Full text of Federal Open Market Committee Meeting Minutes, Transcripts, and Other Documents : Meeting, September 29, 1998 : Greenbook Part 1

View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Prefatory Note

The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version
available based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was
created through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned versions
text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was employed, some
imperfections may remain.
Please note that this document may contain occasional gaps in the text. These
gaps are the result of a redaction process that removed information obtained on a
confidential basis. All redacted passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic format. All
scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced tilting) and lightly
cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other blemishes caused after initial
printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optimal character recognition computer program (OCR) first
created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive, staff checked
and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and tables were not
reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.

Strictly Confidential (FR) Class II FOMC

Part 1

September 23, 1998

CURRENT ECONOMIC
AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS

Summary and Outlook

Prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee
by the staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Strictly Confidential (FR) Class II FOMC

September 23, 1998

SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

Prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee
by the staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Domestic Developments
Overview
The recent performance of the U.S. economy has not differed greatly from what we
anticipated in the August Greenbook. Real GDP has evidently risen moderately in the
third quarter. Domestic final demand appears still to be relatively robust, but
manufacturing activity continues to be restrained by a deteriorating trade balance and
by efforts to curb non-motor vehicle inventory accumulation. Labor markets have
remained extremely tight overall, while indicators of inflation trends continue to be
mixed.
But this has been a far from placid time. Indeed, the intermeeting period has
been marked by financial tumult of such a magnitude as to significantly alter the
outlook for the economy. Given the lags in the response of domestic demand to these
shocks, the effects are not really apparent in the very near term path for real GDP, but
they leave a considerable mark on the projected strength of activity in 1999. A deeper
retrenchment in U.S. stock markets, more cautious credit provision, and more serious
disruptions to economic growth abroad are now expected to combine to produce a
sharper deceleration in output than we predicted in August: After rising at an annual
rate of about 2-1/2 percent on average in the current half-year, real GDP is projected
to increase just 1-1/4 percent over the four quarters of 1999. This pushes the
unemployment rate up about 3/4 percentage point by the end of next year.
The outlook for aggregate demand would be still weaker had we not changed
our monetary policy assumption. We have set aside our previous assumption of a
stable federal funds rate and have instead anticipated that the System will ease money
market conditions appreciably between now and next spring. The lower path for the
federal funds rate exerts a significant influence on the trajectory of the economy in the
latter half of 1999 and in 2000. With this Greenbook, we have extended our forecast
through 2000 for the first time. The Fed easing, along with a diminishing drag from
the external sector, helps to restore real GDP growth by the second half of 2000 to
around the assumed 2-3/4 percent trend of potential output, stabilizing the jobless rate
a touch below 5-1/2 percent.
The incoming information on labor cost trends has been ambiguous. However,
we continue to think that compensation increases probably are flattening this year and
will fall off some in 1999--reflecting not only the effects of weaker profits and of
slower business expansion on commissions and bonuses but, more generally, the
favorable trend of price expectations. Consumer prices have been held down this year

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

by the declining costs of oil and other materials, but in coming months, energy prices
should turn up a bit, and the softening of the dollar on foreign exchange markets
should lead to the firming of import prices. Thus, we continue to project a pickup in
overall CPI inflation from just over 1-1/2 percent in the twelve months that ended in
August to around 2 percent during 1999 and 2000.
Key Background Factors
As noted above, we have changed our monetary policy assumption this round, in
anticipation of an appreciable decline in the federal funds rate between now and next
spring. We chose the timing and dimension of the easing steps with an eye to
bolstering demand enough that real GDP would again be rising at a moderate rate
toward the end of the projection period and to preventing the unemployment rate from
moving above our notional NAIRU. The assumed decline in the funds rate appears to
be in the vicinity of what the market currently is anticipating.
In the August Greenbook, we indicated that the prevailing 5-1/2 percent funds
rate would have been thought to be fairly restrictive were it not for the financial
stimulus associated with a high stock market and aggressive lending. Those conditions
have clearly changed in the intervening period. Even with monetary policy easing, we
do not see financial markets returning to their previous accommodative state. Market
participants will likely be licking their wounds for a while, and they will have to
contend with an ongoing flow of sour economic news over the coming months.
That news will no doubt include negative reports on corporate profitability that
should weigh on the stock market, where current expectations of earnings and notions
of "normal" investment returns still seem out of touch with reality. Under the
circumstances, we expect that major share price averages will slip back to the recent
lows before staging a minimal recovery that begins next spring. This may still be a
conservative prediction: In our projection, corporate profits decline 5-1/2 percent over
1999 before rebounding 4 percent in 2000. Consequently, price-earnings multiples
will remain high by historical standards, leaving the market vulnerable to a
considerably greater correction. As in the last Greenbook, we have chosen to address
that downside risk through an alternative scenario using a model simulation described
at the end of this section.
The shakiness of business conditions over the next several quarters is likely to
affect credit markets along with the equity sector. Risk spreads on corporate bonds
have widened dramatically in recent weeks--indeed, by more than would seem
explicable by a reasoned reassessment of default risks per se. Rather, hit by losses

Domestic Developments

initially on "submerging" market investments and on other leveraged trading strategies,
many of the players have sought to reduce their risk exposures; in the process, the
corporate sector has been the victim of collateral damage, so to speak We foresee
some narrowing of corporate bond spreads as market participants regain their footing,
but we do not expect them to approach the negligible risk premiums that prevailed
before. On balance, given the greater economic adversities in this forecast and the
renewed awareness of risk, we are anticipating a greater degree of restraint in private
credit supplies than was built into our previous forecast--not only in the corporate
bond markets but also in bank lending to businesses and, to a much lesser degree, to
consumers.
We are assuming that after next spring, the federal funds rate will be steady
through 2000. Given that the expectation of Fed easing is now so strongly held, we
do not foresee much, if any, further decline in Treasury yields beyond the very short
end. The yield curve should steepen as prospects for a pickup in economic activity
are seen to improve and expectations regarding subsequent Fed action become neutral.
On balance, we do not expect, over the next couple of years, to see any major
departures in longer-term Treasury interest rates from the range established in the
intermeeting period--but yields on higher-risk private bonds should come down a little
as risk spreads narrow.
The dollar has depreciated substantially against the yen and key Continental
currencies since the last FOMC meeting, but it has declined less in real terms as
measured by our broad index of 29 foreign currencies. On this broader basis, we are
projecting a 1 percent decline on the dollar in the fourth quarter as the Federal
Reserve eases monetary policy. Thereafter, the broad real dollar index trends
gradually lower--roughly 1 percent per year--over the remainder of the projection
period.
Weighing heavily on financial markets in recent weeks has been renewed
concern about the outlook for economic stability and growth in several parts of the
world. Relative to our previous forecast, the largest changes in the outlook for
foreign economic growth are in Latin America. However, we have also marked down
our projections for growth in other areas. Overall, we now expect a slight contraction
in foreign economic output over the second half of this year. We anticipate that, in
1999, continued weakness in output in Asia and in South America will hold growth of
foreign real GDP to less than 1-1/2 percent--around 3/4 percentage point below our
assumption in the August projection. We are expecting that, by 2000, foreign
economic growth will pick up to 2-1/2 percent.

Part 1: Summary and Outlook September 23, 1998

Over the past few months, OPEC and its allies appear to have been largely
successful in achieving the production cuts that they pledged to implement in late
June. As a result, progress has been made in reducing excess inventories of crude oil,
and world oil prices have firmed. The spot price of WTI crude should average about
$14.50 per barrel for September, and we expect it to climb somewhat above $16 per
barrel by the first quarter of next year--a little higher than at the beginning of this
year. Given prospects for world economic growth at the time of the August
Greenbook, we projected that oil prices would continue to move up a bit further over
the course of 1999. The current projection, however, embodies weaker world demand
next year, and in that context, we now think it more likely that prices of crude oil will
average $16 per barrel in 1999. We have assumed that oil prices will tick up to
$16.50 per barrel in 2000 because of the continued weakening of the dollar.
Although the President's predicament has introduced some new political
dynamics into the situation, the fiscal policy assumptions underlying our forecast have
not changed. We have assumed that there will be no government shutdown and that
efforts to push through some tax cuts or to raise spending above the caps will be
rebuffed.' The changed economic projection and stock market path have led us to
mark down our prediction for the federal budget surplus a bit. After reaching roughly
$68 billion in the fiscal year now ending, the surplus is expected to shrink to around
$56 billion in fiscal 1999, about $6 billion less than our August projection. For fiscal
2000, we expect the surplus to fall slightly, to $52 billion. This trajectory is less
favorable than that described by the CBO of late, and it may alter the rhetoric next
year regarding the use of future government surpluses.
Recent Developments and the Near-Term Outlook
We now expect that real GDP will increase at an annual rate of around 2-1/2 percent
in both the third and the fourth quarters--a projection marginally above that in the last
Greenbook. As before, domestic final demand is projected to remain relatively
strong--although not so strong as in the first half of the year: Domestic final sales are
expected to be up at an annual rate of 3-3/4 percent, on average, this quarter and next,
versus 6-3/4 percent during the first two quarters of the year. At the same time, we

1. A temporary extension of funding for government operations, through October 9, was passed by
the Congress last week. We assume that it will be signed and then followed by either another extension

or, eventually, a resolution of 1999 appropriations.
2. The surplus now reported for fiscal 1998 is lower than we had expected because recent figures
from OMB for September revealed losses from spectrum loans and higher expenditures for agricultural
programs as a result of low commodity prices.

Domestic Developments

Summary of the Near-Term Outlook
(Percent change at annual rate except as noted)
Measure

1998:Q2
BEA
Sept.

1998:Q3
Aug.
Sept.

1998:Q4
Aug.
Sept.

prel.

Real GDP
Private domestic final purchases
Personal consumption
Residential investment
Business fixed investment

1.6
7.6
5.8
14.8
12.6

1.9
7.4
5.9
15.5
12.7

2.2
3.3
3.6
8.5
-.6

2.6
3.4
3.5
10.9
.3

2.5
4.2
3.1
2.7
12.2

2.6
4.9
3.4
5.3
14.2

Government outlays for
consumption and investment

3.6

1.4

2.1

2.7

1.5

Change, billions of
chained (1992) dollars
-51.6
7.6
6.7
-8.2
-26.1
-20.7
-26.0
-45.9

-7.9
-30.2

- Inventory investment
Net exports

-52.3
-47.8

anticipate a further drag from net exports, although it is only half as large as during
the first two quarters of the year. We continue to anticipate that, while auto dealers
will be restocking, other nonfarm businesses will be offsetting that impulse to produce
by slowing their inventory investment from the unsustainable pace of the first half.
Real PCE is projected to rise at an annual rate of 3-1/2 percent in the third and
fourth quarters, versus 6 percent in the first half. For the current quarter, the story is
basically the drop-off in sales of new light motor vehicles owing to tight supplies and
a payback after the spring incentive programs ended; retail trade figures through
August point to another large increase in spending on other goods, and outlays for
services have likely remained on a strong uptrend. Although anecdotes of individuals
backing away from some discretionary purchases have already surfaced, we doubt that
the turmoil in financial markets and the apparent ebbing in consumer confidence have
much affected consumer demand in the aggregate to date. As we move through the
next few months, however, the decline in household wealth and the deterioration in
sentiment will likely hold spending in closer alignment with income trends than was
the case earlier this year.
Housing demand--buoyed by gains in employment, income, and wealth and by
the lowest interest rates on fixed-rate mortgages since 1993--also was robust this
summer. Housing starts jumped in July, as single-family starts climbed to an annual
rate of 1.30 million units and multifamily starts surged to more than 400,000 units.

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

Even given the favorable underlying conditions, the July figures looked a bit high, and
we were not surprised to see starts drop back in August to 1.25 million units for
singles and 370,000 for multis. We are looking for only a mild slackening in the pace
of starts in the near term. Shortages of construction workers in a number of localities,
along with the usual difficulties in obtaining building sites and regulatory clearances,
probably have led to a backlog of deferred starts; at the same time, demand indicators
have shown no significant softening yet, despite reports that some potential buyers
have backed off from purchases because of stock market losses. Applications for
loans for home purchase were still setting new highs through mid-September, and
mortgage rates have come down considerably over the past few weeks. A further
sharp increase in real residential investment expenditures is baked in the cake for the
third quarter (our estimate is about 11 percent, annual rate); given lags from starts to
construction, outlays will likely post a substantial, though smaller, advance in the fall
quarter.
The quarterly pattern of increases in business fixed investment is expected to
be uneven in the second half of the year. On average, the rise should be slower than
it was over the first half--owing in part to decelerating output and weakening cash
flow (especially in manufacturing). The flattening in BFI this quarter can be traced
partly to a drop-off in business purchases of light motor vehicles as a result of the GM
strikes; that drag should be reversed in the fourth quarter as supplies expand. Another
negative this quarter is the expected decline in deliveries of aircraft to domestic
buyers--a downswing that is mirrored in a pickup in aircraft exports. Otherwise,
domestic purchases of business equipment, at present, still appear to be growing
relatively rapidly, on balance. For nonresidential construction, we are projecting little
change in outlays during the second half of this year. Further work on office and
commercial projects should be a plus, but industrial building is falling, and the recent
firming in oil prices does not appear to have been sufficient to stem a slide in outlays
for domestic drilling structures.
July data on inventory investment in manufacturing and trade suggest that we
were on the right track in expecting that firms--apart from motor vehicle
distributors--would be trimming their rate of stock accumulation in the current quarter.
At the same time, the sharp step-up in production after the GM strikes appears likely
to yield a slight rise in vehicle inventories. On balance, the rate of nonfarm inventory
investment may be a little higher in this quarter than in the last, contributing
fractionally to the rise in real GDP. We expect a reversal of that contribution in the

Domestic Developments

fourth quarter, as a further slowing in non-vehicle inventory accumulation will bring
the rate of increase in total nonfarm stocks down to around 2-1/2 percent.
The decline in real net exports over the second half of this year is expected to
continue to be sizable, albeit about half as steep as in the first two quarters of the
year. Nonagricultural exports held up surprisingly well in July, but we expect them to
be falling for the remainder of the year. Net exports are projected to hold down the
increase in real GDP almost 1 percentage point in the third quarter and then around
1-1/4 percentage points in the fourth quarter.
After having posted an outsized increase in the second quarter, real federal
purchases should drop back a bit, on balance, during the second half of the year. Last
quarter's figures were boosted by a surge in defense expenditures, which made up for
the large decline that occurred in the first quarter. Real nondefense expenditures are
projected to remain flat. At the same time, we are anticipating a pickup in spending at
the state and local levels during the second half; preliminary numbers on construction
in July were weak, but we expect that, especially given the financial health of these
jurisdictions, expenditures will rise in coming months.
For a change, the incoming information from the labor market appears to line
up reasonably well with our reading of the spending indicators. Hiring has slowed
somewhat in recent months; private payroll gains averaged 180,000 per month in July
and August, down from more than 220,000 per month during the first half of the year.
The deceleration can be traced mainly to deeper cutbacks in manufacturing jobs.
However, the recent low level of claims for unemployment benefits suggests that labor
demand is hardly crumbling, and we are projecting only a gradual moderation in
payroll growth over the remainder of the year.
Firms still have a good number of unfilled positions that they may seek to fill
despite increased concerns about the business outlook. Complaints about shortages of
workers remain numerous, and firms may not want to pass up opportunities to hire
until activity deteriorates convincingly. If anything, the reports in the latest Beige
Book suggest that more firms may be hiking pay substantially to attract or to retain
workers. However, whether what is happening to pay is anything beyond the
acceleration over the past year that has already been captured in the published
aggregate wage statistics is difficult to judge. The only new data we have received
since the last Greenbook are those for average hourly earnings in August; while wages
by this measure were up 1/2 percent last month, the rise followed a couple of small
increases and left the trend in wage inflation ambiguous. We are sticking with our
forecast that ECI compensation will increase at a 3-3/4 percent rate in the third and

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

fourth quarters, holding the year-over-year change at about 3-1/2 percent, where it has
been since last fall.
Our projection for the CPI over the second half of the year also is virtually
unchanged, on balance, from the August Greenbook--with the core index rising at an
annual rate of 2.1 percent and the overall index a couple of tenths less than that. We
had expected that the decline in retail energy prices would extend into the current
quarter, but it appears to have been steeper than we anticipated. And despite the
recent upturn in the price of crude oil, we now expect that retail energy prices will
rise only a little, on average, during the fourth quarter. On the other hand, our nearterm projections for food prices are now a shade higher. For the core CPI, the August
increase of 0.2 percent appears to have been influenced appreciably by increases for a
couple of items that likely will not be repeated in September: A late Labor Day
evidently delayed the usual back-to-school discounts on apparel, and the bimonthly
sampling in some cities spread the backup in prices of motor vehicles after the
expiration of the substantial June incentives into August.
The Outlook for the Economy in 1999 and 2000
The more adverse shocks to demand in this Greenbook have given our
longer-term outlook a more cyclical cast--although that change has been considerably
tempered by the revised policy assumption. We are now assuming a sharp step-down
in the rate of increase in final sales early next year that engenders a very mild
inventory imbalance. Real GDP is projected to increase at an annual rate of but
1 percent during the first half of 1999 and at just over a 1-1/2 percent pace in the
second half. The effect of the slackening in resource utilization over the year on core
inflation largely offsets the firming in non-oil import prices. The CPI is projected to
rise 2.1 percent over the four quarters of the year, whereas the PCE chain-weighted
price index should rise just over 1-1/2 percent.
The monetary easing that we have incorporated in the projection is expected to
help boost the increase in real GDP in 2000 to an annual rate of around 2 percent in
the first half of the year and to a rate of about 2-3/4 percent in the second half.3
However, factoring in a rebound in growth of labor productivity, the unemployment
rate is expected still to be almost 1 percentage point above its current level in 2000,
3. We built a Year 2000 wrinkle into our forecast. At the end of 1999, we expect to see some
precautionary inventory accumulation in advance of potential production disruptions. Those additional
stocks are drawn down in the first quarter of 2000. At the same time, we also allowed for some
disruption of activity in the first quarter of 2000. Together, these two effects hold down the increase in
real GDP in the first quarter of 2000, and output bounces back in the second quarter.

Domestic Developments

Summary of Staff Projections
(Percent change, compound annual rate)
Measure

1998:H2

1999:H1

1999:H2

2000

2.6
2.3

.9
1.3

1.6
2.0

2.4

2.7
2.4

1.2
1.5

1.6
2.1

2.2

PCE
Previous

3.4
3.3

2.5
2.5

2.2
2.6

2.4

Residential investment
Previous

8.0
5.5

-6.1
-4.1

-1.5
-3.2

1.4

BFI

7.0
5.6

4.3
4.9

3.0
4.8

5.4

1.8
2.0

1.0
1.0

1.3
1.3

1.5

Exports
Previous

-2.3
-1.4

.1
1.9

2.6
4.1

4.7

Imports
Previous

6.6
7.5

6.8
7.3

5.3
5.7

6.6

Real GDP
Previous
Final sales
Previous

Previous
Government purchases
Previous

Change, billions of chained (1992) dollars
Inventory change
Previous
Net exports

Previous
. .

-1.2
-.6

-14.9
-10.0

.3
-3.9

14.8

-50.9

-41.9

-21.7

-41.7

-52.1

-36.2

-17.0

Not applicable.

and despite sharply reduced expansion of manufacturing capacity, the utilization rate is
anticipated to be noticeably below where it is now. In that environment, inflation in
2000 is expected to be unchanged from its pace in 1999.
Consumer spending. Clearly, one of the key elements in the outlook is our
assessment of the prospects for the stock market and of the impact of declining share
values on household spending patterns. We continue to believe that the outsized
increase in consumer demand relative to income over the past few years was largely a
result of the rise in household net worth, in which the stunning rise of share prices
was the major driver. With the recent sharp decline in those prices, the ratio of net
worth to income has dropped appreciably, and the additional stimulus from the "wealth

I-10

Part1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

effect" should fade over the next few quarters. For this reason, our forecast shows the
personal saving rate essentially stabilizing--at a very low level--as spending increases
roughly in line with disposable income.
Given the increased and more direct role of equities in the finances of
households (especially with so many individuals seemingly banking on their IRAs and
401(k) accounts for retirement security), one might wonder whether the market
reversal could precipitate a more radical shift in savings propensities in the present
case. The jury is still out on that question. The preliminary Michigan SRC survey for
September did reveal some concern among households about the decline in the market
and its consequences, but it provided no sign that respondents were alarmed enough to
alter their spending habits radically. One reason may be that individuals seem to have
retained their faith in the longer-term profitability of the stock market investments:
Mutual fund customers have redeemed only modest portions of their equity fund
holdings, and surveys indicate that they have maintained optimistic views of the
longer-term returns on equity investments. The further slippage in the markets
anticipated in this forecast should do little to alter this thinking--although a more
sizable decline might exact a greater toll of confidence, possibly exaggerating the
normal wealth effects on spending.
Be that as it may, we are projecting that real PCE will rise 2.4 percent in 1999.
We are looking for a decided deceleration of spending on discretionary items in the
nondurables and services categories. However, we also expect that demand for
durable goods will moderate. Notably, purchases of motor vehicles, which have been
strong for several years now, should slip, and a slackening of housing activity should
take some of the steam out of the demand for furniture and appliances. The rise in
PCE is projected to be moderate again in 2000; given our expectation that share prices
will remained subdued, spending will do well to keep up with gains in income.
Housing. Starts of new homes are projected to fall back noticeably during
1999. Single-family starts are expected to drop to 1.18 million units next year after
having averaged 1.25 million units in 1998. The negative effects of the drop in wealth
and of slower employment and income gains will tend to outweigh the stimulus from
lower mortgage interest rates. However, because the level of home construction would
remain quite high, additions to supply would still be ample. Given the lack of pent-up
demand, we are projecting single-family starts to be unchanged in 2000, despite
improving job growth.
We also anticipate a weakening in the market for apartment units next year.
This year has been another relatively strong one for multifamily starts, and those units

Domestic Developments

1-11

will be coming on the market at a time when demand from potential buyers and
renters is easing. The effect of a backup in vacancy rates could be reinforced by a
more cautious attitude among lenders. The flow of capital from REITs already has
slackened as the equity market has turned negative on these entities this year. As a
result, after having stayed at around 340,000 units for two consecutive years,
multifamily starts probably will drop back to around 300,000 units next year before
firming a bit in 2000.
Business fixed investment. Real business fixed investment is projected to
decelerate further next year, rising 3-1/2 percent over the four quarters of 1999 after
having increased at an average annual rate of 7 percent during the second half of
1998. The step-down occurs entirely in spending for producers' durable equipment.
Underlying that deceleration is the slower trend in sales, a marked deterioration in
corporate cash flow next year, and a less favorable external financing environment.
The slowing in real outlays for producers' durables is expected to be
widespread by type of equipment. Even spending on computing equipment, which we
expect will rise more than 60 percent in real terms in 1998, is not expected to be
immune from prospective cutbacks in capital budgets. However, steeply falling prices
along with a desire to take advantage of newly available features and to resolve Year
2000 problems should prop up spending somewhat--especially early in the year, before
some firms suspend major system upgrades so that they can focus on final software
fixes and testing. In nominal terms, we are projecting that outlays for computers will
rise only a few percent next year, which when deflated translates into more than a
30 percent gain in real, quality-adjusted terms. Outlays for communications equipment
also should post another sizable real increase in 1999, supported by the rapidly
growing demand for the widening array of telecommunications services that are being
offered at attractive prices. However, we expect to see cutbacks over the course of the
year in deliveries of aircraft and motor vehicles to domestic firms and only a small
increase in outlays for other types of equipment overall. Concerns in some
manufacturing industries are expected to lead to a considerable reduction in their
purchases of new equipment to curb the growth of excess, unprofitable capacity.
Nonresidential construction is expected to change little, on balance, over the
projection period. Financing conditions have deteriorated considerably in the
commercial sector. During 1999, the weaker rise in sales will put a damper on the
desire to undertake new office and commercial projects, which have been this year's
bright spots. However, with oil prices firming, we expect the recent sharp drop in

1-12

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

outlays for drilling and mining structures to stop. Industrial building, which has
already fallen considerably this year, is projected to continue declining.
Business inventories. We are assuming that, by the end of this year,
businesses (other than GM dealers, who are now restocking) will have significantly
moderated the expansion of their inventories, leaving few, if any, noticeable
imbalances as the new year begins. However, the marked deceleration of sales in
1999 will call for a further diminution in the pace of inventory accumulation. We
would not be surprised to see some increase in inventory-sales ratios in the early part
of the year, when final demand is particularly weak, but we are expecting the
adjustments to occur quite quickly and have not anticipated any dramatic inventory
dynamics. On net, the expected down-shifting in the rate of nonfarm inventory
investment is projected to be a slight drag on real GDP next year. In 2000,
inventories are assumed to rise roughly in line with sales and to make a marginally
positive contribution to the increase in real GDP.
Farm inventories are expected to accumulate at a slower pace in 1999 as
producers curb output in response to the lower prices that they have experienced this
year and export demand stabilizes.
Government spending. Real federal purchases are projected to decline at an
annual rate of 1-1/4 percent over the forecast period. This trajectory is consistent with
the 1997 budget agreement, which set limits on discretionary spending and required
that any changes to tax or mandatory outlay programs be deficit-neutral. Although
nominal nondefense spending should increase a little, it is projected to slip gradually
in real terms. Real defense spending is expected to fall at a rate of around
1-1/2 percent, on average, although the quarterly pattern likely will continue to be
lumpy.
In the state and local sector, real purchases are projected to rise at a moderate,
2-3/4 percent, annual rate through 2000. These jurisdictions have seen their revenues
outpace their expectations recently, but they have remained cautious about making
major changes in their budget policies. Some politicians may yet succumb to the
temptation to dip into mounting cash balances, but their appetite for cutting taxes or
boosting spending should be lessened next year as they recognize that a weakening
economy is cutting into revenues.
Net exports. With the revision to prospects for foreign GDP, we have marked
down our expectations for real exports of goods and services; that increase is now just
1-1/4 percent next year. Export demand is expected to recover in 2000, pushing the
volume up about 4-3/4 percent as foreign growth picks up and the real depreciation of

Domestic Developments

the dollar enhances U.S. competitiveness. Demand for imports is now expected to be
weaker in 1999 in light of the slower projected growth of domestic activity. On net,
the decline in real net exports next year is anticipated to subtract almost
3/4 percentage point from the increase in real GDP, less than half of its negative
contribution this year. In 2000, the drag diminishes to less than 1/2 percentage point.
(A more detailed discussion is contained in the International Developments section.)
Labor markets. Firms, confronted with pressures on their profit margins,
undoubtedly are continuing to push for gains in efficiency, and we continue to believe
that the underlying trend in labor productivity will be growing 1-3/4 percent a year
over the projection period. However, as noted above, many businesses have been
scrambling for workers, and they may continue to hire even as increases in output tail
off in the period ahead. Consequently, we expect that labor productivity will rise at
something less than the underlying trend pace during the current half-year and then lag
still more during much of 1999, when economic activity turns distinctly subpar. In
2000, as output picks up and Year 2000 fixes are less of a drain, productivity should
accelerate considerably; that year's gain is projected to be 2 percent.

The Outlook for the Labor Market
(Percent change, Q4 to Q4, except as noted)

1997

1998

1999

2000

Output per hour, nonfarm business
Previous

1.7
1.7

1.5
1.1

1.0
1.3

2.0
...

Nonfarm payroll employment
Previous

2.7
2.7

2.3
2.2

.7
.8

Household employment survey
Previous

2.1
2.1

.9
.9

.3
.4

Labor force participation rate1
Previous

67.1
67.1

66.9
67.0

66.8
66.9

66.8
.

4.7

4.5

5.2

5.4

4.7

4.6

5.1

. .

Measure

Civilian unemployment rate'
Previous

...

1. Percent, average for the fourth quarter.
.. . Not applicable.

This pattern of labor productivity implies that variations in the growth of labor
demand will be more muted than those in the growth of output. Nonetheless, net
hiring is projected to be meager by the middle of next year before picking up as

I-14

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

activity accelerates later in 1999 and 2000. By the spring of 2000, however, the
unemployment rate is expected to have risen to 5.4 percent, where we have it
stabilizing.
Some side notes on the quite irregular quarterly pattern of labor market activity
in 2000: Output per hour will mirror the temporary hesitation in the growth of real
GDP resulting from the small, brief disruption of activity that we believe will
accompany problems associated with the Millennium Bug in the first quarter of 2000;
a rebound is expected in the subsequent quarter. And public payrolls will experience
a bulge in the second quarter of 2000 when temporary workers are hired to conduct
the decennial 2000 census.
Wages and prices. Given the easing of labor market pressures and the pricing
environment that we are forecasting, we continue to expect that increases in labor
compensation will level off in the near term and diminish over the next two years.
The year-over-year change in ECI compensation is projected to remain around
3-1/2 percent during the next several quarters, 3.2 percent next year, and 2.9 percent in
2000. Over time, rising joblessness should restrain the size of pay increases. The
deceleration in labor compensation is expected to occur in the wage and salary
component of the index. In the nearer term, one factor is that the rising commissions
of recent times--most notably in the finance and real estate sectors--will not be
sustained. However, a noticeable step-up in the rate of increase in overall benefit costs
is likely in 1999, largely because of the rising cost of health insurance. The large
increases in premiums recently announced in the Federal Employee and CalPERS
insurance programs underscore the pressures facing the health care industry: rapid
increases in the costs of prescription drugs and the need simply to correct the
underpricing of benefits that accompanied the earlier all-out competition for market
share. In addition, lower stock values are likely to boost employer costs for defined
benefit retirement plans. Some offset to these higher costs should come from smaller
"nonproduction" bonus payments over the next several years. Indeed, businesses may
benefit from a cooler labor market in ways that are not so obvious in the published
data as the need to offer hiring bonuses and other costly inducements lessens.
Although the recent slump in the stock market raises the risk that companies may not
be able to get so much mileage from granting options, we are not anticipating that this
will have much impact on aggregate wages and benefits--especially because many
firms will respond by simply cutting strike prices or issuing more options.
We are projecting that core CPI inflation will drop to 2.1 percent in 1999, with
the shift to "geo-means" in January accounting for all of the deceleration from the

Domestic Developments

I-15

Staff Inflation Projections
(Percent change, Q4 to Q4, except as noted)
Measure

1997

1998

1999

2000

Consumer price index
Previous

1.9
1.9

1.6
1.5

2.1
2.1

2.0

Food
Previous

1.7
1.7

1.8
1.7

1.3
1.3

1.5

Energy
Previous

-1.0
-1.0

-8.0
-7.2

4.1
3.9

2.2
2.2

2.3
2.3

2.1
2.1

2.1
.

1.5
1.5

.9
.9

1.6
1.6

1.5

1.6
1.6

1.3
1.3

1.5
1.5

1.5

GDP chain-weighted price index
Previous

1.7
1.7

1.0
1.1

1.5
1.5

1.5

ECI for compensation of private
industry workers'
Previous

3.4
3.4

3.2
3.2

2.9

Prices of core non-oil
merchandise imports

-.7

-2.7

1.4

-.7

-2.9

1.1

Excluding food and energy
Previous
PCE chain-weighted price index
Previous
Excluding food and energy
Previous

1.6

Percentage points
MEMO: Adjustments for technical
changes to the CPI2
Core CPI
1. December to December.

2. Adjustments are calculated relative to the methodological structure of the CPI

in 1994.
..

Not applicable.

2.3 percent rate we expect will be recorded this year. The overall CPI is forecast to
accelerate next year. Energy prices increase 4 percent, after having fallen 8 percent
this year, and prices of non-oil imports turn upward. On a reported basis, the CPI
inflation rate for 1999 is projected to be 2.1 percent, 1/2 percentage point more than
this year, despite the technical changes in the index. We are also looking for pickups
in inflation as measured by GDP-related indexes from current rates, but with numbers
in those cases generally being in the lower, 1 to 1-1/2 percent, range.

1-16

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

The projected inflation rates for 1999 appear to be on the low side of
prevailing expectations--at least as suggested by survey readings, if not by the spreads
between nominal Treasuries and TIPS. The more favorable outcome should encourage
a further decline in those expectations and help to mute inflationary tendencies in
2000. This factor, along with the reduced pressures on resources, should offset any
impulse to U.S. inflation that might come from the effects of a modestly declining
dollar on import prices. Consequently, we are projecting that prices overall will
increase at about the same rate in 2000 as in 1999.
Money and Credit Flows
The expansion of the debt of the nonfinancial sectors this year, at 5-3/4 percent, is
anticipated to outstrip the growth of nominal GDP, owing mainly to increased
borrowing by the business and household sectors. However, over the next two years,
growth of the debt aggregate should be reduced significantly as those sectors pull back
somewhat in the face of weaker income growth and a slightly more restrictive credit
supply environment. The slowdown is a bit more pronounced than projected in the
previous Greenbook.
Borrowing by nonfinancial businesses is anticipated to slow substantially in
coming quarters. As we move into 1999 and 2000, merger and acquisition activity is
likely to tail off appreciably, and firms will be more cautious in their investment
outlays, so that debt growth is expected to slow somewhat even as the generation of
internal funds remains subdued. Less-receptive credit markets probably will play a
role in encouraging this falloff in borrowing; the wider bond market spreads of late are
expected to persist at least for a while before retracing a portion of their recent
increases, and banks should follow suit by tightening standards and terms on business
lending. Indeed, the results of the special survey of senior loan officers conducted this
month suggests that process of bank tightening may already have begun. (The details
of the survey results will be reported in the Greenbook Supplement on Friday.)
Household debt is expected to grow 8 percent this year. Attractive interest
rates have spurred an increase in mortgage borrowing beyond that which is attributable
to home purchases alone. The encouragement potential borrowers have had from
lenders (and the tax code) to substitute home equity loans for consumer credit is only
a part of that story. Possibly, optimistic views about prospective returns on stock
market investments have fostered a tendency to borrow more heavily to cover
expenditures; if so, recent and prospective equity price developments should lessen
this enthusiasm for leverage. But the more important drag on household borrowing

Domestic Developments

1-17

growth over the next two years will be a moderation in the growth of spending.
Although demand-side developments will be the dominant influence slowing debt
growth, the weakening in the economy and rising unemployment may prompt lenders
to tighten their underwriting standards. Investors in asset-backed securities are likely
to continue to exhibit greater caution, which may leave an imprint on the pricing of
consumer loans and subprime mortgages. On net, the increase in household debt over
the next two years is expected to be down around 2-1/2 to 3 percentage points from its
1998 pace.
In the state and local government sector, the rise in debt should slow
somewhat. Capital spending is projected to remain on a moderate track, but the
opportunities to pre-refund debt are now more limited because of the large amount of
activity that has already occurred (repeat advance refundings typically are not
permitted). The continued federal surpluses mean that the Treasury will be retiring
debt on balance, with nominal marketable securities running off at a pretty fast clip.
We are inclined to attribute a noticeable portion of the recent rapid growth of
the monetary aggregates to redirection by households from the capital market toward
safer and more liquid instruments. Supporting this notion, about two-thirds of the net
increase in M2 over August and September was recorded in money market mutual
funds, which mirrored a drying up of inflows to equity market funds. This
reassessment of capital risk and increased risk aversion should continue in the months
ahead and be sufficient to pull up M2 growth over the four quarters of 1998 to
8 percent, considerably faster than was expected at the time of the August FOMC
meeting. However, given our working assumption of no large changes in stock prices
in 1999 and 2000, those safe-haven inflows should abate. As a result, growth of M2
should step down over the next two years. M3 is anticipated to move in tandem,
expanding at a 10 percent rate this year before decelerating considerably in 1999 and
2000, consistent with its longer-run tendency to expand faster than both M2 and
nominal GDP.
Alternative Simulations
Our alternative model-based simulations present the implications, first, of unchanged
System policy and, then, of two different scenarios for the stock market. In the first
alternative, the federal funds rate remains constant at 5-1/2 percent through 2000,
instead of declining over the next few quarters. In this scenario, the increase in real
GDP is 1/2 percentage point below the baseline case next year and 3/4 percentage

1-18

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

Alternative Federal Funds Rate
and Stock Market Assumptions
(Percent change, Q4 to Q4, except as noted)
Measure

Real GDP
Baseline

Unchanged funds rate
Weaker stock prices
Constant stock market wealthto-income ratio

1998

1999

2000

3.2

1.3

2.4

3.2
3.2

.8
1.0

1.6
2.0

3.2

1.7

2.9

Baseline

4.5

5.2

5.4

Unchanged funds rate
Weaker stock prices

4.5
4.5

5.4
5.3

5.9
5.6

Constant stock market wealthto-income ratio

4.5

5.1

2.3
2.3
2.3

2.1
2.0
2.1

2.1
1.6
2.0

2.3

2.1

2.2

Civilian unemployment rate'

CPI excluding food and energy

Baseline
Unchanged funds rate
Weaker stock prices
Constant stock market wealthto-income ratio
1. Average for the fourth quarter.

point lower in 2000--enough so that the unemployment rate would be approaching
6 percent by the end of the projection period. Inflation would be considerably
lower--turning back downward in 2000--with the effects of the added slack being
reinforced by a firmer dollar and a perception on the part of the public that the Federal
Reserve was emphasizing the pursuit of price stability.
The second and third alternatives consider different paths for the stock market.
The baseline for this Greenbook assumes that after having dropped a bit below the
recent lows in the near term, share prices recover about 5 percent by early 2000. The
second alternative takes the more pessimistic view that stock values drop about
10 percent below the recent low by the second quarter of next year and then move up
only slightly in 2000 (essentially paralleling the baseline path). In this scenario, which
we believe is quite plausible, sticking with the baseline interest rate path would result
in 1/4 percentage point slower real GDP growth in 1999; the shortfall widens to
almost 1/2 percentage point in 2000. The payoff in the form of lower inflation is
relatively modest because, in the model's view, the public's perceptions of Federal
Reserve objectives for inflation are little altered.

Domestic Developments

I-19

The third alternative assumes that the ratio of stock market wealth to income
holds steady at its third-quarter average, rather than falling over the projection period.
This avoids the negative wealth effect that is weighing on consumption in the baseline
forecast and provides a lower cost of equity capital for businesses. The resultant
difference in the pace of activity is significant, amounting to about 1/2 percentage
point more in 1999 and again in 2000. The unemployment rate is around 5 percent in
2000, and inflation is a bit higher than in the baseline.
(Two additional alternative scenarios that consider risks in the global economy
are presented at the end of the InternationalDevelopments section.)

Strictly Confidential <FR>
Class II FOMC

September 23, 1998
STAFF PROJECTIONS OF CHANGES IN GDP, PRICES, AND UNEMPLOYMENT
(Percent, annual rate)

ANNUAL

1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
QUARTERLY
1997

01
Q2
Q3
04

1998

01
Q2
Q3
04

1999

01
Q2
Q3
Q4

2000

Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4

TWO-QUARTER

1997

6.4
4.8

4.1
3.6

2.2
1.2

1.8
2.0

-0.4
-0.2

1998

Q2
Q4

4.5
3.9

3.4
2.3

3.7
2.6

0.9
1.4

0.8
1.3

1.2
1.9

-0.3
0.3

-0.3
0.1

1999

02
Q4

2.5
3.0

1.3
2.0

0.9
1.6

1.6
1.4

2.2
2.0

0.3
0.3

2000

3.6
4.2

1.5
1.4

2.1
2.7

0.2
0.1

2.0
2.0

FOUR-QUATER
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
1.
2.
3.
4.

Q4
Q4
Q4

5.8
5.6
4.2
2.8
3.9

3.9
3.8
2.9
1.7

For all
urban consumers.
Level, except as noted.
Percent change from two quarters earlier;
Percent change from four quarters earlier;

3.9
3.8
3.2
1.3
2.4

1.8
1.7
1.1
1.5

1.8
1.7
1.0
1.5
1.5

3.2
1.9
1.5
2.1

3.2
1.9
1.6
2.1
2.0

for unemployment rate, change in percentage points.
for unemployment rate, change in percentage points.

-0.3
-0.6
-0.1
0.5

-0.3
-0.6
-0.2
0.6
0.3

Strictly Confidential <FR>
Class II FOMC

REAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AND RELATED ITEMS, ANNUAL VALUES
(Seasonally adjusted annual rate)

September 23, 1998

- - - Projected - - Units l

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

6244.4
6244.4

6558.1
6389.6

6947.0
6610.7

7269.6
6761.7

7661.6
6994.8

8110.9
7269.8

8488.1
7527.5

8743.6
7648.7

9043.2
7797.4

3.6
4.0
3.9
4.9

2.4
3.0
2.1
3.7

3.3
3.6
2.7
3.7

2.1
1.6
2.7
2.9

3.9
4.2
3.7
4.4

3.8
4.4
3.4
4.5

3.2
4.8
3.5
6.0

1.3
1.9
1.4
2.2

2.4
2.7
2.2
2.7

4.2
9.4
3.4
3.6

2.7
7.4
1.6
2.3

3.1
6.3
3.0
2.5

2.6
4.5
1.7
2.6

3.3
5.8
2.8
3.0

3.7
7.4
2.0
3.8

4.7
7.5
4.6
4.2

2.4
3.2
1.7
2.5

2.4
4.5
1.8
2.3

5.5
9.6
-3.4
16.9

9.9
12.2
4.5
7.8

7.6
10.2
1.1
4.2

7.3
9.1
2.7
-1.4

11.7
11.8
11.6
5.4

9.8
12.7
2.5
4.2

12.1
17.6
-1.8
11.7

3.6
5.1
-0.3
-3.8

5.4
7.3
0.0
1.4

4.1
7.4

4.6
10.2

10.0
12.3

10.5
5.6

10.3
11.8

9.6
14.0

-3.8
9.5

1.3
6.1

4.7
6.6

1.7
1.3
-1.3
2.0

-1.4
-6.1
-6.9
2.0

0.1
-3.9
-6.0
2.7

-0.9
-5.6
-5.0
2.1

2.1
1.1
-0.1
2.8

1.4
-0.6
-1.4
2.6

1.3
-1.1
-3.5
2.6

1.2
-1.7
-2.1
2.7

1.5
-0.8
-0.7
2.6

7.0
2.0
-29.5

22.1
29.5
-70.2

60.6
49.0
-104.6

27.7
37.7
-96.5

30.0
23.2
-111.2

63.2
58.8
-136.1

54.1
46.2
-250.9

24.8
19.8
-341.2

33.2
30.5
-386.0

% change

6.3

5.0

5.8

4.2

5.8

5.6

4.2

2.8

3.9

Nonfarm payroll employment
Unemployment rate

Millions

108.6
7.5

110.7
6.9

114.1
6.1

117.2
5.6

119.6
5.4

122.7
4.9

125.8
4.5

127.3
4.9

128.4
5.4

Industrial prod. index
Capacity util. rate - mfg.

change

3.7
79.4

3.3
80.5

6.5
82.5

3.3
82.8

4.2
81.4

5.8
81.7

1.9
80.5

0.4
78.6

2.8
78.7

Housing starts

Millions

1.20
12.85
10.51
2.34

1.29
13.86
11.71
2.15

1.46
15.01
12.88
2.13

1.35
14.72
12.82
1.90

1.48
15.05
13.35
1.70

1.47
15.03
13.11
1.92

1.59
15.13
13.14
1.99

1.48
14.55
12.66
1.89

1.50
14.41
12.58
1.83

6255.5
6.2
7.2
4.0
5.7

6576.8
5.1
4.0
1.2
4.4

6955.2
5.7
5.2
2.5
3.5

7287.1
4.4
4.6
2.1
3.4

7674.0
5.6
5.9
2.7
2.9

8102.9
5.2
5.4
2.9
2.1

8465.2
4.1
4.9
3.3
0.7

8704.1
2.6
3.1
2.2
0.5

8993.1
3.8
3.7
2.3
0.5

11.3
6.8
6.6

19.0
7.5
7.2

14.1
8.2
7.9

14.6
9.2
8.9

7.7
9.8
9.5

7.7
10.1
9.8

-1.7
9.7
9.4

-5.5
8.9
8.6

4.0
8.6
8.3

-280.9
86.3
18.3

-250.7
87.4
19.7

-186.7
96.8
27.9

-174.4
111.7
37.0

-110.3
122.6
52.2

-21.1
134.1
66.0

71.3
143.7
76.1

45.7
149.0
81.3

50.0
145.9
78.2

14.5
3.7

14.4
3.7

15.5
4.7

16.3
5.8

16.6
6.3

17.4
7.3

17.3
7.3

16.3
6.2

16.0
5.9

2.6

2.5

2.1

1.8

1.7

1.0

1.5

2.3
2.7
3.1

2.5
2.7
2.8

2.0
2.6
3.1

1.8
3.2
2.6

1.3
1.9
2.2

0.5
1.6
2.3

1.4
2.1
2.1

1.4
2.0
2.1

3.6

3.1

2.6

3.1

3.4

3.2

2.9

0.1
2.1
2.0

1.2
2.8
1.6

2.1
3.7
1.6

1.7
3.9
2.1

1.5
4.0
2.5

1.0
3.2
2.2

2.0
2.9
0.9

Item

EXPENDITURES

Nominal GDP

Bill. $
Bill. Ch. $

Real GDP

Real GDP
Gross domestic purchases

% change

Final sales

Priv. dam. final purchases
Personal cons.
Durables
Nondurables
Services

expenditures

Business fixed investment

Producers'
Nonres.

dur. equipment

structures

Residential structures
Exports
Imports

Gov't. cons. a investment
Federal
Defense
State & local
Change in bus. inventories
Nonfarm

Bill. Ch. $

Net exports
Nominal GDP
EMPLOYMENT AND PRODUCTION

Light motor vehicle sales
North Amer.
Other

produced

INCOME AND SAVING

Bill. $

Nominal GHP
Nominal GNP
Nominal personal income
Real disposable income
Personal saving rate

s change

Corp. profits, VA & CCAdj.
Profit share of GNP
Excluding FR Banks

s change

Bill. $

Federal surpl./deficit
State & local surpl./def.

Ex. social ins. funds
Gross natl. saving rate
Net natl. saving rate

PRICES AND COSTS

GDP chn.-wt. price index
Gross Domestic Purchases
chn.-wt. price index
CPI
Ex. food and energy
ECI,

hourly compensatio

Nonfara business sector
Output per hour
Compensation per Hour
Unit labor cost

change

3.5
4.5
1.0

1. Changes are from fourth quarter to fourth quarter.
2. Private-industry workers.

-0.4
1.6
2.0

Strictly
Class II

Confidential <FR>
FOMC

REAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AND RELATED ITEMS, QUARTERLY VALUES
except as noted)
(Seasonally adjusted, annual rate

September 23,

1998

1997
Q2

1997
Q3

1997
Q4

1998

1998
Q2

7955.0
7166.7

8063.4
7236.5

8170.8
7311.2

8254.5
7364.6

8384.2
7464.7

8439.6
7499.6

4.2
1.8
5.1
3.3

4.2
5.5
2.9
4.6

4.0
4.4
2.7
3.3

4.2
4.6
5.8
7.2

3.0
3.2
2.1
2.9

5.5
7.8
4.3
8.5

1.9
4.0
4.5
7.4

1.8
-1.9
1.2
3.0

2.9
7.2
2.9
2.0

4.3
12.3
3.6
3.1

1.6
-1.5
-0.2
3.2

6.2
16.8
5.1
4.7

2.8
3.1
-0.4
4.3

6.1
15.8
7.4
3.5

5.9
11.2
5.2
5.2

11.0
12.3
7.4
19.5

14.2
16.2
8.9
-1.7

8.8
3.2
24.5
-3.9

7.0
8.3
3.9
3.1

14.0
22.8
-6.2
6.1

17.0
18.8
12.4
-0.4

1.8
2.2
0.9
8.2

22.2
34.3
-4.9
15.6

12.7
18.2
-1.1
15.5

3.7
13.1

5.8
13.5

2.1
13.6

32.0
7.0

8.3
18.6

15.5
17.9

10.6
13.5

4.4
6.3

-2.8
15.7

-7.6
9.2

3.2
8.0
7.2
0.5

7.1
8.1
8.1
6.5

-1.6
-4.7
-6.3
0.3

0.0
-6.3
-8.3
3.8

2.1
-2.7
-9.9
4.9

2.1
3.6
9.1
1.3

1.4
-1.2
-1.8
2.9

0.1
-2.1
-2.0
1.3

-1.9
-8.8
-18.5
2.1

3.6
6.7
9.5
2.1

14.4
10.4
-95.5

26.1
15.2
-113.5

47.5
38.6
-140.1

32.1
28.7
-95.9

56.3
56.2
-121.5

79.0
72.1
-131.6

51.0
44.0
-142.4

66.5
62.7
-149.0

91.4
85.9
-198.5

39.8
31.3
-244.4

% change

5.7

7.3

3.9

6.1

7.2

5.6

5.4

4.2

6.4

2.7

Nonfarm payroll employment
Unemployment rate

Millions

118.5
5.6

119.3
5.4

120.0
5.3

120.7
5.3

121.5
5.3

122.3
4.9

123.0
4.9

123.9
4.7

124.8
4.7

125.5
4.4

prod. index
Industrial
- mfg.
rate
Capacity util.

% change

2.0
81.0

7.5
81.6

3.6
81.5

3.8
81.4

5.2
81.6

4.6
81.5

6.0
81.6

7.2
82.2

1.2
81.6

1.7
80.8

Rousing starts
Light motor vehicle sales
North Amer. produced
Other

Millions

1.47
15.10
13.44
1.66

1.49
15.18
13.46
1.72

1.49
15.00
13.33
1.68

1.42
14.91
13.16
1.76

1.47
15.32
13.41
1.92

1.46
14.54
12.68
1.86

1.45
15.19
13.20
1.99

1.53
15.07
13.13
1.94

1.58
15.02
13.07
1.95

1.57
16.08
14.09
1.99

Nominal GNP
Nominal GNP
Nominal personal income
Real disposable income
Personal saving rate

Bill. $
% change

7515.0
5.6
6.6
2.9
3.2

7643.3
7.0
6.9
2.1
2.6

7708.6
3.5
5.5
4.4
3.1

7829.0
6.4
4.6
1.3
2.6

7952.4
6.5
7.3
3.3
2.4

8062.3
5.6
4.7
2.9
2.6

8162.0
5.0
4.7
2.4
1.7

8234.9
3.6
5.0
2.9
1.7

8369.4
6.7
5.9
4.0
1.2

8421.0
2.5
4.5
2.9
0.5

IV
& CCAdj.
Corp. profits,
Profit share of GNP
Excluding PR Banks

i change

16.9
9.8
9.5

6.9
9.8
9.5

3.8
9.8
9.5

3.5
9.7
9.5

18.1
10.0
9.7

11.1
10.1
9.8

13.1
10.3
10.0

-9.2
10.0
9.7

4.2
9.9
9.6

-3.5
9.8
9.5

Federal surpl./deficit
State a local surpl./def.
Ex. social ins. funds

Bill. $

-150.1
117.3
45.3

-112.6
129.1
58.2

-100.1
122.3
52.5

-78.3
121.7
52.9

-51.2
128.4
59.8

-34.8
130.1
61.6

-0.3
136.6
68.7

2.2
141.4
73.8

58.8
140.2
72.7

73.3
135.0
67.3

16.4
6.0

16.4
6.2

16.8
6.6

16.7
6.5

17.0
7.0

17.6
7.6

17.5
7.5

17.3
7.3

17.7
7.8

17.2
7.2

2.2

1.1

0.9

2.1
3.2
2.5

1.0
2.3
2.1

-0.2
0.5
2.4

2.5

4.3

2.7

1996
01

1996
Q2

1996
Q3

1996
Q4

1997

7495.3
6882.0

7629.2
6983.9

7703.4
7020.0

7818.4
7093.1

3.3
4.5
3.6
5.1

6.1
7.0
5.4
6.1

2.1
3.4
0.9
3.1

expenditures

3.7
5.8
2.2
4.0

4.7
12.7
4.8
3.0

Business fixed investment
Producers' dur. equipment
Nonres. structures
Residential structures

13.1
15.7
6.4
9.3

Exports
Imports

Units

Item

EXPENDITURES

Nominal GDP
Real GDP

Bill. $
Bill. Ch. $

Real GDP
Gross domestic purchases
Final sales
Priv. don. final purchases

% change

Personal cons.
Durables
Nondurables
Services

Gov't. cons. & investment
Federal
Defense
State & local
Change in bus.
Nonfazrm
Net exports

inventories

Nominal GDP

EMPLOYMENT AN

Bill. Ch. $

PRODUCTION

INCOME AND SAVING

Gross natl. saving rate
Net natl. saving rate

PRICES JND COSTS

GDP chn.-wt. price index
Gross Domestic Purchases
chn.-wt. price index
CPI
Ex. food and energy
ECI,

hourly compensation

% change

Nonfarm business sector
Output per hour
Compensation per hour
Unit labor cost

1. Private-industry workers.

4.1
2.6
-1.5

3.0
5.2
2.2

Strictly Confidential <FR>
Class II FOMC

REAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AND RELATED ITEMS, QUARTERLY VALUES
(Seasonally adjusted, annual rate except as noted)

--------------

September 23, 1998

Projected---------

---------

1998
Q3

1998
04

1999
Q1

1999
Q2

1999
Q3

1999
Q4

2000
Q1

2000
Q2

2000
Q3

2000
Q4

8526.0
7548.4

8602.3
7597.2

8659.1
7614.1

8708.2
7630.6

8768.2
7657.1

8839.0
7693.0

8903.3
7717.7

8997.6
7772.7

9089.5
7823.9

9182.5
7875.5

2.6
3.5
2.3
3.4

2.6
3.9
3.0
4.9

0.9
1.8
1.3
2.7

0.9
1.6
1.2
2.0

1.4
1.9
1.5
2.1

1.9
2.2
1.7
2.2

1.3
1.6
1.4
2.0

2.9
3.3
2.3
3.0

2.7
3.1
2.3
3.0

2.7
2.8
2.7
2.9

expenditures

3.5
-3.7
3.6
5.0

3.4
7.7
2.2
3.1

2.7
3.6
1.8
3.0

2.4
3.3
1.7
2.6

2.2
2.7
1.8
2.4

2.2
3.2
1.7
2.3

1.8
3.2
1.7
1.6

2.8
5.5
1.7
2.8

2.5
4.6
1.9
2.3

2.5
4.8
1.9
2.3

Business fixed investment
Producers' dur. equipment
Nonres. structures
Residential structures

0.3
0.8
-1.2
10.9

14.2
19.7
-0.1
5.3

5.1
7.3
-0.9
-3.9

3.4
4.7
-0.1
-8.2

3.4
4.6
-0.1
-3.1

2.7
3.7
-0.1
0.1

3.7
5.3
-0.7
1.2

5.1
6.9
-0.0
1.3

6.7
9.0
0.4
1.6

6.1
8.2
0.4
1.6

Exports
Imports

-1.7
5.5

-2.8
7.7

-0.8
6.8

0.9
6.9

2.3
5.9

2.9
4.7

3.8
5.5

4.6
7.6

5.0
7.6

5.3
5.6

Gov't. cons. & investment
Federal
Defense
State & local

2.1
-0.2
-0.7
3.2

1.5
-1.7
-2.0
3.3

0.2
-4.6
-6.5
2.8

1.9
0.3
0.5
2.7

1.6
-0.7
-1.0
2.7

1.1
-1.9
-1.5
2.7

0.2
-4.4
-6.3
2.6

1.7
-0.1
0.4
2.6

1.4
-1.0
-1.1
2.6

2.6
2.4
4.3
2.6

46.5
37.5
-265.1

38.6
29.9
-295.3

30.4
23.1
-318.0

23.7
18.1
-337.2

20.9
16.7
-350.5

24.0
21.1
-358.9

21.2
18.5
-367.7

32.4
29.7
-381.4

40.1
37.4
-394.5

38.9
36.3
-400.6

% change

4.2

3.6

2.7

2.3

2.8

3.3

2.9

4.3

4.1

4.2

Nonfarm payroll employment
Unemployment rate

Millions

126.1
4.5

126.7
4.5

126.9
4.7

127.2
4.8

127.4
5.0

127.6
5.2

127.9
5.3

128.5
5.4

128.8
5.4

Industrial prod. index
Capacity util. rate - mfg.

t change

1.0
79.9

3.6
79.8

-0.6
79.1

-0.7
78.6

0.8
78.3

2.3
78.4

1.0
78.2

3.5
78.6

3.4
78.9

3.2
79.1

Housing starts
Light motor vehicle sales
North Amer. produced
Other

Millions

1.63
14.37
12.34
2.04

1.57
15.04
13.07
1.97

1.50
14.76
12.85
1.91

1.46
14.63
12.72
1.91

1.47
14.45
12.57
1.88

1.48
14.34
12.50
1.84

1.50
14.20
12.41
1.79

1.50
14.41
12.58
1.83

1.50
14.46
12.61
1.85

1.50
14.55
12.70
1.85

8497.6
3.7
5.1
3.7
0.6

8573.0
3.6
4.1
2.5
0.4

8625.8
2.5
2.7
4.1
0.8

8671.2
2.1
3.0
1.3
0.5

8726.2
2.6
3.4
1.7
0.4

8793.4
3.1
3.2
1.5
0.2

8857.1
2.9
4.5
4.2
0.8

8949.3
4.2
3.4
1.6
0.5

9037.1
4.0
3.5
1.7
0.4

9128.7
4.1
3.5
1.7
0.2

-5.6
9.5
9.3

-1.6
9.4
9.2

-7.8
9.2
8.9

-7.7
8.9
8.7

-5.2
8.8
8.5

-1.0
8.7
8.4

-9.8
8.4
8.1

10.6
8.5
8.3

8.1
8.6
8.4

8.5
8.7
8.4

Ex. social ins. funds

80.5
146.5
78.9

72.5
153.2
85.5

44.6
152.6
84.9

44.7
149.5
81.8

48.1
146.3
78.6

45.4
147.7
80.0

36.3
145.2
77.5

48.2
145.9
78.2

59.0
146.0
78.3

56.7
146.5
78.8

Gross natl. saving rate
Net natl. saving rate

17.3
7.3

17.0
7.0

16.7
6.7

16.4
6.3

16.2
6.0

15.9
5.8

16.0
5.8

16.0
5.9

15.9
5.8

1.5

1.0

1.8

1.4

1.6

1.4

1.5

0.8
1.9
2.1

1.0
1.9
2.1

1.6
2.4
2.1

1.3
2.1
2.1

1.2
2.0
2.1

1.3
2.0
2.1

1.6
2.0
2.1

1.4
2.0
2.1

3.7

3.2

3.1

2.9

0.8
3.8
3.0

1.4
3.7
2.3

1.0
3.6
2.6

0.8
3.2
2.4

0.9
3.1
2.2

1.5
3.1
1.6

1.1
3.3
2.2

2.7
2.8
0.1

2.2
2.8
0.6

2.0
2.8
0.8

Units

Ttem

EXPENDITURES
Nominal GDP
Real GDP

Bill. $
Bill. Ch. $

Real GDP
Gross domestic purchases
Final sales
Priv. dam. final purchases

Personal cons.
Durables
Nondurables
Services

Change in bus. inventories

change

Bill. Ch. $

Nonfarm

Net exports
Nominal GDP
EMPLOYMENT AND PRODUCTION

NCOME AND SAVING
Nominal GNP
Nominal GNP
Nominal personal income
Real disposable income
Personal saving rate

Bill. $

Corp. profits, IVA a CCAdj.
Profit share of GNP
Excluding FR Banks

% change

Federal surpl./deficit

Bill. $

% change

State & local surpl./def.

PRICES AND COSTS
GDP chn.-wt. price index
Gross Domestic Purchases
chn.-wt. price index
CPI
Ex. food and energy
ECI, hourly compensation

% change

Nonfarm business sector

Output per hour
Compensation per hour
Unit labor cost
1.

Private-indutry

workers.

Strictly Confidential <FR>
Class II FOMC

Item

Real ODP
Gross dom. purchases
Final sales
Priv. dom.

final purchases

CONTRIBUTIONS TO GROWTH IN

REAL

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT

ITEMS

epteamber 23, 1998

1996
Q3

1996
04

1997
01

1997
02

1997
Q3

1997
Q4

1998
01

1998
Q2

1998
03

9604/
9504

97Q4/
9604

9804/
97Q4

2.1
3.5

4.2
1.9

4.2
5.5

4.0
4.4

4.2
4.7

3.0
3.2

5.5
7.9

1.9
4.1

2.6
3.6

3.9
4.2

3.8
4.4

3.2
4.8

0.9
2.5

5.1
2.7

2.9
3.8

2.7
2.7

5.7
5.9

2.1
2.4

4.3
7.0

4.5
6.1

2.3
2.9

3.7
3.6

3.3
3.7

3.5
5.0

2.9
1.0
0.7
1.2

1.1
-0.1
0.0
1.3

4.2
1.3
1.0
1.9

1.9
0.3
-0.1
1.7

4.0
0.9
1.0
2.0

2.4
-0.3
0.7
2.0

Personal cons. eupenditures
Durables
Nondurables
Services

0.2
0.1
0.0
0.3

2.2
2.4
-0.2
0.6

1.3
1.4
-0.0
0.6

0.0
0.1
-0.0
0.5

-0.5
1.2
-1.7

-0.3
0.5
-0.8

-2.2
-0.3
-1.9

-2.1
-0.9
-1.2

-0.9
-0.2
-0.7

0.4
0.2
0.4
-0.2
0.2

0.3
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.3

0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.2

-0.3
-0.6
-0.8
0.3
0.2

0.6
0.4
0.4
0.0
0.2

0.4
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.4

1.3
0.9
0.4

-1.4
-1.5
0.1

0.9
1.0
-0.1

1.2
1.2
0.0

-2.5
-2.7
0.2

Business fixed inveatment
Producers' dur. equip.
Nonres. structures
Residential structures

1.4
1.1
0.2
-0.1

0.9
0.2
0.6
-0.2

0.7
0.6
0.1
0.1

1.4
1.6
-0.2
0.2

Net exports
Exports
Imports

-1.3
0.2
-1.6

2.4
3.2
-0.9

-1.2
1.0
-2.2

-0.5
1.8
-2.2

Government cons. & invest.
Federal
Defense
Nondefense
State and local

-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
0.0
0.0

0.0
-0.4
-0.4
0.0
0.4

0.4
-0.2
-0.5
0.3
0.6

1.2
1.3
-0.1

-0.8
-0.5
-0.3

1.3
1.5
-0.2

Change in bus. inventories
Nonfarm
Farm

AND RELATED

Note. Components may not sum to totals because of rounding.

0.4
0.1
-0.0
0.1
0.3

0.3
-0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.3

September 23, 1998

CONTRIBUTIONS TO GROWTH IN REAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AND RPbATD ITEMS

Strictly Confidential <FR>
ClassII FOMC

1998
04

1999
01

1999
02

1999
03

1999
Q4

2000
01

2000
Q2

2000
Q3

2000
04

98Q4/
9704

9904/
9804

OQ4/
99Q4

2.6
3.9

0.9
1.9

0.9
1.7

1.4
1.9

1.9
2.2

1.3
1.6

2.9
3.4

2.7
3.1

2.7
2.9

3.2
4.8

1.3
1.9

2.4
2.7

3.0
4.1

1.3
2.2

1.2
1.7

1.5
1.8

1.7
1.9

1.4
1.7

2.3
2.5

2.7
2.5

3.5
5.0

1.4
1.9

2.2
2.3

2.3
0.6
0.4
1.3

1.8
0.3
0.3
1.2

1.7
0.3
0.3
1.0

1.5
0.2
0.4
1.0

1.6
0.3
0.3
0.9

1.2
0.3
0.3
0.6

1.9
0.4
0.3
1.1

1.7
0.4
0.4
1.0

3.2
0.6
0.9
1.7

1.6
0.3
0.3
1.0

1.7
0.4
0.4
0.9

Business fixed investment
Producers' dur. equip.
Nonrem. structures
Residential structures

1.5
1.5
-0.0
0.2

0.6
0.6
-0.0
-0.2

0.4
0.4
-0.0
-0.4

0.4
0.4
-0.0
-0.1

0.3
0.3
-0.0
0.0

0.4
0.4
-0.0
0.1

0.6
0.6
-0.0
0.1

0.7
0.7
0.0
0.1

1.3
1.3
-0.1
0.5

0.4
0.4
-0.0
-0.2

0.6
0.6
0.0
0.1

Net exports
Exports
Imports

-1.3
-0.3
-1.0

-1.0
-0.1
-0.9

-0.8
0.1
-0.9

-0.5
0.2
-0.8

-0.3
0.3
-0.6

-0.3
0.4
-0.7

-0.5
0.5
-1.0

-0.2
0.6
-0.8

-0.6
0.1
-0.8

-0.4
0.5
-0.9

0.3
-0.1
-0.1
-0.0
0.4

0.0
-0.3
-0.3
-0.0
0.3

0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3

0.3
-0.0
-0.0
0.0
0.3

0.2
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.3

0.0
-0.3
-0.2
-0.0
0.3

0.3
-0.0
0.0
-0.0
0.3

0.2
-0.1
-0.0
-0.0
0.3

0.4
0.1
0.2
-0.0
0.3

0.2
-0.1
-0.1
-0.0
0.3

0.3
-0.0
-0.0
-0.0
0.3

-0.4
-0.4
0.0

-0.4
-0.3
-0.1

-0.3
-0.2
-0.1

-0.1
-0.1
-0.1

0.2
0.2
-0.1

-0.1
-0.1
-0.0

0.5
0.5
-0.0

0.4
0.4
-0.0

-0.1
-0.1
-0.0

-0.2
-0.1
-0.1

0.2
0.2
-0.0

Item
Real GDP
Gross dom. purchases
Final sales
Priv. dom.

final purchases

Personal cons. expenditures
Durables
Nondurables
Services

Government cons. a
Federal
Defense
Nondefense
State and local
Change in bus..
Nonfarm
Farm

Note.

invest.

nventories

Components may not sum to

totals

because of rounding.

STAFF PROJECTIONS OF FEDERAL SECTOR ACCOUNTS AND RELATED ITEMS
(Billions of dollars except as noted)

Strictly Confidential (FR)
Class II FOMC

5
Fiscal year

1997

Item

1998

1999

2000

Not seasonally adjusted

UNIFIED BUDGET
Receiptsl
Outlays1
1
Surplus/deficit
On-budget
Off-budget
Surplus excluding
2
deposit insurance
Means of financing
Borrowing
Cash decrease
3
Other
Cash operating balance,
end of period

1579
1601
-22
-103
81

1721
1653
68
-37
105

1770
1714
56
-62
119

1806
1754
52
-74
126

378
409
-30
-51
21

544
407
137
87
50

412
411
1
-7
8

-36

-31

136

-1

38
1
-17

-54
12
-25

-36
-8
-12

-56
0
4

26
4
0

-82
-45
-10

-32
40
-9

388
397
-8
-62
54

541
421
120
66
53

431
425
6
-6
12

412
443
-30
-65
35

407
448
-41
-64
23

549
432
117
60
56

438
431
7
-5
11

419
453
-34
-69
34

-9

119

-31

-42

116

-35

42
11
8

25
-4
-13

-105
-10
-5

2
-5
-3

20
10
1

31
10
1

-89
-25
-3

-17
5
6

19
20
-5

411
472
-61
-60
-1
-62

Seasonally adjusted annual rate

NIPA FEDERAL SECTOR
Receipts
Expenditures
Consumption expend.
Defense
Nondefense
Other expenditures
Current account surplus
Gross investment
Current and capital
account surplus
FISCAL INDICATORS

2000

1999

1998
a

September 23, 1998

1687
1728
458
306
152
1270
-41
61

1820
1767
459
301
158
1308
54
59

1869
1816
464
301
163
1353
52
59

1899
1852
468
302
166
1384
47
57

1809
1750
451
293
158
1299
59
61

1837
1764
464
303
161
1300
73
56

1870
1789
461
301
160
1328
80
60

1886
1814
461
301
160
1353
72
60

1854
1809
463
301
163
1346
45
59

1862
1817
465
302
163
1352
45
59

1873
1825
466
302
164
1359
48
59

1884
1839
465
301
164
1374
45
58

1883
1847
468
301
166
1380
36
57

1904
1856
469
302
167
1387
48
57

1924
1865
469
302
167
1396
59
57

1942
1885
473
306
167
1412
57
58

-102

-6

-10

-2

-14

-10

-13

-21

-9

-1

-90

-55

-87

-83

-91

-103

-90

-75

-68

-65

-50

-37

-.2

-.4

-.5

-.2

-.1

-.2

-.1

-.2

-2.3

-2.1

1.7

-1.5

-.2

-.5

-.2

High-employment (HEB)
surplus/deficit
Change in HEB, percent
of potential GDP
Fiscal impetus (FI),
percent, cal. year

-163
-.8
-2.1

-103
-.8
-1.8

-102

-1.2

0
-1.1

-39

1. OMB's May 1998 surplus estimates (assuming the enactment of the President's proposals) are $39 billion in FY98 and $54 billion in FY99. CBO's
August 1998 baseline surplus estimates are $63 billion in FY98 and $80 billion in FY99. Budget receipts, outlays, and surplus/deficit include
corresponding social security (OASDI) categories. The OASDI surplus is excluded from the on-budget deficit and shown separately as off-budget, as
classified under current law. The Postal Service deficit is included in off-budget outlays beginning in FY90.
2. OMB's May 1998 surplus estimates (assuming the enactment of the President's proposals), excluding deposit insurance spending, are $35 billion
in FY98 and $51 billion in FY99 and CBO's August baseline estimates are $59 billion in FY98 and $76 billion in FY99.
3. Other means of financing are checks issued less checks paid, accrued items, and changes in other financial assets and liabilities.
4. HEB is the NIPA current and capital account surplus in current dollars, with cyclically sensitive receipts and outlays adjusted to the level of
potential output associated with an unemployment rate of 6 percent. Real potential GDP growth is assumed to be 2.8 percent beginning 1995:Q3.
Quarterly figures for change in HEB and FI are not at annual rates. Change in HEB, as a percent of nominal potential GDP, is reversed in sign. FI
is the weighted difference of discretionary changes in federal spending and taxes in chained (1992) dollars, scaled by real federal consumption plus
investment. For change in HEB and FI, negative values indicate restraint.
5. Fiscal year data for the unified budget come from OMB; quarterly data come from the Monthly Treasury Statement and may not sum to OMB fiscal
year totals.
a--Actual.
b--Preliminary.

Strictly Confidential Class II FOMC
September 23, 1998
Change in Debt of the Domestic Nonfinancial Sectors
(Percent)

Year

1990
1991
1992
1993

6.4
4.3
4.6
5.0

11.0
11.1
10.9
8.3

5.2
2.3
2.6
3.8

7.5
4.7
4.3
5.3

9.6
6.4
5.2
4.3

1.5
-1.3
0.5
7.6

3.1
-1.7
0.8
1.6

5.0
8.6
2.2
6.0

4.4
3.8
6.3
5.0

1994
1995
1996
1997

4.6
5.4
5.3
5.3

4.7
4.1
4.0
0.6

4.6
5.9
5.8
7.0

7.5
7.8
7.8
6.8

5.8
5.5
8.0
7.5

14.5
14.1
7.9
4.3

4.0
6.6
5.1
7.6

-4.0
-4.6
-0.6
5.3

5.8
4.2
5.8
5.6

1998
1999
2000

5.6
3.6
3.4

-1.2
-1.6
-1.5

7.8
5.2
4.8

8.0
5.5
4.9

8.9
6.3
5.3

3.8
1.8
1.9

8.3
5.1
4.9

4.8
4.3
3.8

4.2
2.8
3.9

Quarter
1997:3
4
1998:1
2
3
4
1999:1
2
3
4

5.6
6.4
6.0
6.1
4.6
5.1
4.1
3.3
3.5
3.4

0.8
1.1
-0.8
-1.8
-3.9
1.8
-1.3
-2.8
-1.2
-0.9

7.3
8.2
8.3
8.6
7.3
6.1
5.7
5.2
4.9
4.7

6.9
7.3
7.9
8.5
7.5
7.0
6.2
5.6
5.0
4.8

9.1
8.2
8.6
9.3
8.7
8.0
7.1
6.3
5.7
5.5

4.1
3.0
4.1
4.6
3.1
3.4
2.3
2.0
1.5
1.4

7.8
9.1
8.8
9.5
8.1
6.0
5.3
4.9
4.9
4.8

6.7
8.4
8.4
5.7
2.5
2.5
4.6
4.4
4.1
3.9

5.4
4.2
6.4
2.7
4.2
3.6
2.7
2.3
2.8
3.3

Note. Quarterly data are at seasonally adjusted annual rates.
1. Data after 1998:Q2 are staff projections. Changes are measured from end of the preceding period to
end of period indicated except for annual nominal GDP growth, which is calculated from Q4 to Q4.
2. On a monthly average basis, total debt is projected to grow 5.7 percent in 1998 and 3.8 percent in 1999.
3. On a monthly average basis, federal debt is projected to grow -1.2 percent in 1998 and -1.2 percent in 1999.
4. On a monthly average basis, nonfederal debt is projected to grow 8.1 percent in 1998 and 5.4 percent in 1999.
2.6.3 FOF

Strictly Confential Class II FOMC
September 1998
Flow of Funds Projections: Highlights
(Billions of dollars except as noted)

563.2
-88.0
651.2

467.3
-72.0
539.3

514.1
-56.0
570.1

529.0
-40.0
569.0

124.3
-522.0
304.6

127.8
-88.0
275.1

133.1
-72.0
257.1

139.5
-56.0
260.7

146.6
-40.0
257.7

431.2
341.2
40.1
95.4

407.7
321.7
44.2
96.2

371.4
289.7
30.6
96.4

336.5
263.7
26.9
97.2

306.1
243.7
19.3
97.7

296.3
235.7
18.1
98.1

64.9
175.1

28.8
182.9

28.8
190.1

53.8
190.2

51.8
177.6

49.8
185.0

46.8
187.1

-31.3
25.6
30.2

-69.6
-81.5
-136.9

-148.7
-31.8
-0.9

65.8
41.8
61.1

-49.0
25.0
8.3

-106.0
-104.6
-119.6

-46.4
1.7
-6.1

-31.7
19.5
30.2

472.9

323.4

160.9

303.7

249.3

220.3

211.9

222.3

229.5

182.8
11.6
0.5
11.1

182.8
11.0
-0.4
11.3

184.3
11.1
-0.8
11.9

184.9
8.4
-1.7
10.1

185.4
9.4
0.8
8.6

186.3
7.5
-0.6
8.1

187.0
6.2
-1.2
7.4

187.3
6.5
-0.5
7.0

187.4
6.4
-0.4
6.8

810.8
-144.1
954.9

781.1
-138.0
919.1

805.8
-129.2
935.0

534.1
-182.0
716.1

284.9
-522.0
806.9

50.8
-124.0
358.4

82.8
-144.1
425.7

118.5
-138.0
420.2

103.0
-129.2
463.0

98.4
-182.0
404.8

305.4
232.1
25.9
98.5

368.3
326.9
50.3
92.1

396.2
302.0
37.8
92.8

435.9
322.2
51.7
93.6

476.7
359.1
58.6
94.7

50.5
185.0

46.8
186.9

72.6
117.6

92.3
171.5

94.3
179.1

-45.9
-45.9
-46.6

-58.3
-58.3
-87.2

-56.5
-56.5
-47.7

30.3
10.6
10.9

40.8
33.7
39.7

336.9

259.3

221.0

230.7

204.4

182.8
9.5
0.3
9.2

184.2
9.9
-0.5
10.5

186.9
6.7
-0.7
7.3

187.1
6.2
-0.6
6.8

182.0
10.2
0.4
9.8

1999

2000

Net funds raised by domestic
nonfinancialsectors
1 Total
2 Net equity issuance
3 Net debt issuance

653.7
-114.6
768.4

601.5
-242.8
844.3

518.4
-64.0
582.4

546.3
-14.0
560.3

705.6
-124.0
829.6

Borrowing sectors
Nonfinancial business
4 Financing gap 1
5 Net equity issuance
6 Credit market borrowing

73.8
-114.6
337.6

111.0
-242.8
398.2

136.7
-64.0
262.6

163.3
-14.0
264.6

Households
7 Net borrowing 2
8
Home mortgages
Consumer credit
9
10 Debt/DPI (percent) 3

351.6
261.3
52.5
91.9

437.8
336.0
48.7
94.9

327.5
258.2
23.7
97.2

State and local governments
11 Net borrowing
12 Current surplus 4

56.1
135.6

54.2
181.8

23.1
23.1
2.4

Depository institutions
16 Funds supplied
Memo (percentage of GDP)
17 Domestic nonfinancial debt 5
18 Domestic nonfinancial borrowing
19
Federal government 6
Nonfederal
20

Federal government
13 Net borrowing
14 Net borrowing (quarterly, n.s.a.)
15 Unified deficit (quarterly, n.s.a.)

1998

Note. Data after 1998:Q2 are staff projections.
I. For corporations: Excess of capital expenditures over U.S. internal funds.
2. Includes change in liabilities not shown in lines 8 and 9.
3. Average debt levels in the period (computed as the average of period-end debt positions) divided by disposable personal income.
4. NIPA surplus less changes in retirement fund assets plus consumption of fixed capital.
5. Average debt levels in the period (computed as the average of period-end debt positions) divided by nominal GDP.
6. Excludes government-insured mortgage pool securities.
2.6.4 FOF

1999
Q2

1997

Category

Seasonally adjusted annual rates
1998

1997

Calendar year

International Developments
Developments in international financial markets during the intermeeting period have
confirmed our concerns that the actions taken by Russia just before the August FOMC
meeting, to let the ruble depreciate and effectively default on its government debt, could
have widespread negative repercussions. The reaction on the part of investors has been a
general withdrawal from risk. In Latin America in particular, yield spreads and domestic
interest rates soared, while stock markets declined sharply, with falling currencies or
heavy outflows of private capital, especially from Brazil, Venezuela, and Mexico. In
Europe, Japan, and North America, as well, equity markets have dropped substantially
while government bond prices have jumped and corporate bond spreads have widened.
The turmoil in financial markets has led us to revise down substantially our outlook for
GDP growth in Latin America--an outlook that was anemic to begin with by recent
historical standards--and moderately elsewhere. Everything else being equal, the
resultant slowing of U.S. export growth in 1999 would have subtracted more than 1/4
percentage point from our previous projection for U.S. GDP growth over the year ahead.
However, other factors, including a lower path of the dollar associated with an assumed
cut in U.S. interest rates, have a partly offsetting positive effect on the external sector.
Recent Developments
International financial markets. Financial meltdown in Russia proceeded fairly
quickly after the government's actions on August 17, once investors realized fully that
further international financial assistance for Russia would not be forthcoming any time
soon. The ruble plunged and has fluctuated in a wide range between 8 and 22 per dollar
(relative to its starting value of 6.2 rubles per dollar), ending the period around 15 per
dollar. Foreign investors in ruble-denominated government debt appear to be facing very
large losses on their holdings, although in recent days there have been hints that the terms
of the forced restructuring may be amended. After several weeks of political uncertainty,
a government is beginning to emerge under Prime Minister Primakov. Early
pronouncements by the new (and former) head of the central bank, Viktor Geraschenko,
suggest that the new government will depend heavily on the printing press both to finance
wage arrears and to run off its debt.
Brazil was particularly vulnerable to the latest round of contagion, given its very
large budget and external deficits and short-term debt. By early September, Brady bond
spreads for Brazil had soared above their levels seen during the Mexican crisis in 1995,
and domestic short-term interest rates were pushed up to between 40 percent and 50

I-30

Part1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

percent in Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela and to 15 percent in Argentina. The Mexican
peso fell as much as 13 percent, and Brazil ran its reserves down from $68 billion in midAugust to less than $50 billion at present to maintain the real's crawling peg. Pressure on
these financial markets has eased somewhat over the past week and a half as a result of
(1) a sharp increase in domestic interest rates, (2) a growing view in the market that
international financial support would be made available to Brazil and Argentina if
needed, and (3) talk of a cut in U.S. interest rates.
The events in Latin America have been accompanied by significant developments
in international financial markets among the industrial countries. Since the August
FOMC meeting, the dollar has depreciated sharply against the yen (6 1/2 percent), the mark
and most other continental European currencies (6 percent), and the pound (4 percent).
Factors weighing on the dollar include the perception that the U.S. economy is more
vulnerable than either Europe or Japan to a downturn in Latin America, growing
expectations of a U.S. monetary easing, and uncertainty about the prospects for the
Clinton presidency.
The yen strengthened through most of the intermeeting period despite further bad
news about the Japanese banking system and economy, a cut in the Bank of Japan's call
money rate from a bit below 50 basis points to 25 basis points, and a 62 percent drop in
the stock market as the Nikkei fell to a 12-year low. The yen's strength is puzzling.
Market participants cited ongoing withdrawal of Japanese investments from emerging
markets into yen (and in time for the September 30 end of the fiscal mid-year), as well as
growing concern about U.S. and Japanese trade imbalances as reasons for the yen's
appreciation. After having been deadlocked for most of the period, parties negotiating
Japanese bank reform legislation appeared to reach an agreement on September 18, but
disputes over the details arose subsequently. Reflecting both a flight to quality and a
gloomier outlook for economic activity, the long-term government bond yield fell 40
basis points, but corporate bond spreads and the premium on interbank borrowing rates of
Japanese banks widened somewhat.
Stock markets in the major European countries have fallen substantially over the
intermeeting period and have lost 20 to 25 percent on balance since their peaks in July.
Government bond yields have declined 25 to 55 basis points since mid-August and have
moved below 4 percent in Germany for the first time in recent decades.
The dollar is little changed on balance against the Canadian dollar, which
continued its recent downtrend early in the period but recovered after the Bank of Canada
hiked its bank rate 100 basis points on August 27 in response to the currency's slide.

InternationalDevelopments

I-31

Canadian stock and bond markets have moved much the same as those in Europe and the
United States over the period.
Financial markets in Asia, already having undergone a major downturn, were less
affected by the developments in Russia and Latin America. Two actions worthy of note
were massive intervention in the Hong Kong stock market by the Hong Kong Monetary
Authority and the imposition of exchange controls in Malaysia. The HKMA spent an
estimated $12 1/2 billion in the stock market, which ended the period up 4 percent. With
the imposition of exchange controls in Malaysia in early September, the currency was set
at a 10 percent higher level than had prevailed in recent months. Malaysian interest rates
have declined, and the stock market has risen on balance since the controls were imposed
and banking supervision and regulation were relaxed.
On a trade-weighted average basis in terms of the major currencies, the dollar has
declined about 4 percent since the August FOMC meeting. Against a broad weighted
average the dollar is down only 2 percent, however, reflecting in large part the dollar's
rise against the Mexican peso.
The Desk did
not intervene.
Economic activity abroad. The growth of total foreign real GDP (weighted by
shares of U.S. nonagricultural exports) appears to have remained near zero in the second
quarter, and early indications for the third quarter point to continued sluggishness.
Japan's GDP showed another substantial decline, though the rate of descent slowed
somewhat in the second quarter because of a steep drop in imports. Domestic demand
fell at an annual rate of 6.2 percent in the second quarter, somewhat more than in the first
quarter. A drop in industrial production and big declines in housing starts and machinery
orders in July point to negative GDP growth for Japan again in the third quarter.
Real growth in Europe slowed in the second quarter as German GDP growth fell
to only 0.4 percent (SAAR) because of the impact of a VAT increase and unusual
weather. Recent indicators point to some rebound in the third quarter. Elsewhere in
Europe, early indications are generally for some slowing of growth in the third quarter.
Canadian growth should recover somewhat from a strike-depressed second quarter.
Industrial countries showed a substantial slowing in growth of real exports during the first
half of 1998 compared with 1997, and Japanese and U.K. exports recorded significantly
negative growth rates. Twelve-month CPI inflation dipped to zero in Japan in July and
1 percent in continental Europe and
August, was running in the neighborhood of to 1/2
percent in the United Kingdom in August.
Canada and slowed to the official target of 2 1/2

I-32

Part1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

Real output continued to spiral downward in Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, and
Thailand in the second quarter, although GDP in Korea and Malaysia appears to have
declined more slowly than in the first quarter. The decline in the Philippines steepened
from a moderate rate in the first quarter, and growth in Singapore turned negative. The
countries for which data on industrial production are available through July or August
(Korea, Malaysia, and Singapore) show continued weakness. Hong Kong recorded a
sharp drop in real GDP in the first quarter; China and Taiwan showed slowing positive
growth through the second quarter. The growth of China's industrial production held up
at an annual rate of nearly 8 percent through August (12-month change), while Taiwan's
continued at around 4 percent. The combined trade balance of Korea, Malaysia,
Philippines, and Thailand was up $108 billion in the second quarter from a year earlier.
We estimate that $25 billion of the adjustment has been in trade with the United States,
primarily as a reduction in U.S. nominal exports.'
Output growth in Mexico and Argentina has slowed in recent months from last
year's robust pace. In Mexico declining oil prices have forced some fiscal belttightening, and monetary conditions were tightened in response to increasing financial
market turmoil earlier this year. Growth in Brazil is estimated to have picked up in the
second quarter after its first-quarter plunge but appears to have turned negative again in
the third quarter. While most of the Asian emerging market economies have moved
significantly into external surplus this year, the major Latin American countries were still
running relatively large current account deficits during the second quarter and into the
third quarter. Twelve-month consumer price inflation remained high in Mexico through
August (15 percent) but has declined in Brazil (to 4 percent) and remains around 1
percent in Argentina.
U.S. net exports and prices. The U.S. nominal trade deficit in goods and
services narrowed slightly in July from the $174 billion (annual rate) deficit recorded in
the second quarter. Both imports and exports declined, reflecting in part the effects of the
GM strike on automotive trade with Canada and Mexico. The current account deficit
widened to $226 billion, or 2.9 percent of GDP, in the second quarter.
U.S. export prices declined 3.1 percent at an annual rate in July-August relative to
the second quarter, with declines concentrated in agricultural commodities, industrial
materials, and computers. The price of non-oil imports fell 4.1 percent at an annual rate
in July-August following similar declines in the first two quarters. These declines were

1. Given sharp declines in the prices of U.S. imports from key Asian countries, it appears that these
imports have been rising significantly in real terms.

InternationalDevelopments

I-33

widespread across commodity categories, particularly industrial supplies, computers and
semiconductors. Prices of imports from key Asian economies (whose exports are heavily
weighted towards computers and semiconductors) declined while those from Europe and
Canada were little changed. 2 The average price of imported oil dropped further in JulyAugust. Unexpectedly large shipments from Iraq, market disappointment over the pace
of production cutbacks from other OPEC producers, and weak oil demand -- especially in
Asia -- all contributed to the decline in prices below $13.00 (WTI) in mid-August. Spot
prices have rebounded since then largely because OPEC has intensified efforts to restrain
production and because Iraq has announced that it will not be able to maintain its August
export rates through the remainder of the year. Spot WTI is currently trading near $15.50
per barrel.
Outlook
The staff projects that foreign GDP (weighted by U.S. nonagricultural export
shares), which declined slightly during the first half of this year, will decline further in
the second half. Over the next two years, we see growth resuming with a gradual pickup
to about 2 1/2percent by 2000, still well below the average rate during 1992-96. The
projected growth performance for 1998-99 is easily the slowest two-year growth in the
past three decades. Relative to the August forecast, we have subtracted about
1 percentage point from the growth of foreign GDP through the end of 1999 because of
deep cuts in Latin American growth and smaller downward revisions elsewhere. We also
see the risks surrounding this forecast as having widened further, and we outline those
risks in more detail at the end of this outlook section.
We project the dollar to decline moderately in real terms against a broad set of
currencies. This outlook is little changed from that in the August forecast as downward
revisions in the path for the dollar in terms of major currencies is offset by upward
revisions in terms of Latin American currencies. We now see real net exports subtracting
about 1 percentage point from U.S. real GDP growth in the second half of 1998 and about
1/2 percentage point in1999 and 2000 somewhat more than in the August forecast. The
lower foreign GDP growth reduces our projection for U.S. export growth enough to
subtract 0.2 percentage point from U.S. GDP growth over the year ahead. In addition,
U.S. import growth has been weakened slightly in light of the lower trajectory for U.S.
GDP growth.

2. The Asian economies covered by these data include Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan.

Part1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

I-34

Summary of Staff Projections
(Percentage change from end of previous period)
Projection
1998
19981999
Q4
H1____Q3

Measure

1997

Foreign output
August

4.0
3.9

.2
-0.1

-.4
.5

-.1
1.1

1.4
2.1

2.5

Real exports
August

9.6
9.6

-5.2
-5.8

-1.7
-2.3

-2.8
-.5

1.3
3.0

4.7

Real imports
August

14.0
14.0

12.4
13.9

5.5
6.9

7.7
8.2

6.1
6.5

6.6

2000

The dollar. We project that the trade-weighted exchange value of the dollar against
the major foreign currencies will remain near its current level in coming weeks as market
expectations are met for an easing in the very near term by the Federal Reserve. We
assume that further cuts in U.S. short-term interest rates and, over time, growing concern
about the U.S. external deficit, will cause the dollar to fall at an annual rate of about 4
percent against the euro during 1999 and 2000. The dollar should also decline, though
more moderately, against the Canadian dollar as that currency regains some of the ground it
has lost in recent months with the gradual pickup in global activity. There is considerable
uncertainty about factors that will affect the dollar/yen exchange rate. We expect declining
U.S. interest rates and growing concerns about diverging external balances in the United
States and Japan to put downward pressure on the dollar. At the same time, chronic
macroeconomic and financial sector problems in Japan will weigh on the yen. As a result,
we are projecting the dollar to remain little changed against the yen while recognizing that
the risk for large movements in either direction are substantial.
At the same time, our forecast has the real exchange value of the dollar little
changed against emerging market currencies on average as increases in terms of Latin
American currencies are offset by decreases against Asian currencies. We assume that the
Mexican peso will decline significantly in the near term and that the Brazilian real will
depreciate substantially in real terms over the forecast period as Brazil's currency peg
succumbs to market pressures. We again project that Chinese authorities will allow some
decline in the renminbi later next year and that the Argentine and Hong Kong currency pegs
will hold. The projected appreciation of Asian currencies in real terms reflects inflation

InternationalDevelopments

1-35

rates that are higher in those countries than in the United States. On a broad weighted
average basis, in real terms, the dollar falls 1 percent in the fourth quarter and another 2
percent over the next two years.
Activity in foreign industrial countries. The staff projects that real GDP growth
in the foreign industrial countries will edge up from around 11/2 percent in the third quarter
to about 2 percent in the fourth quarter and that it will remain in that vicinity through 2000.
This rate of growth is nearly 1/2 percent lower than that in the August forecast, reflecting
downward revisions, especially in Europe and Canada, in response to the expected negative
effects on spending of stock market corrections and weaker external demand resulting from
the deteriorating outlook in Latin America and Eastern Europe and the slowing of growth in
the United States.
Japan. We now expect Japanese GDP to show another substantial decline in the
third quarter as fiscal measures are unlikely to show through significantly until later in the
year. We project private domestic demand to continue declining through mid-1999 and to
begin to turn up only very sluggishly in 2000. Nevertheless, we are projecting real GDP to
expand at an annual rate of 3/4percent in the fourth quarter and about 1 percent in 1999 as a
result of substantial fiscal stimulus now in train (and our assumption that a bit more is still
to come) plus a small positive contribution from net exports. Absent further fiscal stimulus
percent as private demand picks up. Assuming
in 2000, GDP growth will remain around 1/2
growth of potential output in Japan remains about 1 1/2
percent, this forecast implies an
output gap of over 7 percent by the end of 2000.
Europe and Canada. Real output growth in Euroland is expected to remain
around 21/4 to 21/2 percent through the forecast period. Strength in domestic demand
(supported by accommodative monetary policy) accounts for continued expansion as net
exports are projected to make a negative contribution throughout the remainder of the
forecast period. Real GDP growth in the United Kingdom and Canada is projected to slow
over the next five quarters in response to recent monetary tightening and stock market
declines and to pick up moderately in 2000.
Inflation. Consumer price inflation in the major foreign industrial countries (on a
four-quarter basis and weighted by U.S. non-oil import shares) is projected to fall to just
below 1/2 percent in the fourth quarter as Japanese prices fall 1 percent. We project the
foreign average to rise to positive 1 percent by 2000 as Japanese inflation returns to zero.
Inflation is expected to be low everywhere except in the United Kingdom, where it is
anticipated to remain around 21/2 percent.
Interest rates. This forecast incorporates the assumption that short-term market
interest rates in Japan will remain very low over the forecast period. In coming months,

1-36

Part1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

interest rates in Euroland will decline on average as rates converge at the current level of
German rates (around 31/2 percent) before the start of EMU. In light of the weaker outlook
for growth in Europe, we have dropped our previous assumption that the ECB will tighten
somewhat next year, and we now assume that monetary policy will remain accommodative
over the forecast period with rates unchanged. We also assume that both Canadian and
U.K. interest rates will decline by 100 to 150 basis points over the next two years as growth
slows in those countries and (especially in the case of Canada) as U.S. rates are reduced.
Developing countries. Average real GDP of our major trading partners among
developing countries is projected to decline at an annual rate of nearly 3 percent during the
second half of 1998 and somewhat less in the first quarter of 1999 and to pick up but
remain sluggish thereafter, with growth averaging a little over

percent during 1999 and a

bit less than 3 percent rate in 2000 -- only half the trend rate of recent years. This forecast
represents a substantial downward revision from the previous projection because of a sharp
markdown of our outlook for Latin America, especially Brazil and Argentina.
Latin America. Our best guess for Latin America is that real GDP will be
depressed by diminished access to external borrowing and by the sharply higher interest
rates and fiscal contractions put in place to bolster the confidence of international (and
domestic) investors in these countries. Conditions in Latin American markets are expected
to remain unsettled into next year; however, our forecast assumes that enough confidence
will be restored to allow these countries to finance reduced though still negative current
account balances. 3 Nevertheless, we project that the financial shock that has already
occurred will cause GDP in Brazil and Argentina to decline at annual rates of 3 to 6 percent
over the next several quarters. Venezuela will continue to be hit hard as well, but Mexico
and Chile less so because their domestic policies and more flexible exchange rates have
rendered them somewhat less vulnerable.
Asia. We project that real GDP in the Asian developing countries on average reach
a trough in the first half of 1999 (mid-2000 for Indonesia) and will turn up slowly
thereafter. Only China is expected to record significantly positive growth throughout the
forecast period. Asian growth for 1998-99 has been marked down slightly since the last
Greenbook.
Real net exports of goods and services. Trade data for June and July have led us
to mark up the level of real exports of goods and services in the third quarter somewhat

3. Our forecasts for Latin American growth and exchange rates are consistent with the current account
deficits of these countries falling to half the levels we had projected earlier (and somewhat less than half

their 1987 levels).

InternationalDevelopments

1-37

relative to the previous forecast. The decline in exports of machinery excluding computers
and semiconductors in recent months has been less than we had expected. Beyond the third
quarter, however, we have significantly reduced the growth of exports because of weaker
GDP growth abroad. Latin America accounts for about 20 percent of U.S. exports, roughly
the same as Asia excluding Japan. Exports of nonagricultural goods other than computers
and semiconductors (core exports) are now projected to drop at an annual rate of 6 percent
during the second half of this year and 2 percent during 1999. These exports should expand
again in 2000, by nearly 3 percent, as GDP growth abroad picks up and the moderate
decline in the dollar adds some stimulus to export demand. With exports of computers and
semiconductors expected to continue growing at a much more rapid pace than other exports
in real terms, total exports of goods and services should grow 2 to 3 percentage points
faster than core exports over the forecast period.
We expect that the growth of imports of goods and services will slow noticeably
over the year ahead from its rapid pace over the past several years as U.S. real GDP growth
declines. Real imports of non-oil goods other than computers and semiconductors (core
imports) should decelerate to an annual rate of growth of about 8 percent during the second
half of this year from 13 percent over the past six quarters then slow to about 5 percent
growth in 1999 and 2000. The moderate decline in the dollar over the forecast period
should keep import growth steady as U.S. GDP growth recovers in 2000. Growth of
imports of computers and semiconductors in real terms should remain rapid. The quantity
of oil imports should decline during the second half of this year as inventories retreat from
the current unusually high levels. We project that oil imports will rise a bit more rapidly
than was forecast in August because of the adverse effect of low oil prices on U.S. oil
production. Overall, real imports of goods and services are projected to expand at an
annual rate of 6 1/2
percent during the second half of this year and about 6 percent next year.
Oil prices. The staff has raised its projected path for the price of imported oil
slightly in the near term to reflect recent increases in spot oil prices and anticipated further
increases in response to production cuts by major oil producers. We project that the oil
import price will rise from a little more than $11.50 per barrel in the third quarter to about
$13.50 per barrel in 1999, and to $14 per barrel in 2000. This longer-term path is nearly
$0.75 per barrel below the previous forecast largely because of the weaker outlook for
global GDP growth.
Prices of non-oil imports and exports. We expect that the net appreciation of the
dollar in recent quarters and declining world commodity prices through much of next year
will continue to depress non-oil import prices of core goods through mid-1999. We project
a rate of decline of nearly 3 percent in the second half of 1998 and no change in the first

Part1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

I-38

half of 1999. As the effects of past appreciation of the dollar wane, and the dollar begins
to depreciate, import prices should begin to rise slowly over the rest of the forecast period.
Nonagricultural export prices for core goods are projected to decline slightly further in the
second half of 1998 but to begin rising very slowly over the remainder of the forecast
period, in line with comparable domestic prices.
Selected Trade Prices
(Percentage change from end of previous period
except as noted; seasonally adjusted)

Projection
Trade category

1998
19981999

1997

-2.0
-10.9

-.8
-11.5

.1
-11.4

2000

Exports

Nonagricultural (core)
Agricultural

.5
-3.2

1.2
1.7

1.3
2.0

0.6
13.50

1.4
14.00

Imports

Non-oil (core)
Oil (level, dollars per barrel)

-.7
17.72

-2.6
12.51

-3.8
11.64

-1.8
12.75

NOTE. Prices for exports and non-oil imports of goods, excluding computers and
semiconductors, are on a NIPA chain-weighted basis.
The price of imported oil for multiquarter periods is the price for the final quarter of the
period.

Nominal trade and current account balances. The nominal trade deficit on
goods and services is projected to widen significantly further over the forecast period, from
about $175 billion in the second quarter of this year to nearly $290 billion in the fourth
quarter of 2000. The deficit on net investment income also is projected to widen over the
forecast period. As a result, the current account deficit is expected to grow from about
$225 billion in the second quarter (2 percent of GDP) to an average of more than $360
billion for the year 2000 (4 percent of GDP, noticeably above the previous peak for this
ratio that was reached in 1987).
Risks
The risks surrounding the international outlook are substantial and, if anything, have
widened further as a result of recent events. We consider two alternative scenarios that
highlight the potential implications of these risks for U.S. GDP and inflation. The first,
labeled "pessimistic scenario" combines several somewhat interrelated developments
abroad that could cause U.S. GDP to fall more than in our current baseline forecast. The

InternationalDevelopments

1-39

second, labeled "optimistic scenario" considers a combination of developments abroad that
could raise U.S. GDP and exacerbate U.S. inflation pressures relative to the baseline.
Pessimistic scenario. In this scenario, we assume that (a) Japan either fails to reach
an agreement on how to deal with its banking crisis or fails to implement a banking
resolution agreement effectively, (b) Japanese fiscal expansion falls well short of current
expectations, (c) Latin American financial markets continue in turmoil, as Brazil fails to
make meaningful progress in reducing its budget deficit, international financial assistance
falls well short of current market expectations, and as a result capital flight from Latin
America persists through 1999, necessitating a reduction in these countries' current
accounts to zero or in some cases into small surpluses, (d) negative reactions in Asian
financial markets further depress GDP in those countries, (e) U.S. and European interest
rates follow the paths assumed in the Greenbook forecast.
In this case, GDP growth in Japan and Latin America falls about 5 percentage points
below baseline during 1999 and somewhat less during 2000; GDP growth in the rest of
Asia falls half as much, and GDP growth in Europe falls a bit less than in the United States.
U.S. GDP growth is reduced by 0.4percentage point relative to baseline during 1999, and
by 0.3 percentage point during 2000. The dollar appreciates 4 percent in the near term and
the U.S. inflation rate is reduced 0.2 percentage point for the next two years. In this
simulation, the U.S. stock market falls endogenously by 2 percent. If the U.S. stock market
were to fall by an additional 10 percent (in excess of the model's prediction) in reaction to
these events, the effects on U.S. GDP would be about twice as large. (See the results
labeled "Pessimistic + Stock Market" in the table.)
Optimistic scenario. In this scenario, we assume that (a) Japan quickly reaches
agreement on bank reform legislation and immediately begins effective implementation
with generally positive response in Japanese and global financial markets, (b) Japanese
fiscal stimulus shows through strongly and is augmented with additional legislation,
(c) President Cardoso wins convincingly in the upcoming Brazilian election and undertakes
large and credible fiscal correction, international financial assistance to Latin America is
substantial, and Latin American financial markets recover strongly, with yield spreads and
domestic interest rates falling sharply and allowing countries to continue to finance large
current account deficits (though not as large as we had projected in August), (d) Asian
financial markets rebound and activity picks up, (e) with emerging market jitters calmed,
investors begin to focus on the outsized U.S. external deficit and the dollar falls 10 percent
against a broad range of currencies.
In this case, Japanese GDP growth rises about 2 percentage points above baseline
in 1999 and 2000. GDP growth in Latin America and Asia rises several percentage points

Part1: Summary and Outlook, September 23, 1998

1-40

above baseline but remains well below longer-term trend rates. The effect on Europe is
small. U.S. GDP growth rises 3/4percentage point above baseline in 1999 and 1/2 percentage
point in 2000. Consumer price inflation rises by roughly 1/2percentage point during 1999
and 2000. Most of the effect on U.S. growth and inflation results directly from the decline
in the dollar. If, in addition the U.S. stock market were to rebound strongly to these
developments, the effects on U.S. GDP would be greater.
Alternative International Scenarios
(Percent change, Q4 to Q4)
Measure
U.S. Real GDP
Baseline
Pessimistic
Pessimistic + Stock Market*
Optimistic
U.S. CPI ex. food and energy
Baseline
Pessimistic
Pessimistic + Stock Market*
Optimistic

1998

1999

2000

3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3

1.2
0.8
0.5
2.0

2.4
2.1
1.8
2.8

2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3

2.1
1.9
1.9
2.7

2.1
1.9
1.8
2.6

* U.S. stock market falls an additional 10 percent.

September 23, 1998

Strictly Confidential (FR)
Class II FOMC

OUTLOOK FOR FOREIGN REAL GDP AND CONSUMER PRICES: SELECTED COUNTRIES

(Percent, Q4 to Q4)

----- Projected----

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

0.9
0.1
0.4
0.1

3.1
0.5
2.7
-0.1

4.5
0.8
4.9
3.4

0.8
2.4
2.0
1.3

2.0
3.4
2.9
1.9

4.0
-0.4
2.9
3.0

2.5
-2.6
1.5
2.5

2.2
0.9
1.7
2.3

2.5
0.6
2.3
2.4

-0.1

-0.5

4.1

0.3

2.4

3.0

2.2

1.9

2.0

0.9
-0.8

-0.2
0.1

3.4
2.5

0.0
2.6

2.1
-0.2

2.3
2.8

2.3
1.4

2.0
2.0

2.2
2.3

0.2

0.6

2.8

1.5

2.3

1.8

0.4

1.6

1.7

2.3
0.5
5.2

3.4
1.9
6.1

5.0
3.6
7.2

1.8
1.2
2.5

4.1
2.3
6.8

4.0
2.8
5.4

-0.2
1.3
-2.9

1.4
1.8
0.8

2.5
2.1
2.9

Canada

1.8

-0.0

2.1

2.0

1.0

1.3

1.6

1.5

Japan
United Kingdom (3)

0.9
3.7

1.2
2.7

0.8
2.2

-0.8
2.9

0.1
3.2

2.1
2.8

-1.0
2.6

-0.3
3.0

0.1
2.7

Measure and country
REAL GDP
Canada
Japan
United Kingdom
Euro-11 Average (1)

of which:
France
Germany
Italy

(2)

Foreign G-7 Average

weighted by 1991 GDP
Average weighted by share of
U.S. nonagricultural exports
Total foreign
Foreign G-7
Developing Countries
CONSUMER PRICES

Euro-11 Average (4)
of which:
France
Germany (2)
Italy

2.7

2.0

1.4

1.3

1.5

1.8
3.4
4.9

2.1
4.2
4.1

1.6
2.6
3.8

1.9
1.7
5.9

1.7
1.4
2.7

1.2
1.8
1.6

0.9
0.8
1.7

1.0
1.2
1.8

1.0
1.5
1.8

Foreign G-7 Average
weighted by 1991 GDP

2.4

2.5

1.8

1.6

1.5

1.8

0.6

1.0

1.2

Average weighted by share of
U.S. non-oil imports

1.9

2.0

1.0

1.1

1.3

1.7

0.4

0.9

1.0

1. Includes all of the European Union countries except the United Kingdom, Denmark,
Sweden, and Greece; weighted by GDP.
2. CPI excluding mortgage interest payments which is the targeted inflation rate.
3. Harmonized CPI's for the Euro-11, weighted by shares in final consumption of
households converted to a common currency using estimated PPP exchange rates.

September 23

Strictly Confidential (FR)
Class II FOMC
OUTLOOK FOR FOREIGN REAL GDP AND CONSUMER PRICES: SELECTED COUNTRIES
(Percent, quarterly change at an annual rate)

---------------------

1998
-----------------------

Projected --------------------------

1999
-----------------------

2000
--------- --------------

3.4
-5.2
2.2
3.3

1.8
-3.3
2.0
2.1

2.5
-2.7
0.9
2.5

2.3
0.8
1.0
2.0

2.2
0.8
1.4
2.3

2.2
1.1
1.6
2.3

2.2
0.9
1.8
2.3

2.2
0.7
2.0
2.4

2.2
0.3
2.1
2.4

2.4
0.5
2.3
2.4

2.6
0.7
2.5
2.4

2.8
Q.9
2.5
2.4

2.5
5.9
-0.5

2.8
0.4
1.7

1.8
1.3
3.5

1.8
1.6
1.0

1.8
1.8
2.0

1.8
2.0
2.0

2.0
2.0
2.0

2.0
2.1
2.0

2.0
2.1
2.3

2.0
2.2
2.3

2.0
2.3
2.3

0.1

-0.0

0.4

1.3

1.5

1.6

1.5

1.6

1.8

-0.8
1.6
-4.7

0.4
0.7
-1.1

-0.4
1.2
-3.0

-0.1
1.7
-2.6

0.5
1.8
-1.2

1.3
1.9
0.6

1.8
1.9
1.6

2.1
1.9
2.3

2.2
1.8
2.5

2.4
2.0
2.7

2.6
2.1
3.0

2.7
2.3
3.2

1.0
2.1
2.5
1.2

1.0
0.6
3.0
1.5

1.1
0.0
2.6
1.4

1.3
-1.0
2.6
1.3

1.5
-1.0
2.9
1.4

1.6
-1.0
2.9
1.3

1.6
-0.7
3.0
1.3

1.6
-0.3
3.0
1.5

1.5
0.0
2.9
1.5

1.5
0.0
2.8
1.5

1.5
0.1
2.8
1.5

1.5
0.1
2.7
1.5

0.7

1.0

0.9

1.0

Foreign G-7 Average
weighted by 1991 GDP

1.6

1.3

1.0

0.6

0.7

0.8

1.0

1.1

1.2

Average weighted by share of
U.S. non-oil imports

1.6

1.1

0.8

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.9

1.0

Measure and country
REAL GDP
Canada
Japan
United Kingdom
Euro-11 Average (1)
of which:
France
Germany
Italy
Foreign 0-7 Average
weighted by 1991 GDP
Average weighted by share of
U.S. nonagricultural exports
Total foreign
Foreign G-7
Developing Countries
CONSUMER PRICES (2)
Canada
Japan
United Kingdom (3)
Euro-11 Average (4)
of which:
France

Germany
Italy

1.2
1.7

1.3
1.8

0.8
1.8

0.8
1.7

0.9
1.7

1.0
1.7

1.1
1.7

1.2
1.8

1. Includes all of the European Union countries except the United Kingdom, Denmark,
Sweden, and Greece; weighted by GDP.
2. Percent change from same period a year earlier.
3. CPI excluding mortgage interest payments which is the targeted inflation rate.
4. Harmonized CPI's for the Euro-11, weighted by shares in final consumption of
households converted to a common currency using estimated PPP exchange rates.

1.3
1.8

1.4
1.8

1.5
1.8

Strictly
Class II

Confidential
FOMC

(FR)

September 23,

1998

OUTLOOK FOR U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

------ Projected -----1998
1999
2000

1997

NIPA REAL EXPORTS and IMPORTS
Percentage point contribution to GDP growth, Q4/Q4
Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-0.4
0.4
-0.8

-0.6
0.5
-1.1

-0.4
1.0
-1.4

0.5
1.1
-0.7

-0.3
1.2
-1.4

-0.6
1.1
-1.7

-1.7
-0.4
-1.2

-0.6
0.1
-0.8

-0.4
0.5
-0.9

Percentage change, Q4/Q4
Exports of G&S
Services
Agricultural Goods
Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 1/

4.1
-0.9
10.4
25.2
64.8
2.3

4.6
4.1
-5.5
23.7
32.9
3.6

10.0
6.0
16.6
32.0
66.9
7.0

10.5
9.8
-4.3
55.5
79.6
5.8

10.3
7.5
4.8
35.9
46.2
8.0

9.6
1.5
2.8
40.7
21.0
11.6

-3.8
-1.1
-5.3
9.0
-0.8
-6.2

1.3
1.7
1.5
26.6
16.9
-1.9

4.7
3.0
1.5
28.3
21.3
2.9

Imports of G&S
Services
Oil
Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 2/

7.4
1.4
12.1
45.1
42.0
5.4

10.2
3.2
10.1
39.3
34.2
9.5

12.3
1.4
-0.2
44.8
54.5
12.2

5.6
6.1
2.4
48.1
92.4
-1.2

11.8
5.5
7.9
24.4
57.6
10.4

14.0
12.4
4.0
30.3
32.7
13.0

9.5
2.5
1.0
31.1
-7.3
10.7

6.1
1.3
3.2
30.2
21.8
4.8

6.6
2.7
6.1
29.9
25.3
4.8

-111.2
860.0
971.2

-136.1
970.0
1106.1

-250.9
973.4
1224.3

-341.2
965.3
1306.5

-386.0
1000.6
1386.7

Billions of chained 1992 dollars
Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-29.5
639.4
669.0

-70.2
658.2
728.4

-104.6
712.4
817.0

-96.5
792.6
889.0

Billions of dollars
-51.4

-86.1

-123.8

-115.3

-134.9

-155.2

-233.7

-319.0

-364.1

Net Goods & Services (BOP)
Exports of G&S (BOP)
Imports of G&S (BOP)

-38.7
617.3
656.0

-71.9
643.2
715.2

-100.9
703.8
804.7

-99.9
795.6
895.5

-108.6
850.8
959.3

-110.2
937.6
1047.8

-175.4
920.7
1096.1

-243.2
905.4
1148.6

-277.6
938.8
1216.4

Net Investment Income
Direct, Net
Portfolio, Net

22.5
51.6
-29.1

23.9
55.7
-31.7

16.5
51.8
-35.3

19.3
63.0
-43.7

14.2
66.2
-51.9

-5.3
63.7
-69.1

-17.2
57.5
-74.8

-34.1
49.2
-83.2

-44.8
55.9
-100.7

Net Transfers

-35.2

-38.1

-39.4

-34.6

-40.6

-39.7

-41.1

-41.8

US CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE

1. Merchandise exports excluding agricultural products, computers, and semiconductors.
2. Merchandise imports excluding oil, computers, and semiconductors.

Strictly Confidential
lential (FR)
(FR)
Class II

September

1998

FOMC
OUTLOOK FOR U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS
1995

1996

1997

----------------------------

----------------------- '-----

------------------- '--------

2.4
3.2
-0.9

-1.3
0.9
-2.2

-0.4
1.7
-2.2

-0.5
1.2
-1.7

-0.3
0.5
-0.8

NIPA REAL EXPORTS and IMPORTS
Percentage point contribution to GDP growth
Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-0.2
1.0
-1.2

-0.3
0.6
-0.9

1.6
1.9
-0.3

0.7
1.1
-0.4

-1.1
0.4
-1.5

-1.0
0.6
-1.6

-1.4
0.2
-1.6

Percentage change from previous period, SAAR
Exports of G&S
Services
Agricultural Goods
Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 1/
Imports of G&S
Services
Oil
Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 2/

9.2
9.1
1.8
36.4
72.0
4.3

5.4
2.9
-13.4
33.8
100.8
1.4

17.8
21.7
5.0
86.6
96.2
9.4

10.2
6.4
-9.4
71.6
53.6
8.1

3.7
-4.0
22.6
57.6
23.8
0.1

5.8
10.3
-32.8
24.7
29.7
6.0

2.1
-9.9
-1.6
27.7
30.2
5.7

32.0
39.8
48.7
35.9
118.6
21.3

8.3
-6.7
-16.1
70.2
41.3
13.8

15.5
11.8
-7.8
78.7
17.3
15.6

10.6
5.9
8.7
41.9
32.3
9.2

4.4
-4.0
32.8
-9.2
-2.2
8.0

9.8
20.5
-11.4
15.4
37.1
7.2

7.2
-3.3
15.4
51.6
105.5
1.5

2.0
3.1
31.4
62.7
128.2
-8.8

3.5
5.5
-18.2
69.3
113.3
-3.8

13.1
9.2
-9.8
22.5
38.7
13.9

13.5
4.3
68.9
22.9
8.9
10.5

13.6
9.9
3.5
18.8
50.1
13.5

7.0
-1.1
-14.0
33.8
172.1
4.2

18.6
17.8
-8.2
54.5
89.0
16.2

17.9
10.6
37.0
39.0
16.0
16.1

13.5
15.8
6.0
30.6
20.3
11.8

6.3
5.8
-12.2
2.9
17.6
8.1

-140.1
849.9
990.0

-95.9
911.1
1007.0

-121.5
929.4
1050.9

-131.6
963.6
1095.2

-142.4
988.1
1130.5

-149.0
998.8
1147.8

Billions of chained 1992 dollars, SAAR
Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-109.5
763.9
873.4

-114.7
774.0
888.7

-86.8
806.3
893.1

-74.8
826.1
900.9

-95.5
833.6
929.1

-113.5
845.5
958.9

Billions of dollars, SAAR
US CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE

-123.7

-134.2

-115.5

-87.7

-112.9

-132.0

-161.6

-133.2

-148.0

-140.4

-152.4

-180.2

Net Goods & Services (BOP) -109.3
765.4
Exports of G&S (BOP)
874.7
Imports of G&S (BOP)

-125.8
782.0
907.7

-90.0
809.7
899.7

-74.5
825.6
900.1

-92.4
833.6
926.0

-112.8
845.3
958.2

-132.3
837.5
969.8

-96.8
886.7
983.5

-112.5
904.7
1017.3

-106.1
936.1
1042.1

-108.4
951.7
1060.1

-113.8
957.8
1071.7

Net Investment Income
Direct, Net
Portfolio, Net

20.1
59.9
-39.8

24.0
67.2
-43.2

10.2
56.5
-46.2

22.7
68.3
-45.5

21.4
64.8
-43.3

15.9
64.4
-48.5

6.9
61.9
-55.0

12.7
73.6
-60.9

0.1
64.2
-64.2

1.8
69.6
-67.8

-6.2
65.5
-71.7

-17.0
55.6
-72.6

Net Transfers

-34.5

-32.4

-35.8

-35.9

-41.9

-35.1

-36.2

-49.1

-35.5

-36.1

-37.8

-49.3

1. Merchandise exports excluding agricultural products, computers, and semiconductors.
2. Merchandise imports excluding oil, computers, and semiconductors.

Strictly
Class II

Confidential (FR)
FOMC

September 1998
OUTLOOK FOR U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS

1998

----------------------------- Projected -------------------------------1999

----------------------------

2000

---------------------------

-0.3
0.3
-0.6

-0.3
0.4
-0.7

-0.5
0.5
-1.0

-0.2
0.6
-0.8

5.3
3.1
1.5

NIPA REAL EXPORTS and IMPORTS

Percentage point contribution to GDP growth
Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-2.3
-0.3
-1.9

-2.1
-0.9
-1.2

-0.9
-0.2
-0.7

-1.3
-0.3
-1.0

-1.0
-0.1
-0.9

-0.8
9.1
-0.9

-0.5
0.2
-0.8

Percentage change from previous period, SAAR
Exports of G&S
Services
Agricultural Goods

-2.8
-1.2
-9.9

-7.6
2.0
-23.5

-1.7
-2.8
14.7

-2.8
-2.2
1.6

-0.8
0.1
1.6

0.9
1.7
1.5

2.3
2.5
1.5

2.9
2.4
1.5

3.8
2.5
1.5

4.6
3.2
1.5

5.0
3.1
1.5

-15.5
-2.0
-1.6

8.9
-18.2
-11.1

21.5
7.4
-5.0

26.2
12.6
-6.8

26.2
14.8
-4.6

26.2
15.9
-2.5

26.7
17.9
-0.8

27.2
19.3
0.3

27.7
20.4
1.7

28.2
21.6
2.6

28.6
21.6
3.5

28.6
21.6
4.0

Imports of G&S
Services
Oil

15.7
9.3
8.8

9.2
-0.5
40.8

5.5
-0.1
-13.2

Computers

7.7
1.6
-21.7

6.8
1.0
-6.3

6.9
0.3
35.0

38.8

5.9
1.5
9.6

4.7
2.2
-18.3

5.5
1.6
7.0

22.9

29.6

7.6
3.3
25.6

7.6
3.0
14.3

5.6
3.0
-17.6

33.5

31.1

28.6

27.4

26.2

31.1

Semiconductors
Other Goods 2/

9.9
16.1

-29.5
10.6

-18.5
7.4

17.0
8.9

19.3
6.4

21.6
4.2

22.7
4.1

23.9
4.5

25.3
3.7

25.3
4.8

25.3
5.5

25.3
5.2

Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 1/

Billions of chained 1992 dollars, SAAR

Net Goods & Services

-198.5

-244.4

-265.1

-295.3

-318.0

-337.2

-350.5

-358.9

-367.7

-381.4

-394.5

-400.6

Exports of G&S

991.9

972.4

968.1

961.2

959.3

961.5

966.8

973.8

982.9

994.0

1006.2

1019.4

Imports of G&S

1190.4

1216.8

1233.3

1256.5

1277.3

1298.6

1317.4

1332.7

1350.5

1375.4

1400.7

1420.1

Billions of dollars, SAAR
US CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE

-186.9

-224.5

-242.3

-281.0

-293.0

-311.2

-325.6

-346.1

-343.0

-357.0

-370.4

-386.0

Net Goods & Services (BOP) -140.0
Exports of G&S (BOP)
946.2
Imports of G&S (BOP) 1086.2

-174.3
921.1
1095.4

-180.3
913.6
1093.9

-207.1
901.9
1108.9

-226.2
900.2
1126.4

-240.6
901.9
1142.4

-250.1
906.7
1156.7

-255.9
912.9
1168.9

-263.2
921.9
1185.1

-275.0
932.5
1207.5

-284.4
944.2
1228.7

-287.6
956.7
1244.3

Net Investment Income
Direct, Net
Portfolio, Net

-9.0
62.4
-71.3

-13.0
61.0
-74.0

-23.0
53.7
-76.7

-23.9
53.1
-77.0

-27.8
49.9
-77.8

-31.6
49.1
-80.7

-36.6
48.2
-84.8

-40.2
49.5
-89.7

-40.8
53.4
-94.2

-42.9
55.5
-98.4

-46.9
56.1
-103.0

-48.4
58.8
-107.3

Net Transfers

-37.9

-37.3

-39.0

-50.0

-39.0

-50.0

-39.0

-50.0

1. Merchandise exports excluding agricultural products, computers, and semiconductors.
2. Merchandise imports excluding oil, computers, and semiconductors.

Full text of Federal Open Market Committee Meeting Minutes, Transcripts, and Other Documents : Meeting, September 29, 1998 : Greenbook Part 1

FRASER