The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
FED ER AL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK Fiscal Agent of the United States r Circular No. 6 2 4 IT u November 6, 1968 J RESULTS OF BIDDING FOR 91-DAY AND 182-DAY TREASURY BILLS TO BE ISSUED NOVEMBER 7, 1968 To All Incorporated Banks and Trust Companies, and Others Concerned, in the Second Federal Reserve District: At the time of printing our Circular No. 6240, dated November 4, 1968, announcing an offering of 91-day and 182-day Treasury bills, to be issued November 14, 1968, the results of bidding for the previous week’s offering of 91-day and 182-day Treasury bills, to be issued November 7, 1968, were not available. The results, now available, are: Range of Accepted Competitive Bids High .......................... ................ Low .......................... ................ Average .................... ................ 91-Day Treasury Bills 182-Day Treasury Bills Maturing February 6, 1969 Maturing M ay 8, 1969 Price Approx. equiv. annual rate Price 98.617 98.588 98.596 5.471% 5.586% S.554%1 97.184a 97.154 97.161 Approx. equiv. annual rate 5.570% 5.629% 5.616%a a Excepting one tender of $70,000. 1 These rates are on a bank discount basis. The equivalent coupon issue yields are 5.71 percent for the 91-day bills, and 5.86 percent for the 182-day bills. (65 percent of the amount of 91-day bills bid for at the low price was accepted.) (73 percent of the amount of 182-day bills bid for at the low price was accepted.) Total Tenders Applied for and Accepted (By Federal Reserve Districts) District 91-Day Treasury Bills 182-Day Treasury Bills Maturing February 6, 1969 Maturing M ay 8, 1969 Applied for Boston .................................... New York .............................. Philadelphia............................ Cleveland ................................ Richmond .............................. Atlanta .................................... Chicago .................................. St. Louis ................................ Minneapolis ............................ Kansas C ity ............................ Dallas ...................................... San Francisco........................ T o t a l ...................... $ Accepted 23,765,000$ 23,765,000 1,800,637,0001,131,887,000 36,528,000 21,528,000 38,817,000 38,817,000 18,839,000 18,839,000 31,506,000 29,006,000 182,029,000 156,229,000 40,370,000 34,020,000 22,391,000 20,391,000 23,867,000 23,867,000 29,373,000 24,023,000 135,002,000 77,652,000 $2,383,124,000 $1,600,024,000b Applied for Accepted $ 12,321,000 $ 1,623,747,000 17,810,000 57,924,000 4,231,000 20,341,000 125,397,000 21,150,000 16,967,000 13,716,000 19,626,000 111,822,000 $2,045,052,000 12,321,000 829,867,000 7,733 000 49,654,000 3,987,000 16,341000 75,397 000 15,815^000 11,467 000 13,316!000 12,626 000 52,531,000 $1,101,055 £00° Includes $298,963,000 noncompetitive tenders accepted at the average price of 98.596. cIncludes $128,432,000 noncompetitive tenders accepted at the average price of 97.161. A lfred H ayes , President.
@FedFRASER