabama Financial Group, Inc., Birming­
ham, Alabama, a bank holding company within the
meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act, has
applied for the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3)
of the Act (12 U .S.C . 1842 (a)(3)) to acquire the
successor by merger to Commercial Guaranty
Bank of Mobile, Mobile, Alabama (“ Bank” ). The
bank into which Bank is to be merged has no
significance except as a means to facilitate the
acquisition of voting shares of Bank. Accordingly,
the proposed acquisition is treated herein as the
proposed acquisition of the shares of Bank.
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and none have been timely received.
The Board has considered the application in light
of the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1842(c)).
Applicant controls three banks with aggregate
deposits of approximately $470 million, repre­
senting about 8.1 per cent of deposits of commer­
cial banks in Alabama.1 Consummation of this
proposal would increase Applicant’s share of de­
posits by only .5 percentage points and would not
result in a significant increase in the concentration
of banking resources in the State.
Bank (deposits of about $27 million) is the
fourth largest bank in the Mobile market with
control of approximately 4.2 per cent of area
deposits. There is no significant existing competi­
tion between any of Applicant’s subsidiary banks
and Bank, nor is there a reasonable probability
of competition developing in the future due to the
distances between Bank and Applicant’s banking
subsidiaries (the closest banking subsidiary is lo­
cated about 175 miles from Mobile) and Ala­
bama’s restrictive branching laws. Affiliation by
Bank with Applicant could, however, enable it to
become a stronger alternative competitive force in
the concentrated Mobile market, where the top two
banking organizations control over 70 per cent of
deposits. The Board concludes that competitive
considerations are consistent with approval of the
application.
*A11 b an k in g d a ta are as o f D ecem b er 3 1 , 1971, adjusted
to reflect A p p lic a n t’s acq u isitio n of T h e F irst N atio nal B ank
o f D o th an , D o th a n , A la b am a, and P eo p les N ational B ank of
H u n tsv ille, H u n tsv ille , A la b am a, ap p ro v ed by the B oard in
an O rd er d ated A u g u st 17, 1972.




The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant, its subsidiary banks,
and Bank are regarded as generally satisfactory
and these considerations are consistent with ap­
proval of the application. Considerations related
to the convenience and needs of the community
to be served also are consistent with approval of
the application. It is the Board’s judgment that
the proposed transaction is in the public interest
and that the application should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board,
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta pursuant
to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 18, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Brimmer, and Bucher. Absent and not voting:
Chairman Burns and Governors Daane and Sheehan.

[s e a l]

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.
CENTRAL BANCOMPANY,
JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI

O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k

Central Bancompany, Jefferson City, Missouri,
a bank holding company within the meaning of
the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied for
the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3) of the Act
(12 U .S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire 55 per cent or
more of the voting shares of The First National
Bank of Clayton, Clayton, Missouri ( “ Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
Applicant, the tenth largest multi-bank holding
company in Missouri on the basis of deposits, has
two subsidiary banks with aggregate deposits of
$134.1 million, representing 1.1 per cent of the
total commercial bank deposits in the State. (All
banking data are as of December 31, 1971, ad­
justed to reflect holding company acquisitions and
formations approved by the Board through June

LAW DEPARTMENT

30, 1972.) Consummation of the proposal herein
would increase Applicant’s share of commercial
bank deposits in the State by less than 1 per cent,
and Applicant would become the State’s ninth
largest multi-bank holding company.
Bank ($103.1 million deposits), located in
Clayton nine miles west of downtown St. Louis,
is the ninth largest of 108 banks in the St. Louis
market area, and holds about 1.7 per cent of the
deposits in that market. There is no significant
existing competition between Bank and Appli­
cant’s present subsidiaries, the closest of which
is over 100 miles west of Clayton. Furthermore,
in light of the distances separating Applicant’s
subsidiary banks and Bank, Missouri’s restrictive
branching laws, and the unlikelihood that Appli­
cant would enter the St. Louis area de novo, there
seems to be little prospect for the development
of significant competition between Bank and
Applicant’s subsidiaries. It appears, therefore, that
consummation of the proposal herein would not
likely have any adverse effects on competition and
should enable Bank to compete more effectively
with the larger banks in its market.
The financial and managerial resources and
prospects of Applicant and its subsidiaries are
regarded as satisfactory and consistent with ap­
proval of the application. The same conclusions
apply with respect to Bank’s management. With
regard to the financial resources of Bank, capital
is lower than the Board considers desirable for
subsidiary banks of a holding company. In view
of the Board’s concern in this area, Applicant
proposes to augment Bank’s capital through the
purchase of $1 million of Bank’s common stock
and the initiation of a dividend retention program
at Bank. Implementation of these measures should
strengthen Bank’s financial condition and enhance
its prospects. These considerations lend weight
toward approval of the application. As a result of
its improved financial condition and affiliation with
Applicant, Bank should be able to improve and
expand its range of services. Accordingly, consid­
erations relating to convenience and needs are
consistent with approval of the application. It is
the Board’s judgment that consummation of the
proposed acquisition would be in the public inter­
est, and that the application should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such




827
period is extended for good cause by the Board,
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 18, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Brimmer, and Bucher. Absent and not voting:
Chairman Burns and Governors Daane and Sheehan.

[seal]

(Signed) T ynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

NORTHERN STATES FINANCIAL
CORPORATION,
DETROIT, MICHIGAN
TWIN GATES CORPORATION,
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE
Order A pproving Transactions under B ank
Holding Company A ct
Northern States Financial Corporation, Detroit,
Michigan (“ Northern States” ), has applied for the
Board’s approval, under § 3(a)(1) of the Bank
Holding company Act (12 U.S.C . 1842(a)(1)), for
the formation of a bank holding company through
acquisition of 100 per cent of the voting shares
(less directors’ qualifying shares) of the successor
by merger to City National Bank of Detroit, D e­
troit, Michigan (“ City National” ). The bank into
which City National is to be merged has no sig­
nificance except as a means to facilitate the ac­
quisition of all the voting shares of City National.
Accordingly, the proposed acquisition of the suc­
cessor organization is treated herein as the
proposed acquisition of City National. As an inci­
dent to the acquisition of City National, Northern
States would acquire indirectly 13.2 per cent of
the voting shares of National Bank of Rochester,
Rochester, Michigan (“ Rochester Bank” ), which
shares are held by City National’s profit sharing
trust for the benefit of City National’s employees;
by virtue of § 2(g)(2) of the Act, Northern States
would be deemed to control such shares upon its
acquisition of City National.
In a related application, Twin Gates Corpora­
tion, Wilmington, Delaware (“ Twin Gates” ), a
registered bank holding company owning directly
22.5 per cent of the voting shares of City National1
and 20 per cent of the voting shares of Rochester
*In ad d itio n , ten separate trusts esta b lish e d fo r the benefit
o f the shareholders of T w in G ates hold an additio n al 15.8 per
cent of the outstan d in g sh ares of C ity N a tio n a l. C ontrol of
said shares is a ttributed to T w in G a tes by v irtue of § 2(g)(2)
of the A ct.

828

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

Bank,1 has applied to the Board for approval to
exchange the interest it holds in City National for
22.5 per cent of the voting shares of Northern
States.
Notice of the applications, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
applications and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
Northern States was organized recently in order
to acquire shares of City National. As a result of
consummation of the proposed transaction, Twin
Gates would acquire 22.5 per cent of the out­
standing shares of Northern States through the
exchange of shares that it holds in City National
for shares of Northern States; and Northern States
would become a subsidiary of Twin Gates; City
National would become a direct subsidiary of
Northern States and an indirect subsidiary of Twin
Gates; Rochester Bank would remain a subsidiary
of Twin Gates; Twin Gates would continue to
control, in the aggregate, approximately $539.9
million in deposits, which represents about 2.3 per
cent of the total commercial bank deposits in the
State. (All banking data are as of December 31,
1971.)
City National ($529 million of deposits), head­
quartered in downtown Detroit, operates 30 offices
throughout the Detroit SMSA, and holds about 4
per cent of the commercial bank deposits therein.
Rochester Bank ($10.9 million of deposits), lo­
cated in a suburb about 24 miles from City Na­
tional’s main office in downtown Detroit, operates
its only office in Avon township, and holds about
.04 per cent of the commercial bank deposits in
the Detroit market. In the Detroit market, City
National and Rochester Bank rank, respectively,
as the 6th and 37th largest banking organizations
among 43 banking organizations. An office of City
National is located 3.3 miles south of Rochester
Bank. However the banks are already subsidiaries
of Twin Gates and do not appear to be in com­
petition with each other. Rochester Bank was
organized de novo in 1964 by individuals asso­
ciated with City National and has been operated
more or less as a branch of City National under
R o c h e s te r B ank is also a su b sid iary of T w in G ates by virtue
of the fact th at 20 per cen t o f R o ch ester B a n k ’s v o tin g shares
are o w n ed d irectly by T w in G a tes, and co n tro l of an additional
13.2 per c en t o f R o ch ester B a n k ’s votin g shares is attributed
to T w in G ates becau se of co n tro l o f such shares by a su bsidiary
(C ity N atio n al) of T w in G ates.




common ownership. On the basis of the facts of
record, notably the close working association of
the two banks, the common ownership, and the
unlikelihood that the banks would become disaf­
filiated in the reasonably near future, the Board
concludes that consummation of the proposal
would not have any adverse effects on existing
or potential competition.
Northern States, having been recently organ­
ized, has no operating history; its financial condi­
tion, managerial resources, and prospects depend
on those of its proposed subsidiary, City National,
at least for the near future. The financial and
managerial resources of Twin Gates appear satis­
factory, and its prospects are considered favorable.
The financial condition and managerial resources
and prospects of City National and Rochester Bank
are regarded as generally satisfactory and consis­
tent with approval of the applications.
The capital position of City National is low for
a subsidiary of a bank holding company and should
be strengthened. The Board has previously ex­
pressed the view that a holding company should
agree to strengthen the capital position of each of
its subsidiaries to a desirable level as a condition
to Board approval of the bank holding company
formation or expansion. Northern States has com­
mitted itself to a capital improvement program that
will, upon its implementation, increase the capital
account of City National by $25 million. As a
result of this injection of capital, the financial
condition of City National would be strengthened
and its prospects enhanced. The improvement ex­
pected in City National’s capital account as a result
of Northern States’ capital improvement program
and the greater access that Northern States is likely
to have to capital markets than either of the two
banks alone lend weight for approval of the ap­
plications.
Inasmuch as the proposed transactions involve
essentially a corporate reorganization, there would
be no immediate effects on the convenience and
needs of the communities involved. However,
considerations relating to the convenience and
needs of the communities are consistent with ap­
proval of the applications. It is the Board’s judg­
ment that consummation of the proposal would be
in the public interest and that the applications
should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the applications are
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transactions shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order, (b) later than three mon^is after

829

LAW DEPARTMENT
the effective date of this Order unless such period
is extended for good cause by the Board, or by
the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago pursuant
to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 22, 1972.
Voting for this action: Governors Mitchell, Brimmer, Shee­
han, and Bucher. Absent and not voting: Chairman Burns and
Governors Robertson and Daane.

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.

[s e a l]

UNITED JERSEY BANKS,
HACKENSACK, NEW JERSEY
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k

United Jersey Banks, Hackensack, New Jersey,
a bank holding company within the meaning of
the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied for
the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3) of the Act
(12 U.S.C. 1842 (a)(3)) to acquire all of the voting
shares (less directors’ qualifying shares) of The
Second National Bank of Orange, Orange, New
Jersey (“ Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C .
1842(c)).
Applicant has twelve subsidiary banks with total
deposits of approximately $1.1 billion and ranks
as the second largest multi-bank holding company
in New Jersey with 6.3 per cent of total deposits
in commercial banks in the State.1 (All banking
data are as of December 31, 1971 unless otherwise
shown.) As a result of consummation of the pro­
posal herein, Applicant’s rank, in relation to the
State’s other bank holding companies, would re­
main unchanged.
Bank ($38 million in deposits), with three of­
fices in the city of Orange (in Essex County)
operates in the Greater Newark banking market.
Of the 45 banking organizations operating in that
market, Bank ranks nineteenth, based on total
market deposits. Two of Applicant’s subsidiary
banks, Peoples Trust of New Jersey (“ Peoples” ),
Applicant’s lead bank, and Central Home Trust
^ h i s do es not in clu d e T h e D o v er T ru st C o m p a n y , D o v er,
N ew Jerse y . B y o rd er o f this d a te , the B o ard has ap p ro v ed
A p p lic a n t’s acq u isitio n o f 100 per cen t o f the v o tin g shares
of th at ban k .




Company of Elizabeth, N.J. (“ Central” ), operate
in the market. Together they hold less than 1.3
per cent of total market deposits and Applicant
ranks as the fifteenth largest banking organization
in the market based on market deposits. After
consummation of the proposed acquisition, Appli­
cant would rank tenth, holding approximately 2.2
per cent of market deposits. Bank derives 2.7 per
cent of its loans, 1.3 per cent of its demand
deposits, and 0.5 per cent of its time and savings
deposits from areas served by Peoples and Central.
Conversely, Peoples and Central derive an insig­
nificant portion of their loan and deposit business
from Bank’s service area. Consummation of the
proposed transaction would, therefore, eliminate
no significant existing competition. Due to Bank’s
conservative operation, its limited branching op­
portunities, and the distances separating its
branches from those of Applicant’s subsidiary
banks, it is unlikely that consummation of the
proposal would foreclose significant potential
competition between Bank and any of Applicant’s
present subsidiary banks.
Taking into account Applicant’s commitment to
add $15 million to the equity capital accounts of
Peoples discussed in the Board’s Order of this date
with respect to The Dover Trust Company, con­
siderations relationg to the financial and manage­
rial resources and prospects of Bank and Applicant
and its subsidiaries are considered satisfactory and
consistent with approval of the application. Al­
though the proposed new services that Applicant
intends to make available through Bank are gener­
ally available from other banks in the communities
to be served, consummation of Applicant’s pro­
posal would create an alternative source of such
services as expanded installment, commercial, and
mortgage lending, international banking, data
processing, and accounting. The provision of an
additional source of these services should better
enable Bank to compete in a market in which more
than 53 per cent of total deposits are held by the
three largest banking organizations. Consid­
erations bearing on the convenience and needs of
the communities to be served are consistent with
approval of the application. It is the Board’s judg­
ment that the proposed transaction is in the public
interest and should be approved.
On the basis of the record, including the Board’s
understanding that Applicant will add $15 million
to the equity capital accounts of Peoples, and for
the reasons summarized above, the application is
approved. The transaction shall not be consum­
mated (a) before the thirtieth calendar day follow­

830

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

ing the effective date of this Order or (b) later
than three months after the effective date of this
Order, unless such period is extended for good
cause by the Board, or by the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York pursuant to delegated author­
ity.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 22, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Daane, Brimmer, and Sheehan. Absent
and not voting: Governor Bucher.

[sea l]

(Signed) T ynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

Order A pproving A cquisition of B ank
United Jersey Banks, Hackensack, New Jersey,
a bank holding company within the meaning of
the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied for
the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3) of the Act
(12 U.S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire all of the voting
shares of The Dover Trust Company, Dover, New
Jersey (“ Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and none have been timely received.
The Board has considered the application in light
of the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1842(c)).
Applicant controls 12 banks1 holding deposits
of $1.1 billion, representing 6.3 per cent of total
deposits in commercial banks in New Jersey.2
Acquisition of Bank would not significantly in­
crease Applicant’s control of commercial bank
deposits in the State.
Bank, with deposits of $41.3 million, as of June
30, 1970, controlled approximately 19.4 per cent
of deposits in the Dover-Roxbury banking market,
held by commercial banks. Based on share of
deposits in the market, Bank ranks second among
the ten banking organizations in that market, al­
though Bank ranks seventh among the banking
organizations operating in the market, based on
total deposits held. Bank also operates a branch
office in the Hackettstown banking market.
It appears that consummation of the proposed
‘T h is d o es not include the S eco n d N atio n al B ank o f O ra n g e ,
O ra n g e , N ew Jersey . B y o rd er of this d a te , the B oard has
a p p ro v ed A p p lic a n t’s acq u isitio n of 100 per cen t of the voting
shares (less d ire c to rs ’ q u a lify in g sh ares) of that bank.
2A11 b an k in g d ata are as o f D ecem b er 3 1 , 1971, unless
o th erw ise in d ic a ted , and include fo rm atio n s and acq u isitio n s
th ro u g h Ju n e 3 0, 1972.




transaction will not adversely affect existing com­
petition in the Dover-Roxbury market, as Appli­
cant does not serve that market. Consummation
may eliminate some competition in the Hack­
ettstown market, since Applicant’s lead bank,
Peoples Trust of New Jersey (“ Peoples” ),
operates branch offices in that market and held
19.5 per cent of total market deposits. The six
offices of Peoples in that market are all within
fifteen miles of Dover. Bank’s branch in the mar­
ket is approximately 10.3 miles east of the nearest
office of Peoples. As of December 31, 1971, Bank
derived 1.1 per cent of its deposits and 1.7 per
cent of its loans from the service area of Peoples.
Conversely, Peoples derived less than 0.1 per cent
of its deposits from Bank’s service area. Con­
summation of the proposal would eliminate no
significant existing competition in the Hack­
ettstown Market.
Consummation of the proposal would have only
slightly adverse effects on potential competition
in both the Dover-Roxbury and Hackettstown
markets. Applicant’s four subsidiary banks located
in the First Banking District are permitted to
branch into the Dover-Roxbury market. However,
nine of the thirteen communities comprising that
market are afforded home office or branch office
protection and two others lack sufficient population
to support additional banking offices. Applicant
could enter the Dover-Roxbury market by the
establishment of a de novo bank or by acquisition
of one of the three smaller independent banks in
that market. However, its acquisition of Bank
should be a pro-competitive factor in that Bank,
which has been rather conservatively managed in
the past, should, under Applicant’s guidance, be­
come a stronger competitive force vis a vis the
six larger banks (four of which are subsidiaries
of multi-bank holding companies) with which it
competes in the Dover-Roxbury market. Bank’s
branch in the Hackettstown market controls de­
posits of less than one million dollars. Due to
Bank’s size and conservative management and the
presence of five of the State’s multi-bank holding
companies in the market it is unlikely that, absent
this proposal, Bank would become a significant
competitive force in the market. Consummation
of the proposal therefore would not eliminate a
significant possibility of the development of sub­
stantial competition between Bank and Applicant.
Applicant has indicated its willingness to in­
crease the equity capital of Bank by $1 million
and the equity capital of Peoples by $15 million
should the Board deem it necessary. The Board has

831

LAW DEPARTMENT
concluded that both Bank and Peoples are in need
of such amounts of equity capital. Based on the
Board’s understanding that Applicant will make
such infusions of equity capital, considerations
relating to the financial resources and future pros­
pects of Applicant, its subsidiaries, and Bank lend
weight toward approval. Trust, data processing,
and expanded loan services Applicant proposes to
provide through Bank are generally available in
the communities to be served. However, con­
summation of the proposed transaction would
create another alternative source of such services.
Thus, considerations relating to the convenience
and needs of those communities are consistent with
approval of the application. It is the Board’s judg­
ment that the proposed transaction is in the public
interest and should be approved.
On the basis of the record, including the Board’s
understanding that Applicant will make infusions
of equity capital as referred to above, and for the
reasons summarized above, the application is ap­
proved. The transaction shall not be consummated
(a) before the thirtieth calendar day following the
effective date of this Order or (b) later than three
months after the effective date of this Order, unless
such period is extended for good cause by the
Board, or by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 22, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Mitchell, Daane, Brimmer, and Sheehan. Voting against this
action: Governor Robertson. Absent and not voting: Governor
Bucher.

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.

[s e a l]
D is s e n t in g

Statem en t of G overnor
R obertson

Consummation of the acquisition proposed in
this case would have adverse effects on potential
competition in both the Dover-Roxbury and
Hackettstown markets. Under New Jersey law, the
four subsidiary banks of Applicant located in New
Jersey’s First Banking District are permitted to
branch into the Dover-Roxbury market. Applicant
could enter the Dover-Roxbury market by estab­
lishment of a de novo bank. It has the financial
and managerial resources to pursue this method
of entry and has demonstrated its ability to enter
markets de novo by the establishment of a new
bank in Cherry Hill Township and its application
for permission to establish a new bank in Lake­
wood. De novo entry through branching or the




establishment of a new bank would be less anti­
competitive than, and therefore preferable to, the
instant proposal, as would be acquisition of one
of the three smaller independent banks in the
Dover-Roxbury market.
Consummation of the proposed acquisition will
also foreclose the development of competition
between Bank and Peoples in the Hackettstown
market that could derive from further branching
by either within that market. The Hackettstown
market is one of the fastest growing areas in the
First Banking District and, indeed, in the State.
Six municipalities in the market are open to
branching. Consummation of the acquisition will
therefore adversely affect competition in two mar­
kets.
Major holding companies should be discouraged
from seeking to acquire important local competi­
tors in markets in which they are already repre­
sented or are likely to enter through less anticom­
petitive means, as in the case here, especially
when, as in this case, there are no derivative public
benefits sufficient to outweigh the adverse effects
upon potential competition.
I therefore would deny the application.
ZIONS UTAH BANCORPORATION,
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f B a n k

Zions Utah Bancorporation, Salt Lake City,
Utah, a bank holding company within the meaning
of the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied
for the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3) of the
Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire all of the
voting shares (less director’s qualifying shares) of
Zions National Bank of Ogden, Ogden, Utah, a
proposed new bank (“ Bank” ).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
application, the recommendation of the Comp­
troller of the Currency that the application should
be approved, and all other comments received in
light of the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act
(12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
Applicant, the second largest banking organi­
zation in Utah, controls one bank which has total
deposits of approximately $339.2 million,1 repre­
^ e p o s i t d ata are as o f D e ce m b e r 31 , 1971 and m a rk e t d ata
are as of June 30, 1970, ad ju sted to reflect hold in g c o m pany
form atio n s and a cq u isitio n s th ro u g h June 30, 1972.

832

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

senting 16.1 per cent of the total deposits in
commercial banks in the State. Since Bank is a
proposed new bank, no existing competition would
be eliminated nor would concentration be in­
creased in any relevant area.
Applicant’s acquisition of Bank represents its
initial commercial banking entry into the Ogden
banking market. Applicant’s subsidiary bank,
whose nearest office is located 20 miles from
Bank, is prohibited by State law from branching
into the Ogden banking market. Applicant’s ac­
quisition of Bank would likely have a procompeti­
tive effect by introducing a new competitor into
the Ogden market, where three of the six banks
control over 90 per cent of total market deposits.
Applicant’s entry into this market should stimulate
competition without having adverse effects on any
competing bank.
The financial and managerial resources of
Applicant and its subsidiaries are regarded as sat­
isfactory and consistent with approval. Applicant
has recently augmented the capital position of its
lead bank by contributing a portion of the proceeds
from a sale of Applicant’s stock. Applicant has
indicated that this contribution is a permanent
investment. Since Bank will be able to draw upon
Applicant’s financial and managerial resources, its
prospects seem favorable and the banking factors
are consistent with approval. Applicant proposes
to offer extended banking hours and to offer addi­
tional services, such as guaranteed student loans
at Bank. Considerations relating to the conve­
nience and needs of the communities to be served
lend weight toward approval since Bank will be­
come an additional source of full banking services
in a community that has a high ratio of population
to banking offices. It is the Board’s judgment that
consummation of the proposed acquisition would
be in the public interest and that the application
should be approved.
Applicant is engaged, either directly or through
subsidiaries, in several nonbanking businesses.
The approval herein neither provides authority to
Applicant to continue in the nonbank activities nor
to retain nonbank shares nor requires the Applicant
to modify or terminate said activities or holdings.
However, consummation of the proposal herein is
subject to the continuing authority of the Board
to require modification or termination of such
activities or holdings (within a period no shorter
than two years), if the Board determines that the
continued combination of banking and nonbanking
interests is likely to have an adverse effect on the
public interest.




The provision of any credit, property or services
by the holding company or any affiliate thereof
shall not be subject to any condition which, if
imposed by a bank, would constitute an unlawful
tie-in arrangement under § 106 of the Bank Hold­
ing Company Amendments of 1970. The non­
banking activities of Applicant shall not be altered
in any significant respect from those engaged in
at the time of the filing of the application herein
nor shall they be provided at any location other
than as described in said application, except upon
compliance with the procedures of § 225.4(b)(1)
of Regulation Y ; and no merger, or consolidation,
or acquisition of assets other than in the regular
course of business, to which Applicant or any
affiliate thereof is a party shall be consummated
without prior Board approval.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after that date, and (c) Zions National Bank of
Ogden, Ogden, Utah, shall be opened for business
not later than six months after the effective date
of this Order. Each of the periods described in
(b) and (c) may be extended for good cause by
the Board, or by the Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 29, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Daane, Sheehan, and Bucher. Voting against
this action: Governor Brimmer, on the basis of principles
previously discussed in his Dissenting Statement in connection
with the Board’s Order approving the application of First
National City Corporation to acquire the successor by merger
to The National Exchange Bank of Castleton-on-Hudson (37
Federal Register 14259). Absent and not voting: Chairman
Burns.

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.

[s e a l]

FINANCIAL SECURITIES CORPORATION,
LAKE CITY, TENNESSEE
O r d e r D e n y in g A p p l ic a t io n s t o R e m a in
a

B a n k H o l d in g C o m p a n y a n d t o
R e t a in

S hares of B anks

Financial Securities Corporation, Lake City,
Tennessee, has applied for the Board’s approval
under § 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act
(12 U .S.C. 1842(a)(1)) to remain a bank holding
company through the retention of 65.12 per cent
of the voting shares of First Farmers Bank,

833

LAW DEPARTMENT

Athens, Tennessee, and of 50.56 per cent of the
voting shares of First National Bank of Anderson
County, Lake City, Tennessee. Financial Securi­
ties Corporation has also applied for the Board’s
approval under § 3(a)(3) of the Act to retain 31.6
per cent (included in the above-mentioned 65.12
per cent) of the voting shares of First Farmers
Bank, Athens, Tennessee.
Notice of receipt of the applications, affording
opportunity for interested persons to submit com­
ments and views, has been given in accordance
with § 3(b) of the Act. The time for filing com­
ments and views has expired, and the Board has
considered the applications and all comments re­
ceived in light of the factors set forth in § 3(c)
of the Act (12 U .S.C . 1842(c)).
On the basis of the record, the applications are
denied for the reasons set forth in the Board’s
Statement of this date. Applicant is directed to take
appropriate measures to effect a divestiture of
control of First Farmers Bank, Athens, Tennessee,
and of First National Bank of Anderson County,
Lake City, Tennessee, and is granted until yearend 1972 to effect said divestiture, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. No
later than two months from the effective date of
the Order herein, Applicant is required to report
to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta on the
progress of said divestiture. A reduction of share
holdings to 5 per cent or less of the outstanding
voting shares of each of the banks involved would
be regarded by the Board as appropriate in con­
nection with such divestiture.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 29, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Daane, and Sheehan. Absent and not voting: Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Brimmer, and Bucher.

[seal]

(Signed) Tynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.
S tatement

Financial Securities Corporation, Lake City,
Tennessee, has applied for the Board’s approval
under section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Com­
pany Act (12 U .S.C . 1842(a)(1)) to remain a bank
holding company through the retention of 65.12
per cent of the voting shares of First Farmers
Bank, Athens, Tennessee (“ Farmers Bank” ), and
50.56 per cent of the voting shares of First Na­
tional Bank of Anderson County, Lake City, Ten­
nessee (“ Anderson Bank” ). Applicant states that




it acquired the aforementioned shares in August
1971, from the Athens Financial C o., a partner­
ship, in the mistaken belief that such a reorgan­
ization into corporate form did not require Board
approval. The partnership, the Athens Financial
Co., acquired the aforementioned 50.56 per cent
interest in Anderson Bank and a 33.52 per cent
interest (included in the aforementioned 65.12 per
cent) in Farmers Bank prior to December 31,
1970; such acquisitions did not require Board
approval since a partnership did not fall within
the definition of “ company” in the Bank Holding
Company Act until that date.
In a related application, Applicant has applied
for the Board’s approval under section 3(a)(3) of
the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C .
1842(a)(3)) to retain 31.6 per cent of the voting
shares of Farmers Bank, which Applicant states
were acquired by the Athens Financial Co. in
January 1971 in the mistaken belief that such
action did not require Board approval. No equal
offer was made to the minority shareholders of
the banks involved.
Statutory considerations. Applicant was organ­
ized in August 1971 for the purpose of acquiring
the interests in two banks held by a partnership
made up of three individuals who are now the sole
stock holders of Applicant. By virtue of its own­
ership interests in Farmers Bank and Anderson
Bank, Applicant controls deposits of $27 million,
which represents .3 per cent of the total commer­
cial bank deposits in the State, and is the smallest
of the State’s seven bank holding companies. (All
banking data are as of December 31, 1971.)
Anderson Bank ($14.8 million of deposits) is
the fourth largest of five banks located in Anderson
banking market, approximated by all of Anderson
County and portions of Knox and Campbell coun­
ties, and controls approximately 15 per cent of
the total deposits therein. Farmers Bank ($12.2
million of deposits) is the third largest of ten banks
competing in the Athens banking market, approx­
imated by all of McMinn County and portions of
Meigs, Monroe, and Polk counties, and controls
about 13 per cent of the deposits in that banking
market. It appears that Anderson Bank and Farm­
ers Bank do not now compete with each other.
Nor does it appear likely that they would compete
in the future primarily due to the distances
separating their offices (at least 60 miles) and the
presence of banks in the intervening areas. Ap­
proval of Applicant’s proposal would not have an
adverse effect on competition in any relevant area.
The Board concludes that considerations relating

834

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

to competition are consistent with, but lend no
weight toward, approval of the applications.
In reviewing the financial resources of Appli­
cant, as is required by the Bank Holding Company
Act, the Board finds that the financial resources
of Applicant are not up to Board standards for
a bank holding company. Upon acquisition of the
shares in the two banks from the partnership in
August 1971, Applicant assumed a debt of $1.6
million which had been incurred by the partnership
when it made its original stock purchases in the
two banks. As of September 1971, Applicant’s
balance sheet disclosed shareholders’ equity of
only $5,000, compared to liabilities of $1.6 mil­
lion.
On previous occasions, the Board has expressed
its concern about the use of debt by a holding
company to finance the purchase of bank stock.
The presence of significant debt limits a holding
company’s ability to assist its subsidiary banks
with capital if such a need arises. Furthermore,
a heavy debt servicing obligation may result in
Applicant being unable to service its debt without
unduly straining the bank’s earnings or undertak­
ing a program of substantial management fees,
practices which would impair the capital growth
of the banks involved and operate to the detriment
of the minority shareholders of the banks. In the
present instance, the Board considers that the level
of debt in the holding company is so disapportionate to the equity interests of the shareholders that
the public interest requires denial of Applicant’s
proposal.
It appears that the major banking needs of each
of the areas served by Applicant’s subsidiaries are
being met by existing institutions and no signifi­
cant public benefits would result from approval of
the applications. Rather, the ability of each of
Applicant’s subsidiaries to continue to improve or
expand the services offered could be hampered
because of a need by Applicant to draw on the
financial resources of its subsidiaries in order to
retire Applicant’s debt. Considerations relating to
convenience and needs of the communities to be
served lend no weight toward approval of the
applications.
On the basis of facts of record, the Board
concludes that the high level of debt carried and
the state of the financial recources of Applicant
are adverse factors bearing on the financial condi­
tion and prospects of Applicant and the banks
involved. These adverse findings are not out­
weighed by any procompetitive factors nor by
considerations relating to the convenience and




needs of the communities to be served. Accord­
ingly, approval of the applications is not in the
public interest and the applications should be de­
nied.
COMMUNITY BANKS OF FLORIDA, INC.,
SEMINOLE, FLORIDA
Order A pproving Formation of B ank Hold­
ing Company
Community Banks of Florida, Inc., Seminole,
Florida, has applied for the Board’s approval under
§ 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12
U.S.C . 1842(a)(1)) of formation of a bank holding
company through acquisition of 80 per cent or
more of the voting shares of Bank of Seminole,
Seminole (P. O. Largo) ( “ Seminole Bank” ); First
Commercial Bank, St. Petersburg (“ Commercial
Bank” ); First Community Bank, Largo (“ Largo
Bank” ); First Bank of West Pasco, Pasco County
(“ Pasco Bank” ), and Northside Community
Bank, St. Petersburg (“ Northside Bank” ), all
located in Florida.
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
application and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U .S.C.
1842(c)).
Applicant was formed for the purpose of ac­
quiring the five proposed subsidiary banks, all of
which were organized by the same individuals and
have functioned as a group since their establish­
ment. Upon the acquisition of Seminole Bank
(deposits of $42.6 million); Commercial Bank
(deposits of $11.7 million); Largo Bank (deposits
of $5.9 million); and the Pasco and Northside
Banks which were recently opened, Applicant
would control aggregate deposits of $60.2 million
among commercial banks in Florida and would
rank as the State’s twenty-sixth largest banking
organization, with .37 per cent of total State de­
posits. The proposal would represent no significant
increase in the concentration of banking resources
in the local markets or on a Statewide basis.
Seminole, Commercial, Largo, and Northside
Banks are located in Pinellas County in the South
Pinellas Banking Market where the four banks
control 6.14 per cent of total deposits as the sixth
largest of the 15 banking organizations represented
in the market. Six multi-bank holding companies
hold 49.62 per cent of deposits in this market.

LAW DEPARTMENT

The fifth proposed acquisition, Pasco Bank, is
located in Pasco County, some 20 miles to the
north. It was opened for business in late January
of this year and ranks as the smallest bank in the
county. It appears that the change in corporate
structure for the group represented by this ap­
plication would have no adverse effects on any
of the competing banks in the relevant market
areas.
The Seminole and Largo Banks are located
approximately three miles apart, but their service
areas do not overlap, and there is no significant
present competition between them. The remaining
three banks are located from 6 to 26 miles apart.
There is no meaningful intergroup competition that
would be eliminated between any of the subject
banks by the proposed formation. All five banks
have been closely affiliated since their inception.
Senior management of each bank is vested in the
same individuals and banking services are inter­
changed. It appears that this dependence within
the group is permanently established, and there
exists little likelihood for disaffiliation. Competi­
tive considerations are consistent with approval of
the application.
Although Applicant was recently organized and
has no operating history, its financial structure and
proposed management are deemed to be generally
satisfactory. The subject banks have capable man­
agements and their financial conditions are deemed
satisfactory except for needed improvement in the
capital account of Seminole Bank which Applicant
has agreed to provide. Banking factors are consis­
tent with approval of the application, and prospects
for Applicant and the group of banks appear fa­
vorable. The primary banking needs of both mar­
ket areas are served by existing financial institu­
tions; however, it appears that efficiencies of
operation would result from the corporate struc­
ture, and the public would derive benefits from
trust services proposed to be offered at each bank.
Considerations relating to the convenience and
needs of the communities to be served are consis­
tent with and lend some support toward approval
of the application. It is the Board’s judgment that
the proposed transaction would be in the public
interest and that the application would be ap­
proved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such




835
period is extended for good cause by the Board
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta pursuant
to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 29, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Daane, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Ab­
sent and not voting: Chairman Burns.

[seal]

(Signed) T ynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

BEZANSON INVESTMENTS, INC.,
MORAMERICA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Order D enying A cquisition of B ank
Bezanson Investments, Inc., Cedar Rapids,
Iowa, and its subsidiary, MorAmerica Financial
Corporation, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, each of which
is a registered bank holding company, have ap­
plied for the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3) of
the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U .S.C.
1842(a)(3)), to acquire 76 per cent or more of the
voting shares of First Trust and Savings Bank,
Wheatland, Iowa.
Notice of receipt of the applications, affording
opportunity for interested persons to submit com­
ments and views, has been given in accordance
with § 3(b) of the Act. The time for filing com­
ments and views has expired, and all those re­
ceived have been considered. The Board has con­
sidered the applications in light of the factors set
forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
On the basis of the record, each of the applica­
tions is denied for the reasons set forth in the
Board’s Statement of this date.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 29, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent and
not voting: Chairman Burns and Governor Daane.

[seal]

(Signed) Tynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.
S tatement

Nature of transaction. Bezanson Investments,
Inc., Cedar Rapids, Iowa, (“ Bezanson” ) and its
subsidiary, Mor America Financial Corporation,
Cedar Rapids, Iowa (“ MorAmerica” ), both of
which are registered bank holding companies,
have applied for the Board’s approval, under §
3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12
U .S.C. § 1842(a)(3)), of the acquisition of 76 per
cent or more of the voting shares of First Trust

836

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

and Savings Bank, Wheatland, Iowa (“ Bank” ).
The shares of Bank are proposed to be acquired
directly by MorAmerica, and Bezanson thus would
indirectly acquire such shares.
Statutory considerations. Applicants presently
control Jackson State Bank and Trust Company,
Maquoketa, Iowa, (“ Jackson Bank” ) with depos­
its of $27.8 million, which accounts for 0.4 per
cent of total commercial bank deposits in Iowa.
Bank (with deposits of $8.6 million) is the
second largest of seven banks in the Wheatland
banking market, which is approximated by south­
western Clinton County and northeastern Cedar
County. Bank has an office in the Maquoketa
banking market (approximated by southwestern
Jackson County and northwestern Clinton County)
and is the third largest of five banks competing
there. Jackson Bank is the dominant bank in the
Maquoketa market, controlling 53.2 per cent of
commercial bank deposits in that area. Con­
summation of the proposed transaction would in­
crease Applicants’ share of the Maquoketa market
to 56.1 per cent. (Banking data are as of December
31, 1971, except that market shares were com­
puted as of June 30, 1970.) Although some exist­
ing competition between Bank and Applicants’
subsidiary bank may have been eliminated in early
1971 by the acquisition of Bank by Mr. Peter F.
Bezanson, president and principal shareholder of
Applicants, consummation of the proposal would
formalize existing arrangements and make it less
likely that competition between Bank and Jackson
Bank would be resumed. Accordingly, it appears
that consummation of the proposal would have an
adverse effect on competition in the Maquoketa
banking market.
Considerations related to the convenience and
needs of the communities to be served are consis­
tent with, but do not provide significant support
for, approval of the application. Although com­
petitive considerations and convenience and needs
considerations are not such as to bar approval, the
Board’s inquiry does not end here. As the Board
has stated before, “ [t]he Board believes that a
holding company should be a source of financial
and managerial strength for the banks in its sys­
tem, rather than vice versa, and that every
proposed acquisition should be closely examined
. . . ” in this regard. (Application of First South­
west Bancorporation, Inc., Waco, Texas, 1972
Federal Reserve B u l l e t i n 302.)
The record shows that Bezanson operates a
general insurance agency; and MorAmerica has
substantial interests in ownership and operation of




nursing and convalescent care centers, a new and
used car dealership, real estate development, and
various servicing companies, among other activi­
ties.
As of September 30, 1971, MorAmerica had
a consolidated debt to equity ratio of 376.8 per
cent. By March 31, 1972, MorAmerica’s consoli­
dated debt to equity ratio had increased to 388.9
per cent.
Data with respect to MorAmerica’s consolidated
net income for the past 5 years indicates that
earnings do not average amounts sufficient to am­
ortize its consolidated debt in a reasonable period
of time. Consolidated statements of changes in
financial position of MorAmerica for 1970 and
1971 show that MorAmerica has been retiring its
debt securities as they become due from the pro­
ceeds of new debt issues, and debt repayment
schedules suggest that MorAmerica will likely
refinance a significant portion of its debt in the
future. Apparently, MorAmerica has no immediate
plans to sell additional capital stock to strengthen
its equity position, nor does it plan to reduce debt
significantly from earnings or cash reserves.
On the facts presented, the Board is unable to
conclude that MorAmerica would be a source of
strength for banks within its system. The policies
of Applicants’ management are regarded by the
Board as incompatible with sound banking princi­
ples and with an expansion of banking activities.
Bank’s capital seems adequate, and its prospects
appear favorable. However, considerations related
to the financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicants are not consistent with
approval.
Conclusion. On the basis of the record and
particularly in the light of the considerations dis­
cussed above, it is the Board’s judgment that the
proposed transactions would not be in the public
interest and should not be approved.

BARNETT BANKS OF FLORIDA, INC.,
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n

of

B anks

Barnett Banks of Florida, Inc., Jacksonville,
Florida, a bank holding company within the
meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act, has
filed separate applications for the Board’s approval
under § 3(a)(3) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(a)(3))
to acquire 80 per cent or more of the voting shares
of Westchester National Bank of Dade County,
Miami, Florida (“ Westchester Bank” ), and Mid­

837

LAW DEPARTMENT

way National Bank, Miami, Florida (“ Midway
Bank” ).
Notice of the applications, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views, has been given in accordance with § 3(b)
of the Act. The time for filing comments and views
has expired, and the Board has considered the
applications and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
Applicant is Florida’s third largest banking or­
ganization and controls 34 banks with total depos­
its of $1.0 billion, representing 6.4 per cent of
total deposits in commercial banks in the State.
(All banking data are as of December 31, 1971,
adjusted to reflect holding company formations and
acquisitions approved by the Board through July
31, 1972.) The acquisition of Westchester Bank
($17.3 million deposits) and Midway Bank ($2.7
million deposits) would increase Applicant’s share
of State deposits by 0.1 percentage points, and
Applicant’s rank among banking organizations in
Florida would not change.
Westchester and Midway Banks are located in
Dade County where they control .48 and .07 per
cent, respectively, of deposits in this banking
market. Although subject banks are located only
three miles apart, they do not actively compete
with each other. Midway Bank was established
in April 1971 by directors of Westchester Bank
and is the only bank in its primary service area.
Westchester Bank ranks as the smallest bank in
its immediate service area. Both banks are under
common ownership, control, and management. It
appears that no significant present or potential
competition would be eliminated by consumma­
tion of this proposal.
Applicant presently controls 2.8 per cent of the
Dade County banking market deposits through
three subsidiary banks (representing aggregate
market deposits for each of $63.6, $26, and $9.7
million, respectively) and ranks as the market’s
ninth largest banking organization. Consummation
of this proposal would represent an increase in
Applicant’s control of market deposits by only .5
percentage points. Applicant’s present subsidiaries
in Dade County are located 23, 16, and 10 miles,
respectively, from the Westchester and Midway
Banks’ offices. There is no significant present
competition between any of Applicant’s subsid­
iaries and subject banks. Due to Florida’s re­
strictive branching laws and the highly banked
areas which intervene, it appears that no substan­
tial amount of future competition would be elimi­




nated by consummation of this proposal. There­
fore, competitive considerations are consistent
with approval of the applications.
The financial condition of Applicant and its
subsidiaries are considered to be generally satis­
factory in view of Applicant’s plans to improve
the capital positions of its subsidiaries where a
need exists; management for the system is also
considered to be generally satisfactory, and pros­
pects for the group appear favorable. The financial
condition and management of Westchester and
Midway Banks are deemed satisfactory, and pros­
pects for each appear favorable. Banking factors
are, therefore, consistent with approval of the
applications. Although the proposed affiliation
with Applicant would not introduce new services
to the market, it would better enable each bank
to respond to the increasing financial needs in the
expanding western section of the county which
they serve. Specialized banking services of Appli­
cant would be made available to both Westchester
and Midway Banks, and the quality and quantity
of the banking services offered by each would be
improved. Accordingly, considerations relating to
the convenience and needs of the communities to
be served are consistent with and lend some sup­
port toward approval of the applications. It is the
Board’s judgment that the proposed transactions
would be in the public interest and that the ap­
plications should be approved.
On the basis of the record, the applications are
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transactions shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board,
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta pursuant
to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 31, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent and not voting:
Chairman Burns and Governors Daane and Mitchell.

[seal]

(Signed) Tynan Sm ith,
Secretary of the Board.
WYOMING BANCORPORATION,
CHEYENNE, WYOMING

O rder A pproving A cquisition of B ank
Wyoming Bancorporation, Cheyenne, Wyom­
ing, a bank holding company within the meaning
of the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied

838

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

for the Board’s approval under § 3(a)(3) of the
Act (12 U .S.C. 1842(a)(3)) to acquire 100 per cent
of the voting shares (less directors’ qualifying
shares) of The Stockgrowers Bank of Evanston,
Evanston, Wyoming (“ Bank” ).
Notice of receipt of the application has been
given in accordance with § 3(b) of the Act, and
the time for filing comments and views has ex­
pired. The Board has considered the application
and all comments received in the light of the
factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(c)).
Applicant, the second largest banking organi­
zation in the State, controls nine banks with total
deposits of $103.2 million, representing 11.1 per
cent of the total commercial bank deposits in
Wyoming. (All banking data are as of December
31, 1971, adjusted to reflect holding company
acquisitions approved by the Board through July
31, 1972.) Consummation of the proposal would
not significantly increase Applicant’s share of total
deposits in the State.
Bank, located in the southwestern corner of
Wyoming about 75 miles northeast of Salt Lake
City, Utah, is the smaller of two banks located
in Evanston and holds total deposits of $8.6 mil­
lion. Applicant’s subsidiary located closest to
Bank is about 175 miles to the north and neither
it nor any of Applicant’s other subsidiaries com­
pete with Bank to any significant extent. More­
over, the development of competition between
Bank and any of Applicant’s subsidiaries is con­
sidered unlikely in view of the intervening dis­
tances between the banks, Wyoming’s restrictive
branching laws, and the unlikelihood that Appli­
cant would enter the Evanston’s area de novo. It
appears, therefore, that consummation of the pro­
posal would not eliminate any existing competition
nor foreclose the development of any potential
competition.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant and its subsidiary
banks are regarded as generally satisfactory and
consistent with approval of the application. While
Applicant will incur acquisition debt as a result
of consummation of the proposal, Applicant
proposes to retire the entire debt at an early date
from the proceeds of a stock offering. In addition,
Applicant states that a portion of the proceeds from
the stock offering will be used to augment the
capital at its lead bank and at Bank, thus strength­
ening the financial condition of each. Affiliation
with Applicant would provide Bank with a source
of experienced banking personnel. Thus, consid­




erations relating to the banking factors lend weight
toward approval of the application. Applicant
proposes to assist Bank in improving its services
by establishing trust services and increasing
Bank’s lending capabilities. These considerations
relating to the convenience and needs lend some
weight toward approval. It is the Board’s judgment
that the proposed transaction would be in the
public interest and that the application should be
approved.
On the basis of the record, the application is
approved for the reasons summarized above. The
transaction shall not be consummated (a) before
the thirtieth calendar day following the effective
date of this Order or (b) later than three months
after the effective date of this Order, unless such
period is extended for good cause by the Board,
or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 31, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Daane, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Ab­
sent and not voting: Chairman Bums.

[seal]

(Signed) Tynan Sm ith,
Secretary of the Board.

TEXAS COMMERCE BANCSHARES, INC.,
HOUSTON, TEXAS
Order A pproving A cquisition of B anks
Texas Commerce Bancshares, Inc., Houston,
Texas, a bank holding company within the mean­
ing of the Bank Holding Company Act, has ap­
plied for the Board’s approval, under § 3(a)(3)
of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C.
1842(a)(3)), to acquire 100 per cent of the voting
shares (less directors’ qualifying shares) of the
successor by merger to American National Bank
of Beaumont, Beaumont, Texas. As an incident
to acquisition of said bank, Applicant necessarily
would acquire, and seeks approval for, acquisition
of, 37 per cent of the voting shares of Beaumont
State Bank, Beaumont, Texas, shares of which are
indirectly controlled by American National Bank
under a trust relationship.
Notice of receipt of the application has been
given in accordance with § 3(b) of the Act, and
the time for filing comments and views has ex­
pired. The Board has considered the application
and all comments received in light of the factors
set forth in § 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
On the basis of the record, and for the reasons
summarized in the Board’s Statement of this date,

LAW DEPARTMENT

839

the application is approved on condition that
Applicant divest itself of its interest in Beaumont
State Bank at the earliest practicable time and, in
any event, within two years from the effective date
of consummation of the acquisition of shares of
American National Bank, unless such period is
extended for good cause by the Board. The ap­
plication to acquire shares of Beaumont State Bank
is approved only to the extent necessary, and for
the period granted to Applicant, to effect the
required divestiture of its interest in Beaumont
State Bank. The acquisition of American National
Bank of Beaumont shall not be consummated (a)
before the thirtieth calendar day following the
effective date of this Order or (b) later than three
months after the effective date of this Order, unless
such period is extended for good cause by the
Board, or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 31, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Absent
and not voting: Governor Daane.

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.

[s e a l]

Statem ent

Nature of transaction. Texas Commerce Banc­
shares, Inc., Houston, Texas, a registered bank
holding company, has applied to the Board of
Governors, pursuant to § 3(a)(3) of the Bank
Holding Company Act (12 U .S.C. 1842(a)(3)), for
prior approval of the acquisition of 100 per cent
of the voting shares (less directors’ qualifying
shares) of the successor by merger to American
National Bank of Beaumont, Beaumont, Texas
(“ American Bank” ). The bank into which Amer­
ican Bank is to be merged has no significance
except as a means to facilitate the acquisition of
the voting shares of American Bank. Accordingly,
the proposed acquisition of the shares of the suc­
cessor organization is treated herein as the
proposed acquisition of the shares of American
Bank. Applicant has applied also for approval to
acquire 37 per cent of the voting shares of Beau­
mont State Bank, Beaumont, Texas (“ Beaumont
Bank” ) .1 A trusteed affiliate of American Bank
*At the tim e this ap p lic atio n w as filed, A m erican G en eral
In su ran ce C o m p a n y , H o u sto n , T e x a s, o w n ed m o re than 32
per cen t o f th e votin g sh ares o f T ex as C o m m erce B an csh ares
so that an acq u isitio n o f sh ares by T ex as C o m m erce w ould
c o nstitute in d irect acq u isitio n by A m erican G en eral. T h e re fo re,
separate ap p licatio n s w ith re sp ec t to the acq u isitio n o f the




through its trustees, holds 37 per cent of the
outstanding voting shares of Beaumont Bank for
the benefit of shareholders of American Bank.
Therefore, acquisition of American Bank would
result in Applicant acquiring 37 per cent of the
voting shares of Beaumont Bank.
In its Order and Statement dated April 11, 1972,
the Board denied Applicant’s application to ac­
quire American Bank. At the same time, by sepa­
rate Order, the Board approved Applicant’s ap­
plication to acquire shares of Beaumont Bank.
Subsequently, Applicant filed a Request for Re­
consideration of its application to acquire Ameri­
can Bank stating in part, that the proposed ac­
quisition of shares of Beaumont Bank was incident
to, and sought only in connection with, an ac­
quisition of American Bank; that Applicant did
not seek to acquire shares of Beaumont Bank
independently of an acquisition of American Bank
and could not acquire the shares of Beaumont
Bank apart from an acquisition of American Bank.
In addition, Applicant supplemented its original
application with respect to American Bank with
additional information concerning the present
condition of that bank and the emerging structure
of the Beaumont banking market. In an Order
dated June 13, 1972, the Board granted Appli­
cant’s Request for Reconsideration of the Board’s
Order of April 11, 1972; and vacated its Order
of April 11, 1972, which had granted approval
to Applicant to acquire shares of Beaumont Bank.
Notice of the Board’s Order granting Appli­
cant’s Request for Reconsideration of its ap­
plication to acquire American Bank has been given
and the time for filing comments and views has
expired. The Board has reconsidered this applica­
tion and all comments received in the light of the
factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act and the original
and supplemental material received in connection
with these applications.
Statutory considerations. Applicant controls
two banks located in the Houston area with aggre­
gate deposits of $1.2 billion, representing 3.9 per
cent of total commercial bank deposits in the State.
Applicant, the fourth largest banking organization
in Texas and the second largest in the Houston
banking market, controls approximately 16 per
shares o f B eau m o n t State and A m e ric a n B ank w ere filed by
A m erican G e n eral. H o w ev e r, d u rin g the p e rio d of the B o a rd ’s
co n sid eratio n of these ap p lic atio n s, A m erican G en eral effected
a div estitu re of its ow n ersh ip and c o ntrol of the v o ting shares
of T ex as C o m m erce and has c eased to be a bank hold in g
c o m pany un d er the B ank H o lding C o m p a n y A ct. A c co rd in g ly ,
A m erican G e n e ra l’s a p plications ind irectly to acquire shares
of each of said banks have been dism isse d as m o o t by O rd er
of the B oard (1972 Federal R eserve B u l l e t i n 7650).

840

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

cent of total commercial deposits in the Houston
area. In addition, Applicant controls between 20
and 24.9 per cent of the voting shares of each
of five other banks located in the Houston market
and holding aggregate deposits of $168.7 million,
representing approximately 2.8 per cent of com­
mercial bank deposits in the Houston area.1 Upon
acquisition of both American Bank and Beaumont
Bank (respectively $112.5 million and $25.2 mil­
lion of deposits), Applicant’s position in relation
to other Texas banking organizations and holding
companies would remain unchanged and Appli­
cant’s share of deposits in the State would increase
by approximately .5 percentage points. (All bank­
ing data are as of December 31, 1971, and reflect
holding company formations and acquisitions ap­
proved through June 30, 1972.)
American Bank (located in downtown Beau­
mont) and Beaumont Bank (located 2 miles west
of downtown Beaumont) both operate in the
Beaumont banking market and are, respectively,
the second and seventh largest of 18 banking
organizations in that market; and they control
respectively 17.7 and 4.0 per cent of commercial
bank deposits in that market. American Bank,
however, has a relatively large share of deposits
of other banks and large certificates of deposit.
Its market share of total IPC deposits in accounts
under $100,000 is only 13.7 per cent; and the
share of these smaller accounts is a better measure
of the competitive situation in a local market.
Upon consummation of the proposals herein,
Applicant would control deposits of $137.6 mil­
lion, representing 21.7 per cent of total commer­
cial bank deposits in the Beaumont market, and
would control 18.8 per cent of total IPC deposits
in accounts under $100,000.2
The banking office of Applicant closest to either
proposed subsidiary is located approximately 90
miles west of Beaumont in Houston, Texas, and
operates in a separate but adjacent banking market.
It appears that no meaningful competition exists
between any of Applicant’s present subsidiary
banks and American or Beaumont Bank; and, on
the facts of record, in particular, the Texas law
A p p lic a n t has filed ap p licatio n s w ith the B oard to acquire
all of the rem ain in g votin g sh ares o f each of tw o of these
ban k s.
2B eau m o n t B ank w as o rg a n iz e d in 1955 and has been
affiliated w ith A m erican B ank sin ce 1959 as the result of the
p u rch ase o f 37 p er cen t of B eau m o n t B a n k ’s o u tstan d in g voting
shares by a c o rp o ra tio n , all o f the shares o f w h ich are held
in tru st for the benefit o f the sh areh o ld ers o f A m erican B ank.
In ad d itio n , it ap p ears th at in d iv id u als o w n in g 18 per cent
o f the o u tstan d in g v o tin g sh ares o f A m erican B ank d irectly
co n tro l an a d d itio n al 39 p er cen t of the o u tstan d in g voting
shares of B eau m o n t B ank.




prohibiting branch banking and the distances be­
tween the banks involved, consummation of the
applications is unlikely to foreclose significant
potential competition between either of the
proposed subsidiaries and any of Applicant’s
subsidiary or satellite banks.
In its Order of April 11, 1972, denying acquisi­
tion of American Bank, the Board found that the
facts of record indicated that acquisition by Appli­
cant of control of both American Bank and Beau­
mont Bank or of American Bank alone, would
have serious adverse effects on potential competi­
tion in the Beaumont banking market. The Board
found the market attractive for de novo entry and
Applicant a likely entrant into the Beaumont
banking market. Acquisition of Beaumont Bank
alone, and the resulting disaffiliation of that bank
from American Bank was seen as reducing con­
centration in the Beaumont banking market by the
introduction of an additional organization to com­
pete with the larger banking organizations in that
market. American Bank was regarded as strong
enough to compete as a viable independent bank
and capable of becoming a lead bank or substantial
participant in a new or smaller bank holding com­
pany system.
In connection with its Request for Recon­
sideration, Applicant provided information not
previously available to the Board at the time of
its earlier consideration of the subject proposals.
This information indicates the following:
1. Applicant’s original applications failed to
inform the Board that the proposed acquisition
of shares of Beaumont Bank was sought only
in connection with and as an incident to its
acquisition of American Bank. Applicant has
been advised by directors of both Beaumont and
American banks and by trustees holding shares
of Beaumont Bank that they will neither con­
sider nor cooperate with any efforts of Applicant
to acquire Beaumont Bank separate from ac­
quisition of American Bank.
2. American Bank does not provide signifi­
cant competition to the largest banking organi­
zation in the Beaumont market and does not
have the management or financial resources to
become a substantial member of a small bank
holding company system.
3. Subsequent to the Board’s denial of
Applicant’s proposal to acquire American Bank,
three bank holding company organizations have
either reached agreement or have applied to the
Board to acquire the third, fourth, and fifth
largest banks in the Beaumont market.

LAW DEPARTMENT

4.
Applicant has committed itself to divest
its interest in Beaumont Bank (acquired as a
consequence of an acquisition of American
Bank), should the Board disapprove of Appli­
cant’s having control of both banks.
The Board has reviewed the information sub­
mitted by Applicant in connection with its Request
for Reconsideration, together with a review of the
entire record in this matter; and finds that signifi­
cant changes have occurred in the Beaumont
banking market and with respect to American
Bank and that such changes lend weight toward
approval of Applicant’s acquisition of American
Bank provided Applicant is required to divest the
interest in Beaumont Bank that will be acquired
as an incident to acquisition of American Bank.
Applicant’s inability to acquire shares of Beau­
mont Bank (independently from an acquisition of
American Bank) eliminates the prospect of Beau­
mont Bank, through affiliation with Applicant,
becoming an additional competitor to the larger
banking organizations in the Beaumont market. At
the time of the Board’s prior consideration of this
proposal, the management of American Bank was
considered generally satisfactory despite some in­
dications of a lack of managerial resources; and
the prospects for American Bank for operation
independently were viewed as favorable. How­
ever, the most recent examination of American
Bank (the results of which were not available to
the Board at its earlier consideration of that bank’s
condition) indicates considerable executive turn­
over and a further weakening of management
depth. Furthermore, additional analysis of Ameri­
can Bank’s earnings and growth relative to other
banks in its market indicates that American Bank
is presently not in a position to provide vigorous
competition in that market; and that it is unlikely
that the bank could serve as a lead bank or signifi­
cant participant in a new or smaller bank holding
company system.
Events occurring subsequent to the Board’s de­
nial of the proposed acquisition of American Bank
by Applicant have changed dramatically the out­
look with respect to present and potential banking
competition in the Beaumont market. Three addi­
tional banking organizations (two of which are the
third and fifth largest banking organizations in the
State) seek acquisition of the third, fourth and fifth
largest banks in the market and to compete with
the dominant banking organization in that market.
We express no opinion on those pending applica­
tions but view as likely the prospect that some
of the State’s largest banking organizations will




841
enter the Beaumont market. The competitive posi­
tion of American Bank would be further weakened
by the introduction of additional bank holding
company organizations through affiliation with the
significant banks in the market.
The Board continues to view the acquisition by
Applicant of both American and Beaumont banks
as having serious adverse effects on potential
competition in the Beaumont market. Accord­
ingly, acquisition by Applicant of American Bank
is subject to the condition that Applicant divest
its interest in Beaumont Bank (acquired inciden­
tally to acquisition of American Bank) at the
earliest practicable time and, in any event, within
two years from its acquisition of 100 per cent of
the voting shares (less directors’ qualifying shares)
of the successor by merger to American Bank.
On the basis of the record before it, the Board
concludes that consummation of Applicant’s pro­
posal, as herein conditioned, would not result in
a monopoloy or be in furtherance of any combina­
tion, conspiracy, or attempt to monopolize the
business of banking in any area. Moreover, the
competitive effects of the proposal are consistent
with approval of the application and to the extent
competition among Beaumont banking organi­
zations is likely to become more aggressive, lend
some weight toward approval.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant and its subsidiaries
appear satisfactory and prospects of all are favor­
able. Although the financial condition of American
Bank is generally satisfactory, the bank has not
operated as successfully as competing banks in the
market due, in part, to its lack of managerial
strength. Affiliation with Applicant will enable
American Bank to draw upon Applicant’s finan­
cial, managerial, and technical resource strength
and should result in that bank becoming a vigorous
competitor in the Beaumont area. In addition,
Applicant proposes to introduce through American
Bank specialized banking services such as in­
ternational petroleum and chemical banking
operations to accommodate the large corporations
engaged in various aspects of oil and gas opera­
tions in the Beaumont area.
Considerations relating to the convenience and
needs of the relevant area are consistent with and
lend weight to approval of the applications. It is
the Board’s judgment that consummation of the
proposed acquisition of American Bank, upon the
condition that Applicant divest shares acquired in
Beaumont Bank, is in the public interest and that
the applications should be approved.

842

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

ORDERS UNDER SECTIONS 3 & 4 OF
BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.,
AURORA, NEBRASKA
Order A pproving Formation of B ank Hold ­
ing C ompany and Retention of B rady Insur ­
ance A gency
Capital Management, Inc,. Aurora, Nebraska,
has submitted an application for the Board’s ap­
proval under § 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Com­
pany Act (12 U.S.C . 1842(a)(1)) to become a bank
holding company through the acquisition of 80 per
cent of the voting shares of Bank of Brady, Brady,
Nebraska (“ Bank” ).
At the same time, Applicant has submitted its
application for the Board’s approval under §
4(c)(8) of the Act and § 225.4(b)(2) of the Board’s
Regulation Y to engage in certain permissible
insurance agency activities through the retention
of assets of Brady Insurance Agency, Brady, Ne­
braska (“ Agency” ).
Notice of receipt of these applications has been
given in accordance with sections 3 and 4 of the
Act, and the time for filing comments and views
has expired. The Board has considered the ap­
plications and all comments received in light of
the factors set forth in § 3(c) of the Act, and the
considerations specified in § 4(c)(8) of the Act.
Applicant’s sole business activity is operating
Agency. Bank (deposits of $2.1 million) is the
only bank in a community of approximately 300
people. Bank is the smallest of seven banks in
the towns of North Platte, Gothenburg, Arnold,
and Brady, which approximates Bank’s service
area. (All banking data are as of June 30, 1971.)
Since the transaction involves only a change from
individual to corporate ownership, consummation
of the proposal will have no adverse effects on
existing or potential competition.
The Board notes that Applicant’s president ac­
quired 34 shares of Bank for a lower sum than
that paid for his majority shares. The Board has
previously expressed the view that failure to make
an equivalent offer to minority shareholders is
considered as an adverse circumstance (57 F.R.
B ulletin 415, 688). However, Applicant has
agreed to compensate the former owners of these
minority shares so that they will receive a sum
equal to that paid the majority shareholders.
Applicant further agreed to make an equal offer
to all remaining minority shareholders. The
Board’s approval of these applications is subject




to the condition that Applicant fulfill such agree­
ments prior to consummation of the proposed
transaction.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant, Bank and Agency are
consistent with approval. Although Applicant will
incur considerable debt in acquiring Bank, its
income from Bank and Agency will provide suffi­
cient revenue to adequately service the debt.
(Applicant’s projections concerning the earnings
of both Bank and Agency are reasonable and
possibly conservative.) In addition, Applicant’s
acquisition of Bank will assure continued opera­
tion of the only bank in Brady. Accordingly,
considerations relating to the convenience and
needs of the community to be served, with respect
to the acquisition of Bank, lend weight toward
approval. It is the Board’s judgment that con­
summation of the transaction would be in the
public interest and that the application to acquire
Bank should be approved.
Agency is the only general insurance agency in
Brady, a town of approximately 300, and is lo­
cated on the premises of Bank. The operation by
a bank holding company of a general insurance
agency in a community with a population of less
than 5,000 is an activity that the Board has pre­
viously determined to be closely related to banking
(12 CFR 225.4(a)(9)(iii)).
There is no evidence in the record indicating
consummation of the proposal would result in any
undue concentration of resources, unfair competi­
tion, conflicts of interest, unsound banking prac­
tices or other adverse effects on the public interest.
The acquisition would assure continuation of the
only source of general insurance in the town of
Brady. On the basis of the foregoing and other
facts reflected in the record, the Board has deter­
mined that the considerations affecting the com­
petitive factors under section 3(c) of the Act and
the balance of the public interest factors the Board
must consider under section 4(c)(8) in permitting
a holding company to engage in an activity on
the basis that it is closely related to banking both
favor approval of the Applicant’s proposal.
Accordingly, the applications are approved for
the reasons summarized above. The acquisition of
Bank shall not be consummated (a) before the
thirtieth calendar day following the effective date
of this Order, or (b) later than three months after
the effective date of this Order, unless such period
is extended for good cause by the Board or by
the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City pursuant
to delegated authority. The determination as to

843

LAW DEPARTMENT
Agency’s activities is subject to the Board’s au­
thority to require reports by, and make examina­
tions of, holding companies and their subsidiaries
and to require such modification or termination of
the activities of a holding company or any of its
subsidiaries as the Board finds necessary to assure
compliance with the provisions and purposes of
the Act and the Board’s regulations and orders
issued thereunder, or to prevent evasion thereof.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 4, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Robertson, Mitchell, Brimmer, and Sheehan. Absent and not
voting: Governors Daane and Bucher.

[seal]

(Signed) T ynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

CITIZENS INVESTMENT COMPANY,
THORNTON, COLORADO
Order A pproving Formation of B ank Hold­
Company and Performance of Insurance
A gency A ctivities

ing

Citizens Investment Company, Thornton, Colo­
rado, has applied for the Board’s approval under
§ 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12
U.S.C. 1842(a)(1)) of formation of a bank holding
company through acquisition of 49 per cent or
more of the voting shares of North Valley State
Bank, Thornton, Colorado (“ Bank” ).
At the same time Applicant has applied for the
Board’s approval under § 4(c)(8) of the Act and
§ 225.4(b)(2) of the Board’s Regulation Y to
conduct the insurance agency business presently
conducted by the North Investment Company,
Thornton, Colorado (“ Agency” ).
Notice of receipt of the applications has been
given in accordance with sections 3 and 4 of the
Act, and the time for filing comments and views
has expired. The Board has considered the ap­
plications and all comments received in the light
of the factors set forth in section 3(c) of the Act
(12 U .S.C . 1842(c)), and the considerations
specified in section 4(c)(8) of the Act (12 U.S.C.
1843(c)(8)) and finds that:
Applicant is a non-operating corporation formed
for the purpose of acquiring Bank ($8.8 million
deposits) and Agency. Applicant’s acquisition of
Bank arises, in substantial measure, from the ex­
ercise of buy-sell agreements by major share­
holders of Bank and would not have any adverse
effects on eighter existing or potential competition.
The financial and managerial resources and fu­
ture prospects of Applicant, Bank, and the




proposed insurance agency subsidiary are consis­
tent with approval, as are considerations relating
to the convenience and needs of the communities
to be served.
The business of Agency is currently being con­
ducted on Bank’s premises by the North Invest­
ment Company. Applicant proposes to succeed to
the business of selling credit life, health and acci­
dent insurance to Bank’s customers. Selling credit
life, health and accident insurance in connection
with extensions of credit by a bank or a bankrelated firm is an activity that the Board has
previously determined to be closely related to
banking (12 CFR 225.4(a)(9)).
On the basis of the record, the applications to
acquire Bank and Agency are approved. The ac­
quisition of Bank shall not be consummated (a)
before the thirtieth calendar day following the
effective date of this Order, or (b) later than three
months after the effective date of this Order, unless
such period is extended for good cause by the
Board or by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City pursuant to delegated authority.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 18, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Voting against this action:
Governor Robertson. Absent and not voting: Governors
Mitchell and Daane.

[seal]

(Signed) Tynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.

WESTERN BANCSHARES, INC.,
STOCKTON, KANSAS
Order D enying R etention of B ank and Con ­
tinuation of the A ctivities of a G eneral
Insurance A gency
Western Bancshares, Inc., Stockton, Kansas, a
bank holding company within the meaning of the
Bank Holding Company Act, has applied for the
Board’s approval under § 3(a)(1) of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1842(a)(1)) to retain 89.5 per cent of the
voting shares of Rooks County State Bank,
Woodston, Kansas (“ Bank” ).
At the same time, Applicant has applied for the
Board’s approval under § 4(c)(8) of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and § 225.4(b)(2) of the
Board’s Regulation Y to continue to engage in
certain permissible insurance agency activities
through the retention of Woodston Agency,
Woodston, Kansas ( “ Agency” ).
Notice of receipt of these applications was pub­

844

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. □ SEPTEMBER 1972

lished in the Federal Register on February 16,
1972 (37 Federal Register 3474), and the time for
filing comments and views has expired. The Board
has considered the applications and all comments
received in light of the factors set forth in § 3(c)
of the Act, and the considerations specified in §
4(c)(8) of the Act.
Bank ($1.2 million in deposits, as of December
31, 1971) is the only bank in Woodston, a com­
munity of 332 persons in central Kansas. Agency
conducts a general insurance business from the
premises of Bank. Approval of the proposal would
have no effect upon either existing or potential
competition.
On January 8, 1971, Applicant acquired Agency
and a majority of the shares of Bank without the
prior approval of the Board. On June 22, 1971,
the Board, in order to avoid the imposition of
unnecessary hardships, issued an Order which
provided that any company which acquired a bank
between December 31, 1970, and that date, with­
out securing prior Board approval because the
company lacked knowledge of the Bank Holding
Company Act Amendments of 1970, might file
an application to retain the Bank and, thus, cure
its violation of the Act. In this connection, how­
ever, the Board provided that the standards which
were to be applied to such applications to retain
would be the same as those normally applied to
applications for prior approval. Applicant ap­
parently acted without knowledge of the Act and
the application has been considered on that basis.
A principal of Applicant purchased certain of
Bank’s shares in late December 1970 and trans­
ferred them to Applicant on January 8, 1971.
Between then and early March 1971, Applicant
purchased the remainder of its present interest in
Bank. A majority interst in Bank was purchased
for about $522 a share, shares of certain employees
of the Bank were purchased for $400 a share, and
the shares of unrelated minority shareholders were
purchased for $160 a share.
Applicant has stated that the premium paid to
the principal shareholder reflects a payment for the
related insurance agency. Such a premium would
represent a payment for Agency of over 37 times
the net income of Agency for 1971 and the Board
concludes that Applicant has not justified the sub­
stantial disparity in prices paid for the shares. In
its consideration of the public interest aspects of
this application the Board finds, as it previously
has in similar cases, that the failure to make an
equivalent offer to all shareholders of Bank is an
adverse circumstance weighing against approval of




the application. (E.g. 1971 Federal Reserve
B ulletin 415 and 688)
An examination of considerations relating to the
financial and managerial resources and future
prospects of Bank and the convenience and needs
of the communities to be served indicates that
these considerations do not provide sufficient
weight toward approval to outweigh the adverse
circumstance of the disparate offers to share­
holders.
The Board is aware that since the shares have
already been purchased, denial of the application
will not necessarily remedy the treatment of the
minority shareholders. However, this results not
from the Board’s action but from Applicant’s
failure to obtain prior Board approval for its ac­
quisition. Approval of Applicant’s proposal would
represent Board sanction of the inequitable treat­
ment accorded to the minority and the public
interest would not be served by such action.
On the basis of the record, the Board finds that
approval of the § 3 application would not be in
the public interest and it is accordingly denied.1
As provided in the Board’s Order of June 22,
1971, Applicant shall take appropriate action to
forthwith divest the interest unlawfully held.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 31, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Voting against this
action: Governors Mitchell and Daane. Absent and not voting:
Chairman Burns.

[seal]

(Signed) Tynan Smith,
Secretary of the Board.
ORDERS UNDER SECTION 4(c)(8) OF
BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT

NCNB CORPORATION,
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Order A pproving A cquisition of C. D ouglas
W ilson & Co ., Inc .
NCNB Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina,
a bank holding company within the meaning of
the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied for
the Board’s approval, under § 4(c)(8) of the Act
and § 225.4(b)(2) of the Board’s Regulation Y,
to acquire all of the voting shares of C. Douglas
Wilson & Co., Inc., Greenville, South Carolina,
a company that engages in the activity of mortgage
banking. Such activity has been determined by the
d e n i a l of A p p lic a n t’s 3 (a)(1) a p p lication req u ires d enial of
the a ttendant 4(c)(8 ) pro p o sal.

845

LAW DEPARTMENT

Board to be closely related to the business of
banking (12 CFR 225.4(a)(1)).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views on the public interest factors has been duly
published (37 Federal Register 1427). The time
for filing comments and views has expired, and
none has been timely received.
Applicant controls the North Carolina National
Bank (“ Bank” ), the second largest bank in North
Carolina, and nonbanking subsidiaries engaged
principally in installment loan financing, factoring,
mortgage banking, and furnishing investment ad­
vice. Bank’s deposits of $1.5 billion1 represent
18.5 per cent of the total commercial bank deposits
in the State. Through its mortgage banking sub­
sidiary, NCNB Mortgage Corporation, Applicant
offers a complete line of mortgage banking ser­
vices in North Carolina. However, NCNB Mort­
gage Corporation has no offices in South Carolina
and substantially all of its servicing portfolio of
$186.1 million2 represents mortgages originated in
the State of North Carolina.
C. Douglas Wilson & Co., Inc. (“ Wilson” ),
engages in the origination and servicing of all
types of mortgage loans throughout South Caro­
lina. However, it obtains the majority of its busi­
ness in 18 counties in close proximity to its six
offices in that State. Of Wilson’s total mortgage
originations of $29.6 million in 1970, over 75 per
cent were secured by residential property. Wilson
competes for these mortgage originations with a
number of savings and loan associations, other
mortgage banking companies, and commercial
banks in each of the local markets in which it
maintains offices, including both South Carolina
based firms and firms headquartered in other
States. The record indicates that Wilson is a strong
but not a dominant competitor in South Carolina
mortgage markets, and that the demand for mort­
gage funds in the State may be expected to rise
significantly. Between 1967 and 1970, new hous­
ing unit authorizations increased by 40.4 per cent
*Data as o f D e ce m b e r 3 1, 1971.
2D ata as o f Ju n e 3 0 , 1971.
3N ew H o u sin g U n its A u th o rized in So u th C aro lin a and the
U nited S tates, 1967-1970*

1967

S. C.

1969

1968

U.S.

S.C.

in the State, compared to a national increase of
18.4 per cent.3
The proposed acquisition would not result in any
elimination of existing competition between
NCNB Mortgage Corporation and Wilson in the
residential mortgage market on one-four family
homes or in the servicing of mortgages for the
public. While the two institutions might on occa­
sion be approached to make construction loans or
loans on new income producing properties in the
other’s markets, there is no significant existing
competition between them in either of these prod­
uct markets.
Applicant’s capability for de novo entry into
local mortgage markets in South Carolina is lim­
ited partially by its lack of personnel who are
experienced in those markets. Consummation of
the proposed acquisition eliminates the possibility
of future competition between the two firms.
However, because of numerous other mortgage
companies and other financial institutions which
both originate and service mortgages in South
Carolina, the market is sufficiently unconcentrated
to allow approval of the instant proposal without
a substantial lessening of future competition.
South Carolina’s need for an increasing supply
of mortgage funds, including financing of largescale developments, seems clear. The State’s
urban population increased by approximately 25
per cent between the period 1960-1970, and is
expected to maintain this rate during the next
decade. Consummation of the proposed acquisi­
tion would provide Wilson with access to financial
and other resources of Applicant that would enable
Wilson to provide more effectively for these needs,
and at the same time enable it to compete more
effectively for large commercial and construction
loans in the State. The resulting benefits in terms
of public needs and convenience, and increased
competition would, in the Board’s judgment, out­
weigh any possible adverse effect on competition.
In its consideration of the application, the Board
noted that Applicant has substantial short-term
debt, utilized to carry receivables of nonbank
subsidiaries. In addition, long-term debt has been

U.S.

S.C.

per cent
change
1967-1970

1970

U.S.

S.C.

U.S.

S.C.

U.S.

Number of
units (000’s)
15.6
1,168.6
16.2
1,387.8
16.8
1,352.4
21.9
1,384.0
40.4
18.4
Value of units
($ millions)
18.4
15,367
19.6
18,799
21.9
19,045
26.7
19,664
45.1
28.0
♦Based on local building permits issued in 13,000 places. The data exclude hotels, motels, and other group residential structures.
Source: Bureau of the Census, Construction Reports, Series C-40.




846

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

used for purchasing capital notes of Bank and for
other long-term investments; as a consequence, the
resulting debt level is relatively high in relation
to other bank holding companies. Debt of Appli­
cant’s nonbank subsidiaries appears to be reasona­
bly comparable to that of other similar businesses,
and reasonably supportable without dependence
upon the prestige or resources of Bank. The Board
believes it essential that bank holding companies
and their nonbank subsidiaries be soundly financed
so that they will, if anything, be in a position to
add to the strength of their affiliated banks and
in no way dilute or “ trade on” that banking
strength.
In this, as in every application, the Board looks
to the quality of management of the holding com­
pany itself, as well as to its banking and nonbank­
ing subsidiaries. Applicant and its subsidiaries are
considered capably managed and appear able to
operate satisfactorily with the level of the holding
company’s debt.
The Board notes further that the instant proposal
involves an exchange of stock rather than a stock
purchase; that Applicant’s existing debt level will
not be increased materially; that the earnings
record of Wilson has reasonably provided for debt
servicing; and that prospects are good for contin­
ued favorable earnings under Applicant’s control.
The Board concludes that the acquisition of Wilson
will not place additional demands on Applicant’s
earnings or adversely affect Applicant’s financial
condition in any manner. Under these circum­
stances, the Board concludes that financial factors
are consistent with approval.
Based on the foregoing and other considerations
reflected in the record, the Board hereby approves
the application. This determination is subject to
the conditions set forth in section 225.4(c) of
Regulation Y and to the Board’s authority to
require such modification or termination of the
activities of a holding company or any of its
subsidiaries as the Board finds necessary to assure
compliance with the provisions and purposes of
the Act and the Board’s regulations and orders
issued thereunder, or to prevent evasions thereof.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 1, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Sheehan and Bucher. Voting against this action: Governors
Robertson and Brimmer. Absent and not voting: Governors
Mitchell and Daane.

(Signed) T ynan Sm it h ,
[seal]




Secretary of the Board

D issenting S tatement of Governors
Robertson and B rimmer
We would deny this application.
NCNB Corporation, headquartered in Charlotte,
North Carolina, controls financial subsidiaries en­
gaged principally in installment loan financing,
factoring, mortgage banking, and furnishing in
vestment advice, in addition to its $1.5 billion
(deposit size) North Carolina National Bank. Its
mortgage banking subsidiary, NCNB Mortgage
Corporation, ranks as the 116th largest mortgage
company in the nation. Serving the entire State
of North Carolina, this subsidiary originates a
complete line of mortgage loans up to— and occa­
sionally across— the political boundary dividing
North Carolina from South Carolina. Other non­
banking subsidiaries of Applicant have previously
extended their services into South Carolina.
Moreover, Applicant has applied through the Fed­
eral Reserve Bank of Richmond to establish a trust
company in South Carolina. It is a foregone
conclusion that Applicant will, in time, establish
de novo mortgage banking offices in South Caro­
lina, witness the present mortgage offices in South
Carolina established by Applicant’s principal
holding company competitors in North Carolina—
First Union National Bancorporation and the
Wachovia Corporation. Expansion into South
Carolina would appear essential if Applicant is to
compete effectively with these companies on a
regional basis. Hence, there are strong grounds
for presuming that NCNB Corporation will attempt
to enter South Carolina mortgage markets by al­
ternative means if this application is denied.
The foregoing illustrates not only that Applicant
has both the proximity and interest in the South
Carolina mortgage market to rank it as a leading
potential entrant, but that it has the resources
through which it is capable of making a successful
de novo entry. Indeed, it is Applicant’s capabil­
ity— in terms of both financial resources and man­
agement— that would permit it to overcome what­
ever short-term risks were entailed in such entry.
The record in this case does not disclose any other
potential entrant with the strong interest, incen­
tives, and proximity to the South Carolina mort­
gage market which Applicant has, nor is there one
with its capability. We can only conclude that
significant potential competition exists between
Wilson and NCNB Corporation and this competi­
tion would be eliminated by approval of this ap­
plication.
The vehicle through which Applicant has chosen
to enter the South Carolina mortgage market— C.

847

LAW DEPARTMENT

Douglas Wilson & Co., Inc.— is the largest mort­
gage banking firm headquartered in South Carolina
and the 72nd largest mortgage banking firm in the
nation.1 W ilson’s servicing portfolio in 1971
represented 36.6 per cent (by value) of all mort­
gages serviced by South Carolina-based mortgage
companies. The combined mortgage servicing
portfolio of Wilson and Applicant would total
$452.4 million and would rank 44th nationally.
Such a combination would have, in our opinion,
a significantly adverse effect on competition
among mortgage banking firms in South Carolina,
and it would accelerate the trend toward acquisi­
tion of the remaining independents in that State.
Elimination of the potential competition be­
tween Wilson and Applicant would cause no con­
cern were a number of other potential entrants
standing in the wing, ready to enter the South
Carolina mortgage markets. Such remaining po­
tential entrants would have a competitive influence
on the practices of policies of mortgage bankers
in South Carolina. However, while there are a
number of bank holding companies in the country
having Applicant’s capability, none have the same
proximity or interest in entering local mortgage
markets in South Carolina on a de novo basis.
Undoubtedly, this is due to the fact that the greater
the distance separating a de novo entrant from the
market, the greater its start-up costs and costs of
operation. In short, inability to make a successful
de nova entry, i.e ., one that is profitable early in
its operation, deters many from entering at all.
We conclude that such is the case here and that
few but this Applicant can be shown to have the
capability of making a successful de novo entry.
The elimination of the prospective competition
now offered by Applicant thus constitutes the
elimination of significant potential competition
from the most likely source— an adverse effect
which we believe to be seriously detrimental to
the public interest.
The majority concludes that approval of the
proposed acquisition would be in the public inter­
est and that the benefits to the public would out­
weigh the adverse effects caused by the elimination
of potential competition by reason of additional
funds Wilson could bring to the mortgage markets
in South Carolina. We disagree. A mortgage
banker acts only as a conduit through which funds
flow from an institutional investor to the ultimate
borrower. The funds in most cases— and certainly
in the case of Wilson— come from the treasury
xB ased on a m o rtg ag e serv icin g p o rtfo lio of $ 2 6 6 .3 m illio n
as of Ju n e 3 0 , 1971.




of the institutional investor, not the treasury of
the mortgage banker. We are therefore obliged to
paraphrase an earlier view set forth in our dissent
to the Board’s approval of the application of First
Union National Bancorp., Inc., to acquire ReidMcGee & Company,2 where we stated: “ [Appli­
cant’s] stated intent to make mortgage funds
available in the [South Carolina] region is depend­
ent on the ability or desire of its institutional
investors, not the ability or desire of [Applicant].
Under these circumstances, we would require a
clear showing that the institutional investors
themselves intend to inject additional capital into
the [South Carolina] mortgage market.” Such a
showing has not been made in the record before
the Board on this application. Had Applicant been
required to carry the burden of proof of establish­
ing public benefits that outweigh the adverse ef­
fects of the proposal, we believe that Applicant
would have failed to meet that burden. However,
the majority has concluded that public benefits not
only exist, but are sufficient to outweigh the ad­
verse effects. The additional funds the majority
expects to see channeled into the South Carolina
mortgage market are actually non-existent, since
one mortgage banker in that market has simply
been replaced by another. On the other hand, were
Applicant to enter this market de novo, the public
would be doubly enriched: additional funds would
flow into the market from the new entrant, and
a competitive force would be added in the market
to generate greater competition.
O r d e r A p p r o v in g A c q u is it io n o f T r u s t
C o m p a n y o f F l o r id a

NCNB Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina,
a bank holding company within the meaning of
the Bank Holding Company Act, has applied for
the Board’s approval under § 4(c)(8) of the Act
and § 225.4(b)(2) of the Board’s Regulation Y,
to acquire all of the voting shares of Trust Com­
pany of Florida “ (Trust” ), Orlando, Florida, a
company that engages in the activities performed
or carried on by a trust company in the manner
authorized by State law, but not the acceptance
of demand deposits. Such activity has been deter­
mined by the Board to be closely related to the
business of banking or managing or controlling
banks (12 CFR 225.4(a)(4)).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views on the public interest factors, has been duly
*5 8 F ed eral R eserve B u l l e t i n 7 2 , 7 4 .

848

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

published (37 Federal Register 7272). The time
for filing comments and views has expired, and
none have been timely received.
Trust, which administered total trust assets of
approximately $33 million as of December 31,
1971, operates its sole office in Orlando, and
primarily serves Orange and all but the northern
portion of Seminole Counties. With 7.3 per cent
of the total trust assets held by institutions in the
area, Trust is the fourth largest of seven corporate
fiduciaries in that area and does not appear to be
dominant.
North Carolina National Bank ( “ Bank” ), a
subsidiary of Applicant, engages, among other
things, in a fiduciary business. Bank is located in
Charlotte, North Carolina, and does not solicit
trust business in the State of Florida. Bank’s only
trust business originating in Trust’s service area
is as trustee under a bond indenture for which it
receives an annual fee of $250. Bank also does
a nominal amount of trust business with former
residents of North Carolina who, subsequent to
the establishment of fiduciary relationships with
Bank, moved into Trust’s service area. BullockNCNB Company, the only other subsidiary of
Applicant which performs services that are per­
formed by trust companies, provides investment
advisory and management services principally for
pension and profit-sharing plans and tax-exempt
institutional and endowment funds; it derives no
business from Trust’s service area. Nor does Trust
derive any business from the service area of any
subsidiary of Applicant. It therefore does not ap­
pear that any significant existing competition will
be eliminated by consummation of the proposed
acquisition. Nor does it appear that consummation
would have any adverse effect on potential com­
petition in that a recently-enacted Florida statute,
inapplicable to the transaction proposed in this
case, appears to prohibit the acquisition or owner­
ship of Florida trust companies by out-of-State
corporations.
There is no evidence on the record indicating
that consummation of the proposed transaction
would result in any undue concentration of re­
sources, unfair competition, conflicts of interests,
unsound banking paractices, or other adverse ef­
fects on the public interest. On the other hand,
consummation of the proposal would enhance
Trust’s ability to offer a broadened range of fidu­
ciary and trust-related services to the residents of
the Orlando area by providing Trust with invest­
ment research and portfolio management services,
computer services, and marketing materials.




Consequently, Trust would be better able to serve
the public and to compete more effectively with
the three larger trust departments of commercial
bank subsidiaries of Florida holding companies
which together hold approximately 80 per cent of
the total trust assets in the area.
The Board also concludes for reasons evident
from its order of this date approving Applicant’s
acquisition of shares of C. Douglas Wilson & Co.,
Inc., Greenville, South Carolina, that financial
factors are consistent with approval.
Based upon the foregoing and other consid­
erations reflected in the record, the Board has
determined that the balance of the public interest
factors the Board is required to consider under
section 4(c)(8) is favorable. Accordingly, the ap­
plication is hereby approved. This determination
is subject to the conditions set forth in section
225.4(c) of Regulation Y and to the Board’s au­
thority to require such modification or termination
of the activities of a holding company or any of
its subsidiaries as the Board finds necessary to
assure compliance with the provisions and pur­
poses of the Act and the Board’s regulations and
orders issued thereunder, or to prevent evasion
thereof.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 1, 1972.
Voting for this action: Chairman Burns and Governors
Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Voting against this action:
Governor Robertson, who dissents from this order for reasons
enumerated in his Statement dissenting from the Board’s Order
of December 7, 1971, approving the acquisition of Security
Trust Company, Miami, Florida, by Nortrust Corporation,
Chicago, Illinois (58 Federal Reserve B u l l e t in 67 (1972)).
Absent and not voting: Governors Mitchell and Daane.

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.

[s e a l]

MIDWESTERN FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
DENVER, COLORADO
O rder

A p p r o v in g

A c q u is it io n

of

C ra w sh a w

M ortgage and In v estm en t C o .

Midwestern Financial Corporation, Denver,
Colorado, a bank holding company within the
meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act, has
applied for the Board’s approval, under § 4(c)(8)
of the Act and § 225.4(b)(2) of the Board’s Regu­
lation Y, to acquire all of the voting shares of
Crawshaw Mortgage and Investment Co., Encino,
California, a company that engages in the activity
of mortgage banking. Such activity has been de­

LAW DEPARTMENT

termined by the Board to be closely related to the
business of banking (12 CFR 225.4(a)(1)).
Notice of the application, affording opportunity
for interested persons to submit comments and
views on the public interest factors has been duly
published (37 Federal Register 9805). The time
for filing comments and views has expired, and
none has been timely received.
Applicant is a one-bank holding company
through its ownership of The First National Bank
in Golden (deposits of $39.8 million), Golden,
Colorado.1 Applicant’s major activity of mortgage
banking is conducted through three subsidiaries:
Kassler & Co., Kassler-West Mortgage Corpora­
tion and Kassler of California. As of June 30,
1971, Kassler & Co. serviced $701 million of
permanent mortgages and ranked as the 18th larg­
est mortgage banking firm in the nation. Until
March, 1970, when it acquired Kassler of Califor­
nia, Applicant was not active in the California
mortgage banking markets.
Crawshaw Mortgage and Investment Co.
(“ Crawshaw” ) is a small mortgage company2
operating out of one office in Encino, California.
It engages in originating, brokering and servicing
FHA and VA loans on single-family residences
and construction loans on commercial properties.
In its most recent fiscal year, Crawshaw originated
a total of $11.3 million in single family mortgages
(primarily in Ventura County and the San Fer­
nando Valley— including the northern part of Los
Angeles County) and $8.8 million in commercial
mortgages (throughout the Los Angeles area).
During 1971, Crawshaw had 0.17 per cent of the
total mortgage recordings in Los Angeles County,
while Kassler of California had about 0.51 per
cent. In view of the relatively large number of
other mortgage lenders in the Los Angeles area,
elimination of this small amount of local competi­
tion would have no significantly adverse effect on
mortgage lending in the area.
Kassler of California does not presently compete
in the Los Angeles area for commercial mortgage
loans. Therefore, consummation of the proposal
would not eliminate any existing competition in
this product market. Since Applicant could com­
mence commercial mortgage lending on its own,
however, its removal as a potential competitor to
Crawshaw for such loans could have a slightly
adverse effect.
It is anticipated that the proposed acquisition
b a n k i n g d ata as of D e ce m b e r 3 1 , 1971.
2A s o f S ep tem b er 3 0 , 1971, C ra w sh a w ’s serv icin g p o rtfo lio
w as ap p ro x im ately $28 m illio n .




849

would enable Kassler of California to compete
more effectively with the numerous mortgage
departments of large banks and savings and loan
associations in the Los Angeles area. Present and
potential mortgage customers could be served
more conveniently out of Kassler of California’s
established offices in the area. On balance, the
Board concludes that these public benefits out­
weigh any possible adverse effect on competition.
Based upon the foregoing and other consid­
erations reflected in the record, the Board has
determined that the balance of the public interest
factors the Board is required to consider under §
4(c)(8) is favorable. Accordingly, the application
is hereby approved. This determination is subject
to the conditions set forth in § 225.4(a) of Regu­
lation Y and to the Board’s authority to require
such modification or termination of the activities
of a holding company or any of its subsidiaries
as the Board finds necessary to assure compliance
with the provisions and purposes of the Act, and
the Board’s regulations and orders issued
thereunder, or to prevent evasions thereof.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 31, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Daane, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Ab­
sent and not voting: Chairman Burns.

(Signed) T y n a n S m i t h ,
Secretary of the Board.

[s e a l]

ORDER UNDER SECTION 4(d) OF
BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT

BENEFICIAL CORPORATION,
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE
O r d e r A p p r o v in g

E x e m p t io n o f N o n b a n k in g

A c t iv it ie s o f B a n k H o l d in g C o m p a n y

Beneficial Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware,
a bank holding company within the meaning of
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12
U.S.C. 1841), by virtue of ownership of 73.3 per
cent of the voting shares of Peoples Bank and Trust
Company, Wilmington, Delaware (“ Bank” ), has
applied to the Board of Governors, pursuant to
§ 4(d) of the Act, for an exemption from the
prohibitions of § 4 (relating to nonbanking activi­
ties and acquisitions).
Notice of receipt of the application was pub­
lished in the Federal Register on June 14, 1972
(37 Federal Register 11804). Time for filing com-

850

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

ments and views has expired. No request for a
hearing has been received.
Section 4(d) of the Act provides that to the
extent such action would not be substantially at
variance with the purposes of the Act and subject
to such conditions as the Board considers neces­
sary to protect the public interest, the Board may
grant an exemption from the provisions of § 4 of
the Act to certain one-bank holding companies in
order (1) to avoid disrupting business relationships
that have existed over a long period of years
without adversely affecting the banks or commu­
nities involved, or (2) to avoid forced sales of
small locally owned banks to purchasers not simi­
larly representative of *community interests or (3)
to allow retention of banks that are so small in
relation to the holding company’s total interests
and so small in relation to the banking market to
be served as to minimize the likelihood that the
bank’s powers to grant or deny credit may be
influenced by a desire to further the holding com­
pany’s other interests.
The Board has considered the application and
all comments received in the light of the factors
set forth in § 4(d) of the Act and finds that:
Beneficial Corporation is a diversified holding
company that operates the sixth largest consumer
finance company in the country, and owns Speigel,
Inc., Western Auto Supply Company, and over
60 other firms. The record shows that, in the early
1920’s, Beneficial organized Bank (under another
name), but Bank did not open for business until
December 1952. As of December 20, 1971, Ben­
eficial owned 73.3 per cent of Bank’s outstanding
voting shares; and the remaining shares are owned
by present or former directors, officers, or em­
ployees of Beneficial or of its subsidiaries (25.2
per cent), and by individuals residing in the Wil­
mington area. Furthermore, it appears that, as of
February 29, 1972, approximately one-third of
Bank’s demand deposits represent deposits on be­
half of Beneficial or its subsidiaries, or their
directors, officers, or employees; and 17.6 per cent
of Bank’s total loans represent loans to directors,
officers, or employees of Beneficial or its sub­
sidiaries. The record contains nothing to suggest
that permitting Bank’s affiliation with Applicant
to continue indefinitely will adversely affect either
the Bank or the community of Wilmington.
Bank’s total assets ($20.4 million) at year-end
1971 were about 0.7 per cent of the total assets
of Applicant and all of its subsidiaries ($2.8 bil­
lion). Applicant indicates that neither Beneficial
nor any of its subsidiaries has borrowed from




Bank. During 1971, Beneficial had short-term
borrowings of $275.7 million and long-term bor­
rowings of $955 million. In contrast, Bank’s total
of loans outstanding as of February 29, 1972,
amounted to $5.3 million, with a statutorily im­
posed lending limit of $200,000 to any one affili­
ate of Bank and $400,000 in aggregate to all such
affiliates. The record contains nothing to suggest
that Beneficial has misused Bank’s services for the
benefit of Applicant’s other interests and, in view
of the size disparity between Bank and Applicant,
and the small size of Bank in relation to the
surrounding banking market and to the credit needs
of Beneficial, future misuse of Bank by Beneficial
seems unlikely.
Bank ($16.3 million in deposits) operates in the
Wilmington banking market where it is the fifth
largest of eight banks in the market and controls
about 1.2 per cent of total deposits in the market.
(All banking data are as of December 31, 1971,
and reflect bank holding company formations and
acquisitions approved by the Board through July
7, 1972.) Each of the four larger banks in the
market has deposits in excess of $245 million.
There are at least four other subsidiaries of large
consumer finance companies and seven other
commercial banks in the same market. It does not
appear that there would be any adverse competitive
effects from permitting Beneficial to continue its
ownership of Bank.
Based on the foregoing and other considerations
reflected in the record, the Board concludes that
the facts of record do not warrant disrupting a
business relationship that has existed over a long
period of years without adversely affecting the
banks of the community involved; and that Bank
is so small in relation to the total interests of
Beneficial and so small in relation to the banking
market served by Bank as to minimize the likeli­
hood that Bank’s powers to grant or deny credit
may be influenced by a desire to further Benefi­
cial’s other interests. Accordingly, an exemption
pursuant to § 4(d) of the Act is hereby granted;
provided, however, that this determination is sub­
ject to revocation if the facts upon which it is based
change in any material respect.
By order of the Board of Governors, effective
August 29, 1972.
Voting for this action: Vice Chairman Robertson and Gov­
ernors Mitchell, Daane, Brimmer, Sheehan, and Bucher. Ab­
sent and not voting: Chairman Burns.

(Signed) T ynan Sm it h ,
[seal]

Secretary of the Board.

Announcements
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
BRANCH DIRECTORS

E. Stanley Robbins, who had served since
January 1, 1970, as a Board-appointed Director
of the Birmingham Branch of the Federal Re­
serve Bank of Atlanta, resigned effective June
30, 1972.
Wade C. Barton, who had served since January
1, 1972, as a Board-appointed Director of the




Memphis Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis died on July 26, 1972. Mr. Barton
was President of First Citizens National Bank,
Tupelo, Mississippi.
John G. Beam, who had served since January
1, 1969, as a Board-appointed Director of the
Louisville Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis, died on August 29, 1972. Mr. Beam
was President of Thomas Industries Incorporated,
of Louisville.

851

National Summary of Business Conditions
Released for publication September 18

Industrial production, nonfarm employment, and
retail sales advanced in August. The unemploy­
ment rate was about unchanged. The wholesale
price index rose further. Commercial bank credit,
the money stock, and time and savings deposits
increased. Between mid-August and mid-Sep­
tember, yields on Treasury and municipal securi­
ties rose and yields on seasoned corporate securi­
ties remained relatively steady.
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION

Industrial production rose 0.5 per cent further in
August to 114.3 per cent (1967=100), with gains
in output general among final products and mate­
rials. The higher August level of the index re­
flected in part a pickup of production following
the effects of the hurricane in late June. The July
index was revised slightly upwards to 113.7. The
total index in August was 8.2 per cent above a
year earlier.
Auto assemblies, after allowance for the model
changeovers, were at an 8.5 million unit annual
rate in August, the same as in July. Among other
consumer goods, production of some home goods
and consumer nondurable goods also rose. Output
in most business equipment industries increased
and production of defense equipment advanced
further. Gains continued in output of construction
products and steel, and in the textile, paper, and
chemical materials grouping.
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION

EMPLOYMENT

Nonfarm payroll employment rose in August, with
advances in trade, services, State and local gov­
ernments, and manufacturing. The average factory
workweek edged up 0.1 hour to 40.7 hours. The
unemployment rate was essentially unchanged at
5.6 per cent as the labor force increased consid­
erably.

RETAIL SALES

The value of retail sales rose 1.5 per cent in August
and was 9.5 per cent above a year earlier, accord­
ing to the advance report. Sales at durable goods
stores rose sharply from July, reflecting mainly
strong gains in the automotive and the lumberhardware-farm equipment groupings. Sales at
nondurable goods stores were also higher.
WHOLESALE AND CONSUMER PRICES

The wholesale price index, seasonally adjusted,
rose 0.6 per cent between July and August, as
prices of farm and food products increased 1.4
per cent. The index of industrial commodities
increased 0.4 per cent with important advances
being posted for fuels, hides and skins, lumber
and plywood, and motor vehicles and equipment.
The consumer price index rose 0.4 per cent in
July, seasonally adjusted. Food prices were up 0.6
per cent, boosted by substantial advances for
meats. Prices of other commodities and of services
both increased 0.3 per cent.
BANK CREDIT, DEPOSITS, AND RESERVES

F .R . in d ex es, seaso n ally ad ju sted . L atest figures: A ugust.

852




Commercial bank credit, adjusted for transfers of
loans between banks and their affiliates, increased
rapidly in August— at an annual rate of about 18
per cent. Loan growth was very strong reflecting
continued heavy borrowing in most major cate­
gories— business, real estate, consumer, and non­
bank financial institutions. Holdings of municipal
and Federal agency issues rose somewhat follow­
ing little net change over the previous 2 months,
but holdings of U.S. Treasury securities declined

853

further, probably associated with a smaller-thanusual volume of Treasury financing.
The narrowly defined money stock increased at
an annual rate of 6 per cent, much less rapidly
than in July. U.S. Government deposits declined.
Growth in time and savings deposits other than
large negotiable CD’s was at a faster pace than
in July, but less rapid than earlier in the year.
Sales of large negotiable CD’s accelerated some­
what further.
Net borrowed reserves of member banks
averaged about $180 million over the 5 weeks
ending August 30 compared with $25 million in
July. Member bank borrowings increased substan­
tially further to an average level of about $370
million while excess reserves remained close to
$190 million.

SECURITY MARKETS

Treasury bill rates rose by about 60 to 80 basis
points between mid-August and mid-September.
The 3-month bill was bid at around 4.70 per cent
in the middle of September, up from 3.90 per cent
a month earlier. Yields on U .S. Government notes
and bonds advanced by some 10 to 35 basis points
over the same period.
Yields on new corporate securities fluctuated
narrowly from mid-August to mid-September, ris­
ing slightly on balance. Seasoned corporate secu­
rity yields remained relatively steady. Municipal
security rates rose steadily but leveled off in midSeptember.
Common stock prices increased moderately on
average to light volume.
IN T ER ES T R A TES

P R IC E S
1967=100
130

Wholesale

Consumer

1967=100
130

LONG-TERM
GOVERNMENT
SECURITIES

B ureau o f L ab o r S tatistics. “ F arm p ro d u c ts and fo o d s ” is B LS
“ F arm p ro d u c ts, an d p ro c e sse d fo o d s and fe e d s .” L atest
figures: C o n su m e r, Ju ly ; W h o le sa le , A ug.




D isco u n t rate, range o r level for all F .R . B anks. W ee k ly
average m arket y ields fo r U .S . G o v t, b o nds m a tu rin g in 10
years or m ore and fo r 9 0 -d a y T rea su ry b ills. L atest figures:
w eek ending Sept. 2.

A 1

Financial and Business Statistics

CONTENTS
A 3

GUIDE TO TABULAR PRESENTATION

A 3

STATISTICAL RELEASES: REFERENCE
U.S. STATISTICS:

A 4
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A

8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16

Member bank reserves, Federal Reserve Bank credit,
and related items
Federal funds— Major reserve city banks
Reserve Bank interest rates
Reserve and margin requirements
Maximum interest rates; bank deposits
Federal Reserve Banks
Open market account
Reserve Banks; bank debits
U.S. currency

A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A

17
18
19
20
26
31
32
33
33
34
37
38
39

Money stock
Bank reserves; bank credit
Banks and the monetary system
Commercial banks, by classes
Weekly reporting banks
Business loans of banks
Demand deposit ownership
Loan sales by banks
Open market paper
Interest rates
Security markets
Stock market credit
Savings institutions

A
A
A
A
A
A
A

41
42
44
47
50
51
56

Federally sponsored credit agencies
Federal finance
U.S. Government securities
Security issues
Business finance
Real estate credit
Consumer credit




Continued on next page

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

U.S. STATISTICS— Continued

A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A




60
64
64
66
68
68
70
72

Industrial production
Business activity
Construction
Labor force, employment, and earnings
Consumer prices
Wholesale prices
National product and income
Flow of funds

INTERNATIONAL STATISTICS:
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A

74
75
76
77
78
93
94
95
96
97

A 106

U.S. balance of payments
Foreign trade
U.S. gold transactions
U.S. reserve assets; position in the IMF
International capital transactions of the United States
Foreign exchange rates
Money rates in foreign countries
Arbitrage on Treasury bills
Gold reserves of central banks and governments
Gold production

INDEX TO STATISTICAL TABLES

A 3

Guide to Tabular Presentation
SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
e
Estimated
c
Corrected
p
Preliminary
r
Revised
rp
Revised preliminary
I, II,
III, IV Quarters
n.e.c.
Not elsewhere classified
A.R.
Annual rate
S.A .
Monthly (or quarterly) figures adjusted for
seasonal variation

N .S .A .
IPC
SMSA
A
L
S
U
*

Monthly (or quarterly) figures not adjusted
for seasonal variation
Individuals, partnerships, and corporations
Standard metropolitan statistical area
Assets
Liabilities
Sources of funds
Uses of funds
Amounts insignificant in terms of the par­
ticular unit (e.g ., less than 500,000 when
the unit is millions)
(1) Zero, (2) no figure to be expected, or
(3) figure delayed

GENERAL INFORMATION
Minus signs are used to indicate (1) a decrease, (2) a
negative figure, or (3) an outflow.
A heavy vertical rule is used in the following in­
stances: (1) to the right (to the left) of a total when the
components shown to the right (left) of it add to that
total (totals separated by ordinary rules include more
components than those shown), (2) to the right (to the
left) of items that are not part of a balance sheet, (3) to the
left of memorandum items.
“ U .S. Govt, securities” may include guaranteed
issues of U .S. Govt, agencies (the flow of funds figures

also include not fully guaranteed issues) as well as direct
obligations of the Treasury. “ State and local govt.” also
includes municipalities, special districts, and other politi­
cal subdivisions.
In some of the tables details do not add to totals because
of rounding.
The footnotes labeled N o t e (which always appear
last) provide (1) the source or sources of data that do
not originate in the System; (2) notice when figures are
estimates; and (3) information on other characteristics
of the data.

TABLES PUBLISHED QUARTERLY, SEMIANNUALLY, OR ANNUALLY,
WITH LATEST BULLETIN REFERENCE
Quarterly
Flow of funds .

Issue
June 1972

Page

Annually— Continued

A-72— A-73.9

Semiannually
Banking offices:
Analysis of changes in number ...
On, and not on, Federal Reserve
Par List, n u m b er.........................

Banks and branches, number,
by class and S ta te ..................

Issue

Apr. 1972

Page

A-98— A-99

Flow of funds:

Aug. 1972

A-98

Aug. 1972

A-99

Assets and liabilities:
1960-71 ..................

June 1972 A-73.10— A-73.21

Flows:
1965-71 data (revised) .

June 1972

A -73.1— A-73.9

Annually
Bank holding companies:
List of, Dec. 31, 1971....................... June 1972
Banking offices and deposits of
group banks, Dec. 31, 1971......... Aug. 1972

A-98
A-101

Banking and monetary statistics:
1971 .........................................

Mar. 1972
July 1972

A-98— A -110
A-98— A-101

Income and expenses:
Federal Reserve B anks.................... ... Feb.
Insured commercial banks................ ... May
Member banks:
Calendar y e a r................................ ... May
Income ratios................................. ... May
Operating ratios............................. ... July

1972
1972

A-96— A-97
A-98— A-99

1972
1972
1972

A-98— A -107
A -108— A -113
A -102— A -107

Stock market cre d it..................................Feb. 1972

A -102—A -103

Statistical Releases
LIST PUBLISHED SEMIANNUALLY, WITH LATEST BULLETIN REFERENCE
Issue
Anticipated schedule of release dates for individual releases............................................................................................................................ June 1972




Page
A -115

A 4

BANK RESERVES AND RELATED ITEMS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
MEMBER BANK RESERVES, FEDERAL RESERVE BANK CREDIT, AND RELATED ITEMS
(In millions of dollars)
Factors supplying reserve funds
Reserve Bank credit outstanding
Period o r date

U.S. Govt, securities 1

Total

Bought
o u t­
right

Held
under
repur­
chase
agree­
ment

G old
stock

O ther
F.R .
assets 3

Loans

Special
D rawing
Rights
certificate
account

T reas­
ury
c u r­
rency
o u t­
stan d ­
ing

Averages of daily figures
5
381
142

83
170
652
1,117

2,612
2,404
24,744
21,606

17,518
22,759
20,047
22,879

2,956
3,239
4,322
4,629

78
113
81
75
205
378

94
490
238
765
,086
321

1,665
2,349
2.030
3,251
3,235
3,570

2,204
1,032

29,060
43,853
51,268
56,610
64,100
66,708

17,954
13,799
12,436
10.367
10.367
11,105

400

5,396
5,565
6,777
6,810
6,841
7,145

181
312

804
501
360
407
107

2,572
2,974
3,122
3,129
3,905

991
900
1,105
1,013
982

70,749
71,568
72,349
72,694
74,255

10,184
10.132
10.132
10.132
10.132

400
400
400
400
400

7,460
7,523
7,545
7,573
7,611

20

1,177
957
780
990
934
933

439

3,405
2,959
2,948
3.031
3,140
3,370
3,548
3,347

75,415
73,994
73,181
75,171
75,705
76,108
77,035
76,679

10.132
9,851
9.588
9.588
10,224
10.410
10.410
10.410

400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400

7,656
7,795
7,859
7,922
7,991
8,043
8,080
8,137

58
94
59
129

3,297
2,950
3,704
3,497

878
896
941

75,962
75,747
76,101
76,367

10.410
10.410
10.410
10.410

400
400
400
400

8,023
8,032
8.055
8,057

1,061
1,115
1,156

76,939
76,923
77,663
76,991

10.410
10.410
10.410
10.410

400
400
400
400

8.056
8,077
8,082
8,089

1939—D ec.............................
1941—D ec.............................
1945—D ec.............................
1950—D ec.............................

2,510
2,219
23,708
20,345

2,510
2,219
23,708
20,336

I960—D ec.............................
1965—D ec.............................
1967—D e c
1968—D ec .
1969—D e c
1970—D e c

27,248
40,885
48,891
52,529
57,500
61,688

27,170
40,772
48,810
52,454
57,295
61,310

1971—Au g
Sept.............................
Oct..............................
N ov.............................
D ec..............................

66,324
67,106
67,690
68,052
69,158

66,143
66,794
67,488
67,655

1972—Ja................................. n
Feb..............................
M ar.............................
A pr..............................
M ay ............................
Ju n e ............................
July.............................
Aug.*1.........................

70,687
69,966
69,273
70,939
71,428
71,632
72,089
71,858

70,300
69,862
69,133
70,770
71,391
71,624
71,972
71,732

387
104
140
169
37

68,868

202
397
290

8

117
126

33
99
109
119
94

202

1,111
957

Week ending—
1972—June

7.....................
14.....................
21.....................
28.....................

71,643
71,728
71,325
71,658

71,620
71,728
71,325
71,648

23

July

5 .....................
12.....................
19.....................
26.....................

72,487
71,785
72,353
71,909

72,431
71,688
71,988
71,909

56
97
365

312
227
173
172

3,053
3,767
3,896
3,689

Aug.

2 .....................
9 .....................
16.....................
23 ^ ...................
30* .............

71,990
72,102
72,045
71,731
71,448

71,890
71,967
71,922
71,731
71,356

100

3,195
3.300
3.301
3,737
3,227

1,212
1,265
1,112

92

363
287
382
350
477

670
729

76,832
77,037
76,922
76,557
75,957

10.410
10.410
10.410
10.410
10.410

400
400
400
400
400

8,096
8,116
8,135
8,151
8,153

72,462
71,901
71,890

6 72,462
6 71,901
71,104

786

130
83
1,091

3,299
2,224
3,368

990
1,268
774

76,954
75,539
77,219

10.410
10.410
10.410

400
400
400

8,066
8,095
8,157

7 .....................
14.....................
21.....................
28.....................

71,888
71,728
71,298
72,094

6 71,728
6 71,728
6 71,298
6 72,022

160

135

72

3,125
3,440
3,950
3,488

893
940

181
474

1,012
1,042

76,171
76,247
76,507
77,246

10.410
10.410
10.410
10.410

400
400
400
400

8,028
8,037
8.057
8.057

5 .....................
12.....................
19.....................
26.....................

72,969
69,515
72,443
71,959

6 72,582
6,769,515
6 72,039
6 71,959

387

513

404

82
637

3,072
3,909
4,049
3,569

1,062
1,107
1,155
1,168

77,731
74,683
77,839
77,397

10.410
10.410
10.410
10.410

400
400
400
400

8,056
8,081
8,087
8,093

2 p ...................
9 v ..................
16p...................
23 p ...................
30? ............

72,544
72,565
72,709
70,964
72,033

6 71,864
6 71,953
6 72,031
6,7 70,964
6 71,389

680
612
678

1,271
842
535
878
1,330

3,406
3,135
3,628
3,395
3,053

1,233
1,320
676
727
766

78,572
78,024
77,693
76,031
77,307

10.410
10.410
10.410
10.410
10.410

400
400
400
400
400

8,101

10

135
123

1,002
1,010

End of month
1972—Ju n e ............................
July.............................
A ug.?.........................
W ednesday
1972—June

July

Aug.

For notes see opposite page.




644

66
86

8,132
8,146
8,152
8,157

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ BANK RESERVES AND RELATED ITEMS

A 5

MEMBER BANK RESERVES, FEDERAL RESERVE BANK CREDIT, AND RELATED ITEMS— C ontinued
(In millions of dollars)
Factors absorbing reserve funds
Deposits, other
than member bank
reserves,
with F.R. Banks

Cur­
rency
in
cir­
cula­
tion

Treas­
ury
cash
hold­
ings

7,609
10,985
28,452
27,806

2,402
2,189
2,269
1,290

616
592
625
615

33,019
42,206
47.000
50,609
53,591
57,013

408
808
1,428
756
656
427

58,906
59,012
59,185
59,939
61,060

Treas­
ury

For­
eign

Other
F.R.
ac­
counts3

Other2

Other
F.R.
lia­
bilities
and
capital3

Member bank
reserves

With
F.R.
Banks

Cur­
rency
and
coin*

Period or date

Total

Averages of daily figures
72\9
1,531
1,247
920

353

522
683
902
360
1,194
849

250
154
150
225
146
145

495
231
451
458
458
735

477
466
464
470
453

1,121
1,621
2,100
1,723
1,926

181
151
152
133
290

60,201
59,681
60,137
60,717
61,182
61,874
62,669
62,726

487
436
388
405
573
356
342
319

2,821
2,421
933
1,688
2,170
2,673
2,398
2,025

61,632
61,944
61,958
61,871

361
354
355
354

62,384
63,005
62,829
62,530

248
292
493
739

11,473
12,812
16,027
17,391

1,029
389
-2 0 4
-1 ,1 0 5

2,192
2,265

16,688
18,747
20,753
22,484
23,071
23,925

712
712
736
714
728

2,298
2,296
2,327
2,320
2,287

181
172
170
200
185
153
209
171

750
683
597
615
574
598
617
604

2,559
2,602
2,435
3,173

134
138
150
154

362
352
330
335

2,166
2,427
2,388
2,533

62,448
62,681
62,921
62,785
62,544

336
330
313
315
316

62,201
62,435
62,752

11,473
12,812
16,027
17,391

. 1939—Dec.
.1941—Dec.
. 1945—Dec.
. 1950—Dec.

2,595
3,972
4,507
4,737
4,960
5,340

19,283
22,719
25,260
27,221
28,031
29,265

. 1960—Dec.
. 1965—Dec.
. 1967—Dec.
.1968—Dec.
.1969—Dec.
.1970—Dec.

25,098
25,365
25,463
25,500
25,653

5,357
5,437
5,397
5,453
5,676

30,455
30,802
30,860
30,953
31,329

.1971—Aug.
............Sept.
.............. Oct.

2,208
2,273
2,247
2,313
2,289
2,304
2,329
2,324

26,955
26,374
26,555
27,144
27,347
27,002
27,361
27,457

5,910
5,548
5,366
5,421
5,465
5,537
5,660
5,698

32,865
31,922
31,921
32,565
32,812
32,539
33,021
33,155

.1972—Jan.
...........Feb.
..........Mar.
.......... Apr.
.......... May
............ June
............July
..........Aug.*

611
588
575
571

2,415
2,203
2,253
2,330

27,083
26,760
27,240
26,780

5.594
5,657
5,356
5,521

32,677
32,417
32,596
32,301

.1972—June 7
....................... 14

252
176
199
271

722
599
621
584

2,372
2,364
2,264
2,303

27,548
26,889
27,926
27,334

5.595
5,858
5,369
5,706

33,143
32,747
33,295
33,040

2,464
2,531
2,132
1,780
1,609

150
159
167
177
183

611
633
611
581
584

2,377
2,379
2,235
2,289
2,351

27,352
27,251
27,489
27,590
27,333

5,787
5,882
5,837
5,325
5,709

33,139
33,133
33,326
32,915
33,042

351
337
305

2,344
2,298
1,727

257
160
192

836
620
592

2,359
2,406
2,420

27,482
26,185
28,198

5,594
5,789
5,798

33,076
31,974
33,996

61,936
62,123
62,014
62,161

360
357
368
357

2,356
2,121
2,954
2,923

145
126
186
194

615
533
554
585

2,442
2,223
2,290
2,365

27,155
27.611
27,008
27,528

5.593
5,655
5,357
5,524

32,748
33,266
32,365
33,052

62,926
63,125
62,795
62,582

367
339
337
349

1,795
2,816
2,426
2,490

189
172
236
156

575
561
615
601

2,414
2,216
2,294
2,328

28,331
24,345
28,033
27,794

5.594
859
368
708

33,925
30,204
33,401
33,502

62,642
63,020
63,018
62,766
62,769

345
325
319
325
316

2,137
2,473
1,792
1,919
1,406

168
156
171
187
168

690
562
658
573
602

2,420
2,205
2,266
2,315
2,402

29,080
28,224
28,426
26,908
28.611

787
882
837
325
5,709

34,867
34,106
34,263
32,233
34,320

.............Nov.

............Dec.

Week ending—

.................21

....................... 28
.July

5

........12

..........19
.......... 26

. Aug. 2
.......... 9
..........16

....... 23*

..........30*
End of month

•June
. .July
.Aug.*
Wednesday

1 Includes Federal agency issues held under repurchase agreements as
of Dec. 1, 1966 and Federal agency issues bought outright as of Sept. 29,
1971.
2 Beginning with 1960 reflects a minor change in concept; see Feb.
1961 B u l l e t i n , p. 164.
8 Beginning Apr. 16, 1969, “Other F.R. assets” and “Other F.R.
liabilities and capital” are shown separately; formerly, they were
netted together and reported as “Other F.R. accounts.’*
4 Includes industrial loans and acceptances until Aug. 21, 1959, when
industrial loan program was discontinued. For holdings of acceptances




.1972—June 7
..................... 14

................ 21

..................... 28
.July

5

........12
..........19
..........26

. Aug. 2*
..........9p

....... 16*

..........23*
..........30*

on Wed. and end-of-month dates, see tables on F.R. Banks on following
pages. See also note 2.
5 Part allowed as reserves Dec. 1, 1959—Nov. 23, 1960; all allowed
thereafter. Beginning with Jan. 1963, figures are estimated except for
weekly averages. Beginning Sept. 12, 1968, amount is based on closeof-business figures for reserve period 2 weeks previous to report date.
6 Includes securities loaned—fully secured by U.S. Govt, securities
pledged with F.R. Banks.
7 Reflects securities sold, and scheduled to be bought back, under
matched sale/purchase transactions.

A 6

BANK RESERVES AND RELATED ITEMS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
RESERVES AND BORROWINGS OF MEMBER BANKS
(In millions of dollars)
Reserve city banks
All member banks
New Y ork City
Period

Reserves
T otal
held

R e­
q u ire d 1 Excess

Bor­
row­
ings
at
F.R.
Banks

Reserves
Free
T otal
Re­
held quired 1 Excess

City o f Chicago

Bor­
row ­
ings
at
F.R .
Banks

Reserves
Free
re­
serves

Total
held

R e­
quired 1 Excess

B or­
row ­
ings
at
F.R .
Banks

Free
re­
serves

5,011
3,390
1,491
1,027

3
5
334
142

5,008
3,385
1,157
885

5,623
5,142
4,118
4,742

3,012
4,153
4,070
4,616

2,611
989
48
125

192
58

2,611
989
-1 4 4
67

1,141
1,143
939
1,199

601
848
924
1,191

540
295
14
8

5

540
295
14
3

18,527
22,267
24,915
26,766
27,774
28,993

756
452
345
455
257
272

87
454
238
765
1,086
321

669
107
-3 1 0
-8 2 9
-4 9

3,687
4,301
5,052
5,157
5,441
5,623

3,658
4,260
5,034
5,057
5,385
5,589

29
41
18
100
56
34

19
111
40
230
259
25

10
-7 0
-2 2
-1 3 0
-2 0 3
9

958
1,143
1,225
1,199
1,285
1,329

953
1,128
1,217
1,184
1,267
1,322

4
15
8
15
18
7

8
23
13
85
27
4

-4
-8
—5
-7 0
-9
3

30,455
30,802
30,860
30,953
31,329

30,257
30,596
30,653
30,690
31,164

198
206
207
263
165

804
501
360
407
107

-6 0 6
-2 9 5
-1 5 3
-1 4 4
58

5,693
5,683
5,678
5,644
5,774

5,640
5,674
5,667
5,608
5,749

53
9
11
36
25

164
38
67
107
35

-1 1 1
-2 9
-5 6
-7 1
c- 1 0

1,417
1,417
1.425
1,408
1.426

1,410
1,423
1,408
1,400
1,425

7
-6
17
8
1

7
4
15
22
8

-1 0
2
-1 4
-7

32,865
31,922
31,921
32,565
32,812
32,539
33,021
33,155

32,692
31,798
31,688
32,429
32,708
32,335
32,874
32,894

173
124
233
136
104
204
147
261

33
99
109
119
94

20

153
91
134
27
-1 5

6,066
5,775
5,815
5,938
6,045
5,956
6,129
5,988

6,058
5,807
5,758
5,940
6,031
5,922
6,097
5,994

8
-3 2
57
-2
14
34
32
-6

5
71
48
50
6
15
117

8
-3 7
-1 4
-5 0
-3 6
28
17
-1 2 3

1,503
1,446
1,434
1,482
1,514
1,488
1.510
1.511

1,512
1,442
1,443
1,476
1,505
1,489
1,502
1,500

-9
4
-9
6
9
-1
8
11

4
5
12

-9
4
-1 3
1
-3
—1
2
1

18. . .
25. . .

30,894
30,330
30,605
30,111

30,460
30,303
30,381
30,020

434
27
224
91

764
593
1,179
771

5,781
5,625
5,816
5,456

5,677
5,699
5,748
5,522

104
-7 4
68
-6 6

342
267

61
-7 4
-2 7 4
-3 3 3

1,447
1,419
1,416
1,387

1,434
1,431
1,412
1,383

13
-1 2
4
4

1972—Feb.

2...
9...
16. . .
23...

32,435
31,892
32,257
31,823

32,190
31,842
31,946
31,693

245
50
311
130

16
42
18
14

5,936
5,733
6,078
5,686

5,880
5,825
5,895
5,789

56
-9 2
183
-1 0 3

56
-1 1 4
183
-1 0 3

1,460
1,439
1,450
1,453

1,451
1,445
1,466
1,427

9
-6
-1 6
26

9
-6
-1 6
26

Mar.

1...
8. . .
15 . . .
22. . .
29...

31,614
31,465
32,108
31,558
32,219

31,532
31,289
31,715
31,691
31,934

82
176
393
-133
285

67
103
13
115
153

5,643
5,649
5,982
5,605
5,911

5,679
5,658
5,796
5,725
5,820

-3 6
-9
186
-1 2 0
91

95
94

-3 6
-1 0 8
186
-2 1 5
-3

1,411
1,435
1,473
1,421
1,442

1,425
1,419
1,479
1,433
1,436

-1 4
16
-6
-1 2
6

4
14

-1 4
16
-6
-1 6
-8

5...
12. . .
19...
26...

32,604
32,345
32,565
32,666

32,230
32,179
32,624
32,448

374
166
-5 9
218

141
14
43
279

:
:

5,991
5,963
5,947
5,913

5,933
5,953
6,055
5,824

58
10
-1 0 8
89

23
124

-2 8
10
-1 3 1
-3 5

1,521
1,446
1,498
1,441

1,472
1,482
1,489
1,456

49
-3 6
9
-1 5

23

49
-3 6
9
-3 8

3...
10. . .
17...
24...
31. . .

32,840
32,757
33,157
32,646
32,814

32,704
32,566
32,963
32,560
32,726

136
191
194

117
87
39
63
254

>
t
;
t
I

5,862
6,019
6,223
6,007
5,975

5,927
5,978
6,218
5,994
6,001

-6 5
41
5
13
-2 6

60
49
21
39
51

-1 2 5
-8
-1 6
-2 6
-7 7

1,513
1,486
1,566
1,443
1,520

1,480
1,506
1,535
1,491
1,496

33
-2 0
31
-4 8
24

54

33
-2 0
31
-4 8
-3 0

7...
14. . .
21.. .
28...

32,677
32,417
32,596
32,301

32,346
32,308
32,384
32,177

331
109

212
124

58
94
59
129

I
i
t
i

6,020
5,889
6,047
5,793

5,931
5,920
5,975
5,809

89
-3 1
72
-1 6

18
6

89
-3 1
54
-2 2

1,490
1,506
1,492
1,480

1,491
1,491
1,497
1,476

-1
15
-5
4

-1
15
-5
4

July

5...
12. . .
19. . .
26...

33,143
32,747
33,295
33,040

32,815
32,524
33,148
32,961

328
223
147
79

312
227
173
172

;
I
5
1

6 ,n i
6,014
6,184
6,123

6,097
5,991
6,209
6,124

74
23
-2 5
-1

42
26

32
23
-2 5
-2 7

1,532
1,484
1,519
1,501

1,507
1,485
1,530
1,489

25
-1
-1 1
12

25
-1
-1 1
-1 4

Aug.

2...
9...
16. ..
23*\.
30*>..

33,139
33,133
33,326
32,915
33,042

32,897
33,003
33,072
32,784
32,762

242
130
254
131
280

363
287
382
350
477

I
1
I
>
1

6,052
6,037
6,138
5,889
5,981

6,051
6,038
6,102
5,935
5,900

1
-1
36
-4 6
81

144
39
76
79
85

-1 4 3
-4 0
-4 0
-1 2 5
-4

1,485
1,533
1,503
1,496
1,482

1,498
1,518
1,516
1,486
1,482

-1 3
15
-1 3
10

1939—D ec.............
1941—D ec.............
1945—D ec.............
1950—D ec.............

11,473 6,462
12,812 9,422
16,027 14,536
17,391 16,364

I960—D ec.............
1965—D ec.............
1967— De c
1968—D e c
1969—D e c
1970—D e c

19,283
22,719
25,260
27,221
28,031
29,265

1971—Au g
Sept............
Oct..............
N ov............
D ec.............
1972—Ja................ n
Feb.............
Mar............
Apr.............
M ay...........
June...........
July............
Aug.®.........

202
439

-2

110

-5 5
-1 7 8

6
10

Week ending—
1971—Aug.

Apr.

May

June

4...

11. . .

For notes see opposite page.




86

'
i

15
•

-6 1

43

22

99

86

31

26
11
35

13
-1 2
-2 7
4

-2 4
-2 0
-1 3
10

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ BANK RESERVES AND RELATED ITEMS

A 7

RESERVES AND BORROWINGS OF MEMBER BANKS— C ontinued
(In millions o f dollars)
Country banks

O ther reserve city banks

Reserves

Reserves
Borrow­
ings at
F.R.
Banks

Free
eserves

Borrow­
ings at
F.R.
Banks

Period
Free
reserves

Total
held

R equired1

Excess

1,188
1,302
322
182

1,568
2,210
4,576
4,761

897
1,406
3,566
4,099

671
804
1,011
663

3
4
46
29

668
800
965
634

80
-1 6 1
-5 5
-1 8 0
-4 7 3
-2 2 2

6,689
8,219
8,901
9,875
10,335
10,765

6,066
7,889
8,634
9,625
10,158
10,576

623
330
267
250
177
189

40
92
80
180
321
28

583
238
187
70
-1 4 4
161

425
318
163
177
22

-4 3 7
-2 8 0
-1 4 4
-1 1 2
-5 7

11,474
11,587
11,688
11,795
11,931

11,324
11,422
11,528
11,641
11,757

150
165
160
154
174

208
141
115
101
42

-5 8
24
45
53
132

13
5
26
16
-2 4
7
-4 1
99

12
9
22
31
40
64
134

13
-7
17
-6
-5 5
-3 3
-1 0 5
-3 5

12,342
12,123
12,113
12,325
12,379
12,349
12,533
12,649

12,181
11,976
11,954
12,209
12,274
12,185
12,385
12,492

161
147
159
116
105
164
148
157

20
16
15
34
26
48
117
178

141
131
144
82
79
116
31
-2 1

11,973
11,898
11,901
11,788

121
-4 2
-1 8
10

429
375
545
372

-3 0 8
-4 1 7
-5 6 3
-3 6 2

11,572
11,430
11,490
11,470

11,376
11,275
11,320
11,327

196
155
170
143

292
218
261
132

-9 6
-6 3
-9 1
11

...............................................11
...............................................18
...............................................25

12,686
12,577
12,602
12,583

12,688
12,567
12,636
12,537

-2
10
-3 4
46

1

-2
10
-3 5
46

12,353
12,143
12,127
12,101

12,171
12,005
11,949
11,940

182
138
178
161

16
20
17
14

166
118
161
147

....................... 1972— Feb. 2
............................................... 9
............................................... 16
............................................... 23

12,464
12,396
12,605
12,465
12,651

12,492
12,384
12,554
12,539
12,609

-2 8
12
51
-7 4
42

2
8
21

-8 5
12
49
-8 2
21

12,096
11,985
12,048
12,067
12,215

11,936
11,828
11,886
11,994
12,069

160
157
162
73
146

10
4
11
8
24

150
153
151
65
122

12,804
12,740
12,816
12,865

12,718
12,705
12,903
12,827

86
35
-8 7
38

8
86

86
35
-9 5
-4 8

12,288
12,196
12,304
12,447

12,107
12,039
12,177
12,341

181
157
127
106

55
14
12
46

126
143
115
60

12,894
12,815
12,966
12,884
12,920

12,866
12,804
12,983
12,850
12,966

28
11
-1 7
34
-4 6

2
19
4
8
106

26
-8
-2 1
26
-1 5 2

12,571
12,437
12,402
12,312
12,399

12,431
12,278
12,227
12,225
12,263

140
159
175
87
136

55
19
14
16
43

85
140
161
71
93

12,867
12,772
12,712
12,642

12,791
12,792
12,706
12,639

76
-2 0
6
3

20
44
12
67

56
-6 4
-6
-6 4

12,300
12,250
12,345
12,386

12,133
12,105
12,206
12,253

167
145
139
133

38
50
29
56

129
95
110
77

...............................................14
...............................................21
...............................................28

12,924
12,827
13,046
12,783

12,846
12,814
13,057
12,849

78
13
-1 1
-6 6

126
78
64
33

-4 8
-6 5
-7 5
-9 9

12,516
12,422
12,546
12,633

12,365
12,234
12,352
12,499

151
188
194
134

144
149
109
87

7
39
85
47

...............................................12
...............................................19
...............................................26

12,942
12,982
13,039
12,894
12,875

12,870
13,005
12,990
12,844
12,829

72
-2 3
49
50
46

96
95
170
95
120

-2 4
-1 1 8
-1 2 1
-4 5
-7 4

12,660
12,581
12,646
12,636
12,704

12,478
12,442
12,464
12,519
12,551

182
139
182
117
153

112
118
136
176
272

70
21
46
-5 9
-1 1 9

Total
held

Required

Excess

3,140
4,317
6,394
6,689

1,951
3,014
5,976
6,458

1,188
1,303
418
232

1
96
50

7,950
9,056
10,081
10,990
10,970
11,548

7,851
8,989
10,031
10,900
10,964
11,506

100
67
50
90
6
42

20
228
105
270
479
264

11,871
12,115
12,069
12,106
12,198

11,883
12,077
12,050
12,041
12,233

-1 2
38
19
65
-3 5

12,954
12,578
12,559
12,820
12,874
12,746
12,849
13,007

12,941
12,573
12,533
12,804
12,898
12,739
12,890
12,908

12,094
11,856
11,883
11,798

..............................1939—Dec.
..............................1945—Dec.
..............................1950—Dec.
..............................1960—Dec.
..............................1968— Dec.
..............................1970—Dec.

............................... 1972__ Jan.

............................................July
W eek ending

57

i Beginning Sept. 12, 1968, am ount is based on close-of-business figures for reserve period 2 weeks previous to report date.
N ote .—Averages o f daily figures. M onthly data are averages of daily
figures within the calendar m onth; they are not averages of the 4 or 5
weeks ending on Wed. that fall within the month. Beginning w ith Jan.
1964 reserves are estimated except for weekly averages.




............................................... 8
............................................... 22
Apr. 5
............................................... 12
...............................................19
............................................... 26

............................................... 9
...............................................16
...............................................23^
...............................................30*

Total reserves held: Based on figures at close o f business through Nov.
1959; thereafter on closing figures for balances with F.R . Banks and open­
ing figures for allowable cash; see also note 3 to preceding table.
Required reserves: Based on deposits as o f opening o f business each day.
Borrowings at F.R. Banks: Based on closing figures,

A 8

MAJOR RESERVE CITY BANKS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
BASIC RESERVE POSITION, AND FEDERAL FUNDS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
(In millions of dollars, except as noted)
Basic reserve position
Less-

Reporting banks
and
week ending—

N e t-

Gross transactions

N et transactions

Per cent
of
Surplus
or
avg.
required
deficit
reserves

Pur­
chases

Sales

Total
tw o-w ay
trans­
actions2

-4,678
-6,340
-5,548
-5,304

34.0
46.5
39.5
38.4

11,315
12,440
12,117
11,856

6,580
6,035
6,534
6,597

5,211
7,016
6,959
7,067
5,766

-5,389
-7,027
-6,982
-7,139
-5,870

39.1
50.8
50.3
52.5
43.3

11.724
13,343
13.724
13,524
12,357

-2,673
-3,176
-2,846
-3,230

49.2
60.2
51.4
59.2

Excess
Borre­
serves 1 rowings
at F.R.
Banks

Net
inter­
bank
Federal
funds
trans.

113
30
64

4,735
6,405
5,583
5,259

213
77
96
79
166

Related transactions with
U.S. Govt, securities dealers

Interbank Federal funds transactions

Bor­
row­
ings
from
dealers4

Pur­
chases
o f net
buying
banks

Sales
o f net
selling
banks

Loans
to
dealers 3

3,952
4,018
3,965
3,921

7,363
8,423
8,152
7,935

2,628
2,018
2,569
2,675

1,707
1,721
1,293
1,592

437
344
526
513

1,270
1,377
768
1,079

6,513
6,327
6,765
6,457
6,590

4,320
4,173
4,468
4,680
4,426

7,404
9,170
9,256
8,844
7,931

2,193
2,153
2,297
1,777
2,164

1,650
1,943
2,148
1,873
1,624

548
659
644
415
328

1,102

3,442
3,824
3,693
3,886

728
609
817
663

710
609
743
663

2,732
3,215
2,950
3,224

1,182
1,268
854
1,138

58
53
49
43

1,124
1,215
805
1,096

1,158
1,411
1,610

47
51
72

N et
loans

Total—46 banks
1972—July

August

5....
1 2 ....
19....
26....

170

2 ----9....
16....
23....
30....

35
67
73

66
65
19
8

62

1,284
1,504
1,458
1,296

8 in New York City
1972—July

August

5....
1 2 ....
19....
26....

83
39
30
17

42
23

2,713
3,215
2,876
3,224

2 ----9....
16....
23....
30....

18

132
39
69
79
85

2,621
4,334
4,359
3,742
3,297

-2,736
-4,353
-4,375
-3,859
-3,321

50.7
80.9
80.2
72.9
63.2

3,590
4,985
4,978
4,489
4,075

969
651
619
747
778

969
650
619
747
758

2,621
4,334
4,359
3,742
3,317

21

1,247

3,190
2,707
2,035

2,022

-2,005
-3,163
-2,702
-2,075

24.1
37.8
31.7
24.8

7,874
8,616
8,424
7,970

5,852
5,426
5,717
5,935

3,242
3,409
3,222
3,259

4,631
5,208
5,202
4,711

2,609
2,018
2,496
2,675

-2,654
-2 ,6 7 4
-2 ,6 0 7
-3 ,2 8 0
-2 ,5 5 0

31.7
31.6
30.9
39.5
30.8

8,134
8,358
8,746
9,035
8,282

5,544
5,676
6,145
5,710
5,812

3,352
3,523
3,849
3,934
3,668

4,782
4,835

82

2,590
2,682
2,600
3,324
2,470

26

1,614
1,926
1,555
1,458

-1,584
-1,919
-1,558
-1,481

115.1
141.3
111 .4
108.7

2,166
2,524
2,298
2,154

552
598
743
696

1,551
1,658
1,708
1,522
1,130

-1,564
-1,687
-1,703
-1,515
-1,131

114.2

2,264
2,403
2,424
2,372

408
1,264
1,152
577

-4 2 0
-1,244
-1,143
-5 9 4

1,039
1,024
892
1,803
1,340

-1,090
-9 8 6
-9 0 4
-1,765
-1 ,4 1 9

20

52
-3 7
61

1,111

68
64

1,360
1,538
1,152
1,183

525
453
439
454

379
291
477
470

146
162
-3 8
-1 7

4,614

2,193
2,153
2,297
1,777
2,144

492
533
538
653
377

501
608
572
347
264

-9
-7 6
-3 4
306
113

528
585
649
590

1,638
1,939
1,649
1,564

24
13
94
106

259
291
203
214

259
291
203
214

620
702
678
802
869

1,644
1,701
1,746
1,570
1,233

93
43
38
48
103

235
291
295

235
291
295

161

161

1,220

38 outside
New York City
1972—July

August

70

5....
1 2 . .. .
19....
26....
2....
9....
16....
23....
30....

30
41
17
46

20
45
2

81
38
27

’5’ioi

5 in City o f Chicago
1972—July

August

30
7

5....
1 2 ... .
19....
26....

-3

2....
9....
16. .. .
23....
30....

-2
58
6
7
-1

3

83.6

2,102

713
745
716
850
973

6.1

5,708
6,092
6,126
5,816

5,300
4,828
4,974
5,239

2,714
2,824
2,573

2,668

2,993
3,269
3,553
3,148

2,586
2,005
2,402
2,570

266
162
237
240

379
291
477
470

-113
-130
-240
-230

15.6
14.0

5,870
5,955
6,322
6,663
6,180

4,831
4,931
5,430
4,860
4,840

2,732
2,821
3,171
3,131
2,799

3,138
3,135
3,151
3,532
3,381

2,099

257
241
243
443
216

501
608
572
347
264

-244
-367
-329
96
-4 8

121.6
122.8
111.6

210

210

33 others
1972—July

August

5....
1 2 . .. .
1 9. . . .
26....

58

20
38
-2

2 ----9....
16....
23....
30....

-1 9
41
15
38
3

70

17.8
16.1
8.5

12.8

25.4
20.5

1 Based upon reserve balances, including all adjustments applicable to
the reporting period. Prior to Sept. 25,1968, carryover reserve deficiencies,
if any, were deducted. Excess reserves for later periods are net o f all carry­
over reserves.
2 Derived from averages for individual banks for entire week. Figure
for each bank indicates extent to which the bank’s weekly average pur­
chases and sales are offsetting.
3 Federal funds loaned, net funds supplied to each dealer by clearing




2,110
2,259
1,729
2,040

banks, repurchase agreements (purchases o f securities from dealers
subject to resale), or other lending arrangements.
4 Federal funds borrowed, net funds acquired from each dealer by
clearing banks, reverse repurchase agreements (sales o f securities to
dealers subject to repurchase), resale agreements, and borrowings secured
by Govt, or other issues.
N o t e .—Weekly averages o f daily figures. F or description o f series
and back data, see Aug. 1964 B u l l e t in , pp. 944-74.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ F.R. BANK INTEREST RATES

A 9

CURRENT RATES
(Per cent per annum)
Loans to member banks
U nder Secs. 13 and 13a 1

Loans to all others under
last par. Sec. 133

Under Sec. 10(b)*

Federal Reserve Bank
Rate on
Aug. 31,
1972
Boston..................................................
New Y o rk ...........................................
Philadelphia........................................
Cleveland.............................................
Richm ond............................................
A tla n ta .................................................
Chicago................................................
St. Louis..............................................
M inneapolis........................................
K ansas C ity ........................................
D allas...................................................
San Francisco....................................

Effective
date
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.

4Vi
4Vi
4Vi
4%
4Vi
4Vi
41/2
4Vi
4Vi
4Vi
4Vi
41/2

13,
17,
17,
17,
24,
23,
17,
13,
23,
13,
24,
13,

Previous
rate

R ate on
Aug. 31,
1972

4 V4
4%
434
434
434
434
4!4
434
434
434
434
434

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971

Effective
date
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.

13,
17,
17,
17,
24,
23,
17,
13,
23,
13,
24,
13,

1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971

Previous
rate

R ate on
Aug. 31,
1972

5V4
51,4
5V4
514
5Vi
5V4
514
514
514
514
514
514

6Vi
6Vi
6 Vi
6%
6Vi
6^
6i/i
6Vi
6 Vi
6Vi
6Vi
6Vi

Effective
date
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.

13,
17,
17,
17,
24,
23,
17,
13,
23,
13,
24,
13,

1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971

Previous
rate
634
634
634
6*4
634
634
634
634
634
634
634
634

1 Discounts o f eligible paper and advances secured by such paper or by
2 Advances secured to the satisfaction o f the F.R . Bank. M aximum
U.S. Govt, obligations or any other obligations eligible for F.R. Bank
m aturity: 4 months.
purchase. M aximum m aturity: 90 days except th at discounts o f certain
3 Advances to individuals, partnerships, or corporations other than
bankers’ acceptances and o f agricultural paper may have maturities not
member banks secured by direct obligations of, or obligations fully
over 6 months and 9 m onths, respectively.
guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the U.S. Govt, or any
agency thereof. M aximum m aturity: 90 days.

SUMMARY OF EARLIER CHANGES
(Per cent per annum)

Effective
date

Range
(or level)—
All F.R.
Banks

F.R .
Bank
of
N .Y .

In effect Dec. 31, 1954

Wi

1 Vi

1955—Apr. 14.............
15.............
M ay 2 .............
Aug. 4 .............

W2-IV4

11/2

m -W 4

iy 4
l% -2%
W4-2V4
2 -2 %
2 -2V4

1%
1%
1 34

21/4-21/2
2Vi

2
2
2V4
2V4
21/2
21/2

1956— Apr. 13.............
20.............
Aug. 24 .............
31.............

2Vi-3
2V4-3
2V4-3
3

2V4
2V4
3
3

1957—Aug.

9 .............
2 3
Nov. 15.............
Dec. 2 .............

3 - 31/2
3i/i
3 -3i/i
3

3
31/2
3
3

1958—Jan. 22.............
2 4
M ar. 7 .............
13.............
21.............
A pr. 18.............
M ay 9 .............
Aug. 15.............
Sept. 12.............
23.............
Oct. 2 4 .............
Nov. 7 .............

234-3
2 ^ -3
21^-3
2 l/4-2Y4

3
2%
2%
2%
2V4

Y.Y.'.Y.
9 .............
13.............
Nov. 18.............
23.............
m

Sept.

2V4

Effective
date

1959—M ar.

6
16
M ay 29
June 12
Sept. 11
18

1960—June

3
10,
14,
Aug. 12,
Sept. 9,

1963—July

17,
26,

134-214
iy 4
134-2
1 3 /4 -2

2
2

-2Vi

21/2

iy4
1%

1%

2
2
2

21/i

1965—Dec.

3 Vi-4
3 Vi-4
3Vi
3 -3 Vi
3
3 -3 Vi
31/2
3Vi-4
4
4

7,
14,
Nov. 20,
27,

4

1968—M ar. 15
22,
Apr. 19
26
Aug. 16
30
Dec. 18
20

F.R.
Bank
of
N.Y.
3
3
3Vi
3%

4
4
4

3Vi

3*

Effective
date

4

6
6

1970—Nov. 11.....................
13.....................
16.....................
Dec. 1.....................
4 .....................
11.....................

534-6
534-6
534
5 Vi-5 34
5Vi-534
51/i

6
534
534
534
5Vi
51/2

3V i

1971—Jan.

5i4-5V i
514
5 -514
5 -514
5
4 34 - 5
434
434-5
5
434-5
434
4Vi-434
4i/i-434
41/2

514
514
514
5
5
5
434
5
5
5
434
434
4Vi
41/4

4Vi

41/2

31/2
4
4
41/2
41/2

- 41/2

4
4
4Vi
41/2

-4 Vi
4Vi

4Vi-5
5
5

-51/2

51/2
5 V4-5 Vi
5%
514-51/2
5 Vi

F.R .
Bank
of
N.Y .

4 .....................
8.....................

3

-4 Vi
4%
4

R ange
(or level)—
All F.R .
Banks
5 Vi-6
6

1969—Apr.

Feb.

6,
13.

N o t e . —Rates under Secs. 13 and 13a (as described in table and notes
above). F o r data before 1955, see Banking and Monetary Statistics , 1943,
pp. 439-42, and Supplement to Section 12, p. 31.




2i/i-3
3
3 -3 Vi
31/2
3 Vi-4
4

1964—Nov. 24,
30

1967—Apr.

2V4

Range
(or level)All F.R.
Banks

4Vi
5
5 Vi
51/2
5Vi
5Va

51/2
5Vi

July
Nov.
Dec.

8 .....................
15.....................
19.....................
22......................
29......................
13.....................
19.....................
16.....................
2 3 .....................
11.....................
19.....................
13.....................
17.....................
24 .....................

In effect Aug. 31, 1972........

A 10

RESERVE AND MARGIN REQUIREMENTS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
RESERVE REQUIREMENTS OF MEMBER BANKS
(Per cent o f deposits)
Beginning July 14, 1966

Dec. 31, 1949, through July 13, 1966
N et demand
deposits 2, 7

Central
reserve
city
banks

Re­
serve
city
banks

Coun­
try
banks

Time
depos­
its
(all
classes
of
banks)

In effect Dec. 31, 1949.........

22

18

12

5

1951—Jan.
Jan.
1953—j uiy
1954—June
July
1958—Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
A pr
1960—Sept.
Nov.
Dec
1962—July

23
24
22
21
20
191/2
19
I 8I/2
18
171/2

19
20
19

13
14
13

6

Effective date 1

1 1 ,1 6 .................
25, Feb. 1 . . . .
9} i ...................
24, 16.................
29, Aug. 1 . .. .
27, M ar. 1 . . . .
20, Apr. 1 . . . .
17........................
24 . . .
.
1.......................
24 .......................
1
28.......................

N et dem and
deposits 2, 4, 7
Reserve
city banks

Effective date 1

1966—July 1 4 ,2 1 ........
Sept. 8, 15........

12
H i/i
11

64

« 12

6 16i/i

Sav­
ings
depos­
its

1967—M ar. 2 ...............
Mar. 16...............
1968—Jan. 1 1 ,1 8 ........

16i/i

17

12

12i/i

1969—Apr. 17...............

17

171/2

12i/i

13

17

171/i

12i/i

13

12

In effect Aug. 31, 1972.
4

Present legal
requirement:
M inim um ....................
M axim um ...................

1 W hen two dates are shown, the first applies to the change at central
reserve or reserve city banks and the second to the change at country
banks. For changes prior to 1950 see Board’s Annual Reports.
2 D em and deposits subject to reserve requirements are gross demand
deposits minus cash items in process o f collection and demand balances
due from domestic banks.
3 Authority o f the Board o f Governors to classify or reclassify cities
as central reserve cities was term inated effective July 28, 1962.
4 Since Oct. 16, 1969, member banks have been required under Regula­
tion M to maintain reserves against balances above a specified base due
from domestic offices to their foreign branches. Effective Jan. 7, 1971, the
applicable reserve percentage was increased from the original 10 per cent
to 20 per cent. Regulation D imposes a similar reserve requirement on bor­
rowings above a specified base from foreign banks by domestic offices

On margin stocks

3

5

3
10

3
10

3
10

5

10
22

7
14

o f a member bank. F or details concerning these requirements, see Regula­
tions D and M and appropriate supplements and amendments thereto.
5 Effective Jan. 5, 1967, time deposits such as Christmas and vacation
club accounts became subject to same requirements as savings deposits.
6 See preceding columns for earliest effective date o f this rate.
7 For amendment to Regulation D which will change structure o f
member bank reserve requirements effective with the weekly period begin­
ning Sept. 21, 1972, see “Announcements” beginning on p. 679 o f the
July 1972 B u l l e t i n .
N o t e . —All required reserves were held on deposit with F.R . Banks
June 21, 1917, until Dec. 1959. From Dec. 1959 to Nov. 1960, member
banks were allowed to count part o f their currency and coin as reserves;
effective Nov. 24, 1960, they were allowed to count all as reserves. For
further details, see Board’s Annual Reports.

On convertible bonds

Ending
date

1968—Mar. 11
June
June
8
1970—M ay
1970—May
6
1971—Dec.
Effective Dec. 6, 1971 ,

4,
4,
20,
31 ,
29,
16,
19,
3,
22
15,
4
15
27
9
5
10
7
5
3

On short sales
(T)

40
50
75
100
75
50
75
50
60
70
50
70
90
70
50
70

50
50
75
100
75
50
75
50
60
70
50
70
90
70
50
70
70
80
65
55

50
60
50
50

70
80
65
55

N o t e . —Regulations G, T, and U , prescribed in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act o f 1934, limit the am ount o f credit
to purchase and carry margin stocks th at may be extended on securities as collateral by prescribing a maximum loan value, which is
a specified percentage o f the m arket value o f the collateral at the time the credit is extended; margin requirements are the difference
between the m arket value (100 per cent) and the maximum loan value. The term margin stocks is defined in the corresponding regulation.
Regulation G and special margin requirements for bonds convertible into stocks were adopted by the Board o f Governors effective
M ar. 11, 1968.




5
6

3

For credit extended under Regulations T (brokers and dealers),
U (banks), and G (others than brokers, dealers, or banks)

1945— Feb.
July
1946—Jan.
1947—Jan.
1949—Mar..
1951—Jan.
1953— Feb.
1955—Jan.
Apr.
1958—Jan.
Aug.
Oct.
1960—July
1962—July
1963—Nov,.
1968—Mar..

64
3^
3

(Per cent o f market value)

1937—Nov.
1
1945—Feb.
5
5
July
21
1946—Jan.
1
1947— Feb.
1949—M ar. 30
17
1951—Jan.
1953— Feb. 20
4
1955—Jan.
Apr. 23
1958—Jan.
16
Aug.
5
Oct.
16
1960—July 28
1962—July
10
1963—Nov.
6

Under Over
$5 mil­ $5 mil­
lion
lion

3 Vi
3

MARGIN REQUIREMENTS

Beginning
date

O ther
time deposits

1970—Oct. 1...................

16Vi

I 6I/2
( 3)

Country
banks

U nder Over U nder Over
$5 mil­ $5 mil­ $5 mil­ $5 mil­
lion
lion
lion
lion

5
18
171/i
17

Time deposits 4.5
(all classes o f banks)

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ MAXIMUM INTEREST RATES; BANK DEPOSITS

A 11

MAXIMUM INTEREST RATES PAYABLE ON TIME AND SAVINGS DEPOSITS
(Per cent per annum)
R ates Jan. 1, 1962—July 19, 1966

R ates beginning July 20, 1966

Effective date
Type o f deposit
Jan. 1,
1962

July 17,
1963

4
3%

4
3V4

Savings deposits: 1
12 m onths or m o re . . ,
Less than 12 m onths.

O ther time deposits: 2
12 m onths o r m o r e .. . ,
6 m onths to 12 months
90 days to 6 m o n th s.. .
Less than 90 days..........
(30-89 days)

4
3%
2%
1

Nov. 24,
1964

Effective date
Dec. 6,
1965

4%

5%

4

1 Closing date for the Postal Savings System was M ar. 28, 1966. M ax­
imum rates on postal savings accounts coincided with those on savings
deposits.
2 F o r exceptions with respect to certain foreign time deposits, see
B u l l e t i n s for Oct. 1962, p. 1279; Aug. 1965, p. 1084; and Feb. 1968,
p. 167.
3 M ultiple-maturity time deposits include deposits that are autom ati­
cally renewable at m aturity without action by the depositor and deposits
that are payable after written notice o f withdrawal.
4 The rates in effect beginning Jan. 21 through June 23, 1970, were 6 l/4
per cent on maturities o f 30-59 days and 6 Vi per cent on maturities of

Type of deposit
July 20,
1966
Savings deposits...............
O ther time deposits:2
M ultiple m aturity:3
30-89 days............
90 days-1 y e a r ...
1 year to 2 years..
2 years and over..
Single-m aturity:
Less than $100,000:
30 days to 1 y e a r ..
1 year to 2 years. .
2 years and o v e r. .
$100,000 and over:
30-59 days...........
60-89 days............
90-179 d ays.........
180 days to 1 year.
1 year or m o re . . .

Sept. 26,
1966

Apr. 19,
1968

Jan. 21,
1970
4%

4

4%

5

5
5^
5V4

5 Vi

5
5%
5Y4
5%
5V4
6
W /4

5V2

( 4)
( 4)
6V4
7
m

60-89 days. Effective June 24, 1970, maximum interest rates on these
maturities were suspended until further notice.
N o t e . —M aximum rates that may be paid by member banks are estab­
lished by the Board o f Governors under provisions o f Regulation Q ;
however, a member bank may not pay a rate in excess o f the maximum
rate payable by State banks or trust companies on like deposits under
the laws o f the State in which the member bank is located. Beginning
Feb. 1, 1936, maximum rates that may be paid by nonm em ber insured
commercial banks, as established by the FD IC , have been the same as
those in effect for member banks.

DEPOSITS, CASH, AND RESERVES OF MEMBER BANKS
(In millions o f dollars)
Reserve city banks
All
member
banks

Item

New
York
City

City
of
Chicago

Reserve city banks
Country
banks

Item

O ther

All
member
banks

Four weeks ending June 14, 1972
G ross demand—T o ta l.
Interb an k ...................
U.S. G ovt..................
O ther...........................
N et demand i ...............
T im e................................
D em and balances due
from domestic banks
Currency and c o in . . . .
Balances with F.R.
B anks..........................
Total reserves h e ld . . . .
Required.....................
Excess.........................

196,077
25,252
6,142
164,682
149,937
224,607

41,147
11,481
948
28,718
26,506
27,779

8,108
1,360
252
6,496
6,429
8,170

13,424
5,468

3,616
442

147
103

27,171
32,639
32,485
154

5,531
5,973
5,962
11

1,387
1,490
1,492
-2




City
of
Chicago

C ountry
banks
O ther

F our weeks ending July 12, 1972

70,345 76,477 Gross demand—T o ta l..
In te rb a n k ....................
9,314
3,097
U.S. G ovt...................
2,481
2,461
O th er...........................
58,550 70,919
53,178 63,825 Net demand i ................
81,710 106,947 Tim e.................................
Demand balances due
6,936
from domestic banks.
2,725
1,716
3,206 Currency and coin........
Balances with F.R.
B anks...........................
11,145
9,109
12,861
12,315 Total reserves held........
Required......................
12,850 12,182
11
133
Excess..........................

i
Dem and deposits subject to reserve requirements are gross demand
deposits minus cash items in process o f collection and demand balances
due from domestic banks.

New
Y ork
City

202,732
26,670
6,434
169,629
153,361
225,532

43,143
12,169
996
29,979
27,666
27,702

8,156
1,414
238
6,505
6,420
8,493

13,955
5,583

3,619
458

132
109

2,869
1,743

7,335
3,271

27,114
32,697
32,475
222

5,548
6,006
5,968
38

1,388
1,497
1,491
6

11,033
12,776
12,751
25

9,147
12,418
12,265
153

Note.—Averages of daily figures, close of business.

72,656 78,778
9,778
3,309
2,730
2,471
60,148 72,997
54,160 65,116
81,709 107,628

A 12

FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CONDITION OF ALL FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
(In millions of dollars)
Wednesday

End of month

1972

Item
Aug. 30

Aug. 23

Aug. 16

10,303
400

10,303
400

10,303
400

1972
Aug. 9

Aug. 2

Aug. 31

1971

July 31

Aug. 31

Assets
Gold certificate acco u n t....................................
Special Drawing Rights certificate account.
C ash...........................................................
Loans:
M ember bank borrow ings...............
O th e r.....................................................
Acceptances:
Bought o u trig h t..................................
Held under repurchase agreements.
Federal agency obligations:
Bought outright...................................
Held under repurchase agreem ents.
U.S. Govt, securities:
Bought outright:
B ills..............................
Certificates—Special.
O th e r..
N o tes...........................
Bonds.........................
Total bought o utright.......................
H eld under repurchase agreements.
Total U.S. Govt, securities.

10,303
400

10,303
400

10,303
400

10,303
400

9,875
400

324

328

325

323

322

327

324

280

1,330

878

535

842

1,271

1,091

83

858

67
58

67

68
77

65
97

63
55

66
30

63

52
55

1,076
118

1,169

1,169
29

1,169
3

1,041
48

1,076
74

1,079

30,099

29,581

30,764

30,686

30,725

29,814

30,724

28,937

36,703
3,511

36,703
3,511

36,607
3,491

36,596
3,502

36,596
3,502

36,703
3,511

36,596
3,502

34,513
3,185

i 70.313
'526

1-269,795

i 70,862
649

i 70,784
609

i 70,823
632

i 70,028
712

i 70,822

66,635
233

69

70,839

69,795

71,511

71,393

71,455

70,740

70,822

66,868

Total loans and securities.....................
Cash items in process o f collection. . .
Bank prem ises.........................................
O ther assets:
D enom inated in foreign currencies.
IM F gold deposited 3 .......................
All o th e r...............................................

73,488
*10,526
164

71,909
*1 1,182
165

73,389
*13,382
164

73,569
*11,204
164

73,933
*11,930
164

73,077
*9,948
164

72,047
9,968
164

67,902
9,232
142

Total assets.

*95,807

34

25

14

14

7

34

7

568

‘537'

498

"1,142

i ' 062

’576

^097

23
144
477

*98,475

*97,119

*98,121

*94,829

94,310

88,475

54,897

51,887

26,185
2,298
160

25,467
987
122

*94,849

Liabilities
F.R . notes..............................................
D eposits:
M ember bank reserves....................
U.S. Treasurer—General account.
F o reig n ...............................................
O ther:
IM F gold deposited 3 .................
All o th e r........................................

55,145

55,160

55,408

55,430

55,102

55,120

*28,611
1,406
168

*26,908
1,919
187

*28,426
1,792
171

*28,224
2,473
156

*29,080
2,137
168

*28,198
1,727
192

562

690

592

Total deposits.

144
525

*30,787

*29,587

*31,047

*31,415

*32,075

*30,709

29,263

27,245

Deferred availability cash item s............
O ther liabilities and accrued dividends.

7,473
577

7,787
554

9,754
570

8,069
573

8,524
575

6,580
587

7,744
577

6,982
617

Total liabilities..........................................

*93,982

*93,088

*96,779

*95,487

*96,276

*92,996

92,481

86,731

C apital paid in ...................................................................
Surplus.................................................................................
O ther capital accounts.....................................................

778
742
305

777
742
242

775
742
179

775
742
115

773
742
330

778
742
313

775
742
312

731
702
311

Total liabilities and capital accounts............................

*95,807

*94,849

*98,475

*97,119

*98,121

*94,829

94,310

88,475

Capital accounts

Contingent liability on acceptances purchased for
foreign correspondents................................................
M arketable U.S. Govt, securities held in custody for
foreign and international accounts........................

287

286

267

265

263

287

263

245

30,551

30,671

30,580

30,260

29,923

30,337

29,804

20,351

Federal Reserve Notes—Federal Reserve Agents’ Accounts
F.R . notes outstanding (issued to B ank).......................
Collateral held against notes outstanding:
Gold certificate acco un t................................................
U.S. Govt, securities.......................................................

59,047

59,105

59,021

58,917

58,854

59,088

58,917

55,161

1,945
58,365

1,945
58,365

1,945
58,165

1,945
58,065

1,945
58,055

1,945
58,365

1,945
58,055

3,190
53,440

Total collateral.....................................................................

60,310

60,310

60,110

60,010

60,000

60,310

60,000

56,630

1 See note 6 on p. A-5.
2 See note 7 on p. A-5.




3 See note 1(b) to table at top of p. A-77.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS

A 13

STATEMENT OF CONDITION OF EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK ON AUGUST 31, 1972
(In millions o f dollars)

Item

Total

Boston

New
York

Phila­
del­
phia

Cleve­
land

Rich­
mond

A tlan­
ta

Chi­
cago

an­
M inne­ Ksas
apolis
City

St.
Louis

Dallas

San
Fran­
cisco

Assets
Special Drawing Rights certif. acct.. . .

L oans:
Secured by U.S. G ovt, and agency
A cceptances:
Held under repurchase agreem ents..
Federal agency obligations:
Bought outright...................................
Held under repurchase agreem ents..
U.S. G ovt, securities:
H eld under repurchase agreem ents..

10,303
400
1,227
327

593
23
188
18

2,182
93
219
25

734
23
53
12

876
33
55
36

796
36
119
40

413
22
243
36

2,129
70
55
45

392
15
38
19

156
7
36
7

475
15
70
38

513
14
50
14

1,044
49
101
37

1,091

135

744

1

6

58

46

72

5

3

2

5

14

66
30

66
30
1,076
74

48

277
74

57

83

80

58

173

40

22

44

49

145

170,028
712

3,135

17,996
712

3,719

5,378

5,204

3,803

11,259

2,613

1,408

2,883

3,180

9,450

73,077

3,318

19,899

3,777

5,467

5,342

3,907

11,504

2,658

1,433

2,929

3,234

9,609

C ash items in process o f collection. . .

13,404
164

781
2

2,228
8

794
4

933
28

1,107
13

1,481
16

2,059
17

694
15

524
25

905
17

874
12

1,024
7

O ther assets:
D enom inated in foreign currencies..
All o th e r...............................................

34
576

2
49

29
168

2
28

3
37

2
40

2
28

5
75

1
19

1
12

1
21

2
23

4
76

T otal assets...............................................

99,512

4,974 24,831

5,427

7,468

7,495

6,148

15,959

3,851

2,201

4,471

4,736

11,951

Liabilities
F.R . n o tes.................................................
D eposits:
Member bank reserves.......................
U.S. Treasurer—General account..
Foreign..................................................
O ther:
All o th e r...........................................

56,347

2,955

14,000

3,327

4,480

4,931

2,841

9,603

2,191

975

2,195

2,172

6,677

28,198
1,727
192

1,144
80
7

7,543
468
3 74

1,323
79
8

1,853
129
14

1,455
122
8

1,862
127
11

4,146
121
24

965
80
5

655
91
4

1,294
156
7

1,722
76
9

4,236
198
21

592

3

531

4

1

15

5

3

1

2

3

24

Total deposits..........................................

30,709

1,234

8,616

1,414

1,997

1,600

2,005

4,294

1,051

750

1,459

1,810

4,479

Deferred availability cash item s..........
O ther liabilities and accrued dividends

10,036
587

678
27

1,572
167

562
31

783
44

821
41

1,149
33

1,687
90

526
21

424
12

717
22

633
25

484
74

Total liabilities........................................

97,679

4,894 24,355

5,334

7,304

7,393

6,028

15,674

3,789

2,161

4,393

4,640

11,714

201
193
82

39
38
16

71
68
25

41
38
23

54
50
16

120
111
54

26
25
11

18
17
5

33
32
13

42
41
13

99
95
43

4,974 24,831

5,427

7,468

7,495

6,148

15,959

3,851

2,201

4,471

4,736

11,951

15

26

15

19

43

10

6

12

16

37

7,134

Capital accounts
C apital paid i n ........................................
Surplus.......................................................
O ther capital accounts...........................

778
742
313

Total liabilities and capital a cc o u n ts.. 99,512
Contingent liability on acceptances
purchased for foreign correspond­
en ts.........................................................

287

34
34
12

13

4 75

Federal Reserve Notes—Federal Reserve Agents* Accounts
F.R . notes outstanding (issued to
B an k ).................................................
Collateral held against notes out­
standing :
Gold certificate a cco u n t....................
U.S. G ovt, securities.........................
Total collateral........................................

59,088

3,167 14,730

3,406

4,655

5,129

3,072

9,871

2,308

1,017

2,289

2,310

1,945
58,365

150
3,050 14,850

300
3,250

350
4,400

285
4,915

3,150

700
9,300

155
2,230

1,040

2,400

5
2,380

7,400

60,310

3,200

3,550

4,750

5,200

3,150

10,000

2,385

1,040

2,400

2,385

7,400

14,850

1 See note 6 on page A-5.
2 After deducting $25 million participations o f other Federal Reserve
Banks.
3 After deducting $118 million participations o f other Federal Reserve
Banks.




4 After deducting $212 million participations o f other Federal Reserve
Banks.
N o t e . — Some figures for cash items in process o f collection and for
member bank reserves are preliminary.

A 14

OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT □ SEPTEMBER 1972
TRANSACTIONS OF THE SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT
(In millions of dollars)
Outright transactions in U.S. Govt, securities, by maturity
Total

Treasury bills

Others within 1 year

1-5 years

M onth
Gross
pu r­
chases

Gross
sales

1971—July.
Aug.
Sept.
Oct..
Nov.
Dec.

2,067
1,818
2,102
772
1,883
3,160

1,617
1,024
1,088
1,133
1,070
1,981

1972—Jan..
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
June
July.

915
2,036
2,009
2,666
475
1,294
2,753

248
3,481
298
1,478
291
335
3,286

Redemp­
tions

127
83
’266’
110
410
155
135
96

Gross
pur­
chases

Gross
sales

2,067
1,709
1,818
772
1,129
3,055

1,617
1,024
1,088
1,133
1,070
1,981

499
1,894
1,829
2,254
475
1,094
2,753

248
3,481
298
1,478
291
335
3,286

Redemp­
tions

1971—July,
A ug..
S ept..
O ct...
N ov..
D ec..
1972—J a n ..
Feb..
M ar..
A pr..
M ay.
June.
Ju ly .

Gross
sales

16
34

-5 4 7

267
67

1,920

191
52
31
126

- 2 ,2 6 0

Gross
pur­
chases

Gross
sales

Exch.
or ma­
turity
shifts

14
58
6

150

23
8
47
23.
20

109

Exch.
Gross
sales

m aturity
shifts

46

991
104

84
189

-4 4 4
-1 0 4

’266*

24
11

-3,548
130

406
21

1,478
-1 3 0

110
410
155
133

16
10
11
7

1,301

187
73
92
255

959

Repurchase
agreements
(U.S. Govt,
securities)

Over 10 years
Exch.
or ma­
turity
shifts

Gross
pur­
chases

83

-2
2,626
-9 0

N et
change
in U.S.
Govt,
secur­
ities

M onth
Gross
pur­
chases

Exch.,
m aturity
shifts,
or
redemp­
tions

Gross
sales

127

I O utright transactions in U.S. Govt, securities—Continued
5-10 years

Gross
pur­
chases

Gross
pur­
chases

Gross
sales

3,044
2,184
3,697
2,616
5,003
4,830

3,044
1,951
3,930
2,616
5,003
3,607

323
1,027
698
-3 6 1
613
2,401

4,722
1,694
2,695
2,625
1,115
211
1,736

5,945
1,694
2,022
3,298

-6 6 6
- 1 ,8 5 4
2,229
380
1,299
-2 5 1
-5 3 3

1 Net change in U.S. Govt, securities, Federal agency obligations, and
bankers’ acceptances.

1,326
1,736

Federal agency
obligations (net)

Outj right

61
35
244
145
165
77
83
169

-2*626

69

R epur­
chase
agree­
ments

69
-6 9
101
-1 0 1
16
-1 6
25
-25

+ 127
-2 6

Bankers*
acceptances

O ut­
right,
net

-7
-3
-1
1
6
22
-4
-1 2
19
1
-4
-6
-1 0

U nder
repur­
chase
agree­
ments,
net

55
-55
181
-1 8 1
61
-6 1
65
-6 5

Net
change1

316
1,148
634
-3 2 6
862
2,850
-7 8 7
- 1 ,7 8 9
2,408
472
1,386
-221
-5 7 0

N o t e . —Sales, redemptions, and negative figures reduce System hold­
ings ; all other figures increase such holdings.

CONVERTIBLE FOREIGN CURRENCIES HELD BY FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
(In millions o f U.S. dollar equivalent)

1968— Dec.,
1969—Dec..
1970—Dec.,

2,061
1,967
257

1,444
1,575
154

1971— May,
June,
July.
Aug.
Sept.
O ct..
Nov.
Dec.

94
96
23
23
23
30
15
18

87
87
12
12
12
12
2
2

1972—Jan..
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May

17
17
17
17
57

2
2
2
2
2




Canadian
dollars

French
francs

Pounds
sterling

A ustrian
schillings

Belgian
francs

D anish
kroner

Total

End o f
period

433
199

G erm an
m arks
165
60
98

Italian
lire

Japanese
yen

N ether­
lands
guilders

Swiss
francs

1
125

8
8
8
8
50

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS; BANK DEBITS

A 15

MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF LOANS AND U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES
HELD BY FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
(In millions o f dollars)
W ednesday

End o f m onth

1972

Item
Aug. 30

1972

1971

Aug. 23

Aug. 16

Aug. 9

Aug. 2

Aug. 31

July 31

Aug. 31

1,330
1,330

878
878

535
534
1

843
842
1

1,273
1,272
1

1,091
1,090
1

83
81
2

858
857
1

125
77
48

67
24
43

145
102
43

162
114
48

118
74
44

96
48
48

63
17
46

107
67
40

U.S. Government securities—T o tal.................................
Within 15 days1................................................................
16 days to 90 days...........................................................
91 days to 1 y e ar.............................................................
Over 1 year to 5 years....................................................
Over 5 years to 10 years.................................................
Over 10 years....................................................................

70,839
4,999
14,420
18,945
24,859
6,102
1,514

69,795
3,707
14,477
19,136
24,859
6,102
1,514

71,511
5,275
14,492
19,385
24,781
6,079
1,499

71,393
6,051
15,100
18,972
24,108
5,913
1,249

71,455
6,175
15,089
18,921
24,108
5,913
1,249

70,740
3,212
14,497
20,556
24,859
6,102
1,514

70,822
4,209
15,726
19,617
24,108
5,913
1,249

66,868
2,542
18,904
15,904
23,240
5,377
901

Federal agency obligations—T o tal..................................
W ithin 15 days1...............................................................
16 days to 90 d ay s...........................................................
91 days to 1 y e ar.............................................................
Over 1 year to 5 years....................................................
Over 5 years to 10 years................................................
Over 10 years...................................................................

1,194
152
31
117
519
227
148

1,169
44
67
149
534
227
148

1,198
30
110
149
534
227
148

1,172
3
111
149
534
227
148

1,089
48
99
146
475
197
124

1,150
109
30
117
519
227
148

1,079
38
99
146
475
197
124

69
69

W ithin 15 days..................................................................
16 days to 90 days...........................................................
91 days to 1 y e a r...................................... .......................
Acceptances—T otal.............................................................
W ithin 15 days..................................................................
91 days to 1 y e ar..............................................................

1 Holdings under repurchase agreements are classified as maturing
within 15 days in accordance with maximum m aturity o f the agreements.

BANK DEBITS AND DEPOSIT TURNOVER
(Seasonally adjusted annual rates)
Debits to demand deposit accounts1
(billions of dollars)

Turnover o f demand deposits

Period

6 others2

Total 232
SMSA’s
(excl.
N.Y.)

226
other
SMSA’s

Total
233
SMSA’s

N.Y.

5 ,210.2
5,408.9
5,570.3
5,755.8
5,918.9
5,523.3

2 ,6 8 1 .0
2 ,7 8 3 .7
2 ,7 5 7 .5
2 ,6 8 3 .2
2 ,9 4 5 .2
2 ,859.8

6 ,493.6
6,684.8
6,631.9
6,465.6
6,996.9
6,859.9

3,812.6
3,901.2
3,874.4
3,782.5
4 ,051.6
4,000.2

80.0
81.6
82.2
82.6
86.4
83.7

5 ,687.0
6,013.9
5,631.4
5,801.4
5,939.2
5,780.8
5,633.0

2,803.1
2,913.1
2,932.9
3,053.1
3,148.8
3,096.4
2,996.3

6,843.7
7,013.9
7,154.2
’•7,367.9
r7,461.1
H , 500.7
7,367.1

4,040.6
4,100.9
4,22 1 .2
'4 ,3 1 4 .8
'4 ,3 1 2 .2
r4,404.4
4,370.8

83.9
84.5
83.0
85.6
85.6
84.7
82.3

Leading SMSA’s

Total
233
SMSA’s

N.Y.

11,703.8
12,093.8
12,202.2
12,221.4
12,915.7
12,383.2

L972—Jan ................................... 12,530.7
F eb .................................. 13,027.8
M ar................................. 12,785.5
A pr.................................. ’■13,169.3
M ay ................................ M 3,400.3
J u n e ................................ ’•13,281.6
July................................. 13,000.1

1971—July..............................
A ug.................................
Sept.................................
O ct...................................
N ov.................................
D ec..................................

1 Excludes interbank and U.S. Govt, demand deposit accounts.
2 Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, D etroit, San Francisco-O akland, and
Los Angeles-Long Beach.




Leading SMSA’s
6 others2

Total 232
SMSA’s
(excl.
N.Y.)

226
other
SMSA’s

184.4
189.0
190.6
199.5
203.7
196.1

80.4
82.8
82.3
80.0
87.2
85.2

55.0
55.9
55.6
54.3
58.1
57.3

45.0
45.4
45.2
44.2
46.7
46.4

205.3
205.1
195.2
202.1
200.8
199.9
194.4

82.0
82.6
83.3
87.3
89.8
88.1
84.2

56.3
56.2
57.2
58.9
58.7
’’58.6
57.1

46.2
45.8
47.0
r4 7 .8
46.9
47.5
46.8

N o t e . —Total SMSA’s includes some cities and counties not designated
as SMSA’s.
F or back data see pp. 634-35 o f July 1972 B u l l e t i n .

A 16

U.S. CURRENCY □ SEPTEMBER 1972
DENOMINATIONS IN CIRCULATION
(In millions o f dollars)
Coin and small denomination currency

Total
in cir­
cula­
tion 1

Total

Coin

$1 2

$2

$5

$10

$20

Total

$50

$100

$500

1939.
1941
1945.
1947.

7,598
11,160
28,515
28,868

5,553
8,120
20,683
20,020

590
751
1,274
1,404

559
695
1,039
1,048

36
44
73
65

1,019
1,355
2,313
2,110

1,772
2,731
6,782
6,275

1,576
2,545
9,201
9,119

2,048
3,044
7,834
8,850

460
724
2,327
2,548

919
1,433
4,220
5,070

191
261
454
428

425
556
801
782

20
24
7
5

32
46
24
17

1950.
1955.
1959.

27,741
31,158
32,591

19,305
22,021
23,264

1,554
1,927
2,304

1,113
1,312
1,511

64
75
85

2,049
2,151
2,216

5,998 8,529
6,617 9,940
6,672 10,476

8,438
9,136
9,326

2,422
2,736
2,803

5,043
5,641
5,913

368
307
261

588
438
341

4
3
3

12
12
5

1960.
1961 .
1962.
1963.
1964.

32,869
33,918
35,338
37,692
39,619

23,521
24,388
25,356
26,807
28,100

2,427
2,582
2,782
3,030
3,405

1,533
1,588
1,636
1,722
1,806

88
92
97
103
111

2,246
2,313
2,375
2,469
2,517

6,691
6,878
7,071
7,373
7,543

10,536 9,348
10,935 9,531
11,395 9,983
12,109 10,885
12,717 11,519

2,815
2,869
2,990
3,221
3,381

5,954
6,106
6,448
7,110
7,590

249
242
240
249
248

316
300
293
298
293

3
3
3
3
2

10
10
10
4
4

1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.

42,056
44,663
47,226
50,961
53,950
57,093

29,842
31,695
33,468
36,163
37,917
39,639

4,027
4,480
4,918
5,691
6,021
6,281

1,908
2,051
2,035
2,049
2,213
2,310

127
137
136
136
136
136

2,618
2,756
2,850
2,993
3,092
3,161

7,794
8,070
8,366
8,786
8,989
9,170

13,369
14,201
15,162
16,508
17,466
18,581

12,214
12,969
13,758
14,798
16,033
17,454

3,540 8,135
3,700 8,735
3,915 9,311
4,186 10,068
4,499 11,016
4,896 12,084

245
241
240
244
234
215

288
286
285
292
276
252

3
3
3
3
3
3

4
4
4
4

1971--Ju ly ............ 58,558
Aug............ 58,904
Sept............ 58,797
Oct.............. 59,216
Nov............ 60,636
D ec............. 61,068

40,238
40,442
40,284
40,559
41,699
41,831

6,493
6,537
6,556
6,589
6,714
6,775

2,260
2,267
2,273
2,302
2,360
2,408

136
136
135
135
135
135

3,068
3,058
3,053
3,071
3,186
3,273

9,031
9,045
8,987
9,054
9,329
9,348

19,251 18,321
19,398 18,462
19,279 18,514
19,408 18,657
19,975 18,936
19,893 19,237

5,129 12,735
5,162 12,845
5,155 12,906
5,183 13,024
5,272 13,216
5,377 13,414

208
207
206
205
204
203

242
241
240
239
237
237

3
2
2
2
2
2

4
4
4
4
4
4

59,429
59,795
60,388
60,535
61,702
62,201
62,435

40,388
40,725
41,182
41,140
42,056
42,399
42,449

6,774
6,812
6,860
6,902
6,969
7,016
7,052

2,281
2,275
2,279
2,276
2,334
2,328
2,326

135
135
135
135
135
135
135

3,083
3,087
3,106
3,094
3,170
3,178
3,155

8,900
9,010
9,110
9,028
9,243
9,295
9.231

19,215
19,405
19,692
19,705
20,204
20,446
20,550

5,261 13,337
5,257 13,371
5,275 13,490
5,351 13,606
5,425 13,785
5,446 13,923
5,502 14,052

202
201
200
199
198
197
196

235
234
233
232
232
230
229

2
2
2
2
2
2
2

4
4
4
4
4
4
4

End o f period

1972--Ja n ..............
Feb.............
M ar............
A p r............
M[ay...........
J u n e ...........
July............

1 Outside Treasury and F .R . Banks. Before 1955 details are slightly
overstated because they include small amounts o f paper currency held
by the Treasury and the F .R . Banks for which a denominational breakdown is not available.

Large denom ination currency

19,042
19,070
19,205
19,395
19,647
19,803
19,986

$1,000 $5,000 $10,000

4

2 Paper currency only; $1 silver coins reported under coin,
N o t e . —Condensed from Statement o f United States Currency and

Coin, issued by the Treasury.

KINDS OF UNITED STATES CURRENCY OUTSTANDING AND IN CIRCULATION
(Condensed from Circulation Statement o f United States M oney, issued by Treasury D epartm ent. In millions o f dollars)
Held in the Treasury

Kind o f currency

Total, out­
standing, As security
July 31,
against
Treasury
gold and
1972
cash
silver
certificates

G o ld ........................................................................................
Gold certificates....................................................................
Federal Reserve n o tes.........................................................
Treasury currency—T o ta l..................................................

10,410
(10,303)
58,917
8,095

D o llars................................................................................
Fractional C o in ................................................................
United States notes.........................................................
In process o f retirement 3..............................................

719
6,761
323
292

Total—July 31, 1972...........................................................
June 30, 1972..........................................................
July 31, 1971...........................................................

4 77,422
4 76,761
4 72,880

(10,303)

(10.303)
(10.303)
(10,075)

1 Outside Treasury and F.R. Banks. Includes any paper currency held
outside the United States and currency and coin held by banks. Esti­
mated totals for Wed. dates shown in table on p. A-5.
2 Consists o f credits payable in gold certificates, the Gold Certificate
Fund—Board o f Governors, FRS.
3 Redeemable from the general fund o f the Treasury.




107

For
F.R.
Banks
and
Agents

2 10,302

Currency in circulation 1
H eld by
F.R .
Banks
and
Agents

1972
July
31

June
30

July
31

54,771
7,664

54,572
7,629

51,448
7,111

633
6,383
320
292

482
6,011
322
296

125
105

1
4,021
326

31
72
2

49
276

638
6,414
320
292

4,348
3,907
3,760

62,435

337
351
487

10.302
10.302
10,074

1971

62,201
58,558

4 Does not include all items shown, as gold certificates are secured by
gold. Duplications are shown in parentheses.
N o t e . — Prepared from Statement o f United States Currency and Coin
and other data furnished by the Treasury. For explanation o f currency
reserves and security features, see the Circulation Statement or the Aug.
1961 B u l l e t i n , p. 936.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ MONEY STOCK

A 17

MEASURES OF THE MONEY STOCK
(In billions of dollars)
Seasonally adjusted r
M onth o r week

Mx
(Currency plus
demand deposits)

N ot seasonally adjusted r

M2
Ms
(Mi plus time
(M 2 plus deposits
deposits at coml. at nonbank thrift
institutions) 2
banks other than
large time C D ’s) 1

Mi
(Currency plus
demand deposits)

Mi
M%
(Mi plus time
(M 2 plus deposits
deposits at coml. at nonbank thrift
banks other than
institutions) 2
large tim e C D ’s) 1

1968—D e c
1969—De c
1970—D e c

197.4
203.7
214.8

378.0
386.8
418.2

572.6
588.3
633.9

203.4
209.8
221.2

383.0
392.0
423.5

577.5
593.4
639.1

1971— Au g
Sept.........
O ct..........
N ov.........
Dec..........

228.0
227.6
227.7
227.7
228.2

454.5
455.6
458.3
460.8
464.7

697.6
701.2
706.5
711.6
718.1

224.9
226.2
227.5
229.6
235.1

451.7
454.3
458.0
461.4
470.2

694.5
699.5
705.9
711.4
723.4

1972—Ja n
Feb..........
M ar.........
A pr..........
M ay........
Jun e........
Ju ly r ----Aug.**. . .

228.8
231.2
233.5
235.0
235.5
236.6
239.4
240.4

469.9
475.5
480.1
483.0
486.1
490.4
495.0
498.1

727.3
737.4
745.9
752.7
758.8
766.1
774.8
781.5

235.3
229.0
231.3
236.1
231.3
234.7
237.9
237.1

475.3
472.7
478.7
485.4
483.2
488.9
493.6
495.3

732.8
734.1
744.9
755.6
755.9
765.5
774.0
778.1

239.7
240.1
240.9
240.4
241.2

496.2
497.2
498.6
498.3
499.7

237.4
237.4
238.2
235.8
236.3

494.1
494.9
496.4
494.2
495.3

Week ending—
1972—Aug.

2.
9.
16.
23 p
30p

COMPONENTS OF MONEY STOCK MEASURES AND RELATED ITEMS
(In billions o f dollars)
N o t seasonally adjusted

Seasonally adjusted

Commercial banks

Commercial banks
M onth
or
week

C ur­
rency

D e­
m and
depos­
its

Time and savings
deposits
C D ’s 3

O ther

Total

N on­
bank
thrift
institu­
tions 4

C ur­
rency

D e­
mand
depos­
its

Time and savings
deposits
C D ’s 3

O ther

N on­
bank
thrift
institu­
tions 4

U.S.
Govt.
depos­
its 5

Total

1968—D ec......................
1969—Dec......................
1970—Dec......................

43.4
46.0
49.0

154.0
157.7
165.8

23.6
11.0
25.5

180.6
183.2
203.4

204.2
194.1
228.9

194.6
201.5
215.7

44.3
46.9
50.0

159.1
162.9
171.3

23.6
11.1
25.8

179.6
182.1
202.3

203.2
193.2
228.1

194.6
201.4
215.6

5 .0
5 .6
7.3

1971—Aug.....................
Sept.....................
O ct.......................
Nov.....................
D ec......................

51.7
51.9
52.2
52.2
52.5

176.3
175.7
175.5
175.5
175.7

30.8
31.6
32.7
32.2
33.4

226.5
228.0
230.6
233.1
236.4

257.3
259.6
263.3
265.3
269.9

243.1
245.6
248.3
250.8
253.4

51.9
51.9
52.2
52.8
53.5

173.0
174.3
175.3
176.9
181.5

31.2
32.1
33.6
33.7
33.9

226.9
228.1
230.5
231.8
235.1

258.1
260.3
264.1
265.5
269.0

242.8
245.2
247.9
250.0
253.2

6.8
7.5
5.3
3.9
6.7

1972—Jan .......................
Feb......................
M ar.....................
A pr......................
M ay....................
Jun e....................
July.....................
Aug.p .................

52.8
53.2
53.7
54.0
54.4
54.7
54.9
55.1

176.0
178.0
179.9
180.9
181.1
181.9
r 184.5
185.3

33.2
33.8
33.4
34.7
36.3
37.1
38.1
39.3

241.2
244.3
246.5
248.1
250.7
253.8
255.6
257.7

274.4
278.1
279.9
282.8
287.0
290.9
293.7
297.0

257.4
261.8
265.8
269.7
272.6
r275.7
r279.7
283.2

52.6
52.6
53.2
53.6
5 4.0
54.6
’55.3
55.3

182.7
176.4
178.1
182.6
177.3
180.1
r 182.6
181.8

33.7
33.6
33.3
33.8
35.1
35.8
37.0
39.9

240.0
243.7
247.5
249.3
251.9
254.2
255.7
258.2

273.7
277.3
280.8
283.1
286.9
290.0
292.7
298.1

257.5
261.4
266.2
270.2
272.7
276.6
r280.4
282.8

7.2
7 .2
7 .7
7.6
10.4
6.8
7.2
5.3

54.9
55.2
55.0
55.2
55.2

184.8
185.0
185.9
185.2
186.0

38.6
38.6
38.8
39.7
4 0 .4

256.5
257.0
257.7
257.8
258.5

295.1
295.6
296.5
297.5
298.9

54.9
55.8
55.5
55.2
54.8

182.6
181.7
182.7
180.6
181.5

38.2
38.9
39.4
40.3
4 1 .2

256.7
257.5
258.2
258.3
259.0

294.9
296.4
297.6
298.6
300.2

Week ending—
1972__Aug.

2 .............
9 .............
16.............
2 3 ^...........
30^...........

1 Includes, in addition to currency and demand deposits, savings de­
posits, tim e deposits open account, and time certificates o f deposits other
than negotiable tim e certificates o f deposit issued in denominations o f
$100,000 or more by large weekly reporting commercial banks.
2 Includes M 2, plus the average o f the beginning and end o f m onth
deposits o f m utual savings banks and savings and loan shares.
3 Negotiable time certificates o f deposit issued in denominations of
$ 100,000 o r more by large weekly reporting commercial banks.
4 Average o f the beginning and end-of-month deposits o f m utual savings
banks and savings and loan shares.
s A t all commercial banks.




7.8
6.4
5.3
4 .6
4 .4

N o t e . —F or description of revised series and for back data, see pp. 88093 o f the November B u l l e t i n .
Average o f daily figures. M oney stock consists o f (1) demand deposits
at all commercial banks other than those due to domestic commercial
banks and the U.S. Govt., less cash items in process o f collection and F.R .
float; (2) foreign demand balances at F.R . Banks; and (3) currency outside
the Treasury, F.R . Banks, and vaults of all commercial banks. Time de­
posits adjusted are time deposits at all commercial banks other than those
due to domestic commercial banks and the U.S. G ovt.

A 18

BANK RESERVES; BANK CREDIT □ SEPTEMBER 1972
AGGREGATE RESERVES AND MEMBER BANK DEPOSITS
Member bank reserves,

<z>
>

(In billions o f dollars)
Deposits subject to reserve requirements 3
S.A.
Period
Total

N on­
bor­
rowed

Re­
quired

Avail­
able2

Total

Total member
bank deposits
plus nondeposit
item s4

N .S.A .
Dem and

Time
and
savings

Private

U.S.
Govt.

Total

D em and

Time
and
savings

Private

U.S.
Govt.

S.A.

N.S.A.

1968—Dec.
1969—Dec ,
1970—D e c ... .

27.25
27.98
29.13

26.47
26.83
28.76

26.89
27.75
28.92

24.96
25.25
26.75

297.6
285.4
319.0

164.5
150.3
178.6

128.3
129.8
133.8

4 .8
5.3
6 .5

301.2
288.8
322.8

163.8
149.7
178.2

133.3
134.6
138.7

4.1
4 .6
6 .0

304.6
305.4
330.6

308.1
308.8
334.4

1971— A u g ....
Sept___
Oct........
N ov___
D ec.......

30.74
31.07
30.88
30.97
31.25

r29.99
30.56
'30.49
30.54
31.08

30.57
30.91
30.69
30.75
31.10

28.52
28.50
28.59
28.73
28.84

347.1
349.2
349.8
352.7
357.9

200.2
202.2
205.2
206.4
210.2

141.0
140.5
139.9
140.9
141.5

5.8
6.5
4.7
5 .4
6.2

344.6
348.2
350.2
351.6
362.2

200.8
202.7
205.9
206.9
209.7

138.1
139.2
139.9
141.6
146.7

5.8
6.3
4.3
3 .2
5.7

351.0
353.3
354.7
358.0
361.9

348.6
352.2
355.0
357.0
366.2

1972—Jan ........
Feb.......
M ar___
Apr. . . .
M a y .. . .
J u n e .. . .
July. . . .
Aug.®...

31.77
31.62
32.03
32.64
32.83
33.06
33.14
33.42

31.68
31.58
31.93
32.53
32.73
32.97
r32.92
33.05

31.56
31.47
31.82
32.47
32.69
32.84
32.96
33.21

29.06
29.24
29.63
29.80
29.95
'30.15
30.37
30.59

360.9
363.1
368.4
372.7
377.1
378.7
'3 8 2 .4
384.9

213.7
216.4
217.4
219.8
223.4
226.1
228.2
230.5

141.0
142.9
144.9
145.5
146.3
147.3
'148.9
149.8

6.3
3.7
6.1
7.4
7 .4
5.3
5.3
4 .6

366.3
363.4
368.0
373.1
374.9
376.4
'380.9
382.2

213.4
215.9
218.1
219.8
223.1
225.2
227.1
231.3

146.9
141.5
143.4
146.8
142.9
145.6
'147.7
146.6

6 .0
6.1
6 .6
6.5
8.8
5.7
6.1
4.3

364.9
366.7
372.1
376.3
380.9
382.4
'386.3
389.1

370.3
367.1
371.8
376.6
378.6
380.2
'384.8
386.4

1 Averages o f daily figures. M ember bank reserve series reflects actual
reserve requirement percentages with no adjustment to eliminate the
effect o f changes in Regulations D and M. Required reserves were in­
creased by $660 million effective Apr. 16, 1969, and $400 million, effective
Oct. 16, 1969. Required reserves were reduced by $500 million (net)
effective Oct. 1, 1970.
2 Reserves available to support private nonbank deposits are defined
as (1) required reserves for (a) private demand deposits, (b) total time
and savings deposits, and (c) nondeposit sources subject to reserve re­
quirements, and (2) excess reserves. This series excludes required reserves
for net interbank and U.S. G ovt, demand deposits.
3 Averages o f daily figures. Deposits subject to reserve requirements
include total time and savings deposits and net demand deposits as defined
by Regulation D . Private demand deposits include all demand deposits

except those due to the U.S. Govt., less cash items in process o f collection
and demand balances due from domestic commercial banks. D ata for
1968 are not comparable with later data due to the withdrawal from the
System on Jan. 2, 1969, o f a large m ember bank.
4 Total member bank deposits subject to reserve requirements, plus
Euro-dollar borrowings, bank-related commercial paper, and certain
other nondeposit items. This series for deposits is referred to as “ the ad­
justed bank credit proxy.”
N o t e . — D ue to changes in Regulations M and D , member bank re­
serves include reserves held against nondeposit funds beginning Oct. 16,
1969. Back data may be obtained from the Banking Section, Division o f
Research and Statistics, Board o f Governors o f the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, D .C. 20551.

LOANS AND INVESTMENTS AT ALL COMMERCIAL BANKS
(In billions of dollars)
Seasonally adjusted
Loans
Total
loans
and
invest­
m ents1, 2 T o tal1,2

D ate

Plus
loans
sold

N ot seasonally adjusted
Securities

Commercial
and industrial

1 2 3

Total

Plus
loans
sold3

U.S.
Treas­
ury

Securities

Total
loans
and
invest­
O ther2 m ents1,2 T o t a l 1, 2

Plus
loans
sold
1 2

3

Commercial
and industrial
Total

Plus
loans
sold3

U.S.
Treas­
ury

O ther2

1968—Dec. 3 1 ..
1969—Dec. 314.

390.6
402.1

258.2
279.4

283.3

95.9
105.7

108.3

61.0
51.5

71.4
71.2

400.4
412.1

264.4
286.1

290.0

98.4
108.4

111.0

64.5
54.7

1970—Dec. 3 1 ..

435.9

292.0

294.9

109.6

111.7

58.0

85.9

446.8

299.0

301.9

112.5

114.6

61.7

86.1

1971—Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.

2 5 ..
2 9 ..
2 7 ..
2 4 ..
3 1 ..

468.4
472.4
477.2
479.8
485.7

309.7
313.0
317.0
318.7
320.6

312.4
316.0
319.9
321.6
323.4

115.2
116.2
116.6
116.0
115.5

117.0
118.1
118.4
117.8
117.1

60.9
59.9
59.1
58.8
60.7

97.8
99.5
101.1
102.2
104.5

466.1
472.0
476.5
479.9
497.9

309.3
313.4
315.1
317.3
328.3

312.0
316.4
318.0
320.1
331.1

114.2
115.9
115.6
115.6
118.5

116.0
117.8
117.4
117.4
120.1

58.7
58.7
60.0
61.0
64.9

98.1
99.9
101.5
101.6
104.7

1972—Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
A pr.
M ay
June
July
Aug.

2 6 ..
2 3 ..
29® .
26® .
31® .
30® .
26®..
30®..

491.4
496.6
504.3
505.8
513.8
514.0
518.4
526.3

325.7
328.5
333.3
334.8
340.3
341.2
345.9
353.6

328.7
331.5
336.1
337.5
342.8
343.5
348.3
355.9

116.4
117.3
118.1
119.4
120.7
5119.4
120.8
123.1

118.1
119.0
119.9
121.1
122.2
5120.8
122.2
124.7

59.7
61.0
62.2
62.4
62.8
62.8
61.8
61.0

106.0
107.1
108.7
108.6
110.7
110.0
110.7
111.7

490.1
492.4
500.7
505.1
511.4
518.2
518.5
522.9

322.7
324.3
330.0
334.1
340.0
347.4
348.4
351.9

325.6
327.3
332.8
336.7
342.4
349.7
350.8
354.3

115.2
116.1
118.1
119.6
120.3
5121.8
121.6
121.4

116.9
117.8
119.9
121.3
121.8
5123.2
123.0
123.0

62.7
61.9
62.4
61.6
61.0
59.9
59.2
58.9

104.8
106.2
108.4
109.4
110.5
110.9
110.9
112.1

1 Adjusted to exclude domestic commercial interbank loans.
2 Beginning June 30, 1971, Farmers H om e Administration insured notes
totaling approximately $700 million are included in “ Other securities”
rather than in “Loans.”
3 Loans sold outright by commercial banks to own subsidiaries,
foreign branches, holding companies, and other affiliates.
4 Beginning June 30, 1969, data revised to include all bank-premises
subsidiaries and other significant majority-owned domestic subsidiaries;
earlier data include commercial banks only. Also, loans and investments
are now reported gross, w ithout valuation reserves deducted, rather than
net o f valuation reserves as was done previously. For a description o f the
revision, see Aug. 1969 B u l l e t i n , pp. 642-46. D ata shown in this table
beginning January 1959 have been revised to include valuation reserves.




71.5
71.3

5 Beginning June 30, 1972, commercial and industrial loans were re­
duced by about $400 million as a result o f loan reclassifications at one
large bank.
N o t e . —For monthly data on total loans and investments 1959-70, see
Dec. 1971 B u l l e t i n , pp. 974-75. For monthly data, 1948-58, see Aug.
1968 B u l l e t i n , pp. A-94-A-97. F or a description o f the seasonally ad­
justed series see the following Bulletins: July 1962, pp. 797-802; July 1966,
pp. 950-55; Sept. 1967, pp. 1511-17; and Dec. 1971, pp. 971-73. For
monthly data on commercial and industrial loans, 1959-71, see July 1972
B u l l e t i n , p. A-109. F or description o f series, see July 1972 B u l l e t i n ,
p. 683. D ata are for last Wednesday of m onth except for June 30 and
Dec. 31; data are partly or wholly estimated except when June 30 and Dec.
31 are call dates.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ BANKS AND THE MONETARY SYSTEM

A 19

CONSOLIDATED CONDITION STATEMENT
(In millions of dollars)
Assets

Liabilities
and canital

Loans
net
2

Total

Coml.
and
savings
banks

Federal
Reserve
Banks

Other 3

Other
secu­
rities

Total
assets,
net—
T otal
liabil­
ities
and
capital,
net

Bank credit
D ate

G old
stock
and
SD R
certifi­
cates i

Treas­
ury
cur­
rency
out­
stan d ­
ing

U.S. Treasury securities
Total

4

Total
deposits
and
currency

Capital
and
misc.
ac­
counts,
net

1947—Dec.
1950—Dec.
1967—Dec.
1968—Dec.
1969—Dec.
1970—Dec.

3 1 ..
30 ..
30 ..
3 1 ..
315.
3 1 ..

22,754
22,706
11,982
10.367
10.367
11,132

4,562
4,636
6,784
6,795
6,849
7,149

160,832
171,667
468,943
514,427
532,663
580,899

43,023
60,366
282,040
311,334
335,127
354,447

107,086
96,560
117,064
121,273
115,129
127,207

81,199
72,894
66,752
68,285
57,952
64,814

22,559
20,778
49,112
52,937
57,154
62,142

3,328
2,888
1,200
51
23
251

10,723
14,741
69,839
81,820
82,407
99,245

188,148
199,008
487,709
531,589
549,879
599,180

175,348
184,384
444,043
484,212
485,545
535,157

12,800
14,624
43,670
47,379
64,337
64,020

1971—Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.

2 5 ..
2 9..
27..
24..
31..

10.500
10.500
10.500
10.500
10,532

7.500
7.500
7.600
7.600
7,627

611,300
617,000
622,200
626,700
650,677

365,700
368,100
369,500
370,900
386,010

130,000
131,300
133,600
136,400
141,547

62,200
62,200
63,300
64,400
68,198

66,400
67,600
67,800
69,500
70,804

1,400
1,600
2.500
2.500
2,545

115,600
117,500
119,100
119,400
123,120

629.300
635,000
640.300
644,800
668,837

563.500
567.500
571,600
575,800
604,415

65.800
67,600
68.800
69,000
64,423

1972—Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
M ay
June
July
Aug.

26..
23..
29*.
26*.
31*.
28*.
26*.
30*.

10,500
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,800
10,800
10,800
10,800

7,700
7,800
7.900
7.900
8,000
8,100
8,100
8,200

642,600
643.300
653,700
660,000
665.300
669.300
674,100
678.300

380,600
381.000
386,900
391.000
395.000
400,700
405,200
408,800

138,400
136.600
138.200
138,900
138.600
136.600
136.200
135,700

66,000
65,200
65,800
65.000
64,400
63.000
62,700
62,300

69.900
68.900
69.900
71,300
71,600
71,000
70.900
70,800

2.500
2.500
2,600
2,600
2,600
2,600
2,600
2,600

123,600
125.700
128,500
130.100
131.700
132.100
132.700
133,800

660,800
661,100
671,600
677,900
684.100
688,200
693.100
697,300

593,000
592.900
606,700
612,500
619,400
622.900
628,100
630,200

67.900
68,200
64.900
65,400
64,700
65,300
65,000
67,100

DETAILS OF DEPOSITS AND CURRENCY
M oney stock
Seasonally adjusted 6
D ate
Total

C ur­
rency
outside
banks

Related deposits (not seasonally adjusted)

N ot seasonally adjusted

D e­
mand
deposits
ad ­
justed 7

Total

C ur­
rency
outside
banks

Time

D e­
mand
deposits
ad ­
justed7

Total

U.S. Governm ent

F or­
Postal
eign,
C om ­
M utual Savings
net
10
mercial savings
Sys­
banks 8 banks 9 tem
3

1947—Dec.
1950—Dec.
1967—Dec.
1968—Dec.
1969—Dec.
1970—Dec.

3 1 . .. .
3 0 . .. .
3 0 . .. .
3 1 . .. .
3 1 5 ...
3 1 . .. .

110,500
114,600
181,500
199,600
206,800
209,400

26,100
24,600
39,600
42,600
45,400
47,800

84,400
90,000
141,900
157,000
161,400
161,600

113,597
117,670
191,232
207,347
214,689
219,422

26,476 87,121
25,398 92,272
41,071 150,161
43,527 163,820
46,358 168,331
49,779 169,643

56,411
59,246
242,657
267,627
260,992
302,591

35,249
36,314
182,243
202,786
193,533
230,622

17,746
20,009
60,414
64,841
67,459
71,969

1971—Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.

2 5 . .. .
2 9 . .. .
2 7 ....
2 4 ....
3 1 ....

214,700
213,800
215,900
216,700
224,600

50,300
50,400
51,000
51,100
51,100

164,400
163,400
164,900
165,600
173,500

213,000
212,400
216,800
220,100
234,876

50,600
50,500
50,900
52,500
53,141

162,300
161,900
165,900
167,600
181,735

336,300
340,700
343,700
346,400
353,638

257,700
261,400
263,900
266,100
271,760

78,600
79,400
79,800
80,300
81,877

1972—Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
May
June
July
Aug.

2 6 ....
2 3 ....
2 9 * ...
2 6 * ...
3 1 * ...
2 8 * ...
2 6 * ...
3 0 * ...

217,200
220,400
230,300
227,400
233,800
233,400
233,100
235,900

51,700
52,100
52,600
52,700
53,300
53,300
53,600
53,500

165,500
168,300
177,700
174,700
180,500
180,100
179,500
182,400

220,000
219,300
227,000
227,400
230,900
230,200
232,800
233,800

51,000
51,500
52,100
52,200
53,100
53,300
53,700
53,800

169,000
167,800
174,900
175,200
177,800
177,000
179,100
180,000

357,300
361,700
366,600
369,400
374,100
377,000
380,400
387,300

274,900
278,300
281,700
284,000
288,000
289,900
292,800
299,000

82,500
83,400
84,900
85,400
86,100
87,100
87,600
88,300

1 Includes Special Drawing Rights certificates beginning Jan. 1970.
2 Beginning with data for June 30, 1966, about $1.1 billion in “Deposits
accumulated for payment o f personal loans” were excluded from “Time
deposits” and deducted from “ Loans” at all commercial banks. These
changes resulted from a change in Federal Reserve regulations. See table
(and notes), D eposits Accum ulated fo r Paym ent o f Personal Loans, p. A-32.
See footnote 1 on p. A-23.
3 After June 30, 1967, Postal Savings System accounts were eliminated
from this Statement.
4 See second paragraph o f note 2.
5 Figures for this and later dates take into account the following changes
(beginning June 30, 1969) for commercial banks: (1) inclusion o f con­
solidated reports (including figures for all bank-premises subsidiaries and
other significant majority-owned domestic subsidiaries) and (2) reporting
o f figures for total loans and for individual categories o f securities on a
gross basis—th at is, before deduction o f valuation reserves. See also note 1.
6 Series began in 1946; data are available only for last Wed. o f month.
7 Other than interbank and U.S. Govt., less cash items in process o f
collection.




3,416
2,923

Treas­
ury
cash
hold­
ings

At
coml.
At
and
F.R .
savings Banks
banks
1,452
2,989
5,508
5,385
5,273
8,409

870
668
1,123
703
1,312
1,156

2,500
2,400
2,500
2,600
2,719

500 10,000
500 9,500
500 6,500
500 4,700
464 10,698

1,400
2,000
1,700
1,400
2,020

2,400
2,600
2,500
2,500
2,900
2,900
3,000
2,900

500 9,900
400 7,800
400 9,200
400 11,000
400 9,000
400 9,500
300 9,000
300 4,500

2,900
1,100
900
1,800
2,100
2,900
2,500
1,400

1,682
2,518
2,179
2,455
2,683
3,148

1,336
1,293
1,344
695
596
431

8 See first paragraph o f note 2.
9 Includes relatively small amounts o f demand deposits. Beginning with
June 1961, also includes certain accounts previously classified as other lia­
bilities.
10 Reclassification o f deposits o f foreign central banks in M ay 1961 re­
duced this item by $1,900 million ($1,500 million to time deposits and $400
million to demand deposits).
N o te . —For back figures and descriptions o f the consolidated condition
statement and the seasonally adjusted series on currency outside banks and
demand deposits adjusted, see “ Banks and the M onetary System,” Section
1 of Supplement to Banking and M onetary S tatistics, 1962, and B u lle t in s
for Jan. 1948 and Feb. 1960. Except on call dates, figures are partly esti­
mated and are rounded to the nearest $100 million.
F o r description of substantive changes in official ca ll reports o f
condition beginning June 1969, see B u lle t in for Aug. 1969, pp. 642-46.

A 20

COMMERCIAL BANKS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
PRINCIPAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND NUMBER, BY CLASS OF BANK
(Amounts in millions o f dollars)
Loans and investments
Securities

Class o f bank
and date

All commercial banks:
1941—Dec. 3 1 . ..
1945—Dec. 3 1 . ..
1947—Dec. 31 6.

Total

50,746
124,019
116,284

Loans
l

U.S.
Treas­
ury

21,714 21,808
26,083 90,606
38,057 69,221

Other
2

Total
assets—
Total
Cash
lia­
assets 3 bilities
and
T o tal3
capital
ac­
counts4

D eposits
Interbank3

Bor­
row­
ings

D em and
D e­
mand

U.S.
Govt.

7,225 26,551 79,104 71,283
10, S>82
7,331 34,806 160,312 150,227
14,( )65
9,006 37,502 155,377 144,103 12,792
240

3 1 . ..
3 0 . ..
3 1 . ..
31 7.
3 1 ...

322,661
359,903
401,262
421,597
461,194

217,726
235,954
265,259
295,547
313,334

56,163
62,473
64,466
54,709
61,742

48,772
61,477
71,537
71,341
86,118

69,119
77,928
83,752
89,984
93,643

403,368
451,012
500,657
530,665
576,242

352,287
395,008
434,023
435,577
480,940

19,770
967
21,883 1,314
24,747 1,211
27,174
735
30,608 1,975

1971—Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.

2 5 ...
2 9 ...
2 7 ...
2 4 ...
3 1 ...

482,230
489,640
492,020
497,070
516,564

325,450
331,000
330,570
334,420
346,930

58,720
58,740
59,960
61,030
64,930

98,060
99,900
101,490
101,620
104,704

85,300
88,180
95,590
95,350
99,832

591.080
602,070
611,630
616.080
640,255

491,180
497,530
506,710
506,340
537,946

1972—Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
M ay
June
July
Aug.

2 6 ...
2 3 ...
29p. .
2 6 * \.
3125..
2 8 ^ ..
26v. .
30p. .

508,200
511,360
521,870
523,760
529,510
535,580
539,130
543,820

340,730
343,300
351,130
352,770
358,080
365,380
369,060
372,850

62,690 104,780
61,860 106,200
62,380 108,360
61,620 109,370
60,960 110,470
59,600 110,600
59,190 110,880
58,920 112,050

92,690
96,130
91,350
95,300
101,360
92,730
92,270
92,070

624,750
631,330
638,210
643.770
656.770
653,980
656,960
661,850

521,320
524,280
525,520
531,990
542,940
538,620
542,830
544,230

Member of
F.R. System:
1941—Dec. 3 1 ...
1945—Dec. 3 1 ...
1947—Dec. 3 1 ...

43,521
107,183
97,846

Total
capital
ac­
counts

N um ­
ber
of
banks

Time 5

Time

1966—Dec.
1967—Dec.
1968—Dec.
1969—Dec.
1970—Dec.

18,021 19,539
22,775 78,338
32,628 57,914

O ther

O ther

44, 349
105 ,921
1,343 94,367

15,952
30,241
35,360

23 7,173 14,278
219 8,950 14,011
65 10,059 14,181

4,992
5,234
5,010
5,054
7,938

167,751
184,066
199,901
208,870
209,335

158,806 4,859 32,054 13,767
182,511 5,777 34,384 13,722
203,154 8,899 37,006 13,679
193,744 18,360 39,978 13,661
231,084 19,375 42,958 13,686

26,380
27,050
28,920
28,200
32,205

2,110 9,390
2,500 8,920
2,610 5,950
2,600 4,210
2,908 10,169

195,020
197,180
204,800
204,670
220,375

258,280
261,880
264,430
266,660
272,289

44,980
45,110
45,530
45,710
47,211

13,739
13,753
13,768
13,776
13,783

28,480
31,050
26,430
26,140
28,240
26,520
27,250
27,030

2,960 9,280 205,160 275,440 26,370 46,600
2,990 7,270 204,080 278,890 29,190 47,050
2,950 8,740 205,210 282,190 32,810 47,450
2,870 10,470 207,990 284,520 31,520 47,780
3,020 8,430 214,640 288,610 33,110 48,310
3,000 8,920 209,710 290,470 34,240 48,340
3,230 8,480 210,500 293,370 34,050 48,710
3,310 3,900 210,370 299,620 35,700 49,140

13,787
13,799
13,806
13,823
13,838
13,875
13.877
13.877

5,961 23,113 68,121 61,717 10,385
6,070 29.845 138,304 129,670 13,576
7,304 32.845 132,060 122,528 12,353

140 1,709
64 22,179
50 1,176

37,136
69,640
80,609

12,347
24,210
28,340

24,620
26,850
27,240
30,870
25,912

4
208
54

5,886
7,589
8,464

6,619
6,884
6,923

1966—Dec.
1967—Dec.
1968—Dec.
1969—Dec.
1970—Dec.

3 1 ...
3 0 . ..
31 . . .
31 7.
3 1 ...

263,687
293,120
325,086
336,738
365,940

182,802
196,849
220,285
242,119
253,936

41,924
46,956
47,881
39,833
45,399

38,960
49,315
56,920
54,785
66,604

60,738
68,946
73,756
79,034
81,500

334,559
373,584
412,541
432,270
465,644

291,063
326,033
355,414
349,883
384,596

794
18,788
20,811 1,169
23,519 1,061
25,841
609
29,142 1,733

4,432
4,631
4,309
4,114
6,460

138,218
151,980
163,920
169,750
168,032

128,831 4,618 26,278
147,442 5,370 28,098
162,605 8,458 30,060
149,569 17,395 32,047
179,229 18,578 34,100

6,150
6,071
5,978
5,869
5,766

1971—A ug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.

2 5 ...
2 9 ...
2 7 ...
2 4 ...
3 1 ...

379,269
385,391
386,028
389,468
405,087

261,993
266,575
2,64,847
267,287
277,717

42,337
42,369
43,586
44,630
47,633

74,939
76,447
77,595
77,551
79,738

74,807
77,361
83,963
83,788
86,189

473,923
483,064
490,047
492,995
511,353

389,558
394,598
401,167
399,678
425 380

25,169
25,829
27,616
26,941
30,612

1,883
2,274
2,385
2,372
2,549

7,907
7,369
4,840
3,317
8,427

155,336
157,000
162,600
161,905
174,385

199,263
202,126
203,726
205,143
209,406

23,749
25,843
26,203
29,776
25,046

35,723
35,827
36,179
36,303
37,279

5,730
5.724
5.725
5,729
5,727

1972—Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
M ay
June
July
Aug.

2 6 ...
2 3 ...
2 9 ...
2 6 ...
3 1 ...
2 8 ...
2 6 ...
30p. .

397,951
400,338
409,024
409,925
414,469
419,412
422,102
425,392

272,452
274,508
281,182
282,298
286,310
292,333
2,95,275
297,851

45,723
45,102
45,486
44,643
44,403
43,251
42,932
42,727

79,776
80,728
82,356
82,984
83,756
83,828
83,895
84,814

80,580
83,258
78,710
82,345
87,524
80,019
79,164
79,057

498,591
503,720
508,747
513,123
523,538
520,769
522,562
525,983

411,462
413,339
413,132
418,730
427,426
423,451
426,242
426,716

27,230
29,738
25,154
24,893
26,913
25,272
25,923
25,742

2,596
2,627
2,590
2,510
2,663
2,644
2,867
2,954

7,643
5,931
7,216
8,939
6,825
7,301
6,953
2,966

162,307
161,031
161,976
164,071
169,496
165,349
165,393
164,851

211,686
214,012
216,196
218,317
221,529
222,885
225,106
230,203

25,429
28,227
31,792
30,406
31,907
32,965
32,725
34,315

37,028
37,340
37,683
37,928
38,356
38,355
38,649
38,979

5,718
5,720
5.713
5.713
5.713
5.714
5.705
5.705

Reserve city member:
New York C ity :8, 9
1941—Dec. 3 1 ...
1945—Dec. 3 1 ...
1947—Dec. 3 1 ...

12,896
26,143
20,393

4,072 7,265
7,334 17,574
7,179 11,972

1,559
1,235
1,242

6,637
6,439
7,261

19,862
32,887
27,982

17,932
30,121
25,216

4,202
4,640
4,453

6
17
12

866
6,940
267

12,051
17,287
19,040

807
1,236
1,445

i95
30

1,648
2,120
2,259

36
37
37

467
741
622
268
956

1,016
1,084
888
694
1,039

26,535
31,282
33,351
36,126
32,235

17,449
20,062
20,076
14,944
20,448

1,874
1,880
2,733
4,405
4,500

5,298
5,715
6,137
6,301
6,486

12
12
12
12
12

1966—Dec.
1967—Dec.
1968—Dec.
1969—Dec.
1970—Dec.

3 1 ...
3 0 ...
3 1 ...
31 7.
3 1 ...

46,536
52,141
57,047
60,333
62,347

35,941
39,059
42,968
48,305
47,161

4,920
6,027
5,984
5,048
6,009

5,674
7,055
8,094
6,980
9,177

14,869
18,797
19,948
22,349
21,715

64,424
74,609
81,364
87,753
89,384

51,837 6,370
60,407 7,238
63,900 8,964
62,381 10,349
67,186 12,508

1971—Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
D ec.

2 5 ...
2 9 ...
2 7 ...
2 4 ...
3 1 ...

60,886
61,997
61,734
61,776
63,342

47,659
48,700
47,971
47,626
48,714

4,793
4,713
5,088
5,582
5,597

8,434
8,584
8,675
8,568
9,031

21,431
23,254
24,405
23,026
22,663

88,217
90,982
91,671
90,162
91,461

67,392
68,633
68,923
67,792
71,723

11,918
12,471
13,005
12,988
13,825

939
1,013
1,086
1,196
1,186

1,564
1,283
710
392
1,513

28,578
29,229
29,561
28,785
30,943

24,393
24,637
24,561
24,431
24,256

6,201
6,818
6,748
6,954
5,195

7,078
7,061
7,207
7,257
7,285

12
12
12
12
12

1972—Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
M ay
June
July
Aug.

2 6 ...
2 3 ...
2 9 ...
2 6 ...
3 1 ...
2 8 ...
2 6 ...
3 0 ...

62,539
61,856
64,450
63,467
65,719
66,761
66,331
67,353

48,337
48,221
50,063
49,539
50,799
51,973
51,408
52,031

5,405 8,797
5,190 8,445
5,567 8,820
4,825 9,103
5,257 9,663
4,962 9,826
4,954 9,969
5,158 10,164

23,684
23,615
21,400
21,014
22.516
19,971
19.517
19,152

91,726
91,094
91,687
90,364
93,765
92,258
91,247
92,066

71,017
69,674
68,029
68,798
70,852
70,213
69,508
69,330

13,443
15,152
11,674
11,451
12,303
11,790
11,580
11,679

1.258
1.258
1,231
1,162
1,198
1,156
1,312
1,345

1,395
878
1,360
2,013
1,038
989
1,170
288

30,660
28,084
28,793
28,842
29,918
29,649
28,396
27,497

24,261
24,302
24,971
25,330
26,395
26,629
27,050
28,521

5,854
6,906
8,428
6,650
8,103
7,528
7,431
8,188

7,253
7,306
7,342
7,372
7,618
7,559
7,612
7,736

12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13

For notes see p. A-23.




SEPTEMBER 1972 □ COMMERCIAL BANKS

A 21

PRINCIPAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND NUMBER, BY CLASS OF BANK— Continued
(Amounts in millions of dollars)
Loans and investments
Securities
Class o f bank
and date

Reserve city member (cont.)
City of Chicago: *
1941—Dec. 3 1 ............
1945—Dec. 3 1 ............
1947—Dec. 3 1 ...........

Total

Loans

U.S.
Treas­
ury

O ther

Total
assets—
Total
lia­
Cash
bilities
and
assets3
capital T o tal3
ac­
counts4

D eposits
O ther
D em and
D e­
m and

2,760
5,931
5,088

954
1,333
1,801

1,430
4,213
2,890

376
385
397

1,566
1,489
1,739

4,363
7,459
6,866

4,057
7,046
6,402

1,035
1,312
1,217

Total N um ­
capital ber
ac­
of
counts banks

Bor­
row­
ings
Tim es

Time
U.S.
G ovt.

O ther

127
1,552
72

2,419
3.462
4,201

476
719
913

288
377
426

13
12
14

1966—Dec.
1967—Dec.
1968—Dec.
1969—Dec.
1970—Dec.

3 1 . ..
3 0 . ..
3 1 . ..
31 7.
3 1 ...

11,802
12.744
14,274
14,365
15.745

8,756
9,223
10,286
10,771
11,214

1,545
1,574
1,863
1,564
2,105

1,502
1,947
2,125
2,030
2,427

2,638
2,947
3,008
2,802
3,074

14,935
16,296
18,099
17,927
19,892

12,673
13,985
14,526
13,264
15,041

1.433
1.434
1,535
1,677
1,930

25
21
21
15
49

310
267
257
175
282

6,008
6,250
6,542
6,770
6,663

4,898
6,013
6,171
4,626
6,117

484
383
682
1,290
1,851

1,199
1,346
1,433
1,517
1,586

11
10
9
9
9

1971—Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.

25.,
29.
27.
24.
31.

16,346
16,704
16,526
16,651
17,133

12,113
12,273
11,938
11,945
12,285

1,528
1,671
1,732
1,780
1,782

2,705
2,760
2,856
2,926
3,067

3,089
2,756
3,576
3,856
3,011

20,364
20,438
21,049
21,333
21,214

15,234
15,571
15,933
15,364
16,651

1,365
1,339
1,553
1,431
1,693

142
191
228
219
168

380
374
240
102
364

5,997
6,028
6,386
6,097
6,896

7,350
7,639
7,526
7,515
7,530

2,447
1,952
2,462
2,712
1.935

1,638
1.649
1,669
1.649
1,682

9
9
9
9
9

1972—Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
M ay
June
July
Aug.

2 6.,
23.
29.
26.
31.
28.
26.
30.

16,614
17,234
17,668
17,761
18,147
18,529
18,582
19,200

11,901
12,505
12,898
12,998
13,283
13,934
14,130
14,701

1,657
1,576
1,582
1,510
1,665
1,456
1,398
1,455

3,056
3,153
3,188
3,253
3,199
3,139
3,054
3,044

3,488
3,311
3,204
3,207
3,538
2,902
3,070
2,880

21,059
21.489
21,806
21,858
22,697
22.489
22,727
23,128

15,730
15,791
15,912
16,017
16,509
16,688
16,695
17,147

1,460
1,509
1,398
1,344
1,412
1,329
1,447
1,487

213
207
191
191
182
c191
194
196

378
267
341
465
282
243
310
68

6,243 7,436
6,305 7,503
6.462 7,520
6,381 7,636
6,631 8,002
6,533 c8 ,392
6,157 8,587
6,226 9,170

2,673
2.935
3,180
2,972
3,280
2,926
3,187
2,985

1,781
1,796
1,820
1,829
1,836
1,839
1.850
1.850

9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9

15,347
40,108
36,040

7,105 6,467
8,514 29,552
13,449 20,196

1,776 8,518
2,042 11,286
2,396 13,066

24,430
51,898
49,659

22,313
49,085
46,467

4,356
6,418
5,627

491 12.557 4,806
104
30 8,221 24,655 9,760
22
405 28,990 11,423

2
1

1,967
2,566
2,844

351
359
353

O ther reserve city: *
1941—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1945—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1947_D ec. 3 1 ___

13,326
17,487
20,337
18,484
22,860

24,228
26,867
28,136
29,954
31,263

1966—Dec.
1967—Dec.
1968—Dec.
1969—Dec.
1970—Dec.

3 1 . ..
3 0 . ..
3 1 . ..
31 7.
3 1 ...

95,831
105,724
119,006
121,324
133,718

123,863
136,626
151,957
157,512
171,733

108,804 8,593
120,485 9,374
132,305 10,181
126,232 10,663
140,518 11,317

233
310
307
242
592

1,633
1,715
1,884
1,575
2,547

49,004
53,288
57,449
58,923
59,328

49,341 1,952
55,798 2,555
62,484 4,239
54,829 9,881
66,734 10,391

9,471
10,032
10,684
11,464
12,221

169
163
161
157
156

1971- -Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.

25.
29.
27.
24.
31.

137,513 98,538 13,132 25,843 27,341 172,142
140,060 100,339 13,121 26,600 27.832 175,407
139,515 98,621 13,810 27,084 30,995 177,945
141,421 100,284 14,203 26,934 32,048 180,956
149,401 106.361 15,912 27,129 33,732 190,880

138,865 9,111
140,334 9,237
143,113 10,006
142,820 9,537
155,226 11,241

667
846
847
733
933

3,366
2,982
1,963
1,264
3,557

54,235
54.557
56,832
57,068
62,474

71,486
72,712
73,465
74,218
77,020

12,375
13.927
13,732
16,692
14,799

12,854
12,922
13.012
13.012
13,197

156
156
156
156
156

1972—Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
M ay
June
July
Aug.

26.
23.
29.
26.
31.
28.
26.
30.

145,436
146,609
149,384
149,586
151,153
152,851
154,528
153,956

901
938
944
894
1,020
1,034
1,098
1,150

3,057
2,492
2,889
3,839
2,763
3,310
2,867
1,015

56,144
57,121
57,001
58,129
60,716
58,398
58,980
58,564

77,944
78,372
78,099
79,453
80,690
80,632
81,139
82,383

13,528
14.927
16,508
16,766
16,435
18,156
17,595
18,421

13,427
13,463
13,657
13,725
13,890
13,903
14,011
14,062

156
156
156
156
156
156
156
156

225 10,109 6,258
30
17 5,465 24,235 12,494
432 28,378 14,560
17

4
11
23

69,464
73,571
83,634
90,896
96,158

103,311
104,067
106,665
107.362
108,846
111,037
113,172
112,637

13,040
14,667
15,036
11,944
14,700

14,796
14,768
14,583
14,434
14,362
13,999
13,873
13,501

27,329
27,774
28,136
27,790
27,945
27,815
27,483
27,818

29,154
30,945
29,082
32,579
34,413
32,122
30.832
31,452

182,373
185,420
186,613
190,334
193,947
193,131
193,689
193,592

147,352
148,824
147,937
151,394
155,174
152,512
153,772
152,570

9,306
9,901
9,004
9,079
9,985
9,138
9,<—
9,458

2,250 6,402
2,408 10,632
3,268 10,778

19,466
46,059
47,553

17,415
43,418
44,443

792
1.207
1,056

Country member: 8-9
1941—Dec. 3 1 ..
1945—Dec. 3 1 ..
1947_D ec. 3 1 ..

12,518
35,002
36,324

1966—Dec.
1967—Dec.
1968—Dec.
1969—Dec.
1970—Dec.

3 1 ..
3 0 ..
3 1 ..
317.
3 1 ..

109,518
122,511
134,759
140,715
154,130

68,641
74,995
83,397
92,147
99,404

22,419
24,689
24,998
21,278
22,586

18,458
22,826
26,364
27,291
32,140

19,004
20,334
22,664
23,928
25,448

131,338
146,052
161,122
169,078
184,635

117,749
131,156
144,682
148,007
161,850

2,392
2,766
2,839
3,152
3,387

69
96
111
84
135

1,474
1,564
1,281
1,671
2,592

56,672
61,161
66,578
67,930
69,806

57,144
65,569
73,873
75,170
85,930

308
552
804
1,820
1,836

10,309
11,005
11.807
12,766
13.807

5,958
5,886
5,796
5,691
5,589

1971—Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.

2 5 ..
2 9 ..
2 7 ..
2 4 ..
3 1 ..

164,524
166,630
168,253
169,620
175,211

103,683
105,263
106,317
107,432
110,357

22,884
22.864
22,956
23,065
24,343

37,957
38,503
38,980
39,123
40,511

22,946
23,519
24,987
24,858
26,783

193,200
196,237
199,382
200,544
207,798

168,067
170,060
173,198
173,702
181,780

2,775
2,782
3,052
2,985
3,853

135
224
224
224
263

2,597
2,730
1,927
1,559
2,993

66,526
67,186
69,821
69,955
74,072

96,034
97,138
98,174
98,979
100,600

2,726
3,146
3,261
3,418
3,118

14,153
14,195
14,291
14,385
15,114

5,553
5.547
5.548
5,552
5,550

1972—Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
M ay
June
July
Aug.

2 6 ..
2 3 ..
2 9 ..
2 6 ..
31 ..
2 8 ..
2 6 ..
30*V

173,362
174,639
177,522
179,111
179,450
181,271
182,661
184,883

108,903
109,715
111,556
112,399
113,382
115,389
116,565
118,482

23.865
23,568
23,754
23,874
23,119
22,834
22,707
22,613

40,594
41,356
42,212
42,838
42,949
43,048
43,389
43,788

24,254
25,387
25.024
25,545
27,057
25.024
25,745
25,573

203,438
205,717
208,641
210,567
213,129
212,891
214,899
217,197

177,363
179,050
181,254
182,521
184,891
184,038
186,267
187,669

3,021
3,176
3,078
3,019
3,213
3,015
3.208
3,118

224
224
224
263
263
263
263
263

2,813
2,294
2,626
2,622
2,742
2,759
2,606
1,595

69,260
69,521
69,720
70,719
72,231
70,769
71,860
72,564

102,045
103,835
105,606
105,898
106,442
107,232
108,330
110,129

3,374
3,459
3,676
4,018
4,089
4,355
4,512
4,721

14,567
14,775
14,864
15,002
15,012
15,054
15,176
15,331

5,541
5,543
5.536
5.536
5.535
5.536
5.527
5.527

For notes see p. A-23.




5,890 4,377
5,596 26,999
10,199 22,857

1,982 6,219
2,525 6,476
2,934 6,519

A 22

COMMERCIAL BANKS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
PRINCIPAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND NUMBER, BY CLASS OF BANK— Continued
(Amounts in millions o f dollars)
Loans and investments

Classification by
FR S membership
and FD IC
insurance

Securities
Total

Insured banks:
Total:
1941—Dec. 3 1 .. 49,290
1945_D ec. 3 1 .. 121,809
1947—Dec. 3 1 .. 114,274

Loans
l

U.S.
Treas­
ury

21,259 21,046
25,765 88,912
37,583 67,941

Other
2

Total
assets—
Total
Cash
lia­
assets 3 bilities
and
capital
ac­
counts4

Deposits
Interbank3

O ther

Total 3

D em and
D e­
mand

Time
5

Time

6,984 25,788 76,820 69,411
10,(554
7,131 34,292 157,544 147,775
13,!383
8,750 36,926 152,733 141,851 12,615

54

U.S.
Govt.

Other

1,762
23,740
1,325

41,298
80,276
92,975

15,699
29,876
34,882

Bor­
row­
ings

Total
capital
ac­
counts

10
215
61

N um ­
ber
of
banks

6,844 13,426
8,671 13,297
9,734 13,398

1963—Dec. 2 0 .. 252,579 155,261 62,723 34,594 50,337 310,730 273,657 15,077
1964—Dec. 3 1 .. 275,053 174,234 62,499 38,320 59,911 343,876 305,113 17,664
1965—Dec. 3 1 .. 303,593 200,109 59,120 44,364 60,327 374,051 330,323 18,149

443
733
923

6,712 140,702 110,723
6,487 154,043 126,185
5,508 159,659 146,084

3,571 25,277 13,284
2,580 27,377 13,486
4,325 29,827 13,540

1966—Dec. 3 1 .. 321,473 217,379 55,788 48,307 68,515 401,409 351,438 19,497
1967—Dec. 3 0 .. 358,536 235,502 62,094 60,941 77,348 448,878 394,118 21,598
1968—Dec. 3 1 .. 399,566 264,600 64,028 70,938 83,061 498,071 432,719 24,427

881
1,258
1,155

4,975 166,689 159,396
5,219 182,984 183,060
5,000 198,535 203,602

4,717 31,609 13,533
5,531 33,916 13,510
8,675 36,530 13,481

1969—June 307. 408,620 283,199 53,723 71,697 87,311 513,960 423,957 24,889
Dec. 3 1 .. 419,746 294,638 54,399 70,709 89,090 527,598 434,138 26,858

800
695

5,624 192,357 200,287 14,450 38,321 13,464
5,038 207,311 194,237 18,024 39,450! 13,464

1970—Dec. 3 1 .. 458,919 312,006 61,438 85,475 92,708 572,682 479,174 30,233

1,,874

7,898 208,037 231,132 19,149 42,427| 13,502

1971—June 3 0.. 478,302 321,575 59,991 96,735 95,181 595,819 501,283 30,953 2,166 8,391 205,736 254,036 22,297 44,816 13,547
Dec. 3 1.. 514,097 345,386 64,691 104,020 98,281 635,805 535,703 31,824! 2,792 10,150 219,102 271,835 25,629 46,731 13,602
1
National member:
1
1,088 23,262
8,322
4 3,640 5,117
6 , ’786
1941—Dec. 3 1 .. 27,571 11,725 12,039 3,806 14,977 43,433 39,458
14,013 45,473 16,224
78 4,644 5,017
1945—Dec. 3 1 .. 69,312 13,925 51,250 4,137 20,144 90,220 84,939
9,: 129
35
795 53,541 19,278
45 5,409, 5,005
1947—Dec. 3 1 .. 65,280 21,428 38,674 5,178 22,024 88,182! 82,023 8,375
1963—Dec. 2 0 .. 137,447 84,845 33,384 19,218 28,635 170,233| 150,823 8,863
1964—Dec. 3 1 .. 151,406 96,688 33,405 21,312 34,064 190,289 169,615 10,521
1965—Dec. 3 1 .. 176,605 118,537 32,347 25,720 36,880 219,744 193,860 12,064

146
211
458

3,691
3,604
3,284

61,288
70,746
85,522

1,704 13,548
1,109 15,048;
2,627 17,434

4,615
4,773
4,815

1966—Dec. 3 1 .. 187,251 129,182 30,355 27,713 41,690 235,996 206,456 12,588
1967—Dec. 3 0 .. 208,971 139,315 34,308 35,3481 46,634 263,375 231,374 13,877
1968—Dec. 3 1 .. 236,130 159,257 35,300 41,572! 50,953 296,594 257,884 15,117

437
652
657

3,035 96,755 93,642
3,142 106,019 107,684
3,090 116,422 122,597

3,120 18,459i
3,478 19,730
5,923 21,524

4,799
4,758
4,716

1969—June 307. 242,241 170,834 29,481 41,927 52,271 305,800 251,489 14,324
Dec. 3 1 .. 247,526 177,435 29,576 40,514 54,721 313,927 256,314 16,299

437
361

3,534 113,134 120,060 9,895 22,628
3,049 121,719 114,885 12,279 23,248

4,700
4,668

1970—D ec. 3 1 .. 271,760 187,554j 34,203 50,004 56,028 340,764 283,663 18,051

982

4,740 122,298 137,592 13,100 24,868

4,620

1971—June 3 0.. 281,830 192,339 33,759 55,732 57,244 352,807 294,025 16,575
Dec. 31.. 302,756 206,758 36,386 59,612 59,191 376,318 314,085 17,511

1,441
1,828

5,118 121,096 149,795 15,629 25,999
6,014 128,441 160,291 18,169 27,065

4.598
4.599

State member:
1941—Dec. 3 1 ..
1945—Dec. 3 1 ..
1947—Dec. 3 1 ..

15,950
37,871
32,566

6,295 7,500
8,850 27,089
11,200 19,240

2,155 8,145
1,933i 9,731
2,125 10,822

24,688
48,084
43,879

22,259
44,730
40,505

3,'739
4,<411
3,978

1963—Dec. 2 0 ..
1964—Dec. 3 1 ..
1965—Dec. 3 1 ..

72,680
77,091
74,972

46,866 15,958 9,855 15,760
51,002 15,312 10,777| 18,673
51,262 12,645 11,065 15,934

91,235
98,852
93,640

78,553
86,108
81,657

1966—Dec. 3 1 ..
1967—Dec. 3 0 ..
1968—Dec. 3 1 ..

77,377
85,128
89,894

54,560 11,569 11,247 19,049 99,504
58,513 12,649 13,966 22,312 111,188
61,965 12,581 15,348 22,803 116,885

1969—June 307.
Dec. 3 1 ..

88,346
90,088

64,007 9,902 14,437 26,344 119,358
65,560 10,257 14,271 24,313 119,219

1970—Dec. 3 1 ..

94,760

66,963 11,196 16,600 25,472 125,460 101,512 11,091

1971—June 3 0..
Dec. 31..

96,939
102,813

67,726 10,279 18,934 27,499 129,955 107,484 13,389
71,441 11,247 20,125 26,998 135,517 111,777 13,102

Nonmember:
1941—Dec. 3 1 ..
1945—Dec. 3 1 ..
1947—Dec. 3 1 ..

5,776
14,639
16,444

3,241 1,509
2,992 , 10,584
4,958 10,039

1,025
1,063
1,448

2,668
4,448
4,083

8,708
19,256
20,691

7,702
18,119
19,340

262

4

1963—Dec. 2 0 ..
1964—Dec. 3 1 ..
1965—Dec. 3 1 ..

42,464
46,567
52,028

23,550 i 13,391
26,544 13,790 i
30,310 i 14,137

5,523
6,233
7,581

5,942
7,174
7,513

49,275
54,747
60,679

44,280
49,389
54,806

559
658
695

1966—Dec. 3 1 ..
1967—Dec. 3 0 ..
1968—Dec. 3 1 ..

56,857
64,449
73,553

33,636 1 13,873 9,349 ' 7,777
37,675 i 15,146 1 11,629 ' 8,403
43,378 16,155 ; 14,020 I 9,305 i

65,921
74,328
84,605

59,434
67,107
76,368

1969—June 307.
Dec. 3 1 ..

78,032
82,133

48,358 ! 14,341 15,333 8,696 i 88,802 :
51,643 1 14,565 i 15,925 i 10,056> 94,453 .

78,610
83,380

1970—Dec. 3 1 ..

92,399

57,489» 16,039' 18,871 11,208: 106,457r 93,998

1,091

141

1971—June 30 ..
Dec. 31 ..

99,532
108,527

61,509 ►15,953 1 22,07C> 10,439►113,0581 99,774
67,188 1 17,058 ! 24,282 t 12,092» 123,97CI 109,841

989)
1,212>

1861 1,40S)
241I 1,722\

For notes see p. A-23.



76,836
84,534
92,533

15

621
8,166
381

13,874
24,168
27,068

4,025
7,986
9,062

1
130
9

2,246
2,945;
3,055

1,502
1,867
1,918

5,655
6,486
5,390

236
453
382

2,295
2,234
1,606

40,725
44,005
39,598

29,642
32,931
34,680

1,795
1,372
1,607

7,506
7,853
7,492

1,497
1,452
1,406

85,547
95,637
98,467

6,200
6,934
8,402

357
516
404

1,397
1,489
1,219

41,464
45,961
47,498

36,129
40,736
40,945

1,498
1,892
2,535

7,819
8,368
8,536

1,351
1,313
1,262

93,858
94,445

9,773
9,541

285
248

1,341
1,065

45,152
48,030

37,307
35,560

4,104
5,116

8,689
8,800

1,236
1,201

750

1,720

45,734

42,218

5,478

9,232

1,147

539
721

1,865
2,412

44,731
45,945

46,959
49,597

6,071 9,823
6,878 10,214

1,138
1,128

53
1,560
149

4,162
10,635
12,366

3,360
5,680
6,558

6
7
7

959
1,083
1,271

6,810
6,416
6,478

61
701
83

726
649
618

23,140
25,504
27,528

19,793
22,509
25,882

72
99
91

4,234
4,488
4,912

7,173
7,262
7,320

709
786
908

87
89
94

543
588
691

28,471 29,625
31,004 ■ 34,640
34,615 i 40,060

99
162
217

5,342
5,830
6,482

7,384
7,440
7,504

791
1,017r

78
85i

749> 34,070 I 42,921
924|. 37,561 43,792 :

129
244

1,4381 40,005i

51,322:

39,9081 57,2831
4 4 ,7 1 'f 61,946i

451 7,004 ■ 7,528
629• 7,403 . 7,595
8,326i

7,735

591r 8,993 t
582> 9,451 I

7,811
7,875

571

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ COMMERCIAL BANKS

A 23

PRINCIPAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND NUMBER, BY CLASS OF BANK— Continued
(Amounts in millions o f dollars)
Loans and investments
Classification by
FRS membership
and FD IC
insurance

Securities
Total

Loans
l

U.S.
Treas­
ury

Other
2

Total
assets—
Total
Cash
lia­
assets 3 bilities
and
capital T o tal3
ac­
counts 4

Deposits
Interbank3

O ther
Bor­
row­
ings

Dem and
D e­
mand

Time
U.S.
Govt.

Noninsured
nonmember:
1941—Dec. 31...........
1945—Dec. 31...........
1947—Dec. 316.........

1,457
2,211
2,009

455
318
474

761
1,693
1,280

241
200
255

763
514
576

2,283
2,768
2,643

1,872
2,452
2,251

329
181
177

1963—Dec. 2 0 ...........
1964—Dec. 31...........
1965 Dec. 31...........

1,571
2,312
2,455

745
1,355
1,549

463
483
418

362
474
489

374
578
572

2,029
3,033
3,200

1,463
2,057
2,113

190
273
277

83
86
85

1967 Dec. 30...........
1968—Dec. 31...........

2,638
2,901

1,735
1,875

370
429

533
597

579
691

3,404
3,789

2,172
2,519

285
319

1969—June 30 7........
Dcc. 31...........

2,809
2,982

1,800
2,041

321
310

688
632

898
895

3,942
4,198

2,556
2,570

Time
5

Total
capital
ac­
counts

N um ­
ber
of
banks

O ther

1,: 91
1,905
18 1,392

253
365
478

13
4
4

329
279
325

852
714
783

17
23
17

832
1,141
1,121

341
534
612

93
99
147

389
406
434

285
274
263

58
56

15
10

1,081
1,366

733
767

246
224

457
464

211
197

298
316

81
41

15
16

1,430
1,559

731
638

290
336

502
528

209
197

185

1970—Dec. 31...........

3,079

2,132

304

642

934

4,365

2,570

375

101

40

1,298

756

226

532

184

1971—June 3 0 .........
Dec. 3 1 .........

2,968
3,147

2,057
2,224

263
239

648
684

960
1,551

4,356
5,130

2,480
2,923

360
380

41
116

20
19

1,182
1,273

877
1,134

250
283

495
480

182
181

Total nonmember:
1941_D ec. 31 ...........
1945—Dec. 31...........
1947—Dec. 31...........

7,233
16,849
18,454

3,696 2,270
3,310 12,277
5,432 11,318

1,2 66
1,262
1,703

3,431 10,992 9,573
4,962 22,024 20,571
4,659 23,334 21,591

457
425
439

190

5,504
14,101
167 13,758

3,613
6,045
7,036

18
11
12

1,288
1,362
1,596

7,662
7,130
7,261

1963—Dec. 2 0 ...........
1964—Dec. 31...........
1965—Dec. 3 1 ...........

44,035 24,295
48,879 27,899
54,483 31,858

13,854
14,273
14,555

5,885
6,707
8,070

6,316 51,304 45,743
7,752 57,780 51,447
8,085 63,879 56,919

749
931
972

144
156
168

743 23,972 20,134
672 26,645 23,043
635 28,649 26,495

165
198
238

4,623
4,894
5,345

7,458
7,536
7,583

1967—Dec. 30...........
1968—Dec. 31...........

67,087 39,409
76,454 45,253

15,516 12,162
16,585 14,617

8,983 77,732 69,279
9,997 88,394 78,887

1,071
1,227

147
150

603 32,085 35,372
701 35,981 40,827

408
441

6,286
6,945

7,651
7,701

1969—June 30 7........
Dec. 3 1 ...........

80,841 50,159 14,662 16,021 9,594 92,743 81,166
85,115 53,683 14,875 16,556 10,950 98,651 85,949

1,090
1,333

160
126

765 35,500 43,652
940 39,120 44,430

741
965

7,506
7,931

7,737
7,792

1 9 7 0 -D e c . 31 ...........

95,478

59,621

16,342 19,514 12,143 110,822 96,568

1,466

243

1,478 41,303 52,078

796

8,858

7,919

1971—June 3 0 ......... 102,500 63,566
Dec. 3 1 ......... 111,674 69,411

16,216 22,718 11,398 117,414 102,254
17,297 24,966 13,643 129,100 112,764

1,348
1,592

227
359

1,429 41,091 58,160
1,742 45,990 63,081

847
866

9,489
9,932

7,993
8,056

1 Beginning June 30, 1966, loans to farmers directly guaranteed by
CCC were reclassified as securities, and Export-Im port Bank portfolio
fund participations were reclassified from loans to securities. This reduced
Total loans and increased “ O ther securities” by about $1 billion. Total
loans include Federal funds sold, and beginning with June 1967 securities
purchased under resale agreements, figures for which are included in
“ Federal funds sold, etc.,” on p. A-24.
Beginning June 30, 1971, Farmers H om e Administration notes are
classified as “ Other securities” rather than “ Loans.” As a result o f this
change, approximately $300 million was transferred to “ Other securities”
for the period ending June 30, 1971, for all commercial banks.
See also table (and notes) at the bottom o f p. A-32.
2 See first two paragraphs o f note 1.
3 Reciprocal balances excluded beginning with 1942.
4 Includes items n o t shown separately. See also note 1.
5 See last paragraph o f note 1.
6 Beginning with Dec. 31, 1947, the series was revised; for description,
see note 4, p. 587, M ay 1964 B u lle t in .
7 Figure takes into account the following changes beginning June 30,
1969: (1) inclusion o f consolidated reports (including figures for all bankpremises subsidiaries and other significant majority-owned domestic
subsidiaries) and (2) reporting o f figures for total loans and for individual
categories o f securities on a gross basis—that is, before deduction o f
valuation reserves—rather than net as previously reported.
8 Regarding reclassification as a reserve city, see Aug. 1962 B u lle t in ,




p. 993. F or various changes between reserve city and country status in
1960-63, see note 6, p. 587, M ay 1964 B u lle t in .
9 Beginning M ay 6, 1972, two New Y ork City country banks, with
deposits o f $1,412 million, merged and were reclassified as a reserve city
bank.
N o t e . —D ata are for all commercial banks in the United States (includ­
ing Alaska and Hawaii, beginning with 1959). Commercial banks represent
all commercial banks, both m ember and nonm em ber; stock savings
banks; and nondeposit trust companies.
F or the period June 1941-June 1962 member banks include m utual
savings banks as follows: three before Jan. 1960, two through Dec. 1960,
and one through June 1962. Those banks are not included in insured
commercial banks.
Beginning June 30, 1969, commercial banks and member banks exclude
a small national bank in the Virgin Islands; also, member banks exclude,
and noninsured commercial banks include, through June 30, 1970, a small
member bank engaged exclusively in trust business.
Comparability o f figures for classes of banks is affected somewhat by
changes in F.R. membership, deposit insurance status, and the reserve
classifications o f cities and individual banks, and by mergers, etc.
D ata for national banks for Dec. 31, 1965, have been adjusted to make
them comparable with State bank data.
Figures are partly estimated except on call dates.
For revisions in series before June 30, 1947, see July 1947 B u lle t in ,
pp. 870-71.

A 24

COMMERCIAL BANKS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
LOANS AND INVESTMENTS BY CLASS OF BANK
(In millions of dollars)
Other loans 1

Class o f
bank and
call date

Total
loans i
and
invest­
ments

T o tal;2
1947—Dec. 3 1 .. 116,284

Fed­
eral
funds
sold,
etc.2

Total
3 .4

Investments

For
To
U.S. Treasury
purchasing
financial
securities 6
or
carrying
institutions
O
ther,
Com­
to
mer­ Agri- securities
Real
in- Other
cial
cules­
ditate
and
tur- To
vidal 5 bro­
Bills
in­
uals3
dus­
kers T o Banks Others
Total and Notes Bonds
and others
trial
certifi­
cates
deal­
ers

38,057 18,167 1,660

115

830 1,220

9,393

5,723

947 69,221 9,982 6,034 53,205 5,276 3,729

1969—Dec. 31 io 422,728 9,928 286,750 108,443 10,329 5,739 4,027 2,488 15,062 70,020 63,256 7,388 54,709
1971—June 30. 481,270 15,663 307,969 114,362 12,226 5,634 3,493 2,844 16,958 75,777 69,149 7,527 60,254
Dec. 31. 517,244 19,954 327,656 118,526 12,497 7,292 3,659 4,591 16,926 81,601 74,514 8,049 64,930
All insured:
1941— Dec. 3 1 .. 49,290
1945—Dec. 3 1 .. 121,809
1947—Dec. 3 1 .. 114,274

40
49
114

21,259 9,214 1,450 614 662
25,765 9,461 1.314 3,164 3,606
37,583 18,012 1,610 823 1,190

State
and
ther
local Osecu­
govt. rities 5
secu­
rities

59,183 12,158
77,994 19,389
82,420 22,284

4,773
21,046
4,505
988 3,159 16,899 3,651 3,333
4,677 2,361 1,132 88,912 21,526 16,045 51,342 3,873 3,258
9,266 5,654 914 67,941 9,676 5,918 52,347 5,129 3,621

1969—Dec. 31 io 419,746 9,693 284,945 107,685 10.314 5,644 3,991 2,425 14,890 69,669 63,008 7,319 54,399
58,840 11,869
1971—June 30. 478,302 15,381 306,194 113,411 12,211 5,555 3,480 2,718 16,825 75,615 68,942 7,437 59,991 i i ’729 38j 540 12j 509 77,687 19,048
Dec. 31. 514,097 19,623 325,764 117,603 12,482 7,201 3,644 4,405 16,792 81,434 74,263 7,939 64,691
82,099 21,921
Member—T otal:
1941—Dec. 3 1 .. 43,521
1945—Dec. 3 1 .. 107,183
1947_D ec. 3 1 .. 97,846

39
47
113

18,021 8,671
972 594 598
22,775 8,949
855 3,133 3,378
32,628 16,962 1,046 811 1,065

3,494
19,539
3,653
971 3,007 15,561 3,090 2,871
3,455 1,900 1,057 78,338 19,260 14,271 44,807 3,254 2,815
7,130 4,662 839 57,914 7,803 4,815 45,295 4,199 3,105

1969—Dec. 31 337,613 7,356 235,639 96,095 6,187 5,408 3,286 2,258 14,035 53,207 48,388 6.776 39,833
47,227 7,558
1971—June 30. 378,769 12,026 248,040 98,573 7,094 5,333 3,024 2,496 15,770 56,934 52,037 6.777 44,038 *5^444 25*365 '9*791 61,963 12,702
65,244 14,494
Dec. 31. 405,570 15,373 262,826 101,479 7,311 6,895 3,167 4,123 15,713 61/091 55,839 7,207 47,633
New York C ity:
1941—Dec. 3 1 .. 12,896
1945—Dec. 3 1 .. 26,143
1947—Dec. 3 1 .. 20,393

4,072 2,807
7,334 3,044
7,179 5,361

1969—Dec. 31 io 60,333
1971—June 30. 61,059
Dec. 31. 63,342

802 47,503 28,189
996 46,247 26,948
774 47,941 26,526

3,695
3,822
4,701

2,760
5,931
5,088

732
954
1,333
760
1,801 1,418

48
211
73

52
233
87

1969—Dec. 31io 14,365
1971—June 30. 16,477
Dec. 31. 17,162

215 10,556 6,444
612 11,164 6,515
621 11,693 6,355

337
373
527

262
245
263

Other reserve city:
1941—Dec. 3 1 .. 15,347
1945—Dec. 3 1 .. 40,108
1947—Dec. 3 1 .. 36,040

7,105 3,456
8,514 3,661
13,449 7,088

City o f Chicago:
1941—Dec. 3 1 ..
1945—Dec. 3 1 ..
1947—Dec. 3 1 ..

300
205
225

20
42
23

183
471
227

1969—Dec. 31 io 141,286 3,31 89,401 23,762 4,739
1971—June 30. 163,782 5,407 98,452 26,922 5,433
Dec. 31. 175,582 6,208 104,520 28,201 5,599

498
352
474

947
723
821

Nonmember:
1947—Dec. 3 1 ..

614

20

156

1969—Dec. 31 io 85,115 2,572 51,111 12,348 4,141
1971—June 30. 102,500 3,638 59,929 15,789 5,131
Dec. 31. 111,674 4,581 64,830 17,046 5,187

329
301
398

741
468
492

18,454

5,432

1,205

22
36
46
186 1,219
218 1,465
382 1,568
4
17
15

114 194
427 1,503
170 484

659
648
818

5,890 1,676
5,596 1,484
10,199 3,096

7,265
522
311 1,623 5,331
287 272 17,574 3,910 3,325 10,339
564 238 11,972 1,642
558 9,772

95
51
149

842
862
861 1,078
949 1,167
1,527
1,459
3,147

811 2,274 1,561

1,430
256
40 4,213 1,600
26 2,890
367
354 1,564
367 1,736
431 1,782

473

153 1,022
749 1,864
248 2,274
717

729
606
638

830
629
604

6,192 788
7,298 1,401
7,729 1,302
182
181
213

193
204
185

1,837
276 2,580
2,688

192
384
379

1,508
6,467
751 5,421
295
855 387 29.552 8,016 5,653 15,883
1,969 351 20,196 2,731 1,901 15,563

956 820
1,126 916
1,342 1,053

876 6,006 19,706 17,569 2,757 11,944
16,625 1,859
893 7,517 20,722 17,929 3,120 14.552 1,850 7,752 3,445 22,409 3,304
1,671 7,497 22,300 19,405 3,173 15,912
23,459 3,670

1 Beginning with June 30, 1948, figures for various loan items are
shown gross (i.e., before deduction o f valuation reserves); they do not
add to the total and are not entirely comparable with prior figures. Total
loans continue to be shown net. See also note 10.
2 Includes securities purchased under resale agreements. Prior to June 30,
1967, they were included in loans—for the most part in loans to “ Banks.”
Prior to Dec. 1965, Federal funds sold were included with “ Total” loans
and loans to “ Banks.”
3 See table (and notes), Deposits Accumulated for Payment o f Personal
Loans, p. A-32.




123
80
111

776 1,047 4,547 3,835 3,595 1,807 5,048
637 1,106 4,210 4,202 3,916 1,385 5,116
677 1,722 3,997 4,496 4,151 1,641 5,597

1969—Dec. 31 io 121,628 3,021 88,180 37,701 1,386 878 1,300
786 1,419
1971—June 30. 137,451 5,010 92,176 38,189 1,601
Dec. 31. 149,484 7,771 98,673 40,397 1,630 1,193 1,407
Country:
1941—Dec. 3 1 .. 12,518
1945—Dec. 3 1 .. 35,002
1947—Dec. 3 1 .. 36,324

32
26
93

412 169
2,453 1,172
545 267

2
4
5

1,823
1,881
3,827

110
4,377
1,528
481 3,787 1,222 1,028
707 359 26,999 5,732 4,544 16,722 1,342 1,067
1,979 224 22,857 3,063 2,108 17,687 2,006 1,262

148 2,263 28,824 26,362 1,858 21,278
22,572 4,718
279 2,577 31,148 29,113 1,905 22,634 2,310 14,622 4,510 29,675 7,614
348 2,651 33,347 31,117 1,962 24,343
31,367 9,144
2,266

1,061

231 1,028 16,813 14,868
348 1,187 18,843 17,112
468 1,213 20,509 18,675

109 11,318 2,179
612 14,875
749 16,216
842 17,297

1,219 7,920

1,073

625

11,956 4,600
16,031 6,687
17,176 7,790

4 Breakdowns o f loan, investment, and deposit classifications are not
available before 1947; summary figures for 1941 and 1945 appear in the
table on pp. A-20—A-23.
5 Beginning with June 30, 1966, loans to farmers directly guaranteed
by CCC were reclassified as “ O ther securities,” and Export-Im port Bank
portfolio fund participations were reclassified from loans to “ O ther
securities.” This increased “ O ther securities” by about $1 billion.
6 Beginning with Dec. 31, 1965, components shown at par rather than
at book value; they do not add to the total (shown at book value) and are
not entirely comparable with prior figures. See also note 10.
For other notes see opposite page.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ COMMERCIAL BANKS

A 25

RESERVES AND LIABILITIES BY CLASS OF BANK
(In millions o f dollars)
D em and deposits
Class o f
bank and
call date

T otal:3
1947—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1969—Dec. 31 io ..
1971—June 3 0 . . .
Dec. 3 1 . . .
All insured:
1941_D ec. 3 1 . . . .
1945—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1947—Dec. 3 1 . . . .

R e­
serves
with
F.R .
Banks

D e­
Bal­
mand
C ur­ ances
de­
rency with
posits
and
do­
ad­
coin mestic
banks7 justed 8

17,796 2,216 10,216 87,123

Interbank
State
and
local
govt.

U.S.
F o r­ Govt.
D o­
mestic7 eign9

11,362

1,430

1,343

6,799

Time deposits

Certi­
fied
and
offi­
cers*
checks,
etc.

2,581

IPC

84,987

U.S.
Govt. State
Inter­ and
and
bank Postal local
Sav­ govt.
ings

240

735
21,449 7,320 20,314 172,079 24,553 2,620 5,054 17,558 11,899 179,413
24,066 7,634 21,546 168,263 28,699 2,614 8,412 17,276 11,949 177,692 2,207
27,478 7,541 25,548 185,907 29,349 2,855 10,169 17,665 10,130 192,581 2,908
12,396 1,358 8,570 37,845
15,810 1,829 11,075 74,722
17,796 2,145 9,736 85,751

9,823
673 1,762
12,566 1,248 23,740
11,236 1,379 1,325

3,677
5,098
6,692

1,077
2,585
2,559

36,544
72,593
83,723

158
70
54

695
1969—Dec. 31 i o . . 21,449 7,292 19,528 170,280 24,386 2,471 5,038 17,434 11,476 178,401
1971—June 3 0 . . . 24,066 7,610 20,748 168,860 28,519 2,434 8,392 17,185 11,736 176,815 2,166
184,366
2,680
10,150
17,547
7,532
29,145
191,746
2,792
27,478
24,171
9,810
Dec. 3 1 . . .
Member—T o tal:
1941—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1945—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1947— Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1969—Dec. 31 io ..
1971—June 3 0 . . .
Dec. 3 1 . . .

12,396 1,087
15,811 1,438
17,797 1,672

671 1,709
6,246 33,754 9,714
7,117 64,184 12,333 1,243 22,179
6,270 73,528 10,978 1,375 1,176

5 105
4,015
4,639

93
111
151

1969—Dec. 31 io ..
1971—June 3 0 . . .
Dec. 31. . .

4,358
4,716
5,362

463
466
459

City o f Chicago:
1941—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1945—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1947—Dec. 3 1 ___

1 021
*942
1,070

43
36
30

298
200
175

2,215
3,153
3,737

1,027
1,292
1,196

1969—Dec. 3110..
1971—June 3 0 . . .
Dec. 3 1 . . .

869
991
956

123
126
133

150
247
202

5,221
5,044
5,335

1,581
1,439
1,592

96
51
101

Other reserve city:
1941—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1945—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1947—Dec. 3 1 . . . .

4,060
6,326
7,095

425
494
562

2,590 11,117
2,174 22,372
2,125 25,714

Country:
1941—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1945—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1947—Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1969—Dec. 31 *o..
1971—June 3 0 . . .
Dec. 3 1 . . .

1,009
2,450
2,401

33,061
62,950
72,704

140
64
50

609
21,449 5,676 11,931 133,435 23,441 2,399 4,114 13,274 10,483 145,992
24,066 5,870 12,971 127,670 27,605 2,360 6,983 12,953 10,654 142,220 1,980
27,478 5,778 14,893 140,446 28,056 2,556 8,427 12,955 8,587 152,843 2,549

New York City:
1941—Dec. 3 1___
1945— Dec. 3 1 . . . .
1947—Dec. 3 1 . . . .

1969—Dec. 31 io ..
1971—June 3 0 . . .
Dec. 3 1 . . .

3,066
4,240
5,504

9,044 1,787
10,394 1,822
12,264 1,819

319
237
290

450
1,338
1,105

11,282
15,712
17,646

694
1,199
1,513

1,168
789
909

6,605
6,032
3,841

28,354
268
25,994
937
26,193 1,186

8
127
20 1,552
72
21

233
237
285

34
66
63

2,152
3,160
3,853

175
318
363

268
352
333

229
211
240

6,273
6,084
6,323

4,302
6,307
5,497

54
491
110 8,221
131
405

1,144
1,763
2,282

286
611
705

3,456 44,169 10,072
4,069 43,872 9,631
4,222 48,063 10,637

590 1,575
535 2,954
604 3,557

3,934
3,716
3,600

141 10,761
78 15,065
70 16,653

3,595
607
866
3,535 1,105 6,940
267
3,236 1,217

455 21,316 8,708 1,641
1,193 15,264 13,504 1,717
1,806 18,315 12,047 1,779

6
17
12

242
735
933

3,080
3,031
3,779

72 1,671
56 2,513
73 2,993

7,905
8,095
8,113

1,721
1,956
1,973

58,304
58,691
63,986

84
223
263

385

167

1,295

180

12,284

190

222
940
254 1,429
299 1,742

55

4,284
4,323
4,710

1,416
1,295
1,543

33,420
35,472
39,737

126
227
359

7 Beginning with 1942, excludes reciprocal bank balances.
8 Through 1960 dem and deposits other than interbank and U.S.
G ovt., less cash items in process o f collection; beginning with 1961,
demand deposits other than domestic commercial interbank and U.S.
G ovt., less cash items in process o f collection.
9 F or reclassification o f certain deposits in 1961, see note 6 , p. 589,
May 1964 B u lle t in .
10 Beginning June 30, 1969, reflects (1) inclusion o f consolidated reports
(including figures for all bank-premises subsidiaries and other significant
majority-owned domestic subsidiaries) and (2) reporting o f figures for
total loans and for individual categories o f securities on a gross basis—that
is, before deduction o f valuation reserves. See also notes 1 and 6.




4 5,886
208 7,589
54 8,464

778
1,648
1,206 * 195 2,120
1,418
30 2,259

207 14,692 4,405 6,301
45
68 1,896 21,572 4,531 6,860
51 2,060 22,145 5,195 7,285

53,062
51,451
56,341

7,870 62,729
7,461 63,490
8,663 68,733

1,112
1,094
1,293

29
20
14

1,928
2,455
2,533

7,179 3,302
7,964 3,455
8,896 3,367

13,595

10
12

20
38
45

30
17
17

10 6,844
215 8,671
61 9,734

186 9,951 140,308 17,395 32,047
462 20,534 175,757 21,700 35,822
445 23,890 185,553 25,046 37,279

104
30
22

8,500
21,797
25,203

3,947

418 11,878
399 23,712
693 27,542

11,127
22,281
26,003

239
435
528

544

50
99
105

216
741
809

1,370
2,004
2,647

65 10,059

211 13,166 180,860 18,024 39,450
517 26,132 227,387 22,297 44,816
529 30,303 241,003 25,628 46,731

1
3
1

2
225
8 5,465
7
432

1,644 8,383 38,644
1,765 8,576 40,593
1,763 10,655 45,462

492 15,146
496 29,277
826 33,946

15
85
168

790
1,199
1,049

1969—Dec. 31 io
1971—j une 30
Dec. 31

59
103
111

9

3,216 9,661
4,665 23,595
3,900 27,424

Nonmember:3
1947—Dec. 31

866 34,383

211 13,221 181,443 18,360 39,978
517 26,221 228,176 22,547 45,311
529 30,384 242,055 25,912 47,211

2

526
796
929

2,210
4,527
4,993

111

IPC 3

Capi­
Bor­
tal
row­
ac­
ings counts

476
719
902

288
377
426

4,409 1,290 1,517
6,353 2,359 1,636
6,749 1,935 1,682

243 4,542
160 9,563
332 11,045

1,967
2 2,566
1 2,844

86 4,609 50,439 9,881 11,464
249 8,863 62,312 12,153 12,826
225 10,516 66,362 14,799 13,197
31
52
45

146 6,082
219 12,224
337 14,177

4 1,982
11 2,525
23 2,934

54 4,920 70,768 1,820 12,766
143 9,033 85,521 2,656 14,499
167 10,505 90,298 3,118 15,114
6,858

12 1,596

25 3,269 41,135
55 5,688 52,419
85 6,494 56,502

6

172

965 7.931
847 9,489
866 9.932

N o t e . —D ata are for all commercial banks in the United States; member
banks in U.S. possessions were included through 1968 and then excluded.
For the period June 1941—June 1962 member banks include mutual
savings banks as follows: three before Jan. 1960, two through Dec. 1960,
and one through June 1962. Those banks are not included in all insured or
total banks.
A small noninsured member bank engaged exclusively in trust business
is treated as a noninsured bank and not as a m ember bank for the period
June 30, 1969—June 30, 1970.
Comparability o f figures for classes o f banks is affected somewhat by
changes in F.R. membership, deposit insurance status, and the reserve
classifications of cities and individual banks, and by mergers, etc.
For other notes see opposite page.

A 26

WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF LARGE COMMERCIAL BANKS
(In millions of dollars)
Loans
Federal funds sold, etc.1

Wednesday

O ther

To brokers
and dealers
involving—

Total
loans
and
invest­
ments
Total

To
com­
mer­
cial
banks

U.S.
Treas­
ury
se­
curi­
ties

F o r purchasing
o r carrying securities

To
others

Total

Other
curities

Com­
mer­
cial
and
indus­
trial

To brokers
and dealers
Agri­
cul­
tural

U.S.
Treas­
ury
secs.

O ther
secs.

To nonbank
financial
institutions

To
others

U.S.
Treas­
ury
secs.

Other
secs.

Pers.
and
sales
finan.
cos.,
etc.

O ther

Large banks'—
Total

1971
Aug.

4 ...............
11...............
18................
2 5

265,418
264,797
266,380
266,399

8,829
8,594
8,825
8,600

8,263
8,119
8,083
7,699

409
386
504
679

144
72
172
158

181,714
181,671
183,615
183,873

81.528
81,356
82.248
82,310

2,210
2,207
2,191
2,185

482
613
724
780

4,074
3,791
3,907
3,951

148
149
118
119

2,403
2,394
2,405
2,428

7,057
7,180
6,764
6,601

7,081
7,121
7,226
7,105

2,708
2,693
2,684
2,690

7,064
6,495
6,637
6,433

9,558
9,553
9,576
9,613

6,362
6,339
6,275
6,144
6,247

9,807
9,839
9,972
10,097
10,188

1972
July

5 ...............
12................
19................
2 6

298,209
297,337
296,385
296,091

12,901 11,683
12,250 9,566
11,951 10,916
11,571 10,567

638
2,228
536
597

359
269
287
250

221
187
212
157

205,496
205,134
205,144
204,904

85,442
85,267
85,314
85,188

2,552
2.554
2.555
2.549

589
1,319
653
717

7,425

158
160
155
167

Aug.

2*.............
9*..............
16*..............
23 *..............
30*...............

298,463
297,328
298,503
298,951
297,630

11,804
11,523
12,069
12,171
10,677

10,692
10,326
11,073
10,278
9,792

682
718
583
1,496
499

252
300
259
216
216

178
179
154
181
170

206,701
205,983
206,793
206,917
206,978

85,321
84,981
85,239
85,157
85,026

2.550
2.543
2.543
2,537
2,535

892
750
862
970
848

7,658
7,277
7,204
7,104
7,133

176
165
165
185
184

57,062
56,624
57,335
57,203

1,367
1,162
1,194
884

1,218
1,128
1,153
853

115
31
35
12

43,300
43,221
44,050
44,068

25,608
25,617
25,965
26,087

380
508
581
625

2,841
2,485
2,526
2,645

579
575
578
583

2,238
2,317
2,113
2,030

1,590
1,624
1,646
1,561

5 ................
12.................
19.................
2 6

62,409
62,043
61,474
61 ,C—

1,816
1,219
1,264
1,039

1,768
1,196
1,223
1,028

47,076
47,018
46,618
46,280

24,452
24,224
24,270
24,126

478
1,179
546
584

4,857
4,640
4,534
4,582

674
663
663
657

2,039
1,735
1,809
1,752

2,488
2,470
2,516
2,521

2*..............
9 v .............
1 6 * ...........
2 3 * ...........
30*..............

62,620
62,070
62,084
62,635
62,067

1,196
1,142
975
1,356
985

1,177
1,059
970
1,220
954

47,315
46,862
47,036
47,054
46,937

24,232
24,105
24,095
24,170
24,168

733
651
750
836
727

4,935
4,609
4,511
4,417
4,448

652
652
648
650
652

1.791
1.792
1,783
1,684
1,781

2,590
2,592
2,694
2,748
2,742

208,356
208,173
209,045
209,196

7,462
7,432
7,631
7,716

7,045
6,991
6,930
6,846

294
355
469
667

110
69
166
139

138,414
138,450
139,565
139,805

55,920
55,739
56,283
56,223

2,195
2,191
2,174
2,168

102
105
143
155

1,233
1.306
1,381
1.306

127
129
98
97

1,824
1,819
1,827
1,845

4,819
4,863
4,651
4,571

5,491
5,497
5,580
5,544

N ew York C ity

1971
Aug.

4 . .............
11.................
18.................
2 5
1971

July

Aug.

10

68
132

Outside
N ew Y ork C ity

1971
Aug.

4 ...............
11...............
18...............
25...............
1972

July

5 . .............
1 2 ..............
1 9 ..............
2 6 ..............

235,800
235,294
234,911
235,003

11,085
11,031
10,687
10,532

9,915
8,370
9,693
9,539

638
2,228
536
597

359
269
277
250

173
164
181
146

158,420
158,116
158,526
158,624

60,990
61.043
61.044
61,062

2.519
2.521
2.522
2.519

111
140
107
133

2,568
2,506
2,623
2,534

115
116
112
125

2,034
2,030
2,021
2,033

5,025
4,760
4,828
4,681

7,070
7,083
7,060
7,092

Aug.

2 p . . .........
9j3, ...........
16*............
2 3 * ..........
30 * ............

235,843 10,608
235,258 10,381
236,419 11,094
236,316 10,815
235,563 9,692

9,515
9,267
10,103
9,058
8,838

682
718
583
1,364
499

252
232
259
216
216

159
164
149
177
139

159,386
159,121
159,757
159.863
160,041

61,089
60,876
61,144
60,987
60,858

2.520
2.513
2.513
2,498
2,495

159
99
112
134
121

2,723
2,668
2,693
2,687
2,685

135
124
124
144
144

2,078
2.085
2,075
2.085
2,123

4,571
4,547
4,492
4,460
4,466

7,217
7,247
7,278
7,349
7,446

For notes see p. A-30.




SEPTEMBER 1972 □ WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS

A 27

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF LARGE COMMERCIAL BANKS— Continued
(In millions of dollars)
Loans (cont.)

Investments

O ther (cont.)

U.S. Treasury securities
Notes and bonds
m aturing—

To commercial
banks

W ednesday
Real
estate
D o­
mes­
tic

F o r­
eign

C on­
sumer
instal­
ment

F or­
eign
govts.2

All
other

Total

Bills

Certif­
icates
W ithin
1 yr.

1 to
5 yrs.

A fter
5 yrs.

Large banks—
Total
1971
36,216
36,371
36,518
36,653

561
579
777
794

1,860
1,974
2,682
2,819

22,849
22,884
22,935
23,015

802
809
820
823

14,443
14,243
14,300
14,290

25,182
25,030
25,006
24,952

3,431
3,300
2,901
2,858

3,556
3,593
3,350
3,367

14,923
14,876
15,831
15,853

3,272
3,261
2,924
2,874

........................... Aug. 4
...................................... 11
...................................... 18
...................................... 25

42,025
42,213
42,395
42,561

1 ,403
1,432
1 ,429
1,339

2,838
2,869
2,966
2,932

25,733
25,747
25,792
25,900

1,023
1,018
1,020
1,011

16,978
16,668
16,811
16,688

26,225
25,696
25,581
25,804

3,901
3,523
3,422
3,498

4,823
4,780
4,841
5,014

14,728
14,694
14,714
14,667

2,773
2,699
2,604
2,625

........................... July 5
...................................... 12
...................................... 19
...................................... 26

42,742
42,922
43,219
43,366
43,432

1,376
1,377
1 ,368
1,475
1,450

2,997
2,977
2,955
2,927
2,869

26,008
26,089
26,167
26,276
26,379

1,029
1,050
1,043
1,034
1,078

17,053
16,937
17,058
16,910
16,834

25,770
25,466
25,246
25,417
25,639

3,268
3,072
2,997
3,131
3,549

5,328
5,308
4,281
4,582
4,641

14,489
14,415
14,860
14,448
14,292

2,685
2,671
3,108
3,256
3,157

........................... Aug. 2p
....................................9 v
....................... \6 V
...................................... 23^
...................................... 302*

1972

New York City
1971
3,813
3,824
3,853
3,857

195
211
278
303

911
977
1,383
1,328

1,874
1,877
1,894
1,891

554
558
561
558

2,681
2,612
2,635
2,561

4,378
4,310
4,424
4,597

741
663
525
645

522
502
446
404

2,774
2,800
3,203
3,294

341
345
250
254

........................... Aug. 4
...................................... 11
......................................18
......................................25

4,524
4,548
4,570
4,591

419
418
445
346

1,164
1,183
1,281
1,259

1,956
1,965
1,970
1,967

627
631
623
616

3,322
3,285
3,315
3,207

4,737
4,518
4,494
4,660

1,150
1,013
1,014
1,099

964
966
1,008
1,085

2,357
2,366
2,388
2,372

266
173
84
104

........................... July 5
...................................... 12
...................................... 19
...................................... 26

4,648
4,665
4,718
4,740
4,693

400
481
462
472
452

1,284
1,272
1,275
1,267
1,243

1,972
1,985
1,996
2,008
2,006

626
634
627
632
661

3,381
3,353
3,406
3,350
3,284

4,851
4,760
4,546
4,697
4,877

881
733
703
839
1,209

1,349
1,369
878
912
917

2,464
2,477
2,551
2,470
2,328

157
181
414
476
423

........................... Aug. 2p
.................................... 9 p
...................................... 16p
......................................23 p
......................................2>Qp

1972

Outside
New York City
1971
20,804
20,720
20,582
20,355

2,690
2,637
2,376
2,213

3,034
3,091
2,904
2,963

12,149
12,076
12,628
12,559

2,931
2,916
2,674
2,620

........................... Aug. 4
......................................11
......................................18
......................................25

13,656
13,383
13,496
13,481

21,488
21,178
21,087
21,144

2,751
2,510
2,408
2,399

3,859
3,814
3,833
3,929

12,371
12,328
12,326
12,295

2,507
2,526
2,520
2,521

........................... July 5
...................................... 12
.......................................19
...................................... 26

13,672
13,584
13,652
13,560
13,550

20,919
20,706
20,700
20,720
20,762

2,387
2,339
2,294
2,292
2,340

3,979
3,939
3,403
3,670
3,724

12,025
11,938
12,309
11,978
11,964

2,528
2,490
2,694
2,780
2,734

........................... Aug. 2 p
.................................. gp
....................... 16 p
......................................23 p
......................................30p

32,403
32,547
32,665
32,796

366
368
499
491

949
997
1,299
1,491

20,975
21,007
21,041
21,124

248
251
259
265

11,762
11,631
11,665
11,729

37,501
37,665
37,825
37,970

984
1 ,014
984
993

1,674
1,686
1,685
1,673

23,777
23,782
23,822
23,933

396
387
397
395

38,094
38,257
38,501
38,626
38,739

976
896
906
1,003
998

1,713
1,705
1,680
1,660
1,626

24,036
24,104
24,171
24,268
24,373

403
416
416
402
417

1972

For notes see p. A-30.







EPORTING BANKS o SEPTEMBER 1972
S AND LIABILITIES OF URGE COMMERCIAL BANKS— Continue
(In millions of dollars)
Investments (cont.)
O ther securities
Obligations
o f State
and
political
subdivisions
Tax
war­
ra n ts3

All
other

Other bonds,
corp. stock,
and
securities

Certif.
of
partici­
pation4

Cash
items
in
process
of
collec­
tion

Re­
serves
with
F.R.
Banks

Cur­
rency
and
coin

liab
itie

All
others

7,801
7,675
7,466
7,424

34,967
35,089
34,851
34,954

1,364
1,342
1,282
1,260

5,561
5,396
5.335
5.336

31,875
31,516
30,303
29,811

20,057
17,972
18,588
19,311

3,220
3,486
3,494
3,615

343,
339,
340,
341,

8,449
8,856
8,534
8,881

37,301
37,585
37,401
37,104

1,556
1,553
1,527
1,532

6,281
6,263
6,247
6,295

35,551
30,060
29,878
27,826

21.326
17,799
21,005
20,503

3,456
3,894
3,775
3,900

386,
375,
377,
374,

8,946
9,081
9,278
9,186
9,053

37,276
37,285
37,172
37,340
37,275

1.568
1.569
1,541
1,547
1,549

6,398
6,421
6,404
6,373
6,459

30,040
27,030
29,385
26,076
27,012

21,966
21.326
21,532
19,877
21,295

3,651
3,686
3,703
3,851
3,924

380,
275,
379,
374,
376,

1,433
1,373
1,346
1,351

5,217
5,284
5,122
5,115

226
211
217
207

1,141
1,063
982
981

14,018
14,937
12,981
14,135

5,534
4,506
4,458
5,241

431
436
430
426

83,
83,
82,
83,

2,318
2,650
2,574
2,844

5,351
5,540
5,443
5,135

275
275
272
277

836
823
809
853

13,289
9,414
9,996
9,821

5,651
4.239
4,662
5,130

438
448
434
442

91,
84,
85,
85,

2,869
2,868
3,072
3,031
2,910

5,212
5,271
5,270
5,326
5,159

286
285
278
264
271

891
882
907
907
928

10,276
9,485
8,915
8,558
9,554

4,442
5.239
5,191
4,684
5,287

435
435
434
438
459

86.
85;
85!
84;
85;

6,368
6,302
6,120
6,073

29,750
29,805
29,729
29,839

1,138
1,131
1,065
1,053

4,420
4,333
4,353
4,355

17,857
16,579
17,322
15,676

14,523
13,466
14,130
14,070

2,789
3,050
3,064
3,189

259,
256;
258;
257;

6,131
6,206
5,960
6,037

31,950
32,045
31,958
31,969

1,281
1.278
1.255
1.255

5,445
5,440
5,438
5,442

22,262
20,646
19,882
18,005

15,675
13,560
16,343
15,373

3,018
3,446
3,341
3,458

295
290;
292;
289;

6,077
6,213
6,206
6,155
6,143

32,064
32.014
31,902
32.014
32,116

1,282
1,284
1,263
1,283
1.278

5,507
5,539
5,497
5,466
5,531

19,764
17,545
20,470
17,518
17,458

17,524
16,087
16,341
15,193
16,008

3,216
3,251
3,269
3,413
3,465

294
289;
293;
289;
290;

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS

A 29

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF LARGE COMMERCIAL BANKS— Continued
(In millions of dollars)
Deposits
D emand

Time and savings

Domestic
interbank

Total

IPC

States
and
polit­
ical
sub­
divi­
sions

U.S.
Govt.

Com ­
mer­
cial

Foreign

IPC

Com ­
M utual
Govts., mer­
sav­
etc. 2
cial
ings
banks

Certi­
fied
and
offi­
cers*
checks

T otal6
Sav­
ings

Other

States
and
polit­
ical
sub­
divi­
sions

D o­
mes­
tic
inter­
bank

Wednesday
F or­
eign
gov ts.2

Large banks—
Total
1971
139,404
138,109
139,164
139,672

97,190
96,119
96,218
95,700

6,620
6,611
6,212
6,062

2,890
2,333
6,001
6,272

21,489
21,126
20,164
20,562

703
617
620
608

760
1,283
949
803

2,358
2,298
2,461
2,416

7,394
7,722
6,539
7,249

132,924
133,179
133,494
133,827

53,133
53,113
53,070
52,986

57,472
57,708
58,082
58,184

15.067
15,111
15.068
15,258

1,566
1,536
1,597
1,691

5,144
5,208
5,173
5,195

...............Aug. 4
..........................11
..........................18
..........................25

157,679
146,907
148,811
145,194

108,396
105,800
104,317
102,644

6,806
6,317
5,887
5,895

4,345
3,237
6,321
5,326

24,531
20,729
21,690
20,395

920
846
728
694

1,175
958
1,038
893

3,157
2,773
2,898
2,988

8,349
6,247
5,932
6,359

149,337
149,874
150,883
151,358

58,014
58,003
57,983
57,939

65,242 18,033
65,645 18,090
66,483 18,202
66,907 18,176

2,261
2,323
2,442
2,482

5,292
5,322
5,273
5,363

...............July 5
..........................12
..........................19
..........................26

147,379
140,911
143,100
138,859
140,296

104,096
101,382
104,684
102,010
102,300

6,749
5,999
6,266
5,811
6,055

4,467
3,396
1,976
2,043
1,715

20,957
20,140
20,195
19,350
20,359

747
700
688
632
681

953
800
774
715
837

2,959
2,926
2,984
2,719
2,996

6,451
5,568
5,533
5,579
5,353

152,123
152,996
153,485
154,475
155,538

57,892
57,925
57,901
57,868
57,836

67,564
68,466
68,942
69,812
70,794

18,332
18,320
18,286
18,436
18,487

2,474
2,433
2,480
2,501
2,550

5,362
5,358
5,381
5,355
5,329

...............Aug. 2 p
..........................9 p
..........................16p
..........................23 p
..........................30*

1972

New York City
1971
39,282
39,928
38,495
40,456

21,711
20,764
20,896
21,626

509
795
769
468

545
428
1,545
1,506

9,610
9,973
8,747
9,888

378
319
308
311

586
1,116
777
635

1,648
1,598
1,695
1,611

4,295
4,935
3,758
4,411

23,013
22,980
23,379
23,346

5,191
5,176
5,169
5,151

12,439
12,339
12,659
12,568

1,515
1,548
1,542
1,566

751
746
820
886

2,928
3,014
3,026
3,013

...............Aug. 4
..........................11
..........................18
.......................... 25

45,187
38,053
39,529
38,853

24,397
22,596
22,455
22,375

473
452
366
294

637 11,328
630 8,397
1,307 9,415
1,118 8,863

536
460
385
362

1,039
812
858
748

2,290
1,945
2,039
2,107

4,487
2,761
2,704
2,986

25,140
25,407
25,846
25,815

5,745
5,732
5,724
5,714

13,446
13,578
13,924
13,758

1,957
2,075
2,112
2,144

1,088
1,115
1,225
1,249

2,814
2,824
2,778
2,865

...............July 5
......................... 12
..........................19
..........................26

38,806
36,860
36,504
35,912
37,256

22,651
21,716
22,336
22,043
22,169

352
357
460
381
363

398
369
348
319
349

810
653
633
558
674

2,116
2,032
2,112
1,873
2,153

3,006
2,483
2,322
2,458
2,291

26,023
26,182
26,395
26,819
27,268

5.695
5.696
5,699
5,702
5,673

13,987
14,343
14,527
14,901
15,384

2,183
2,060
2,043
2,097
2,070

1,243
1,186
1,234
1,246
1,280

2,831
2,813
2,809
2,787
2,775

...............Aug. 2 p
..........................9 p
..........................16*
..........................23*
..........................30*

1972

832
633
253
315
274

8,641
8,617
8,040
7,965
8,983

Outside
New York City
1971
100,122
98,181
100,669
99,216

75,479
75,355
75,322
74,074

6,111
5,816
5,443
5,594

2,345
1,905
4,456
4,766

11,879
11,153
11,417
10,674

325
298
312
297

174
167
172
168

710
700
766
805

3,099 109,911
2,787 110,199
2,781 110,115
2,838 110,481

47,942
47,937
47,901
47,835

45,033
45,369
45,423
45,616

13,552
13,563
13,526
13,692

815
790
777
805

2,216
2,194
2,147
2,182

...............Aug. 4
..........................11
..........................18
..........................25

112,492
108,854
109,282
106,341

83,999
83,204
81,862
80,269

6,333
5,865
5,521
5,601

3,708
2,607
5,014
4,208

13,203
12,332
12,275
11,532

384
386
343
332

136
146
180
145

867
828
859
881

3,862
3,486
3,228
3,373

124,197
124,467
125,037
125,543

52,269
52,271
52,259
52,225

51,796
52,067
52,559
53,149

16,076
16,015
16,090
16,032

1,173
1,208
1,217
1,233

2,478
2.498
2,495
2.498

...............July 5
..........................12
..........................19
..........................26

108,573
104,051
106,596
102,947
103,040

81,445
79,666
82,348
79,967
80,131

6,397
5,642
5,806
5,430
5,692

3,635
2,763
1,723
1,728
1,441

12,316
11,523
12,155
11,385
11,376

349
331
340
313
332

143
147
141
157
163

843
894
872
846
843

3,445
3,085
3,211
3,121
3,062

126,100
126,814
127,090
127,656
128,270

52,197
52,229
52,202
52,166
52,163

53,577
54,123
54,415
54,911
55,410

16,149
16,260
16,243
16,339
16,417

1,231
1,247
1,246
1,255
1,270

2,531
2,545
2,572
2,568
2,554

...............Aug. 2 p
....................... 9 j>
! ....................... 16*
..........................23*
..........................30p

1972

For notes see p. A-30.




A 30

WEEKLY REPORTING BANKS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF LARGE COMMERCIAL BANKS— Continued
(In millions of dollars)
Reserves
for—

Borrowings
from—

Wednesday

Federal
funds
F.R.
pur­
chased, Banks
etc. 7

Others

Other
liabili­
ties,
etc.8

Loans

M em oranda

Total
capital
Secur­
ac­
ities counts

Total
loans
(gross)
ad­
justed 9

Large negotiable
Total
time C D ’s
loans
included in time
and
De­
and savings deposits n
invest­ mand
ments deposits
ad­
(gross)
Issued Issued
justed 1o Total
ad­
to
to
justed 9
IPC ’s others

Gross
liabili­
ties o f
banks
to
their
foreign
bran­
ches

Large banks—
Total
1971
23,195
21,657
20,827
19,499

552
454
1,017
1,692

5 ........................
12........................
19........................
2 6

30,696
29,362
29,495
28,653

420
58
47
593

2 * ......................

30,164
31,162
31,997
30,285
29,539

1,200
777
439
809
1,178

6,532
5,913
5,520
4,584

100
1,025

Aug.

4 ........................
11........................
18........................
2 5

July

1,146 15,750
1,140 14,997
1,058 15,043
1,203 15,269

4,013
4,012
4,011
4,008

1,518
1,647
1,638
1,543

14,147
14,796
14,401
14,623

76
113
77
77

26,161
26,156
26,129
26,147

181,719
181,567
183,580
183,980

256,594
256,099
257,520
257,906

83,150
83,134
82,696
83,027

30,428 18,569 11,859
30,750 18,783 11,967
31,302 19,239 12,063
31,512 19,273 12,239

1,912
1,104
1,374
1,409

4.159
4,148
4,142
4.159

28,359
28,350
28,281
28,354

205,311
206,386
204,750
204,569

285,123
286,339
284,040
284,185

93,252
92,881
90,922
91,647

35,685
36,358
37,047
37,706

22,499
22,976
23,518
23,938

13,186
13,382
13,529
13,768

824
1,375
974
1,342

1,488 15,459
1,528 14,952
1,486 15,810
1,555 15,661
1,475 15,258

4,171
4.166
4,168
4.167
4,181

28,514
28,547
28,489
28,537
28,584

206,437
205,803
206,421
207,335
206,413

286,395
285,625
286,062
287,198
286,388

91,915
90,345
91,544
91,390
91,210

38,231
38,937
39,389
40,288
41,247

24,243
25,031
25,418
26,213
27,038

13,988
13,906
13,971
14,075
14,209

1,829
i;2 5 0
1,778
1,839
1,262

202
207
209
311

6,684
6,165
6,373
6,118

1.191
1.191
1,193
1,196

6,774
6,786
6,778
6,765

43,254
43,044
43,813
43,796

55,649
55,285
55,904
56,047

15,109 10,873
14,590 10,880
15,222 11,437
14,927 11,456

7,185
7,112
7,562
7,532

3,688
3,768
3,875
3,924

1,209
759
977
720

4,658
5,248
4,855
5,160

1,218
1,218
1,213
1.224

7,165
7,161
7,158
7,135

46,705
46,623
46,214
45,945

60,222
60,429
59,806
59,714

19,933
19,612
18,811
19,051

12,279
12,594
13,061
13,129

8,284
8,432
8,812
8,707

3,995
4,162
4,249
4,422

553
1,013
653
1,051

7.202
7.202
7,188
7,183
7,258

46,934
46,464
46,579
46,718
46,516

61,043
60,530
60,652
60,943
60,661

19,057
18,125
19,296
19,074
18,445

13.304
13,542
13,830
14.304
14,678

8,827
9,243
9,498
9,947
10,354

4,477
4,299
4,332
4,357
4,324

1,446
972
1,448
1,543
931

19,387
19,370
19,351
19,382

138,465
138,523
139,767
140,184

200,945
200,814
201,616
201,859

68,041 19,555
68,544 19,870
67,474 19,865
68,100 20,056

11,384
11,671
11,677
11,741

8,171
8,199
8,188
8,315

703
345
397
689

1972

Aug.

9 p .......................

16 * ......................
23 p ......................
30 p ......................
New York City
1971
Aug.

4 ........................
11........................
18........................
2 5

20

1972
July

Aug.

5 ........................
12........................
19........................
2 6

7.471
6; 749
6,250
6,300

160

413
411
447
373

2 p ......................
9 p ......................
16*......................
23*......................
30*......................

6,324
8,032
7,755
6,962
6,794

511
275
37
570
482

371
335
339
354
316

5,805
5,320
5,686
5,837
5,277

1.224
1,221
1,222
1,227
1,235

16,663
15,744
15,307
14,915

532
454
917
667

944
933
849
892

9,066
8,832
8,670
9,151

2,822
2,821
2,818
2,812

Outside
New York City
1971
Aug.

4 ........................
11........................
18........................
2 5

76
113
77
77

1972
July

5 ........................
12........................
19........................
2 6

23,225
22,613
23,245
22,353

420
58
47
433

1,105
1,236
1,191
1,170

9,489
9,548
9,546
9,463

2,941
2,930
2,929
2,935

21,194
21,189
21,123
21,219

158,606
159,763
158,536
158,624

224,901
225,910
224,234
224,471

73,319
73,269
72,111
72,596

23,406 14,215
23,764 14,544
23,986 14,706
24,577 15,231

9,191
9,220
9,280
9,346

271
362
321
291

Aug.

2 p ......................
9 p ......................
16p ......................
23*......................
30*......................

23,840
23,130
24,242
23,323
22,745

689
502
402
239
696

1,117 9,654
1,193 9,632
1,147 10,124
1,201 9,824
1,159 9,981

2,947
2.945
2.946
2,940
2.946

21,312
21,345
21,301
21,354
21,326

159,503
159,339
159,842
160,617
159,897

225,352
225,095
225,410
226,255
225,727

72,858
72,220
72,248
72,316
72,765

24,927
25,395
25,559
25,984
26,569

9,511
9,607
9,639
9,718
9,885

383
278
330
296
331

1 Includes securities purchased under agreements to resell.
2 Includes official institutions and so forth.
3 Includes short-term notes and bills.
4 Federal agencies only.
5 Includes corporate stock.
6 Includes U.S. Govt, and foreign bank deposits, not shown separately.
7 Includes securities sold under agreements to repurchase.




15,416
15,788
15,920
16,266
16,684

8 Includes minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries.
9 Exclusive o f loans and Federal funds transactions with domestic com­
mercial banks.
10 All demand deposits except U.S. Govt, and domestic commercial
banks, less cash items in process o f collection.
11 Certificates o f deposit issued in denominations o f $100,000 or more.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ BUSINESS LOANS OF BANKS

A 31

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LOANS OF LARGE COMMERCIAL BANKS
(In millions of dollars)
Outstanding

Net change during-

1972

Industry
Aug.
30
D urable goods m anufacturing:
Primary m etals....................................
M achinery............................................
Transportation equipm ent................
Other fabricated metal p roducts. . .
Other durable go o d s..........................
Nondurable goods manufacturing:
Food, liquor, and to b acco ...............
Textiles, apparel, and leather...........
Petroleum refining..............................
Chemicals and ru b b e r.......................
O ther nondurable g oods...................
Mining, including crude petroleum
and natural gas.............................
T rade: Commodity dealers...................
O ther wholesale.........................
R etail............................................
T ransportatio n ........................................
C om m unication.......................................
O ther public utilities..............................
C onstruction ............................................
Services.....................................................
All other domestic loans.......................
Bankers’ acceptances..............................
Foreign commercial and industrial
loans..................................................
Total classified lo an s..............................

Aug.
23

1972

Aug.
16

Aug.
9

Aug.
2

Aug.

1972

July

June

1971

1972

1971

II

I

IV

1st
half

2nd
half

1,978
4,211
2,228
1,724
2,850

1,974
4,200
2,245
1,716
2,832

1,973
4,209
2,217
1,742
2,828

1,976
4,138
2,203
1,684
2,772

2,008
4,138
2,236
1,686
2,800

-6 8
4
39
22
65

-4 7
-8
-1 7 0
-9
-4 1

-3 3
-5 5
-6 0
21
76

30
-7 4
-3 1 7
-2 2
185

54
-9 1
14
17
146

-1 6 2
-6 0 0
-1 0 1
-2 5 9
-3 2 8

84
-1 6 5
-3 0 3
-5
331

-2 8 2
-8 3 1
-7 7
-3 8 9
-3 1 7

2,730
2,981
915
1,935
1,666

2,761
3,000
942
1,910
1,654

2,740
3,016
904
1,916
1,650

2,725
2,984
957
1,899
1,652

2,721
2,960
965
1,913
1,671

54
48
-6 0
-4 6
-4

51
78
-1 4
-1 4 7
16

58
88
-2 9
-3 9
-2 3

-4 1
281
-8 8
-2 3
-9 3

-2 2 7
281
-9 7
-1 0 3
-7 5

205
-2 7 3
56
-4 3 7
-9 6

-2 6 8
562
-1 8 5
-1 2 6
-1 6 8

498
-3 0 4
52
-5 9 2
-3 6

3,687
1,251
4,468
4,666
5,430
1,577
3,060
4,420
8,462
5,644
1,230

3,692
1,253
4,459
4,606
5,395
1,570
3,048
4,441
8,531
5,705
1,241

3,669
1,233
4,491
4,624
5,404
1,592
2,978
4,438
8,525
5,817
1,278

3,671
1,248
4,492
4,571
5,413
1,594
2,934
4,331
8,496
5,921
1,323

3,648
1,190
4,474
4,672
5,476
1,594
2,934
4,343
8,488
6,003
1,346

42
42
-3 0
-5 0
-3 3
-2 4
266
84
-8
-2 9 3
-1 1 2

41
31
6
197
-1 8 3
166
95
38
-1 3 4
241
-9 9

-7 6
-1 8 4
77
9
77
151
40
171
325
-3 4 8
-1 8 3

-6 6
-3 0 4
111
138
33
195
247
325
358
-1 3 4
-3 0 0

-1 3 7
-1 9 4
-5 2
259
-3 3
-7 4
-2 7 4
156
372
176
-5 5 3

-1 7
460
132
-3 4 0
-7 8
-2 4 9
176
77
276
305
696

-2 0 3
-4 9 8
59
397
121
-2 7
481
730
42
-8 5 3

187
532
524
-2 5 9
—324
-2 2 5
525
183
289
610
1,158

3,436 3,452 3,444 3,471
3,460
70,549 70,627 70,688 70,455 70,726

-2 0
-8 2

59
167

19
82

83
524

89
-3 4 6

254
-3 0 3

172
178

578
1,500

-1 6 2

235

233

1,136

47

335

1,183

1,614

Total commercial and industrial loans. *>85,026 85,157 85,239 84,981

85,321

See N ote to table below.

“TERM” COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LOANS OF LARGE COMMERCIAL BANKS
(In millions o f dollars)
O utstanding

N et change during—

1972

1971

1972

1971

1972

Industry
July
26

June
28

May
31

Apr.
26

Mar.
29

Feb.
23

Jan.
26

Dec.
29

II

1,313
1,968
1,266

1,354
1,935
1,244

1,369
1,958
1,360

1,381
1,986
1,370

1,367
2,005
1,389

1,342
2,072
1,493

1,330
2,001
1,553

1,315
2,179
1,605

1,362
2,285
1,620

27
-1 1 4
-1 3 3

-2 0
-2 1 3
-1 2 7

-1 6 2
-1 9 4
-6 9

-6 2
-5 7
130

7
-3 2 7
-2 6 0

713
1,147

711
1,130

677
1,183

685
1,144

695
1,163

688
1,145

683
1,118

699
1,117

713
1,135

-1 1
38

-2 5
10

-6 2
-7 9

-3 9
-1 9

-3 6
48

1,084

1,034

931

947

909

912

937

987

1,021

19

-1 0 9

36

17

-9 0

689
652
1,188
882

701
685
1,200
860

666
694
1,234
875

646
726
1,245
930

667
714
1,238
960

651
757
1,226
980

580
818
1,315
973

567
848
1,330
1,010

576
892
1,441
1,024

15
-6 3
8
-1 0 5

75
-1 3 5
-2 1 5
-4 4

-3 1
35
-3 4 4
6

10
-3 4
-3 2
-2

90
-1 9 8
-2 0 7
-1 4 9

2,724
107
866
1,375
4,197
516
1,643
1,453
3,811
1,491

2,723
110
905
1,345
4,243
517
1,471
1,392
3,747
1,549

2,667
109
902
1,297
4,314
502
1,423
1,404
3,706
1,465

2,785
128
912
1,332
4,285
427
1,218
1,371
3,555
1,787

2,870
125
889
1,328
4,400
460
1,161
1,376
3,593
1,805

2,872
125
927
1,340
4,383
440
1,160
1,417
3,657
1,703

2,891
132
883
1,352
4,314
417
1,191
1,327
3,545
1,602

2,927
119
915
1,349
4,397
432
1,305
1,257
3,542
1,545

3,039
115
893
1,383
4,440
427
1,316
1,244
3,488
1,431

-2 0 5
-1 6
-2 5
-4 3
-6 9
62
263
-1 3
49
-2 3 8

-1 6 7
10
34
-4 3
-5 7
13
-1 5 6
173
169
272

105
6
46
-8 8
-1 3 1
7
44
52
141
41

-5 6
12
11
57
-2 6
-4 8
178
5
89
141

-3 7 2
-6
9
-8 6
-1 2 6
75
107
160
218
34

2,064

2,028

2,033

1,995

1,981

1,939

1,898

1,995

2,076

94

-1 3 7

184

-4 3

31,229 30,860 31,440 31,921

-4 6 0

-6 9 2

-4 5 7

275 -1 ,1 5 2

Aug.
30
Durable goods manufactur­
ing :
Primary metals.....................
M achinery............................
Transportation equipment.
O ther fabricated metal
prod u cts............................
Other durable goods...........
Nondurable goods manufac­
turing:
Food, liquor, and tobacco.
Textiles, apparel, and
leather................................
Petroleum refining...............
Chemicals and rubber........
O ther nondurable g o o d s. .
Mining, including crude pe­
troleum and natural gas.
Trade: Commodity d e a le rs..
O ther wholesale.........
R etail............................
T ransportation.........................
C om m unication.......................
O ther public utilities...............
C onstruction............................
Services......................................
All other domestic loans . . . .
Foreign commercial and in­
dustrial loans...................
Total loans................................

31,149 30,884 30,769 30,855 31,095

N o t e . —A bout 160 weekly reporting banks are included in this series;
these banks classify, by industry, commercial and industrial loans am ount­
ing to about 90 per cent o f such loans held by all weekly reporting banks
and about 70 per cent o f those held by all commercial banks.
For description o f series see article “ Revised Series on Commercial and
Industrial Loans by Industry,” Feb. 1967 B u lle t in , p. 209.




I

IV

III

1st
half

Commercial and industrial “ term ” loans are all outstanding loans with
an original m aturity o f more than 1 year and all outstanding loans granted
under a formal agreement—revolving credit or standby—on which the
original maturity o f the commitment was in excess o f 1 year.

A 32

DEMAND DEPOSIT OWNERSHIP □ SEPTEMBER 1972
GROSS DEMAND DEPOSITS OF INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND CORPORATIONS1
(In billions o f dollars)
Type o f holdei
Class o f bank, and quarter or month

Total
deposits,
IPC

Financial
business

Nonfinancial
business

Consumer

Foreign

All
other

17.1
17.0
17.3

85.3
88.0
92.7

49.0
51.4
53.6

1.6
1.4
1.3

9 .6
10.0
10.3

162.5
167.9
175.1

1971— M ar........................................................................................
Ju n e........................................................................................
Sept........................................................................................

18.3
17.9
17.9
18.5

86.1
89.9
91.5
98.4

54.1
56.0
57.5
58.6

1.4
1.3
1.2
1.3

10.4
10.7
9 .7
10.7

170.3
175.8
177.9
187.5

1972—M ar........................................................................................

18.1
17.9

93.9
97.1

59.1
59.9

1.3
1.4

10.6
10.9

183.1
187.2

14.1
13.5
13.8
13.9
13.7
14.4

54.7
53.4
54.6
55.5
55.8
58.6

24.8
24.1
24.5
24.5
24.6
24.6

1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2

5 .4
5.1
5.5
5.4
5 .4
5.9

100.3
97.2
99.6
100.4
100.7
104.8

14.4
13.7
13.9
14.3
13.7
14.1
14.4

56.8
55.4
56.1
56.9
56.2
57.1
58.4

25.4
24.4
25.2
27.0
25.4
25.8
26.0

1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3

5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.7
5.9
5.9

103.7
100.5
102.1
105.4
102.1
104.2
106.1

All commercial banks:

W eekly reporting banks:
1971—July.........................................................................................
Sept........................................................................................
O ct.....................................................................................

1972—Jan ..........................................................................................
Feb.........................................................................................
M ar........................................................................................
A pr.........................................................................................
July*.......................................................................................
1 Including cash items in process o f collection.

N o t e .— Daily-average balances maintained during m onth as estimated

from reports supplied by a sample o f commercial banks. F o r a detailed
description o f the type of depositor in each category, see June 1971
B u lle t in , p. 466.

DEPOSITS ACCUMULATED FOR PAYMENT OF PERSONAL LOANS
(In millions o f dollars)
Class o f
bank

Dec. 31,
1969

All com m ercial............................
Insured......................................
N ational m em ber...................
State m em ber...........................
All m em ber..................................

1,131
1,129
688
188
876

Dec. 31,
1970
804
803
433
147
580

June 30,
1971
746
745
407
129
536

Dec. 31,
1971
680
677
387
95
482

N o te . —These hypothecated deposits are excluded from Time deposits
and Loans at all commercial banks beginning with June 30, 1966, as
shown in the tables on pp. A-20, A-21, and A-26—A-30 (consumer instal­
ment loans), and in the table at the bottom o f p. A -18. These changes




Class o f
bank
All member—Cont.
O ther reserve city................
C ountry.................................
All nonm em ber........................
In su red ...................................
N oninsured...........................

Dec. 31,
1969

304
571
255
253
2

Dec. 31,
1970

143
437
224
223
1

June 30,
1971

125
411
210
209
1

Dec. 31,
1971

112
371
197
195
2

resulted from a change in Federal Reserve regulations. See June 1966
B u lle t in , p. 808.
These deposits have not been deducted from Time deposits and Loans
for commercial banks as shown on pp. A-22 and A-23 and on pp. A-24
and A-25 (IPC only for time deposits).

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ LOAN SALES BY BANKS; OPEN MARKET PAPER

A 33

LOANS SOLD OUTRIGHT BY COMMERCIAL BANKS
(A m o u n ts o u t s t a n d i n g ; in m illio n s o f d o lla r s )

To own subsidiaries, foreign branches,
holding companies, and other affiliates

To all others except banks
By type o f loan

By type o f loan

D ate
Total

Total
Commercial
and
industrial

Commercial
and
industrial

All other

All other

1972—M ay

3 ...........
10...........
17...........
2 4 ...........
31...........

2,610
2,571
2,485
2,446
2,450

1,618
1,612
1,557
1,564
1,472

992
959
928
882
978

1,654
1,659
1,670
1,660
1,674

368
357
r362
366
362

1,286
1,302
*•1,308
1,294
1,312

June

7 ...........
14...........
2 1 ...........
2 8 ...........

2,413
2,346
2,268
2,296

1,513
1,499
1,439
1,422

900
847
829
874

1,697
1,688
1,680
1,675

374
366
357
353

1,323
1,322
1,323
1,322

July

5 ...........
12
19...........
2 6 ...........

2,238
2,217
2,304
2,327

1,298
1,347
1,384
1,426

940
870
920
901

1,666
1,662
1,710
1,687

336
331
368
340

Aug.

2 ...........
9 ...........
16...........
2 3 ..........
3 0 ...........

2,381
2,481
2,432
2,520
2,380

1,433
1,516
1,524
1,519
1,550

948
965
908
1,001
830

1,688
1,688
1,698
1,699
1,701

334
320
316
317
321

1,330
1,331
1,342
1,347
1,354
1,368
1,382
1,382
1,380

N o t e .— A m o u n ts s o ld u n d e r r e p u r c h a s e a g re e m e n t a r e e x c lu d e d . F ig u re s in c lu d e s m a ll a m o u n t s s o ld
b y b a n k s o t h e r t h a n la rg e w e e k ly r e p o r tin g b a n k s .

COMMERCIAL AND FINANCE COMPANY PAPER AND BANKERS9 ACCEPTANCES OUTSTANDING
(In millions o f dollars)
Commercial and finance
company paper
Placed through
dealers

End o f period

D ollar acceptances

Total

Based on—

Held by—

Placed
directly

Accepting banks

F.R. Banks

Total

Others
Bank
Bank
related O th er1 related O ther2

5
6
7
8
9
0

9,058
13,279
16,535
20,497
31,709
31,765

1971—July.
Aug.
Sept.
O ct..
Nov.
Dec.
^ Dec.

29,746
30,057
29,946
31,205
31,164
29,934
31,103

469
454
395
454
406
495
495

11,001
11,494
11,909
11,897
11,825
10.923
10.923

1972—Jan..
Feb.
M ar.
A pr.
M ay
June
July.

32,167
32,579
32,681
32,814
33,055
33,482
33,891

505
525
545
532
517
542
604

11,922
12,262
12,233
12,394
12,043
12,325
12,319

196
196
196
196
196
197

1,903
3,089
4,901
7,201
1,216 10,601
409 12,262

Total

Bills
bought

Own

b ills

a c c t.

Im ­
Ex­
ports
ports
from
into
United United
States States

All
other

7,155
10,190
11,634
13,296
3,078 16,814
1,940 17,154

3,392
3,603
4,317
4,428
5,451
7,058

1,223
1,198
1,906
1,544
1,567
2,694

1,094
983
1,447
1,344
1,318
1,960

129
215
459
200
249
735

187
193
164
58
64
57

144
191
156
109
146
250

1,837
2,022
2,090
2,717
3,674
4,057

792
997
1,086
1,423
1,889
2,601

974
829
989
952
1,153
1,561

1,626
1,778
2,241
2,053
2,408
2,895

1,339
1,338
1,505
1,527
1.624
1.478
1.478

16,937
16,771
16,137
17,327
17,309
17,038
18,207

7,454
8,377
8,148
7,811
7,479
7,889

2,594
2,612
2,803
3,000
2,852
3,480

2,168
2,131
2,227
2,350
2,204
2,689

426
481
575
650
648
791

55
107
51
52
58
261

228
245
259
261
258
254

4,577
5,413
5,036
4,499
4,312
3,894

3,118
3,405
3,286
3,148
2,848
2,834

1,388
1,505
1,470
1,366
1,392
1,546

2,948
3,467
3,391
3,296
3,239
3,509

1,582
1.624
1,627
1,644
1,482
1,429
1,652

18,158
18,168
18,276
18,244
19,013
19,186
19,316

7,601
7,935
7,985
7,734
7,443
7,069
6,643

2,917
3,123
3,083
2,840
2,874
2,817
2,430

2,157
2,408
2,246
2,009
2,117
2,082
1,873

761
715
837
830
757
735
557

75
63
143
83
143
73
63

253
267
263
265
261
251
263

4,356
4,482
4,496
4,547
4,165
3,927
3,887

2,558
2,589
2.597
2.597
2,683
2,657
2,492

1,584
1,717
1,774
1,707
1,596
1,569
1,606

3,458
3,629
3,613
3,431
3,164
2,843
2,545

D ata for commercial and finance company paper on new basis
beginning Dec. 1971. The new series reflects inclusion o f paper issued
directly by real estate investment trusts and several additional finance
companies.




Own

F or­
eign
corr.

1 As reported by dealers; includes finance company paper as well as
other commercial paper sold in the open market.
2 As reported by finance companies that place their paper directly with
investors.

A 34

INTEREST RATES □ SEPTEMBER 1972
PRIME RATE CHARGED BY BANKS
(Per cent per annum)
Rate

In effect during—
192 9

51/2-6

193
193
193
193

3 Vi-6
2% -5
3V4--4
1 % -4

0
1
2
3

1934—
1947 (Nov.)
Effective date

Effective date
1956—Apr.
Aug.

1 3 ...
2 1 ...

1957—Aug.

6 ...

Rate

Effective date

Rate

m
4

1969—Jan.
Mar.
June

41/2

1970—Mar. 25
Sept. 2 1 ..
..
Nov. 12, , ,
2 3 ..........
Dec. 2 2 ..........

1958—Jan. 2 2 ...
Apr.
2 1 ...
Sept. 1 1 ...

4

1959—May 1 8 ...
Sept.
1 ...

41/2

1960—Aug. 2 3 . ..

4%

3%

4

5

1947—Dec. i.

m

1965—Dec.

6 ...

1948— Aug. 1

2

1950—Sept. 2 2 ...........

2%

1966—M ar.
June
Aug.

1 0 ...
2 9 ...
1 6 ...

1951—Jan.
Oct.
Dec.

8 ...........
17...........
19...........

21/z
234
3

1967—Jan. 26-27
M ar. 2 7 ...
Nov. 2 0 ...

5% -5M
5%
6

1953—Apr.

27...........

3%

1954—Mar.

17...........

3

1955—Aug.
Oct.

4 ..........
1 4..........

3%
3y2

1968—Apr. 1 9 ...
Sept. 2 5 ...
Nov. 1 3 ...
Dec.
2 ...
1 8 ...

61/2
6 -6%
61/4
6%
6%

1 9 7 1 -Ja n .
Feb.
M ar.

5

5V4
5y4
6

7 ..........
17..........
9 ...........

6
15
1 8 ..........
16..........
11
19..........

1971—Apr. 2 3 ...........
M ay 11...........
6 ...........
July
7...........
Oct. 2 0 ..........
1...........
Nov.
4 ..........
8 ..........
2 2 ..,
.
29, ,
Dec. 6 ..........
2 7 ..........
31...........

7
m
81/2
8
m
7M

Effective date

Rate

1972—Jan.

3 ...........
17...........
2 4...........
31...........
Feb. 2 8 ...........

M ar. 13...........
2 3 ...........
27 ...........
Apr. 3 ...........
5 ...........
17...........
M ay 1...........
30...........
June 12...........
2 6 ...........
29...........
July
3 ...........
10...........

7

634

6i/i
6%
6

5 14-51/i
51/4
514-51/2
51/2
5 Vi-6
6
534
534*-55/ l
5i/2*-55/8
51/2*
5% -5% *
514-51/2*
5i4-53/851/ 2 *
514-51/2*
514*

1 7 ..........
31...........
Aug.

3 ...........
7 ...........
14...........
2 1 ...........

5-5i/8-5 i4 *
434-514*
45/8-5*
41/ 2- 434*
43/8-41/2434*
41/2- 434*
434*
4 % * -4 % -5
434 *-5
5*
5*-5V4
5*-5i/8-5 i4
5
5 *-51/8
5-514 *-5 3/s
5 -5 14 *-5 3/s
514 *-5 3/s
514 *-53/851/2
5 14 *-51/2
514 *-5 3/851/2
5 *4-51/2*
514 *-5i/2
514
514 *-53/8

1 D ate o f change not available.
N o t e . —Beginning Nov. 1971, several banks adopted a floating prim e
rate keyed to money m arket variables. Asterisk denotes prime rate charged
by the majority o f commercial banks.

RATES ON BUSINESS LOANS OF BANKS
Size o f loan (in thousands o f dollars)
A lls izes

1-9

10-99

100-499

500-999

1,000 and over

Center
May
1972

Feb.
1972

M ay
1972

Feb.
1972

May
1972

Feb.
1972

May
1972

Feb.
1972

M ay
1972

Feb.
1972

May
1972

Feb.
1972

5.76
5.27
5.91
5.60
6.11
5.81
6.08

5.57
5.28
5.72
5.64
5.47
5.71
5.55

5.44
4.97
5.54
5.46
5.76
5.60
5.46

5.33
5.21
5.46
5.34
5.30
5.60
5.35

5.31
5.38
5.45
5.17
5.29
5.58
5.07

5.60
5.34
5.44
5.55
5.56
5.69
5.72

5.60
5.35
6.09
5.73
6.22
5.47

5.31
5.22
5.28
5.32
5.86
6.44
5.10

5.57
5.44
5.76
5.86
4.91
5.85
5.55

5.18
5.05
5.38
5.73
5.74
5.73
5.04

6.19
5.83
6.51
6.08
6.78
6.42
6.02

5.87
5.54
6.01
6.12
7.05
6.29
5 .25

6.13
5.62
6.88
6.04
9.53
6.68
5.04

5.78
5.64
5.85
5.84
5.50
6.35
5.79

5.44
5.29
5.52
5.17
5.50
5.87
5.87

Short-term
35 centers.........................................
New Y ork C ity ..........................
7 Other N o rth east.....................
8 N orth C entral.........................
7 Southeast..................................
8 Southw est................................
4 West C oast...............................

5.59
5.28
5.81
5.54
5.78
5.88
5.60

5.52
5.35
5.72
5.37
5.87
5.79
5.39

7.07
6.54
7.25
6.70
7.30
7.02
7.45

7.08
6.47
7.20
6.72
7.39
7.05
7.41

6.53
6.10
6.73
6.31
6.77
6.44
6.77

6.44
5.92
6.58
6.21
6.73
6.43
6.69

5.94
5.61
6.10
5.85
5.96
6.04
6.12

Revolving credit
35 centers.........................................
New Y ork C ity ........................ ..
7 O ther N o rth east................... ..
8 N orth C entral....................... ..
7 Southeast..................................
8 Southw est.................................
4 W est C o ast............................ ..

5.59
5 .44
5.82
5.84
5.13
5.98
5.57

5.24
5.07
5.41
5.67
5.76
5.91
5.13

6.52
5.92
7.56
6.36
5.95
6.52
6.90

6.60
6.06
7.37
7.14
6.03
6.65
6.67

6.28
5.97
6.73
6.00
6.05
6.48
6.37

6.16
5.51
6.56
5.95
6.13
5.94
6.36

5.69
5.41
5.87
5.74
5.44
5.91
5.72

Long-term
35 centers.........................................
New Y ork C ity ........................ ..
7 Other N o rth east................... ..
8 N orth C entral....................... ..
7 Southeast..................................
8 Southw est.............................. ..
4 West C o ast..............................

5.87
5.66
6.03
5.92
6.45
6.37
5.80

5.64
5.35
5.99
5.42
7.07
6.16
5.80

7.03
5.55
7.76
6.83
6.58
6.92
7.49

6.98
5.75
7.59
6.39
7.81
6.57
7.55

N o t e . —Beginning Feb. 1971 the Quarterly Survey o f Interest Rates on
Business Loans was revised. F o r description o f revised series see pp. 46877 o f the June 1971 B u lle t in .




6.65
6.26
6.60
6.94
6.63
6.95
6.35

6.85
5.77
7.07
6.75
9.03
6.67
6.24

6.26
5.99
6.45
6.00
7.10
6.33
6.37

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ INTEREST RATES

A 35

MONEY MARKET RATES
(Per cent per annum)
Finance
Prime
coml.
paper,
4- to 6m o n th s1

Period

CO.

paper
placed
directly,
3- to 6m onths2

U.S. G overnment securities (taxable)4
Prime
bankers’
accept­
ances,
90 days1

Federal
funds
ra te 3

3-month bills5

6-m onth bills5

9- to 12-month issues

R ate on
new issue

M arket
yield

Rate on
new issue

M arket
yield

1-year
bill (mar­
ket yield)5

O ther6

3- to 5year
issues7

1964..............................
1965..............................
1966..............................
1967..............................
1968..............................
1969..............................

3.97
4.38
5.55
5.10
5.90
7.83

3.83
4.27
5.42
4.89
5.69
7.16

3.77
4.22
5.36
4.75
5.75
7.61

3.50
4.07
5.11
4.22
5.66
8.22

3.549
3.954
4.881
4.321
5.339
6.677

3.54
3.95
4.85
4.30
5.33
6.64

3.686
4.055
5.082
4.630
5.470
6.853

3.68
4.05
5.06
4.61
5.48
6.84

3.74
4.06
5.07
4.71
5.45
6.77

3.76
4.09
5.17
4.84
5.62
7.06

4.06
4.22
5.16
5.07
5.59
6.85

1970..............................
1971...............................

7.72
5.11

7.23
4.91

7.31
4.85

7.17
4.66

6.458
4.348

6.42
4.33

6.562
4.511

6.55
4.51

6.53
4.67

6.90
4.75

7.37
5.77

1971—Aug...................
Sept...................
O ct.....................
N ov...................
D ec....................

5.73
5.75
5.54
4.92
4 .74

5.57
5.44
5.30
4.81
4.60

5.57
5.49
5.05
4.78
4.45

5.57
5.55
5.20
4.91
4.14

5.078
4.668
4.489
4.191
4.023

4.93
4.69
4.46
4.22
4.01

5.363
4.934
4.626
4.338
4.199

5.22
4.97
4.60
4.38
4.23

5.52
5.20
4.75
4.49
4.40

5.67
5.31
4.74
4.50
4.38

6.39
5.96
5.68
5.50
5.42

1972—Jan .....................
Feb....................
M ar...................
A pr....................
M ay...................
J u n e ..................
July ...................
Aug...................

4.08
3.93
4.17
4.58
4.51
4.64
4.85
4.82

3.95
3.78
4.03
4.38
4.38
4.45
4.72
4.58

3.92
3.52
3.95
4.43
4.25
4.47
4.73
4.67

3.50
3.29
3.83
4.17
4.27
4.46
4.55
4.80

3.403
3.180
3.723
3.723
3.648
3.874
4.059
4.014

3.38
3.18
3.72
3.70
3.68
3.91
3.97
4.01

3.656
3.594
4.086
4.218
4.064
4.270
4.583
4.527

3.66
3.63
4.12
4.22
4.12
4.35
4.49
4.53

3.78
4.05
4.42
4.65
4.44
4.70
4.91
4.90

3.99
4.07
4.54
4.84
4.58
4.87
4.89
4.91

5.33
5.51
5.74
6.01
5.69
5.77
5.86
5.92

Week ending—
1972—M ay

6 ...........
13...........
2 0 ...........
2 7 ...........

4.55
4 .50
4.50
4 .5 0

4.38
4.38
4.38
4.38

4.25
4 .25
4.25
4.25

4.25
4 .20
4.32
4 .24

3.604
3.462
3.699
3.825

3.56
3.58
3.74
3.78

3.998
3.907
4.118
4.233

4.03
4.03
4.23
4.19

4.37
4.42
4.53
4.47

4.52
4.55
4.67
4.57

5.72
5.73
5.71
5.62

June

3 ...........
1 0 ...........
1 7 ...........
2 4 ...........

4 .50
4.50
4.63
4.65

4.38
4.38
4.38
4 .50

4.25
4.35
4.38
4.53

4.38
4.48
4.46
4.39

3.762
3.861
3.798
3.924

3.82
3.86
3.87
3.97

4.106
4.243
4.187
4.328

4.20
4.25
4.29
4.40

4.51
4.62
4.62
4.69

4.66
4.80
4 .80
4.89

5.64
5.71
5.73
5.81

July

1 ...........
8 ...........
15...........
2 2 ...........
2 9 ...........

4.83
4.88
4.88
4.88
4.80

4.58
4.70
4.75
4.75
4.63

4.70
4.75
4.75
4.75
4.68

4.49
4.61
4.62
4 .4 6 r
4.54

4.023
4.138
4.102
3.948
4.047

3.96
4.05
4.03
3.92
3.93

4.484
4.688
4.605
4.455
4.585

4.50
4.54
4.54
4.46
4.46

4.92
5.00
4.94
4.86
4.86

5.02
5.01
4.97
4.84
4.79

5.87
5.86
5.85
5.84
5.87

Aug.

5 ...........
12...........
1 9...........
2 6 ...........

4.73
4 .70
4.85
4.88

4.58
4 .50
4.58
4.63

4.63
4.63
4.63
4.75

4.56
4.69
4.87
4.75

3.794
3.928
3.956
4.058

3.79
3.85
3.89
4.11

4.298
4.431
4.464
4.623

4.30
4.37
4.46
4.68

4.78
4.75
4.75
5.00

4.72
4.71
4.78
5.05

5.85
5.85
5.87
5.94

Sept.

2 ...........

4.95

4.63

4.75

4.90

4.332

4.46

4.818

4.90

5.28

5.38

6.11

1 Averages o f daily offering rates o f dealers.
2 Averages o f daily rates, published by finance companies, for varying
maturities in the 90-179 day range.
3 Seven-day average for week ending Wednesday.




4 Except for new bill issues, yields are averages computed from daily
closing bid prices.
5 Bills quoted on bank discount rate basis.
6 Certificates and selected note and bond issues.
7 Selected note and bond issues.

A 36

INTEREST RATES □ SEPTEMBER 1972
BOND AND STOCK YIELDS
(Per cent per annum)
Government bonds

Corporate bonds

State and local
Period

United
States
(long­
term)

Total i

Aaa

Stocks

Seasoned issues
Newissue
Aaa
utility

Baa

By selected
rating

Dividend/
price ratio

Earnings/
price ratio

By
group

Total i
Aaa

Baa

Indus­
trial

R ail­
road

Public
utility

Pre­
ferred

Com­
mon

Com ­
m on

1962...................................
1963....................................
1964....................................

3.95
4 .0 0
4.15

3.30
3.28
3.28

3.03
3.06
3.09

3.67
3.58
3.54

4.19
4.21
4 .3 4

4.62
4.50
4.57

4.33
4.26
4.40

5.02
4.86
4.83

4.47
4.42
4.52

4.86
4.65
4.67

4.51
4.41
4.53

4.50
4.30
4.32

3.37
3.17
3.01

6.06
5.68
5.5 4

1965....................................
1966....................................
1967....................................
1968....................................
1969....................................
1970....................................
1971....................................

4.21
4.66
4.85
5.25
6 .10
6.59
5 .74

3.34
3.90
3.99
4.48
5.73
6.42
5.62

3.16
3.67
3.74
4 .2 0
5.45
6.12
5.22

3.57
4.21
4 .30
4.88
6.07
6.75
5.89

4 .50
5.43
5.82
6.50
7.71
8.68
7.62

4.64
5.34
5.82
6.51
7.36
8.51
7.94

4.49
5.13
5.51
6.18
7.03
8.04
7.39

4.87
5.67
6.23
6.94
7.81
9.11
8.56

4.61
5.30
5.74
6.41
7.22
8.26
7.57

4.72
5.37
5.89
6.77
7 .46
8.77
8.38

4 .6 0
5.36
5.81
6.49
7 .49
8.68
8.13

4.33
4.97
5 .34
5.78
6.41
7.22
6.69

3.00
3.40
3.20
3.07
3.24
3.83
3.14

5.87
6.72
5.71
5.84
6.05
6.28
5.44

1971 _ A u g ........................
Sept.......................
O ct.........................
N ov........................
D ec........................

5.78
5.56
5.46
5 .44
5.62

5.84
5.45
5.05
5.20
5.24

5.56
5.09
4.75
4.94
4.99

6.21
5.86
5.38
5.53
5.55

7.71
7.68
7 .5 0
7.38
7.28

8.12
7.97
7.88
7.77
7.75

7.59
7.44
7.39
7.26
7.25

8.76
8.59
8.48
8.38
8.38

7.80
7.64
7.58
7.46
7.42

8.48
8.39
8.25
8.13
8.12

8.30
8.12
8.04
7.96
7.92

7.04
6.90
6.75
6.78
6.81

3.18
3.09
3.16
3.31
3.10

1972—Jan .........................
Feb.........................
M ar........................
A pr........................
M ay .......................
Ju n e.......................
Ju ly ........................
Aug........................

5.62
5.67
5.66
5.74
5.64
5.59
5.57
5.54

5.13
5.29
5.31
5.45
5.33
5.35
5.50
5.36

4.84
5.01
4.99
5.16
5.09
5.07
5.23
5.10

5.49
5.63
5.61
5.79
5.65
5.72
5.78
5.66

7.21
7.34
7.2 4
7.45
7.38
7.32
7.38
7.37

7.66
7.68
7.66
7.71
7.71
7.66
7.66
7.61

7.19
7.27
7.24
7.30
7.30
7.23
7.21
7.19

8.23
8.23
8.24
8.24
8.23
8 .20
8.23
8.19

7.34
7.39
7.35
7.42
7.43
7.36
7.39
7.35

7.98
8.00
8.03
8.04
8.01
7.98
8.00
7.99

7.85
7.84
7.81
7.87
7.88
7.83
7.80
7.69

6.57
6.67
6.76
6.91
6.90
6.93
6.99
6.90

2.96
2.92
2.86
2.83
2.88
2.87
2.90
2.80

5.65
4 .86

Week ending—
July

1 ................
8 ...............
15...............
2 2 ................
2 9 ...............

5.61
5.61
5.59
5.56
5.54

5.45
5.51
5.53
5.50
5.45

5.20
5.20
5.25
5.25
5.20

5.80
5.80
5.80
5.75
5.70

7.42
7.35
7.32
7.37
7.48

7.65
7.64
7.66
7.67
7.68

7.21
7.20
7.20
7.20
7.22

8.20
8.19
8.20
8.25
8.27

7.36
7.37
7.38
7.40
7.41

7.99
7.98
7.99
8.00
8.00

7.80
7.77
7.78
7.81
7.82

6.95
6.98
6.99
7 .0 0
7.00

2.90
2.87
2.91
2.92
2.89

Aug.

5 ................
12................
19...............
2 6 ...............

5.51
5.48
5.53
5.56

5.40
5.35
5.31
5.36

5.10
5.10
5.05
5.10

5.70
5.65
5.60
5.65

7 .40
7.37
7.32

7.66
7.63
7.60
7.59

7.22
7.20
7.19
7.17

8.25
8.23
8.19
8.16

7.39
7.36
7.35
7.34

8.00
7.99
7.98
8.00

7.80
7.73
7.67
7.64

6.97
6.96
6.90
6.79

2.84
2.80
2.78
2.77

Sept.

2 ...............

5.62

5.41

5.15

5.70

7.41

7.59

7.16

8.15

7.32

8.02

7.63

6.87

2.81

N um ber o f issues2..........

9

20

5

5

121

20

30

41

30

40

14

500

1 Includes bonds rated Aa and A , data for which are not shown sep­
arately. Because o f a limited num ber o f suitable issues, the number
o f corporate bonds in some groups has varied somewhat. As o f Dec.
23, 1967, there is no longer an A aa-rated railroad bond series.
2 N um ber o f issues varies over tim e; figures shown reflect most recent
count.
N o te . —Annual yields are averages o f monthly or quarterly data.
Bonds: M onthly and weekly yields are computed as follows: (1) U.S.
G ovt.: Averages o f daily figures for bonds maturing or callable in 10 years
or more. (2) State and local govt.: General obligations only, based on

500

Thurs. figures. (3) Corporate: New-issue A aa utility rates are weekly aver­
ages compiled by the Board o f G overnors o f the Federal Reserve System.
Rates for seasoned issues are averages o f daily figures from M oody’s In­
vestors Service.
Stocks: Standard and P oor’s corporate series. D ividend/price ratios
are based on Wed. figures; earnings/price ratios are as o f end o f period.
Preferred stock ratio is based on eight median yields for a sample o f noncallable issues— 12 industrial and two public utility; common stock ratios
on the 500 stocks in the price index. Quarterly earnings are seasonally
adjusted at annual rates.

Notes to tables on opposite page:
Security Prices:

Terms on M ortgages:

i Begins June 30,1965, at 10.90. On th at day the average price of a share
o f stock listed on the American Stock Exchange was $10.90.

i
Fees and charges—related to principal mortgage am ount—include
loan commissions, fees, discounts, and other charges, which provide
added income to the lender and are paid by the borrower. They exclude
any closing costs related solely to transfer o f property ownership.

N o te . —Annual data are averages o f monthly figures. Monthly and
weekly data are averages o f daily figures unless otherwise noted and are
computed as follows: U.S. Govt, bonds, derived from average market
yields in table on preceding page on basis o f an assumed 3 per
cent, 20-year bond. Municipal and corporate bonds, derived fro m average
yields as computed by Standard and Poor’s Corp., on basis o f a 4 per cent,
20-year bond; Wed. closing prices. Common stocks, derived from com­
ponent common stock prices. Average daily volume o f trading, normally
conducted 5 days per week for 5 Vi hours per day, or 27 l/ i hours per week.
In recent years shorter days and/or weeks have cut total weekly trading
to the following num ber o f hours: 1967—Aug. 8-20, 20; 1968—Jan. 22M ar. 1 ,2 0 ; June 30-Dec. 31,22; 1969—Jan. 3-July 3, 20; July 7-D ec. 3122.5; 1970—Jan. 2-M ay 1, 25.




N o te . —Compiled by Federal Home Loan Bank Board in cooperation
with Federal D eposit Insurance C orporation. D ata are weighted averages
based on probability sample survey o f characteristics o f mortgages
originated by major institutional lender groups (including mortgage
companies) for purchase o f single-family homes. D ata exclude loans for
refinancing, reconditioning, or m odernization; construction loans to
homebuilders; and perm anent loans th a t are coupled with construction
loans to owner-builders. Series beginning 1965, not strictly comparable
with earlier data. See also the table on Home-M ortgage Yields, p. A-55.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ SECURITY MARKETS

A 37

SECURITY PRICES
C om m on stock prices
New Y ork Stock Exchange

Bond prices
(per cent o f par)

Standard and Poor’s index
(1941-43= 10)

Period

U.S.
Govt.
(long­
term)

State
and
local

C or­
porate
AAA

86.94
86.31
84.46
83.76
78.63
76.55
72.33
64.49
60.52
68.80

112.0
111.3
111.5
110.6
102.6
100.5
93.5
7 9.0
72.3
80.0

1971—Au g
Sept
O ct.........
N o v ... . ,
D ec........

67.33
69.35
70.33
70.47
68.80

1 9 7 2 -J a ..........n
Feb........
M ar.
A p r........
M ay
June
July........
Aug........

196
196
196
196
196
196
196
196
197
197

2
3

4

5
6
7
8
9
0
1

New York Stock Exchange index
(Dec. 31, 1965 = 50)
Trans­
porta­
tion

Indus­
trial

Rail­
road

Public
utility

96 .2
96.8
95.1
93.9
86.1
81.8
76.4
68.5
61.6
65.0

62.38 65.54
69.87 73.39
81.37 86.19
88.17 93.48
85.26 91.09
91.93 99.18
98.70 107.49
97.84 107.13
83.22 91.29
98.29 108.35

30.56
37.58
45.46
46.78
46.34
46.72
48.84
45.95
32.13
41.94

59.16
64.99
69.91
76.08
68.21
68.10
66.42
62.64
54.48
59.33

44.16
50.77
55.37
54.67
45.72
54.22

43.79
51.97
58.00
57.45
48.03
57.92

48.23
53.51
50.58
46.96
32.14
44.35

44.77
45.43
44.19
42.80
37.24
39.53

77.4
81.7
84.7
84.1
83.5

63.4
64.2
65.2
66.4
66.5

97.24
99.40
97.29
92.78
99.17

107.26
109.85
107.28
102.21
109.67

43.55
47.18
44.58
41.19
43.17

57.51
56.48
57.41
55.86
57.07

53.73
54.95
53.76
51.17
54.76

57.62
59.13
57.52
54.50
58.85

44.83
48.09
47.02
44.29
48.34

68.79
68.32
68.43
67.66
68.59
69.05
69.23
69.55

84.6
83.8
84.1
82.5
84.6
83.4
83.1
65.8

67.1 103.30 114.12
66.7 105.24 116.86
66.2 107.69 119.73
65.1 108.81 121.34
65.3 107.65 120.16
65.6 108.01 120.84
65.6 107.21 119.98
84.2 111.01 124.35

45.16
45.66
46.48
47.38
45.06
43.66
42.00
43.28

60.19
57.41
57.73
55.70
54.94
53.73
53.47
54.66

57.19
58.45
59.96
60.65
59.82
59.87
59.21
61.07

61.33
63.36
65.18
66.10
65.30
65.76
65.13
67.25

Total

Total

Indus­
trial

Utility

Fi­
nance

Amer­
ican
Stock
Ex­
change
total
in d e x 1

Volume of
trading in
stocks
(thousands o f
shares)

NYSE A M EX

44.43
49.82
65.85
70.49
54.64
70.38

8.52
9.81
12.05
14.67
19.67
27.72
28.73
22.59
25.22

3,820
4,573
4,888
6,174
7,538
10,143
12,971
11,403
10,532
17,429

1,225
1,269
1,570
2,120
2,752
4,508
6,353
5,001
3,376
4.234

38.17
37.53
37.93
36.87
37.52

69.41
72.14
71.24
68.98
72.28

24.84
25.47
25.24
24.10
25.04

14,574
12,038
13,340
13,163
17,171

3,473
3,259
3,622
3.234
4,777

50.56
52.80
53.71
55.50
53.43
51.26
48.45
48.97

40.02
38.56
38.56
37.48
37.04
36.32
36.02
36.87

74.24
73.74
77.15
80.36
78.32
76.59
75.41
78.27

26.46 18,072
27.52 18,817
28.03 18,351
28.24 18,402
27.63 15,270
27.47 14,298
26.97 14,450
26.85 15,522

5,516
6,328
5,680
5,584
4,184
3,872
3,546
3,807

Week ending—
Aug.

5,
12,
19,
26,

69.82
70.09
69.60
69.32

65.9
65.6
65.6
66.7

83.8
84.5
84.9
84.2

109.13
109.23
111.87
111.62

122.32
124.50
125.43
124.89

42.41
41.94
41.46
42.08

53.28
53.89
54.48
55.87

60.04
61.05
61.52
61.44

66.19
67.40
67.90
67.47

48.82
49.76
48.96
48.74

35.99
36.21
36.72
37.78

76.22
77.58
78.47
79.52

26.83 16,055
26.92 15,070
26.97 16,201
26.83 16,729

3,872
3,878
3,998
3,598

Sept.

2,

68.79

65.9

83.5

110.76

123.89

43.64

55.68

60.94

66.87

48.28

37.57

79.17

26.63

3,283

11,889

For notes see opposite page.

TERMS ON CONVENTIONAL FIRST MORTGAGES
New homes

Existing homes

Con­
tract
rate
(per
cent)

Fees &
charges
(per
cent) 1

M aturity
(years)

Loan /
price
ratio
(per
cent)

1965..........................
1966..........................
1967..........................
1968..........................
1969..........................
1970..........................
1971.........................

5.74
6.14
6.33
6.83
7.6 6
8.27
7.60

.49
.71
.81
.89
.91
1.03
.87

2 5.0
24.7
25.2
25.5
25.5
25.1
26.2

73.9
73.0
73.6
73.9
72.8
71.7
74.3

25.1
26.6
28.0
30.7
34.1
35.5
36.3

18.3
19.2
20.4
22.4
24.5
25.2
26.5

5.87
6.30
6.40
6.90
7.68
8.20
7.54

1971—J u n e ............
July..............
Aug..............
Sept..............
O ct...............
N ov..............
D ec...............

7.38
7.51
7.60
7.67
7.68
7.65
7.62

.74
.90
.84
.97
.97
.87
.93

26.3
26.3
26 .2
25.8
26.4
26.7
26.6

73.7
74.5
73.9
75.3
75.5
75.4
74.5

37.5
36.8
36.5
35.1
35.2
36.7
36.4

27.3
27.1
26.5
25.9
26.3
27.3
26.5

1972—Jan ................
Feb...............
M ar..............
A pr...............
M ay.............
Ju n e r ...........
July..............

7.62
7.45
7.38
7.38
7 .4 0
7.41
7.45

.95
1.02
.84
.83
.84
.85
.83

26.5
2 7.0
27.2
27.2
27.2
27.2
27.3

75.0
76.5
76.2
76.0
76.2
76.5
77.2

37.3
37.2
37.7
38.3
38.2
37.2
37.1

27.6
27.8
28.2
28.5
28.5
27.8
28.2

Period

For notes see opposite page.




Pur­
Loan
chase
amount
price
(thous.
(thous. o f dollars)o f
dollars)

Pur­
Loan
chase
am ount
price
(thous.
of
(thous. o f dollars)
dollars)

M aturity
(years)

Loan /
price
ratio
(per
cent)

.55
.72
.76
.83
.88
.92
.77

21.8
21.7
22.5
22.7
22.7
22.8
24.2

72.7
72.0
72.7
73.0
71.5
71.1
73.9

21.6
22.2
24.1
25.6
28.3
30.0
31.7

15.6
15.9
17.4
18.5
19.9
21.0
23.1

7.38
7.50
7.58
7.63
7.62
7.56
7.51

.74
.75
.76
.79
.79
.79
.80

24.3
24.2
24.5
24.2
24.1
24.3
24.6

73.9
74.5
74.2
74.5
74.2
74.6
74.6

32.9
31.6
31.9
30.7
31.2
31.6
32.5

23.9
23.2
23.5
22.5
22.9
23.2
23.9

7.45
7.35
7.31
7.30
7.33
7.36
7.37

.82
.79
.77
.78
.77
.78
.78

24.9
25.4
25.1
25.2
25.2
25.5
25.5

74.7
75.8
75.6
75.3
75.4
76.1
76.0

32.5
33.1
32.7
33.6
33.3
33.8
33.6

24.1
24.8
24.4
24.9
24.6
25.2
25.0

Con­
tract
rate
(per
cent)

Fees &
charges
(per
cent) 1

A 38

STOCK MARKET CREDIT o SEPTEMBER 1972
STOCK MARKET CUSTOMER FINANCING
(In millions of dollars)
M argin credit at brokers and banks 1
Regulated 2
By type

By source

End o f period

M argin stock
Total

Unregu­
lated 3

Convertible
bonds

Subscription
issues

Brokers Banks
Brokers Banks Brokers Banks Brokers Banks

O ther
security
credit
at banks 4

Free credit balances
at brokers 5

N onm argin
stock
credit at
banks
M argin
accts.

Cash
accts.

1971—J u ly .. .
A u g .. .
S ep t...
O c t .. . .
N o v ...
D e c .. .

5,860
5,917
5,990
6,016
5,995
6,835

5,050
5,121
5,208
5,238
5,198
5,700

810
796
782
778
797
835

4,790
4,850
4,930
4,950
4,910
5,400

737
723
713
711
731
764

215
227
230
239
242
258

56
58
54
53
51
57

45
44
48
49
46
42

1,091
1,208
1,182
1,194
1,193
1,197

1,183
1,206
1,237
1,204
1,209
1,298

410
405
364
393
412
387

1.841
1,838
1,734
1,765
1,758
1,837

1972—Jan. .
F e b ...
M a r..
A p r..
M ay.
J u n e .,
July. •

6,850
7,427
7,847
8,250
8,472

5,989
6.477
6,896
7,283
7.478
7,792
7,945

861
950
951
967
994

5,700
6,180
6,620
7,010
7,200
7,510
7,660

789
877
883
898
924

252
256
240
240
241
244
248

56
56
53
57
58

37
41
36
33
37
38
37

1,182
1,170
1,158
1,150
1,141

1,313
1,327
1,294
1,278
1,296

448
434
442
433
403
386
403

2,040
2,108
2,070
2,030
1,930
1,845
1.842

1 M argin credit includes all credit extended to purchase or carry stocks
or related equity instruments and secured at least in part by stock (see
Dec. 1970 B u lle t in ) . Credit extended by brokers is end-of-month data
for m em ber firms o f the NYSE. June data for banks are universe totals;
all other data for banks represent estimates for all commercial banks
based on reports by a reporting sample, which accounted for 60 per cent
o f security credit outstanding at banks on June 30, 1971.
2 In addition to assigning a current loan value to margin stock generally,
Regulations T and U perm it special loan values for convertible bonds and
stock acquired through exercise o f subscription rights.

3 N onm argin stocks are those not listed on a national securities exchange
and not included on the Board o f Governors o f the Federal Reserve
System’s list o f OTC margin stocks. A t banks, loans to purchase or carry
nonm argin stocks are unregulated; at brokers, such stocks have no loan
value.
4 Includes loans to purchase or carry m argin stock if these are unsecured
or secured entirely by unrestricted collateral (see Dec. 1970 B u lle t in ) .
5 Free credit balances are in accounts with no unfulfilled commitments
to the brokers and are subject to withdrawal by customers on demand.

EQUITY STATUS OF MARGIN ACCOUNT DEBT
AT BROKERS

SPECIAL MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT BALANCES
AT BROKERS, BY EQUITY STATUS OF ACCOUNTS

(Per cent o f total debt, except as noted)

(Per cent o f total, except as noted)

End o f
period

Total
debt
(mil­
lions
of
dol­
lars) 1

1971—J u ly ..
Aug..
Sept..
O ct...
N ov..
D e c ..
1972—J a n ...
F e b ..
M ar..
A p r ..
M ay .
June.
J u ly ..

Equity class (per cent)
End o f period
80 or
more

70-79

60-69

50-59

40-49

Under
40

4,790
4,850
4,930
4,950
4,910
5,400

8 .3
9.3
8 .7
7 .5
7.3
8 .6

12.2
14.4
13.1
10.9
10.7
12.7

29.1
35.4
34.3
28.7
25.9
27.1

25.2
19.6
20.7
24.4
26.2
29.9

11.0
8.9
9 .9
12.1
13.1
10.2

14.1
12.6
13.3
16.3
16.8
11.5

5,700
6,180
6,620
7,010
7,200
7,510
7,660

8.7
8 .4
7 .6
7.1
6.9
6 .0
5.5

13.5
12.4
11.2
10.2
9 .9
9.1
8 .3

27.1
25.9
22.3
19.5
19.3
15.9
14.6

32.6
35.1
38.5
4 0 .0
38.6
33.9
30.8

8.5
8 .5
10.6
12.8
15.0
2 2.0
24.9

9 .6
9 .7
9 .7
10.5
10.4
13.2
15.7

1972—Jan ..........................
Feb.........................
M ay.......................
J u n e .......................

N et
credit
status

Equity class of accounts
in debit status

Total
balance
(millions
60 per cent Less than o f dollars)
or more 60 per cent

45.2
44.6
44.2
45.5
44.6
35.0

46.7
48.0
47.0
45.2
45.1
55.7

8.1
7 .4
8.8
9.3
10.2
9 .4

4,190
4,230
4,160
4,060
4,000
7,300

36.8
35.1
35.8
35.5
34.7
34.3
34.4

55.9
57.0
56.0
56.5
57.1
56.3
55.2

7.3
7.9
8.1
8 .0
8 .0
9 .4
11.4

5,780
5,910
5,990
5,920
5,860
5,770
5,930

N o t e . —Special miscellaneous accounts contain credit balances that
may be used by customers as the margin deposit required for additional
purchases. Balances may arise as transfers based on loan values o f other
N o t e . —Each custom er’s equity in his collateral (market value of col­ collateral in the custom er’s margin account or deposits o f cash (usually
lateral less net debit balance) is expressed as a percentage o f current col­ sales proceeds) occur.
lateral values.

i See note 1 to table above.




SEPTEMBER 1972 □ SAVINGS INSTITUTIONS

A 39

MUTUAL SAVINGS BANKS
(In millions o f dollars)
Securities

Loans

End o f period

M ort­
gage

Other

U.S.
Govt.

C orpo­
rate
and
o th e r1

State
and
local
govt.

O ther
assets

Cash

Total
assets—
Total
liabili­
ties
and
general
reserve
accts.

Depos­
its2

M ortgage loan
commitments 3
classified by m aturity
(in m onths)

Other General
liabili­ reserve
ac­
ties
counts
3 or
less

3-6

6-9

Over
9

Total

1963................. 36,007
1964 ............... 40,328
1965
........... 44,433
1966 ............... 47,193

607
739
862
1,078

5,863
5,791
5,485
4,764

440
391
320
251

5,074
5,099
5,170
5,719

912
1,004
1,017
953

799
886
944
1,024

49,702
54,238
58,232
60,982

44,606
48,849
52,443
55,006

943
989
1,124
1,114

4,153
4,400
4,665
4,863

1967.................
1968.................
1969.................
1970.................

50,311
53,286
55,781
57,775

1,203
1,407
1,824
2,255

4,319
3,834
3,296
3,151

219 8,183
194 10,180
200 10,824
197 12,876

993
996
912
1,270

1,138
1,256
1,307
1,471

66,365
71,152
74,144
78,995

60,121
64,507
67,026
71,580

1,260
1,372
1,588
1,690

4,984
5,273
5,530
5,726

742
811
584
619

1971—June. .
Ju ly . . .
Aug. ..
S e p t.. .
O ct.. ..
N o v .. .
D ec__

59,546
59,935
60,350
60,622
61,036
61,473
62,069

2,696
2,545
2,685
2,782
2,840
2,891
2,808

3,409
3,558
3,517
3,467
3,382
3,346
3,334

319
326
338
339
343
357
385

16,649
16,969
17,159
17,282
17,292
17,452
17,674

1,281
1,198
1,151
1,177
1,250
1,280
1,389

1,665
1,750
1,692
1,742
1,712
1,695
1,711

85,565
86,282
86,892
87,410
87,856
88,495
89,369

77,683
78,130
78,437
79,236
79,648
80,165
81,440

1,956
2,198
2,423
2,129
2,150
2,218
1,810

5.926
5; 924
6,031
6,045
6,059
6,112
6,118

1,118
1,015
978
1,086
1,125
1,129
1,047

517
582
557
509
415
554
627

343
347
374
422
484
461
463

1,244
1,260
1,246
1,196
1,230
1,231
1,310

3,222
3,204
3,155
3,213
3,253
3,375
3,447

1972—Jan. 4 ..
F e b ....
M a r ...
A pr__
M a y ...
Ju n e ? ..

62,258
62,517
62,947
63,299
63,753
64,333

3,224
3,523
3,660
3,452
3,499
3,439

3,261
3,306
3,380
3,425
3,450
3,397

433
459
515
548
598
642

18,417
19,055
19,659
20,192
20,615
20,857

1,246
1,255
1,256
1,239
1,238
1,332

1,802
1,808
1,852
1,868
1,881
1,948

90,641
91,924
93,268
94,022
95,035
95,947

82,327
83,269
84,809
85,299
85,976
87,027

1,962
2,229
1,991
2,231
2,493
2,254

6,352
6,427
6,468
6,492
6,565
6,667

1,045
1,277
1,448
1,720
1,654
1,612

676
759
769
747
778
925

409
533
681
742
737
540

1,442
1,414
1,429
1,437
1,591
1,603

3,572
3,983
4,327
4,646
4,760
4,679

1 Also includes securities o f foreign governments and international
organizations and nonguaranteed issues o f U.S. Govt, agencies.
2 See note 8, p. A-19.
3 Commitments outstanding o f banks in New Y ork State as reported to
the Savings Banks Assn. o f the State o f New York. D ata include building
loans beginning with Aug. 1967.
4 Balance sheet data beginning Jan. 1972 are reported on a gross o f
valuation reserves basis. The data differ somewhat from balance sheet

2,549
2,820
2,697
2,010
982
799 2,523
1,034
1,166 3,011
452
485
946 2,467
322
302
688 1,931

d a ta p re v io u s ly r e p o r t e d b y NAMSB w h ic h w e r e n e t o f v a lu a tio n re s e rv e s.
F o r m o s t ite m s , h o w e v e r , t h e d iffe re n c e s a r e r e la tiv e ly s m a ll.
N o t e .— N a tio n a l A s s n . o f M u tu a l S a v in g s B a n k s d a t a ; fig u re s a r e
e s tim a te s f o r a ll s a v in g s b a n k s in t h e U n i t e d S ta te s a n d d iffe r s o m e w h a t
fro m t h o s e s h o w n e ls e w h e re in t h e B u l l e t in ; t h e la t t e r a r e f o r c a ll d a te s
a n d a re b a s e d o n r e p o r t s filed w ith U .S . G o v t, a n d S ta te b a n k s u p e rv is o ry
a g e n cie s.

LIFE INSURAf 2E COMPANIES
(In millions o f d o lla r s )
Business securities

G overnm ent securities
End o f period

Total
assets

Total

United State and Foreign1
States
local

Total

Bonds

Stocks

M ort­
gages

Real
estate

Policy
loans

O ther
assets

Statem ent value:
1963
1964.
1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.

141,121
149,470
158,884
167,022
177,832
188,636

12, 438
12, 322
11,,679
10,,837
10,,573
10,,509

5,813
5,594
5,119
4,823
4,683
4,456

3,852
3,774
3,530
3,114
3,145
3,194

2,773
2,954
3,030
2,900
2,754
2,859

60,780
63,579
67,599
69,816
76,070
82,127

53,645
55,641
58,473
61,061
65,193
68,897

7,135
7,938
9,126
8,755
10,877
13,230

50,544
55,152
60,013
64,609
67,516
69,973

4,319
4,528
4,681
4,883
5,187
5,571

6,655
7,140
7,678
9,117
10,059
11,306

6,385
6,749
7,234
7,760
8,427
9,150

Book value:
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.

167,022
177,361
187,695
197,208
207,254

10,,864
10,,530
IO!,483
10;,914
11,,068

4,824
4,587
4,365
4,514
4,574

3,131
2,993
3,036
3,221
3,306

2,909
2,950
3,082
3,179
3,188

68,677
73,997
79,403
84,566
88,518

61,141
65,015
68,575
70,859
73,098

7,536
8,982
10,828
13,707
15,420

64,661
67,575
70,071
72,027
74,375

4,888
5,188
5,573
5,912
6,320

9,911
10,060
11,284
13,825
16,064

8,801
11,011
10,881
9,964
10,909

1971-—Ju n e r .............................. 214,532
July................................. 215,284
Aug................................. 216,436
Sept................................. 217,489
O ct.................................. 218,257
N ov................................. 219,353
Dec.................................. 221,573

10 ,717
11 ,031
11 ,076
11 ,000
11 ,016
11 ,150
11 ,129

4,261
4,466
4,475
4,345
4,331
4,473
4,427

3,339
3,430
3,452
3,484
3,485
3,484
3,518

3,117
3,135
3,149
3,171
3,200
3,193
3,184

95,262
95,683
96,429
97,199
97,778
98,443
99,430

76,854
77,333
77,581
78,121
78,890
79,384
78,912

18,408
18,350
18,848
19,078
18,888
19,059
20,518

74,509
74,583
74,707
74,799
74,864
74,903
75,596

6,552
6,729
6,749
6,811
6,876
6,949
7,097

16,531
16,590
16,679
16,782
16,850
16,948
17,027

10,961
10,668
10,796
10,898
10,873
10,960
11,294

223,312
224,736
226,024
227,893
229,336
230,182

11 ,325
11 ,341
11 ,517
11 ,083
11 ,128
11 ,105

4,594
4,609
4,744
4,476
4,516
4,394

3,535
3,535
3,532
3,373
3,366
3,355

3,196
3,197
3.241
3,234
3,246
3,356

101,350
102,821
103,798
105,249
106,434
107,074

80,087
80,795
81,099
82,293
83,060
83,382

21,263
22,026
22,699
22,956
23,374
23,692

75,517
75,456
75,424
75,469
75,493
75,547

7,097
6,999
7,048
7,034
7,094
7,149

17,074
17,132
17,212
17,360
17,441
17,528

10,949
10,987
11,025
11,698
11,746
11,779

1972-—Jan ..................................
Feb..................................
M ar.................................
A pr..................................
M ay ................................
Ju n e ................................

Figures are annual statement asset values, with bonds carried on an
1 Issues o f foreign governments and their subdivisions and bonds of
amortized basis and stocks at year-end m arket value. Adjustments for
the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
interest due and accrued and for differences between m arket and book
N o t e . —Institute o f Life Insurance estimates for all life insurance
values are not made on each item separately but are included in total, in
companies in the United States.
“ Other assets.”




A 40

SAVINGS INSTITUTIONS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
(In millions of dollars)
Assets

End o f period

Other*

Total
assets—
Total
liabilities

3,315
3,926
3,979
4,015
3,900
3.366
3,442
2,962
2,438
3,506

4,775
5,346
6,191
7,041
7,960
8,378
9,107
9,571
8,606
9,326

19,281
18,972
18,663
18,971
19,096
18,293

2,139
2,077
2,056
2,166
2,284
2,783

19,691
20,682
21,427
21,449
22,070
21,644
22,145

2,785
2,829
2,521
2,551
2,456
2,414
2.366

M ort­
gages

Invest­
ment
secur­
ities 1

196 1
196 2
196 3
196 4
196 5
196 6
196 7
196 8
1969 5.........
1970 5..........

68,834
78,770
90,944
101,333
110,306
114,427
121,805
130,802
140.232
150,331

5,211
5,563
6,445
6,966
7,414
7,762
9,180
i 11,116
10,873
13,020

1971 _ j u l y . .
Aug..
Sept..
O ct..
Nov..
D ec..

163,720
166,111
168.233
170,106
172,047
174,385

1971—Jan..
Feb..
M ar..
A p r..
M ay.
Ju n e.
July*,

175,838
177,614
180,145
182,711
185,431
188,884
191,703

Cash

M ortgage loan
com m itm ents4

Liabilities

Savings
capital

Reserves
and un­
divided
profits

Bor­
rowed
money 3

Loans
in
process

82,135
93,605
107,559
119,355
129,580
133,933
143,534
152,890
162,149
176,183

70,885
80,236
91,308
101,887
110,385
113,969
124,531
131,618
135,538
146,404

5,708
6,520
7,209
7,899
8,704
9,096
9,546
10,315
11,228
11,991

2,856
3,629
5,015
5,601
6,444
7,462
4,738
5,705
9,728
10,911

1,550
1,999
2,528
2,239
2,198
1,270
2,257
2,449
2,455
3,078

1.136
1,221
1.499
1,729
1,849
2.136
2,462
2,803
3,200
3,799

807
1,602

1,872
2,193
2,572
2,549
2,707
1,482
3.004
3,584
2,812
4,393

10,084
10,312
10,474
10,603
10,811
10,842

195,224
197,472
199,426
201,846
204,238
206,303

164,524
165,633
168,303
169,796
171,358
174,472

12,337
12,329
12,339
12,327
12,325
13,187

8,011
8,203
8,388
8,353
8,439
9,048

4,944
5,023
4,996
5,001
4,960
5,072

5,408
6,284
5,400
6,369
7,156
4,524

3,144
2,880
2,639
2,537
2,511
2,345

8,555
8,311
8.004
7,806
7,759
7,237

10,926
11,144
11,291
11,440
11,691
11,865
11,953

209,240
212,269
215,384
218,151
221,648
224,807
228,167

177,738
180,556
184,843
186,617
188,826
192,564
194,853

13,250
13,248
13.261
13.262
13,257
13,583
13,581

8,053
7,275
6,759
6,847
6,802
7,273
7,220

4,874
4,853
5,077
5,283
5,608
5,887
5,992

5,325
6,337
5,444
6,142
7,155
5.500
6,521

2,508
3,354
4,110
4,047
4,545
4,198
4,011

7,510
8,659
9,864
10,837
11,793
11,663
11,875

1 U.S. Govt, securities only through 1967. Beginning 1968 the total
fleets liquid assets and other investment securities. Included are U.S.
G ovt, obligations, Federal agency securities, State and local govt, securi­
ties, tim e deposits at banks, and miscellaneous securities, except FHLBB
stock. Compensating changes have been made in “ Other assets.”
2 Includes other loans, stock in the Federal home loan banks, other
investments, real estate owned and sold on contract, and office buildings
and fixtures. See also note 1.
3 Consists o f advances from FHLBB and other borrowing.
4 Insured savings and loan assns. only. D ata on outstanding commit­

O ther

O utstand­
ing at
end o f
period

Made
during
period

ments are comparable with those shown for mutual savings banks (on
preceding page) except that figures for loans in process are not included
above but are included in the figures for m utual savings banks.
5 Balance sheet data for all operating savings and loan associations
were revised by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board for 1969 and 1970.
N o t e . — Federal Home Loan Bank Board data; figures are estimates for
all savings and loan assns. in the United States. D ata are based on
monthly reports o f insured assns. and annual reports o f noninsured assns.
D ata for current and preceding year are preliminary even when revised.

MAJOR BALANCE SHEET ITEMS OF SELECTED FEDERALLY SPONSORED CREDIT AGENCIES
(In millions o f dollars)
Federal home loan banks
Assets
End o f
period

Liabilities and capital
Cash
and
de­
posits

M em­
ber
de­
posits

A d­
vances
to
mem­
bers

Invest­
ments

1967.
1968. .............
1969.
1970.
1971.

4,386
5,259
9,289
10,614
7,936

2,598
2,375
1,862
3,864
2,520

127
126
124
105
142

4,060
4,701
8,422
10,183
7,139

1,432
1,383
1,041
2,332
1,789

1971-- J u l y . .
Aug...
S e p t..
O c t...
N o v ..
D e c ...

7,338
7,513
7,637
7,640
7,708
7,936

3,211
2,744
2,584
2,740
2,545
2,520

85
86
117
99
101
142

7,297
7,218
7,190
7,390
7,139
7,139

1972-- J a n . . .
F e b ...
M a r ..
A p r...
M a y ..
J u n e ..
J u ly ..

7,238
6,515
5,992
5,913
5,853
6,075
6,138

3,412
3,805
4,342
4,233
4,067
3,850
3,579

156
115
113
81
108
118
118

7,139
6,731
6,730
6,729
6,528
6,527
6,526

Bonds
and
notes

Banks
for
cooperatives

M ort­
gage
loans
(A)

Deben­
tures
and
notes
(L)

Loans
to
cooper­
atives
(A)

Deben­
tures

1,395
1,402
1,478
1,607
1,618

5,348
6,872
10,541
15,502
17,791

4,919
6,376
10,511
15,206
17,701

1,699
1,532
1,522
1,450
1,548
1,789

1,600
1,603
1,600
1,603
1,607
1,618

15,674
16,304
16,732
17,202
17,535
17,791

1,949
2,014
2,008
1,762
1,789
1,746
1,497

1,647
1,696
1,708
1,717
1,718
1,721
1,722

17,977
18,220
18,342
18,403
18,598
18,628
18,740

Capital
stock

N ote.—D ata from Federal H om e Loan Bank Board, Federal N ational
M ortgage Assn., and Farm Credit Admin. Among omitted balance
sheet items are capital accounts o f all agencies, except for stock o f FH LB ’s.
Bonds, debentures, and notes are valued at par. They include only publicly




Federal National
Mortgage Assn.
(secondary m arket
operations)

Federal
intermediate
credit banks

Deben­
tures

(L)

Loans
and
dis­
counts
(A)

1,506
1,577
1,732
2,030
2,076

1,253
1,334
1,473
1,755
1,801

15,638
15,260
16,241
16,984
17,138
17,701

1,997
1,942
1,942
2,030
2,076
2,076

17,442
17,814
17,992
18,131
17,959
18,560
18,194

2,098
2,149
2,267
2,260
2,181
2,145
2,137

Federal
land
banks

Bonds

(L)

M ort­
gage
loans
(A)

3,411
3,654
4,275
4,974
5,669

3,214
3,570
4,116
4,799
5,503

5,609
6,126
6,714
7,186
7,917

4,904
5,399
5,949
6,395
7,063

1,726
1,791
1,791
1,745
1,763
1,801

5,905
5,866
5,841
5,763
5,633
5,669

5,712
5,742
5,713
5,680
5,606
5,503

7,650
7,709
7,767
7,826
7,870
7,917

6,884
6,884
6,884
7,063
7,063
7,063

1,867
1,840
1,840
1,833
1,852
1,786
1,731

5,785
5,720
5,967
6,105
6,229
6,378
6,330

5,537
5,591
5,689
5,879
6,018
6,118
6,174

7,970
8,039
8,139
8,238
8,343
8,430
8,517

7,063
7,186
7,186
7,382
7,382
7,382
7,659

(L)

offered securities (excluding, for FH L B ’s bonds held within the FHLB
System) and are not guaranteed by the U.S. G ovt.; for a listing o f these
securities, see table below. Loans are gross o f valuation reserves and
represent cost for FN M A and unpaid principal for other agencies.




EMBER 1972 □ FEDERALLY SPONSORED CREDIT AGENCIE
)ING ISSUES OF FEDERALLY SPONSORED AGENCIES,
Cou­
pon
rate

6V4
1%

A m ount
(millions
o f dollars)

2* 5
8.3
5.70
4 .2 0
7.20
8 .4 0
8 .4 0
7.10
6.35
7.65
8.00
6.10
8.05
7.95
6 .5 0
7H
6.95
7.75
7.80
6.60

394
250
310
350
400
400
450
300
250
300
300
181
227
250
265
300
350
300
200
350
200
200

7.10
7.75
5.30
6.15
8.60
7.75
7.15

175
150
200
350
140
150
150

387
6 .00
8 .00
4.38

250
200
249

7 .50
8.38
8.63

400
250
200

Agency, and date o f issue
and m aturity
Federal National M ortgage
Association— Cont.
D ebentures:
5/11/70 - 9/11/72...........
6/10/70 - 9/11/72...........
11/10/69 - 12/11/72___
10/13/70 - 1 2 /1 1 /7 2 ....
11/10/70 - 3/12/73.........
12/12/69 - 3/12/73.........
6/12/61 - 6/12/73...........
7/10/70 - 6/12/73...........
7/12/71 -6 /1 2 /7 3 .............
3/10/70 - 9/10/73...........
6/10/71 -9 /1 0 /7 3 .............
12/10/70 - 12/10/73___
8/10/71 - 12/10/73...........
12/1/71 - 3/11/74...........
4/10/70 - 3/11/74...........
8/5/70 - 6/10/74............
11/10/71 -6 /1 0 /7 4 ...........
9/10/69
9/10/74...........
2/10/71 - 9/10/74.............
5/10/71 - 12/10/74...........
9/10/71 - 12/10/74...........
11/10/70 - 3/10/75.........
10/12/71 - 3/10/75.........
4/12/71 -6 /1 0 /7 5 .............
10/13/70 - 9/10/75.........
3/10/72 - 12/10/75.........
3/11/71 - 3/10/76.............
6/10/71 -6 /1 0 /7 6 .............
2/10/72 - 6/10/76.............
11/10/71 -9 /1 0 /7 6 ...........
6 /1 2 /7 2 -9 /1 0 /7 6 ............
7/12/71 - 12/10/76...........
2/13/62
2/10/77...........
12/10/70 - 6/10/77.........
5/10/71 -6 /1 0 /7 7 .............
9 /1 0 /7 1 -9 /1 2 /7 7 .............
10/12/71 - 1 2 /1 1 /7 8 ....
6 /1 2 /7 2 -9 /1 0 /7 9 .............
12/10/71 - 12/10/79___
2/10/72 - 3/10/80.............
6 /2 9 /7 2 - 1/29/81.............
1/21/71 - 6/10/81 ...........
9/10/71 -9 /1 0 /8 1 .............
6 /2 8 /7 2 -5 /1 /8 2 ...............
2/10/71 - 6/10/82.............
3/11/71 6/10/83.............
11/10/71 -9 /1 2 /8 3 ..........
4/12/71 -6 /1 1 /8 4 .............
12/10/71 - 12/10/84___
3/10/72 - 3/10/92...........
6 /1 2 /7 2 -6 /1 0 /9 2 ............

C ou­ A mount
pon
(millions
rate o f dollars)

8.40
7.40
8.00
7.20
7.30
8 .30
4%
8.35
6.75
8 .10
6.13
5.75
7.15
5.45
7.75
7 .90
5.70
7.85
5.65
6.10
6.45
7.55
6.35
5.25
7.50
5.70
5.65
6.70
5.85
6.13
5.85
7.45
4%
6.38
6.50
6.88
6.75
6.40
6.55
6.88
6.15
7.25
7.25
5.84
6.65
6.75
6.75
6.25
6 .90
7.0 0
7.05

400
200
200
400
450
250
146
350
550
300
350
500
500
400
350
400
350
250
300
250
450
300
600
500
350
500
500
250
450
300
500
300
198
250
150
300
300
300
350
250
156
250
250
58
250
200
250
200
250
200
200

JULY 31, 1972

Agency, and date o f issue
and m aturity

illioi
lollai

Banks for cooperatives
D ebentures:
2 /1 /7 2 - 8 /1 /7 2 ...........
4/3/72 - 10/2/72.........
5 /1 /7 2 - 11/1/72........
6 /1 /7 2 - 12/4/72.........
7 /3 /7 2 - 1/3/73...........
10/1/70 - 10/1/73.. .

458
269
317
299
288
100

Federal intermediate
credit banks
D ebentures:
11/1/71 - 8/1/72.........
12/1/71 - 9 /5 /7 2 ....
1 /3 /7 2 - 10/2/72.........
2 /1 /7 2 - 11/1/72.........
3 /1 /7 2 - 12/4/72.........
4 /3 /7 2 - 1/2/73...........
5 /1 /7 2 -2 /1 /7 3 ...........
3/2/70 - 3/1/73.........
6 /1 /7 2 - 3/1/73...........
7/3/72 - 4/2/73.........
9 /1 /7 0 -7 /2 /7 3 ...........
7/1/71 - 1/2/74...........
1/4/71 - 7/1/74.........
5/1/72 - 1/2/75...........
1 /3 /7 2 -7 /1 /7 5 ...........

594
593
454
634
558
514
482
203
489
475
200
212
224
240
302

Federal land banks
Bonds:
9/14/56 - 9 /1 5 /7 2 ...
9/22/69 - 9 /1 5 /7 2 ...
10/23/72 - 10/23/72.
7/20/71 - 10/23/72...
7/20/70 - 1/22/73. . .
2/20/63 - 2/20/73-78
4/20/72 - 4 /2 3 /7 3 ....
1/20/70 - 7 /2 0 /7 3 ...
8/20/73 - 7 /2 0 /7 3 ....
4/20/70 - 10/22/73..
7/20/72 - 1/21/74. . .
2/20/72 - 2 /2 0 /7 4 ...
10/20/70 - 4 /2 2 /7 4 ..
10/21/71 - 7 /2 7/74..
4/20/71 - 10/21/74...
2/20/70 - 1 /2 0 /7 5 ...
4/20/65 - 4 /2 1 /7 5 ...
2/15/72 - 7/21/75
7/20/71.- 10/20/75...
4/20/72 - 1 /2 0 /7 6 ....
2/21/66 - 2 /2 4 /7 6 ...
7/20/66 - 7 /2 0 /7 6 ...
10/27/71 - 10/20/77.
5/2/66 - 4 /2 0 /7 8 ....
7/20/72 - 7/20/78. . .
2/20/67 - 1 /2 2 /7 9 ...
2/23/71 -4 /2 0 /8 1 ___
4/20/72 - 4 /2 0 /8 2 ....

109
337
200
446
407
148
433
198
350
300
450
155
354
326
300
220
200
425
300
300
123
150
300
150
269
285
224
200

n ot guaranteed by the U.S. G o v t.; see also note to table at bottom of opposite page.

A 42

FEDERAL FINANCE □ SEPTEMBER 1972
FEDERAL FISCAL OPERATIONS: SUMMARY
(In millions of dollars)
U.S. budget

Means of financing

Receipt-expenditure account

Borrowings from the public 2

Period
N et
lend­
ing

Budget
out­
lays i

Budget
surplus
or
deficit
(-)

Less: Cash and
monetary assets

Less: Invest­
Public Plus
ments by Govt,
Equals:
Trea­
debt Agency
accounts
Less:
Total
sury
securi­ securi­
Special borrow ­ operat­
ties
ties
notes 3
ing
ing
Special Other
balance
issues

O ther
means
of
financ­
ing,
n e t4

Budget
receipts

N et
ex­
pendi­
tures

Fiscal year:
196 9
197 0
197 1
197 2

187,784
193,743
188,392
208,596

183,072
194,456
210,318
230,514

3,236 6,142
633
1,476 184,548
2,131 196,588 -2 ,8 4 5 17,198 -1,739
1,107 211,425 -23,033 27,211
-3 4 7
1,105 231,619 -23,023 29,131 -1,269

7,364
9,386
6,616
6,795

2,089 - 1 ,3 8 4 2-1 ,2 9 5
676
5,397
800
19,448
1,625
19,442

H alf year:
1970—July-Dee.
1971—Jan.-June
July-Dee.
1972—Jan.-June

87,583
100,809
93,100
115,496

104,117
106,201
110,608
119,906

99
1,008
948
157

-2 1
104,216 -16,633 18,240
6,400 8,971
107,209
-3 2 6
111,557 -18,377 26,001 -1,119
3,130
-1 5 0
120,062 -4 ,6 4 6

1,807
4,809
2,803
3,992

157
647
523
1,102

16,257
3,189
21,556
- 2 ,1 1 4

54
656
973
389

-882
-4 5 3
303 4,039
80 -2 ,1 2 2
835 7,971

M o n th :
1971—Jul y
Aug..........
Sept.........
O ct..........
N ov.........
Dec..........

*•13,221
15,652
19,710
12,462
14,945
17,213

18,507
19,276
18,265
18,677
18,798
17,085

49
306
-6 9
115
149
399

*•-959
1,861
20 2,309
-5 0 3 -1,019
50 -1,690
-1 0
40
284 1,291

122
150
+ 194
-1
47
22

4,227
6,854
- 2 ,0 0 3
1,407
2,590
8,482

-1 ,5 5 9
2,337
470
-3,3 1 8
-2 ,3 2 4
1,328

*•-630 -1,069
-8 1 9 -1 ,4 0 7
281
1,239
-2 9 0
1,314
-1 7
-9 2 8
5,653 -1 ,2 3 0

1972—J a.............n
Feb..........
M ar.........
A pr..........
M ay........
Ju n e........
Ju ly .........

17,596
15,239
15,237
24,534
17,275
25,537
15,207

19,226
18,589
20,000
19,113
19,723
23,255

243
175
327
-5 1 5
237
-3 1 0

-4 7 4 -1,508
568 1,450
-1 0 3
-6 8 3
- 4 4 -1,770
272 3,527
- 3 7 0 2,975
9 1,409

-3 6 9
286
97
1,746
-2 9
-6 2 8
-6

134
1
3,795
- 2 ,0 5 9
-6 1 8
-3 ,3 6 8
3,730

-1 9 1
-4 ,0 1 8
591
4,047
-2 ,0 3 0
417
-1 ,1 2 9

1,026 2,573
-2 0 8
-7 0 2
-1 6
1,869
1,338
1,508
-1 ,6 1 7
-3 4 6
1,877
3,070
-1 ,8 1 0 -3 ,2 8 4

7.169
*•18,568 ‘-5 ,3 4 8
19,582 - 3 ,9 3 0 9,293
18,196 + 1,513 -2,324
-3 3 4
18,791 -6 ,6 3 0
18,947 -4 ,0 0 2
2,686
17,484
271 9,511
19,469
18,764
20,327
18,598
19,960
22,945
18,591

-1 ,8 7 3 -1,269
1.169
-3 ,5 2 5
3,312
-5 ,0 9 0
5,935 -2,039
-2 ,6 8 5
2,607
-6 5 1
2,591
-3 ,3 8 4
5,123

O ther

596
2,151
710
1,362

1,616
-5 8 1
-9 7 9
905

269
-9 8 2
3,586
5,849

Selected balances
Federal securities

Treasury operating balance
End
of
period
F .R .
Banks

Tax
and
loan
accounts

O ther
deposi­
taries5

Total

Public
debt
securities

Agency
securities

Less:
Investments o f
Govt, accounts
Special
issues

O ther

Less:
Special
n otes3

E quals:
T otal
held
by
public

M em o:
D ebt o f
G ovt.sponsored
corps.—
N ow
private 6

Fiscal year:
196 9
197 0
197 1
197 2

1,258
1,005
1,274
2,344

4,525
6,929
7,372
7,934

112
111
109
5 139

5,894
8,045
8,755
10,117

353,720
370,919
398,130
427,260

14,249
12,510
12,163
10,894

66,738
76,124
82,740
89,539

20,923
21,599
22,400
24,023

825
825
825
825

279,483
284,880
304,328
323,770

24,991
35,789
36,886

Calendar year:
197 0
197 1

1,156
2,020

6,834
9,173

109
113

8,099
11,306

389,158
424,131

12,491
11,044

77,931
85,544

21,756
22,922

825
825

301,138
325,884

38,802
39,860

M o n th :
1971—J u l y .. ..
A u g .. . .
S ep t.. . .
O ct........
N o v .. . .
Dec.......

1,274
987
2,102
1,876
1,996
2,020

7,372
8,408
7,763
4,667
2,223
9,173

113
113
113
113
113
113

8,755
9,508
9,978
6,655
4,331
11,306

405,299
414,962
412,268
411,934
414,620
424,131

11,203
11,223
10,720
10,770
10,760
11,044

84,601
86,910
85,904
84,213
84,253
85,544

22.522
22,672
22.853
22.853
22,900
22,922

825
825
825
825
825
825

308,554
315,408
313,406
314,812
317,402
325,884

37,985
37,116
37,380
39,530
39,392
39,860

1972—Ja
n
Feb.......
M a r.. . .
A pr.......
M ay___
J u n e .. ..
J u ly .. . .

2,860
884
1,293
1,871
2,144
2,344
2,298

8,118
6,075
6,391
9,724
7,420
7,934
6,547

5 134
134
2
136
136
139
144

11,112
7,094
7,685
11,732
9,700
10,117
8,988

422,862
424,032
427,343
425,304
427,912
427,260
432,383

10,570
11,137
11,034
10,991
11,263
10,894
10,903

84,037
85,486
84,804
83,034
86,561
89,539
90,944

22.522
22,839
22,935
24.681
24,652
24,023
24,018

825
825
825
825
825
825
825

326,017
326,019
329,814
327,755
327,137
323,770
327,499

39,701
39,883
40,109
40,632
40,426
41,044

1 Equals net expenditures plus net lending.
2 The decrease in Federal securities resulting from conversion to private
ownership o f Govt.-sponsored corporations (totaling $9,853 million) is
not included here. In the bottom panel, however, these conversions de­
crease the outstanding amounts o f Federal securities held by the public
mainly by reductions in agency securities. The Federal N ational Mortgage
Association (FNM A ) was converted to private owership in Sept. 1968 and
the Federal intermediate credit banks (FICB) and banks for coopera­
tives in Dec. 1968.
3 Represents non-interest-bearing public debt securities issued to the
International M onetary Fund and international lending organizations.
New obligations to these agencies are handled by letters of credit.




4 Includes accrued interest payable on public debt securities, deposit
funds, miscellaneous liability and asset accounts, and seigniorage.
5 As o f Jan. 3, 1972, the Treasury operating balance was redefined to
exclude the gold balance and to include previously excluded “ O ther deposi­
taries” (deposits in certain commercial depositaries that have been con­
verted from a time to a demand basis to permit greater flexibility in
Treasury cash management).
6 Includes debt o f Federal home loan banks, Federal land banks, R .F .K .
Stadium Fund, FN M A (beginning Sept. 1968), FICB, and banks for
cooperatives (beginning Dec. 1968).

Note.—Half years may not add to fiscal year totals due to revisions in
series which are not yet available on a monthly basis.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ FEDERAL FINANCE

A 43

FEDERAL FISCAL OPERATIONS: DETAIL
(In millions of dollars)
Budget receipts
C orporation
income taxes

Individual income taxes
Period
Total
on­ Re­
W ith­ N
held with­
held funds

Fiscal year:
1969........................................
1970........................................
1971.......................................
1972.......................................

187,784
193,743
188,392
208,596

70,182
77,416
76,490
83,282

27,258
26,236
24,262
25,683

N et
total

1,660
2,208
3,535
2,760

H alf year:
565 42,469 12,744
1970—July-D ee................... 87,584 37,465 5,569
1971—Jan .-Ju n e................. r100,808 '39,025 18,693 13,957 ^43,761 17,576
574 43,465 13,262
July-D ee................... 93,180 38,449 5,589
1972—J an .-Ju n e................. 115,416 44,833 20,094 13,567 51,359 21,535

1,467
r2,069
1,448
1,312

490
r6,245
306
6,706
5,513 3,755
396
5,941
264
7,245
6,823
379

1972—Jan............................. 17,596 6,627
Feb............................. 15,239 7,581
M ar........................... 15,237 7,782
A pr............................ 24,534 6,599
M a y .......................... 17,275 8,141
June........................... 25,537 8,102
Ju ly ............................ 15,207 7,052

4,318
682
1,323
8,650
1,413
3,708
548

191
91
76
55
55
106

87,249
90,412
86,230
94,824

Em ployment
taxes and
Gross R e­ contributions1 Un- O ther
N et
re­
empl. net
re­
total
ceipts funds Pay­
insur. ceipts2
Selfroll
taxes empl.

38,338
35,037
30,320
34,797

M onth:
1971—July............................ r13,221
Aug............................ 15,652
19,710
O ct............................. 12,462
Nov........................... 14,945
D ec............................ 17,213

10,191
13,240
14,522
14,141

Social insurance taxes
and contributions

r6,543
6,920
9,192
6,282
7,455
7,096

1,163
688
4,505
1,111
730
5,064

1 10,944
1,416 6,846
5,200 3,905
3,284 11,985
2,997 6,557
668 11,142
245 7,355

1,228
878
4,995
5,145
967
8,324
1,258

32,521
37,190
39,751
44,087

1,715
1,942
1,948
2,032

Estate Misc.
and
re­
gift ceipts3

15,222
15,705
16,614
15,484

2,319
2,430
2,591
3,285

3,491
3,644
3,735
5,412

2,908
3,424
3,858
3,624

8,153 1,317
8,462 1,274
8,961 1,838
6,523 1,447

1,537
2,198
2,395
3,017

2,006
1,853
1,718
1,906

3,328
3,465
3,673
4,377

2,353
2,700
3,206
3,434

39,918
45,298
48,578
53,929

17,768
133 1,348
21,983 1,815 2,325
19,643
155 1,518
24,444 1,877 4,736

1,576
1,630
1,673
1,761

20,826
'27,753
22,989
30,940

205
660
60
116
424
52

272
287
273
274
288
278

3,464
5,996
3,784
2,983
4,120
2,642

1,532
1,482
1,490
1,412
1,656
1,389

227
244
363
334
343
329

319
311
263
391
566
545

r257
245
312
324
293
286

124
153
147
545
167
71
1,153
343
223 1,636
111
64
260

295
274
325
283
303
281
289

3,615
743
5,740
819
4,350 1,130
5,655 1,091
7,443 1,371
4,137 1,370
4,277 1,442

259
224
264
215
235
250
237

621
596
602
372
461
364
334

344
347
263
342
475
135
492

284 2,987
236 5,049
198 3,299
152
Sept............................
375 2,592
218 3,408
138 2,308
3
158
212
273
250
234
185
187

Excise Cus­
taxes toms

3,044
4,774
3,787
3,877
5,281
3,681
3,727

Budget outlays4

Period

Educa­
N at­
Com­ ComH ealth
mun.
tion
ural
merce develop.
and
and
and
re­
and
welfare
man­
sources transp.
housing power

Intragovt,
trans­
ac­
tions *

Total

N a­
tional
de­
fense

Fiscal year:
1969........................................
1970........................................
1971........................................
1972r......................................
1973®6...................................

184,548
196,588
211,425
231,619
7246,257

81,232
80,295
77,663
78,150
78,310

3,785
3,570
2,884
3,659
3,844

4,247
3,749
3,381
3,424
3,191

6,221
6,201
5,312
7,276
6,891

7,921
2,081
2,480 9,310
2,713 11,283
3,754 11,055
2,450 11,550

6,525 49,395 7,640 15,791
1,961
8,677 18,312
2,965 7,289 56,785
3,382 8,650 70,164 9,787 19,608
4,230 10,200 81,492 10,748 20,607
4,844 11,281 87,775 11,745 21,161

H alf year:
1970—July-D ee...................
1971—Jan .-Ju n e .................
July-D ee...................
1972—J a n .-Ju n e .................

104,216
107,242
111,557
120,063

38,521
39,178
35,755
42,396

1,409
1,475
1,752
1,906

1,720
1,661
1,777
1,647

4,633
679
5,999
1,278

1,561
1,152
1,952
1,801

5,808
5,475
6,030
5,025

1,677
1,705
2,181
2,048

3,744
4,906
4,355
5,845

32,710
37,454
38,131
43,362

M onth:
1971—J u ly............................ '18,568
Aug............................ 19,582
Sept........................... 18,196
O ct............................. 18,791
18,947
D ec............................ 17,484

'5,203
5,595
5,979
6,106
6,175
6,713

340
308
303
303
286
181

377
291
273
266
286
285

'1,783
963
336
1,134
568
852

'292
432
344
309
302
271

'573
1,643
947
1,030
892
875

545
291
292
272
256
402

684
661
924
501
851
722

'6,190
6,385
6,169
6,499
6,437
6,444

'799
892
758
833
942
896

'1,655
1,668
1,800
1,418
1,811
1,702

'370 '- 2 4 4
533
386
287
-2 4 6
396
-2 7 6
334
-3 4 3
473 - 2 ,3 3 2

19,469
18,764
20,327
18,598
19,960
22,945
18,591

6,161
6,333
7,158
6,738
7,107
8,899
5,139

347
307
361
265
268
358
313

259
276
310
238
207
294
289

699
298
16
-1 9 6
126
335
2,397

264
237
265
255
265
515
-8 2 1

813
619
876
793
713
1,211
827

434
254
342
9
490
519
529

813
908
932
728
1,033
1,431
764

6,807
6,938
7,111
6,936
6,914
8,657
6,214

1,023
864
1,045
929
973
911
884

1,737
1,714
1,801
1,792
1,784
1,728
1,695

390
-2 7 7
400
-3 8 5
-2 9 3
401
419
-3 0 8
-3 7 1
389
495 -2 ,4 0 8
612
-2 5 2

1972—Jan .............................
Feb.............................
M ar...........................
M a y ..........................
J u n e ..........................
Ju ly ............................

Intl.
affairs

Space
re­
search

Agri­
cul­
ture

1 Old-age, disability, and hospital insurance, and Railroad Retirement
accounts.
2 Supplementary medical insurance premiums and Federal employee
retirement contributions.
3 Deposits o f earnings by Federal Reserve Banks and other miscellane­
ous receipts.
4 Outlays by functional categories are published in the Monthly
Treasury Statement (beginning April 1969). M onthly back data (beginning
July 1968) are published in the Treasury Bulletin o f June 1969.
5 Consists o f government contributions for employee retirement and
interest received by trust funds.




Vet­
erans

Inter­
est

4,626 9,597
5,162 10,014
5,003 10,050
5,745 10,556

G en­
eral
govt.

2,866
3,336
3,970
4,888
5,531

- 5 ,1 1 7
- 6 ,3 8 0
- 7 ,3 7 6
- 7 ,8 6 4
- 8 ,5 9 0

1,818
2,147
2,392
2,494

-3 ,6 0 7
-3 ,7 7 0
- 3 ,8 2 2
- 4 ,0 4 2

6 Estimates presented in the Jan. 1973 Budget Document. Breakdowns do
not add to totals because special allowances for contingencies, Federal pay
increase (excluding D epartm ent o f Defense), and revenue sharing, totaling
$6,275 million for fiscal 1973, are not included.
7 On June 5, 1972, the adm inistration revised the Budget estimates—
increasing total outlays to $250.0 billion; revised figures for the functional
breakdown are not available.

Note.—Half years may not add to fiscal year totals due to revisions in
series which are not yet available on a monthly basis.

A 44

U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES □ SEPTEMBER 1972
GROSS PUBLIC DEBT, BY TYPE OF SECURITY
(In billions of dollars)
Public issues
Total
gross
public
debt 1

End o f period

M arketable
Total
Total

Bills

C on­
vert­
ible
B onds 2 bonds

Certifi­
cates

Notes

30.0

6.0
10.1

33.6
119.5

50.2
48.3
61.4
76.5
85.4
101.2

104.2
99.2
95.2
85.3
69.9
58.6

N onm arketable

Special
issues 4

Total 3

Sav­
ings
bonds
& notes

8.9
56.5

6.1
49.8

7 .0
24.6

2.8
2.7
2 .6
2.5
2 .4
2 .4

52.9
52.3
54.9
56.7
56.9
59.1

50.3
50.8
51.7
52.3
52.2
52.5

46.3
52.0
57.2
59.1
71 .0
78.1

1941—Dec.
1946—Dec.

57.9
259.1

50.5
233.1

41.6
176.6

2.0
17.0

1965—Dec.
1966—Dec.
1967—Dec.
1968—Dec.
1969—Dec.
1970—Dec.

320.9
329.3
344.7
358.0
368.2
389.2

270.3
273.0
284.0
296.0
295.2
309.1

214.6
218.0
226.5
236.8
235.9
247.7

60.2
64.7
69.9
75.0
80.6
87.9

1971— Aug.
Sept.
O ct..
Nov.
Dec..

414.6
412.3
411.9
414.6
424.1

325.8
324.5
325.8
328.4
336.7

249.7
249.9
252.2
254.5
262.0

89.6
88.6
89.0
89.8
97.5

108.2
109.5
111.5
114.0
114.0

51.9
51.8
51.8
50.7
50.6

2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3

73.8
72.2
71.3
71.6
72.3

54.0
54.2
54.4
54.7
54.9

87.0
86.0
84.3
84.4
85.7

1972—Jan..
Feb..
M ar.
Apr..
M ay
June.
July.
Aug.

422.9
424.0
427.3
425.3
427.9
427.3
432.4
435.4

336.9
336.5
340.6
340.4
339.5
335.8
339.6
339.9

261.9
261.2
265.4
263.0
261.9
257.2
257.7
258.1

97.5
98.1
102.4
98.3
98.1
94.6
95.2
96.2

114.0
112.9
112.9
114.7
113.4
113.4
113.4
115.7

50.4
50.2
50.1
50.0
50 .4
49.1
49.1
46.2

2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3

72.7
73.0
72.9
75.1
75.2
76.3
79.5
79.5

55.1
55.3
55.6
55.9
56.2
56.5
56.7
57.0

84.2
85.6
84.9
83.1
86.6
89.6
91.0
93.6

1 Includes non-interest-bearing debt (of which $622 million on Aug. 31,
1972, was not subject to statutory debt limitation).
2 Includes Treasury bonds and m inor am ounts o f Panam a Canal and
postal savings bonds.
3 Includes (not shown separately): depositary bonds, retirement plan
bonds, foreign currency series, foreign series, and R ural Electrification
A dm inistration bonds; before 1954, Armed Forces leave bonds; before

5.9

1956, tax and savings notes; and before Oct. 1965, Series A investment
bonds.
4 Held only by U.S. Govt, agencies and trust funds and the Federal
home loan banks.
N o t e . —Based on Daily Statement o f U.S. Treasury. See also second
paragraph in N o t e to table below.

OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC DEBT
(Par value, in billions o f dollars)
Held by private investors

Held b y Total
gross
public
debt

U.S.
Govt.
agencies
and
trust
funds

F.R .
Banks

1939—D ec.................
1946—D ec.................

41.9
259.1

6.1
2 7 .4

2 .5
23.4

1965—D ec.................
1966—D ec.................
1967—D ec.................
1968—D ec.................
1969— D ec.................
1970—Dec.................

320.9
329.3
344.7
358.0
368.2
389.2

59.7
65.9
73.1
76.6
89.0
97.1

1971—Ju ly.................
Aug.................
Sept.................
O ct..................
N ov.................
D ec..................

405.3
414.6
412.3
411.9
414.6
424.1

1972—Jan ..................
Feb..................

422.9
424.0
427.3
425.3
427.9
427.3
432.4

End o f
period

A pr.................
M ay ...............
Ju n e ................
July.................

M utual
savings
banks

Insur­
ance
com­
panies

O ther
corpo­
rations

State
and
local
govts.

33.4
208.3

12.7
74.5

2.7
11.8

5 .7
24.9

2 .0
15.3

.4
6.3

1.9
44.2

7.5
20.0

.2
2.1

.3
9.3

40.8
44.3
49.1
52.9
57.2
62.1

220.5
219.2
222.4
228.5
222.0
229.9

60.7
57.4
63.8
66.0
56.8
62.7

5.3
4 .6
4.1
3.6
2 .9
2.8

10.3
9.5
8 .6
8.0
7.1
7 .0

15.8
14.9
12.2
14.2
13.3
10.5

22.9
24.3
24.1
24.4
25 .4
23.1

49.7
50.3
51.2
51.9
51.8
52.1

22.4
24.3
22.8
23.9
29.1
29.8

16.7
14.5
15.8
14.3
11.4
20.6

16.7
19.4
19.9
22.4
24.1
21.4

104.9
107.3
106.5
104.7
104.7
106.0

65.8
66.9
67.6
67.2
67.8
70.2

234.6
240.4
238.2
240.0
242.1
247.9

60.5
59.5
60.0
60.9
61.5
65.3

2.9
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.7

6.7
6 .7
6 .5
6.5
6.5
6.6

11.6
10.9
10.0
11.1
12.0
12.6

21.9
21.1
21.0
20.8
20.6
20.4

53.4
53.6
53.7
54.0
54.2
54.4

24.8
24.5
24.1
23.7
23.4
23.0

35.4
42.7
42.4
42.8
44.1
46.9

17.3
18.6
17.7
17.4
17.1
16.0

104.4
106.2
105.5
105.5
109.1
111.5
112.8

69.6
67.7
69.9
70.3
71.6
71.4
70.8

248.9
250.2
251.9
249.5
247.2
244.4
248.8

62.8
62.1
63.3
61.9
60.8
59.9
57.6

2 .7
2 .7
2.7
2.7
2.8
2.7
2 .7

6.5
6.5
6.5
6 .4
6.3
6 .2
6.1

12.2
12.5
12.3
11.2
12.0
10.4
10.0

21.1
22.0
21.6
21.5
21.4
21.8
22.4

54.6
54.9
55.2
55.5
55.8
56.0
56.3

22.8
2 2.4
22.3
21.9
21.4
20.8
20.7

48.2
48.9
49.9
49.8
49 .4
50.0
54.6

18.0
18.2
18.1
18.5
17.4
16.7
18.3

1 C onsists of investm ents of foreign and in tern atio n al accounts in
the U nited States.
2 C onsists o f savings and lo an assns., nonprofit institutions, cor­
porate pension tru st funds, and dealers and brokers. A lso included
are certain G ovt, deposit accounts and G ovt.-sponsored agencies.
N o t e . —Reported data for F.R . Banks and U.S. G ovt, agencies and
trust funds; Treasury estimates for other groups.




Individuals

Com ­
mercial
banks

Total

Other
Savings
bonds securities

Foreign
O ther
and
misc.
inter­
inves­
national 1 tors 2

T he debt and ow nership concepts were altered beginning w ith the
M ar. 1969 B u l l e t i n . The new concepts (1 ) exclude guaranteed se­
curities and (2 ) rem ove from U .S. G ovt, agencies and tru st funds
and add to other m iscellaneous investors the holdings o f certain
Govt.-sponsored but privately owned agencies and certain Govt, deposit
accounts.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES

A 45

OWNERSHIP OF MARKETABLE SECURITIES, BY MATURITY
(Par value, in millions o f dollars)
W ithin 1 year
Type o f holder and date

All holders:
1969 Dec.
1970—Dec.
1971—Dec.
1972 June
July

Total
Total

Bills

O ther

1-5
years

5-10
years

10-20
years

Over
20 years

3 1.............................................................
31.............................................................
3 1 .............................................................
30.............................................................
3 1 .............................................................

235,863
247,713
262,038
257,202
257,717

118,124
123,423
119,141
121,944
122,528

80,571
87,923
97,505
94,648
95,234

37,553
35,500
21,636
27,296
27,294

73,301
82,318
93,648
89,004
89,004

20,026
22,554
29,321
26,852
26,851

8,358
8,556
9,530
9,343
9,317

16,054
10,863
10,397
10,059
10,015

U.S. Govt, agencies and trust funds:
1969—Dec. 31.....................................................
1970—Dec. 3 1 .....................................................
1971—Dec. 3 1 .....................................................
1972—June 30.....................................................
July 3 1 .....................................................

16,295
17,092
18,444
19,868
19,785

2,321
3,005
1,380
2,350
2,213

812
708
605
1,671
1,598

1,509
2,297
775
679
615

6,006
6,075
7,614
7,739
7,760

2,472
3,877
4,676
4,906
4,950

2,059
1,748
2,319
2,358
2,350

3,437
2,387
2,456
2,514
2,512

Federal Reserve Banks:
1969 Dec. 31.....................................................
1970 Dec. 31.....................................................
1971—Dec. 3 1 .....................................................
1972 June 30.....................................................
July 3 1 .....................................................

57,154
62,142
70,218
71,356
70,822

36,023
36,338
36,032
40,085
39,552

22,265
25,965
31,033
31,258
30,724

13,758
10,373
4,999
8,827
8,828

12,810
19,089
25,299
24,109
24,107

7,642
6,046
7,702
5,913
5,913

224
229
584
627
627

453
440
601
622
622

Held by private investors:
1969 Dec. 31.....................................................
1970—Dec. 31.....................................................
1971—Dec. 3 1 .....................................................
1972 June 30.....................................................
July 3 1 .....................................................

162,414
168,479
173,376
165,978
167,110

79,780
84,080
81,729
79,509
80,763

57,494
61,250
65,867
61,719
62,912

22,286
22,830
15,862
17,790
17,851

54,485
57,154
60,735
57,156
57,137

9,912
12,631
16,943
16,033
15,988

6,075
6,579
6,627
6,358
6,340

12,164
8,036
7,340
6,923
6,881

Commercial banks:
1969 Dec. 31 ............................................
1970 Dec. 31.............................................
1971—Dec. 3 1 ............................................
1972 June 30............................................
July 3 1 ............................................

45,173
50,917
51,363
47,028
44,778

15,104
19,208
14,920
14,337
13,371

6,727
10,314
8,287
6,335
5,131

8,377
8,894
6,633
8,002
8,240

24,692
26,609
28,823
26,326
25,505

4,399
4,474
6,847
5,688
5,337

564
367
555
500
411

414
260
217
178
154

M utual savings banks:
1969 Dec. 3 1 .............................................
1970— Dec. 3 1 .............................................
1971—Dec. 3 1 ............................................
1972 June 30............................................
July 3 1 ............................................

2,931
2,745
2,742
2,668
2,649

501
525
416
388
368

149
171
235
175
162

352
354
181
213
206

1,251
1,168
1,221
1,192
1,188

263
339
499
502
502

203
329
281
298
297

715
385
326
287
294

Insurance companies:
1969 Dec. 3 1 .............................................
1970—Dec. 31.............................................
1971—Dec. 3 1 ............................................
1972 June 3 0 ............................................
July 3 1 ............................................

6,152
6,066
5,679
5,340
5,276

868
893 ,
720
525
528

419
456
325
208
220

449
437
395
317
308

1,808
1,723
1,499
1,362
1,335

253
849
993
1,027
1,021

1,197
1,369
1,366
1,356
1,357

2,028
1,231
1,102
1,068
1,034

Nonfinancial corporations:
1969 Dec. 31.............................................
1970—Dec. 31.............................................
1971—Dec. 3 1 ............................................
1972 June 30............................................
July 3 1 ............................................

5,007
3,057
6,021
4,182
4,830

3,157
1,547
4,191
3,010
3,491

2,082
1,194
3,280
1,945
2,160

1,075
353
911
1,065
1,331

1,766
1,260
1,492
1,020
1,194

63
242
301
135
127

12
2
16
10
9

8
6
20
9
9

Savings and loan
1969 Dec.
1970—Dec.
1971—Dec.
1 9 7 2 -Ju n e
July

associations:
31.............................................
31.............................................
3 1 ............................................
30............................................
3 1 ............................................

3,851
3,263
3,002
2,849
2,787

808
583
629
675
652

269
220
343
359
329

539
363
286
316
323

1,916
1,899
1,449
1,250
1,236

357
281
587
608
594

329
243
162
140
132

441
258
175
175
173

State and local governments:
1969—Dec. 31.............................................
1970—Dec. 3 1 .............................................
1971—Dec. 3 1 ............................................
1972 June 30............................................
July 3 1 ............................................

13,909
11,204
9,823
10,314
10,408

6,416
5,184
4,592
5,298
5,379

5,200
3,803
3,832
4,441
4,512

1,216
1,381
760
857
867

2,853
2,458
2,268
2,223
2,227

524
774
783
749
793

1,225
1,191
918
773
766

2,893
1,598
1,263
1,270
1,244

All others:
1969 Dec.
1970—Dec.
1971—Dec.
1972 June
July

85,391
91,227
94,746
93,597
96,382

52,926
56,140
56,261
55,276
56,974

42,648
45,092
49,565
48,256
50,398

10,278
11,048
6,696
7,020
6,576

20,199
22,037
23,983
23,783
24,452

4,053
5,672
6,933
7,324
7,614

2,545
3,078
3,329
3,281
3,368

5,665
4,298
4,237
3,936
3,973

31.............................................
3 1 .............................................
3 1 ............................................
30............................................
3 1 ............................................

N o t e . —D irect public issues only. Based on Treasury Survey o f
Ownership.
Beginning with Dec. 1968, certain Govt.-sponsored but privately owned
agencies and certain Govt, deposit accounts have been removed from U.S.
Govt, agencies and trust funds and added to “ All others.” Comparable data
are not available for earlier periods.
D ata complete for U.S. Govt, agencies and trust funds and F.R. Banks
but for other groups are based on Treasury Survey data. O f total m ar-




ketable issues held by groups, the proportion held on latest date by those
reporting in the Survey and the num ber o f owners surveyed were: (1)
about 90 per cent by the 5,635 commercial banks, 485 m utual savings
banks, and 738 insurance companies com bined; (2) about 50 per cent by
the 466 nonfinancial corporations and 487 savings and loan assns.; and
(3) about 70 per cent by 504 State and local govts.
“ All others,” a residual, includes holdings o f all those not reporting
in the Treasury Survey, including investor groups not listed separately.

A 46

U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES □ SEPTEMBER 1972
DAILY-AVERAGE DEALER TRANSACTIONS
(Par value, in millions of dollars)
U.S. Governm ent securities
By m aturity

By type o f custom er

Period
Total

W ithin
1 year

Dealers and brokers
1-5
years

5-10
years

Over
10 years
U.S. G ovt,
securities

Com ­
mercial
banks

O ther

All
other

U.S. Govt.
agency
securities

D ec..................................

2,484
2,482
2,115
2,646
2,691
3,139

2,103
1,848
1,598
1,905
1,668
2,317

280
512
271
438
523
497

74
97
219
268
418
266

28
25
26
36
81
58

814
859
759
988
906
1,006

131
129
99
117
157
214

837
855
725
906
940
1,190

702
640
532
634
687
730

471
462
482
659
547
569

1972—Jan ...................................
F eb..................................
M ar.................................
A p r..................................
M ay ................................
Ju n e ................................
July.................................

3,191
3,260
3,177
2,990
2,542
2,452
2,571

2,268
2,339
2,443
2,300
1,939
2,001
2,124

571
652
464
460
348
257
283

309
242
241
203
221
161
131

44
27
29
28
35
34
33

i 879
913
800
704
589
545
633

2 391
363
437
450
364
355
382

1,120
1,170
1,060
1,002
821
759
851

3 801
815
881
835
767
793
704

623
611
459
609
485
411
438

Week ending—
1972—July
5 .........................
12.........................
19.........................
26.........................

2,926
2,130
2,286
2,080

2,601
1,874
1,938
1,880

199
146
165
116

107
89
156
65

19
21
26
19

609
420
588
581

401
310
367
265

932
710
709
636

983
691
622
599

328
419
366
587

4,990
2,337
2,038
2,245
2,751

3,313
1,687
1,600
1,781
2,005

1,121
329
250
251
361

399
175
119
108
226

157
145
69
104
159

1,228
487
398
513
606

725
359
233
300
605

1,864
852
726
815
886

1,174
639
681
616
654

531
341
349
405
606

1971—July.................................
A ug.................................
Sept.................................

Aug.

2 .........................
9 .........................
16.........................
23.........................
30.........................

1 Beginning Jan. 5, 1972, represents transactions
dealers.
2 Beginning Jan. 5, 1972, represents transactions
brokers.
3 Beginning Jan. 5, 1972, includes transactions
in securities other than U.S. Govt., previously
dealers and brokers.

o f U.S. Govt, securities
o f U.S. Govt, securities
o f dealers and brokers
shown under “ other”

N o te .— The transactions data combine m arket purchases and sales o f
U.S. Govt, securities dealers reporting to the F.R. Bank o f New York.
They do not include allotments of, and exchanges for, new U.S. Govt,
securities, redemptions o f called or m atured securities, or purchases or
sales o f securities under repurchase agreement, reverse repurchase (resale),
or similar contracts. Averages o f daily figures based on the num ber of
trading days in the period.

DAILY-AVERAGE DEALER POSITIONS

DAILY-AVERAGE DEALER FINANCING

(Par value, in millions o f dollars)

(In millions o f dollars)

U.S. Governm ent securities, by maturity
Period

W ithin
All
1
m aturi­
y ear
ties

1-5
years

5-10
years

Over
10
years

U.S.
Govt.
agency
securi­
ties

Commercial banks
Period

All
sources

1,296
1,456
1,347
1,044
1,107
1,056
753

904
719
907
746
931
838
496

1,750
1,344
949
657
755
804
820

1,763
1,686
1,458
953
1,280
1,108
986

4,237
3,980
3,905
3,271

1,091
1,047
1,174
969

1,005
944
831
630

891
860
759
709

1,250
1,129
1,142
962

3,093
2,796
2,865
3,240

798
635.
594
922

602
463
483
442

746
684
793
989

947
1,014
996
887

June............
July.............
Week ending—
1972—June 7 . . .
1 4 ...
21. ..
28. ..

-1 1
11
36
37
265
232

771
698
926
903
1,063
1,101

1971—J uly .............

1972—Jan ...................
F eb..................
M ar.................
A pr..................
M ay.................
Ju n e.................
Ju ly .................

5,561
4,960
4,933
3,573
4,257
3,733
3,252

4,665
4,094
4,710
3,713
4,089
3,903
3,626

437
479
228
20
84
-5 5
-1 4 6

365
304
-3 2
-1 3 1
102
-9 9
-2 1 6

94
83
27
-2 9
-1 8
-1 6
-1 1

847
554
489
422
551
532
356

1972—Jan ...............
Feb..............
M ar.............

Week ending—
1972—June 7 .........
14
21 ,
2 8 .........

3,963
3,845
3,891
3,511

4,054
3,932
4,011
3,813

-2 9
-2 1
-3 8
-1 0 4

-3 9
-4 6
-7 0
-1 8 7

-2 4
-2 1
-1 2
-1 1

526
488
594
533

3,129
2,920
3,109
3,560

3,547
3,374
3,431
3,870

-1 4 9
-1 8 3
-1 3 4
-1 2 5

-2 5 6
-2 5 9
-1 8 8
-1 8 0

-1 3
-1 2

470
276
279
456




1,254
967
1,430
1,699
2,082
1,571

5,714
5,205
4,662
3,400
4,073
3,804
3,055

26
70
377
310
943
600

N o te . —The figures include all securities sold by dealers under repur­
chase contracts regardless o f the maturity date o f the contract, unless the
contract is matched by a reverse repurchase (resale) agreement or delayed
delivery sale with the same maturity and involving the same am ount of
securities. Included in the repurchase contracts are some th at more
clearly represent investments by the holders o f the securities rather than
dealer trading positions.
Average o f daily figures based on num ber o f trading days in the period.

721
821
811
921
1,564
1,659

1,151
894
1,049
1,188
1,877
1,375

-2 3
344
355
394
914
626

-4

391
390
856
704
932
912

3,516
3,071
4,146
4,511
6,455
5,517

3,018
2,473
3,089
3,612
3,725
3,877

5 .........
12
19.........
2 6 .........

All
other

Else­
where

1971—Ju ly ................. 3,011
Aug.................. 2,897
Sept.................. 3,856
O ct................... 4,353
5,846
Dec.................. 5,335

July

Corpora­
tions 1

New
Y ork
City

Sept.............

July

5. ..
1 2 ...
1 9 ...
26. ..

1 All business corporations, except commercial banks and insurance
companies.
N o t e . —Averages o f daily figures based on the num ber of calendar days
in the period. Both bank and nonbank dealers are included. See also
N o t e to the table on the left.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ GOVERNMENT SECURITIES

A 47

U.S. GOVERNMENT MARKETABLE AND CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES, AUGUST 31, 1972
(In millions of dollars)
A m ount

Issue and coupon rate

Issue and coupon rate

Treasury bills— Cont.
Feb. 15, 1 9 7 3 ....
4,102
Feb. 22, 1 9 7 3 ....
4.101
4.102
Feb. 28, 1973.. ..
M ar. 1, 1973 . . .
4,105
M ar. 31, 1 9 7 3 ....
1,702
4.098
Apr. 30, 1973___
4.102
M ay 31, 1 9 7 3 ....
June 30, 1 9 7 3 ....
4.101
July 31, 1 9 7 3 ....
4.102
Aug. 28, 1 9 7 3 ....
1.700
4.102
4.099
4.102
4.103
5,803
1,800
1,802 Treasury notes
Oct.
1, 1972.........li/i
1,802
1.799
Nov. 15, 1972..........6
Feb. 15, 1973..........6'A
1.701
Feb. 15, 1973..........4%
1.799
1,801
Apr. 1, 1973.........1Vi
1.800
M ay 15, 1973..........7y4
May 15, 1973..........4 y4
1,800
1,700
Aug. 15, 1973..........8Vg
1,800
Oct.
1, 1973.........m
1,801
Feb. 15, 1974..........iy 4

Treasury bills
Sept. 7, 1972
Sept. 14, 1972
Sept. 21, 1972
Sept. 28, 1972
Sept. 30, 1972
Oct. 5, 1972
Oct. 12, 1972
Oct. 19, 1972
Oct. 26, 1972,
Oct. 31, 1972
Nov. 2, 1972,
Nov. 9, 1972,
Nov. 16, 1972,
Nov. 24, 1972,
Nov. 30, 1972,
Dec. 7, 1972.
Dec. 14, 1972,
Dec. 21, 1972.
Dec. 28, 1972.
Dec. 31, 1972.
Jan. 4, 1973.
Jan. 11, 1973.
Jan. 18, 1973.
Jan. 25, 1973.
Jan. 31, 1973.
Feb. 1, 1973.
Feb. 8, 1973.

Issue and coupon rate

Amount

Treasury notes—Cont.
Apr. 1, 1974.........UA
May 15, 1974.........7%
Aug. 15, 1974.........5Ys
Oct.
1, 1974.........1%
Nov. 15, 1974.........5V4
Feb. 15, 1975.........5%
Feb. 15, 1975.........5%
Apr. 1, 1975.........li/i
May 15, 1975.........5%
M ay 15, 1975.........6
Aug. 15, 1975.........5%
Oct.
1, 1975........ IVi
Nov. 15, 1975.........7
Feb. 15, 1976.........6 Va
Feb. 15, 1976.........5%
Apr. 1, 1976.........li/i
M ay 15, 1976.........5%
May 15, 1976 ......... 6V£
33
Aug. 15, 1976.........7i/i
1,327
2,514
Oct.
1, 1976.........li/i
4,268
Nov. 15, 1976.........614
Feb. 15, 1977.........8
34
Apr. 1, 1977......... li/i
5,844
Aug. 15, 1977.........734
3,792
Feb. 15, 1978........ 614
1,839
Nov. 15, 1978.........6
30
Aug. 15, 1979.........614
2,960
1,800
1,801
1.701
1,801
1.702
1.700
1.701
1,201
1,201
1,804

t Tax-anticipation series.

A m ount

Issue and coupon rate

A m ount

34
Sept. 15, 1967-72. • 2i/i
4,334
Dec. 15, 1967-72. • 2Vi
10,284
Aug. 15, 1973
.4
42
Nov. 15, 1973
• 41/g
5,440
Feb. 15,
•41/g
4,016
M ay 15,
.414
1,222
Nov. 15, 1974
•37/s
8
M ay 15, 1975-85. .414
1,776
June 15, 1978-83. .314
6,760
Feb. 15, 1 9 8 0 .... .4
7,679
Nov. 15, 1980
• 3i/i
30
Aug. 15, 1981
.7
3,115
Feb. 15, 1982 , •63/g
Aug. 15, 1 9 8 4 .... •63/8
3,739
4,945
M ay 15, 1 9 8 5 .... .314
27
Nov. 15, 1986
.61/8
2,802
Aug. 15, 1987-92. .414
2,697
Feb. 15, 1988-93. .4
4,194
M ay 15, 1989-94. .41/s
11
Feb. 15, 1 9 9 0 .,.. •3i/i
1,283
Feb. 15, 1 9 9 5 ,,,. .3
5,163
Nov. 15, 1998 , , , •31/i
5
2,264
8,389 Convertible bonds
8,207
Investment Series B
A pr. 1, 1975-80.. 234
4,563

454
1,350
3,894
4,339
2,467
2,852
1,212
1,207
1,511
2,582
1,899
807
2,702
2,354
1,008
1,216
3,775
242
1,524
4,347
998
3,445

2,308

N o t e .— D irect public issues only. Based on Daily Statement o f U.S.

Treasury.

NEW ISSUES OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SECURITIES
(In millions o f dollars)
All issues (new capital and refunding)
Type o f issue

Issues for new capital

Type o f issuer

Period
Total

196
196
196
196

4
5
6
7

196 8

196 9
197 0
197 1

G ener­
al
obli­
gations

Reve­
nue

HAA1

U.S.
Govt.
loans

State

Special
district
O ther2
and
stat.
auth.

120 2,838
50 3,311
3,667
5,867
6,523
4,884
7,526
9,293

905
707
1,044
548
761
1,058

1,942
1,894
2,053
1,626
2,134
2,042

301
352
463
291
418
353

120
158
65
210
338
137

231
377
458
353
500
239

219
159
271
96
246
298

1,071
846
796
678
631
1,016

591
670
849
969
785
778
680

1,696
1,930
2,111
2,075
1,919
1,959
1,762

377
531
463
490
657
334
325

147
78
134
229
214
144
120

440
433
348
434
295
523
208

56
29
329
10
67
393
152

676
858
837
912
684
563
957

171
“ *258

5
9
3
3
1

477
459
348
341
629
441

606
735
706
840
874
568

639
354
434
471
374
246
647

545
977
954
674
828
1,199
444

1,776
2,002
2,237
2,114
1,986
2,224
1,771

1,120
1,049
1,289
1,382
990
975
1,315

654
948
718
725
992
1,035
454

253

225
209

1 Only bonds sold pursuant to 1949 Housing Act, which are secured
by contract requiring the Housing Assistance Adm inistration to make
annual contributions to the local authority.
2 Municipalities, counties, townships, school districts.
3 Excludes U.S. Govt, loans. Based on date o f delivery to purchaser
and payment to issuer, which occurs after date o f sale.
4 W ater, sewer, and other utilities.




O ther
H ous­ Veter­
ans’ pur­
ing^
aid
poses

727
626
533
645
787
543
466
2,068

1,628
2,401
2,590
2,842
2,774
3,359
4,174
5,999

1972—J a n ...
F e b ...
M ar..
A p r...
M a y ..
J u n e ..
J u ly ..

Util­
ities4

2,437
1,965
1,880
2,404
2,833
1,734
3,525
5,214

208
170
312
334
282
197
103
62

506
754
523
890
869
440

oads
Edu­ Rand
cation bridges

688
900
1,476
1,254
1,526
1,432
1,532
2,642

637
464
325
477
528
402
131
1,000

1,306
1,141
1,313
836
1,394
1,367

Total

3,392
3,619
3,738
4,473
4,820
3,252
5,062
5,278

3,585
3.517
3,955
5,013
6.517
3,556
6,082
8,681

1,989
1,903
2,098
1,728
2,264
2,068

Use o f proceeds

3,812 5,407 10,069 10,201
3,784 5,144 11,538 10,471
11,303
4,110 4,695
14,643
4,810 7,115
5,946 7,884
16,489
3,596 4,926
11,838
18,110
5,595 8,399
8,714 10,246
24,495

10,847 6,417
11,329 7,177
6,804
11,405
14,766 8,985
16,596 9,269
11,881 7,725
18,164 11,850
24,962 15,220

1971—July. .
A u g ..
S e p t..
O c t...
N o v ..
D ec...

Total
amount
deliv­
ered 3

5 Includes urban redevelopment loans.
N o t e . —The figures in the first column differ from those shown on the

following page, which are based on Bond Buyer data. The principal
difference is in the treatment of U.S. Govt, loans.
Investment Bankers Assn. data; par am ounts o f long-term issues
based on date o f sale unless otherwise indicated.
C omponents may not add to totals due to rounding.

A 48

SECURITY ISSUES □ SEPTEMBER 1972
TOTAL NEW ISSUES
(In millions of dollars)
Gross proceeds, all issues1
N oncorporate

C orporate

Period
Total

U.S.
G o v t.2

U.S.
Govt,
agency3

State
and local
(U.S.)*

Bonds
O ther5

Stock

Total
Total

Publicly
offered

Privately
placed

Preferred

C om m on

1964......................
1965......................
1966......................

37,122
40,108
45,015

10,656
9,348
8,231

1,205
2,731
6,806

10,544
11,148
11,089

760
889
815

13,957
15,992
18,074

10,865
13,720
15,561

3,623
5,570
8,018

7,243
8,150
7,542

412
725
574

2,679
1,547
1,939

1967......................
1968......................
1969......................
1970.......................
1971.......................

68,514
65,562
52,496
88,666
105,233

19,431
18,025
4,765
14,831
17,325

8,180
7,666
8,617
16,181
16,283

14,288
16,374
11,460
17,762
24,370

1,817
1,531
961
949
2,165

24,798
21,966
26,744
38,945
45,090

21,954
17,383
18,347
30,315
32,123

14,990
10,732
12,734
25,384
24,775

6,964
6,651
5,613
4,931
7,354

885
637
682
1,390
3,670

1,959
3,946
7,714
7,240
9,291

1971—June..........
Ju ly ...........
Aug...........
Sept...........
O c t.c.........
N ov. c. . . .
D e c.c........

10,994
9,316
9,346
9,445
9,410
10,568
6,911

2,779
1,153
3,228
1,698
2,455
3,254
443

1,812
2,049
1,500
1,774
1,876
1,300
698

1,988
1,951
1,850
2,044
1,679
2,286
2,058

40
17
237
161
12
24
39

4,375
4,147
2,532
3,768
3,387
3,704
3,673

3,042
1,951
1,844
2,573
2,665
2,436
2,473

2,283
1,331
1,428
1,966
1,942
2,003
1,190

760
619
416
607
723
433
1,283

104
1,527
270
165
86
270
169

1,228
669
418
1,031
637
999
1,031

1972—Jan ............
Feb............
M ar...........
A pr. r........
M ay r ........
Ju n e..........

7,188
7,302
6,556
8,635
9,547
7,588

529
539
586
2,281
1,090
1,500

1,401
1,325
400
1,090
1,500
300

1,737
1,942
2,185
1,963
1,924
2,222

316
126
156
26
165
190

3,205
3,369
3,229
3,275
3,597
4,341

2,371
2,329
2,253
2,411
2,450
2,556

1,767
1,917
1,677
1,622
1,676
1,336

604
412
577
789
774
1,218

303
195
282
263
130
612

531
846
694
601
1,017
1,174

Gross proceeds, major groups of corporate issuers
M anufacturing

Commercial and
miscellaneous

Transportation

Bonds

Stocks

Bonds

Stocks

Bonds

1964.
1965.
1966.

2,819
4,712
5,861

228
704
1,208

902
1,153
1,166

220
251
257

944
953
1,856

1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.

9,894
5,668
4,448
9,192
9,426

1,164
1,311
1,904
1,320
2,152

1,950
1,759
1,888
1,963
2,272

117
116
3,022
2,540
2,390

1971—June.
J u ly ..
A ug..
Sept..
Oct.. ,
N ov.
D ec..

1,031
383
262
991
571
637
687

175
200
212
154
91
174
293

497
159
76
123
150
61
246

1972—J a n ...
Feb..
M ar..
A p r.r
M ay r
Ju n e.

321
428
448
383
607
468

71
101
155
197
154
299

163
67
178
235
193
181

Period

Com m unication

R eal estate
and financial

Bonds

Stocks

Bonds

Stocks

Bonds

Stocks

38
60
116

2,139
2,332
3,117

620
604
549

669
808
1,814

1,520
139
189

3,391
3,762
1,747

466
514
193

1,859
1,665
1,899
2,213
1,998

466
1,579
247
47
420

4,217
4,407
5,409
8,016
7,605

718
873
1,326
3,001
4,195

1,786
1,724
1,963
5,053
4,227

193
43
225
83
1,592

2,247
2,159
2,739
3,878
6,601

186
662
1,671
1,638
2,212

290
188
175
295
172
232
127

182
157
76
120
185
145
199

115
62
12
29
5
6
33

616
520
687
578
703
672
520

439
212
162
492
230
545
371

204
232
359
235
432
261
311

14
1,390

9
42

513
500
385
525
624
660
510

300
144
126
179
224
303
335

138
104
264
178
281
341

268
142
102
129
142
171

14
4
3
3
71
15

418
388
386
924
381
1,018

115
600
354
295
357
520

458
438
197
177
376
368

294
60
30
1
16
431

742
865
942
562
751
349

202
171
170
190
270
179

1 Gross proceeds are derived by multiplying principal amounts or
num ber o f units by offering price.
2 Includes guaranteed issues.
3 Issues not guaranteed.
4 See n o te to table at bottom o f preceding page.




Stocks

Public utility

46

5 Foreign governments and their instrumentalities, International Bank
for Reconstruction and Development, and domestic nonprofit organ­
izations.
N o t e . —Securities and Exchange Commission estimates o f new issues
m aturing in more than 1 year sold for cash in the United States.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ SECURITY ISSUES

A 49

NET CHANGE IN OUTSTANDING CORPORATE SECURITIES
(In millions of dollars)
D erivation o f change, all issuers1
All securities

Period

Bonds and notes

C om m on and preferred stocks

New issues

Retirements

N et change

New issues

Retirements

N et change

New issues

Retirements

N et change

7
8
9
0
1

25,964
25,439
28,841
38,707
46,687

7,735
12,377
10,813
9,079
9,507

18,229
13,062
18,027
29,628
37,180

21,299
19,381
19,523
29,495
31,917

5,340
5,418
5,767
6,667
8,190

15,960
13,962
13,755
22,825
23,728

4,664
6,057
9,318
9,213
14,769

2,397
6,959
5,045
2,411
1,318

2,267
-9 0 0
4,272
6,801
13,452

1971—1 ..
II.
III
IV

11,241
13,212
10,746
11,488

2,015
2,979
1,992
2,521

9,226
10,233
8,754
8,967

8,765
8,974
6,159
8,019

1,776
2,681
1,649
2,084

6,989
6,294
4,510
5,935

2,476
4,238
4,586
3,469

239
299
343
437

2,237
3,939
4,244
3,032

1972—1 ..

10,072

2,691

7,381

6,699

2,002

4,698

3,373

690

2,683

196
196
196
197
197

Type o f issuer
M anu­
facturing

Period

Bonds
& notes

Transpor­
tation 3

Commercial
and other 2

Stocks

Public
utility

Communi­
cation

Real estate
and financial 1

Bonds
& notes

Stocks

Bonds
& notes

Stocks

Bonds
& notes

Stocks

Bonds
& notes

Stocks

Bonds
& notes

Stocks

7,237
4,418
3,747
6,641
6,585

832
- 1 ,8 4 2
69
870
2,534

1,104
2,242
1,075
853
827

282
821
1,558
1,778
2,290

1,158
987
946
1,104
900

165
-1 4 9
186
36
800

3,444
3,669
4,464
6,861
6,486

652
892
1,353
2,917
4,206

1,716
1,579
1,834
4,806
3,925

467
120
241
94
1,600

1,302
1,069
1,687
2,564
5,005

-1 3 0
-7 4 1
866
1,107
2,017

- I ...................
I I ..................
I l l ................
IV .................

2,076
2,296
852
1,361

520
885
676
453

201
446
-1 0
190

416
757
678
445

271
461
195
-2 7

33
374
230
163

1,897
1,347
1,493
1,749

948
1,261
814
1,183

1,194
919
832
980

66
38
1,442
54

1,349
825
1,148
1,683

255
624
404
734

- I ...................

696

423

31

545

267

15

827

872

1,020

402

1,856

425

1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.

1 Excludes investment companies.
2 Extractive and commercial and miscellaneous companies.
3 R ailroad and other transportation companies.
N o t e . —Securities and Exchange Commission estimates o f cash transactions only. As contrasted with data shown on opposite page, new issues

exclude foreign sales and include sales o f securities held by affiliated companies, special offerings to employees, and also new stock issues and cash
proceeds connected with conversions o f bonds into stocks. Retirements
are defined in the same way and also include securities retired with internal funds or with proceeds o f issues for that purpose,

OPEN-END INVESTMENT COMPANIES
(In millions o f dollars)

Year

Sales and redem ption
o f own shares
Sales 1 R edem p­
tions

N et
sales

Assets (m arket value
at end o f period)
T otal 2

Cash
position 3

O ther

Sales and redem ption
o f own shares
Sales 1 Redem p­
tions

Assets (m arket value
at end o f period)

N et
sales

T otal 2

Cash
position 3

O ther

1971—Ju ly ...
A ug...
Sept...
O c t....
N ov...
D e c...

371
432
304
596
397
453

444
394
471
419
334
411

-7 3
38
-1 6 7
177
63
42

51,424
53,798
53,291
51,160
50,958
55,045

2,856
3,016
2,511
2,885
3,172
3,038

48,568
50,782
50,780
48,275
47,786
52,007

1972—J a n ....
F e b ...
M ar...
42,135
A pr.. .
49,490
M a y ..
44,445
Ju n e r .
J u ly . .
43,969
53,531

521
404
472
405
378
393
398

475
514
667
655
585
544
424

46
-1 1 0
-1 9 5
-2 5 0
-207
-1 5 1
-2 6

56,694
58,536
58,740
58,870
59,736
57,708
56,932

3,163
3,478
3,251
2,827
2,763
3,015
3,219

53,531
55,058
55,489
56,043
56,973
54,693
53,713

1960...............

2,097

842

1,255

17,026

973

16,053

1961...............
1962...............
1963...............

2,951
2,699
2,460

1,160
1,123
1,504

1,791
1,576
952

22,789
21,271
25,214

980
1,315
1,341

21,809
19,956
23,873

1964...............
1965...............
1966...............

3,404
4,359
4,671

1,875
1,962
2,005

1,528
2,395
2,665

29,116
35,220
34,829

1,329
1.803
2,971

27,787
33,417
31,858

1967................
1968...............
1969...............

4,670
6,820
6,717

2,745
3,841
3,661

1,927
2,979
3,056

44,701
52,677
48,291

2,566
3,187
3,846

1970...............
1971................

4,624
5,145

2,987
4,751

1,637
774

47,618
56,694

3,649
3,163

1 Includes contractual and regular single purchase sales, voluntary and
contractual accumulation plan sales, and reinvestment o f investment in­
come dividends; excludes reinvestment o f realized capital gains dividends.
2 M arket value at end o f period less current liabilities.




M onth

3 Cash and deposits, receivables, all U.S. G ovt, securities, and other
short-term debt securities, less current liabilities.
N o te . —Investment Com pany Institute data based on reports o f m em­
bers, which comprise substantially all open-end investment companies
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. D ata reflect
newly formed companies after their initial offering o f securities.

A 50

BUSINESS FINANCE □ SEPTEMBER 1972
CORPORATE PROFITS, TAXES, AND DIVIDENDS
(In billions of dollars)

Profits
before
taxes

In ­
come
taxes

Profits
after
taxes

Cash
divi­
dends

Undis­
tributed
profits

Corporate
capital
consump­
tion
allow­
ances1

19 66
1967

84.2
79 .8

34.3
33.2

49.9
46.6

20.8
21.4

29.1
25.3

39.5
43.0

1968
1969
1970,
1971

87.6
84.9
74.3
83.3

39.9
40.1
34.1
37.3

47.8
44.8
40.2
45.9

23.6
24.3
24.8
2 5.4

24.2
20.5
15.4
20.5

46.8
51.9
55.2
60.3

Y ear

Q uarter

Profits
before
taxes

In ­
come
taxes

Profits
after
taxes

Cash
divi­
dends

Undis­
tributed
profits

Corporate
capital
consum p­
tion
allow­
ances 1

1970—1 1 . ..
I I I . ..
IV ...

75.2
76.6
69.6

34.6
35.4
32.2

40.6
41.2
37.4

24.7
24.9
24.7

15.8
16.3
12.7

54.8
55.2
56.1

1971—I . . . .
I I .. .
I I I .. .
I V ...

81.3
84.5
84.1
83.2

38.0
38.6
37.5
35.3

43.2
45.8
46.6
48.0

25.5
25.4
25.5
25.2

17.7
20.4
21.0
22.7

57.5
59.4
61.2
63.0

1972—1 . . . .
I I ....

88.2
93.1

38.8
40.7

49.5
52.4

26.0
26.2

r23.5
2 .2

64.8
68.4

i
Includes depreciation, capital outlays charged to current accounts, and
N ote.— D ept, o f Commerce estim ates.
adjusted annual rates.
accidental damages.

Quarterly data are at seasonally

CURRENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF CORPORATIONS
(In billions of dollars)
Current assets
N et
working
capital

End o f period

Total

Cash

U.S.
Govt.
securi­
ties

C urrent liabilities

Notes and accts.
receivable

N otes and accts.
payable

Inven­
tories
U.S.
G o v t.1

Other

Other

U.S.
G o v t.1

Other

Accrued
Federal
income
taxes

Total

O ther

1967.................................
1968.................................
1969................................

198.9
212.0
213.2

470.4
513.8
555.9

54.1
58.0
54.9

12.7
14.2
12.7

5.1
5.1
4.8

216.0
237.1
261.0

153.4
165.8
184.8

29.0
33.6
37.8

271.4
301.8
342.7

5.8
6 .4
7.3

190.6
209.8
238.1

14.1
16.4
16.6

60.8
69.1
80.6

1970—1...........................
I I .........................
I l l .......................
I V .......................

213.3
213.6
214.0
217.0

561.0
566.3
567.6
572.1

52.9
52.5
53.7
56.9

12.5
10.7
9 .3
9 .7

4.7
4 .4
4.2
4 .2

264.5
268.7
270.0
268.1

188.0
190.2
191.8
194.4

38.5
39.9
38.5
38.8

347.7
352.7
353.6
355.2

7 .2
7 .0
6.8
6.6

238.4
244.1
243.0
244.5

18.0
14.6
15.4
15.9

84.2
87.1
88.3
88.1

1971—1...........................
I I .........................
I l l .......................
IV 2 .....................

220.4
226.3
231.3
235.3

576.9
582.6
591.9
601.5

55.8
58.6
59.8
63.0

10.1
10.3
10.6
13.0

4 .2
3.9
3.9
3.5

269.8
273.2
276.9
277.6

196.8
197.4
199.5
201.3

40.1
39.3
41.2
43.0

356.5
356.3
360.6
366.2

6.1
5.3
5 .2
4 .9

240.3
241.2
242.2
247.4

18.6
16.8
18.7
19.5

9 1 .4
93.0
94.7
9 4.4

1972—1...........................

240.6

611.8

62.7

12.3

3.4

282.7

205.4

45.2

371.2

4.9

247.3

21.4

97.7

1 Receivables from, and payables to, the U.S. Govt, exclude amounts
offset against each other on corporations’ books.
2 New series (for which figures for the third and fourth quarters o f 1971
were published in the April B u l l e t i n ) has been tem porarily abandoned
by SEC.

N o te . —Securities and Exchange Commission estim ates; excludes
banks, savings and loan assns., insurance companies, and investment
companies.

BUSINESS EXPENDITURES ON NEW PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
(In billions o f dollars)
Public utilities

Transportation

M anufacturing
Period

Mining

T otal
D urable

N on­
durable

Commu­
nications
Gas
and other

Other i

Rail­
road

Air

Other

Electric
6.75
7.66
8.94
10.65
12.86
14.58

2.00
2.54
2.67
2.49
2.44
2.86

6.34
6.83
8.30
10.10
10.77
12.30

14.59
15.14
16.05
16.59
18.05
19.51

Total
(S.A.
A.R.)

196 7
196 8
196 9
197 0
197 1
1972 2 . . . .

65.47
67.76
75.56
79.71
81.21
89.77

14.06
14.12
15.96
15.80
14.15
16.11

14.45
14.25
15.72
16.15
15.84
16.50

1.65
1.63
1.86
1.89
2.16
2.20

1.86
1.45
1.86
1.78
1.67
1.75

2.29
2.56
2.51
3.03
1.88
2.42

1.48
1.59
1.68
1.23
1.38
1.55

1970—IV ..

21.66

4 .26

4.4 0

.50

.43

.76

.33

3.12

.63

2.81

4.42

78.63

1971—1 . . .
1 1 ...
111..
IV ..

17.68
20.60
20.14
22.79

3.11
3.52
3.40
4.12

3.58
4.03
3.91
4.32

.49
.54
.55
.59

.34
.47
.42
.45

.34
.60
.39
.56

.28
.36
.37
.37

2.70
3.20
3.35
3.60

.41,
.63
.71
.69

2.50
2.81
2.62
2.84

3.94
4.4 4
4.42
5.26

79.32
81.61
80.75
83.18

1972—1 . . .
II 2.
III 2

19.38
22.90
22.41

3.29
4.09
3.95

3.32
4.09
4.00

.58
.61
.58

.48
.47
.49

.50
.76
.50

.32
.38
.34

3.19
3.56
3.72

.44
.71
.87

2.72

4.55

86.79
90.69
89.72

1 Includes trade, service, construction, finance, and insurance.
2 Anticipated by business.




8.24
7.96

N o te . —D ept, o f Commerce and Securities and Exchange Commission
estimates for corporate and noncorporate business; excludes agriculture,
real estate operators, medical, legal, educational, and cultural service, and
nonprofit organizations.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ REAL ESTATE CREDIT

A 51

MORTGAGE DEBT OUTSTANDING
(In billions of dollars)

End o f
period

All properties

Farm

O ther
holders2
Finan­
All
cial
hold­
Indi­
insti­
U.S. viduals
ers
tutions 1 agen­
and
cies
others

Finan­ O ther
All
cial
hold­
hold­
insti­
ers
tutions 1 e rs 3

N onfarm
1- to 4-family houses4
All
hold­
ers
Total

Finan. O ther
hold­
insti­
tutions 1 ers

M ultifamily and
commercial properties 5

Total

Finan. O ther
hold­
insti­
tutions 1 ers

M ortgage
ty p e6
FH A VAunderwritten

C on­
ven­
tional

1941
1945

37.6
35.5

20.7
21.0

4 .7
2 .4

12.2
12.1

6 .4
4 .8

1.5
1.3

4 .9
3 .4

31.2
30.8

18.4
18.6

11.2
12.2

7.2
6 .4

12.9
12.2

8.1
7 .4

4.8
4.7

3.0
4.3

28.2
26.5

1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969.

300.1
325.8
347.4
370.2
397.5
425.3

241.0
264.6
280.8
298.8
319.9
339.1

11.4
12.4
15.8
18.4
21.7
26.8

47.7
48.7
50.9
53.0
5 5.8
59.4

18.9
21.2
23.3
25.5
27.5
29.5

7 .0
7 .8
8 .4
9.1
9.7
9 .9

11.9
13.4
14.9
16.3
17.8
19.6

281.2
304.6
324.1
344.8
370.0
395.9

197.6
212.9
223.6
236.1
251.2
266.8

170.3
184.3
192.1
201.8
213.1
265.0

27.3
28.7
31.5
34.2
38.1
1.8

83.6
9 1.6
100.5
108.7
118.7
129.1

63.7
72.5
80.2
87.9
97.1
105.5

19.9
19.1
20.3
20.9
21.6
23.6

77.2
81.2
84.1
88.2
93.4

204.0
223.4
240.0
256.6
276.6

1969—III.
IV .

418.7
425.3

335.7
339.1

24.9
26.8

58.1
5 9.4

29.2
29.5

10.1
9 .9

19.1
19.6

389.5
395.9

263.4
266.8

222.5
223.6

40.9
43.2

126.0
129.0

103.1
105.5

22.9
23.5

98.5
100.2

291.0
295.7

1970—1 . ..
11..
III.
IV .

429.4
435.6
443.4
451.7

340.7
344.5
349.7
355.9

28.6
30.0
31.7
33.0

60.1
61.1
61.9
62.8

29.8
30.3
30.8
31.2

9 .8
9 .8
10.0
10.1

20.0
20.5
20.8
21.1

399.6
405.2
412.5
420.5

268.5
271.7
276.0
280.2

223.8
225.7
228.5
231.4

44.7
46.0
47.5
48.8

131.1
133.5
136.5
140.3

107.1
109.1
111.4
114.6

23.9
24.5
25.1
25.7

101.9
103.2
106.8
109.2

297.6
302.0
305.7
311.3

1971—1 ...
11..
III.
IV .

459.0
471.1
485.6
499.9

361.8
372.0
383.6
394.5

33.6
35.2
37.4
105.4

63.6
63.9
64.6
66.8

31.8
31.9
32.4
32.9

10.1
9 .7
9 .8
9 .9

2 1.7
22.2
22.6
23.0

427.2
439.3
453.2
467.0

283.6
290.8
299.7
307.8

234.5
240.7
248.0
254.2

49.1
50.1
51.7
53.6

143.6
148.3
153.5
159.2

117.5
121.6
125.8
130.5

26.1
26.7
27.7
28.7

111.0
114.4

316.2
324.9

1 Commercial banks (including nondeposit trust companies but not
trust depts.), mutual savings banks, life insurance companies, and savings
and loan assns.
2 U.S. agencies include former FN M A and, beginning fourth quarter
1968, new G N M A as well as FH A , VA, PH A , Farmers Home Admin.,
and in earlier years, R FC, HOLC, and FFM C. They also include
U.S. sponsored agencies—new FN M A , Federal land banks, G N M A
(Pools), and the FH LH C . Other U.S. agencies (amounts small or sep­
arate data not readily available) included with “ individuals and others.”
3 Derived figures; includes debt held by Federal land banks and farm
debt held by Farmers Home Admin.
4 For multifamily and total residential properties, see tables below.

MORTGAGE DEBT OUTSTANDING
ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES

5 Derived figures; includes small am ounts o f farm loans held by savings
and loan assns.
6 D ata by type o f mortgage on nonfarm 1- to 4-family properties alone
are shown in table below.
N o t e . —Based on data from Federal D eposit Insurance Corp., Federal
H om e Loan Bank Board, Institute o f Life Insurance, D epts. o f Agricul­
ture and Commerce, Federal N ational M ortgage Assn., Federal Housing
Admin., Public Housing Admin., Veterans Admin., G overnment N ational
M ortgage Assoc., Federal H om e Loan M ortgage Corp., and Comptroller
o f the Currency.
Figures for first three quarters o f each year are F.R. estimates.

MORTGAGE DEBT OUTSTANDING ON
NONFARM 1- to 4-FAMILY PROPERTIES
(In billions o f dollars)

(In billions o f dollars)

End of
period
Total

G overnmen itUJnderwritte :n

All residential

M ultifamily i

Finan­
cial
insti­
tutions

O ther
holders

Total

F inan­
cial
insti­
tutions

Other
holders

End o f period

1941.................
1945.................
1963................
1964................

2 4.2
24.3
211.2
231.1

14.9
15.7
176.7
195.4

9 .4
8 .6
34.5
35.7

5 .9
5 .7
29.0
33.6

3 .6
3 .5
20.7
25.1

2 .2
2 .2
8.3
8.5

1965................
1966.................
1967.................
1968.................
1969.................

250.1
264.0
280.0
298.6
319.0

213.2
223.7
236.6
250.8
265.0

36.9
40.3
43.4
47.8
54.0

37.2
40.3
43.9
47.3
52.2

29.0
31.5
34.7
37.7
41.3

8 .2
8.8
9 .2
9 .6
10.9

1970—1...........
I I .........
I l l ___
IV ........

321.7
326.3
332.2
338.2

265.9
268.9
272.8
277.2

55.8
57.4
59.4
61.0

53.2
54.5
56.1
58.0

42.9
43 .2
44.3
45.8

10.3
11.3
11.8
12.2

1971—1...........
II, . ,
I I I ___
IV ........

343.3
353.1
364.0
374.7

281.6
290.1
298.4
306.1

61.7
63.0
65.6
68.6

59.7
62.3
64.3
66.8

47.2
4 9.4
50.4
52.0

12.5
12.9
13.9
14.8

i Structures o f five o r m ore units.
N o t e . — Based on data from same source as for “ M ortgage D ebt Out­
standing” table.




Total
Total

FH A insured

VAguaranteed i

Con­
ven­
tional

1954..................................
1963..................................
1964..................................

18.6
182.2
197.6

4.3
65.9
69.2

4.1
35.0
38.3

.2
30.9
30.9

14.3
116.3
128.3

1965..................................

212.9
223.6
236.1
251.2
266.8

73.1
76.1
79.9
84.4
90.2

42.0
44.8
47.4
5 0.6
54.5

31.1
31.3
32.5
33.8
35.7

139.8
147.6
156.1
166.8
176.6

268.5
271.7
276.0
280.2

91.6
92.2
95.1
97.3

55.6
56.1
58.1
59.9

36.0
36.0
37.0
37.3

176.9
179.6
181.0
182.9

283.6
290.9
299.7
307.8

98.2
100.4
102.9
105.2

61.0
62.8
64.4
65.7

37.3
37.6
38.5
39.5

185.3
190.5
196.8
202.6

1968..................................
1969...................................
1970—1 ............................
I l l .........................
1971—1.............................
I I ...........................
I l l .........................

1 Includes outstanding am ount o f VA vendee accounts held by private
investors under repurchase agreement.
N o t e . — F or total debt outstanding, figures are FHLBB and F.R .
estimates. F or conventional, figures are derived.
Based on data from FHLBB, Federal Housing Admin., and Veterans
Admin.

A 52

REAL ESTATE CREDIT □ SEPTEMBER 1972
MORTGAGE LOANS HELD BY BANKS
(In millions of dollars)
Commercial bank holdings 1

M utual savings bank holdings 2

Residential
Total
Total

FH A in­
sured

VAguar­
anteed

4,906
4,772

3,292
3,395

4
5
6
7
8

43,976
49,675
54,380
59,019
65,696

28,933
32,387
34,876
37,642
41,433

7,315
7,702
7,544
7,709
7,926

2,742
2 ,(
2,599
2,696
2,708

1969— 1 . ..
I I .'.
III.
IV ..

67,146
69,079
70,336
70,705

42,302
43,532
44,331
44,573

7,953
8,060
8,065
7,960

1970—1 . ..
II. .
III.
IV ..

70,854
71,291
72,393
73,275

44,568
44,845
45,318
45,640

1971—I . ..
II ..
II I.
IV.

74,424
76,639
79,936
82,515

46,343
48,163
50,280
52,004

1941...........
1945...........
196
196
196
196
196

Residential

O ther
nonfarm

End o f period
Con­
ven­
tional

VAguar­
anteed

Total
sured
1,048
856

566
521

4,812
4,208

18,876
21,997
24,733
27,237
30,800

12,405
14,377
16,366
17,931
20,505

2,638
2,911
3,138
3,446
3,758

40,556
44,617
47,337
50,490
53,456

36,487 12,287
40,096 13,791
42,242 14,500
44,641 15,074
46,748 15,569

2,711
2,743
2,793
2,663

31,638
32,729
33,470
33,950

20,950
21,459
21,924
22,113

3,894
4,088
4,081
4,019

7,*
7,800
7,885
7,919

2,496
2,575
2,583
2,589

34,184
34,469
34,850
35,131

22,248
22,392
22,825
23,284

7,971
8,146
8,246
8,310

2,595
2,636
2,806
2,980

35,777
37,381
39,228
40,714

23,595
24,477
25,500
26,306

1 Includes loans held by nondeposit trust companies, but not bank
trust depts.
2 D ata for 1941 and 1945, except for totals, are special F.R. estimates.
N o t e . — Second and fourth quarters, Federal D eposit Insurance C orpo­
ration series for all commercial and mutual savings banks in the United

Other
nonfarm

Total
Con­
ven­
tional

3,884
3,387

Farm

900
797

28
24

11,121 13,079
11,408 14,897
11,471 16,272
11,795 17,772
12,033 19,146

4,016
4,469
5,041
5,732
6,592

53
52
53
117
117

54,178
54,844
55,359
56,138

47,305 15,678 12,097 19,530
47,818 15,769 12,151 19,898
48,189 15,813 12,169 20,207
48,682 15,862 12,166 20.654

6,756
6,908
7,053
7,342

117
117
117
114

4,038
4,054
4,250
4,351

56,394
56,880
57,402
57,948

48,874 15,865 12,105 20,904
49,260 15,931 12,092 21,237
49,628 16,017 12,127 21.654
49,937 16,087 12,008 21,842

7,413
7,519
7,671
7,893

107
101
103
119

4,486
3,999
4,156
4,205

58,680
59,643
60,625
61,978

50,553 16,157 12,010 22,386
51,362 16,281 12,011 23,069
51,989 16,216 12,033 23,740
53,027 16,141 12,074 24,812

8,014
8,174
c8,636
c8,951

113
107
75
50

States and possessions. First and third quarters, estimates based on special
F.R. interpolations after 1963 or beginning 1964. For earlier years, the
basis for first- and third-quarter estimates included F.R. commercial bank
call report data and data from the N ational Assn. of M utual Savings
Banks.

MORTGAGE ACTIVITY OF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES
(In millions of dollars)
Loans acquired

Loans outstanding (end o f period)

N onfarm

N onfarm

Period
Total

Farm

Total

FH A insured

VAguar­
anteed

Other i

Total
Total

FH A insured

Farm

VAguar­
anteed

O ther

1945...................................................

976

6,637

5,860

1,394

4,466

766

1964..................................................
1965..................................................
1966...................................................

10,433
11,137
10,217

9,386
9,988
9,223

1,812
1,738
1,300

674
553
467

6,900
7,697
7,456

1,047
1,149
994

55,152
60,013
64,609

50,848
55,190
59,369

11,484
12,068
12,351

6,403
6,286
6,201

32,961
36,836
40,817

4,304
4,823
5,240

1967...................................................
1968..................................................
1969...................................................
1970...................................................
1971..................................................

8,470
7,925
7,531
7,137
7,684

7,633
7,153
6,943
6,785
7,185

757
755
663
397
320

444
346
220
80
98

6,432
6,052
6,108
6,268
6,584

837
722
537
315
497

67,516
69,973
72,027
73,227
74,700

61,947
64,172
66,254
67,555
69,125

12,161
12,469
12,271
11,551
11,086

6,122
5,954
5,701
5,540
5,195

43,664
45,749
48,282
49,898
52,274

5,569
5,801
5,773
5,672
5,574

1971—J u n e ......................................
J u ly .......................................
A ug..................................... ..
Sept..................................... ..
O ct...................................... ..
D ec........................................

537
590
735
672
607
607
1,346

494
551
684
636
568
565
1,285

29
20
23
73
28
20
18

9
8
8
10
11
9
10

456
523
601
515
487
492
1,252

42
39
51
36
39
42
61

74,535
74,583
74,707
74,799
74,864
74,903
75,596

68,973
69,017
69,121
69,209
69,270
69,302
69,995

11,123
11,048
10,975
10,950
10,884
10,843
10,760

5,219
5,180
5,142
5,104
5,071
5,047
5,001

52,631
52,789
52,438
52,590
52,749
52,854
c54,228

5,562
5,566
5,586
5,590
5,594
5,596
5,601

1972—Jan.........................................
F eb........................................
M ar..................................... ..
A pr........................................
M ay r ....................................
Ju n e ................................... ..

503
436
569
560
600
708

475
392
484
504
540
643

37
26
24
30
15
31

16
12
18
15
13
21

393
354
442
459
512
591

28
44
85
54
60
65

81,056
75,456
75,424
75,469
74,931
74,987

75,517
69,940
69,897
69,163
69,379
69,409

10,722
10,674
10,599
10,535
10,467
10,391

4,986
4,952
4,932
4,903
4,873
4,838

53,704
53,750
54,366
53,725
54,039
54,180

5,539
5,516
5,527
5,543
5,552
5,578

1
1 Includes mortgage loans secured by land on which oil drilling or the end-of-Dec. figures may differ from end-of-year figures because (1)
extracting operations are in process.
monthly figures represent book value o f ledger assets, whereas year-end
figures represent annual statement asset values, and (2) data for year-end
N o t e . —Institute o f Life Insurance data. F or loans acquired, the
adjustments are more complete. Beginning 1970 monthly and year-earlier
monthly figures may not add to annual to tals; and for loans outstanding
data are on a statem ent balance basis.




SEPTEMBER 1972 □ REAL ESTATE CREDIT

A 53

COMMITMENTS OF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES FOR INCOME PROPERTY MORTGAGES
Averages
N um ber
o f loans

Period

Total
am ount
committed
(millions o f
(dollars)

Loan
am ount
(thousands
o f dollars)

C ontract
interest
rate
(per cent)

M aturity
(yrs./mos.)

Loanto-value
ratio
(per cent)

Capitaliza­
tion rate
(per cent)

D ebt
coverage
ratio

Per cent
constant

1968..............................
1969..............................
1970.............................
1971..............................

2,569
1,788
912
1,664

3,244.3
2 ,9 2 0 .7
2,341.1
3,982.5

1,263
1,6 33
2,567
2,393

7.66
8.69
9.93
9.07

22/11
21/8
22/8
22/10

73.6
73.3
74.7
74.9

9 .0
9 .6
10.8
10.0

1.30
1.29
1.32
1.29

9.5
10.2
11.1
10.4

1971—Jan ...................
Feb..................
M ar..................
A pr..................
June.................
Ju ly .................
Aug..................
Sept..................
O ct...................
N ov..................
D ec..................

69
90
124
137
146
203
183
153
178
112
136
133

141.4
237.7
351.5
302.1
257.3
729.0
386.5
434.4
366.1
198.4
288.2
290.0

2,050
2,641
2,835
2,205
1,762
3,591
2,112
2,839
2,057
1,771
2,119
2,181

9.69
9.47
9 .14
8.98
8.91
8.92
8.94
9.08
9.15
9.20
9.01
8.96

22/8
22/11
23/4
22
23/4
23/8
21/10
23/1
22/6
22/7
23/5
23

74.3
72.9
75.0
75.2
75.6
75.5
74.4
74.9
74.8
75.8
75.6
74.4

10.5
10.2
10.2
9 .9
10.0
9 .8
9 .8
9 .9
9 .8
10.0
9 .9
9.9

1.31
1.32
1.32
1.28
1.27
1.29
1.26
1.27
1.28
1.28
1.27
1.30

10.7
10.6
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.2
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.2
10.2

1972—Jan ...................
Feb..................
M ar.................

107
122
220

198.6
423.5
530.4

1,856
3,471
2,411

8.78
8.62
8.50

22/1
22/6
24/2

73.3
73.3
76.3

10.0
9 .7
9 .5

1.31
1.31
1.29

10.2
10.0
9 .7

N o t e . —Life Insurance Association o f America data for new commit­
ments o f $100,000 and over each on mortgages for multifamily and non­
residential nonfarm properties located largely in the U nited States. The 15
companies account for a little more than one-half o f both the total assets
and the nonfarm mortgages held by all U.S. life insurance companies.
Averages, which are based on number o f loans, vary in part with loan
composition by type and location o f property, type and purpose o f loan,
and loan amortization and prepayment terms. D ata for the following are

limited to cases where inform ation was available or estimates could be
made: capitalization rate (net stabilized property earnings divided by
property value); debt coverage ratio (net stabilized earnings divided by
debt service); and per cent constant (annual level payment, including
principal and interest, per $100 o f debt). All statistics exclude construction
loans, increases in existing loans in a com pany’s portfolio, reapprovals,
and loans secured by land only.

MORTGAGE ACTIVITY OF SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATIONS

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS
(In millions o f dollars)

(In millions o f dollars)
Advances outstanding
(end o f period)

Loans outstanding (end o f period)

Loans made

Period
Period
Total i

1945...............

New
home
con­
struc­
tion

1,913

181

Home
pur­
chase

1,358

FH A - VAin­
guar­
sured anteed

T o tal 2

24,913 6,638 10,538 101,333 4,894
24,192 6,013 10,830 110,306 5,145
16,924 3,653 7,828 114,427 5,269

1967...............
1968...............
1969...............
1970...............
1971...............

20,122
21,983
21,847
21,383
39,472

1971—J u ly ...
A u g ...
S ep t...
O ct.. .
N o v ...
D e c .. .

4,151
4,111
3,672
3,405
3,298
3,592

686
641
628
609
589
573

1972—J a n ....
Feb.. .
M ar...
A p r...
M ay. .
Ju n e r .
Ju ly ...

2,632
2,849
2,849
3,819
4,603
5,449
4,565

481
518
712
707
836
872
745

4,243 9,604
4,916 11,215
4,757 11,254
4,150 10,237
6,835 18,811

6,683 89,756
6,398 98,763
6,157 103,001

121,805
130,802
140,347
150,331
174,385

5,791
6,658
7,917
10,178
13,798

6,351
7,012
7,658
8,494
10,848

109,663
117,132
124,772
131,659
149,739

2,087
2,225
1,951
1,717
1,661
1,590

163,951
166,342
168,464
170,106
172,047
174,385

12,592
12,852
13,130
13,278
13,521
13,798

9,784
10,034
10,232
10,374
10,582
10,848

141,575
143,456
145,102
146,454
147,944
149,739

1,253
1,400
1,861
1,819
2,276
2,920
2,514

175,838
177,614
180,145
182,711
185,431
188,884
191,703

13,976
14,167
14,450
14,697
14,878
15,019
15,159

11,013
11,264
11,546
11,789
12,010
12,293
12,615

150,849
152,183
154,149
156,225
158,543
161,572
163,929

1 Includes loans for repairs, additions and alterations, refinancing, etc.
not shown separately.
2 Beginning with 1958, includes shares pledged against mortgage loans;
beginning with 1966, includes junior liens and real estate sold on contract;
and beginning with 1967, includes downward structural adjustment for
change in universe.

Note.—Federal Home Loan Bank Board data.




Repay­
ments
Total

Con­
ven­
tional

5,376

1964...............
1965...............
1966...............

A d­
vances

M em bers’
deposits
(end of
Short­ Long­ period)
term 1 term 2

278

213

195

176

19

46

1964.........................
1965.........................
1966.........................

5,565
5,007
3,804

5,025
4,335
2,866

5,325
5,997
6,935

2,846
3,074
5,006

2,479
2,923
1,929

1,199
1,043
1,036

1968.........................
1969.........................
1970.........................
1971.........................

1,527
2,734
5,531
3,256
2,714

4,076 4,386
1,861
5,259
1,500 9,289
1,929 10,615
5,392 7,936

3,985
4,867
8,434
3,081
3,002

401
392
855
7,534
4,934

1,432
1,382
1,041
2,331
1,789

N ov.............
D ec..............

358
327
306
364
490

183
203
303
296
262

7,514
7,637
7,640
7,709
7,936

2,812
2,844
2,874
2,829
3,002

4,702
4,793
4,766
4,880
4,934

1,528
1,522
1,450
1,549
1,789

Feb..............
M ar..............
A pr..............
M ay.............
June ............
Ju ly .............

186
148
165
318
260
420
285

885
871
689
396
320
198
222

7,238
6,515
5,992
5,913
5,853
6,074
6,138

2,569
2,342
2,125
2,049
2,019
1,944
1,990

4,669
4,173
3,867
3,864
3,835
4,130
4,148

1,948
2,014
2,008
1,762
1,789
1,746
1,497

1971—Aug..............
Sept.............

1 Secured or unsecured loans maturing in 1 year or less.
2 Secured loans, amortized quarterly, having maturities o f more than
1 year but not more than 10 years.

Note.—Federal Home Loan Bank Board data.

A 54

REAL ESTATE CREDIT □ SEPTEMBER 1972
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
AUCTIONS

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION ACTIVITY
(In millions o f dollars)
M ortgage
transactions
(during
period)

M ortgage
holdings
End o f
period

196
196
196
197
197

Pur­
chases

Sales

1,474
2,046
3,270
4,431

1,400
1,944
4,121
5,078
3,574

12

15,674 11,184 4,490
16,204 11,562 4,642
16,732
17,202
17,535
17.791

407
659
635
553
406
350

FH A insured

5,522 4,048
7,167 5,121
10,950 7,680
15,502 11,071
17.791

7
8
9
0
1

1971-July..
A ug..
Sept..
Oct. .
N ov..
D e c ..
1972-Jan...
F eb ..
M ar..
A p r..
M ay.
Ju n e.
J u ly ..

D ate o f auction

VAguaranteed

Total

17,977
18,220
18,342
18,403
18,599
18,628
18,740

16,926
13,654
13,744
13,923
13,952
14,013

1,178
4,687
4,659
4,674
4,670
4,714

G overnment-underwritten Conventional hom e loans
home loans

M ortgage
commitments

M ade
during
period

Out
stand­
ing

1,736
2,697
6,630
8,047
4,986

501
1,287
3,539
5,203
5.694

576
1,219
572
655
893
1,014

5,709
5,146
5,327
5,208
5,466
5.694

574
598
469

281
324
316
246
321
223
258

M ortgage
amounts

Offered

Average
Average
M ortgage
yield
amounts
yield
(short­
(short­
term
term
commit­
com m it­
Ac­
Ac­
cepted ments) Offered cepted ments)

In millions o f
dollars

In
per cent

1972—Feb. 28.
M ar.

6 ...
1 3 ...
2 0 ...

Apr.

5,558
5,696
5,635
5,853
6,186
5,957

3 . ..
1 0 ...
1 7 ...

M ay

June

N o t e . —Federal N ational M ortgage Assn. data. T otal holdings include
conventional loans. D ata prior to Sept. 1968 relate to secondary m arket
portfolio o f former FN M A . M ortgage holdings include loans used to back
bond issues guaranteed by GN M A . M ortgage commitments made during
the period include some multifamily and nonprofit hospital loan commit­
ments in addition to 1- to 4-family loan commitments accepted in F N M A ’s
free m arket auction system, and through the F N M A -G N M A Tandem
Plan (Program 18).

July

Aug.

86.9

50.6

7.56

202.9

86.2

7 .54

258.8

178.5

7.56

347.4

176.3

7.60

1 ...

364.9

336.4

7.63

1 5 ...
3 0 ...

266.3
133.4

188.2
76.4

7.63
7.62

1 ...
1 2 ...
2 6 ...

83.5
97.8

48.1
76.6

7.62
7.62

1 0 ...
1 7 ...
2 4 ...

134.6

92.1

7.62

123.9

113.0

7.62

7 . ..
1 4 ...
2 1 ...

106.2

81.7

7.63

ii4 .'6

87.2

7.62

In millions of
dollars

In
per cent

21.1

11.5

10.1

5.5

7.61

27.1

14.9

7.66

35.0

20.4

7.77

28.2

22.7

7.80

32.4

22.7

7.80

24.7

24.2

7.80

N o t e . —Average secondary m arket yields are gross—before deduction
o f 38 basis-point fee paid for mortgage servicing. They reflect the average
accepted bid yield for home mortgages assuming a prepayment period o f
12 years for 30-year loans, without special adjustm ent for FN M A com m it­
ment fees and FN M A stock purchase and holding requirements. Begin­
ning Oct. 18, 1971, the m aturity on new short-term commitments was
extended from 3 to 4 months. M ortgage amounts offered by bidders are
total eligible bids received.

GNMA MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITY PROGRAM

GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION ACTIVITY

(In millions o f dollars)

(In millions o f dollars)
Pass-through securities
M ortgage
transactions
(during
period)

M ortgage
holdings
End o f
period

M ortgage
commitments

Total

FH A in­
sured

VAguar­
anteed

Pur­
chases

Sales

1967.............
1968.............
1969.............
1970.............

3,348
4,220
4,820
5,184

2,756
3,569
4,220
4,634

592
651
600
550

860
1,089
827
621

1

1971-July...
A u g ...
Sept...
Oct. ..
N o v ...
D e c .. .

5,282
5,279
5.259
5,245
5.260
5,294

4,761

520

4,749

510

25
29
17
15
24
32

1972-Jan....
F e b .. .
M ar.. .
A p r.. .
M a y ..
J u n e ..
J u ly ...

5.287
5,281
5,243
5,125
5,214
5,235
5.287

Applications
received

Securities
issued

1,126.2
4,3 7 3 .6

452.4
2,701.9

M ade
during
period

O ut
stand­
ing

197 0
197 1

1,045
867
615
897

1,171
1,266
1,130
738

1971—July.
Aug.
Sept.
Oct..
Nov.
Dec.,

104.2
121.1
254.2
226.1
533.7
318.3

116.4
118.0
71.5
112.6
244.2
212.8

487

1,586

1972—Jan..
Feb..
M ar.
Apr.,
May.
June,
July.

384.1
511.2
528.3
187.8
216.4
245.8
135.5

247.7
391.2
322.5
275.1
212.9
193.2
145.8

N o t e . — G overnm ent N ational M ortgage Assn. data. D ata prior to
Sept. 1968 relate to Special Assistance and M anagement and Liquidating
portfolios o f former F N M A and include mortgages subject to participation
pool o f G overnment M ortgage Liquidation Trust, b u t exclude conven­
tional mortgage loans acquired by form er F N M A from the R F C M ortgage
C o., the Defense Homes Corp., the Public Housing A dmin., and C om ­
m unity Facilities Admin.




Bonds
sold

Period

1,315.0
300.0
300.0

200.0
*566. 0 *

N o t e . —Government N ational M ortgage Assn. data. U nder the M ortgage-Backed Security Program , G N M A guarantees the timely paym ent
o f principal and interest on both pass-through and bond-type securities,
which are backed by a pool o f mortgages insured by FH A or Farmers
H om e Admin, or guaranteed by VA and issued by an approved mortgagee.
To date, bond-type securities have been issued only by FN M A and
FH LM C.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ REAL ESTATE CREDIT
HOME-MORTGAGE YIELDS

GOVERNMENT-UNDERWRITTEN RESIDENTIAL
LOANS MADE

(In per cent)

F H A series

New
homes

Yield
on FH A insured
new
home
loans

7.03
7.82
8.35
7 .54

7.12
7.99
8.52
7.75

7.21
8.26
9.05
7 .7 0

7.66
7.74
7.83
7.84
7.79
7.77

7.63
7.71
7.76
7.75
7.69
7.64

7.80
7.85
7.85
7.80
7.75
7.70

7.97
7.92
7.84
7.75
7.62
7.59

7.78
7.60
7.52
7.51
7.53
r7 . 55
7.58

7.58
7.49
7.44
7.42
7.46
7.49
7 .50

7.60
7.60
7.55
7.60
7.60
7.60
7.65

7.49
7.46
7.45
7.50
7.53
7.54
7 .54

FH LBB series
(effective rate)

New
homes

Existing
homes

1968.........................
1969.........................
1970.........................
1971.........................

6.97
7.81
8.44
7 .60

1971---JUly .............
Aug..............
Sept..............
Oct...............
N ov..............
Dec..............
1972—Jan ...............
Feb..............
M ar..............
A pr..............
M ay.............
Ju n e.............
J u ly .............

(In millions o f dollars)

Secondary
m arket

Prim ary m arket
(conventional loans)

Period

A 55

FH A -insured
M ortgages

Period
Total

1945.............

N ote.—Annual data are averages o f monthly figures. The
FH A data are based on opinion reports submitted by field offices
on prevailing local conditions as o f the first o f the succeeding
month. Yields on FH A -insured mortgages are derived from
weighted averages o f private secondary m arket prices for Sec.
203, 30-year mortgages with minimum downpayment and an
assumed prepayment at the end o f 15 years. Gaps in data are
due to periods o f adjustm ent to changes in maximum permis­
sible contract interest rates. The FH A series on average contract
interest rates on conventional first mortgages in prim ary markets
are unweighted and are rounded to the nearest 5 basis points.
The FHLBB effective rate series reflects fees and charges as well
as contract rates (as shown in the table on conventional firstmortgage terms, p. A-37) and an assumed prepayment at end
of 10 years.

Ex­
New isting
homes homes

665
257
217
8,130 1,608 4,965

8,689
7,320
1967............. 7,150
1968............. 8,275
9,129
11,981
1971—J u n e .
J u ly ..
Aug..
Sept..
Oct. .
Nov..
D e c ..

V A -guaranteed

1,705
1,729
1,369
1,572
1,551
2,667

Pro­
jects1

Mortgages
P rop­
erty
im­
T o tal3 New
Ex­
prove­
homes isting
m ents2
homes

20
895

171
663

192
2,846

1,023

1,821

5,760
591
4,366
583
4,516
642
4,924 1,123
5,570 1,316
5,447 3,250

634
641
623
656
693
617

2,652
2,600
3,405
3,774
4,072
3,442

876
980
1,143
1,430
1,493
1,311

1,774
1,618
2,259
2,343
2,579
2,131

1,372
1,340
1,393
1,242
1,202
1,220
1,598

322
338
407
320
318
358
358

629
646
710
543
504
511
502

399
304
216
290
276
273
691

21
53
60
89
105
77
47

519
561
577
693
514
757
685

127
135
146
188
135
226
220

392
426
431
506
379
526
465

1972—Jan . . 1,277
F e b .. 1,094
M ar.. 1,253
A p r..
954
M ay.
628
June.
643

420
366
349
272
259
27

516
448
449
381
369
372

280
237
401
249
217
197

62
44
54
51
56
71

629
460
658
509
603
848

204
199
231
170
185
239

425
361
427
339
418
609

1 M onthly figures do not reflect mortgage amendments included in annual
totals.
2 N ot ordinarily secured by mortgages.
3 Includes a small am ount o f alteration and repair loans, not shown separ­
ately; only such loans in am ounts o f more than $1,000 need be secured.
N ote.— Federal Housing Admin, and Veterans Admin, data. FHA-insured
loans represent gross am ount o f insurance w ritten; VA-guaranteed loans,
gross am ounts o f loans closed. Figures do not take into account principal
repayments on previously insured or guaranteed loans. F or VA-guaranteed
loans, am ounts by type are derived from data on num ber and average
am ount o f loans closed.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORPORATION ACTIVITY

DELINQUENCY RATES ON HOME MORTGAGES
(Per 100 mortgages held o r serviced)

(In millions o f dollars)
Loans n o t in foreclosure
but delinquent for—
End o f period

Loans in
fore­
closure

Total

30 days

60 days

90 days
or more

1965.................
1966.................
1967.................
1968.................
1969.................
1970.................
1971.................

3.29
3.40
3.47
3.17
3.22
3.64
3.93

2.40
2.54
2.66
2.43
2.43
2.67
2.82

.55
.54
.54
.51
.52
.61
.65

.34
.32
.27
.23
.27
.36
.46

.40
.36
.32
.26
.27
.33
.46

1969—1...........
I I .........
I ll....
IV ___

2.77
2.68
2.91
3.22

2.04
2.06
2.18
2.43

.49
.41
.47
.52

.24
.21
.26
.27

.26
.25
.25
.27

1970—1...........
I I .........
I l l ___
IV ........

2.96
2.83
3.10
3.64

2 .1 4
2.1 0
2.26
2.67

.52
.45
.53
.61

.30
.28
.31
.36

.31
.31
.25
.33

1971—1 ...........
I I ..........
I l l ........
IV ........

3.21
3.27
3.59
3.93

2.26
2.36
2.54
2.82

.56
.53
.62
.65

.39
.38
.43
.46

.40
.38
.41
.46

1972—1...........

3.16

2.21

.58

.37

.50

M ortgage
transactions
(during period)

End o f period

N ote.—M ortgage Bankers Association o f America data from
reports on 1- to 4-family FHA-insured, VA-guaranteed, and con­
ventional mortgages held by more than 400 respondents, including
mortgage bankers (chiefly), commercial banks, savings banks, and
savings and loan associations.




M ortgage
holdings

C on­
ven­
tional

P ur­
chases

Sales

325
821

147

325
778

64

328
346
485
637
689
798
902
976
968

322
339
454
587
625
695
761
800
821

6
7
31
50
65
103
141
176
147

8
20
141
154
54
111
108
91
45

979
893
988
1,110
1,324
1,415

828
844
928
1,040
1,239
1,344

151
49
60
70
86
72

17
23
98
126
220
194

Total

FH A VA

1970....................
1971....................

325
968

1971—A pr
M ay. . . .
Ju n e . . . .
July
Aug.........
Sept........
Oct..........
N o v ........
Dec.........
1972—Jan..........
Feb.........
M ar........
A pr.........
M ay. . . .
June........

15
49
2
104

97

M ortgage
commitments

M ade
during
period

O ut­
stand­
ing

182

49
76
117
49
23
7

283
305
376
300
227
182

17
126
258
232
156
117

182
290
373
455
398
313

N ote.—F ederal H om e Loan M ortgage Corp. data. D ata for 1970 include
only the period beginning Nov. 26 when the FH L M C first became operational.
Holdings, purchases, and sales include participations as well as whole loans.
M ortgage holdings include loans used to back bond issues guaranteed by
GN M A . Commitment data cover the conventional and G ovt.-underwritten
loan programs.

A 56

CONSUMER CREDIT □ SEPTEMBER 1972
TOTAL CREDIT
(In millions o f dollars)
Instalment

End o f period

Total

A uto­
mobile
paper

Other
consumer
goods
paper

Total

Noninstalment
Repair
and mod­
ernization
loans i

Personal
loans

Total

Single­
payment
loans

Charge
accounts

Service
credit

1939.
1941.
1945.

7,222
9,172
5,665

4,503
6,085
2,462

1,497
2,458
455

1,620
1,929
816

298
376
182

1,088
1,322
1,009

2,719
3,087
3,203

787
845
746

1,414
1,645
1,612

518
597
845

1950.
1955.
1960.

21,471
38,830
56,141

14,703
28,906
42,968

6,074
13,460
17,658

4,799
7,641
11,545

1,016
1,693
3,148

2,814
6,112
10,617

6,768
9,924
13,173

1,821
3,002
4,507

3,367
4,795
5,329

1,580
2,127
3,337

1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.

90,314
97,543
102,132
113,191
122,469
126,802
137,237

71,324
77,539
80,926
89,890
98,169
101,161
109,545

28,619
30,556
30,724
34,130
36,602
35,490
38,310

18,565
20,978
22,395
24,899
27,609
29,949
32,447

3,728
3,818
3,789
3,925
4,040
4,110
4,356

20,412
22,187
24,018
26,936
29,918
31,612
34,432

18,990
20,004
21,206
23,301
24,300
25,641
27,692

7,671
7,972
8,428
9,138
9,096
9,484
10,300

6,430
6,686
6,968
7,755
8,234
8,850
9,818

4,889
5,346
5,810
6,408
6,970
7,307
7,574

1971--Ju ly .................................
A ug.................................
Sept.................................
N ov.................................
D ec..................................

128,354
129,704
130,644
131,606
133,263
137,237

102,848
104,060
104,973
105,763
107,097
109,545

36,763
37,154
37,383
37,759
38,164
38,310

29,165
29,477
29,840
30,072
30,586
32,447

4,240
4,295
4,330
4,357
4,370
4,356

32,680
33,134
33,420
33,575
33,977
34,432

25,506
25,644
25,671
25,843
26,166
27,692

9,854
9,997
10,061
10,097
10,182
10,300

8,271
8,305
8,305
8,435
8,634
9,818

7,381
7,342
7,305
7,311
7,350
7,574

Feb..................................
M ar.................................
A pr..................................
M ay ................................
Ju n e................................
July.................................

135,830
135,253
136,135
137,791
139,963
142,215
143,456

108,826
108,634
109,481
110,734
112,477
114,567
115,832

38,111
38,239
38,762
39,337
40,119
41,104
41,678

32,096
31,615
31,682
31,882
32,309
32,841
33,203

4,319
4,332
4,354
4,417
4,497
4,571
4,617

34,300
34,448
34,683
35,098
35,552
36,051
36,334

27,004
26,619
26,654
27,057
27,486
27,648
27,624

10,324
10,433
10,511
10,620
10,749
10,851
10,917

8,929
8,141
8,011
8,306
8,692
8,870
8,846

7,751
8,045
8,132
8,131
8.045
7,927
7,861

1972-

i Holdings o f financial institutions; holdings o f retail outlets are ineluded in “ other consumer goods paper.”

hold, family, and other personal expenditures, except real estate mortgage
loans. For back figures and description o f the data, see “ Consumer Credit,”
Section 16 (New) o f Supplement to Banking and, Monetary Statistics, 1965,
and pp. 983-1003 o f the B u l l e t i n for Dec. 1968.

N o te .—Consumer credit estimates cover loans to individuals for house-

INSTALMENT CREDIT
(In millions o f dollars)
Financial institutions
End o f period

Total

Retail outlets

Total

Com­
mercial
banks

Finance
cos. 1

Credit
unions

Mis­
cellaneous
lenders i

Total

A uto­
mobile
dealers 2

O ther
retail
outlets

1939.
1941.
1945.

4,503
6,085
2,462

3,065
4,480
1,776

1,079
1,726
745

1,836
2,541
910

132
198
102

18
15
19

1,438
1,605
686

123
188
28

1,315
1,417
658

1950.
1955.
1960.

14,703
28,906
42,968

11,805
24,398
36,673

5,798
10,601
16,672

5,315
11,838
15,435

590
1,678
3,923

102
281
643

2,898
4,508
6,295

287
487
359

2,611
4,021
5,936

1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.

71,324
77,539
80,926
89,890
98,169
101,161
109,545

61,533
66,724
69,490
77,457
84,982
87,064
94,086

28,962
31,319
32,700
36,952
40,305
41,895
45,976

24,282
26,091
26,734
29,098
31,734
31,123
32,140

7,324
8,255
8,972
10,178
11,594
12,500
14,191

965
1,059
1,084
1,229
1,349
1,546
1,779

9,791
10,815
11,436
12,433
13,187
14,097
15,459

315
277
285
320
336
327
360

9,476
10,538
11,151
12,113
12,851
13,770
15,099

1971--J u ly ...................................... ................

102,848
104,060
104,973
105,763
107,097
109,545

89,458
90,536
91,279
91,943
92,901
94,086

43,509
44,112
44,603
44,947
45,396
45,976

30,906
31,098
31,133
31,331
31,643
32,140

13,296
13,570
13,780
13,875
14,052
14,191

1,747
1,756
1,763
1,790
1,810
1,779

13,390
13,524
13,694
13,820
14,196
15,459

344
347
349
354
359
360

13,046
13,177
13,345
13,466
13,837
15,099

1972—Jan .........................................................

108,826
108,634
109,481
110,734
112,477
114,567
115,832

93,668
93,955
94,853
96,104
97,748
99,734
100,913

45,878
45,963
46,415
47,148
48,032
49,167
49,879

31,948
31,979
32,221
32,530
32,957
33,470
33,823

14,062
14,126
14,328
14,494
14,797
15,175
15,293

1,780
1,887
1,889
1,932
1,962
1,922
1,918

15,158
14,679
14,628
14,630
14,729
14,833
14,919

359
360
366
372
381
391
397

14,799
14,319
14,262
14,258
14,348
14,442
14,522

M ay......................................................
Ju n e ......................................................
J u ly .......................................................

1 Finance companies consist o f those institutions formerly classified
as sales finance, consumer finance, and other finance companies. Miscellaneous lenders include savings and loan associations and m utual
savings banks.




2 Automobile paper only; other instalment credit held by automobile
dealers is included with “ other retail outlets.”
See also N o t e to table above,

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ CONSUMER CREDIT
INSTALMENT CREDIT HELD BY COMMERCIAL BANKS

A 57

INSTALMENT CREDIT HELD BY FINANCE
COMPANIES

(In millions of dollars)

(In millions o f dollars)
Autoi nobile
pa]per
End o f
period

Total

Pur­
chased

D irect

Other
con­
sumer
goods
paper

R epair
and
m odern­
ization
loans

Per­
sonal
loans

End o f period

Total

A uto­
mobile
paper

O ther
con­
sumer
goods
paper

R epair
and
modern­
ization
loans

Per­
sonal
loans

1939.
1941.
1945.

1,079
1,726
745

237
447
66

178
338
143

166
309
114

135
161
110

363
471
312

1939..................................
1941..................................

1,836
2,541
910

932
1,438
202

134
194
40

151
204
62

619
705
606

1950.
1955.
1960.

5,798
10,601
16,672

1,177
3,243
5,316

1,294
2,062
2,820

1,456
2,042
2,759

834
1,338
2,200

1,037
1,916
3,577

1950..................................
1955..................................
1960..................................

5,315
11,838
15,435

3,157
7,108
7,703

692
1,448
2,553

80
42
173

1,386
3,240
5,006

1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971,

28,962
31,319
32,700
36,952
40,305
41,895
45,976

10,209
11,024
10,927
12,213
12,784
12,433
13,003

5,659
5,956
6,267
7,105
7,620
7,587
8,752

4,166
4,681
5,126
6,060
7,415
8,633
9,805

2,571
2,647
2,629
2,719
2,751
2,760
2,864

6,357
7,011
7,751
8,855
9,735
10,482
11,552

1965..................................
1966..................................
1967..................................
1968..................................
1969..................................
1970..................................

24,282
26,091
26,734
29,098
31,734
31,123
32,140

9,400
9,889
9,538
10,279
11,053
9,941
10,279

4,425
5,171
5,479
5,999
6,514
6,648
6,521

224
191
154
113
106
94
107

10,233
10,840
11,563
12,707
14,061
14,440
15,233

1971--J u ly . . .
Aug. ..
S ep t.. .
Oct---N o v .. .
Dec__

43,509
44,112
44,603
44,947
45,396
45,976

12,614
12,753
12,831
12,932
13,015
13,003

8,220
8,318
8,380
8,509
8,680
8,752

8,931
9,074
9,235
9,301
9,412
9,805

2,803
2,838
2,860
2,874
2,875
2,864

10,941
11,129
11,297
11,331
11,414
11,552

1971—July .......................

30,906
31,098
31,133
31,331
31,643
32,140

10,037
10,077
10,077
10,177
10,248
10,279

6,230
6,249
6,268
6,306
6,325
6,521

101
103
104
105
106
107

14,538
14,669
14,684
14,743
14,964
15,233

1972-- J a n .. . .
F e b ....
M ar. ..
A p r.. . .
M a y ...
J u n e ...
July. ..

45,878
45,963
46,415
47,148
48,032
49,167
49,879

12,957
13,007
13,167
13,369
13,647
14,028
14,315

8,734
8,763
8,903
9,065
9,264
9,487
9,612

9,783
9,769
9,833
10,004
10,208
10,486
10,644

2,835
2,824
2,835
2,873
2,925
2,985
3,019

11,569
11,600
11,677
11,837
11,988
12,181
12,289

1972—Jan .........................
Feb........................

31,948
31,979
32,221
32,530
32,957
33,470
33,823

10,197
10,207
10,340
10,474
10,642
10,865
10,974

6,501
6,508
6,554
6,574
6,686
6,820
6,936

108
107
109
112
113
114
117

15,142
15,157
15,218
15,370
15,516
15,671
15,796

S ee N o t e t o firs t ta b le o n p r e c e d in g p a g e .

Sept.......................
N ov.......................

M ay.......................
Ju n e ......................
J uly .......................

N o t e . —Finance companies consist o f those institutions formerly clas­
sified as sales finance, consumer finance, and other finance companies.

NONINSTALMENT CREDIT

INSTALMENT CREDIT HELD BY OTHER
FINANCIAL LENDERS

(In millions o f dollars)

(In millions o f dollars)

End o f period

T otal

A uto­
mobile
paper

O ther
con­
sumer
goods
paper

R epair
and
modern­
ization
loans

Per­
sonal
loans

Single­
payment
loans
End o f period

Total

Charge accounts

C om ­
mer­
cial
banks

O ther
finan­
cial
insti­
tutions

Retail
outlets

Credit
cardsi

Service
credit

1939...................................
1941...................................
1945...................................

150
213
121

27
47
16

5
9
4

12
11
10

106
146
91

1950...................................
1955...................................
1960...................................

692
1,959
4,566

159
560
1,460

40
130
297

102
313
775

391
956
2,034

1939.................
1941.................
1945.................

2,719
3,087
3,203

625
693
674

162
72

1,414
1,645
1,612

1965...................................
1966...................................
1967...................................
1968...................................
1969...................................
1970...................................
1971...................................

8,289
9,314
10,056
11,407
12,943
14,046
15,970

3,036
3,410
3,707
4,213
4,809
5,202
5,916

498
588
639
727
829
898
1,022

933
980
1,006
1,093
1,183
1,256
1,385

3,822
4,336
4,704
5,374
6,122
6,690
7,647

1950................
1955.................
1960.................

6,768
9,924
13,173

1,576
2,635
3,884

245
367
623

3,291
4,579
4,893

76
216
436

1,580
2,127
3,337

1971—Ju ly .......................
Aug.......................
Sept.......................
O ct.........................
N ov.......................
D ec........................

15,043
15,326
15,543
15,665
15,862
15,970

5,548
5,659
5,746
5,787
5,862
5,916

958
977
992
999
1,012
1,022

1,336
1,354
1,366
1,378
1,389
1,385

7,201
7,336
7,439
7,501
7,599
7,647

196
196
196
196
196
197
197

18,990
20.004
21,206
23,301
24,300
25,641
27.692

6,690
6,946
7,340
7,975
7,900
8,205
8.916

981
1,026
1,088
1,163
1,196
1,279
1.384

5,724
5,812
5,939
6,450
6,650
6,932
7.597

706
874
1,029
1,305
1,584
1,918
2,221

4,889
5,346
5,810
6,408
6,970
7,307
7.574

1972—Jan.........................
Feb........................
M ar.......................
A pr........................
M ay ......................
Ju n e.......................
Ju ly.......................

15,842
16,013
16,217
16,426
16,759
17,097
17,211

5,864
5,902
5,986
6,057
6,185
6,333
6,380

1,013
1,019
1,033
1,046
1,067
1,093
1,101

1,376
1,401
1,410
1,432
1,459
1,472
1,481

7,589
7,691
7,788
7,891
8,048
8,199
8,249

1971—J u ly ...
Aug—
Sept. . .
O c t.. . .
Nov. . .
Dec----

25,506
25,644
25,671
25,843
26,166
27.692

8,498
8,633
8,694
8,722
8,795
8.916

1,356
1,364
1,367
1,375
1.387
1.384

6,173
6,120
6,101
6,269
6,482
7.597

2,098
2,185
2,204
2,166
2,152
2,221

7,381
7,342
7,305
7,311
7,350
7.574

1972—J a n .. . .
F e b ....
M a r .. .
A p r....
M a y ...
J u n e ...
J u ly ...

27.004
26,619
26,654
27,057
27,486
27,648
27,624

8,937
9,008
9,083
9,176
9,294
9,406
9,473

1.387
1,425
1,428
1.444
1,455
1.445
1,444

6,719
6,008
5,969
6,239
6,638
6,764
6,680

2,210
2,133
2,042
2,067
2,054
2,106
2,166

7,751
8.045
8,132
8,131
8.045
7,927
7,861

N o t e .— O t h e r fin a n c ia l le n d e r s c o n s is t o f c r e d it u n io n s a n d m is c e l­
la n e o u s le n d e rs .




5
6
7
8

9
0
1

152

518
597
845

1 Service station and miscellaneous credit-card accounts and homeheating-oil accounts. Bank credit card accounts outstanding are included
in estimates o f instalment credit outstanding.
See also N o t e to first table on preceding page.

A 58

CONSUMER CREDIT □ SEPTEMBER 1972
INSTALMENT CREDIT EXTENDED AND REPAID, BY TYPE OF CREDIT
(In millions o f dollars)

Total

Automobile paper

O ther consumer
goods paper

Period
S.A .i

N.S.A.

S .A .1

N.S.A.

S .A .1

N.S.A.

R epair and
modernization loans
S .A .1

N.S.A.

Personal loans
S .A .1

N.S.A.

Extensions
78,586
82,335
84,693
97,053
102,888
104,130
117,638

1965.............................................
1966.............................................
1967.............................................
1968.............................................
1969.............................................
1970.............................................
1971............................................

27,227
27,341
26,667
31,424
32,354
29,831
34,638

22,750
25,591
26,952
30,593
33,079
36,781
40,979

2,266
2,200
2,113
2 ’268
2,278
2,145
2,550

26,343
27*203
28*961
32,768
35]177
35*373
39*471

1971—July.................................
Aug.................................
Sept.................................
Oct..................................
N ov.................................
D ec.................................

9,675
10,049
10,156
10,031
10,572
10,130

10,098
10,300
9,849
9,797
10,711
11,966

2,773
3,004
3,147
2,992
3,162
2,973

3,032
3,066
2,927
3,037
3,105
2,780

3,399
3,465
3,462
3,467
3,595
3,604

3,415
3,465
3,454
3,423
3,737
5,061

218
222
227
229
214
217

248
253
237
225
215
181

3,285
3,358
3,320
3,343
3,601
3,336

3,403
3,516
3,231
3,112
3,654
3,944

1972—Jan ...................................
Feb..................................
M ar.................................
A pr.................................
M ay ................................
Ju n e ................................
July.................................

10,184
10,339
10,996
10,777
10,998
11,118
10,811

8,766
8,902
10,951
10,563
11,677
12,062
11.032

2,978
3,046
3,143
3,194
3,239
3,398
3,182

2,470
2,762
3,358
3,257
3,666
3,885
3,415

3,706
3,698
3,921
3,824
3,938
3,969
4,061

3,297
2,926
3,727
3,591
3,986
4,066
3,962

221
243
249
256
243
249
236

156
202
230
262
307
290
264

3,279
3,352
3,683
3.503
3,578
3,502
3,332

2,843
3,012
3,636
3,453
3.718
3,821
3,391

Repayments
69,957
76,120
81,306
88,089
94,609
101,138
109,254

1965.............................................
1966.............................................
1967.............................................
1968.............................................
1969.............................................
1970.............................................
1971.............................................

23,543
25,404
26,499
28,018
29,882
30,943
31,818

20,518
23,178
25,535
28,089
30,369
34,441
38,481

2,116
2,110
2,142
2,132
2,163
2,075
2,304

23,780
25*428
27*130
29*850
32*195
33*679
36,651

1971—July.................................
A ug.................................
Sept.................................
O ct..................................
N ov.................................
D ec..................................

8,914
9,222
9,157
9,107
9,306
9,230

9,112
9,088
8,936
9,007
9,377
9,518

2,565
2,697
2,732
2,634
2,662
2,696

2,618
2,675
2,698
2,661
2,700
2,634

3,203
3,262
3,172
3,219
3,254
3,188

3,226
3,153
3,091
3,191
3,233
3,200

188
196
199
197
199
198

194
198
202
198
202
195

2,958
3,067
3,054
3,057
3,191
3,148

3,074
3,062
2,945
2,957
3,252
3,489

1972—Jan...................................
F eb..................................
M ar.................................
A pr..................................
M ay ................................
Ju n e ................................
July.................................

9,547
9,373
9,632
9,681
9,557
9; 791
9; 784

9,485
9,094
10,104
9,310
9,934
9,972
9,767

2,761
2,693
2,693
2,767
2,748
2,851
2,835

2,669
2,634
2,835
2,682
2,884
2,900
2,841

3,501
3,408
3,422
3,531
3,457
3,526
3,681

3,648
3,407
3,660
3,391
3,559
3,534
3,600

201
200
204
207
214
207
215

193
189
208
199
227
216
218

3,084
3,072
3,313
3,176
3,138
3,207
3,053

2,975
2,864
3,401
3,038
3,264
3,322
3,108

N et change in credit outstanding 2
1965.............................................
1966.............................................
1967.............................................
1968.............................................
1969.............................................
1970.............................................
1971............................................

3,684
1,937
168
3,406
2,472
- 1 ,1 1 2
2,820

8,629
6,215
3,387
8,964
8,279
2,992
8,384

2,232
2,413
1,417
2,504
2,710
2,340
2,498

150
90
-2 9
136
115
70
246

2,563
1,775
1,831
2,918
2,982
1,694
2,820

1971—Ju ly .................................
A ug.................................
Sept.................................
Oct..................................
N ov.................................
D ec.................................

761
827
999
924
1,266
900

986
1,212
913
790
1,334
2,448

208
307
415
358
500
277

414
391
229
376
405
146

196
203
290
248
341
416

189
312
363
232
514
1,861

30
26
28
32
15
19

54
55
35
27
13
-1 4

327
291
266
286
410
188

329
454
286
155
402
455

1972—Jan..................................
F eb..................................
M ar.................................
A pr.................................
M ay ................................
J u n e ................................
July.................................

637
966
1,364
1,096
1,441
1,327
1,027

-7 1 9
-1 9 2
847
1,253
1,743
2,090
1,265

217
353
450
427
491
547
347

-1 9 9
128
523
575
782
985
574

205
290
499
293
481
443
380

-3 5 1
-4 8 1
67
200
427
532
362

20
43
45
49
29
42
21

-3 7
13
22
63
80
74
46

195
280
370
327
440
295
279

-1 3 2
148
235
415
454
499
283

1 Includes adjustm ents fo r differences in trading days.
2 N et changes in credit outstanding are equal to extensions less
repaym ents.
N ote .—E stim ates are based on accounting records and often
include financing charges. Renewals and refinancing of loans,




purchases and sales of instalm ent paper, and certain other transac­
tions may increase the am ount of extensions and repaym ents
w ithout affecting the am ount outstanding.
F o r back figures and description of the data, see “ Consum er
C redit,” Section 16 (N ew ) of Supplement to Banking and M onetary
Statistics, 1965, and pp. 983-1003 of the B u l l e t i n for Dec. 1968.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ CONSUMER CREDIT

A 59

INSTALMENT CREDIT EXTENDED AND REPAID, BY HOLDER
(In millions of dollars)
Total

Period
S.A.1

N.S.A.

Commercial banks

Finance companies

S.A.1

S.A.1

N.S.A.

N.S.A.

O ther financial
lenders
S.A.1

N.S.A.

Retail outlets
S.A.1

N.S.A.

Extensions
29,528
30,073
30,850
36,332
38,533
39,136
45,099

78,586
82,335
84,693
97,053
102,888
104,130
117,638

1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.

25,192
25,406
25,496
28,836
30,854
29,662
32,036

9,436
10,362
10,911
12,850
14,245
14,619
17,312

14,430
16,494
17,436
19.035
19,256
20,713
23,191

1971—July..
Aug..
Sept..
O ct..
N ov..
D ec..

9,675
10,049
10,156
10,031
10,572
10,130

10,098
10,300
9,849
9,797
10,711
11,966

3,644
3,919
3,989
3,832
4,140
3,939

3,917
4,062
3,932
3,752
3,931
4,023

2,676
2,699
2,718
2,733
2,853
2,760

2,791
2,729
2,549
2,655
3,015
3,370

1,423
1,452
1,488
1,490
1,564
1,454

1,506
1,582
1,439
1,414
1,535
1,477

1,932
1,979
1,961
1.976
2,015
1.977

1,884
1,927
1,929
1,976
2,230
3,096

1972—J a n ...
F eb..
M ar..
A p r..
M ay.
June.
J u ly ..

10,184
10,339
10,996
10,777
10,998
11,118
10,811

8,766
8,902
10,951
10.563
li;6 7 7
12,062
11,032

3,826
3,947
4,117
4,156
4,250
4,565
4,273

3,366
3,539
4,237
4,215
4,701
4,968
4,510

2,695
2,666
2,906
2,908
2,912
2,777
2,773

2,247
2,354
2,890
2,793
3,009
3,106
2,840

1.482
1,602
1,737
1,583
1,614
1,656
1.483

1,244
1,465
1,743
1,577
1,792
1,870
1,541

2,181
2,124
2,236
2,130
2,222
2,120
2,282

1,909
1,544
2,081
1,978
2,175
2,118
2,141

Repayments
25,663
27,716
29,469
32,080
35,180
37,961
41,018

69,957
76,120
81,306
88,089
94,609
101,138
109,254

1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.

13,433
15,470
16,815
18,038
18,502
19,803
21,829

8.310
9.337
10,169
11,499
12,709
13,516
15,388

22,551
23,597
24,853
26,472
28,218
29,858
31,019

1971—July..
Aug..
Sept.
O ct..
Nov..
D e c ..

8,914
9,222
9,157
9,107
9,306
9,230

9,112
9,088
8,936
9,007
9,377
9,518

3,351
3,456
3,460
3,439
3,470
3,451

3,419
3,459
3,441
3,408
3.482
3,443

2,485
2,590
2,614
2,495
2.579
2,596

2,494
2,537
2,514
2,457
2,703
2,873

1,293
1,288
1,266
1,319
1.360
1,324

1,387
1,299
1,222
1,292
1.338
1,369

1,785
1,888
1,817
1,854
1,897
1,859

1,812
1,793
1,759
1,850
1,854
1,833

1972—Jan ........
Feb___
M ar___
A pr___
M ay . . .
June. . .
Ju ly .. . .

9,547
9,373
9,632
9,681
9,557
9,791
9,784

9,485
9,094
10,104
9,310
9,934
9,972
9,767

3.620
3,538
3,574
3,598
3.621
3,755
3,796

3,464
3,454
3,785
3.482
3,817
3,833
3,798

2,586
2,463
2,513
2.579
2,489
2,528
2,523

2,439
2.323
2,648
2,484
2,582
2,593
2,487

1,346
1,377
1,527
1,424
1,408
1,480
1.361

1,372
1,294
1,539
1,368
1,459
1,532
1,427

1.995
1.995
2,018
2,080
2,039
2,028
2,104

2,210
2,023
2,132
1,976
2,076
2,014
2,055

N et change in credit outstanding 2
2,641
1,809
643
2,364
2,636
-6 1 1
1,017

3,865
2,357
1,381
4,252
3,353
1,590
4,081

8,629
6,215
3,387
8,964
8,279
2,992
8,384

1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.

1,126
1,025
742
1,351
1,536
1,103
1,924

997
1,024
621
997
754
910
1,362

—July.................................
Aug.................................
Sept.................................
O ct...................................
N ov.................................
D ec..................................

761
827
999
924
1,266
900

986
1,212
913
790
1,334
2,448

293
463
529
393
670
488

498
603
491
344
449
580

191
109
104
238
274
164

297
192
35
198
312
497

130
164
222
171
204
130

119
283
217
122
197
108

147
91
144
122
118
118

72
134
170
126
376
1,263

—Jan...................................
Feb..................................
M ar.................................
A pr..................................
M ay ................................
Ju n e ................................
J u ly .................................

637
966
1,364
1,096
1,441
1,327
1,027

-7 1 9
-1 9 2
847
1,253
1,743
2,090
1,265

206
409
543
558
629
810
477

-9 8
85
452
733
884
1,135
712

109
203
393
329
423
249
250

-1 9 2
31
242
309
427
513
353

136
225
210
159
206
176
122

-1 2 8
171
204
209
333
338
114

186
129
218
50
183
92
178

-3 0 1
-4 7 9
-5 1
2
99
104
86

1 Includes adjustments for differences in trading days.
2 N et changes in credit outstanding are equal to extensions less re­
payments, except in certain months when data for extensions and re­
payments have been adjusted to eliminate duplication resulting from
large transfers o f paper. In those months the differences between ex­
tensions and repayments for some particular holders do not equal the




changes in their outstanding credit. Such transfers do not affect total
instalment credit extended, repaid, or outstanding.
N o t e . — “ Other financial lenders” include credit unions and miscellaneous
lenders. See also N o t e to preceding table and Note 1 at bottom o f p. A-56.

A 60

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION: S.A. □ SEPTEMBER 1972
MARKET GROUPINGS
(1967 = 100)

Grouping

1967
p ro ­
p or­
tion

1971

1971
aver­
age1*
July

Aug.

Sept.

T otal in d ex .......................................... 100.00 106.8 106.8 105.6 107.1
Products, to ta l........................................
Final products......................................
Consumer goods.............................
Equipm ent.......................................
Interm ediate products.......................
M aterials..................................................

62.21
48.95
28.53
20.42
13.26
37.79

106.4
104.7
115.7
89.4
112.6
107.4

107.0
105.0
116.3
89.3
114.6
106.4

1972

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

M ar.

Apr.

M ay

June

July*5

108.7

110.0 111.2 112.8 113.2 113.4 113.7

106.1 107.0 107.0
104.8 105.5 105.4
115.9 116.7 116.6
89.8 89.8
89.5
110.9 112.3 113.2
104.8 107.3 106.6

107.9
106.1
118.0
89.6
114.3
106.5

108.0
106.2
118.0
89.6
114.9
108.4

108.4
106.4
118.5
89.5
115.9
109.2

109.5
107.6
119.6
90.9
117.0
110.8

110.1
108.2
119.6
92.4
117.3
113.1

111.4
109.8
122.0
92.7
117.3
115.0

112.1
110.2
122.2
93.4
119.3
115.6

112.1
110.3
122.2
93.3
119.3
115.9

112.0
110.1
121.8
93.7
119.2
116.5

116.0 117.4
119.7 119.9
109.2 109.4
140.1 140.0

117.5
116.6
102.8
143.4

120.3
119.5
106.4
144.5

118.9
119.3
104.6
147.5

125.9
128.9
114.3
157.0

125.3
127.4
111.3
158.3

125.
125.7
108.2
159.2

125.2
125.6
108.2
159.3

116.0
116.9
135.8
81.3
120.4
113.7

118.1
123.8
143.4
87.1
121.7
113.5

120.7
123.1
146.9
78.3
126.1
117.2

118.7
115.1
131.9
84.0
127.1
117.2

124.2
132.2
149.3
100.1
131.3
116.9

124.3
129.3
148.2
93.7
132.0
118.2

125.8
125.9
141.2
97.2
134.0
122.3

124.7
124.2
142.4
89.9
135.9
120.3

106.8 107.4 108.1

Consumer goods
Durable consumer goods........................
Automotive products.........................
A utos................................................
A uto parts and allied goods........

7.86 115.1 117.4
2.84 119.5 121.7
1.87 108.3 107.9
.97 140.9 148.0

117.3 117.1
122.3 122.9
108.5 108.0
148.9 151.5

H om e go o d s............................................
Appliances, TV, and rad io s.............
Appliances and A /C .................
TV and home audio................
Carpeting and furniture..................
Misc. home g o ods............................

5.02 112.6 115.0
1.41 111.5 115.5
.92 127.6 126.7
.49 81.4 94.5
1.08 117.2 121.2
2.53 111.2 112.1

114.4 113.8 113.9 113.8
112.4 110.4 109.7 110.5
128.5 129.0 129.5 131
82.4 75.6 72.6 71.8
121.7 121.9 120.7 122.2
112.7 112.3 113
112.0

Nondurable consumer goods................
Clothing..............................................
Consumer staples..............................
Consumer foods and to b acco ...
N onfood staples...........................
Consumer chemical products.
Consumer paper p ro d u c ts.. . .
Consumer fuel and lighting. .
Residential utilities..............

20.67
4.32
16.34
8.37

116.0
101.4
119.8
113.6

7.98 126.3
2.64 133.9
1.91 107.9
3.43 130.8
2.25 137.6

116.
121.9
107.8
149.0

115.9 115.4 116.5
102.5 100.3 103.6
119.4 119
119.9
112
112.8 114.1

116.6
103.2
120.2
113

118.8
103.7
122.8
117.2

118.4
105.0
121.9
115.5

119.0
105.8
122.5
115.4

119.3
102.7
123.7
115.5

119.9
105.0
123.9
116.3

120.5
105.0
124.6
116.8

121.0
106.2
124.9
117.2

120.8 120.5
106.6
124.6 123.9
117.5 115.4

126.4
133.3
106
132.3
138.6

126.1
133.6
109.2
129.6
136.5

126.7
132.0
111.0
131.6
138.5

128
137.2
111.5
131.6
138.8

128.7
134.3
114.8
132.1
139.0

129.8
137.6
111.4
134.2
141.8

132.4
144.3
112.1
134.5
142.5

132.0
141.4
113.9
134.9
142.3

132.8
145.4
111.4
134.8
142.1

133.1
144.8
111.1
136.3
143.2

132.0
140.2
112.2
136.8
145.0

97.5 98.2
92.8 93.2
96 .4 96.6
82.1
81
119.0 118.7

98.2
93
95.5
83.1
118.8

97.9
94.2
95.2
83.5
121

98.0
94.2
94.0
83.8
121

98.4 99.9 101.3 101.3 102.5 102.2 102.2
95.4 96.3 95.7 96.3 97.2 96.9
94.1
98.0 99.6 101.2 98 .4 97 .0 98.3 9 9 .4
82.4 83.4 84.5
86.7
84.9 85.9
86.5
121.0 122.7 122.0 121.4 122.8 123.5 121.8

126.9
132.7
106.9
133.8
141.8

132.9
140.4
110.9
139.4
148.0

Equipment
Business equipment.......................
Industrial equipm ent...............
Building and mining eq u ip .,
M anufacturing equipm ent.
Power equipm ent.................
Commercial, transit, farm eq..
Commercial eq u ip m en t.. . .
Transit equipm ent...............
Farm equipm ent...................
Defense and space equipment.
M ilitary products.................

97.1
12.74 96
6.77 92.9 9 2.0
1.45 92.9
88.9
82.6 82.5
3.85
1.47 119.8 119.9

5.97 101.2 102.9 102.8 104.0 103.6 102.1 102.4 103.3 105.1 107.0 107.6 109.6 108.3 108.0
3.30 110.0 111.7 111.1 113.1 112.2 110.2 109.4 109.1 111.9 114.7 114.1 116.4 116.7 116.9
2.00 89.4 89.3 90.7 90.8 91.1
89.4 93.1
95.1
94.7 95.4 97.0 98.9 94.0 92.2
.67 93.2 100.2 97.7 98.5 98.8 100.0 96.1
98.6 102.4 103.5 106.8 108.2 109.7 111.1
7.68
5.15

77.1
79

76.3
78.8

76.3
79.2

76.0
79.0

75.7

75.6
78.3

74.8
77.6

111.5 112.8 114.2 115.2
112.9 113.5 114.4 114.5

115.7
116.1

79.0

75.9
78.8

76.0
78.5

77.6
80.7

78.5
81

78.2
81.1

78.9
81.4

79.5
82.5

Interm ediate products
Construction products...........
Misc. intermediate products.

5.93 112.6 115.2 109.3
7 .34 112.6 114.4 112.1

115.8 115.9
118.0 118.5

116.5 118.0 117.7 118.1
118.0 120.4 120.6 119.8

M aterials
Durable goods materials.. . .
Consumer durable p a rts .
Equipm ent p arts..............
D urable materials n e c ...

20.91 101.7 99 .7 9 6.5 100.6 102.2 100.5 101.6 103.5 105.8 107.8 110.4 111.1 110.9 111.0
4.75 104.2 101.1 105.6 103.3 104.1 101.8 104.0 105.1 107.1 110.2 113.8 112.0 111.6 111.7
87.1
88.0 83.1
87.1
5.41
87
88.1
87.9
88.8 90.7 91.0 95.4 95.3 95.0 96.8
99.3 106.2 108.5 106.5 107.4 110.2 112.8 115.2 116.5 118.6 118.7 117.9
105.1
10.75 107

Nondurable goods materials............
Textile, paper, and chem. m a t..
N ondurable materials n.e.c.
Fuel and power, industrial.............

13.99
8.58
5.41
2.89

114.1
116.6
110.3
116.3

113.6
115.5
110.6
119.6

114.7
117.7
110.0
117.4

114
115.0 115.9
118.8 119.0 121.5
108.2 108.4 107.2
119.5 98.7 104.6

116.7
123.0
106.8
117.6

116.0
120.8
108.3
117.4

117.0
121.5
109.9
117.7

119.8
125.0
111.4
118.9

120.6
125.9
112.3
121.6

121.3
127.1
112.3
120.7

122.5
128.7
112.7
121.7

123.3
129.9
112.3
122.9

Supplementary groups
H om e goods and clothing.
C ontainers........................... .

9.3 4 107.4 109.2 107.9 109.1
1.82 116.8 118.3 117.3 115.1

108.9 109.
116.9 119.

110.9 112.4 112.4 112.3
121.0 120.6 123.7 120.3

115.3 115.9 116.9 116.4
127.5 127.0 130.2 131.0

Gross value of products
in market structure
(In billions of 1963 dollars)
Products, total...................
Final p ro d u cts.............
Consumer go o d s. . .
Equipm ent................
Interm ediate p roducts.

For Note see p. A-63.




392.0 391.8 390.0 392.1 393.2 396.5 396.5 398.7 402.0 405.6 409.7 413.0 412.1 410.0
302.6 300.7 302.4 303.5 303.8 306.7 305.8 306.7 309.2 312.3 317.1 318.5 317.8 315.5
213.8 213.3 213.9 214.2 215.0 217.9 217.4 217.4 218.8 220.4 224.8 225.1 224.5 221.8
88.8 87.7
88.6 89.4 89.2 89.0 88.9 89.2 90.4 91.9 92.4 93.3 93.4 93.7
89.5 91.4 87.8 88.9 89.4 90.2 90.6 92.5 92.9 93.2 92.8 94.5
94.3 94.6

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION: S.A.

A 61

INDUSTRY GROUPINGS
(1967 = 100)

G rouping

1967
p ro ­
p o r­
tion

1972

1971

1971
aver­
age*
July

88.55 105.2 105.8
D u rab le................................................. 52.33 9 9.4 100.3
N ondurable.......................................... 36.22 113.6 113.8
M ining and utilities................................ 11.45 118.9 119.2
6.37 107.0 105.6
5.08 133.9 136.2
U tilities.................................................

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

M ar.

Apr.

M ay

June

104.2
91A
114.0
118.6
106.3
134.1

105.7
99.3
115.1
118.3
105.9
134.0

106.1
100.1
114.7
114.3
97.7
135.2

106.0
99.1
115.9
117.4
102.5
136.0

106.2
99.5
116.0
120.1
107.8
135.8

107.1
100.4
116.8
120.6
107.3
137.4

108.5
102.1
117.8
121.6
107.2
139.7

109.7
103.4
118.8
122.3
108.5
139.7

111.8
105.8
120.3
122.9
109.0
140.2

112.3
106.3
120.8
122.6
107.9
141.1

112.8 113.0
106.8 107.2
121.3 121.1
122.7 122.2
107.5 107.1
141.8 141.1

July*

Durable manufactures
Primary and fabricated metals.............
Primary m etals....................................
Iron and steel, subtotal.................
Fabricated metal p ro d u cts...............

12.55 104.0 104.6
6.61 100.9 98.9
4.23 96.6 9 9 .0
5.94 107.5 110.9

Machinery and allied goods...................
M achinery............................................
Nonelectrical m achinery...............

32.44
17.39
9.17
8.22
9.29
4.56
4.73
2.07
3.69

Transportation equipm ent...............
M otor vehicles and p a rts .............
Aerospace and misc. trans. e q . . .
Instrum ents..........................................
Ordnance, private and G ovt............

94 .9
96.2
94.3
98.3
92.9
114.1
72.5
108.5
86.1

94.0 99.5 101.3
81.2 93.8 96.1
66.5
85.9 89.4
108.2 105.9 107.1

95.8 95.4
97.7 96.7
95.8 95.5
99.9 97.9
93.2 93.9
115.5 116.3
71.7
72.3
110.9 109.1
85.0 85.5

98.8 100.6 104.0 105.4 107.4 110.4 112.7
91.4 94.3 102.4 102.6 105.1 110.2 113.5
81.9 85.5
95.2 95.9 98.8 105.5 108.3
107.1 107.6 106.0 108.6 110.1 110.8 111.9

9 6.2 96.6 95.9 95.6 95 .7 97.3 98.4
99.5 100.3
97.9 98.3 97.8 91.9 98.5
97.0 97.4 95.9 94.8 95.1
96.2 97.6
99 .0 99.3 99.9 101.3 102.2 103.2 103.3
94.2 94.5
93.4 92.7 92.0 94.7 95.9
115.8 116.0 115.7 116.1 114.0 117.7 118.8
73.4 73.7
72.0 70.1
70.8 72.7 73.9
110.5 111.2 110.4 109.3 111.3 114.5 114.2
85.2 85.3
84.4 83.2 83.7
84.9
86.4

101.1
102.6
98.6
107.1
100.4
125.6
76.1
116.1
87.3

101.0
103.0
100.4
105.9
98.9
122.6
76.1
117.3
87.6

111.4
110.7
105.1
112.3

113.3
112.8
108.5
113.9

101.9
105.1
102.9
107.4
9 7 .4
119.1
76.4
119.3
89.2

101.9
104.5
102.1
107.3
98.2
121.2
76.1
119.7
89.3

Lumber, clay, and glass.........................
L um ber and p ro d u cts.......................
Clay, glass, and stone products-----

4 .44 111.5 111.4 111.0 112.1 113.2 113.7 114.8 115.5 118.0 118.1 118.1 118.2 119.2 118.1
1.65 113.9 114.1 113.9 114.8 118.2 119.4 121.7 122.0 119.7 119.6 119.9 119.1 121.8 121.0
2.79 110.0 109.8 109.3 110.6 110.1 110.4 110.7 111.6 117.0 117.2 117.1 117.5 117.7 116.4

Furniture and miscellaneous..................
Furniture and fixtures.......................
Miscellaneous m anufactures............

2.9 0 111.7 115.9 114.0 114.2 114.0 113.3 114.3 115.0 117.3 118.4 119.9 120.6 122.1 122.7
1.38 102.1 104.8 105.2 105.3 104.5 105.4 103.8 104.0 108.4 108.7 111.7 110.7 113.9 114.5
1.52 120.5 126.1 122.0 122.2 122.6 120.5 123.9 125.1 125.4 127.2 127.4 129.6 129.6 130.0

Nondurable manufactures

A pparel p ro d u cts................................
Leather and p ro d u cts........................

6.90 100.7 100.9 100.8 102.5 102.3 101.8 103.1 102.0 101.1 103.7 106.1 104.9 105.8 104.7
2.69 108.6 108.6 110.5 111.0 110.1 110.2 112.6 108.9 107.0 110.9 113.5 112.8 113.8 114.0
3.33 97.8 98.3 97.4 99.5 100.0 99.8 99.7 99.8 100.1 102.7 103.3 102.8 103.0
87.4 83.3
87.1
89.6 86.9 85.4 94.4 89.2 92.1 ' '90.'5
.88 87.4 87.0 84.2 87.7

Paper and printing..................................
Paper and p ro d u cts............................
Printing and publishing.....................

7.92 107.8 108.4 108.1 108.2 109.4 110.5 110.7 111.3 112.6 112.6 112.3 114.1 114.7 115.1
3.18 115.8 115.3 117.5 116.2 116.9 119.2 119.8 122.2 122.8 122.5 124.4 127.2 126.7 128.0
4.74 102.5 103.8 101.7 102.9 104.3 104.5 104.7 103.9 105.8 105.9 104.2 105.3 106.8 106.4

Textiles, apparel, and leather...............

Chemicals, petroleum, and rubber----Chemicals and pro d u cts...................
Petroleum p ro d u cts............................
R ubber and plastics products..........
Foods and tobacco..................................
F oods....................................................
Tobacco products...............................

11.92
7.86
1.80
2.26

124.8
126.4
115.7
126.0

124.7
126.0
114.8
128.1

126.3
127.7
115.8
129.9

127.5
129.9
113.7
129.6

126.6
128.4
115.7
129.1

127.9
130.8
116.0
127.7

127.9
130.4
118.3
126.6

129.8
131.2
119.3
133.3

132.6
135.1
118.7
135.0

133.4
135.7
117.9
138.1

136.1
137.9
117.0
144.7

137.5
138.9
119.5
146.5

137.4
139.3
117.3
146.5

137.3
138.9
118.7
146.6

9 .48 113.7 114.1 113.1 114.2 113.3 115.8 115.0 115.7 115.9 116.3 117.6 117.1 117.6 117.2
8.81 114.9 115.5 114.1 115.2 114.4 117.1 116.6 116.5 116.9 117.5 118.6 118.5 119.3 118.8
.67 97.7 96.6 98.2 100.3 98.5 98.2 93.8 103.8 102.5 101.9 103.9 99.1
96.4

Mining
Metal, stone, and earth minerals..........
M etal m ining.......................................
Stone and earth m inerals.................
C o a l.......................................................
Oil and gas extraction.......................

1.26 104.6
.51 121.4
.75 93.2

91.5
93.3
90.2

96.8 98.1 102.0 110.9 111.1 108.0 109.8 108.3 104.6 99.4
104.8 109.7 117.1 136.7 137.7 128.9 133.7 131.0 122.2 110.7
91.7 93.4 92.7 93.8 93.5
91.4 90.1
92.7 92.6 91.7

98.6
104.3
94.7

98.0
106.3
92.4

5.11 107.6 109.1 108.7 107.9 96.6 100.4 107.1 107.1 106.5 108.6 110.0 109.9 109.7 109.4
55.7 112.4 106.3 99.6 104.1 112.9 105.0 103.8 103.8
.69 99.8 109.3 110.7 111.0 29.5
4.42 108.9 109.1 108.4 107.4 107.1 107.4 106.3 107.2 107.6 109.3 109.6 110.7 110.7 110.3

Utilities
Electric......................................................
G as.............................................................

For Note seep. A-63.




3.91
1.17

138.1 140.9
119.8

138.6 138.6 140.6 141.9 141.9
1...........

141.2 144.4 144.8 145.6 147.1
1...........

148.0 146.8

A 62

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION: N.S.A. □ SEPTEMBER 1972
MARKET GROUPINGS
(1967 = 100)

G rouping

1967
p ro ­
p or­
tion

1971

1971
aver­
age*

Total index .............................. ............ 100.00 106.8

July

Aug.

102.8

Sept.

1972

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

M ar.

Apr.

May

June

July*

105.8

110.3

110.3

107.7

104.5

106.6

110.3

111.6 113.6

113.4 116.4 109.2

62.21
48.95
28.53
20.42
13.26
37.79

106.4 104.5 107.4
104.7 102.0 105.5
115.7 112.6 118.4
89.4
87.3
87.5
112.6 113.5 114.3
107.4 99.9 103.1

112.2
110.6
124.2
91.7
118.0
107.3

111.5
109.7
123.0
91.1
118.0
108.2

107.7
105.9
117.2
90.1
114.1
107.6

103.0
101.2
109.9
89.0
109.8
106.9

105.5
104.4
115.7
88.6
109.4
108.3

109.0
107.7
119.4
91.4
113.8
112.4

110.0
108.3
119.2
93.1
116.5
114.5

111.7
110.2
122.4
93.2
117.4
116.6

110.8
108.5
119.6
93.1
119.5
117.7

115.2
113.3
125.8
95.8
122.2
118.5

Automotive products.........................
A u to s.................................................
Auto parts and allied goods........

7.86
2.84
1.87
.97

115.1 102.7 109.7
119.5 94.9 102.0
108.3 69.4 76.5
140.9 144.0 151.1

122.5
128.7
112.0
160.6

126.6 119.9 107.7 117.1
135.9 123.9 102.5 120.7
124.0 115.6 87.5 112.0
158.7 139.8 131.3 137.5

122.9
126.5
117.0
144.8

121.8
126.3
115.1
147.8

128.8
138.2
128.0
157.8

126.0
132.6
121.3
154.3

129.1 108.2
133.5 93.6
120.1
61 .0
159.2 156.3

Home goods........................................
Appliances, TV, and rad io s.........
Appliances and A /C ..................
TV and home au d io..................
Carpeting and fu rn itu re................
Misc. home goods..........................

5.02 112.6 107.1 114.1
1.41 111.5 102.9 104.5
.92 127.6 122.9 115.0
.49 81.4 65.4
84.8
1.08 117.2 103.4 121.9
2.53 111.2 111.1 116.2

119.0
113.9
128.6
86.2
125.4
119.1

121.4
125.7
143.5
92.5
122.0
118.8

117.6 110.7 115.1 120.8 119.3
116.7 98.4 123.1 127.2 120.1
132.3 108.2 143.8 150.3 139.3
87.4 80.1
84.3
83.9 84.1
125.5 123.0 123.5 131.4 130.8
114.7 112.3 107.1 112.7 113.9

123.5
131.9
156.6
85.6
131.8
115.3

122.3
124.9
146.9
83.7
128.3
118.2

126.6
125.6
147.4
84.8
132.8
124.6

124.8
107.0
129.5
123.9

121.6 116.2 110.8
110.4 100.6 90.6
124.6 120.3 116.2
120.5 115.8 109.0

115.1 118.1
100.8 106.6
118.9 121.2
109.2 111.2

118.2
108.1
120.9
113.0

119.9
113.2
121.7
114.8

117.1
102.7
120.9
114.7

124.5 120.7
113.0
127.6 126.8
120.8 116.2

129.0
129.3
106.3
141.4
152.3

129.2
135.0
110.8
135.0
144.2

128.9
142.3
110.3
129.0
136.3

127.4
143.9
107.9
125.5
128.7

134.8
152.3
114.8
132.4
137.5

Products, to ta l.........................................
Final products......................................
Consumer goods.............................
Equipm ent........................................
Interm ediate p ro d u cts.......................
M aterials..................................................

109.0
106.5
117.3
9 1 .4
118.1
109.4

Consumer goods

Nondurable consumer goods..................
C lothing................................................
Consumer staples................................
Consumer foods and tobacco___

20.67
4.32
16.34
8.37

116.0 116.4 121.7
101.4 93.7 105.6
119.8 122.4 126.0
113.6 112.9 118.7

N onfood staples..............................
Consumer chemical p ro d u c ts..
C onsumer paper products........
C onsumer fuel and lighting. . .
Residential utilities................

7.98
2.64
1.91
3.43
2.25

126.3
133.9
107.9
130.8
137.6

132.4
138.0
109.6
140.8
151.6

133.7
139.6
113.9
140.2
149.6

Business equipment..................................
Industrial equipm ent..........................
Building and mining equip...........
M anufacturing equipm ent...........
Power equipm ent............................

12.74
6.77
1.45
3.85
1.47

96.8
92.9
92.9
82.6
119.8

94.4
91.0
87.0
80.7
121.7

94.7 101.1 100.3
90.8 95.7 95.2
90.5 98.2 97.0
80.0 85.0 83.9
119.1 121.2 123.1

98.3 96.4
94.6 93.4
99.0 95.7
83.2 83.1
120.2 118.1

Commercial, transit, farm eq...........
Commercial equipm ent.................
Transit equipm ent..........................
Farm equipm ent.............................

5.97
3.30
2.00
.67

101.2 98.2
110.0 114.5
89.4 75.5
93.2 85.8

99.1
111.9
83.1
83.8

102.4 99.9 100.7
110.5 107.4 105.3
91.8
90.8 93.5
93.7 90.6 99.1

Defense and space equipment................
M ilitary products................................

7.68
5.15

75.4
78.2

75.5
78.6

135.3 128.9
145.4 139.4
116.0 114.7
138.3 128.8
148.6 134.8

125.0
137.1
110.7
123.7
126.9

123.7
124.9
108.9
131.0
135.5

131.7
137.7
109.1
139.6
150.1

116.5
112.0
138.6
62.2
115.9
119.2

138.0
146.0
113.7
145.3
155.8

Equipment

77.1
79.9

107.3 106.1
116.7 113.2
92.9 96.0
103.7 101.2
76.1
78.9

75.7
78.7

76.4
79.0

76.6
78.8

96.6 100.7 102.2 102.3 102.2 105.5 9 9 .2
93.0 96.2 96.4 95.7 95.7 99 .0 95.8
99.5 97.9 99.0 96.3 101.4 97.3
97.1
81.4 85.6 86.2 84.8 85.5
88.2
84.6
119.3 120.6 121.4 121.2 121.8 124.9 123.6

75.3
77.8

105.8 108.7
110.1 112.6
97.3 99.5
109.9 117.2
75.9
78.4

77.9
81.0

109.8
112.2
104.8
113.2
78.0
81.1

109.6 112.9 103.0
114.7 121.9 119.8
100.9 97.5
77.9
110.0 114.4 95.1
78.1
81.3

79.6
82.7

78.5
81.9

Intermediate products
Misc. intermediate products.................

5.93
7.34

112.6 112.2 111.8 116.1 117.6 112.7 109.1 107.6 113.7
112.6 114.5 116.4 119.6 118.4 115.2 110.4 110.9 113.9

116.9 118.9 120.6 122.0 116.1
116.1 116.2 118.7 122.4 119.8

M aterials

D urable materials n.e.c.....................

20.91 101.7
4.75 104.2
5.41
87.1
10.75 107.9

93.1
90.4
82.6
99.6

Textile, paper, and chem. m at..........
N ondurable materials n.e.c..............
Fuel and power, industrial...................

13.99 114.1
8.58 116.6
5.41 110.3
2.89 116.3

107.7
107.3
108.3
111.6

Durable goods materials.........................
Consumer durable p a rts ...................

93.5 100.8 103.3 101.2 100.1 102.2 107.5 110.2 112.4 113.8 114.7 103.9
96.7 102.7 106.6 106.3 109.0 108.8 110.5 111.6 112.9 113.3 112.5 99.9
93.7 96.5
81.1
88.0 87.8
86.5 87.1
89.1
92.1
95.9 9 9.2 90.9
98.3 106.4 109.6 106.3 102.7 105.8 114.0 117.8 120.1 123.1 123.5 112.2
114.4
116.8
110.7
118.0

114.8 117.6 117.5
118.7 121.5 122.8
108.6 111.3 109.0
118.5 97.9 105.3

114.4
119.2
106.8
119.2

115.1
120.0
107.4
119.4

118.3
124.3
108.8
119.6

119.8
126.0
110.0
119.6

121.8 123.0 123.8
128.5 129.6 130.5
111.2 112.6 113.2
121.8 120.7 120.8

116.5
120.7
109.9
114.7

Supplementary groups
H om e goods and clothing.....................
Containers................................................

For Note seep. A-63.




9.34 107.4 100.9
1.82 116.8 113.1

110.2 113.4 116.3 109.7 101.4 108.5 114.2 114.1 118.7 113.2 120.3 107.8
121.3 120.2 123.6 118.3 111.9 114.0 123.3 120.3 127.9 128.9 134.2 125.2

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION: N.S.A.

A 63

INDUSTRY GROUPINGS

(1967= 100)

Grouping

Manufacturing, total. .
D urable ...................
N ondurable.............
Mining and utilities...
M ining.....................
U tilities...................

1967
p ro ­
por­
tion

1971
averagep

88.55
52.33
36.22
11.45
6.37
5.08

105.2
99.4
113.6
118.9
107.0
133.9

1971

1972
Jan.

Feb.

M ar.

Apr.

M ay

June

July2*

110.5
105.5
117.8
120.7
106.4
138.7

112.7
107.5
120.2
120.4
108.8
134.9

112.7
107.6
120.0
120.0
109.9
132.6

115.7
109.4
124.7
122.7
109.5
139.4

107.1
100.2
117.1
124.7
105.9
148.4

109.4 112.6
98.9 98.0 102.
90.2
89.4 101.0 108.6 113.5
80.7
93.7 101.3 107.4
81
108.6 107.6 104.8 110.2 111.5

114.3
117.2
113.2
111.1

115.7
118.9
114.3
112.2

114.4
115.3
108.8
113.3

104.8
101.4
100.0
108.6

89.2 91.0 9 8.0 99.2 96 .7 93 .7 95.
99.1 100.2
93.1
93.5 100.4 100.6 98.1
95.6 97.8 101.7 102.2
93.6 92.0 98.6 97.1
95.0 93.7 93.9 99.4 100.2
92.6 95.2 102.5 104.4 101.5 97.7 102.1 104.3 104.5
84.4 94.8 99.0 95.4 90.3 94.0 97.5
79.0
99.0
88.0 98.0 116.6 124.8 119
110.8 119.1 123.3 123.8
70.4 71.2 73.8 74.1
72.6 75.0
71.9 70.6 69.8
110.9 111.4 114.9 114.4 111.0 109.2 108.1 111.2 112.3
84.5
84.3
84.7 85.0 84.8 83.7
84.0 87.1
84.9

102.3
103.4
99.8
107.4
103.8
131.8
76.8
112.5
87.3

101.7
102.9
100.9
105.1
101.7
128.1
76.3
116.1
87.8

104.2 9 4 .7
107.0 100.3
104.8 99.8
109.5 100.8
81.0
100.7
125.8 87.6
76.6 74.7
121.8 119.7
88.6
89.6

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

100.3
93.7
109.9
121.3
103.0
144.2

103.5
94.3
116.8
123.5
107.9
143.0

108.8
101.0
120.0
122.8
106.5
143.4

109.7
102.4
120.2
114.2
97.9
134.7

106.8
99.8
116.8
113.9
101.8
129.1

102.7 104.7 109.0
99.2 103.8
91A
110.9 112.6 116.4
118.1 121.0 121.1
107.5 104.7 105.4
131.5 141.5 140.8

Durable manufactures
Primary and fabricated metals.
Primary m etals.......................
Iron and steel, su b to ta l...
Fabricated metal pro d u cts. .

12.55 104.0 9 6 .2 90.2
16 A
6.61 100.9 88.5
4.23 96.6 9 0.4 62.1
5.94 107.5 104.8 105.5

Machinery and allied goods...............
M achinery........................................
Nonelectrical machinery...........
Electrical m achinery..................
Transportation equipm ent...........
M otor vehicles and p a rts.........
Aerospace and misc. trans. eq.
Instrum ents......................................
Ordnance, private and G ovt........

32.44 9 4.9
17.39 96.2
9.17 94.3
8.22 98.3
9.29 92.9
4.56 114.1
4.73 72.5
2.07 108.5
3.69 86.1

99.1 101.6
94.5
91.1
81.9 86.2
107.9 109.5

Lumber, clay, and glass...................
Lum ber and p ro d u cts.................
Clay, glass, and stone p roducts.

4 .44 111.5 111.5 116.7 117.6 118.6 113.5 107.1 105.9 112.3 115.9 118.5 120.4 124.3 118.2
1.65 113.9 113.2 118.5 120.4 122.6 116.2 109.3 111.1 119.5 121.5 122.1 121.8 126.5 120.0
2.79 110.0 110.5 115.6 115.9 116.3 111.9 105.8 102.8 108.1 112.5 116.3 119.6 123.0 117.1

Furniture and miscellaneous.. . .
Furniture and fixtures...........
Miscellaneous manufactures.

2 .9 0 111.7 106.2 114.6 118.1 117.3 117.5 115.2 111.3 118.4 118.8 119.1 118.1 123.1 114.3
91.1 103.5 106.4 104.8 108.6 106.9 106.2 113.7 112.7 111.6 108.7 112.1 100.9
1.38 102.1
1.52 120.5 120.0 124.8 128.8 128.7 125.6 122.7 116.0 122.8 124.4 125.9 126.6 133.2 126.6

Nondurable manufactures
90.8 104.4 105.0 107.5 101.3 92.6 100.4 105.4 106.7 109.9 103.9 110.7 95.0
97.0 114.5 113.6 113.8 111.0 101.9 106.6 110.3 114.0 115.9 115.8 118.9 103.7
89.9 100.4 102.4 106.7 98.1
87.7 98.4 105.3 105.0 109.5 98.7 108.9
75.4
91.5
88.1
83.9 83.0 88.9 90.6 90.4 93.3
87.3 92.7 78-5

Textiles, apparel, and leather.
Textile mill p ro d u cts...........
Apparel p roducts.................
Leather and products..........

6 .9 0 100.7
2.69 108.6
3.33 97.8
87.4

Paper and printing...............
Paper and p ro d u cts........
Printing and publishing.,

7.92 107.8 105.1 111.4 113.3 115.2 112.0 104.9 105.2 109.9 111.2 112.9 114.1 117.5 111.9
3.18 115.8 105.5 117.3 115.9 123.0 120.2 110.
120.7 125.9 125.3 128.1 128.5 130.2 118.3
4 .74 102.5 104.9 107.5 111.5 109.9 106.5 100.9 94.8 99.2 101.7 102.7 104.4 109.0 107.6

Chemicals, petroleum, and rubber. ,
Chemicals and pro d u cts.............
Petroleum p ro d u cts.....................
Rubber and plastics p ro d u cts..,
Foods and tobacco. . ,
F oods.......................
Tobacco products.

11.92
7.86
1.80
2.26

124.
126.4
115.7
126.0

122.3
125.2
118.9
114.9

126.8
128.7
120.9
124.7

130.9 130.1 129.1 125.9 126.0
133.3 131.0 131.3 127.7 126.6
118.9 117.8 115.2 116.5 114.4
131.9 136.7 132.3 126.9 133.0

131.1
132.0
115.0
140.8

132.5
134.1
113.5
142.2

135
138.0 141.3 134.6
138.9 140.7 144.0 138-1
112.1 118.4 121.5 123.0
144.1 144.0 147.5 131.5

9 .48 113.7 112.3 117.
122.9 121.2 116.
110.4 110.8 111.4 112.9 114.2 114.1 120.1 115.6
8.81 114.9 114.3 118.7 124.1 122.4 118.2 112.8 111.3 111.
113.7 115.3 115.3 121.4 117.8
86.2 105.7 106.5 106.1
.67 97.7
99.0 78.7 103.6 105.5 102.1
99.4 98.1 103.0

Mining
Metal, stone, and earth minerals..
M etal m ining..............................
Stone and earth m inerals.........

1.26 104.6 97.2 104.1 104.1 105.8 103.9 100.5 93.1
.51 121.4 106.6 116.9 118.7 117.9 114.8 111
105.8
.75 93.2 90.9 95 .4 94.2 97.6 96.6 93.1
84.4

Coal, oil, and g a s.............
C o a l................................
Oil and gas extraction.

5.11 107.6 104.5 108.8 107.1
83.7 117.9 113.9
.69 99.8
4.42 108.9 107.8 107.4 106.1

95.4 98.0 105.3 110.8 110.6 104.6
113.8 114.4 123.5 131.5 131.3 121.4
82.8 86.8 92.8 96.7 96.6 93.1

95.9 101.3 109.2 107.6 107.9 108.5 109.7 109.7 109.2 106.2
31.5 56.9 111.7 105.1
99.9 102.7 114.9 107.1 104.8
87.6
106.0 108.2 108.8 108.0 109.2 109.4 108.9 110.1 109.9 109.1

U tilities
Electric.
G as.

3.91
1.17

138.1 151.3
119.8

150.0 150.8 139.9 132.8 136.2 146.6 145.8 143.5

N o t e . —Published groupings include series and subtotals not shown
separately. A description and historical data will be available at a later




138.5

136.4 144.9

156.2

date. Figures for individual series and subtotals are published in the
monthly Business Indexes release.

A 64

BUSINESS ACTIVITY; CONSTRUCTION □ SEPTEMBER 1972
SELECTED BUSINESS INDEXES
(1967= 100, except as noted)
Industrial production
M arket

Period

Products

Total

Fin al prodiicts
Total

Inter­ M ate­
mediate rials
C on­
Equip­
p rod­
sumer
Total
ucts
goods ment

1952.......................
1953.......................
1954.......................

51.9

51.8

50.8

1955.......................
1956.......................
1957.......................
1958.......................
1959.......................

58.5
61.1
61.9
57.9
64.8

56.6
59.7
61.1
58.6
64.4

I960.......................
1961.......................
1962.......................
1963.......................
1964.......................

66.2
66.7
72.2
76.5
81.7

66.2
66.9
72.1
76.2
81.2

M anu­
facturing 2
Ca­
N onag­
pacity
C on­ ricul­
utiliza- stru
c
­
tural
tion
tion
em­
in mfg.
con­
ploy­
Em­
(1967 tracts ment— ploy­
Pay­
M anu­ output
rolls
factur­ = 100)
Total i m ent
ing

Prices 4

In­
dustry

T otal
retail
sales3

C on­
sumer

W hole­
sale
com ­
m odity

53.3

47.9

55.1

52.0

51.5

92.8
95.5
84.1

74.1
76.3
74.4

93.4
98.2
89.6

54.5
60.3
55.1

52
54
54

79.5
80.1
80.5

88.6
87.4
87.6

54.9
58.2
59.9
57.1
62.7

59.5
61.7
63.2
62.6
68.7

48.9
53.7
55.9
50.0
54.9

62.6
65.3
65.3
63.9
70.5

61.5
63.1
63.1
56.8
65.5

58.2
60.5
61.2
56.9
64.1

90.0
88.2
84.5
75.1
81.4

76.9
79.6
80.3
78.0
81.0

92.9
93.9
92.2
83.9
88.1

61.1
64.6
65.4
60.3
67.8

59
61
64
64
69

80.2
81.4
84.3
86.6
87.3

87.8
90.7
93.3
94 .6
94.8

64.8
65.3
70.8
74.9
79.6

71.3
72.8
77.7
82.0
86.8

56.4
55.6
61.9
65.6
70.1

71.0
72.4
76.9
81.1
87.3

66.4
66.4
72.4
77.0
82.6

65.4
65.6
71.4
75.8
81.2

80.1
77.6
81.4
83.0
85.5

82.4
'82.1
84.4
86.1
88.6

88.0
84.5
87.3
87.8
89.3

68.8
68.0
73.3
76.0
80.1

70
70
75
79
83

88.7
89.6
90.6
91.7
92.9

94.9
94.5
94.8
94.5
94.7

1965.......................
1966.......................
1967.......................
1968.......................
1969.......................
1970.......................
1971.......................

89.2 88.1
86.8 93.0 78.7 9 3.0
97.9
96.8
96.1
98.6 9 3.0 99.2
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
105.7 105.8 105.8 106.6 104.7 105.7
110.7 109.7 109.0 111.1 106.1 112.0
106.7 106.0 104.5 110.3 96.3 111.7
106.8 106.4 104.7 115.7 89.4 112.6

91.0
99.8
100.0
105.7
112.4
107.7
107.4

89.1
98.3
100.0
105.7
110.5
105.2
105.2

89.0
91.9
87.9
87.7
86.5
r7 8 .3
r75.0

93.2
94.8
100.0
113.2
123.7
132.0

92.3
97.1
100.0
103.1
106.7
107.3
107.4

93.9
99.9
100.0
101.4
103.2
98.1
94.3

88.1
97.8
100.0
108.3
116.6
114.2
116.9

91
97
100
109
114
120
122

94.5
97.2
100.0
104.2
109.8
116.3
121.2

96.6
99.8
100.0
102.5
106.5
110.4
113.9

1971—Ju ly ...........
A ug...........
Sept...........
O ct............
N ov...........
D ec............

106.8
105.6
107.1
106.8
107.4
108.1

107.0
106.1
107.0
107.0
107.9
108.0

105.0
104.8
105.5
105.4
106.1
106.2

116.3
115.9
116.7
116.6
118.0
118.0

89.3
89.5
89.8
89.8
89.6
89.6

114.6
110.9
112.3
113.2
114.3
114.9

106.4
104.8
107.3
106.6
106.5
108.4

105.8
104.2
'7 4 .7
105.7 I
106.1 j
106.0
'7 4 .6
106.2 J

151.0
153.0
156.0
137.0
155.0
160.0

107.1
107.1
107.6
107.6
107.9
108.1

93.9
93.5
94.5
94.1
94.4
94.2

116.8
116.5
117.0
117.8
118.4
121.1

129
133
135
134
136
133

121.8
122.1
122.2
122.4
122.6
123.1

114.6
114.9
114.5
114.4
114.5
115.4

1972—Jan .............
Feb............
M ar...........
A pr............
M ay..........
Ju n e..........
Ju ly ...........
A ugp
.

108.7
110.0
111.2
112.8
113.2
113.4
113.7
114.3

108.4
109.5
110.1
111.4
112.1
112.1
112.0
112.3

106.4
107.6
108.2
109.8
110.2
110.3
110.1
110.7

118.5
119.6
119.6
122.0
122.2
122.2
121.8
122.3

89.5
90.9
92.4
92.7
93.4
93.3
93.7
94.6

115.9
117.0
117.3
117.3
119.3
119.3
119.2
118.7

109.2
110.8
113.1
115.0
115.6
115.9
116.5
117.5

107.1
108.5
'7 5 .3
109.7 j
111.8 j
112.3 \ '7 7 .4
112.8 J
113.0
113.6

165.0
155.0
159.0
167.0
165.0
154.0
155.0

108.7
108.9
109.4
109.7
110.2
110.3
110.2
110.7

94.5
95.0
95.6
96.2
96.8
'97.1
'9 6 .6
97.1

122.2
124.9
125.8
128.7
129.4
130.7
'128.7
131.3

133
135
139
139
142
141
143

123.2
123.8
124.0
124.3
124.7
125.0
125.5

116.3
117.3
117.4
117.5
118.2
118.8
119.7
119.9

86.1
89.4

Construction contracts: F. W. D odge Co. monthly index o f dollar
value o f total construction contracts, including residential, nonresidential,
and heavy engineering; does not include data for Alaska and Hawaii.
Employment and payrolls: Based on Bureau o f Labor Statistics d ata;
includes data for Alaska and Hawaii beginning with 1959.
Prices: Bureau o f Labor Statistics data.

1 Employees only: excludes personnel in the Armed Forces.
2 Production workers only.
3 F.R . index based on Census Bureau figures.
4 Prices are not seasonally adjusted. Latest figure is final.
N o t e . —All series: D ata are seasonally adjusted unless otherwise noted.
Capacity utilization: Based on data from Federal Reserve, M cG raw Hill Economics D epartm ent, and D epartm ent o f Commerce.

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AND PRIVATE HOUSING PERMITS
(In millions of dollars, except as noted)
1972

1971
Type o f ownership and
type o f construction

1970

1971
July

Total construction 1............................

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

M ar.

Apr.

May

June

67,097 78,878 7,670 7,712 6,814 6,568 6,405 6,286 6,234 5,607 7,284 8,100 9,907 8,478 8,067

By type o f ow nership:
Public............................................
Private 1.......................................

23,362 24,183 2,683 2,299 2,010 1,837 1,960 1,696 2,137
45,058 56,408 4,987 5,413 4,804 4,731 4,445 4,590 4,097

By type o f construction:
Residential building 1...............
Nonresidential building............
N onbuilding..................... ..........

24,910 35,226 3,357 3,255 3,196 3,170 3,001 2,997 2,667 2,664 3,617 3,971 4,428 4,375
24,180 26,577 2,621 2,120 2,246 2,064 2,128 1.959 1,728 1,799 2,187 2,182 2,908 2,447
18,489 20,509 1,691 2,337 1,371 1,332 1,274 1.959 1,840 1,144 1,480 1,947 1,762 1,655

Private housing units a u th o riz e d '..
(In thousands, S.A., A.R.)

July

1,324

1,885 2,034 1,997

1,944 1,983 2,051

1,634 1,686 1,741 2,574 2,517 2,528
3,973 5,598 6,359 6,524 5,960 5,538

2,142 2,204 2,056 2,007

1,991

1,995 '2,121

2,082

N o t e . —D ollar value o f construction contracts as reported by the F. W.
i
Because o f improved collection procedures, data for 1-family homes
D odge Co. does not include data for A laska or Hawaii. Totals o f monthly
beginning Jan. 1968 are not strictly comparable with those for earlier
data exceed annual totals because adjustments—negative—are made into
periods. To improve comparability, earlier levels may be raised by ap­
accumulated monthly data after original figures have been published.
proximately 3 per cent for total and private construction, in each case,
and by 8 per cent for residential building.
Private housing units authorized are Census Bureau series for 13,000
reporting areas with local building permit systems.




SEPTEMBER 1972 a CONSTRUCTION

A 65

VALUE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY

(In millions of dollars)
Private

Public

Nonresidential
Period

Total
Total

Buildings

Resi­
dential
Total
Indus­
trial

Com­
mercial

O ther
build­
ings 1

Other

Total

Mili­
tary

High­
way

Conser­
vation
&
O ther 2
develop­
ment

1962 3 ___
1963 4 ___
1964
1965
1966

59,965
64,563
67,413
73,412
76,002

42,096
45,206
47,030
51,350
51,995

25,150
27,874
28,010
27,934
25,715

16,946
17,332
19,020
23,416
26,280

2,842
2,906
3,565
5,118
6,679

5,144
4,995
5,396
6,739
6,879

3,631
3,745
3,994
4,735
5,037

5,329
5,686
6,065
6,824
7,685

17,869
19,357
20,383
22,062
24,007

1,266
1,179
910
830
727

6,365
7,084
7,133
7,550
8,405

1967 . . . . . .
1968
1969
1970
197 1

77,503
86,626
93,347
94,265
108.968

51,967
59,021
65,384
66,147
79,080

25,568
30,565
33,200
31,748
42.379

26.399
28,456
32,184
34.399
36,701

6,131
6,021
6,783
6,538
5,423

6,982
7,761
9,401
9,754
11,619

4.993
4,382
4,971
5,125
5,437

8,293
10,292
11,029
12,982
14,222

25,536
27,605
27,963
28,118

695
808
879
719

8,591
9,321
9,252
9,986

1971—July.
Aug.
Sept.
O ct..
Nov.
Dec.,

109,801
111,778
110,319
114,748
115,186
117,017

80,328
81,939
81,730
82,905
84,764
85,989

42,533
43,795
45,027
46,135
46,841
47,741

37,795
38,144
36,703
36,770
37,923
38,248

5,428
4,852
4,597
4,993
4,885
4,914

12,690
13,069
11,702
11,510
12,188
12,391

5,499
5,482
5,591
5,372
5,670
5,770

14,178
14,741
14,813
14,895
15,180
15,173

29,473
29,839
28,573
31,843
30,422
31,028

1,142
900
786
881
938
918

150
609
570
540
697
454

1972—Jan..
Feb..
M ar.
Apr.,
M ay
June
July.

120,763
121,728
122.968
120,634
122,443
121,365
121,376

88,580
90,812
92,586
91,686
92,622
92.821
921351

49,587
51,907
53,109
52,766
52,471
52,989
53.380

38,993
31,905
39,477
38,920
40,151
39,832
38,971

4,936
4,674
4,796
4,649
4,723
4,944
4,567

13,272
13,247
13,243
13,411
14,132
13,477
13,123

5,734
5,583
5.993
5.765
5.766
5,907
5,793

15,051
15,401
15,445
15,095
15,530
15,323
15,452

32,183
30,916
30,382
28,948
29,821
28,544
29,025

985
1,002
1,186
965
980
1,088
1,353

943
804
919
644
970
206
468

1 Includes religious, educational, hospital, institutional, and other build­
ings.
2 Sewer and water, formerly shown separately, now included in “ Other.”
3 Beginning July 1962, reflects inclusion o f new series affecting most
private nonresidential groups.

4 Beginning 1963, reflects inclusion o f new series under “ Public” (for
State and local govt, activity only).
N o t e . — Census Bureau data, m onthly series at seasonally adjusted
annual rates.

NEW HOUSING UNITS
(In thousands)
Units started
Private (S.A., A .R .)
Region

M obile
home
ship­
ments
(N.S.A.)

Governm ent
underwritten
(N .S.A .)

Private and public
(N.S.A.)

Period
Type o f structure

Total
N orth­ N orth South
Central
east

West

5- or
12- to 4- morefamily family family

Total

Private

Public

Total

FH A

VA

1963............................
1964............................

1,610
1,529

261
253

328
339

591
582

431
355

1,021
972

108

450

1,642
1,562

1,610
1,529

32
32

292
264

221
205

71
59

151
191

1965............................
1966............................
1967............................
1968............................
1969............................
1970............................
1971............................

1,473
1,165
1,292
1,508
1,467
1,434
2,051

270
207
215
227
206
218
263

362
288
337
369
349
294
434

575
473
520
619
588
612
869

266
198
220
294
323
310
485

964
779
844
900
810
813
1,151

87
61
72
81
87
85
120

422
325
376
527
571
536
780

1,510
1,196
1,322
1,548
1,500
1,467
c2,087

1,473
1,165
1,292
1,508
1,467
1,434
c2,055

37
31
30
40
33
33
c32

246
195
232
283
288
479
c627

197
158
180
227
237
418
c533

49
37
53
56
51
61
c94

216
217
240
318
413
401
c497

1971—J u ly '...............
A ug.r .............
Sept.r .............
O ct.r..............
N o v .r .............
D ec.r .............

2,034
1,997
1,944
1,983
2,051
2,142

312
309
305
289
304
305

424
422
416
414
443
472

788
757
761
776
796
842

510
509
462
504
508
523

965
910
891
908
952
966

140
142
141
136
133
127

929
945
912
939
966
1,049

197
206
176
182
179
155

194
205
174
180
176
152

3
2
2
2
3
3

52
55
58
47
57
92

43
46
50
39
48
85

9
9
9
8
9
7

45
50
53
50
40
34

1972—J a n . '............... 2,204
F e b . '............. 2,056
M ar.r ............. 2,007
A p r.r ............. 1,991
M ay r ............. 1,955
Ju n e r ............. 2,121
July................. 2,0S2

376
303
257
282
265
271
280

405
377
364
430
422
419
413

841
767
842
820
752
870
874

582
609
544
459
516
561
515

1,098
959
954
963
923
989
997

143
122
134
152
149
146
141

963
975
919
876
883
986
944

151
154
206
213
226
223
204

149
152
204
212
224
220
203

2
1
2
2
2
3
1

45
36
49
38
43
43
38

37
28
38
29
34
33
29

8
8
11
9
9
10
9

33
40
49
53
52
55

N o t e . —Starts are Census Bureau series (including farm starts) except
for Govt.-underwritten, which are from Federal Housing Admin, and
Veterans Admin, and represent units started, including rehabilitation




5;89

units under FHA, based on field office reports of first compliance inspec­
tions. D ata may not add to totals because o f rounding.
Mobile home shipments are as reported by M obile Homes M anufac­
turers Assn.

A 66

EMPLOYMENT □ SEPTEMBER 1972
LABOR FORCE, EMPLOYMENT, AND UNEMPLOYMENT

(In thousands of persons, except as noted)
Civilian labor force (S.A.)
Total noninstitutional
population
(N.S.A.)

Period

N ot in
labor force
(N.S.A.)

Total
labor
force
(S.A.)

U nem­
ployed

Unemploy­
ment
ra te 2
(per cent;
S.A.)

Em ployed1
Total
Total

In nonagri­
cultural
industries

In
agriculture

196 6
..... 131,180
1967 3............................... 133,319
196 8
..... 135,562
196 9
..... 137,841
197 0
..... 140,182
197 1
.....142,596

52,288
52,527
53,291
53,602
54,280
55,666

78,893
80,793
82,272
84.240
85,903
86,929

75,770
77-, 347
78,737
80,734
82,715
84,113

72,895
74,372
75,920
77,902
78,627
79,120

68,915
70,527
72,103
74,296
75,165
75,732

3,979
3,844
3,817
3,606
3,462
3,387

2,875
2,975
2,817
2,832
4,088
4,993

3.8
3 .8
3.6
3.5
4 .9
5 .9

1971 _ A u g ...................... 142,886
Sept...................... 143,104
O ct....................... 143,321
N ov...................... 143,517
D ec.................. .... 143,723

54,433
56,220
55,968
55,802
56,181

87,088
87.240
87,467
87,812
87,883

84.313
84,491
84,750
85,116
85,225

79,199
79,451
79,832
80,020
80,098

75,792
76,088
76,416
76,601
76,698

3,407
3,363
3,416
3,419
3,400

5,114
5,040
4,918
5,096
5,127

6.1
6 .0
5.8
6 .0
6 .0

1972—Jan................... ..... 144,697
Feb........................ 144,895
M ar................. ..... 145,077
A pr.................. .....145,227
M ay......................145,427
June......................145,639
Ju ly ................. .....145,854
Aug.......................146,069

57,550
57,577
57,163
57.440
57.441
55,191
54,850
55,311

88,301
88,075
88,817
88,747
88,905
88,788
88,855
89,256

85,707
85,535
86.313
86,284
86,486
86,395
86,467
86,860

80,636
80,623
81,241
81,205
81,394
81,667
81,682
81,973

77,243
77,266
77,759
77,881
78,041
78,330
78,237
78,348

3,393
3,357
3,482
3,324
3,353
3,337
3,445
3,625

5.071
4,912
5.072
5,079
5,092
4,728
4,785
4,887

5.9
5.7
5.9
5.9
5 .9
5.5
5 .5
5.6

1 Includes self-employed, unpaid family, and domestic service workers.
2 Per cent o f civilian labor force.
3 Beginning 1967, data not strictly comparable with previous data.
Description o f changes available from Bureau o f L abor Statistics.

N o t e . — Bureau o f Labor Statistics. Inform ation relating to persons 16
years o f age and over is obtained on a sample basis. M onthly data relate
to the calendar week that contains the 12th day; annual data are averages
o f monthly figures.

EMPLOYMENT IN NONAGRICULTURAL ESTABLISHMENTS, BY INDUSTRY DIVISION
(In thousands o f persons)
Contract
construc­
tion

Period

Total

M anufac­
turing

1966...............................................................
1967...............................................................

63,955
65,857
67,915
70,284
70,616
70,699

19,214
19,447
19,781
20,167
19,369
18,610

627
613
606
619
622
601

3,275
3,208
3,285
3,435
3,345
3,259

1971—Aug...................................................
Sept...................................................
Oct....................................................
Nov...................................................
Dec....................................................

70,529
70,853
70,848
71,042
71,185

18,457
18,616
18,560
18,603
18,566

609
616
521
525
607

1972—Jan .....................................................
Feb....................................................
M ar...................................................
A pr....................................................
M ay..................................................

71,584
71,729
72,030
72,263
72,558
72,630
72,592
72,871

18,609
18,690
18,777
18,870
18,973
18,999
18,915
18,999

70,542
71,184
71,379
71,638
72,034
70,643
70,776
71,374
71,928
72,533
73,345
72,407
72,831

1969...............................................................

Transporta­
tion & pub­
lic utilities

Trade

Finance

Service

G overn­
ment

4,151
4,261
4,310
4,429
4,504
4,481

13,245
13,606
14,084
14,639
14,922
15,174

3,100
3,225
3,382
3,564
3,690
3,800

9,551
10,099
10,623
11,229
11,630
11,917

10,792
11,398
11,845
12,202
12,535
12,858

3,219
3,250
3,290
3,320
3,245

4,428
4,460
4,442
4,434
4,465

15,223
15,273
15,270
15,278
15,315

3,804
3,821
3,834
3,851
3,860

11,946
11,962
11,996
12,044
12,089

12,843
12,855
12,935
12,987
13,038

616
612
613
603
602
598
597
595

3,320
3,236
3,272
3,233
3,256
3,247
3,177
3,227

4,502
4,479
4,536
4,522
4,539
4,539
4,520
4,524

15,447
15,495
15,518
15,647
15,671
15,712
15,716
15,775

3,872
3,879
3,890
3,897
3,921
3,938
3,930
3,940

12,120
12,177
12,217
12,254
12,303
12,379
12,404
12,442

13,098
13,161
13,207
13,237
13,293
13,218
13,333
13,369

18,651
18,840
18,709
18,693
18,595

625
623
522
524
605

3,509
3,471
3,478
3,410
3,177

4,486
4,509
4,455
4,447
4,469

15,151
15,242
15,327
15,537
16,089

3,865
3,829
3,826
3,836
3,841

11,994
11,986
12,020
12,032
12,029

12,261
12,684
13,042
13,159
13,229

18,440
18,537
18,653
18,713
18,824
19,142
18,749
19,174

602
596
599
597
602
612
613
610

2,965
2,880
2,974
3,117
3,246
3,406
3,425
3,517

4,430
4,407
4,482
4,486
4,521
4,589
4,579
4,583

15,266
15,147
15,274
15,460
15,592
15,771
15,690
15,701

3,833
3,844
3,867
3,885
3,913
3,969
3,993
4,003

11,926
12,031
12,131
12,279
12,401
12,540
12,528
12,492

13,181
13,334
13,394
13,391
13,434
13,316
12,830
12,751

M ining

SEASONALLY adjusted

July*................................................
not seasonally adjusted

1971—Aug...................................................
O ct....................................................

1972—Jan .....................................................
Feb....................................................

N ote.—Bureau of Labor Statistics; data include all full- and parttime employees who worked during, or received pay for, the pay pe­
riod that includes the 12th of the month. Proprietors, self-employed




persons, domestic servants, unpaid family workers, and members of
the Armed Forces are excluded.
Beginning with 1969, series has been adjusted to Mar. 1970 bench­
mark.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS

A 67

PRODUCTION WORKER EMPLOYMENT IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES
(In thousands o f persons)
Seasonally adjusted1
Industry group

1971

N ot seasonally adjusted1

1972

1971

1972

Aug.

June

July*

Aug.*

Aug.

June

July*

Aug.*

13,371

13,886

13,818

13,892

13,524

14,006

13,616

14,024

7,534
94
503
375
497
901

7,899
95
524
406
523
971

7,886
96
528
410
522
966

7,929
99
531
411
522
976

7,514
93
521
378
513
905

7,988
94
544
406
536
994

7,727
96
544
401
534
977

7,888
98
550
414
538
980

1,016
1,159
1,167
1,248
256
318

1,054
1,215
1,247
1,257
273
334

1,052
1,214
1,238
1,257
273
330

1,055
1,232
1,233
1,265
278
327

1,013
1,147
1,176
1,189
257
329

1,065
1,227
1,243
1,269
273
336

1,034
1,210
1,220
1,120
271
322

1,052
1,218
1,237
1,184
279
338

Apparel and related p ro d u cts...................................
Paper and allied products..........................................

5,837
1,179
56
841
1,180
520

5,987
1,193
61
874
1,187
541

5,932
1,183
60
871
1,168
540

5,963
1,169
57
879
1,187
545

6,010
1,302
64
846
1,195
527

6,018
1,185
53
886
1,201
549

5,889
1,208
53
861
1,125
541

6,136
1,292
65
885
1,195
552

Printing, publishing, and allied industries.............
Chemicals and allied products..................................
Petroleum refining and related industries...............
Rubber and misc. plastic products............................
Leather and leather products....................................

658
577
115
447
264

667
584
116
492
272

662
579
115
488
266

666
582
115
493
276

656
582
120
450
268

667
588
120
493
276

659
581
120
481
263

664
587
120
496
280

Durable goods........................................................................
Ordnance and accessories..........................................
Lum ber and wood products......................................
Stone, clay, and glass p ro d u cts................................
Fabricated metal pro d u cts........................................
Electrical equipment and supplies...........................
T ransportation equipm ent........................................
Instrum ents and related p ro d u c ts...........................

Food and kindred p ro d u cts......................................
Tobacco m anufactures...............................................

1 D ata adjusted to 1970 benchmark.

N o t e . —Bureau o f Labor Statistics; data cover production and related
workers only (full- and part-time) who worked during, or received pay for,
the pay period that includes the 12th o f the month.

HOURS AND EARNINGS OF PRODUCTION WORKERS IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES
Average weekly earnings1
(dollars per week; N.S.A.)

Average hours w orked1
(per week; S.A.)
Industry group

1972

1971
Aug.

June

July*

1972

1971
Aug.*

Aug.

June

Average hourly earnings1
(dollars per h o u r; N.S.A.)
1972

1971

July*

Aug.*

Aug.

June

July*

Aug.*

T o tal.........................................*...............................

39.8

40.6

40.6

40.7 141.69 154.63 153.12

154.25

3.56

3.79

3.79

3.79

Durable goods...........................................................
O rdnance and accessories.............................
Lum ber and wood p ro d u c ts........................
Furniture and fixtures...............................
Stone, clay, and glass products...................
Primary metal industries..............................

40.0
41.9
40.2
39.9
41.8
38.8

41.4
42 .0
41.3
40.9
42.0
41.5

41.2
42.5
41.1
40.4
41.9
4 1.2

41.2 151.60 168.06
42.9 161.80 172.60
41.5 129.20 138.78
40.5 118.78 125.36
42.1 157.78 165.39
41.9 166.45 193.53

164.42 166.86
171.79 173.79
136.12 139.61
121.60 126.28
165.45 168.27
192.05 197.35

3.79
3.88
3.19
2.94
3.73
4.29

4.04
4.09
3.32
3.05
3.91
4.63

4.02
4.10
3.32
3.04
3.93
4.65

4.05
4.07
3.34
3.08
3.95
4.71

Fabricated metal products............................
M achinery........................................................
Electrical equipment and supplies..............
Transportation equipm ent............................
Instruments and related products...............
Miscellaneous m anufacturing industries...

40.2
40.8
4 0.0
39.9
39.8
39.2

41.2
42.1
40.5
42.0
40.6
39.5

4 1.2
4 2.0
40.3
41.5
40.5
39.2

41.2 151.13
42.3 162.01
40.6 140.00
41.2 171.74
40.9 140.58
39.0 115.64

162.38 164.37
175.96 178.07
146.07 150.22
192.92 192.04
149.54 151.81
119.27 121.29

3.75
4.02
3.50
4.37
3.55
2.95

3.98
4.26
3.67
4.73
3.72
3.09

3.98
4.24
3.67
4.66
3.72
3.09

3.98
4.26
3.70
4.73
3.73
3.11

Nondurable goods...................................................
Food and kindred products.........................
Tobacco m anufactures..................................
Textile-mill products......................................
Apparel and related p ro d u cts.....................
Paper and allied p ro d u cts............................

39.3
40.1
37.1
40.7
35.7
42.4

39.8
40.6
34.3
41.5
35.9
43.0

39.7
40.5
34.6
41.1
35.9
42.9

39.7 129.17 137.66 138.50
40.1 135.94 145.71 146.42
35.6 119.31 122.50 122.11
41.2 104.86 113.42 110.84
35.9 90.00 93.60 92.62
43.0 158.53 168.99 170.74

138.05
143.26
119.57
112.75
94.48
171.54

3.27
3.34
3.19
2.57
2.50
3.73

3.45
3.58
3.52
2.72
2.60
3.93

3.48
3.58
3.56
2.71
2.58
3.98

3.46
3.52
3.34
2.73
2.61
3.98

Printing, publishing, and allied industries.
Chemicals and allied products.....................
Petroleum refining and related industries .
R ubber and misc. plastic products.............
Leather and leather products.......................

37.5
41.5
43.4
40.1
37.6

37.9
42.0
42.1
41.5
38.6

38.0
41.9
41.8
41.0
38.4

38.1
41.8
42.5
41.2
39.2

170.62 171.97
176.40 175.14
209.73 208.08
148.10 150.28
104.25 106.23

4.23
3.99
4.59
3.45
2.59

4.46
4.20
4.95
3.58
2.70

4.49
4.22
4.97
3.63
2.68

4.49
4.21
4.99
3.63
2.71

1Data adjusted to 1970 benchmark.




159.47
164.79
195.53
139.04
97.38

165.17
179.35
149.37
199.13
151.40
122.36

169.03
176.40
209.88
148.57
105.84

N o t e . —Bureau of Labor Statistics; data are for production and related
workers only.

A 68

PRICES □ SEPTEMBER 1972
CONSUMER PRICES
(1967 = 100)
Housing
All
items

Period

Food
Total

Rent

H om e­
owner­
ship

H ealth and recreation

Fuel
oil
and
coal

Gas
and
elec­
tricity

40.5
48.0

81.4
79.6

1929............................
1933............................
1941............................
1945............................

51.3
38.8
44.1
53.9

48 .3
30.6
38.4
50.7

53.7
59.1

7 6 .0
54.1
57 .2
58.8

1960............................
1961............................
1962............................
1963............................
1964............................

88.7
89.6
90.6
91.7
92.9

8 8.0
89.1
89.9
9 1.2
9 2 .4

90.2
90.9
91.7
92.7
93 .8

91.7
92.9
9 4 .0
9 5 .0
9 5.9

86.3
86.9
87.9
89 .0
9 0.8

89.2
91.0
91.5
93.2
92.7

98.6
99.4
99.4
99.4
99.4

1965............................
1966............................
1967............................
1968............................
1969............................
1970............................
1971............................

94.5
97.2
100.0
104.2
109.8
116.3
121.3

94 .4
99.1
100.0
103.6
108.9
114.9
118.4

94.9
97.2
100.0
104.2
110.8
118.9
124.3

96.9
98.2
100.0
102.4
105.7
110.1
115.2

92.7
96.3
100.0
105.7
116.0
128.5
133.7

94.6
97.0
100.0
103.1
105.6
110.1
117.5

1971—July................. 121.8
Aug................. fl 22.1
Sept................ tl2 2 .2
O ct.................. fl2 2 .4
N ov................ 122.6
D ec................. 123.1

119.8
120.0
119.1
118.9
119.0
120.3

124.5
125.1
125.5
125.9
126.4
126.8

115.4
115.8
116.1
116.4
116.6
116.9

133.5
134.4
135.1
135.7
136.7
137.0

123.2
123.8
124.0
124.3
124.7
125.0
125.5

120.3
122.2
122.4
122.4
122.3
123.0
124.2

127.3
127.6
127.9
128.2
128.5
129.0
129.5

117.1
117.5
117.7
118.1
118.3
118.8
119.0

137.8
138.0
138.2
138.5
138.9
139.6
140.7

1972—Jan..................
F eb.................
M ar................
A pr.................
M a y ...............
J u n e ...............
July.................

F u r­ Apparel Trans­
nish­
and
porta­
ings upkeep tion
and
opera­
tion

Total

M ed­
ical
care

Per­
sonal
care

R ead­
ing
and
recrea­
tion

O ther
goods
and
serv­
ices

37.0
42.1

41.2
55.1

47.7
6 2 .4

4 9 .2
56 .9

48.5
36.9
44.8
61.5

44.2
47.8

93.8
93.7
93.8
94.6
95 .0

89.6
90 .4
90.9
91.9
92.7

89.6
90.6
92.5
93.0
94.3

85.1
86.7
88.4
9 0 .0
91.8

79.1
81.4
83.5
85.6
87.3

90.1
90.6
92.2
93 .4
94.5

87.3
89.3
91.3
9 2.8
9 5 .0

87.8
88.5
89.1
90 .6
9 2 .0

99 .4
99.6
100.0
100.9
102.8
107.3
114.7

95.3
97 .0
100.0
104.4
109.0
113.4
118.1

93.7
96.1
100.0
105.4
111.5
116.1
119.8

9 5.9
97.2
100.0
103.2
107.2
112.7
118.6

9 3 .4
96.1
100.0
105.0
110.3
116.2
122.2

89.5
9 3.4
100.0
106.1
113.4
120.6
128.4

9 5 .2
97.1
100.0
104.2
109.3
113.2
116.8

95.9
97.5
100.0
104.7
108.7
113.4
119.3

94 .2
9 7 .2
100.0
104.6
109.1
116.0
120.9

117.5
117.8
117.8
117.8
118.1
118.1

114.7
115.7
115.7
115.7
116.2
118.2

118.9
119.1
119.4
119.5
119.5
119.6

119.3 119.5
119.0 1119.3
120.6 t 118.6
121.6 fl 19.3
121.9 118.8
121.8 118.6

122.6
123.1
123.6
123.5
123.7
123.9

129.3
130.0
130.4
129.6
129.7
130.1

117.1
117.5
117.6
117.9
117.9
117.9

119.6
119.7
120.5
120.5
120.8
121.1

121.2
121.8
122.4
122.6
122.8
123.0

118.7
118.7
118.7
118.6
118.7
117.8
117.7

119.0
119.4
119.7
120.2
120.5
120.3
120.3

119.5
119.6
120.1
120.5
120.8
121.0
121.1

120.2 119.0
120.7 118.3
121.3 118.4
121.8 118.6
122.5 119.5
122.1 '119.8
121.1 120.3

124.3
124.7
125.0
125.5
125.8
126.1
126.3

130.5
131.0
131.4
131.7
132.0
132.4
132.7

118.1
118.4
118.7
119.1
119.7
120.0
120.0

121.4
121.5
121.7
122.3
122.5
122.9
123.0

123.5
124.3
124.6
125.1
125.4
125.6
125.8

t Reflects effect o f refund o f Federal excise tax on new cars.
N o t e . — Bureau o f Labor Statistics index for city wage-eamers and clerical workers.

WHOLESALE PRICES: SUMMARY
(1967 = 100)
Industrial commodities

Period

Pro­
All
cessed
com ­ Farm
rod­ foods
m odi­ pucts
and
ties
feeds Total

Tex­
tiles,
etc.

R ub­
Hides, Fuel, Chem­
icals,
ber,
etc.
etc.
etc.
etc.

M a­
Lum ­ Paper, M et­ chin­
urni­
ery Fture,
ber,
als,
etc.
and
etc.
etc. equip­
etc.
ment

N on­ Trans­
m e­ porta­ M is­
tallic tion cella­
min­ equip­ neous
erals m e n t1

95.3
9 1.0
91.6
93.5
95 .4

1960................................
1961................................
1962................................
1963................................
1964................................

94.9
94.5
94.8
94.5
94.7

97.2
96.3
98.0
96.0
94.6

89.5
9 1 .0
91.9
92.5
92.3

95.3
94.8
94.8
94.7
95.2

99.5
97.7
98.6
98.5
99.2

90.8
91.7
92.7
9 0 .0
90.3

1965................................
1966................................
1967................................
1968................................
1969................................
1970................................
1971................................

96.6
99.8
100.0
102.5
106.5
110.4
113.9

98.7
105.9
100.0
102.5
109.1
111.0
112.9

95.5
101.2
100.0
102.2
107.3
112.0
114.3

9 6.4
98.5
100.0
102.5
106.0
110.0
114.0

99.8
100.1
100.0
103.7
106.0
107.2
108.6

94.3
103.4
100.0
103.2
108.9
110.1
114.0

1971— Aug.....................
Sept....................
O ct.....................
N ov....................
D ec.....................

114.9
114.5
114.4
114.5
115.4

113.2
110.5
111.3
112.2
115.8

115.4
114.6
114.1
114.4
115.9

115.1
115.0
115.0
114.9
115.3

109.7 114.4 114.8 104.3
109.7 114.7 115.3 104.3
109.6 114.7 114.8 104.2
109.8 115.1 114.7 103.8
110.6 116.2 115.0 103.4

1972—Ja n ......................
Feb.....................
M ar....................
A pr.....................
M ay ...................
Ju n e ...................
July.....................
Aug.....................

116.3 117.8
117.3 120.7
117.4 119.7
117.5 119.1
118.2 122.2
118.8 124.0
119.7 128.0
119.9 128.2

117.2
118.8
118.6
117.7
118.6
119.6
121.5
121.0

115.9
116.5
116.9
117.3
117.6
117.9
118.1
118.5

111.3
112.0
112.1
112.6
113.3
113.6
114.0
114.1

1For transportationequipment, Dec. 1968=100.




117.8
119.1
123.0
127.2
129.5
130.9
131.6
134.6

96.1 101.8
97.2 100.7
96.7 99.1
96.3 97.9
93.7 98.3

92 .4
91.9
9 1.2
91.3
93.8

92.0
91.9
92.0
92.2
92.8

99.0
98.4
97.7
9 7 .0
97.4

97.2
97 .6
97.6
97.1
97.3

93 .0
93.3
93.7
94.5
95 .2

95.5 99.0 95.9 95.9 96.2 96 .4
9 7.8 9 9 .4 97.8 100.2 98.8 98.8
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
98.9 99.8 103.4 113.3 101.1 102.6
100.9 99.9 105.3 125.3 104.0 108.5
105.9 102.2 108.6 113.7 108.2 116.7
114.2 104.2 109.2 127.0 110.1 119.0

93.9
96.8
100.0
103.2
106.5
111.4
115.5

96.9
98 .0
100.0
102.8
104.9
107.5
109.9

97.5
98.4
100.0
103.7
107.7
113.3
122.4

95.9
97.7
100.0
102.2
100.8 105.2
104.5 109.9
110.3 112.8

116.0
116.1
116.5
116.9
117.5
118.2
118.6
119.7

103.4
103.5
103.4
104.1
104.4
104.3
104.2
104.4

103.1
99.2
96.3
96.8
95.5

98.1
95 .2
96.3
95.6
95.4

109.8
109.7
109.5
109.5
109.4

134.6
134.3
131.8
131.3
132.7

110.6
110.6
110.6
110.6
110.7

121.1
121.1
121.0
120.9
120.8

116.1
116.0
116.0
115.9
116.2

110.2
110.2
110.2
110.2
110.2

124.2
124.2
124.1
124.0
124.2

110.5
109.6
110.7
110.8
112.9

113.0
113.0
113.0
113.1
113.2

109.5
109.2
108.9
108.7
108.8
108.9
109.2
109.5

134.9
137.7
139.5
141.1
142.7
144.2
146.1
148.1

110.8
111.6
112.3
112.8
113.2
113.5
113.7
114.1

121.4
122.6
123.4
123.5
123.6
123.6
123.5
123.7

116.5
117.1
117.3
117.6
117.9
118.1
118.3
118.3

110.2
110.8
110.9
111.0
111.1
111.2
111.4
111.7

124.3
124.6
124.8
125.6
125.9
125.8
126.2
126.7

113.4
113.6
113.8
113.7
113.8
114.2
114.1
114.2

113.7
114.0
114.2
114.1
114.1
114.2
114.9
115.1

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ PRICES

A 69

WHOLESALE PRICES: DETAIL

(1967= 100)

G roup

1972

1971

Group

Aug.

June

July

Aug.

115.9
92.8
121.3
100.8
93.4
119.3
110.1
114.3
113.9

121.7
94.5
146.4
102.9
127.3
121.7
91.9
116.9
119.9

129.9
96.3
152.4
118.4
125.4
116.8
121.8

138.9
99.8
148.1
106.8
120.6
122.0
99.3
115.9
134.6

111.4
117.7
115.4
116.2
120.5
116.1
144.0
147.5
140.7
124.6
113.8
104.7

113.3
131.4
115.3
119.5
121.3
117.8
125.8
112.0
119.1
121.5
114-4
107.7

113.6
135.8
117.7
119.6
122.2
117.9
124.1
106.9
115.8
121.4
114.4
110.9

115.3
132.3
118.6
120.2
121.3
118.9
124.0
104.1
107.5
121.5
113.9
111.7

112.5
92.7
103.1
113.6
104.8
117.2

122.6
99.2
108.6
114.4
109.5
125.8

123.0
100.0
108.9
115.1
109.5
122.6

122.8
101.1
108.7
115.1
109.9
121.4

122.0
102.2

Processed foods and feeds:
Cereal and bakery p roducts...............
M eat, poultry, and fish........................
Dairy p ro d u cts.......................................
Processed fruits and vegetables..........
Sugar and confectionery......................
Beverages and beverage m aterials. . .
Animal fats and oils..............................
Crude vegetable oils..............................
Refined vegetable oils...........................
Vegetable oil end p ro d u cts.................
Miscellaneous processed foods...........
M anufactured animal feeds.................

114.6
114.4
117.1
108.2

204.1
138.6
125.8
116.7

212.5
138.1
126.5
116.5

243.0
140.6
126.5
118.7

182.9
150.5
107.2
115.3
113.2
107.3

191.2
155.3
112.9
121.5
113.2
108.5

191.2
155.3
113.2
122.1
113.2
109.1

191.5
155.3
114.3
122.1
114.7
110.7

102.4
115.9
99.8
102.7
134.2
9 1 .0
89.0
112.4

101.4
118.3
103.9
103.1
115.9
92.3
87.9
113.8

101.5
118.3
104.2
103.2
113.2
91.9
87.9
113.3

101.3
118.3
105.2
103.3
121.4
92.0
88.2
113.5

113.7
99.6
111.4
119.3

113.3
98.6
108.7
120.8

113.8
98.8
109.5
121.3

114.3
98.7
109.7
122.1

94.1

93.5

93.3

93.3

100.1

98.1

98.2

98.3

8.6

97.9

98.3

97.9

146.7
123.8
120.5
118.9

159.0
128.4
131.7
123.4

161.6
129.6
132.9
125.6

164.1
130.0
135.9
126.8

Fuels and related products, and power:
C o a l..........................................................
C oke.........................................................
Gas fuels...................................................
Electric p o w er........................................
Crude petroleum ....................................
Petroleum products, refined...............

Rubber and plastic products:
R ubber and rubber p ro d u cts..............
C rude rubber......................................
Tires and tu b es..................................
Miscellaneous rubber products___
Plastic construction products (Dec.
1969 = 100)..........................................
U nsupported plastic film and sheeting
(Dec. 1970= 100)..............................
Lam inated sheets, high pressure
(Dec. 1 9 7 0= 100)...............................
Lumber and wood products:
Lum ber....................................................
M illw ork.................................................
Plywood...................................................
Other wood products............................

Note.—Bureau of Labor Statistics indexes.




July

Aug.

Pulp, paper and products, excluding
building paper and b oard............
W oodpulp............................................
W astepaper..........................................
P ap er.....................................................
Paperboard..........................................
Converted paper and p ap erb o ard ..
Building paper and b o a rd ................

110.8
112.4
112.8
114.7
102.8
110.1
104.3

113.8
111.5
137.7
116.2
106.0
113.5
106.6

114.0
111.5
137.7
116.7
106.0
113.7
106.8

114.4
111.5
138.9
116.7
106.0
114.3
107.2

Iron and steel.......................................
Steelmill products................................
Nonferrous m etals...............................
M etal containers..................................
H ardw are...............................................
Plumbing equipm ent............................
H eating equipm ent..............................
Fabricated structural metal products
Miscellaneous metal p roducts. . . .

125.3
128.1
117.1
124.2
117.7
118.3
116.8
119.6
119.8

128.1
130.4
117.6
128.8
120.4
119.7
118.6
122.2
124.4

128.3
130.3
116.8
129.9
120.5
119.7
119.0
122.2
124.2

128.6
130.2
116.8
130.9
120.7
120.2
119.2
122.5
124.7

Agricultural machinery and equip...
Construction machinery and eq u ip ..
M etalworking machinery and equip
General purpose machinery and
equipm ent........................................ .
Special industry machinery and
equipm ent..........................................
Electrical machinery and equip.........
Miscellaneous m achinery...................

117.5
121.9
118.1

122.7
125.9
120.2

122.7
125.9
120.5

122.8
126.1
120.8

120.3

122.7

122.9

123.0

121.6
109.9
118.0

123.7
110.6
120.7

123.9
110.7
120.8

124.0
110.6
120.8

115.5
118.2
97.6
107.4
94.0
122.1

117.2
119.5
98.6
107.1
92.6
125.4

117.4
119.8
98.8
107.3
92.4
126.4

117.8
119.8
98.8
107.7
92.4
126.8

124.3
124.0
122.8

121.1
126.8
125.3

121.8
126.9
126.0

122.8
128.1
126.1

114.9
126.9
131.2
114.3
131.5
125.7

117.4
127.1
131.2
113.9
136.2
127.4

117.5
127.1
131.2
115.7
136.4
127.1

117.5
129.6
131.2
116.1
136.4
127.1

114.9
122.5

118.5
129.6

118.4
130.2

118.5
130.2

112.6
116.8
111.7
106.3
112.9

114.4
117.5
111.7
106.2
115.2

114.5
117.5
111.7
106.3
117.4

114.5
117.5
111.7
107.0
117.6

Furniture and household durables:
Household furniture..........................
Commercial furniture........................
Floor coverings..................................
H ousehold appliances.......................
H om e electronic equipm ent.............
Other household durable g o o d s. . .

Nonmetallic mineral products:

Chemicals and allied products:
Industrial chem icals..............................
Prepared p a in t........................................
Paint m aterials.......................................
Drugs and pharm aceuticals.................
Fats and oils, inedible..........................
Agricultural chemicals and p ro d u c ts..
Plastic resins and m aterials.................
Other chemicals and p ro d u cts............

June

Machinery and equipment:

Hides, skins, leather, and products:
Hides and skins......................................
Leather.....................................................
F ootw ear......................*.........................
O ther leather products.........................

Aug.

M etals and metal products:

Textile products and apparel:
C otton p ro d u cts....................................
Wool products.......................................
M anmade fiber textile products
A pparel....................................................
Textile housefum ishings......................
Miscellaneous textile p ro d u cts...........

1972

Pulp, paper, and allied products:

Farm products:
Fresh and dried produce.....................
G rains.......................................................
Livestock.................................................
Live poultry............................................
Plant and animal fibers........................
Fluid m ilk ...............................................
Eggs..........................................................
Hay and seeds........................................
O ther farm products.............................

1971

Flat glass..............................................
Concrete ingredients.........................
Concrete products..............................
Structural clay products excluding
refractories......................................
R efractories.........................................
A sphalt roofing..................................
Gypsum p roducts..............................
Glass containers.................................
O ther nonmetallic m inerals.............

Transportation equipment:
M otor vehicles and equipm ent.
R ailroad equipm ent.....................

Miscellaneous products:
Toys, sporting goods, small arms,
am m unition.......................................
Tobacco products................................
N otions...................................................
Photographic equipment and supplies
Other miscellaneous products...........

A 70

NATIONAL PRODUCT AND INCOME a SEPTEMBER 1972
GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT
(In billions o f dollars)

Item

1929

1933

1941

1950

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1971
II

103.1
101.4
77.2
9 .2
37.7
30.3

Gross private domestic investment.....................
Fixed investment...............................................

16.2
1 .4
14.5
3 .0
10.6
2 .4
5 .0
.9
5 .6
1.5
4 .0
.6
3.8
.5
1.7 - 1 . 6
1.8 - 1 . 4

45.8
3 .5
22.3
20.1

80.6 191.0 492.1 536.2 579.5 616.8 664.9
9 .6 30.5 73.1 84.0 90.8 90.5 103.5
42.9 98.1 215.0 230.8 245.9 264.4 278.1
28.1 62.4 204.0 221.3 242.7 261.8 283.3

IV

I

II

660.4
101.9
277.2
281.3

670.7
106.1
278.5
286.1

680.5
106.1
283.4
290.9

696.1
111.0
288.3
296.7

713.4
113.9
297.2
302.4

54.1 116.6 126.0 139.0 137.1 152.0 153.0 152.2
47.3 108.4 118.9 131.1 132.2 148.3 146.4 150.9
27.9 83.3 88.8 98.5 100.9 105.8 105.0 106.3
9 .2 28.0 30.3 34.2 36.0 38.4 38.3 38.7
18.7 55.3 58.5 64.3 64.9 67.4 66.7 67.6
19.4 25.1 30.1 32.6 31.2 42.6 41.4 44.5
18.6 24.5 29.5 32.0 30.7 42.0 40.9 43.9
6 .8
8 .2
7.8
4.9
7.1
3.6
6.6
1.3
6 .0
7 .5
7.7
4.8
2.4
6.9
-.2
5.1

158.8
157.2
109.8
38.8
71.0
47.3
46.7
1.7
.8

168.1
167.7
116.1
41.3
74.8
51.6
51.0
.4
.1

177.0
172.0
119.2
42.0
77.2
52.8
52.1
5 .0
4.3

1.8
13.8
12.0

.4
68.5
68.2

-2 .1
63.0
65.1

- 4 .6
70.7
75.3

-5 .2
70.0
75.2

37.9 180.1 199.6 210.0 219.0 232.8 229.5 233.6
18.4 90.7 98.8 98.8 96.5 97.8 96 .3 97 .9
14.1 12. A 78.3 78.4 75.1 71.4 71.2 70.1
4 .3 18.4 20.5 20.4 21.5 26.3 25.0 27.8
19.5 89.4 100.8 111.2 122.5 135.0 133.3 135.7

240.9
100.7
71.9
28.7
140.2

249.4
105.7
76.7
28.9
143.7

254.1
108.1
78.6
29.6
146.0

203.6 141.5 263.7 355.3 j 675.2 706.6 725.6 722.1 741.7 737.9 742.5

754.5

766.5

783.9

17.9
13.4
9.5
2.9
6 .6
3.9
3.7
4 .5
4 .0

Net exports of goods and services.....................
E xports...............................................................
Im ports...............................................................

1.1
7 .0
5.9

.4
2 .4
2 .0

1 .3
5.9
4 .6

Government purchases of goods and services..
Federal............................................................
N ational defense......................................
O ther...............................................................

8 .5
1 .3

8 .0
2 .0

7 .2

6 .0

24.8
16.9
13.8
3.1
7 .9

Gross national product in constant (1958)
dollars.................................................................

III

55.6 124.5 284.8 793.9 864.2 930.3 976.4 1050.4 1043.01056.9 1,078.1 1,109.1 1,139.4
57.2 120.1 278.0 785.7 857.1 922.5 971.5 1046.7 1036.4 1055.6 1,076.4 1,108.6 1,134.4

Personal consumption expenditures...................

Structures...................................................
Producers’ durable equipment..............
Residential structures..................................
N onfarm ....................................................
Change in business inventories.................

1972

N o t e . —Dept, o f Commerce estimates., Quarterly data are seasonally
adjusted totals at annual rates. For back data and explanation o f series,

5 .2
4 6.2
41 .0

2.5
50.6
48.1

1.9
55.5
53.6

3 .6
62.9
59.3

.7
66.1
65.4

.1
66.7
66.6

see the Survey o f Current Business, July 1968, July 1969, July 1970, July
1971, July 1972, and Supplement, Aug. 1966.

NATIONAL INCOME
(In billions o f dollars)

1929

1933

1941

1950

1967

1968

1969

1972

1971
1970

1971

Item
II

III

IV

I

IIP

National income.....................................................

86.8

4 0.3 104.2 241.1 653.6 711.1 766.0 798.6 855.7 851.4 860.8 876.2 903.1 923.6

Compensation of employees................................

51.1

29.5

64.8 154.6 467.2 514.6 566.0 603.8 644.1 639.6 648.0 660.4 682.7 697.8

Wages and salaries...........................................
Private.............................................................

50.4
45.5
.3
4 .6

29.0
23.9
.3
4 .9

62.1 146.8 423.1 464.9 509.7 541.9 573.5 569.6 576.5 587.3 606.6 620.0
51.9 124.4 337.3 369.2 405.6 426.8 449.7 447.0 451.6 460.9 475.8 487.1
1.9
5 .0 16.2 17.9 19.0 19.6
18.8
19.4 20.8
19.4 19.4
20.5
8.3
17.4 69.5 77.8 85.1
95.5 104.4 103.3 106.0 107.0 110.0 112.4

Government civilian............................. ..
Supplements to wages and salaries.......... ..
Em ployer contributions for social in­
surance ...................................................
O ther labor income.................................

.7

.5

2 .7

7.8

44.2

49.7

56.3

61.9

70.7

70.0

71.5

73.0

76.1

77.8

.1
.6

A
.4

2 .0
.7

4 .0
3.8

21.9
22.3

24.3
25.4

27.8
28.4

29.7
32.1

34.1
36.5

33.8
36.1

34.3
37.2

35.0
38.0

37.3
38.8

38.0
39.8

Proprietors’ income..............................................
Business and professional..............................
F a rm ...................................................................

15.1
9 .0
6 .2

5 .9
3.3
2 .6

17.5
11.1
6 .4

37.5
24 .0
13.5

62.1
47.3
14.8

64.2
49,5
14.7

67.2
50.5
16.7

66.8
49.9
16.9

70.0
52.6
17.3

69.3
52.4
16.9

70.7
53.1
17.6

71.8
53.8
18.1

73.3
54.3
19.1

73.2
54.4
18.7

Rental income of persons....................................

5 .4

2 .0

3 .5

9 .4

21.1

21.2

22.6

23.3

24.5

24.4

24.8

25.0

25.2

24.2

10.5

- 1 .2

15.2

37.7

78.7

84.3

79.8

69.9

78.6

80.1

78.3

79.4

81.8

87.6

74.3
34.1
40.2
24.8
15.4

83.3
37.3
45.9
25.4
20.5

84.5
38.6
45.8
25.4
20.4

84.1
37.5
46 .6
25.5
21.0

83.2
35.3
48.0
25.2
22.7

88.2
38.8
49.5
26.0
23.5

93.1
40.7
52.4
26.2
26.2

Corporate profits and inventory valuation
10.0
1.4
8 .6
5.8
2 .8

1.0
.5
.4
2 .0
-1 .6

17.7
7 .6
10.1
4 .4
5 .7

42.6
17.8
24.9
8.8
16.0

79.8
33.2
46.6
21.4
25.3

87.6
39.9
47.8
23.6
24.2

84.9
40.1
4 4.8
24.3
20.5

Inventory valuation adjustm ent....................

.5

-2 .1

-2 .5

-5 .0

-1 .1

-3 .3

-5 .1

-4 .4

-4 .7

-4 .4

-5 .8

-3 .9

-6 .5

-5 .5

Net interest.............................................................

4 .7

4 .1

3 .2

2 .0

24.4

26.9

30.5

34.8

38.5

38.1

39.1

39.7

40.1

40.9

Profits before ta x .............................................
Profits after tax............................................
D ividends...................................................
Undistributed profits..............................

N o t e . —Dept, o f Commerce estimates. Q uarterly data are seasonally
adjusted totals at annual rates. See also N o t e to table above.




SEPTEMBER 1972 □ NATIONAL PRODUCT AND INCOME

A 71

RELATION OF GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT, NATIONAL INCOME, AND PERSONAL INCOME AND SAVING
(In billions o f dollars)

1929

Item

1933

1941

1950

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971
II

103.1
Less: Capital consum ption allowances..........
Indirect business tax and nontax liaBusiness transfer paym ents...................
Statistical discrepancy.............................
Plus: Subsidies less current surplus o f gov­
ernment enterprises..............................

III

IV

Up

I

55.6 124.5 284.8 793.9 864.2 930.3 976.4 1050.4 1043.0 1056.9 1,078.1 1,109.1 1 ,139.4

7 .9

7 .0

8 .2

18.3

68.9

95.0

97.4

99.7

105.3

7 .0
.6
.7

7.1
.7
.6

11.3
.5
.4

23.3
.8
1.5

70.4 78.6 85.9 93.4 101.9 100.3 102.6
3.4
4 .7
3.1
3.8
4 .2
4 .6
4 .6
- . 7 - 2 .7 - 6 .1 - 4 .7 - 4 .8 - 4 .9 - 5 .9

105.6
4 .7
-5 .2

106.7
4.8
-4 .1

108.7
4 .9
-1 .6

.1

.2

-.1
86.8

Less: C orporate profits and inventory valu­
ation adjustm ent..................................
Contributions for social insurance----Excess o f wage accruals over disburse­
ments .......................................................

1972

1971

74.5

1.4

.7

81.6

1.0

86.3

.9

92.4

.3

.7

1.2

1.6

40.3 104.2 241.1 653.6 711.1 766.0 798.6 855.7 851.4 860.8

876.2

903.1

923.6

79.4
66.9

81.8
71.9

87.6
73.1

10.5 - 1 . 2
.2
.3

1.5

93.8

15.2
2.8

37.7
6.9

78.7
42.4

84.3
47.1

79.8
54.2

69.9
57.7

78.6
65.3

.8

80.1
64.8

78.3
65.7

.6

.2

.6

1.4

-1 .4

-.5

Plus: Government transfer paym ents............
N et interest paid by government and
consum ers..............................................
D ividends...................................................
Business transfer paym ents...................

.9

1.5

2 .6

14.3

4 8.7

56.1

61.9

75.2

89.0

90.7

90.3

92.1

94.4

95.7

2 .5
5.8
.6

1.6
2 .0
.7

2 .2
4 .4
.5

7 .2
8.8
.8

23.6
21.4
3.1

26.1
23.6
3.4

28.7
24.3
3.8

31.0
24.8
4 .2

31.1
25.4
4 .6

31.0
25.4
4 .6

31.1
25.5
4 .7

30.9
25.2
4 .7

30.9
26.0
4.8

31.8
26.2
4 .9

96.0 227.6 629.3 688.9 750.9 806.3 861.4 858.1 867.9

881.5

907.0

922.1

97.9 116.5 116.7 117.0 115.2 117.5

123.0

136.5

139.5

Equals: Personal income....................................

85.9

47.0

Less: Personal tax and nontax paym ents.. . .

2.6

1.5

Equals: Disposable personal income.................

83.3

45.5

92.7 206.9 546.3 591.0 634.4 689.5 744.4 742.9 750.4

758.5

770.5

782.6

Less: Personal o u tlay s.......................................
Personal consum ption expenditures.
Consumer interest paym ents.............
Personal transfer payments to for­
eigners.................................................

79.1
77.2
1.5

46.5
45.8
.5

81.7 193.9 506.0 551.2 596.2 634.7 683.4 678.8 689.4
80.6 191.0 492.1 536.2 579.5 616.8 664.9 660.4 670.7
2 .4 13.2 14.3 15.8 16.9 17.6 17.5 17.6
.9

699.2
680.5
17.7

714.9
696.1
17.8

732.5
713.4
18.0

.3

.2

.2

.5

.7

.8

.9

1.0

1.0

.9

1.1

1.1

1.0

1.1

E quals: Personal saving.......................................

4 .2

-.9

11.0

13.1

40.4

39.8

38.2

54.9

60.9

64.1

61.0

59.3

55.7

50.1

Disposable personal income in constant (1958)
dollars.................................................................. 150.6 112.2 190.3 249.6 477.5 499.0 513.6 533.2 554.7 554.6 556.5

560.9

565.7

571.4

M ay

June

July?

3.3

20.7

83.0

N o t e . —Dept, o f Commerce estimates. Quarterly data are seasonally
adjusted totals at annual rates. See also N o t e to table opposite.

PERSONAL INCOME
(In billions o f dollars)

Item

1970

1971

1972

1971
July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

M ar.

Apr.

Total personal income............................

806.3 861.4 862.4 869.1 872.2 874.8 879.4 890.4 898.9 908.5 913.6 919.4 924.0 922.9 934.2

W age and salary disbursements...........
Commodity-producing industries. .
Manufacturing only........................
Distributive industries.......................
Service industries................................
G overnm ent.........................................

541.9
201.0
158.3
129.2
96.7
115.1

572.9 572.5 577.2 577.9 579.9
206.1 205.5 205.5 206.9 207.9
160.3 160.0 159.5 160.4 161.3
138.2 137.7 139.3 140.2 140.4
105.0 105.7 106.3 106.8 107.5
123.5 123.6 126.1 124.0 124.0

583.4
208.8
161.7
140.8
108.2
125.5

594.3
213.1
165.1
143.8
109.4
128.0

602.6
214.8
165.8
145.5
111.2
131.2

609.0 612.4 617.6 619.9
217.7 220.1 221.7 222.5
169.3 171.3 173.3 173.8
148.1 148.0 149.4 149.4
111.6 112.8 113.9 114.7
131.7 131.5 132.5 133.2

624.0 626.4
223.5 222.7
175.0 174.8
151.4 152.3
115.5 117.2
133.6 134.3

O ther labor incom e................................

32.1

36.5

36.9

37.2

37.5

37.8

38.0

38.3

38.5

38.8

39.1

39.5

39.8

40.1

40.5

Proprietors’ incom e................................
Business and professional.................
F a rm ......................................................

66.8
49.9
16.9

69.9
52.6
17.3

70.0
52.8
17.2

70.7
53.1
17.6

71.3
53.4
17.9

71.6
53.6
18.0

71.9
53.8
18.1

72.0
53.9
18.1

72.6
54.0
18.6

73.2
54.1
19.1

74.2
54.7
19.5

74.0
54.9
19.1

74.0
55.3
18.7

71.6
53.2
18.4

74.3
55.7
18.6

R ental incom e.........................................

23.3

24.5

24.7

24.9

24.9

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.1

25.2

25.3

25.5

25.6

21.5

25.8

24.8

25 .4

26.0

26.1

26.3

26.3

26.4

65.8

69.6

72.7

73.4

73.8

D ividends.................................................
Personal interest incom e.......................
Transfer paym ents..................................
Less: Personal contributions for social
insurance..........................................
Nonagricultural income..........................
Agricultural income................................

25.5
69.8

25.6
70.2

25.5
70.5

70.5

25.5
70.6

24.6
70.7

26.0
70.8

26.1
71.0

79.5

93.6

94.2

94.7

96.1

96.2

96.8

97.6

97.6 100.0

28.0

31.2

31.2

31.4

31.5

31.6

31.8

32.3

34.3

34.7

71.3

72.0

100.1

99.7

100.9

101.3

102.4

34.8

35.0

35.1

35.3

35.5

782.8 837.2 838.4 844.7 847.6 850.0 854.5 865.0 873.4 882.4 887.1 893.4 898.3 897.5 908.6
23.5 24.2 24.0 24.4 24.6 24.8 24.9 25.4 25.6 26.0 26.5 26.0 25.8 25.4 25.5

N o t e . —Dept, o f Commerce estimates. M onthly data are seasonally
adjusted totals at annual rates. See also N o t e to table opposite.




25.5

A 72

FLOW OF FUNDS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
SUMMARY OF FUNDS RAISED AND ADVANCED IN U.S. CREDIT MARKETS
(Seasonally adjusted annual ra te s; in billions o f dollars)
1969

Transaction category, or sector

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1970

1971

1972

1971
HI

H2

HI

H2

HI

H2

Ql

Funds raised, by type and sector

1

Total funds raised by nonfinancial
sectors............................................

70.4

68.7

83.4

97.8

2
3
4

U.S. Government.................................
Public debt securities......................
Budget agency issues......................

1.8
1.3
.5

3 .6
2 .3
1.3

13.0
8.9
4.1

13.4
10.3
3.1

-3 .6
- 1 .3
-2 .4

5 A ll o th e r n o n fin a n cia l s e c t o r s . .
6
Corporate equity sh ares.................
D ebt instrum ents.............................
7
8
D ebt capital instrum ents...........
9
State and local govt. secs.. . .
Corporate and fgn. b o n d s. . .
10
11
M ortgages.................................
12
Home mortgages..................
13
Other residential...................
14
Commercial..........................
15

68.6
.3
68.3
38.8
7.3
5.9
25.6
15.4
3 .6
4 .4
2 .2

65.0
.9
64.1
39.0
5 .7
11.0
22.3
11.4
3.1
5 .7
2 .1

70.4
2 .4
68.0
46.2
8.3
15.9
22.0
11.6
3 .6
4 .7
2 .1

84.4
-.7
85.1
51.3
10.1
14.0
27.3
15.2
3 .5
6 .6
2 .1

16
17
18
19
20

O ther private credit.....................
Bank loans n.e.c........ ..............
C onsumer cre d it......................
Open m arket p ap er.................
O th er..........................................

29.5
14.1
10.0
-.3
5 .7

25.1
10.4
7 .2
1.0
6 .4

21.8
9 .9
4 .6
2.1
5 .2

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

B y b o rro w in g s e c to r ......... ............
F o reig n ..............................................
State and local governm ents.........
H ouseholds.......................................
Nonfinancial business....................
Corporate......................................
Nonfarm noncorporate................
Farm...............................................

68.6
2 .5
7.6
28.8
29.6
2 0 .6
5 .7
3 .3

65.0
1.3
6.4
23.2
34.1
25.2
5 .5
3 .5

70.4
4 .0
8.5
19.7
38.1
2 9 .7
5 .0
3 .5

91.7 101.6 156.3

92.1

91.0

25.5
26.0
-.5

-6 .4
- 5 .9
-.5

-.6
3.6
-1 .3

8 .2
9 .5
-4 .2

95.3
4.8
90.6
49.0
7.9
13.1
27.9
15.7
4 .8
5 .5
1.9

88.8 130.8
6.8
13.5
81.9 117.4
60.8 87.5
13.8 20.2
21.1
20.3
25.8 47.0
12.8 26.1
5 .9
8 .8
5 .4
10.1
1.8
2 .0

98.5
1.9
96.6
51.8
8.5
14.0
29.3
16.8
4 .6
5 .7
2 .3

91.5
7.6
83.9
46.2
7.4
12.2
26.5
14.6
5.1
5 .3
1 .6

33.8
13.8
11.1
1.6
7.3

41.6
16.8
9.3
3.3
12.2

21.1
5.0
4.3
3.8
8.0

29.9
13.0
10.4
-.4
6.9

44.8
19.4
10.0
4 .6
10.8

84.4
3.1
10.4
31.9
39.1
30 .7
5 .7
2 .7

95.3
3.3
8 .7
32.6
50.8
40.2
7.4
3 .2

88.8 130.8
3.0
5.6
13.9 20.6
22.3 41.6
49.5 63.0
39.8 48.6
6 .4
10.3
3 .2
4.1

98.5
4 .7
8.9
34.2
50.8
39.8
7.6
3 .4

12.8
12.9
-.1

93.8 109.7 142.9 168.9 138.6
17.4
16.3
1.1

22.3
23.8
-1 .6

1

5.3
3.1
2 .2

2
3
4

85.6
6 .0
79.6
52.5
11.8
18.0
22.7
11.2
5 .2
4 .8
1.5

92.3 120.6 140.3 133.3
10.4
7.6
12.7
14.2
84.7 108.0 126.1 122.9
69.2 84.5 90.5
77.7
15.9 22.0
18.4
16.7
24.3 23.2
17.4
11.6
2 9.0 39.3
54.6 49.4
14.4 20.4 31.8 2 7 .2
6 .6
8 .6
9 .0
8 .5
6 .0
8 .6
11.6 11.5
2.1
2 .2
1 .8
2 .3

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

37.8
14.2
7.9
2.1
13.6

27.1
9 .0
5 .5
3 .7
8.8

15.5
1.1
3.4
3.8
7.3

45.2
19.7
13.9
2.9
8.6

16
17
18
19
20

91.5
2 .0
8.5
30.3
50.7
40.6
7.2
3 .0

85.6
2.3
11.4
22.0
49.9
41.1
5 .6
3 .2

92.3 120.6 140.3 133.3
3.8
5.8
2.9
5.5
16.4 22.1
19.1
17.8
22.9 31.5 51.0 47.4
4 9.2 61.6 64.4 65.2
38.5 47.0 50.1
49.5
7.4 11.0
9 .7
11.4
3 .3
3 .6
4 .6
4 .2

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

23.4
7.9
6.5
-.4
9 .4

28.6
28.1
.5

35.6
18.0
13.5
-.4
4 .5

Private net investment and borrowing in credit markets

1
2
3

T otal, households and business
T o ta l c a p ita l o u tl a y s 1...............
Capital consum ption2.....................
N et physical investm ent.................

4
5

N et funds raised ..............................
Excess net investm ent3...................

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

58.5
4 .9

57.3
15.4

57.9
2 .4

84.1
50.5
33.6

97.0
54.2
42.8

94.0
58.5
35.6

29.6
*
4 .0

33.0
1.2
8 .7

35.8
2 .3
-2 .5

N et physical investment.................

62.8
35.2
27.5

77.1
38.2
38.9

72.0
41.5
30.5

76.2
45.1
31.1

84.0
49.9
34.2

Corporate equity issues.................
Excess net investment3...................

20.6
*
6.9

2 4.0
1.2
13.7

27.4
2 .3
.8

31.6
-.8
.3

35.9
4 .3
-6 .0

89.6
59.9
29.7

Total business
T o ta l c a p ita l o u tl a y s .................
Capital consum ption.......................
N et debt funds raised.....................
C orporate equity issues..................
Excess net investment3...................
Corporate business
T o ta l c a p ita l o u tla y s .................

Households
T o ta l c a p ita l o u tla y s .................
N et physical investment.................

21
22
O f which:
23
24
25
26

173.6 191.2 188.7 208.7 227.1 225.5 252.9 224.2 229.9 224.3 226.7 247.0 258.8 276.1
110.3 118.5 128.4 140.4 154.4 164.9 178.5 151.0 157.7 162.5 167.3 174.5 182.6 188.7
63.3 72.7
60.3
68.3
72.7 60.6 74.3
73.2 72.2 61.8
59.4 72.5 76.1
87.4

D urables less cons, cre d it..............
Nonprofit P&E less m ortgages. . .
Less: Unallocated d e b t..................

71.0 83.3
71.8 104.6 84.9
- 2 . 7 - 1 0 . 6 - 1 1 . 2 - 3 0 .3 - 1 1 . 7

81.1
71.9
72.1 93.1 115.4 112.6
- 8 . 9 - 1 0 .1 - 1 2 . 7 - 2 0 . 5 - 3 9 . 2 - 2 5 . 2

4
5

99.0 109.3 110.1 118.0 106.1 112.4 108.4 111.9 116.9 119.0 129.4
63.2 69.5 73.6 80.0 67.9
71.1
72.9
74.2 77.8 82.3
85.5
35.8 39.7 36.6 37.9 38.1
41.3
35.5
37.6 39.2 36.7 43.9

6
7
8

40.0 46.5 42.7 49.6 49.5
-.8
4.3
6.8
13.4
1.2
- 3 . 3 - 1 1 .1 - 1 2 . 9 - 2 5 .1 - 1 2 . 6
85.2
57.3
27.9

81.5
48.7
32.9

33.0 35.1
6.8
13.4
- 7 .9 - 2 0 .7

38.6
1.2
-6 .9

9
10
11
12
13
14

31.2 34.7 35.6 39.0
12.3
7.3
14.5
10.5
- 5 .3 -1 7 .6 -2 3 .7 - 1 7 .0

15
16
17

94.2
64.3
29.9

94.6 109.7 117.8 115.3 134.9 118.1 117.5 115.9 114.8 130.1 139.8 146.7
69.9
77.2 84.8 91.3 98.5 83.1
86.6 89.6 93.0 96.7 100.3 103.2
24.7
32.5 33.0 24.0 36.4 35.1
30.9 26.3
21.7 33.4 39.4 43.5

18
19
20

28.8
.9

23.2
6 .7

19.7
5 .0

31.9
.6

32.6
.5

22.3
1.7

41.6
-5 .2

34.2
.9

30.3
.6

22.0
4.3

22.9
-1 .2

31.5 51.0
1.9 - 1 1 .5

47.4
-3 .9

21
22

-3 .3
4 .7
1.8
2.4

- .8
7.9
2 .0
2 .4

-1 .3
7.8
1.9
3.5

-2 .1
5.6
1.9
4.8

-2 .9
7.0
2.2
5.8

-1 .9
5.5
2 .2
4.1

-8 .1
5.7
2.3
5.2

-2 .8
7.7
2 .0
6 .0

-3 .1
6.9
2 .4
5.6

- 1 .0
6.4
2.3
3.3

-2 .8
4 .4
2.1
4.9

- 4 .2 -1 1 .9
8.7
3.5
2.3
2 .4
4.9
5.6

-4 .4
5.4
2 .6
7 .5

23
24
25
26

N o t e . —Capital outlays and capital consum ption allowances reflect
1969-72 revisions published in the July 1972 issue o f Survey o f Current
Business.
Funds raised by type and sector. Credit flows included here are the

84.6
52.7
31.9

43.4 43.7 41.9 49.2 49.9
54.6
7.4
6.3
7.3
12.3
14.5
10.5
- 9 .5 - 1 4 .4 -1 1 .6 -2 2 .4 -2 7 .7 - 2 1 .3
94 .0
61.5
32.5

1 Capital outlays are totals for residential and nonresidential fixed
capital, net change in inventories, and consumer durables, except outlays
by financial business.
2 Capital consumption includes amounts for consumer durables and
excludes financial business capital consumption.
3 Excess o f net investment over net funds raised.




1
2
3

86.5
51.1
35.4

83.0
52.3
30.7

34.9
33.2
7.4
6.3
- 5 .1 -1 0 .4

86.3
53.1
33.1

85.0
55.6
29.4

85.5
59.0
26.4

net am ounts raised by households, nonfinancial business, governments,
and foreigners. All funds raised by financial sectors are excluded. U.S.
G overnment budget issues (line 4) are loan participation certificates
issued by CCC, Export-Im port Bank, FN M A , and G N M A , together with
security issues by F H A , Export-Im port Bank, and TV A. Issues by federally
sponsored credit agencies are excluded as borrowing by financial institu­
tions. Such issues are in U.S. G overnment securities on p. A-73, line 11.
C orporate share issues are net cash issues by nonfinancial and foreign
corporations. Mortgages exclude loans in process. Open m arket paper is
commercial paper issued by nonfinancial corporations plus bankers’
acceptances.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ FLOW OF FUNDS

A 73

DIRECT AND INDIRECT SOURCES OF FUNDS TO CREDIT MARKETS
(Seasonally adjusted annual rates; in billions of dollars)
1969
Transaction category, or sector

1 Total funds advanced in credit m ar­
kets to nonfinancial sectors.
By public agencies and foreign
2 Total net advances...............................
3
U.S. Governm ent securities.........
4
Residential m ortgages....................
5
FH LB advances to S&L’s .............
6
O ther loans and securities............

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

HI

1970

H2

HI

1971

H2

HI

1972

H2

Ql

70.1

67.7

81.0

98.5

86.9

94.7 142.9

90.2

83.3

87.8 102.1 130.2 154.7 128.2

1

8 .9
3.7
.4
.7
4.1

11.9
3.4
2.8
.9
4 .8

11.3
6.8
2.1
- 2 .5
4 .9

12.2
3 .4
2 .8
.9
5.1

15.8
.9
4 .6
4 .0
6.3

28.0
15.7
5.7
1.3
5.2

41.2
33.4
5 .7
- 2 .7
4.8

9.9
-2 .7
3 .0
3.1
6.6

22.3
4 .5
6.3
5 .0
6 .6

25.3

27.2
20.4
5.9
-6 .0
6 .9

2
3
4
5
6

By agency—
7
U.S. G overnm ent...........................
8
Sponsored credit agencies..............
9
Federal R eserve...............................
10
F oreign.............................................
11 Agency borrowing not in line 1 . . . .

2.8
2 .2
3.8
.1
2.1

4.9
5.1
3.5
- 1 .6
4 .8

4 .6
-.1
4 .8
2 .0
-.6

4 .9
3 .2
3 .7
.3
3.5

2.9
9 .0
4 .2
-.3

2.8
9.9
5.0
10.3
8 .7

3 .2
2.8
26.4
3.9

2 .7
6 .2
3 .7
- 2 .6
7.1

3 .7
11.8
4.8
2 .0
11.0

Private domestic funds advanced
Total net advances..............................
U.S. Government securities.........
M unicipal securities......................
C orporate and foreign bonds----Residential m ortgages...................
O ther mortgages and loans........
Less: FHLB advances..................

63.3
*
7.3
6.0
18.6
32.1
.7

60.6
5 .4
5 .7
10.3
11.6
28.5
.9

69.1
5 .7
8.3
16.0
13.1
23.5
-2 .5

89.8
13.3
10.1
13.8
15.8
37.8
.9

79.9
4.6
7.9
12.6
15.8
43.0
4.0

75.5 105.5
5.8 - 4 . 0
13.8
20.2
20.5 20.0
12.9 29.2
23.8
37.4
1.3 - 2 . 7

87.3
3.5
8.5
13.4
18.3
46.8
3.1

P riv a te fin a n c ia l in te r m e d ia tio n
19 Credit market funds advanced by pri­
vate financial institutions..........
20
Commercial b an k in g ......................
21
Savings institutions.........................
22
Insurance and pension fu n d s........
23
O ther finance..................................

62.5
29.1
14.3
13.6
5.5

44 .7
17.0
7.9
15.0
4 .7

62.
35.9
15.0
12.4
-.5

75.0
39.0
15.6
13.9
6 .6

54.0
18.9
14.2
12.2
8.6

70.2 105.8
31.6 49.8
16.6 41.6
17.6
12.0
4 .5
2.3

24
25
26

Sources o f funds....................................
Domestic private deposits.............
C redit m arket borrow ing.............

62.5
38.5
6.8

4 4 .7
2 1 .2
3.0

62
4 9.4
-.6

75.0
46.1
6.9

54.0
2 .5
16.8

70.2 105.
60.4 9 2 . 3
1.8
4.5

27
28
29
30
31

O ther sources..................................
Foreign funds.............................
Treasury balances.....................
Insurance and pension reserves
O ther, n e t....................................

17.2
.8
-1 .0
11.4
5.9

20.5
3.7
-.5
13.2
4 .2

14.0
2 .3
.2
11.8
- .3

2 2.0
2 .6
- .2
11.2
8 .4

34.7
9.3
*
10.3
15.1

8 .0
- 8 .4
2 .9
13.5

P riv a te d o m e s tic n o n fin a n c ia l
in v e sto rs
32 D irect lending in credit m k ts...........
33
U.S. G overnment securities.........
34
M unicipal securities......................
35
C orporate and foreign bonds---36
Commercial p ap er.........................
37
O th er.................................................

7 .6
2.3
2 .6
1.4
.5

18.9
8.8
2 .7
2 .5
2 .0
3 .0

5.8
-1 .3
-2 .0
5.3
1.5
2 .4

21.7
7 .7
.3
5.1
4 .4
4 .2

42.7
16.0
6.7
7.6
8 .7
3.7

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

37.7
32.4
4.2

7.1

4.6

-5 .
6.9

2.J

3.1
11.1
2 .8
8.3
10.8

2 .6
8 .7
7 .2
12.2
6 .6

4 .4
-1 .8
8 .4
26.7

26.1

2 .2
7.3
3.8
13.9
6 .0

7
8
9
10
11

72.0
6.1
7 .4
11.8
13.3
38.5
5.0

73.3
8.6
11.8
17.1
10.0
28.6
2.8

7 8.0
3.1
15.9
23.8
15.7
19.4
-.1

92.8
- 9 .9
22.0
23.0
24.7
27.2
-5 .8

106.9
- 8 .7
16.7
17.1
11.3
33 i 29.6
52.0
- 6 .0

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

64.1
23.1
17.8
12.4
10.9

4 3.7
14.7
10.6
12.1
6.2

54.3
2 1.6
11.7
17.7
3.3

86.1 105.9 105.3 120.9
50.0 55.2
41.5 49.4
37.8 49.8
21.5 45.4
12.4
17.5
11.6
8.1
5 .2
5.5
-.6
7 .9

64.1
5.0
13.4

4 3 .7
-.1
20.1

54.3
32.0
10.7

86.1 105.9 105.3 120.9
88.8 105.8 78.6 112.3
9.2
-7 .0
-.2
7 .2

9 .0
-3 .3
2 .2
8 .2
1.8

45.7
14.4
-2 .1
9 .7
23.7

23.6
4 .2
2.1
10.9
6.3

7 .0
4 .2
- 7 . 6 - 1 3 .1
1.4
5.7
10.4
8.6
- 1 .2 -2 .1
4.1
5.0

36.4
14.6
6 .2
6 .0
6.1
3.5

48.7
17.4
7 .2
9.1
11.2
3.8

10.5

6.3
2.8
5.7

30.6
21.0
5.2
-.1

11.6
4 .3
- 3 . 4 -1 3 .5
3 .4
2 .4
13.0 14.1
-1 .3
1.2

.3

.3
- 7 .6
- 1 .6
7.6
2 .0

29.5 -1 5 .0 - 1 3 . 3
1.8 -1 7 .0 - 2 4 . 7
3.8 - 1 . 1
5.3
12.1
10.3
8 .7
10.9 -1 3 .3 - 7 . 8
4.3
4.3
3.5

17.6
1.0
6.1
8.8
1.6

24
25
26

1.4
1.3
- 7 .9
3.1
4 .9

27
28
29
30
31

21.2 - 6 . 8
- 1 . 6 -1 8 .2
6.1
4 .2
6.8
7.1
3.7 - 3 . 8
6.2
4 .0

32
33
34
35
36
37

38
39

D eposits and currency.....................
Time and savings accounts.........

40 .7
32.7

23.1
20.3

51.5
39.3

48.6
34.0

5.3
- 2 .2

63.9
56.2

95.7
81.3

6 .5
5.2

4.1
- 9 .7

35.0
31.1

92.
81.4

110.3
92.4

80.9
70.1

117.4
92.7

38
39

40
41
42

M oney..............................................
D em and deposits........ ..............
C urrency....................... ..............

7.9
5.8
2.1

2.
.8
2 .0

12.2
10.1
2.1

14.6
12.2
2 .4

7.6
4.7
2.8

7 .7
4 .2
3.5

14.4
11.0
3.4

1.3
- .2
1.5

13.
9 .6
4 .2

3.9
.9
3.0

11.4
7 .4
4 .0

17.9
13.4
4 .5

10.7

24 .7
19.6
5 .0

40
41
42

43

Total of credit m arket instr., de­
posits, and currency.................

4 8.2

42.1

57.3

70.3

48.8

71.3

99.9

42.1

55.3

65.3

77.8

96.9 102.1 110.6

43

44
45

M em oranda:
Public support rate (in per cent)
Pvt. fin. interm ediation (in per
c en t).......................................•
Total foreign funds..................... •

12.7

17.6

13.9

12.3

18.0

29.4

28.9

11.1

26.0

28.6

30.0

28.9

2 9.0

21.2

44

98.8
.8

73.7
2.1

90.8
4 .3

83.5
2 .9

66.9
9 .0

92.6
1.8

100.2
23.1

74.3
11.

58.5
6.2

73.4
4 .9

110.3
- 1 .3

114.0
19.1

89.8
27.1

113.1
15.2

45
46

46

8 .4

2.3

C orporate equities not included above
1 Total net issues.....................................
2
M utual fund shares.........................
O ther equities.............................
3

3 .4
3.1
.3

4 .6
3.7
.9

4 .9
2 .6
2.3

4 .0
4 .7
-.7

10.4
5.7
4.7

9.3
2 .4
6.9

14.6
1.1
13.5

8.3
6.4
1.9

12.6
5 .0
7.6

9.1
3.0
6.1

9 .5
1.9
7.6

12.9
.2
12.7

16.3
2.1
14.2

7 .9
- 2 .7
10.6

1
2
3

4 Acq. by financial in stitu tio n .............
5 O ther net purchases............................

5.7
-2 .3

6.0
-1 .3

8.4
-3 .5

9.5
-5 .5

12.8
- 2 .4

11.3
- 2 .0

19.1
-4 .5

12.1
-3 .8

13.5
- .9

12.5
-3 .3

10.2
- .7

20.7
-7 .8

17.5
- 1 .2

14.7
- 6 .7

4
5

Notes
Line
1. Total funds raised (line 1 o f p. A-72) excluding corporate equities.
2. Sum o f lines 3-6 or 7-10.
6. Includes farm and commercial mortgages.
11. Funds raised by Federally sponsored credit agencies.
12. Line 1 less line 2 plus line 11. Also line 19 less line 26 plus line 32.
Also sum o f lines 27 through 41 excluding subtotals.
17. Includes farm and commercial mortgages.
25. Lines 39 + 41.
26. Excludes equity issues and investment company shares. Includes
line 18.
28. Foreign deposits at commercial banks, bank borrowings from foreign
branches, and liabilities o f foreign banking agencies to foreign
affiliates.




29. Demand deposits at commercial banks.
30. Excludes net investment o f these reserves in corporate equities.
31. Mainly retained earnings and net miscellaneous liabilities.
32. Line 12 less line 19 plus line 26.
33-37. Lines 13-17 less amounts acquired by private finance. Line 37
includes mortgages.
42. Mainly an offset to line 9.
43. Lines 32 plus 38 or line 12 less line 27 plus line 42.
44. Line 2/line 1.
45. Line 19/line 12.
46. Lines 10 plus 28.
Corporate equities
Line

1 and 3 Includes issues by financial institutions.

A 74

U.S. BALANCE OF PAYMENTS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
1. U.S. BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
(In millions o f dollars)

1969

C redits+ , debits —

Line

1970

1971

1971
I

II

1972
III

Ip

IV

Summary—Seasonally adjusted
621
2,164 -2 ,6 8 9
289 - 1 ,0 1 2
-4 7 2 - 1 ,4 9 4 - 1 ,6 7 3
36,417 41,963 42,770
11,017
10,710
11,479
9,564
11,809
-3 5 ,7 9 6 -3 9 ,7 9 9 -4 5 ,4 5 9 -1 0 ,7 2 8 -1 1 ,7 2 2 -1 1 ,9 5 1 -1 1 ,0 5 8 -1 3 ,4 8 2

1
2
3

M erchandise trade balance 1........................................................
E xports......................................................................................

4
5

Military transactions, n e t..............................................................
Travel and transportation, n e t.....................................................

- 3 ,3 4 4
- 1 ,7 8 4

-3 ,3 7 4
-2 ,0 6 1

-2 ,8 9 4
-2 ,4 3 2

-6 6 5
-4 9 8

-6 9 8
-6 2 5

-7 2 4
-6 0 6

-8 0 7
-7 0 3

-8 6 6
-6 4 3

6
7
8
9

U.S. direct investments abroad............................................
O ther U.S. investments abroad............................................
Foreign investments in the United States.........................

5,975
7,340
3,199
- 4 ,5 6 4

6,259
7,920
3,506
-5 ,1 6 7

7,995
9,455
3,443
-4 ,9 0 3

1,798
2,060
877
-1 ,1 3 9

2,191
2,464
833
-1 ,1 0 6

1,711
2,163
852
-1 ,3 0 4

2,295
2,770
881
- 1 ,3 5 6

1,836
2,271
930
- 1 ,3 6 5

442

574

748

212

180

182

172

199

Balance on goods and services 3............................................................

1,911

3,563

727

1,136

36

91

-5 3 7

—1,147

12

Remittances, pensions, and other transfers.............................

-1 ,3 0 1

- 1 ,4 7 4

-1 ,5 2 9

-3 5 5

-3 6 9

-4 0 2

-4 0 4

-3 8 7

13

Balance on goods, services, and remittances......................................

610

2,089

-8 0 2

781

-3 3 3

-3 1 1

-9 4 1

- 1 ,5 3 4

14

U.S. Government grants (excluding m ilitary)...........................

- 1 ,6 4 4

-1 ,7 3 4

- 2 ,0 4 5

-4 3 6

-4 7 7

-5 4 4

-5 8 8

-5 6 0

15

Balance on current account.....................................................................

-1 ,0 3 5

356

- 2 ,8 4 7

345

-8 1 0

-8 5 5

-1 ,5 2 9

- 2 ,0 9 4

16

- 2 ,1 0 6
-8 7

- 1 ,8 2 9
244

- 2 ,1 1 7
225

-6 0 9
4

-6 8 1
102

-4 4 2
72

-3 8 5
48

-2 8 7
45

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

U.S. Government capital flows excluding nonscheduled
repayments, net 4 .........................................................................
Nonscheduled repayments o f U.S. Government assets...........
U.S. Government nonliquid liabilities to other than foreign
official reserve agencies..............................................................
Long-term private capital flows, n e t...........................................
U.S. direct investments ab ro ad ............................................
Foreign direct investments in the United States..............
Foreign securities....................................................................
U.S. securities other than Treasury issues.........................
O ther, reported by U.S. b an k s............................................
Other, reported by U.S. nonbanking concerns.................

267
-5 0
- 3 ,2 5 4
832
- 1 ,4 9 4
3,112
477
277

-4 3 3
-1 ,3 9 8
- 4 ,4 0 0
1,030
-9 4 2
2,190
198
526

-4 8 6
-4 ,1 4 9
-4 ,7 6 5
-6 7
-9 0 9
2,282
-8 1 4
124

-9 7
-9 2 2
- 1 ,2 9 0
124
-3 6 1
559
-1 2 7
173

-1 8 8
-5
- 1 ,6 0 5 - 1 ,8 8 3
- 1 ,2 7 7 - 1 ,4 1 0
1
-3 7 4
-3 7 2
-2 4 9
196
606
-2 1 4
-3 0 8
61
-1 4 8

-1 9 6
260
-7 8 8
181
73
921
-1 6 5
38

-1 4 3
-7 6 2
-9 9 4
-3 3 5
-3 8 8
1,066
6
-1 1 7

26

Balance on current account and long-term capital 4..........................

-3 ,0 1 1

-3 ,0 5 9

- 9 ,3 7 4

-1 ,2 7 9

- 2 ,9 9 9

- 3 ,2 9 6

- 1 ,8 0 2

-3 ,2 4 1

27
28
29
30

N onliquid short-term private capital flows, net*......................
Claims reported by U.S. b a n k s............................................
Claims reported by U.S. nonbanking concerns...............
Liabilities reported by U.S. nonbanking concerns..........

-6 4 0
-6 5 8
-7 3
91

-4 8 2
-1 ,0 2 3
-3 6 1
902

- 2 ,4 2 0
-1 ,8 0 7
-5 5 5
-5 8

-5 3 4
-1 3 9
-1 3 3
-2 6 2

-3 1 5
-9 1
-1 4 5
-7 9

-8 8 3
-8 9 2
-1 4 7
156

-6 8 8
-6 8 5
-1 3 0
127

-5 2 9
-5 6 6
34
3

31
32

Errors and omissions, n e t.............................................................

-2 ,4 7 0

867
717
-1 ,1 7 4 -1 0 ,9 2 7

180
-9 4 4

179
- 2 ,5 8 6

179
-5 ,3 8 0

179
-2 ,0 1 8

178
480

- 6 ,1 2 2

-3 ,8 5 1 -2 2 ,0 0 2

10
11

17
18

33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41

Liquid claim s............................................................................
Reported by U.S. nonbanking c o n cern s..................
Liquid liab ilities.....................................................................
To foreign commercial b a n k s ......................................
To international and regional organizations............
To other foreigners........................................................

2,702

42

45

Financed by changes in—
Nonliquid liabilities to foreign official reserve agencies
reported by U.S. G overnm ent..................................................
N onliquid liabilities to foreign official agencies reported
by U.S. b anks...............................................................................
Liquid liabilities to foreign official agencies..............................

46
47
48
49
50

U.S. official reserve assets, n e t.....................................................
G old...........................................................................................
SD R’s ........................................................................................
Convertible currencies...........................................................
Gold tranche position in I M F .............................................

43
44

51
52
53

M emoranda:
Transfers under military grant programs (excluded from
lines 2, 4, and 14).......................................................................
Reinvested earnings o f foreign incorporated affiliates of
U.S. firms (excluded from lines 7 and 20).............................
Reinvested earnings o f U.S. incorporated affiliates of
foreign firms (excluded from lines 9 and 21).........................

For notes seeendof table.




- 2 ,5 7 7

- 5 ,7 2 1

- 9 ,3 8 0

-4 ,3 2 9

- 3 ,1 1 2

-7 ,7 6 3
-1 ,0 7 2
-5 6 6
-5 0 6
-6 ,6 9 1
- 6 ,9 0 8
682
-4 6 5

-2 ,8 4 8
-2 7 2
-9 4
-1 7 8
- 2 ,5 7 6
-2 ,9 2 8
280
72

-7 4 5
95
32
63
-8 4 0
-8 9 2
198
-1 4 6

-2 ,5 5 1
-5 5 5
-3 9 2
-1 6 3
-1 ,9 9 6
- 1 ,7 7 5
149
-3 7 0

-1 ,6 1 9
-3 4 0
-1 1 2
-2 2 8
-1 ,2 7 9
- 1 ,3 1 3
55
-2 1

-1 6 5
-6 9 3
-5 1 8
-1 7 5
528
438
29
61

- 9 ,8 3 9 -2 9 ,7 6 5

-5 ,4 2 5

- 6 ,4 6 6 -1 1 ,9 3 1

-5 ,9 4 8

- 3 ,2 7 7

8,824 -5 ,9 8 8
162
252
-2 0 9
-9 9
371
351
8,662 - 6 ,2 4 0
9,166 -6 ,5 0 8
-6 3
181
-4 4 1
87

-1 6 2

535

341

-8

-8

—9

366

280

-8 3 6
-5 1 7

-8 1 0
7,637

-5 3 9
27,615

-2 0 1
4,952

-1 6 0
5,975

-1 7 3
10,919

-5
5,774

-4
2,572

- 1 ,1 8 7
-9 6 7
814
-1 ,0 3 4

2,477
787
-8 5 1
2,152
389

2,348
866
-2 4 9
381
1,350

682
109
—55
373
255

659
456
17
-6 6
252

1,194
300
-2 9
72
851

-1 8 7
1
-1 8 2
2
-8

429
544
—178
64
-1

2,856

2,586

3,153

2,614

2,885

( 5)

( 5)

( 5)

( 5)

( 5)

( 5)

431

434

( 5)

( 5)

( 5)

( 5)

( 5)

( 5)

735

778

701

939

932

SEPTEMBER 1972 a U.S. BALANCE OF PAYMENTS AND FOREIGN TRADE
1.

A 75

U.S. BALANCE OF PAYMENTS-Continued
(In millions o f dollars)
1971
1969

Credits + , debits —

1970

1972

1971
II

III

IV

Ip

- 2 ,7 5 7
-5 ,6 0 5

- 5 ,9 0 0
- 6 ,6 4 5

-9 ,5 5 9
-1 2 ,1 1 0

- 4 ,5 0 8
- 6 ,1 2 7

- 3 ,2 9 0
-3 ,4 5 5

I
Balances excluding allocations o f SD R’s—Seasonally adjusted
-6 ,1 2 2
2,702

-4 ,7 1 8
-1 0 ,7 0 6

-2 2 ,7 1 9
-3 0 ,4 8 2

Balances not seasonally adjusted
Balance on goods and services (line 11)..........................................
Balance on goods, services, and remittances (line 13).................
Balance on current account (line 15)................................................
Balance on current account and long-term capital 4 (line 2 6 )...
Balances including allocations o f SD R ’s :
N et liquidity (line 33)...................................................................
Official reserve transactions (line 42)........................................
Balances excluding allocations o f SD R’s:
N et liquidity...................................................................................
Official reserve transactions........................................................

1,911
610
-1 ,0 3 5
-3 ,0 1 1

3,563
2,089
356
-3 ,0 5 9

727
-8 0 2
- 2 ,8 4 7
- 9 ,3 7 4

1,509
1,174
709
- 1 ,2 6 2

251
-1 3 1
-6 5 5
- 3 ,4 6 6

- 1 ,3 3 0
-1 ,7 4 3
- 2 ,2 4 6
- 4 ,6 7 2

296
-1 0 4
-6 5 7
23

-7 8 2
- 1 ,1 4 8
-1 ,7 3 8
- 3 ,2 7 2

- 6 ,1 2 2
2,702

-3 ,8 5 1
-9 ,8 3 9

- 2 2 ,0 0 2
-2 9 ,7 6 5

- 1 ,8 5 8
-4 ,7 1 8

- 6 ,6 1 2
- 6 ,4 6 2

-1 0 ,0 6 6
-1 2 ,7 0 3

- 3 ,4 6 6
- 5 ,8 8 2

- 2 ,3 6 5
- 2 ,5 4 8

- 6 ,1 2 2
2,702

-4 ,7 1 8
-1 0 ,7 0 6

-2 2 ,7 1 9
-3 0 ,4 8 2

-2 ,5 7 5
-5 ,4 3 5

- 6 ,6 1 2
- 6 ,4 6 2

-1 0 ,0 6 6
-1 2 ,7 0 3

- 3 ,4 6 6
- 5 ,8 8 2

- 3 ,0 7 5
-3 ,2 5 8

1 Adjusted to balance o f payments basis; excludes transfers under
military grants, exports under U.S. military agency sales contracts and
imports o f U.S. military agencies.
2 Includes fees and royalties from U.S. direct investments abroad or
from foreign direct investments in the United States.

3 Equal to net exports o f goods and services in national income and
product accounts o f the United States.
4 Includes some short-term U.S. Govt, assets.
5 N ot available.
N o t e . — D ata are from U.S. D epartm ent o f Commerce, Office o f Busi­
ness Economics. Details may not add to totals because o f rounding.

2. MERCHANDISE EXPORTS AND IMPORTS
(Seasonally adjusted; in millions o f dollars)
Trade balance
Period
1969

1970

1971

1972

1969

1970

1971

1972

M onth:
J a n .. .
Feb..
M ar..
A pr..
M ay.
June.
J u ly ..
Aug..
Sept..
O c t..,
N ov..
D ec..

32,161
3 2,266
33,188
33,318
3 3,268
3 3,179
3,182
3,366
3.341
3.342
3,398
3,280

3,406
3,547
3,376
3,409
3,661
3,730
3,699
3,592
3,553
3,689
3,499
3,570

3,733
3,691
3,815
3,528
3,776
3,662
3,493
3,678
4,505
2,710
3,160
3,858

4,221
3,806
3,891
3,760
3,914
3,905
4,019

3 2,002
3 2,672
3 2,982
33,183
3 3,257
33,152
3,074
3,163
3.078
3,192
3,180
3.078

3,223
3,278
3,218
3,263
3,338
3,266
3,255
3,346
3.428
3,501
3.428
3,404

3,685
3,546
3,568
3,748
3,988
4,019
3,793
3,928
4,237
3,523
3,379
4,128

4,540
4,403
4,475
4,460
4,466
4,495
4,561

Quarter:
I ___
1 1 ...
111...
I V . ..

7,615
9,765
9,889
10,020

10,328
10,800
10,845
10,758

11,239
10,965
11,675
9,726

11,917
11,579

7,655
9,591
9,315
9,450

9,719
9,867
10,029
10,333

10,799
11,747
11,958
11,030

13,418
13,421

Year4 . .

37,332

42,662

43,555

36,043

39,963

45,602

1 Exports o f domestic and foreign merchandise; excludes Dept, o f
Defense shipments o f grant-aid military equipment and supplies under
M utual Security Program.
2 General imports including imports for immediate consumption plus
entries into bonded warehouses.




1970

1971

1972

159
-4 0 6
206
135
11
27
108
203
263
150
218
202

183
269
158
146
323
465
444
246
125
188
71
166

48
145
247
-2 2 0
-2 1 2
-3 5 0
-3 0 0
-2 5 1
268
-8 1 5
-2 1 8
-2 7 0

-3 1 9
-5 9 8
-5 8 4
-6 9 9
-5 5 2
-5 9 0
-5 4 2

-4 0
174
574
570

609
933
816
425

440
-7 8 2
-2 8 3
-1 ,3 0 4

1,289

2,699

- 2 ,0 4 7

1969

-1 ,5 0 1
-1 ,8 4 2

3 Significantly affected by strikes.
4 Sum o f unadjusted figures.
N o t e . —Bureau of the Census data. Details may not add to totals be­
cause o f rounding.

A 76

U.S. GOLD TRANSACTIONS □ SEPTEMBER 1972
3. U.S. NET MONETARY GOLD TRANSACTIONS WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES
AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

(Net sales [—] or net acquisitions; in millions of dollars at $35 per fine troy ounce)
Area and country
W estern Europe:
A u stria..................................
Belgium.................................
F rance....................................
G erm any, Fed. Rep. o f . ..
Ireland...................................
Italy ........................................
N etherlands..........................
Spain......................................
Switzerland...........................
United K ingdom .............
Bank for Intl. Settlements.
O th er.....................................
T o tal.

1963

-8 2
-5 i8

-130
‘329

1965

1964

-5 5
-4 0
-4 0 5
-2 2 5
-1
200
-6 0
-3 2
-8 1
618

-3 9 9

-1 0 0
-8 3
-8 8 4
-2
-8 0
-3 5
-1 8 0
-5 0
150

Latin American republics:
Argentina .......................
Brazil.................................
C olom bia..........................
Venezuela.........................
O ther..................................
T o ta l.
Asia:
I r a q .................
J ap a n ...............
L eb an o n .........
M alaysia.........
Philippines. . .
Saudi A ra b ia .
Singapore. . . .
O th er...............

-1 1
32

-1 3
12

All o th er..........................

-3 6

T otal foreign countries.

-392

3
-7

G rand to ta l.........

II

III

-5 8
600

-2
-6 0

325
500
41
-7 6

-2
-8 5

-5 2
-2 0 9
-1 9

-3 0
-8 7 9

-5 0
-8 3 5

-2 5

-1 2 9

-110
-473

-1 1 0
-2 8 2

-1 9 1

-5 0
51
-5 0

-1 7 5

-5 0

-5 0

16

-4 7

-2 9

-1 3

-6

-2 2

-9 8 0

-6 6 9

969

-2 0 4

-7 9 6

-4 4 8

-263

200

150

50

-3 9
-3
7

-1
-1

-2 5

-2 5

-2 8
-2 3
-1

-6

-4 0

-2 9

-80

-4

17

-4 1

-6 5

-5 4

-131

-4

-1 0

-4
-5 6
-1 1

-1 4

-1 4

-2 4

-8 6

-1 6

-2 2

- 3 6 - 1 ,5 4 7

IV

I

II

-2 5

-4 9

« -2 2 5
-392

1971

-659

- 3 6 - 1 ,3 2 2

Intl. M onetary F u n d 5..

1970

-2 5
-6 0 i

-2 1

-4 2

" -i

-9 5
-3 4
9
-5 0
-8 1
-7 5

-1
-6

1969

-3 5

25

T o ta l...................

1968

-1,299

-9
56

1967

200
11

C anada -----

1972

1971
1966

-2 2

-1 1 9
40
11
-9

-3 5
-1 0
-2

-91

-1 0
-1

-1

21

-3 0
-1

10

-32

-3 6 6

-2 1 3

3 -1 6 6

3 -6 8

-8 1

-608 -1 ,0 3 1

-1,118

957 4-6 3 1

-845

-4 4 5

22

-3

10

-1 5 6

-2 2

-1 1

-4

-5 4 4

-431 -1 ,0 0 9

-1,121

967

-7 8 7

-867

-4 5 7

-300

-5 4 4

177

1 Includes purchase from D enm ark o f $25 million.
2 Includes purchase from Kuw ait o f $25 million.
3 Includes sales to Algeria o f $150 million in 1967 and $50 million in
1968.
4 D ata for IM F include the U.S. paym ent o f $385 million increase in
its gold subscription to the IM F and gold sold by the IM F to the United
States in mitigation o f U.S. sales to other countries making gold payments
to the IM F . The country d ata include U.S. gold sales to various countries
in connection with the IM F qu o ta payments. Such U.S. sales to countries
and resales to the U nited States by the IM F total $548 million each.
5 Includes IM F gold sales to and purchases from the U nited States,

-4
-296

U.S. paym ent o f increases in its gold subscription to IM F , gold deposits
by the IM F (see note 1 (b) to Table 4), and withdrawal o f deposits. The
first w ithdrawal ($17 million) was m ade in June 1968 and the last with­
drawal ($144 million) was made in Feb. 1972.
IM F sold to the U nited States a total o f $800 million o f gold ($200
million in 1956, and $300 million in 1959 and in 1960) with the right o f
repurchase; proceeds from these sales invested by IM F in U.S. Govt,
securities. IM F repurchased $400 million in Sept. 1970 and the remaining
$400 million in Feb. 1972.
6 Payment to the IM F o f $259 million increase in U.S. gold subscription
less gold deposits by the IM F.

Notes to Table 5 on opposite page:
1 Represents net IM F sales o f gold to acquire U.S. dollars for use in
IM F operations. Does not include transactions in gold relating to gold
deposit or gold investment (see Table 6).
2 Positive figures represent purchases from the IM F o f currencies of
other members for equivalent am ounts o f dollars; negative figures repre­
sent repurchase o f dollars, including dollars derived from charges on
purchases and from other net dollar income o f the IM F. The United
States has a commitment to repurchase within 3 to 5 years, but only to
the extent th at the holdings o f dollars o f the IM F exceed 75 per cent o f
the U.S. quota. Purchases o f dollars by other countries reduce the U.S.
commitment to repurchase by an equivalent am ount.
3 Includes dollars obtained by countries other than the United States
from sales o f gold to the IM F.
4 Represents the U.S. gold tranche position in the IM F (the U.S.
quota minus the holdings o f dollars o f the IM F), which is the am ount
that the United States could purchase in foreign currencies automatically




if needed. U nder appropriate conditions, the United States could pur­
chase additional am ounts equal to its quota.
5 Includes $259 million gold subscription to the IM F in June 1965 for
a U.S. quota increase, which became effective on Feb. 23, 1966. In figures
published by the IM F from June 1965 through Jan. 1966, this gold sub­
scription was included in the U.S. gold stock and excluded from the
reserve position.
6 Includes $30 million o f Special D raw ing Rights.
7 Represents am ount payable in dollars to the IM F to m aintain the
value o f IM F holdings o f U.S. dollars.
N o t e . —The initial U.S. quota in the IM F was $2,750 million. The U.S.
quota was increased to $4,125 million in 1959, to $5,160 million in Feb.
1966, to $6,700 million in Dec. 1970, and to $7,274 million in M ay 1972 as
a result o f the change in par value o f the U.S. dollar. U nder the Articles o f
Agreement, subscription payments equal to the quota have been m ade
25 per cent in gold and 75 per cent in dollars.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ U.S. RESERVE ASSETS; POSITION IN THE IMF

A 77

4. U.S. RESERVE ASSETS
(In millions of dollars)
Gold sto ck 1
End o f
year

Total

1958.
1959.
1960.

C on­
vertible
foreign
curren­
cies

G old s to ck 1

Reserve
position
in
IM F 3

T o tal2

Treasury

22,540
21,504
19,359

20,582
19,507
17,804

20,534
19,456
17,767

1961.
1962.
1963.
1964.
1965.

18,753
17,220
16,843
16,672
15,450

16,947
16,057
15,596
15,471
613,806

16,889
15,978
15,513
15,388
613,733

116
99
212
432
781

1,690
1,064
1,035
769
6 863

1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.

14,882
14,830
15,710
7 16,964
14,487
812,167

13,235
12,065
10,892
11,859
11,072
10,206

13,159
11,982
10.367
10.367
10,732
10,132

1,321
2,345
3,528
72,781
629
8 276

326
420
1,290
2,324
1,935
585

T o tal2

Treasury

C on­
vertible
foreign
curren­
cies 5

End of
m onth

SD R ’s 4

1,958
1,997
1,555

851
1,100

1 Includes (a) gold sold to the United States by the International M on­
etary Fund with the right o f repurchase, and (b) gold deposited by the
IM F to mitigate the impact on the U.S. gold stock o f foreign purchases
for the purpose o f making gold subscriptions to the IM F under quota
increases. F o r corresponding liabilities, see Table 6.
2 Includes gold in Exchange Stabilization Fund.
3 The United States has the right to purchase foreign currencies equiva­
lent to its reserve position in the IM F autom atically if needed. U nder ap­
propriate conditions the United States could purchase additional am ounts
equal to the U.S. quota. See Table 5.
4 Includes allocations by the IM F o f Special Drawing Rights as follows:
$867 million on Jan. 1, 1970; $717 million on Jan. 1, 1971; and $710
million on Jan. 1, 1972; plus net transactions in SDRs.
5 For holdings o f F.R . Banks only, see pp. A-12 and A-13.
6 Reserve position includes, and gold stock excludes, $259 million gold
subscription to the IM F in June 1965 for a U.S. quota increase which

Reserve
position

SD R ’s 4

1971
A ug...
S ep t...
O c t.. .
N o v ...
D ec...

12,128
12.131
12,146
12.131
8 12,167

10,488
10,209
10.207
10.207
10,206
10,206

10.132
10.132
10.132
10.132
10.132

248
250
259
243
8 276

574
577
580
582
585

1.097
1.097
1,100
1,100
1,100

1972
J a n .. .
F e b ...
M ar...
A p r...
M a y ..
J u n e ..
J u ly ..
A ug...

12,879
12,330
12,270
12,285
913,345
13,339
13,090
13,124

10,206
9.662
9.662
9,662
910,490
10,490
10,488

10,132
9.588
9.588
9.588
910,410
10.410
10.410
10.410

276
276
212
429
469
457
203
234

587
582
586
391
9428
434
439
444

1,810
1,810
1,810
1,803
91,958
1.958
1.958
1.958

became effective on Feb. 23, 1966. In figures published by the IM F from
June 1965 through Jan. 1966, this gold subscription was included in the
U.S. gold stock and excluded from the reserve position.
7 Includes gain o f $67 million resulting from revaluation o f the German
m ark in Oct. 1969, o f which $13 million represents gain on m ark holdings
a t time o f revaluation.
8 Includes $28 million increase in dollar value o f foreign currencies
revalued to reflect market exchange rates as o f Dec. 31, 1971.
9 Total reserve assets include an increase o f $1,016 million resulting
from change in par value o f the U.S. dollar on M ay 8, 1972; o f which,
total gold stock is $828 million (Treasury gold stock $822 million), reserve
position in IM F $33 million, and SD R ’s $155 million.
N o t e . —See Table 24 for gold held under earm ark at F.R . Banks for
foreign and international accounts. G old under earm ark is not included
in the gold stock o f the United States.

5. U.S. POSITION IN THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
(In millions o f dollars)
Transactions affecting IM F holdings o f dollars
(during period)

IM F h o ld in g s
o f dollars

( e n d o f D e rio d )

U.S. transactions with IM F

Transactions by
other countries
with IM F

Period
Payments
of
subscrip­
tions in
dollars
1946— 1957................................
1958— 1963................................
1964— 1966................................
1967.............................................
1968.............................................
1969.............................................
1970.............................................
1971.............................................

2,063
1,031
776

600
150

i,i5 5

22
6712
*

For notesseeoppositepage.




Transac­
tions in
foreign
curren­
cies 2

1,640
-8 4

1971—Aug.................................
Sept.................................
O ct...................................
N ov.................................
D ec..................................
1972—Jan...................................
Feb..................................
M ar.................................
A pr..................................
M ay ................................
Ju n e ................................
July.................................
A u g ................................

N et
gold
sales
by IM F 1

150
1,362
862

200
7541

IM F net
income
in
dollars

Purchases
of
d o lla rs 3

R e­
purchases
in
dollars

Total
change

Amount

Per cent
of
U.S.
quota

U.S.
reserve
position
in IM F
(end o f
period) 4

-4 5
60
45

- 2 ,6 7 0
—1,666
—723

827
2,740
6

775
2,315
1,744

775
3,090
4,834

28
75
94

1,975
1,035
5326

20
20
19
25
—28

-1 1 4
—806
-1 ,3 4 3
—854
-2 4

268
741
40

-9 4
-8 7 0
- 1 ,0 3 4
1,929
1,350

4,740
3,870
2,836
4,765
6,115

92
75
55
71
91

420
1,290
2,324
1,935
585

-3
-3
-3
-2
-3

859
-3
-3
-2
-3

6,126
6,123
6,120
6,118
6,115

91
91
91
91
91

574
577
580
582
585

-2
5
—4
—5
—4
—6
-5
—5

-2
5
—4
195
537
—6
—5
—5

6,113
6,118
6,114
6,309
6,846
6,840
6,835
6,831

91
91
91
94
94
94
94
94

587
582
586
391
428
434
439

A 78

INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S. □ SEPTEMBER 1972
6. U.S. LIQUID AND NONLIQUID LIABILITIES TO FOREIGN OFFICIAL INSTITUTIONS, AND LIQUID
LIABILITIES TO ALL OTHER FOREIGNERS
(In millions of dollars)
Liabilities to foreign countries
Official institutions2

End
of
period

Total

Liquid
liabili­
ties to
IM F
arising
from
gold
trans­
actions 1

Liquid

Total

Short­
term
liabili­
ties re­
ported
by
banks
in
U.S.

Liquid liabilities to
other foreigners

Nonliquid

N onm ar­
M arket­ ketable
able
con­
U.S.
vertible
Govt.
U.S.
bonds
Treas.
and
bonds
n o tes3, 4
and
notes

N onm ar­ Long­
ketable
term
noncon­ liabili­
vertible ties re­
U.S.
ported
Treas.
by
bonds
banks
and
in
notes 5
U.S.

Liquid
liabili­
ties
to com­
mercial
banks
abroad 6

Total

Short­
term
liabili­
ties re­
ported
by
banks
in
U.S.

Liquid
liabili­
ties to
non­
mone­
tary
M arket­
inti,
able
and re­
U.S.
gional
Govt.
organi­
bonds
zations 8
and
notes3,7

195 7
195 8
195 9

9 15,825
9 16,845
19,428

200
200
500

10,120

7,917
8,665
9,154

( 10)
(10)
966

3,472
3,520
4,678

2,940

2,252
2,430
2,399

(10)
( 10)
541

764
1,047
1,190

1960 i i ..........

/20,994
\ 2 1,027

800
800

11,078
11,088

10,212
10,212

866
876

4.818
4.818

2,773
2,780

2.230
2.230

543
550

1,525
1,541

1961 i i ...........

(22,853
\22,936

800
800

11.830
11.830

10.940
10.940

890
890

5,404
5,484

2,871
2,873

2,355
2,357

516
516

1.948
1.949

1962 i i ..........

/24,268
\24,268

800
800

12,948
12,914

11,997
11,963

751
751

5.346
5.346

3.013
3.013

2.565
2.565

448
448

2,161
2,195

1963 i i ..........

J26,433
\26,394

800
800

14,459
14,425

12.467
12.467

1,217
1,183

703
703

63
63

9
9

5.817
5.817

3,397
3,387

3.046
3.046

351
341

1,960
1,965

1964 i i ...........

/29,313
\2 9 ,364

800
800

15,790
15.786

13,224
13,220

1.125
1.125

1.079
1.079

204
204

158
158

7,271
7,303

3,730
3,753

3,354
3,377

376
376

1.722
1.722

200
200

29,569

834

15,826

13.066

1,105

1,201

334

120

7,419

4,059

3,587

472

1,431

1966 i i ...........

/3 1 ,145
\3 1,020

1,011
1,011

14,841
14,896

12,484
12,539

860
860

256
256

328
328

913
913

10,116
9,936

4.271
4.272

3.743
3.744

528
528

906
905

1967 i i ..........

/35,819
\35,667

1.033
1.033

18,201
18,194

14,034
14,027

908
908

711
711

741
741

1.807
1.807

11,209
11,085

4,685
4,678

4,127
4,120

558
558

691
677

1968 i i ..........

/38,687
\ 38,473

1.030
1.030

17,407
17,340

11.318
11.318

529
462

701
701

2.518
2.518

2.341
2.341

14.472
14.472

5,053
4,909

4.444
4.444

609
465

725
722

1969 i i ..........

J45,755
\45,914

1.019
1.019

15,975
15,998

11,054
11,077

346
346

i 2 555
555

i 22,515
2,515

1.505
1.505

23,638
23,645

4,464
4,589

3,939
4,064

525
525

659
663

1970—Dec. n

f47,009
\46,960

566
566

23.786
23,775

19.333
19.333

306
295

429
429

3.023
3.023

695
695

17,137
17,169

4,676
4,604

4,029
4,039

647
565

844
846

1971—J u ly ...
A u g .. .
S ep t...
O c t.. .
N o v ...
Dec. 13

56,603
63,105
63,943
65,262
65,746
/6 7 ,681
\67,810

544
544
544
544
544
544
544

36,259
43,863
45,331
46,574
48,339
51,209
50,651

26,868
34,015
35,080
36.067
37,271
39.679
39,018

632
870
1,015
1,272
1,747
1.955
1.955

5,452
5,785
6.054
6.055
6.055
6,060
6.093

023
021
021
021
096
371
3.441

284
172
161
159
170
144
144

13,937
12,820
12,435
12,478
11,194
10,262
10,950

4,473
4,382
4,160
4,244
4,214
4,138
4,141

3,894
3,839
3,645
3,734
3,733
3,691
3,694

579
543
515
510
481
447
447

1,390
1,496
1,473
1.422
1,455
1,528
1,524

1972—J a n . '. .
F e b .r . .
M a r.r .
A p r.r .
M ay. .
June**.
July2*..

69,063
69.995
71,015
72,217
72,110
73.996
77,466

544

51,514
52,799
53,811
54,098
53,579
54,630
59,466

39,581
40.679
40,985
38,728
37,850
38,632
39,827

2,260
2,448
2,882
2,933
3,283
3,557
3,781

6.094
6.094
6.094
8.594
8.594
8.594
12,094

3.441
3.441
3.723
3.723
3.723
3.723
3,647

138
137
127
120
129
124
117

11,171
11,373
11,464
12,433
12,821
13,409
12,071

4,153
4,204
4,194
4,242
4,284
4,486
4,507

3,763
3,812
3,818
3,853
3,889
4,114
4,137

390
392
376
389
395
372
370

1,681
1,619
1,546
1,444
1,426
1,471
1.422

196 5

1 Includes (a) liability on gold deposited by the IM F to mitigate the
impact on the U.S. gold stock o f foreign purchases for gold subscriptions
to the IM F under quota increases, and (b) U.S. Govt, obligations at cost
value and funds awaiting investment obtained from proceeds o f sales o f
gold by the IM F to the U nited States to acquire income-earning assets.
2 Includes BIS and European Fund.
3 Derived by applying reported transactions to benchm ark data;
breakdown o f transactions by type o f holder estimated 1960-63. Includes
securities issued by corporations and other agencies o f the U.S. Govt,
which are guaranteed by the United States.
4 Includes nonguaranteed securities o f U.S. Federally-sponsored agen­
cies, beginning Feb. 1972.
5 Excludes notes issued to foreign official nonreserve agencies.
6 Includes short-term liabilities payable in dollars to commercial banks
abroad and short-term liabilities payable in foreign currencies to com m er­
cial banks abroad and to “ other foreigners.”
7 Includes marketable U.S. Govt, bonds and notes held by commercial
banks abroad.
8 Principally the International Bank for Reconstruction and D evelop­
ment and the Inter-American and Asian Development Banks. From D ec.
1957 through Jan. 1972 includes difference between cost value and face
value o f securities in IM F gold investment account.
9 Includes total foreign holdings o f U.S. Govt, bonds and notes, for
which breakdown by type o f holder is not available.
i o N o t available.




11 D ata on the two lines shown for this date differ because o f changes
in reporting coverage. Figures on first line are comparable with those
shown for the preceding date; figures on second line are comparable with
those shown for the following date.
12 Includes $101 million increase in dollar value o f foreign currency
liabilities resulting from revaluation of the Germ an mark in Oct. 1969 as
follows: liquid, $17 million, and nonliquid, $84 million.
13 D ata on the second line differ from those on first line because cer­
tain accounts previously classified as “ official institutions” are included
with “ banks” ; a number of reporting banks are included in the series for
the first time; and U.S. Treasury securities payable in foreign currencies
issued to official institutions o f foreign countries have been increased in
value to reflect m arket exchange rates as of Dec. 31, 1971.
N o t e . —Based on Treasury D ept, data and on data reported to the
Treasury Dept, by banks and brokers in the U nited States. D ata correspond
generally to statistics following in this section, except for the exclusion
o f nonmarketable, nonconvertible U.S. Treasury notes issued to foreign
official nonreserve agencies, the inclusion o f investments by foreign
official reserve agencies in nonguaranteed bonds o f U.S. Federally
sponsored agencies and m inor rounding differences. Table excludes IM F
“holdings o f dollars,” and holdings o f U.S. Treasury letters o f credit and
non-negotiable, non-interest-bearing special U.S. notes held by other in­
ternational and regional organizations.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S.

A 79

7. U.S. LIQUID AND NONLIQUID LIABILITIES TO OFFICIAL INSTITUTIONS
OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES, BY AREA
(Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
Total
foreign
countries

End o f period

18,194
(17,407
\17,340
1969 3 ............................................................................................. / 4 15,975
\ 15,998
1970 3 .............................................................................................
/23,786
\23,775
1968 3 .............................................................................................

Western
Europe 1

Latin
American
republics

C anada

Asia

Africa

O ther
countries 2

10,321
8,070
8,062
4 7,074
7,074
13,620
13,615

1,310
1,867
1,866
1,624
1,624
2,951
2,951

1,582
1,865
1,865
1,888
1,911
1,681
1,681

4,428
5,043
4,997
4,552
4,552
4,713
4,708

250
259
248
546
546
407
407

303
303
302
291
291
414
413

1971—Ju ly .....................................................................................
A ug.....................................................................................
Sept.....................................................................................
O ct.......................................................................................
N ov.....................................................................................
D ec.5 ' ...............................................................................

36,259
43,863
45,331
46,574
48,339
/51,209
150,651

23,048
26,059
26,634
27,154
28,157
30,010
30,134

3,210
3,474
3,462
3,530
3,710
3,980
3,980

1,362
1,398
1,275
1,344
1,340
1,414
1,429

7,566
11,788
12,872
13,477
14,009
14,519
13,823

285
312
296
276
248
415
415

788
832
792
793
875
871
870

1972—J a n . '...................................................................................
F e b . '..................................................................................
M a r.' .................................................................................
A p r . '..................................................................................
M ay ....................................................................................
June*..................................................................................
July*...................................................................................

51,514
52,799
53,811
54,098
53,579
54,630
59,466

30,266
31,190
31,593
31,363
30,935
31,910
36,390

3,974
3,981
4,052
4,181
4,316
4,486
4,446

1,402
1,330
1,323
1,492
1,476
1,485
1,392

14,430
14,792
15,191
15,249
14,967
14,589
14,757

426
449
457
477
458
533
572

1,016
1,057
1,195
1,336
1,427
1,627
1.909

1 Includes Bank for International Settlements and European Fund.
2 Includes countries in Oceania and Eastern Europe, and Western Euro­
pean dependencies in Latin America.
3 See note 11 to Table 6.
4 Includes $101 million increase in dollar value o f foreign currency
liabilities resulting from revaluation o f the G erman m ark in Oct. 1969.
5 D ata on second line differ from those on the first line because certain
accounts previously classified as “ Official institutions” are included in
“ Banks” ; a number o f reporting banks are included in the series for
the first time; and U.S. Treasury liabilities payable in foreign currencies

to official institutions o f foreign countries have been increased in value by
$110 million to reflect m arket exchange rates as o f Dec. 31, 1971.
N o t e . — D ata represent short- and long-term liabilities to the official
institutions o f foreign countries, as reported by banks in the United States;
foreign official holdings o f m arketable and nonmarketable U.S. Govt,
securities with an original m aturity o f m ore than 1 year, except for non­
marketable notes issued to foreign official nonreserve agencies; and in­
vestments by foreign official reserve agencies in nonguaranteed bonds o f
U.S. Federally-sponsored agencies.

8. SHORT-TERM LIABILITIES TO FOREIGNERS REPORTED BY BANKS
IN THE UNITED STATES, BY TYPE
(Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
To nonm onetary international
and regional organizations6

To all foreigners
Payable in dollars
End o f period
Deposits

Total i
Total

Demand

U.S.
Treasury
bills and
Time 2 certifi­
cates 3

Other
short­
term
liab.4

Payable
in
foreign
cur­
rencies

IM F
gold
invest­
m ent5

D eposits
Total
Demand

U.S.
Treasury
bills and
Tim e2 certifi­
cates

Other
short­
term
liab .4

1969................................ 40,199
19707............................... /4 1 ,719
141,761

39,770
41,351
41,393

20,460
15,785
15,795

6,959
5,924
5,961

5,015
14,123
14,123

7,336
5,519
5,514

429
368
368

800
400
400

613
820
820

62
69
69

83
159
159

244
211
211

223
381
381

1971—July..................... 46,346
Aug..................... 52,416
Sept..................... 52,878
Oct...................... 53,946
Nov..................... 53,898
D ec.8 ' ............... /55,404
\55,430

45,693
51,766
52,481
53,566
53,527
55,018
55,038

10,274
9,294
10,605
11,860
10,883
10,399
6,460

4,955
5,026
5,054
5,088
5,219
5,209
4,217

23,439
30,198
29,772
29,758
30,723
33,025
33,025

7,025
7,248
7,050
6,860
6,702
6,385
11,336

653
650
397
380
371
386
392

400
400
400
400
400
400
400

1,247
1,342
1,318
1,267
1,300
1,372
1,368

79
61
92
78
69
73
73

224
202
212
177
205
192
192

170
269
146
168
157
210
210

774
810
867
843
870
896
892

56,439
57,326
57,656
56,289
55,825
57,465
57,295

56,007
56,853
57,140
55,795
55,326
56,948
56,816

6,157
6,019
5,991
6,460
6,570
7,216
7,338

4,220
4,331
4,428
4,499
4,650
4,827
4,743

33,902
34,490
34,929
32,324
31,498
31,871
32,878

11,728
12,013
11,792
12,512
12,608
13,034
11,857

432
473
516
494
499
517
479

400

1,524
1,462
1,389
1,275
1,265
1,310
1,260

86
85
88
87
84
85
101

201
164
186
195
183
235
259

338
295
275
177
198
212
142

899
918
839
817
800
779
758

1972—J a n . '...................
F e b .' ...................
M a r.' .................
A p r .'..................
M ay....................
June*..................
July*...................

For notes seethe following page.




A 80

INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S. □ SEPTEMBER 1972
SHORT-TERM LIABILITIES TO FOREIGNERS REPORTED BY BANKS
IN THE UNITED STATES, BY TYPE— Continued

(Amounts outstanding; in millions of dollars)
To residents o f foreign countries

To official institutions?

Payable in dollars
End o f period
T otal

Dem and

T im e2

U.S.
Treasury
bills and
certifi­
cates3

Deposits

Payable in dollars
O ther
short­
term
liab.4

Payable
in
foreign
cur­
rencies

Total

D eposits
D em and

Tim e2

U.S.
Treasury
bills and
certifi­
cates 3

O ther
short­
term
liab.4

Payable
in
foreign
currencies

1969.................
19707...............

38,786
/40,499
\40,541

20,397
15,716
15,726

6,876
5,765
5,802

3,971
13.511
13.511

7,113
5,138
5,133

429
368
368

11,077
19.333
19.333

1,930
1.652
1.652

2,942
2.554
2.554

3,844
13.367
13.367

2,159
1,612
1,612

202
148
148

1971*—J u ly .. . .
A u g ... .
S e p t....
O c t... .
N o v ....
Dec.* r

44,699
50,674
51,160
52,279
52,198
53,632
53,662

10,195
9,233
10,513
11,781
10,814
10,326
6,387

4,732
4,823
4,843
4,911
5,014
5,017
4,025

22,869
29,529
29,226
29,190
30,166
32.415
32.415

6,249
6,438
6,182
6,016
5,831
5,489
10,443

653
650
397
380
371
386
392

26,868
34,015
35,080
36,067
37,271
39.679
39,018

1,469
1,264
1,450
1,231
1,263
1,620
1,327

2,307
2,371
2,392
2.465
2.465
2,504
2,039

19,605
26,674
27,855
28,982
30,071
32.311
32.311

3,067
3,285
3,225
3,231
3,314
3,086
3,176

420
421
158
158
158
158
165

1972—J a n .r . ..
F e b .r . .
M a r.r . .
A p r.r . .
M ay. . .
Ju n e* ..
Ju ly * ...

54,515
55,864
56,267
55,014
54,560
56,155
56,035

6,071
5,934
5,903
6,373
6,486
7,131
7,237

4,020
4,167
4,242
4,304
4,468
4,592
4,484

33,164
34,195
34,654
32,147
31,300
31,659
32,736

10,828
11,095
10,952
11,696
11,808
12,256
11,100

432
473
516
494
499
517
479

39,581
40.679
40,985
38,728
37,850
38,632
39,827

1,185
1,099
1,128
1,246
1,224
1,540
1,521

2,024
2,119
2,148
2,270
2,379
2,469
2,377

33,045
34,092
34,548
32,047
31,209
31,573
32,655

3,161
3,202
2,994
2,998
2,871
2,883
3,104

166
167
167
167
167
167
170

To b an k s1°

To other foreigners
Payable in dollars

End o f period

T otal

Deposits
D em and

Tim e2

U.S.
Treasury
bills and
certifi­
cates

Total

O ther
short­
term
liab.4

D eposits
Total
D em and

Tim e2

U.S.
Treasury
bills and
certifi­
cates

To banks
and other
. foreigners:
Payable in
foreign
O ther
cur­
short­
rencies
term
liab.4

1969.............
19707 .........

27.709
/2 1 ,166
\2 1 ,208

23,419
16,917
16,949

16,756
12,376
12,385

1,999
1,326
1,354

20
14
14

4,644
3,202
3,197

4,064
4,029
4,039

1,711
1,688
1,688

1,935
1,886
1,895

107
131
131

312
325
325

226
220
220

1971—J u ly ..
Aug..
Sept..
Oct.. .
N ov..
D ec.8

17,831
16,659
16,080
16,212
14,927
fl 3,953
\14,644

13,704
12,590
12,196
12,256
10,981
10,034
10,722

7,030
6,284
7,486
8,845
7,871
7,047
3,400

600
665
739
786
879
850
320

3,168
2,769
1,286
120
9
8
8

2,905
2,872
2,686
2,504
2,223
2,130
6,995

3,894
3,839
3,645
3,734
3,733
3,691
3,694

1,696
1,684
1,577
1,705
1,680
1,660
1,660

1,825
1,787
1,712
1,660
1,670
1,663
1,666

96
87
85
89
87
96
96

277
280
272
281
296
274
271

233
230
239
222
213
228
228

1972—J a n .r .
F e b .r
M ar.r
A pr..
M ay.
June*
July*.

14,934
15,185
15,282
16,286
16.710
17,523
16,208

10,904
11,067
11,115
12,106
12,488
13,059
11,762

3,183
3,121
3,093
3,372
3,569
3,791
3,877

335
349
359
352
307
310
286

4
4
4
4
3
5
5

7,382
7.593
7,658
8,379
8,609
8,953
7.594

3,763
3,812
3,818
3,853
3,889
4,114
4,137

1,703
1,714
1,682
1,756
1,693
1,799
1,839

1,660
1,699
1,735
1,682
1,781
1,813
1,820

116
99
102
96
88
81
75

285
299
299
318
328
421
402

267
306
349
327
333
350
309

1 D ata exclude “holdings o f dollars” o f the International M onetary
Fund.
2 Excludes negotiable time certificates o f deposit, which are included
in “ O ther.”
3 Includes nonmarketable certificates o f indebtedness issued to official
institutions o f foreign countries.
4 Principally bankers’ acceptances, commercial paper, and negotiable
time certificates o f deposit. See also note 8(a).
5 U.S. Treasury bills and certificates obtained from proceeds o f sales of
gold by the IM F to the United States to acquire income-earning assets.
U pon term ination o f investment, the same quantity o f gold was reac­
quired by the IM F.
6 Principally the International Bank for Reconstruction and Develop­
ment and the Inter-American Development Bank.
Includes difference between cost value and face value o f securities in
IM F gold investment account.
7 D ata on the two lines shown for this date differ because o f changes in
reporting coverage. Figures on the first line are comparable in coverage
with those shown for the preceding date; figures on the second line are
comparable with those shown for the following date.




8 D ata on second line differ from those on first line because (a) those
liabilities o f U.S. banks to their foreign branches and those liabilities o f
U.S. agencies and branches o f foreign banks to their head offices and
foreign branches, which were previously reported as deposits, are included
in “ Other short-term liabilities” ; (b) certain accounts previously classified
as “ Official institutions” are included in “ Banks” ; and (c) a num ber o f
reporting banks are included in the series for the first time.
9Foreign central banks and foreign central govts, and their agencies,
and Bank for International Settlements and European Fund.
i o Excludes central banks, which are included in “ Official institutions.”
N o t e . —“Short term” refers to obligations payable on demand or having
an original m aturity o f 1 year or less. For data on long-term liabilities
reported by banks, see Table 10. D ata exclude the “holdings o f dollars”
o f the International M onetary F u n d ; these obligations to the IM F consti­
tute contingent liabilities, since they represent essentially the am ount o f
dollars available for drawings from the IM F by other member countries.
D ata exclude also U.S. Treasury letters o f credit and non-negotiable, noninterest-bearing special U.S. notes held by the Inter-American Develop­
ment Bank and the International Development Association.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S.

A 81

9. SHORT-TERM LIABILITIES TO FOREIGNERS REPORTED BY BANKS
IN THE UNITED STATES, BY COUNTRY
(End o f period. Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
1970

1971

1972

Area and country
Nov.

Switzerland...................................................
T u rk ey ...........................................................
U nited K ingdom .........................................
Yugoslavia.....................................................
O ther W estern E urope2............................
U.S.S.R..........................................................
O ther Eastern E u ro p e................................

185
597
189
117
2,267
7,520
184
1,330
762
324
274
198
503
1,948
46
5,504
37
594
15
54

246
736
168
134
2,858
5,733
175
1,953
291
714
308
185
757
3,265
67
7,711
40
1,401
8
67

254
701
168
160
3,150
6,596
170
1,888
271
685
303
203
791
3,248
68
7,374
34
1,369
14
53

Europe:
A ustria...........................................................
Belgium-Luxembourg.................................
D en m ark .......................................................
Finland...........................................................
F ran ce............................................................
G erm any.......................................................
G reece............................................................
Ita ly ................................................................
N etherlands...................................................
N orw ay..........................................................
P ortugal.........................................................
S pain...............................................................

J a n .r

F e b .r

M a r.r

A p r.r

May

June*

July*

254
701
168
160
3,150
6,596
170
1,888
270
685
303
203
792
3,249
68
7,379
34
1,391
14
53

261
728
177
156
3,234
6,972
167
1,700
306
702
299
187
803
3,256
36
7,908
35
1,367
13
54

252
779
179
150
3,311
7,724
164
1,693
424
675
282
177
871
3,099
34
7,600
40
1,438
11
46

257
888
191
140
3,103
7,670
147
1,572
823
674
267
183
964
2,935
42
8,089
54
1,416
9
58

276
866
218
151
3,043
5,482
163
1,627
878
655
279
219
981
2,942
36
7,954
94
1,391
9
56

283
864
203
131
3,027
5,500
159
1,572
861
669
284
206
1,010
2,709
40
7,954
88
1,388
13
58

254
961
215
148
3,513
6,483
179
1,373
847
654
269
231
1,044
2,626
44
7,913
90
1,367
10
68

261
1,159
216
176
4,324
6,601
168
1,423
1,488
769
290
222
1,036
3,623
55
4,941
87
1,399
18
58

D ec.1 r

Dec.

T o tal........ ..............................................

22,648

26,816

27,503

27,530

28,361

28,951

29,483

27,321

27,021

28,289

28,314

C anada...............................................................

4,056

3,590

3,441

3,441

3,593

3,574

3,486

3,722

4,146

3,966

3,727

Latin America:
A rgentina.......................................................
B razil..............................................................
Chile...............................................................
C olom bia.......................................................
C uba...............................................................
M exico...........................................................
P a n a m a .........................................................
P e ru ................................................................
Uruguay.........................................................
Venezuela.......................................................
O ther Latin American republics..............
Bahamas and B erm uda..............................
Netherlands Antilles and Surinam ..........
Other Latin A m erica..................................

539
346
266
247
7
821
147
225
118
735
620
745
98
39

437
383
189
179
6
706
150
163
108
874
615
376
85
46

441
342
191
188
6
709
154
164
108
963
656
657
87
36

441
342
191
188
6
715
154
164
108
963
655
656
87
37

435
376
180
185
6
758
158
164
108
870
645
313
97
43

420
406
146
176
6
748
156
160
111
843
685
278
90
46

541
449
137
163
6
659
156
174
124
740
649
307
81
37

507
543
132
184
7
668
155
174
118
851
695
444
87
29

465
576
134
190
6
761
185
167
122
873
661
440
91
43

459
628
136
190
7
733
154
179
117
919
681
484
94
40

458
619
136
196
6
786
165
178
121
831
671
385
88
47

T o tal.......................................................

4,952

4,317

4,702

4,708

4,337

4,272

4,223

4,593

4,714

4,820

4,686

Asia:
China M ainland..........................................
H ong K o n g ...................................................
In d ia...............................................................
Indonesia.......................................................
Israel...............................................................
Ja p a n ..............................................................
K o rea.............................................................
Philippines.....................................................
Taiw an...........................................................
Thailand.........................................................
O th e r..............................................................

33
258
302
73
135
5,150
199
285
275
508
717

34
336
142
65
133
13,919
216
304
248
107
579

39
312
89
63
150
14,294
201
304
258
126
595

39
312
89
63
150
14,295
196
306
258
126
595

39
304
114
54
133
14,179
224
271
280
121
774

38
335
118
71
143
14,950
220
267
291
116
708

39
306
116
90
143
14,808
204
268
320
120
717

39
299
102
89
145
14,902
178
294
338
170
714

38
328
104
87
148
14,017
196
337
365
174
729

39
311
105
113
139
14,095
198
346
383
177
706

39
341
120
98
128
13,963
205
345
426
120
733

7,936

16,082

16,432

16,429

16,495

17,257

17,131

17,267

16,525

16,612

16,518

Africa:
Congo (K inshasa)........................................
M orocco.........................................................
South A frica.................................................
U.A .R. (Egypt)............................................
O th e r..............................................................

14
11
83
17
395

12
9
74
13
314

12
9
78
24
474

12
9
78
24
474

12
10
53
14
510

13
9
73
13
538

22
9
70
13
526

14
11
79
15
542

16
8
70
18
522

18
11
76
19
608

27
11
92
17
620

T o tal.......................................................

521

422

597

597

599

646

640

661

635

731

768

O ther countries:
A ustralia........................................................
All other........................................................

389
39

919
51

916
42

916
42

1,087
42

1,124
41

1,257
47

1,405
43

1,482
39

1,692
45

1,977
45

T o tal.......................................................

428

970

957

957

1,129

1,165

1,304

1,448

1,520

1,737

2,022

Total foreign co u n tries..................................

40,541

52,198

53,632

53,662

54,515

55,864

56,267

55,014

54,560

56,155

56,035

International and regional:
International 3...............................................
Latin American regional............................
O ther regional4............................................

975
131
114

1,269
287
144

1,332
298
142

1,327
298
143

1,475
306
142

1,000
316
146

941
301
147

808
333
134

802
329
134

817
346
147

792
298
170

T otal.......................................................

1,220

1,700

1,772

1,768

1,924

1,462

1,389

1,275

1,265

1,310

1,260

G rand to tal...........................................

41,761

53,898

55,404

55,430

56,439

57,326

57,656

56,289

55,825

57,465

57,295

For notesseethe followingpage.




A 82

INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S. □ SEPTEMBER 1972
SHORT-TERM LIABILITIES TO FOREIGNERS REPORTED BY BANKS
IN THE UNITED STATES, BY COUNTRY— Continued
(End o f period. Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
Supplementary data 5

1970
Area and country

1971

1972

Apr.

Dec.

A pr.

Dec.

A pr.

Other Western Europe:
Cyprus.......................................
Iceland......................................
Ireland, Rep. o f........................

15
10
32

10
10
41

7
10
29

2
11
16

2
9
15

Other Latin American republics:
Bolivia.......................................
Costa Rica................................
Dominican Republic................
Ecuador.....................................
El Salvador...............................
Guatemala.................................
Haiti..........................................
Honduras..................................
Jamaica.....................................
Nicaragua.................................
Paraguay...................................
Trinidad & Tobago..................

76
43
96
72
79
110
19
29
17
76
17
11

69
41
99
79
75
100
16
34
19
59
16
10

59
43
90
72
80
97
19
44
19
47
15
14

55
62
123
57
78
117
18
42
19
50
17
10

53
70
91
62
83
123
23
50
32
66
17
15

Other Latin America:
British West Indies................. .

38

33

38

32

23

Other Asia:
Afghanistan.............................
Burma...................................... .
Cambodia................................
Ceylon..................................... .
Iran.......................................... .
Iraq..........................................

15
5
1
4
41
6

26
4
2
4
32
11

15
3
2
4
50
7

19
10
5
4
59
10

17
5
2
6
88
( 6)

1 D ata in the two columns shown for this date differ because o f changes
in reporting coverage. Figures in the first column are comparable in cov­
erage with those shown for the preceding date; figures in the second column
are com parable with those shown for the following date.
2 Includes Bank for International Settlements and European Fund.
3 D ata exclude “ holdings o f dollars” o f the International M onetary
F und b u t include IM F gold investment until Feb. 1972, when investment
was terminated.

1970
Area and country

1971

1972

A pr.

Dec.

A pr.

Dec.

A pr.

Other Asia—Cont.:
Jordan.........................................
Kuwait........................................
Laos............................................
Lebanon.....................................
Malaysia.....................................
Pakistan......................................
Ryukyu Islands (incl. Okinawa)
Saudi Arabia..............................
Singapore...................................
Syria............................................
Vietnam......................................

30
66
4
82
48
34
26
166
25
6
91

14
54
5
54
22
38
18
106
57
7
179

3
36
2
60
29
27
39
41
43
3
161

2
20
3
46
23
33
29
79
35
4
159

2
16
3
60
25
58
( 6)
80
45
6
185

Other Africa:
Algeria........................................
Ethiopia (incl. Eritrea)..............
Ghana.........................................
Kenya.........................................
Liberia........................................
Libya..........................................
Nigeria........................................
Southern Rhodesia....................
Sudan..........................................
Tanzania.....................................
Tunisia........................................
Uganda.......................................
Zambia.......................................

13
33
7
47
41
430
11
2
1
18
7
7
38

17
19
8
38
22
195
17
1
1
9
7
8
10

13
12
6
13
21
91
25
2
1
10
6
5
14

23
11
8
9
23
274
46
2
1
6
9
3
13

31
29
11
14
25
(<)
(‘>

All other:
New Zealand..............................

18

25

22

23

27

(7

7
(«)
(*)

4 Asian, African, and European regional organizations, except BIS and
European Fund, which are included in “Europe.”
5 Represent a partial breakdow n o f the am ounts shown in the “ other”
categories (except “ O ther Eastern Europe” ).
6 N ot available.

10. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES TO FOREIGNERS REPORTED
BY BANKS IN THE UNITED STATES
(Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
C ountry or area

To foreign countries
E nd o f period

Total

To
inti.
and
regional

Total

Official
institu­
tions

O ther
B anks1 foreign­
ers

G er­
many

United
K ing­
dom

O ther
Europe

T otal
L atin
America

Japan

O ther
Asia

All
other
coun­
tries

196 8
196 9
197 0

3,166
2,490
1,703

777
889
789

2,389
1,601
914

2,341
1,505
695

56
166

40
40
53

2
*
110

46
42

16
7
26

541
239
152

658
655
385

1,093
582
137

80
70
62

1971—J u ly ..
A ug..
S ep t..
O ct.r .
N o v ..
D e c.r

1,024
895
885
942
917
902

501
480
480
490
452
446

524
415
405
452
465
457

284
172
161
159
170
144

189
190
189
236
237
257

51
53
55
57
59
56

164
164
164
164
165
164

19
19
19
44
45
52

25
25
24
24
25
30

101
80
76
99
115
111

83
12
12
12

100
101
99
101
96
87

31
14
9
7
10
9

1972—J a n .'.
F e b .r .
M a r.r
A p r.r
M ay.
June®
July?.

989
1,026
1,088
1,106
1,154
1,168
1,157

540
558
632
654
689
695
690

449
468
456
453
465
473
467

138
137
127
120
129
124
117

254
252
253
253
253
267
269

58
79
78
80
83
82
81

164
164
165
165
165
165
165

50
67
67
67
66
66
68

30
31
30
32
35
34
33

107
108
103
105
119
135
136

83
83
72
66
60
58
47

14
14
19
18
20
14
18

1Excludescentral banks, whichareincludedwith“Official institutions.”




SEPTEMBER 1972 □ INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S.

A 83

11. ESTIMATED FOREIGN HOLDINGS OF MARKETABLE U.S. GOVERNMENT BONDS AND NOTES
(End of period; in millions of dollars)
1971
July

Aug.

Sept.

1972
Nov.

Oct.

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

M ar.

Apr.

M ay

June*

July*

Europe:
Belgium-Luxembourg.......................
Switzerland..........................................
United K ingdom ................................
O ther W estern E urope.....................
Eastern E u ro p e..................................

6
29
496
25
6

6
29
460
25
6

6
29
432
49
5

6
29
427
71
5

6
60
362
82
5

6
60
323
85
5

6
53
279
95
5

6
53
283
95
5

6
53
268
95
5

6
52
280
95
5

6
52
288
95
5

6
52
264
96
5

6
49
265
98
5

T o ta l............................................

562

525

521

538

516

480

438

441

426

438

445

424

422

C an a d a .....................................................

175

175

175

175

179

181

179

179

178

179

166

313

313

Latin America:
Latin American republics.................
O ther Latin A m erica........................

1
6

1
6

1
6

1
6

1
6

1
6

1
6

1
6

1
6

1
6

1
6

1
6

1
6

T o tal............................................

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

7

Asia:
In d ia .....................................................
Jap an ....................................................
O ther A sia..........................................

20
395
10

20
633
10

20
755
10

20
1,009
10

20
1,488
10

1,717
10

2,007
10

2,146
10

2,391
10

2,415
10

2,777
10

2,901
10

3,125
10

T o ta l.............................................

425

663

784

1,038

1,518

1,727

2,017

2,156

2,401

2,425

2,787

2,912

3,136

A frica.......................................................

43

43

43

25

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

All other...................................................

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

T otal foreign countries.........................

1,211

1,413

1,530

1,782

2,228

2,402

2,650

2,791

3,020

3,057

3,413

3,664

3,886

International and regional:
International.......................................
Latin American regional.................

115
28

126
28

126
29

126
29

126
30

126
30

126
31

126
31

126
32

136
33

136
25

136
26

136
27

143

154

155

155

156

156

157

157

158

168

161

161

162

G rand to ta l................................

1,354

1,567

1,685

1,937

2,383

2,558

2,807

2,948

3,177

3,226

3,574

3,825

4,048

N o t e . —D ata represent estimated official and private holdings o f m ar­
ketable U.S. Govt, securities with an original m aturity o f more than 1

year, and are based on benchm ark surveys o f holdings and regular monthly
reports o f securities transactions (see Table 16).

12. NONMARKETABLE U.S. TREASURY BONDS AND NOTES ISSUED TO OFFICIAL INSTITUTIONS OF
FOREIGN COUNTRIES
(In millions o f dollars or dollar equivalent)
Payable in dollars
End o f period

Payable in foreign currencies

Total
Total

Bel­
gium

C an­
ada 1

Ger­
many

Total

Ger­
m any 3

Italy

Switz­
erland

100
100

4 1,750
1,083

4 1,084
542

125

541
541

Tai­
wan

Thai­
land

135
25

20
20

Italy 2 Korea

196 9
197 0

43,181
3,563

1,431
2,480

32
32

1,129
2.289

1971—Aug.
Sept.
Oct..
Nov.
Dec..

8,924
9,193
9,195
9,271
5 9,657

7.479
7.479
7.479
7,554
7.829

32
32
32
32
32

2.289
2.289
2.289
2,365
2.640

5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000

23
23
23
22
22

20
20
20
20
20

100
100
100
100
100

1,444
1,714
1.716
1.716
5 1,827

542
542
542
542
612

902
1,172
1.174
1.174
1.215

1972—Jan..
Feb..
M ar.
Apr.
M ay
June
July.
Aug.

9.658
9.658
9,940
12.440
12.441
12.441
15.864
15.864

7.829
7.829
8,188
10,688
10,688
10,688
14.188
14.188

32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32

2.640
2.640
2.840
2.840
2.840
2.840
2.840
2.840

5.000
5.000
5,158
7.658
7.658
7.658
11.158
11.158

22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22

20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20

100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100

1,828
1,828
1.752
1.752
1.753
1.753
1.676
1.676

612
612
536
536
536
536
459
459

1.216
1,216
1,216
1,216
1.217
1.217
1.217
1.217

1 Includes bonds issued in 1964 to the G overnment o f Canada in connec­
tion with transactions under the Columbia River treaty. Amounts out­
standing end o f 1967 through Oct. 1968, $114 m illion; Nov. 1968 through
Sept. 1969, $84 m illion; Oct. 1969 through Sept. 1970, $54 million; and
Oct. 1970 through Oct. 1971, $24 million.
2 Bonds issued to the G overnment o f Italy in connection with mili­
tary purchases in the United States.
3 In addition, nonmarketable U.S. Treasury notes amounting to $125




million equivalent were issued to a group of G erm an commercial banks in
June 1968. The dollar value o f these notes was increased by $10 million in
Oct. 1969 and by $18 million as o f Dec. 31, 1971.
4 Includes an increase in dollar value o f $84 million resulting from
revaluation of the German m ark in Oct. 1969.
5 Includes $106 million increase in dollar value o f foreign currency
obligations revalued to reflect market exchange rates as o f Dec. 31, 1971.

A 84

INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S. □ SEPTEMBER 1972
13. SHORT-TERM CLAIMS ON FOREIGNERS REPORTED BY BANKS
IN THE UNITED STATES, BY COUNTRY
(End o f period. Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
1970

1971

1972

Area and country
Dec.
Europe:
Belgium -Luxem bourg................................
Finland...........................................................
G erm any.......................................................
G reece............................................................
Ita ly ................................................................
N etherlands............................... ...................
N orw ay..........................................................
Portugal...................................... ..................
Sweden...........................................................
Sw itzerland...................................................
T urkey...........................................................
United K ingdom .........................................
Yugoslavia............................... .....................
U .S.S.R..................................... .....................
T o tal.......................................................

Nov.

D ec.1 r

F e b .r

J a n .r

M ar.

M ay

Apr.

June*

July*

6
50
40
66
113
186
26
101
61
54
11
52
97
100
9
379
35
13
3
45

10
63
48
116
182
227
23
139
90
66
12
68
120
143
3
536
22
11
10
33

11
57
49
135
267
235
30
159
105
67
12
70
118
145
3
563
19
12
28
37

11
57
49
135
268
235
30
161
105
67
12
70
118
145
3
563
19
12
28
37

8
71
50
137
311
200
30
166
92
72
14
83
125
147
4
526
20
13
33
44

11
102
54
139
344
252
25
182
102
71
14
88
125
181
8
562
15
16
37
48

11
78
55
138
342
258
29
230
117
73
14
105
130
164
3
559
25
17
47
51

12
66
52
137
273
239
28
213
105
72
13
135
128
138
3
537
24
17
70
42

13
72
54
132
295
231
30
231
101
65
24
149
132
193
3
539
27
19
65
43

15
73
52
126
321
315
24
201
117
64
21
141
95
147
3
564
25
24
57
43

16
73
50
124
311
286
25
203
107
71
25
156
114
137
3
756
23
23
62
44

1,449

1,923

2,122

2,124

2,146

2,374

2,445

2,303

2,417

2,429

2,608

1,530

1,530

1,508

1,701

1,942

1,831

1,697

1,737

2,088

1,043

1,138

Latin America:
A rgentina.......................................................
B razil..............................................................
Chile...............................................................
Colom bia.......................................................
C uba...............................................................
Mexico...........................................................
P an am a..........................................................
P e ru ................................................................
U ruguay.........................................................
Venezuela.......................................................
Other Latin American republics..............
Bahamas and B erm uda..............................
Netherlands Antilles and Surinam ..........
O ther Latin A m erica..................................

326
325
200
284
13
909
112
147
63
283
342
196
19
22

316
410
142
378
13
839
109
201
39
249
337
264
20
23

305
429
139
380
13
936
125
176
41
268
374
262
18
25

305
435
139
380
13
936
125
176
41
268
374
262
18
26

310
447
126
375
13
1,004
110
163
41
271
366
253
20
23

306
465
122
390
13
977
106
159
41
271
364
288
23
21

316
482
106
376
13
1,006
116
155
41
278
352
300
16
20

304
511
108
379
13
1,095
110
163
38
311
376
278
15
27

316
544
94
394
13
1,037
121
177
38
299
359
265
16
24

325
551
78
404
13
1,152
125
160
35
314
366
314
16
25

323
569
77
395
13
1,173
133
157
38
333
357
375
16
22

T o tal.......................................................

3,239

3,340

3,490

3,496

3,521

3,547

3,577

3,727

3,697

3,878

3,980

Ja p a n ..............................................................
K o rea.............................................................
Philippines.....................................................
Taiw an...........................................................
Thailand......................... ...............................
O th e r..............................................................

2
39
13
56
120
3,890
178
137
95
109
167

1
71
17
40
132
3,889
329
129
94
148
226

1
68
21
41
129
4,279
348
136
109
164
252

1
70
21
41
129
4,280
348
138
109
173
252

1
61
22
37
124
4,131
330
141
123
176
237

1
81
20
35
106
4,059
394
145
154
200
213

2
90
17
37
98
4,116
403
149
156
201
232

2
99
18
39
84
3,980
399
137
172
203
210

2
107
16
49
81
3,685
377
138
180
193
199

2
111
16
45
78
3,577
346
138
182
188
221

2
100
14
44
101
3,542
344
143
178
181
245

Asia:
China M ainland..........................................
H ong K ong...................................................
In d ia ...............................................................
Indonesia.......................................................

T o tal.......................................................

4,807

5,075

5,548

5,561

5,382

5,407

5,502

5,343

5,028

4,903

4,893

Africa:
Congo (Kinshasa)........................................
M orocco........................................................
South A frica.................................................
U.A .R. (Egypt)............................................
O th e r..............................................................

4
6
77
13
79

21
4
152
9
90

21
4
156
10
99

21
4
158
10
99

21
4
163
11
91

14
4
166
13
101

13
3
147
11
104

15
4
152
10
120

18
4
161
11
129

14
4
160
16
123

12
4
149
14
121

T o tal.......................................................

180

277

291

292

290

299

278

301

324

318

300

O ther countries:
A ustralia........................................................
All other................................. .......................

64
16

140
24

158
28

158
28

161
32

158
29

165
35

169
34

175
31

176
34

210
38

T otal.......................................................

80

164

186

186

193

188

200

203

206

211

248

Total foreign c o u n trie s.................................

10,798

11,917

13,167

13,189

13,039

13,515

13,944

13,709

13,370

13,475

14,117

International and regional.............................

3

4

3

3

3

5

4

3

7

4

3

G rand to ta l................... .......................

10,802

11,920

13,170

13,192

13,043

13,520

13,948

13,712

13,376

13,479

14,120

1 D ata in the two columns shown for this date differ because o f changes
on demand or with a contractual maturity o f not more than 1 year: loans
in reporting coverage. Figures in the first column are comparable in
made to, and acceptances made for, foreigners; drafts drawn against
coverage with those shown for the preceding date; figures in the second
foreigners, where collection is being made by banks and bankers for
column are comparable with those shown for the following date.
their own account or for account o f their customers in the United States;
and foreign currency balances held abroad by banks and bankers and
N ote.—Short-term claims are principally the following items payable
their customers in the United States. Excludes foreign currencies held
by U.S. monetary authorities.




SEPTEMBER 1972 □ INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S.

A 85

14. SHORT-TERM CLAIMS ON FOREIGNERS REPORTED BY BANKS
IN THE UNITED STATES, BY TYPE
(Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
Payable in dollars

Payable in foreign currencies

Loans to—
End o f period

T otal

Official
institu­
tions

B anks1

Others

Collec­
tions
o ut­
stand­
ing

T otal
Total

Accept­
ances
made
for acct.
o f for­
eigners

Other

Total

Foreign
govt, se­
Deposits curities,
with for­ coml.
eigners and fi­
nance
paper

O ther

9,680
10,802

9,165
10,192

3,278
3,051

262
119

1,943
1,720

1,073
1,212

2,015
2,389

3,202
3,985

670
766

516
610

352
352

89
92

74
166

1971—July..................... 10,953
A ug..................... 12,441
Sept..................... 11,870
O ct....................... 11,289
N o v .r ................. 11,920
D ec.2 r ............... /13,170
\1 3 ,192

10,423
11,810
11,225
10,668
11,276
12,328
12,351

3,559
4,290
3,831
3,516
4,024
4,503
3,970

200
191
188
135
169
223
224

2,051
2,682
2,236
2,056
2,429
2,613
2,080

1,308
1,417
1,406
1,325
1,426
1,667
1,666

2,364
2,357
2,372
2,307
2,306
2,475
2,475

3,678
4,157
4,049
3,864
3,897
4,243
4,254

821
1,006
974
982
1,050
1,107
1,652

531
631
645
620
644
842
841

374
495
453
406
457
549
548

62
46
104
111
89
119
119

95
90
88
103
99
174
174

1972—J a n . '...................
F e b .'...................
M ar.....................
A pr......................
M ay ....................
June?..................
July®...................

12,298
12,733
13,048
12,991
12,616
12,721
13,308

3,875
4,027
4,179
4,455
4,608
4,770
5,068

209
198
167
163
169
163
162

2,053
2,055
2,141
2,354
2,516
2,586
2,796

1,613
1,774
1,870
1,939
1,922
2,021
2,111

2,473
2,430
2,476
2,469
2,541
2,650
2,703

4,234
4,394
4,410
4,252
3,837
3,489
3,227

1,716
1,882
1,983
1,815
1,631
1,812
2,310

744
787
900
721
760
758
811

501
562
579
498
530
477
509

139
127
183
112
112
148
187

104
98
138
111
118
133
115

1969.................................
1970.................................

13,043
13,520
13,948
13,712
13,376
13,479
14,120

1 Excludes central banks, which are included with “ Official institutions.”
2 D ata on second line differ from those on first line because (a) those
claims o f U.S. banks on their foreign branches and those claims o f U.S.
agencies and branches o f foreign banks on their head offices and foreign

branches, which were previously reported as “ Loans” , are included in
“Other short-term claims” ; and (b) a num ber o f reporting banks are included
in the series for the first time.

15. LONG-TERM CLAIMS ON FOREIGNERS REPORTED BY BANKS
IN THE UNITED STATES
(Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
Type

Country or area

Payable in dollars
End o f
period

Total

Loans to—

Total

Official
institu­
tions

Other
B anks1 foreign­
ers

Other
long­
term
claims

Payable
in
foreign
curren­
cies

United
K ing­
dom

O ther
Europe

Latin
C anada America

Japan

O ther
Asia

All
other
countries

1969...................
1970...................

3,250
3,075

2,806
2,698

502
504

209
236

2,096
1,958

426
352

18
25

67
71

411
411

408
312

1,329
1,325

88
115

568
548

378
292

1971—July. . . .
A u g .r ..
Sept.r ..
O c t . '. . .
N o v .' . .
D e c . '. . .

3,261
3,393
3,440
3,494
3,537
3,661

2,959
3,090
3,121
3,181
3,237
3,338

489
523
524
542
567
575

253
265
269
266
282
315

2,217
2,302
2,328
2,373
2,389
2,448

282
276
291
286
276
300

20
28
28
26
23
22

118
120
126
127
138
130

530
546
570
580
586
593

266
259
264
261
244
228

1,277
1,337
1,351
1,323
1,357
1,456

219
221
225
240
240
246

515
539
536
565
564
582

337
370
367
398
407
426

1972—J a n . '. . .
Feb........
M a r.. . .
A pr........
M a y .. . .
Ju n e* ...
July®. . .

3,688
3,739
3,838
3,940
4,046
4,193
4,307

3,369
3,423
3,528
3,619
3,724
3,869
3,993

575
595
644
654
674
712
747

311
324
329
335
335
369
372

2,483
2,503
2,555
2,630
2,715
2,788
2,875

295
292
284
295
291
293
282

24
24
26
27
30
30
32

132
124
131
143
140
139
146

581
592
605
625
636
631
672

256
254
233
230
251
284
283

1,457
1,475
1,496
1,540
1,582
1,642
1,721

241
241
278
290
281
311
295

594
624
651
672
712
739
758

427
430
444
440
444
446
432

1 Excludes central banks, which are included with “Official institutions.”




A 86

INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S. □ SEPTEMBER 1972
16. PURCHASES AND SALES BY FOREIGNERS OF LONG-TERM SECURITIES, BY TYPE
(In millions o f dollars)
U.S. corporate
securities 2

M arketable U.S. Govt, bonds and notes 1

Foreign bonds

Foreign stocks

N et purchases o r sales
Period
Total

Intl.
and
regional

Pur­
chases

Foreign
Total

Official

Sales

N et pur­ Pur­
chases or chases
sales

Sales

1,582
1,415
1,907

1,490
1,687
1,044

2,441
2,575
1,797

-9 5 1
-8 8 8
-7 5 4

1,033
1,385
1,504

998
1,434
1,388

35
-4 9
117

N et pur­ Pur­
chases or chases
sales

Sales

N et pur­
chases or
sales

O ther
123 11,426 9,844
- 1 1 9 14,573 13,158
- 7 7 11,054 9,147

56
1,672
1,490

-2 5
130
6

82
1,542
1,484

-4 1
1,661
1,561

O ct.r .................
N ov. r ................
D ec....................

260
212
118
252
446
175

1
11
1
*
1
1

259
202
117
252
445
175

253
238
145
257
474
209

6
-3 6
-2 8
-5
-2 9
-3 4

1,042
1,185
1,045
965
940
1,673

1,006
1,021
796
974
845
1,207

36
163
249
-9
94
465

112
110
131
163
137
185

138
313
138
245
148
175

-2 7
-2 0 3
-7
-8 2
-1 1
10

102
124
118
157
137
195

144
102
96
104
76
154

-4 2
22
22
52
61
41

1972—Jan .....................
Feb.....................
M ar....................
A pr....................
M ay...................
June*.................
July*.................

248
141
230
48
348
251
223

1

247
141
229
38
356
251
222

305
138
245
25
350
274
224

-5 8
3
-1 6
13
6
-2 3
-2

1,580
1,611
2,025
1,703
1,350
1,652
1,134

1,277
1,312
1,527
1,420
1,111
1,407
1,093

302
299
498
283
239
245
41

126
159
181
161
124
103
188

409
241
248
157
310
332
100

-2 8 3
-8 2
-6 7
4
-1 8 6
-2 2 9
88

191
200
290
197
245
225
157

170
199
269
181
138
269
162

21
1
20
16
107
-4 3
-5

1970...............................
1971 T.............................
1972 Jan.-July*........
1971

Ju ly ...................
Aug....................

1
11
-8
1
1

1 Excludes nonmarketable U.S. Treasury bonds and notes issued to
official institutions o f foreign countries; see Table 12.
2 Includes State and local govt, securities, and securities o f U.S. Govt,
agencies and corporations th at are not guaranteed by the U nited States.

Also includes issues o f new debt securities sold abroad by U.S. corpora­
tions organized to finance direct investments abroad.
N o t e . —Statistics include transactions o f international and regional
organizations.

17. NET PURCHASES OR SALES BY FOREIGNERS OF U.S. CORPORATE STOCKS, BY COUNTRY
(In millions o f dollars)
Period

G er­
many

Total

N ether­ Switzer­ United
land K ingdom
lands

Other
Europe

Total
Europe

Latin
Canada Am
erica

Asia

Africa

Other Intl. &
countries regional

1970.......................
1971r.....................
1972—Jan.-July*

626
731
784

58
87
78

195
131
-7 9

128
219
153

110
168
320

-3 3
-4 9
209

24
71
23

482
627
704

-9
-9 3
-9 4

47
37
-51

85
108
178

1971—Jul y
Aug............
Sept...........
O c t.r .........
N ov...........
D ec............

-3
78
155
-4 8
*
483

12
10
24
8
9
66

-6
7
33
-4
-9
51

15
38
9
2
22
76

-1 0
24
38
4
1
102

6
-3 3
11
-3 0
-1
68

-1 3
-7
17
*
20
32

4
38
132
-2 1
42
394

-2 4
11
10
-2 1
-1 4
2

2
12
7
-1 7
-38
49

15
16
4
5
6
39

-2
*
2
7
4
-2

269
153
177
78
55
31
21

36
13
19
-9
19
8
-6

29
4
-1 2
-2 2
-1 4
-2 0
-4 4

60
37
27
19
8
15
-1 4

98
55
56
1
27
27
56

2
36
95
46
20
-2
14

-7
5

218
149
185
35
62
32
23

1
-3 2
-2 6
-2 3
-1 7
-1
4

11
10
3
13
-2 2
-4 2
-2 5

27
20
8
49
30
32
12

12
6
7
6
2
9
7

1972—Ja............... n
Feb............
M ar...........
A pr............
M ay..........
J u n e * ....,
Ju ly * ........




1
-2

22
54
48

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S.

A 87

18. NET PURCHASES OR SALES BY FOREIGNERS OF U.S. CORPORATE BONDS, BY COUNTRY
(In millions o f dollars)
N ether­ Switzer­ United
land K ingdom
lands

Other
Europe

Total
Europe

134
197
54

118
327
212

91
39
74

464
612
571

128
37
56

25
19
16

1
-1
•
*
-1
-2

3
26
21
53
42
-1 2

20
49
69
24
70
18

1
-3
-3
2
6
-6

22
67
86
83
122
-3

-1 0

16
-8
7
-1 3

3
1
5
-2
-1
•

1
-1
«
20
*
8
12

-1 4
-2 0
29
-1
-3
21
42

20
102
54
17
71
4
-5 6

38
-1 1
15
-1 3
15
17
13

49
67
106
63
121
148
16

10
11
-3
-1
11
23
4

-2
-1 3
3
*
26
*
2

Period

Total

France

G er­
many

1970.....................
1971.....................
1972—Jan.-July*.

956
684
1,123

35
15
188

48
35
2

37
-1
40

40
85
94
40
94
—18

—2
-3
5
«
-1

-1
-1
-1
1
4
-1

33
146
321
205
184
214
20

3
-1
5
38
40
95
9

2
-1
3
3
-3
1
-3

1971—July___
Sept...........
O ct.............

Dec...........
1972—Jan.............
Feb............
M a r.. . . . .
A pr............

June* . . . .
July *.........

*

N o t e . —Statistics include State and local govt, securities, and securities
o f U.S. Govt, agencies and corporations that are not guaranteed by

Latin
C anada America

•

Asia

Africa

28
-2
293
*
1

1
*

*

*
*
*

-1
2
1

*
*
•

3
51
192
27
11
8
1

•
*

O ther Intl. and
countries regional

*

*
•

*
*

-1 2
-2 1
*

324
39
187

*

24
17
-1 4
-3 3
-31
-3

*

*
•
-5
*
*
*

-2 7
29
23
115
14
36
-4

*

•
*

the United States. Also includes issues o f new debt securities sold abroad
by U.S. corporations organized to finance direct investments abroad.

19. NET PURCHASES OR SALES BY FOREIGNERS OF
LONG-TERM FOREIGN SECURITIES, BY AREA

20.
FOREIGN CREDIT AND DEBIT
BALANCES IN BROKERAGE ACCOUNTS

(In millions o f dollars)

(Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)

Latin
Canada Amer­ Asia
ica

Period

Total

Intl.
and
re­
gional

Total
foreign
coun­
tries

Eu­
rope

1970.................
1971r ...............
1972—
Jan .-Ju ly * . .

-9 1 5
-9 3 7

-2 5 4
-3 1 0

-6 6 2
-6 2 7

50
38

-5 8 6
-2 8 5

-1 1
-4 6

-6 3 7

-1 4 8

-4 9 0

302

-4 7 8

1971—J u ly ....
Aug---Sept.. . .
O c t.r . ..
N o v .r . .
D e c .. . .

-6 8
-1 8 0
15
-3 0
50
51

7
-1 5 2
8
32
11
2

-7 5
-2 9
6
-6 3
39
49

-1 6
23
1
27
37
23

-6
-2 3
-7
-1 1 1
32
53

1972—Jan
,.
F e b .. . .
M ar___
A pr. T. .
M ay. . .
J u n e * ..
July * ...

-2 6 2 - 2 4 2
-1 2
-8 1
14
-4 6
20
6
3
-7 8
-2 7 2
5
83
78

-2 0
-6 8
-6 0
14
-8 1
-2 7 8
5

11
32
58
65
75
26
36

-2 4
-7 3
-7 4
8
-1 4 3
-1 9 5
23

End o f
period

Credit
balances
(due to
foreigners)

D ebit
balances
(due from
foreigners)

20
32

1969—Sept..............................

467
434

297
278

-1 3

23

1970—M ar..............................

-1
1
*
1
*
-4

2
1
1
2
3
2

368
334
291
349

220
182
203
281

1971—M ar...............................
June..............................
Sept...............................

511
419
333
311

314
300
320
314

1972—M ar...............................
June*...........................

325
312

379
339

Af­
rica

Other
coun­
tries

-1 2 9
-3 6 6

-6
-1

-4 5

-2 8 0

-2
-1 6
3
-6
-2 8
-1 0

-5 3
-1 4
8
24
5
-1 5

-1 6
1
-2
-3 1
14
-1 5
3

5
-2 6
-4 7
-3 6
-2 1
-9 4
-6 0

* !
-2
-5
3
-9
*
*

3
*
10
5
2
*
2

N o t e . —D ata represent the money credit balances and
money debit balances appearing on the books o f reporting
brokers and dealers in the U nited States, in accounts o f
foreigners with them, and in their accounts carried by
foreigners.

Notes to Tables 21a and 21b on following pages:
1 Total assets and total liabilities payable in U.S. dollars am ounted to
F or a given m onth, total assets may not equal total liabilities because
some branches do not adjust the parent’s equity in the branch to reflect
$8,295 million and $8,387 million, respectively, on M ay 31, 1972.
unrealized paper profits and paper losses caused by changes in exchange
rates, which are used to convert foreign currency values into equivalent
N o t e . —Components may not add to totals due to rounding.
dollar values.




A 88

INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S. □ SEPTEMBER 1972
21a. ASSETS OF FOREIGN BRANCHES OF U.S. BANKS
(In millions o f dollars)
Claims on U.S.

Location and currency form

Month-end

Total
Total

IN ALL FO R EIG N CO UNTRIES

IN T H E BAHAMAS
Total all currencies................................

For notes seep. A-87.




O ther

Total

Other
branches
o f parent
bank

Other
banks

Offi­
N on­
cial
bank
insti­
for­
tutions eigners

O ther

47,363

9,740

7,248

2,491

36,221

6,887

16,997

1971— M ay ...........
Ju n e ...........
July............
Aug............
Sept............
Oct.............

50,574
52,732
52,739
54,873
56,967
57,496
58,630
61,474

4,398
4,853
4,833
4,092
5,047
5,844
5,650
4,800

2,191
2,661
2,619
2,036
2,970
3,649
3,341
2,313

2,207
2,191
2,214
2,056
2,077
2,195
2,308
2,487

41,576
43,292
43,088
46,393
48,963
49,716
51,066
54,879

8,317
8,924
8,788
9,126
9,706
10,154
10,416
11,224

18,124
19,062
18,474
20,773
22,305
21,923
22,661
24,630

798
851
1,006
1,129
1,164
1,198
1,195
1,167

14,337
14,456
14,820
15,365
15,788
16,441
16,795
17,858

4,600
4,587
4,817
4,388
2,957
1,937
1,914
1,795

1972—Jan ............. 60,026
Feb............. 61,862
M ar............ 65,053
A pr............ 64,171
M ay ........... 64,372

4,333
4,116
4,565
4,886
4,619

1,987
1,742
2,085
2,426
2,080

2,345
2,374
2,480
2,461
2,539

53,760
55,845
58,662
57,465
57,943

10,445
11,013
10,635
10,544
10,463

24,513
25,618
28,070
26,693
27,060

1,211
1,118
1,176
1,181
1,275

17,591
18,095
18,781
19,048
19,145

1,933
1,901
1,826
1,820
1,810

1970—Dec............

34,619

9,452

7,233

2,219 24,642

4,213

13,265

362

6,802

525

1971—M ay...........
Ju n e ...........
July............
Aug............

Dec............

36,070
37,648
37,117
37,846
38,712
38,570
39,130
40,236

4,193
4,648
4,613
3,875
4,807
5,600
5,368
4,542

2,172
2,651
2,610
2,025
2,950
3,633
3,319
2,306

2,020
1,998
2,003
1,851
1,858
1,968
2,049
2,236

28,296
29,438
28,718
30,703
32,145
32,617
33,118
35,117

5,354
5,609
5,648
5,791
6,029
6,094
6,436
6,659

13,839
14,645
13,799
15,466
16,436
16,302
16,690
18,040

554
587
714
866
875
907
910
864

8,549
8,598
8,557
8,581
8,805
9,013
9,082
9,554

3,581
3,562
3,787
3,268
1,759
653
644
577

1972—Jan .............
Feb.............
M ar............
A pr............
M ay ...........

38,928
39,920
43,002
41,757
41,932

4,072
3,864
4,300
4,597
4,393

1,975
1,732
2,062
2,387
2,063

2,097
2,132
2,238
2,210
2,330

34.228
35,374
38,074
36,489
36,886

6,427 17,759
6,637 18,514
6,727 20,608
6,359 19,346
6,475 19,574

822
821
845
883
935

9,220
9,402
9,891
9,902
9,902

629
682
631
671
653

1970—Dec............

28,451

6,729

5,214

1,515 21,121

11,095

316

6,235

601

1971—M ay...........
Ju n e...........
Aug............
Sept............
O ct.............
N ov............
D ec............

29,952
31,276
30,710
32,119
33,280
33,408
33,945
34,552

2,746
3,188
3,098
2,608
3,390
4,116
3,845
2,694

1,401
1,827
1,700
1,340
2,143
2,772
2,529
1,230

1,345
1,361
1,398
1,268
1,247
1,344
1,316
1,464

24,627
25,545
25,140
27,249
28,464
28,458
29,203
30,996

4,218 11,957
4,393 12,632
4,448 11,953
4,462 13,744
4,882 14,683
5,189 14,536
5,483 15,040
5,690 16,211

433
418
520
558
512
524
527
476

8,020
8,101
8,218
8,486
8,387
8,210
8,153
8,619

2,579
2,542
2,473
2,262
1,426
834
896
862

1972—Jan .............
Feb.............
M ar............
A pr............
M ay...........

33,877
34,712
37,104
36,126
36,311

2,514
2,247
2,503
2,738
2,441

1,228
1,044
1,312
1,574
1,282

1,287
1,204
1,190
1,163
1,160
>

30,447
31,617
33,810
32,585
33,119

5,243 16,411
5,584 17,097
5,380 19,177
5,269 17,945
5,209 18,304

469
454
491
507
585

8,325
8,482
8,762
8,865
9,020

916
848
790
803
750

1970—D ec............

22,574

6,596

15,655

2,223

9,420

4,012

323

1971—M ay...........
Ju n e...........
Ju ly ...........
Aug............
Sept............
Oct.............
N ov............
Dec............

23,028
24,228
23,282
23,848
24,418
24,481
24,561
24,428

2,651
3,098
3,010
2,528
3,289
4,012
3,717
2,585

18,156
18,918
18,155
19,451
20,123
20,069
20,445
21,493

3,030
3,231
3,219
3,245
3,369
3,440
3,918
4,135

10,128
10,674
10,031
11, 336
11,883
11, 859
12,090
12,762

4,999
5,013
4,906
4,870
4,871
4,771
4,438
4,596

2,221
2,211
2,116
1,868
1,006
399
398
350

1972—Feb............
M ar............
A pr............
M ay...........

23,816
26,097
24,967
24,928

2,153
2,401
2,620
2,356

21,254
23,324
21,943
22,195

3,960
3,926
3,708
3,577
S-------------

13,058
14,865
13,754
14, 101

4,237
4,534
4,481
4,517

409
372
404
377

1970—Dec............

4,815

1,173

455

717

3,583

y
2,119

1,464

59

1971—M ay ...........
Ju n e...........
Ju ly ...........
Aug............
Sept............
Oct.............
N ov. r . . . .
D ec............

5,379
5,760
6,047
5,970
6,208
6,586
7,264
8,493

773
839
890
728
835
887
1,025
1,282

113
203
267
139
219
246
277
505

660
635
623
589
615
641
798
778

3,913
4,238
4,428
4,618
5,039
5,605
6,139
7,119

2,062
2,338
2,357
2,604
2,934
3,019
3,203
3,798

1,850
1,900
2,071
2,014
2,105
2,585
2,936
3,320

694
683
729
624
334
95
101
92

7,973
1972—Jan .............
8,380
Feb.............
8,836
M ar............
A pr............
9,038
M ay ........... 19,094

955
994
1,178
1,284
1,361

159
107
126
204
195

796
888
1,052
1,080
1,166

6,925
7,276
7,551
7,643
7,615

3,679
3,819
4,038
4,121
4,181

3,247
3,457
3,513
3,521
3,434

94
110
108
111
117

O ct.............

Payable in U.S. d o llars..........................

Parent
bank

1970—D ec............

Dec............

IN U NITED KINGDOM
Total, all currencies................................

Claims on foreigners

3,475

695 11,643

1,403

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S.

A 89

21b. LIABILITIES OF FOREIGN BRANCHES OF U.S. BANKS
(In millions of dollars)
To foreigners

To U.S.

Total

Parent
bank

Other

Total

Other
branches
o f parent
bank

Offi­
N on­
cial
bank
for­
insti­
tutions eigners

O ther
banks

Other

M onth-end

4,180

7,377

1,967 .............1970—Dec.

25,039
26,729
26,544
27,178
28,497
28,520
29,350
31,147

5,216
5,339
5,373
5,450
5,476
5,581
5,749
5,491

7,502
7,721
7,670
8,203
8,451
8,638
8,509
8,786

1,835 ............ 1971—M ay
1,824
1,741 ......................... July
1,902
2,014
2,041 ......................... Oct.
2,113
2,119

10,324
10,645
10,363
10,119
10,055

29,763
30,707
'33,692
32,651
33,129

5,869
6,180
'6,331
6,617
6,630

9,091
9,102
9,546
9,723
9,830

2,034 ............ 1972—Jan.
2,058 ..........................Feb.
2,073
2,081
1,908

47,

2,575

716

1,859 42,812

6,426 24,829

50,
52,
52,
54,
56,
57,
58,
61,

2,848
2.565
3,061
3,349
3,015
2,915
2,870
3,114

726
528
477
763
501
474
475
669

2,122
2,038
2,584
2,586
2,514
2,441
2,395
2,445

45,891
48,342
47,934
49,622
51,940
52,540
53,646
56,242

8,134
8,553
8,346
8,792
9,516
9,802
10,038
10,818

60,
61,
65,
64,
64,

2.938
3,170
3,047
2,980
2,818

658
779
636
621
562

2,280
2,391
2,411
2,358
2,256

55,048
56,634
59,933
59,111
59,645

36,

2,334

657

1,677 32,509

4,079

19,816

3,737

4,877

1,243 .............1970—Dec.

37,
39,
38,
39,
40,
40,
40,
42,

2.582
2,293
2,762
2.939
2,638
2,549
2,523
2,674

643
432
393
643
381
352
375
511

1,939
1,861
2,368
2,296
2,257
2,198
2,148
2,163

33,638
35,782
34,571
35,406
36,375
36,331
37,149
38,139

5,469
5,793
5,433
5,735
6,234
6,154
6,479
6,692

19,120
20,610
20,192
20,340
20,981
20,797
21,120
22,069

4,419
4,604
4,416
4,375
4,408
4,503
4,662
4,426

4,630
4,775
4,530
4,956
4,752
4,878
4,888
4,953

1,096 ............ 1971—M ay
1,068
990 ......................... July
1,149
1,195
1,161
1,221
1,276 .........................Dec.

41,
42,
45,
44,
44,

2,556
2,743
2,643
2.591
2.411

546
644
509
514
439

2,010
2,099
2,135
2,077
1,973

37,642
38,607
41,744
40,260
40,751

6,710
6,853
6,945
6,583
6,648

'20,862
21,742
24,425
23,127
23,618

'4 ,7 6 5
4,768
4,947
5,202
5,152

5,306
5,244
5,428
5,349
5,333

1,182 ............ 1972—Jan.
1,212 ......................... Feb.
1,225
1,227
1,058

28,

1.339

116

1,222 26,520

2,320 16,533

3,119

4,548

592

29,
31,
30,
32,
33,
33,
33,
34,

1.591
1.565
1,773
2,000
1,658
1,628
1,618
1,660

301
147
126
300
117
104
77
111

1,291
1,419
1,647
1,700
1,541
1,523
1,541
1,550

27,667
29,021
28,264
29,429
30,877
31,009
31,513
32,128

2,843
2,931
2,762
3*069
3,344
3,250
3,106
3,401

16,387
17,578
16,843
17,310
18,431
18,535
18,901
19,137

3,873
3,967
4,034
4,268
4,318
4,447
4,622
4,464

4,565
4,545
4,625
4,782
4,785
4,777
4,885
5,126

694 ............ 1971—M ay
690
674
691
745
772
814
763

33,
34,
37,
36,
36,

1,626
1.582
1,525
1.340
1,397

132
114
78
68
105

1,494
1,468
1,447
1,272
1,291

31,473
32,371
34,787
33,980
34,090

3,296
3,417
3,209
3,056
3,154

18,076
18,705
20,989
19,893
19,908

4,680
4,788
4,996
5,172
5,158

5,421
5,461
5,594
5,859
5,871

778 ............ 1972—Jan.
759
792
807
824

23,

1,208

98

1,548 13,684

2,859

3,404

302 .............1970—Dec.

23,
24,
23,
24,
24,
24,
25,
24,

1,455
1,432
1,610
1,790
1,460
1,435
1,452
1.412

266
96
89
238
59
49
36
23

1,189
1,336
1,521
1,552
1,401
1,387
1,416
1,389

21,378
22,682
21,428
22,095
22,882
22,875
23,166
23,059

1,902
2,053
1,819
1,900
2,126
2,095
2,028
2,164

12,967
14,071
13,198
13,445
14,160
14,079
14,185
14,038

3,368
3,493
3,382
3,501
3,555
3,660
3,813
3,676

3,142
3,065
3,029
3,249
3,041
3,041
3,140
3,181

365 ............ 1971—M ay
361
361
377
400
417
426
374

24,

1,377
1,327
1,154
1,202

50
19
26
58

1,327
1,308
1,129
1,144

22,985
25,220
24,027
24,168

2,081 13,670
2,093 15,694
1,852 14,465
2,054 14,610

3,824
4,041
4,233
4,141

3,411
3,392
3,477
3,363

403 .............1972—Feb.
424
419
417
90 .............1970—Dec.

26,
25,

25 ;

1,110 21,495

4

542

4,183

488

2,872

823

5

646
446
753
696
719
628
599
750

4,633
5,221
5,197
5,155
5,359
5,805
6,510
7,557

991
1,013
1,126
1,005
931
1,083
1,446
1,649

2,744
3.095
3 ,138
3,029
3,381
3,551
3,943
4,784

898
1,113
933
1,121
1,048
1,170
1,121
1,124

101 ............ 1971—M ay
93
95
119
133
155
155 .........................N o v .'
188

625
858
833
961
812

7,197
7,380
7,876
7,922
8,138

1,563
1,526
1,429
1,494
1,454

4,427
4,676
5 ,142
5 ,224
5,353

1,207
1,178
1,305
1,204
1,330

151 ............ 1972—Jan.
142 ......................... Feb.
128
155
144

5

6

5
6
6

7

8

7
8
8

9
19

seep. A-87.




Location and currency form

IN ALL FO R EIG N COUN TRIES
.. .Total, all currencies

.Payable in U.S. dollars

IN U NITED KIN G D O M
. . .Total, all currencies

.Payable in U.S. dollars

IN T H E BAHAMAS
.Total, all currencies

INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S. □ SEPTEMBER 1972

A 90

22. LIABILITIES OF U.S. BANKS TO THEIR FOREIGN BRANCHES
AND FOREIGN BRANCH HOLDINGS OF SPECIAL U.S.
GOVERNMENT SECURITIES

23. MATURITY OF EURO-DOLLAR
DEPOSITS IN FOREIGN
BRANCHES OF U.S. BANKS

(Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)

(End o f m o n th ; in billions o f dollars)

Liabili­ Wednesday
ties1

W ednesday

29...............
28...............
27...............
27...............

3,412
3,166
4,059
4,241

1968
M ar.
June
Sept.
Dec.

4,920
6,202
7,104
6,039

27...............
26...............
25...............
31 (1/1/69)
1969

M ar.
June
Sept.
Dec.

9,621
13,269
14,349
12,805

26...............
25...............
24...............
31...............

Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
M ay
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.

2 5 .................
24.................
30.................
30.................

11,885
12,172
9,663
7,676

27.
2 4 .,
31.,
28.
26.
30.
28.
25.
29.
27.
24.
29.

1972
Jan.
5.
12.
19.
26.

6,536
5,666
2,858
2,158
1,579
1,492
1,495
1,405
2,475
2,917
3,342
909
1,208
1,721
1,568
1,419
1,301
1,062
1,006
1,068

Feb.

M ar.

Wednesday

Liabili­
ties1

1972

M aturity o f
liability
A pr.

M ay

June

1.91
2.10

1.74
1.91

2.37
2.02

9.00
5.90
5.05
2.16
2.06
2.12
.38
.58
.51
.36
.37
.43

9,48
6.24
3.86
2.43
2.47
2.33
.63
.54
.41
r .41
r .39
.45

11.19
4.92
4.82
2.85
2.61
2.48
.73
.42
.54
.41
.45
.29

1.11

1.05

1.12

1972—Cont.

1970
M ar.
June
Sept.
Dec.

Liab.
plus
sec.2

1971

1967
M ar.
June
Sept.
Dec.

Liabili­
ties1

1.,
8.
15.
22.
29.

954
1,164
1,263
1,346
1,532

7,536
6,666
4,358
5,166
4,587
4,500
4,645
4,075
3,578

Apr.

5 . . ’.
1 2 ...
1 9 ...
2 6 ...

1,130
1,052
1,279
1,374

M ay

3 ...
1 0 ...
1 7 ...
2 4 ...
3 1 ...

1,240
1,323
1,544
1,599
1,465

June 7 . . .
1 4 . ..
2 1 ...
28. . .

1,192
1,525
1,740
1,442

July 5 . . . .
1 2 ....
1 9 ....
2 6 ....

824
1,375
974
1,342

Aug. 2. ..
9 ...
1 6 ...
2 3 ...
3 0 ...

1,829
1,250
1,778
1,845
1,262

C all.......................................
Other liabilities, maturing
in following calendar
m onths after report
date:
2nd................................
3rd.................................
6th.................................

11th.................................
12th.................................
M aturities o f more than 1

34.05 34.32 37.25
N o t e . — Includes interest-bearing U.S. dollar
deposits and direct borrowings o f all branches in
the Bahamas and o f all other foreign branches
for which such deposits and direct borrowings
am ount to $50 million or more.
Details may not add to totals due to rounding.

1 Represents gross liabilities o f reporting banks to their branches in foreign countries.
2 F o r period Jan. 27, 1971 through Oct. 20, 1971, includes U.S. Treasury Certificates Euro­
dollar Series and special Export-Im port Bank securities held by foreign branches. Beginning
July 28, 1971, all o f the securities held were U.S. Treasury Certificates Eurodollar Series.

24. DEPOSITS, U.S. GOVT. SECURITIES,
AND GOLD HELD AT F.R. BANKS FOR
FOREIGN OFFICIAL ACCOUNT

25. SHORT-TERM LIQUID CLAIMS ON FOREIGNERS
REPORTED BY NONBANKING CONCERNS
(Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)

(In millions o f dollars)
Payable in
Payable in dollars foreign currencies

Assets in custody
End of
period

Deposits
U.S. Govt.
securities1

Earmarked
gold

1969................
1970...............

134
148

7,030
16,226

12,311
12,926

1971—A u g ...
S e p t...
O c t.. .
N ov. .
D e c.. .

122
166
135
177
294

35,914
36,921
38,207
39,980
43,195

13,821
13,819
13,819
13,820
13,815

1972—J a n ....
Feb. ..
M ar...
A p r.. .
M a y ..
June. .
J u ly ...
A u g ...

147
137
191
228
157
257
160
192

44,359
45,699
46,837
46,836
46,453
47,176
51,522
51,676

13,815
14,359
14,321
14,315
15,542
15,542
15,542
15,530

1 M arketable U.S. Treasury bills, certificates o f in­
debtedness, notes, and bonds and nonm arketable U.S.
Treasury securities payable in dollars and in foreign
currencies.
N o t e . —Excludes deposits and U.S. Govt, securities

held for international and regional organizations. Ear­
marked gold is gold held for foreign and international
accounts and is not included in the gold stock o f the
United States.




End of
period

Total

Short­
Short­
term D eposits term
D eposits invest­
invest­
ments 1
ments 1

United
K ing­
dom

C anada

1968.....................
10£Q 2

1,638
/1,319
\ 1,491
1,141

1,219
952
1,062
697

87
116
161
150

272
174
183
173

60
76
86
121

979
610
663
372

280
469
534
436

1971—June........
Ju ly .........
Aug..........
Sept..........
O ct...........
N ov.........
D ec..........

1,470
1,478
1,661
1,579
1,604
1,622
1,637

932
949
1,085
989
1,015
1,029
1,073

176
189
201
198
206
205
203

240
238
246
285
277
246
241

122
101
128
107
106
143
120

634
579
639
519
540
612
575

365
395
480
489
531
517
577

1972—Jan...........
Feb..........
M ar.r ___
A p r.r ___
M ay.r . . .
June........

1,736
1,820
1,982
1,907
1,990
1,994

1,087
1,034
1,235
1,273
1,309
1,342

235
316
266
211
223
208

251
245
281
259
305
273

163
225
200
164
153
170

614
548
653
662
698
693

672
845
847
740
685
652

1 Negotiable and other readily transferable foreign obligations payable on demand
or having a contractual maturity of not more than 1 year from the date on which the
obligation was incurred by the foreigner.
2 D ata on the two lines for this date differ because o f changes in reporting coverage.
Figures on the first line are comparable in coverage with those shown for the preceding
d a te ; figures on the second line are comparable with those shown for the following date.
N o t e . —D ata represent the liquid assets abroad of large nonbanking concerns in
the United States. They are a portion of the total claims on foreigners reported by
nonbanking concerns in the United States and are included in the figures shown in
Tables 26 and 27.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S.

A 91

26. SHORT-TERM LIABILITIES TO AND CLAIMS ON FOREIGNERS REPORTED BY NONBANKING CONCERNS
(End o f period. Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
Liabilities to foreigners
Area and country

1972

1971
M ar.

Europe:
A ustria......................................
Belgium-Luxembourg...........
D enm ark..................................
F in lan d .....................................
F ran ce......................................
Germany, Fed, Rep. o f .. . . .
G reece......................................
Ita ly ...........................................
N etherlands.............................
N orw ay....................................
Portugal....................................
S pain.........................................

Claims on foreigners

June

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.®

1972

1971
M ar.

June

Sept.

Dec.

Mar.®

Turkey......................................
United K in g d o m ....................
Y ugoslavia..............................
O ther W estern E u ro p e .........
Eastern E u ro p e.......................

11
47
9
2
112
122
4
71
115
4
14
27
28
122
3
735
4
1
4

12
58
3
2
117
105
5
69
102
5
18
35
31
85
5
659
4
2
3

10
60
3
2
139
125
6
74
85
5
18
37
28
100
3
686
4
2
3

5
66
2
2
142
117
4
108
70
5
16
66
17
91
2
768
3
2
4

5
105
3
2
128
88
5
112
75
6
9
66
16
60
2
870
4
1
5

10
49
16
8
159
191
34
175
65
15
13
93
53
38
17
1,020
16
12
16

10
61
17
15
181
228
27
172
74
14
20
91
40
62
9
961
16
11
16

13
59
14
16
182
209
40
176
66
17
13
89
37
95
9
846
21
14
16

14
62
15
18
208
192
35
191
69
13
16
125
40
63
9
957
13
13
28

17
47
18
19
201
210
36
187
67
16
23
103
35
59
9
976
10
13
25

T o ta l.................................

1,437

1,319

1,391

1,489

1,564

1,997

2,027

1,932

2,080

2,074

C an ad a.........................................

206

193

183

181

188

721

706

800

909

1,217

P e ru ...........................................
U ruguay...................................
Venezuela.................................
O ther L.A. republics.............
Bahamas and Berm uda.........
Neth. Antilles and Surinam .
O ther Latin Am erica.............

14
15
13
6
*
20
6
4
4
17
29
173
5
5

17
17
8
6
*
20
6
4
4
17
29
167
7
6

19
13
14
6
•
23
6
5
4
14
33
232
4
8

18
21
14
7
*
22
5
7
2
16
33
275
3
5

18
20
21
7
«
17
8
8
3
18
28
341
5
12

65
105
40
36
1
143
21
35
7
69
95
222
8
21

66
117
44
31
1
151
17
36
6
69
96
273
9
25

66
127
48
40
1
146
20
34
6
73
105
362
9
21

55
150
47
46
1
151
21
34
5
81
101
366
9
24

49
142
40
41
1
134
19
31
6
77
95
313
8
22

T o ta l.................................

311

307

381

429

506

866

940

1,057

1,090

977

Asia:
Hong K ong..............................
In d ia..........................................
Indonesia..................................
Isra e l.........................................
Ja p a n .........................................
K orea........................................
Philippines...............................
Taiw an......................................
T h ailan d ...................................
O ther A sia...............................

8
25
5
28
165
11
7
10
4
59

8
22
6
19
158
10
7
11
3
122

9
26
11
21
178
10
6
17
4
140

12
27
10
10
177
13
7
18
3
143

11
13
6
9
194
12
9
23
4
110

19
39
20
24
349
50
31
32
12
153

25
39
21
25
372
54
56
38
13
158

26
36
24
21
397
52
43
43
16
201

24
37
29
23
411
68
49
41
15
147

21
31
29
23
469
56
64
45
18
173

T o ta l.................................

322

366

421

420

391

729

800

859

844

930

A frica:
Congo (K inshasa)..................
South A frica............................
U .A .R. (Egypt).......................
O ther A frica............................

2
31
2
19

2
45
1
33

1
45
1
32

1
31
1
35

1
26
1
31

5
32
10
53

6
38
9
67

4
39
9
70

6
41
9
100

5
42
9
76

T o ta l.................................

54

82

78

68

59

100

120

122

156

130

O ther countries:
A ustralia..................................
All o th e r..................................

81
8

81
8

68
9

46
9

54
10

86
13

82
17

85
24

83
19

86
27

T otal.................................

89

89

77

55

64

99

99

109

102

113

International and regional. . . .

*

*

1

*

*

3

4

4

4

2

G rand to ta l.....................

2,418

2,357

2,532

2,643

2,774

4,515

4,696

4,882

5,185

5,443

Latin America:
A rgentina.................................
Brazil........................................
C hile..........................................
Colom bia..................................
C uba..........................................

N o t e . —Reported by exporters, im porters, and industrial and commercial concerns and other nonbanking institutions in the United States.




D ata exclude claims held through U.S. banks, and intercompany accounts
between U.S. companies and their foreign affiliates.

A 92

INTL. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE U.S. □ SEPTEMBER 1972

27. SHORT-TERM LIABILITIES TO AND CLAIMS ON FOREIGNERS REPORTED BY
NONBANKING CONCERNS, BY TYPE
(Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
Liabilities

Claims
Payable in foreign
currencies

End o f period
Total

Payable
in
dollars

Payable
in
foreign
currencies

Total

Payable
in
dollars

Deposits with
banks abroad
in reporter’s
nam e

O ther

1967—D ec........................

1,386

1,039

347

3,011

2,599

203

209

1968—M ar........................
Ju n e.......................
Sept........................
D ec.........................

1,358
1,473
1,678
1,608

991
1,056
1,271
1,225

367
417
407
382

3,369
3,855
3,907
3,783

2,936
3,415
3,292
3,173

211
210
422
368

221
229
193
241

1969—M ar........................
June.......................
Sept........................

1,576
1,613
1,797
( 1,786
I 2,124

1,18$
1,263
1,450
1,399
1,654

391
350
346
387
471

4,014
4,023
3,874
3,710
4,159

3,329
3,316
3,222
3,124
3,532

358
429
386
221
244

327
278
267
365
383

1970—M ar........................
D ec.........................

2,234
2,387
2,512
2,655

1,724
1,843
1,956
2,159

510
543
557
496

4,275
4,457
4,361
4,160

3,738
3,868
3,756
3*579

219
234
301
234

318
355
305
348

1971—M ar........................
Ju n e........................
Sept........................
D ec.........................

2,418
2,357
2,532
2,643

1,957
1,919
2,091
2,180

462
438
442
463

4,515
4,696
4,882
5,185

3,909
4,045
4,174
4,535

232
303
383
318

374
348
326
333

1972—M ar.*.....................

2,774

2,340

433

5,443

4,677

358

408

1 D a ta on the two lines shown for this date differ
because o f changes in reporting coverage. Figures on
the first line are comparable with those shown for the

preceding date; figures on the second line are comparable with those shown for the following date,

28. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES TO AND CLAIMS ON FOREIGNERS REPORTED BY NONBANKING CONCERNS
(Amounts outstanding; in millions o f dollars)
Claims

End o f period

Country or area

Total
liabilities
Total

U nited
Kingdom

O ther
Europe

Canada

Brazil

Mexico

Othei*
Latin
America

Japan

O ther
Asia

Africa

All
other

1967—D ec...........................

428

1,570

43

263

322

212

91

274

128

132

89

16

1968—M ar..........................
Ju n e .........................
Sept..........................
D ec...........................

582
747
767
1,129

1,536
1,568
1,625
1,790

41
32
43
147

265
288
313
306

330
345
376
419

206
205
198
194

61
67
62
73

256
251
251
230

128
129
126
128

145
134
142
171

84
83
82
83

21
33
32
38

1969—M ar..........................
Ju n e.........................
Sept..........................
(
Tif*n 1
(

1,285
1,325
1,418
1,725
2,304

1,872
1,952
1,965
2,215
2,363

175
168
167
152
152

342
368
369
433
442

432
447
465
496
562

194
195
179
172
177

75
76
70
73
77

222
216
213
388
420

126
142
143
141
142

191
229
246
249
271

72
72
71
69
75

43
40
42
42
46

1970—M ar..........................
Ju n e .........................
Sept..........................
D ec...........................

2,358
2,587
2,785
3,102

2,744
2,757
2,885
2,950

159
161
157
146

735
712
720
708

573
580
620
669

181
177
180
183

74
65
63
60

458
477
586
618

158
166
144
140

288
288
284
292

71
76
73
71

47
54
58
64

1971—M ar...........................
Ju n e..........................
Sept...........................
Dec...........................

3,177
3,172
2,922
3,028

2,983
2,994
3,025
3,137

154
151
135
128

688
692
675
715

670
677
753
756

182
180
179
174

63
64
63
60

615
629
598
656

161
138
133
141

302
313
323
327

77
75
91
96

72
76
75
85

1972—M ar.*.......................

2,946

3,214

128

723

775

173

59

662

141

362

104

86

1 D ata on the two lines shown for this date differ because o f changes
shown for the preceding date; figures on the second line are com parable
in reporting coverage. Figures on the first line are comparable with those
with those shown for the following date.




SEPTEMBER 1972 □ MONEY RATES

A 93

FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
(In cents per unit of foreigncurrency)
Argentina
(peso)

Period

Australia
(dollar)

Austria
(schilling)

Belgium
(franc)

C anada
(dollar)

Ceylon
(rupee)

D enm ark
(krone)

Finland
(markka)

France
(franc)

.28473
.28492
2 26.589
22.502

111.25
111.10
111.36
113.61

3.8675
3.8654
3.8659
44.0009

2.0026
1.9942
2.0139
2.0598

92.801
92.855
3 95.802
99.021

16.678
16.741
16.774
16.800

13.362
13.299
13.334
13.508

23.761
23.774
23.742
23.758

20.191
1 19.302
18.087
18.148

1971—Aug..
Sep t..
O ct..
N o v ..
D ec..

20.757
19.919
19.923
19.925
19.928

113.17
114.78
115.76
115.89
117.48

4.0264
4.0844
4.1261
4.1280
4.2041

2.0351
2.0921
2.1353
2.1572
2.1986

98.670
98.717
99.537
99.607
100.067

16.792
16.839
16.820
16.806
16.797

13.435
13.672
13.768
13.773
13.994

23.735
23.830
23.800
23.773
23.852

18.130
18.112
18.073
18.096
18.549

1972—Jan ..
Feb..
M ar..
Apr..
May.
June.
J u ly ..
Aug..

19.960
219.960

119.10
119.10
119.10
119.10
119.10
119.10
119.10
119.11

4.2516
4.3108
4.3342
4.3236
4.3277
4.3421
4.3674
4.3470

2.2514
2.2810
2.2757
2.2672
2.2737
2.2758
2.2814
2.2795

99.411
99.528
100.152
100.430
101.120
102.092
101.630
101.789

16.653
16.650
16.650
16.650
16.650
16.772
15.878
15.611

14.219
14.306
14.361
14.301
14.332
14.336
14.368
14.438

24.077
24.099
24.121
24.088
24.084
24.136
24.035
24.020

19.329
19.650
19.835
19.852
19.944
19.937
19.990
19.986

Germany
(Deutsche
m ark)

India
(rupee)

Ireland
(pound)

Italy
(lira)

Japan
(yen)

M alaysia
(dollar)

Mexico
(peso)

N eth­
erlands
(guilder)

25.048
5 25.491
27.424
6 28.768

13.269
13.230
13.233
13.338

239.35
239.01
239.59
244.42

.16042
.15940
.15945
.16174

.27735
.27903
.27921
.28779

32.591
32.623
32.396
32.989

8.0056
8.0056
8.0056
8.0056

27.626
27.592
27.651
6 28.650

1971—Aug.
Sept.
O ct..
Nov.
Dec.,

29.277
29.794
30.065
30.005
30.593

13.345
13.401
13.349
13.353
13.388

243.46
246.94
249.06
249.33
252.66

.16157
.16292
.16332
.16324
.16652

.28113
.29583
.30202
.30418
.31249

32.737
33.354
33.573
33.627
34.135

8.0056
8.0056
8.0056
8.0056
8.0056

28.693
29.308
29.772
30.006
30.503

1972—Jan ..
Feb..
M ar.
Apr.,
May,
June,
July ,
Aug.

30.956
31.390
31.545
31.468
31.454
31.560
31.634
31.382

13.415
13.638
13.716
13.735
13.763
13.754
13.072
13.030

257.05
260.37
261.81
261.02
261.24
256.91
244.47
245.02

.16923
.17036
.17161
.17138
.17175
.17142
.17208
.17203

.31978
.32769
.33054
.32943
.32854
.33070
.33219
.33204

34.737
35.080
35.409
35.406
35.446
35.475
35.918
36.026

8.0002
8.0000
8.0000
8.0000
8.0000
8.0000
8.0000
8.0000

31.072
31.468
31.384
31.142
31.124
31.296
31.424
31.158

Period

New
Zealand
(dollar)

Norway
(krone)

Portugal
(escudo)

South
Africa
(rand)

Spain
(peseta)

Sweden
(krona)

Switz­
erland
(franc)

United
K ing­
dom
(pound)

1968........................................................................................
1969........................................................................................
1970........................................................................................

111.37
111.21
111.48
113.71

14.000
13.997
13.992
14.205

3.4864
3.5013
3.4978
3.5456

139.10
138.90
139.24
140.29

1.4272
1.4266
1.4280
1.4383

19.349
19.342
19.282
19.592

23.169
23.186
23.199
7 24.325

239.35
239.01
239.59
244.42

1971—Aug............................................... .............................
Sept............................................................................
Oct..............................................................................
N ov............................................................................
D ec.............................................................................

113.28
114.95
115.88
116.01
117.31

14.244
14.494
14.599
14.578
14.816

3.5289
3.5970
3.6275
3.6342
3.6494

141.46
140.88
140.43
140.40
137.22

1.4335
1.4415
81.4457
1.4533
1.4822

19.502
19.732
19.914
19.989
20.434

24.813
25.118
25.157
25.104
25.615

243.46
246.94
249.06
249.33
252.66

1972—Jan..............................................................................
Feb.............................................................................
M ar.............................................................................
Apr.............................................................................
M ay............................................................................
J u n e ...........................................................................
J u ly ............................................................................
Aug.............................................................................

119.36
119.39
119.29
119.36
119.41
119.13
119.31
119.45

14.913
15.029
15.161
15.151
15.214
15.303
15.367
15.335

3.6474
3.6690
3.6930
3.6950
3.7075
3.7083
3.7178
3.7211

131.27
132.98
133.77
133.32
133.82
132.63
125.26
125.28

1.5162
1.5170
1.5369
1.5487
1.5492
1.5509
1.5754
1.5752

20.731
20.858
20.956
20.907
21.032
21.101
21.134
21.160

25.693
25.890
25.974
25.920
25.903
26.320
26.561
26.449

257.09
260.37
261.81
261.02
261.24
9256.91
244.47
245.02

1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.

Period

196
196
197
197

8
9
0
1

1 Effective Aug. 10, 1969, the French franc was devalued from 4.94 to
5.55 francs per U.S. dollar.
2 A new Argentine peso, equal to 100 old pesos, was introduced on
Jan. 1, 1970. Since A pr. 6, 1971, the official exchange rate is set daily by
the Government o f Argentina. Average for Feb. 1-27,1972.
3 On June 1, 1970, the Canadian Government announced that, for the
time being, C anada will not m aintain the exchange rate o f the Canadian
dollar within the margins required by IM F rules.
4 Effective M ay 9, 1971, the A ustrian schilling was revalued to 24.75
per U.S. dollar.
5 Effective Oct. 26, 1969, the new par value o f the G erm an m ark was
set at 3.66 per U.S. dollar.
6 Effective May 10,1971, the German m ark and Netherlands guilder
have been floated.




7 Effective M ay 10, 1971, the Swiss franc was revalued to 4.08 per
U.S. dollar.
8 Effective Oct. 20, 1971, the Spanish peseta was revalued to 68.455
per U.S. dollar.
9 Effective June 23, 1972, the U .K . pound was floated.
N o t e . —Effective Aug. 16, 1971, the U.S. dollar convertibility to gold
was suspended; as from that day foreign central banks did not have to
support the dollar rate in order to keep it within IM F limits.
During December 1971, certain countries established central rates
against the U.S. dollar in place o f former IM F parities.
Averages o f certified noon buying rates in New Y ork for cable transfers.
For description o f rates and back data, see “ International Finance,”
Section 15 o f Supplement to Banking and Monetary Statistics, 1962.

A 94

MONEY RATES □ SEPTEMBER 1972
CENTRAL BANK RATES FOR DISCOUNTS AND ADVANCES TO COMMERCIAL BANKS
(Per cent per annum)
Changes during the last 12 months

Rate as of
Aug. 31, 1971
1971

Country
Per
cent

M onth
effective

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

6 .0
5 .0
6 .0
20.0
5.25

C eylon......................................
C hile..........................................
C olom bia.................................
C osta R ica...........................
D enm ark..................................

6.5
8 .0
8 .0
4 .0
7.5

Jan. 1970
July 1971
May 1963

7 .0

Apr. 1971

5.0
7 .0

Ecuador....................................
Egypt, Arab Rep. o f .............
El Salvador..............................
Ethiopia....................................
F in lan d .....................................

8 .0
5 .0
4 .0
6.50
8.50

Jan.
May
Aug.
Aug.
June

1970
1962
1964
1970
1971

F ran ce.......................................
G ermany, Fed. Rep. o f .. . . .
G h a n a .......................................
G reece.......................................
H onduras.................................

6.75
5.0
8.0
6.5
4 .0

M ay
Apr.
July
Sept.
Feb.

1971
1971
1971
1969
1966

Iceland......................................
In d ia ..........................................
Indonesia..................................
Ira n ............................................
Irelan d ......................................

5.25
6.0
6 .0
8.0
6.12

Jan.
Jan.
M ay
Aug.
Aug.

1966
1971
1969
1969
1971

Ita ly ...........................................
Jam aica....................................
J a p a n ........................................
K o rea........................................
Mexico......................................

5 .0
5.5
5.25
16.0
4.5

Apr.
Apr.
M ay
June
June

1971
1971
1971
1971
1942

M orocco...................................
Netherlands.............................
New Zealand...........................
N igeria......................................
N orw ay....................................

3.50
5.5
7 .0
4.50
4.5

Nov.
Apr.
Mar.
June
Sept.

1951
1971
1961
1968
1969

P akistan....................................
P e ru ...........................................
Philippine R epublic...............
P ortugal....................................
South A frica............................

5 .0
9.5
10.0
3.75
6.5

June
Nov.
June
Feb.
M ar.

1965
1959
1969
1971
1971

S pain.........................................
Sweden......................................
Sw itzerland..............................
Taiw an......................................
T hailan d ...................................

6 .0
6 .0
3.75
9.25
5 .0

Apr.
Apr.
Sept.
M ay
Oct.

1971
1971
1969
1971
1959

Sept.
Sept.
Apr.
Oct.
Sept.

1966
1970
1971
1970
1970

5 .0
9 .0
6 .0
5 .0
18.0

1957
1970
1971
1969
1971

Oct.

A rgentina.................................
A ustria......................................
Belgium....................................
B razil........................................
C an ad a.....................................

Tunisia......................................
Turkey......................................
United K ingdom ....................
Venezuela.................................
Vietnam....................................

Dec.
Jan.
Mar.
July
Feb.

Sept.

1972
M ar.

May

Apr.

June

July

Aug.

18.0
5.5

5 .0

4.5

18.0
5 .0
4 .0
20.0
4.75

4 .0

4.75

6.5
7 .0
8 .0
5 .0
8 .0

8 .0

8 .0
5 .0
4 .0
6.50
7.75

7.75
6.5
4 .5

5.12

7 .0
5.12

4 .0

4.94

6 .0

5.75

5.75
3 .0
8 .0
6.5
4 .0

3 .0

4.81

4.81

5.25
6 .0
6 .0
7 .0
5.19

5.19
4 .0

4.5
5.0
4.75

4 .0
6 .0
4.25
13.0
4.5

6 .0
4 .25
13.0

4.5

5 .0

3.50
4 .0
6 .0
4.5 0
4.5

4 .0
6 .0

6 .0

6 .0
5 .0
5.5

6 .0
9.5
10.0
3.75
6 .0
5 .0
5 .0
3.75
9.25
5 .0

5 .0

5 .0

N o t e . —Rates shown are mainly those at which the central bank either
discounts or makes advances against eligible commercial paper and/or
govt, securities for commercial banks or brokers. F o r countries with
more than one rate applicable to such discounts or advances, the rate
shown is the one at which it is understood the central bank transacts
the largest proportion o f its credit operations. O ther rates for some
o f these countries follow :
Argentina—3 and 5 per cent for certain rural and industrial paper, de­
pending on type o f transaction;;
Brazil—8 per cent for secured paper and 4 per cent for certain agricultural
paper;
Chile—Various rates ranging from 1 per cent to 17 per cent; 20 per cent
for loans to make up reserve deficiencies.
Colombia—5 per cent for warehouse receipts covering approved lists of
products, 6 and 7 per cent for agricultural bonds, and 12 and 18 per cent
for rediscounts in excess o f an individual bank’s q u o ta ;
Costa Rica—5 per cent for paper related to commercial transactions
(rate shown is for agricultural and industrial paper);
Ecuador—5 per cent for special advances and for bank acceptances for
agricultural purposes, 7 per cent for bank acceptances for industrial
purposes, and 10 per cent for advances to cover shortages in legal reserves;
Ethiopia—5 per cent for export paper and 6 per cent for Treasury bills.




Feb.

R ate
as o f
Aug. 31,
1972

6 .0

5 .0
9 .0
6 .0
5 .0

18.0
Honduras—R ate shown is for advances only.
Indonesia—Various rates depending on type o f paper, collateral, com­
modity involved, e tc.;
Japan—Penalty rates (exceeding the basic rate shown) for borrowings
from the central bank in excess o f an individual bank’s q u o ta ;
Morocco—Various rates from 3 per cent to 4.6 per cent depending on type
o f paper, maturity, collateral, guarantee, etc.
Peru—3.5, 5, and 7 per cent for small credits to agricultural o r fish produc­
tion, import substitution industries and manufacture o f exports; 8 per
cent for other agricultural, industrial and mining paper;
Philippines—6 per cent for financing the production, im portation, and dis­
tribution o f rice and corn and 7.75 per cent for credits to enterprises en­
gaged in export activities. Preferential rates are also granted on credits to
rural banks; and
Venezuela—2 per cent for rediscounts o f certain agriculture paper, 4Vi
per cent for advances against government bonds, and 5
per cent for
rediscounts o f certain industrial paper and on advances against promissory
notes or securities o f first-class Venezuelan companies.
Vietnam—10 per cent for export paper; treasury bonds are rediscounted
at a rate 4 percentage points above the rate carried by the bond; and
there is a penalty rate o f 24 per cent for banks whose loans exceed quan­
titative ceilings.

SEPTEMBER 1972 □ MONEY RATES; ARBITRAGE

A 95

OPEN MARKET RATES
(Per cent per annum)
United Kingdom

C anada
M onth

Prime
Treasury
Treasury Day-tobank
bills,
bills,
day
bills,
3
3 m onths * money* 3 m o n th s3 months

Germany,
Fed. Rep. o f

France

Netherlands

Switzer­
land

Day-today
money

Clearing
banks*
deposit
rates4

Day-today
m oney5

Treasury
bills,
60-90
d ays6

Day-today
m oney7

Treasury
bills,
3 months

D ay-today
money

Private
discount
rate

197 0
197 1

6.12
3.62

6.22
3.76

8.26
6.41

6.70
5.57

5.73
4.93

5.23
3.84

8.67

6.54
4.54

8.67
6 .10

5.97
4.34

6.47
3.76

5.14
5.24

1971—Aug.
Sept.
O c t.,
Nov.
Dec.

3.88
3.93
3.79
3.31
3.25

3.94
4.16
4.16
3.60
3.63

5.99
3 5.42
8 4.9 0
4.7 4
4.42

5.75
4.83
4.63
4.48
4 .36

5.05
4.39
4.29
3.75
3.46

4.00
4 3.00
2.88
2.70
2.50

5.69
5.99
5.95
5.51
5.28

4.25
4.25
3.75
3.75
3.25

6.18
7.01
7.50
4.58
5.78

4.24
4.34
4.47
4.06
3.90

5.53
3.80
5.35
3.79
4.91

5.25
5.25
5.25
5.25
5.12

1972—Jan ..
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
M ay
June
July.
Aug.

3.29
3.48
3.51
3.65
3.67
3.61
3.48
3.47

3.71
3.79
3.70
3.68
3.73
3.64
3.45
3.54

4.48
4.85
4.77
4.62
4.83
5.86
6.82
6.71

4.36
4.37
4 .3 4
4 .3 0
4.27
5.21
5 .60
5.79

3.94
4.43
4.58
3.82
4.56
3.92
4.99
5.13

2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.93
4.18
5.25

5.31
5.20
4.76
4.81
5.32
3.81

3.25
2.75
2.75
2.75
2.75
2.75
2.75

4.20
4.15
3.88
3.77
2.95
2.65
2.24

3.61
3.19
2.26
1.84
1.98
1.90
1.09
0.75

4.44
3.38
0.98
0.70
3.03
1.53
0.86

5.00
5.0 0
5.00
4.75
4.75
4.75
4.75

1 Based on
2 Based on
3 D ata for
months.
4 D ata for
deposits.

average yield o f weekly tenders during month.
weekly averages o f daily closing rates.
1968 through Sept. 1971 are for bankers’ acceptances, 3
1968 through Sept. 1971 are for bankers’ allowance on

5 R ate shown is on private securities.
6 Rate in effect at end o f month.
7 M onthly averages based on daily quotations.
8 Bill rates in table are buying rates for prim e paper.
N o t e . —F or description and back data, see “ International Finance,’
Section 15 o f Supplement to Banking and Monetary Statistics, 1962.

ARBITRAGE ON TREASURY BILLS
(Per cent per annum)
United States and U nited Kingdom

United States and C anada

Treasury bill rates
D ate

United
Kingdom
(adj. to
U.S.
quotation
basis)

United
States

Treasury bill rate*

Spread
(favor
of
London)

Premium
( + ) or
discount
( - ) on
forward
pound

N et
incentive
(favor
of
London)

C anada
As
quoted
in
Canada

Adj. to
U.S.
quotation
basis

United
States

Spread
(favor
of
Canada)

Premium
( + ) or
discount
( - ) on
forward
C anadian
dollars

N et
incentive
(favor
of
Canada)

1972
M ar.

3 ...............
10...............
17...............
2 4 ...............
31...............

4 .3 0
4.29
4.29
4.27
4.26

3.40
3.53
3.78
3.69
3.80

.90
.76
.51
.58
.46

- .4 0
.15
.07
.12
-.1 1

.50
.91
.58
.70
.35

3.41
3.40
3.56
3.61
3.55

3.38
3.33
3.48
3.53
3.47

3.40
3.53
3.78
3.69
3.80

-.0 2
-.2 0
-.3 0
-.1 6
-.3 3

-1 .0 8
-1 .2 8
-.7 6
-.7 6
- .7 6

-1 .1 0
- 1 .4 8
-1 .0 6
- .92
- 1 .0 9

A pr.

7 ...............
14...............
2 1 ...............
2 8 ...............

4.27
4.27
4.23
4.21

3.72
3.78
3.48
3.48

.55
.49
.75
.73

.17
.12
.01
-.0 4

.72
.61
.76
.69

3.64
3.71
3.64
3.62

3.56
3.63
3.56
3.54

3.72
3.78
3.48
3.48

-.1 6
- .1 5
.08
.06

-.8 0
-.8 0
-1 .0 4
-1 .2 0

-.9 6
-.9 5
-.9 6
-1 .1 4

M ay

5 ...............
12...............
19...............
2 6 ...............

4.19
4 .2 0
4 .2 0
4 .2 4

3.44
3.55
3.72
3.67

.75
.65
.48
.57

- .2 2
-.2 1
- .3 8
- .4 9

.53
.44
.10
.08

3.61
3.62
3.69
3.75

3.53
3.54
3.61
3.66

3.44
3.55
3.72
3.67

.09
-.0 1
- .1 1
- .0 1

- 1 .2 8
-1 .4 0
-1 .7 2
-1 .7 2

-1 .1 9
- 1 .4 1
-1 .8 3
-1 .7 3

June

2 ...............
9 ...............
16...............
2 3 ...............
30 ...............

4 .3 4
4.78
5.46
5.54
5.56

3.77
3.78
3.85
3.93
3.91

.57
1.00
1.61
1.61
1.65

-.3 9
-.4 9
-1 .6 2
- 7 .7 4
-4 .0 0

.18
.51
-.0 1
-6 .1 3
-2 .3 5

3.73
3.70
3.57
3.53
3.50

3.65
3.62
3.49
3.45
3.42

3.77
3.78
3.85
3.93
3.91

- .1 2
-.1 6
-.3 6
- .4 8
-.4 9

- 1 .8 0
-1 .3 6
-.7 2
- .1 0
-.2 0

-1 .9 2
-1 .5 2
- 1 .0 8
-.5 8
-.6 9

July

7 ...............
14 ...............
2 1 ...............
2 8 ...............

5.41
5.34
5.67
5.69

3.96
3.94
3.85
3.80

1.45
1.40
1.82
1.89

-2 .5 0
- 3 .5 8
-3 .4 3
-3 .4 3

- 1 .0 5
-2 .1 8
-1 .6 1
-1 .5 4

3.56
3.49
3.43
3.46

3.48
3.41
3.33
3.38

3.96
3.94
3.85
3.80

-.4 8
-.5 3
- .5 2
- .4 2

- .0 4
.02
.24
.12

-.5 2
-.5 1
- .2 8
-.3 0

Aug.

4 ...............
11...............
18...............
2 5 ...............

5.71
5.69
5.69
5.75

3.74
3.77
3.80
4.07

1.97
1.92
1.89
1.68

- 3 .5 9
- 2 .9 1
-2 .0 8
- 2 .4 0

-1 .6 2
-.9 9
-.1 9
-.7 2

3.48
3.41
3.44
3.46

3.40
3.34
3.36
3.38

3.74
3.77
3.80
4.07

- .3 4
- .4 3
-.4 4
-.6 9

- .1 6
.00
.00
.00

-.5 0
-.4 3
- .4 4
-.6 9

N o t e . — Treasury bills: All rates are on the latest issue o f 91-day bills.
U.S. and Canadian rates are m arket offer rates 11 a.m. Friday; U .K .
rates are Friday opening m arket offer rates in London.
Premium or discount on forward pound and on forward Canadian dollar:
Rates per annum computed on basis o f midpoint quotations (between
bid and offer) at 11 a.m. Friday in New Y ork for both spot and forward
pound sterling and for both spot and forward Canadian dollars.




All series: Based on quotations reported to F.R . Bank o f New Y ork
by market sources.
F or description o f series and for back figures, see Oct. 1964 B u l l e t i n ,
pp. 1241-60. F or description of adjustments to U .K . and C anadian
Treasury bill rates, see notes to Table 1, p. 1257, and to Table 2, p. 1260,
Oct. 1964 B u l l e t i n .

A 96

GOLD RESERVES □ SEPTEMBER 1972
GOLD RESERVES OF CENTRAL BANKS AND GOVERNMENTS
(In millions of dollars; valued at $35 per fine ouncethrough Apr. 1972 and at $38 per fine ounce thereafter)

End o f
period

1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971—J u ly ..
A ug..
Sept..
O c t..,
Nov..
D ec1972—Jan.. .,
F eb ...
M ar..
A p r.. .
M ay. .
J u n e ..
July*.

End o f
period

Esti­
mated
total
world i

Intl.
M one­
tary
Fund

United
States

Esti­
mated
rest o f
world

Algeria

Argen­
tina

243,230
43,185
41,600
40,905
41,015
41,275

31,869
2,652
2,682
2,288
2,310
4,339

13,806
13,235
12,065
10,892
11,859
11,072

27,285
27,300
26,855
27,725
26,845
25,865

6
6
155
205
205
191

66
84
84
109
135
140

223
224
231
257
263
239

700
701
701
714
715
714

41,210

4,479
4,695
4,722
4,724
4,726
4.732

10,453
10,209
10.207
10.207
10,206
10,206

26,280
26,250'

192
192
192
192
192
192

140
140
140
140
140
90

259
259
259
259
259
259

4.732
5.303
5.304
5,331
5.761
5.761
5.761

10,206
9,662
9,662 26,290
9,662
10.490
10.490 *28*585
10.490

192
192
192
192
208
208
208

90
90
70
70
76

260
260
259
259
282
283
285

41,185

41,260
"*44]835

C o­
lom bia

D en­
m ark

Fin­
land

France

G er­
many,
Fed.
Rep. of

Greece

Aus­
tralia

India

Aus­
tria

Bel­
gium

Brazil

Burma

Canada

1,558
1,525
1,480
1,524
1,520
1,470

63
45
45
45
45
45

84
84
84
84
84
63

1,151
1,046
1,015
863
872
791

44
45
45
46
47
47

746
752
722
722
722
729

1,600
1,584
1,572
1,564
1,564
1,544

46
46
46
46
46
46

22
22
22
22
22
22

792
792
792
792
792
792

47
47
47
47
47
47

729
729
729
729
791
792
793

1,544
1,544
1,544
1,544
1,682
1,682
1,682

46
46
46
46

r21
21
20
20
18
16
16

792
792
792
767
836
834
834

47
47

Iran

Iraq

Ire­
land

Israel

Italy

Chile

Japan

1965............................
1966............................
1967............................
1968............................
1969............................
1970............................

35
26
31
31
26
17

97
108
107
114
89
64

84
45
45
45
45
29

4,706
5,238
5,234
3,877
3,547
3,532

4,410
4,292
4,228
4,539
4,079
3,980

78
120
130
140
130
117

281
243
243
243
243
243

146
130
144
158
158
131

110
106
115
193
193
144

21
23
25
79
39
16

56
46
46
46
46
43

2,404
2,414
2,400
2,923
2,956
2,887

328
329
338
356
413
532

1971---July.................
A ug.................
Sept.................
O ct...................
N ov.................
D ec..................

16
14
14
14
14
14

64
64
64
64
64
64

29
49
49
49
49
49

3,523
3,523
3,523
3,523
3,523
3,523

4,077
4,076
4,077
4,077
4,077
4,077

99
99
98
98
98
98

243
243
243
243
243
243

131
131
131
131
131
131

143
143
143
143
143
144

16
16
16
16
16
16

43
43
43
43
43
43

2,884
2,884
2,884
2,884
2,884
2,884

670
679
679
679
679
679

1972—Jan...................
Feb..................
M ar.................
A pr..................
M ay................

14
14
14
14
15
16
16

64
64
64
64
69
69
69

49
49
49
49
53
53
53

3,523
3,523
3,523
3,523
3,826
3,826
3,826

4,077
4,077
4,077
4,077
4,437
4,437
4,437

98
98
98
98
132
132
132

243
243
243
243
264
264

131
131
131
131
143
143
143

144
144
144
144
156
156
156

16
16
16
16
17
17
17

43
43
43
43
47
47

2,884
2,884
2,884
2,884
3,131
3,131
3,131

679
711
735
735
801
801
801

M alay­
sia

Mexi­
co

M oroc­
co

N ether­
lands

Philip­
pines

Portu­
gal

Saudi
Arabia

July*...............
End o f
period

Kuw ait

Leb­
anon

Libya

N or­
way

Paki­
stan

Peru

1965............................
1966............................
1967............................
1968............................
1969............................
1970............................

52
67
136
122
86
86

182
193
193
288
288
288

68
68
68
85
85
85

2
1
31
66
63
48

158
109
166
165
169
176

21
21
21
21
21
21

1,756
1,730
1,711
1,697
1,720
1,787

31
18
18
24
25
23

53
53
53
54
54
54

67
65
20
20
25
40

38
44
60
62
45
56

576
643
699
856
876
902

73
69
69
119
119
119

1971—July.................
Aug.................
Sept.................
O ct..................
N ov.................
D ec..................

87
87
87
87
87
87

322
322
322
322
322
322

85
85
85
85
85
85

58
58
58
58
58
58

184
184
184
184
184
184

21
21
21
21
21
21

1,888
1,889
1,889
1,889
1,889
1,909

34
34
34
34
34
33

55
55
55
55
55
55

40
40
40
40
40
40

64
65
66
67
67
67

895
907
911
911
918
921

119
127
127
127
127
127

1972—Jan ..................
Feb..................
M ar.................
A pr..................
M ay................
June ............
J u ly * .............

87
87
87
89
104
98
94

322
322
322
322
350
350
350

85
85
85
85
93
93
93

58
58
58
58
63
63

181
179
177
174

21
21
21
21
23
23

1,908
1,908
1,908
1,908
2,079
2,079
2,079

33
33
33
33
36
36
36

55
55
55
55
60

40
40
40
40

68
68
68
68
73
72
72

921
921
925
925
1,004
1,004

127
127
127
127
138
138
138

For notes seeend of table.




SEPTEMBER 1972 □ GOLD RESERVES AND PRODUCTION

A 97

GOLD RESERVES OF CENTRAL BANKS AND GOVERNMENTS— Continued
(In millions o f dollars; valued at $35 per fine ounce through Apr. 1972 and at $38 per fine ounce thereafter)

End o f
period

South
Africa

Spain

Sweden

Switzer­ Taiwan
land

Thai­
land

Turkey

U.A.R.
(Egypt)

U nited
K ing­
dom

U ru­
guay

Vene­
zuela

Yugo­
slavia

Bank
for
Intl.
Settle­
ments 4

1965................................
1966.................................
1967............... ................
1968................................
1969.................................
1970.................................

425
637
583
1,243
1,115
666

810
785
785
785
784
498

202
203
203
225
226
200

3,042
2,842
3,089
2,624
2,642
2,732

55
62
81
81
82
82

96
92
92
92
92
92

116
102
97
97
117
126

139
93
93
93
93
85

2,265
1,940
1,291
1,474
1,471
1,349

155
146
140
133
165
162

401
401
401
403
403
384

19
21
22
50
51
52

-5 5 8
-4 2 4
-6 2 4
-3 4 9
-4 8 0
-2 8 2

1971—July.....................
Aug.....................
Sept.....................

481
486
479
460
443
410

498
498
498
498
498
498

200
200
200
200
200
200

2,909
2,909
2,909
2,909
2,909
2,909

82
81
81
80
80
80

81
81
82
82
82
82

127
127
127
127
122
130

85
85
85
85
85
85

803
778
778
778
778
775

148
148
148
148
148
148

391
391
391
391
391
391

52
52
52
52
51
51

225
210
215
227
249
310

403
405
405
412
469
506
543

498
498
498
498
541
541

200
200
200
200
217
217
217

2,909
2,909
2,909
2,909
3,158
3,158
3,158

80
80
80
80
87
87
87

82
82
82
82
89
89
89

130
130
129
127
'127
'122
122

85
85
85
85
92
92

778
751
751
751
816
816

146
146
156
156
169
169
169

391
391
391
391
425
425
425

51
51
51
51
56
56
56

332
333
354
347
365
304
276

Nov.....................
Dec......................
1972—Jan .......................
Feb......................
M ar.....................
A p r......................
July?*...................

1 Includes reported or estimated gold holdings o f international and
regional organizations, central banks and govts, o f countries listed in
this table, and also o f a num ber not shown separately here, and gold to be
distributed by the Tripartite Commission for the R estitution o f M onetary
G old; excludes holdings o f the U.S.S.R., other Eastern European coun­
tries, and C hina M ainland.
The figures included for the Bank for International Settlements are
the Bank’s gold assets net o f gold deposit liabilities. This procedure
avoids the overstatement o f total world gold reserves since m ost o f the
gold deposited with the BIS is included in the gold reserves o f individual
countries.
2 Adjusted to include gold subscription payments to the IM F made by

some m ember countries in anticipation o f increase in Fund quotas, except
those matched by gold mitigation deposits with the United States and
U nited K ingdom ; adjustment is $270 million.
3 Excludes gold subscription payments made by some m ember countries
in anticipation o f increase in Fund quotas: for m ost o f these countries
the increased quotas became effective in Feb. 1966.
4 N et gold assets o f BIS, i.e., gold in bars and coins and other gold
assets minus gold deposit liabilities.
N o t e . —F or back figures and description o f the data in this and the
following tables on gold (except production), see “ G old,” Section 14 o f
Supplement to Banking and Monetary Statistics, 1962.

GOLD PRODUCTION
(In millions o f dollars; valued at $35 per fine ounce through 1971 and at $38 per fine ounce thereafter)
Africa
Period

W orld
produc­
tion i

1966............................... 1.445.0
1967................................ 1.410.0
1968................................ 1.420.0
1969................................ 1.420.0
1970................................ 1.4 5 0 .0
1971?..............................

N orth and South America

South
Africa

G hana

C ongo
(K in ­
shasa)

1 ,080.8
1.068.7
1,088.0
1.090.7
1 ,128.0
1.098.7

24.0
26.7
2 5 .4
24 .8
24.8
24.4

5 .6
5 .4
5 .9
6 .0
6 .2
6 .0

United
States

Can­
ada

Mex­
ico

63.1
5 3 .4
53.9
60.1
63.5

114.6
103.7
94.1
89.1
84.3
77.3

7.5
5.8
6.2
6.3
6.9

Asia

O ther

Nica­ Colom­ India
ragua
bia

Japan

Philip­
pines

Aus­
tralia

All
o th e r1

9 .8
9 .0
8 .4
7.7
7.1
6 .6

4 .2
3 .4
4 .0
3 .4
3.7
4.1

19.4
23.7
21.5
23.7
24.8
27.0

15.8
17.2
18.5
20.0
21.1
22.2

32.1
28 .4
27.6
24.5
21.7
23.5

62.9
59.4
61.6
60.0
54.1

5.2
5.2
4.9
3.7
3.8

1971—June...................
Ju ly ....................
A ug....................
Sept....................
Oct.....................
N ov....................
D ec.....................

92.0
93 .4
92.3
91.3
93.4
91.7
85.7

6.7
5.8
6.3
6.1
6.3
6.6
5.9

.1
1.1
.6
.6
.6
.6
.5

.4
.4
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3

2 .4
2 .4
2 .4
2 .4
2.1
2 .4
2 .2

1.9
2.1
2.1
2.1
2 .0
2.1
2.1

1972—Jan .....................
Feb.....................
M ar....................
A pr.....................
M ay ...................
June...................

95.3
88.2
91.8
9 3.2
9 4 .4
94.3

6.5
6 .4
6 .6
7.5
6.8
6.2

.7
.6
.5
.6

.4

2 .6
2.5
2 .6

3.3
2.3

i Estimated; excludes U.S.S.R., other Eastern European countries,
C hina M ainland, and N orth Korea.




A 98

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
A r t h u r F. B u r n s, Chairman
G e o r g e W. M i t c h e l l
John E. S h eehan

J. D e w e y D a a n e

J. L. R o b e r ts o n , Vice Chairman
A n d r e w F. Brimmer
Jeffrey M. B ucher

R o b e r t C. H o ll a n d , Executive D irector
R o b e r t S o lo m o n , A d v ise r to the B oard
J. C h a r le s P a r t e e , A d viser to the B oard
H o w a rd H. H a c k le y , A ssistan t to the B oard
R o b e r t L. C a r d o n , A ssista n t to the B oard
E dw in J. J o h n so n , A ssistan t to the B oard
F ra n k O ’B r ie n , Jr. , S pecial A ssista n t to the B oard
Joseph R. C o y n e , S pecial A ssistan t to the B oard
Joh n S. Rippey, S pecial A ssista n t to the B oard

OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

R o b e r t C. H o ll a n d , Executive D irector
D a v id C. M e ln ic o f f , D eputy Executive
D irector
G o rd o n B. G rim w ood , A ssistan t D irecto r and
Program D irector fo r Contingency Planning
H a r ry J. H a l l e y , Program D irector for
M anagem ent System s
W illia m W. L a y t o n , D irector o f Equal
Em ploym ent Opportunity
B r e n to n C. L e a v it t , Program D irector fo r
Banking Structure

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

T y n a n S m ith , Secretary
M u rr a y A ltm a n n , A ssistan t Secretary
N orm and R. V. B e r n a r d , A ssistan t Secretary
A r t h u r L. B r o id a , A ssistan t Secretary
E liz a b e t h L. C a r m ic h a e l, A ssistan t
Secretary
M ic h a e l A. G r een sp a n , A ssistan t Secretary

LEGAL DIVISION

Thom as J. O ’C o n n e l l, G eneral Counsel
P a u l G a r d n e r , Jr. , A ssistan t G eneral Counsel
P a u lin e B. H e l l e r , A ssistan t G eneral Counsel
R o b e r t S. P lo t k in , A dviser

DIVISION OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
OPERATIONS

James A. M c In to sh , D irector
Joh n N. K ile y , Jr. , A ssociate D irector
W a lt e r A. A lt h a u s e n , A ssistan t D irecto r
D o n a ld G. B a r n e s, A ssistan t D irector
H a r ry A. G u in te r , A ssistan t D irector
P. D. R in g, A ssistan t D irector
James L. V in in g , A ssistan t D irector
C h a r le s C. W a l c u t t , A ssistan t D irector
E. M a u rice M c W h ir te r , Chief Federal
R eserve Examiner



DIVISION OF RESEARCH AND STATISTICS

J. C h a r le s P a r t e e , D irecto r
S te p h e n H. A x ilr o d , A ssociate D irector
S a m u el B. C h a se , A sso cia te D irector
L y le E. G r a m le y , A sso cia te D irecto r
P e t e r M. K eir, A d viser
James L. P ie r c e , A d viser
S t a n le y J. S ig e l, A d viser
M u rr a y S. W er n ick , A d viser
K e n n e th B. W illia m s, A d viser
James B. E c k e r t, A ssociate A d viser
Joseph S. Z e is e l, A sso cia te A d viser
E d w ard C. E t t in , A ssistan t A d viser
E le a n o r J. S t o c k w e l l , A ssistan t A d viser
S te p h en P. T a y lo r , A ssista n t A d viser
L ou is W e in e r , A ssista n t A d viser
L ev o n H. G a r a b e d ia n , A ssistan t D irecto r
DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCE

R a lp h C. B r y a n t , D irecto r
Joh n E. R e y n o ld s , A sso cia te D irecto r
A. B. H e rse y , Senior A d viser
R o b e r t F. G em m ill, A d viser
R eed J. I r v in e ,A d viser
S a m u el I. K a t z , A d viser
B e r n a r d N o r w o o d , A d viser
S a m u el P iz e r , A d viser
R a lp h C. W o o d , A d viser
George B. Henry, Assistant Adviser
H elen B. Junz, Assistant Adviser
DIVISION OF SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

F r e d e r ic S o lo m o n , D irector
B r e n to n C. L e a v it t , D eputy D irecto r
F re d e ric k R. D a h l , A ssistan t D irector
Jack M. E g e r t s o n , A ssista n t D irecto r
Joh n P. F la h e r t y , A ssista n t D irector
J a n e t O. H a r t, A ssistan t D irecto r
Joh n N. L y o n , A ssista n t D irector
Joh n T. M c C lin to c k , A ssistan t D irector
Thom as A. Sidm an, A ssista n t D irector
C h a r le s L. M a r in a c c io , A d viser

A 99

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Continued

DIVISION OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION

R o n a ld G. B u r k e , D irector
Joh n J. H a r t, A ssistan t D irector

OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER

Jo h n K a k a le c , C ontroller
H a r r y J. H a l l e y , D epu ty Controller
DIVISION OF DATA PROCESSING

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

Joseph E. K e l l e h e r , D irector
W a lt e r W. K reim an n , D eputy D irector
D o n a ld E. A n d e r so n , A ssistan t D irector
J oh n D. S m ith , A ssistan t D irector




J e r o ld E. S lo c u m , D irecto r
C h a r le s L. H am pton , A sso cia te D irecto r
G le n n L. Cummins, A ssista n t D irecto r
B enjam in R. W . K n o w le s , J r.,
A ssista n t D irector
H e n r y W. M e e t z e , A ssista n t D irecto r
R ich a rd S. W a t t , A ssista n t D irecto r
E d w a rd K. O ’C o n n o r , A ssistan t D irector

A 100

FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE
A r t h u r F. B u r n s, Chairman

A lf r e d H a y e s, Vice Chairman

A n d re w F. Brimmer

J. D e w e y D a a n e

J. L. R o b e r tso n

Jeffrey M. B ucher

D avid P. E astburn

John E. S heehan

P h ilip E. C o l d w e l l

B r u c e K. M a c L a u ry

W ill is J. W in n

G eorge W. M itchell
R o b e r t C. H o l l a n d , Secretary
A r t h u r L. B r o id a , D eputy Secretary
M u rr a y A lt m a n n , A ssistan t Secretary

R o b e r t S o lo m o n , Econom ist
(International Finance)
E d w a rd G. B o e h n e , A sso cia te Econom ist
R a lp h C. B r y a n t , A sso cia te Econom ist

N orm and R. V . B e r n a r d , A ssistan t Secretary

L y le E. G r a m le y , A sso cia te Econom ist

H o w a r d H. H a c k le y , G eneral Counsel

R a lp h T. G r e e n , A sso cia te Econom ist

Thom as J. O ’C o n n e l l , A ssistan t G eneral Counsel

A. B. H e r se y , A sso cia te Econom ist

J. C h a r le s P a r t e e , Senior Econom ist

W illia m J. H o c t e r , A sso cia te Econom ist

TT A
„
S te p h e n H. A x ilr o d , Econom ist
(D om estic Finance)

Joh n H. K a r e k e n , A sso cia te Econom ist
R o b e r t G. L ink , A sso cia te Econom ist

A la n R. H o lm e s, M an ager, System Open M arket A ccou nt
C h a r le s A. Coombs, Special M an ager, System Open M arket A ccount

FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
A. W. C la u s e n , t w e l f t h f e d e r a l r e s e r v e d is t r ic t , President
G. M o rris D o r r a n c e , J r., t h ir d f e d e r a l r e s e r v e d is t r ic t , Vice P resident
James F. E n g lish ,

first federal

reserve district

D avid R ockefeller ,

D avid H. M orey ,

second

John S. F ang bo ner , fourth

federal

C hester C. L in d ,

nin th federal

reserve district

fifth federal

reserve district

M orris F. M iller ,

ten th federal

reserve district

H arry H ood B assett ,




eighth federal

reserve district

reserve district

reserve district

seventh federal

reserve district

federal reserve district

Joseph W. B arr ,

G aylord F reem an ,

sixth federal

L ewis H. B o n d ,

eleventh federal

reserve district

H e r b e r t V. P r o c h n o w , Secretary
W illia m J. K o rsv ik , A ssista n t Secretary

A 101

FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND BRANCHES
F e d e ra l R e s e rv e B a n k ,
b ra n c h , o r fa c ility
Z ip code

C h airm a n
D e p u ty C h airm an

P resid e n t
F irst V ice P resid e n t

B o sto n .........................

02106

Jam e s S. D u e se n b e rry
L o u is W . C ab o t

F ra n k E . M o rris
E arle O . L ath am

N ew Y o r k ...................

10045

R o sw e ll L . G ilp a tric
E lliso n L . H a za rd
M o rto n A d am s

A lfred H ayes
W illia m F . T reib er

19101

B ay a rd L . E n g lan d
Jo h n R . C o le m an

D a v id P. E a stb u rn
M ark H . W illes

C le v e la n d ..................

44101
4 5201
15230

A lb e rt G . C lay
J. W ard K e en e r
G rah am E . M arx
L a w re n c e E . W alk ley

W illis J. W in n
W alter H . M ac D o n a ld

C in c in n ati .............
P ittsb u rg h .............

R o b ert W . L a w so n , Jr.
S tu a rt S h u m ate
Jo h n H . F e ttin g , Jr.
C h arles W . D eB ell

A u b re y N . H eflin
R o b e rt P. B lack

Jo h n C . W ilso n
H . G . P a ttillo
D avid M ath ew s
H en ry K . S tan fo rd
Jo h n C . T u n e , Jr.
B ro a d u s N . B u tler

M o n ro e K im b rel
K y le K . F o ssu m

E m erso n G . H ig d o n
W illiam H . F ran k lin
P eter B . C lark

R o b ert P. M ay o
E rn est T . B au g h m an

F red e ric M . P eirce
Sam C o o p er
R o lan d R . R em m el

D a rry l R . F ran cis
E u g e n e A . L eo n ard

B u f f a lo .................... ....1 4 2 4 0
P h ila d e lp h ia

............

R i c h m o n d ......................... 23261
B a l tim o r e ...................... 21203
C h a r lo tte ........................28201
C u lp ep er C om m un ications
C e n te r ........................22701

A tla n ta .......................

3 0303

B ir m in g h a m ..........
Jac k so n v ille ..........
N a s h v ille .................
N ew O r le a n s ..........
M ia m i O ffice ..........

35 2 0 2
3 2203
37203
70160
33101

C h ic a g o .......................

60690

D e tr o it......................

48231

S t. L o u i s ......................

63166

L ittle R o c k ..............
L o u i s v ille ...............
M e m p h is .................

7 2203
4 0201
38101

M in n e a p o lis ..............

55480

H e le n a ......................

59601

K a n s a s C i t y ...............

64198

D e n v er ....................
O k la h o m a C ity ....
O m a h a ....................

80217
73125
68102

D a l l a s ...........................

75222

E l P a s o ....................
H o u s t o n ..................
San A n to n io ..........

79999
77001
78295

S a n F r a n c i s c o ...........

94120

L os A n g e le s ..........
P o r tla n d ..................
Salt L ak e C i t y .......
S e a t t l e ......................

90051
97 2 0 8
84110
98124




A . A . M a c ln n e s, Jr.

F red O . K iel
Jam e s H . C am p b ell

H . L ee B o a tw rig h t, III
J im m ie R . M o n h o llo n
J. G o rd o n D ic k e rso n , Jr.

D a n L . H e n d ley
E d w a rd C . R ain ey
Jeffre y J. W ells
G e o rg e C . G u y n n
W . M . D avis

D an iel M . D oyle

Jo h n F . B reen
D o n a ld L . H e n ry
L a u re n c e T . B ritt

W illiam L . G iles
D a v id M . L illy
B ru ce B . D a y to n
W arre n B . Jo n es

B ruce K . M ac L a u ry
M . H . S tro th m a n , Jr.

R o b ert W . W ag staff
W illard D . H o sfo rd , Jr.
D a v id R . C . B ro w n
J o se p h H . W illia m s
H e n ry Y . K le in k a u f

G e o rg e H . C lay
Jo h n T . B oy sen

C h as. F . Jo n es
P h ilip G . H o ffm an
A llan B . B o w m an
G eo . T . M o rse , Jr.
Irv in g A . M ath e w s

P h ilip E . C oldw ell
T . W . P lant

O . M ered ith W ilso n
S. A lfred H a lg re n
L e la n d D . P ratt
Jo h n R . H o w ard
Jo h n H . B re ck e n rid g e
C . H e n ry B a c o n , Jr.

V ice P resid e n t
in ch arg e o f b ran ch

H o w ard L . K nous

G e o rg e C . R an k in
H o w ard W . P ritz
R o b ert D . H a m ilto n

F red e ric W . R eed
Jam e s L . C au th en
C arl H . M o o re

A . B . M erritt
P aul W . C av a n
W illia m M . B ro w n
A rth u r L . P rice
W illia m R . S a n d stro m

A 102

FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD PUBLICATIONS
A v a i l a b l e f r o m P u b lic a tio n s S e r v ic e s , D iv is i o n o f A d m in is tr a tiv e S e r v ic e s , B o a r d o f G o v e r n o r s o f th e F e d e r a l
R e s e r v e S y s te m , W a s h i n g to n , D .C . 2 0 5 5 1 .

W h e r e a c h a r g e is in d ic a te d , r e m itta n c e s h o u ld a c c o m p a n y r e q u e s t

a n d b e m a d e p a y a b l e to th e o r d e r o f th e B o a r d o f G o v e r n o r s o f th e F e d e r a l R e s e r v e S y s te m in a f o r m c o lle c ti b le
a t p a r in U .S . c u r r e n c y . (S ta m p s a n d c o u p o n s a r e n o t a c c e p t e d .)

ANNUAL REPORT
FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN. Monthly. $6.00 per
annum or $.60 a copy in the United States and
its possessions, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, C olom ­
bia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic,
Ecuador, Guatemala, Haiti, Republic of Hon­
duras, M exico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay,
Peru, El Salvador, Uruguay, and Venezuela; 10
or more of same issue sent to one address, $5.00
per annum or $.50 each. Elsewhere, $7.00 per
annum or $.70 a copy.
FEDERAL RESERVE CHART BOOK ON FINANCIAL
AND BUSINESS STATISTICS. Monthly. Annual
subscription includes one issue of Historical
Chart Book. $6.00 per annum or $.60 a copy
in the United States and the countries listed
above; 10 or more of same issue sent to one
address, $.50 each. Elsewhere, $7.00 per annum
or $.70 a copy.
HISTORICAL CHART BOOK. Issued annually in Sept.
Subscription to monthly chart book includes one
issue. $.60 a copy in the United States and
countries listed above; 10 or more sent to one
address, $.50 each. Elsewhere, $.70 a copy.
THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT, as amended through
December 1971, with an appendix containing
provisions of certain other statutes affecting the
Federal Reserve System. 252 pp. $1.25.
REGULATIONS OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF
THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.
PUBLISHED INTERPRETATIONS OF THE BOARD OF
GOVERNORS, as of D ec. 31, 1971. $2.50.
FLOW OF FUNDS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1939-53.
1955. 390 pp. $2.75.
DEBITS AND CLEARING STATISTICS AND THEIR USE.
1959. 144 pp. $1.00 a copy; 10 or more sent
to one address, $.85 each.
SUPPLEMENT TO BANKING AND MONETARY STA­
TISTICS. Sec. 1. Banks and the Monetary S ys­
tem. 1962. 35 pp. $.35. Sec. 2. Member Banks.
1967. 59 pp. $.50. Sec. 5. Bank Debits. 1966.
36 pp. $.35. Sec. 6. Bank Income. 1966. 29
pp. $.35. Sec. 9. Federal Reserve Banks. 1965.




36 pp. $.35. Sec. 10. Member Bank Reserves
and Related Items. 1962. 64 pp. $.50. Sec. 11.
Currency. 1963. 11 pp. $ .3 5 . Sec. 12. Money
Rates and Securities Markets. 1966. 182 pp.
$ .6 5 . Sec. 14. Gold. 1962. 24 pp. $ .3 5 . Sec.
15. International Finance. 1962. 92 pp. $.65.
Sec. 16 (New). Consumer Credit. 1965. 103 pp.
$ .65.
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION—1957-59 BASE. 1962.
172 pp. $ 1.00 a copy; 10 or more sent to one
address, $.85 each.
BANK MERGERS & THE REGULATORY AGENCIES:
APPLICATION OF THE BANK MERGER ACT OF
1960. 1964 . 260 pp. $1 .0 0 a copy; 10 or more
sent to one address, $.85 each.
BANKING MARKET STRUCTURE &PERFORMANCE IN
METROPOLITAN AREAS: A STATISTICAL STUDY OF
FACTORS AFFECTING RATES ON BANK LOANS.
1965. 73 pp. $.5 0 a copy; 10 or more sent to
one address, $ .40 each.
THE PERFORMANCE OF BANK HOLDING COMPA­
NIES. 1967. 29 pp. $.25 a copy; 10 or more sent
to one address, $ .2 0 each.
THE FEDERAL FUNDS MARKET. 1959. I l l pp.
$ 1.00 a copy; 10 or more sent to one address,
$.85 each.
TRADING IN FEDERAL FUNDS. 1965. 116 pp. $1 .0 0
a copy; 10 or more sent to one address, $.85
each.
U.S. TREASURY ADVANCE REFUNDING, JUNE
1960-JULY 1964. 1966. 65 pp. $ .50 a copy; 10
or more sent to one address, $ .4 0 each.
BANK CREDIT-CARD AND CHECK-CREDIT PLANS.
1968. 102 pp. $ 1 .0 0 a copy; 10 or more sent
to one address, $.85 each.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS: TESTS ON YIELD
SPREADS AMONG SHORT-TERM GOVERNMENT
SECURITIES. 1968. 83 pp. $ .50 a copy; 10 or
more sent to one address, $ .40 each.
SURVEY OF FINANCIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF
CONSUMERS. 1966. 166 pp. $ 1.00 a copy; 10
or more sent to one address, $.85 each.

FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD PUBLICATIONS

SURVEY OF CHANGES IN FAMILY FINANCES. 1968.
321 pp. $1.00 a copy; 10 or more sent to one
address, $.85 each.
REPORT OF THE JOINT TREASURY-FEDERAL RE­
SERVE STUDY OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT SE­
CURITIES MARKET. 1969. 48 pp. $.25 a copy;
10 or more sent to one address, $.20.
JOINT TREASURY-FEDERAL RESERVE STUDY OF
THE GOVERNMENT SECURITIES MARKET: STAFF
STUDIES—PART 1 (papers by Cooper, Bernard,
and Scherer). 1970. 86 pp. $.50 a copy; 10 or
more sent to one address, $.40 each. PART 2
(papers by Ettin, Peskin, and Ahearn and Pes­
kin). 1971. 153 pp. $1.00 a copy; 10 or more
sent to one address, $.85 each.
(Lim ited su pplies, in m im eographed or
lar form , o f staff papers others than
contained in Parts 1 and 2 are available
request for single copies. See p. 48 of
report fo r a list of such p a p ers.)

sim i­
those
upon
main

OPEN MARKET POLICIES AND OPERATING PROCE­
DURES—-STAFF STUDIES (papers by Axilrod,
D avis, Andersen, Kareken et al., Pierce, Fried­
man, and Poole). 1971. 218 pp. $2.00 a copy;
10 or more sent to one address, $1.75 each.
REAPPRAISAL OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE DIS­
COUNT MECHANISM, V ol. 1 (papers by Steering
Committee, Shull, Anderson, and Garvy). 1971.
276 pp. V ol. 2 (papers by Boulding, Chandler,
Jones, Ormsby, M odigliani, Alperstein, Melichar, and Melichar and D oll). 1971. 173 pp.
V ol. 3 (papers by Staats, W illis, M insky,
Stackhouse, M eek, Holland and Garvy, and
Lynn). 1972. 214 pp. Each volume $3.00 a
copy; 10 or more sent to one address, $2.50
each.
A lim ited supply of the follow ing m im eo­
graphed p a p er is available upon request for
single copies:
ACADEMIC VIEWS ON IMPROVING THE FEDERAL
RESERVE DISCOUNT MECHANISM. 1970. 172
pp.
STAFF ECONOMIC STUDIES

Studies and papers on econom ic and financial
subjects that are of general interest in the field
o f econom ic research.
Summaries only printed in the BULLETIN.

(Lim ited supply of m im eographed copies of full
text available upon request for single copies.)
MEASURES OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION AND




A 103

FINAL DEMAND, by Clayton Gehman and Corne­
lia Motheral. Jan. 1967. 57 pp.
OPERATING POLICIES OF BANK HOLDING COMPA­
NIES—PART 1, by Robert J. Lawrence. Apr.
1971, 82 pp.
THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF MONETARY AND
FISCAL VARIABLES IN DETERMINING PRICE LEVEL
MOVEMENTS: A NOTE, by Peter S. Rose and Lacy
H. Hunt II. June 1971. 7 pp.
ESTIMATION OF THE INVESTMENT AND PRICE
EQUATIONS OF A MACROECONOMETRIC MODEL,
by Robert J. Shiller. June 1971. 65 pp.
ADJUSTMENT AND DISEQUILIBRIUM COSTS AND
THE ESTIMATED BRAINARD—TOBIN MODEL, by
Joseph Bisignano. July 1971. 108 pp.
A TEST OF THE “EXPECTATIONS HYPOTHESIS”
USING DIRECTLY OBSERVED WAGE AND PRICE
EXPECTATIONS, by Stephen J. Turnovsky and
Michael L. Wachter. Aug. 1971. 25 pp.
MORTGAGE REPAYMENTS AS A SOURCE OF
LOANABLE FUNDS, by Robert Moore Fisher.
Aug. 1971. 43 pp.
THE USE OF INTEREST RATE POLICIES AS A STIMU­
LUS TO ECONOMIC GROWTH, by Robert F.
Emery. Sept. 1971. 37 pp.
PRIVATE HOUSING COMPLETIONS—A NEW DIMEN­
SION IN CONSTRUCTION STATISTICS, by Bernard
N. Freedman. Jan. 1972. 20 pp.
POLICY VARIABLES, UNEMPLOYMENT AND PRICE
LEVEL CHANGES, by Peter S. Rose and Lacy H.
Hunt II. Jan. 1972. 11 pp.
OPTIMAL DISTRIBUTED LAG RESPONSES AND EX­
PECTATIONS, by Roger Craine. Feb. 1972. 9 pp.
THE EFFECT OF HOLDING COMPANY ACQUISITIONS
ON BANK PERFORMANCE, by Samuel H. Talley.
Feb. 1972. 25 pp.
INTERNATIONAL MONEY MARKETS AND FLEXIBLE
EXCHANGE RATES, by Stanley W. Black. Mar.
1972. 74 pp.
EXPLAINING CHANGES IN EURO-DOLLAR POSI­
TIONS: A STUDY OF BANKS IN FOUR EUROPEAN
COUNTRIES, by Rodney H. M ills, Jr. May 1972.
34 pp.
CREDIT RATIONING: A REVIEW, by Benjamin M.
Friedman. June 1972. 27 pp.
REGULATION Q AND THE COMMERCIAL LOAN MAR­
KET IN THE 1960’s, by Benjamin M. Friedman.
June 1972. 38 pp.

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

A 104

Printed ini full in the BULLETIN.

(These studies are included in list of reprints
below .)

UNDERWRITING OF MUNICIPAL REVENUE BONDS.
Aug. 1967. 16 pp.

REPRINTS

THE FEDERAL RESERVE-MIT ECONOMETRIC
MODEL, Staff E conom ic Study by Frank de
Leeuw and Edward Gramlich. Jan. 1968. 30 pp.

ADJUSTMENT FOR SEASONAL VARIATION. June
1941. 11 pp.

U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS: TRENDS IN
1960-67. Apr. 1968. 23 pp.

SEASONAL FACTORS AFFECTING BANK RESERVES.
Feb. 1958. 12 pp.

MONETARY RESTRAINT AND BORROWING AND
CAPITAL SPENDING BY LARGE STATE AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS IN 1966. July 1968. 30 pp.

LIQUIDITY AND PUBLIC POLICY, Staff P aper by
Stephen H. Axilrod. Oct. 1961. 17 pp.
SEASONALLY ADJUSTED SERIES FOR BANK CREDIT.
July 1962. 6 pp .
INTEREST RATES AND MONETARY POLICY, Staff
Paper by Stephen Axilrod. Sept. 1962. 28 pp.
MEASURES OF MEMBER BANK RESERVES. July
1963. 14 pp.
CHANGES IN BANKING STRUCTURE, 1953-62. Sept.
1963. 8 pp.
REVISION OF BANK DEBITS AND DEPOSIT TURN­
OVER SERIES. Mar. 1965. 4 pp.
TIME DEPOSITS IN MONETARY ANALYSIS, Staff
E conom ic Study by Lyle E. Gramley and Sa­
muel B. Chase, Jr. Oct. 1965. 25 pp.
RESEARCH ON BANKING STRUCTURE AND PER­
FORMANCE, Staff E conom ic Study by Tynan
Smith. Apr. 1966. 11 pp.
A REVISED INDEX OF MANUFACTURING CAPACITY,
Staff E conom ic Study by Frank de Leeuw with
Frank E. Hopkins and Michael D. Sherman.
N ov. 1966. 11 pp.
THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES IN U.S.
CAPITAL MARKETS, Staff E conom ic Study by
Daniel H. Brill with Ann P. Ulrey. Jan. 1967.
14 pp.
REVISED SERIES ON COMMERCIAL AND INDUS­
TRIAL LOANS BY INDUSTRY. Feb. 1967. 2 pp.
SURVEY OF FINANCE COMPANIES, MID-1965. Apr.
1967. 26 pp.
EVIDENCE ON CONCENTRATION IN BANKING MAR­
KETS AND INTEREST RATES, Staff E conom ic
Study by Almarin Phillips. June 1967. 11 pp.
THE PUBLIC INFORMATION ACT—ITS EFFECT ON
MEMBER BANKS. July 1967. 6 pp.
INTEREST COST EFFECTS OF COMMERCIAL BANK




FEDERAL FISCAL POLICY IN THE 1960’s. Sept. 1968.
18 pp.
BUSINESS FINANCING BY BUSINESS FINANCE COM­
PANIES. Oct. 1968. 13 pp.
MANUFACTURING CAPACITY: A COMPARISON OF
TWO SOURCES OF INFORMATION, Staff Econom ic Study by Jared J. Enzler. N ov. 1968.
5 pp.
MONETARY RESTRAINT, BORROWING, AND CAPITAL
SPENDING BY SMALL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND
STATE COLLEGES IN 1966. Dec. 1968. 30 pp.
REVISION OF CONSUMER CREDIT STATISTICS. D ec.
1968. 21 pp.
HOUSING PRODUCTION AND FINANCE. Mar. 1969.
7 pp.
OUR PROBLEM OF INFLATION. June 1969. 15 pp.
THE CHANNELS OF MONETARY POLICY, Staff Econom ic Study by Frank de Leeuw and Edward
Gramlich. June 1969. 20 pp.
REVISION OF WEEKLY SERIES FOR COMMERCIAL
BANKS. Aug. 1969. 5 pp.
EURO-DOLLARS: A CHANGING MARKET. Oct. 1969.
20 pp.
RECENT CHANGES IN STRUCTURE OF COMMER­
CIAL BANKING. Mar. 1970. 16 pp.
SDR’s IN FEDERAL RESERVE OPERATIONS AND
STATISTICS. May 1970. 4 pp.
INFLATION IN WESTERN EUROPE AND JAPAN. Oct.
1970. 13 pp.
MEASURES OF SECURITY CREDIT. D ec. 1970. 11
pp.
MONETARY AGGREGATES AND MONEY MARKET
CONDITIONS IN OPEN MARKET POLICY. Feb.
1971. 26 pp.

FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD PUBLICATIONS

A 105

BANK FINANCING OF MOBILE HOMES. Mar. 1971.
4 pp.

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF FOREIGN BRANCHES
OF U.S. BANKS. Feb. 1972. 16 pp.

RESPONSE OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
TO VARYING CREDIT CONDITIONS. Mar. 1971. 24
pp.

WAYS TO MODERATE FLUCTUATIONS IN THE CON­
STRUCTION OF HOUSING. Mar. 1972. 11 pp.

INTEREST RATES, CREDIT FLOWS, AND MONETARY
AGGREGATES SINCE 1964. June 1971. 16 pp.
TWO KEY ISSUES OF MONETARY POLICY. June
1971. 4 pp.
SURVEY OF DEMAND DEPOSIT OWNERSHIP. June
1971. 12 pp.
BANK RATES ON BUSINESS
SERIES. June 1971. 10 pp.

LOANS—REVISED

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION—REVISED AND NEW
MEASURES. July 1971. 26 pp.
BANKING AND MONETARY STATISTICS, 1970. Se­
lected series of banking and monetary statistics
for 1970 only. F eb., Mar., and July 1971. 19
pp.
REVISED MEASURES OF MANUFACTURING CAPAC­
ITY UTILIZATION. Oct. 1971. 3 pp.
REVISION OF THE MONEY STOCK. N ov. 1971. 14
pp.
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM: REVISED
GUIDELINES FOR BANKS AND NONBANK FINAN­
CIAL INSTITUTIONS. N ov. 1971. 11 pp.
REVISION OF BANK CREDIT SERIES. D ec. 1971. 5
pp.
PLANNED AND ACTUAL LONG-TERM BORROWING
BY STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. D ec. 1971.
11 pp.




U.S. BALANCE OF PAYMENTS AND INVESTMENT
POSITION. Apr. 1972. 15 pp.
OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS AND THE MONETARY
AND CREDIT AGGREGATES—1971. Apr. 1972. 23
pp.
CHANGES IN BANK LENDING PRACTICES, 1971. Apr.
1972. 5 pp.
CONSTRUCTION LOANS AT COMMERCIAL BANKS.
June 1972. 12 pp.
SOME ESSENTIALS OF INTERNATIONAL MONETARY
REFORM. June 1972. 5 pp.
CHARACTERISTICS OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
DIRECTORS. June 1972. 10 pp.
CHANGES IN TIME AND SAVINGS DEPOSITS AT
COMMERCIAL BANKS, JANUARY-APRIL 1972. July
1972. 11 pp.
BANK DEBITS, DEPOSITS, AND DEPOSIT TURN­
OVER-REVISED SERIES. July 1972. 5 pp.
RECENT REGULATORY CHANGES IN RESERVE RE­
QUIREMENTS AND CHECK COLLECTION. July
1972. 5 pp.
FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SECOND
QUARTER OF 1972. August 1972. 9 pp.
TREASURY AND FEDERAL RESERVE FOREIGN EX­
CHANGE OPERATIONS. Sept. 1972. 26 pp.
YIELDS ON NEWLY ISSUED CORPORATE BONDS.
Sept. 1972. 2 pp.

A 106

FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN □ SEPTEMBER 1972

INDEX TO STATISTICAL TABLES
A c c e p ta n c e s , b a n k e rs ’, 14, 3 3 , 35
A g ricu ltu ral lo an s of c o m m e rc ial b a n k s, 2 4 , 26
A rb itrag e, 95
A ssets and liab ilities (S ee also F o reig n ers):
B an k s, by c la sses, 2 0 , 2 4 , 2 5 , 2 6 , 39
B an k s and th e m o n etary sy ste m , 19
C o rp o ra te , c u rren t. 50
F ed eral R ese rv e B an k s, 12
A u to m o b iles:
C o n su m e r in sta lm en t c re d it, 5 6 , 5 7 , 58
P ro d u ctio n in d ex , 6 0 , 61

B a n k c red it p ro x y , 18
B a n k e rs’ b a la n ce s, 2 5 , 28
(See a lso F o reig n e rs, claim s o n , and liab ilities to)
B an k s an d th e m o n etary sy ste m , 19
B an k s for c o o p erativ es, 40
B o n d s (See also U .S . G o v t, secu rities):
N ew issu es, 4 7 , 4 8 , 4 9
Y ield s and p ric e s, 3 6 , 37
B ran ch b a n k s, fo reig n , 3 0, 8 8, 8 9 , 90
B ro k erag e b a la n ce s, 87
B u sin ess e x p en d itu re s on new p la n t and e q u ip m e n t, 50
B u sin ess in d e x e s, 64
B u sin ess lo an s (S ee C o m m ercial and in d u strial loans)

(R eferences

are

to pages

A-4 through

A-97

although

the

prefix

“ A ” is omitted

in this in d e x )

(F or list o f tab les p u b lish ed p e rio d ic a lly , but not m o n th ly , see page A -3)

C a p a c ity u tiliz a tio n , 64
C ap ital accounts:
B an k s, b y c lasses, 2 0 , 2 5 , 30
F ed eral R ese rv e B an k s, 12
C en tral b a n k s, 9 4 , 96
C ertificates o f d e p o sit, 30
C o in s, c irc u la tio n , 16
C o m m ercial and in d u strial loans:
C o m m ercial b a n k s, 18, 2 4 , 33
W eek ly rep o rtin g b a n k s, 2 6 , 31
C o m m ercial b an k s:
A ssets and lia b ilities, 18, 2 0 , 2 4 , 2 5 , 26
C o n su m er lo an s h eld , by ty p e, 57
D ep o sits at, for p a y m e n t o f p e rso n al lo a n s, 32
L oans sold o u trig h t, 33
N u m b e r, by c la sses, 20
R eal estate m o rtg ag es h eld , by ty p e , 52
C o m m ercial p a p er, 33., 35
C o n d itio n statem en ts (S ee A ssets and liab ilities)
C o n stru ctio n , 6 4 , 65
C o n su m er cred it:
In stalm en t c re d it, 5 6 , 5 7 , 5 8 , 59
N o n in stalm en t c re d it, by h o ld e r, 57
C o n su m er p rice in d e x e s, 6 4 , 68
C o n su m p tio n ex p en d itu re s, 7 0 , 71
C o rp o ratio n s:
Profits, tax es, and d iv id e n d s, 50
S ecu rity issu es, 4 8 , 49
S ecu rity y ield s and p ric e s, 3 6 , 37
C o st o f living (See C o n su m e r p rice in d ex es)
C u rren cy and c o in , 5, 10, 25
C u rren cy in c irc u la tio n , 5 , 16, 17
C u sto m er c re d it, stock m a rk e t, 38

D e b its to d ep o sit a cc o u n ts, 15
D eb t (S ee specific ty p es o f d eb t or secu rities)
D em an d dep o sits:
A d ju sted , b an k s an d th e m o n etary sy stem , 19
A d ju sted , c o m m e rc ial b a n k s, 15, 18, 25
B an k s, by c la sses, 11, 2 0 , 2 5 , 29




D em an d s dep o sits— C o n tin u ed
O w n ersh ip by in d iv id u a ls, p a rtn e rsh ip s, and
co rp o ra tio n s, 32
S u b ject to reserve re q u ire m e n ts, 18
T u rn o v er, 15
D eposits (S ee a lso specific types of d eposits):
A ccu m u lated at co m m e rc ial banks for pa y m e n t o f p e r­
sonal lo a n s, 32
A d ju sted , and c u rre n c y , 19
B an k s, by c la sses, 11, 2 0 , 2 5 , 29 , 39
E u ro -d o lla rs, 90
Federal R eserv e B an k s, 12, 90
P ostal sav in g s, 19, 25
S ubject to reserv e re q u ire m e n ts, 18
D isco u n t rates (See In te re st rates)
D isco u n ts and a dvances by R ese rv e B anks (S ee L oans)
D iv id e n d s, c o rp o ra te , 50
D ollar a sse ts, fo reig n , 7 7 , 83

E a r n in g s and h o u rs, m a n u fa c tu rin g in d u strie s, 67
E m p lo y m en t, 64 , 66, 67
E u ro -d o llar dep o sits in fo reig n b ran ch es of U .S . b a n k s, 90

F a r m m ortgage lo a n s, 51 , 52
Federal agency o b lig a tio n s, 12, 13, 14, 15
F ederal finance:
C ash tra n sac tio n s, 42
R eceip ts and e x p en d itu re s, 43
T reasu ry o p e ra tin g b a la n ce , 42
F ederal fu n d s, 8, 24 , 26 , 30, 35
F ederal hom e loan b a n k s, 4 0 , 4 1 , 53
F ederal H om e L oan M o rtg a g e C o rp o ra tio n , 55
F ederal H o u sin g A d m in istra tio n , 51, 52, 53, 54, 55
Federal in term ed iate c re d it b a n k s, 4 0 , 41
F ederal land b a n k s, 4 0 , 41
F ederal N ational M o rtg ag e A ss n ., 4 0 , 4 1 , 54
Federal R eserve B anks:
C ond itio n statem e n t, 12
U .S . G ovt, secu rities h e ld , 4 , 12, 15, 4 4 , 45
F ederal R eserve c re d it, 4 , 6 , 12, 15
F ederal R eserv e n o te s, 12, 16
F ed erally sp o n so red cre d it ag en c ie s, 4 0 , 41
F inance com p an ies:
L o a n s, 26, 56, 57 , 59
P ap er, 33, 35
F inancial in stitu tio n s, loans to , 2 4 , 26
F lo a t, 4
F low of fu n d s, 72
F oreign:
C u rren cy o p e ra tio n s, 12, 14, 77, 83
D eposits in U .S . b a n k s, 5, 12, 19, 25, 29 , 90
E x ch an g e ra te s, 93
T rad e , 75
F oreigners:
C laim s o n , 8 4 , 85 , 9 0 , 9 1 , 92
L iabilities to , 30, 7 8 , 7 9 , 81, 82, 83, 9 0 , 9 1 , 92

G o ld :
C ertificates, 12, 13, 16
E a rm ark ed , 90
N et p u rc h a se s by U n ited S tates, 76
P ro d u ctio n , 97
R eserv es of cen tral b an k s and g o v ts ., 96
S to c k , 4 , 19, 77
G o v e rn m e n t N a tional M o rtg a g e A ss n ., 54
G ross n ational p ro d u c t, 7 0 , 71

A 107

N a tio n a l b an k s, 2 2 , 32
N atio n al in c o m e , 7 0 , 71
N a tional d efen se e x p en d itu re s, 4 3 , 70
N o n m em b er b a n k s, 2 2 , 2 4 , 2 5 , 32
O p e n m ark et tra n sac tio n s, 14
P a y ro lls , m a n u fa c tu rin g in d e x , 64
P ersonal in c o m e , 71
P ostal sav in g s, 19, 25
P rices:
C o n su m e r and w h o lesale c o m m o d ity , 6 4 , 68
S e c u rity , 37
P rim e ra te , co m m ercial b an k s, 34




T a x re c eip ts, F e d e ra l, 43
T im e d e p o sits, 11, 18, 19, 2 0 , 2 5 , 29
T reasu ry cash , T reasu ry c u rre n c y , 4 , 5 , 16, 19
T rea su ry d e p o sits, 5 , 12, 42
T reasu ry o p e ra tin g b a la n ce , 42
U n e m p lo y m e n t, 66
U .S . b alan ce o f p a y m e n ts, 74
U .S . G o v t, b alances:
C o m m ercial bank h o ld in g s, 25 , 29
C o n so lid ate d c o n d itio n statem e n t, 19
M em b e r b ank h o ld in g s, 18
T rea su ry dep o sits at R eserv e B an k s, 5, 12, 42
U .S . G ovt, securities:
B an k h o ld in g s, 19, 2 0 , 24, 27, 39, 4 4 , 45
D e ale r tra n sac tio n s, p o sitio n s, and financing, 4 6
F ed eral R eserve B ank h o ld in g s, 4 , 12, 15, 4 4 , 45
F o reig n and intern atio n al h o ld in g s, 12, 83 , 86 , 90
In tern atio n al tra n sac tio n s, 83, 86
N ew issu e s, gross p ro c e ed s, 48
O pen m a rk e t tra n sac tio n s, 14
O u tstan d in g , by type of sec u rity , 4 4 , 4 5 , 47
O w n ersh ip , 4 4 , 45
Y ields and pric e s, 36, 37
U nited S tates no tes, 16
U tilities, p ro d u ctio n in d e x , 6 1 , 63
V e te r a n s A d m in istra tio n , 51 , 52, 53 , 5 4 , 55
W e e k ly re p o rtin g b a n k s, 26
Y ie ld s (S ee In te re st rates)

in this in d e x )
is omitted

“ A”
prefix
the
although

A-97
through

M a n u f a c tu r e r s :
C ap acity u tiliz a tio n , 64
P ro d u ctio n in d ex , 6 1 , 64
M argin re q u ire m e n ts, 10
M em b er ban k s:
A ssets and lia b ilities, b y c la sses, 2 0, 24
B o rro w in g s at F ed eral R eserv e B an k s, 6 , 12
D e p o sits, by c la sses, 11
N u m b e r, b y c la sses, 20
R eserv e o sitio n , b a sic , 8
R eserv e re q u ire m e n ts, 10
R eserv es and related ite m s, 4 , 18
M in in g , p ro d u c tio n in d ex , 6 1 , 63
M obile h o m e sh ip m e n ts, 65
M oney rates (S ee In terest rates)
M oney sto ck and related d a ta , 17, 19
M ortg ag es (S ee R eal estate lo an s and R esid e n tia l m o rtg ag e
loans)
M utual fu n d s (S ee In v e stm e n t co m p an ies)
M utual sav in g s b a n k s, 19, 2 9 , 3 9, 4 4 , 4 5 , 52

S a v in g :
Flow of funds series, 72
N atio n al incom e series, 71
Savings and loan a ss n s., 4 0 , 4 5 , 53
Savings dep o sits (S ee T im e d e posits)
Savings in stitu tio n s, prin cip al a sse ts, 39 , 40
S ecurities (S ee also U .S . G o v t, securities):
F e d e ra lly sponsored a g en c ie s, 4 0 , 41
I n t e r n a t i o n a l t r a n s a c t i o n s , 6 , 87
N ew issu e s, 4 7 , 4 8 , 49
S ilver c o in , 16
S pecial D ra w in g R ig h ts, 4 , 12, 13, 19, 74 , 77
State and local go v ts.:
D e p o sits, 25 , 29
H old in g s of U .S . G ovt, sec u rities, 4 4 , 45
N ew security issues, 4 7 , 48
O w n ersh ip of securities o f, 24 , 28 , 39
Y ields and prices of sec u rities, 3 6 , 37
State m e m b e r b a n k s, 22 , 32
Stock m a rk e t c re d it, 38
Stocks:
N ew issu e s, 4 8 , 49
Y ields and p ric e s, 36 , 37

A-4

L a b o r fo rce , 66
L oans (S ee also specific ty p es o f loans):
B an k s, b y c la sses, 2 0 , 2 4 , 2 6 , 2 7, 39
C o m m ercial b a n k s, 18, 2 0 , 2 4 , 2 6 , 2 7 , 3 1 , 3 3 , 34
F ed eral R eserv e B an k s, 4 , 6 , 9 , 12, 13, 15
In su ran ce co m p a n ies, 3 9 , 5 2 , 53
In