View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FED ER AL RESERVE BANK
O F NEW YORK

Circular N o. 8542 T
M arch 2 6 , 1 9 7 9
J

BANK SERVICE ARRANGEMENTS
— Rules Simplified
— Regulation S Revoked

To All State Member Banks, and Others Concerned,
in the Second Federal Reserve District:

Following is the text of a statement issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System:
[March

The Federal Reserve Board announced today
5] it is revoking one of its regulations in the
ongoing program to clarify and simplify all of its regulations.
The Board decided to revoke Regulation S, which governed the Board’s power to regulate and examine
banking services performed for State-chartered member banks by outsiders. The regulation had been in
effect since April 3, 1963, but a recent amendment to the Bank Service Corporation Act has made the
regulation unnecessary.
The Board also adopted modified interpretations to simplify present interpretations and to conform
them to the amended Act. The Act creates an exception to the general prohibition in Federal banking
laws against the the purchase of stock by member banks. The Act allows two or more banks to engage
in a joint venture by investing up to 10 per cent of their capital and surplus in a “bank service corporation”
that provides clerical services to banks.
Under the Regulatory Improvement Project the Board has now revoked two regulations; reviewed,
updated and simplified a number of others; approved a plan for a Federal Reserve Board service to
disseminate regulatory materials more widely; and expanded its rulemaking procedures to improve the quality
and public understanding of its regulations.

Enclosed is the text of the Board of Governors’ order in this matter. Also enclosed, for State mem­
ber banks, is a statement indicating their continuing responsibility under the Bank Service Corporation
Act and a suggested form of notification of performance of bank services.
Any questions on this matter should be directed to our Regulations Division (Tel. No. 212-791-5914).




Paul

A.

V olcker,

President.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF STATE MEMBER BANKS
UNDER THE BANK SERVICE CORPORATION ACT

Under the Bank Service Corporation Act(12 U.S.C. 1861-65), State
member banks are subject to supervision by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, and national banks are subject to supervision by the
Comptroller of the Currency.
Section 5 of the Bank Service Corporation Act (but no other section)
has been amended by section 308 of the Financial Institutions Regulatory and
Interest Rate Control Act of 1978, effective March 10, 1979.

That section, as

revised, reads as follows:
Whenever any bank which is regularly examined by a Federal
supervisory agency, or any subsidiary or affiliate of such bank which
is subject to examination by that agency, causes to be performed, by
contract or otherwise, any bank services for itself, whether on or o ff
its premises—
(1) such performance shall be subject to regulation and examin­
ation by such agency to the same extent as if the services were being
performed by the bank itself on its own premises, and
(2) the bank shall notify such agency of the existence of a
service relationship within 30 days after the making of such service
contract or the performance of the service, whichever occurs first.
The definition of "bank services" in section 1(b) of the Act remains
the same and reads as follows:
The term 'bank services' means services such as check and deposit
sorting and posting, computation and posting of interest and other
credits and charges, preparation and mailing of checks, statements,
notices, and similar items, or other clerical, bookkeeping, accounting,
statistical, or similar functions performed for a bank.
The Board has previously elaborated on this definition in two interpretations (see
12 CFR 250.301 and 250.302). In the first, the Board concluded that the term is




1

essentially limited to clerical and similar services and would not usually relate to
legal, advisory, and administrative services, such as transportation or guard
services. In the other interpretation, the Board described operations of a bank
credit card service organization that would meet the definition.
The Board believes that a regulation in this area is no longer
necessary and thus has rescinded Regulation S effective March 10, 1979.
Existing interpretations of the Bank Service Corporation Act have been updated
and streamlined to reflect the statutory change.

The only substantive rulings

that have been added to the interpretations are taken from: (1) an interpretation
previously published only in the Federal Reserve Bulletin explaining the scope of
investment authority in ’’bank service corporations" (48 Fed. Res. Bull. 1429
(1962)); and (2) the last sentence of section 219.4 of Regulation S, concerning the
performance of legal, advisory, and administrative services.
A State member bank is to give notice when bank services are
provided for it, or its affiliates or subsidiaries that are subject to Federal
Reserve examination, by any servicer, including national banks; non-member
insured banks; State member banks; non-profit, no-stock bank credit card service
organizations, and servicing subsidiaries of bank holding companies. Notification
should not be provided for the performance of legal, advisory, and administrative
services, such as transportation or guard services.
For notification purposes, a letter should be signed by a duly
authorized officer of the bank or of its affiliate or subsidiary for which services
are performed, and be provided to the District Federal Reserve Bank .

This

letter is to be provided no later than 30 days after the making of a contract to
provide services, or no later than 30 days after the performance of the services,
whichever comes first. In lieu of a letter, the attached form may be used to
report the making of a contract to provide services, or the performance of
services.




2

If a bank has an existing bank service arrangement in e ffect on March
10, 1979, and has already furnished "assurances” regarding the arrangement in
compliance with Regulation S, no additional notification regarding the arrange­
ment is necessary.




BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
NOTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE OF BANK SERVICES
BANk NAm E"An C> ADDRESS (Includes Street, City, State and ZIP Code)

Complete below (1n space Indicated) Federal Reserve Bank's Name and Address

In compliance with the requirement of the Bank Service Corporation Act we hereby notify
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System of bank services provided by the
se rv ice r reported below.
CORPORATE T I T L E D ?

S E R V IC E R ------------------------------------------

l o c a t io n

* si

op

p r e m is e s

w h er e

s e r v ic e s

ARE PERFORMED
Ad d r e s s o f S E R V I C E R 'S C O R P O R A T E
HEADQUARTERS

NAME OF m a n A5TN8 O F F I C E R ( S ) A T PROCESSING
LOCATION(S)

telephone

Nu m b e r

a

T p r o c e s s i n g s i TE

1 BANK'S p r i n c i p a l c o n t a c t "AT C e n TEr (S)

(If other than Managing Officer(s))

TELEPHONE

n u m b e r o f p r i n c i p a l c On TAc T(s )

APPLICATIONS PROCESSED AND SERVICES PERFORMED (Indicate both present and planned services)

T IJL E

or

SIGNATURE




O F F I C E O O T N O R 1 Z E C )’ T O S IG N N O T I F I C A T I O N -------------------------------------------------- TELEPHONE n u m b e r

of authorized O F F IC E R

DATE SIGNED

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Rescission of Regulation S

a

[6 2 1 0 -0 1 -M ]
[Reg. S, Docket No. R-0209]

PART 219— BANK SERVICE
ARRANGEMENTS
PART 250— MISCELLANEOUS
INTERPRETATIONS
Rescission of Regulation S; Amend­
ment of Interpretation Regulations

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Revocation and amendment
of interpretations.
SUMMARY: As part of its Regulatory
Improvement Project, involving a sub­
stantive review of all Federal Reserve
regulations, the Board has reviewed
Regulation S, “Bank Service Arrange­
ments” (12 CFR Part 219), which im­
plements the Bank Service Corpora­
tion Act (12 U.S.C. 1861-65). That reg­
ulation specifies the manner of assur­
ing the Board that the performance of
bank services for State member banks
will be subject to regulation and exam­
ination by the Board whenever the
services are performed by anyone
other than the bank itself. On the
basis of its review and in the light of a
recent amendment of the Act (Pub. L.
95-630, 92 Stat. 3677), that becomes ef­
fective on March 10, 1979, the Board
has decided to: (1) Rescind Regulation
S as no longer necessary; (2) revise and
update its interpretations of the Act;
and (3) send to State member banks
through the Reserve Banks an an­
nouncement and explanation of the
new provisions. The Board’s actions
are intended for simplification and
clarification, and the revision of the
interpretations will not impose any
new requirements not contained in the
Act.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 10, 1979.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Carl V. Howard, Attorney, Legal Di­
vision, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, Washing­
ton, D.C. 20551 (202/452-3786).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Bank Service Corporation Act
(the “Act” ) (12 U.S.C. 1861-65), as
originally adopted, required that,
when a State member bank has bank
services performed for it (such as
check sorting and posting of interest
on savings accounts), satisfactory as­
surances must be furnished to the
Board that the performance of the
services will be subject to the Board’s
regulation and examination to the
same extent as if the services were
being performed by the bank itself on
its own premises. The purpose was to
make certain that the appropriate
Federal banking agency would not be
frustrated in its examination of a bank



subject primarily to its supervision be­
cause the bank’s records have been
transferred to another organization or
some other organization is carrying
out part or all of the bank’s functions.
Regulation S, “Bank Service Arrange­
ments” (12 CFR Part 219), was issued
by the Board in 1963 to implement the
Act by specifying when and in what
form assurances shall be provided to
the Federal Reserve System.
However, the Congress has taken a
more direct approach to supervision of
bank service arrangements through an
amendment of the Act contained in
section 308 of the Financial Institu­
tions Regulatory and Interest Rate
Control Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-630; 92
Stat. 3677). Effective March 10, 1979,
the performance of bank services for
State member banks or their subsid­
iaries or affiliates will be subject to
regulation and examination by the
Board as a matter of law without the
necessity for “assurances.” A State
member bank will be required to
notify the Board of the existence of a
bank service arrangement within 30
days after the making of the service
contract or the performance of the
service, whichever occurs first.
In the course of reviewing Regula­
tion S in its Regulatory Improvement
Project, the Board has concluded that
the regulation will no longer be neces
sary and should be rescinded in the
light of the legislative change. The
provisions regarding “assurances” will
become obsolete. The only provision of
the regulation that will continue to
have effect is the rule that the per­
formance of legal, advisory, and ad
ministrative services, such as transpor­
tation or guard services, is not subject
to examination unless specifically re­
quested by the Board. This rule, which
essentially is an interpretation o f the
term “bank services” in section Kb) of
the Act (12 U.S.C. 1861(b)), will be in­
corporated in the Board’s published
interpretations. No new regulatory
provisions are considered necessary to
reflect the recent amendment o f the
Act.
As in the past, the letter notifying
the Board of the bank service arrange­
ment is to be sent to the Federal Re
serve Bank in whose district the State
member bank has its main office. If a
bank has an existing bank service ar­
rangement on March 10, 1979, and has
already furnished assurances regard­
ing the arrangement in compliance
with Regulation S, no additional noti
fication regarding the arrangement is
necessary.
As a further effort to improve its
‘ regulations, the Board is revising, up­
dating, and streamlining Hs interpreta
tions. The only substantive rulings
being added are taken from: (1) An in­
terpretation published in the Federal
R e s e r v e B u lle tin (48 Fed. Res. Bull.
1429 (1962)) but not in the Code o f
F ed era l R e g u la tio n s ; and (2) the last

sentence of section 219.4 relating to
legal, advisory, and administrative
services (discussed above).
The Board is also adding a short
summary paragraph at the beginning
of each interpretation to facilitate the
public’s finding of information and
lessen the burden of reading materials
that may not be relevant to the re­
searcher’s interest. Of course, if reli­
ance is to be placed upon the interpre­
tation, the full text must be consulted
since the summary is only a para­
phrase of the ruling rather than the
ruling itself.
The Board is asking the Federal Re­
serve Banks to notify State member
banks of the statutory and regulatory
changes and to explain compliance
with the amended Act.
The procedures of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) re­
garding notice, public participation
and deferred effective date were not
followed in connection with these reg­
ulatory changes because: (1) The
Board finds that public participation
is unnecessary since the rescission of
the regulation will result in neither
the granting of authority to the per­
sons regulated, nor the imposition or
relaxing of any requirements; and (2)
rulemaking procedures do not apply to
interpretive rules. For similar reasons,
the expanded rulemaking procedures
set forth in the Board’s policy state­
ment of Janury 15, 1979 (44 F.R. 3957)
do not apply.
To implement these regulatory
changes, the following actions are
being taken under the Board’s author­
ity in 12 U.S.C. 1861-65:

PART 219— [REVOKED]

1. 12 CFR Part 219 is hereby re­
voked.*
PART 250 MISCELLANEOUS
INTERPRETATIONS

2. The table of contents of 12 CFR
Part 250 is amended by adding at the
end of the table a new heading and
three new section titles to read as fol­
lows:
B ank S ervice A rrangements

Sec.
250.300 Kinds of bank servicers subject to
Board examination under the Bank
Service Corporation Act.
250.301 Scope of investment authority and
notification requirement under the
Bank Service Corporation Act.
250.302 Applicability of Bank Service Cor­
poration Act to bank credit card service
organization.

3. 12 CFR Part 250 is amended by
adding new sections §§ 250.300-250.302
immediately after a new heading,
* 12 CFR 219.101 is a cross reference to 12
CFR 225.115. The revocation of the former
is not intended to result in the revocation of
the latter.

“BANK
SERVICE
ARRANGE­ ganizations that are not bank service
MENTS,” to read as follows:
corporations is also subject to Board
regulation and examination.
B an k S ervice A rrangements
(d) If the bank servicer is a national
§ 250.300 Kinds of bank servicers subject bank or a State nonmember insured
to Board examination under the Bank bank, its performance of bank services
for State member banks is subject to
Service Corporation Act.
Board regulation and examination, de­
S u m m a r y . The performance of bank
services for State member banks is spite the fact that the servicer is sub­
subject to the Board’s regulation and ject primarily to regulation and exami­
examination, regardless of the nature nation by one of the other Federal
of the bank servicer, including ser­ banking ageneies. By the same token,
vicers that are national banks; State the performance of bank services by a
nonmember insured banks; non-profit, State member bank for a national
no-stock credit card servicing organiza­ bank or State nonmember insured
tions; and servicing subsidiaries of bank is subject to regulation and ex­
amination by the Comptroller of the
bank holding companies.
T ext, (a) Since the enactment of the Currency or the Federal Deposit In­
Bank Service Corporation Act (the surance Corporation, respectively. The
“Act” ) (12 U.S.C. 1861-65), the Board purpose of section 5 of the Act is to
has on several occasions considered make certain that the appropriate
whether performance of “bank serv­ Federal banking agency will be able ef­
ices” (as that term is defined in sec­ fectively to exercise its responsibilities
tion 1(b) of the Act) for State member with respect to a bank subject primar­
banks is subject to regulation and ex­ ily to its supervision.
(e) It is important to note that the
amination by the Board under section
5 of the Act if (1) the bank servicer is scope of the Board’s regulation and
not a “bank service corporation” (as examination under section 5 of the
that term is defined in the Act), or (2) Act does not extent to all affairs of
the bank servicer is a bank itself. In the bank servicer, but only to the
each instance, based on the reasoning “bank services” performed for a State
set forth below, the Board expressed member bank and only to the same
the view that section 5 of the Act ap­ extent as if the services were being
plied to any organization that per­ performed by the State member bank
formed bank services for State itself on its own premises.
member banks, including national
banks; another State member bank; § 250.301 Scope of investment authority
and notification requirement under the
State nonmember insured banks; serv­
Bank Service Corporation Act.
icing subsidiaries of bank holding com­
panies; and non-profit, no stock credit
S u m m a r y , (a) The authority of State
card servicing organizations.
member banks under the Bank Service
(b) The Senate Committee on Bank­ Corporation Act to invest in bank serv­
ing and Currency stated with regard ice corporations is limited to invest­
to section 5 of the Act, as enacted in ments in corporations that perform
1962, that the Federal supervisory “bank services” solely.
agencies “must be able to examine all
(b) A State member bank is required
of the banks’ records, and they must by the Act to notify the Board only of
be able to exercise proper supervision
the performance of “bank services”
over all the banks’ activities, whether
for it.
performed by the banks’ employees on
(c) “Bank services” will not usually
their premises or by anyone else on or
be
regarded as including legal, adviso­
off the banks’ premises. This examina­
tion and this supervision cannot be ry, and administrative services, such as
frustrated by a transfer of the banks’ transportation or guard services.
T e x t (a) Section 2(a) of the Bank
records to some other organization or
by having some other organization Service Corporation Act (12 U.S.C.
carry out all or part of the banks’ 1861-65) provides that “no limitation
functions.” (S. R£p. No. 2105, 87th or prohibition otherwise imposed by
Cong. 3 (1962)). Similarly, the Com­ any provision of Federal law exclusive­
mittee on Banking and Currency of ly relating to banks shall prevent any
the House of Representatives stated two or more banks from investing not
that “it would obviously be unwise to more than 10 per centum of the paidpermit banks to avoid the examination in and unimpaired capital and unim­
and supervision of vital banking func­ paired surplus of each of them in a
tions by the simple expedient of farm­ bank service corporation.” This 10 per­
ing out such functions.” (H.R. Rep. cent investment ceiling applies to
loans and other advances of funds, as
No. 2062, 87th Cong. 3 (1962)).
(c) Section 5 of the Act. is not limited well as the purchase of stock. The Act,
by its terms to “bank service corpora­ however, does not authorize a State
tions” as defined in the Act; nor, in bank to invest in a bank service corpo­
the Board’s opinion based on the legis­ ration if the bank is not permitted to
lative history of the Act, should such a do so under the applicable State law.
(b) “Bank service corporation” is de­
limitation be implied. The Board con­
cludes that the performance of bank fined in section 1(c) of the Act to
services for State member banks by or­ mean “a corporation organized to per­




form bank services for two or more
banks, each of which owns part of the
capital stock of such corporation, and
at least one of which is subject to ex­
amination by a Federal supervisory
agency.” Section 4 of the Act states
that “no bank service corporation may
engage in any activity other than the
performance of bank services for
banks.” Thus, the investment authori­
ty created by section 2(a) is limited to
corporations that are engaged solely in
the provision of “bank services” to
banks, as that term is defined in the
Act.
(c) In addition to its grant of invest­
ment authority, the Act also requires
State member banks to notify the
Board within 30 days of the execution
of a contract for “bank services” or
the actual provision of such services,
whichever occurs first. Moreover, the
Act authorizes the Board to regulate
and examine the performance of
“bank services.” Thus, the scope of the
Act’s notification and examination re­
quirements also is limited to “bank
services.”
(d) The term “bank services” is de­
fined in section 1(b) of the Act to
mean “services such as check and de­
posit sorting and posting, computation
and posting of interest and other cred­
its and charges, preparation and mail­
ing of checks, statements, notices, and
similar items, or any other clerical,
bookkeeping, accounting, statistical, or
similar functions performed for a
bank.”
(e) Bearing importantly upon the
meaning of "bank services” is the fol­
lowing quotation from the Report of
the Senate Committee on Banking and
Currency: “The authority to examine
and supervise banks is broad and must
be vigorously exercised. At the same
time sound discretion must be used.
Banks have always employed others to
do many things for them, and they
will have to continue to do so, and the
bill is not intended to prevent this or
to make it more difficult. For example,
banks have employed lawyers to pre­
pare trust and estate accounts and to
prosecute judicial proceedings for the
settlement of such accounts. Banks
have employed accountants to prepare
earnings statements and balance
sheets. Banks have employed public
relations and advertising firms. And
banks have employed individuals or
firms to perform all kinds of adminis­
trative activities, including armored
car and other transportation services,
guard services and, in many cases,
other mechanical services needed to
run the bank’s buildings. It is not ex­
pected that the bank supervisory
agencies would find it necessary to ex­
amine or regulate any of these agents
or representatives of a bank, except
under the most unusual circum­
stances. The authority is intended to
be limited to banking functions as

such.” (S. Rep. No. 2105, 87th Cong. 3
(1962)).
(f) On the basis of the Act’s defini­
tion of “bank services”, the limitation
contained in section 4 of the Act, and
the preceding quotation from the
Act’s legislative history, it is apparent
that the term "bank services” is essen­
tially limited to clerical and similar
services. For example, the term would
not usually be regarded as including
legal, advisory, and administrative
services, such as transportation or
guard services.
(g) Thus, State member banks gener­
ally may rely on the Act to justify in­
vestment only in a corporation that is
engaged solely in performing one or
more of the services contained in the
definition of “bank services” in section
1(b), or a service similar to one of
those services, and only if those serv­
ices are provided solely to banks. In­
vestment in a corporation providing
any other services, such as the type of
services described in the above quota­
tion from the Act’s legislative history,
generally is not permitted on the basis
of this Act, unless such services are le­
gitimately incidental to the provision
of "bank services” by that corporation.
(h) Since the notification required
by section 5 of the Act, as amended,
also is based on the provision of "bank
services,” such notification need only
be provided with regard to the provi­
sion of one or more of the services




enumerated in section 1(b) of the Act
or a service similar to one of those
services.
§ 250.302 Applicability o f Bank Service
Corporation Act to bank credit card
service organization.

cedures relating to credit card security
control; (5) upon telephonic request,
advising merchants and participating
banks respecting credit authorizations
above certain specified limits; and (6)
compiling lists of participating mer­
chants.
(c) The Board expressed the view
that because the service organization
has no stock and the State member
bank does not otherwise “invest”
therein by "the making of a loan, or
otherwise, except a payment for rent
earned, goods sold and delivered, or
services rendered prior to. the making
of such payment” (section 1(d) of the
Act), the service organization is not a
"bank service corporation” within the
meaning of section 1(c) of the Act.
(d) However, the Board concluded
that the functions described above do
constitute "bank services” as defined
bi section 1(b) of the Act. Accordingly,
the State member bank is required to
notify the Board (through the appro­
priate Federal Reserve Bank) of the
performance of the services for the
bank in accordance with section 5 of
the Act.

S u m m a r y . Although a non-profit,
no-stock service organization in which
no bank has made an investment is
not a “bank service corporation” as de­
fined in the Bank Service Corporation
Act, that organization’s credit card
servicing activities are "bank services”
as defined in the Act and thus subject
to the notification requirement of sec­
tion 5 of the Act.
T e x t (a) The Board of Governors
has considered whether the Bank
Service Corporation Act (12 U.S.C.
1861-65), is applicable where a bank
credit card plan of a State member
bank and other banks used the facili­
ties of a non-profit, no-stock service
organization.
(b) The functions of the service or­
ganization include the following: (1)
Performing cardholder accounting for
participating banks; (2) developing in­
formation concerning each credit card
Effective date: March 10, 1979.
and holder, including such holder’s
current balance owing to the card issu­
Board of Governors of the Federal
ing bank and the amount of such bal­ Reserve System, March 5, 1979.
ance that is delinquent; (3) assisting in
procedures relating to the presenta­
T heodore E. A l l is o n ,
tion and settlement of drafts and
S e c r e ta r y o f the B o a r d .
credit memoranda; (4) developing pro­
[FR Doc. 79-7307 Filed 3-8-79; 8:45 am]