View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Prefatory Note

The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version available
based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was created
through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned
versions text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was
employed, some imperfections may remain.
Please note that some material may have been redacted from this document if that
material was received on a confidential basis. Redacted material is indicated by
occasional gaps in the text or by gray boxes around non-text content. All redacted
passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                            
1
  In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic
format. All scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced
tilting) and lightly cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other
blemishes caused after initial printing).
 
2
 A two-step process was used. An advanced optical character recognition computer program (OCR)
first created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive,
staff checked and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and
tables were not reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff. 

Content last modified 6/05/2009.

 

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)

SUPPLEMENT
CURRENT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS

Prepared for the
Federal Open Market Committee

By the Staff
Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System

November 21, 1969

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES

The Domestic Economy
Consumer prices.

In October consumer prices rose 0.4 per

cent or at an annual rate of 5 per cent, about the same as in the third
However, except for a

quarter but somewhat slower than in September.

special downward adjustment in costs of medical care, the rise would
have been about the same as in September.

The CPI was 5.6 per cent

above October 1968.
Food prices dropped seasonally--for the first time since
February--as prices of food consumed at home reflected a decline in
meat prices.

Apparel and upkeep costs continued to advance strongly,

even after seasonal adjustment.

The cost of both food and apparel was

over 5 per cent higher in October than in the same period of 1968.
Durable commodity prices rose sharply in October reflecting
the introduction of 1970 model autos and a large rise in the price of
The rise in new car prices of about 4.7 per cent unadjusted, or about

homes.

0.4 per cent seasonally adjusted, was not too different than in
1968.

1967 and

Used car prices also rose, but somewhat less sharply.
The rise in service costs in October was held to 0.3 per cent

as a result of a decline of 0.6 per cent in medical care services, which
have risen over 7 per cent in the last year.

The decline reflects an

accounting adjustment to correct an overstatement of the rise in costs
in 1968.

The adjustment is made once a year when information from major

health insurance carriers is analyzed.

Other service costs continued to

increase sharply, led by a rise of 0.9 per cent in finance and insurance
costs.

- 2 -

In November and December new car prices will rise less and
used car prices will decline if the usual seasonal pattern prevails.
Retail food prices are not expected to change greatly for the rest of
the year.

CONSUMER PRICES
(Per cent change at annual rates)

Dec.
Mar.

19681969

1969
June-

Oct. 1968Oct. 1969

MarchJune

September

6.0

6.4

5.2

4.8

5.6

8.8
3.6
8.0
14.4
10.8

2.0
7.6
6.8
10.4
8.0

-.4

16.8
2.4
3.6
10.8

-7.2

4.3
4.9
7.2
11.5
7.4

0
6.0

5.2
5.3

All items
Durables
Nondurables
Services
Insurance & financeMedical care
Seasonally adjusted
Food
Apparel & upkeep

4.0
5.2

8.8
5.2

5.6
7.6
11.6
7.2

5.2
4.8

SeptemberOctober

-1/ Includes mortgage interest, taxes and insurance, automobile insurance, and
other auto expenses.

Durable new orders.

New orders for durable goods dipped by

1.2 per cent in October following a sharp increase in September, according to the advance report.

Order backlogs also fell, while shipments

rose slightly and the ratio of unfilled orders to shipments declined
slightly further.
New orders for machinery and equipment were off by a tenth,
but remain at relatively advanced levels.

The greatest declines were

at the industry groups which had increased most in September.

Declines

-3-

in machinery and equipment and in the motor vehicle group were partly
offset by a rebound in orders in the volatile defense group; on balance,
however, defense orders are still at reduced levels compared with those
prevailing from mid-1968 through early 1969.

Orders for consumer dur-

ables other than autos dropped slightly, as did orders for iron and
steel, while there were moderate increases for primary nonferrous and
fabricated metals.
Cyclical indicators.

Of the 8 leading cyclical indicators

used in the calculation of the preliminary Census composite, enough are
now available to suggest a decline in October.

Series declining were

the manufacturing workweek, inverted initial claims for unemployment
insurance, industrial materials prices, housing permits, new orders for
durable goods, and machinery and equipment orders--the last being a
major component of plant and equipment contracts and orders.

Series

rising included the common stock price index and the ratio of price to
unit labor cost.
Rental vacancy rates in the third quarter of the year
(confidential) were the lowest for any third quarter in the history of
the quarterly series which began in 1956.

Underscoring the strength

of basic shelter demands in relation to the available supply, vacancy
rates for homes also remained unusually low, as shown in the table.

-4

-

HOUSING VACANCY RATES
(Per cent)

1957
Rental units

Average for third quarter of: *
1965
1966
1967
1968

5.2

19691

7.2

6.8

6.4

5.4

5.0

Northeast
North Central
South
West

3.3
5.4
6.0
7.1

4.6
6.4
7.9
10.8

4.9
5.8
7.1
10.2

4.3
5.6
7.8
8.1

3.4
5.4
6.8
6.2

2.8
5.5

Home-owner units

0.8

1.5

1.3

1.3

1.1

1.0

Northeast
North Central
South
West

0.6
0.7
0.9
1.3

0.8
1.2
1.9
2.0

0.8
0.9
1.6
2.3

0.6
1.0
1.6
2.0

0.7
0.9
1.4
1.4

0.7
0.9
1.1
1.2

1/

6.3

5.8

Confidential until release, November 24.

The Domestic Financial Situation
Mortgage market.

Based on data which has just become avail-

able, seasonally adjusted new mortgage commitments at all savings and
loan associations apparently declined 2 per cent during October, in
line with the particularly poor savings flow experience.

The backlog

of outstanding commitments, although still rather high, edged lower for
the sixth consecutive month.

In anticipation of possible severe with-

drawals in the upcoming January reinvestment period, and combined with
the current depressed savings flow pattern, the S&Ls could be expected
to pursue a cautious commitment policy during the remainder of the year.
Corporate and municipal bond markets.

Corporate and

municipal bond yields continued to advance this week.

Yields on new

corporate bonds rose sharply to new peaks; the largest issue of the

-5

-

week, a high quality bond yielding 8.90 per cent, attracted substantial
institutional interest and sold out, generating some investor interest
in older, slow-moving offerings.

A heavy calendar of new municipal

issues contributed to the 19 basis point rise--to 6.36 per cent--in the
Bond Buyer Index.

Government securities marke t .

Yields in all sectors of the

U.S. Government securities market have continued to rise since Monday.
Most Treasury bill rates have gained another 25 to 50 basis points,
putting all of the key issues at new record highs, with the 3-month
bill closing yesterday at 7.35 per cent.

Notes and bonds have advanced

generally 15 to 25 basis points since Monday.

Intermediate issues

still remain considerably below their October 1 peaks.
long-term bonds have surpassed their previous highs.

However, some
The 20-year

constant maturity series, for instance, reached 6.90 per cent, 9
basis points above its October 1 level.
The very sharp increases in the bill area reflect concern
over the large prospective increase in supply from three auctions
beginning today on three consecutive trading days totaling $7 billion,
including $2.5 billion of new money.

The market's nervousness is

heightened by the fact that demand for bills (apart from official
account buying) has been light, while dealer bill positions are still
relatively large.

Moreover, dealers will have less time to dispose

of new bill awards just after the auctions because of the shortened
holiday week.

- 6KEY INTEREST RATES
1969

Lows

Highs

October 27

November 20

Short-Term Rates
Federal funds (weekly averages) 5.95 (1/1)

9.68 (10/15)

8.68 (10/22)

8.79 (11/19)

5.87 (4/30) 7.35 (11/20)
6.38 (2/17)
8.50 (7/9)
7.06 (1/22) 12.50 (6/10)
6.03 (3/28)
8.39 (11/20)
6.13 (3/11)
8.25 (7/30)

6.99
8.00
9.63
7.52 (10/22)
8.00

7.35
8.13
10.71
8.39
8.13

6.00

6.00
8.70 (7/23)

6.00
8.50 (10/22)

6.00
8.50

7,87 (11/20)
8.62 (7/9)
8.88 (10/8)
8.58 (11/20)

7.23
8.13
8.38
7.80 (10/22)

7.87
8.25
8.63
8.58

6.50 (1/30)

6.25
9.00 (7/23)

6.25
8.75 (10/22)

6.25
8.75

5.86 (1/16)
3.90 (1/2)

7.69 (11/20)
5.85 (9/17)

7.10
5.45 (10/22)

5.45

6.11 (1/20)
5.91 (6/5)

8.04 (10/1)

7.28
6.48

7.72
6.90

3-months

Treasury bills (bid)
Bankers' acceptances
Euro-dollars
Federal agencies

Finance paper
CD's (prime NYC)
Highest quoted new issue
Secondary market
6-months
Treasury bills (bid)
Bankers' acceptances

Commercial paper
Federal agencies
CD's (prime NYC)
Highest quoted new issue
Secondary market
1-year
Treasury bills (bid)
Prime municipals

6.40

(4/30)

5.96
6.50
6.25
6.32

(2/17)
(1/7)

(4/30)
(1/16)

6.25

7.69

Intermediate and Long-Term
Treasury coupon issues
5-years
20-years
Corporate
Seasoned Aaa
Baa
New Issue Aaa
Ho call protection
Call protection

6.90 (11/20)

6.56 (1/2)
7.26 (2/3)

8.28 (10/14)

7.27
8.17

7.37
8.27

7.03 (1/23)
6.90 (2/20)

7.80 (6/18)
8.44 (11/19)

7.82 (10/22)

8.44

Municipal
Bond Buyer Index
Moody's Aaa

4.82 (1/23)
4.57 (1/2)

6.37 (9/4)
5.95 (11/20)

6.07 (10/22)

6.36

5.80 (10/22)

5.95

Mortgage--implicit yield
in FNMA weekly auction 1/

7.66 (1/6)

8.63 (10/20)

8.60

8.51 (11/17)

7.41 (10/14)

1/ Yield on 6-month forward commitment after allowance for commitment fee and
required purchase and holding of FNMA stock. Assumes discount on 30-year loan
amortized over 15 years.

- 7 -

Flow of funds, third quarter.

Total credit flows to private

nonfinancial borrowers--all except the Federal Government--finally
tipped downward in the third quarter after a strong first-half rate of
borrowing that marked the peak of a 2-1/2 year expansion in funds raised.
The drop in the private total--from a $102 billion annual rate, seasonally adjusted, in the first half of the year to a $86 billion rate in
the summer--occurred in all sectors and in both long- and short-term
credit markets (Table 1).

The sharpest reductions were in state and

local government security issues and bank loans.

Short-term credit

from nonbank sources, particularly loans held by bank affiliates, was
well above the first-half rate but not sufficiently increased to offset
the cutback in bank loan flows.

Mortgage borrowing was only slightly

down from the first half.

Table 1
NET FUNDS RAISED
(In billions of dollars, seasonally adjusted annual rates)

1966

1967

1968

H1/69

QIII/69

Total funds raised
U.S. Government

68.5
3.5

82.6
13.0

97.4
13.4

92.5
-9.6

100.9
15.1

All other borrowers
State & local gov't, securities
Corporate & foreign securities
Mortgages

64.9
5.7
11.9
22.3

69.6
7.7
18.2
22.0

84.1
9.9
13.3
27.3

102.1
11.5
16.4
28.1

85.8
6.8
14.1
27.2

10.3
14.7

9.6
12.0

13.4
20.2

16.5
29.6

5.8
31.8

Bank loans n.e.c.
Other

-8-

For corporate business the $5 billion reduction in credit
flow from the first half contrasted sharply with a $4-1/2 billion
increase in

capital spending,

bringing a major shift toward internal

resources during the quarter.

(Table 2)

With corporate profits down

somewhat from first-half rates, this increased internal financing
appears, from preliminary estimates, to have been mainly in the form of
a reduction in liquid asset holdings during the quarter (line 4).

An

actual drop in business liquid-asset holdings, after seasonal adjustment,
is fairly rare in the 1960's and over the postwar period was associated
generally with slow-downs in economic activity.
the summer of 1966 and in

early 1967,

Reductions occurred in

and before that during all

quarters

Table 2

(In

CORPORATE BUSINESS
billions of dollars, seasonally adjusted annual rates)

1966

1967

1968

H1/69

QIII/69

1.
2.

Retained funds
Capital expenditures

61.2
77.1

61.2
72.5

63.1
76.9

63.3
85.2

63.4
89.7

3.

Credit market borrowing

25.4

29.3

31.0

41.2

36.2

4.
5.

Net change in liquid assets
Other financial uses, net

1.9
7.6

.6
17.4

10.1
7.1

4.9
14.4

-6.1
16.0

of 1960.

1956 and during

In the 1950's liquid assets fell sharply in

the 1957-58 recession, although to some extent this reflected decreases
If

liquid assets did

in

tax liabilities through payment acceleration.

in

fact decrease during the summer (direct evidence is

not yet in)

it

- 9-

may have brought the actual liquidity ratios to new postwar lows.

In

relation both to short-term liabilities and to the rate of business
activity, corporate liquidity seems to have dropped to and perhaps gone
below the troughs of late 1966.

These ratios had held roughly

even

during 1967 and 1968, and the ratios were maintained fairly well during
the first half of this year.
Liquid-asset reductions by business were heavily concentrated
in CD runoffs and in U.S. Government securities, with sizable offsets
in purchases of both commercial paper and short-term municipal issues.
This left the U.S. Government securities market heavily dependent on
households and on state and local government funds for support.

The

present estimates for household buying of Governments during the summer
are extremely high, offsetting both decreases in bank time deposit
balances and sharply reduced flows into savings institutions. Through
direct purchases, households may have been the only sizable net source
of funds to the Governments market during the summer, and the effect
has been to elevate

measurably the position of Governments in household

portfolios.
Financial disintermediation has been severe this year by any
basis of comparison, despite heavy volumes of direct credit market
borrowing by financial institutions to offset deposit drains.

In Table

4, line 2 and line 12 suggest the extent to which lending based on
deposits, insurance reserves, and net internal funds has fallen off
during 1969, while line 7 totals the use of open-market borrowing by
financial institutions during the period.

Total lending by finance, on

- 10 -

lines 3 and 13, is down markedly from even 1966 in relation to credit
demands, with third-quarter decreases concentrated in banks and savings
institutions.

The sharp rise in third-quarter lending by other finance

(line 6) is dominated (1) by FNMA and home loan bank lending, which were
in turn financed by borrowing on line 9, and (2) by finance company and
bank affiliate credit to business covered mainly by commercial paper
sales in line 11.
This shift in the third quarter from banks and savings
institutions to open-market finance borrowers maintained total intermediary lending at first-half rates, but did not increase intermediation
to anything near the levels of recent years.

Some of this activity,

moreover, was lending among intermediaries, such as from home loan banks
to savings and loan associations, that raised the aggregate flows more
than the net supply of funds to nonfinancial borrowers.

After allowance

for such inflation of the totals, intermediary activity was somewhat
lower in the third quarter than earlier in the year.
Apart from erratically high Federal Government borrowing and
offsetting buildup in Government cash balances, the third-quarter evidence
is of a significant constriction in credit flows and of business liquidity
in the face of rising financing needs, with the funds supplied predominantly by nonfinancial investors buying securities in open markets
(Table 3, line 4).

Business liquidity shifted in form toward short-term

claims on private borrowers and state and local governments, while household assets were shifted toward Governments and credit agencies supporting
the mortgage market.

11
Table 3
SOURCES OF CREDIT MARKET FUNDS
(Billions of dollars, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rates)
QIII/69

1966

1967

1968

H1/69

Total funds raised and advanced
(= lines 1 + 7)

68.5

82.6

97.4

92.5

100.9

Private domestic nonfinancial
Investors:
2.
Total deposits and securities
3.
Deposits a/

42.8
23.7

47.7
50.6

58.1
44.3

50.4
7.7

37.5
-16.9

19.1
3.6
3.4
12.1

-3.0
*
1.2
-4.2

13.8
9.0
.7
4.1

42.7
18.5
8.1
16.0

54.4
10.3
4.5
39.6

25.7
- .4
.7
25.4

34.9
1.2
5.0
28.7

39.3
-1.2
4.0
36.5

42.1
-7.4
13.4
36.1

63.4
14.8
12.7
35.9

1.

4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.

a/
b/

Credit market instruments b/
Business
State & local govts.
Households
Credit sources except line 1:
U.S. Govt. cash balances
Foreign
Other

At banks and savings institutions. Includes currency.
Includes credit market claims on financial institutions.

-

12 -

Table 4
FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION
(Billions of dollars, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rates)

1966
1.

1968

H1/69

QIII/69

68.5

82.6

97.4

92.5

100.9

43.7

78.0

74.1

30.7

27.3

58.5
16.8
7.9
33.8

81.7
37.0
15.2
29.5

93.0
39.2
15.5
38.3

62.7
10.3
19.5
33.0

66.1
- .2
10.8
55.5

14.8
2.8

3.7
.4

18.9
2.0

32.0
13.7

38.8
6.2

4.8
.1
7.1

- .6
-1.7
5.6

3.5
1.1
12.3

6.3
3.3
8.7

12.3
4.4
15.9

Total funds raised by
nonfirnancial sectors

2.

1967

Net funds advanced by financial
institutions

([3]

-

[6])

4.
5.
6.

Total funds advanced by
financial institutions
Banks
Savings institutions
Other

7.

Credit market borrowing by

3.

8.
9.
10.
11.

12.
13.

14.

financial institutions a/
Banks b/
Sponsored credit agencies
Svgs. & loan associations
Other finance c/

Percentage ratios:
Net lending/total funds raised
([2]/[1])
Total lending/total funds

64%

94%

76%

33%

27%

raised ([3]/[11)
Borrowings/Total lending by
finance ([6]/[3])

85%

99%

95%

67%

66%

25%

5%

20%

51%

59%

Plus bank borrowings from foreign branches.
Excludes bank affiliates not consolidated in bank reports. See note a.
Finance companies, nonconsolidated bank affiliates, security dealers,
and investment companies.

Corrections:
Page II - 17, line 2:
Page III - 22.
November 14.

"million" should read "months'".

The last column in the table should be

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)

SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX A:

SURVEY OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
THIRD QUARTER,
BORROWING REALIZATIONS:

1969*

Preliminary analysis of the experimental survey of State and
local government borrowing realizations for the third quarter of 1969
indicates that these governments experienced at least a $1.67 billion
shortfall in long-term borrowing attributable to high interest rates.
This equaled about three-fourths of the $2.2 billion of borrowing they
actually accomplished.- /

Capital outlay and contract award cutbacks

as a consequence of these shortfalls, estimated from the sample, will
This is equal to 7 to 9 per cent

range between $600 and $750 million.

of the actual second quarter total of $8 billion of State and local
capital expenditures.
Additional analysis is required to update the borrowing
expectations of the entire sample.

Nonetheless, it appears that State

and local governments would like to borrow $5.0 to $5.8 billion in the
fourth quarter of this year.
Borrowing Shortfalls
Table 1 gives a breakdown by type of governmental unit of
the long-term borrowing State and local governments accomplished and
of the shortfalls induced by high interest rates.

Only those shortfalls

1/ Long-term bond sales for the third quarter of 1969 amounted to
$2.43 billion, while the estimates for total borrowing based on the
survey sample, are $2.20 billion. Evidently the blown-up survey results
reported herein captured only 90.5 per cent of the borrowing actually
accomplished. No attempt has yet been made to correct for this discrepancy. Of the 594 units included in the quarterly survey, all but
8 responded, for a response rate of 98 per cent.
*

Prepared by John E. Petersen, Economist, Capital Markets Section,
currently on leave to the Urban Institute.

CONFIDENTIAL

SA - 2

(FR)

attributable to high borrowing costs are analyzed in this appendix,
even though perhaps as much as $1 billion of additional shortfalls were
due to other factors.

Some of these other factors may have been partly

related to the level of interest rates.

Thus,

the estimates for

interest rate effects on borrowing--and on spending--may be understated.

Table 1
LONG-TERM BORROWING AND SHORTFALLSINDUCED BY HIGH INTEREST RATES
3rd Quarter 1969, Millions of Dollars

Type
of unit

(1) Actual
Borrowing

(2) Shortfalls induced
by high interest rates-

(2)/(1)
Ratio

State-2 /

622

638

1.04

County

201

111

.55

City & town

773

371

.48

Special Dist.

152

70

.46

School Dist.

450

479

1.06

$2,199

$1,669

.76

Total

1/ Includes postponements, abandonments, and reductions in issues.
2/ Includes State authorities and colleges.

Altogether,

high interest rates in the third quarter

2/
forstalled an estimated $1.67 billion in desired long-term borrowing.While all units of government experienced severe cutbacks below planned
borrowing,

State governments and school districts fared worst.

For the

State category, the primary reason for the large cutback in borrowing

2/ The amount of long-term borrowing shortage which had high interest
rates as at least a contributing factor was $1.82 billion. When multiple
reasons for shortfalls were given, the amount of the shortfalls was
distributed proportionately among them. The same device was used in
allocating the spending impacts.

SA - 3

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)

apparently was rate ceilings in several large, traditionally high
borrowing, States.

For school districts, rate ceilings were also

important, but in addition many school districts are of small unit
size, are not rated by bond rating services, and have great difficulty
marketing bonds in tight financial markets.

For both States and school

districts, borrowing shortfalls exceeded the long-term borrowing actually
accomplished by them in the third quarter.

Effects on Capital Spending
Table 2 shows the effect on spending plans of the
borrowing shortfalls induced by high interest rates.

Such borrowing

disappointments are apparently resulting in a $600 to $750 million
3/
reduction in State and local spending below planned levels.-

The

impacts again appear to be heaviest for State governments and school
districts.

The ratio of aggregate spending reduction to total borrow-

ing shortfalls attributed to the high cost of borrowing is approximately
40 per cent, twice the rate found in the System's survey on the 1966
borrowing and spending experiences of these governments.

3/ The expenditure impacts have been estimated as a range because 12
of the 68 units reporting capital spending impacts did not estimate the
amount of the reduction. In these cases, the amount of the borrowing
shortfalls has been used as a proxy for the spending reduction. Thus,
the reduction amounts explicitly given by units form the bottom of the
range whereas addition of the proxied amounts gives the upper limit.

CONFIDENTIAL

(FR)

SA -

4

Table 2
CAPITAL SPENDING AND CONTRACT AWARD CUTBACKS
INDUCED BY HIGH INTEREST RATE
3rd Quarter, 1969

Type of unit

State

Contract and
spending cutbacks(Millions of dollars)

Ratio of cutbacks to
borrowing shortfalls
(Per cent) 2/

229 to 312
47 to

County
City & town

36 to 49
43

48

School Dist.
Total

29 to 35

10

14

214 to 264

45 to 55

609 to 755

Special Dist.

109 to 131

38 to 45

1/ Upper limit of range is given by addition of proxy amounts of spending reduction where units indicated spending cutbacks but failed to
give a dollar estimate.
2/ Long-term borrowing shortfalls induced by high interests are given
in Table 1.

The estimated expenditure effects will take time to be felt
fully, because of the lags inherent in the construction process.
Nevertheless, on an annual rate basis, they suggest a $2.4 to $3.0
billion reduction in capital spending below planned levels.

Capital

expenditures were at a $32 billion annual rate at midyear 1969 and have
been growing on the order of 10 per cent a year recently.

It appears,

therefore, that the restrictive credit conditions experienced this year
could erase most of the "normal" growth in these expenditures in the
near future.

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)

SA - 5

Alternative Means of Financing Shortfalls
A total of $772 million in long-term borrowing shortfalls
attributed to high interest rates did not lead to spending reductions.
As is shown in Table 3, short-term borrowing was overwhelmingly the
major stopgap employed to keep expenditure plans on schedule.

Drawing

down of liquid assets was of very little importance, as were reductions
in other expenditures.

About 18 per cent of the dollar volume of the

shortfalls did not lead to spending effects because the borrowing was
planned well in advance of cash needs.

Table 3
ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF FINANCING
SHORTFALLS DUE TO HIGH INTEREST RATES
3rd Quarter, 1969

Means

Short-term borrowing

Reductions in current
expenditures
No immediate need
Other means

Note:

Per cent
._.
or total

464

64

60

8

9

1

128

18

63

9

722

Liquid assets

Total

Millions
or aoiiars

100

Items do not add to totals due to rounding.

The relative importance of these various means of alternatively financing shortfalls contrasts markedly with those used by
State and local governments in 1966 when expenditure effects were much

SA - 6

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)

4/
milder.-

Use of liquid assets and borrowing in advance of needs,

were very important in 1966.

The greatly diminished importance of

these alternatives to long-term borrowing reflect the debilitating
impacts of prolonged restrictive credit market conditions on the
sector's financial holdings.

The depletion of these buffers probably

accounts in part for the more severe spending impacts now being experienced.

As units borrow

less--and closer to cash needs--their asset

position, and the insulation it provides, progressively shrinks.

Funds

are no longer on hand to bridge the borrowing-expenditure gap as they
did in 1966.
Revisions of Borrowing Expectations
The amount of long-term borrowing anticipated by respondents
should be interpreted as a desired amount that could be accomplished
if conditions permit.

Obviously, factors other than adverse interest

rate developments are going to displace intended borrowings.

Only time

and intensive examination of all the reasons for shortfalls will establish those patterns which bias expectations.
Nevertheless, first approximations of the potential demand
can be extracted from combining the results of the annual and follow-up
surveys.

Allowing for revised plans and for what may prove to be some

upward bias in earlier reporting of anticipations, it is estimated that

4/ The System's 1966 survey indicated that short-term borrowing
accounted for about 45 per cent of those shortfalls not leading to
capital spending cutbacks; liquid assets, 25 per cent; and borrowing
planned in advance of cash needs, 30 per cent. Other sources--including
cuts in current expenditures--constituted the remaining 5 per cent of
borrowing shortfalls not leading to capital spending cutbacks.

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)

SA -

7

desired long-term borrowing is $5.8 billion for the fourth quarter of

5/ That is,
$5.8 billion is the amount that could be brought to

1969.-

market were "everything else" to be completed on time.

Since under

even the most favorable conditions they could not be, $5 billion of
planned long-term borrowing in the fourth quarter is probably more
realistic.

5/ This allows for a 50 per cent attrition rate in not yet authorized
borrowing. Discussion with survey field officers and very summary
inspections of data, indicate that units that simply misunderstood the
survey may have overreported anticipated third quarter borrowing by as
much as $0.5 to $1 billion. This would be long-term borrowing that
could not have been accomplished in any event.