View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 8/21/2020

RECORDS SECTION

REC'D

APR 30 1970

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D. C.

20551

April 30,

1970

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)

TO:

Federal Open Market Committee

FROM:

Mr. Broida

There is enclosed a copy of a memorandum from Mr. Partee,
dated today and entitled "Proposed new summary of District developments."

It is contemplated that this memorandum will be discussed

at the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee to be held on

May 5, 1970, under agenda item 8.

Arthur L. Broida,

Deputy Secretary,
Federal Open Market Committee.
Enclosure

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 8/21/2020

REC'D IN RECORDS SECTION

APR 30 1970
CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
April 30,
To:

Federal Open Market Committee

From:

J. Charles Partee, Economist

Subject:

1970

Proposed new summary of
District developments.

The purpose of this memorandum is to suggest the inauguration
of a new report for the use of the Committee as background for its
deliberations.

Briefly the report would consist of a rundown, District

by District, of the most significant economic information that had come
to the attention of the Reserve Banks since the last meeting of the Committee.

The emphasis would be on qualitative rather than quantitative

intelligence, and on company, industry or regional developments rather
than national ones.

The timing of the report would coincide with that

of the green book, so that all Committee members would have a chance to
review it prior to the Tuesday meetings.
The Committee has discussed the possibility of such a compendium before, but now the need seems more pressing.

First, the change

in format of Committee discussion has tended to reduce the opportunity
for verbal reporting of significant District developments.

Second, the

substantial lag and questionable quality of some of the major national
statistical series suggest that useful and more current insights might
be gained through questioning of leading members of the business and
financial community,

Finally, the evident importance of attitudes and

expectations in shaping important economic trends--wage and price
determinations, inventory policies, capital spending, security market
conditions, for example--indicate that a more consistent effort to

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 8/21/2020

-2uncover changes in such attitudes might help provide additional qualitative depth to the information made available to the Committee.
The most significant inputs to such a report might include the
comments on current developments of Reserve Bank and Branch directors,
discussions or surveys involving business and financial leaders, the
thinking of business and financial economists with District firms, and
information on major company or community developments gathered from
public sources such as the local press.

Interpretive comment on the cur-

rent regional statistics might also be included, but only when the developments revealed are of topical or unusual significance.

The emphasis of

the report should be on current opinion and judgment rather than on the
presentation of District statistical series that parallel their national
counterparts.

Toward this end, I would think that individual District

reports normally should be kept quite brief--to within, say, three
double-spaced pages.
Board staff does not have the resources to handle another report
within the pre-FOMC week, in addition to the green book, blue book, green
book supplement and, on occasion, chart show presentation.

I would suggest

instead that the new report (the red book?) should be made the responsibility of the Committee's Associate Economists from the Reserve Banks.
These five economists might sit as a review committee, or they might
designate one of their members as editor and compiler for each issue.
In any event, the Editor or Editorial Board would be responsible for
obtaining and editing the District reports, preparing an introductory
summary or commentary, and processing and distributing the new document
in a timely manner.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 8/21/2020

-3If the Committee agrees that this proposal might provide a
useful source of additional information, I would recommend that the
Associate Economists--currently Messrs. Link, Hocter, Parthemos, Jones
and Craven--be asked to organize and inaugurate it on a trial basis as
soon as practicable.