View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Embargoed for release at 2:00 p.m., EDT, September 18, 2013

Economic Projections of Federal Reserve Board Members and Federal Reserve Bank Presidents, September 2013
Advance release of table 1 of the Summary of Economic Projections to be released with the FOMC minutes

Percent

2013
Change in real GDP . . . . . 2.0 to 2.3
June projection . . . . . . 2.3 to 2.6

Central tendency1
2014
2015
2016
2.9 to 3.1 3.0 to 3.5 2.5 to 3.3
3.0 to 3.5 2.9 to 3.6
n.a.

Unemployment rate. . . . . . 7.1 to 7.3
June projection . . . . . . 7.2 to 7.3

6.4 to 6.8
6.5 to 6.8

5.9 to 6.2
5.8 to 6.2

PCE inflation. . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1 to 1.2
June projection . . . . . . 0.8 to 1.2

1.3 to 1.8
1.4 to 2.0

Core PCE inflation3 . . . . . 1.2 to 1.3
June projection . . . . . . 1.2 to 1.3

1.5 to 1.7
1.5 to 1.8

Variable

Longer run
2.2 to 2.5
2.3 to 2.5

2013
1.8 to 2.4
2.0 to 2.6

2014
2.2 to 3.3
2.2 to 3.6

Range2
2015
2.2 to 3.7
2.3 to 3.8

5.4 to 5.9
n.a.

5.2 to 5.8
5.2 to 6.0

6.9 to 7.3
6.9 to 7.5

6.2 to 6.9
6.2 to 6.9

5.3 to 6.3
5.7 to 6.4

5.2 to 6.0
n.a.

5.2 to 6.0
5.0 to 6.0

1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0

1.7 to 2.0
n.a.

2.0
2.0

1.0 to 1.3
0.8 to 1.5

1.2 to 2.0
1.4 to 2.0

1.4 to 2.3
1.6 to 2.3

1.5 to 2.3
n.a.

2.0
2.0

1.7 to 2.0
1.7 to 2.0

1.9 to 2.0
n.a.

1.2 to 1.4
1.1 to 1.5

1.4 to 2.0
1.5 to 2.0

1.6 to 2.3
1.7 to 2.3

1.7 to 2.3
n.a.

2016
2.2 to 3.5
n.a.

Longer run
2.1 to 2.5
2.0 to 3.0

Note: Projections of change in real gross domestic product (GDP) and projections for both measures of inflation are from the fourth quarter of the previous year to
the fourth quarter of the year indicated. PCE inflation and core PCE inflation are the percentage rates of change in, respectively, the price index for personal consumption
expenditures (PCE) and the price index for PCE excluding food and energy. Projections for the unemployment rate are for the average civilian unemployment rate in the
fourth quarter of the year indicated. Each participant’s projections are based on his or her assessment of appropriate monetary policy. Longer-run projections represent each
participant’s assessment of the rate to which each variable would be expected to converge under appropriate monetary policy and in the absence of further shocks to the
economy. The June projections were made in conjunction with the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on June 18–19, 2013.
1. The central tendency excludes the three highest and three lowest projections for each variable in each year.
2. The range for a variable in a given year includes all participants’ projections, from lowest to highest, for that variable in that year.
3. Longer-run projections for core PCE inflation are not collected.

Figure 1. Central tendencies and ranges of economic projections, 2013–16 and over the longer run

Percent

Change in real GDP

5

Central tendency of projections
Range of projections

4
3
2
1
+
0
1

Actual

2
3

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Longer
run
Percent

Unemployment rate

10
9
8
7
6
5

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Longer
run
Percent

PCE inflation
5
4
3
2
1
+
0
-

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Longer
run

Note: Definitions of variables are in the general note to the projections table. The data for the actual values of
the variables are annual.

Figure 2. Overview of FOMC participants’ assessments of appropriate monetary policy

Number of participants

Appropriate timing of policy firming

12

12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4

3
3
2

2
1

2014

2015

2016

Appropriate pace of policy firming

Percent

Target federal funds rate at year-end
6

5

4

3

2

1

0

2013

2014

2015

2016

Longer run

Note: In the upper panel, the height of each bar denotes the number of FOMC participants who judge that, under
appropriate monetary policy, the first increase in the target federal funds rate from its current range of 0 to 1/4 percent
will occur in the specified calendar year. In June 2013, the numbers of FOMC participants who judged that the first
increase in the target federal funds rate would occur in 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 were, respectively, 1, 3, 14, and 1.
In the lower panel, each shaded circle indicates the value (rounded to the nearest 1/4 percentage point) of an individual
participant’s judgment of the appropriate level of the target federal funds rate at the end of the specified calendar year
or over the longer run.

Explanation of Economic Projections Charts
The charts show actual values and projections for three economic variables,
based on FOMC participants’ individual assessments of appropriate monetary
policy:
x Change in Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP)—as measured from the
fourth quarter of the previous year to the fourth quarter of the year
indicated, with values plotted at the end of each year.
x Unemployment Rate—the average civilian unemployment rate in the
fourth quarter of each year, with values plotted at the end of each year.
x PCE Inflation—as measured by the change in the personal consumption
expenditures (PCE) price index from the fourth quarter of the previous
year to the fourth quarter of the year indicated, with values plotted at the
end of each year.
Information for these variables is shown for each year from 2008 to 2016, and
for the longer run.
The solid line, labeled “Actual,” shows the historical values for each variable.
The lightly shaded areas represent the ranges of the projections of
policymakers. The bottom of the range for each variable is the lowest of all of
the projections for that year or period. Likewise, the top of the range is the
highest of all of the projections for that year or period.
The dark shaded areas represent the central tendency, which is a narrower
version of the range that excludes the three highest and three lowest
projections for each variable in each year or period.
The longer-run projections, which are shown on the far right side of the charts,
are the rates of growth, unemployment, and inflation to which a policymaker
expects the economy to converge over time—maybe in five or six years—in
the absence of further shocks and under appropriate monetary policy. Because
appropriate monetary policy, by definition, is aimed at achieving the Federal
Reserve’s dual mandate of maximum employment and price stability in the
longer run, policymakers’ longer-run projections for economic growth and
unemployment may be interpreted, respectively, as estimates of the economy’s
normal or trend rate of growth and its normal unemployment rate over the
longer run. The longer-run projection shown for inflation is the rate of
inflation judged to be most consistent with the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate.

Explanation of Policy Path Charts
These charts are based on policymakers’ assessments of the appropriate path for the
FOMC’s target federal funds rate. The target funds rate is measured as the level of
the target rate at the end of the calendar year or in the longer run. Appropriate
monetary policy, by definition, is the future path of policy that each participant deems
most likely to foster outcomes for economic activity and inflation that best satisfy his
or her interpretation of the Federal Reserve’s dual objectives of maximum
employment and stable prices.
x In the upper panel, the shaded bars represent the number of FOMC
participants who judge that the initial increase in the target federal funds rate
(from its current range of 0 to ¼ percent) would appropriately occur in the
specified calendar year.
x In the lower panel, the dots represent individual policymakers’ assessments of
the appropriate federal funds rate target at the end of each of the next several
years and in the longer run. Each dot in that chart represents one
policymaker’s projection. Please note that for purposes of this chart the
responses are rounded to the nearest ¼ percentage point, with the exception
that all values below 37.5 basis points are rounded to ¼ percent.
These assessments of the timing of the initial increase of the target federal funds rate
and the path of the target federal funds rate are the ones that policymakers view as
compatible with their individual economic projections.