View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
OF NEW YORK

[

Circular No. 10743 "I
November 28, 1994

J

INTERNATIONAL BANKING OPERATIONS
Amendment to Regulation K

To All Depository Institutions in the Second
Federal Reserve District, and Others Concerned:

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has amended its Regulation K,
“International Banking Operations,” effective January 1, 1995, in order to set forth the application
procedures that State-licensed branches and agencies of foreign banks will be required to follow to
request the Board’s approval to engage in or continue to engage in activities not generally permissible
for a federal branch o f a foreign bank. The amendment also provides that no application will be
required in connection with the conversion by a foreign bank of its federally licensed branch or
agency into a State-licensed branch or agency.
Enclosed — for member banks, branches and agencies of foreign banks, foreign bank holding
companies, and others maintaining sets of the Board’s regulations — is the text o f the amendment
to Regulation K, which has been reprinted from the Federal Register of November 3. Questions
regarding this matter may be directed to Carmine Gioioso, Examining Officer, European
Examinations Department (Tel. No. 212-720-6965).




W il l ia m J. M c D o n o u g h ,

President.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
INTERNATIONAL BANKING OPERATIONS
AMENDMENT TO REGULATION K
(Effective January 1, 1995)
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

desires to engage in or continue to

engage in an activity that is not
Kathleen M. O ’Day, Associate General
12CFR Part 211
permissible for a federal branch,
Counsel (202/452-3786), Ann E.
pursuant to statute, regulation or order
Misback, Managing Senior Counsel
[Regulation K; Docket No. R-0793]
or interpretation issued by the Office of
(202/452-3788), John W. Rogers,
the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC),
Attorney (202/452-2798); Michael G.
International Banking Operations
Martinson, Assistant Director (202/452- to file an application in letter form to
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the
3640), Division of Banking Supervision the Board for permission to conduct or
Federal Reserve System.
to continue to conduct such activity.
and Regulation, Board of Governors of
The‘proposed regulation set forth the
ACTION: Final rule.
the Federal Reserve System. For the
required contents of the application and
hearing impaired only,
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Telecommunication Device for the Deaf a procedure for divestiture or cessation
Federal Reserve System (Board or
of impermissible activities not approved
[TDD], Dorothea Thompson (202/452Federal Reserve) amends its Regulation
3544), Board of Governors of the Federal by_the Board.
K concerning the permissible activities
The Board specifically requested
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets,
of state-licensed branches and agencies
comment on several items, including
N.W ., Washington, D.C. 20551.
of foreign banks. Section 202(a) of the
the contents of the application, whether
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
202 of the Act amended section 7 of the prior notice rather than an application
Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA or
might be appropriate for certain classes
International Banking Act (IBA) by
Act) provides that after December 19,
of activities, and whether the conduct of
adding several new subsections
1992, a state-licensed branch or agency
activities permitted by the OCC
concerning the establishment and
of a foreign bank may not engage in any
pursuant to informal rather than formal
termination of foreign bank branches in
activity that is not permissible for a
interpretation,
opinion or advice should
the United States. N ew subsection 7(h)
federal branch of a foreign bank unless
require the filing of an application.
of the IBA provides that:
the Board has determined that the
In addition, the Board requested
(1) IN GENERAL.— A fter the en d o f the 1- comment on another provision of
activity is consistent with sound
year p eriod b eg in ,n in g, on„the date o f
banking practice, and in the case of an
Regulation K which requires that a
,
.
. , .
.
. ,
en actm en t o f the [ Ac t a St at e b r a n c h or St at e ,
insured branch, the Federal Deposit
r
foreign bank wishing to convert from a
' . ___ . ^
ng a g e i n a n y t y p e ot act i vi t y r , °
°
..
agen cy m ay n ot engage
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has
federal
branch
or
agency
license-to
a
that is n ot p erm issib le for a F ederal branch
determined that the activity would pose u n le ss—
state branch or agency license file for
no significant risk to the affected
approval to do so with the Board.
(A) the [Federal Reserve] Board has
The Board received four public
deposit insurance fund. This
d eterm in ed that su ch activity is co n sisten t
comments on the regulation. Comments
amendment to Regulation K sets forth
w ith so u n d b an k in g practice; and
(B) in th e ca se o f an in su red branch, the
were submitted by a state banking
the application procedures which stateF ederal D ep o sit Insurance C orporation has
supervisor, an association of state
licensed branches and agencies of
d eterm in ed that the a ctiv ity w o u ld p o se no banking supervisors, a trade association
foreign banks w ill be required to follow
significant risk to the deposit insurance fund ^
a ]aw
The commented
in order to request the Board’s
12 U.S.C. 3105(h)(1).
generally Were supportive of the
permission to engage in or continue to
In order to implement this provision, approach taken in the proposed rule,
engage in an activity which is not
the Board issued a proposed rule on
The comments focused on whether an
permissible for a federal branch of a
January 6,1993, with a request for
activity-based approach rather than a
foreign bank and the requirements of
divestiture and cessation plans. Insured public comment. (58 FR 513). In taking bank-based approach would be
this action, the Board stated that it
preferable, whether the conduct of
branches are also required to seek the
would consider revisions to the
activities permitted by the OCC
approval of the FDIC to engage in or to
proposed rule as appropriate and on the pursuant to informal rather than formal
continue to engage in such an activity.
interpretation, opinion or advice should
The final rule also amends Regulation K basis of the comments received. The
comment period endpct on March 5,
require an application and whether an
to clarify that no application w ill be
1993. The Board indicated that it would application would be required to
required in connection with the
accept and process applications under conduct an activity that the OCC
conversion by a foreign bank of its
federally-licensed branch or agency into the statute during the pendency of the permitted but only subject to
rulemaking. No applications have been quantitative restrictions. The
a state-licensed branch or agency.
received.
commenters uniformly stated that no
EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation is
The proposed rule required a foreign application should be required to
effective on January 1,1995, except for
bank operating a state-licensed branch convert from a federal branch or agency
§ 211.21(e) which is effective December
or agency in the United States, which
license to a state branch or agency
5,1994.
PRINTED IN NEW YORK, FROM FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 59. NO. 212, pp. 55026-29

|Enc. Cir. No. 107431




license.
On March 2,1993, the FDIC issued its
own proposed regulation implementing
section 7(h) of the IBA. See 58 FR
11992. The Board has consulted with
the FDIC concerning the response to its
proposed rule. Both the Board and the
FDIC have attempted to make their final
rules as consistent with one another as
possible and thereby to reduce the
burden that might be imposed on
applicants. A description of the final
rule and an analysis of the relevant
comments follows.

Determining if an Activity is
Permissible for a Federal Branch
The commenters generally stated that
no application should be required from
a state-licensed branch or agency for the
conduct of an activity that is permitted
for a federal branch pursuant to
interpretation, opinion or advice issued
in writing by the OCC or its staff, as well
as by statute, regulation official bulletin,
circular or order. The commenters
argued that a stricter requirement would
result in a competitive disadvantage to
state licensed offices and thereby would
be inconsistent with the intent of the
statute. The Board agrees with that
argument. Accordingly, the conduct of
activities permitted for a federal branch
pursuant to interpretation, opinion or
advice issued in writing by the OCC or
its staff w ould not require an
application, so long as such
interpretation, opinion or advice is still
considered valid, i . e . , it has not been
overruled by the OCC or found invalid
by a court of competent jurisdiction. In
addition, because national banks and
federal branches may rely on a written
opinion of counsel that an activity is
permissible under the National Bank
Act or other applicable statutes, in the
Board’s view, it would be appropriate to
permit state-licensed branches and
agencies also to rely on such opinions,
provided the opinion of counsel is
based on a reasoned analysis of
applicable statutes, regulations, official
bulletins, circular, orders, or
interpretations, opinions or advice of
the OCC or its staff. The Board plans to
consult with the OCC when questions
arise as to the permissibility of any
particular activity. Insured branches of
foreign banks also should consult with
the FDIC as to the permissibility of
particular activities.

Bank Approach Versus Activity
Approach
The Board’s proposed rule took a
bank-based approach to im plem enting




the statute; that is, an application was
required from each bank wishing to
conduct or continue to conduct an
activity not permissible for a national
bank. The comments suggested that the
Board instead take an activity based
approach, at least with respect to
activities which the commenters
believed presented minimal risk. One
commenter suggested that the Board
entertain applications from industry
trade groups with respect to the conduct
of such activities.
The Board has determined that a
combination of the two approaches is
the appropriate way to proceed and has
modified the proposed rule accordingly.
As described in further detail below, the
final rule provides that certain
categories of activities are consistent
with sound banking practice and that no
application should be required to
conduct such activities. The fact that the
Board’s prior consent is not required
does not preclude the Board from taking
any appropriate action within its
authority with respect to such activities
if the facts and circumstances warrant
such action.

found to be improperly conducted, the
Board retains enforcement authority to
require conformance to safety and
soundness requirements.
Finally, like the proposed rule, the
final rule provides that an application
under this section normally shall not be
required where an activity is
permissible to a federal branch but the
OCC imposes a quantitative restriction
on the conduct of such activity by the
federal branch. The commenters were
supportive of this exemption. The Board
believes appropriate quantitative
restrictions can be addressed on a caseby-case basis as part of the ongoing
supervisory process.

Contents of Application

Section 211.29(b) of the proposed
regulation provided that the application
shall be in letter form and shall contain
certain information, including among
other things, a description of the activity
in which the branch or agency desires
to engage or in which it is already
engaged, the foreign bank’s financial
condition, the assets and liabilities of
the branch or agency, the projected
effect of the proposed activity on the
Application Not Required in Certain
financial condition of the foreign bank
Instances
and the branch or agency, and in the
case of an application by a stateThe first category of activities
licensed insured branch, a statement of
exempted from the application
why the proposed activity w ill pose no
requirement are certain activities
significant risk to the deposit insurance
already determined by the FDIC not to
fund.
pose a significant risk to the Bank
The commenters suggested that
Insurance Fund pursuant to § 362.4(c)(3)
applicants not be required to provide
of the FDIC’s regulations (12 CFR part
information already available to the
362). The Board has determined not to
Federal Reserve through its general
require an application under this part
for the conduct of any such activity that examination and supervisory process.
the FDIC would permit an insured state Accordingly, the Board has deleted from
the final rule the requirement to provide
bank to conduct directly, provided the
activity is permissible for the branch or certain financial information. The Board
may request such information in
agency under applicable state law and
individual cases if the information in its
any other applicable federal law or
possession is either out of date or
regulation. The Board believes the
conduct of these activities, with proper otherwise deemed insufficient.
The Board and the FDIC have
controls, is consistent with safe and
consulted concerning the type of
sound banking. A s set forth in 12 CFR
information which each agency w ill
362.4(c)(3)(i)—(ii)(A), the exempted
need in order to make an informed
activities include guarantee activities
judgment and have agreed on a common
and activities found by the Board by
regulation or order to be closely related list of information in order that
applicants w ill need to prepare only one
to banking. In addition, the Board has
application which, in the case of
determined to exempt from the
insured branches, may be submitted to
application requirement any activity
both agencies. It is contemplated that
conducted as agent rather than as
the Board and the FDIC w ill review
principal, provided that the activity is
one that could be conducted by a state- such applications simultaneously.
chartered bank headquartered in the
Standards To Be Examined
same state as the branch or agency is
licensed. O f course, all activities of the
Section 211.29(d) of the final rule sets
branches and agencies remain subject to forth the standards that the Board w ill
examination. If any particular activity is examine in order to determine whether

2

a particular activity is consistent with
sound banking practice. These factors
are:

connection with the conversion of: (1) a Office of the Comptroller of the
federally-licensed branch to a state
Currency; or
(2) Is rendered impermissible due to
licensed-branch; or (2) a federally
• What types of risks, if any, the
a subsequent change in statute,
licensed-agency to a state-licensed
activity poses to the U.S. operations of
agency. Applications are not considered regulation, official bulletin or circular,
the foreign banking organization;
written order or interpretation, or
necessary in light of the fact that state• If the activity poses any such risks, licensed branches and agencies must
decision of a court of competent
the magnitude of each risk; and
jurisdiction.
restrict their activities to those
• If a risk is not de m in im is, the
(b) E xception s. No application shall
permissible for a federal branch or
actual or proposed procedures to control receive the Board’s approval to engage
be required by a state-licensed branch or
and minimize such risk.
in the activity. Section 24 of Regulation agency to conduct any activity that is
Each of these factors shall be evaluated K w ill be amended accordingly.
otherwise permissible under applicable
in light of the ability of the foreign bank
state and federal law or regulation and
Regulatory Flexibility Act
to provide financial and managerial
that:
support to the branch or agency, the
(1) Has been determined by the FDIC
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
performance record of the foreign bank
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 pursuant to 12 CFR 362.4(c)(3)(i)in general and the branch or agency in
et seq.), it is certified that this final rule (c)(3)(ii)(A ) not to present a significant
particular, and the volume of the
risk to the affected deposit insurance
w ill not have a significant impact on a
fund;
proposed activity. The Board may also
substantial number of small entities.
(2) Is permissible for a federallydetermine that a particular activity, after
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 211
licensed branch but the OCC imposes a
consideration of the above factors and
quantitative limitation on the conduct of
subject to any conditions or limits
Exports, Federal Reserve System,
such activity by the federal branch;
imposed by die Board, may be
Foreign banking, Holding companies,
(3) Is conducted as agent rather than
conducted by any other state-licensed
Investments, Reporting and record­
as principal, provided that the activity
branch or agency without further
keeping requirements.
is one that could be conducted by a
application to the Board.
For the reasons set forth in the
state-chartered bank headquartered in
This section remains unchanged from preamble, the Board amends 12 CFR
the same state in which the branch or
the proposed rale.

part 211 as set forth below:

Cessation or Divestiture
In the event that a state branch or
agency is required to cease conducting
an activity pursuant to the final
regulation, § 211.29(f) sets forth the
guidelines that must be followed to
divest or cease the impermissible
activity. Generally, this section provides
that the state branch or agency shall
submit a written plan of divestiture or
cessation within 60 days of (1) being
notified by the Board or the FDIC that
an application to continue to conduct
the activity has been denied, (2) the
effective date of the regulation in the
event that the foreign bank elects not to
apply for permission to continue to
conduct the activity, and (3) any change
in statute, regulation, order or OCC
interpretation that renders the activity
impermissible. Divestiture or cessation
shall be completed within one year, or
sooner if the Board so directs. The
Board requested comment on whether
or not this period of time should be
longer or shorter.

No comments were received on this
portion of the proposed rule.
Accordingly, no substantive changes
were made.
Conversion From Federal to State
License

As suggested by the commenters, the
Board has determined not to require an
application under the Foreign Bank
Supervision Enhancement Act in



PART 211— INTERNATIONAL
BANKING OPERATIONS
(REGULATION K)
1. The authority citation for Part 211
is revised to read as follows:
A u thority: 12 U.S.C. 221 e t s e q . , 1818,
1841 e t s e q . , 1843 e t s e q . , 3101 e t s e q . , 3901
e t seq.

2. In § 211.21, paragraph (e) is revised
to read as follows:

agency is licensed; or
(4) Any other activity that the Board
has determined may be conducted by
any state-licensed branch or agency of a
foreign bank without further application
to the Board.

(c) Contents o f a p p lica tion . An
application submitted pursuant to
paragraph (a) of this section shall be in
letter form and shall contain the
following information:

(1) A brief description of the activity,
including the manner in which it will
be conducted and an estimate of the
§211.21 D efinitions.
expected dollar volume associated with
*
*
*
*
*
the activity;
(e)
Change the status of an office
(2) A n analysis of the impact of the
means convert a representative office
proposed activity on the condition of
into a branch or agency, or an agency
the U.S. operations of the foreign bank
into a branch, but does not include
in general and of the branch or agency
renewal of the license of an existing
in particular, including a copy, if
office.
available, of any feasibility study,
*
*
*
*
*
management plan, financial projections,
3. In § 211.29, the text is added to
business plan, or similar document
read as follows:
concerning the conduct of the activity;
(3) A resolution by the applicant’s
§ 211.29 Applications by state-licensed
board of directors or, if a resolution is
branches and agencies to conduct activities not required pursuant to the applicant’s
not permissible for federal branches.
organizational documents, evidence of
(a) Scope. A state-licensed branch or approval by senior management,
agency shall file with the Board a prior authorizing the conduct of such activity
written application for permission to
and the filing of this application;
engage in or continue to engage in any
(4) If the activity is to be conducted
type of activity that:
by a state-licensed insured branch, a
(1) Is not permissible for a federal
statement by the applicant of whether or
branch, pursuant to statute, regulation, not it is in compliance with 12 CFR
official bulletin or circular, or order or
346.19 and 346.20, Pledge of Assets and
interpretation issued in writing by the
Asset Maintenance, respectively;

3

paragraph (d)(1) of this section, shall be
(5) If the activity is to be conducted
evaluated in light of the financial
by a state-licensed insured branch,
condition of the foreign bank in general
statements by the applicant:
(i) That it has complied with all
and the branch or agency in particular
and the volume of the activity.
requirements of the Federal Deposit
(e) A p p lic a tio n p roced ures.
Insurance Corporation concerning an
Applications pursuant to this section
application to conduct the activity and
shall be filed with the responsible
the status of the application, including
a copy of the FDIC’s disposition of such Reserve Bank for the foreign bank. A n
application shall not be deemed
application, if available; and
complete until it contains all the
(ii) Explaining why the activity w ill
information requested by the Reserve
pose no significant risk to the deposit
Bank and has been accepted. Approval
insurance fund; and
(6) Any other information that the
of such an application may be
Reserve Bank deems appropriate.
conditioned on the applicant’s
(d)
Factors co n sid e re d in
agreement to conduct the activity
determ ination. (1) The Board shall
subject to specific conditions or
consider the following factors in
limitations.
determining whether a proposed
(f) D ivestiture o r cessation. (1) In the
activity is consistent with sound
event that an applicant's application for
banking practice:
permission to continue to conduct an
activity is not approved by the Board or,
(1) T h e ty p e s o f risks, if any, the activity
if applicable, the FDIC, the applicant
p o se s to the U .S . o p era tio n s o f the foreign
b an k in g org a n iza tio n in general and the
shall submit a detailed written plan of
branch or a g en cy in particular;
divestiture or cessation of the activity to
(ii) If the a ctiv ity p o se s any su ch risks, the the responsible Reserve Bank within 60
m a g n itu d e o f e a ch risk; and
days of the disapproval. The divestiture
(iii) If a risk is n ot d e m in im is, the actual
or cessation plan shall describe in detail
or p ro p o sed p ro ced u res to control and
the manner in which the applicant w ill
m in im ize the risk.
divest itself of or cease the activity and
(2) Each of the factors set forth in




4

shall include a projected timetable
describing how long the divestiture or
cessation is expected to take.
Divestitures or cessation shall be
complete within one year from the date
of the disapproval, or within such
shorter period of time as the Board shall
direct.
(2) In the eyent that a foreign bank
operating a state branch or agency
chooses not to apply to the Board for
permission to continue to conduct an
activity that is not permissible for a
federal branch or which is rendered
impermissible due to a subsequent
change in statute, regulation, official
bulletin or circular, written order or
interpretation, or decision of a court of
competent jurisdiction, the foreign bank
shall submit a written plan of
divestiture or cessation, in conformance
with paragraph (f)(1), of this section
within 60 days of January 1,1995 or of
such change or decision.
By order o f the Board o f G overnors o f the
F ederal R eserve S y stem , O ctober 2 7 ,1 9 9 4 .

William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
(FR Doc. 9 4 -2 7 1 2 1 F ile d 1 1 - 2 -9 4 ; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P