View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
OF NEW YORK

[

Circular No. 1 0 6 7 9 ~|
December 3 1 ,1 9 9 3

J

EQUAL CRED IT OPPORTUNITY
Amendments to Regulation B Regarding the Right o f
Credit Applicants to R eceive Copies o f Appraisal Reports

To All Depository Institutions, and Others Concerned,
in the Second Federal Reserve District:
The following statement has been issued by the Board of G overnors of the Federal Reserve
System:
The Federal Reserve Board has issued amendments to its Regulation B (Equal Credit Opportunity)
regarding the right of credit applicants to receive copies of appraisal reports.
The amendments define the coverage of the appraisal requirements to be loans secured by a lien
on a residential structure containing one to four units. The regulation provides alternative methods of
compliance with the law. Creditors may choose to automatically provide a copy of appraisal reports to
all applicants for covered loans. Or, they may choose to provide a copy upon the applicant’s request and
be subject to other provisions in the regulation. For creditors that do not automatically provide copies
of appraisal reports, the regulation includes a requirement that applicants be notified of the right to
receive a copy and limits when an applicant must request (and the creditor must provide) it.
The Regulation B amendments implement and clarify the amendments to the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act contained in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
which took effect in December 1991. The amendments to the regulation are effective on December 14,
1993, but compliance with the regulatory requirements is optional until June 14, 1994.
Enclosed — for depository institutions in the Second Federal Reserve D istrict and others who
maintain sets of regulations of the Board of Governors — is the text of the amendments to
Regulation B , which has been reprinted from the Federal R egister of D ecem ber 16; additional, single
copies may be obtained at this Bank (33 Liberty Street) from the Issues Division on the first floor,
or by contacting the Circulars Division (Tel. No. 2 1 2 -7 2 0 -5 2 1 5 or 5 2 1 6 ). Questions regarding
Regulation

B

may

be

directed

to

our Compliance

Exam inations

Department

2 1 2 -7 2 0 -5 9 1 4 ).




W il l ia m

J.

M cD o nough,

President.

(Tel.

No.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
EQUAL CRED IT OPPORTUNITY
Amendments to Regulation B

(Effective D ecem ber 14, 1993; com pliance optional until June 14, 1994)

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, m ost ot which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 IT.S.C. 15t0.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sok t by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices ot
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

12 CFR Part 202

DATES: E ffective date.
1993.

December 14,

C om pliance date. Compliance is
optional until June 14,1994.
FOR FURTHER4NFORMATOW CONTACT:

Michael Bylsma, Senior Attorney, or
Jane Ahrens, Jane Gell or Mary Jane
Seebach, Staff Attorneys, at (202) 4523667; for the hearing impaired only,
contact Dorothea Thompson,
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
(TDD), at (202) 452-3544, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington. DC 20551.

[R egulation B; Docket No. R-0782]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Equal Credit Opportunity; Appraisals
and Enforcement

(1) Background

The Equal Credit Opportunity Act
(ECOA), 15 U-S.C. 1691-1691£, makes it
unlawful for creditors to discriminate in
any aspect of a credit transaction on the
SUMMARY: The Board is adopting a final
basis of gender, marital status, race,
rule revising Regulation B to implement national origin, color, religion, age
amendments to the Equal Credit
(provided the applicant has the capacity
Opportunity Act contained in the
to contract), because all or part of an
Federal Deposit In s u ra n c e Corpora*km
applicant’s income derives from any
Improvement Act of 1991. The law
public assistance, or because an
provides credit applicants with a right
applicant has in good faith exercised
to receive copies of appraisal reports.
any right under the Consumer Credit
Regulation B is amended to provide
Protection Act, 15 U.S.C, 1601 el seq.
alternative methods of compliance with The ECOA also provides that a credit
the law. Creditors may automatically
applicant has the right to obtain a
provide a copy of an appraisal report to written statement of reasons for a denial
all applicants for certain dwellingof crediL The Board is authorized to
secured loans, or they may provide a
prescribe rules that in its judgment are
copy upon the applicant's request
necessary or proper to effectuate the
(subject to other provisions in the final
purposes of the ECOA, to prevent
rule). For creditors that do not
circumvention or evasion of the act, or
automatically provide copies of
to facilitate or substantiate compliance
appraisal reports, the regulation
with the act. The act is implemented by
includes limits on when an applicant
the Board’s Regulation B, 12 CFR part
may request (and a creditor must
202. A staff commentary to the
provide) a copy of an appraisal report,
regulation, 12 CFR pert 202 Supp. k
and a requirement that applicants be
applies and interprets the requirements
notified of the right to receive a copy.
of Regulation B.
The final rule applies to applications for
The Federal Deposit Insurance
credit to be secured by a Hem on a
Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
residential structure containing one-to(FDICIA) was enacted Into law in
four family units.
Board o f Governors o f the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:

[Enc. Cir. No. 10679]




December 1991 (Pub. L. 102-242,105
Stat. 2236). Section 223 of the FDICIA
contains amendments to the ECOA that
took effect on the date the law was
enacted. The law requires creditors to
furnish applicants, upon written
request, with a copy of an appraisal
report used in connection with an
application fora loan secured by
residential real property. The law
provides that creditors may require the
applicant to reimburse the creditor for
the cost of the appraisal. The law also
expands the enforcement activities of
the federal financial supervisory
agencies when information about
possible violations of the ECOA
becomes known. The law specifies
when the Department of Justice (DOJ)
must be contacted regarding suspected
violations of the ECOA, and when the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) must be notified of
suspected violations of the ECOA that
may also be violations of the Pair
Housing Act (FHAX
On December 7,1992, the Board
published a proposed rule to implement
the FDICIA amendments to the ECOA
(57 FR 57697). The Board received
nearly 240 comment letters on the
proposal, mostly from institutions that
would be covered by the regulation. A
number o f commenters raised concerns
about the burden and costs the new
requirements would impose. Many
commenters raised specific questions
about various provisions in the
proposal. The Board has responded to
many of those concerns by adopting
both substantive sod technical changes
to the proposal.
A creditor's duty to provide
appraisals upon request began on
December 19,1991. Creditors must
begin complying with the regulation's
requirements on June 6,1994, which
allows institutions to familiarize
themselves with the rule, prepare
disclosures, and train personnel

(2) Regulatory Provisions

with the law. For example, some
industry commenters suggested that
“residential real property” could be
Section 701(e) of the ECOA requires a interpreted to indude only one- to fourcreditor promptly to furnish an
unit dwellings, while others thought the
applicant, upon a written request made term could be interpreted to include all
within a reasonable period of time of the dwellings.
application, a copy of the appraisal
Based on the comments received and
report used in connection with a loan
upon further analysis, the Board is
that is or would have been secured by
adopting a rule that defines and
a lien on residential real property. The
interprets the key terms and text of
Board proposed to implement the
section 701(e) of the ECOA. The Board
appraisal provision by defining the
believes a consistent understanding
scope of residential real property;
among creditors and consumers alike
imposing time limitations for applicants about the law, including which loans
to request copies of appraisals and for
trigger the duty to provide appraisal
creditors to provide copies; and
reports and what information comprises
requiring creditors to provide a written
an appraisal report, will ease
notice to credit applicants of their right compliance, avoid conflict and potential
to obtain copies of appraisal reports
liability, and effectuate the purposes of
upon written request. These rules were
the ECOA.
proposed to minimize the potential for
Section 202.5a—Rules on Providing
civil liability (due to the uncertainty of
the scope of the law) and to aid uniform Appraisal Reports
S co p e o f coverage. Section 701(e) of
and objective assessments of creditors’
the ECOA provides that the right to
compliance with the ECOA in an
obtain a copy of an appraisal report
examination by federal enforcement
applies to an application for credit that
agencies.
In addition to soliciting comment on
is or would have been secured by a lien
the specific provisions of the proposal,
on residential real property. The term
“residential real property” is not
the Board solicited comment on two
alternative approaches to implementing defined in the statute. In the proposed
the ECOA appraisal provision: (1)
rule, the Board defined the scope of
Incorporating the text of section 701(e)
coverage to be credit applications,
into Regulation B without elaboration,
regardless of their purpose (whether
or (2) interpreting and defining only a
business or consumer purpose), that are
to be secured by a dwelling. A
few key terms found in section 701(e)
“dwelling” was defined as a one- to
(such as the scope of the law) in the
f o u r -u n it r e s i d e n t i a l s t r u c t u r e . T h e
regulation.
Of the 240 commenters,
proposed coverage included loans to be
approximately a dozen favored adopting secured by mobile homes and
only the statutory text or not
individual cooperative units, whether or
incorporating the statutory provision
not such dwellings are considered real
into the regulation at all, suggesting that property under state law, and excluded
self-regulation would be adequate to
loans to be secured by land only.
ensure compliance. Most commenters
Coverage would not have been limited
favored defining and interpreting terms to first-lien transactions.
In response to the comments received
in the regulation. Most commenters also
and upon further analysis, the Board is
made specific suggestions and raised
adopting the scope of coverage as
questions about the proposed
proposed. The definition of dwelling
regulation.
The commenters favoring precise
that was included in the proposal has
rules (including financial institutions
been adopted. The definition includes
and community representatives) argued mobile homes and individual
that it would help creditors by clarifying cooperative units, whether or not they
how to comply with the amendments,
are considered real property under state
and help credit applicants by ensuring
law, to ensure that the coverage of
that they are treated consistently,
residential appraisals is not limited by
regardless of the creditor from whom
property classification. The Board notes
they seek credit.
that this definition is consistent with
The Board believes, in light of the
the definition of dwelling contained in
volume and variety of issues raised in
§ 202.13(a).
comments regarding the scope of
In general, most commenters
coverage, timing, and other statutory
supported the proposed rule’s coverage
terms, that merely incorporating the text of dwellings containing one to four
of section 701(e) could produce widely
units and opposed any broadening
inconsistent approaches by creditors
beyond that. Several commenters
(and even regulators) to compliance
supported expanding the coverage of the
Right to A pp ra isal Report




2

regulation to include all dwellings, no
matter how many units a dwelling
comprises. They stated that
discriminatory practices in residential
appraisals can include
“underappraising” a multifamily
building based on the characteristics of
the residents of the building or of the
neighborhood in which it is located.1
Tne Board believes that extending the
coverage of the appraisal requirements
to include multifamily dwellings could
impose a significant burden on
institutions which could outweigh the
benefits to consumers. Such coverage,
for example, would extend the right to
receive a copy of an appraisal report to
developers of multifamily properties,
who generally were not identified by the
Congress as experiencing lending
discrimination through the appraisal
process or as having difficulty in
receiving copies of appraisals.
Nevertheless, while the final rule does
not cover multifamily dwellings,
creditors are reminded that the rules
prohibiting discrimination under
Regulation B are applicable to
transactions involving multifamily
dwellings (as are the provisions of the
Fair Housing Act). For example, the
regulation prohibits a creditor from
denying an application for credit to be
secured by an apartment building based
on the race or national origin of the
applicant, or of the tenants in the
building (or the neighborhood in which
it is located). Furthermore, the Board
w i ll m o n i t o r c o m p l a i n t s a n d

information obtained through the
examination process about loan denials
in connection with multifamily
properties. If the Board has reason to
believe that applicants for multifamily
loans are not receiving copies of
appraisal reports upon request (or are
experiencing discrimination), it may
consider broadening the coverage of
§ 202.5a.
Some commenters opposed the
coverage of transactions secured by a
consumer’s dwelling that are for a
business purpose, such as loans to start
a small business. These commenters
discussed the potential difficulty in
training commercial loan staff to comply
with the new requirements, particularly
1Some commenters referred to a recent settlement
of litigation (G reen v. A v e n u e B an k o f O a k P ark),
approved by a federal district court in Illinois, as
an indication that credit on multifamily properties
could be denied based on redlining and
underappraLsaLs. This lawsuit involved allegations
that a loan officer's assessment of the value of a
multifamily property— based on his perceptions
about conditions in the low-income neighborhood
where it was located— was used to deny a mortgage
application, although no formal appraisal was
made.

if a notice is required to be given to all
applicants. The statute does not exempt
applications for business loans secured
by residential real property from the
right to obtain a copy of an appraisal
report, and nothing in the legislative
history suggests that coverage should be
so limited. Further, business-purpose
loans presently are subject to Regulation
B and its requirements to provide
notices about the action taken on an
application. Therefore, the Board
believes that the requirements of
§ 202.5a can be readily incorporated
into existing procedures—particularly
since, as described below, the notice
requirement for appraisal reports may
be incorporated into other commonly
used documents or required notices.
The burden on institutions by extending
the right to receive a copy of an
appraisal report to both consumer- and
business-purpose loans secured by a
dwelling will be minimized in the final
rule, because multifamily dwellings are
not covered.
D efinition o f appraisal report. The
statute does not define an appraisal
report; however, the legislative history
suggests that it is the complete appraisal
report signed by the appraiser,
including all information submitted to
the lender by the appraiser for the
purpose of determining the value of
residential property. The proposed
definition was based on the legislative
history, and stated that an appraisal
report referred to the documents relied
upon by a creditor in evaluating the
market value of residential property
containing one-to-four family units on
which a lien will be taken as collateral
for an extension of credit, including
reports prepared by the creditor. The
proposal stated that an appraisal report
would not be limited to reports
prepared by third parties
Tne final rule provides the same
meaning for an appraisal report as was
proposed, but the definition has been
shortened for clarity. A consumer who
requests a copy of the appraisal report
will be entitled to receive a copy of any
third party appraisal that has been
performed. For consistency with the
rules implementing the prohibitions of
the Fair Housing Act on discrimination
in apprising residential real property,
an appraisal report includes all written
comments and other documents
submitted to the creditor in support of
the appraiser1* estimate or opinion of
value. (See 24 CFR 100.135(b).)
The "appraisal report” does not
include copies of “review appraisals,”
agency-issued statements of appraised
value, or any interna) documents if a
third party appraisal report was used to




establish the value of the security. Even
when a third party appraisal has been
performed, however, a consumer
requesting a copy of the report also must
receive a copy of documents that reflect
the creditor’s valuation of the dwelling
when that valuation is different from
that stated in the third party appraisal
report. Such documents would include
staff appraisals or other notes indicating
why the value assigned by the third
party appraiser is not the appropriate
valuation.
The right to receive a copy of an
appraisal report provided under
Regulation B includes, but is not limited
to, transactions in which appraisals by
a licensed or certified appraiser are
required by federal law. ff the value of
the dwelling has been determined by
the creditor and a third party appraiser
has not been used, the appraisal report
would be the report of the creditor’s
staff appraiser, where applicable, or theother documents of the creditor which
assign value to the dwelling.
A lternative M eans o f C om pliance

1. Paragraph (a)(1)—Routine Delivery
The proposal provided that creditors
routinely giving copies of appraisal
reports to all applicants, whether credit
is grunted or denied, would not be
subject to the proposed timing
requirements las providing an applicant
with a notice of the right to receive a
copy of an appraisal report. However,
the proposal also provided that such
creditors would remain subject to the
proposed timing rules for responding (o
a written request for a report, if the
request was made prior to the time the
creditor routinely provided it.
In response to comments received and
upon further analysis, the Board is
adopting a final rule that differs from
the proposal. Paragraph (a)(1) of the
final role provides that a creditor may
comply with the law by routinely giving
each applicant a copy of the appraisal
report (whether credit is granted or
denied or the application is withdrawn).
Creditors that routinely provide copies
when the appraisal is completed, or
later in the application process (for
example, when notice is given of action
taken on the application), will be in
compliance with the regulation. A
creditor complying with the law
pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) is exempt
from the requirements of paragraph
(a)(2), the notice and timing rules. The
Board believes this approach will
provide consumer benefits, simplify the
regulation, and substantially ease the
compliance burden for creditors.

3

2. Paragraph (a)(2)—Upon Request
The requirements are more detailed
for creditors who provide a copy of an
appraisal report only upon the written
request of the applicant:
T im e w hen requ ests m ust b e m ade.

The law provides that an applicant must
make a request "within a reasonable
period of time of the application.” The
legislative history states thata
reasonable period1of time depends on a
balancing of factors, such as how long
lenders routinely maintain loan fifes
and how long a loan applicant might
need to identify and act upon suspected
discrimination.
The Board proposed that applicants
must make written requests for an
appraisal report no later than 90 days
after receiving the notice from the
creditor. The Board’s proposal noted
that the 90-day period for requesting an
appraisal report could be viewed as too
short, given the regulation’s
requirements for keeping records and
the statute of limitations for filing an
ECOA lawsuit.2 The Board stated the
belief that the proposed 90day time
limit would reasonably tie the period in
which an appraisal report must be
requested close to the period in which
the applicant would be likely to request
it, and in which the creditor likely
would still have the files “on sitei”
Most commenters supported the
proposed 90-day period, stating that it
was a reasonable interpretation of the
statute, which did not specify any
period. Some commenters
recommended that requests be required
to be made in a shorter period of rime,
such as within 30 to 60 days of the date
the consumer receives the notice of
action taken on the application. The
commenters argued that fifes may not be
maintained in the creditor’s office for 9 0
days, for example, if the loan is to be
sold or if the files are transferred to
another location. Some of the
cornraenters questioned whether the
valuation contained in the appraisal
would have a similarly short “useful
life” when market conditions cause
property values to change frequently.
Other coimnenters opposed the
proposal and urged the adoption of a
time period for appraisal requests that is
uniform with the ZS-month record
retention requirements in § 202.12 (12
2 An aggrieved applicant may file suit far an
alleged ECOA vkrtalhm up ftr two rears from Hie
date of tho afleged rw faBao . FWtiwcimre. ander
§202.12 of Regulation B, creditors are required to
maintain lo ss ttie* fo« up to 2S month* tl2 months
for bwsinaes cmdit) from the time they pvovRio the
appfecaat uritfc a notice o ith o actio * takas on the
application os » notice oitocora pi— —
provided in § 2S2.S.

months for business loans). These
commenters believed that such a
requirement would not impose a much
greater burden than already exists since
the appraisal must be maintained with
the other records used in evaluating the
application. Additionally, some
coirsmenters noted that a shorter time
period for requesting appraisal reports
than for retaining records could mean
that appraisal reports could only be
obtained through litigation, unless the
institution voluntarily provided the
report after lha* time.
Based on the comments and its
analysis, the Board is adopting the 90day time period that was proposed. The
statutory language indicates an
expectation that the period for request
should be reasonably dose in time to
the application. The 90-day rule should
provide applicants the right to request a
copy oi the appraisal report during the
time they are most likely to be
interested in receiving it—around the
time the application has been made and
the appraisal has been conducted and
paid for. A 90-day period also should
not present significant compliance
difficulties, especially since the final
rule provides greater flexibility in how
soon the report must be provided
following a request.
Tim e w hen appraisal reports m ust be
p ro v id ed . The law also states that a

creditor must “promptly’* furnish a
copy of the appraisal report- The Board
proposed requiring the creditor to
provide a copy of the report within 15
days of receiving a written request or
within 15 days at obtaining an appraisal
report, whichever occurs later. While
many commenters on this provision
thought that the 15-day period was a
reasonable interpretation of the statute,
many other commenters recommended
a longer period (with most suggesting a
30-day period). These commenters
believed a longer time was necessary for
lenders who do not maintain loan files
in their office. After consideration of the
public comments, the Board has revised
the proposal to provide greater
flexibility in the final rule. The
regulation does not set a specific time
by which an appraisal report must be
provided. Instead, the regulation
requires creditors to provide copies of
appraisal reports “promptly,” which it
states will be 30 days, but which may
be longer in exceptional circumstances.
S o m e c o m m e n te r s req u e ste d th a t th e
B o a rd c la rify th a t th e tim in g ru le a p p ly
o n ly a fte r th e la test o f th re e e v e n ts : th e
re q u e st, r e c e ip t o f th e a p p ra isa l by th e
le n d e r, a n d th e a p p lic a n t’s
re im b u rs e m e n t o f th e c r e d ito r for th e
c o s t o f th e a p p ra isa l. T h e B o a rd ag rees




that this is the appropriate way to
measure the time after which the
creditor must “promptly” provide a
copy of the report, and the final rule
clarifies this.
N o tic e o f Right to Copy o f A ppraisal

The amendments to ECOA do not
specify that creditors shall notify
applicants of their right to receive a
copy of the appraisal report. The Board
proposed that applicants for credit to be
secured by a dwelling should be
provided a written notice of their right
to receive a copy of the appraisal report.
This notice generally was to be given no
later than 15 days after the creditor
received the application. In proposing
the notice requirement, the Board noted
the Congress’s belief that access to
appraisal reports might help in
detecting credit discrimination
associated with the appraisal of
property. The Board also noted that the
notice would be particularly important
to applicants if there has been a lender
practice of not making appraisals
available to applicants.
Most commenters opposed the
proposed notice requirement because of
the additional paperwork burden that it
would impose and the fact that the
Congress did not require it. Some
commenters opposed the notice
requirement on the general grounds that
the cumulative effect of disclosure rules
is to overburden the industry. At the
other end of the spectrum, a few
commenters including a state consumer
protection agency recommended that
the final regulations require notification
to all applicants and a second notice to
applicants whose loans are denied.
W h i l e t h e n o t i c e w o u l d i m p o s e some
burden, the Board believes that it is
outweighed by the consumer benefit
from receiving the notice. If the
notification were to be included on
notices of action taken on a consumer’s
loan application (required by Regulation
B), Trutn in Lending disclosures, or on
application or other forms (instead of
creating a separate disclosure), the
compliance costs would be limited to
the one-time incremental cost of
revising documents to add the notice.
A fte r re v ie w o f th e p u b lic c o m m e n ts ,
th e B o a rd b e lie v e s g re a te r effect to th e
E C O A a p p ra is a l a m e n d m e n ts is
a c h ie v e d by req u irin g th at a p p lic a n ts be
n o tified o f th e ir rig h t to a c o p y o f th e
a p p ra isa l re p o rt, as p ro p o se d . In th e
B o a rd 's v ie w , it is im p o rta n t th at th is
m in im a l n o tic e be g iv en to a p p lic a n ts in
light o f th e C o n g re s s ’s c o n c e r n ab o u t
p o te n tia l d is c rim in a tio n in th e a p p ra isa l
p ro c e s s . Ifcis a ls o im p o rta n t to n o tify all
c o n s u m e r s o f th e ir sta tu to ry rig h t to a

4

copy of their appraisal, given the
anecdotal evidence (confirmed by the
commenters) that appraisals previously
were not made available to applicants
upon request.3 Therefore, pursuant to
the Board's authority in section 703 of
the ECOA, creditors will be required to
provide all applicants with written
notice of the right to receive a copy of
the appraisal report. As stated above,
the notice need not be given by creditors
who automatically provide copies to all
applicants. To reduce the potential
paperwork burden of the notice
requirement, the Board will not require
that the notice be provided in a form the
consumer can keep, as was proposed.
Furthermore, in response to
commenters’ suggestions for flexibility
on timing, the rule would permit
creditors to provide this notice as early
as the time of application. They may
also provide the notice later, but not
later than at the time they notify an
applicant of the action they have taken
on the application. (Under § 202.9 of the
regulation, creditors must notify
applicants of their approval of,
counteroffer to, or adverse action on an
application within 30 days of receipt of
a completed application.) The notice
may be included on or with the adverse
action notice, the application, or other
documents.
R e im b u rs e m e n t. The statute permits a
creditor to require reimbursement from
the applicant for the cost of the
appraisal before a copy is provided.
Many commenters responded to the
Board’s request for information about
the fees that may be charged for a copy
of an appraisal. Most commenters that
addressed the issue stated that all or
part of the cost of having the appraisal
conducted is imposed on the applicant.
According to several commenters, no
other fees are imposed for providing a
copy of the appraisal report. Many
commenters who charge consumers for
having the appraisal performed asked
the Board to clarify whether fees for
providing a copy of the appraisal (for
example, copying fees and postage)
could be imposed following the
adoption of the final rule.

The statute permits the creditor to be
reimbursed for the cost of the appraisal
and the final rule reflects that. This
provision permits a creditor to require
the consumer to pay for the cost of the
appraisal prior to providing a copy.
"Reimbursement" would not be allowed
'In the proposal, the Board asked creditors
whether they currently provided appraisal reports
automatically. Nearly 30 commenters addressed the
issue. About ten of those stated they routinely
provide appraisal reports to consumers.

as a condition for providing a copy of
the appraisal if the fee has already been
paid by the consumer—for example, as
part of the application fee.
The final rule also permits the
creditor to require reimbursement of
photocopy and postage costs that are
incurred in providing the copy of the
report, unless prohibited by state or
other law.
Paragraph (b)— Credit U nions

The proposal excepted from the
requirements creditors that provide
appraisal reports pursuant to NCUA
regulations, in keeping with the
legislative history to the ECOA
amendments. (See S. Rep. No. 167 at
90.) The final rule exempts credit
unions from the provisions of § 202.5a
if they are subject to, and comply with,
the provisions of the NCUA regulations
relating to making appraisals available
upon request. 12 CFR 701.31(c)(5).
Section 202.14—Enforcement, Penalties,
and Liabilities
Paragraph (b)— Penalties and Liabilities

The Board proposed that changes
made to section 706 of the ECOA by
FDICIA be incorporated into Regulation
B. The language of the final rule differs
slightly from the proposed text for
clarity, but the meaning is unchanged;
federal financial supervisory agencies
must refer suspected pattern and
practice discrimination cases to the DOJ.
In addition, the agencies must notify
HUD when they have reason to believe
violations of the ECOA have occurred
that may also constitute violations of the
FHA, unless the matter has been
referred to the DOJ.

wants to give applicants the option to
call and leave their name and the
address to which an appraisal report
should be sent, the creditor may modify
the notice accordingly. The reference in
the proposed model form to telephone
requests for a copy of the appraisal
report has been deleted, however, to
respond to comments expressing
concern that it could be viewed as
requiring telephone requests to be
honored. In addition, for brevity, the
model form has been revised to
eliminate the reference to reimbursing
creditors for the cost of the appraisal
and copies of the report (although such
a reference may be included with the
notice).
(3) Economic Impact Statement
The Board’s Division of Research and
Statistics has prepared an economic
impact statement on the proposed
revisions to Regulation B. A copy of the
analysis may be obtained from
Publications Services, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, DC 20551, at (202)
452-3245.

(4) Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507 of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980
(44 U.S.C. 35; 5 CFR 1320.13), the
proposed information collection was
reviewed by the Board under the
authority delegated to it by the Office of
Management and Budget after
considering comments received during
the public comment period.
A number of commenters believed
that complying with the proposal would
place significant paperwork burdens on
institutions, particularly small
institutions. Some expressed concern
Appendix C—Sample Disclosure Forms about the volume ana variety of
A sample disclosure notice, Form C- disclosures provided to consumers for
9, has been added to Appendix C.
credit transactions secured by
Proper use of this form satisfies
residential real property, and the
compliance with § 202.5a of Regulation potential for consumer confusion.
A few commenters reacted to the
B. Creditors may design their own form,
specific burden estimates that appeared
or add to or modify the model form, to
in the proposal. They believed that the
reflect their individual policies and
estimates underreported the burden,
procedures. For example, if a creditor

Aged, Banks, Banking, Civil rights,
Credit, Marital status discrimination,
Penalties, Religious discrimination,




R eport title: Recordkeeping and

Disclosure Requirements in
Connection with Regulation B (Equal
Credit Opportunity)
R eport n u m b er: Not applicable
OMB docket n u m b er: 7100-0201
F req u en cy : As needed
R eporters: State member banks
Estimated time
per response
(minutes)

125,000
625,000

10
.25

Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sex discrimination.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, and pursuant to authority

5

P roposed Inform ation Collection

Number of
records sub­
ject to require­
ment
Appraisal report upon request ........................
Notice of right to appraisal.............................

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 202

particularly the time associated with
responding to requests for copies of
appraisal reports. The commenters
questioned whether institutions
typically could retrieve and review files,
then copy and send appraisal reports in
5 minutes, as proposed.
In response to these comments, the
Board has adjusted the burden estimates
that were made in the proposal by
increasing the estimated time needed to
respond to requests for appraisal
reports.
The requirements will apply to both
large and small mortgage lenders. The
impact on small creditors will depend
upon whether lenders provide
appraisals as a matter of course. The
model disclosure form in the regulation
will somewhat ease compliance burdens
on the lenders. In addition, lenders that
regularly provide appraisal reports to
applicants (whether the loan is
approved or denied) need not comply
with the notice requirement of the
regulation.
The following information shout
paperwork burden relates only to the
effect of the proposal on state member
banks of the Federal Reserve System.
Lenders that are subject to Regulation B
other than state member banks are
supervised by other Federal agencies.
For purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, these agencies will
report their own estimates of the
paperwork burden imposed by the new
ECOA requirement.
The Board estimates that the
disclosure requirement will result in an
annual reporting burden of about 23,000
hours for state member banks.

-

Estimated total
number of
hours of an­
nual reporting
burden
20,800
2,600

granted in 15 U.S.C 1691b of the ECOA,
the Board amends 12 CFR part 202 as
follows:

reimbursement from the applicant tor
the report, whichever is last to occur. A
creditor need not provide a copy when
the applicant’s request is received more
The authority citation for part 202
than 90 days after the creditor has
continues to read as follows:
provided notice of action taken on the
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1691-169lf.
application under § 202.9 of this part or
90 days after the application is
2. Section 202.1 is amended by
withdrawn.
revising the last sentence of paragraph
(b) Credit unions. A creditor that is
(b) to read as follows:
subject to the regulations of the National
$ 202.1 Authority, scope, and purpose.
Credit Union Administration on making
*
*
*
*
*
copies of appraisals available is not
(b) * * * The regulation also requires
subject to this section.
(c) D efinitions. For purposes of
creditors to notify applicants of action
paragraph (a) of this section, the term
taken on their applications: to report
dw elling means a residential structure
credit history in the names of both
spouses on an account; to retain records that contains one to four units whether
or not that structure is attached to real
of credit applications; to collect
property. The term includes, but is not
information about the applicant's race
limited to, an individual condominium
and other personal characteristics in
applications for certain dwelling-related or cooperative unit, and a mobile or
other manufactured home. The term
loans; and to provide applicants with
appraisal report means the document(s)
copies of appraisal reports used in
relied upon by a creditor in evaluating
connection with credit transactions.
the value of the dwelling.
3. Section 202.5a is added to read as
4.
Section 202.14 is amended by
follows:
revising paragraph (b)(3) and by adding
$ 202.5a Rules on providing appraisal
paragraphs (b)(4) and (b)(5) to read as
reports.
follows:
(a) Providing appraisals. A creditor
shall provide a copy of the appraisal
§ 202.14 Enforcem ent, penalties and
report used in connection with an
lia b ilitte a .
application for credit that is to be
*
*
*
*
*
secured by a lien on a dwelling. A
creditor shall comply with either
(b) Penalties a nd liabilities. * * *
*
*
*
*
paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section. *
(1) flout/ne delivery. A creditor may
(3 ) If an agency responsible for
routinely provide a copy of the
administrative enforcement is unable to
appraisal report to an applicant
obtain compliance with the act or this
(whether credit is granted or denied or
part, it may refer the matter to the
the application is withdrawn).
Attorney General of the United States.
(2) Upon request. A creditor that does In addition, if the Board, the
not routinely provide appraisal reports
Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal
shall provide a copy upon an
Deposit Insurance Corporation, the
applicant’s written request.
Office of Thrift Supervision, or the
(i) N otice. A creditor that provides
National Credit Union Administration
appraisal reports only upon request
has reason to believe that one or more
shall notify an applicant m writing of
creditors engaged in a pattern or
the right to receive a copy of an
practice of discouraging or denying
appraisal report. The notice may be
applications in violation of the act or
given at any time during the application this part, the agency shall refer the
process but no later than when the
matter to the Attorney General.
creditor provides notice of action taken Furthermore, the agency may refer a
under § 202.9 of this part. The notice
matter to the Attorney General if the
shall specify that the applicant’s request agency has reason to believe that one or
must be in writing, give the creditor's
more creditors violated section 701(a) of
mailing address, and state the time for
the act.
making the request as provided in
(4) On referral, or whenever the
paragraph (a)(2Kii) of this section.
Attorney General has reason to believe
[ii\ D elivery. A creditor shall mail or
that one or more creditors engaged in a
deliver a copy of the appraisal report
pattern or practice in violation of the act
promptly (generally within 30 days)
after the creditor receives an applicant’s or this regulation, the Attorney General
request, receives the report, or receives may bring a civil action for such relief
PART 202— EQUAL CREDIT
OPPORTUNITY (REGULATION B)




6

as may be appropriate, including actual
and punitive damages and injunctive
relief.
(5)
If the Board, the Comptroller of tin
Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurant:*
Corporation, the Office of Thrift
Supervision, or the National Credit
Union Administration has reason to
believe (as a result of a consumer
complaint, conducting a consumer
compliance examination, or otherwise)
that a violation of the act or this part ha:
occurred which is also a violation of the
Fair Housing Act, and the matter is not
referred to the Attorney General, the
agency shall notify:
(i) The Secretary of Housing and
Urban Development; and
(ii) The applicant that the Secretary o
Housing and Urban Development has
been notified and that remedies for the
violation may be available under the
Fair Housing Act.
*
*
*
*
*
5.
Appendix C to Part 202 is amended
in the first paragraph of the introductioi
by revising the first sentence and addinj
a sentence at the end; in the last
paragraph of the introduction by adding
a sentence at the end: and by adding
sample Form C-9 to read as follows:
Appendix C to P art 202—Sample
Notification Forms
T h is ap p e n d ix c o n ta in s nin e sam p le
n o tificatio n form s. * • • F o rm C - 9 is
designed fo r use in n o tifyin g an a p p lic a n t of
th e right to re ce iv e a c o p y o f an ap p raisal
u n d er § 2 0 2 .5 a .
*

*

*

*

*

* * * P rop er u se o f Fo rm C - 9 w ill satisfy
the req u irem en ts o f § 2 0 2 .5 a o f th is part.
*
*
*
*
*
F o rm C - 9 — S am p le D isclosu re o f Right to
R eceive a C o p y o f an A p p raisal
Y o u h av e th e righ t to a c o p y o f th e
ap p raisal rep o rt u sed in c o n n e c tio n w ith
y o u r a p p lica tio n for c r e d i t If y o u w ish a
co p y , p lease w rite to u s at th e m ailin g
ad d ress w e h a v e p ro v id ed . W e m u st h e a r
from yo u n o la te r th an 9 0 d ay s after w e notii
yo u ab o u t th e a c tio n tak en on y o u r c re d it
a p p lica tio n o r yo u w ith d raw y o u r
a p p licatio n .
(In y o u r letter, give us the follo w in g
in fo rm atio n :)
B y o rd e r o f the B o ard o f G o vern ors o f the
F e d e ra l R eserve System . D ecem b er 9 . 1 9 9 3 .
W illia m W . W iles,

Secretary o f th e B o a rd .
[FR D o c 9 3 - 3 0 5 3 6 F ile d 1 2 - 1 5 - 9 3 ; 8 :4 5 am
M in t;

coot 82-te-ot-a