The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF N E W YORK L Circular No. 7 7 1 2 "I September 18, 1975 J TRUTH IN LENDING Amendments to Regulation Z to Implement the Fair Credit Billing Act To All Member Banks, and Others Concerned, in the Second Federal Reserve District: O n S ep tem b er 15, 1975, the B o a rd o f G o v e rn o rs of th e F e d e ra l R eserv e S y stem a n n o u n c ed the ad o p tio n of sev eral a m en d m en ts to its R e g u la tio n Z— T r u th in L e n d in g — to im plem ent th e new F a ir C re d it B illin g A ct. T h e se am en d m en ts to R e g u la tio n Z becom e effective on O c to b e r 28, 1975, the d a te th a t th e new A c t goes in to effect. F o llo w in g is the te x t o f the B o a rd ’s s ta te m e n t: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System today issued regulations to implement the Fair Credit Billing Act, effective October 28, the date the new Act goes into effect. The Act is a new part of the T ruth in Lending Act and the Regulations published today amend Regu lation Z, which implements the T ruth in Lending law. The new Act directs the Federal Reserve to issue the regulatory rules for F air Credit Billing. These are to be enforced by the same Federal agencies that enforce the T ruth in Lending Act. The chief purpose of the Fair Credit Billing Act and of the new Federal Reserve Regulation is to help consumers resolve credit billing disputes promptly and fairly. The Act prohibits certain practices deemed un fair to consumers using credit cards or other open-end credit accounts and certain practices between credit card issuers and retail merchants deemed to be anticompetitive. The rules implementing the Fair Credit Billing Act (F C B A ) published today follow extensive con sultation with consumer groups, creditors and the public at large. The Board published proposed FCBA regulations on April 30, and received comment on its proposals through June 20. On June 17 the Board published for comment proposed rules under a related but separate section of Public Law 93-495, which provides for minimum disclosure requirements for transactions reflected on periodic billing statements received by a customer using any type of open-end credit account. On July 30, the Board published revisions of its draft rules and on August 5 held hearings on the proposals. Comment was received through August 18. The F air Credit Billing amendments to Regulation Z as adopted by the Board include the following provisions (with principal changes from the most recent proposals noted) : 1. Definitions: Creditor— Credit card issuers, whether or not a finance charge is imposed. Also, for some purposes— set forth in the Regulation—persons who honor credit cards. Open-end accounts—Chiefly, credit extended by the use of a credit card. Billing error—Amounts charged due to unauthorized use of the customer’s credit card; amounts ques tioned by the custom er; amounts charged for property or services not accepted by the customer, or wrongly delivered; failure to credit payments already m ade; accounting errors, including errors in computing finance charges; imposition of finance or other charges for late payment when a customer is not billed at his cur rent address, if notification of change of address was given at least 1 0 days before the end of the billing period. Proper written notification of error—W ritten notice to the creditor, at an address he specifies, within 60 days of the billing, that enables the creditor to identify the customer, indicates the customer’s belief that the billing contains an error and the amount involved, and gives reasons for believing it is an error. 2. Billing error resolution: A billing error is any of six specified categories of acts or omissions by the creditor. To trigger the resolu tion procedure the customer must send a proper written notification of a billing error. Upon receipt of proper written notification, the creditor must acknowledge the inquiry within 30 days and resolve the dispute in two billing cycles, or no more than 90 days. During the resolution process, the customer need not pay any amount in dispute, or any minimum payments on amounts in dispute. The creditor may not collect any disputed amount or any finance charges on it. The customer’s account may not be closed because he fails to pay an amount he believes to be incorrect. The creditor may not report adversely on the customer’s credit standing with regard to amounts in dispute nor threaten to make such a report until the creditor has complied with his responsibilities under the error resolution procedure. Failure to comply subjects the creditor to a forfeiture of the disputed amount, up to $50, regardless of whether an error has been made. j . Rights of the cardholder to assert claims: The credit card holder may withhold payment, and assert legal claims against the card issuer with respect to shoddy or defective merchandise or services purchased with a credit card (with certain exceptions and limitations) following an unsuccessful attempt to resolve the problem with the merchant. 4. Discounts for payments in cash: M erchants may offer their customers a discount of up to 5 per cent for using cash in lieu of using a credit card. This does not constitute a finance charge. Credit card issuers must notify merchants using their card, by November 28, 1975, that any previous agreement between them barring discounts for cash is no longer valid. Simultaneously with publication of its FCBA rules the Board is sending a letter to the Chair man, and ranking minority members, of the House and Senate banking committees, and their sub-committees on consumer affairs, asking for clarification whether the provisons of the Act regarding discounts for the use of cash apply also to so-called surcharges when credit cards are used. In its proposals of July 30, the Board suggested the possibility of treating surcharges of up to 5 per cent when credit cards were used in the same manner as discounts are treated. 5. Notification of rights: New customers must be notified of their rights under the FCBA by use of a notice set forth in the Regula tion. In general, the notice must be mailed to active accounts in the first full billing cycle after October 28, 1975. A t the customer’s request, or when a billing error is alleged, the customer must be supplied with the full notice of rights. W ith the following exception, the notification form must also be sent to all customers semiannually. The Regulation provides that a short form of notification of rights (set forth in the Regulation) may be mailed out monthly in lieu of the longer semiannual form. 6. Notification of balance and avoidance of finance charges: Customers with either a credit or debit balance m ust receive a periodic statement of their account. W here there is a provision for a period during which payment may be made without incurring a finance charge, the statement must be mailed or delivered to the customer, with some exceptions, at least 14 days before the end of such a “free ride” period. 7 . Prompt crediting of payments: The creditor must specify at least one location where payments will be credited as of the date of receipt. However, during a one-year transition period (to October 28, 1976) crediting may be delayed by as much as five days. Crediting need not take place as of the date of receipt if this does not result in a finance charge. The creditor may notify account holders that at other locations crediting may be delayed by up to five days. A djustm ent for any finance charges caused by not crediting an account on the date of receipt must take place in the next billing. 8. Transition periods: Transition periods—not previously specified in the Board’s proposals—have been provided in the Regula tion aimed at avoiding errors and confusion in billings due to difficulties in changing over from forms now in use and in making technical changes, such as computer programming and computations required to imple ment the FCBA. Transition provisions cover new disclosure requirements specified in the Regulation, including showing dates of payments, indication of credit balances and specification of the address to which billing error complaints are to be sent. p. Phase-in of identification of transaction requirements: F urther new transition periods have been provided in order to avoid confusion and error during the largescale reprogramming of computers that must take place to implement provisions of the Act for identifying trans actions on bills sent to credit card customers. Until July 1, 1976, creditors may continue to identify transac tions as they do currently. In no case may compliance with all such requirements be completed later than October 28, 1977. 2 The main elements of full compliance are: —Creditors who bill “descriptively” (that is, who send only a statement of account, without copies of the sales voucher made at the time of the transaction) must provide a transaction date. In addition, for two-party creditors (for instance, a transaction with a departm ent store where the department store’s credit card is used) there must be a description of the goods or services purchased. For three-party transactions (where a third party’s credit card is used) the name of the m erchant and the address where the transaction took place must be given. 10 . Time for payments after resolution of a billing error: A period free from finance charges must be provided for payment after resolution of a billing error dis pute (if the creditor normally gives a “free ride” period for payment without finance charges) when the creditor was in error. Earlier drafts of the proposed Regulation would have required such a period free of finance charges after resolution of a billing dispute even when the creditor did not make an error or did not normally offer a period for payment free of finance charges. 11. Inconsistent State laws: The Regulation as adopted provides that any State credit billing law that differs from the error resolution procedure and credit reporting prohibitions of the F C B A and its implementing Regulation are inconsistent, and, thereby, preempted. As an exception, the Regulation permits customers to make use of any time period for making an inquiry concerning a billing error provided by State law that is longer than the inquiry period provided by the Act and the Regulation. The Regulation declares State law not to be inconsistent, and therefore not preempted, if the creditor can comply without violating the other sections of the Federal law. The Regulation establishes limitations on notifications to consumers by creditors of State law provisions, and sets up a procedure through which a State may ask the Board for a determination that its law gives greater protection to consumers than does the Federal law, or is otherwise not inconsistent. 12. The merchant must give the card issuer prom pt notification (in not over seven business days) of a refund due to the customer on either merchandise or services. Such amounts are to be credited to the customer’s account within three business days. 13. Credit card issuers who hold deposits made by a customer may not use those deposits to offset the debt of the customer to the card issuer without a court order or by way of remedies constitutionally available to all creditors generally. 14. Credit card issuers may not require merchants or other persons honoring their cards to open deposit accounts with them, or to procure any services from the credit card issuer not essential to the operation of the credit card plan. 15. The Regulation prevents bank credit card issuers from automatically collecting credit card payments from a customer’s deposit account, even though there is an agreement with the customer for such automatic collection, when some or all of the items on a periodic statement are disputed by the customer. 16. A customer’s account may not be closed or restricted during resolution of a dispute over an alleged error before the card issuer has fulfilled all its responsibilities under the procedures for resolving errors, solely because the customer fails to pay the amount in dispute. 17. The credit card issuer may recapture minimum payments not made during an error resolution pro cedure if it is determined in the end that the customer owes some or all of the disputed amount, but the card issuer may not declare the whole debt due. Earlier drafts of the Regulation would have required adjustm ent of finance charges during the dispute period, whether or not the dispute is ultimately resolved in the cus tomer’s favor. 18. The Regulation provides a procedure for the treatment of delinquency credit reports, and threats by creditors to make adverse reports to third parties, with respect to disputed amounts shown on a billing statement. The Regulation prohibits such reports and threats during the resolution of disputes, and makes other requirements. Failure by creditors to comply m ay result in a forfeiture penalty. A copy of the amendments to Regulation Z will be sent to you shortly. Any questions reg ard ing these amendments should be directed to our Bank Regulations Department. P a u l A. V o lc k e r , President. 3