View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

The meeting of the executive committee of the Federal Open Mar
ket Committee was reconvened in the offices of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System in Washington on Thursday, May 20, 1948,
at 3:15 p.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

McCabe, Chairman
Sproul, Vice Chairman
Eccles
Szymczak
Williams
Mr. Morrill, Secretary
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Vest, General Counsel
Mr. Townsend, Assistant General Counsel
Mr. Thomas, Economist
Messrs. Bopp, Irons, Langum, and Robb,
Associate Economists
Mr. Rouse, Manager of the System Open
Market Account
Mr. Thurston, Assistant to the Board
of Governors
Mr. Riefler, Assistant to the Chairman
of the Board of Governors
Mr. Sherman, Assistant Secretary, Board
of Governors
Mr. Smith, Economist, Government Finance
Section, Division of Research and
Statistics, Board of Governors
Mr. Arthur Willis, Special Assistant,
Securities Department, Federal Re
serve Bank of New York

Messrs. Clayton, Draper, Evans, Gilbert, Leedy,
and Young, members of the Federal Open Mar
ket Committee
Messrs. Leach, Gidney, McLarin, and Earhart,
alternate members of the Federal Open
Market Committee

Messrs. Whittemore, Davis, and Peyton, Presi
dents of the Federal Reserve Banks of

Boston, St. Louis, and Minneapolis,
respectively.

5/20/48
Messrs. Thompson and Johns, Vice Presi
dents of the Federal Reserve Banks of
Cleveland and Kansas City, respectively
Consideration was given to the direction to be issued to the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York as agent for the System account and
it was suggested that a limit of $750,000,000 on changes in System
holdings of Government securities would be adequate for the time
being.

It

was pointed out that the executive committee had been

given authority to make changes in the aggregate amount of securi
ties in the account up to $1.5 billion and that the means were
readily available for granting additional authority to the New York
Bank in the event the $750,000,000 was not sufficient.

Thereupon, upon motion duly made and
seconded, the executive committee voted
unanimously to direct the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York until otherwise directed
by the executive committee:
(1) To make such purchases, sales, or exchanges (in
cluding replacement of maturing securities and allowing
maturities to run off without replacement) for the Sys
tem account, either in the open market or directly from,
to, or with the Treasury, as may be necessary, in the
light of the general credit situation of the country,
for the practical administration of the account, for
the maintenance of stable and orderly conditions in the
Government security market, and for the purpose of re
lating the supply of funds in the market to the needs
of commerce and business; provided that the total amount
of securities in the account at the close of this date
shall not be increased or decreased by more than
$750,000,000 exclusive of special short-term certifi
cates of indebtedness purchased for the temporary ac
commodation of the Treasury pursuant to paragraph (2)
of this direction;
(2) To purchase direct from the Treasury for the
System open market account such amounts of special short
term certificates of indebtedness as may be necessary

5/20/48
from time to time for the temporary accommodation of the
Treasury; provided that the total amount of such certi
ficates held in the account at any one time shall not
exceed $750,000,000.
In taking this action it was under
stood that the limitation contained in
the direction included commitments for
purchases and sales of securities for
the System account.
Reference was made to the date for the next meeting of the
executive committee and no objection was made to the suggestion by
Mr. Sproul that the meeting be held during the week of June 21, 1948.
Mr. Rouse then submitted a memorandum reading as follows:
"At a meeting of the executive committee of the Fed
eral Open Market Committee on June 10, 1946, the follow
ing question, among others, was discussed and the
suggested solution approved unanimously:
'2. Whether the committee should recognize,
at least informally, the present commission
of 1/64 of a point on transactions with
dealers for the System account in notes
and bonds and the present limitation to

exceptional cases of transactions in these
securities on a net basis and whether the
committee should establish a commission of
perhaps 0.01 per cent on transactions in
certificates.
'Transactions in notes and bonds on an agency
basis for the System account with qualified dealers
should be handled in such a manner as to permit the
dealers a spread of not more than 1/64 of a point,
and such transactions where the dealers act as
principal should be limited to exceptional cases
and the transactions together with the reasons
therefor should be reported separately by the New
York Bank in the weekly report. Transactions in
certificates should be handled in such a manner as
to permit the dealers a spread of not more than
0.01 per cent (in relation to the price to the
customer when on an agency basis and in relation
to the current market price when the dealers act

5/20/48
"as principal) on the longest maturity of
certificates and the equivalent in dollars on
shorter maturities.'
"In view of the particular importance attached at
times to System Open Market operations in Treasury bonds,
it is the suggestion of the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York that more flexibility could be provided in handling
System transactions, if the above solution were revised
to include the underscored insertion shown below;
Transactions in notes and bonds on an
agency basis for the System account with qual
ified dealers should be handled in such a man
ner as to permit the dealers a spread of not
more than 1/64 of a point, and such transac
tions where the dealers act as principal should
be limited to exceptional cases and the trans
actions together with the reasons therefor should
be reported separately by the New York Bank in
the weekly report. If, however, it appears de
sirable in the interest of maintaining an orderly
market to avoid the identification by the market
of System operations, transactionsin Treasury
bonds may be confirmed to us by dealers as prin
cipals rather than as agents, provided the
dealers' confirmations to us state that the
bonds were bought from or sold to another at
a price spread of not more than 1/64 of a point.
Transactions in certificates should be handled
in such a manner as to permit the dealers a
spread of not more than 0.01 per cent (in re
lation to the price to the customer when on an
agency basis and in relation to the current mar
ket price when the dealers act as principal) on
the longest maturity of certificates and the
equivalent in dollars on shorter maturities."
Mr. Rouse stated that the principal purpose of the June 10,
1946, action was to assure that the dealers' price spread would not
be more than 1/64 of a point.

He also stated that during the past

few days when it was necessary to offer bonds in the market to stem
a rapid rise in prices, under the instructions of the executive com
mittee, these offerings were handled by the brokers on an agency

-5

5/20/48

basis which resulted in a disclosure of the fact that securities
were being offered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York because
the System account was the only one known to require agency execu
tion, and that, if

the dealers were permitted to handle these

transactions as principals and their confirmations of the trans
actions, as suggested above, were required to state that the securi
ties were bought from or sold to another at a price spread of not
more than 1/64 of a point, the original purposes of the executive
committee could be accomplished without requiring disclosure of the
fact that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was the seller or
purchaser of the securities in question.
Upon motion duly made and seconded,
and by unanimous vote, the amended in
structions of the executive committee
to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
were approved unanimously as follows:
Transactions in notes and bonds on an agency basis
for the System account with qualified dealers should be
handled in such a manner as to permit the dealers a
spread of not more than 1/64 of a point, and such trans
actions where the dealers act as principal should be
limited to exceptional cases and the transactions to
gether with the reasons therefor should be reported
separately by the New York Bank in the weekly report.
If, however, it appears desirable in the interest of
maintaining an orderly market to avoid the identifica
tion by the market of System operations, transactions
in Treasury bonds may be confirmed to the Federal Re
serve Bank of New York by dealers as principals rather
than as agents, provided the dealers' confirmations to
the Bank state that the bonds were bought from or sold
to another at a price spread of not more than 1/64 of a
Transactions in certificates should be handled
point.
in such a manner as to permit the dealers a spread of

5/20/48

-6

not more than 0.01 per cent (in relation to the price to
the customer when on an agency basis and in relation to

the current market price when the dealers act as princi
pal) on the longest maturity of certificates and the
equivalent in dollars on shorter maturities.
Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Secretary.

Approved:

Chairman.