View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MEMORANDUM OF DISCUSSION

A meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee was held in
the offices of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, May 5, 1970, at 10:00 a.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Burns, Chairman
Hayes, Vice Chairman
Brimmer
Daane
Francis
Heflin
Hickman
Maisel
Mitchell
Robertson
Sherrill
Swan

Messrs. Galusha, Kimbrel, and Morris, Alternate
Members of the Federal Open Market Committee
Messrs. Eastburn, Clay, and Coldwell, Presidents
of the Federal Reserve Banks of Philadelphia,
Kansas City, and Dallas, respectively
Mr. Holland, Secretary
Messrs. Kenyon and Molony, Assistant
Secretaries
Mr. Hackley, General Counsel
Mr. Partee, Economist
Mr. Holmes, Manager, System Open Market Account
Mr.-Baughman, First Vice President, Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago
Mr. Holmes noted that paragraph 1(a) of the continuing author
ity directive set a $2 billion limit on changes in System Account
holdings of U.S. Government securities during the period from the
opening of business on the day following a Committee meeting to the

5/5/70

-2

close of business on the day of the next meeting.

As a consequence

of unsettled conditions in the Government securities market, the
Desk had found it necessary to buy about $1.8 billion of Treasury
bills over the course of the last six business days.

In view of the

continued unsettlement in the market, and particularly in view of
the uncertain prospects for the Treasury financing now in process, the
Desk might well find it desirable to make purchases today in excess of
the remaining leeway in order to maintain orderly market conditions
and perhaps to assist the Treasury directly.

And, if the unsettlement

persisted, large-scale purchases might also be required in the inter
meeting period beginning with the opening of business tomorrow.

Accord

ingly, he recommended that, for the period from the opening of business
today until the close of business on the day of the next scheduled
meeting--May 26, 1970--the Committee suspend the provision of para
graph 1(a) of the continuing authority directive limiting changes in
holdings of U.S. Government securities between meetings to $2 billion.
After discussion, the members agreed that the action recom
mended by the Manager was appropriate.
By unanimous vote, the provision of
paragraph 1(a) of the continuing authority
directive limiting changes in System
Account holdings of U.S. Government securi
ties between meetings of the Committee to
$2 billion was suspended for the period
from the opening of business May 5, 1970,
until the close of business May 26, 1970.
At this point the following entered the meeting:

5/5/70
Mr. Broida, Deputy Secretary
Messrs. Axilrod, Craven, Gramley, Hersey,
Hocter, Jones, and Solomon, Associate
Economists
Mr. Coombs, Special Manager, System Open
Market Account
Mr. Bernard, Assistant Secretary, Office of
the Secretary, Board of Governors
Mr. Cardon, Assistant to the Board of Governors
Mr. Coyne, Special Assistant to the Board of
Governors
Messrs. Wernick and Williams, Advisers,
Division of Research and Statistics,
Board of Governors
Mr. Keir, Associate Adviser, Division of
Research and Statistics, Board of
Governors
Mr. Wendel, Chief, Government Finance Section,
Division of Research and Statistics,
Board of Governors
Miss Ormsby, Special Assistant, Office of the
Secretary, Board of Governors
Miss Eaton, Open Market Secretariat Assistant,
Office of the Secretary, Board of Governors
Mr. Melnicoff, First Vice President, Federal
Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Messrs. Eisenmenger, Link, and Tow, Senior Vice
Presidents, Federal Reserve Banks of Boston,
New York, and Kansas City, respectively
Messrs. Snellings, Scheld, and Green, Vice Presi
dents, Federal Reserve Banks of Richmond,
Chicago, and Dallas, respectively
Messrs. Gustus and Kareken, Economic Advisers,
Federal Reserve Banks of Philadelphia and
Minneapolis, respectively
Mr. Cooper, Manager, Securities and Acceptance
Departments, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Mr. Cox, Financial Economist, Federal Reserve
Bank of Atlanta
By unanimous vote, the minutes of
actions taken at the meeting of the
Federal Open Market Committee held on
April 7, 1970, were approved.
The memorandum of discussion for the
meeting of the Federal Open Market Com
mittee held on April 7, 1970, was accepted.

5/5/70
Before this meeting there had been distributed to the members
of the Committee a report from the Special Manager of the System
Open Market Account on foreign exchange market conditions and on
Open Market Account and Treasury operations in foreign currencies
for the period April 7 through 29, 1970, and a supplemental report
covering

the period April 30 through May 4, 1970.

Copies of these

reports have been placed in the files of the Committee.
In supplementation of the written reports, Mr. Coombs said
the price of gold in the London market had risen to $36.19 this
morning, mainly reflecting the Cambodian situation.

On the other

hand, the foreign exchange markets remained remarkably quiet and
orderly despite the strains that had developed in the domestic
financial markets of many countries.

Confidence in the present

parity structure was still strong, and the forward markets were func
tioning smoothly and efficiently.

As interest rate differentials

had developed among the various centers, offsetting movements in
forward rates had served to restrain flows of hot money from one
center to another.

He thought the only instance in which there

currently was a major incentive to move funds was from the United
States to Canada.

Although price and wage trends varied considerably

from one country to another, no country had been so successful in
restraining inflation as to cause its currency to be labeled as a
candidate for revaluation.

Conversely, in those countries in which

wage and price inflation was threatening the parity, speculation
was still being held in check by severe fiscal or monetary restraint.

5/5/70
More generally, Mr. Coombs continued, most major foreign cur
rencies had been pushed close to their ceilings by the emergence this
year of a very sizable deficit in the U.S. balance of payments, and
there was again some talk in the market about the potential vulner
ability of the dollar.

At the same time, the market recognized that

European needs for dollars to repay official debt and to replenish
depleted dollar reserves would provide the United States with more
or less automatic financing possibilities in certain currencies for
at least some months to come.
However, Mr. Coombs observed, one might get a glimpse of
things to come in the financing problems that were now developing in
Switzerland, Belgium, and the Netherlands.

Over the years the typical

pattern had been one of large flows of dollars into continental Euro
pean countries in the fall, which the Federal Reserve absorbed by
drawing on the swap lines, followed by return flows which enabled the
System to repay its drawings.
dollars had failed to reverse.

This year the earlier heavy inflows of
One consequence was that the dollar

holdings of the Swiss National Bank remained at the unusually high
figure of more than $600 million.

Whether the Swiss National Bank

would remain content to see its dollar holdings grow still further
over the course of the year was an open question.

And there had been

further growth, rather than a decline, in Federal Reserve debt in
Belgian francs.

Finally, the System's swap debt in Dutch guilders

remained outstanding, having reached its second three-month maturity
towards the end of April.

5/5/70
Mr. Coombs noted that at the preceding meeting Mr. Bodner had
secured the Committee's approval of a further renewal of the guilder
drawing if it proved necessary.

In subsequent discussions, Dutch

officials had suggested that the swap debt should not be allowed to
run on beyond six months and had indicated that they would be willing
to accept $60 million of marks as part payment.

That transaction was

effected last week, reducing the Federal Reserve guilder debt from
$130 to $70 million.

The Dutch also had suggested that the balance

of $70 million might be cleaned up by a U.S. Treasury drawing of
guilders from the International Monetary Fund, by sale of Special
Drawing Rights, by sale of gold, or by some combination of the three.
The U.S. Treasury had elected to make a drawing of $70 million of
guilders from the Fund, and would be doing so within the next week or
so.

The Treasury also had indicated its willingness to draw at the

same time enough Belgian francs from the Fund to clear up the System's
Belgian franc debt of $130 million.

Federal Reserve drawings on the

Belgian line had been outstanding since last November.
On the other side of the ledger, Mr. Coombs said, he was glad
to report that the Italian lira had stabilized during recent weeks,
with only minimal market losses being experienced by the Bank of Italy.
The provision last March of additional credit lines to the Bank of
Italy by the System and the U.S. Treasury had, he thought, also
facilitated Italian Government borrowing at medium term in the Euro
dollar market.

As the members might know, the Italian electricity

5/5/70
authority recently had raised $425 million in such medium-term money,
and tomorrow the Bank of Italy would be devoting $200 million of the
proceeds to paying down its swap debt to the Federal Reserve from
$800 to $600 million.

He thought it quite possible, barring serious

political or social disturbances, that the Bank of Italy would be
able to liquidate the remaining debt to the Federal Reserve completely
before next fall.
By unanimous vote, the System
open market transactions in foreign
currencies during the period April 7
through May 4, 1970, were approved,
ratified, and confirmed.
Mr. Coombs noted that two System drawings on the National Bank
of Belgium would mature soon--one for $25 million on May 25, 1970, and
one for $15 million on June 2.

As he had indicated, he was hopeful

that a Treasury drawing on the Fund would enable the System to clear up
its Belgian franc debt.

To provide against contingencies, however, he

would recommend renewal of the two drawings if necessary.

Both would

be second renewals.
Possible renewal of the two
drawings on the National Bank of Belgium
was noted without objection.
Finally, Mr. Coombs said, he would recommend renewal of two
$200 million Bank of Italy drawings on the System that matured on
May 19 and May 26, if the Italians so requested.

Both would be first

renewals.
Renewal of the two drawings
by the Bank of Italy, if requested,
was noted without objection.

5/5/70
Chairman Burns then observed that along with Mr. Coombs he had
attended the April meeting of central bank governors in Basle.

He

suggested that Mr. Coombs report on developments at that meeting.
Mr. Coombs said he could summarize briefly the impressions he
had received from the discussions at Basle.

It appeared that the German

boom continued unbroken and that credit conditions were likely to be
kept extremely tight in that country in an effort to deal with infla
tionary pressures.

The Italian situation seemed to be characterized by

a firm degree of credit restraint on the private economy.

That restraint

had been intensified by the recent increase in the Bank of Italy's dis
count rate, which had improved its alignment with Euro-dollar rates.
However, there was a rather difficult situation in the budgetary area;
the Bank of Italy was in a position in which it almost automatically had
to finance a growing budget deficit.

The main problem in Britain ap

peared to arise from the recent wave of very large wage increases in the
face of extremely tight fiscal and monetary policy.

The French situation

was improving, and the Belgians and Dutch were holding about even.
Chairman Burns added that there was considerable interest evi
dent at the meeting in the state of the U.S. economy, particularly in
the prospects for the U.S. balance of payments.
"interest" advisedly;

He used the word

while there was some concern about the U.S.

balance of payments, he did not think it was very great.
The Chairman observed that

there had been a newspaper report

on the meeting which--while not very harmful in itself--had apparently
been based on a leak.

In view of that unfortunate event he had

-9

5/5/70

advised the members of the Federal Reserve family who frequently at
tended the Basle meetings to be especially discreet at future sessions.
Chairman Burns then noted that along with Messrs. Mitchell and
Coldwell he had also attended the recent meeting in Chile of the Gov
ernors of the Central Banks of the American Continent.

He invited

Mr. Mitchell to comment on the meeting.
Mr. Mitchell noted that the Seventh Conference of Governors of
the Central Banks of the American Continent was held in Vina del Mar,
Chile, on April 28-29.

All of the hemisphere's central banks were rep

resented by their heads except those of Argentina and Canada, from
which deputies attended.

The discussion was led by the presidents of

certain Latin American central banks, including Mr. Massad of Chile,
Mr. Galveas of Brazil, Mr. Losada of Venezuela, Mr. Gomez of Mexico,
Mr. Brown of Jamaica, and Mr. Bruce of Trinidad--all of whom struck
him as outstanding men, well equipped for their posts by education and
experience.
Mr. Mitchell observed that Chairman Burns' report on the U.S.
economic situation and prospects was well received.

However, some of

the delegates differed with the view, which they attributed to the
Chairman, that the difficult part of the task of fighting inflationremoving excess demand--had already been accomplished in the United
States, and that only the easier part--controlling cost-push pres
sures--remained to be done.

In the experience of those delegates,

countering cost-push pressures was harder to achieve than the control
of excess demand.

-10-

5/5/70

Mr. Mitchell noted that there was a rather long discussion of
flexible exchange rates and in particular "crawling pegs."

The crawl

ing peg technique is already in use in Chile, Brazil, and Colombia.
The discussants seemed to feel that crawling pegs for developed
countries would offer neither great advantages nor disadvantages to
the less developed countries, but on balance the discussion left one
with the impression of a favorable attitude toward somewhat greater
flexibility in the rates of developed countries.

One speaker expressed

apprehension about the possible consequences of a shift to flexible
exchange rates by the United States.

However, he was reassured by

Chairman Burns, who expressed the view that the United States had no
intention of changing the existing relationship to gold.
The other main discussion topics were aid and interest rates,
Mr. Mitchell continued.

Mr. Galveas of Brazil, who had studied the

growth of net reserves relative to exports in developed countries,
came up with a rather pessimistic view of the prospects for aid.

In

his judgment net reserves were rising too slowly relative to exports
to permit the developed countries to expand aid.

He also expressed

the view that in the 1960's private investment partially replaced
Government aid.

This observation led Mr. Brown of Jamaica to remark

that he sensed a growing feeling in Latin America that foreign private
investment might involve too great a sacrifice of national objectives.
Although most countries represented apparently were not prepared to
admit it, Mr. Brown's observation was supported by numerous examples
of negotiated restraint on foreign ownership and control of business

-11

5/5/70
enterprise, including banking.

For example, Canadian action in the

Mercantile Bank of Canada case was cited as an appropriate way of
coping with entry and growth of foreign banking.
As to interest rates, Mr. Mitchell said, the discussion was
concerned mainly with means of attracting funds given the current high
levels in developed countries.

Tne hope was expressed that world

interest rates would moderate shortly.
Mr. Coldwell observed that it had been clear in the discussion
of flexible exchange rates that the countries now using the crawling
peg approach were quite pleased with the results.

In the discussion

of comparative interest rate levels Mr. Gomez of Mexico noted that his
country was one of those laboring under the largest disadvantage and
that it had taken steps to stop the flight of capital.
Mr. Coldwell remarked that in addition to attending the
meeting he had visited the governors of a number of Latin American
central banks in their own countries.

In general, it was his

impression that Latin America was a seething cauldron.

The central

banks were trying to hold down inflation in the face of rising
government spending and pressures for higher wage rates and were
having some limited successes.

However, in virtually every major

country there were strong elements of instability, grounded upon
too-slow progress both in containing inflation and in improving the
standard of living of the mass of poor people.

-12-

5/5/70

At the Chairman's request Mr. Solomon then presented the
following statement:
I shall use the time allotted for the usual inter
national briefing to give the Committee a report on
meetings of the Group of Ten Deputies and of Working
Party Three, held in Paris the week before last.
The Group of Ten Deputies--with Undersecretary
Volcker and Governor Daane representing the United
States--held an intensive discussion of limited exchange
rate flexibility. On the table was a brief document
prepared at the Fund. As you know, this subject has
been under discussion in the Fund's Executive Board for
several months.
The major outcome of the Group of Ten meeting was
the revelation that there is more support for, and less
opposition to, limited flexibility than was indicated
in the earlier discussions in the Fund. Most striking
was the interest shown in small and more frequent changes
in exchange rates--which some refer to as a crawling peg.
And several delegates indicated a leaning toward a crawl
ing peg with an upward bias. The possibility of a
slightly wider band for exchange rate variation around
parities did not arouse much enthusiasm.
The German and Italian representatives were joined
by the Dutch in making a positive case for greater flexi
bility. And they were supported by the United States.
Equally impressive was the fact that the French and
Belgians expressed only very mild reservations. The
most negative were the Japanese.
The upshot of the meeting was that the subject will
continue under active discussion. The Fund Board is
being encouraged to prepare a report for the September
annual meetings and it is hard to see how that report
can fail to reflect the favorable views expressed two
weeks ago in Paris. Meanwhile, the Deputies will discuss
the subject again in July. All in all, then, the subject
of limited flexibility of exchange rates is still very
much alive. Whether or not an amendment to the Fund's
Articles of Agreement eventuates, a climate of opinion
is being generated that makes greater flexibility more
likely in the future.
The WP-3 meeting focused mainly on monetary develop
ments in the major countries. I presented a report on

5/5/70

-13-

developments in the United States up to mid-April, point
ing to the renewed expansion in the aggregates and the
rather limited reductions in interest rates that had
occurred up to that time. I must admit that I did not
manage to predict what would happen to U.S. interest rates
in the second half of April.
Considerable interest was expressed in the apparent
change in the approach to Federal Reserve policy. The
articles that had appeared in the U.S. press following
release of the report on the January FOMC meeting had
been given wide coverage in the European financial press.
I tried to provide some perspective for the Working
Party by stressing that what was involved was a change
in emphasis in FOMC procedures rather than a switch in
the Federal Reserve approach to monetary policy from
exclusive concern with interest rates to exclusive con
cern with the aggregates.
As developments in other countries were reviewed,
it became clear that the overriding concern among Euro
pean monetary authorities is the battle against inflation.
Prices and wages are rising rapidly throughout Europe.
Germany occupies a key position in terms of influence
on other countries, and all the evidence points to the
continuance there of strong demand pressures for some
time. And, as in most other countries, monetary policy
is being heavily relied upon.
As a result interest rates have risen sharply in
most European countries in recent months, and interest
rate differentials have narrowed among countries.
The conclusions that emerged from the discussion
were as follows:
(1) The United States is ahead of the
rest of the world in getting excess demand under control.
(2) Until further progress is made in dealing with infla
tion outside the United States, there is not much scope
for downward movements of world interest rates.
Only
the Belgian representative indicated a leaning toward
some cooperative effort to reduce interest rates inter
nationally. Oddly enough, the British Treasury repre
sentative raised a question about the appropriateness
of combating wage-push inflation with monetary policy.
It was agreed that the relative change in interest
rates as between the United States and Europe that had
occurred up to mid-April had not caused serious tensions
in international payments. If U.S. rates should fall
further a few countries would be inclined to follow down,
at least to some degree, but probably not many.

-14-

5/5/70

In general, the Europeans are so preoccupied with
their own inflation problems that they did not express
much concern about the U.S. balance of payments. But
this is not a state of affairs that can be counted on to
continue.
Before this meeting there had been distributed to the members
of the Committee a report from the Manager of the System Open Market
Account covering domestic open market operations for the period
April 7 through 29, 1970, and a supplemental report covering the
period April 30 through May 4, 1970.

Copies of both reports have

been placed in the files of the Committee.
In supplementation of the written reports, Mr. Holmes com
mented as follows:
Interest rates moved sharply higher over the period
since the Committee last met, in a deteriorating market
atmosphere that affected the equity market as well as the
bond markets. Among the factors that went so far as to
raise the spectre of possible financial panic in the eyes
of some market observers were the continuing concern
about the fiscal outlook and about the success of the
Government's anti-inflationary program; puzzlement over
the market implications of greater reliance on monetary
and credit aggregates in the implementation of monetary
policy; a shortfall of bill demand relative to dealer
expectations, at a time when dealer portfolios were
very high; the continued heavy demand on the capital
markets; the decline in stock market values; and intensi
fied concern about the financial health of some Wall
Street firms. The new turn of events in Southeast Asia
late last week added still another uncertainty to this
already long list. All in all, it was not a propitious
background for the Treasury refunding that was announced
after the close of business on Wednesday. Markets
quieted down a bit before the weekend, in part reflect
ing the price and rate adjustments already made, but
an air of extreme uncertainty emerged yesterday that
leaves the success of the Treasury financing in doubt.

5/5/70

-15-

The Treasury bill market ran into special problems
as the period progressed. As you know, dealers had built
up their bill portfolios after mid-March in anticipation
of lower rates ahead, and at the time of the last meeting
they were in the process of building them up further in
anticipation of seasonal demand later in April. When
that demand failed to live up to expectations and it
became increasingly evident to the market that the Federal
Reserve was permitting the money market to firm up some
what, distress selling of bills got under way, and rates
pushed sharply higher. At the close on Friday, dealers
had succeeded in reducing their bill portfolios by about
$1-1/2 billion from the level prevailing on the comparable
day before the last Committee meeting. While System pur
chases of over $1 billion of bills last week helped
stabilize the market momentarily, dealers still had more
long bills than they wanted, and we purchased an additional
$668 million in an early go-around yesterday morning. In
yesterday's rather chaotic market, regular weekly auction
average rates of 7.18 and 7.49 per cent were established for
three- and six-month bills, respectively, up 77 and 104 basis
points from the levels established in the auction just
preceding the last meeting of the Committee.
As the written reports to the Committee emphasize,
open market operations over the period sought to work
against a rapid expansion in the money supply and bank
credit that was clearly running well ahead of the target
levels sought by the Committee for April and to a lesser
extent, if the projections can be believed, for the
second quarter as a whole. In essence we became a rather
reluctant supplier of reserves, pushing the Federal funds
rate up by about 1/2 of a percentage point and net borrowed
reserves to higher levels. This relatively modest firming
of money market conditions might, in other circumstances,
have resulted in only a minor adjustment of other short
term interest rates. But given the vulnerability of the
Treasury bill market, the generally unsettled and rather
cynical mood of the financial markets, and the wrench
to earlier expectations of a further decline in interest
rates, a very substantial interest rate reaction occurred.
Given all the circumstances such a reaction was inevitable.
In conducting open market operations over this deli
cate period, we were concerned that the reaction take
place before the Treasury had to set the terms of its
May refunding, with the hope that the market could it
self find a new trading level before the System entered

5/5/70

-16-

into a period of even keel. As you know, last week we
conducted several large go-arounds to buy Treasury bills,
one on Monday a week ago--prior to the weekly bill auc
tion--when the Treasury bill market was as close to
disorderly as I would care to see it, and two others on
Friday and yesterday when it was apparent that dealers
were again becoming restive with their still heavy long
bill positions. Despite the massive injection of reserves
on these occasions, we have been able so far to maintain
the somewhat firmer money market conditions that appear
consistent with the behavior of the money supply and the
adjusted bank credit proxy, but it is clear that even
keel considerations have now taken precedence.
The growing market realization that the Federal
Reserve was paying more attention to aggregates in its
policy deliberations was not the major factor in
unsettling the markets, but it did play a part. The
suspicions of some market participants that something
of the kind was in the wind were confirmed with the
publication on April 15 of the policy record for the
January meeting of the Committee. Given the mood of
the market--in part related to the technical position
of the bill market--the reaction was, as noted earlier,
more vigorous than it might have been at other times.
In the heat of the moment I am sure that many of youas we at the Desk--had a number of irate phone calls.
A number of dealers have suggested that their willing
ness to take positions would be affected and that they
would take to the sidelines with a wait-and-see attitude.
I trust that things will calm down as exaggerated fears
of widely fluctuating money market conditions are,
hopefully, set at rest. I have had several suggestions
from market participants that it would be helpful if the
Committee provided a fuller explanation of just what the
new rules of the game are. Provided it can be done, I
would think that the timely publication of a well-reasoned
article setting forth the rationale of greater emphasis on
aggregates would be constructive for the market. Inciden
tally, a number of dealers are setting their economists to
work to forecast the aggregates, and I wish them well in
that arduous endeavor.
1/ contains new
Looking to the future, the blue book
targets for the money supply and bank credit over the
second quarter. It would be nice to set out with some

1/ The report, "Monetary Aggregates and Money Market Conditions",
prepared for the Committee by the Board's staff.

5/5/70

-17-

degree of confidence the implications of these targets for
open market operations and for money market conditions, but
that is unfortunately not easy to do. Projections for the
second quarter suggest--for what they are worth and on the
basis of somewhat lower bill rate assumptions than may be
realistic--that the aggregates will grow more rapidly than
the suggested target of a 4 per cent annual rate for both
bank credit and the money supply; about 1 percentage point
more on the Board staff estimates and substantially more on
New York staff estimates. If these projections are borne
out--and if the Committee adopts the blue book targetsit would imply that the System might have to become a
still more reluctant supplier of reserves and that money
market conditions might have to be shaded on the firmer
side after the even keel period has ended.
As mentioned earlier, the atmosphere has been anything
but favorable for the current refunding of $16.5 billion of
Treasury securities maturing on May 15, of which $4.9
billion are held by the public. Earlier hopes that the
offering might include a prerefunding of issues maturing
later in the year, to cut back future refunding operations
at times of seasonal Treasury cash needs, had to be aban
doned. But by last Wednesday market conditions had
stabilized enough to encourage the Treasury to attempt a
combined rights-cash offering. As you know, the books
are open for one day only--today--for a public offering
of $3-1/2 billion of an 18-month 7-3/4 per cent note,
discounted to yield 7.79 per cent. The purpose of this
offering was to cover attrition on the total refunding
and to raise $1 billion or more in new money, thus obvi
ating the need for another trip to the market before the
end of the fiscal year. Tomorrow the books close on the
offering of two reopened issues--the 7-3/4 per cent notes
of May 1973, and the 8 per cent notes of February 1977.
The Treasury, quite naturally and properly, has been
concerned about the success of its offering--particularly
in the light of new developments in Southeast Asia, which
occurred after the terms had been set.
In the uncertainty that prevailed yesterday it was
hard to judge what the outcome of either the cash financing
or the rights exchange might be. While the Treasury may be
able to squeak by, the possibility of a failure cannot be
ignored. The Treasury should be expected to do all it can
with its own resources, but I believe that the System
should be prepared to lend support if a near-emergency situ
ation arises. Thus, unless the Committee objects, I would
be prepared, if required in order to maintain orderly markets,
to purchase rights, or any or all of the three new notes on
a when-issued basis, or other coupon issues. We should also

5/5/70

-18

be prepared for direct borrowing by the Treasury from
the System if the financing results in a cash shortage
for the Treasury.
We would, of course, try to offset any unwanted re
serve supply resulting from such operations by selling short
bills or letting bills run off at maturity. Such action
would not require any change in the continuing authority
directive, but since it would represent a departure from
our normal practice of avoiding operations in issues
involved in a Treasury refunding I considered it desirable
to bring the matter before the Committee. I hope that we
will not have to support the Treasury operation directly
but believe we should be prepared for any contingency.
As you know, the System holds $11.5 billion of the May
15 maturities, and it would be desirable to split our sub
scriptions among the three securities being offered. I
would plan to subscribe today to $7.0 billion of the
18-month notes, and to split the remaining $4.5 billion
between the two longer notes, roughly in proportion to
expected public demand.
In response to questions, Mr. Holmes said the Federal trust
accounts held only a small amount of the May 15 maturities.

The

Treasury announcement of the $3-1/2 billion cash financing had
indicated that some additional amounts of the 18-month note offered
would be sold to the Federal Reserve and the trust accounts, but
had not mentioned any specific amounts.

The market was not partic

ularly concerned with the amount the Federal Reserve bought since
it would expect that in the normal course of events the System would
hold the notes until maturity.
In reply to questions by Mr. Brimmer, Mr. Holmes observed
that the Treasury would in fact raise $1 billion in new cash only
if, in addition to sales to the public of $3-1/2 billion of the 18
month note, the attrition on the exchange was held to $2-1/2 billion,
or 50 per cent.

To expect an attrition rate of only 50 per cent now

-19

5/5/70
might well be optimistic.

Moreover, it was possible that sales of

the new note to the public might come to less than $3-1/2 billion.
If the net proceeds of the combined operation fell short of
needs, Mr. Holmes continued, the Treasury might announce that it
would borrow directly from the System any additional funds it required
during the remainder of the fiscal year, thus providing reassurance
that it would not be back in the market before June 30.

There were,

of course, other possible ways in which the problem might be handled;
for example, the System could go into the open market to buy rights,
or it could advise dealers that it was prepared to bail them out if
necessary.

However, such courses would raise legal and/or policy

problems, and he hoped they could be avoided.
the Treasury would not favor them either.

As he understood it,

Direct Treasury borrowing

from the System seemed to him to be the cleanest and best means of
coping with the problem.
Mr. Mitchell asked whether any such borrowing was not likely
to be of considerably longer duration than customary.
Mr. Holmes replied that the borrowing was likely to remain
outstanding for a number of weeks, rather than the usual few days.
In view of the seriousness of the situation, however, he would not
consider that inappropriate.
Mr. Holland noted that such a development would not be with
out precedent.

At one point during World War II a Treasury borrowing

from the System had remained outstanding for several weeks.

5/5/70

-20
Mr. Maisel asked about the probable effects of operations of

the kind under discussion on the monetary aggregates.

After some

comments were made on this matter, Mr. Mitchell remarked that any
effects would be temporary--although of uncertain duration--since
at some point it would be possible to withdraw any reserves supplied
now in connection with the Treasury financing.
Mr. Heflin commented that the problems being discussed pointed
up the need to give the Manager guidance concerning the appropriate
interpretation of "even keel" under the Committee's present policy
of placing increased emphasis on the aggregates.

He hoped that

question would be considered later in the meeting today.
Mr. Brimmer agreed that the question was one that needed
resolution.

He thought, however, that the problem under discussion

went well beyond the usual even keel considerations, since it con
cerned the risk of disorderly markets during a financing.
By unanimous vote, the open
market transactions in Government
securities, agency obligations, and
bankers' acceptances during the
period April 7 through May 4, 1970,
were approved, ratified, and confirmed.
The Chairman then called for the staff economic and financial
reports, supplementing the written reports that had been distributed
prior to the meeting, copies of which have been placed in the files
of the Committee.
Mr. Partee made the following statement concerning economic
developments:

5/5/70

-21-

Major new uncertainties have emerged in the
economic picture over recent weeks. Potentially most
significant, of course, is the new military involvement
in Cambodia. The principal commitment of U.S. troops
there is expected to last only 6 to 8 weeks, in which
case the economic effects would be small. But it is
impossible to judge at this point what all of the rami
fications of the broadened area of conflict might be,
especially since there has been nothing definitive in
the way of response yet from the other side. At the
least, it would seem possible that the changed situation
could lead to delays in scheduled troop withdrawals
from Vietnam, and hence in expected reductions of
defense expenditures in the months ahead.
Another dramatic development has been the sharp
sustained drop in stock prices throughout the past
month. Broad stock market indexes, such as the New
York Stock Exchange composite, have dropped by an
eighth or more, thereby extinguishing something on
the order of $100 billion in market values. Investors
apparently were reacting partly to poor first-quarter
earnings reports which, according to our tabulations,
were down about 10 per cent on average from a year
ago on an after-tax basis for manufacturers. Before
tax profits dropped appreciably more than this, but
the cut in the surtax reduced the impact on net. In
addition, a more general pessimism has been evidenced
in the market, reflecting such factors as the state
of the brokerage business, the turnaround in the money
market, and the presumed lack of progress toward
solution of our major economic problems. Most
recently, of course, the military situation has put
the market down further.
It seems evident that the stock market, if it
continues to decline or even fails to rally, will be
having an unfavorable impact on the real economy.
Partly this stems from the psychology of a falling
market on business and consumer expectations, which
are likely to turn more bearish with growing financial
uncertainty. In addition, lower stock prices may
have a wealth effect on expenditures, by reducing
the market value of financial asset holdings, and
serve to raise the effective cost of equity capital
to business. These factors have considerable weight
in the Board's econometric model. Reducing stock
values by one-eighth, while holding all other

5/5/70

-22-

factors unchanged, reduces consumption $6 billion and
GNP $11 billion by year end from what otherwise would
be projected. This may be extreme, since interest
rates at least would probably be more stimulative, but
it does provide some indication of the possible quanti
tative impact.
A third development of some importance has been
the outbreak of wildcat strikes by truckers in a number
of major industrial centers. What is at stake here is
whether the labor settlement in this industry will be
the one negotiated by the national union, which calls
for increases in total compensation averaging nearly
9 per cent per annum over a 39-month period, or some
thing larger. This in itself is a commentary on the
probable difficulty of reaching labor contract
settlements this year. But meanwhile the strikes
are having an increasing impact on production, deliveries,
and employment in affected industries. We think that
this will force some decline in the industrial production
index in April. And secondary layoffs resulting from
delivery problems have become sizable--probably
involving around 100,000 workers currently. Such lay
offs have been a factor in the recent renewed uptrend
of unemployment insurance claims, and may have
contributed also to a further rise in the unemployment
rate in April. Preliminary indications are that the
rate was 4.8 per cent, with the increase again
concentrated among adult males. These figures have
just been received, and are extremely confidential
until released publicly, probably late this week.
Other economic news during the past month has been
mixed. New orders declined appreciably in March, and
order backlogs dropped for the third month in a row.
Manufacturer's inventories, on the other hand, showed
only a very small increase, a good sign that the
inventory correction is proceeding rapidly. Retail
sales were about unchanged in March, but weekly data
indicate a slight increase in April. Nondurable goods
are showing moderate strength, while automobile dealers'
and some other durable sales continue weak. New car
deliveries, however, improved sharply in late April.
For the first quarter as a whole, total retail sales
in real terms were unchanged from the fourth quarter
and 2-1/2 per cent below a year ago.
The McGraw-Hill survey taken in April again
indicates the apparent continuing strength of business
capital spending plans for 1970. Compared with last

5/5/70

-23-

fall's survey, manufacturers' anticipations have been
revised down somewhat but spending plans in other areas
have strengthened. The over-all rise for the year now
shown by this survey is 9 per cent. Machinery and
equipment orders declined slightly in the first quarter,
however, and partial results from a National Industrial
Conference Board survey indicate substantially more down
ward than upward revisions for the year among manufacturing
firms. Under the circumstances, our projection still
shows an 8 per cent rise in capital outlays in 1970, but
I continue to think that a shortfall is probable.
One of the main surprises in the March data was the
further sharp rise reported in housing starts. The
increase, to an annual rate close to 1.4 million units,
principally reflected continuing unexpected strength in
multi-family projects. This may reflect in part
seasonal aberrations, but it also is beginning to
appear that there is more financing for such projects
than we had anticipated. Accordingly, we have revised
upward our second-quarter housing starts projection,
although we still expect a decline from the recent
levels to about a 1.2 million rate. Unfortunately,
we have had also to revise upward our estimate of the
second-quarter increase in the GNP price deflator.
Although there are now more signs of moderation in
the price rise, especially in foods but also in some
non-food commodities, the first-quarter increase in the
deflator was substantially larger than we had expected.
With these exceptions, the staff GNP projection
remains broadly as presented to the Committee in the
previous green book 1/ supplement. Real GNP is
expected to level out this quarter, reflecting mainly
the special income stimulants to consumption and a
smaller drop in inventory investment, and to turn
upward again in the second half of the year. The
projected second-half rise is limited by declining
defense spending and a slowing of the increase in
capital outlays, however, and amounts to a relatively
moderate 3-1/2 per cent annual rate in real terms.
The high employment budget should also be turning
somewhat more restrictive as the second half progresses

1/ The report, "Current Economic and Financial Conditions,"
prepared for the Committee by the Board's staff.

5/5/70

-24-

and markedly so in the first half of next year. And
we still expect that the rate of inflation will diminish
gradually as the year progresses.
Our standard projection therefore continues to
indicate the desirability of holding to a moderate
rate of monetary expansion. But I must emphasize that
we have allowed for neither a major reaction in
business and consumer behavior to the fall in the stock
market, nor to the possibility of larger military spend
ing requirements than had been projected in the January
budget. For the time being, the former seems to me
the most pressing problem. I would think it highly
desirable, even aside from the immediate Treasury
financing requirements, to avoid any significant further
increase in market interest rates that would give the
impression of cumulating difficulties in financial
markets. At the same time, however, we need to resist
any unnecessarily large deviation from a moderate
growth path in money and credit, since this would be
inimical to the Committee's longer-run stabilization
objectives. To the extent that additional credit
must be supplied because of the present market situation,
efforts will need to be made to withdraw it gradually
later on,
Mr. Axilrod made the following statement concerning
financial developments:
Since the last meeting of the Committee stock
prices have dropped quite sharply and there has also
been a relatively sharp upward adjustment in market
interest rates, with mortgage rates so far appearing
to be an exception. The extent of this rebound in
interest rates has amounted to about 40-60 basis
points in the long-term area and to about 70-90
basis points for Treasury bills and bankers' accep
tances. Long-term Treasury issues and new high
grade corporate bonds have moved slightly above
their late-1969 cyclical peaks, while municipal
issues are only slightly below their peak. In
short-term markets most yields remain around 60-100
basis points below the previous peaks.

5/5/70

-25-

These developments have been explained at some
length in the various documents presented to the Commit
tee. I would like to put some additional stress on
three interrelated and overlapping explanations. First,
the sheer weight of massive supply in long-term markets
has had a naturally depressing effect on prices. Second,
this effect on prices has been magnified by disappointed
expectations as to the rapidity with which monetary
policy was going to ease and by concerns about the
future course of fiscal policy. And, thirdly, the
changes in the term structure of interest rates--with
short-term rates down on balance thus far this year
and long-term rates basically unchanged--is in large
part, and in my judgment, a reflection of shifts in
liquidity preference of borrowers, lenders, and the
public generally.
With respect to borrowers, corporations appear to
be putting considerably more stress on long- rather
than short-term financing. Partly this reflects the
need to compensate for an unbalanced corporate
financial structure that has resulted from the great
extent to which liquid assets have been economized
and bank lines have been utilized over the past few
years to accommodate external financing requirements.
Outstanding business loans at banks actually appear
to have declined slightly in the course of March and
April, even after including loans sold to affiliatesand, at least in March, this was accompanied by a
reduction in the rate of borrowing in the commercial
paper market. Unfortunately, we do not have the
statistics to evaluate whether this reduction in
business loans is primarily because of an accelera
tion in repayments or a deceleration in extensions.
We presume some of both has been involved, although
reports from banks, though mixed, remain suggestive
of fairly strong loan demands.
Another aspect of the enhanced demand for
liquidity has been seen in the behavior of institutions.
Banks have increased their holdings of securities by an
estimated $5 billion over the past two months, a period
in which outstanding total loans made by banks have
declined by about half that amount. Part of this rise
in securities did reflect earlier expectations of
declining interest rates, but liquidity preferences

5/5/70

-26-

also appear to be important. The increase in U.S.
Government securities holdings appears to be largely
in the bill area, while the rise in other securities
includes for the most part short-term municipal
securities. Moreover, savings and loan associations
have improved their liquidity positions in the past
month or two. It is a nice question, of course, as
to how much of the improvement in institutional
liquidity is wanted by banks and others and how much
unwanted. To a degree, it would certainly seem to
be desired--given the sharp erosion of liquidity
over the past year and the uncertainties about the
sustainability of continued inflows of time depositsbut to an extent the investments in short-term market
securities may also reflect, for S&L's, the difficulty
of finding mortgages in view of the start-up time
required in the construction industry. For banks,
the availability of investment funds may result from
abatement of business needs for short-term funds and,
more recently, from reduced demands of security
dealers, In other words, at least some of the
liquidity improvement must be an aspect of current
economic weakness.
Yet another element in liquidity demands may be
reflected in increased desires for cash balances. It
is most difficult to evaluate whether any such increased
demand for cash is transitory or permanent--let alone
attempting to determine whether it in fact exists
given the imperfection of our money supply statistics.
My judgment in current circumstances is that there
has been some shift in the demand for cash, largely
for precautionary reasons in light of stock market
uncertainties and partly as individuals and others
permit cash balances to rise, perhaps transitorily,
in the process of making difficult decisions between
spending and interest-earning investments in an
environment in which future economic prospects and
cash flow are quite uncertain.
One of the questions for monetary policy is
whether to accommodate itself to increased demands
for liquidity and cash balances. The rise in both
short- and long-term interest rates since the last
meeting of the Committee is consistent with the
view that policy is not being completely accomodativealthough it is no doubt true that expectational factors

5/5/70

-27-

have been affecting interest rates to a degree so that
rates can by no means be completely explained by the
relationship between liquidity demands and the operations
of the central bank to accommodate them.
In view of the uncertainties about how much progress
is being made in containing inflationary pressures, it
appears desirable for policy not to be completely
accommodative to shifting liquidity demands. Satisfying
such demands too quickly could lead to resurgence of
inflationary spending. Moreover, we are not all certain
what the demand for liquidity really amounts to, and it
may be that the economy has over the past few years
learned to live with relatively little liquidity. On
the other hand, this type of argument can easily be
overdone. Given the need to stimulate the mortgage
market and in light of continued relatively weak
consumer spending, I would think that it would be a
desirable course for policy to accommodate at least
part, and possibly a considerable portion of, liquidity
demands. To be specific, I would supply enough bank
reserves to avert, at a minimum, further significant
increases in market interest rates and would not be
averse to seeing or even encouraging declines from
current advanced levels, provided that the growth
rates of money and bank credit remain on the moderate
side when averaged out over a number of months.
One would expect an abatement of credit market
pressures to require the money supply and the
adjusted bank credit proxy to begin rising, after
the several weeks of decline--much more pronounced
for money than bank credit--that followed the end-of
first-quarter bulge. The blue book's adjusted paths
for money and bank credit are predicated on such a
rise. But in evaluating trade-offs among money,
bank credit, and interest rates, I would this time
put more stress on sustaining a reasonable growth in
institutional credit from banks and nonbanks and
encouraging moderation of interest rate pressurehoping that this might not require more growth in
the money supply than shown in the blue book but
recognizing that over the short run it might. An
abatement of pressures in credit markets might have
a salutary psychological effect on the stock market,
would increase the willingness of lenders to begin
making mortgage commitments at a more rapid pace,
and might lead to a more stable kind of environment
for rational decision-making by businessmen and
consumers.

-28-

5/5/70

Mr. Holland reported that since distribution of the draft
directive a revised version had been prepared which took account
In

of suggestions made on the earlier draft at three points.1/

the first paragraph, the opening sentence had been revised into
two sentences, and a modification had been made in the statement
regarding interest rates; and in the second paragraph a proviso
clause had been added.
Chairman Burns then called for a general discussion of
current and prospective economic conditions.
Mr. Hayes said it seemed increasingly clear that there
would not be a significant recession this year.

The information

that had become available in the past few weeks strongly
suggested to him that the economy was about to turn the corner,
if it had not already done so.

The evidence was not unmixed, but

he thought most indicators were stronger on balance than they had
been a month ago.

In his judgment the main risk now was of a

resurgence of demand.
The latest McGraw-Hill survey tended to confirm the
strength of capital spending plans, Mr. Hayes remarked.

/ The draft directive originally submitted by the staff
for consideration by the Committee and the revised draft
are appended to this memorandum as Attachments A and B,
respectively.

-29

5/5/70

From his own conversations with businessmen he had concluded
that attitudes toward capital spending remained buoyant.

The

housing outlook appeared to have strengthened a bit, as
Mr. Partee had noted.

The fact that consumers had spent the

bulk of the increment to their disposable income in the first
quarter raised the odds, he thought, that they would react
similarly in the current quarter to the income injections from
the increase in social security benefits and the Federal pay
raise.

The Indochina situation was an area of uncertainty, but

it might well develop into a major stimulus to Federal spending.
Any deterioration in the budget position would, of course,
increase the Government's borrowing requirements, Mr. Hayes
continued.

Such an increase, in turn, could make it more

difficult for the System to hold growth in the monetary
aggregates down to moderate rates.

Estimates of borrowing

requirements for the second half of the year already were rising
into a relatively high range.
Mr. Hayes noted that the GNP projections made by the
Board's staff were close to those prepared at the New York
Bank.

However, the latter were less optimistic with respect

to the course of the price deflator.

In contrast to the Board

staff's projection that the rise in the deflator would be down
to a 3.7 per cent annual rate by the fourth quarter, the New York

-30

5/5/70

Bank projected that the increase would not fall below 4 per
cent this year.

Of course, all such projections were highly

conjectural.
Turning to the balance of payments problem, Mr. Hayes
noted that less progress had been made thus far in 1970 than
had been hoped for.

In the first quarter the over-all

deficit on the official settlements basis exceeded the surplus
that had been recorded in the full year 1969, and the trade
surplus was smaller than had been expected.

Thus, there was

reason for considerable concern with the problem of inflation
on international as well as on domestic grounds.
Mr. Daane said he demurred from Mr. Hayes' apparent
willingness to assume away the possibility of recessionary
tendencies in the economy.

Nor did he think one could afford

to ignore the possible effects on economic developments later
in the year of existing conditions and expectations in financial

markets.

His own view was that there was now a real risk of a

collapse of confidence, although he doubted that such a collapse
would actually occur and he noted that the System could help

forestall one by appropriate action.

As to the buoyancy of

capital spending plans, he had detected some feeling on the
part of the Federal Advisory Council at its recent meeting
with the Board that survey results of the kind Mr. Hayes had
mentioned tended to overstate the actual volume of spending.

-31

5/5/70

In general, Mr. Daane observed, he had no quarrel on
economic grounds with the staff's GNP projections.

However,

he thought it was much too soon to discount the various kinds
of uncertainties that now existed.
Mr. Swan commented that it had been the objective of
policy to achieve cutbacks in capital spending.

One had to

distinguish between changes in psychology that led to desired
results and changes that could be described as a collapse of
confidence.

In his judgment the latter were not imminent.

Mr. Daane expressed the view that recent developments
in financial markets, including the stock market, suggested
that expectational changes had already passed beyond the
desirable type.
Mr. Coldwell remarked that he had gathered from
conversations since his return from South America that earlier
expectations of further easing in monetary policy had been
disappointed.

Also, rightly or wrongly, people no longer

believed that fiscal policy would remain stringent.

And there

appeared to be greatly increased concern about wage strikes

and campus unrest.

All of those concerns apparently were

being reflected in the stock market declines.
Mr. Hickman said he thought there had been a cataclysmic
change in expectations over the last two months--resulting from

-32

5/5/70

such developments as the postal strike and the events in Indochinawhich had had a decided impact on the stock market.

The evidence

in terms of economic statistics that had become available since
the last meeting, while spotty, suggested to him that the economy
had stabilized.

They indicated that the Committee might perhaps be

more concerned soon about too rapid a resumption of growth and addi
tional inflationary pressures than about the risk of additional
slack in the economy.
Mr. Hickman remarked that he agreed in general with
Mr. Partee's assessment of the economic outlook.

The strong

points in the situation included the recent sharp decline in busi
ness inventory investment, the sharp growth in personal and dis
posable income and consumer spending, the deficit in the high
employment budget in the second quarter--which might be offset by
surpluses later in the year, but at the moment represented a stimu
lative factor--and the recent McGraw-Hill survey of capital spending
plans of business, which indicated continued strength in that sector
for 1970 and beyond.

He shared Mr. Daane's view that survey

results overstated actual capital spending because for almost a
year he had been hearing from businessmen that they were paring
back their planned outlays.

However, actual spending appeared to

be holding up.
Chairman Burns suggested that that might be due in part to
a "money illusion."

Businessmen, thinking in physical volume terms,

-33

5/5/70

could be speaking about cutbacks from plans while dollar outlays
were rising because of increasing costs.
Mr. Hickman said that might well be true.

He went

on to note that the economic evidence was likely to continue spotty
for some time, as was always the case at or near turning points
in activity.

The weakness in the March figures for new orders

and the upward revision in residential construction outlays were
cases in point.

He believed that real GNP would begin to increase

sharply after the settlement of the truck strike in the Midwest.
The workers who had been laid off because of the truck strike would
not be reemployed for a week or two while the pipelines were
being refilled, but he thought that a substantial rise in real GNP
would begin around late May.
Mr. Heflin said there were three key questions bearing on
the Committee's policy decision today, but the evidence was not
yet in on two of them.

One of these related to expectations.

They were in a state of flux, and since March they may have been
moving back into an inflationary pattern; but one could not yet be
sure.

The second related to the effect on the Federal budget of

recent developments in Southeast Asia.

Perhaps the current operation

would have no great impact on total defense outlays. On the other
hand, the experience of 1965 might be repeated.
The third question, Mr. Heflin continued, concerned the
state of the economy.

The evidence suggested to him that the best

-34

5/5/70

to be hoped for was a sluggish recovery over the next two quarters.
However, he was less worried now about a recession than he had
been a month ago.
As to open market operations, Mr. Heflin noted that there
would be an even keel constraint over the next ten or twelve days.
He thought that even keel considerations should be dominant; and as
he had suggested earlier in the meeting he believed the Committee
should give the Manager explicit instructions on that point.

In

view of the shaky state of the market the Manager should be given
a wide degree of leeway.
Mr. Heflin added that, after participating in the morning
call for the past month, he was impressed with the difficulties of
interpreting the current figures on the monetary aggregates.

He

found it even more difficult to place much faith in the dependa
bility of the projections.
Mr. Brimmer observed that he agreed with Mr. Hayes'
analysis.

He recalled that at the February meeting there had been

considerable sentiment within the Committee to the effect that a
serious recession was in prospect later in the year--while some
members, including himself, had resisted that conclusion.
the Committee was faced with a similar uncertainty.

Today

He was not dis

turbed by Mr. Partee's suggestion that the drop in stock prices
might have a substantially depressing effect on consumer spending.
Indeed, he took some comfort in such a prospect, given the

-35

5/5/70

outlook for increased Federal expenditures in both the defense and
nondefense areas.

A turnaround in real GNP of the degree projected

by the staff--from a decline in the first half to growth in the
second half at a 3-1/2 per cent rate--would not appear to offer a
climate conducive to dampening inflationary expectations.
In the short run, Mr. Brimmer said, it obviously was
important to avoid a financial panic and to give the Manager the
leeway necessary to that end.

But that was not the same as sug

gesting that the System should undertake to bail out securities
dealers.

Like any other business, dealer firms should be expected

to bear the risk of losses in their operations.
Mr. Mitchell said he thought the Committee's approach thus
far, which he would describe as one of gradualism, had produced the
sequence of events needed to achieve its goals.

Demands of the

household sector were moderating; contrary to the views of some,
he saw no evidence that the demands of the Government sector were
about to rise explosively; the performance of the stock market
indicated that inflationary psychology there had been tranquilized;
and the banking system appeared convinced that the Federal Reserve
meant business.
In short, Mr. Mitchell remarked, he thought the System
had turned the corner in its effort to make a moderate change in
the stance of monetary policy.

He saw no need to be concerned

about the bullish flare-ups that would occur from time to time.

The

5/5/70

-36

Committee's major problem now was that of achieving the amount of
monetary expansion that would insure economic recovery at a moderate
rate in the fall of 1970 and on into 1971.
Mr. Kimbrel commented that his confidence in the intentions
of bank management in the Sixth District had been strengthened in
recent weeks by the fact that the banks had used their enlarged
inflows of time deposits mainly to improve their liquidity positions

rather than to expand loans rapidly.
The business picture in the District remained mixed,
Mr. Kimbrel said.

People in the automobile industry expected sales

during the next few months to be below present levels.

Construction

contracts were continuing to increase, but chiefly for nonresidential
construction; in the residential area the vacancy rate was rising.
Mr. Kimbrel added that he had the impression from talking
with District businessmen that inflationary expectations were once
more building up--not as a result of the System's policies but as a
consequence of the belief that the kind of fiscal actions to be
expected in an election year would lead to trouble before many months
had passed.

He very much hoped that an outbreak of a new inflationary

spiral could be avoided.
Mr. Francis remarked that recent economic developments in
dicated that the policy of monetary and fiscal restraint was
operating on schedule.

There was no basis for complacency, but as

he had watched economic developments unfold he had seen nothing that

5/5/70

-37

indicated a need to deviate from the Committee's planned course of
monetary action.
Economic developments in the first quarter, and since, had
contained no surprises, Mr. Francis said.

The growth of total spend

ing continued to moderate, while the high rate of inflation persisted.
That was what should have been expected; an

inflation that had been

allowed to build up for five years could not be reversed quickly.
A look at most recent developments did not suggest to
Mr. Francis that downward forces were cumulating in such a way as to
threaten a serious recession.

Industrial production had moved up

slightly in March, payroll employment had continued upward, and
inventories had not been building up excessively.

At the same time,

inflationary forces did not seem to be intensifying.

Wholesale in

dustrial prices showed signs of slowing, and stock prices were
behaving anything but bullishly.

Those were scant bits of evidence,

but he felt, nevertheless, they provided some basis for encouragement.
In his judgment, Mr. Francis continued, the budget was not
deviating significantly from the January plan, except for the timing
of the Federal pay increase and the larger increase apparently forth
coming for postal workers.

What was important was that expansion in

monetary aggregates be maintained, but kept moderate.

Forces had

been set in motion to reduce the rate of inflation by late 1970 and
early 1971.

Quickened expansion of monetary growth--in response to,

say, Treasury demands for cash, or inappropriate consideration

5/5/70

-38

of trends in bank credit--could nullify the effects of the fiscal
and monetary restraint that had already occurred.

On the other hand,

retreating from a policy of moderate monetary growth could have the
effect of reducing real output more than was actually desirable.
Mr. Baughman said he still viewed the GNP projections of the
Board's staff as reasonable in light of the available evidence and
as acceptable targets for monetary policy.

It appeared that Seventh

District businessmen had a roughly similar outlook in mind in making
their plans and commitments.

At the moment, however, the most signif

icant development in the District was the effect of the truckers'
strike, which was spreading more and more widely and gradually
strangling activity.
Turning to individual industries, Mr. Baughman remarked that
there seemed to be a firmly held view that a turnaround was in
process in the automobile industry and that both production and sales
would increase in the second quarter unless prevented by the truckers'
strike.

Sales of construction equipment were surprisingly good for

an industry that had not expected to be doing well at this time.
Activity in the farm machinery industry was improving about in
line with expectations from recent very low levels.
As to prices, Mr. Baughman observed that he was still not at
all sure that there were any indications of a significant slowing in
the rate of advance.

5/5/70

-39
Mr. Baughman then said that he might report on the unusual

public interest shown in the Chicago area in the 18-month note the
Treasury was offering for cash in the current financing.

Well

over 4,000 people--many of them housewives--had come to the Bank
yesterday to enter subscriptions, compared with a maximum of about
300 in the regular Treasury bill auctions.

In addition, so many

telephone inquiries were received that people calling the Bank on
other business frequently could not get through.
the unusual interest were not clear.

The reasons for

In particular, it did not

appear to have been stimulated by the press, since the news stories
regarding the offering, carried on Friday, had been quite routine.
And the public evidently had not been attracted by the small $1000
denominations no longer available on Treasury bills, since most of
those at the Bank yesterday were subscribing to larger amounts.
Chairman Burns asked whether a similar situation had
developed at other Reserve Banks.
Mr. Morris observed that the experience at his Bank was
quite similar.

Mr. Clay said the number of people entering sub

scriptions at the Kansas City Bank had been surprisingly large,
although not as large as at Chicago.

Mr. Holmes reported that

the number coming to the New York Bank had not been unusually
great, but there had been a deluge of telephone inquiries about
the financing.
The Chairman then suggested that the Committee turn its
attention to financial developments and prospects.

5/5/70
Mr. Mitchell referred to Mr. Axilrod's earlier comment that
it would be desirable at this time to put more stress on sustaining
reasonable growth in institutional credit from both banks and non
banks, and asked how that could be done most effectively.
Mr. Axilrod replied that the most important requirement
would be a lower level of Treasury bill rates, since the current
level was inimical to the flows of funds to institutions.

He sus

pected that a large part of the money the public was investing in
the new Treasury note was being withdrawn from banks and other
thrift institutions.

He would be prepared to see more short-run

growth in the money supply than called for in the blue book, if
that were necessary to bring down bill rates.
Mr. Mitchell asked how much more growth in the money supply
might be required; what the implications would be for growth in bank
credit; and whether the objective might not be achieved by an increase
in Regulation Q ceilings rather than by a reduction in bill rates.
Mr. Axilrod noted that the blue book suggested 4 per cent
annual rates of growth as targets for the second quarter for both
money and the adjusted bank credit proxy.

He thought growth in money

in the second quarter at a 5 or 6 per cent annual rate might be needed
to get bill rates down to a desirable level.

He hadn't worked out the

implications for bank credit, but would guess that the adjusted

proxy series might expand at a rate in the 4 to 6 per cent range.
In his judgment it would be better, under current conditions, to seek

-41

5/5/70

lower bill rates than to raise Q ceilings for the purpose of sustain
ing growth in institutional credit at a reasonable rate.
Mr. Brimmer observed that the "current projections" for
the second quarter shown in a table distributed on the same day as
the blue book--annual rates of growth of 4.7 per cent for the
adjusted proxy series and 5 per cent for money--were higher than
the target rates of 4 per cent for both suggested in the blue book.
Mr. Axilrod said the difference reflected the fact that the
projections represented expected growth rates on the assumption
of no change in money market conditions, whereas the blue book
targets were intended to involve no change from the concept of
"moderate growth" implied by the targets agreed upon at the previous
meeting.

The new targets for the individual aggregates differed

from the old because, in the staff's judgment, the relationships
had changed.
Mr. Hayes suggested that it would be helpful to include
the projections as well as the suggested targets in the blue book.
Although they tended to fluctuate widely in the short run, the
projections were extremely important from the point of view of
day-to-day operations.
Mr. Partee remarked that that could be done if the Commit
tee so desired.

He would be concerned, however, about possible

confusion resulting from the multiplicity of figures.

He noted that

the projections--which often could be expected to differ a little

5/5/70

-42-

from the targets--were readily available in other places, includ
ing the Manager's report.
Mr. Morris referred to Mr. Partee's earlier report that
the unemployment rate was tentatively indicated to have increased
to 4.8 per cent in April, with much of the advance involving adult
males.

In his (Mr. Morris') judgment, that information added to a

pattern that seemed to be developing in the current statistics.

As

Mr. Brimmer had noted, considerable concern had been expressed about
the economic outlook at the Committee's February meeting, and a
number of members had indicated then that they expected data for
the next few months to reflect further deceleration.

However,

actual developments had led the staff to make substantial upward
revisions in its GNP projections for the year.

At present conditions

in financial markets and the latest economic statistics suggested
that the tide might be running the other way; he suspected that
the odds favored downward, rather than upward, revisions in the
GNP projections over the next few months.
At the same time, Mr. Morris continued, he had no strong
convictions about the course of the economy over the rest of the
year.

Until a better assessment was possible he thought it would

be desirable to follow a middle course with respect to policy.
the case for resolving doubts on the side of ease seemed to him
to be stronger than it had been four weeks ago.

But

-43

5/5/70

Mr. Hickman said he would expect the economic statistics
for May to be quite weak because of the truckers' strike.
Chairman Burns remarked that Mr. Hickman's expectation might
be unduly pessimistic, if judged by the results of a study he (the
Chairman) had made in 1956 of the effects of strikes of nationwide sig
nificance in such major industries as coal and steel.

He had found

that it was difficult to detect such a strike in over-all data for
the economy in the absence of prior knowledge concerning it--even
though activity in the specific industry affected might have
collapsed.
Chairman Burns then noted that much was being said about
inflationary expectations in current discussions of economic matters.
As he examined information on the economy he found no evidence of
strong inflationary expectations on the part of consumers.

On the

contrary, consumers presently were saving at an abnormally high
rate.
tions.

The stock market certainly was not reflecting such expecta
His information on real estate markets was limited, but

he had the impression that while prices were high they were rising
at a less rapid rate than previously.
The surveys of capital spending plans did suggest that the
expectations of businessmen were inflationary, the Chairman continued.
The evidence indicating what the actual course of investment spending
might be was mixed; the information on orders for durable goods and
on machine tool orders suggested that such spending would be weaker

-44-

5/5/70

than the survey results indicated.

Like Mr. Partee, he expected

the dollar volume of investment outlays to rise in 1970, but by
less than the surveys indicated.
There was little doubt, the Chairman remarked, that business
men were concerned about inflation and about the outlook for fiscal
policy.

The latter concern was deeply felt in the business com

munity, although not so deeply as in the financial community, and
it had grown considerably in recent months.
One had to take into account such attitudes of businessmen,
Chairman Burns observed, since attitudes were facts that had conse
quences in themselves.

Nevertheless, it was important to bear in

mind that present expectations for fiscal policy in business and
financial circles were out of perspective.

A change in thinking

about fiscal policy had been set off initially by the Administration's
announcement that it was releasing funds that had been impounded
earlier for State and local government construction projects.

However,

according to Budget Bureau estimates, the maximum amount of funds
involved in this fiscal year was $175 million--and that maximum would
be reached only if governments displayed more efficiency in their
operations than was characteristic of them.

The shift in atti

tudes had been gravely accentuated by the postal strike and the
subsequent legislation raising the pay of postal and other Federal
workers.

But the resulting increase in estimated Federal expenditures

was not great enough to make much of a change in the over-all fiscal

-45

5/5/70

picture; indeed, it was unlikely that there would have been the
present alarm had it not been for the experience with Federal
budgets in other recent years.

There were good grounds for expect

ing part of the rise in expenditures to be financed by added
revenues.

Moreover, he thought it likely that the Administration

would announce soon some retrenchment in certain categories of
expenditure.
The Chairman noted that the Cambodian development, which had
occurred while he was in South America, was the latest source of
concern about fiscal policy.

Because of his own concern, on return

ing from abroad he had explored the implications for Federal expendi
tures as thoroughly as possible, drawing on sources that he considered
excellent.

The subject was, of course, marked by uncertainty, and he

intended to do some further checking.

It was his present impression,

however, that--barring some response from Communist China, which
could not be ruled out--the Cambodian development would not have much
effect on Federal expenditures.

The fact that the contrary view was

widely held in financial markets had, of course, had an impact on
those markets and had contributed to the problems faced by the Desk
in recent days.
The Chairman then expressed the view that insufficient atten
tion had been paid in the discussion today to the problem of
unemployment.

Referring to the comments that had been made about

earlier excessive pessimism in expectations for the economy, the
Chairman said the unemployment rate had risen faster than he, among

-46-

5/5/70
others, had expected.

At 4.8 per cent the unemployment rate already

was about at the level the staff had projected would be reached late
in the year; and it was well over the 4.3 per cent average for the
year the Council of Economic Advisers had anticipated.
In conclusion the Chairman said he thought it would be a
disastrous mistake to tighten monetary policy at this time, but
that relaxing would also be a serious mistake.

In his judgment the

present track of policy was sound, and he favored holding to it.
Mr. Hayes remarked that he had arrived at the same conclusion.
He added that the Chairman obviously had far better sources than he
regarding the probable budget impact of developments in Cambodia,
and he fervently hoped that the impression the Chairman had
received on that subject would prove to be accurate.

At the same

time it was worth noting that from past experience one might con
clude that the executive branch of the Government was not always
the best judge of such matters.
Chairman Burns then called for the go-around of comments
and views on monetary policy.

Mr. Hayes made the following statement:

I believe the greatest danger we could face would
lie in a relaxation of policy that would tend to con
firm and strengthen current widely-held fears that
the authorities are giving up on the effective use of
fiscal and monetary policy to break the inflationary
spiral. In other words, our basic stance should be
one of firm restraint.
In translating this into a more specific policy
directive for the next three weeks, we have to deal
with a perplexing combination of circumstances. To

-47-

5/5/70

my mind moderate growth in the money and bank credit
aggregates remains a proper intermediate policy objec
tive. The general ranges discussed at the last meeting
still seem reasonable. While the interrelationships
between money supply and bank credit, on the one hand,
and interest rates and GNP, on the other, are by no
means certain, I don't object to the new blue book
targets. In view of the sharp rise in interest rates
of recent weeks and the consequent increased uncertainty
in the outlook for reintermediation, I think money
supply deserves greater attention than bank credit for
the time being. Since current projections--such as they
are--point to a rather excessive rate of money growth
for the second quarter--one that could spark new fears
of inflation--there would be reason on this score to
move toward somewhat firmer money market conditions.
However, we are in the midst of an even-keel period,
when confidence in the Government securities market,
and in financial markets generally, is more shaky
than it has been in several years. Indeed, the
fear of disorderly financial markets in general is
now stronger than at any time in recent years. Under
the circumstances, the Manager should, I think, give
a good deal of weight in the coming three weeks to
money market conditions and market psychology. With
the market tending to exaggerate the scope of the
policy change expressed in the January 15 directive,
it would seem to behoove the System to demonstrate
by deed that our sole concern is not with the
aggregates, but that we are still vitally interested
in the proper functioning of the markets. Of course,
to the extent that these market problems may tend to
take care of themselves, the Manager would be able
to give more weight to the pressing need for a
sufficient check to excessive monetary expansion.
Mr. Morris said that he would accept the policy called for by
the revised draft directive distributed today.

Since the latest

economic indicators were a little weaker than he had expected, how
ever, he would not be overly concerned if the Desk's efforts to
maintain orderly markets resulted in growth in the aggregates at
rates above the targets.

5/5/70

-48Mr. Coldwell expressed the view that market stability was the

critical need in the present circumstances, and he hoped the Desk
would place a high priority on maintaining stability.

An even keel

was clearly required in light of the unusual nature of the Treasury
financing.
Mr. Swan commented that he also would accept the revised
draft directive.

He recognized the necessity for giving market

conditions a high priority in the period immediately ahead.

How

ever, he shared Mr. Hayes' views regarding the aggregates, and he
would want the Desk to take the aggregates into account to the extent
possible.

He would be somewhat concerned if the money supply grew at

the rate Mr. Axilrod had mentioned in connection with his recommen
dation to seek lower bill rates.
Mr. Galusha expressed support for the revised draft directive.
Mr. Baughman said he also found the revised directive accept
able.

However, the Committee might want to consider amplifying the

statement in the first paragraph noting that attitudes in financial
markets were being affected by developments in Southeast Asia.

The

Manager had mentioned certain other factors affecting the current
market atmosphere--such as continuing concern about the success
of the Government's anti-inflationary program--that might also
be mentioned.
In his judgment, Mr. Baughman continued, the Desk's recent
posture had been appropriate to the objective of keeping the market
functioning, and in light of the rather rapid increases in interest

-49-

5/5/70

rates he would favor a continuation of about the same posture.

The

Board might want to consider a further increase in the Regulation Q
ceilings for the purpose of achieving somewhat more rapid growth in
bank credit relative to money at the current level of interest rates.
Mr. Clay commented that the Committee seemed to be generally
on course with respect to the policy it had been following since
January.

In his judgment, however, growth in money and bank credit

in the past month was somewhat more rapid than desirable, and the
4 per cent rate suggested as a target for money in the second quarter
was a little high.

He hoped it would be possible to achieve more

moderate growth rates for the aggregates, although he recognized that
such a task would not necessarily be easy.

The revised draft directive

submitted by the staff was acceptable to him, and he agreed that the
Manager should be given considerable flexibility for the period
immediately ahead.
Mr. Heflin said he found the revised draft directive to be
satisfactory.
Mr. Mitchell said he also was satisfied with the revised
draft directive.

It should be recognized, however, that the Manager

would be taking the actions needed to maintain orderly markets,
whatever the implications for the aggregates.

He would not be con

cerned if the consequence was a large increase in money during May.
He would be quite disturbed, however, if money continued to increase
rapidly in June and July.

5/5/70

-50
Mr. Daane said he would agree in general with the comments

made by Mr. Morris.

Clearly, the immediate need was to maintain

orderly conditions in financial markets, and that required an even
keel in the traditional sense of the term.

Following a traditional

even keel at this time would also have the advantage of dispelling
the market's belief that the Committee was focusing exclusively on
the aggregates.
While he supported the sense of the draft directive, Mr. Daane
continued, he was troubled by the proposed insertion of the words
"bank reserves" in the clause of the second paragraph reading "System
open market operations...shall be conducted with a view to maintaining
bank reserves and money market conditions consistent with that objec
tive...."

He had no quarrel with the purpose of the addition, as set

forth in the explanatory notes attached to the directive draft.1 /

How

ever, the directive notes were not a published document, and the language
of the directive itself might mislead the reader into believing the
Committee was calling for an increased degree of fine tuning.
Chairman Burns commented that some suitable means should be
found for avoiding such a connotation.

1/ The note in question read as follows: "A reference to 'bank
reserves' as well as to 'money market conditions' is suggested in the
statement of instructions to help make clear that in reaching his
operating decisions the Manager is expected to keep an eye on the path
of changes in the whole family of reserve aggregates. The staff
understands that deviations from that path are expected to be used
as information supplementing--not substituting for--developments in
money market conditions as a guide to possible Desk operations."

-51-

5/5/70

Mr. Partee remarked that the Committee's intention could
be made clear by including the substance of the explanatory note in
the text of the policy record that would be published along with the
directive.
Mr. Daane commented that such a procedure would be useful.
Mr. Maisel said he agreed with Mr. Partee's estimate of
the economy and was satisfied with the probabilities.
financial side, he agreed with Mr. Axilrod.
were far from buoyant.

On the

Financial markets

If anything, their action would seem to

indicate higher probabilities of a liquidity crisis than of an
excess of liquidity.
Against that background, it seemed to Mr. Maisel that
operations since the last meeting had moved along the proper path.
The sharp increases in the monetary aggregates were not ignored
as they would have been under a purely accommodative policy following
a change in money market conditions.

Instead those movements were
The

taken into account in the rate at which reserves were furnished.

dealers and lenders following previous precedents took a tremendous
speculative position.
ably healthy.

The fact that they had to abandon it was prob

The past month also showed how erratic week-to-week

data could be but at the same time how useful it was to be following
a target path well laid out.

The Committee had made a much better

policy turn than he thought had been typical of past turns.

-52-

5/5/70

The question facing the Committee, Mr. Maisel continued,
concerned the path for the next three months that would be suit
able.

Unfortunately, the problem was made difficult because the

July projections seemed to have been left out of the blue book.

He

assumed they had been omitted because they would give no additional
information on the path.

Still, he would have preferred to have

them, and he hoped three-month projections would be provided in the
future so that each member of the Committee could make up his own
mind on this point.
Mr. Maisel noted that the target paths shown in the blue
book reflected staff estimates of a possible trade-off between the
money supply, the adjusted bank credit proxy, and total reserves.
He would prefer that, for this coming period, more weight be given
to the adjusted bank credit proxy and total reserves than to the
narrowly defined money supply.

His reason was that he believed

liquidity was extremely short as a result of the low rates of
growth in the aggregates that had persisted for the past year.
During that period growth in the credit proxy probably had been
negative, while the money supply had grown by 2.8 per cent.

At

the same time, of course, the economy's spending actually went up
6 per cent.

That large difference in rates of growth explained a

lack of liquidity in the economy.
Mr. Maisel observed that if the Committee were to accept
the target paths laid out in the blue book it would find that by

-53

5/5/70

the end of June M 1 would have grown at an annual rate of 3.9 per
cent for the current half-year; the adjusted credit proxy would
have grown at a 2.4 per cent rate; and total reserves would have
fallen at a 1.2 per cent rate.

Clearly, those rates were not

sufficient to furnish current liquidity, without taking into
account any possible prior shortages.

Therefore, he would

be happier if for the current quarter the Committee set its
targets for growth in each of the aggregates at least 1 per
centage point higher than indicated in the blue book--that is,
5 per cent for the adjusted proxy and the money supply and 1-1/2
per cent for total reserves.
Furthermore, Mr. Maisel continued, he would not be concerned
if the adjusted proxy and total reserves grew even faster than the
target--although, primarily for psychological reasons, he would
not want to see an annual growth rate of over 6 per cent for M1
for this quarter.

Even with such a rate the money supply would

have grown slightly under 5 per cent for the current half-year.
Mr. Brimmer said he was troubled by the suggestion by
Mr. Axilrod and several Committee members that growth rates in the
aggregates in excess of the blue book targets should be sought or
at least accepted.

He personally found the blue book target rates

barely acceptable, and would prefer less rapid growth.

The need to

work toward controlling the aggregates was particularly important

-54

5/5/70

in light of the tendency he had noted since mid-February for actual
growth to exceed the target rates.

There would be relatively little

time between the end of the Treasury financing and the next meeting
of the Committee, but he hoped the Manager would do what he could
in that period to reverse preceding large reserve injections and to
offset tendencies toward excessive aggregate growth rates.
Mr. Brimmer added that he had no objection to including the
words "bank reserves" in the second paragraph of the directive.

He

agreed that it would be desirable to include explanatory material
in the policy record.
Mr. Sherrill said he concurred in Mr. Mitchell's comments on
the economic situation.

It appeared that excess demand had been

tranquilized and that the business sector was in a good position to
move ahead at a reasonable pace after having successfully accomplished
most of the needed inventory adjustment.

If it were not for the

disturbed conditions in financial markets, including the stock
market, he would be quite satisfied with the over-all situation.
As to policy for the forthcoming period, Mr. Sherrill
continued, he thought the blue book targets for the aggregates
were quite acceptable.

As others had noted, however, the target

rates might well be exceeded as a result of the Manager's efforts
to cope with problems in the market.

Indeed, it would be fortunate

if actual growth could be moved back to rates near the targets by
the next meeting.

Nevertheless, he hoped the Manager would give

-55

5/5/70

as much consideration as possible to the effects of his operations
on the growth of bank credit.
Mr. Hickman said that he considered appropriate the targets
suggested in the blue book for growth in both bank credit and money
at a 4 per cent annual rate in the second quarter.

Given the problems

that would be facing the Desk in the next few weeks he doubted that
much could be done now to assure that those targets would be met, but

he hoped that any excesses would not be great.

He considered the

proposed directive language to be excellent, although he thought the
reference to bank reserves did not add much and could be omitted.
Mr. Eastburn said he would accept the revised draft directive.
He added that, like Mr. Heflin, he was concerned about the meaning
of even keel in the context of the current increased emphasis on the
aggregates.

Perhaps the staff could be asked to prepare a memorandum

on the matter.
Chairman Burns agreed that such a memorandum would be helpful,
and Mr. Axilrod indicated that one would be prepared.
Mr. Kimbrel remarked that if he had a choice he, too, would
accept the revised draft directive.

He hoped the Manager would resolve

any doubts on the side of tightness rather than ease.
Mr. Francis said that, in the current situation--with both
continued rapid inflation and sluggishness in real output--policy
should avoid the extremes of either rapid monetary expansion or no

5/5/70

-56

expansion for a prolonged period of time.

He suggested that the

Committee's target for money growth should remain at the 3 per cent
annual rate adopted earlier this year rather than the faster rate
suggested in the blue book.

The June target level for money sug

gested in the blue book would represent an increase at about a
6 per cent annual rate from February, which was the end of the period
of

no net growth in money and about the time that policy was changed

to seek moderate expansion.

He saw no reason for raising the

target growth rate for money either for its own sake or as a
compromise designed to avoid a sharper downward revision in the bank
credit target.

The recent rise in interest rates above Regulation Q

ceilings had led to a forecast of renewed disintermediation of time
deposits and a contraction in bank credit, and the System should not
interpret that as monetary restraint.

To get money back down to the

3 per cent growth path adopted in February, it was necessary that
System open market operations should be conducted so as to provide for
about a 4 per cent annual rate of decrease from the two weeks ended
April 29 until June.
In sum, Mr. Francis concluded, he could not support the
directive if, as he understood it, that would imply acceptance of the
targets suggested in the blue book.

He feared that the adoption of

those targets would undo over the next two months much of the good
that monetary policy had accomplished over the past several months.

-57

5/5/70

In response to the Chairman's request for comment, Mr. Axilrod
remarked that rates of change in aggregates could, of course, be
measured from a variety of bases, and as Mr. Francis had noted the
Committee had adopted the objective of moderate growth in the aggre
gates in February.

However, from the point of view of evaluating the

impact of policy on the economy, he thought there was much to be said
for considering the trend of the aggregates over a longer periodperhaps from October or November of 1969.

That procedure would yield

a lower average growth rate for money.
Mr. Francis agreed that the growth rate calculated would be
smaller if an earlier base were used.

For the reasons he had men

tioned, however, he considered February to be the appropriate choice.
Moreover, in terms of absolute levels the June target given in the
blue book struck him as higher than desirable.
Chairman Burns expressed the view that the nature of the
Committee's policy decision in February was not necessarily deci
sive with respect to the choice of a base for measuring recent
changes in the money stock.
Mr. Robertson made the following statement:
I think the proper course for monetary policy today
is, in a careful but determined way, to keep fostering
the orderly adjustment of our long overheated economy.
It may be that we have bottomed out in the decline in
real economic activity, and that a moderate resumption
of growth lies ahead of us. If so, that is laudable if,
and only if, we experience some corresponding cooling
of prices.
I was heartened by the first harbingers of
a hopefully better price performance to which the staff

5/5/70

-58-

was finally able to point; but further progress on this
front is absolutely essential if the use of our general
stabilization tools to achieve noninflationary prosperity
with growth is to be vindicated in this environment.
I am glad we are having some success in rolling
back the bulge in money supply and bank credit that
developed in March and early April, and that the staff
now sees us returning to a path that could fairly be
called one of moderate growth over the second quarter.
I have no concern, myself, with bulges in the aggregates
that last only a few days or a week or two; but those
which threaten to be of longer duration I think should
be resisted, and I am glad the Manager managed to
tighten up on reserve availability and money market
conditions enough to do just that. I am also glad that
he did not tighten money market conditions any more
than he did, given the sensitive state of the markets
and the delicate balance of the current Treasury finan
cing. Having Regulation Q ceilings still in place, I
would point out, was a key factor enabling the Manager
to slow down bank credit growth with no more reserve
pressure than he applied. Distasteful though those
interest rate ceilings may be, in principle, they still
are demonstrating their pragmatic usefulness.
Looking ahead, I am satisfied with the goals for
moderate growth in money and bank credit outlined in the
blue book, I recognize that "even keel" will have to be
an overriding consideration for much of the time between
now and the next meeting of the Committee, but I hope
that the Manager will do what he can within that constraint
to promote a climate of moderate--not immoderate--monetary
expansion. Even though participants may be tugging on
markets in ways that suggest strong desires for more liq
uidity, I think our long-range objectives for the economy
are best served by our maintaining an orderly and moderate
monetary response. Having come this far along that road,
I think we should fight the temptation to alter our stance
now.
Accordingly, I would favor the draft directive as
presented by the staff, essentially unchanged from last
time.
The Chairman said he agreed with all of Mr. Robertson's
comments except those pertaining to Regulation Q.
rough consensus had emerged from the go-around.

He thought a

Most members seemed

-59

5/5/70

ready to support the revised draft directive, although there had
been suggestions for further revisions.

Similarly, most seemed to

agree, more or less, with the targets for the aggregates suggested
in the blue book, although preferences had been expressed for both
slightly lower and slightly higher growth rates.
Mr. Hayes said it was his impression that there was a

little more sentiment for lower growth rates than higher.
Mr. Daane referred to Mr. Baughman's earlier suggestion for
expanding the sentence in the first paragraph of the directive refer
ring to the factors affecting attitudes in financial markets.

He

(Mr. Daane) thought that an addition also would be desirable to the
list of factors cited in that paragraph as contributing to the recent
increases in interest rates.

He had in mind the possible shift in

liquidity preferences that Mr. Axilrod had noted in his statement
today.
Chairman Burns expressed the view that additions of the types
proposed by both Mr. Baughman and Mr. Daane would be desirable.

He

suggested that the Committee vote on a directive consisting of the
revised draft distributed earlier, amended to include the proposed
additions.

In view of the lateness of the hour the specific language

for the additions might be left to the staff, subject to the concur
rence of Messrs. Daane and Mitchell.
There was general agreement with the Chairman's suggestion.
With Mr. Francis dissenting, the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York was
authorized and directed, until otherwise

-60-

5/5/70
directed by the
transactions in
accordance with
economic policy

Committee, to execute
the System Account in
the following current
directive:

The information reviewed at this meeting indicates
that real economic activity weakened further in the
first quarter of 1970. Growth in personal income, how
ever, is being stimulated in the second quarter by the
enlargement of social security benefit payments and the
Federal pay raise. Prices and costs generally are
continuing to rise at a rapid pace, although some compo
nents of major price indexes recently have shown mod
erating tendencies. Most market interest rates have
risen sharply in recent weeks as a result of heavy
demands for funds, possible shifts in liquidity pref
erences, and the disappointment of earlier expectations
regarding easing of credit market conditions. Prices
of common stocks have declined markedly since early
April. Attitudes in financial markets generally are
being affected by the expansion of military operations
in Southeast Asia and by concern about the success of
the Government's anti-inflationary program. Both bank
credit and the money supply rose substantially from
March to April on average, although during the course
of April bank credit leveled off and the money supply
receded sharply from the end-of-March bulge. The over
all balance of payments was in considerable deficit
during the first quarter. In light of the foregoing
developments, it is the policy of the Federal Open Market
Committee to foster financial conditions conducive to
orderly reduction in the rate of inflation, while encour
aging the resumption of sustainable economic growth and
the attainment of reasonable equilibrium in the country's
balance of payments.
To implement this policy, the Committee desires to
see moderate growth in money and bank credit over the
months ahead. System open market operations until the
next meeting of the Committee shall be conducted with
a view to maintaining bank reserves and money market
conditions consistent with that objective, taking account
of the current Treasury financing; provided, however,
that operations shall be modified as needed to moderate
excessive pressures in financial markets, should they
develop.

5/5/70

-61
The Chairman then noted that a memorandum from Mr. Partee,

entitled "Proposed new summary of District developments," had been
distributed on April 30, 1970. 1 /

He asked Mr. Partee to comment.

Mr. Partee remarked that the purpose of the memorandum was
to propose that the Committee experiment with a new report, perhaps
to be known as the "red book," that would present the most signifi
cant economic information coming to the attention of the Reserve
Banks since the previous meeting.

The report might be distributed

on the same time schedule as the green book and would supplement
the latter by emphasizing qualitative rather than quantitative
information and company, industry, or regional developments rather
than national developments.

It was proposed to place responsibility

for preparing the new report with the Committee's five Associate
Economists from the Reserve Banks.
Chairman Burns observed that one purpose of the new report,
as he understood it, was to permit the Committee to draw to a
greater extent than at present on the knowledge of Reserve Bank
people, including the directors.

The emphasis was placed on quali

tative information, such as opinions and judgments, partly because
such information could be kept quite current; the quantitative
information on which the Committee now relied so heavily necessarily
lagged actual developments.

1/ A copy of this memorandum has been placed in the files
of the Committee.

-62-

5/5/70

Mr. Hickman said he had no objection to the proposed report.
He thought, however, that the Reserve Banks might be a source of
some quantitative information that would usefully supplement that
given in the green book.

For example, the GNP projections prepared

at his Bank had on occasion proved better than those prepared at
the Board.
The Chairman agreed that it might be desirable to include
some quantitative information.
Mr. Hayes said he was happy that the proposed report had
been described as an experiment because there was some chance that
the costs might exceed the benefits; sometimes he felt that the
material being prepared for the Committee's use had grown so volumi
nous as to be almost counter-productive.

Nevertheless, he started

out with a bias in favor of the proposal.
After further discussion it was agreed to proceed with the
proposed report on an experimental basis.
It was agreed that the next meeting of the Federal Open Market
Committee would be held on Tuesday, May 26, 1970, at 9:30 a.m.
Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Secretary

ATTACHMENT A
May 4, 1970
Draft of Current Economic Policy Directive for Consideration by the
Federal Open Market Committee at its Meeting on May 5, 1970

The information reviewed at this meeting indicates that
real economic activity weakened further in the first quarter of
1970, but income expansion is being stimulated in the second
quarter by the enlargement of social security benefit payments
and the Federal pay raise. Prices and costs generally are con
tinuing to rise at a rapid pace, although some components of
major price indexes recently have shown moderating tendencies.
Most market interest rates have risen sharply in recent weeks
as a result of heavy demands for funds and the disappointment
of earlier expectations of further easing of credit market con
ditions. Prices of common stocks have declined markedly since
early April. Attitudes in financial markets are being affected
by the expansion of military operations in Southeast Asia. Both
bank credit and the money supply rose substantially from March
to April on average, although during the course of April bank
credit leveled off and the money supply receded sharply from the
end-of-March bulge. The over-all balance of payments was in
considerable deficit during the first quarter. In light of the
foregoing developments, it is the policy of the Federal Open
Market Committee to foster financial conditions conducive to
orderly reduction in the rate of inflation, while encouraging
the resumption of sustainable economic growth and the attain
ment of reasonable equilibrium in the country's balance of
payments.
To implement this policy, the Committee desires to see
moderate growth in money and bank credit over the months ahead.
System open market operations until the next meeting of the Com
mittee shall be conducted with a view to maintaining bank reserves
and money market conditions consistent with that objective,
taking account of the current Treasury financing.

ATTACHMENT B
May 5, 1970
REVISED
Draft of Current Economic Policy Directive for Consideration by the
Federal Open Market Committee at its Meeting on May 5, 1970

The information reviewed at this meeting indicates that real
economic activity weakened further in the first quarter of 1970.
Growth in personal income, however, is being stimulated in the
second quarter by the enlargement of social security benefit pay
ments and the Federal pay raise. Prices and costs generally are
continuing to rise at a rapid pace, although some components of
major price indexes recently have shown moderating tendencies.
Most market interest rates have risen sharply in recent weeks as
a result of heavy demands for funds and the disappointment of
earlier expectations regarding easing of credit market conditions.
Prices of common stocks have declined markedly since early April.
Attitudes in financial markets are being affected by the expansion
of military operations in Southeast Asia. Both bank credit and
the money supply rose substantially from March to April on average,
although during the course of April bank credit leveled off and
the money supply receded sharply from the end-of-March bulge. The
over-all balance of payments was in considerable deficit during
the first quarter. In light of the foregoing developments, it is
the policy of the Federal Open Market Committee to foster finan
cial conditions conducive to orderly reduction in the rate of
inflation, while encouraging the resumption of sustainable economic
growth and the attainment of reasonable equilibrium in the country's
balance of payments.
To implement this policy, the Committee desires to see
moderate growth in money and bank credit over the months ahead.
System open market operations until the next meeting of the Com
mittee shall be conducted with a view to maintaining bank reserves
and money market conditions consistent with that objective, taking
account of the current Treasury financing; provided, however, that
operations shall be modified as needed to moderate excessive
pressures in financial markets,should they develop.