View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
OF N EW YORK

tab
,
March 27, 1978
MISUSE OF INSIDE INVESTMENT INFORMATION
Board of Governors’ Policy Statement
To the Chief Executive Officer of the State Member Bank
Addressed, and Others Concerned:

Following is the text of a statement issued March 20, 1978 by the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System today issued a policy statement alerting State
member banks to penalties that may arise from the misuse of inside investment information, and providing
examples of steps that could be taken to avoid violation of Federal law in this field.
The Board said the policy statement—which is effective immediately—reflects the judgment of the Board
that misuse of material inside information in connection with securities transactions, or recommendations
about such transactions, constitutes an unsafe and unsound banking practice.
Accordingly, the statement said, the Board “expects each State member bank exercising investment
discretion for the accounts of others to adopt written policies and procedures . . . to ensure that material
inside information in its possession is not misused.”
The policy statement, affecting chiefly the operations of trust departments of State member banks, noted
that Federal law generally prohibits the purchase or sale of securities by persons possessing material inside
information about the securities until the information they have is disclosed to the public. If the information
cannot be disclosed publicly because it was obtained in confidence, holders of the information must abstain
from transactions or recommendations concerning the security involved until the information is divulged.
Violations of these laws, the statement noted, could expose banks to severe financial penalties and to
criminal charges.
Information was defined as being “material” when there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable
investor would consider it important in deciding whether to buy, sell or hold securities.
The Board said that in its opinion, the preventive policies and procedures banks should adopt should
limit activities that are likely to result in an improper interchange of material information. They should also
provide the bank with ways to deal affirmatively with such information when it comes into the possession of
bank personnel who make investment decisions for the account of others. The Board urged each State member
bank to review its policies and procedures to make sure they would accomplish these purposes, in the par­
ticular circumstances of the bank.
The Board set forth the following examples of possible approaches to the development of written policies
and procedures to avoid the misuse of material inside information:
1. Denial of access by trust personnel to commercial credit files, government, agency and municipal
securities underwriting files, and other pertinent files.
2. A prohibition against attendance by trust personnel at private meetings with bank lending or under­
writing personnel, except where the meeting is held solely to seek a new customer relationship.
3. A prohibition against personnel serving simultaneously on a committee authorized to make specific
investment decisions or recommendations and a committee responsible for commercial lending or
underwriting of government issues.




4. A requirement for a prompt report to management by any trust department, or trust department
employee, of the receipt of inside information they should not have, and, if management determines
that the information is material, prompt orders to:
—Halt all bank trading of the indicated security, or bank recommendations concerning it;
—Determine whether the information is valid and has not been made public;
—Request the issuer or other appropriate parties to make pertinent information public;
—Seek legal advice, if the information is not publicly disclosed, as to what else should be done before
trading in the security, or recommendations concerning it, are resumed.
5. The provision for every account, of a copy of the bank’s policies and procedures to the person having
power to terminate the bank’s discretionary investment authority over the account, or to the person
to whom an accounting would ordinarily be rendered.
6. Physical separation of trust and commercial bank lending and investing personnel, as circumstances
allow.

Printed below is the text of the Board’s policy statement. Questions regarding this matter
may be directed to our Bank Examinations Department (Tel. No. 212-791-5194).
P a u i >A. V olcker,

President.

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
(Docket No. R-0148)

Policy Statement Concerning Use of Inside Information
AGENCY:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System.
A C T IO N :

Policy Statement.

This policy statement reflects the judg­
ment of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System that the use of material inside information by
any State member bank in connection with any decision
or recommendation to purchase or sell securities con­
stitutes an unsafe and unsound banking practice. Noti­
fication is given that the Board of Governors expects
each State member bank exercising investment discre­
tion for the accounts of others to adopt written policies
and procedures suitable to its particular circumstances to
ensure that such information in its possession is not mis­
used. Guidelines are provided to aid State member banks
in the development of such policies and procedures.

SUM M ARY:

E F F E C T IV E D A T E :
FOR

FURTH ER

March 17, 1978.

IN F O R M A T IO N

CONTACT:

Robert S. Plotkin, Assistant Director, (202/452-2782)
or Robert A. Wallgren, Chief, Trust Activities Pro­
gram, (202/452-2717), Division of Banking Supervi­
sion and Regulation, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551.




This policy
statement is issued pursuant to the Board’s supervisory
authority over State member banks contained in section
9 (12 U.SC. §321) and section 11 (12 U.S.C. §248
(a )) of the Federal Reserve Act and the Financial
Institutions Supervisory Act of 1966 (12 U.S.C.
1818(b)) and related provisions of law.
S U P P L E M E N T A R Y IN F O R M A T IO N :

S ta te m e n t o f P o lic y C o n c e rn in g
U se o f I n s id e In fo rm a tio n

Commercial banks may receive information about
their customers that is not otherwise available to the
public. In many cases, customers about which the bank
possesses confidential information are firms whose
securities are publicly traded. Full-service commercial
banks, being institutions that provide a diversity of
services, may, at the same time such confidential infor­
mation is in their possession, be effecting purchases or
sales of such securities for trust customers and others
and advising customers as to the purchase or sale of
such securities.
Where confidential information in the possession of
a person is “material” (i.e., is of such nature that there
is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor

would consider it important in deciding whether to
buy, sell or hold securities), Federal securities law gen­
erally prohibits the purchase or sale of pertinent securi­
ties by such person until the information is disseminated
to the public. A person in possession of such material
inside information must, before effecting transactions in
the affected security, disclose to the public such infor­
mation or, if unable to do so (e.g., in order to protect
a corporate confidence), must abstain from trading in
or recommending such securities until the information
is disclosed. Similarly, divulging confidential material
inside information only to one’s customers who then
act on the basis of the information violates Federal
securities law.
For a bank to purchase or sell, or recommend the
purchase or sale of, securities on the basis of material
inside information in the bank’s possession subjects the
bank not only to injunctive suits and criminal proceed­
ings, but also to civil damage suits by persons on the
other side of the transactions. In such cases, liability
may not be limited to the persons on the other side of
the transactions, but conceivably could extend to all
persons who effected transactions in the securities before
the information became public; thus potential liability
could be substantial in terms of the amount of damages
that may be awarded.
Accordingly, the Board of Governors will view the
use of material inside information in connection with
any decision or recommendation to purchase or sell
securities as an unsafe and unsound banking practice.
Furthermore, the Board expects each State member
bank exercising investment discretion for the accounts
of others to adopt written policies and procedures, suit­
able to its particular circumstances, to ensure that such
information in its possession is not misused.
Because the size and organizational structure of indi­
vidual banks that engage in investment activities vary
widely, the Board does not believe that it should, at
this time, mandate the specific content of policies and
procedures to be adopted. The Board believes, however,
that in general such policies and procedures should limit
those types of activity that are likely to give rise to
an improper interchange of material inside information
and establish a course of action for the bank to deal
affirmatively with such information that may come into
the possession of personnel engaged in investment de­
cision making for the accounts of others. In this con­
nection, the Board urges each State member bank to
review its organizational structure and methods of op­
eration to ensure that its policies and procedures are
appropriately tailored to its circumstances. System trust
examiners will be instructed to evaluate regularly the
adequacy of policies and procedures adopted by indi­
vidual banks.
Set forth below are examples of specific approaches
to dealing with inside information that State member
banks may wish to consider in the development of
policies and procedures for their own use. Although
more generally applicable to larger banks, (i e., those
managing assets for the accounts of others with a mar­




ket value over $100 million), they may prove useful
to smaller banks as well.
E x a m p le s

(1) Trust personnel (i.e., bank employees whose
duties include the making of investment decisions or
recommendations for fiduciary or agency accounts)
should not have access to commercial credit files, gov­
ernment, agency and municipal securities underwriting
files or such other files that the bank can reasonably
determine may contain material inside information;
(2) Trust personnel should not attend private meet­
ings between or among personnel engaged in commercial
lending activities or in underwriting government, agency
and municipal securities, on the one hand, and bank
customers on the other, except where the sole purpose
of the meeting is to seek a new customer relationship;
(3) Officers, directors, or employees of the bank
should not serve simultaneously on any committee
having responsibility for the making of investment
decisions or recommendations with respect to specific
transactions and any committee having responsibility
for commercial lending or government, agency and
municipal securities underwriting activities, unless
necessary to the circumstances of the individual bank;
(4) All trust department employees should be ad­
vised to report promptly to the management of the
trust department suspected material inside information
and, upon a determination by that management that the
information is material, management should promptly:
(a) halt all trading by the bank in the security
or securities of the pertinent issuer and all recom­
mendations thereof;
(b) ascertain the validity and non-public nature
of the information with the issuer of the securities ;
(c) request the issuer or other appropriate
parties to disseminate the information promptly
to the public, if the information is valid and non­
public ;
(d) in the event the information is not publicly
disseminated, notify the bank’s legal counsel and
request advice as to what further steps should be
taken, including possible publication by the bank
of the information, before transactions or recom­
mendations in the securities are resumed.
(5) A copy of the bank’s policies and procedures
should be furnished for each fiduciary or agency account
for which the bank exercises investment discretion to
the person having the power to terminate the account
or, if there is no such person, to the persons to whom
an accounting would ordinarily be rendered;
(6) Trust personnel should be separated physically
from commercial lending personnel and government,
agency and municipal securities underwriting personnel
to the extent appropriate to the circumstances of the
individual bank.
B o a r d o f G o v e r n o r s o f th e F e d e ra l R e s e r v e S y s te m ,
M a rc h I 7 , I 9 78 .