The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
Federal R eserve Bank of N ew Yo r k N E W Y O R K 4 5 , N. Y. RECTOR 2-5 7 0 0 February 23, 1962 Third Progress Report on MICR Program To All Banks in the Second Federal Reserve District: Enclosed is a copy of a press statement and its accompanying tables summarizing the results of the third semiannual survey of com mercial "bank participation throughout the nation in the Magnetic Ink Character Recognition program of the American Bankers Association. Also enclosed is an additional table showing the participation by banks in this District in the program. Although barely one year has elapsed since the first survey, the latest figures reveal that Second District banks have made a sig nificant stride forward in preparing their checks for processing on electronic check-handling equipment. Now 97*0 per cent of all banking offices to which checks are sent for payment by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York have started encoding their ABA routing numbers, as compared with 89.1 per cent six months ago and 68.4 per cent one year ago. Geographically, all banking offices in 68 of the 75 counties in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut located within the Second District have started encoding their checks, including all banking offices in the twelve northern counties of New Jersey. Six months ago, all banking offices located in 47 of the 75 counties had started encoding their checks, and one year ago, all banking offices located in only 13 of such counties had done so. In terms of average check volume handled daily by this Bank, 53*0 per cent of all checks are now encoded in con trast to 38.O per cent six months ago and 19*5 P er cent one year ago. While the progress made by Second District banks since the first survey was undertaken has been very encouraging, it is our hope that those banks that are not yet encoding their checks with magnetic ink will do so as soon as possible. We would also urge the cooperation of those customers of banks who order their check forms directly. If MICR, as is generally agreed, is the key to the solution of the check collection problem of the future, its value will only be realized when all banks are actively participating in the program. ALFRED HAYES, President. Enclosures STATEMENT fox* the Press F e d e r a l R e s e r v e B a n k o f N e w Y ork N e w Y o r k 4 - 5 . N.Y. R E cto r 2 * 5 7 0 0 -e x t . 156 No. 11 FOR RELEASE; MONDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1962 In only a year the proportion of checks carrying magnetic ink identification of the bank on which they are drawn has increased from one in five to almost three in five, the Federal Reserve System reported over the week end. This is the finding of the third semiannual survey undertaken by the System to measure participation by commercial banks in the MICR program of The American Bankers Association according to Marcus A. Harris, Chairman of the Federal Reserve System's Subcommittee on Collections. The survey indicated that 54.6 per cent of all checks cleared through the 12 Federal Reserve Banks and their 24 branches carried the magnetic ink characters devised by The American Bankers Association for electronic identi fication of drawee banks, a prerequisite for high-speed check processing. This figure compares with 36.1 per cent just six months ago and 19*5 per cent one year ago. Furthermore, the survey indicated that of the 15,709 banking offices throughout the country to which checks are sent for collection by the Federal Reserve Banks, 97*1 per cent were issuing some redesigned checks bearing encoded ABA routing numbers. This figure compares with 80.3 per cent and 52.6 per cent in August and February 1961, respectively. These percentage increases, Mr. Harris said, are significant testimony to the fact that virtually all banks have recognized the urgent need to improve the Nation s collection system to accommodate an ever-increasing volume of checks. (M ORE ) 2 Among the 12 Federal Reserve Districts, the Third (Philadelphia) District leads, with all par banks in that District now encoding their checks, and with 73*3 Per cent of such checks being encoded. The greatest improvement percentagewise in the number of banks encoding occurred in the Eighth (St. Louis) District, which showed an increase of 47.8 per cent since the August 1961 sur vey, while the greatest improvement in the number of checks encoded occurred in the Ninth (Minneapolis) District where the percentage of encoded checks increased by 25.2 . Cataloging the figures on a state-by-state basis discloses that all par banks located in ten states and the District of Columbia are now encoding their checks. These states are: Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont and West Virginia. Delaware also leads in the volume of encoded checks issued with 78.6 per cent, followed by Washington with 73*3 P e^ cent and California with 70.8 per cent. Mr. Harris observed that, although country banks, in total, lead their city counterparts by a slight margin both with respect to the percentage of banks encoding and the percentage of encoded checks being issued, this relationship varies within each Federal Reserve District, and suggests a broad distribution of banks are participating in the MICR program. He went on to say that now that virtually all banks are participating in the program by encoding their ABA rout ing number on their checks, it is the hope of the banking system that more and more banks will also encode the dollar amount on checks which they receive for collection. The attached tables give information on the encoding of checks in the 12 Federal Reserve Districts, and in each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. # # # # # # SECOND DISTRICT ENCODING SURVEY BY STATES AND COUNTIES February 1962 Banking Offices to Which Checks are Sent by FRBNY *w York City Bronx Kings New York Queens Richmond Total 3W York State Albany Allegany Broome Cattaraugus Cayuga Chautauqua Chemung Chenango Clinton Columbia Cortland Delaware Dutchess Erie Essex Franklin Fulton Genesee Greene Hamilton Herkimer Jefferson Lewis Livingston Madison Monroe Montgomery Nassau Niagara Oneida Onondaga Ontario Orange Orleans Oswego Per Cent of Encoding Offices Now Increase Since Encoding August 1961 Total Daily Average Check Volume Sent to All Banking Offices Per Cent of Check Volume Now Increase Since Encoded August 1961 0 6 6l* 3 1 0 100.0 67.2 66.7 100.0 0 16.7 25.2 0 0 0 3,780 904,687 9,212 3,436 0 37-5 40.7 55-5 69.2 0 8.9 11.5 14.2 2 2 .1 71 70.4 24.2 921,115 41.0 11.7 5 15 9 14 8 16 4 5 4 4 5 13 14 37 4 6 6 8 5 l 8 14 6 6 7 9 7 64 12 14 14 7 20 4 9 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 75.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 83.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 .7 0 0 1 6 .7 0 14.3 0 0 0 0 0 16 .6 0 0 0 0 1 .7 0 7 .1 0 0 0 25.0 0 89,651 3,232 12,340 5,517 4,722 5,503 4,118 3,850 3,779 1,470 2,676 8,268 20,206 46,706 2,212 2,026 2,914 3,095 2,898 300 7,804 4,311 947 1,991 3,680 B,399 4,844 124,565 4,890 14,427 25,064 4,872 16,727 1,152 4,154 39.7 49.7 6 1.6 57.8 57-0 53.7 58.6 56.1 80.8 71.6 59-1 39.2 66.5 74.2 63.3 51.0 44.1 55-6 63.2 23.7 61.3 52.1 38.6 64.7 71.9 54.9 76.3 72.7 66.3 64.8 59-5 53-5 60.9 63.4 45.5 10.6 15.5 25.3 15.3 15.5 13 .8 4.8 20.7 5 .7 1 1 .3 14.8 12.9 18.6 16 .8 19 .5 25.8 20.0 21.4 10.6 10.8 7.4 26.2 27.4 11.9 21.4 18.0 27.7 18.8 14.3 17.1 24.8 12.2 16.7 22.7 13 .6 Includes 22 foreign banking agencies and corporations whose drafts are collectible through the City Collection Department of the New York Clearing House. 2 Banking Offices to Which Checks are Sent by FRBNY New York State (Cont'd) Otsego Putnam Rensselaer Rockland St. Lawrence Saratoga Schenectady Schoharie Schuyler Seneca Steuben Suffolk Sullivan Tioga Tompkins Ulster Warren Washington Wayne Westchester Wyoming Yates Per Cent of Encoding Offices Now Increase Since August 1961 Encoding Total Daily Average Check Volume Sent to All Banking Offices Per Cent of Check Volume Now Increase Since Encoded August 1961 3,888 7,332 940 1,009 1,668 8,701 50,984 5,542 2,449 7,326 16,822 3,767 3,278 6,348 93,188 2,155 841 55.2 72.3 61.8 71.3 53.5 45.9 72.2 44.5 57.6 58.2 61. & 68.9 6 5.1 74.1 34.1 66.8 46.9 47.3 58.3 68.3 64.5 32.5 19 .2 32.3 15.5 32.9 24.2 23.0 30.4 28.2 21.6 20.8 12.7 23.8 19.3 16.9 24.0 12.8 21.4 18.0 15.3 12.0 15.4 13.7 2.8 695,882 62.3 17.4 96.4 4.3 1,616,997 50.2 14.1 43 28 12 8 24 20 10 7 8 6 25 10 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 2.3 25.0 8.3 0 12 .5 20.0 10.0 0 0 0 12.0 0 74,249 111,576 73,373 5,073 44,905 24,092 32,101 34,064 13,384 6,305 101,667 7,003 76.0 50.7 58.8 6 5.1 63.5 50.8 69.4 79.9 61.0 61.3 47.6 71.9 20.8 22.0 10.3 26.1 28.4 30.3 7.3 16.6 15.5 39.9 13.1 39.0 201 100.0 10.0 527,792 59.7 17.1 Connecticut Fairfield 29 9 6.6 6.9 76,475 69.2 21.6 Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico 16 81.3 50.0 5,355 29.I 14.3 921 97.0 7.9 2,226,619 53.0 15.0 Total Total New York City and State New Jersey Bergen Essex Hudson Hunterdon Middlesex Monmouth Morris Passaic Somerset Sussex Union Warren Total Total Second District 12 4 6 9 IT 6 5 2 4 5 14 45 11 6 4 15 8 8 10 17 10 2 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 83.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 8.3 0 0 0 5.9 16 .6 0 50.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.0 0 37.5 0 0 0 10.0 0 4,797 3,919 4,640 10,688 604 99.5 675 ENCODING SURVEY BY STATES AND OTHER SUBDIVISIONS FEBRUARY 1962 State Alabama Alaska Arkansas Arizona California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming District of Columbia Puerto Rico & Virgin Islands Total No. of Banking Offices in Survey Per Cent of Banking Offices Increase Now Since August Encoding 1961 Total Daily Average Check Volume Sent to All Banking Offices Per Cent of Check Volume Increas Now Since Aug Encoded 1961 179 39 138 151 • 1,525 165 138 37 275 136 77 105 973 539 735 590 376 115 73 174 197 483 296 70 584 122 420 39 65 287 81 675 250 58 689 382 251 910 23 135 105 257 1,000 86 69 355 392 181 625 55 11 91.1 92.3 96.4 82.8 98.7 97.6 99.3 100.0 94.2 93.4 55.8 83.8 99.4 99.8 98.4 98.5 96.3 93.0 97.3 98.9 99.0 98.3 99.7 7 7 .1 96.4 100.0 98.3 92.3 100.0 100.0 9 5 .1 96.4 96.8 100.0 100.0 99.7 99.6 99.9 100.0 78.5 100.0 98.4 96.5 70.9 100.0 95.5 96.2 100.0 9 7 .1 92.7 100.0 29.3 28.2 50.7 15.7 0.6 4.9 1 1 .1 0 9.4 16.8 0.5 14.3 19.0 15.0 20.0 2 1.2 33.1 20.8 40.7 1 .2 26.6 13.0 2.8 15.5 56.0 1 3 .1 27.0 10.5 3-0 10.2 19.2 6.3 27.3 1.7 5-2 54.4 4.8 3.0 52.2 31.6 2.9 26.2 14.3 19.2 20.3 11.7 8.7 3.8 28.7 14.5 0 108,600 11,100 68,900 26,900 1,147,000 99,500 327,500 25,700 265,100 207,000 5,100 42,800 804,700 268,600 187,700 219,600 170,000 104,400 75,000 200,000 699,000 401,300 252,100 45,000 335,300 48,800 131,000 12,600 93,000 646,900 26,500 1 ,617,000 123,000 25,900 588,000 183,400 116,500 687,000 62,000 49,000 38,200 163,200 574,000 87,500 63,000 205,000 275,900 87,000 162,300 8,000 22,000 28.0 32.4 24.7 37.9 70.8 53.6 69.6 78.6 43-8 45.9 5.9 33.9 57.7 52.0 42.0 33.1 37.7 35.8 37.3 61.0 59.5 62.9 61.8 42.2 37-0 45.3 27.5 47-6 57.0 64.1 44.2 50.2 35.8 57.5 64.0 40.4 66.8 69.7 56.5 26.5 49.0 41.1 42.1 31.5 65.I 47.3 73.3 48.3 43.8 25.0 45-5 10.9 20.2 14.8 15.6 10.1 21.4 20.4 9.3 19.1 24.1 2.2 5.6 23.3 20.8 20.1 24.4 11.4 17.2 18.3 16.8 11.8 24.3 26.9 15.9 17.1 23.I 16.8 4.2 18.3 17.6 17.8 14.1 18.6 21.1 29.0 25.3 20.8 20.2 16.5 12.5 21.1 23.6 17.7 14.5 38.0 20.7 16.5 15.9 23.6 12.5 17.9 16 81.3 50.0 5,400 29.6 14.8 15,709 9 7 .1 16.8 12,200,000 54.6 18.5 increase ENCODING SURVEY B Y FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS FEBRUARY 1962 No. of Banking Offices in Survey str: Per Cent of Banking Offices Increase Since NowAugust Encoding 1961 Total DailyAverage Check Volume Sent to All Banking Offices Per Cent of Check Volume IncreaE Since Now Augusl Encoded 1961 1 Boston City Country Total 7 ?29 536 100.0 99-2 99.3 14.3 23.7 23.6 210,000 1 ,033,000 1,243,000 48.1 62.6 60.2 20.2 15.5 16.0 2 New York City Country Total 78 843 921 74.4 99-1 97.0 26.6 5.6 7-9 996,200 1 ,230,500 2,226,70C 42.5 61,5 53-0 11.5 17.9 15.0 3 Philadelphia City Country Total 19 678 697 100.0 100.0 100.0 4.8 1.6 1.7 160,000 448,700 608,700 80.3 70.9 73.3 22.0 20.2 20.7 4 Cleveland City Country Total 33 hm 1,208 100.0 99.4 99.4 8.8 7.2 7*2 225,000 658,100 883,100 6 3 .1 63.2 63.2 24.3 23.9 24.0 5 Richmond City Country Total 26 1,056 1,082 88.5 9 5 .1 94.9 19.3 14.5 14.6 _ 108,000 567,000 675,000 60.2 45.1 47.6 15.3 18.2 17.7 6 Atlanta City Country Total 50 856 906 90.0 93.1 92.9 15 .0 19.0 18.8 153,100 661,800 814,900 50.6 39.4 41.5 20.4 19.5 19.6 7 Chicago City Country Total 85 2; 682 2,767 100.0 98.5 98.6 6.9 17.3 17.0 218,000 1 ,389,000 1,607,000 49.6 58.O 56.9 20.2 22.5 22.8 8 S t . Louis City Country Total 87 1,16 8 1,255 94.3 96.7 96.6 32.2 48.9 47.8 146,900 488,900 635,800 45.5 33.6 36.4 22.6 18.8 19.8 9 Minneapolis City Country Total 63 710 773 . 100.0 99.9 99.9 0 7.3 6.7 164,700 244,700 409,400 64.5 52.7 57.4 2 9 .1 22.5 25.2 10 Kansas City City Country Total 77 1,727 1,804 98.9 98.3 98.3 4.2 34.2 32.9 127,700 634,700 762,400 42.6 36.0 37.1 18.7 24.6 23.5 11 Dallas City Country Total 67 1,075 1,142 97.0 96.1 96.1 6.2 1 6 .1 15.5 119,000 496,900 615,900 46.8 40.8 41.9 15*3 18.0 17.7 12 San Francisco City Country Total 139 2/479 2,618 9 7 .1 94.7 94.8 0 4.7 4.4 189,100 1 ,529,000 1,718,100 69.3 66.7 67.0 10.0 12.9 12.6 Total City Country Total 731 14,978 15,709 94.5 97.3 9 7 .1 11-3 17.1 16.8 2,817,700 9,382,300 12,200,000 51.8 55-5 54.6 17 .4 18.9 18.5