View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

A meeting of the executive committee of the Federal Open Market
Committee was held in the offices of the Board of Governors of the Fed
eral Reserve System in Washington on Tuesday, July 20, 1954, at 10:45 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Robertson
Bryan, Alternate
Vardaman, Alternate
C. S. Young, Alternate

Mr.

Mills, Member of the Federal Open Market
Committee
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Thurston, Assistant Secretary
Vest, General Counsel
Thomas, Economist
R. A. Young, Associate Economist
Rouse, Manager, System Open Market Account
Carpenter, Secretary, Board of Governors
Sherman, Assistant Secretary, Board of
Governors
Mr. Youngdahl, Assistant Director, Division of
Research and Statistics, Board of Governors
Mr. Willis, Secretary, Federal Reserve Bank of
New York
Upon motion duly made and seconded,

and by unanimous vote, the minutes of the
meetings of the executive committee of the
Federal Open Market Committee held on June
23 and July 7, 1954, were approved.
Before this meeting there had been sent to the members of the
committee a report prepared at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
covering open market operations during the period July 7 to July 15,
1954,

inclusive,

and at this meeting there was distributed a supplementary

report covering commitments executed July 16-19, 1954, inclusive.
commenting on the reports,

In

copies of which have been placed in the files

of the Federal Open Market Committee,

Mr.

Rouse noted that the System

7/20/54

-2

account's holdings of $167,150,000 of Treasury bills due July 22, 195
were tendered, subject to allotment, on Monday, July 19, in exchange
for the new issue of 91-day bills due October 21, 1954, but that the
tender was made at a price below the range of accepted bids.

Mr. Rouse

stated that dealers were having a difficult time reducing their positions
and that at the close of business last night they were holding a little
more than $500 million in Treasury bills.

He also commented that in

managing the System account he had been trying to take advantage of op
portunities to dispose of bills during the last few weeks.
Upon motion duly made and seconded,
and by unanimous vote, the transactions
in the System account during the period
July 7-19, 1954, inclusive, were approved,
ratified, and confirmed.
Mr. R. A. Young made a statement reviewing recent economic
developments substantially in accordance with the summary of economic
conditions contained in the staff memorandum dated July 16, 1954, copies
of which were distributed before this meeting.

Mr. Young noted that

economic conditions had shown unusual stability recently, following marked
declines in activity and employment from peaks reached a year ago.

An

important feature of the current situation, Mr. Young said, was that
business inventories were still

being reduced as production was con

tinuing below the total of final takings by consumers,
Government.

business, and

Such reductions in business inventories might be laying

the groundwork for some advance in production later, and Mr. Young

7/20/54

-3

suggested that definite signs of recovery in the economy might show
up in the not too distant future.
Mr. Young went on to comment on views expressed at the Merrill
Center for Economics which he had attended at Southampton,
during the past three weeks,

Long Island,

at which some thirty economists were

present for the purpose of discussing the general subject of how
instability in
world.

the American economy might affect trading in the free

In this group, there was considerable optimism regarding short

run developments in the economy,

it

being the consensus that the current

recession had gone about as far on the down side as was likely without
some new forces of an external nature, and that no such forces which
might cause a further downward movement were apparent at present.
was a good deal of reservation,

There

however, as to how strong the forces

of growth might be over the coming years and whether the peak of the
coming revival in

economic activity, if

be substantially in

such a revival took place, would

excess of the high levels reached by the economy

during 1953.
Mr. C. S.
that Mr.
the

Young stated,

in response to Chairman Martin's inquiry,

R. A. Young's comments on the economic situation about told

story for the Chicago area.

As he had indicated before, Mr. Young

said that he had not been as optimistic as many others regarding the
economic outlook and that he had been particularly fearful that the
building industry would not maintain during the rest of 1954 the rate
of activity it

had shown earlier this year.

There were soft spots in

7/20/54

-4

industry in the Chicago District, Mr. Young said, and in his opinion
some further readjustment in business inventories would take place.
The over-all picture,
Mr.

however, was relatively good.

Bryan had no serious reservations about the review of the

economic situation that had been presented but said that he was puzzled
as to what was going to be the source of a long-sustained upward move
ment in the economy.

As to the more immediate outlook, there was real

concern in the Atlanta District regarding this year's crops and the
Reserve Bank expected to be confronted with problems growing out of
run-offs of deposits and related developments at country banks in much
of the area.

Mr. Bryan also commented on vacancies in store and office

buildings in

various cities of the district, stating that the commercial

component of the building industry might not continue to be as strong
a sustaining force to the economy of the Sixth District as it

has been

heretofore.
In response to a question from Mr.

Vardaman, Mr. R. A.

Young said

that unfilled orders of manufacturers were still declining but that new
orders had been rising recently although they were not yet up to the cur
rent level of sales.

This, he noted, was particularly relevant with

respect to the durable goods sector of industry.
At Chairman Martin's request Mr. Thomas commented on capital mar
kets and the credit situation.

Loans and investments of reporting member

banks had shown about the usual seasonal changes since mid-June.

The

money supply was increasing when measured in terms of both demand and

7/20/54

-5

time deposits and after adjustment for seasonal influences.

Reserve

positions of banks had been somewhat less easy during tne past few
weeks than had been anticipated owing principally to a temporary increase
in

foreign balances at the Reserve Banks.

Mr. Thomas also presented

a sheet showing an estimated pattern of reserve changes by weeks during
the remainder of July and August as well as a tabulation showing esti
mated weekly averages of free reserves from July 14 through September 1.
The latter tabulation indicated that, if

all maturing bills in the System

account were permitted to run off, free reserves would be in the range
of $500-800 million during the remainder of July and August except during
the week of August 4 when they would probably exceed $1,100 million.
Mr. Rouse said that the estimates prepared at the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York checked closely with those presented by Mr. Thomas.
Chairman Martin stated that on the basis of the economic and
credit review and the projections of reserve changes that might be anti
cipated during the next few weeks,

it

would appear that the program being

carried out by the committee was about right and that developments in
the money market were working out pretty well in line with what the com
mittee had hoped for at its
members of the committee first

preceding meeting.

consider whether any change was called for

in the general policy being pursued, as it
two weeks.

He suggested that the

might apply during the next

None of the members of the committee indicated that a change

was called for at this time.
Mr.

Rouse stated that in his opinion the atmosphere in the money

7/20/54

-6

market had been just about what the committee indicated that it
at its

desired

meeting on July 7.
Chairman Martin expressed the view that the volume of free re

serves indicated by the projections presented by Mr. Thomas for the
next few weeks would be about right.

It

was his feeling that a little

"topping" would be desirable during the first

week of August when pay

ment would be made for the Treasury's offering of $3-1/2 billion of
tax anticipation certificates,
March 22, 1955.

to be dated August 2, 1954,

and to mature

After that period, Chairman Martin felt that the com

mittee would have to watch the situation carefully in order to prevent
the volume of free reserves from getting out of hand.
Mr.

Robertson agreed with this statement generally, adding that

he would not object to some bulge in

free reserves during the week of

August 4 although he would be happier if

the volume were below the pro

jected figure of $1,120 million.
Mr.

Rouse commented that it

might be possible to reduce the volume

of free reserves during that week by selling from the System account
some of the bills that would otherwise mature during the weeks of August
11 and 18, with the result that the run-off in System holdings of bills
during those two weeks would be smaller than projected.
Chairman Martin suggested that the next meeting of the executive
committee be held on Tuesday, August 3, 1954,

at 10:45 a.m. which would

provide an opportunity to review the situation at about the time the

7/20/54

-7

Treasury's cash offering of tax anticipation bills had been completed,
and there was agreement with this suggestion.
Mr. C. S.

Young stated that he would like to see the System

account take advantage of any opportunity to sell bills it

was holding,

in addition to run-offs of bills maturing during the next few weeks,

as

a means of reducing the System's portfolio.
Mr.

Bryan said that he felt the entire policy and operation

of the Federal Reserve System had been brilliant throughout the recent
period, although, as stated at the meeting of the full Committee on
June 23, 1954, he had some reservation as to whether there was not too
much emphasis being placed on the volume of free reserves.

He had

grave doubts whether the rediscount rate should be left at its

present

level of 1-1/2 per cent in the light of open market and reserve-require
ment policies that have produced open market rates well below that
figure.

Mr. Bryan said that he would be much happier if

the discount

rate and the tradition of the American banking system were such as would
cause the banking system to obtain a portion of its

reserves by a much

higher level of discounts and advances at the Reserve Banks than is
indicated.

now

Despite these reservations, Mr. Bryan emphasized that he

felt the System had handled monetary policy and operations brilliantly
in the recent past.
Mr. Mills reverted to the question whether it
to sell bills from the System account during the first

would be desirable
week of August,

stating that this would be the week in which the Treasury would receive

7/20/54

-8

payment for the $3-1/2 billion of tax anticipation certificates to
be issued.

His concern was that the distribution of reserves among

central reserve city, reserve city, and country banks might not be
satisfactory and that while,
volume of free reserves,

in the aggregate,

there might be a large

these might be concentrated for a period at

country banks while there might be a paucity of free reserves at reserve
city and, particularly,
thought that it

at central reserve city banks.

It

was Mr. Mills'

might be desirable to allow a greater latitude in

free

reserves during the period than was contemplated under the suggestion
for selling bills during that week.
Mr. Rouse indicated that he agreed with the views expressed by
Mr. Mills.
Chairman Martin felt this was a pertinent comment and that the
situation should be watched closely.

It was his view that, as he had

indicated earlier in the meeting, some excess of reserves during the
period of the Treasury financing was not going to be harmful.
None of the members of the committee disagreed with this view,
and it

was understood that operations for the System account would be

continued in terms of the program authorized at the preceding meeting
of the executive committee and in the light of the discussion at this
meeting.
Mr. Robertson referred to a memorandum which, pursuant to the
suggestion made at the meeting of the executive committee on June 8, 1954,
had been prepared in the Securities Department of the Federal Reserve

7/20/54

-9

Bank of New York under date of July 6, 1954 relating to transactions
for cash delivery for the System open market account.

Mr. Robertson

said that on the basis of the pros and cons set forth in this memorandum,
copies of which were distributed at the meeting on July 7, 1954, it

would

appear that there were situations where cash trading, as contrasted
with the practice of limiting transactions to "regular" (next day)
delivery, would make it
market policy.

It

possible to do a better job of executing open

was his suggestion, therefore,

that the existing

practice be modified and that the executive committee authorize the
Manager of the System Open Market Account to trade in Treasury bills
on both a cash and regular delivery basis,
stances.

depending on market circum

It was Mr. Robertson's opinion that it

would be desirable for

the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to engage in some cash trading in
the weeks immediately ahead, if

market circumstances permitted, in

order to develop System experience with such transactions.

He noted

that the memorandum prepared at the New York Bank on the subject indicated
there might be certain operating difficulties with cash trading, and
he felt that it

would be helpful to take the measure of these problems

through actual experience and to give those operating the System account
an opportunity to solve the difficulties when not under pressure.
Robertson also suggested that if

Mr.

the authorization which he proposed

were given to the Manager of the System Account, dealers be notified
that the account was willing to engage in

cash transactions in Treasury

bills under appropriate circumstances without,

of course,

any implication

7/20/54

-10

that the System wished to encourage cash trading by others.
Chairman Martin inquired of Mr. Vest whether this suggestion
involved problems in terms of the authorization given by the full Com
mittee to the executive committee,
Mr.

Vest stated that, while he understood that transactions for

the System account had almost always been on a "regular" delivery basis
and while this customary practice had been a matter of comment at a
meeting of the full Committee some years ago, it

was his opinion that

the directive of the Federal Open Market Committee under which the execu
tive committee was now operating was phrased in such broad language as
to permit a change in
Robertson.

Mr.

operating technique of the sort proposed by Mr.

Vest read portions of the full Committee's directive,

noting particularly that part which authorized the executive committee
to arrange for transactions with a view, among other things,
practical administration of the account."

"to the

He felt that this clause

was sufficiently broad to cover authority for a change such as Mr.
Robertson proposed.

At the same time, it was Mr.

Vest's view that it

might be desirable to bring to the attention of the members of the
full Committee the change in practice that would be involved in Mr.
Robertson's suggestion.
Chairman Martin stated that his understanding of the proposal
was that there would be an authorization to the Manager of the System
Account to engage in cash transactions as distinguished from regular
delivery transactions in the event it

seemed desirable to do so.

7/20/54

-11
Mr. Robertson stated that this was correct but that he would

hope that some transactions on a cash delivery basis would be executed
during the next several weeks so as to provide some experience in
effecting transactions in that manner.
Mr. Rouse said that he saw no objection to the proposal and,
in

fact, he felt it

might be useful to have the authority.

also suggested that it

Mr. Rouse

would be desirable to furnish all members of the

full Committee with a copy of the memorandum of July 6 prepared at the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York to which Mr. Robertson had referred,
and it

was understood that this procedure would be followed.
Thereupon, upon motion duly made and

seconded, Mr. Robertson's suggestion as
set forth above was approved unanimously.
Mr. Rouse suggested that the existing limitation of $750 million
in the first

paragraph of the directive to be issued to the Federal

Reserve Bank of New York be continued in view of the possibility of large
transactions for the System account during the next two weeks.

Thereupon, upon motion duly made
and seconded, the executive committee
voted unanimously to direct the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York until otherwise
directed by the executive comittee:
(1)
To make such purchases, sales, or exchanges (including
replacement of maturing securities and allowing maturities to
run off without replacement) for the System account in the
open market or, in the case of maturing securities, by direct
exchange with the Treasury, as may be necessary in the light of
current and prospective economic conditions and the general
credit situation of the country, with a view (a) to relating
the supply of funds in the market to the needs of commerce and
business, (b) to promoting growth and stability in the economy

7/20/54

-12

by actively maintaining a condition of ease in the money
market, and (c) to the practical administration of the
account; provided that the total amount of securities in
the System account (including commitments for the purchase
or sale of securities for the account) at the close of
this date shall not be increased or decreased by more than
$750 million;
(2)
To purchase direct from the Treasury for the
account of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (with dis
cretion, in cases where it seems desirable, to issue
participations to one or more Federal Reserve Banks) such
amounts of special short-term certificates of indebtedness
as may be necessary from time to time for the temporary
accommodation of the Treasury; provided that the total
amount of such certificates held at any one time by the
Federal Reserve Banks shall not exceed in the aggregate
$500 million;
To sell direct to the Treasury from the System
(3)
account for gold certificates such amounts of Treasury
securities maturing within one year as may be necessary
from time to time for the accommodation of the Treasury;
provided that the total amount of such securities so sold
shall not exceed in the aggregate $500 million face amount,
and such sales shall be made as nearly as may be practicable
at the prices currently quoted in the open market.
Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Assistant Secretary